Slashdot Mirror


Secret Files Reveal UK Police Feared That Trekkies Could Turn On Society

An anonymous reader writes: Scotland Yard was worried that fans of shows like the X Files and Star Trek might run amok during the Millennium according to secret files. The file, called UFO New Religious Movements (NRMs) And The Millennium, reveals that anti-terrorism experts were also concerned about the brain-washing effect of Dark Skies, Roswell, Millennium and The Lawnmower Man on viewers. According to the Telegraph: "The secret briefing note was obtained from the Met under the Freedom of Information Act by Sheffield-based British X-Files expert Dr Dave Clarke while researching a new book, How UFOs Conquered the World. Dr Clarke, who teaches investigative journalism at Sheffield Hallam University, said: 'The documents show the police and security services were concerned about the export of some new religious movements concerning UFOs and aliens from the USA in the aftermath of the mass suicide by followers of the Heaven's Gate.'"

214 comments

  1. Seems obvious now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sure, it seems obvious now, but I'm kind of glad we have people looking at these ridiculous scenarios and planning how to deal with them *just in case*. It's difficult to predict the unknown so might as well be prepared for it even if it's unlikely.

    1. Re:Seems obvious now by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      well, they were just concerned that people are really, really, really stupid.

      which is fair. I mean, look at youtube now. full of newage idiots babbling about how we're moving to a new age and all that stuff. luckily the people who believe in that kind of crap and conspiracy theories about the government suppressing information about crystals usually just stick to their homes(and to scamming money out of other idiots, seriously, look at any youtube channel about newage/conspiracy stuff. if they have more than 2 hours of content they want to sell you something, even if they're babbling about the end of the monetary system).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Seems obvious now by Etherwalk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      well, they were just concerned that people are really, really, really stupid.

      which is fair. I mean, look at youtube now. full of newage idiots babbling about how we're moving to a new age and all that stuff. luckily the people who believe in that kind of crap and conspiracy theories about the government suppressing information about crystals usually just stick to their homes(and to scamming money out of other idiots, seriously, look at any youtube channel about newage/conspiracy stuff. if they have more than 2 hours of content they want to sell you something, even if they're babbling about the end of the monetary system).

      This. It seems really stupid to think that these shows will lead someone down those roads--notably, if these shows will, so will almost anything. But sometimes people are really, really stupid. See, e.g.: anti-vaxxer movement. There probably actually *should* be a government conspiracy to silent the anti-vaxxer movement because it presents a serious threat to public health.

      We could call the conspiracy the "NIH" and ask it to do "peer-reviewed research." :)

      But a good propaganda machine designed to promote research over stupid ideas that threaten public safety, scary as it is, might actually be called for on occasion... be a bit transparent about it, but still.

    3. Re:Seems obvious now by thephydes · · Score: 0

      Yes, you posted before me but they are my thoughts too.

    4. Re:Seems obvious now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I agree, I am glad the police are looking into trekkies, those people are strange and different and who knows what they are capable of! The police should investigate minority group and subculture, it's the only way to ensure our freedom. There are some very dangerous groups out there. Have you ever heard of slashot? They're like trekkies but with black hat hacker skills.. cyber criminals more dangerous than anything the police could have imagined in 1999. I hope the police investigate and round up the lot of them, better safe than sorry.

    5. Re:Seems obvious now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's what we need a secret, but transparent, government conspiracy... for our own good. You sound like a fucking x-files villain. You should kill yourself for societies benefit.

    6. Re:Seems obvious now by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      I guess you just stumbled into the videos for the "Endgame" AR-Game.

      Worst. Book. Ever.

      --
      bickerdyke
    7. Re:Seems obvious now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      well, they were just concerned that people are really, really, really stupid.

      which is fair. I mean, look at youtube now. full of newage idiots babbling about how we're moving to a new age and all that stuff.

      Like all the nuts on here when someone mentions the "Singularity"?

    8. Re:Seems obvious now by Rei · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Can you imagine the dystopian dictatorship where trekkies come to power? All of the halls of power full of people walking around in spandex and fake ears and brow ridges, the fed directed to work toward the absolution of currency, the military directed to accelerate development of phasers and for all recruits to undergo "Kobayashi Maru" training.... NASA would finally get their proposed $18,5 billion dollar annual budget passed - except that the bill would have the word "annual" crossed out and the word "monthly" written in its place. National anti-bullying legislation would be passed, probably with a name like Spock's Law. And of course they'd insist on referring to the UN as the United Federation of Planets.

      --
      POTUS Witch Hunt tracker: 75 charges filed against 19 witches, 4 witches cooperating and 5 witches have pled guilty.
    9. Re:Seems obvious now by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      You should see how high on the list anonymous Slashdot posters are. You're being watched, terrorist.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    10. Re:Seems obvious now by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, you posted before me but they are my thoughts too.

      That's because THEY transmit the "thoughts" to people's brains... think about it!

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    11. Re:Seems obvious now by mrxak · · Score: 1

      And they'd move the capital to the left coast. Ugh.

    12. Re:Seems obvious now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking the same thing. Mention "Singularity" or "AI" and Slashdotters start talking about uploading themselves to a cloud and computers who are going to take over the world.

      Meanwhile my Mac can't even connect to wifi reliably. But yeah, I'm sure AI is right around the corner.

    13. Re:Seems obvious now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, I am glad the police are looking into trekkies, those people are strange and different and who knows what they are capable of! The police should investigate minority group and subculture, it's the only way to ensure our freedom. There are some very dangerous groups out there. Have you ever heard of slashot? They're like trekkies but with black hat hacker skills.. cyber criminals more dangerous than anything the police could have imagined in 1999. I hope the police investigate and round up the lot of them, better safe than sorry.

      Wtf! This is currently Score:4, Informative... It's like a recursive troll

    14. Re:Seems obvious now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Trekker myself (we are not called Trekkies), I am here to tell you that there is no risk of us "turning on" anyone. That's why we are Trekkers - no girlfriends.

    15. Re:Seems obvious now by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to see the down-side...

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    16. Re:Seems obvious now by Xiaran · · Score: 1

      In Star Trek SF in not the capital of the Federation. Earth is. A chunk of the infrastructure is located in SF but other cities(especially Paris) have other facilities.

    17. Re:Seems obvious now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was obvious then, it is obvious now, and it was all a gigantic waste of money, period.

    18. Re:Seems obvious now by MitchDev · · Score: 0

      Religious people are the most dangerous, they believe things that aren't real and want to force that on others, christians and muslims are amongst the worst...

    19. Re:Seems obvious now by MitchDev · · Score: 2

      What's the difference between a trekker and a trekkie?

      A trekker is a Star Trek fan.

      A trekkie is an idiot that insists you call them a trekker.

    20. Re:Seems obvious now by operagost · · Score: 1

      Starfleet HQ is in San Fran.

      So basically, it's Arlington, VA if you compare it to the USA.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    21. Re:Seems obvious now by MisterSquid · · Score: 1

      Yes, you posted before me but they are my thoughts too.

      That's because THEY transmit the "thoughts" to people's brains... think about it!

      I tried thinking about it but the transmissions wouldn't let me.

      --
      blog
    22. Re:Seems obvious now by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Sure, it seems obvious now, but I'm kind of glad we have people looking at these ridiculous scenarios and planning how to deal with them *just in case*. It's difficult to predict the unknown so might as well be prepared for it even if it's unlikely.

      No doubt they are looking into a Slashdotter's apocalypse, where thousands of us come en masse out of our mother's basements, and make out with every woman we see.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    23. Re:Seems obvious now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Religious people are the most dangerous, they believe things that aren't real and want to force that on others, christians and muslims are amongst the worst...

      Yeah, like "Thou shalt not kill" and such. Stupid people are stupid, whether they're religious or atheistic.

    24. Re:Seems obvious now by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 2

      Yes, you posted before me but they are my thoughts too.

      That's because THEY transmit the "thoughts" to people's brains... think about it!

      I tried thinking about it but the transmissions wouldn't let me.

      My God... you are old enough Slashdoter, do i have to treat you like a baby? Anyway: wear you tin foil hat first...

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    25. Re:Seems obvious now by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I read TFS as a big giant "holy cow are police forces actually this damned stupid?"

      How can these idiots take themselves seriously when they have such monumentally idiotic ideas? And why should they expect us to take them seriously?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    26. Re:Seems obvious now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you think, why your Mac can't connect?
      The intertubes are already clogged with competing AI's.

    27. Re:Seems obvious now by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      And they'd move the capital to the left coast. Ugh.

      Actually, they'd move it to Paris. San Francisco is home to Starfleet Academy, not the Federation capital.

