Slashdot Mirror


$9 Open Source Computer Blows Past Crowdfunding Goal

An anonymous reader writes: A team of engineers and artists has launched a Kickstarter campaign for C.H.I.P., a small computer that costs $9. The campaign met and far exceeded its $50,000 goal on the first day. The device runs an R8 ARM CPU clocked at 1 GHz, 512 MB of RAM, and 4GB of storage. It has built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, and runs a version of Debian. The price was enabled by two things: super-cheap Chinese tablets pushing down processor costs, and support from manufacturer Allwinner to make it even cheaper. The team is also building breakout boards for VGA and HDMI connections, as well as one with a tiny LCD screen, keyboard, and battery. Importantly, "all hardware design files schematic, PCB layout and bill of materials are free for you the community to download, modify and use."

180 comments

  1. Not $9 by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 5, Funny

    $9 is too much. 7's the key number here. Think about it. 7-Elevens. 7 dwarves. 7, man, that's the number. 7 chipmunks twirlin' on a branch, eatin' lots of sunflowers on my uncle's ranch. You know that old children's tale from the sea. It's like you're dreamin' about Gorgonzola cheese when it's clearly Brie time, baby. Step into my office.

    1. Re:Not $9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It is $7 Canadian.

    2. Re:Not $9 by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Funny

      $9 is too much.

      It would have been cheaper, but (as per TFA) it

      runs a flavor of Debain* Linux

      So they had to up the hardware specs in order to support Systemd

      * Although they may have been better off spending that extra money on a proof reader.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    3. Re:Not $9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you f'ing kidding me? The exchange rate between CAD and USD at this time means it will cost CAD$19!

      -- Pissed off Canadian yearning for those on-par or better days

    4. Re:Not $9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really not. Who uses composite video nowadays? Realistically it is $19 or $24 for the VGA and HDMI respectively, especially in the use cases illustrated in the o-so-funny-and-games video.

      Compare this with the Raspberry Pi line and the reason for C.H.I.P to exist is nowhere to be found.

      Maybe a competitor for some Arduino use-cases. Maybe.

    5. Re:Not $9 by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Even cheap flat panel TVs usually have a lonely Composite jack somewhere on the back, just in case someone's grandfather wants to plug in the VCR. Of course this means you'll be limited to NTSC resolution and probably a fuzzy picture, but it's $9 and has built-in Wifi and Bluetooth so you don't need to hang a wired keyboard off of it like you do with the Pi. I'm not sure what I'd do with this, but that's true of all of these cheap little SBCs, and I usually find something worth doing.

      The handheld version with the GPIO pins sticking out seems pretty cool. I'd really like to feel that keyboard before committing to it though.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    6. Re:Not $9 by ArcadeMan · · Score: 0

      C.H.I.P., even with the VGA or HDMI board, is still cheaper than a Raspberry Pi A+ which has half the RAM and a lower clock speed*.

      * I don't know enough about the CPU of either board to compare the actual computing power for single-core tasks.

    7. Re:Not $9 by chihowa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Who needs a display? For small job, low power ARM servers and embedded controllers that need more power than an Arduino can supply, this thing looks nice.

      All the display hardware in the RPi and Beaglebone does for me is waste power and drive up the cost.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    8. Re:Not $9 by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      Really not. Who uses composite video nowadays? Realistically it is $19 or $24 for the VGA and HDMI respectively, especially in the use cases illustrated in the o-so-funny-and-games video.

      Compare this with the Raspberry Pi line and the reason for C.H.I.P to exist is nowhere to be found.

      Maybe a competitor for some Arduino use-cases. Maybe.

      Agreed. It's bait and switch. "Hey $9 computer.... oh you want better than 480 resolution? Well that's another $10! Oh you want to connect to a modern HDTV? That's another $5".

      And honestly, at these low specs, I could buy a used 1ghz, 512 mb, 4gb desktop PC for about $25 and it would have VGA and at least be able to run some flavor of Windows and be upgradeable.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    9. Re:Not $9 by danlip · · Score: 1
    10. Re:Not $9 by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. They should stop focusing on display outputs. If you want a device to attach to your TV, a chromecast or Roku sticks are better suited anyways.

    11. Re:Not $9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't meant to be competition to a PC. But if you are angling that way, you would need to add wireless and bluetooth to the PC and add the ability to run off of batteries. By the time you add those features to the PC you would have shot your budget and still have a power-hungry beast that is about 100 times larger than this little board. Oh, and Windows isn't really a player in the embedded/maker/hacker world. If that's your game, stick with the PC.

    12. Re:Not $9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seeing as it's Debian, they could install sysV. If someone is using Debian, they're probably the more knowledgeable Linux type and don't need their ass wiped by distros.

    13. Re:Not $9 by mspohr · · Score: 1

      I have a few RPi's dedicated to servers and monitoring various things. None of them use a display port. I access them all using ssh over WiFi. This would be a good drop in replacement for these projects.
      Right now I use a RPi ($35) plus WiFi dongle ($10). With this, $9.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    14. Re:Not $9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. There's many applications where display isn't required at all.

      The problem is that the promo video showcases it as https://d2pq0u4uni88oo.cloudfront.net/projects/1805765/video-534975-h264_high.mp4 basically a web surfing/word processing computer for $9, and.. well... that's a lie.

      I bet many of the $9 backers are in for a surprise when the thing finally arrives at their door.

    15. Re:Not $9 by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Seems like a weak Loonie benefits Canadian manufacturing, not only with Canada's trade with the US, but EU as well.

      It's better to have a job at all than to have the few people with jobs have better buying power.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    16. Re:Not $9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      9 USD = 10.88 CAD

      Not according to Coursera where USD49.00 == CAD96.00

    17. Re:Not $9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $9 is too much. 7's the key number here. Think about it. 7-Elevens. 7 dwarves. 7, man, that's the number. 7 chipmunks twirlin' on a branch, eatin' lots of sunflowers on my uncle's ranch. You know that old children's tale from the sea. It's like you're dreamin' about Gorgonzola cheese when it's clearly Brie time, baby. Step into my office.

      They're paying those damn Chinese too much. We want ALWAYS the low price. Make them work quintuple shifts for base pay.

    18. Re:Not $9 by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Really not. Who uses composite video nowadays?

      No on-board HDMI because they expect a lot of people to want to run it headless, but because the composite video is essentially a freebie (it doesn't require all the chippery of a VGA or HDMI port), it's cheaper to add it to the full production run than to have it as an optional extra. So why not include it? At times things will go wrong, and you may need to look inside -- so think of it as a diagnostics port, if you like.

      Realistically it is $19 or $24 for the VGA and HDMI respectively, especially in the use cases illustrated in the o-so-funny-and-games video.

      ... which aren't really the intended use cases, are they? It's just hard to demonstrate how to use something for various unspecified makery uses.

      Compare this with the Raspberry Pi line and the reason for C.H.I.P to exist is nowhere to be found.

      Actually, it has a massive plus in its favour against the Pi -- it's a chip you should be able to get hold of in relatively low quantities. The Pi is kind of handy for prototyping embedded devices, but as the Broadcom chip in it is only available in extreme bulk, you're not normally working with the chip your final product will use. Here, though, there's the realistic possibility of getting the same chip as the CHIP for your product, so it's a very attractive prospect as a prototyper. Including the battery circuits makes it extremely attractive, because that means the prototyper only has to worry about wiring up the GPIO to enable their specific use case -- it's damn near plug-and-play.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    19. Re:Not $9 by antdude · · Score: 1

      8 is good too for Chinese. ;)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    20. Re:Not $9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $9 is too much. 7's the key number here. Think about it. 7-Elevens. 7 dwarves. 7, man, that's the number.

