Slashdot Mirror


Internet Explorer's Successor, Project Spartan, Is Called Microsoft Edge

An anonymous reader writes: At its Build 2015 developer conference today, Microsoft announced Project Spartan will be called Microsoft Edge. Joe Belfiore, Microsoft's corporate vice president of the operating systems group, announced the news on stage, adding that Edge will have support for extensions. Edge is Microsoft's new browser shipping on all Windows 10 devices (PCs, tablets, smartphones, and so on). Belfiore explained the name as referring to "being on the edge of consuming and creating."

83 of 153 comments (clear)

  1. Hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    On the edge of relevance, more like!

    1. Re:Hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Google thanks you for your loyalty. And the x-year long history of add-on choices, Web searches, personal and business correspondence, phone records, daily movements, Web browsing, and whatever other personal, private information you have given to them. You truly will be a warning to future generations.

      (chrome, search, android / voice, android, doubleclick, other)

    2. Re:Hah! by fisted · · Score: 2

      Well, these last days our Windows support has made Google inaccessible (peer disconnected all the time).

      I hate that damn peer guy, he disconnects me from IRC all the time, too. Happen to know where he lives?

      *sharpens fists in a giant pencil sharpener*

    3. Re:Hah! by WillKemp · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, one thing Microsoft does well - the only thing - is their anticompetitive strategy.

    4. Re:Hah! by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      No other search site worked, except one... guess which was the only search still working?

      Ned Ryerson?

    5. Re: Hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I just filter out double click. Never see it again.

    6. Re:Hah! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Why discount it so immediately?

      Because if it is any good, it will be the exception that proves the rule.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    7. Re:Hah! by MightyMartian · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And Microsoft's market share of mobile devices is almost as pathetic as BlackBerry's. So why would any mobile app developer even give a fuck about some porting tools?

      Face it. Microsoft lost the mobile game; not once, but like three times now.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    8. Re:Hah! by davester666 · · Score: 1

      renamed to get away from the stink of "Internet Explorer"

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    9. Re:Hah! by Cafe+Alpha · · Score: 1

      Yeah, one thing Microsoft does well - the only thing - is their anticompetitive strategy.

      Which is why Edge has to be horrible beyond the imaginings of mere mortals.

    10. Re:Hah! by Anomander · · Score: 1

      You mean this guy?

    11. Re:Hah! by BVis · · Score: 1

      Because it's a browser from Microsoft. They don't have a great track record. I can't wait to see all the "standards" they make up so that everyone has to do their site design twice.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    12. Re:Hah! by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      If you're referring to Surface, surely by now you have to admit it has failed to live up to expectations.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  2. Microsoft Edge? by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 4, Funny

    So.. ME instead of IE? ME.... reminds me of Windows ME. *shudder*.

    --
    You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
    1. Re:Microsoft Edge? by Adriax · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nah, just E.
      It will be introduced to the public via incredibly annoying commercials featuring stereotypical frat guys telling each other "Duuuude! She so wants the E!" "Ya man, I showed her my E last night and she was all over it!" and so on. Ending with them in uncomfortable silence after one of them (probably the token uncool guy) makes a homoerotic comment about another guy's E.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    2. Re:Microsoft Edge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ... why does that sound so horribly plausible?

    3. Re:Microsoft Edge? by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Microsoft have always had problems naming things.
      The rationale for calling the browser Edge, shows their corporate Think: "being on the edge of consuming and creating". Really? The MS marketing dept. fucked that up well and truly.
      The issue here is that they could have called it what they wanted and associated any wordage to it, patted themselves on the back and gone out to a very long lunch. What they failed to do is to use the word in a sentence. "Have you got Edge?"
      No I haven't. I'm as blunt as the family vagina.
      Here MS had a unique opportunity to actually rename their browser and they came up with shit... again.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    4. Re:Microsoft Edge? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Nah, just E. It will be introduced to the public via incredibly annoying commercials.

      They'll probably ressurect that annoying "You're getting a Dell" guy.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    5. Re:Microsoft Edge? by Livius · · Score: 1

      And then they'll put it on computers and call it e-E.

