Slashdot Mirror


Amid Controversy, Construction of Telescope In Hawaii Halted

An anonymous reader sends word that Hawaii Gov. David Ige has asked for a week-long hold in the construction of the Thirty Meter Telescope atop Mauna Kea. "After more than a week of demonstrations and dozens of arrests, Hawaii Gov. David Ige said Tuesday that the company building one of the world's largest telescopes atop Hawaii's Mauna Kea has agreed to his request to halt construction for a week. 'They have responded to my request and on behalf of the president of the University and the Office of Hawaiian Affairs have agreed to a time out on the project, and there will be no construction activities this week,' Ige said at a news conference. Thirty Meter Telescope is constructing the telescope on land that is held sacred to some Native Hawaiians. Scientists say the location is ideal for the telescope, which could allow them to see into the earliest years of the universe. Ige said he hopes the temporary pause in construction will allow the interested parties to have more discussions about the project. Native Hawaiian groups have been protesting the construction of the telescope since its inception last year."

228 comments

  1. NIMBY strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The natives should have said something before the Mauna Kea Observatory was constructed in 1968. Making all this noise now is decades too late.

    1. Re:NIMBY strikes again by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or they could just go fuck off.

    2. Re:NIMBY strikes again by NotDrWho · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I used to live in Hawaii. And I can tell you that native Hawaiians are always bitching. They also live on the beach and have nothing better to do all day than bitch, moan, and protest shit. It's just what they do.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    3. Re:NIMBY strikes again by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The natives should have said something before the Mauna Kea Observatory was constructed in 1968.

      Most likely, they did complain. But the complaints were drowned out by all their complaining about everything else. Native Hawaiians are mostly anti-technology, anti-progress, anti-growth, anti-business, and anti-modern-world. They generally oppose anything that changes anything. They are also anti-education, with some of the worst schools in America, which just propagates the problem on to the next generation. The Big Island has a higher proportion of natives, which makes the problem there even worse than on Oahu. For instance, Hawaii has some of the best geothermal energy resources anywhere, and some of the highest electricity prices in the world. But geothermal energy is blocked because it "steals the breath of Pele", despite the fact that almost no one actually believes in Pele anymore. It is just used as an excuse to block progress. Oh, and one other thing: after blocking businesses from growing, electricity from being generated, and schools from being funded, they also complain that there are no jobs.

    4. Re:NIMBY strikes again by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      The American scientist and polymath Jared Diamond wrote a book, whose title is the solution to dealing with the Natives: "Guns, Germans, and Steel"

      You can buy Guns and Steel, but Germans are the difficult one to get in the Beanie Baby set.

      Also, German military policy is to only participate in wars which they start themselves.

      (Joking aside, the German parliament gets their drawers in a not, with nasty debates, before they export a single H&K MP7 anywhere in the world.)

      They also live on the beach and have nothing better to do all day than bitch, moan, and protest shit..

      Strange . . . I could swear that you are describing the Greeks. Are you sure that you are really lived in Hawaii, and not Greece . . . ?

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    5. Re:NIMBY strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But geothermal energy is blocked because it "steals the breath of Pele", despite the fact that almost no one actually believes in Pele anymore.

      Times have changed. It's not 1990 any more.

    6. Re:NIMBY strikes again by jazman_777 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I bet they're just proud of Hawaii's child, Barack Obama.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    7. Re:NIMBY strikes again by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You have given the single, most concise answer in this discussion.

      We have stopped building an expensive modern scientific instrument that will improve all of humanity, because of fucking ghosts. And not even ghosts in the "poltergeist" sense, but ghosts in the "my great grandaddy told me Jesus cries when you eat a ham and cheese sandwich" sense - Such complete nonsense that any adult should feel ashamed that such idiotic words might come out of their mouth in voicing their objections to this telescope.

      The sooner we as a species stop humoring these morons, the better.

      / Not an atheist.
      // Not psychotic enough, though, to pretend I know god's will about big rock, meteorites, walls, and mountain tops.
      /// Also not just "pro science, so fuck you" - I'd say the same about building a Walmart in the same spot.

    8. Re:NIMBY strikes again by jythie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is easy to be poor when someone comes in with an army and takes all your shit away.

    9. Re:NIMBY strikes again by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > Strange . . . I could swear that you are describing the Greeks. Are you sure that you are really lived in Hawaii, and not Greece . . . ?

      And here *I* thought he was talking about Venice, California.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    10. Re:NIMBY strikes again by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Vae Victis.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    11. Re:NIMBY strikes again by funwithBSD · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but I don't remember them complaining when they diverted the Lava to miss villages using modern technology.

      Isn't that thwarting the will of Pele?
      Kinda kills the argument for offending the gods.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    12. Re:NIMBY strikes again by war4peace · · Score: 1

      ...while all this time he was in Romania.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    13. Re:NIMBY strikes again by ProzacPatient · · Score: 1

      Native Hawaiians are mostly anti-technology, anti-progress, anti-growth, anti-business, and anti-modern-world. They generally oppose anything that changes anything.

      Coming from Arizona where a quarter of the state the feds have given to Indian reservations I can tell you that it is pretty much this way anywhere there are native cultures, though to be fair not all of the tribes are like that.

    14. Re:NIMBY strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it so terrible that some people who live somewhere want to live a different lifestyle than the people who came along later and appropriated their land?

      Does every place on earth have to be overrun by the productivity crowd?

      Maybe they are complaining because island life was nice when you didn't have to have "jobs" to survive very comfortably.

      And they are the assholes...

    15. Re:NIMBY strikes again by radarskiy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "a quarter of the state the feds have given to Indian reservations"

      This is an interesting use of the word "given".

    16. Re:NIMBY strikes again by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      I don't remember them diverting lava to miss villages at all. Ten foot tall walls of advancing rock tend to defy human intervention.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    17. Re:NIMBY strikes again by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You obviously didn't bother to look up Mauna Kea or why it is sacred. It's more about it being sacred for the gifts it gave the early Hawaiians in the form of food, water and other resources than of it being because of ghosts.

    18. Re:NIMBY strikes again by hawaiian717 · · Score: 1

      Interesting that you bring up Walmart, since they had problems with a site where a Walmart/Sam's Club complex was being built in the middle of Honolulu 11 years ago: http://the.honoluluadvertiser....

      --
      End of Line.
    19. Re:NIMBY strikes again by NotDrWho · · Score: 0

      It's also easy to be poor when you sit on your ass at the beach all day and won't get a job.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    20. Re:NIMBY strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What shit? We've always been poor islander basterds. Used to be much more misiginistic too. Look up our sex history some time. I love having a place I'm from but seriously, who the f cares. (Wouldn't say this in my lock community ofcourse because id' get killed. Really though we're a far cry from what we were and that's a good thing.

    21. Re:NIMBY strikes again by pla · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's more about it being sacred for the gifts it gave the early Hawaiians in the form of food, water and other resources than of it being because of ghosts.

      "The summit of Mauna Kea was seen as the "region of the gods", a place where benevolent spirits reside. Poliahu, deity of snow, also resides there."

      Like I said, ghosts.

      In any case, whether "ghosts" or "we liked hanging out there 1500 years ago", neither makes any difference as to whether or not we should build an observatory in one of the single most suitable spots on the planet for its primary purpose.

    22. Re:NIMBY strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't remember them diverting lava to miss villages at all.

      And yet that doesn't mean it didn't happen

      http://hvo.wr.usgs.gov/volcano...

    23. Re:NIMBY strikes again by painandgreed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We have stopped building an expensive modern scientific instrument that will improve all of humanity, because of fucking ghosts. And not even ghosts in the "poltergeist" sense, but ghosts in the "my great grandaddy told me Jesus cries when you eat a ham and cheese sandwich" sense - Such complete nonsense that any adult should feel ashamed that such idiotic words might come out of their mouth in voicing their objections to this telescope.

      I suspect that like most religious thing, it is just a justification for their behavior. In this case, they're still pissed about having their island and land taken from them in a coup sponsored by the American government in favor of corporations against their sovereign nation, the mess it has made for them since, and the general disrespect they get from everybody else. I have enough friends from there to know that if they said "it's part of our heritage" and you said "Boo hoo, fucking ghosts." Whether they believed in those ghosts or not, you'd get punched in the face because you generally being disrespectful to people who are complaining about people being disrespectful to them.

    24. Re:NIMBY strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And gives you statehood? You know what Hawaii is without statehood? The Philippines.

    25. Re:NIMBY strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Native Hawaiians are mostly anti-technology, anti-progress, anti-growth, anti-business, and anti-modern-world. They generally oppose anything that changes anything. They are also anti-education, with some of the worst schools in America, which just propagates the problem on to the next generation.

      With the only worse public schools being in California, despite getting 55% of the state budget?

    26. Re:NIMBY strikes again by StrangeBrew · · Score: 2

      Yeah... there's no chance that there was tribal warfare, slaughter, genocide, rape or any other atrocities happening before the stupid white man showed up, right? There was no tribal chieftain who was obliterated by another chieftain because of either a slight or an idea that all land belonged elusively to them. Anyone who doesn't think all humans are the same, and capable of the same actions is a bigot.

    27. Re:NIMBY strikes again by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Native Hawaiians are mostly anti-technology, anti-progress, anti-growth, anti-business, and anti-modern-world.

      I want to point out here that the opposition is a vocal minority; there are a lot of Native Hawaiians who support the observatory. I don't live on the Big Island myself, but from talking to people who know a lot more on the topic than I do, it is my understanding that most Native Hawaiians are in support of the TMT. Most people in the Hilo area support the TMT, and recognize that it will being in economic, cultural, and educational benefits, as well as prestige and international recognition. It is the extremists who are protesting.

      I can see where you are coming from though, and lets face it, there is a not insignificant segment of the Hawaiian community that really does seem to have some problems with the extreme anti-progress lot, especially with the Hawaiian independence activists who will stir up shit at any opportunity. These people build themselves around and value one thing and one thing only: being Hawaiian. That's it. How many cultures in history find success after getting so caught up in their own culture that they stop doing anything else? Not many. And yet, that is exactly the path these protestors want to take.

