Slashdot Mirror


Will Robot Cars Need Windows?

An anonymous reader writes: The Atlantic has an article asking whether autonomous cars need windows. If there's no driver, will the passengers want to look outside? In the summer, will anyone want to endure the relentless heat from the sun? The robot cars offer us a great opportunity to rethink the platform which is largely devoted to supporting the driver. But if a computer is in charge and it sees with dozens of cameras ringing the car, what else can we change? What else don't we need? What can improve?

61 of 435 comments (clear)

  1. carsickness by blindbat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People who get car sick need windows. Nuff said.

    1. Re:carsickness by Ambiguous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, but since there will be no drivers, we could just drug passengers into unconsciousness for the duration of their trip! RETHINK THE PLATFORM, MAN!

      --
      Their may be a grammatical error, misspeling, or evn a typo in this post.
    2. Re:carsickness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Also claustrophobia.

      There is a reason why trains, even underground trains, have windows.

    3. Re:carsickness by hierofalcon · · Score: 2

      No windows is a stupid idea, but just to be clear - the best you can hope for is crash resistant.

    4. Re:carsickness by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here's a novel thought - make both types, with and without windows. Then let the market decide!

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    5. Re:carsickness by JourneymanMereel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People who get car sick need windows. Nuff said.

      Pretty much. Did passenger cars in trains need windows? Do airplanes need windows? Do houses need windows?

      Obviously the windows in today's cars need to provide a LOT of visibility so the driver can see as much as possible. But taking away a driver's need to see doesn't take a way the need for windows.

      I honestly can't believe this is even a question.

      --
      Life has many choices. Eternity has two. What's yours?
    6. Re:carsickness by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Oh, shit .. my first thought wast they meant Microsoft Windows.

      What idiot thinks people are going to want to spend any time in a friggin car (self driving or not) without any damned windows?

      Congratulations, Peter Wayner ... that's one of the dumbest things I've heard in weeks.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    7. Re:carsickness by robbyb20 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would find it detrimental to not have windows for one reason alone, being able to see THRU cars. Think about driving behind a large truck/van/other large vehicle that you cant see past. Thing of how hard it is to know whats directly in front of you beyond that other car. Then, think about when youre pulling out a parking lot where you need to see past the car next to you to gauge the traffic coming from that direction. If youre in a smaller car, you need to inch up to see over their hood, with windowless cars, EVERY car would need to start inching up.

      TL;dr - Windows are not purely for the passenger of the car, they also provide visibility thru the car.

    8. Re:carsickness by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      I'll tell you what. We'll lock you in a box with no *real* outside view, but a camera view.

      We may or may not make the monitors fail. We may or may not put you into a car crash.

      You tell us how you feel about the experience.

      I simply think people will flat out refuse to get into the damned things. I know for a fact I would.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    9. Re:carsickness by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What are they going to get rid of next....?

      Are they also going to throw out convertible and targa roofs on autos?

      Geez, more and more I hope this driverless car thing doesn't take over and become *mandatory* my driving lifetime.

      I've never owned anything but 2-seater sports cars, I don't think of driving as just a drudge, I actually have an adventure every time I fire up the engine and go for a drive!!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    10. Re:carsickness by Shortguy881 · · Score: 2

      Retractable shades. There, I just saved you the effort of building two nearly identical fleets of vehicles. You can send the check to my secretary.

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    11. Re:carsickness by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      Yes, but not only for barfing out of ...

      Wow, that just reminded me of a needed use for windows...when driving drunks home, you often need a way for them to barf OUT of the car while on the road.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    12. Re:carsickness by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Houses don't need as many windows as they currently have so that people can see stuff outside. The reason houses have so many windows is so that people have an escape route in the event of a fire. If it weren't for that requirement, you could make houses much more energy-efficient by reducing their number. Do you really need a window in a bathroom, for instance? Heck no.

      But yes, the reason planes and trains have windows is mostly so people can see outside, especially for planes.

      For cars, however, they still have the same need as houses: people need to escape in the event of a crash, and sometimes windows serve as the opening to get people out because the door is stuck or mangled. The windows aren't just there so you can see.

