Slashdot Mirror


Nearly Half of Game of Thrones Season 5 Leaks Online

HughPickens.com writes Paul Tassi reports at Forbes that the first four episodes of the new season of "Game of Thrones", nearly half of the ten total episodes, have been leaked online to various torrent sites. The four episodes appeared to come from a screener sent to reviewers with the digital watermark blurred out and are in 480p video format, equivalent to standard-definition TV, not HD.The episodes have already been downloaded almost 800,000 times, and that figure was expected to blow past a million downloads by the season 5 premiere. Game of Thrones has consistently set records for piracy, which has almost been a point of pride for HBO. "Our experience is [piracy] leads to more penetration, more paying subs, more health for HBO, less reliance on having to do paid advertising If you go around the world, I think you're right, Game of Thrones is the most pirated show in the world. Well, you know, that's better than an Emmy."

How the leak happened isn't a mystery. Television critics typically receive the first four episodes of an HBO show before its season premiere, and "Game of Thrones" is no exception. HBO could not immediately say whether the leak could be traced to screener copies of the show. "I suspect HBO may be a bit more restrictive about handing out Game of Thrones screeners to press, given the event-like nature of the show and its reliance on keeping spoilers close to the chest," writes Tassi. "I really don't see why commentary like that needs to exist in the first place." The network can take solace in at least one thing, though. Episode four ends on a heck of a cliffhanger, and those who pirated the episodes will be in the same boat as those of us who received them legally — waiting until May to find out what happens next. "I would imagine it's more fun to just spend the next month watching week to week as nature intended, even if you are watching illegally," concludes Tassi. "Game of Thrones is one of the last true "event" shows where it's something you want to talk about Sunday night or Monday morning with friends and strangers alike."

148 comments

  1. You can get all of season 5 leaked by chris200x9 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All you have to do is read anything about the books.

    1. Re:You can get all of season 5 leaked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are books? I did not know that! Tell me more.

    2. Re:You can get all of season 5 leaked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh come on! How does that even make any sense?!

      How would someone writing books about a TV series, know what's happening next?!

    3. Re:You can get all of season 5 leaked by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Wasn't a split from the "book universe" announced for Season 5?

      --
      bickerdyke
    4. Re:You can get all of season 5 leaked by thaylin · · Score: 1

      What it a split from the books, or was it that the author of the books would not be assisting in the writing of the season?

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    5. Re:You can get all of season 5 leaked by chris200x9 · · Score: 1

      I thought he said you get a snowball effect in that any small change from the books in earlier seasons would make a bigger difference in later seasons, so season 5 might be somewhat different from the books but I don't think we'll see a "split." Still I think knowing the books can count as a leak because they shouldn't be *too* different.

    6. Re:You can get all of season 5 leaked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually not true. I'm not a reader, but I've been told we've already seen a bit of the show starting to change, but supposedly this season is going to change even more. And I think that's going to be inevitable going forward. Even though JRRM has shared his overall plan with the producers, we're starting to get near the end of the currently completed writings (this season and next season focus mostly on the last 2 already published books, which have a simultaneous timeline in the books, but are interwoven for TV). Since the show has a tendency to pull some stories forward (and push others back), we're going to start seeing some of the stuff that hasn't been released in the books yet.

    7. Re: You can get all of season 5 leaked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Riiiight. Because everything on the show is identical to the books. Like how Jon Snow shot Mance Rayder in the heart with an arrow. And how Ramsay Bolton is actually marrying the real Sansa Stark. And Jaqen H'gar is running the show at the House of Black and White. Et cetera.

    8. Re: You can get all of season 5 leaked by Viol8 · · Score: 0

      You need to get out more. Before Winter comes of course.

    9. Re:You can get all of season 5 leaked by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

      Newspaper article promised the return of that assasin as a member of Black and White house* and the death of characters who are still alive in the novels. Reason behind this supposedly is that they don't expect Martin to finish the next volumes on time, so the TV authors already are preparing for writing their own finale.

      *sorry, neither read the books nor could be bothered to remember the exact name from the article

      --
      bickerdyke
    10. Re:You can get all of season 5 leaked by Severus+Snape · · Score: 0

      All you have to do is read anything about the books.

      Not really, having watched them it's starting to look like a different thing completely.

    11. Re:You can get all of season 5 leaked by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I had the same thought. The only surprises in the show are what they left out, and major events like deaths aren't going to be among those.

      Has working illiteracy reached the point where this is actually a big deal?

    12. Re:You can get all of season 5 leaked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but I want to enjoy GoT. Suffering GRRM's atrociously pseudo-victorian prose to gather a few gleanings of actual story amongst the flowery descriptions of dishes present at luncheon isn't something I want to waste time on. HBO did ASoFaI better than GRRM did.

    13. Re: You can get all of season 5 leaked by hatemonger · · Score: 1

      Don't forget how Mance doesn't have a kid in the show. No idea what's going to motivate the scooby gang to sail South now (as they did in FfC). It's definitely departing from the books in larger and larger ways.

    14. Re:You can get all of season 5 leaked by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Both. There are certain events in the book (Lady Stoneheart, for instance) that the show has announced it either won't cover, or it will cover very differently.

      The biggest problem, however, is the books in the series come out years apart. Game of Thrones is one season per year. Season Five is overtaking certain plot points in the series, especially since the order of events in the show doesn't always match the publication order of the books. Season Four even had a few events that were canon, yet haven't yet been featured in the book series. And it seems pretty clear that the show is going to finish before the book series does. The only question is when one will completely overtake the other.

    15. Re: You can get all of season 5 leaked by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, Game of Thrones is a Spring series. No Winter for another eight months, thank you!

    16. Re:You can get all of season 5 leaked by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I want to enjoy GoT. Suffering GRRM's atrociously pseudo-victorian prose to gather a few gleanings of actual story amongst the flowery descriptions of dishes present at luncheon isn't something I want to waste time on. HBO did ASoFaI better than GRRM did.