      There is a great opportunity here for astronomy research, but do they want Hawai'i known for astronomy? Nope, just 'culture'. There is ongoing controversy about biotechnology here, with genetically engineered taro (University of Hawai'i developed, before anyone invokes that conspiracy) being banned previously for 'religious reasons' by exactly the same people now protesting the observatory. Do they want Hawai'i know for biotech? Nope, just 'culture'. And as you mentioned, there was the geothermal issue. Do they want that? Nope, just 'culture'. Every time, it is the same people protesting. It's like they want to kick out as much important things, things that actually matter and have social, educational, and economic value, until the islands are left with nothing...nothing but them of course.

      The thing to remember is that the independence activists like to kick up a big fuss about anything they can to draw attention to themselves. And they don't care what the long term effects are. They don't care about a thriving Hawai'i...oh they say they do but their actions say otherwise. What they care about is bringing power and influence to themselves, and they find plenty of useful idiots along the way, both angry Hawaiians who have been told that all their problem are the fault of the US and they would be so much better under a new monarchy as well as hippie dipshits so overcome by white guilt that they bafflingly enough think a reestablishment of a race based Hawaiian Kingdom where they would be essentially second class citizens would, somehow, be a good thing. There is, as you see everywhere else, politics underlining anti-science, and in this case pretty nasty politics at that.

      Personally, I'd be on the first plane to the mainland in the unlikely event any of these assholes ever got any real power. Their beliefs are simply unacceptable.

    28. Re:NIMBY strikes again by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      I recall several attempts. I just don't recall them being spectacularly successful. As was pointed out in the article you quoted: "The efficacy of this lava bombing is disputed by some volcanologists"

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    29. Re:NIMBY strikes again by danlip · · Score: 1

      You say "not an atheist" which I assume you mean you have some sort of religious belief. Why is their religious belief less important or more nonsensical than yours?

    30. Re:NIMBY strikes again by bleckywelcky · · Score: 0, Troll

      Native groups complain about this kind of stuff all the time. When the reality is that they make abundant use of all of the benefits received from being "couped" by their overtakers. While complaining about anything they don't like. There's an island in the northeast part of the Indian ocean called North Sentinel Island. There's a group of primative people that have been living isolated on the island for as long as we know. To this day, they've resisted all contact with the outside world. They have practically no knowledge of modern travel, modern medicine, modern technology, modern sanitation, modern agriculture, or modern anything. A few videos / photographs have been taken from approach to the island, but at some distance. They run around in loin clothes and they throw spears, with likely no knowledge of even basic medicine or basic agricultural practices for steady agricultural yield. That's what no contact and leaving you alone gets you. Yet every one of these protestors probably has a cell phone, access to a hospital, lives in a house that meets modern (i.e. 1900s and later) construction standards, with sanitation systems, and access to grocery stores that have plenty of food available nearly year round. What most of these groups need is a reality check. The world moves on. Smart people invent smart things and inherit the Earth. Their approach to live in isolation will eventually result in their culture's death through famine, disease, asteroid, or the Sun burning out. Developing advancements will at least give us a chance to survive beyond those problems. Stop complaining, join the rest of us, and let's all move on with life.

    31. Re:NIMBY strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the alternative was being ruled by the Japanese or Russians. To the victors go the spoils and people just have to accept that borders were still being settled the last 100 years.

    32. Re:NIMBY strikes again by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I've been to Hawaii, and to this day there are "homeless" people who literally live under a bush and forage for food and to be honest, I could see how a person could do this. If you can sit on your ass at the beach all day and not worry about a job, why not?.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    33. Re:NIMBY strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now here it is, giving us yet another gift for the benefit of humanity (an excellent place to see the universe), and these groups are trying to prevent that.

      Hypocrisy? Nah, just otherwise good people maintaining the status quo that was indoctrinated in them from a vulnerable, young age - religion.

    34. Re:NIMBY strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Put it another way. Would you have a problem is someone took a big nasty dump on your law? Even better would you have a problem if "I" took a big nasty dump on your lawn?

      Its just land, right? Its even more important to building something for science, I need to take my dumps. Like every day, its a biological need. So it might as well be on your lawn. I'll tell all the bums around your side of town your cool with them hanging out on your lawn. Because its just land right? There's no sacred value at all for you, not your privacy or the odor, since these are logical things that "can" be done and have little reason beyond sentimentality to not be done, any logic based argument fails? Right?

      Being 100% logically correct ! being a human being.

    35. Re:NIMBY strikes again by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he meant they took the land from one Nation of Indians to set up reservations for Indians moved in from other places.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    36. Re:NIMBY strikes again by towermac · · Score: 3, Funny

      Because it's obvious to any thinking person that there was a Creator.

      Which ghosts live in which volcano is... somewhat less obvious.

      That's the distinction.

    37. Re:NIMBY strikes again by towermac · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Hawaiians weren't that bad. The had their share of drama and history to be sure, but not all that that you said. At least not any moreso than the Anglo-Saxons...

    38. Re:NIMBY strikes again by towermac · · Score: 1

      I don't always use my mod points, but when I do, I mod up posts like yours.

    39. Re:NIMBY strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Successful or not, what is true is that during the recent flow in Puna the people threatened by the advancing lava met regularly with scientists from the Hawaii Volcano Observatory to hear the latest predictions. Perhaps the key to unlocking Mauna Kea is to show people how astronomy affects their lives. Let me begin by saying it will be extremely difficult to do this, to demonstrate real world benefits. So, then fall back on the quest for knowledge for its own sake. Ah, but this smells like intellectualism, and that is a property associated with Caucasians. Hawaiian are engaged in a struggle to differentiate themselves from Caucasians, so what white folks do, they don't do. That is why Hawaiians in general are contemptuous of education and its trappings. They embrace pidgin English not due to a lack of education, but to distance themselves from any appearance of education, which is the white man's domain. Appealing to their curiosity about the universe will be a long, hard pull. Please understand that my comments are generalities and that there are many well educated Hawaiians who fully support the pursuit of knowledge and, specifically, the use of Mauna Kea as an observational site.

    40. Re:NIMBY strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, no wonder Hawaii is such a fucking economic backwater.

      Oh, wait...

    41. Re:NIMBY strikes again by GrahamCox · · Score: 2

      Because it's obvious to any thinking person that there was a Creator

      Err, no. The opposite, in fact.

    42. Re:NIMBY strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Kingdom of Hawaii was not stolen by Americans. This is a myth perpetuated by a small but vocal group of activists. Many citizens of Hawaii became distrustful and frustrated with the Monarchy due to the lack of representation. There were attempts to convert to a representational monarchy like England had at the time (19th C.) but the government refused. At the same time, European powers -- England, Germany, and Russia -- along with the USA, recognized Hawaii's strategic position in the Pacific. All regularly courted the Hawaiian royalty, notably Queen Liliuokalani, hoping to gain exclusive use of Honolulu harbor and the surrounding waters. Most prominent land owners at that were Hawaiian citizens of American ancestry. Many were married to daughters of royal families. These men controlled most of the wealth of the nation and were against any move to align the nation by treaty with a European government. At the same time they all feared that one of these suitors would take the nation by force. These citizens met in secret and held a bloodless revolution, replacing the Monarchy with a democratic government. Still fearful of a power grab by one of the Europeans, they sent an urgent request to President McKinley to make Hawaii a US Territory. The Hawaiian revolution was instigated and carried out by Hawaiians, no less legal than the American revolution, and much more legal than the bloody wars fought by Kamehameha in which he conquered neighboring kingdoms.

    43. Re:NIMBY strikes again by pla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "In the early 1960s, the Hawaii Island Chamber of Commerce began encouraging astronomical development of Mauna Kea, as an economic stimulus [...] UH rebuilt its small astronomy department into a new Institute for Astronomy, and in 1968 the Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources gave it a 65-year lease for all land within a 4 km (2.5 mi) radius of its telescope

      Yes, I would have a problem with you randomly appearing and taking a dump on my front lawn, because I pay the government roughly 1.5% of the value of my home every year for the continued privilege of having the mostly-exclusive right to decide who gets to defecate on my lawn.

      If, however, I put out an ad for someone to come fertilize my lawn with human excrement, and awarded you an exclusive contract to do the job for the next 65 years... Well then, I wouldn't really have much to right to bitch about you doing exactly what I asked you to, now would I?

      Now git offa mah lawn, whippersnapper!

    44. Re:NIMBY strikes again by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      NIMBY is not a factor here, because it's not near anyone's "backyard" and it's not on reservation land, so it does not belong to the natives. In fact, it's in an area already populated with large telescopes.

      Some of the scopes on this mountain had originally been planned for the summit of Mt Graham in southeastern Arizona. Like Mauna Kea, it's not reservation land, nobody lives there and no species is threatened by this particular kind of construction. But the identical controversy erupted when Greens protested on the basis that astronomy represented an intrusion into the sacredness of nature. Some Indian group popped up out of nowhere to claim that the mountaintop was sacred to them, though it's not their land and this claim has never been heard before. Some scopes did get built on Mt Graham, but most of the construction was moved to Mauna Kea because it "wouldn't be controversial there."

      There is a standard question that Greens always use when we propose building something new: "Who are you working for?" When something like this happens, we need to start throwing it right back in their faces. Where is their money coming from? Who are they working for?

    45. Re:NIMBY strikes again by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Another Arizonan here: It's not the tribes who are anti-technology, anti-business, and anti-modern world. It's our imported California hippies.

    46. Re:NIMBY strikes again by thesupraman · · Score: 1

      No, they just havnt been bought off enough yet.

      That is how things usually work these days, their concerns will be about deep sacred untouchable things that can never change, until an
      offer is made that they decide is enough (usually involving both obvious stuff like new buildings/land for their people, plus some
      less obvious ones, usually resulting in a ton of cash for their leaders) and suddenly we will find they can bless the land, and everything
      will be ok.

      Now that may sound racist/culturist/whatever, but its quite the opposite. If such things are that sacred, then stick to your damn guns!
      dont sell it out.. but thats not how it works.. the leaders are always just after the big payout. Very very sad. I am sure we will hear in a while
      how they have decided to allow it to happen for the good of the rest of us, and we have decided to generously give them a ton of whatever in
      return..

    47. Re:NIMBY strikes again by thesupraman · · Score: 0

      This..

      I bet when their children are sick they take them to a hospital, not up to the sacred sites..
      But dont worry, it will all be made better when their leaders decide to bless the site and make it ok.
      Of course that costs.. a lot.. because... sacred!

    48. Re:NIMBY strikes again by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 1

      You obviously didn't bother to look up Mauna Kea or why it is sacred. It's more about it being sacred for the gifts it gave the early Hawaiians in the form of food, water and other resources than of it being because of ghosts.