      You forgot to mention Trurl's Machine, which knows that 2 + 2 = 7, and will die to prove it. For this fact alone, the CHIP should cost $7.

    21. Re:Not $9 by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Does Coursera have to charge G.S.T. for Canadian customers? If they do that could account for a lot of that spread.

    22. Re: Not $9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, if the 100,000 people who benefit from it outweigh the 30,000,000 that are hurt by it.

    23. Re: Not $9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We(the middle class) all benefit when unemployment is reduced. Prices for eggs and milk don't usually go up when you have a weak dollar, but it does make it harder to buy less essential items like the latest TVs and new cars. Labor and service costs usually don't change either. (other than the normal inflationary adjustments)

      Replacement parts to repair the old cars you have tend to already be in a more localized warehouse and were bought years ago. Keeping your old car running can be a real alternative, especially if the labor costs haven't gone up proportional to the currency fluctuation.

  2. Unbelievable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I think about how much more power this has than my old Commodore 64, and how much cheaper it is (whether you take inflation into account or not!), it is just awesome. Mind blown.

    1. Re:Unbelievable. by Njorthbiatr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And yet a graphing calculator with a fraction of the power will still run you $109.

    2. Re:Unbelievable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And when you think how the 747 had its maiden flight in 1969 and planes still look the same, fly the same, use the same fuel, use the same materials, and go the same speed, my mind says no one is going to live on Mars because we can play video games with dirty sand.

    3. Re:Unbelievable. by QuasiSteve · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In defense of the calculator - it has an included screen, dedicated custom keyboard, custom slim case, battery life measured in months if not years, etc.

      In non-defense of the calculator - most of its cost is not in the above, but in its certification for use in [school / university / industry] - even if not for itself, then its sibling product which is.. and when that product costs $NN, you can't very well start selling this one for $N without people cluing in.

    4. Re:Unbelievable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, you think it's easy running an education scam, er | mean textbook industry/university?

    5. Re:Unbelievable. by ckatko · · Score: 1

      You have to be crazy to think a TI-83 is expensive because of its parts and not trade agreements forcing out competition. The TI-83 is well-built. There's nothing that says well-built has to be expensive. It's just more plastic in the right places and proper fasteners--engineers allowed to do their job.

      Moreover, any money spent on research has been paid back 15 years ago.

      The situation might be different if TI didn't make all of the chips that go into it (dwindling inventories), but it's not. If it was, they would have replaced it with a newer generation model like every other company does on the planet.

    6. Re:Unbelievable. by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Its all about the market. Supply, demand, branding. A good calculator is a tool that has value above its parts. There is value in its specific design and functionality, which has been honed over time to meet a specific need. I am sure the margins on them are quite healthy, but their market is eroded by computers and tablets, which puts them more in a lower volume niche. There evidently isn't enough demand in that niche for low cost calculators for someone to move in to the space and try to compete.

      At least that is my quick take on it.

    7. Re:Unbelievable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that is blatantly wrong you twat.

    8. Re:Unbelievable. by jandrese · · Score: 1

      The Kickstarter has a handheld version with a battery, screen, and keyboard. You can install Wolfram Alpha on it as well (it comes by default with Rasbian now). It has better everything than a TI graphing calculator and costs $49.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    9. Re:Unbelievable. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Insightful

      TI-83 is a scam run on Schools, Students and Teachers. There are books written on how to do math on THIS calculator. They don't teach math, they teach math on this Calculator.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    10. Re:Unbelievable. by QuasiSteve · · Score: 1

      Yeah, which is a good chunk more than $9 - showing that a lot of cost in a device is not really in the innards; and it still doesn't certify it for use on tests and all that jazz, where the true cost of graphing calculators normally referred to lies.
      ( There's certainly cheap graphing calculators as well - just can't use those in those situations. )

    11. Re:Unbelievable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, you'll be using the thrust of your computers to go into space? Or do you mean the improvements in engines in the last half century are the same scale as how computers improved in the same time span?

      Oh tell me, Oh Wise One, how I'm wrong.

      planes still look the same, prove me wrong.
      fly the same, prove me wrong.
      use the same fuel, fark me, prove me wrong.
      use the same materials, fark me, before you say carbon fiber read your history...
      and go the same speed, hey sparkey, we don't even have the Concorde anymore, we're slower today if anything...

      Computers might still get a bit better, but no one's living on Mars because of that... you twunt.

    12. Re:Unbelievable. by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      the PocketCHIP has a screen and keyboard.

      You could probably go for a few days if you were careful about sleep states and the display and used a big battery. If you chose to run on alkaline batteries instead of rechargeable you can go longer (realize that AA is about 2000mAh, while a LiPO of a similar volume is rarely more than 500mAh). eInk display instead of backlit LCD/TFT is going to make it into a pretty effective Calculator platform, but that's a fairly involved DIY project because the PocketCHIP is not eInk.

      ps - the above is a wild guess, but I was one of the original Kindle developers.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    13. Re:Unbelievable. by sherr · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the stated reason that schools / standardized tests allow you to use a TI calculator but not a tablet or other form of computer actually does make a lot of sense: no internet connection. They want you to be able to graph and calculate, but not search on Google.

    14. Re:Unbelievable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a pipe mean textbook industry/university?

    15. Re:Unbelievable. by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      I worked as a NASA contractor for a good while - it is widely stated at the various NASA centers that computers are why we are not in space (for a variety of reasons).

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    16. Re:Unbelievable. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      Why wasn't my HP 12C allowed? Oh right, because the books didn't know RPN.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    17. Re:Unbelievable. by Damarkus13 · · Score: 1
      No, it's a captive market. I had one math teacher in high school get irate when I brought a TI-85 into class where the syllabus suggested we use a TI-83. She actually suggested (rather forcefully) that I go out and buy an 83 or she wouldn't be able to help me with any of the graphing calculator assignments.

      Texas Instruments has gotten cozy with textbook publishers and that is why you can find the TI-x line of calculators at places like Target, not because of any technical superiority.

    18. Re:Unbelievable. by Njorthbiatr · · Score: 1

      So you're telling me it has a whole $20 worth of components?

      I mean, including your very own plastic case. Impressive!

    19. Re:Unbelievable. by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      That part of the niche market is captive doesn't negate any of my point. I never said they had any technical superiority either, I said they were a tool that we well developed for the purpose. That point is somewhat backed up by the insistence of experienced folks who demanded you use it, they feel it is the right tool.

    20. Re:Unbelievable. by rwise2112 · · Score: 1

      When I think about how much more power this has than my old Commodore 64, and how much cheaper it is (whether you take inflation into account or not!), it is just awesome. Mind blown.

      Commodore 64s were free! Thanks Mom!

      --

      "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert"
    21. Re:Unbelievable. by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1
      From your article;

      And it’s because we want to have a tool that kids can use in a classroom, on their way home, at home when they’re doing homework and also a tool they can bring in during their most important exam.”

      hence the 'tool' part I spoke of.