    6. Re:Microsoft Edge? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      I thought they were dead until Slashdot reported the horror that Apple was providing users with FREE content. :)

    7. Re:Microsoft Edge? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nah, just E.

      Well, at least users won't be confused. They can still "click on the E" to get to the Internet.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    8. Re:Microsoft Edge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Behold the worst commercial by any company ever:

      The Martinettis Bring Home A Computer by Apple, Inc.

    9. Re:Microsoft Edge? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Free?

      Free as in beer?
      Free as in speech?
      Free as in a kick in the nuts?

      It's not just the best things in live that are free.
      The worst things in live are free too.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    10. Re:Microsoft Edge? by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I've been thinking it ties in to other parts of their naming scheme, like Surface. "Use Edge on Surface." All they need is a Microsoft Corner or maybe Internet Bevel and they can capture the lucrative carpenters market.

  3. Seriously, Slashdot? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    What's the slashdot equivalent of "shitpost?" You might have at least mentioned that it's going to have a new renderer and support for extensions, rather than just farting out a 3 sentence blurb about the name.

    However, only Edge will use Microsoft’s new rendering engine of the same name. ...
    Developers will be able to take their Chrome extensions or Firefox add-ons and, with “just a few changes,” bring them to Microsoft Edge. Belfiore demoed a Reddit extension originally built for Chrome, running on Microsoft Edge.

    And yeah, the "Reddit extension" in question is RES (Reddit Enhancement Suite).

    1. Re:Seriously, Slashdot? by JabrTheHut · · Score: 1

      Developers will be able to take their Chrome extensions or Firefox add-ons and, with “just a few changes,” bring them to Microsoft Edge. Belfiore demoed a Reddit extension originally built for Chrome, running on Microsoft Edge.

      I wondered why they'd bothered, but this might explain part of it. It's been ages since MS had a real go at EEE. Embrace other browsers' extensions, extend the standards so they no longer work with the original browsers and then extinguish them. I don't think it'll work this time though.

      --
      Work like no one is watching. Dance like you've never been hurt. Make love like you don't need the money.
  4. Safari Does by CritterNYC · · Score: 3, Informative

    Safari works the same way. That's why folks with older Mac hardware who aren't running the latest OS can't run the latest Safari.

    1. Re:Safari Does by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, but the underlying WebKit framework still gets updates that bring better compatibility. Only the user-facing features remain static.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:Safari Does by sootman · · Score: 2

      Not forever. When updates stop, updates stop. There's a relatively short time when old OSs still get updates.

      An up-to-date 10.10 Mac shows webkit version 600.5.17. A 10.6.8 Mac has 534.59.10. A 10.3.9 Mac has 312.9. (According to http://browserspy.dk/webkit.ph... ) Current webkit nightlies (.dmg) won't run on 10.6 or 10.8. MAYBE I could build from source, but a) I doubt it and b) effectively no one, anywhere, does that.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    3. Re:Safari Does by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      That's true, but FireFox and Chrome don't maintain backwards compatibility forever, either. Firefox 16 and Chrome 21 are the last versions that support 10.5. And older, 32-bit-only machines are limited to Chrome 38 even if they're running 10.6.x. Otherwise, I think they're both still supporting 10.6.8 for now, but it is probably just a matter of time.

      IIRC, they already don't support certain features on old operating systems. For example, Chrome supports WebGL only on 10.8 and later (unless they've changed that recently). So although the UI might be getting updated and security holes might be getting fixed, they're still not getting the full upgrade experience.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    4. Re:Safari Does by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I was really surprised to learn recently that Chrome's support for OS X 10.6 is one of the main things blocking Skia from adopting C++11 library features (i.e. the things that make C++ not completely suck as a language). 10.6 has been officially unsupported for over a year and the last security update was a few months before that. It has known security holes (including one from missing bounds checking in DMA requests to the GPU that allows privilege escalation and might be exploitable from WebGL). Keeping these machines on the Internet is not really doing anyone a favour.