      That's irrelevant. The reason or history behind why a place is sacred is utterly uninteresting. It's a hyperspace bypass. You've got to build bypasses. But seriously, everywhere is sacred in some way, to someone, or has remains from some group or ancients. The point remains that it's high time to start phasing out these concerns. Where two sites are of equal applicability, utility, and cost, sure you can pick the one that respects tradition. But otherwise... move on*.

      It's not like there's more land each year that can be used without offending someone.

      *Note: I'm not advocating destroying unique historical monuments like pyramids, stone circles, Easter Island heads, or lunar rover landing sites on a whim. But places with random bones or places with nothing but tradition... yeah.

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    49. Re:NIMBY strikes again by thesupraman · · Score: 2

      Ah, but you are not thinking through his claim well enough! ;)

      A magical spirit that has existed forever somehow decided to make just us, here, and has a bunch of rather
      arbitrary rules that we must follow or we go to hell for eternity, or heaven if we follow them (which seem to be somewhat flexible and
      changing, as they once included stoning people to death and keeping slaves, but now, not so much..) is OBVIOUS (or pick another
      one of the hundreds of belief systems if you like..), but that instead of that, the same life-after-death existence cannot possibly involve
      ending up on top of the local big volcano, a place that has been part of the peoples life for all their life?

      However perhaps towermac was meaning the type of Creator described in Star Maker (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Maker), who
      couldnt really care less about our existence, but I have my doubts ;)

    50. Re:NIMBY strikes again by colinwb · · Score: 2

      "Because it's obvious to any thinking person that there was a Creator."

      Peter Medawar's views on religion: ... I believe that a reasonable case can be made for saying, not that we believe in God because He exists but rather that He exists because we believe in Him... Considered as an element of the world, God has the same degree and kind of objective reality as do other products of mind... I regret my disbelief in God and religious answers generally, for I believe it would give satisfaction and comfort to many in need of it if it were possible to discover and propound good scientific and philosophic reasons to believe in God... To abdicate from the rule of reason and substitute for it an authentication of belief by the intentness and degree of conviction with which we hold it can be perilous and destructive... I am a rationalist—something of a period piece nowadays, I admit... --- from 'The question of the existence of God' in "The limits of science" (1984)

      Medawar was a thinking person. You can form your own view as to whether he believed there was a "Creator".

    51. Re:NIMBY strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that does not reduce them amount of self-fucking that they need to engage in. Not one iota.

    52. Re:NIMBY strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and that makes you racist

    53. Re:NIMBY strikes again by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

      I suspect that like most religious thing, it is just a justification for their behavior. In this case, they're still pissed about having their island and land taken from them in a coup sponsored by the American government in favor of corporations against their sovereign nation, the mess it has made for them since, and the general disrespect they get from everybody else.

      You're missing the point: They want concessions (and will get) in the form of monetary benefits to allow the telescope to be built.

      This happens for every new telescope. They protest at lower levels in between telescopes to maintain their credibility. It's an unexpected twist of capitalism combined with democracy!

    54. Re:NIMBY strikes again by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well, funnily enough, science projects etc bring them food and money now.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    55. Re: NIMBY strikes again by TimMD909 · · Score: 1

      Leave Goku out of this

    56. Re:NIMBY strikes again by jythie · · Score: 1

      Both of those had country-hood before being invaded.

    57. Re:NIMBY strikes again by jythie · · Score: 1

      Statistically, the largest factor in predicting a person's income and success is how wealthy their parents and social community are. Take those away and pretty much any group who feel themselves hard working and morally superior end up the same way.

    58. Re: NIMBY strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no evidence at all, that any god exists. Looks to me that you are full of contadictions, you criticize their ghosts but defend yours. Your god is as ghost as theirs. I am pro science and atheist, but I respect all other beliefs. If you want to believe in a bearded man that watches what billions of people do every day, it is Ok for me, and if, as an example, you do not want a lab to be built in the cemetery where your ancestors are buried, I am good with that. For me it is only bones that will eventually disintegrate, but for you they may respresent a lot. I respect that and I would not do anything to hurt your beliefs, so why you do not respect theirs if you want yours to be respected? You are the definition for hypocrite.

    59. Re:NIMBY strikes again by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      "a quarter of the state the feds have given to Indian reservations"

      This is an interesting use of the word "given".

      If I hit you on the head with a baseball bat, take all your money and clothes, then throw your shoes and a couple of dollars at you out of pity, that's technically giving.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    60. Re: NIMBY strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that an observatory is a good neighbor once construction is finished. They want things quiet and dark nearby.. Great for the ancestors to get some rest.

    61. Re: NIMBY strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Hawaiian Island Chamber of Commerce isn't a group of Native Hawaiians, it a business org.

    62. Re:NIMBY strikes again by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      bzzt, wrong.

      i mean, it's obvious to any thinking man that we're all living in a simulation produced in the real universe.

      but that one will be more real, and more awesome than ours, because the information density has to necessarily be greater than our own.

    63. Re: NIMBY strikes again by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      hypothetically, we'll progress to the point where we'll be able to simulate miniature universes. Which will soon thereafter outnumber the number of our universes. x:1

      If each universe eventually spawned ever just two universes... i mean binary growth and all that. The probability that we exist in the root universe, of all the universes that could be created vanishes to zero.

      And the God of our universe could really be a snot-nosed 16 year old who likes to mess with his creations.

      Wouldn't that suck?

    64. Re: NIMBY strikes again by pla · · Score: 1

      Quit playing obtuse. The Hawaiian Department of Land and Natural Resources gave the University of Hawaii an exclusive lease to use that land. Whether that department consists of "Natives" or haole, you racist, your elected government made a deal on your behalf.

      You don't get to go back on that deal just because some BS "native rights" movement has grown in popularity over the past few years.

    65. Re:NIMBY strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Hawaiian Pizza for you!

    66. Re:NIMBY strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this is supposed to be a joke? But the title is "Guns, Germs, and Steel" and it talks about those factors (mostly the latter two) on how civilizations developed based on the natural resources and climate around them.

  2. Telescope == Sacred by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What could be more honoring, holy and sacred than a telescope peering out into universe?

    1. Re:Telescope == Sacred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      An inanimate hunk of rock, that's what. Just look at it, sitting there, being rock. Mindblowing.

    2. Re:Telescope == Sacred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly what I was thinking. I mean, if they were building a Soylent Green factory it would be an other story, but a Telescope... come on people!

    3. Re:Telescope == Sacred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Even more perplexing: according to Hawaiian tradition the land is reserved for a soul-searching journey which involves foot-climbing the mountain and stargazing.

    4. Re:Telescope == Sacred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Exactly what I was thinking. I mean, if they were building a Soylent Green factory it would be an other story, but a Telescope... come on people!

      Were it a Soylent Green factory, someone would be saying "Come on in, people!"

    5. Re:Telescope == Sacred by DarrinJWard · · Score: 0

      i think installing viruses on my users' computers is sacred. i'm an idiot.

      --
      Please use SEOChat.com and ChatButton.com so i can install viruses on your users' computers
    6. Re:Telescope == Sacred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Communication, that's what it takes. Somebody has to take charge, responsibility and the initiative and show the people behind the protests the possibilities, the value and more importantly, allow "cultural integration" of the project with the local culture. It's a though job, but somebody has to do it, but nobody usually does and force is used instead.

    7. Re:Telescope == Sacred by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they should be campaigning to close the road rather than the observatory then?

    8. Re:Telescope == Sacred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What could be more honoring, holy and sacred than a telescope peering out into universe?

      The spot savage natives cannibalized eachother in spite of plentiful resources, obviously.

  3. Mythical gods and dumb beliefs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Should not interfere with the advancement of science.

    I was sad that I didn't get a callback when I applied for a job working on the software for this project.

    1. Re:Mythical gods and dumb beliefs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It shouldn't interfere with other activities either. In my religion the air is sacred, please ground all air traffic thank you.

    2. Re:Mythical gods and dumb beliefs by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Compromise. Allow them to name the facility after one of their gods and more importantly setup a scholarship in astronomy for native Hawaiians. In the future a few native Hawaiian astrophysicists or cosmologist would totally change the picture.

    3. Re:Mythical gods and dumb beliefs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We were there already.
      Nothing good come out of it....

    4. Re:Mythical gods and dumb beliefs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give them privileges. That is what every whiner want. MOAR PRIVILEGE! MOAR!

      Except that we tried that before. It is never enough, they just come back for more. #KillThemAll

    5. Re:Mythical gods and dumb beliefs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't want a name. They want money; and if you give into their demands, you'll only make them louder & bolder.

    6. Re:Mythical gods and dumb beliefs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give them privileges. That is what every whiner want. MOAR PRIVILEGE! MOAR!

      Except that we tried that before. It is never enough, they just come back for more. #KillThemAll

      Like negotiating with a terrorist.

  4. The tarnishing of spirits really helps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thirty Meter Telescope is constructing the telescope on land that is held sacred to some Native Hawaiians. Scientists say the location is ideal for the telescope, which could allow them to see into the earliest years of the universe.

    Do these scientists work in a James Cameron film? Is there something about "sacred land" that makes an area better to see into the birth of the universe than plain old "cursed land"?

    1. Re:The tarnishing of spirits really helps by crashumbc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The land is on top of a dormant volcano away from city lights. and the "bowl" at the top makes the perfect base for it...

    2. Re:The tarnishing of spirits really helps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. It is probably just land in a position that is good for observation (low light pollution, high altitude, useful latitude) which was available for them to build a telescope on. The fact that the location also has some sacred value to the Hawaiians is entirely coincidental.

    3. Re: The tarnishing of spirits really helps by tysonedwards · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And the reason why there are no cities nearby is precisely because the land is sacred. When the U.S. came to Hawaii, they took much of the native people's lands. The idea of mass demolition of a holy site simply because it does not appear to comply with angio-saxon definitions of what should and should not be holy is not a matter that should be taken flippantlyly. Consider various Native American tribes practices and and ideals with regards to respect for land. It is the source of life. The act of destroying it violently could be seen as offensive.

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
    4. Re: The tarnishing of spirits really helps by crashumbc · · Score: 1

      To be clear, I wasn't making a moral judgment either for or against. Merely stating the reasons why the site was ideal for the planned telescope.