    28. Re:Seems obvious now by mrxak · · Score: 2

      I was just trying to make a joke about how California sucks, but sure, let's nerd fight.

      Starfleet Headquarters is in San Francisco
      The Federation Council is in San Francisco
      President of the United Federation of Planets is in Paris, but everyone knows the Federation Council has all the real power and it's been suggested the Federation is a parliamentary type system with the Council electing the President
      France is also coastal, and to the west of the bulk of the continent on which it resides, thus west coast.
      We don't know where the Federation Supreme Court is, but probably someplace on a west coast.

      I maintain that if Trekkies took over the world, they would put their capital on a west coast.

    29. Re:Seems obvious now by mrxak · · Score: 1

      The Federation Council is in San Francisco, too. Between them and Star Fleet HQ, the power is all in San Francisco.

    30. Re: Seems obvious now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're all pedo weirdos.

    31. Re:Seems obvious now by Minwee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, I read TFS as a big giant "holy cow are police forces actually this damned stupid?"

      How can these idiots take themselves seriously when they have such monumentally idiotic ideas? And why should they expect us to take them seriously?

      You're talking about someone who managed to make it his paid, full-time job to write X-File fanfic and hang out at Star Trek conventions, most likely putting everything on a government expense account. The word you're looking for isn't "stupid", it's "brilliant".

    32. Re:Seems obvious now by tehcyder · · Score: 1, Funny

      I was thinking the same thing. Mention "Singularity" or "AI" and Slashdotters start talking about uploading themselves to a cloud and computers who are going to take over the world.

      Meanwhile my Mac can't even connect to wifi reliably. But yeah, I'm sure AI is right around the corner.

      Didn't you get the memo that the pro-AI crowd achieved AI by defining AI to include things like my radio alarm clock "interacting" with me. Oh look, it can tell the time and wake you up, it's smarter than a chimpanzee.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    33. Re:Seems obvious now by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      we are not called Trekkies

      Oh yes you are. It's funnier.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    34. Re:Seems obvious now by MobSwatter · · Score: 1

      Yep, they need to screw up what is left of Hollywood at this point, because screwing up the airline industry is just so yesterday.

    35. Re:Seems obvious now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, like "Thou shalt not kill - unless they're an infidel" and such.

      FTFY

    36. Re:Seems obvious now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Religious people are the most dangerous, they believe things that aren't real and want to force that on others, christians and muslims are amongst the worst...

      Yeah, like "Thou shalt not kill" and such. Stupid people are stupid, whether they're religious or atheistic.

      It's even worse than that. Christians have as their greatest commandment "love your neighbor as yourself." Fortunately, most of them ignore this one.

    37. Re:Seems obvious now by neoshroom · · Score: 1

      Can you imagine the dystopian dictatorship where trekkies come to power?

      Nope. Neither can you despite a lot of imaging. It almost sounds...logical.

      --
      Big apple, new Yorik, undig it, something's unrotting in Edenmark.
    38. Re: Seems obvious now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're all pedo weirdos.

      Nah, mostly they just have a fetish for green women.

    39. Re:Seems obvious now by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      I maintain that if Trekkies took over the world, they would put their capital on a west coast.

      Unless we find a world where the sun rises in the west, in which case we'd put it on the EAST coast. It's all about the dramatic sunsets.

    40. Re:Seems obvious now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being an idiot and schizophrenia are two different, if often related, things. I sometimes wonder if the youtube new-age cultism isn't actually an organized propaganda movement built around taking advantage of various poorly-understood mental phenomena, especially capitalizing on the classified or illegal nature of some of the research required to debunk their outlandish claims.

    41. Re:Seems obvious now by JimSadler · · Score: 0

      Maybe I'm too hard on people but i don't worry one bit about a group of nuts committing suicide. Frankly some personalities are so mush like that suicide is justified for them. I also could care less that people misuse prescription drugs and over dose at rates higher than the yearly combat losses in Vietnam. If people are dumb enough to get high and perish from it so what? But for tax payers to be funding government officials who sit around and get big pay for worrying about people going nuts over popular TV shows and movies offends me. As far as conspiracies we really do suffer from some. I have no doubt that JFK's death was a government conspiracy. I don't like that. But it certainly should not cause people to have nervous breakdowns.

    42. Re:Seems obvious now by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      But my mac can connect to alien command ship and give it a cold (um virus, I mean virus).

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    43. Re:Seems obvious now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing real terrorists showed up!

    44. Re:Seems obvious now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Secret Files Reveal UK Police Feared That Trekkies Could Turn On Society"

      My fear was always that they would turn it off.

    45. Re:Seems obvious now by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Didn't you hear, all the data is in the cloud now so we no longer need computers.

    46. Re:Seems obvious now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'm sure they were worried about the trekkies causing peace to break out all over.. Oh.. wait, please..no "We're British".. it's the *American* pentagon that would be worried about that ! BEsides, the UK has cameras in every corner of every block and square and public restroom. No Romulan or Zindi plot would go unrecorded.. ;-)

  2. Its funny by Chrisq · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Its funny that they should be concerned about this but go out of the way to say that so many real acts of terrorism committed by Muslims using the Qur'an as justification "have nothing to do with Islam".

    1. Re:Its funny by dave420 · · Score: 0

      With every one of your anti-Islam posts you are just showing the world how small-minded, ignorant and scared you are, just like the fanatics you probably intend to rail against (but due to your ignorance you get them confused with people who identify with the same religion, but who are not fanatical). You have more in common with the fanatics than you think.

    2. Re:Its funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Fuck off Islam apologist. Sure, not all muslim are islamist, but all Islamist are muslim. And stepping around this to avoid hurt feeling only endanger us. Do you want to go the way of the middle east buddhists? Everywhere islam when it destroyed the culture and erased, almost, all traces of it's existence. You may argue that is is human nature, stronger culture always replace the weaker one, but then what is the evil in fighting back? Shouldn't we also be allowed to exist? Face it, the truth is that you are anti-westerner and/or anti-white.

    3. Re:Its funny by Crashmarik · · Score: 2

      http://video.foxnews.com/v/403...

      There you go. Now please reiterate your message about how people know nothing about it and that it promotes peace.

      BTW Sorry about having to use a link from fox news, I know some people can't deal with the fact it exists but they were the only network willing to broadcast this. You might wish to consider what that implies about agenda in the media.

    4. Re:Its funny by Chrisq · · Score: 0

      With every one of your anti-Islam posts you are just showing the world how small-minded, ignorant and scared you are, just like the fanatics you probably intend to rail against (but due to your ignorance you get them confused with people who identify with the same religion, but who are not fanatical). You have more in common with the fanatics than you think.

      Please read the qur'an = your ignorance of the actual teachings of Islam is astounding.

    5. Re:Its funny by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 2

      With every one of your anti-Islam posts you are just showing the world how small-minded, ignorant and scared you are, just like the fanatics you probably intend to rail against (but due to your ignorance you get them confused with people who identify with the same religion, but who are not fanatical). You have more in common with the fanatics than you think.

      I am not the one who wrote the comment you replied to, but i agree with him (actually, in the one month i am a "Slashdoter", i have made some anti-Muslim/Islam posts myself - not very "popular", like the parent's that has modded down) - i don't know about the other guy, but i know about Muslims (i grow up with them, still live close to them), i read the Quran and the Hadiths, plus i am Greek (and Christian by the way, and as a "disclaimer"), so i may have the extra "historic privilege" to know few things more about the issue.

      I don't think that i am "small-minded, ignorant", but yes i am "scared" (of Muslims) - as for this "You have more in common with the fanatics than you think", i must disagree: i (as a Christian - even "fanatic", or just a non-Muslim, like an "Atheist" is for example) don't believe what Muslims believe... and you better believe ME when i write to you that "i am scared of Muslims" (ALL MUSLIMS - i don't like ALL "Atheists", but i am not scared of them... most of them at least...)

      What is your knowledge/experiance of Islam/Muslims Sir?

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    6. Re:Its funny by Chrisq · · Score: 0, Troll

      As if the bible was any better, you fucking racist asshole.

      Because all christians are one race, and Muslims another you ignorant appeaser

    7. Re:Its funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure he doesn't have any problem with the secular/cultural muslims who ignore the quran's teachings to kill and enslave all the infidels, and don't feel any particular need to try to model their lives on that of a barbarian warlord from the middle ages.

      Unfortunately there are some muslims who are religious, and the religion of islam is an oppressive and violent ideology that is entirely incompatible with western democracy. People who want to live as Muhammad did and follow his teachings are an existential threat to everything you probably hold dear, just as Communism was, and Fascism before that.