      It's also a bit surprising that Chrome on 10.6 can't just bundle a copy of libc++.dylib, since none of the system APIs are C++ and the only problem with linking libc++ and libstdc++ is if you use standard library types at library boundaries.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Safari Does by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      FWIW, a number of critical Foundation-level APIs are C++ under the hood. Whether linking a newer libc++ dylib would cause them to break or not, I couldn't begin to guess.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    6. Re:Safari Does by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The issue is only when you pass standard library objects across a library boundary between two libraries compiled for different standard library implementations. It's perfectly safe to pass C and Objective-C values between libraries that use libc++ and libstdc++ internally.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  5. Re:Not even going to consider it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It wasn't always like that. Windows XP went from, what, IE5 or 6 all the way up to IE9? Or something like that? Anyway I'm sure I have the version numbers wrong, but several versions were supported under XP.

  6. E = Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How are people going to tell which big E means Internet?

    1. Re:E = Internet by TWX · · Score: 2

      Well, since the current logo is an E, if the new logo is an E, then the end-user won't have any trouble knowing which icon to avoid clicking on.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:E = Internet by fisted · · Score: 1

      Hahah, that caught me by surprise. You owe me one mouth- and half a noseful of coffee.

  7. Re:FUCK LIBERALISM by beelsebob · · Score: 1

    AKA "Wow, the DMV is full of people who look different to me, because of that, I'm going to discriminate against them all".

  8. Named appropriately by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    For all the new edge use cases of extra css and js conditional statements needed to display content properly ... ducks

  9. Big News! by tsqr · · Score: 4, Funny

    The last big news about Windows 10 was Spartan. Today's big news about Windows 10 is that Spartan has been re-named.

    I can't tell you how excited I am. Really, I can't.

  10. Re:Is there anything to actually recommend Spartan by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Makes job much easier for Web developers to have a more up to date and compliant browser. Grandma and Mom's do not know what a browser and will always click the blue E out of habit because of familiarity even if Chrome is installed

  11. Re:Not even going to consider it by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

    ...except Safari, and mobile browsers in general. Also, expect XP support to disappear from Chrome shortly.

    On the other hand, Microsoft has made it a point to discourage users from installing OS upgrades, by charging lots of money for them and changing core functionality in undesirable ways.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  12. Allows them to keep the blue "e" by Lumpio- · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So that the clueless people still using it don't have to buy a new computer when the Internet disappears.

  13. Re:Is there anything to actually recommend Spartan by vux984 · · Score: 1

    No good reason for Grandma to use Chrome anyway, or anyone else for that matter.

  14. I think our namespace is getting too crowded... by itsdapead · · Score: 4, Funny

    Edge?

    Would that be named after the mobile broadband technology, the guitarist from U2 or Samsung's flagship smartphone? Why don't they give it a meaningful name that somehow relates to its function, like, er, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Mozilla, SeaMonkey... Oh, right. Failing that, why not the old, reliable pseudo Latin/Greek names: Webia, Browsium, internet startup names (MeWeb, WebBox, WeBrowse...) or even retro Unix names ('yawb', 'enie')?

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    1. Re:I think our namespace is getting too crowded... by Strudelkugel · · Score: 1

      With that logo, they should have named it "Elvis"

      --
      Imagine how much harder physics would be if electrons had feelings! -Feynman, maybe
    2. Re:I think our namespace is getting too crowded... by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 5, Insightful

      IE has long supported a header:

      X-UA-Compatible: IE=edge

      This tells it that your website is compatible with the "edge" of technology... the latest stuff the browser supports. If you don't have it, IE might determine your site needs to be run in IE6 compatibility mode.

      This idea of the "edge" has been around IE since I believe IE10. The concept has clearly stuck.

    3. Re:I think our namespace is getting too crowded... by jsepeta · · Score: 1

      Microsoft Labia has a nice ring to it.

      --
      Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
    4. Re:I think our namespace is getting too crowded... by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 1

      You joke, but no. Edge isn't just a new skin for IE -- it's a branch that removes all the compatibility cruft.