    5. Re:The tarnishing of spirits really helps by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Not to mention the natives kinda gloss over every volcano EVAR is considered "sacred land" to some tribe somewhere as...surprise surprise, primitives believed all that destructive power HAD to be angry Spirits/Gods that must be "appeased" in some fashion to keep them from bringing death with their "anger".

      Seriously can anybody show me a SINGLE volcano over 300 years old on that island that ISN'T considered "sacred"?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    6. Re: The tarnishing of spirits really helps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fail to see how they are destroying a mountaintop that consists primarily of rubble ... there is no vegetation, no wildlife, nothing on top of this mountain, heck, its even covered in snow for parts of the year, which is something Hawaiians steer very clear of !

      we are talking about 4000 meters in elevation, (13,000ft) ... if It weren't for the road built primarily for the observatory, 99% of the population wouldn't even have access to the top of this mountain and wouldn't even be able to enjoy this "sacred place" I fail to see how these observatories (which are incredibly beautiful in my opinion) have any negative impact on the mountain... they actually promote its usefulness and beauty !

    7. Re: The tarnishing of spirits really helps by Cederic · · Score: 2

      Avoiding use of land because random fuckwit thinks it's "holy" is asinine. My church says that a telescope is the pinnacle of sanctity and any holy site is utterly incomplete without one, and although I just invented my church is has every bit as much legitimacy as some millenia old superstition.

    8. Re: The tarnishing of spirits really helps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea of mass demolition of a holy site simply because it does not appear to comply with angio-saxon definitions of what should and should not be holy is not a matter that should be taken flippantly.

      Why shouldn't it be taken flippantly? These people are claiming that this section of dirt is "special" compared to other sections of dirt for entirely made up reasons.

      If they don't want me to take their claims flippantly, then stop giving ludicrous reasons for their claims.

    9. Re: The tarnishing of spirits really helps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The concept of "sacred land" is primitive.

    10. Re:The tarnishing of spirits really helps by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      Yes, actually, there is something better about that land. First, it's 13,000 feet above sea level, outside most of the earth's atmosphere. Second, the winds above the side are unusually stable, making it easy to post-process the data with computers to get rid of atmospheric distortion.

      It's one of the few places on earth you can collect astronomical data with quality comparable to a space-based telescope.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    11. Re: The tarnishing of spirits really helps by J053 · · Score: 2

      The reason there are no cities nearby is that the mountaintop is at 13000+ ft (3400m). Not many people want to live that high up. And, to the parent, there is no "bowl" at the summit of Maunakea - it's mostly cinder cones.

      The primary reasons for wanting to be on Maunakea are (1) average over 240 clear nights per year and (2) you are above most of the atmospheric water vapor.

    12. Re: The tarnishing of spirits really helps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No the reason there are no city lights nearby is because the ground is far less fertile. I thought this was 8th grade geology.

      If it's so "Holy" they should have complained about the 28 other telescopes already up there and the tourism that supports their economy. No one in my generation actually believes this shit. They just do it as a way to have power or identity, it's all they have since they are generally lower on the socio economic scale.

      They wont let geothermal power go in in the lower regions because it might "Steal Pele's breath", no one actually believes that. they are just being assholes because they have nothing else to do. They have nothing else to do because they feel entitled to a past that no longer exists. Also the reality of that past is totally shitty.

      I know because I'm 17 and female.I'd be a village baby factory because of the traditional wife sharing and misogynistic culture.
      I'm also half islander native. I get pretty tired of the racist remarks against whites. (I'm Hawaiian and Japanese)
      The culture here is very strange, "Protect our native women" (because they are our property and we can control them). Pele's lives in that volcano! the telescope might offend him! (ignores the other 28 telescopes).

      I love my ancestors, but we've got to get past this backwards thinking.
      I hope my generation can change things.

    13. Re:The tarnishing of spirits really helps by fnj · · Score: 1

      it's 13,000 feet above sea level, outside most of the earth's atmosphere

      "Most" is a stretch. The standard atmosphere calculator says 13,000 ft is above 1/3 of the mass of the atmosphere and below 2/3 - i.e., the density is reduced to 56% that at sea level.

    14. Re:The tarnishing of spirits really helps by bitingduck · · Score: 1

      It's got a good balance of elevation, good seeing, dry atmosphere to look through, accessibility, and political stability. There aren't very many places that have all of those (among other factors) which is why there are so many telescopes there. The Atacama desert in Chile is one of the few realistically competitive areas (and it's better in some of those features), but it's not as accessible and maybe less politically stable.

    15. Re: The tarnishing of spirits really helps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm no. The land is unoccupied because it is not a good place to live compared to the surrounding area. By the way most other ethnic groups have dispensed with leaving huge swaths of land left unused due to declarations of sacredness, not just "Anglo-Saxon" people. Basically everywhere that has been civilized has rejected the notion. It just isn't practical to maintain such superstitious influence. Parks and nature reserves are the closest thing to large swaths of land made sacred in civilized societies. Even those see use and use is even promoted.

  5. I give you the Kennewick man by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    Not an Indian but they claim rights to the remains, this area you can't dig without hitting some ceremonial site (Washington State).

    Posted to en.wikipedia.org yet some DRM prevents it from being included (ie creator of bust) http://tinypic.com/usermedia.p... and it's a damn statue.

    1. Re:I give you the Kennewick man by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      Not an Indian but they claim rights to the remains, this area you can't dig without hitting some ceremonial site (Washington State).http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=j7ffoz&s=5#.VSVv_pK2Ivw

      Posted to en.wikipedia.org yet some DRM prevents it from being included (ie creator of bust)

      Good DRM can't get the pix to show

    2. Re:I give you the Kennewick man by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

      Kennewick man is an anomaly with no reasonable shared heritage of any contemporary tribe. I suspect the native american opposition to study of Kennewick man is an unreasonable fear of weakened land claims. Totally BS.

      When it was surmised that Kennewick man was caucasian I did like the neopagan group that claimed Kennewich man as one of their own and pressed to have their ancestor further studied.

  6. sacred. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    all the land in hawaii is considered sacred.

    it is an island, they buried people and constructed heiaus all over the place. there's only so many places to bury people over the course of a few hundred years. you can't swing a dead cat in hawaii without hitting something that is sacred to someone.

    you ever been on the big island? no one ELSE is using the top of mauna kea for anything. it is one harsh place that can't grow weed or coffee... come get your sacred stuff out and let them build their telescope.

    1. Re:sacred. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      " there's only so many places to bury people over the course of a few hundred years. "

      Do you think that you've ever been anyplace where NO ONE has ever died? Mankind has a 5000 year recorded history, and tens of thousands of years of history that weren't recorded - much if at all. Anyplace you have ever walked, you were probably in sight of a place where someone died, at some point in time. You almost certainly walk on hallowed ground, no matter where you live.

      Of course, I don't worry about it much. A couple hundred years after I die, someone will probably be plowing the ground that I lay under. Cemeteries aren't exactly forever, you know.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    2. Re:sacred. by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Do you know the key strategic weakness of the human race? The dead outnumber the living. - Missy

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  7. Bad reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are reporting about a protest, you should, at the very minimum say WHY they are protesting.

    This article totally fails to do that.

    Some of us are assuming it is religious, but we don't know that. It could be a simple ownership issue - HEY THAT"S OUT LAND, NOT YOURS.

    Or it could be some argument about light pollution rules preventing them from upgrading their street lights.

    Look, I don't care if you disagree with the protestors, but if you don't clearly tell us why they are protesting, you are a failure as a reporter.

    1. Re:Bad reporting by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      If you are reporting about a protest, you should, at the very minimum say WHY they are protesting.

      This article totally fails to do that.

      From TFS and TFA:

      Thirty Meter Telescope is constructing the telescope on land that is held sacred to some Native Hawaiians.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    2. Re:Bad reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still bad reporting, since it glossed over whether it was owned by those natives.

      If they don't actually own it, they're just whining and can go pound sand.

    3. Re:Bad reporting by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      Streetlight upgrades are to remove the blasted things. They waste energy and pollute.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    4. Re:Bad reporting by J053 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The worst part of the reporting, and what nobody really wants to talk about, is the reason that the county and state pressured TMT for a 1-week hiatus - this is the week of the Merrie Monarch Hula Festival in Hilo, a time when hula halau (schools) from all over the state and several other places all converge on the Big Island. There's no way local authorities wanted to have images of 13-yr-old girls in hula costumes being arrested on the Maunakea summit. Bad for tourism, ya know...

  8. Re:Hawaii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh just fucking kill yourself already, the world is full of "libtards" and it's only gonna get worse. Better end it now. Go on.

  9. Re:Hawaii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look another one who thinks they will win in the end. Hint: Marx was wrong in all his historical predictions.

  10. Religion and Racism by Etherwalk · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What could be more honoring, holy and sacred than a telescope peering out into universe?

    Doing it while paying a suitably large bribe and paying Hawaiians. Hawaii is one of the more corrupt places in the country, and there's a lot of anti-white racism.

    Although in this case it may just be an anti-science woman who doesn't conceive of herself of anti-science using her religion to justify her not wanting change to the environment. Like a Wiccan fighting your attempt to sell a public park. It's hard to tell without being involved with the local politics. So long as we give religion an elevated importance in our society, this is the crap we have to deal with.

    "The irony is, backward looking is a part of the astronomy paradox, in that the farther out into space we look the further back in time we are looking, so making bigger telescopes to see farther in time, means we are moving farther and farther away from modern relevancy, actually."

    http://kahea.org/blog/mk-vigne...

    1. Re:Religion and Racism by NotDrWho · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, my first thought when reading this story was that whoever was building that observatory didn't know that any building project in Hawaii has to start with a big bribe to the natives.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    2. Re:Religion and Racism by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my first thought when reading this story was that whoever was building that observatory didn't know that any building project in Hawaii has to start with a big bribe to the natives.

      Probably to the building inspector usually, but to someone claiming to represent native interests for big projects.

    3. Re:Religion and Racism by ckatko · · Score: 1, Interesting

      While that may be true, you might also be missing the point. Any project undertaken on someone else's land should absolutely begin from a place of respect, and not "ha ha, I own this shit now." Words and context are extremely powerful. The difference between a protest or revolt for the same deal can be as simple as shaking someones hand, or bowing out of respect.

    4. Re:Religion and Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Someone else's land?" I have to believe they own the land there. Whether the natives recognize that or not, however...