      If everyone calling themselves a muslim was like the secular Christians who put up Christmas lights but don't go to Church every Sunday or study the Bible, then there'd be no terrorists and nobody would have any problem with islam. There are plenty of muslims who don't study the quran or hadith, and of those most are probably good people just going about their business. When you hear somebody criticizing islam, they are not attacking these secular muslims.

      A lot of people use the term "radical" but there's nothing radical about the terrorists. I'm glad you used the term "fanatical" instead. The most accurate term would still be "fundamentalist". These are not reformers, or part of some kind of some new off-shoot of islam. The terrorists are adhering to the fundamental principles of their faith when they're killing people and blowing up buildings. If you doubt this, I suggest you read a copy of the quran and hadith for yourself. When a religion is based on violent conquest of the entire world, and the extermination or enslavement of anyone who will not convert, this fact is not hidden away. It's fundamental to the religion. It's right there in the source text, plain as day and repeated many times, so that followers of that religion know what they're supposed to do. Followers of islam, therefore, have been terrorizing the rest of the world since the year the year 623 when Muhammad started telling his followers to attack non-muslims, men, women, and children alike. There's been nearly 1400 years of non-stop hostilities between the muslim world and the rest of the world. Perhaps you are not aware of this history, or perhaps you've been convinced it's all somebody else's fault every time. Perhaps you would be better served by listening to muslim religious scholars and reading Muhammad's own words on the subject. They are all in agreement. This violence is required of muslims. Luckily, not everyone who calls themselves a muslim is actually all that religious. I expect Parent is aware of the distinction as well as I am.

    8. Re:Its funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a popular tactic of islam-apologists to deflect rather than answer hard questions about islam's violent ideology. It's also a popular tactic to accuse anyone criticizing islam of racism, despite, as has already been noted, islam is not a race. I see this AC has chosen to go with both strategies at the same time.

      You see, islamacists understand the West quite well. They know the West is full of very guilty white people who feel ashamed of various atrocities their great great great grandparents may have carried out. Above all, they do not want to feel like they're perpetuating any sort of racism or bigotry of any kind themselves. It becomes trivial to deflect any attention on islam's very clear ideology of hatred and violence back onto anyone who might criticize it. The Western listener, rather than continuing to ask critical questions about the quran or hadith, instead feels guilty about asking, and forgets all about their criticism.

      Note, this apologist does not deny that islam is full of violence and hatred. Such a position, he knows, is indefensible. It is plain as day to anyone who cares to read islam's religious texts. All he did was try to accuse another religion of such things, thereby excusing any violence or hatred espoused by Muhammad, while knowing full well that his argument about Christianity in this case is complete nonsense. Christ was not a warlord. He taught about non-violent resistance, he did not lead over two dozen battles personally to attack non-believers. He did not order the deaths of his enemies, or the rape of any women and girls. He taught about acceptance and tolerance of other peoples, not the wholesale killing and enslavement of other peoples. He confronted his follower's racism, he did not encourage it. This apologist knows these rather significant differences, yet he is counting on the average Westerner to not know much about the Bible. For anyone who has vaguely heard some old Hebrew stories, and doesn't know what the New Covenant is, this trick may even work. When arguing with an islam-apologist, it's important to be as knowledgeable about the religious texts in question. I strongly suggest everyone read the quran and hadith and decide for themselves how it compares to the story of Jesus Christ.

      At the very least, I suggest you familiarize yourself with the Sermon on the Mount, and compare what you learn from that with what an islamacist says about Christianity when he wants to deflect attention from his own religion of violence and hatred. Not only will you see his deflection is a poor one, but in doing so you will come to realize that he never denied anything you were criticizing islam for.

    9. Re:Its funny by dave420 · · Score: 0

      So you are engaging in the exact lazy xenophobia the parent is. I've seen some of your more racist posts in the past, so it's no surprise you've chimed in here offering support for a serial bigot.

      You go be scared of your own shadow, and the rest of the world will try to tidy up the mess caused by equally scared people as yourself.

      My experience is rather large, and entirely inconsequential, as is yours. One is a bloody fool if they think they can extrapolate the workings of the world and the opinions of over a billion people from the handful of people he has chosen to be representatives of the group in question.

      If Muslims are as scary as you say, there are two possibilities here: Either you are small minded or dead. As you are not dead, that is pretty good evidence that the 1.6+ billion Muslims haven't given in to their (according to you) innate desire to slay non-Muslims. That means you are, by your own argument, either a zombie or small minded. A small minded person would know enough about Islam, religion, and human tendency towards fanaticism to know that the highly-vocal Muslims you see on TV do not represent the much greater population of moderate Muslims, many of whom you wouldn't even recognise as being Muslim in the first place.

      But whatever. Trying to talk to a small-minded person is never going to end well, as you clearly lack the capability of figuring this schoolkid-level stuff out. The fact you are harassing a bunch of people because you think they harass a bunch of people should make you think twice about your chosen approach to learning.

    10. Re:Its funny by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Just like fundamentalists of every religion. Islam is not special in this regard. Read the Bible and see just how fucked up that book is, and try to understand how that appears from an outsider's perspective. Your nonsensical, generalisation-laden rant towards the end isn't helping you look rational.

    11. Re:Its funny by dave420 · · Score: 0

      Way to dodge the question, bigot.

      The Qu'ran is no more violent than the Bible, so you complaining about one and not the other is the very definition of bigotry.

    12. Re:Its funny by dave420 · · Score: 1

      So you think those people represent the entire religion. No wonder you are so confused.

      The only agenda in the media over that video is the desire to not show a brutal, graphic murder to people who might be flipping through channels. If you hadn't thought of that, I guess that says more about you than it does anything else.

    13. Re:Its funny by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Yes, all Islamists are Muslim, but to turn against all Muslims because of the Islamists will cause even more Muslims to become fundamentalist, and deny you the one tool you should be clamouring to use to fight Muslim extremism - moderate Muslims. Your claims of the destruction caused by Islam also apply to Christianity, so you not mentioning that seems to cast doubt on the rational nature of your approach.

    14. Re:Its funny by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 0

      So you are engaging in the exact lazy xenophobia the parent is.

      Well, "xenophobia" is a Greek word! It means fear of foreigners - i, a Greek, am not scared of Japanese people, nor Christian Ethiopian people (but i am scared of Muslim Ethiopian people - and i have met them!)

      I've seen some of your more racist posts in the past, so it's no surprise you've chimed in here offering support for a serial bigot.

      Since when Islam is a "race"? Maybe you are confusing some posts i made (e.g., "i hate Muslims" - when i am directly questioned about, i try to answer clearly) with "racism", but i inform you that in my own general race ("white"/"Caucasian") exist many Muslims. I clearly wrote in the comment you replied: "i have made some anti-Muslim/Islam posts myself".

      You go be scared of your own shadow, and the rest of the world will try to tidy up the mess caused by equally scared people as yourself.

      Well, "i am not scared of my own shadow"... i am a Greek! I am scared of Muslims BECAUSE I AM A GREEK.

      My experience is rather large, and entirely inconsequential, as is yours.

      The experience AND knowledge of someone like me, who HAS experience and knowledge of Islam/Muslims is "entirely inconsequential"? If the experience AND knowledge of anyone about anything is "entirely inconsequential", why are we in Slashdot making comments?

      One is a bloody fool if they think they can extrapolate the workings of the world and the opinions of over a billion people from the handful of people he has chosen to be representatives of the group in question.

      Oh... that's why my experience AND knowledge is "entirely inconsequential"! So, that "over a billion people" who are Muslims, believe in something other than the Quran and the Hadiths (that even i have read) - and "that group of people who represent them" (by doing all the things we know they do - THE THINGS THAT ARE ORDERED BY THE QURAN AND THE HADITHS TO DO) are not Muslims?

      If Muslims are as scary as you say, there are two possibilities here: Either you are small minded or dead. As you are not dead, that is pretty good evidence that the 1.6+ billion Muslims haven't given in to their (according to you) innate desire to slay non-Muslims. That means you are, by your own argument, either a zombie or small minded. A small minded person would know enough about Islam, religion, and human tendency towards fanaticism to know that the highly-vocal Muslims you see on TV do not represent the much greater population of moderate Muslims, many of whom you wouldn't even recognise as being Muslim in the first place.

      Have you ever lived in a Muslim dominated society as a non-Muslim? By the way: I DON'T KNOW MUSLIMS FROM "TV"!

      But whatever. Trying to talk to a small-minded person is never going to end well, as you clearly lack the capability of figuring this schoolkid-level stuff out. The fact you are harassing a bunch of people because you think they harass a bunch of people should make you think twice about your chosen approach to learning.

