Slashdot Mirror


Two Gunman Killed Outside "Draw the Prophet" Event In Texas

cosm writes: ABC news reports that two armed gunman were shot and killed outside a "Draw the Prophet" event hosted in Garland Texas. From the article: "The event, sponsored by the American Freedom Defense Initiative, featured cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad, and scheduled speakers included Dutch MP Geert Wilders, who has campaigned to have the Quran banned in the Netherlands. The winner of the contest was to receive $10,000." In light of the Charlie Hebdo terrorist attacks, the Lars Vilks Muhammad drawing controversies, and the American show South Park's satirical depiction of the state of Muhammad phobia in the US and elsewhere, is there an end in sight to the madness associated with the representation of this religious figure?

26 of 1,097 comments (clear)

  1. Looks like the prophet's gunmen by phayes · · Score: 5, Funny

    were slow at the draw - texas style...

    --
    Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    1. Re:Looks like the prophet's gunmen by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      After the Paris "Charlie Hebdo" shooting, it was obvious that such an event, in Texas, would be well protected against similar attacks. Isn't that attack another proof that fanaticism == stupidity?

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    2. Re:Looks like the prophet's gunmen by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, when all you have to convince people that they should work for you is promises of eternal bliss after death without any kind of proof, you can't really expect nobel prize material to flock to you...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Looks like the prophet's gunmen by pitchpipe · · Score: 5, Funny
      I guess to see this coming would have required an actual prophet.

      Good riddance to bad rubbish.

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    4. Re:Looks like the prophet's gunmen by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, when all you have to convince people that they should work for you is promises of eternal bliss after death without any kind of proof, you can't really expect nobel prize material to flock to you...

      Not sure that's the only reason. Some of these people are just looking for something in which they can get deeply involved, out of the ordinary society stuff. They would actually love being enrolled in some armies to fight for a country, kill or be killed, but they just don't see themselves fighting for our western countries. So the actual reason may not really be Santa Claus / God / Mahomet / [...] and the "eternal bliss", but just the desire to fight for something in which they feel more free than within the regular organized and stricter western armies.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    5. Re:Looks like the prophet's gunmen by vongillern · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you are so afraid that you need to carry a gun to work with you, then you may want to consider moving to a safer area.

      What utter horseshit. what if you're poor and can't afford the safer area? You can't defend yourself because you work a menial job, or went into bankruptcy after a major medical condition. Guns are the great equalizer and everyone deserves to have them and defend themselves.

    6. Re:Looks like the prophet's gunmen by tranquilidad · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "...then you may want to consider moving to a safer area."

      I wish that were so easy. I'm licensed to carry a concealed weapon and carry my pistol pretty much wherever I go. The only time I had to defend myself I was in a very safe area. It just so happens that was the same are where someone decided he was going to start beating the woman who was with him. He took exception to me witnessing the beating and calling the police and decided I would be the next target of his rage. Fortunately, as with most defensive uses of a handgun, I didn't have to fire a shot.

      If needing to defend oneself was restricted to specific geographic areas then I would, as you suggest, simply move to a safer area. The problem is you don't know where something will happen and the only question will be whether or not you're prepared.

  2. Like deer hunting in Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They place containers of corn in plain site of their blinds for weeks, then hide out on opening day of hunting season and take the deer by the dozens

    Seems like they were baiting for 'terrorists' in a similar way

    1. Re:Like deer hunting in Texas by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 5, Funny

      Jihadi honeypots! Like rattlesnake roundups, but much more ecologically friendly.

  3. Re:Don't mess with Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It was the cops who shot the gunmen, so what the 2nd has to do with it, I can't fathom.

  4. Re:Suicide mission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't care what your belief is, there is a right to turn up and speak your mind. The alternative is a cult - an unquestioned entity that demands belief based on no facts. If your only response to criticism is bullets then your argument is weak, and what you believe in is worth no more than some madmen willing to defend it with bombs, death and fear. Unscientific dross. State your point and then leave. If your point doesn't hold water then we're under no obligation. Killing us won't prove your point, it just reduces our number but not our resolve.

    Do they deserve to have a voice? Yes.

    Do they have the right to be heard? Yes.

    Do their words have to be heard? No.

    Say what you will but don't expect everyone to listen.