    22. Re:Unbelievable. by Eunuchswear · · Score: 2

      TI-83 is a scam run on Schools, Students and Teachers. There are books written on how to do math on THIS calculator. They don't teach math, they teach math on this Calculator.

      True.

      Here in France a huge effort was made to break the TI monopoly, and now we are allowed to use one crappy, expensive Casio as an alternative to the crappy, expensive TI.

      Meanwhile all kids have a phone with more compute power than a Cray-1.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    23. Re:Unbelievable. by IamJaxn · · Score: 1

      *COUGH* Bullshit. They've been using these TI calcs for over 20-25 years.... WAY, WAY before people could use a device to "Google" solutions. The fact that they have contracts and books, and lord knows what else is what keeps their devices in play and permitted for testing. If nothing else, at least the cost was driven down because of the fact that their parts are dirt cheap compared to my day (early 90's) when you couldn't get a TI for under a few hundred bucks. I don't know if the new color models with crazy interfaces are allowed in schools now, but please know that the internet had no bearing on the original decision to allow these calcs to be used in testing.

    24. Re:Unbelievable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked as a NASA contractor for a good while - it is widely stated at the various NASA centers that computers are why we are not in space (for a variety of reasons).

      i never recall hearing such statements about computers at either landover or ft. meade.

      -j

  3. May 2016 delivery by trevc · · Score: 0

    That is too far out. Technology will have moved on by then.

    1. Re:May 2016 delivery by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      I might have bitten, except for this. A year in this product space is pretty large. And I'm sure DX will have a clone in their shop by July or August 2016 that's $5-6.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  4. Pretty amazing, but not much cheaper than RPi by tapspace · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is pretty amazing if they can actually sell those for $9. Definitely one of the better kickstarters I've seen recently, so I am glad to see its successful.

    However, once you add the HDMI, it's essentially the same price as a raspberry pi model A.

    1. Re:Pretty amazing, but not much cheaper than RPi by afidel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      However, once you add the HDMI, it's essentially the same price as a raspberry pi model A.

      But a heck of a lot cheaper than an rPi plus WiFi dongle plus BT 4.0 dongle and I'm sure it uses way less power (you generally can't run both wireless dongles without a powered USB hub. I'm working on a hub for my BT LE thermometer (ET-735) and it turned out to be cheaper to buy a Moto E or Allwinner based tablet than to add all the components to an rPi, which is just insane to me considering the non-rPi solutions added storage, a screen, a battery, and case to the BOM, oh and the Moto E would be considerably smaller.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:Pretty amazing, but not much cheaper than RPi by Dan+East · · Score: 3, Informative

      Your comparison is flawed. The Raspberry Pi doesn't have Wifi, Bluetooth, or any onboard storage. By the time you add those three things to the Pi, C.H.I.P. will still be less than half the price (even with the HDMI board).

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    3. Re:Pretty amazing, but not much cheaper than RPi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if you add a dport ? Is there any open solution for display output that is not price dependent on DRM / regulations and other artificial "paperwork" ?

    4. Re:Pretty amazing, but not much cheaper than RPi by tapspace · · Score: 1

      Oops! I even saw that it had that wireless module on the PCB. Good catch.

    5. Re:Pretty amazing, but not much cheaper than RPi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes the little yellow cable it uses by default is unencumbered by DRM and licensing

    6. Re:Pretty amazing, but not much cheaper than RPi by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 1

      This is pretty amazing if they can actually sell those for $9. Definitely one of the better kickstarters I've seen recently, so I am glad to see its successful.

      However, once you add the HDMI, it's essentially the same price as a raspberry pi model A.

      As long as it has a USB port, digital GPIO and an on board A/D chip. The A/D chip would be optional if the thing has a I2C connector but it would be a nice touch. I don't care about the HDMI. I use these things for all manner of gadget projects because I'm not familiar with the industry standard embedded boards, Arduino is to simple for my needs and I'm a Unix developer so I know Linux and just being able to add a web-server with a single apt-get call is heaven compared to computers in this category. Being able to skip the HDMI and other components would be a plus and built in WiFi + Bluetooth is a bonus since that's an added cost if you buy a Raspberry PI A+, especially if you need any kind of range for the WiFi. An add-on board for connecting and charging a LiPo battery and that gracefully shuts down the computer when the you press an off button or when the battery is low would be a nice too. That is another added cost with the Raspberry PI.

    7. Re:Pretty amazing, but not much cheaper than RPi by chihowa · · Score: 1

      It looks like it has an onboard LiPo charger and connector, but I'm not sure if it's integrated enough to be able to shutdown gracefully. Since it's based on a phone SoC, it probably is.

      I agree about the lack of HDMI, too. I'll never use it and it shaves off considerable cost and space.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    8. Re:Pretty amazing, but not much cheaper than RPi by chispito · · Score: 1

      However, once you add the HDMI, it's essentially the same price as a raspberry pi model A.

      If you are interested in the HDMI, you're doing it wrong. Did you see the picture where it's about the size of a standard LiPo? If they provide these things for the stated price, you're basically getting an ESP2866 with a built-in computer for only 3X the price.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    9. Re:Pretty amazing, but not much cheaper than RPi by Nyder · · Score: 1

      This is pretty amazing if they can actually sell those for $9. Definitely one of the better kickstarters I've seen recently, so I am glad to see its successful.

      However, once you add the HDMI, it's essentially the same price as a raspberry pi model A.

      I remember when I could get a Timex Sinclair for $100 and I thought that was the best thing ever. Never did buy one, so I guess maybe I should buy one of these? =)

      It's cool that we've gotten to the point that we can have cheap computing hardware for whatever the fuck we want. And compact.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    10. Re:Pretty amazing, but not much cheaper than RPi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The esp8266 costs $1.70 ($3 module) and can run 160Mhz. It has built in wifi and there are Arduino projects that work.

    11. Re:Pretty amazing, but not much cheaper than RPi by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      It really all depends on your purpose. I can see these used headless for all kinds of things. Low power projects will line up. If you want a PC then you can pick up one off the curb more powerful than this or the pi. I see them thrown out all the time. I picked up a core2duo laptop for 25 dollars the other day with 2 gigs of ram. The battery only lasts about 10 minutes but it works good running makulu linux. It's all according to the purpose you have.

  5. no $8 by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    No 8 minute abs. You can't get abs in 7 minutes. Don't be rediculous.

    Does that price include a power adapter, wifi adapter, and case? If so I might buy it an use those parts for my Rasberry Pi. If not then those will cost more than the "computer".

    So this thing is basically a cheaper Rasberry PI without all the I/O features?

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:no $8 by captnjohnny1618 · · Score: 2

      I think it's has a bunch of GPIO pins, but not the built in usb, hdmi, etc. The built in wifi is nice too. Let's hope it works better than the wifi dongle I bought for my RPi. I second the argument that after you buy a case, power adapter, and anything else just about, the price is never going to be only $9.

      itd be nice if it booted and auto joined your wifi network. Then you could ssh and really only NEED to buy a power adapter. We'll see what they come up with.

      This board is perfect for a few projects I've been kicking around and the $9 price point is better than having to drop $50 on a beaglebone black or $40 on a Pi.