      I "harass people" by mentioning my opinion (that is based on my experience AND knowledge) about Islam/Muslims? But i am "a small-minded person", so i should not express my opinion... it is not right for the poor Muslims, that harass people because the QURAN AND THE HADITHS orders them to do...

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    15. Re:Its funny by operagost · · Score: 2

      The Qur'an instructs believers to go to war against Jews and Christians.

      The Bible records the history of wars.

      There's a difference between recording a violent history, and instructions to commit violent acts.

      The Qur'an has no order to love your neighbor, to treat others as one would wish to be treated, or to not resist an evil man. The Qur'an's plan for peace is to obtain it by force.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    16. Re:Its funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I complain about them both, hows about that.

    17. Re:Its funny by tsqr · · Score: 1

      Read the Bible and see just how fucked up that book is, and try to understand how that appears from an outsider's perspective.

      Yeah. Maybe what's important isn't so much what the books say, but what the fanatical believers actually do.

    18. Re:Its funny by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Then you have read neither.

      There is no comparison between the two in terms of violence. The Qu'ran is in part a history of the early conquests and has over a hundred verses about smiting the unbelievers.

      While there is some "smite the unbelievers" in the Bible, it is limited to the Old Testament... which was not written by Christians, but is there to support the claim of Christ being the one prophesied in the Old Testament.

      The new Testament, contains no such verses justifying the killing of unbelievers by Christians.

      Smiting by the hand of God? Sure, but not by members of the religion.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    19. Re:Its funny by GameboyRMH · · Score: 0

      Sure, not all water-drinkers are murderers, but all murderers are water-drinkers. I recommend you stop drinking this awful poison that causes people to kill!

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    20. Re:Its funny by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Way to dodge the question, bigot.

      The Qu'ran is no more violent than the Bible, so you complaining about one and not the other is the very definition of bigotry.

      OK - I'm not a christian but I'll do my best to answer. There are two diferent views on the bible in Christianity, Sola Scriptura and Sola fide. Sola fide (as practiced by catholics and orthodox) says that the bible does not give a clear complete and unabiguous message but must be interpreted by faith, divine revelations to certain limited people (e.g pope in catholicism), and tradition. To these christians it would not matter even if the bible contained commands to kill unbeleievers, take sex slaves, etc (it doesn't) as long as the pope or a tradition said it was wrong.

      For christians following sola scripture it is a universally held belief that the new testament represents a new covernent. Hence in any contradiction between teh two the new testament takes precidence. So for them all the "turn the other cheek" guff invalidates the accounts of violence in the old testament.

      Now for the Jewish interpretation I am really out of my depth, but my understanding is that they see the bible as a historic account of a maturing understanding of God, and that the accounts of the old testament show a young and impetuous race jumping to conclusions. (If anyone can correct or explain this further I'd appreciate it).

      A final point - there certainly were some other religions that were violent too - the aztecs in later times spring to mind. personally I don't hold with the Muslim apologists view that if someone else has behaved badly then its OK for them to do it.

    21. Re: Its funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let'em try. Christians and Jews are better at war than muzzies. We Christians kicked them in the asses and shit all over them throughout history and, if push really comes to shove, we will abandon all those stupid pretenses of civilization and kick them again. Fuckin' impale them by the thousands, man.

    22. Re:Its funny by dave420 · · Score: 1

      And the Bible instructs people to take slaves, rape people, etc. etc. The only point one can make by comparing these books as some sort of reflection on their respective religions is how futile it is. You are better than this, operagost.

    23. Re:Its funny by dave420 · · Score: 1

      This is all entirely irrelevant. If what you are saying is true, every Muslim on the planet must be frothing-at-the-mouth eager to kill everyone. Seeing as there are ~1.6 billion Muslims, even if 1% couldn't hold back and give in to their alleged intentions, there would be 16,000,000 million Muslims running around straight-up murdering people. Until that happens your argument holds no water. It's like standing outside in the middle of the day trying to argue that the sun exploded years ago. The evidence for you being wrong is all around us and staggeringly obvious.

    24. Re:Its funny by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for proving my point. You are scared, ignorant, and seemingly very happy with that arrangement. Your ancient Greek forbears would be *oh so thrilled* that you've thrown your cognitive ability down the drain and settled for knee-jerk reaction instead.

      Anyone who extrapolates their own experiences to judge the entire world is a demonstrable idiot.

    25. Re:Its funny by dave420 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've read neither in about 20 years since taking a comparative religion class at school.

      It's the same God in both the OT and the NT. I wonder why, when Christianity's holy book's text is looked at, people leap through hoops to try to break apart the trinity or add all sorts of explanations for the hideous, God-sanctioned behaviour, with the Qu'ran it's apparently a factual guide book and evidence that all Muslims are violent psychopaths. It's all bullshit. Most Christians don't live by the Bible just as most Muslims don't live by the Qu'ran.

      But whatever. This discussion is pointless. Neither book is at all suitable for teaching how to behave to your fellow man.

    26. Re:Its funny by tehcyder · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Fuck off Islam apologist. Sure, not all muslim are islamist, but all Islamist are muslim.

      Not all people in Northern Ireland during the Troubles were terrorists, but all the Northern Irish terrorists during the Troubles were from Northern Ireland, so anyone from Northern Ireland was probably a terrorist.

      The argument is ludicrous. Hint: the number of terrorists is tiny compared with the total population.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    27. Re:Its funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Fox News is the only network "willing to broadcast" something, I'd worry about its veracity right there.

      I realize that between agendas and cowardice a lot of "news reports" are less than complete, but the idea that there's only one news agency in the world with the courage to report something implies that the world is a lot less complicated than it is.

    28. Re:Its funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BECAUSE I AM A GREEK

      Sorry to hear that. I guess my life isn't so bad after all.

    29. Re:Its funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is all entirely irrelevant. If what you are saying is true, every Muslim on the planet must be frothing-at-the-mouth eager to kill everyone. Seeing as there are ~1.6 billion Muslims, even if 1% couldn't hold back and give in to their alleged intentions, there would be 16,000,000 million Muslims running around straight-up murdering people. Until that happens your argument holds no water. It's like standing outside in the middle of the day trying to argue that the sun exploded years ago. The evidence for you being wrong is all around us and staggeringly obvious.

      Typical muzzy apologist. Bring up a point, then when it is shown to be false claim its irellevant

    30. Re:Its funny by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      Just like fundamentalists of every religion.

      Just from a statistical standpoint, in the recent three or four decades (especially since the quieting of the Irish troubles), there seem to be a lot more incidents of Muslim fundamentalists killing people, and organizing into large groups to kill people, than there are incidents of Christian (any denomination) or any other religion's fundamentalists. So, on average, I'd worry more about meeting someone from that particular group. (Notable exception; the Hutu/Tutsi conflict wasn't world-religion based. It was just about killing people.)

    31. Re:Its funny by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      Thanks for proving my point. You are scared, ignorant, and seemingly very happy with that arrangement. Your ancient Greek forbears would be *oh so thrilled* that you've thrown your cognitive ability down the drain and settled for knee-jerk reaction instead.

      Anyone who extrapolates their own experiences to judge the entire world is a demonstrable idiot.

      I repeatedly informed you about my knowledge AND experience of Islam/Muslims - you repeatedly answered me that i am an ignorant, stupid, coward, racist, fanatic, etc (while you did not anwered about YOUR knowledge AND experience of Islam/Muslims)

      One of the many great things my great ancient Greek ancestors gave to the world is the reasoning proving that "anyone who extrapolates their own experiences to judge the entire world" is... WISE! They were scared of "barbarians" because of their knowledge AND experience of them, and with that reasoning they civilized much of the "barbarian" world.

      You attack people (not just me - i read your replies to others in this thread) by accusing them for ignorance, stupidity, cowardness, racism, fanatism, etc, just because they express their objections to Islam/Muslims - i will give you an advise: READ SOME GREEK HISTORY... you may understand the irony of your accusations.

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    32. Re:Its funny by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      Hint: the number of terrorists is tiny compared with the total population.

      Hmm. Maybe if we just called them "criminals against society", instead of justifying and explaining their actions as politically or religiously based, it would simplify things.

    33. Re:Its funny by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      If everyone calling themselves a muslim was like the secular Christians who put up Christmas lights but don't go to Church every Sunday or study the Bible, then there'd be no terrorists and nobody would have any problem with islam.

      Just as you can be a committed Christian and go to Church and read the Bible without wanting to kill people, so you can also be a committed Muslim and go to your Mosque and study the Koran without wanting to kill people. Otherwise, there would be literally millions of terrorists just in Europe.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    34. Re:Its funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is all entirely irrelevant. If what you are saying is true, every Muslim on the planet must be frothing-at-the-mouth eager to kill everyone. Seeing as there are ~1.6 billion Muslims, even if 1% couldn't hold back and give in to their alleged intentions, there would be 16,000,000 million Muslims running around straight-up murdering people.