  5. Re:Suicide mission by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Funny

    The fortunate part of suicide missions is that there is a very small percentage of repeat offenders.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  6. 'armless by GoddersUK · · Score: 5, Funny

    tfs wrote

    two armed gunman

    What other kind of gunman is there? If they were unarmed they couldn't be gunmen. I guess it could mean two-armed gunmen, in which case all is forgiven.

  7. Schmuck bait. by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You would think even people stupid and fanatic enough to do this would know that Texas is the wrong place to try and pull a Charlie Hebdo.

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  8. tip of the iceberg by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't think anyone is shocked. The shock for me comes when the suggestion is made that we should do a little self-censorship. Yeah, sure... this is just the one taboo we have to respect... this is the only bit of sharia law we infidels have to obey, right?

    Except it doesn't end there. It can never end there. I mean hell, the hadith have in the past been widely interpreted to forbid all artwork of animals and humans. They've given up that battle... for now. But rest assured, they have not forgotten. None of this barbarous shit in any of the Abrahamic faiths can ever be truly forgotten, because all sitting there in the unalterable book waiting for someone to decide to take it literally again."Respect" for religious insanity is a continuous spectrum of masochistic self-censorship trailing down into an infinite abyss. Or do you really, honestly believe that ISIS's current set of laws is the most extreme interpretation possible?

    It's possible to resist the scaremongering of the right (no, neither ISIS nor any of the other bearded fuckwits are in any position to do us significant harm at this very moment ) while still acknowledging that over the long run this is a zero sum game with no possibility of common ground.

    We cannot share a planet with these people. So yes, let's keep making the bastards angry.

  9. Re:"xenophobic fascist" by itzly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The others aren't just prepared to murder Wilders. They want to abolish democracy and replace it with sharia law, and kill the Untermenschen i.e. the unbelievers. I don't think fighting for freedom and democracy is as deplorable as fighting against it. Of course, there are many useful idiots who think they can live peacefully with islamists in the same country, believing that it we respect them, they'll respect us. Big mistake.

  10. No, probably not by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You might recall that during the whole "draw Mohammad" controversy South Park took it on. While the were not allowed to show Mohammad at all, they did show people literally shitting on Jesus, the American flag, and so on. They received zero threats in relation to that, there was no action taken against them.

    It's not like Christians didn't know either, it is a major syndicated TV show that is produced in the US.

  11. Not seeing the problem by bradley13 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Organizing a deliberately provocative event is a clear statement of support for free speech. A clear statement that allowing potentially offensive speech is essential to a free society. Other reactions to Charlie Hebdo - how we have to tread carefully and avoid offense - are utterly wrong.

    Terrorists are barbarians, and are a direct threat to civilization. Apparently, the Texan reaction to barbarism is "bring it on".

    More power to Texas. I hope other places find the courage to hold similar events.

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
  12. Being a pedophile was Mohammad's example - FOREVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    its "prophet" who married a 6 year old.

    Oh please. Political marriages of young girls were common in those days. He waited until she was nine to consummate it.

    Ummmmm no they weren't. It was one of many scandals that pedophile Mohammad explained away with "Allah told me to do it". Mohammad had a "revelation" to marry her.

    It simply isn't a case that "That's what they did back then". The Koran very explicitly states that Muslims must follow the "sunnah" or example of Mohammad. It is in the Koran so that means FOREVER! These are recorded in what are called the hadiths (orally transmitted information about Mohammad's life and actions) . So Muslims are OBLIGED to do everything contained in hadiths that are sahih (trusted). Mohammad was recorded literally dozens of times as having sex with a little 9 year old girl in these sahih hadiths. Ever wondered why ISIS, the Taliban and other fundamentalist Muslims are into marrying little girls. Just following the example of pedophile Mohammad which is FOREVER.

    So marrying and having sex with little 9 year old girls like Aysha is a "perfect" example for Muslims THEN NOW AND FOREVER.

    It gets even more disgusting and worse!!!!!! Mohammad was even more depraved than "merely" having vaginal sex with little 9 year old girls.