      For almost every epic fantasy I've read, I've read the book first, then watched the adaptation. GoT is the big exception, and I found I just.. I just couldn't get through book 1. Somehow there's a disconnect for me that I don't get from other series, even the much-more-boring Wheel of Time.

    17. Re:You can get all of season 5 leaked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on! How does that even make any sense?!

      How would someone writing books about a TV series, know what's happening next?!

      I guess you don't realize that the books came first and its a tv series taken from the books, not the other way around

    18. Re:You can get all of season 5 leaked by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      I guess you don't realize that the TV series has almost caught up with the books, and this season will have events in it that go beyond what the books have covered so far.

    19. Re: You can get all of season 5 leaked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not exactly I've read the books and also watched the first 4 episodes and for some characters they go past what happens in a dance with dragons. They also change ALOT. I'll just say two major characters that everyone loves may or may not die by episode 4
        that are still alive in the book that will be a total shock to book readers "red wedding" style shock

  2. Re:And nothing of value was gained... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still a better story than your b.s. comment.

  3. Re:And nothing of value was gained... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Still a better story than your b.s. comment.

    No, reading his comment was over quicker than watching game of thrones

  4. Good guy HBO by Hashead · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Our experience is [piracy] leads to more penetration, more paying subs, more health for HBO, less reliance on having to do paid advertising If you go around the world, I think you're right, Game of Thrones is the most pirated show in the world. Well, you know, that's better than an Emmy.

    That right there is why I happily pay a premium for a technically poor streaming service (HBO Nordic ). Even though it's much easier for me to download episodes than to use the service, I still think that HBO has met me half way in providing their content in a reasonable, fair manner. Time to put our money where our mouths are.

    1. Re:Good guy HBO by silas_moeckel · · Score: 0, Troll

      If they would just cut out the DRM I would buy it from them. I want my media to play on my devices and I want to own it not rent it.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    2. Re:Good guy HBO by peragrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Funny I am the opposite I don't want to own it. I want to rent it. Why. Because once watched I probably won't ever watch it again at least not for another decade. I have been ditching dvd's since I rarely rewatch them. Exceptions are made I own several series. However most are once and done.

      Then again I am smart enough to remember the movies the first time.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    3. Re:Good guy HBO by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Because once watched I probably won't ever watch it again at least not for another decade.

      I can see this for some shows, but GoT is one I almost always watch at least twice. It's such a huge cast that if I don't review key parts of the last season before the next one starts, I forget minor details, like who got married and brought 17 new characters from their family into House Evilempire, or who arrived/left locations X and Y, or who died in a spectacular betrayal by their formerly loyal henchman/sibling/dog.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    4. Re:Good guy HBO by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Soon watching shows online will be like taking a book out of the library (except there will be unlimited copies). You'll get a subscription to the service and will have access to everything they ever offered. I can mobile devices eventually acting like PVRs allowing you to login, store content for your travels. As far as I'm concerned the Netflix model is the future of visual entertainment.

    5. Re:Good guy HBO by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      If they would just cut out the DRM I would buy it from them. I want my media to play on my devices and I want to own it not rent it.

      So I stream it (using a friend's account..), and buy it in Blu-Ray when it comes out 9 months later for permanent watching and extras (which are actually pretty interesting..).

    6. Re:Good guy HBO by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Soon watching shows online will be like taking a book out of the library (except there will be unlimited copies).

      I'd love to believe that, but it doesn't look like the direction we're moving towards.

      You'll get a subscription to the service and will have access to everything they ever offered.

      The problem with this is that the media companies own the distribution rights. They always have, they always will. They HATE the Netflix model, but there's really nothing they can do to stop it for physical media. Netflix by mail is a fantastic, fantastic series. Netflix streaming is terrible thanks to their shitty selection. Everyone has a shitty selection, but Netflix is hit particularly hard because most Hollywood studios and other various media conglomerates detest the Netflix subscription model. They don't want subscriptions, they want high-cost pay-per-view. They want demand-based pricing, so you don't know what you'll have to pay until it's time to order. They want you to pay $6 for a 24-hour dvd-quality stream, and $9 for an hd-quality stream (or more, or less, based on popularity, remember).

      The online streaming situation is fucked up because power has shifted back to the media companies. Legally, they can't really stop Netflix from renting out discs under Netflix's terms. But online streaming is something they control entirely, and they want the age of Netflix-style subscription services to end.

    7. Re:Good guy HBO by nblender · · Score: 1

      I used to be smart enough to remember movies the first time... I don't think I got dumb, but I definitely got 'old.

      old != dumb.

    8. Re:Good guy HBO by houghi · · Score: 1

      That right there also shows that they perhaps leaked it themselves. Especially with thye cliffhanger on the end of episode 4 and episode 5 not being leaked.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    9. Re:Good guy HBO by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      Effectively paying twice for one piece of content.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    10. Re:Good guy HBO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny I am the opposite I don't want to own it. I want to rent it. Why. Because once watched I probably won't ever watch it again at least not for another decade. I have been ditching dvd's since I rarely rewatch them. Exceptions are made I own several series. However most are once and done.

      Then again I am smart enough to remember the movies the first time.

      If you were smart enough to remember movies the first time then you would be smart enough to remember that they are rehashed stories and the really smart people don't actually watch movies or TV.

    11. Re: Good guy HBO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wish I was smart enough to remember movies...

    12. Re:Good guy HBO by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Sometimes I subscribe but then download the torrent anyway. Virgin Media is too shitty to sustain high quality streaming in my area (been promising upgrades for months), and hay, I paid for it so I have no moral qualms about just downloading a high quality rip and watching that instead. If anything it increases their profits as they don't have to provide the streaming data I paid for.

      Unfortunately there is no HBO streaming service for the UK.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:Good guy HBO by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Ah, you missed the part where I said I was streaming off a friend's account.