    13. Re:carsickness by ByTor-2112 · · Score: 2

      You aren't re-thinking it enough. Cryofreeze your passengers.

    14. Re:carsickness by Adriax · · Score: 2

      As I recall, the original iteration of subway cars were windowless.
      It didn't end well...

      Even if there is nothing to see outside, people still need that visual connection to the outside world.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    15. Re:carsickness by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      That explains basement windows.

      Maybe, but my recent experience in a 1930 house in the northeast was that those shitty old basement windows also allowed *too much* ventilation during the winter, and as a result a pipe froze.

      Windows that can't accept blinds on bathrooms due to being in the shower are probably just an example of shitty architecture. My neighbor's house is like that and they installed frosted glass, but it still doesn't cut it. That's just bad design.

      Two things: 1) I see this bad design all the time. 2) I see a lot of cases where someone stuck a window in the small bathroom (because, most likely, building code requires it), and as a result, the whole bathroom has a terrible design because there just isn't any room left over in the bathroom after putting the window there. You can't put a shower where the window is, nor can you put the sink there, and it's kinda lame to put the toilet in front of the window too, so you wind up with a big chunk of floor space that you can't use for anything, and with an already-tiny bathroom this means you get a horrible bathroom layout somehow, like with a toilet crammed into a tiny corner. Eliminating the window would make the bathroom design much easier and flexible. Personally, I don't want to look outside when I'm in the bathroom, and I don't know why anyone else would want to either. For light, we have artificial lights. Windows are obsolete. Yes, I understand artificial lights aren't as desirable as natural light most times, but this is the bathroom here, and I'm talking about small bathrooms. If I want a really nice bathroom where I can lounge in the jacuzzi for an hour (and thus would probably like natural light), it's not going to be the size of two phone booths, plus you can actually put the jacuzzi next to a window. But for a tiny bathroom, I don't want a window constraining my layout.

  2. Gun ports by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't need windows - just gun ports.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    1. Re:Gun ports by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2

      Okay, wait a second!

      Here we have all these people saying that they wouldn't trust an automated car but they're fine with automated turrets? What happens when that asshole in the left lane takes out your turret? Then you got nothin'!

      I agree. You need gunports--at least a backup.

  3. Linux would be better by gnu-sucks · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would say that linux would be a superior choice to windows for a car. Less re-starting.

    1. Re:Linux would be better by marcosdumay · · Score: 2

      In all seriousness, do you ask those questions when you board a plane?

    2. Re:Linux would be better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If we're resurrecting dead jokes, it should be noted that the Linux cars never had any good drivers in the first place.

    3. Re:Linux would be better by kesuki · · Score: 2

      'but but but i drive better with wine!!!'

  4. Yes. by TWX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The passengers in a plane do not need windows but clearly because planes have windows at considerable cost to design properly (remember the Dehavilland Comet?) there's clearly a want for them to be there.

    Passengers in cars will want the option of looking out. One can even argue that scenic drives with an autonomous car would be much safer because there's no driver to split his attention between the view and the act of operating the vehicle.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Yes. by PvtVoid · · Score: 3, Informative

      The passengers in a plane do not need windows but clearly because planes have windows at considerable cost to design properly (remember the Dehavilland Comet?) there's clearly a want for them to be there.

      Windowless planes are coming. And they will be awesome.

    2. Re:Yes. by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      The passengers in a plane do not need windows but clearly because planes have windows at considerable cost to design properly (remember the Dehavilland Comet?) there's clearly a want for them to be there.

      That was my thought. Just install windows with shades that the occupants can pull down if needed. Cars seems to get by well structurally with windows already anyway, why bother redesigning them? With shades if they want to sleep they can sleep, look out the windows if they want to, or have some privacy for any, uh, "other activities" the occupants may want to partake in. Plus, windows are good escape routes if there is an accident that is preventing the doors from opening.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re:Yes. by 0123456 · · Score: 2

      The passengers in a plane do not need windows but clearly because planes have windows at considerable cost to design properly (remember the Dehavilland Comet?) there's clearly a want for them to be there.