    5. Re:Religion and Racism by hawkfish · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Someone else's land?" I have to believe they own the land there. Whether the natives recognize that or not, however...

      You know, the natives might have some legitimate disagreements about land ownership. Just because the traditional religion is used to block projects like this doesn't mean that it is the root cause. Religion may just have been legally expedient at first and then grew into a self-perpetuating thing.

      Another poster was referring to the "corruption" in Hawaii, but a brief read of the link above would suggest that US financial interests have been corrupting Hawaii for a long time. And its funny how some of the descriptions of Hawaiians on this thread sound just like descriptions of Native Americans, African Americans, and just about any ethnic group that has been traumatised by rich white people over the last few centuries...

      --
      You will not drink with us, but you would taste our steel? - Walter Matthau, The Pirates
    6. Re:Religion and Racism by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 2

      What should also be mentioned is the change in demographics. There were about 40,000 native Hawaiians at the time (1890ish).

      Was it crappy that white people took over the islands? Yes. It was also completely normal for the time period. By 1900 there were more Japanese alone on the islands than natives. It's certainly not unfeasible to think that if the USA hadn't, that either Japan or some European power would have established at least a protectorate.

      Look, history is a long story of people doing crappy things to other people. That doesn't mean we should wash our hands of it completely, or forget about it all, but there need to be reasonable goals. Those goals should be trying to get everyone to a reasonable footing today - things like making sure children can get an education, people can get opportunities for jobs, to build wealth, etc. We shouldn't just say "oh, well, you have the poor historical luck to be poor and live in a poor area now, so your schools will suck, etc, tough luck" for instance. If anything, that's at the heart of today's problems - the systematic past destruction of and transfer of wealth.

      But at the same time, we're not going to be able to just turn back the clock. It would be insane to just think we should do something like give Manhattan back to the Lenape tribe (nevermind the rest of New Jersey, Delaware, etc), because you'd be evicting over a million people on behalf of 10,000 or so.

    7. Re:Religion and Racism by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

      Another poster was referring to the "corruption" in Hawaii, but a brief read of the link above would suggest that US financial interests have been corrupting Hawaii for a long time.

      Yes, financial interests from US Citizens and Corporations are used to bribe the corrupt people. It doesn't excuse the people receiving or asking for the bribes from corruption.

      If you file a set of building plans on hawaii, chances are they'll be rejected regardless of whether there's anything wrong unless you bribe the right guy, because you forgot to pay the bribe.

      If you are on the list to receive a water meter in Hawaii, chances are you will languish there for a very long time as newcomers who bribe the right guy at the water department get water meters ahead of you.

      That doesn't mean Hawaiians are bad people--there are some *great* Hawaiians whom I'd be happy to work with or share a beer with any day. But they do have a real problem with corruption in the government.

      There are other really corrupt places in the United States. I don't know if you're familiar with the process of building a building in New York City, for example. It involves hiring people called "expediters" who know who to bribe and do the bribing so that the rich owner or developer does not get his hands dirty. Every few decades a crop of them will be arrested and fined and the DA will be shocked to discover the breadth of the widespread bribery and blatant disregard for the law.

    8. Re:Religion and Racism by Etherwalk · · Score: 2

      They absolutely might have legitimate disagreements over land ownership. I don't have a problem with that going to courts. Two centuries ago we refused to honor native american ownership claims under the argument that, basically, while they recognized it was really, really unfair, the "courts of the conqueror" can't undo the conquering. But Hawaii was a different case and there would be more interesting land ownership claims, it is more recent and there are more detailed records of land transactions.

      I do have a problem with the preferred status we give to religions of whatever culture, because we're making a choice as a society to subsidize nonsense. If we're going to do it, we should make it part of arts programs, because it's fiction.

      I do have a problem with someone who claims to care about science saying that studying the universe doesn't matter because we're looking too far back in time for it to be relevant, and that their right to their favorite fiction is more important than somebody else's right to build a telescope.

    9. Re:Religion and Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, my first thought when reading this story was that whoever was building that observatory didn't know that any building project in Hawaii has to start with a big bribe to the natives.

      NASA offered 2 million dollars to the native organization, The offer was rejected so we can suppose the bribe was too small. At least they tried.

    10. Re:Religion and Racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What could be more honoring, holy and sacred than a telescope peering out into universe?

      Doing it while paying a suitably large bribe and paying Hawaiians. Hawaii is one of the more corrupt places in the country, and there's a lot of anti-white racism.

      ...

      That's a bit rich...seeing as you annexed (read: stole) the country from the natives in the first place.

  11. Just relocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just round up the natives and move them to another island. Send in the missionaries to show them the one true god(whichever it is this week), and progress will continue. ;p

  12. I've got it!!! by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

    Tell them with this instrument they will be able to look back in time at previous Spam (the luncheon meat) shortages and will be able to plan and prevent these shortages in the future.

  13. Yeah Baby by koan · · Score: 0

    Religion... keeping you down for millennia.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  14. Re:Hawaii by mc6809e · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is more likely an expression of Hawiian nationalism which has been on the rise in recent years.

    In some cases it has crossed the line into race hatred as the Southern Poverty Law Center noted a few years back.

    And there are several independence groups. China has even offered to arm them.

  15. Re:Hawaii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you see that like a bad thing?
    USA stole the islands from natives by fraud and arms and now thay do want the independence back and that is a good thing.

  16. Deities of Native Hawaiian mythology .. by DougPaulson · · Score: 1

    Surely Kane, Ku, Lono, Kanaloa, Laka, Kihawahine, Haumea, Papahnaumoku, and Pele would be happy to see such a telescope constructed. The Native Hawaiians could use it to get a look at their deities.

    The Hawaiian gods and goddesses

    1. Re:Deities of Native Hawaiian mythology .. by ralphsiegler · · Score: 1

      let's rename the telescope to Pele's Pee Pee a god with a 30 meter diameter dong, how impressive is that?

    2. Re:Deities of Native Hawaiian mythology .. by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Pretty impressive for a transgendered goddess.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    3. Re:Deities of Native Hawaiian mythology .. by war4peace · · Score: 1

      It would look more like an arsehole...

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  17. Hooray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    The stupidity of religion again stymies the advancement of knowledge and humankind in general! What a BLESSED day.

    I think from now on, I'm going to start using the word "bless" in place of the word "fuck".

    I can't blessing wait for the next time I hear someone sneeze...

    Bless those motherblessers. Gods aren't blessing real.

  18. Other reasons by nimbius · · Score: 0

    Its easy to sweep this under the rug of 'religious plebs hate science' but there are other reasons to reconsider the telescope. The principle fresh water aquifer for Hawaii Island is on Mauna Kea, and there have been mercury spills on the summit; toxins such as Ethylene Glycol and Diesel are used there; chemicals used to clean telescope mirrors drain into the septic system, along with half a million gallons a year of human sewage that goes into septic tanks, cesspools and leach fields. theres not been talk of a plan on how to deal with this at all. Its also home to endangered species, such as the palila bird, which is endangered in part because of the damage to its critical habitat, which includes the mamane tree.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:Other reasons by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      Diesel? Really? Diesel is so benign you have no idea. And septic fields, which feed plants? You're stretching hard.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Other reasons by kanoalani · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just for the record: none of the spills have contacted the earth. Those are "spills" like when you spill coffee on your desk. All mirror cleaning water is trucked off the mountain. There are no palila birds or mamane trees at 13,000 ft. The TMT does not plan to have a cesspool. The EIS calls for a sealed building, everything except photons are trucked in and trucked out. There has been over a decade of very detailed planning and study focused on mitigating impact from all observatories and all of these documents are freely available online.

    3. Re:Other reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you miss the part about "The principle fresh water aquifer for Hawaii Island is on Mauna Kea".

      Diesel in drinking water is bad. Human waste in drinking water is bad. I'm guessing you have an extremely naive view that you need to clean the toxins out of water before you drink it anyways...

    4. Re:Other reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is blatantly inaccurate!

      Diesel is used in many, many motor vehicles all around the state.
      Propylene glycol is used in anti-freeze in virtually every car and truck.

      The "chemical" used to clean the mirrors is carbon dioxide -- believe you me, the astronomers want to use the gentlest thing to move dust and gecko poop off of the surfaces.

      You can look at pictures of the summit of Mauna Kea -- there are no trees anywhere near the 14,000' summit -- it is too dry and cold.
      This is due to the natural environment, not due to human activity in the area.
      All of the posters objections are similar hog-wash.

      The protesters neglected to mention that they are actually protesting for more money.
      You see, the Hawaiians require sizeable "donations" in exchange for their "support".
      The astronomers have paid quite a bit, but those Hawaiians are ever hungry for more...

      There was a project to build windmills on some of the islands, and the Hawaiians said, "We own the wind, and you think you can build these without paying us, you are in for a train wreck!" Doesn't this remind you of the way the Mafia act?

      Hawaiians sometimes claim that the summit is a religious area to them.
      My question is how come I *never* see Hawaiians visiting the summit of Mauna Kea?
      I've seen a lot of astronomical personnel and tourists go up there, but never Hawaiians, and certainly not on a regular basis.
      They're just playing dog-in-the-manger here.

      If you ever want to make a Hawaiian angry, ask them what they did to the "Menehune", the people who lived in Hawaii before the Hawaiians arrived.
      They killed them *all*.

    5. Re:Other reasons by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 3, Informative

      To my knowledge, they have and there is public information available on the environmental impact statement. This work is being done by astronomers who really do care. I've seen far to many people act as if this is some big mean corporation who just wants to profit at the cost of the environment or something. I've met these people, they are scientists, who value the environment and respecting culture. And if that were the main problem, the activists should hit those issues specifically instead of calling for the scrapping of the whole thing, and also, if that were the main issue, we wouldn't have prominent activists wanting a removal of all telescopes. It doesn't surprise or convince me when people who call for the TMT stopped on every conceivable ground also call for it to be stopped on environmental ones.

    6. Re:Other reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The AQUIFER for the island is on a 13,000 foot volcano?

      I don't think that words means what you think it means.

    7. Re:Other reasons by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Happens that I visited that mountaintop, in the summer of 1968 when the only sign of human presence was the graded road and the foundation for the very first telescope. There was absolutely no life up there: A Marscape of volcanic cinder. Not a single tree, mamane or otherwise. I can bet that the only sewage that's up there now is the stuff you're spouting.