      But is it really that odd an idea anyway? I go to the movie theater, I like it, I buy it on Blu-Ray, paying twice for the same content.

  5. Keeping spoilers close to the chest??? by khchung · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is that a joke? The series followed the book (thankfully) close enough that anyone can know what's coming by RTFB.

    --
    Oliver.
    1. Re:Keeping spoilers close to the chest??? by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a friend of mine read the entire series and uses it to drop spoilers as punishment when someone insults him. Having read the series myself I am naturally immune.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    2. Re:Keeping spoilers close to the chest??? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2

      anyone can know what's coming by RTFB.

      Until next year. Given that GRRM's shown no interest in accelerating his writing and it must have been 5+ years since the last book, it's likely that the TV show will overtake the paper version within the next season or so. Reportedly, their general strategy is that since the TV show only follows the general storyline rather than being 1:1 with the books in recent seasons anyway, they will get an advance outline of the future of the story and work from that instead.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    3. Re:Keeping spoilers close to the chest??? by Grantbridge · · Score: 1

      Actually, this series is diverging pretty heavily from the books.

    4. Re:Keeping spoilers close to the chest??? by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a friend of mine read the entire series and uses it to drop spoilers as punishment when someone insults him. Having read the series myself I am naturally immune.

      He hasn't read the entire series as the last two books aren't out yet. In fact, the show is supposed to move beyond the published books this season. So you won't have to worry about him throwing out spoilers any more. Feel free to insult him... (evil grin)

    5. Re:Keeping spoilers close to the chest??? by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

      ...anyone can know what's coming...

      I hope it's not winter.

    6. Re:Keeping spoilers close to the chest??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Martin has cancelled several convention appearances this year to try and finish book 6 before the end of the year.

      He's also mentioned there are some big divergences on the show from the upcoming book, especially considering the status of some characters on the show vs. the books.

    7. Re:Keeping spoilers close to the chest??? by Nukenbar · · Score: 1

      How about Sansa getting carted off to Winterfell to marry Ramsey Bolton? Bet you didn't know about that.

    8. Re:Keeping spoilers close to the chest??? by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 0

      Seasons 1 through 4 diverge some from the books. Season 5 apparently diverges a lot, since they're setting up for a season 6 with no book to work from.

    9. Re:Keeping spoilers close to the chest??? by pastafazou · · Score: 0

      Well we'll see if Jon Snow dies on the show like he does in the book. Or Stannis for that matter...

    10. Re:Keeping spoilers close to the chest??? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      What's a book? Is that some fancy feature only available on Samsung TVs?

  6. Re:Another slashvertisement by Hashead · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Judging by the hype and how popular it is with the general populace, it seems my decision is the correct one.

    Is that not the definition of being a hipster?

  7. Re:Another slashvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you abstain from oxygen and water too? You can't be a real iconoclast while you use those. (I'll bet you're a poser who reads books, and not scrolls like the real cool kids.)

  8. What? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would imagine it's more fun to just spend the next month watching week to week as nature intended

    I don't think nature intended us to be sitting on our asses to watch stories happen on animated flat canvases.

    1. Re:What? by netsavior · · Score: 2

      I would imagine it's more fun to just spend the next month watching week to week as nature intended

      I don't think nature intended us to be sitting on our asses to watch stories happen on animated flat canvases.

      Nature rewards us grandly for it. If "nature" didn't intend us to seek food and entertainment, our bodies wouldn't fill our junkie brains with dopamine when we do it.

    2. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I would imagine it's more fun to just spend the next month watching week to week as nature intended

      I don't think nature intended us to be sitting on our asses to watch stories happen on animated flat canvases.

      I don't think nature intended us to be sitting on our asses in front of a device to comment on Internet forums. Yet here we are...

    3. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm writing this while running on the sidewalk of a busy -- NO CARRIER ATDT5551234 RING ATA CONNECT 2400 subject is deceased.

    4. Re:What? by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      In your defense the sentence war poorly written but he's referring to the event-like nature of the show. (as previously stated in the same article).

    5. Re:What? by Holi · · Score: 1

      I don't think nature intends anything since it does not have a conscious mind.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  9. Thanks for the heads-up! by popoutman · · Score: 1

    Yes indeed, thank you to the OP, for letting me know this, so I can go and get them and tease people about them. I pay a TV license, I pay for Sky, so I've no problem about timeshifting this series. I've already paid my money.

    --
    - This sig deliberately left blank. Nothing to see, move along.
  10. Khaleesi!!!! by orcundead · · Score: 1

    AAAAHHH!!!111

  11. Re:Another slashvertisement by quantaman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh, Hugh Pickens. 'Nuf said. As if being the #1 pirated show doesn't bring it enough publicity, they have to advertise it here.

    I pride myself in the fact that I have never watched even a single episode of the show. Judging by the hype and how popular it is with the general populace, it seems my decision is the correct one.

    Silly me, I tend to base my viewing decisions on whether a particular show is good or not, whether the "right" people share my particular taste is irrelevant.

    By taking pride in not seeing a single episode you're not celebrating refined taste, you're celebrating ignorance.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  12. Sends a Terrible Message at a Critical Time by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 1
    Though they may make claims that piracy is a great compliment and testament to the show's popularity, it's clear that they would like to curtail piracy by offering legal avenues of watching the show as evidenced by their recent launch of HBO Now and scheduling the release of new episodes to happen simultaneously world wide.

    Personally, I was a hater of HBO for the last few years due to their open hostility to Netflix, their taking of sides AGAINST Net Neutrality and their tying of their streaming service to Comcast et al -- but I've come to forgive them a bit because of their work with Amazon in bringing their back catalog of originals for internet streaming free to Amazon Prime users and their launch of HBO Now, which I have signed up for.