      I take it you haven't seen the news lately.

    35. Re:Its funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for proving my point. You are scared, ignorant, and seemingly very happy with that arrangement. Your ancient Greek forbears would be *oh so thrilled* that you've thrown your cognitive ability down the drain and settled for knee-jerk reaction instead.

      Anyone who extrapolates their own experiences to judge the entire world is a demonstrable idiot.

      Yeah, because as any fool know, the only proper way to judge the world is through the lens of their own (myopic) ideology!

    36. Re:Its funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now for the Jewish interpretation I am really out of my depth, but my understanding is that they see the bible as a historic account of a maturing understanding of God, and that the accounts of the old testament show a young and impetuous race jumping to conclusions. (If anyone can correct or explain this further I'd appreciate it).

      From Babylonian Talmud, Shabbat 31a: Once there was a gentile who came before Shammai, and said to him: "Convert me on the condition that you teach me the whole Torah while I stand on one foot. Shammai pushed him aside with the measuring stick he was holding. The same fellow came before Hillel, and Hillel converted him, saying: That which is despicable to you, do not do to your fellow, this is the whole Torah, and the rest is commentary, go and learn it."

      I believe most, if not all, Jews today would say that Hillel's views on Torah are correct.

      Caveat: I'm not Jewish.

    37. Re:Its funny by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      It is indeed pointless, you don't know what you are talking about, you admit you don't know what you are talking about (going on 20 year old remembrance) ....

      But somehow you know what you are talking about.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    38. Re:Its funny by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      https://twitter.com/ap/status/...

      oh yeah, and here you go from the AP

    39. Re:Its funny by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      All Christian terrorists are also Christian! Don't shut your eyes to the truth!

    40. Re:Its funny by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      There are many versus that also teach to treat Jews and Christians well as they are fellow monotheists, or peoples of the book.

      "Surely those who believe, and those who are Jews, and the Christians, and the Sabians, whoever believes in Allah and the Last day and does good, they shall have their reward from their Lord, and there is no fear for them, nor shall they grieve."

      Islam does have orders to love your neighbors, because Islam includes the teachings of Christ as well. They just don't consider him divine.

      Meanwhile, in the new testament: "Then He said to them, 'But now, he who has a money bag, let him take it, and likewise a knapsack; and he who has no sword, let him sell his garment and buy one.'" Of course it's out of context, but using religion for violence has always been about taking things out of context.

    41. Re:Its funny by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Fuck off Islam apologist. Sure, not all muslim are islamist, but all Islamist are muslim.

      Not all people in Northern Ireland during the Troubles were terrorists, but all the Northern Irish terrorists during the Troubles were from Northern Ireland, so anyone from Northern Ireland was probably a terrorist.

      This. I know this argument borderlines on "no true scotsman" but you can argue that a lot of the people who join Islamic terrorist groups are proper Muslims. A lot wont follow the same tenants as are proselytised by the likes of ISIS, certainly this is the case with most western recruits. Then again, the tenants of groups like ISIS hardly represent the majority of Muslims.

      The argument is ludicrous. Hint: the number of terrorists is tiny compared with the total population.

      This cannot be understated.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    42. Re:Its funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you read medieval Arabic? If not, then you haven't read the Qu'ran either.

      And if you don't even know why that is, I strongly suggest you stop pontificating about it.

    43. Re:Its funny by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I've read neither in about 20 years since taking a comparative religion class at school.

      It's the same God in both the OT and the NT. I wonder why, when Christianity's holy book's text is looked at, people leap through hoops to try to break apart the trinity or add all sorts of explanations for the hideous, God-sanctioned behaviour, with the Qu'ran it's apparently a factual guide book and evidence that all Muslims are violent psychopaths. It's all bullshit. Most Christians don't live by the Bible just as most Muslims don't live by the Qu'ran.

      What you've got to remember is that the Qu'ran is selectively quoted out of context deliberately by people who have an irrational hate of Muslims. They do this because often the context doesn't support their point.

      If you selectively quoted the bible, it looks just as bad. Zechariah 12:3 for example tells Christians to kill false prophets, Leviticus made it clear it's OK to keep slaves, then there is the well known example of Ezekiel 25:17 (think pulp fiction). In fact the entire story of Ezekiel 25 is pretty violent and advocates killing an entire people, the thing is, I know this is a story, a work of fiction the same as verses in the Qu'ran are poems built in the same manner. If you take individual parts of Ezekiel 25 it sounds like commands from god to kill the Ammonites, but in context its part of a story.

      It's a case of "figures dont lie, but liars figure".

      But whatever. This discussion is pointless. Neither book is at all suitable for teaching how to behave to your fellow man.

      Erm, pretty much.

      Almost all Christians ignore things like Leviticus on slaves, by the same token almost all Muslims dont take "kill the unbeliever" literally.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    44. Re:Its funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no moderate muslim. Islam is not moderate, read the fucking Quran. Although there are cultural muslim that really just do the ramadan the same way most westerner do christmas free of religious non-sense. These peoples are unwilling to fight islam; they rather flee and immigrate somewhere else where there is no islam. But with that attitude, soon, there will be no were else to hide.

      Stop being a islam apologist. Every culture that tolerated islam is now gone. Islam is toxic and the peoples that defend it or feel offended by criticism are just as toxic. Deport them all if they don't renounce the abject cult. This is way more humane than what they have planned for you if you don't convert.

      Also why would someone be unable to criticise islam without criticise christianity in the same post? Why do islam apologists always respond 'but.. but.. but christianity'? Is is because you see criticism as hatred and one may not hate others without a dose of self hate?

      I am not christian and I do not feel the need to attack them because they are not a threat to me, that battle is won. Why do you feel the need to attack christianity? Why do you defend islam?

    45. Re:Its funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never said anything about terrorist..

      I see the problem here, you think islamist are terrorist. Which make you the bigot in this thread.

      Islam is a political system base on the teaching of the Quran. Islam is toxic even without the few terrorist that promoted it. You will understand this when IS will be recognized by the United States and when we start doing business with them. After that we will have elected the first muslim president, to prove that we are not islamophobes. A tax will then be imposed for non-muslim, but don't worry, it will be for humanitarian or social justice reason. Also the tax will be phase out progressively as islam become mandatory state by state. I bet California will be the first to mandate it, these peoples always were the more open minded...

      This is how Islam operated for the last 1400 years and it never stop progressing since. Also notice how it's growth accelerate and various political and economical situation favour them. Study history, stop being a islam apologist.

    46. Re:Its funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, but, but Christian! Also self hated to prove that I am not racist.

      The bible are a collection of stupid stories and myth. The Quran is the exact word of god where he command to murder peoples. You may argue that passage of the bible were you read 'jesus says' is the 'exact word of god' but in none of these passage he ever orderer to murder peoples. In fact he did the exact opposite; let yourself be killed rather then fight back. And this is why western culture that were colonised by jewish cults are so vulnerable to the stronger and more violent islamic culture. They think the quran is just like the 'arab' version of the bible and therefore is racist to disagree. Islam is a political system that is out to conquer the world, it use the gullibility of the bronze age religious mentality to dominate. It has been like that since the beginning.

      Read the fucking Quran, educate yourself and stop being a muslim apologist.

    47. Re:Its funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judging from this whole thread, dave420 is clealry a islamist shill. Spew poison over all other cultures while vigorously defend islam. He might as well be an islamist himself.

    48. Re:Its funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why'd you piss colored troublemakers all end up in deserts? Christians drove you out, you weak little fucks. Plain and simple. Nobody sane would want to live in a desert. You had no choice after Christians got wind of your "we will cut off your head and convert by fire and sword" crap and you are nothing but little lying weasels per your "al-tiquyya" belief it is fine to lie you little sandflea loser. Try it again? How'd it go in IRAQ?? Keep up your pussy terrorism. Next time, it'll be extermination for the lot of you and nuclear teardrops all over your asses and we'll turn that sand into glass (happened before, IRAQ has evidences of it from ancient history because you little whimps never change).

    49. Re:Its funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why'd you piss colored troublemakers all end up in deserts? Christians drove you out, you weak little fucks. Plain and simple. Nobody sane would want to live in a desert. You had no choice after Christians got wind of your "we will cut off your head and convert by fire and sword" crap and you are nothing but little lying weasels per your "al-tiquyya" belief it is fine to lie you little sandflea loser. Try it again? How'd it go in IRAQ?? Keep up your pussy terrorism. Next time, it'll be extermination for the lot of you and nuclear teardrops all over your asses and we'll turn that sand into glass (happened before, IRAQ has evidences of it from ancient history because you little whimps never change) and off with YOUR heads motherfucker!