      If I remember correctly, the Comet windows were designed properly (though they turned out to have less safety margin than intended), but they weren't installed properly. And I believe the window that failed was the one used for navigation fixes, which would have been hard to live without in the days before GPS.

    4. Re:Yes. by neilo_1701D · · Score: 4, Informative

      The passengers in a plane do not need windows but clearly because planes have windows at considerable cost to design properly (remember the Dehavilland Comet?) there's clearly a want for them to be there.

      If I remember correctly, the Comet windows were designed properly (though they turned out to have less safety margin than intended), but they weren't installed properly. And I believe the window that failed was the one used for navigation fixes, which would have been hard to live without in the days before GPS.

      The DH-106 Comet had square windows. The resulting point at each corner was a stress concentrator, and as the skin expanded and contracted during normal flights metal fatigue started. A year into service, the metal fatigue reached a point where the skin failed catastrophically and the aircraft came apart in mid-flight.

      Installation of the windows was a factor, true, but the square windows was the primary point of failure.

    5. Re:Yes. by 0123456 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Installation of the windows was a factor, true, but the square windows was the primary point of failure.

      The corners had higher stress than expected, which is why they were redesigned once they discovered the problem. But the cracks started from rivet holes, where the windows were incorrectly installed; AFAIR the design specified different rivets, and glue as a backup, and would probably have at least survived long enough for an engineer to notice any cracks during normal inspections, if they'd been installed that way.

    6. Re:Yes. by _merlin · · Score: 3, Informative

      It wasn't the passenger windows that were the issue, it was a radio antenna window, and the failure was because the window was supposed to be glued in but they used rivets instead, and the fractures started at the rivet holes.

  5. A for effort, but no by dAzED1 · · Score: 2

    Do you drive your house? Why do you have windows there? Do you drive the plane? Why are there windows there? And carsickness. I mean sure, it's great to ask questions, but the windows on a car aren't just for the driver to know where they are going.

  6. Drive-throughs by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are plenty of reasons (beyond merely operating the vehicle) to need windows:

    • Carsickness, as you mentioned
    • Being able to use drive-through windows
    • Ventilation
    • Scenery (which is better with an autonomous car, because the person who would otherwise be driving can enjoy it too!)
    • Carrying stuff that sticks out a little
    • Being able to yell at the idiot driver of the (non-autonomous) car in the lane next to you
    • And finally, driving, when going off-road or other situations in which the autopilot fails or can't be used (I assume any autonomous car is going to end up having manual backup controls, at least for the foreseeable future)
    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    1. Re:Drive-throughs by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not to mention letting your dog stick its head out of the window. #1 most important function of car windows according to dogs.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Drive-throughs by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In aircraft, windows for passengers add a lot of expense and structural weakness. Yet aircraft still have them. Passengers don't want to feel boxed in, and just want to enjoy the view. For SDCs, windows will be necessary for quite a while in case the driver needs/wants to take over.

    3. Re:Drive-throughs by _merlin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Window blinds have to be raised for safety reasons during take-off/landing because sometimes a passenger will be able to see something important or dangerous. Windows do provide some safety as well.

    4. Re:Drive-throughs by bearinboots · · Score: 5, Funny

      Also, Grey Poupon.

    5. Re:Drive-throughs by Slider451 · · Score: 2

      William Shatner's greatest role.

      --
      Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
    6. Re:Drive-throughs by cahuenga · · Score: 2

      Yeah, it might be kinda nice to have a view of the road in case the AI happens to miss that approaching tornado ahead.

  7. Re:Back seats have windows in the door by neilo_1701D · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Technically, the driver of a car never uses the windows in the door of the back seats.

    I really don't want to be on the same road as you when you change lanes on the non-driving side...

  8. Why are we asking this... by geekmux · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...when we are not ready to mitigate every single scenario in which a human driver would need to take over and drive in an emergency?

    I mean seriously, we're not even close to answering that. Therefore, humans will still need things like windows and mirrors.