    2. Re:no $8 by Zerth · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wifi b/g/n AP|client, bluetooth 4, and a battery charge controller(easy UPS) are onboard, as are 8 digital GPIO, 1 PWM, and a parallel LCD output(it has an HDMI converter, but I wouldn't expect 1080p)

      No power or case for the $9 version. No ethernet on any of them, looks like.

    3. Re:no $8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I agree that 8 is better. It's like infinity taking a nap.

    4. Re:no $8 by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      The built in wifi is key, there are a number of headless applications that I can think of, as long as setting up while headless isn't too much of a burden. If the audio DAC is quality, I can see me buying a couple.

    5. Re:no $8 by captnjohnny1618 · · Score: 1

      I have a bunch of network connected lighting experiments that I'm interested in doing and having a $9 board with this much going on (and that many GPIO pins!) sounds amazing. I was thinking I would get a beaglebone black but just couldn't get psyched to spend the money. I'm definitely going to pick up a few of these boards.

      Out of curiosity, what projects are you thinking you'll do that need reasonable audio quality?

    6. Re:no $8 by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      There's an ab for that!

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    7. Re:no $8 by Immerman · · Score: 0

      From what I can see it sounds more like a much cheaper, more feature rich alternative to the Raspberry Pi Compute Module - oriented more towards small-scale production products than hobbyist projects, though thanks to the price, VGA/HDMI breakout boards and it's suitability to battery power there will probably be several niches there as well.

      Possibly bulkier than the CM thanks to the ports and standard sockets, but also easier to work with since you already have USB, wifi, and sound circuitry in place (probably the three most universally appealing features for whatever custom gadget someone is making). Plus, you don't need to wire your electronics with a DDR2 SODIMM socket with all those tiny little contacts, making hand-assembled devices much more viable.

      Personally, as someone who's never actually been tempted to do a production run of anything, I think this looks like a great product - much better suited to a lot of the "first-time/small run production" market than the CM.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    8. Re:no $8 by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, what projects are you thinking you'll do that need reasonable audio quality?

      Some custom build network music players. R- Pi has crappy audio and costs too much. I don't need super hi grade, but reasonably good. This might be so cheap I could just add a USB DAC. I then just use a Lepai amp or similar and some decent speakers and you can make some pretty good sounding stuff. If I get the internals works out, I'll pick up some antique radio boxes or build something with nice wood and give as gifts to family.

      I also have some LED lighting ideas for my TV room, but arduino type boards are pretty good for that. I can work on audio stuff and stay interested, the lighting projects tend to get started but never finish.

    9. Re:no $8 by goombah99 · · Score: 2

      i'm curious how you reach that conclusion. it seems like as long as you plan on using hdmi the specs and price are comparable to an Rpi A which sells for $25. two differences are the wifi and built in storage which are extra on rpi. on the otherhand 4gb is kinda small if you want to call it PC the Rpi is supported better in hardware, software, drivers, and is proven. (how much is your time worth?) it looks to me like the shields for this consume the io pins as well.

      http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    10. Re:no $8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      *opens mouth to speak*
      *pauses, nothing to say*
      *abandons effort*

    11. Re:no $8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Don't be rediculous."

      As ridiculous as your spelling.

    12. Re:no $8 by captnjohnny1618 · · Score: 1

      the lighting projects tend to get started but never finish

      Amen to the that. Might change "lighting projects" to just "many of my electronics projects..." ;-). The only audio-related project I've done is an arduino controlled magnetically-levitated record playing with a friend of mine as a gift for his sister's wedding, but it didn't come out all that great. Overly-complex combined with lack of knowledge, funds, and time. Shoulda kept it simple (stupid).

    13. Re:no $8 by Immerman · · Score: 1, Informative

      Why would you automatically assume that it would usually be coupled with an expansion board costing 67% more than the device itself? I'm comparing it to the Compute Module, becasue that was the stripped-down Pi which was announced as JUST the CPU, 4GB flash, and 512MB ram, delivered on a notebook RAM form factor, designed for relatively easy usage of a Pi-compatible SOC for embedded projects.

      Plus the article explicitly mentions that they designed this thing in response to deciding that the CM wasn't actually all that well suited for it's intended market (for example, I imagine, consider that if you want *any* sort of I/O you have to build a custom circuit board containing the necessary modules wired to a SODIMM-style socket) Honestly I'm somewhat puzzled about the expected use-case of the CM - it seems they expect people to trade in all the IO features of the Pi A/B for a little storage and a slightly smaller form factor at roughly the same price. Seems to me there's a pretty narrow range of "amateur" products where the thickness is *that* important. The price point though - Chip shaves off $16, 64% of the cost of the Pi-A, while keeping pretty much all the features of interest to an embedded project (and actually, I'd say the swap from ethernet to wifi counts as a substantial upgrade in almost all scenarios).

      That it can *also* function as an alternative to the RPi-A with a different set of features by adding an HDMI shield is an added bonus. Though as you point out yourself, 4GB of storage isn't much for a PC configuration, and there's no expansion potential except by using one of the two precious USB ports. (Not to mention, with PC usage patterns that 4GB flash isn't going to last long)

      As an aside, please be aware that case matters for units: 1GB(gigabyte) = 8Gb(gigabit). "gb" isn't an actual thing, and guessing which of the aforementioned was intended can be difficult, especially considering how many seedy marketers intentionally exploit the confusion, but also when when talking about the embedded device space where native hardware capacities are often measured in bits, I suppose for consistency with smaller-capacity hardware and/or to avoid confusion around non-standard byte sizes (for example extra "hidden" bits are required for each byte to provide error-detection or -correction)

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    14. Re:no $8 by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Honestly I'm somewhat puzzled about the expected use-case of the CM

      Same here. People talk about using it for prototyping embedded systems, but as the Broadcom chip on the Pi is only available in massive bulk, you end up with a prototype that doesn't accurately model the performance of the final product. The Allwinner A13, though, is almost a commodity part, and I'm not surprised they're giving Next Thing help here: if this gets established as the hobbyist prototyping platform, by next year it'll start appearing as the core chip in more and more new devices being launched via Kickstarter.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    15. Re:no $8 by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 2

      The $9 does not include a power adapter or battery. It can be powered from USB so any standard USB charger should work as a power source. They are selling batteries if you want to go that way. It also does not include a case.

      WiFi is built into the board. So is Bluetooth. But no wired Ethernet.

      Yes, in a way it's a cheaper Raspberry Pi. Overall it's comparable to the original Pi - pluses are a faster CPU and built-in WiFi and Bluetooth, the big minus is no built-in HDMI. It falls short of the power of the Pi 2, which has a quad core CPU and 1GB RAM, but we shouldn't expect a $9 computer to be as powerful as a $35 computer. The $9 price point makes it appealing for embedded applications, and the fact that you're getting networking with that $9 makes it even better.

    16. Re:no $8 by flargleblarg · · Score: 2

      ... but we shouldn't expect a $9 computer to be as powerful as a $35 computer.

      The 1975 me just thinks this is really funny.

      We are truly living in the future. $35 computers? $9 computers? Bring it!

  6. $29, not $9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    $9 with $20 shipping is an old ebay scam, but evidently still effective

    1. Re:$29, not $9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Move to the US then. Seriously, of all the stupid shit to complain about. And read the FAQ.