    So it pains me a bit to see HBO change tact and offer a compelling streaming service only to suffer a massive leak by a trusted party so soon after it's debut. While I'm sure HBO will take it in stride, I've long said that if these bad actors like HBO could offer legal channels to get their content without a wait, I would sign-up and not pirate. But, with this action and the amount of seeders and leachers, it seems the use case claimed by many -- that they only pirate due to not having a clear legal means to watch without having to wait several months for the DVD release -- is the exception and not the rule.

    1. Re:Sends a Terrible Message at a Critical Time by C0R1D4N · · Score: 1

      The streaming service is in no way responsible for the leak, it's obviously from a screener (since there is even a blurred out watermark in the corner of the screen). I would have gladly paid for the streaming service (I am 'lucky' enough to be a Cablevision customer), but fuck them for charging $15 a month for it AND making me wait a day after airing. Game of Thrones is the only show I want from HBO currently and I'm not spending $15 for a fraction of the content offered by Hulu or Netflix.

    2. Re:Sends a Terrible Message at a Critical Time by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      It's a real shame all of this variety is only for the US.

      Living in Argentina, I've no way of getting HBO other than old cable TV. It's prohibit expensive, and you actually have to pay an additional bonus for HDTV, and a second bonus for HBO.

      I wonder why their online subscription is not available worldwide (and even better: at locally adjusted pricing).

    3. Re:Sends a Terrible Message at a Critical Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it pains me a bit to see HBO change tact and offer a compelling streaming service only to suffer a massive leak by a trusted party so soon after it's debut.

      I don't know why anyone bothers with digital watermarks given how easy they are to work around. It's all digital so it's next to zero cost for a provider to create reviewer-specific streams that drop specific frames, hue shift and/or audio tricks (e.g. blips).

    4. Re:Sends a Terrible Message at a Critical Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry but no. Here in Venezuela we have HBO Go.

      Of course you must be a suscriber to HBO Package on a cable/satellite operator, but that's another issue...

  13. It is important to clarify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that four, is nearly half of ten. In the same way we clarify to the average American that some things are the size of cars, football-fields, or elephants.

  14. HBO has loved piracy for 20+ years – full qu by Khopesh · · Score: 1
    In Time Warner's quarterly earnings call on 2013/08/07, Tuna Amobi of S&P U.S. Equity Research Services asked CEO Jeff Bewkes about piracy and Game of Thrones. The end of the call, as transcribed (and emphasized) by Business Insider:

    Tuna Amobi: Game of Thrones has obviously had a phenomenal performance, but one other issue that has come up with regards to that title is the online piracy. I think by all accounts one of the highest pirated shows and I'm not aware what you guys have done to kind of address that. It seems that you have viewed it as kind of a compliment in terms of looking the other way so much. Is that the right way of thinking? Kind of a paradigm shift with the piracy and its impact on shows going forward that what you've done.

    [...]

    Time Warner CEO Jeff Bewkes: To end on Game of Thrones on HBO, I have to confess I think you're right. I have to admit, our first reaction to how much people want to watch it — now first of all it's got ratings of 14, 15 million — a lot of it is VOD [video on demand] on your TV system, an increasing amount of it is VOD on your [HBO]Go Service.

    It's just really strengthening not just the image, but the engagement of our subs [subscribers] with HBO programming, it's also getting them familiar and more involved with using the video on demand capabilities of HBO and don't forget, the television part. The part where you go to your house and you turn on that big screen TV watching it over the video plan, also the HBO Go service where Game of Thrones is the leading introduction manual for how to use HBO Go which more and more people are doing.

    Then go to people watching it who aren't subs, it's a tremendous word of mouth thing, the issue would be if they were doing it and because they could get it not subscribing, we don't see much of that.

    Basically, we've been dealing with this issue for years with HBO, literally 20, 30 years, where people have always been running wires down on the back of apartment buildings and sharing with their neighbors.

    Our experience is, it all leads to more penetration, more paying subs, more health for HBO, less reliance on having to do paid advertising — we don't do a whole lot of paid advertising on HBO, we let the programming and the views talk for us — it seems to be working.

    If you go around the world, I think you're right, Game of Thrones is the most pirated show in the world. Well, you know, that's better than an Emmy. (laughter)

    --
    Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
  15. As long as you don't mind spoilers for 11+ months by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 4, Informative

    I still think that HBO has met me half way in providing their content in a reasonable, fair manner.

    I've bought legal copies of the previous seasons on Blu-Ray, lacking better options for seeing them. HBO's insistence on not releasing each season on disc until just before the next one (with the inevitable resulting spoilers in between) really annoys me.

    When I've paid full price -- and it's an expensive price for a show with only 10 episodes per season -- for something that from my point of view was only just released, I don't appreciate seeing trailers and promos for the new season that show the person in supposedly mortal jeopardy at the end of the episode I just watched is going to make it/not make it/turn into an angel and fly away. This has been happening even in between old shows I'm rewatching on second-rate freeview TV channels for more than a month (advertising the new GoT season coming up on an expensive premium channel not conveniently available where I am). They even had two principal characters on the front cover of TV magazines at the store last week.

    I'm generally anti-piracy, but this is a show that depends on the big plot twists and no-one-is-safe surprises, and I'm far more likely to give up and just rip it on-line as so many others do because of the spoilers than for any other reason. Or just give up watching at all, because why bother when the story has already been ruined anyway?

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  16. Piracy. Either condone it, or embrace it. by geekmux · · Score: 1, Funny

    "...Game of Thrones has consistently set records for piracy, which has almost been a point of pride for HBO. "Our experience is [piracy] leads to more penetration, more paying subs, more health for HBO, less reliance on having to do paid advertising If you go around the world, I think you're right, Game of Thrones is the most pirated show in the world. Well, you know, that's better than an Emmy."

    Hey assholes, either condone piracy, or embrace it. One or the other.

    You can't sit here and champion the benefits piracy clearly brings to your business while wanting to attack those same pirates with your infringement legal team.