    8. Re:Other reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah yeah and I bet the next year you bought your first real six-string down at the five and dime.

    9. Re:Other reasons by kanoalani · · Score: 1

      TMT has posted a fact sheet addressing the controversy: http://www.maunakeaandtmt.org/

    10. Re:Other reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't these scientists protest their values of the environment. They want the job to complete so they should protest how much they "love" the environment and state on their signs that we only love you all! Makes no sense that you are the one stating this info and not them. I don't speak for anyone as I don't know them and I cannot argue it. Maybe they do maybe they don't! But if they believe ...........just sayin.

  19. 'Sacred' is the magic word... by superdave80 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you are a native of any kind, just start yelling that something is sacred, and nobody will be able to fight back against you.

    Hate stuff being built near you? Just claim you can't build there because it is sacred ground.

    Want something built, like a casino or giant housing development? Just claim the land is sacred and demand it back as 'sovereign' territory... so that you can build your casino.

    You get to have it both ways!

    1. Re:'Sacred' is the magic word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is building a casino on your sacred ground any worse than the white-man building a church on his?

    2. Re:'Sacred' is the magic word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When we build churches on casino ground, we have the decency to have Elvis perform the weddings.

    3. Re:'Sacred' is the magic word... by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 1

      That happened a few years ago here with the genetically engineered taro disaster. Basically, university researchers wanted to insert a disease resistance gene into taro, a historically very important Hawaiian crop, so that the unique Hawaiian varieties could be preserved without having to hybridize them with other varieties. People flipped out, saying that changing the taro is offensive because it is sacred. Of course, no one told the ancient Hawaiian that, because if these people knew the history of the crop, they would have known that Hawaiians have been selecting somatic mutants for centuries, which lead to the diversity present in Hawai'i. But they invoked the sacred and offensive cards, and not enough people called them out on their bullshit rhetoric for exactly the reason you mentioned. The research was banned, as for the taro the activists claimed to care so much about, yields are in decline and fairly little is being done to really promote it.

      I work in plant science in Hawai'i, had it is hard for me to miss the similarities between the two situations. I don't want the same thing that happened to my field to happen to the astronomers. It's my understanding than ancient Hawaiians would go up Mauna Kea to look at the stars. Now the same thing is bad? No, it is just people playing political games and using the cheapest identity politics tricks they can find. As far as I can tell, if the ancient Hawaiians were alive today, they would be all for it. Unfortunately, this is all very political, so history, science, and facts don't matter one bit to the loudest of the activist groups.

      And don't misunderstand me, I fully understand and recognize the cultural aspects of the Mauna and the natural beauty that all people can recognize, as do the astronomers behind the project. The anti-TMT people are just taking things way too far.

    4. Re:'Sacred' is the magic word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you worked for Monsanto and just got kicked out eh.

    5. Re:'Sacred' is the magic word... by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      What?

    6. Re:'Sacred' is the magic word... by Locando · · Score: 1

      Basically, university researchers wanted to insert a disease resistance gene into taro, a historically very important Hawaiian crop, so that the unique Hawaiian varieties could be preserved without having to hybridize them with other varieties.

      I'm sure that's the only motive they could possibly have had.

    7. Re:'Sacred' is the magic word... by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 1

      Yeah, actually that was the motivation. The varieties of local importance are somewhat unique, and pretty minor on the global scale. Consequently, methods which minimize the amount of genetic change are desirable, because just like how a seeding of a Pinot noir and some other grape is not the same as the actual Pinot Noir, a hybrid between a poi taro like the Maui Lehua variety and a Chinese one like Bun Long will have the unique properties of the Hawaiian parent damaged. Is there something otherwise that you wish to imply? I'm sure you'll have proof of your statements if you do.

  20. amerika by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's not like the fucking americans settled on somebody else's homeland whilst exterminating... from the beginning... oh wait

  21. Recursive telescope by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    Thirty Meter Telescope is constructing the telescope

    Woah.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  22. Re:Hawaii by mc6809e · · Score: 2

    Whoa. I didn't say it was good or bad.

    I was just replying to the suggestion that this was the fault of "liberals".

  23. Re:Hawaii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two wrongs don't make a right.

    (But three lefts do)

  24. 13 Telescopes already at the Summit by Icebreaker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I live in Hawaii and am excited for the new 30 meter telescope. There are currently 13 telescopes at the summit of Mauna Kea.
    https://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/mko...
    This project has been in the works for 7 years, The local population that is against the building of this telescope has had that long to protest, but didn't actually start protesting until the project was already underway.
    From what I hear on my Facebook feed from my Hawaiian friends is that they oppose the building of this new telescope because they consider Mauna kea a sacred place, as well as the sheer size of this new telescope.
    The summit is sacred to ancient Hawaiians, so much that a kapu (Ancient Hawaiian law) was made that only important tribal chiefs were allowed up at the summit. (Breaking Kapu usually meant death).
    So in old Hawaii only a select few were allowed up on the volcano. I don't know why anyone is complaining. in new Hawaii anyone can visit the summit and see the majestic views of the island as well as some amazing star-gazing at night.
    I don't speak up on Facebook even though many of my friends are asking me to sign a petition to stop the building of the telescope as well as protesting locally (I am on Maui). Its hard since most of my friends are not very techy or interested much in science. I keep my mouth shut since I fear I will be ostracized for speaking my true opinion.
    Only complaint I have, I really wish most of these telescopes were open to the public. I have never had the opportunity to look through anything bigger than a backyard telescope and it would be amazing to be able to see what a thirty meter telescope can do.

    1. Re:13 Telescopes already at the Summit by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Only complaint I have, I really wish most of these telescopes were open to the public.

      You just have to reserve a time and show sufficient competency at operating one.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    2. Re:13 Telescopes already at the Summit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, do astronomers actual "look through" large telescopes any more? I thought (assumed) it was all electronics these days. So you wouldn't even need to be at the telescope to see the output.

    3. Re:13 Telescopes already at the Summit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Things like this are usually not things people can actually look through, it's all done by computer.

      Images from such telescopes are often publically released.

    4. Re:13 Telescopes already at the Summit by kanoalani · · Score: 1

      I live in Hawaii too and feel the same way. It's awkward because it's taboo to even try to discuss with anyone taking the indigenous/religious position.

    5. Re:13 Telescopes already at the Summit by Icebreaker · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, According to the UH website :

      Note: The observatories are private research facilities and generally not open to the public. Stargazing is best done at the VIS, where we are equipped for visitors, have telescopes you can look through, and temperatures are much warmer than the summit.

      so unless I break in :), I think I am out of luck.

    6. Re:13 Telescopes already at the Summit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing for a visitor to "see" through most of these telescopes because none of them have eyepieces.

    7. Re:13 Telescopes already at the Summit by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 1

      If you ever make it the the Visitor's center on the Big Island halfway up Mauna Kea, they have some relatively fancy computer controlled telescopes for the public to look through. I was just there a few weeks ago, and you could see the clouds of Jupiter through one of them. If you're ever in the Hilo area, that's really a great thing to go to. The IFA is very good and active with their outreach. As for the observatories, those are not so easy to use, and there are waiting lists for astronomers to use them, so I don't think they're going to see any public use anytime soon.

      But you know, if you don't speak up, they win. I work in plant science on O'ahu, and if you live in Maui, you know how controversial that one is. If we don't want laws passed against research, we have to speak up, because the activist groups certainty have no problem with making noise.

    8. Re:13 Telescopes already at the Summit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I live in Hawaii and am excited for the new 30 meter telescope. There are currently 13 telescopes at the summit of Mauna Kea. ...
      Only complaint I have, I really wish most of these telescopes were open to the public. I have never had the opportunity to look through anything bigger than a backyard telescope and it would be amazing to be able to see what a thirty meter telescope can do.

      As someone who actually uses these instruments, I can assure you that NO ONE "looks" through these telescopes. There are no eyepieces, or even the possibility of previewing the CCD images on those optical telescopes that take "field images". You have to put the digital image data through a whole data reduction "pipeline" to get the final images. In addition, a large number of the telescopes don't even use optical wavelengths: the Sub-Millimeter Array, James Clerk Maxwell, Caltech Sub-millimeter Observatory, and VBLA are all radio or microwave observatories. The U.K. InfraRed Telescope (UKIRT) and NASA's InfraRed Telescope Facility (IRTF) are...wait for it... infrared telescopes.

    9. Re:13 Telescopes already at the Summit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't really look through the big telescopes, they are only made for use with cameras, and there's no place to attach an eyepiece - and no place to stand or sit anywhere near where the instruments / cameras go. The 30m telescope apparently has an f-ratio of f/15, so it is really, really dim, but has an amazing magnification. Typical backyard telescopes have f/6 to t/10, and many astrophotographers use focal reducers to make them faster.

    10. Re:13 Telescopes already at the Summit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Only complaint I have, I really wish most of these telescopes were open to the public. I have never had the opportunity to look through anything bigger than a backyard telescope and it would be amazing to be able to see what a thirty meter telescope can do.

      The big telescopes on top of Mauna Kea aren't exactly backyard efforts - they're more akin to giant multispectral digital cameras. I'd be surprised if there are any optical paths suitable for a conventional viewfinder - you're really not going to 'look through' one of these beasts.

      You can get to see inside some of them, though - there are escorted summit tours with guides giving loads of information on what astronomers are doing up there, along with access to 'at least one' of the observatories. I went on such a tour a few years ago, and got to see inside one of the twin Keck telescopes. Bloody incredible.

      It's really quite alien up there, with not much air. The tour required us to stay at the ~3km altitude visitor centre for an hour or two to help us acclimatise - we got to watch a video on the construction of the telescopes, and on quite how and why the mountain was so important to the native Hawaiians. After that, it was off to the summit - SUV mountaineering, we dubbed it.

    11. Re:13 Telescopes already at the Summit by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      I keep my mouth shut since I fear I will be ostracized for speaking my true opinion.

      Well, shame on you then, you coward. That's how oppression works.

    12. Re:13 Telescopes already at the Summit by bitingduck · · Score: 2

      Only complaint I have, I really wish most of these telescopes were open to the public. I have never had the opportunity to look through anything bigger than a backyard telescope and it would be amazing to be able to see what a thirty meter telescope can do.