    2. Re:$29, not $9 by msauve · · Score: 3, Informative

      $9 with $5 shipping on Kickstarter, at least in the US.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  7. $9 for parts or the entire unit. by jellomizer · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Ok you got the parts cheap.
    Then you need to put it together.
    Then you need to package it.
    Then you need to advertise it.
    Then you need to ship it.
    You have to pay taxes on your profit.
    You need to pay for the people managing this process.
    If there is a failure rate you will have returns that you need to refund.

    All in all you are probably up to $30-$40 for a unit. This is still a good price, but it is comparable to a Raspberry Pi.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:$9 for parts or the entire unit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just going to make a bunch of wild assumptions about what they haven't thought off then add arbitrary numbers. You made a list so that should earn you some mod points even though your post lacks any substance.

    2. Re:$9 for parts or the entire unit. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Ok more to the point.
      A product cost more than the sum of its parts.
      Even if you are a not for profit. Selling it at cost is still more than the sum of the cost of the parts.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  8. $9 Computer is BLAH Android Sticks are Better by ZippyTheChicken · · Score: 1

    The first thing I thought when I saw this is someone knocked down the price of a tablet .. but when I click through what I see is a mainboard looking like a Raspberry Pii and not much else. .. WooHoo $9 for that? well what does it give you? Not very much. You still need a Keyboard & Mouse, Monitor or TV It doesn't even have video out you have to get an adapter for that.. ... . I just picked up three iCraig Android TV Sticks.. they come with 1.5G Ram 4Gig Rom .. they run full android.. they can be rooted and flashed.. they have HDMI Out They have Wifi.. They have a USB Port .. They have a MicroSD Slot to expand to 32Gig for storage. Android is already installed so you can quickly connect to the internet, You can install Office Apps, Games, Utilities You can print over WiFi Bluetooth or USB .. You also have access to TV Content sites like Netflix, Hulu, LiveStreams of TV News from hundreds of Local Stations, Music.. and if thats not enough you can install Kodi.tv and mine came installed with it.. You can connect to Local USB Drives or shares over a network.. You can install a Cloud Storage App or just use Google's... . Who needs this garbage mainboard with no features when I can go to the store and buy an android stick for $12.95 and turn all my TVs into Computers without having to deal with garbage daughter boards or OS's that aren't as full featured.. PlugNPlay Ready.. . And there is no Learning Curve .. its just like your phone but better.... . NAH... too little too late whoever gives them money could spend $12 on a Android Stick and be farther ahead and up and running in 10 minutes

    1. Re:$9 Computer is BLAH Android Sticks are Better by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      You still need a Keyboard & Mouse, Monitor or TV

      Doesn't that rather depend on the application? I need a controller to tie together a bunch of stepper motors and a GPS module. Do I need a monitor and keyboard?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:$9 Computer is BLAH Android Sticks are Better by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      hope you don't mean the Craig Smart TV HDMI Adapter and Mouse (CVD601) because the reviews for that are awful

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    3. Re:$9 Computer is BLAH Android Sticks are Better by msauve · · Score: 1

      "You still need a Keyboard & Mouse, Monitor or TV"

      Uh, no. I doubt anyone is thinking this will be someone's only computer. Just shell in via telnet or ssh via WiFi. If a CLI is too hard for you, then setup an X server.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    4. Re:$9 Computer is BLAH Android Sticks are Better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a nice advertisement you have there. The user reviews for your "iCraig" device are terrible. Thanks, I'll pass.

    5. Re:$9 Computer is BLAH Android Sticks are Better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You still need a Keyboard & Mouse, Monitor or TV"

      Uh, no. I doubt anyone is thinking this will be someone's only computer. Just shell in via telnet or ssh via WiFi. If a CLI is too hard for you, then setup an X server.

      This would be ideal as a terminal so you can use applications in the web browser and/or secure remote command-line sessions via an SSH client. No need to run applications locally on this "computer." With the WiFi, Bluetooth and USB connectivity it should be possible to attach local external storage device if storing stuff in the "cloud' is scary or undesirable. It would be better if they offered a complete unit with a case the size of a BlackBerry Z10 smartphone and ports for USB, HDMI, and power adapter so you could easily utilise it as a network-connected terminal via WiFi and Bluetooth. Price it at CAD50.00.

    6. Re:$9 Computer is BLAH Android Sticks are Better by jdschulteis · · Score: 1

      For the use case you have set forth, an Android stick would be a better deal.

      If you crack one open though, how easy would it be to wire up additional hardware? The CHIP has 8 GPIOs, SPI, TWI, and UART on headers.

      What about using one to create a portable device? The CHIP has a battery power and charging circuit already on board.

      OS's that aren't as full featured.

      The CHIP runs Debian.

  9. Imagine a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these.

    1. Re:Imagine a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 someonefinallypoststheobligatory

    2. Re: Imagine a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I came here for this.

  10. 512MB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not enough RAM. Having used a B+, it's totally not enough RAM for the stuff they're saying you can do with it.

    1. Re:512MB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      512 MB is plenty (and 640 should be enough for anyone).

      Not that the Chip is really optimized for such use (no ethernet, don't need the wifi) but the ancient boxes doing duty as my firewall, mailserver, proxy, etc are running Linux on only 64 or 128 MB (depending on the box).

      This is perfect for when you need something a step up from an Arduino and don't want to pay for a Beagle Bone Black or a RasPi. I wouldn't want to compile the kernel or run Blender or the Gimp on it, but that's not what it's for.

  11. I love the Pocket Chip flavor by kosmosik · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I love the Pocket Chip flavor - already pledget for two piece set. I was looking for something similar for Raspi but couldn't find any decent enclosure with integrated input, display and battery in slick case. Also integated wifi and bluetooth are very nice.

    The $9 basic board comes without any display port but the modular aproach in which you can add VGA or HDMI via addon board is IMHO better than all-in-one Raspi - the board is cheaper that way and you can own only one display adapter and use it in multiple headless projects.

    1. Re:I love the Pocket Chip flavor by kage.j · · Score: 1

      Apparently it has a built-in composite video port.

      --
      he demonstrated by A plus B minus C divided by Z that the sheep must be red, and die of the rot
    2. Re:I love the Pocket Chip flavor by kosmosik · · Score: 1

      Which right now I can plug to exactly nothing I own. ;) But I guess the Pocket edition uses that for display.

  12. $20 shipping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that right? $29 for a $9 computer?

    1. Re:$20 shipping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another problem is that the word "gets" does not contain an apostrophe.

    2. Re:$20 shipping? by Diss+Champ · · Score: 1

      It appears to me from the kickstarter that shipping is $5 in the US.

    3. Re:$20 shipping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bob the Angry Flower says it best.
      http://www.yalerecord.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/itsits.gif

    4. Re:$20 shipping? by petermgreen · · Score: 2

      Yep, $5 for people in the USA, $20 for everyone else. Worse for many people that will likely push the total cost into the band where it is liable for VAT in the EU (at least if they are honest on the customs form) and the carrier will then more than likely charge me for collecting the VAT.

      And they don't seem to offer any packs of multiple of the basic board to spread the cost of shipping and customs BS over more units. The only multipacks they seem to offer are of their portable device.

      I guess (as a brit) I'll wait until the dust settles after the kickstarter and distributors over here start stocking them. Hopefully at not too much of a markup.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    5. Re:$20 shipping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want a Windows 8.1 x86 tablet, good for you. Not everybody does. Not everybody wants these for Angry Birds either. Some just want to displace some more workers on the assembly line, so Windows 8.1 is just pointless. So is the tablet format. And the fused x86 bootloader.