    1. Re:Piracy. Either condone it, or embrace it. by itzly · · Score: 1

      You can't sit here and champion the benefits piracy clearly brings to your business while wanting to attack those same pirates with your infringement legal team.

      Of course they can. Or are you going to stop them ?

    2. Re:Piracy. Either condone it, or embrace it. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      A nuanced response to piracy seems to me to be a very good thing. Individuals sharing your stuff? That's free advertising and lots of companies would kill for it. Somebody you trusted with a screener leaking it? That's a breach of trust and you shouldn't feel any qualms about going after them. Professional pirate pressing thousands of copies and profiting from selling them? Again, no problems going after that.

    3. Re:Piracy. Either condone it, or embrace it. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      A nuanced response to piracy seems to me to be a very good thing. Individuals sharing your stuff? That's free advertising and lots of companies would kill for it.

      OK, so there's one way of looking at free advertising. Sharing is cool. Got it.

      Somebody you trusted with a screener leaking it? That's a breach of trust and you shouldn't feel any qualms about going after them. Professional pirate pressing thousands of copies and profiting from selling them? Again, no problems going after that.

      Oh, I see. So, as long as you wrap a pretty word like "sharing" around theft, it's cool and considered free advertising...but the minute someone charges 25 cents to cover the cost of the blank media for that "shared" copy, oh they're suddenly now a professional pirate. Throw the fucking book at them.

      I sure as hell hope you now see my original point regarding businesses championing piracy, because you couldn't have made the conflict of interest any more clear with your examples here.

    4. Re:Piracy. Either condone it, or embrace it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...Game of Thrones has consistently set records for piracy, which has almost been a point of pride for HBO. "Our experience is [piracy] leads to more penetration, more paying subs, more health for HBO, less reliance on having to do paid advertising If you go around the world, I think you're right, Game of Thrones is the most pirated show in the world. Well, you know, that's better than an Emmy."

      Hey assholes, either condone piracy, or embrace it. One or the other.

      You can't sit here and champion the benefits piracy clearly brings to your business while wanting to attack those same pirates with your infringement legal team.

      I think the cost of copyright piracy is regarded the same way in business as government regulation. When you reach a certain place in the market it goes from "bad" to "good" because it makes it harder for competition to take root. When you are in a good position, raking in money, it becomes an acceptable cost of doing business if it screws over everyone else behind you. Look at Microsoft and their off-and-on unofficial support of unlicensed copies of Windows for example. If you are looking for some ideological reasoning here, you are lost, it's just business.

      What you have to evaluate is, is it good for the market, or good for HBO?

      When you hear about big companies nodding along to some new regulation that will cost them money, keep this in mind.

    5. Re:Piracy. Either condone it, or embrace it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      either condone piracy, or embrace it. One or the other.

      Um, did you mean condemn? Or perhaps you meant "one then the other"... I'm sure it was just a confusing typo.

    6. Re:Piracy. Either condone it, or embrace it. by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 0

      The situation changed quite a bit when they recently launched HBO Now. For non-cable subscribers, piracy used to be the only option. Now it's not.

    7. Re:Piracy. Either condone it, or embrace it. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Your post indicates you don't understand the meaning of the word "profit." I chose that term carefully, and note that it anticipates your "25 cents to cover the cost of the blank media." Perhaps you should spend a few minutes on Wikipedia and then come back with something less superficial?

    8. Re:Piracy. Either condone it, or embrace it. by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see. So, as long as you wrap a pretty word like "sharing" around theft, it's cool and considered free advertising...but the minute someone charges 25 cents to cover the cost of the blank media for that "shared" copy, oh they're suddenly now a professional pirate. Throw the fucking book at them.

      It's more than that, it's probably a contract violation as well. HBO doesn't send screeners to reviewers out of the goodness of their hearts. Reviewers gain something in exchange for giving up something. What they gain is advanced access to the content, but what they give up is the ability to speak of it before the episodes air. Tit for tat, except this particular reviewer violated the arrangement, likely a legal agreement that he/she signed.

    9. Re:Piracy. Either condone it, or embrace it. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      either condone piracy, or embrace it. One or the other.

      Um, did you mean condemn? Or perhaps you meant "one then the other"... I'm sure it was just a confusing typo.

      Whoops, yes, I did, thank you for that clarification.

    10. Re:Piracy. Either condone it, or embrace it. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Your post indicates you don't understand the meaning of the word "profit." I chose that term carefully, and note that it anticipates your "25 cents to cover the cost of the blank media." Perhaps you should spend a few minutes on Wikipedia and then come back with something less superficial?

      When every agency responsible for controlling piracy has clearly and blatantly stated that "profit" is not a factor in determining theft of IP, I find it funny that you want to now call it out here. I'm sorry. Would a price tag of $5 make you feel better or worse about being wrong?

      A guy giving away DVDs of the latest movie screener is going to get the same amount of legal attention as the guy selling them, as was the case here. The only thing I question is whether or not the "guy" was employed by HBO to pull this stunt, and I say that only because of their apparent willingness to allow this show to be pirated.

  17. Re:Another slashvertisement by Holi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    SO in other words, you have no idea if the show is any good or not, but you'll pull the whole superiority thing (aka I don;t even own a tv). Sorry but puffing out your chest doesn't make you any less ignorant.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  18. Seeing now against the law by Aryk · · Score: 1

    The comment that scares me the most from the summary is "watching illegaly"

    1. Re:Seeing now against the law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wouldn't download a car, would you?

    2. Re:Seeing now against the law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes you would. And then you can print it on your Universal Replicator. And then the manufacturer can sue you for the sum of... ONE MILLION DOLLARS!!! MWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!!!!

  19. Re:Another slashvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  20. Hey Hollywood! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That enemy you'be been fighting? You know. 'Piracy' and illegal content distrubution? Yea. That. It seems you're employing that. Good job funding your own enemy and wasting money in the process!!!

    Sorry, but HBO is part of Hollywood. And I've been enjoying it since the 80's! Thanks!