      You don't really "look through" them so much as reserve time and then sit in a control room in Waimea, or more likely your home institution anywhere in the world, and wait for digital data. Some stuff is done with a realtime observer making decisions (based on the digital data), but a lot of it's automated and planned on schedules that optimize the amount of observing vs. the amount of repointing and other overhead. There's various ways to get access, but mostly they require being part of a research institution and proposing for time. The various institutions involved in building them get observing time in return, and then some amount is probably also available through gov't grants to "buy" time. A nice thing about ground based telescopes over space based is the amount of effective observing time relative to things like calibration and maintenance, so they're effectively accessible to more people. The number of people on the summit is getting to be fairly small and tending toward the people who are doing construction, maintenance, installation, or any kind of hand-on instrument calibration or adjustment, but observing is moving to be more and more remote, which also makes it more accessible to more people.

    13. Re:13 Telescopes already at the Summit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From memory of discussions with others I recall that there is a one meter or half meter scope available to the public. If I remember correctly the person that mentioned said that use of it is sparse. As far as looking through a thirty meter the field compared to your eye's dimension would lead to a less enjoyable experience than looking through a meter sized scope.

  25. Re:Hawaii by ralphsiegler · · Score: 1

    Has what Marx proposed been tried on any scale larger than a hippie commune?

  26. Re:Hawaii by ckatko · · Score: 1
    This is pretty hilarious. I thought liberals had convinced us that racism never occurs to white people, and is never caused by "minorities."

    The last day of school has long been unofficially designated "Kill Haole Day," with white students singled out for harassment and violence. (Haole — pronounced how-lee — is slang for a foreigner, usually white, and sometimes is used as a racial slur.)

    Hot damn that's some fiery racism.

  27. Re:Hawaii by sycodon · · Score: 0

    There's always one idiot who falls back on the claim that Communism just hasn't been done correctly yet.

    Maybe they need to kill even MORE people in order to get it juuuust right.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  28. Re:Hawaii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's not a serious question is it?

  29. I live and work out of Maui (thank you, Internet!) by gbooch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Let me tell you that the issue is far more complex and far more nuanced than any of the comments here unveil.

    For some background, read this perspective from the Native Hawaiian community (http://www.welivemana.com/articles/sacredness-mauna-kea-explained?hc_location=ufi) and then also read this history from Harvard (http://www.pluralism.org/reports/view/21).

    Mauna Kea is a flashpoint for Native Hawaiians because, as the Harvard report notes "it is also one of the most sacred places in the universe for Native Hawaiian people." Imagine putting an oil refinery inside the Masjid al-Haram or cell tower anchored in the Western Wall.

  30. No by Spazmania · · Score: 1

    Sorry, no, you don't get to declare the entire top of the mountain that's the single best astronomy spot in the world, land you don't own or make any effort to maintain, as your cultural heritage location. The handful of spots up there that aren't a straight-up moonscape are already protected. Get over yourselves.

    'sides, it's sacred as in the aborigines spun yarns about it while performing human sacrifice against enemies at the oceanfront heiaus scores of miles away laterally and 2 miles down. Not sacred as in lots of cultural events were actually held in the thin air at 13,000 feet atop the mountain.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    1. Re:No by hendrips · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair, the only reason the natives don't own the land is that William McKinley's goons stole it from them at gunpoint. It seems reasonable that they might be mad about that.

  31. A lack of vision...(no pun intended) by tatman · · Score: 1

    What an honor to have such an amazing piece of equipment peering back in time, to honor the history of their ancestors.

    --
    I've always said English was my second language. Had Romeo and Juliet been written in C, I might have understood it.
    1. Re:A lack of vision...(no pun intended) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...telling people what they should be honored by...interesting.

  32. Re:Hawaii by swillden · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Has what Marx proposed been tried on any scale larger than a hippie commune?

    No. Why is that?

    It's certainly not because Marx's ideas are new, or because there aren't a lot of devotees of them. I posit that the reason it hasn't been tried at scale is that every attempt to scale it up breaks down as soon as you get more than a few hundred people.

    Marx was a decent economist for his day, but had no understanding of human nature. An understanding of game theory, had it existed in his day, would have tremendously improved his ideas, I think. In addition, his economic theories have holes you can drive a 747 through, mainly because they seriously underestimate the knowledge component of labor, and the resulting impact of innovation, and completely ignore the value of organization. It's the latter problem that results in imposition of heavy-handed, centrally-controlled economies in all attempts to build communal societies at scale. Since Marx's structure eliminates any reasonable mechanism for self-organization of a dynamic economy, implementers try to paper it over with central committees. Unfortunately, central organization is not only horribly inefficient because the complexity of a significant economy is far beyond the comprehension of any group of humans, it inevitably creates powerful, self-interested elites. That generates resentment among the populace, which provokes top-down imposition of population control systems... propaganda, powerful secret police, etc. -- the hallmarks of the real-world communist state.

    It's pretty obvious why Marxism can't work at scale, once you recognize the fact that collective ownership eliminates the ability of the economy to self-organize for efficient production. As long as the economy is small and organization is simple and obvious, it works. But beyond a few hundred people... it can't. Perhaps after we've passed the AI singularity, when all production is automated, and all organization of production as well, then communal ownership will work, and may even be essential. Or maybe not.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  33. Re:Hawaii by humptheElephant · · Score: 2

    Kill more people, sort of like the US does with its drones on innocent civilians. Yep, way to go.

  34. Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they want to appease their gods, I suggest they throw themselves in a volcano.

    The whole lot of 'em, just to make sure.

  35. Kapu was horrifically elitist... by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

    ...it made the various Game of Thrones societies look like communist utopias. And according to Wiki, (Hawaiian word BTW), it was abandoned by Kamehameha in the 19th century. I'm all for protecting burial grounds and historic sites, but 'violating' prime real estate reserved for royalty in order to advance mankind's knowledge of the universe strikes me as a win.

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
  36. Science versus religion by iris-n · · Score: 1

    Typical case of religion obstructing the progress of science. Luckily in this case it is a minority religion that the local administration does not take seriously anymore. Imagine if that was a place sacred to christians, like the Mount of Olives, or to buddhists, like Sri Pada (also known as Sri Kanda). The poor telescope would never have a chance.

    --
    entropy happens
    1. Re:Science versus religion by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

      Can you show us any examples of Christians halting the construction of a telescope?

      --
      "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    2. Re:Science versus religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Pope somebody-or-other wasn't all that happy with Galileo, but to be honest that was more because GG was an arrogant asshole and pissed in the Pope's cornflakes. The telescope business was really not all that important to His Holiness.

    3. Re:Science versus religion by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

      Actually, Galileo was a denier going up against scientific consensus.

      --
      "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  37. Re:Hawaii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I may be wrong on this, but doesn't a US territory have to vote to become a state? Like the reason Peurto Rico isn't a state is because the votes for it have failed. So if that's true, then the natives, or at least some portion of them, voted to be a state. So even if the US did originally "steal" the islands, apparently the people that live there now don't mind.

  38. Re:I live and work out of Maui (thank you, Interne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see what the problem with putting a Cell tower on the Western Wall is...
    (assuming the cell traffic and geography require it).

    As far as a refinery inside Masjid al-Haram, I'm sure there is no actual need for a refinery there as there are plenty of places in SA for a refinery that are not in the middle of Mecca.

  39. some damn asshole said: by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Why are they always so mad?
    We're we're basically splitting this country 50/50 with them.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  40. Re:Hawaii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just imagine what would happen if they were independent with no aid from the US. No subsidies. No healthcare. No education. No military. No tax-free imports. Welcome to Micronesia, only poorer and less safe.

  41. Re:I live and work out of Maui (thank you, Interne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work on one of the telescopes on Maui, where we also have similar problems with the Hawaiians.
    The solution is simply to pay them more ransom money.

    This has very little to do with Hawaiian religion and has much more to do with the Hawaiian Mafia.
    It is *exceedingly* rare for Hawaiians to visit the summit for religious purposes. I've *never* seen it happen on Maui, where I live.
    I have a co-work who has worked at the summit (5 days/week) for over a decade, and he has also *never* seen Hawaiians use the summit for religious purposes.

    Unfortunately, when they Hawaiian organizations are given money, they spend it on lining the pockets of some of the higher-ups, who drive BMW's and live expensive life-styles. They give out high-paying jobs to a few people who go around to schools and "educate" children, however they don't spend the money on fixing up the island they've been given, building houses in the areas which have been exclusively reserved for them, starting businesses, or sending their kids to any of the Hawaiian schools. Basically they spend it on graft.

    One of the amazing things is that we're starting to have public Hawaiian immersion schools, and they are among the best public schools in the state.
    The odd thing is that most of the teachers and students aren't Hawaiian!

    Hawaiian memes such as "Aloha" are very popular, but the Hawaiians organizing these protests are just out for more blood-money.
    They don't seem to be practicing their own religion.
    It's kinda sad.

  42. Re:Hawaii by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is the most likely reason. You see a lot of the same people protesting this as you see against a lot of other things (like geothermal power, biotechnology, tourism, ect.). They don't care what they protest, as long as they make some noise to draw attention to their cause of re-establishing the Hawaiian monarchy...with themselves as the new kings no doubt...and recreating the Hawaiian kingdom for people with Hawaiian blood. That, of course, is an inherently racist proposition. And I've snooped around those independence rallies before; I've seen these Hawaiian community leaders and independence activists play the race card in manners that, quite frankly, I think are unacceptable in an enlightened society.

    They're people who live in the past, and play identity politics and pointless localism to enrich themselves by giving people something to hate on, no matter the cost (really, no different than you see in the South with those 'The Confederate States will rise again!' assholes). Of course, the Hawaiian nationalists don't care if this place goes to shit after they do as much damage as possible to achieve their goals, as long as they're the kings of shit mountain, and tough luck for everyone else, including no doubt their supporters who would then be in a much worse off position without the US and all the economic drivers the nationalists would like to see gone. It's really sad that anyone gives these assholes the time of day.

  43. Re:Hawaii by blue9steel · · Score: 1

    There's always one idiot who falls back on the claim that Communism just hasn't been done correctly yet.

    If you use Marx's terminology then technically they're right, the farthest we've ever gotten is dictatorship of the proletariat, which is the phase before communism. Nitpicking aside, I agree with what you were trying to say, centrally planned utopias just don't match up with human behavior and so will never be a successful model.

  44. Re:Hawaii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marx was a decent economist for his day, but had no understanding of human nature.