    50. Re:Its funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why'd you piss colored troublemakers all end up in deserts? Christians drove you out, you weak little fucks. Plain and simple. Nobody sane would want to live in a desert. You had no choice after Christians got wind of your "we will cut off your head and convert by fire and sword" crap and you are nothing but little lying weasels per your "al-tiquyya" belief it is fine to lie you little sandflea loser. Try it again? How'd it go in IRAQ?? Keep up your pussy terrorism. Next time, it'll be extermination for the lot of you and nuclear teardrops all over your asses and we'll turn that sand into glass (happened before, IRAQ has evidences of it from ancient history because you little whimps never change) and its your heads that will come off assholes.

    51. Re:Its funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why'd you piss colored troublemakers all end up in deserts? Christians drove you out, you weak little fucks. Plain and simple. Nobody sane would want to live in a desert. You had no choice after Christians got wind of your "we will cut off your head and convert by fire and sword" crap and you are nothing but little lying weasels per your "al-tiquyya" belief it is fine to lie you little sandflea loser. Try it again? How'd it go in IRAQ?? Keep up your pussy terrorism. Next time, it'll be extermination for the lot of you and nuclear teardrops all over your asses and we'll turn that sand into glass (happened before, IRAQ has evidences of it from ancient history because you little whimps never change). Next time your heads will be seared off asshole. Fire and sword in 1 nuclear shot.

    52. Re:Its funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why'd you piss colored troublemakers all end up in deserts? Christians drove you out, you weak little fucks. Plain and simple. Nobody sane would want to live in a desert. You had no choice after Christians got wind of your "we will cut off your head and convert by fire and sword" crap and you are nothing but little lying weasels per your "al-tiquyya" belief it is fine to lie you little sandflea loser. Try it again? How'd it go in IRAQ?? Keep up your pussy terrorism. Next time, it'll be extermination for the lot of you and nuclear teardrops all over your asses and we'll turn that sand into glass (happened before, IRAQ has evidences of it from ancient history because you little whimps never change). Next time it'll be your fire and sword alright. Nuclear sword that will sear off YOUR heads motherfuckers!

    53. Re:Its funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why'd you piss colored troublemakers all end up in deserts? Christians drove you out, you weak little fucks. Plain and simple. Nobody sane would want to live in a desert. You had no choice after Christians got wind of your "we will cut off your head and convert by fire and sword" crap and you are nothing but little lying weasels per your "al-tiquyya" belief it is fine to lie you little sandflea loser. Try it again? How'd it go in IRAQ?? Keep up your pussy terrorism. Next time, it'll be extermination for the lot of you and nuclear teardrops all over your asses and we'll turn that sand into glass (happened before, IRAQ has evidences of it from ancient history because you little whimps never change). Your heads are going to be charred off by fire and sword. Nuclear fire.

    54. Re:Its funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why'd you piss colored troublemakers all end up in deserts? Christians drove you out, you weak little fucks. Plain and simple. Nobody sane would want to live in a desert. You had no choice after Christians got wind of your "we will cut off your head and convert by fire and sword" crap and you are nothing but little lying weasels per your "al-tiquyya" belief it is fine to lie you little sandflea loser. Try it again? How'd it go in IRAQ?? Keep up your pussy terrorism. Next time, it'll be extermination for the lot of you and nuclear teardrops all over your asses and we'll turn that sand into glass (happened before, IRAQ has evidences of it from ancient history because you little whimps never change). Fire and sword? Your heads will sear right off under a nuclear fire and sword terrorist cowards that you all are and liars beyond belief. Think you're clever you deceitful little motherfuckers? You're all shit and look like Klingons.

    55. Re:Its funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why'd you piss colored troublemakers all end up in deserts? Christians drove you out, you weak little fucks. Plain and simple. Nobody sane would want to live in a desert. You had no choice after Christians got wind of your "we will cut off your head and convert by fire and sword" crap and you are nothing but little lying weasels per your "al-tiquyya" belief it is fine to lie you little sandflea loser. Try it again? How'd it go in IRAQ?? Keep up your pussy terrorism. Next time, it'll be extermination for the lot of you and nuclear teardrops all over your asses and we'll turn that sand into glass (happened before, IRAQ has evidences of it from ancient history because you little whimps never change). Fire and sword? Next time you will all have your lying heads cut off by a nuclear fire you Klingon looking motherfucking little deceitful trashbag sandscum.

    56. Re:Its funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why'd you piss colored troublemakers all end up in deserts? Christians drove you out, you weak little fucks. Plain and simple. Nobody sane would want to live in a desert. You had no choice after Christians got wind of your "we will cut off your head and convert by fire and sword" crap and you are nothing but little lying weasels per your "al-tiquyya" belief it is fine to lie you little sandflea loser. Try it again? How'd it go in IRAQ?? Keep up your pussy terrorism. Next time, it'll be extermination for the lot of you and nuclear teardrops all over your asses and we'll turn that sand into glass (happened before, IRAQ has evidences of it from ancient history because you little whimps never change). Scary? Only thing scary is how much you ugly motherfuckers look like Klingons. Fire and sword? Next time it's nuclear fire and it's going to char your ugly lying heads off terrorist scumbag.

    57. Re:Its funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why'd you piss colored troublemakers all end up in deserts? Christians drove you out, you weak little fucks. Plain and simple. Nobody sane would want to live in a desert. You had no choice after Christians got wind of your "we will cut off your head and convert by fire and sword" crap and you are nothing but little lying weasels per your "al-tiquyya" belief it is fine to lie you little sandflea loser. Try it again? How'd it go in IRAQ?? Keep up your pussy terrorism. Next time, it'll be extermination for the lot of you and nuclear teardrops all over your asses and we'll turn that sand into glass (happened before, IRAQ has evidences of it from ancient history because you little whimps never change). Jihad eh? Next time we'll cut your heads off with a nuclear fire as the sword you Klingon looking ugly motherfucking al-tiquyya lying sandscum. Do another terrorist act and see you little shits and you're done. Believe me.

  3. Tony Blairs fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Justifying a budget by inventing hypothetical enemies.

    It's Tony Blair's fault. He expanded the police force far beyond any needs, and let them set up 'private companies' to coordinate their plans.

    Those private companies became political campaign groups that expand laws to justify increased budgets. When we elect a leader to get a grip on these scaremongering oppressive ass-shats, their PR people go out and campaign against the politicians plans.

    So you see endless stories with policeman hypothesizing new crimes and dividing society by creating suspicion.

  4. oh boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am watching Adventure Time episodes now, hope it does not turn me violent
    captcha: idealism

    1. Re:oh boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am watching Adventure Time episodes now, hope it does not turn me violent

      That's nothing. I decided to watch just one episode of My Little Pony five years ago, and I'm still on the goddamn ride! (The one thread in which that damn Starlight Glimmer troll would be on-topic, and she's nowhere to be found :)

  5. Trekkies Could Turn On Society by bug1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    With those uniforms ?

    1. Re:Trekkies Could Turn On Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheldon (as Data) says, "Stealing is against the law."
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KI77mKYKAVs

  6. anti-terorism experts or idiots by crbowman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article labels them "anti-terrorism experts" but the mere fact that they even considered this long enough for there to have been a written record belies that title and proves instead that they are "anti-terrorism idiots".

    1. Re:anti-terorism experts or idiots by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Either than or they are heavily into UFOs and the real threat there were considering was humans allying with the aliens against existing power structures. This whole government attack on all things UFO based on the ludicrous idea that humans are the only intelligent species in this galaxy, really is beginning to smell more like their complete and total impotence when it keeps to dealing with stuff not of this world or even just the idea of it. So they are desperate to maintain a front of control and authority, not of course for the benefit of humanity but to serve their own greed, lusts and ego. Kind of like the crazy conspiracy theories of governments colluding with aliens, trying to create the subconscious illusion that somehow those governments have some influence over what is happening beyond the thin skin of our own atmosphere. The whole silly nonsense is starting to look really childish.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:anti-terorism experts or idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not considering it and then it happening would make them idiots. Considering something and then it not happening doesn't make anyone an idiot. It's why we buy insurance.

      Sheesh, 4-digit UID and you haven't moved beyond "everyone who has a different opinion to me is a de-facto idiot"? Really?