    /also not blind that they likely don't waste money, from 'Hollywood accounting'...

  21. They need better watermarks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What HBO could have done is place identifiable watermarks on frames which will change location and the mark itself based on the content time mark. Couple of frames per minute should do it without it being visible to the regular viewers.

  22. Great by symes · · Score: 0

    Wasn't this the first fictional program to premier worldwide simultaneously? I think it is kind of a shame that this globally shared event has been spoiled. When Armstrong first put his foot on the lunar surface it was watched across the world. Recently people write and complain if a shuttle launch interrupted their TV schedule. We are a miserable species - can't even hold back and wait for a fictional show about flying reptiles and chilly landscapes.

    1. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Wasn't this the first fictional program to premier worldwide simultaneously? "

      The fact that as a species we've been creating fictional programs in a distributable format for over 60-100 years now, and we have __only just__ got around to releasing something globally and simultaneously, is a testament to the success of those money-grubbing-cunts who control the media industry.

  23. Dammit, Snowden! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some leaks just go too far.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g11IxTJlhIQ

  24. Re:Another slashvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    War is peace.
    Freedom is slavery.
    Ignorance is strength.

  25. Not my type of show either.... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I'm glad so many people enjoy it, and it speaks to the quality of original television HBO has managed to create in recent years. (Great way to re-imagine themselves as they realized their classic business model wasn't going to sustain them into the future. Too much competition with the business model of offering a selection of "seen before" movies to view for a fixed monthly rate.)

    But for whatever reason (and frankly, I can't explain it!), I just can't really get into television or movies that take place in these time-frames? I could barely get through any of those medieval times movies with knights on horses jousting and dragons and castle sieges. (That's despite one of my best friends constantly watching that stuff and trying to get me into it, years ago.) Anything about ancient Rome or even non-existent fantasy worlds with similar levels of technology (a la Lord of the Rings)? Same thing .... Just not feeling it.

    And I feel kind of guilty about it, because by contrast, I love good science fiction. Anyone else out there relate to this? I feel like the only guy on the planet who loved Star Wars, Star Trek, the remake of BSG, etc. etc. -- yet who couldn't ever bring himself to bother watching The Hobbit or the LOTR trilogy!

    1. Re:Not my type of show either.... by linuxguy · · Score: 2

      You're not alone. I mostly like science fiction. Star Trek, BSG, Firefly yes. Star Wars no. And LOTR and Hobbit did not do anything for me. But, Game of Thrones is in another league. I love Game of Thrones. For me, it is as good as the hype suggests it is. I was surprised by that.

      Watch first first season of Game of Thrones and then come back and give us your feedback here. I am interested in finding out if your opinion changes.

    2. Re:Not my type of show either.... by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Let me help you over the bridge. Science fiction is often just fantasy, but with lasers and pod racers instead of swords and horses. Star Wars itself would lose little if it happened in a medieval setting (storywise, special effects would have suffered, and sadly that was 80% of the cool factor for me). I mean they already have a princess who keeps getting captured and needs rescuing by a knight...uh, I mean jedi knight. Lucky the old master is there to train the young apprentice in the way of the sword...er...force! He struggles to become strong enough to take on the black knight...um, Lord Vader. But only once the old master is defeated can the new apprentice rise above his master and defeat the black knight...fuck it, I mean Vader.

      There's an old saying, if it's fantasy the women are dressed in fur bikinis. If it's science fiction, they are wearing metallic bikinis.

      So, just take any science fiction story, and if the storyline itself could play out just as well in medieval Europe, Middle Earth or some spell casting land (swap guns and gadgets for wands, staves and magic items) then it's really just fantasy.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    3. Re:Not my type of show either.... by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      As someone who read the first book when it came out 19 years ago, (and most of the subsequent ones... I eventually gave up) I have trouble sitting through more than a single episode.

      However, I'm told that the problem I have with the books declining quality was significantly less of an issue with the series.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    4. Re:Not my type of show either.... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2

      There's an old saying, if it's fantasy the women are dressed in fur bikinis. If it's science fiction, they are wearing metallic bikinis.

      Funnily enough, I think this is one of the things that gives GoT its edge over a lot of on-screen sword and sorcery fantasy. You get women wearing realistic clothes, like expensive formal outfits at court or actually useful armour for combat. You get women wearing effectively no clothes at all. However, you rarely get much in between, and in particular you don't get women going into situations with random skimpy clothing for no apparent reason beyond the ratings. Also, while there has been (with some justification) criticism of the gratuitous nudity on the show, the same basic all-or-nothing-but-plausible divide has been true of the male characters as well.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    5. Re:Not my type of show either.... by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      It's just a matter of taste. The fact that the masses like the show is just an indicator that a majority love the show and it may be worth trying on for 3 episodes (it takes that many for this show to hook you). You may not like it and that's just fine but if you don't really try it you can never really know.

      I'm one of the stubborn people that refused to watch it. I was tired of series as they always felt cheap so for many years I just didn't watch television other than the odd sporting event. A year ago a friend with very similar taste to mine strongly suggested I watch the first 3 episodes. The first didn't get me. It took 2 more episodes to take a liking.

      Again, don't feel bad. You either like or don't like. Nobody can tell you what you like. Give them a polite F U if they aren't happy with your choices.

    6. Re:Not my type of show either.... by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      So, just take any science fiction story, and if the storyline itself could play out just as well in medieval Europe, Middle Earth or some spell casting land (swap guns and gadgets for wands, staves and magic items) then it's really just fantasy.

      I call it pseudoscience fiction. I'd call it fantasy, but then people are all "But they use sciency terminology?!?"

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  26. Re:Another slashvertisement by Ecuador · · Score: 1

    I pride myself in the fact that I have never watched even a single episode of the show.