    He was performing "Muta Kathat" on Aisha when she was 6 when he first married her. BTW, "Muta Kathat" was anal sex and masturbation between the thighs.
    Ask a Muslim about "Muta Kathat". They either will honestly not know what it is (fewer than one or two percent have ever read the hadiths or Mohammad's biography the sira.. only about 10% of Muslims have ever read the Quran!) or they will lie about it with the hope that you didn't actually check out what was written (and Islam obliges Muslims to lie 'if of help to Islam' - rather difficult to get converts when your founder in the modern day would be on a sexual offenders register or with a prison file stamped "never to be released").

    Not only was he performing pedophile sex acts with a little 6 year old girl (yes, it's 6, not 9!!!), he was performing pedophile acts on little boys, The hadiths explain that one away with some nonsense about the "miraculous and soothing effects" of Mohammad's saliva.

    Further, Mohammad was a necrophile, having sex with his dead aunt Fatima "to make her a mother of the believers".

    He even was a cross-dresser, dressing up in the clothes of his wives. His favorite dressing up was in the clothing of the above mentinoed Aysha. You may start asking questions of Mohammad being married for more than 10 years with more than 10 wives yet only achieving one child!

    I didn't even discuss other parts of Mohamamd's "achievements" such as his rapes, his murders of old women poets for writing satires, his genocides against other tribes or his banditry.

    No, I'm not "anti-muslim". I feel that Muslims are in fact the biggest victims if Islam. Imagine belonging to a cult (yes, Islam fulfills all the academic criteria of being a cult such as death if you leave it, exclusivity, avoiding association and marriage with non-members, substantial efforts into recruitment and so on) whose Koran tells you that family members are OBLIGED to shun you if you leave and even tells its members to kill you if you don't recant on your decision to be an apostate. Please take your bigoted "raghead" comments elsewhere (I didn't say "racist", Islam is not an ethnicity, it is a "faith").

    Posting as an Anonymous Coward for good reason. If you think that fundamentalist Muslims get upset about cartoons, you should see them when you point out explicitly where in the Koran, the hadiths and the sira the things I mentioned above are said.

  13. Re:The Perfect Bait by Livius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you set up an event specifically designed to insult/offend/antagonise a particular religion

    The point of Muslim iconoclasm is that Mohammud is merely God's messenger and is not divine himself. The Muslims who are "offended" are the ones who don't actually understand why they have the rule in the first place. And why the rule doesn't apply to non-Muslims in the first place.

    (Ironically much like Christian iconoclasm while it lasted.)

  14. Wait, what? by soccerisgod · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So..... these guys set up an event supposedly to protect free speech and all, and then they invite a guy "who has campaigned to have the Quran banned in the Netherlands."

    I can't put my finger on it but something here doesn't fit :P

    --
    If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
  15. Re:All the devout know.. by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does it specifically say female virgins? Maybe they get there and it's just a bunch of slashdotters milling about.

  16. Re:All the devout know.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Steve Martin answered the question about what 72 virgins might really be like, and his answer follows:

    Virgin No. 1: Yuck.

    Virgin No. 2: Ick.

    Virgin No. 3: Ew.

    Virgin No. 4: Ow.

    Virgin No. 5: Do you like cats? I have fourteen!

    Virgin No. 6: I’m Becky. I’ll be legal in two years.

    Virgin No. 7: Here, I’ll just pull down your zipper. Oh, sorry!

    Virgin No. 8: Can we cuddle first?

    Virgin No. 9: It was a garlic-and-onion pizza. Why?

    Virgin No. 10: . . . so I see Heath, and he goes, “Like, what are you doing here?,” and I go, “I’m hangin’ out,” so he goes, “Like, what?” . . .

    Virgin No. 11: First you’re going to have to show me an up-to-date health certificate.

    Virgin No. 12: Hurry! My parents are due home!

    Virgin No. 13: Do you want the regular or the special?

    Virgin No. 14: I’m eighty-four. So what?

    Virgin No. 15: Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes!

    Virgin No. 16: Even I know that’s tiny.

    Virgin No. 17: “Do it”? Meaning what?

    Virgin No. 18: I’m saving myself for Jesus.

    Virgin No. 19: Somewhere on my body I have hidden a buffalo nickel.

    Virgin No. 20: Don’t touch my hair!

    Virgin No. 21: I hope you’re not going to sleep with me and then go sleep with seventy-one others.

    Virgin No. 22: Do you mind if we listen to Mannheim Steamroller?

    Virgin No. 23: Are you O.K. with the dog on the bed?