    6. Re:$20 shipping? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Basically, it looks like they didn't do any research on how much shipping would cost to other countries, and just wanted to make sure they didn't end up in the red. The problem with this is that there's places like Canada and Europe where you can most likely ship for way less that $20. I'm in Canada, and I've ordered bicycle parts from the US that weigh quite a bit more than this tiny computer, and the box would be much bigger, and still the shipping cost was $10 or less. Spending an afternoon at the post office, or talking to somebody on the phone could probably give you a pretty reasonable idea of what the shipping costs would be to most popular countries where people would order this thing.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  13. $20 shipping? by 0xdeaddead · · Score: 2

    OK, so it's a $30 board. The problem is $79 get's you a Windows 8.1 x86 tablet.

  14. Too bad it still requires binary-only drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And of course there's the GPL... "oversights" that didn't get corrected after asking.

  15. Lame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Has wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame.

  16. I would love one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would love one but it's $20 shipping to the UK and there doesn't seem to be any obvious way to combine. (I can't believe I had to log in to see the shipping cost, they should make that very obvious on the front KS page.

    Also, you should note that the initial fulfillment schedule is aiming for this time next year.

    1. Re:I would love one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't have to log in. Just hover over one of the reward levels and click 'select this reward'. The dialog that pops up includes shipping options at the bottom.

    2. Re:I would love one! by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      The fact that you have to interact with something before seeing such basic information is a failure.

    3. Re:I would love one! by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      The fact that you have to interact with something before seeing such basic information is a failure.

      And would be illegal under consumer protection laws in most civilised countries....

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    4. Re:I would love one! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Do not diss The Flat, you clutter-loving philistine!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  17. Post-scarcity society kicking in. by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    Said it roughly 15 years ago already here on slashdot:
    We're smack in the middle of a transition to a post-scarcity cyberpunk society. A throw-away end-user PC for 9$ is basically exactly that.
    Computers aren't the deal anymore. Who can operate them, how do I connect x to y to z and how do I migrate data from a to b - that's what this is all about. I can hardly be bothered to replace my 4.5 year old HTC Desire HD Smartphone because it's already basically a supercomputer in my pocket. With a replacable battery - which most of todays smartphones don't have.

    The fact that I would like a bigger screen and that the browser with Android 2.3 Gingerbread is starting to have problems with todays website might actually just get me to do it. I would love to have a convergence device though - one that can act as my desktop as soon as I plug it into its cradle. ... Maybe I should really wait for that new Ubuntu phone to come out ...

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Post-scarcity society kicking in. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Why are you using the Android browser instead of Firefox or Chrome?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:Post-scarcity society kicking in. by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      agree, but not so much about 'migrate data from a to b' because a redundant 2TB is not that cheap and if you go cheaper, you go with lousy, small and slow flash (USB, SD).
      Bandwith is similar if you pay for it (e.g. 360 euros per year for DSL, or similar for limited 4G)

      I could get by with a computer with single core, 256MB RAM and 4TB storage (can play a lot of audio/video)
      a good PC from 1999 costs $0, you can add a PCI controller card and two 2TB hard drives ; a junk iphone only has 8GB or 16GB ; a single board computer has very low storage (4GB here) and you need to pay for USB keyboard, PSU, HDMI display etc.

    3. Re:Post-scarcity society kicking in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to get a new phone, Grandpa.

    4. Re:Post-scarcity society kicking in. by Lennie · · Score: 1

      When you say post-scarcity in other words you are saying abundance:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      In this video it's explained how the price of solar power is on a similar Moore's law-track like a lot of electronics.

      And if you have cheap solar power, you have cheap power, when you have cheap power can convert salt/unclean water to clean water cheaply. When you have cheap water and power you can grow food pretty darn cheaply.

      What they didn't know when they made the video is that energy storage is also on a Moore's law track:
      http://rameznaam.com/2015/04/1...

      The prediction in 2014 was: grid-parity in Germany in summer of 2016
      http://cleantechnica.com/2014/...

      Now that really is abundance:
      - cheap electronics
      - cheap computing
      - cheap decentralized power
      - cheap power storage
      - cheap water
      - cheap food
      - we already have cheap software with free- and open source software
      - silicon photonics was delayed by one year says Intel, but supposedly we should have cheap networking and other connections too.

      And they think they can make at least certain parts of health care cheap too.

      Now it isn't all great there are big society challenges ahead when automation takes away all the simple tasks and keep moving up the ladder.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    5. Re:Post-scarcity society kicking in. by afidel · · Score: 1

      Because Firefox or Chrome would run like crap on something as low end as a Desire HD, not enough ram or CPU. The best browser for something that old is Opera Classic or maybe Dolphin.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    6. Re:Post-scarcity society kicking in. by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      The fact that I would like a bigger screen and that the browser with Android 2.3 Gingerbread is starting to have problems with todays website might actually just get me to do it.

      Bigger screens are overrated. As for the rest, just install Android 5.1,

    7. Re:Post-scarcity society kicking in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      firefox and chrome are resource pigs. They are the new internet explorers of the modern world. when you want something to run well you don't dump those pigs on it.

    8. Re:Post-scarcity society kicking in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why bother when used android phone/tablets with better specs and functional display is available for similar cost on ebay? Couple of years ago, I got htc evo 4G for $20 on ebay, and price of used phones keep going down

  18. ...and runs a version of Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No thanks, I don't want SystemD in my house.

    1. Re:...and runs a version of Debian by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      That's okay, SystemD will integrate your house in the next version.

  19. allwinner is a big time gpl violator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    https://linux-sunxi.org/GPL_Violations

    https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Allwinner-GPL-Violate-Proof

    why are we enabling them and encouraging them?

    1. Re:allwinner is a big time gpl violator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'We' aren't. 'They' are. Unless you're one of them? You should ask them.

      And I imagine 'they' are because they want to make a cool thing.

    2. Re:allwinner is a big time gpl violator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are reading this article and generating buzz for articles mentioning allwinnner and so we are all guilty

    3. Re:allwinner is a big time gpl violator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they want to make a cool thing.

      please explain why this is a good rationale for breaking the law, violating international trade agreements and pushing free software organizations to hire lawyers to fight you? So really, forcing copyright owners (the people who actually wrote the software and made the contribution) to defend their copyrights is okay because someone wants to make a cool thing?

      maybe now you can tell us that GPL is "different" somehow from other copyright agreements and does not have the same legal protections?

      wow

    4. Re:allwinner is a big time gpl violator by smugfunt · · Score: 1

      They are learning:
      allwinner-zh
      Are any of the other SoC vendors any better?