    I can understand things like "I pride myself in the fact that I have not watched more than one episode of the show" or "more than half an episode of the show", but you are basically telling us that you are an idiot. Judging things as bad by how popular they are is not in any way better than judging things as good by how popular they are.
    Are you at least consistent? I mean maybe the "idiot" comment was harsh, I could perhaps call you a person of "strange principles", if you have also never watched things like LOTR, Avengers, Toy Story and you actually liked /. beta.

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  27. Re:Another slashvertisement by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    I pride myself in the fact that I have never watched even a single episode of the show. Judging by the hype and how popular it is with the general populace, it seems my decision is the correct one.

    That would make equal sense if you changed "watched even a single episode of the show" to "had sex".

  28. Re:Another slashvertisement by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "We are at war with Eurasia. We have always been at war with Eurasia."

    If only that book wasn't so popular, I could read it...but alas.

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
  29. Re:Another slashvertisement by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

    Spoiler alert: Bambi was from house Stark!

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
  30. I'll still pay by whistlingtony · · Score: 1

    Dear HBO,

    I'll still pay you. I paid for seasons 1-4. I'll pay for 5 on google play. I just couldn't wait, and I don't want your stupid service, since the ONLY thing you have that I want is GoT.

    Me, and pretty much everyone.

    1. Re:I'll still pay by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      I'll still pay you. I paid for seasons 1-4. I'll pay for 5 on google play. I just couldn't wait, and I don't want your stupid service, since the ONLY thing you have that I want is GoT. Me, and pretty much everyone.

      Maybe you should look into True Detective as well. That one was pretty good, and Silicon Valley is pretty good for a comedy, especially given it's CS subject matter.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  31. I only watched the first episdoe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you're used to watching in 1080i (with Deinterlace on auto using yadif x2), the 480p version looks like absolute junk.

    Not only that, it looks to me like the quality has been intentionally gimped. It's an eyesore.

  32. Re:Another slashvertisement by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

    Is that not the definition of being a hipster?

    He probably vapes clove flavored juice too!

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  33. money money money by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    They should perhaps consider selling to a real network that people actually watch or licensing to a streaming service so they can actually make some money off the show. HBO is a giant black hole of not making anything on your show.

    1. Re:money money money by praxis · · Score: 1

      What makes a network real? Does it require a central authority dictating programming to each affiliate? Does it require terrestrial broadcast capability? Does it require orbital broadcast capability? All three?

      As it stands, I will end up paying them $30 to watch their product commercial free when it is released. Do you think that Game of Thrones is worth more money? How much do you think they should charge? How many commercials would a "real" network have to inject into their broadcasts to recoup what they'd have paid HBO for the license to it?

  34. bla bla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bla bla "leaked" bla bla "leads to more penetration"
    next time "leak" the entire season

  35. Seems like an intentional leak by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    Hmmm...this sounds like an intentional leak by HBO to me.

    1) Story is out the day the season debuts
    2 ) "Equivalent to standard-definition TV, not HD"
    3) "Episode four ends on a heck of a cliffhanger"
    4) HBO confirms leak but can't find the leaker

    Anyway, meh. I'll still download the HD version of episode 1 tomorrow from some pirate site like 50% of the rest of GoT viewership - "standard TV" doesn't do it for me anymore.

    1. Re:Seems like an intentional leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AND 30 day free trial of HBO NOW = 4 free episodes. Also, HBO, i would like to pay for your service without paying the apple tax of needing to own a apple device.... I own a old Iphone 3gs but you need ios 7 or better to even dl the app to sign up

  36. why? by SuperDre · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I still don't understand why people want to watch such a crap quality (480p and blurred watermark)..

    1. Re: why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because it's not about the quality of the screen ,it's about the story and the show I am watching( which doesn't change), for free.... but hey if you've got the money why don't you spend it in something that's free!

    2. Re: why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhm, the story is already available in the books, which have been out quite a bit longer.

    3. Re: why? by praxis · · Score: 1

      The story in the book and the story in the show, while very similar, is not actually the same.

    4. Re:why? by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      It may surprise you that a lot of people watch shows primarily for the content and story; any nice effects, design, and clarity is secondary so long as it does not affect the story. For these people, 480p is more than acceptable.

  37. Re:As long as you don't mind spoilers for 11+ mont by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 0

    They just launched HBO Now, so your complaint is moot.

  38. Re:Another slashvertisement by snookiex · · Score: 1

    How can a deer be part of a wolves clan? Shouldn't it be a Baratheon?

    --
    Open Source Network Inventory for the masses! Kuwaiba
  39. It's a trap by I+Read+Good · · Score: 1

    I smell an MPAA honeydick.

    1. Re:It's a trap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bring it! The MPAA have no dicks!

  40. Re:As long as you don't mind spoilers for 11+ mont by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    They just launched HBO Now, so your complaint is moot.

    I know, but as I'm in the UK, my complaint remains perfectly valid.

    Here your legal options are basically limited to either getting Sky or relying on one of the very limited number of on-line options. All of these require dedicated equipment and/or work out absurdly expensive if GoT is the only exclusive show on the service that you're interested in watching. As I understand it, you're also still likely to get interrupted by ad breaks and logos/banners spammed all over the screen -- an insultingly inferior experience to just playing a disc and enjoying the show, and you're paying a premium for the "privilege".

    Personally, all I'd need to avoid the disappointment is a simple and reasonably priced pay-per-view option to watch in sync with everyone else. With no real effort at all they could at least release the box set of discs as soon as the season has finished like every other show ever. In practice that would probably still avoid the worst of the spoilers, because usually people are pretty good about not assuming everyone saw this show live. The biggest spoilers I had for season 4, which I just finished watching, were all the trailers and promos for season 5, which obviously only start happening nearly a year after season 4 finished its first run.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  41. Re:As long as you don't mind spoilers for 11+ mont by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I've paid full price -- and it's an expensive price for a show with only 10 episodes per season -- for something that from my point of view was only just released.

    It's an expensive show.