    3. Re:anti-terorism experts or idiots by Feral+Nerd · · Score: 1

      The article labels them "anti-terrorism experts" but the mere fact that they even considered this long enough for there to have been a written record belies that title and proves instead that they are "anti-terrorism idiots".

      One might be tempted to assume this is a hoax. Unfortunately we have examples of similar hysteria from decades past that make one seriously consider that this might be true. It is really strange how people manage to get themselves into a state of utter hysteria about some minority ethnic, cultural or even cultural sub group. Punks, hippies, jews, gypsies, gays, social democrats... to name a few have all caused the elements within society that are prone to worrying themselves to death or who just simply enjoy tyrannizing some smaller group of people a great degree of anguish although nowadays it the favorite target seems to be muslims.

    4. Re:anti-terorism experts or idiots by quantaman · · Score: 1

      The article labels them "anti-terrorism experts" but the mere fact that they even considered this long enough for there to have been a written record belies that title and proves instead that they are "anti-terrorism idiots".

      They were idiots if they acted on those suspicions and started spying on Comic Con or individual geeks, but to have never researched them at all would have been stupider by far.

      Geeks are a major cultural force and a lot of those shows have their own utopian ideology mixed in, the 20th century is basically a story of different ideologies fighting it out, Democracy, Communism, Fascism, etc. Almost certainly nothing sinister would ever emerge from Trekkies, but when you have a national law enforcement agency those threats that almost certainly won't happen can be worth checking out.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    5. Re:anti-terorism experts or idiots by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      The article labels them "anti-terrorism experts" but the mere fact that they even considered this long enough for there to have been a written record belies that title and proves instead that they are "anti-terrorism idiots".

      Or they could just be sci-fi wannabe writers themselves.

      Not everyone can write a good sci-fi conspiracy theory, but many people still try anyway.

    6. Re:anti-terorism experts or idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to take into account:

      - the large amount of resources they have (i.e., it cost them a minimal percentage of their resources, most of the rest being used for "more serious" leads and investigations),

      - their goal to "assure security" (i.e., of course they will investigate most significant groups, even when mostly certain there is no risk at all, considering however there may still be "some small subgroups with some more radical views", or "individuals with psychiatric problems being influenced negatively to cause some problems"... plus it could be used as practice/training...),

      - bureaucracy (i.e., of course they will write a report on everything they are working with, even if the conclusion is that there is no risk at all... and it can actually help later in various ways, including as part of a general knowledge base...),

      - and laziness (in their place, you would turn down investigating some SF universe and geeky groups for x weeks/months, even if you have no care for them, just for some easier/lighter work...?).

      Well, they sure could be 'idiots' too.

    7. Re:anti-terorism experts or idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. Geeks are NOT a major cultural force. False consumerist "geeks" who are "fashionably nerdy" are the ones you're thinking of. As soon as being a nerd isn't cool anymore, they (market forces) will find some other sub culture to cash in on, and create a whole other set of "individuals through consumerism"

    8. Re:anti-terorism experts or idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like the story where the asshole goes on strike. Nobody cares until the work doesn't get done.

    9. Re:anti-terorism experts or idiots by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Nah. The real threat wasn't anything overtly violent or traitorous.

      The nerds had agreed to stop reproducing by not having sex.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  7. Now we know what 'law enforcement' thinks of us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These guys really believe the public is weak-minded enough to be 'brainwashed' by silly film & tv fiction. This speaks volumes about how out-of-touch with reality and utterly disconnected from society these guys are.

    1. Re:Now we know what 'law enforcement' thinks of us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      X-Files okay, it's mainstream, someone retarded could be influenced, but Star Trek? Why? Star Trek is not about phasers and aliens, it's about moral dillemas viewed in different light. I would say that for example series "Grim" looks more dangerous to me.

  8. Not to worry ... by Forever+Wondering · · Score: 4, Funny

    Trekkies always keep their phasers set to stun ...

    --
    Like a good neighbor, fsck is there ...
    1. Re:Not to worry ... by ghmh · · Score: 1

      Boldly going forward 'cause they can't find reverse..

  9. Trekkie Hooligans, Unite! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wanna keep us off the streets? Stop canceling our goddam sci-fi shows!

    1. Re:Trekkie Hooligans, Unite! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I gave up on TV long ago because of this. Every sci-fi show I wanted to watch was replaced by some teenage ghost+vampire+werewolf show - or crap like Fringe.

    2. Re:Trekkie Hooligans, Unite! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bring back Firefly, or society is done for!

      Seems like an oddly reasonable request... Maybe some one should put that up on "we the people."

    3. Re:Trekkie Hooligans, Unite! by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      Joss Whedon is my master now.

  10. Reasonable by symes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The dossier – called UFO New Religious Movements and the Millennium – was drawn up in response to the 1997 mass suicide by 39 cultists in San Diego known as Heaven's Gate.

    Given that cults with a somewhat "sci-fi" approach to their idiocy exist it seems fair game to, at the very least, think through possible scenarios and plan accordingly. This is surely good disaster planning, certainly logical. What has happened here, it seems, is that someone has suggested regular "trekkies" are the real risk to garner attention and to sell someone's book.

    1. Re:Reasonable by Doc_Gamesh · · Score: 1

      I hear the sound of a nail being hit on the head.

    2. Re:Reasonable by nobby · · Score: 1

      One, in particular, comes to mind.

    3. Re:Reasonable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you guys also thinking of the Jedi Church (http://www.jedichurch.org/)?

  11. Question Everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do I believe in UFOs and little green men? No, but shows like Dark Skies and The X Files taught me to question everything, especially information provided by those in power. That's what made shows like that useful. Now with Snowden et al we find that governments have been lying to us for years.

  12. Need MORE of those shows! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need shitloads of those TV shows to keep those "experts" busy, perhaps then they do less damage to the things that matter. Denial-of-service attack FTW!

  13. 2000 was harmless by jaklode · · Score: 1

    2038 will be a whole new level. Machines will run amok.

    1. Re:2000 was harmless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yah, 2000 was only a Microsoft Windows 2000 problem. The shit will really hit the fan when the UNIX epoch flips over, since UNIX rules the whole world wide intertubes.

    2. Re:2000 was harmless by dave420 · · Score: 1, Troll

      I take it you weren't actually there. Most of the Y2K problems I (and the company I worked for) was involved in fixing were in UNIX systems and aged, still-working mainframes.

    3. Re:2000 was harmless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obvious troll is obvious. By Windows 2000, MS had fixed all their Y2K issues. The main ones were in Windows 3.1 and Excel, not in any version of WinNT.

    4. Re:2000 was harmless by Andy_R · · Score: 2

      Never mind 2038, it's 2048 when the Y2K bug hits us that we'll really be in trouble.

      --
      A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
  14. well, they DID. we just don't remember. by turkeydance · · Score: 3, Informative

    that Men in Black flashy thing.

  15. Oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Trekkies can't turn on anyone!

    1. Re: Oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dirtbag.

    2. Re: Oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mother must be one proud crusty old pair of piss flaps to have creamed the likes of you out of her snatch.

    3. Re: Oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your anger, festering over the years and bubbling forever under the surface, is funny to me. I revel in your misery, loser. You know, I thought shit kids like you would forget and move on, but over time I discovered you simply can't. We made an indelebile impression on your life. We destroyed you, utterly. And ghost of self-esteem you had, we took it away forever. All that was left of you is an empty, putrid filthy shell that is only filled with the fart-like stench of your own hatred. But you don't just hate us, those who drowned you in the pool of vomit that is your life, you hate yourself. You hate the loser you are. You hate the bleak life you condemned yourself to. You hate the world that rightly shunned you and shoved you into a corner, where you belong. And I'm glad I did my part in pushing you there, lost and imprisoned forever in a dark corner with no escape, stuck in the prison of your own inadequacy. Buried alive. Buried... Alive.

  16. There are quite a few haters on this thread but... by Afty0r · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Protecting people from evil cults (even if they got the specifics of meme transmission a bit off by choosing "X-Files" and similar) is definitely something I would like my government to do. You need to research the cults, methods etc. to do that.

    Further, if this was in existence a few decades ago, perhaps we would have nipped Scientology in the bud before it landed in the UK.

  17. ... but are they?? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2

    ... but I'm kind of glad we have people looking at these ridiculous scenarios and planning how to deal with them *just in case* ...

    Those motherfucking assholes are the real life version of the keystone kops --- They always do the wrong thing

    Had the assholes really know their stuffs that British soldier Lee Rigby would still be alive today

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M...

    And the London tube wouldn't have been bombed

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7...