  15. Re:Internet Explorer not cool enough by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Actually I was thinking Edge will still decline due to the icon.

    Yes Mom and Grandma will still click on it out of habit, but the millenial generation won't even give it a chance. They will see the E and think of IE 7 at work and go eww and click on Chrome instead etc.

  16. They named it Edge years ago by Lodlaiden · · Score: 4, Informative

    <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge" />

    --
    Suborbital [spaceflight] is the special olympics of spaceflight. - Rei
    1. Re:They named it Edge years ago by Athanasius · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I came here to comment about, but thought to check if someone else had first.

    2. Re:They named it Edge years ago by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      No, that means latest, as in bleeding edge.

      Ie 11 has compatibility settings for Edge, 10, 9, 8, 7. How could it implement compatibility with a non existent browser?

    3. Re:They named it Edge years ago by Lodlaiden · · Score: 1

      And here I thought they were calling it Edge because the user base was about to fall off.

      --
      Suborbital [spaceflight] is the special olympics of spaceflight. - Rei
  17. Re:FUCK LIBERALISM by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    Hey everybody, Anonymous Coward is having a bad day. Could you all be a little extra nice to him?

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  18. Honestly, by fisted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Windows Idiot was much better than expected.

  19. Re:Not even going to consider it by supremebob · · Score: 1

    XP only supported IE6 through IE8. That's kind of weak considering that it was supported by Microsoft for over a decade.

  20. Was anyone else reminded of Ubuntu Edge? by MarsLander · · Score: 2

    I wonder if the trade mark that Ubuntu presumably has could come into legal dispute? https://www.indiegogo.com/proj...

  21. Edge, when you open it, you fall off it by HannethCom · · Score: 1

    This is what I, and some other people I know first thought about the new name. It is aptly named.

    --
    Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon what's the difference? All steal money from devs and control with walled gardens.
  22. From a Microsoft hater by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Informative
    I'm actually hoping that Redmond puts out a good product with W10, and if Edge works well, that will be good also.

    Microsoft has been wallowing in a Ballmer induced miasma since Vista, they have lost their way. And even though 7 didn't suck - how's that for damning with faint praise? - Windows 8 and 8.1 had the shithouse rats complaining about the stench.

    But I'm really really hoping that they climb out of the abyss, and return the user experience to XP days, which was one where people came as close to "just doing stuff" as Microsoft ever did.

    Waiting hopefully, and if they don't, it's not a huge problem, I've got my Linux and OSX machines - but maybe pappy wants a new toy, a bright shiny Windows lappy.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  23. So, its like IE... by Z80a · · Score: 1

    But grittier, dark and edgy?

  24. Re:Internet Explorer not cool enough by Entropius · · Score: 1

    Once you've eaten one shit sandwich and it tasted like ass, you're a bit leery of the same guy who says "buttttt this one's chocolate!"

  25. Re: Not even going to consider it by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Google said they're dropping XP support for Chrome this month.

  26. Re:Great name cos will push Microsoft over the edg by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Newsflash: The talented asshole who ran Apple died in 2011.

  27. Re: Not even going to consider it by pfleming · · Score: 1

    Dammit - post to undo improper mod

  28. Re:Internet Explorer not cool enough by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    I think of the Chrome at work and click on SeaMonkey.

    Why would I use anything else when given the choice?

  29. Isn't it just a rebranded IE? by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    A browser we don't need, want and would like to go away gets renamed and we celebrate like something has changed.

    I doubt they completely rewrote it. Their marketing department has a long history of talking about IE standards compliance and IE's technology leadership which is well known. So why does the marketing department get a pass this time around?

    I'm not going to call it Edge. It's just going to be newer versions of IE to me. They'd be better calling it "web browser" or "browser" and leave it at that. They don't need to market the thing because it hasn't been a selling point for a long long time; it's so bad they had to rebrand it to turn it back into a selling point when everything has a built-in browser on it today.

  30. So the... by ltjohhed · · Score: 1

    ... HTTP 500: the server made a Bono

    --
    All generalizations are false
  31. It can be worse than IE. Can it? Can it? by Cafe+Alpha · · Score: 1

    Sob!