    5. Re:allwinner is a big time gpl violator by oliver.schinagl · · Score: 2

      Hi, I'm olliver from the Linux Sunxi community. Lets make sure people don't overreact and only see 'They violate GPL hate, run' etc. First off, yes, they do violate the GPL, but. For the SoC in this device, the only violating bit is the VPU (Video codec) and they are working on resolving that. Right now, they feel they are in their right, the community dissagree's, but they are trying to work it out. The bigger question is, what DO we get from Allwinner, or rather what have we, the community, achieved so far. The A13 used in this device, the sun5i mach, is next to identical to the more commonly known sun4i (A10) and very similar to the better supported sun7i (A20, a dual core cortex-A7 variant). These 3 chips are all very descently supported these days in the mainline! kernel. Are there things missnig and not perfect in the mainline kernel yet? Of course, there's no VPU, GPU support yet (MALI). The VPU IS reasonably well reverse engineerd however. Then there is the bootloader, mainline support? YES! How many cheap SoC's can claim all that. Can you pop in an SD card and run Kodi from Linux, no; but that's not really the intended market is it? Would we want more support from Allwinner, of course. Is there work still needing to be done? Absolutly. But things are not as bleak and dark as they are made out to be. TLDR; On the cheap side of things, this SoC is still the most promessing, even though there are set-backs. The community has done a lot of the legwork and while this is a 3 year old SoC, it is well supported now and has a strong community behind it. This kickstarter is offering something valueable, a cheap development platform. P.S. The HDMI and VGA bits are allready supported on the SoC. The boards they sell are just breakout boards for the pins.

  20. Not actually open source yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the Q&A:

    Is C.H.I.P. Open Source? Where are the docs?
    YES. Very open source, but we are still in the process of testing and refining the whole family of C.H.I.P. boards, and are not yet releasing our design files. We expect to be pushing files out publicly soon after the campaign.

    So I'll believe it when I can download it.

  21. $9 Open Source Computer Blows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Past Crowdfunding Goal.

    A lesson in title-making.

  22. No, it is not open. No, it is not $9. by Khyber · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Importantly, "all hardware design files schematic, PCB layout and bill of materials are free for you the community to download, modify and use."

    I guess you people have never heard of Allwinner, a fairly serial GPL violator. They're also pretty hostile towards the OSS community.

    No Linux device tree that I can tell, which means no support for shit.

    Oh, also - $9 computer with $20 shipping cost? That's the oldest eBay scam in the book. That thing only weighs a couple of ounces at most - $5 maximum even WITH insurance.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:No, it is not open. No, it is not $9. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally agree. Did anyone find datasheets for this Allwinner R8 chip or SoC or whatever it is?

    2. Re:No, it is not open. No, it is not $9. by tgeller · · Score: 5, Informative
      --
      Tom Geller
    3. Re:No, it is not open. No, it is not $9. by GrumpySteen · · Score: 3

      The shipping is $5 for people in the US.

    4. Re:No, it is not open. No, it is not $9. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      The shipping even over seas for that absurdly low weight is no fucking more than $5.

      Source: I sold LED panels and shipped them globally. Those things weighed POUNDS and didn't cost more than $15 to ship from USA to Australia.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    5. Re:No, it is not open. No, it is not $9. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Good old khyber who has worked in every job, learnt everything and done everything.

    6. Re:No, it is not open. No, it is not $9. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      And has the tax documentation to prove it!

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  23. What's an "R8 ARM" supposed to be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know it's an Allwinner A13 which uses the Cortex-A8 architecture, can't they even try to get the basic facts right?

    1. Re:What's an "R8 ARM" supposed to be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, A13 indeed. Even the Mali-400 used seems to be the same. Funny they call it R8.

      From my experience, my guess is the A13 burnt too many people out there (me included). Better avoid any mention of it, heh.

      I for one wont' be buying anything from Allwinner for a long time, no matter what it is called.

  24. Shipping ! by markus_baertschi · · Score: 1

    I went to the Kickstarter page with the intent of buying one. But then I found that shipping the $9 board to anywhere except the US starts at $20. So the price just tripled !

    So it looks like I'll wait until I can order it directly from china, with no detour through the US, with free shipping.

  25. $9 my ass by Guspaz · · Score: 1

    Let's add it up, shall we?

    $9 for the board
    $15 for the HDMI board so you can actually hook it up to a monitor
    $20 shipping
    Total: $44

    At that point you're better off getting a Pi. More performance, more support/accessories, more ports, more everything.

    1. Re:$9 my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's add it up, shall we?

      $9 for the board
      $15 for the HDMI board so you can actually hook it up to a monitor
      $20 shipping
      Total: $44

      At that point you're better off getting a Pi. More performance, more support/accessories, more ports, more everything.

      You cheap ass!!

    2. Re:$9 my ass by leuk_he · · Score: 1

      Add:
      USB power: same for pi and chip
      usb hub, because you want to connect with keyboard and mouse (bluetooth mouse & keyboard are way more expense)

      at the pi side: add a wifi module.
      mmpeg2 license (because ??)

      and the pi2 has way more processing power that this thing has.

    3. Re:$9 my ass by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Oh sure, the Pi has lots of additional expenses, but the Chip has a lot of the same ones too, and some things (like USB power) most people probably already have. I'm sure by now everybody has tons of USB phone chargers, those work fine for the Pi.

    4. Re:$9 my ass by afidel · · Score: 1

      $20 is international shipping, US is $5, not every project needs HDMI, and this board includes WiFi and BT 4.0 which are expensive and bulky when adding to an rPi plus it includes storage.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:$9 my ass by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      But this is great for those projects needing an embedded computer that doesn't need a display. Just the WiFi alone will run you more than $9 in most cases if you just need to add it to a project that doesn't have USB capabilities.

    6. Re:$9 my ass by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      For that price they should add a propeller and it can deliver itself.

  26. Where the money really is by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    Clearly, the cost of computing isn't in the chips or the PCB design. It's in the device enclosures. Tooling costs for nice enclosures are expensive even if you do have them made in China and 3D printing isn't quite mature enough to make short-run production-quality parts.

  27. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  28. How reliable is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how long will this el cheapo thing last? There's a reason I don't buy el cheapo thumb drives - they go bad almost instantly.

    1. Re:How reliable is it? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Tell me about it. A few months ago I bought a cheap USB drive that was so bad, I lost my data before copying it to the drive.

    2. Re:How reliable is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Data? You had data????

    3. Re:How reliable is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should have bought some WOM (write-only memory). At least your data would have been intact.

  29. Just standard Chinese approach to software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure why you're harboring a special grudge against Allwinner, when virtually all the SoC manufacturers in China are identical in that respect.

    What it comes down to is a difference in cultures. Companies like Allwinner have no interest in complete solutions, but merely design and produce the ARM SoCs that are most likely to sell to ARM-based gadget manufacturers. A consequence of this is that software is just a burden to their hardware business and so they spend as little time on it as possible.

    What's more, copyrights and licenses have very little relevance in the Chinese culture, it's regarded as "a western thing". And who are we to argue when it's completely normal in the West to ignore the copyrights and licenses on music and films in exactly the same way.

    Also, the Chinese SoC manufacturers document very little, and even less in English. Well why should they? How many Western companies translate their documentation into Chinese? When you add that to the fact that they're not producing end-user solutions anyway, and that most of their SoCs are sold to local Chinese manufacturers just across the road, it's pretty clear why things are as they are. We still benefit from it though, because it's their lack of such preoccupations that gives us such cheap gear.

    What's more, Allwinner can't fully document nor open source the MALI GPU drivers because ARM Holdings doesn't given them the right to do so. And ARM is a Western company, so perhaps you should blame someone closer to home.

    Finally, if you want support for Allwinner chips but you don't speak Chinese then the place you should be looking is linux-sunxi.org .