  9. airplanes have windows by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Airliners only need one set of windows at the front, for the pilots. But there's a row of windows on either side, and the seats next to those windows are the second-most-popular (after those on the aisle) despite the fact that they're the most difficult to get in and out of, have no access to the overhead bins, and offer less head/foot room. See also: trains, buses, passenger ferries. So I think the answer is yes: robot cars will still have windows.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  10. Spectrum Pursuit Vehicle by OzPeter · · Score: 2

    Captain Scarlet had it right .. not only did the Spectrum Pursuit Vehicle not have any windows, the occupants had rearward facing seats to better protect them in the case of a crash, and they used video monitors to view where they were driving.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  11. Re: Fewer Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In an ideal system, robotic cars will not break traffic laws and fewer traffic stops will be needed. And if falsely accused, the vehicle's logs should provide a staunch defense.

  12. Re:Dumbest question I'll see all day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, no, the purpose of advancing technology is total isolation from the natural world. The natural world is icky and uncomfortable. Glass just isn't enough of a barrier.

  13. Quick Answer by StikyPad · · Score: 2

    Yes. Next question.

  14. Seating arrangements by Frag-A-Muffin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I like the seats on the cross-country trains (VIA up here in Canada). They have pairs of seats that can swivel, to make them face another pair of seats. A fold out table creates a nice surface for a nice game of cards, or whatever you fancy. You could even have meetings while driving to a destination. So many possibilities when you don't have to stare at the back of someone's head!

    --

    AirSpeak - http://itunes.com/apps/AirSpeak
    1. Re:Seating arrangements by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      I would love to see this in a self-driving car for long family road-trips. Three hour car ride? Set your destination, turn your seats around, grab a tabletop game (Pandemic, Munchkin, Catan, etc) and play a few games while the car drives you to your destination. Of course, some games might need travel versions to keep the pieces on the playing board. For example, Catan might be difficult if every bump the car hit caused your pieces to go flying. Still, this could make long road trips more fun for the entire family.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  15. Re:OT: Dogs by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Funny

    Because dogs love it, and because there is nothing funnier than a dog with its face and ears flapping in the wind, drool splashing on the windshield of the car behind.

    Honestly, picture Dug from Up ... in full gloriously happy tongue wagging happiness.

    A dog with his head out the car windows is such an unbridled expression of glee+goofy it makes me smile just thinking of it.

    Let's see a damned cat do that. You can't, because cats are stupid pets.

    Of course at the time I had an onion on my belt, because that was the style back then ... wait? What?

    Get off my damned lawn you darned cat lover!!

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  16. Re:The windows need to stay by hawguy · · Score: 2

    A self-driving car will still need windows in case the human driver ever needs to take over. But the windows could certainly have privacy shades. Other things we'd no longer need for robot cars are street signs, stop lights, and lane markers. You might argue that we'd need to keep those things for the people choosing to drive themselves but my question would be how long should the rest of us finance billions in infrastructure for a diminishing number of holdouts?

    Either the infrastructure will need to allow for fallback to human control or not, but it can't be both ways -- you can't expect a human who has let his car drive him around for years to find his way home without street signs, or drive safely without traffic control devices. So if you want to allow for human control, you'll need to provide street signs and traffic signals.

  17. Yes by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 2

    Yes, they do.

    An early example of getting it wrong was the City & South London Railway, the first deep-level underground rail line in London. The designers of the rolling stock didn't bother with windows because there was, supposedly, nothing to see. Passengers hated the "padded cells". Even if all you see is tunnel walls rushing by, people need to see outside.

    I could see the utility of an airliner with no windows but cameras and viewing screens - it would solve some engineering problems - but for a car, the simplest is still the best. Windows.

    ...laura

  18. Really? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Atlantic has an article asking whether autonomous cars need windows....

    There are windows on space capsules.

    There are windows on railroad passenger cars.

    There are windows in houses.

    .

    My guess is that people, in general, like to look outside.