    I wonder how thoroughly they will f*ck it up. If it's as bad as active X then the pit of despair has no bottom.

  32. How many years has it been since anyone here by Cafe+Alpha · · Score: 1

    opened IE. Web devs don't count.

    For me it's been at least a year.

    1. Re:How many years has it been since anyone here by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      I did, about a week ago. I can't see myself using it because of the GUI. It's not very easy to use on a desktop as too many things are now hidden, buried or just not there anymore.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    2. Re:How many years has it been since anyone here by Shados · · Score: 1

      IE at this point is arguably better than Firefox, the later having fallen from grace quite a bit.

      Also, I know you said web devs don't count, but recently, IE11's devtools have been updated to be pretty good. They're not on par with Chrome's, but for some stuff (sourcemaps), they're better (and are leaps and bounds better than anything available on Firefox).

    3. Re:How many years has it been since anyone here by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      For a long time, at work, I didn't have any choice. It was fairly recent that they installed FF as a secondary browser. I still use IE for some of the internal web stuff, since some of it doesn't work with FF.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  33. Re:Not even going to consider it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Considering that Windows 10 will be free for anyone with Windows 7 or Windows 8, legal copy or not, I don't see a problem. Additionally, all current browsers are shit. There isn't a single one that behaves the way I want with the features I want with the performance that I want. Microsoft does make some good products, so I'm looking forward to trying their new browser.

  34. Re: Not even going to consider it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://www.cnet.com/news/google-to-support-chrome-on-windows-xp-until-end-of-2015/

  35. Killer feature by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just watched the promo video. It looks f**king awesome!

    Away with consumption (according to the video; writing HTML) and towards creating (according to the video; drawing a smiley face)!

    The "drawing mustaches on marsupials" feating is the killer feature of a new generation of browsers.
    Can your Chrome or Firefix draw mustaches on marsupials? Does it even HAVE mustaches?
    Do you want to be a slave to consumption? Making webpages? While you can be the god of your own highlighted-random-text creations?

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  36. Longer URLs & .tgz download by renergy · · Score: 1

    So, will (or does) Spartan/Edge 1) support URLs longer than 2083 bytes (believe me, there is use for longer URLs... besides, there is no limit on their length in the http standard) 2) download foo.tgz file as foo.tgz, and not as foo.gz?

  37. Wondering by puddingebola · · Score: 1

    Wondering what the biggest problem is with IE? The quirks between different versions of the same browser, the speed? Was it that Microsoft fought the development of open web standards? Or is it just that using IE is slow and sucks? What are the ideological problems with IE, what are the technical problems, in a nutshell? People seem annoyed with the direction of Firefox's development, untrusting of Google's Chrome. What does that leave you? Opera?

  38. sounds like a phone by jsepeta · · Score: 1

    or a phailure

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
  39. Re:Not even going to consider it by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    You underestimate the longevity of a desktop computer, if it's not affected by past "plagues" (no-brand memory plague, PSU plague, capacitor plague and some problems with lead-free solder)

    I think we're gonna see a huge problem again in 2020 if Windows 7 is EOL'ed then.

  40. Microsoft and Ford? by afaiktoit · · Score: 1

    do they have some kind of name sharing agreement? explorer's and edge's?

  41. Which E to click? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Yes they will. So long as Internet Explorer and Edge are both shipped as part of Windows, you'll get "Why does buttbook look different when I click on this E vs. this E?"

  42. Will they keep the blue e logo? by Helldesk+Hound · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking that, just like each succeeding version of MS Windows was based on the same actual code base just with changes, so too will MSE be essentially MSIE under the hood PERHAPS with some cosmetic changes to make people think it's different.

    Microsoft Internet Explorer by any other name is still Microsoft Internet Explorer. I suspect that they're trying - desperately trying - to dump the poor reputation their browser has but I really doubt they would want to write the software completely from scratch like Mozilla did when they went from Netscape 4.x to Netscape 6. That was a massive job that took many years before it was good.