    Virgin No. 24: Would you mind saying, “Could I see you in my office, Miss Witherspoon?”?

    Virgin No. 25: Ride me! Ride me, Lucky Buck!

    Virgin No. 26: You like your vanilla hot?

    Virgin No. 27: Does Ookums like Snookums?

    Virgin No. 28: It’s so romantic here, dead.

    Virgin No. 29: Well, I’m a virgin, but my hand isn’t.

    Virgin No. 30: You are in?

    Virgin No. 31: Hi, cowboy. I just rode down from Brokeback Mountain.

    Virgin No. 32: I’m a virgin because I’m so ugly.

    Virgin No. 33: You like-ee?

    Virgin No. 34: I’ll betcha you can’t get an erection. Go on, impress me. C’mon, show me. Show me, big shot.

    Virgin No. 35: By the way, here in Heaven “virgin” has a slightly different meaning. It means “chatty.”

    Virgin No. 36: Sure, I like you, but as a friend.

    Virgin No. 37: No kissing. I save that for my boyfriend.

    Virgin No. 38: I’m Zania, from the planet Xeron. My vagina is on my foot.

    Virgin No. 39: It’s a lesion, and, no, I don’t know what kind.

    Virgin No. 40: I’m Jewish. Why do you ask?

    Virgin No. 41: Hi, I’m Becky. Oh, whoops—you again.

    Virgin No. 42: I just love camping! Camping is so great! Can we go camping sometime?

    Virgin No. 43: In the spirit of full disclosure, I’m a single mom.

    Virgin No. 44: You like my breasts? They were my graduation gift.

    Virgin No. 45: When you’re done, you should really check out how cool this ceiling is.

    Virgin No. 46: I’m almost there. Just another couple of hours.

    Virgin No. 47: Get your own beer, you nitwit.

    Virgin No. 48: No, you’ve got it wrong. We’re in the Paradise Casino.

    Virgin No. 49: I really enjoyed that. Thank you very much. Gee, it’s late.

    Virgin No. 50: You make me feel like a real woman. And after this is over I’m going to find one.

    Virgin No. 51: What do you mean, “move a little”?

    Virgin No. 52: Not now, I’m on my BlackBerry.

    Virgin No. 53: I love it when you put on your pants and leave.

    Virgin No. 54: We’ve been together twenty-four hours now, and, you know, sometimes it’s O.K. to say something mildly humorous.

    Virgin No. 55: That was terrible. I should have listened to the other virgins.

    Virgin No. 56: I think I found it. Is that it?

  17. Re:Oblig. answer by Loki_1929 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Your equivocation is showing.

    Nobody shows up to just start opening fire on everyone involved when some art exhibit depicting Jesus in some terrible way is shown (though they may show up to damage the artwork). Piss Christ is just one example. The Misadventures of the Romantic Cannibals is another. South Park has done plenty of cartoons depicting Jesus in a less than respectful manner as has Family Guy, yet no murders. Leon Ferrari lived to a ripe old age despite his many works of blasphemy that even drew the ire of Pope Francis (Mary in a blender comes to mind). Yet again, some of the artwork was vandalized, but the man himself was never harmed. In fact, the threats he received were for his earlier political work (which drove him to exile). Ants of a Crucifix, Phallus-faced Jesus, Chris Ofili’s “The Holy Virgin Mary"; the list just goes on and on. Protests, lawsuits, condemnations, funding being pulled; these are the reactions from Christians.

    But draw cartoons of Mohammed? Guys with guns show up to murder people.

    There's a fucking difference.

    --
    -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
  18. Try the seafood platter, etc. by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Funny

    AFAIK a stick figure labeled by name or "the prophet" will do.

    1. Draw stickman.
    2. Add beard and turban.
    3. ...
    4. Prophet!

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  19. Re:The nature of any polygamous religion by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One of the biggest problems in any polygamous society is getting rid of young men. Every man with 4 wives leaves 3 angry, young, horny men in his wake who got no wives.

    This is not only a problem in polygamous societies, but also in countries with gender selective abortions, including China and India. There are already more than 10 million "missing" women in China, and the problem will get far worse in the next decade, as millions and millions of young men reach maturity to find there are no women available. This is very likely to have a destabilizing effect throughout East Asia, since unattached young men tend to support political leaders who advocate nationalism, militarism, and confrontation.