    This would be more impressive if you talked about his understanding of human nature.

  45. Re:Hawaii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, central organization is not only horribly inefficient because the complexity of a significant economy is far beyond the comprehension of any group of humans, it inevitably creates powerful, self-interested elites. That generates resentment among the populace, which provokes top-down imposition of population control systems... propaganda, powerful secret police, etc. -- the hallmarks of the real-world communist state.

    You mean the hallmarks of almost every single countries today...?

  46. Re:I live and work out of Maui (thank you, Interne by avandesande · · Score: 1

    Previously their most sacred site in the Universe was located where Newark NJ is now.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  47. Build it in space by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    The sooner humanity gets off this rock, the better. Leave it for those who want to dance around in animal skins and howl at the moon.

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  48. Re:Hawaii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought liberals had convinced us that racism never occurs to white people, and is never caused by "minorities."

    No, that's just yet another right-wing talking point that is complete and utter bullshit.

    The SPLC is a very progressive organization, and they call out racism and bigotry wherever they see it.

  49. Re:I live and work out of Maui (thank you, Interne by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    It's the same on almost all of the Pacific islands. Where I live, the US gave several million dollars for the local government to guild sea walls all to protect the locals from rising tides due to climate change. There have been no rising tides and not one wall has been build but lots of 54" TV have been bought as well as big-ass SUVs with tinted windows for the government officers and their families to cruise around in. Considering you can drive all the way across the island in 3 minutes at 35 miles an hour you have to really wonder......

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  50. Re:Hawaii by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 2

    Also, the "Native" population only comprises about 5.9% as of the 2010 Census. There are more Filipino (14.6%) and Japanese (13.6%) alone. Various "white/caucasian" ethnic groups are about 25%. Even if you add in "Other Pacific Islander" to the Native column, it's still only 10% of the population.

    Also crappy as that may be and have been, it should probably also be mentioned that the alternative was not "Hawaii lives happy and free and everything is perfect." It would have been being turned into a Protectorate or Possession of some other power - probably Japan. In the early 1920s the population of Hawaii was over 40% Japanese, and only 25% "Native."

    Furthermore, Hawaii, unlike every single other exterior territory (excepting Alaska, which is very different from the rest) the USA has acquired, is now a state with full voting rights. Contrast this to Puerto Rico, Guam, the Marianas, American Samoa, etc... And let's not even get started on how much worse the native tribes in the various interior regions of the USA were treated.

    While I do have some sympathy for the fact that the USA steamrollered the fuck out of lots of indigenous native populations, nevermind those it displaced to form in the first place, there do need to be limits.

  51. Re:Hawaii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same for libertarianism. Works great on a small scale, on a large scale, someone's gonna' get robbed.

  52. Re:Hawaii by danlip · · Score: 1

    Hawaii was annexed by the US decades before it became a state. There was a vote for statehood, but the alternate choice was to remain a territory - independence was never on the table, and it may just be that those who voted considered statehood the better choice of the two.

  53. Defend Hawaii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a great example of Hawaiian culture struggling to survive. If people knew the beauty of Hawaiian culture they would think twice before shitting on the Mauna Kea protestors. Hula, Mele, Oli, Aina, Aloha, Ohana, Ho'oponopono, Ke Akua, are of more value than any telescope.

    1. Re:Defend Hawaii by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

      I like Don Ho.

      --
      "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  54. Why are you guys calling them the 'natives'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, none of the Pacific Islanders are 'natives'

    Just like all the others, they are all 'foreigners' --- their ancestors migrated from Vietnam / Taiwan / Indonesia / Papua New Guinea

    1. Re:Why are you guys calling them the 'natives'? by colinwb · · Score: 1

      The Pacific Islanders are a different type of "foreigner" to, for example, the English (and French and Dutch and ...) settlers in Northern America: when they first arrived in the Marquesas, Hawaii, New Zealand, etc there was no-one already there to call them foreigners!

      Their exploration and settling of the Pacific is one of the great feats of human history: Migration by sea in the south Pacific: 2000 BC - AD 800:

      The Pacific islanders develop a twin-hulled sailing canoe which is an extremely effective sea-going vessel. In boats of this kind they continue the process of spreading eastwards through Polynesia (Greek polus many, nesos island). The first staging posts are Tonga and Samoa. The earliest surviving trace of human occupation in these islands is about 420 BC in Tonga and 200 BC in Samoa. But colonists are likely to have arrived considerably earlier than this, since by the 1st century BC humans have reached the much more inaccessible Marquesas Islands. The final thrust, to the most remote island groups of the Pacific, takes place from the Marquesas. Hawaii is reached in about AD 400; Easter Island perhaps a century later; Tahiti and the Society Islands in about 600. The last great step in man's colonization of the planet involves the longest sea journey of all - thousands of miles southwest from the Marquesas or Tahiti to New Zealand. This is accomplished in about AD 800.

  55. Defend Hawaii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a great example of Hawaiian culture struggling to survive. If people knew the beauty of Hawaiian culture they would think twice before shitting on the Mauna Kea protestors. Hula, Mele, Oli, Aloha, Olelo Hawaii, Aina, Mana, Ho'oponopono, Ohana, Ke Akua are of more value then any telescope.

  56. Re:I live and work out of Maui (thank you, Interne by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    Let me tell you that the issue is far more complex and far more nuanced than any of the comments here unveil.

    Slashdot doesn't do complex and nuanced. We (well, most of us commentators and moderators, though not I) do simple and simplified - and insult and shit all over everyone else's rights, but scream like a toddler when one of our (usually self assumed) "rights" are so much as glanced at askance.

  57. need local support by jago25_98 · · Score: 2

    It doesn't seem wise to try to construct such a thing without people on side.

    Its too easy to protest non violently after construction with mobile phone signals and halogen lights.

    I lived in La palma for a while in Europe. People here are happy to have mobile internet service and mobile reception cut mid call to improve observation. You need that level of support.

    If you can get support then you have to build on another territory. I know the USA has other territories similar. I would like to be able to quote where. AFAIK what stops this is that observatories also serve military purposes and that is something that limits where they can put these things. If this aspect was more honest though the hiding behind 'betterment of humankind' wouldn't work so well.

    Slightly offtopic: I find the domes really beautiful. Its the curve. If only our cities were freer from the tyranny of straight lines a bit more we might all be a lot happier and productive

  58. Meaning of sacred by Livius · · Score: 1

    If someone sincerely believed the ground to be truly sacred, wouldn't a telescope that helps bring enlightenment to all of humanity be one of the *best* possible uses of the land?

  59. Re:I live and work out of Maui (thank you, Interne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live and work on the Big Island, and gbooch is absolutely right: this is a complex issue. The US government, religious leaders and corporate powers have shat upon Native Hawaiians for 150+ years, and it is natural to see resentment harbored to yet another massive development project occurring on sacred ground.

    I would strongly suggest to those who dismiss their protests with blatant insensitivity to consider how they would feel if an enormous structure was erected right in the middle of their backyard. Analogies that come to mind are building a dam on the Grand Canyon or putting a new structure in the middle of Stonehenge.

    Many of those who are protesting are intelligent and thoughtful individuals who feel like their voices were not heard during the application process. Those of us who do understand the scientific implications of such a project would be better served in trying to educate those on just how significant this instrument will be. The Hawaiian people were some of the best navigators in history--what better project to honor that history than the TMT?

  60. Re:Hawaii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Had the new Nation of Hawaii not become a US territory it would have been annexed by Russia, then Russia would have lost it to the Japanese in the early years of WWII. By 1960 Oahu would be covered with Sony and Toyota factories, and Waikiki would have that huge Ferris wheel that every other decent tourist attraction has.

  61. WEAK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Way to play the white shame card, Social Justice Paladin.

  62. heya heya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Red man speak with forked tongue. Build a straw man he does. White man denied building on tribal land. Tribe then build casino on tribal land. Learn to read, Walks With n00bs.

  63. gold? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish the US Gov gave you guys money for education, or at least a spell checker. Or are you seriously stating that we gave them money to cover their sea walls in gold?

  64. well, man.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since they opened the First Church of Weed in Indiana today, you should go ahead and register yours before the religious freedom act is repealed.

  65. thatsracist.gif by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your summary is racist stereotyping. You are bad and should feel bad for being bad.

  66. Re:Hawaii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look another one who thinks they will win in the end. Hint: Marx was wrong in all his historical predictions.

    Marx maintained that capitalist economies would always be able to out-produce communist ones.

  67. Re:I live and work out of Maui (thank you, Interne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    science is my religion, saw aw yea

  68. Re:Hawaii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've got to be kidding.

    I've heard more than once from liberals and progressives that racism is impossible without power (and in their mind, only whites have power).

  69. Surely you jest by johnwerneken · · Score: 0

    Jihadists kin Hawaii? The hell with people's dearly held beliefs! go extinct, dinosaurs!

  70. This is... unfortunate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hawaii is my home, and the culture I was raised in. As it's still my home, I'm going to hide behind AC. Despite my being an outsider even among my own people, I love this place. Notwithstanding, there are tremendous rifts which will not heal anytime soon.

    Lots of this can be traced back to plantation culture. There were entire families born into labor. Anti-intellectualism runs rampant in indigent areas, because of this memory. If someone is smarter, then they will elevate themselves above the equality of the others. They might be too good to work in the fields with the rest of us, so fuck em. In the local creole ("Pidgin") there are visible traces of this.

    Hawaiians have gotten the short end of the stick a lot over the years. I'm quite staunchly an American, and I don't support some of their noisy fringe activists who crave radical action like secession. Still, the poorest areas of the island are the ones were Hawaiians represent over 40% of the populace, where they're about 10% elsewhere. I wish that we could urge more of their children into higher education, but it's discouraged even amongst their own families. High school graduations are celebrated with fervor and passion on the Leeward Coast, because that's as high as their parents ever aspire for them.

    The telescope isn't the problem. Misguided anger is their problem. Researchers from the University of Hawaii are among some of the nicer people I've ever met, but they are a personification of the enemy. I hope that things go well for the astronomers, but I've seen a very small but vocal minority hurt other things that were good for our state.

  71. Damn right-wing fundamentalists by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

    Damn right-wing religious fundamentalists, always screwing things up. :-)

    --
    There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  72. Re:I live and work out of Maui (thank you, Interne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From what I've seen, the most sacred place to native Hawaiians appears to be the California hotel and casino in Las Vegas.