  19. Re:OT: Dogs by Oligonicella · · Score: 2

    Nose candy. Dogs smell things we don't. When I visit friends and drive through the forest, the dogs damn near hang out the windows.

    Oh, and it's fun.

  20. Re:OT: Dogs by Oligonicella · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is safest practice for all concerned.

    So is not going anywhere at all. Bet you don't let your kid make an airfoil with their hand on the hiway either. Curmudgeon.

  21. Privacy by seven+of+five · · Score: 2

    On the one hand, you could black out the windows for privacy. On the other hand, many police departments have a hard time with blacked out windows.

  22. Re:OT: Dogs by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Informative
    Serious answer:

    If your sense of smell was strong enough to let you smell something at the bottom of a lake, and if as a beloved pet your entire life was spent mostly in the same restricted area - a particular home, yard and neighborhood, you would also jump at the chance to get as much new, fresh and undiscovered air drift past your nostrils as you could. If ever you observe a dog with its head out the window in a car, it will have the "smiling" pose known by dog owners (relaxed jaw, ears back, tongue out) but also those nostrils will be working furiously the entire time. The dog is smelling everything it can, as much as it can.

    Dogs are curious creatures (which is why wolves were first drawn to human habitations). Wild dogs and wolves in packs usually roam over large territories. Modern dogs have adapted to living a human lifestyle more or less, provided they get plenty of exercise and toys and social stimulation to keep them from being bored. But when they get the chance to add new smells to their experience, they love that most of all.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  23. Won't know any better by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your dog is deprived of a simple pleasure. Hooray for you.

    My dog arrives safely at his destination and won't become a 50lb projectile that could kill both of us in an accident. He also won't get any debris in his eyes that I'll have to have a vet remove later. My dog has plenty of joy in his life and I promise you will not know he missed anything by keeping his head inside the window.

  24. Re:OT: Dogs by cayenne8 · · Score: 2
    Man, this type of thing reminds me of how things really have changed.

    Does anyone here on the list still remember when as a kid, you didn't also have to be *bolted* into a seat? I remember crawling up in the space under the rear windshield on top of the seats and watching the world go by or even going to sleep.

    I also was free to lay around and read or play toys in the whole back seat area.

    I kinda feel sad for all the freedom to enjoy life a bit more has been lost in the era of fear and forced safety.

    As for my dogs, they've already been trained to sit in their seats, front or back and act reasonably well. I rarely would drive with the window down with them in the car, as they seems to prefer the AC since it is hot so much of the year down here, but on nice days, I'd crack the passenger window so they could smell the world outside, but usually not enough for them to crawl out of...

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  25. Re:OT: Dogs by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is safest practice for all concerned.

    Never take your dog out. That's safest of all! Just lock it in a cage and it won't ever come to harm, although it will probably die of desperation.

    Seriously while I don't agree with the labrador bouncing around in the back of the pickup truck, and while I do realize that the airbag can easily kill my 5lb poodle if it deploys, I don't spend my entire life worrying about every possible little thing that can go wrong. She's in my wife's lap with her leash on, and she loves to smell outside the window. I'd rather let her enjoy the ride with a small chance of serious injury if the worst should happen, than make sure she was miserable every trip getting car sick in a "safe" crate somewhere in the back of my car.

    Life has risks. It's up to everyone to figure out the trade off they are willing to accept for themselves.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  26. Re:OT: Dogs by mark-t · · Score: 2

    Actually, yes I do... And doing so has even saved my life twice.

  27. Re:OT: Dogs by Triklyn · · Score: 4, Funny

    this is why the best option is to strap the safety crate to the roof of the vehicle, and let the dog fear-poop itself while getting its fill of the 60mph scent-hurricane of highway travel.

  28. Re:Back seats have windows in the door by Zmobie · · Score: 2

    If your side view mirrors are adjusted correctly, you don't have blind spots.

  29. Re:OT: Dogs by tj2 · · Score: 2

    this is why the best option is to strap the safety crate to the roof of the vehicle, and let the dog fear-poop itself while getting its fill of the 60mph scent-hurricane of highway travel.

    Mitt, is that you?