  42. Re:As long as you don't mind spoilers for 11+ mont by ksheff · · Score: 1

    If they have an Apple device that they can use to watch it. I've been debating whether it is worth it. If I want to watch it on my TV, I'd have to shell out for an HDMI adapter or an Apple TV. Given that there is just a $20 difference, I may end get the latter.

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  43. Re:Another slashvertisement by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

    He didn't say he read the books, so he only went at most half hipster.

    For full hipster credit, he would had to 1. say he read the books before the show came out, 2. say that they were ruined by the TV show and 3. found a way to say the books were much better than the TV show he's supposedly never seen WITHOUT saying "because it's popular."

  44. "event" shows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >"Game of Thrones is one of the last true "event" shows where it's something you want to talk about Sunday night or Monday morning with friends and strangers alike."

    Could this be done around some kind of water cooler?

  45. Re:As long as you don't mind spoilers for 11+ mont by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what you're saying is that there *are* legal ways for you to get the show earlier and avoid being spoiled?

    U.S.-based shows rarely release their box sets right after the season ends. They generally wait until the next season is almost on so they can advertise the new season on the box.

  46. Meh by Holi · · Score: 1

    480p crappy resolution.

    I can wait.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  47. Re:Another slashvertisement by Holi · · Score: 1

    You pride your self in you ignorance. You admit to never having watched it, and you say that because it's popular that you choice was correct. Did it not occur to you that maybe it's popular be cause it is good?

    I get it your young, especially going by your id# but hey, your beer is too hoppy, your pants are too tight, and no one cares to hear you say you don't watch the show we are taking about. If you don't watch it why are you commenting on a story about it? it's very trollish of you.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  48. I tell spoilers to my friends by houghi · · Score: 1

    When "I am Legend" came out, I spoiled it for all my friends by telling them how it ended. That showed them.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:I tell spoilers to my friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  49. Re:As long as you don't mind spoilers for 11+ mont by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    So what you're saying is that there *are* legal ways for you to get the show earlier and avoid being spoiled?

    Reportedly, but as far as I know I don't have any way to use any of them without spending many times the cost of the box set just on one kind of equipment or another and then another significant multiple of the box set cost on the subscription/streaming/whatever for the show itself. So as long as I don't mind a 1000-2000% mark-up, sure, I can probably avoid being spoiled (unless you count the other inferior aspects I mentioned as spoiling the show in another sense, of course).

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  50. Re:As long as you don't mind spoilers for 11+ mont by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    I know, but charging me X for the box set just after it finished wouldn't cost them anything compared to charging me X nearly a year later. In fact, it would benefit them a little in terms of cash flow and probably very slightly due to inflation. And obviously it would benefit them compared to me being fed up with the spoilers and consequently not bothering to buy the next season on disc at all. I enjoy the show, but I enjoy plenty of other shows too, and I could just as easily spend similar money on 20+ episodes of one of them instead of 10 episodes of GoT next time I'm on Amazon.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  51. Re:As long as you don't mind spoilers for 11+ mont by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    If they have an Apple device that they can use to watch it.

    Nope.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  52. Re:As long as you don't mind spoilers for 11+ mont by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless you don't drink Apple Coolaid or use some obscure ISP HBO decided to support. Outside of those use cases you are still hosed.

  53. Not Enough Hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This just means there wasn't enough hype about Game of Thrones at the moment. Same reason why rappers leak albums :)

  54. Damn you! by AntiSol · · Score: 1

    Usually, I love leaks. But I hate whoever leaked this.

    The temptation to just watch them all in a one-sitting GoT orgy is going to be seriously difficult to resist for the next 4 weeks.

    But if I do that, I'll have to wait a month for more GoT. Waiting 7 days for each new episode is bad enough. Now I've got that wait plus the temptation to just watch the next one. Either way, the next 4 weeks are going to be torture.

    Bastard.

    1. Re:Damn you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already watched it...all 4 leaked episodes and it was.... freaking nice ;P

  55. Re:Another slashvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I think the point of the story was that a content provider has finally acknowledged that piracy, if anything, helps their cause:

    Our experience is [piracy] leads to more penetration, more paying subs, more health for HBO, less reliance on having to do paid advertising.

  56. Re:As long as you don't mind spoilers for 11+ mont by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    borrowing a copy from a friend is not illegal.

  57. Re:Another slashvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's up there with the most obnoxiously ignorant comment I've read this morning, and I've been messing about on YouTube since 4am.

  58. Re:As long as you don't mind spoilers for 11+ mont by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    A copy of what, exactly? No-one has a physical copy at that stage, so there's nothing to borrow.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  59. Re:As long as you don't mind spoilers for 11+ mont by ksheff · · Score: 1

    Well, the HBO Now intro page does state that it's only available in the US and some US territories. So, yes, fans in other countries are still out of luck until all the licensing stuff is worked out.

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  60. Stupid policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as HBO and other studios continue the brain dead policy to release movies at different times across the globe, the pirating will continue. In times of ubiquotous and mostly free access to world wide distribution channels, aka the internet, it remains a mistery why some people still believe they can control access by geographical regions. Mind you, the policies make sense if you think you have a handle on access and that access is worth $$. But if you don't it just means you are better off to offer payed access from day 1, globally. The wast majority of today's freeloaders would happily pay if the opportunity were given to them.

  61. I didn't expect them to be so enlightened. by sabbede · · Score: 1

    "Our experience is [piracy] leads to more penetration, more paying subs, more health for HBO, less reliance on having to do paid advertising If you go around the world, I think you're right, Game of Thrones is the most pirated show in the world. Well, you know, that's better than an Emmy."

    If that view was more widespread, we wouldn't have to deal with DRM that only interferes with paying users.

  62. In the game of complete season releases, by sixsixtysix · · Score: 1

    you play or you die.

    --
    ...
  63. Thanks for the info. by franciscoeduca · · Score: 1

    Thanks, have a nice day ;) http://www.educa.net/opiniones...