    Oh and good luck having hissifits about the Chinese view of copyright, a classic "first-world problem". They might even be acting more sensibly about this "imaginary property" stuff than we are, who knows. History will tell.

    1. Re:Just standard Chinese approach to software by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      What's more, copyrights and licenses have very little relevance in the Chinese culture, it's regarded as "a western thing".

      Their target market is very much a "western thing" too.

      We still benefit from it though, because it's their lack of such preoccupations that gives us such cheap gear.

      The guy who lacks preoccupations about ripping off delivery trucks sells cheap gear down the pub.

      They might even be acting more sensibly about this "imaginary property" stuff than we are, who knows. History will tell.

      ...aaaaaaand now we get to the point: you don't believe in protecting the copyrights that created the industries that invented the cheap stuff in the first place. There will be no new stuff if the people who put the time and energy into making it don't have their rights respected.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    2. Re:Just standard Chinese approach to software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy who lacks preoccupations about ripping off delivery trucks sells cheap gear down the pub.

      Ah, so you equate copyright infringement with stealing things off trucks. In other words you don't know the first thing about law, nor are you able to separate logically different concepts.

      Unless you remedy that, nothing you say on this subject can ever have any meaning. Making crap up because you think it sounds right might work on Slashdot, but don't try it in a court of law unless you're looking for laughter.

    3. Re:Just standard Chinese approach to software by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      The guy who lacks preoccupations about ripping off delivery trucks sells cheap gear down the pub.

      Ah, so you equate copyright infringement with stealing things off trucks. In other words you don't know the first thing about law, nor are you able to separate logically different concepts.

      You are overinterpreting quite harshly there. I did not say copyright infringement was the same as stealing -- you were implying that because a particular illegal practice makes things cheaper for the consumer, it is better. I gave an example of a different illegal practice that makes things cheaper for the consumer.

      I could have instead used the example of child labour, or slave labour, or unsafe working practices. I could have mentioned industrial espionage. Each of those means that you or I get cheaper things, but it is still not a just practice.

      Unless you remedy that, nothing you say on this subject can ever have any meaning. Making crap up because you think it sounds right might work on Slashdot, but don't try it in a court of law unless you're looking for laughter.

      You are the one needing remedy -- you were far too quick to assume that the only reason I disagree with you is because of ignorance. You should learn to accept that other people can be equally well-informed as you and still come to different conclusions.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  30. They might not be able to deliver. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The comments section for their camera project don't look very positive. It was supposed to ship mid-January, but it seems they ran into issues.

    As of two days ago backer #34 noted that they still haven't gotten their unit, and in their twitter they state that they're only just starting to ship on May 2.

    We'll see. It does look like they're launching another project so quickly because they're not actually making money on anything other than "concept."

  31. Nice Slashvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's Dice's cut?

  32. WOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2 sets of 2x20 GPIO? That is what, 54 IO pins total? Good computing power and that many inputs/outputs gives this a huge potential for hobby projects that can scale up to businesses. At $9 a piece that is amazing. I can think of excuses to buy at least 20 of these.

  33. and runs a version of Debian. by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

    runs a version of Debian.

    What does that mean? From the official Debian wiki:

    Porting to new platforms

    Unlike x86, each and every arm platform boots in a slightly different way. Thus, most of work of getting Debian running will involve dealing with bootloader and Kernel. Which is not really debian-specific work. After that, people can start working porting debian-installer for the system in question.

    Something tells me that we have another weirdo ARM board with its own "Debian" distro, joining the disarray ranks of dozen others: poorly supported, barely maintained, and soon forgotten.

    Considering the total amount of effort invested (and wasted) by developers into building the custom distros, I'm surprised (and disappointed) that nobody has actually stepped up, organized and standardized booting/etc on the ARM SoC yet. (IMO ARM Ltd itself should have done that a decade ago, since IMO it is one of the major roadblocks to the broader adoption of the ARM.)

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  34. 9 rings by electrosoccertux · · Score: 4, Funny

    actually no

    7 were for dwarf lords in their halls of stone
    this $9 is for mortal men doomed to die
    in the land of silicon where transistors lie

  35. mathematical industrial complex by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

    In defense of the calculator - it has an included screen, dedicated custom keyboard, custom slim case, battery life measured in months if not years, etc.

    In non-defense of the calculator - most of its cost is not in the above, but in its certification for use in [school / university / industry] - even if not for itself, then its sibling product which is.. and when that product costs $NN, you can't very well start selling this one for $N without people cluing in.

    down with the calculators of defense! it's time we end the mathematical industrial complex! they've been selling children-- children! overpriced calculators running on gameboy processors for 20 years! why can't the children just have a happy childhood? why do we have to repackage the gameboy into a torture device?

    1. Re:mathematical industrial complex by IamJaxn · · Score: 1

      Won't somebody please Think of the CHILDREN!?!?

  36. Meta by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    I'll soon be creating a Kickstarter to fund the creation of a crowd-sourced funding system. Stay tuned!

    1. Re:Meta by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      StartKicker?

  37. Money is in Kickstarter campaigns by tomhath · · Score: 2
    FTFA:

    Chip is near reality. There is a working prototype

    I'll believe the $9 price tag after they actually go to market.

  38. Missing: Cell transmitter by kuzb · · Score: 1

    If this had a cell reciever/transmitter I'd be sold. Of course, it'd then be $400 for no apparently logical reason.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  39. Stackable case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how long before someone designs/prints a stackable case, so one can wrap a machine in a case, with each shield adding a ring layer to the case.

  40. Arduino territory by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    That's truly all over Arduino's territory price-wise, it's hard to knock off even a chipduino cheaper than that. If you need more horsepower and/or wireless with your GPIO, it seems kind of a no-brainer.

    How much hardware is on the VGA breakout? Does it actually have caps and whatnot on it or could you replicate it with just some jumper wires and a through-hole VGA connector?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  41. As long as you can install your own OS, sure. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

    I'd love a portable little OpenBSD machine. I wonder how standard the hardware will be?

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  42. compare Arduino. I've never needed a power adapter by raymorris · · Score: 1

    You might not even need a power adapter. The price on this compares favorably to an Arduino, so I might use it where I would have previously used and Arduino. My Arduino projects have never needed a power adapter because they've always borrowed power from whatever they were connected to.

  43. Slashdot whines again by Required+Snark · · Score: 4, Insightful
    On Slashdot, it's not about the technology, it about the whining and complaining. A quick scan of all the comments reveals that no one has anything good to say about a $9 card size computer that runs Linux.

    Are you all nuts? This is an incredible price performance point. Yet all I see is nit picking: it can't do this, it doesn't run that, the "real' price is X (what about SHIPPING!!!), the Raspberry Pi is the same only better, etc. What the hell do you expect for $9? A cold six pack and a back massage?

    Speaking of the R Pi, if you go back and look at the responses to those announcements, you see the same kind of mindless bitching. The complaints are similar: t doesn't do enough, It's overpriced for what it does, it should be cheaper, more things should be optional, etc. Pretty much the same crap. Yet here the R Pi is the gold standard, and this board sucks. Make up you damned minds.

    No matter what anybody comes up with, it's wrong. Have any of the legions of critics done anything even remotely like this? Of course not. They're all just sitting in their parents basement sniping at people who get stuff done. It sounds bunch of pathetic losers who knock everyone else down so they can try and feel superior. It's a disgusting display.

    --
    Why is Snark Required?