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re: ... but are they?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I see you conveniently missed innocent people being murdered by police

    2. Re:... but are they?? by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      I love how on slashdot the surveillance society is pure fascist evil, until the surveillance isn't quite good enough and something bad happens, then it's the government's fault for not doing the surveillance right and stopping the terrorists.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  18. They must be insane then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So let me get this straight: islam is all fine and dandy, but trekkies are considered a religious problem?

    If anyone knows any starships leaving for a saner planet please let me know...

    1. Re:They must be insane then... by LaurenCates · · Score: 1

      Yeah, see, it's easier to deal with something that's wider-spread and more innocuous than a concentrated real problem.

      Lack of perspective FTW!

      Now where'd I keep that Sub-Etha Thumb?

      --
      Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
    2. Re:They must be insane then... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      You are confusing fundamentalism with all followers of a particular religion, fundamentalists and moderates alike. That never ends well, as it is intellectually lazy and ensures you will reach the wrong conclusion.

    3. Re:They must be insane then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "fundamentalists" are the followers of islam. The "moderates" are actually secular. There is no "reformed islam" to have adherents. Either you're religious, and believe in violence and conquering the world to kill and enslave the non-believers and take their women and girls as wives, or you're just a muslim in name only.

    4. Re:They must be insane then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I guess EVERY christian in the US isn't a true christian, since their not strictly adhering to the bible. Actually, they don't even adhere to the teaching of the very man their religion is named after.

    5. Re:They must be insane then... by Scotsman,+True · · Score: 1

      Explain that to me again?

    6. Re:They must be insane then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I guess EVERY christian in the US isn't a true christian, since their not strictly adhering to the bible. Actually, they don't even adhere to the teaching of the very man their religion is named after.

      Regretfully, as a Christian, I must agree with this. All too often, we fall far too short of the mark. May God have mercy.

    7. Re:They must be insane then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why'd you piss colored troublemakers all end up in deserts? Christians drove you out, you weak little fucks. Plain and simple. Nobody sane would want to live in a desert. You had no choice after Christians got wind of your "we will cut off your head and convert by fire and sword" crap and you are nothing but little lying weasels per your "al-tiquyya" belief it is fine to lie you little sandflea loser. Try it again? How'd it go in IRAQ?? Keep up your pussy terrorism. Next time, it'll be extermination for the lot of you and nuclear teardrops all over your asses and we'll turn that sand into glass (happened before, IRAQ has evidences of it from ancient history because you little whimps never change). IRAQ conflicts twice didn't end well for you Klingon ugly looking motherfuckers. Neither did the 6 days war. You al-tiqquya lying scum live at our mercy motherfucker. Remember that when you pull your terrorism again.

  19. Well, no wonder Dr. Who is so big over there... by bistromath007 · · Score: 1

    The British Government is afraid of sci-fi that is actually written well enough to inspire people in any way.

    1. Re:Well, no wonder Dr. Who is so big over there... by itsdapead · · Score: 2

      Except that, even if you don't care for the pantomime style, Doctor Who often rips the shit out of politicians, the military and religion. Plus, there are other British shows like Utopia, Black Mirror, Life on Mars/Ashes To Ashes and Orphan Black (OK - the latter is a US/BBC co-production) that 'do' conspiracies and social comment in ways that the traditional US TV networks wouldn't touch with a bargepole (looking forward to "Humans" although I understand that's a remake of a Scandinavian show). US viewers might not have seen them because they don't have 500 episodes and (with the exception of Who) tend to finish when the material is tapped out.

      The US output has got vastly better in the last 20 years, but in the past they really couldn't touch the sort of dark, anti-establishment or morally ambiguous content of British shows like Quatermas, Blake's 7, Doomwatch (X-files without the aliens), UFO, Edge of Darkness (not the film!) or the non-SF 'House of Cards' (original British version). The sets may have wobbled (only UFO had state-of-the-art effects for the time), they all had good and bad episodes, but the stories didn't pull any punches. Yes, Star Trek had a strong social justice message, but it was mostly morally squeaky-clean and moralistic, with nice happy endings.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    2. Re:Well, no wonder Dr. Who is so big over there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the US version of Life on Mars completely misses the intent of the show, only worse translation to USian that I can think of was Red Dwarf

  20. In a parallel universe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... 10.000 cosplayers dressed up as Borg to the great amusement of all non-basement dweller declared London fully assimilated on January 1st, 2000.

  21. Cult of 47 by mrxak · · Score: 1

    When I saw this article on the front page of Slashdot, there were 47 comments on it.

  22. The only fictious part in X-Files were the aliens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    X-Files was supposed to be an over-the-top conspiracy filled sci-fi series, but considering what we've all learned in the past few years about the spy scandals they weren't that far off with their conspiracies.

  23. Re:There are quite a few haters on this thread but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Protecting people from evil cults (even if they got the specifics of meme transmission a bit off by choosing "X-Files" and similar) is definitely something I would like my government to do. You need to research the cults, methods etc. to do that.

    Further, if this was in existence a few decades ago, perhaps we would have nipped Scientology in the bud before it landed in the UK.

    And if it were done a few decades before that, we could have avoided giving the underclasses any of those expensive, nasty human rights they are constantly drumming on about. This evil cult of not knowing one's place should have been stamped out a long time ago. Now we will have to try even harder to get the UK's house in order.

  24. Mentally unstable ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it that the people who accuse others of being mentally unstable seem to be the mentally unstable ones?

    Sure, there were probably a handful of sci-fi fans to be concerned about. On the other hand, those people are not in a position of power and are generally frowned upon to start with. Yet the police and security services are in a position of power, while having a greater means to act upon their paranoia. Those are the ones to worry about.

  25. Futurama by sproketboy · · Score: 1

    Didn't Futurama have an episode like that? Where Star Trek became a religion and was banned at some point? I gotta find me that episode!

    1. Re:Futurama by mrxak · · Score: 1

      Where No Fan Has Gone Before, season 4, episode 11.

    2. Re:Futurama by sproketboy · · Score: 1

      Thanks!

  26. So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is considered ridiculous and absurd?

    Yet, when Anita Sarkeesian says that video games are evil because they're violent and sexist and misogynistic and gamers are rapists and stalkers and sending death threats (when they actually aren't) and blaming everything on "male toxicity", we consider that fucking reasonable?

    How is that shit any different from this?!

    1. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because SJWs have invaded Slashdot. Hadn't you noticed? This site used to be about science and technology, now it's a liberal echo chamber.

    2. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're retarded and deluded. Slashdot these days is mostly butt-hurt loser boy-men whining about how wimmin are in charge and the 'SJWs' have taken over and should all be killed - on *every fucking thread regardless of any relevance*. I.E. you.

    3. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. This site is the opposite of the "liberal echo chamber" you mention. Every single fucking thread is loaded with racists, anti-progressives. Must be you see those posts as "normal" and all the other rational people are the "liberals" and "sjw" (i dont even know what sjw means, cause I'm not an internet-dweller, as in, I go outside and do things sometimes.

    4. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not reasonable, but much easier to side with than MRA/Social Injustice Enthusiast butthurt manchild whining - plus you guys are giant LOLcows ripe for the milking!

  27. Contingency plans for the contingency planners by swb · · Score: 1

    Given the vast weirdness of the government bureaucracy and its penchant for contingency plans for all kinds of events, I wonder if contingency plans for some branch of the government trying to take over based on paranoid contingency plans has ever happened.

    1. Re:Contingency plans for the contingency planners by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Given the veneer some contingency plans get (zombie apoc as a veneer for disease outbreak and riot scenario), "Trekkie" might have been code for something else in this contingency.

    2. Re:Contingency plans for the contingency planners by swb · · Score: 1

      Given the potential universe of wacky cults, from Scientology to the Heaven's Gate to Aum Shinrikyo to Jim Jones' People's Temple, it might make sense to think about the risks associated with cults.

      Especially if you factor in that Heavens Gate attracted a lot of people with IT smarts and Aum Shinrikyo tried to sarin gas the subway. Even if they don't become mass phenomenons there's some risk that bizarre millennial thought coupled with above average intelligence could lead to some bad outcomes.

  28. Journalism 101 by itsdapead · · Score: 4, Informative

    The headline:

    Scotland Yard was worried that fans of shows like the X Files and Star Trek might run amok during the Millennium according to secret files.

    The actual story:

    'The documents show the police and security services were concerned about the export of some new religious movements concerning UFOs and aliens from the USA in the aftermath of the mass suicide by followers of the Heaven's Gate.'"

    Slight difference...

    Anyway, was this going to be the Star Trek Wars or the Star Wars Trek?

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    1. Re:Journalism 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'The documents show the police and security services were concerned about the export of some new religious movements concerning UFOs and aliens from the USA in the aftermath of the mass suicide by followers of the Heaven's Gate.'"

      Slight difference...

      Anyway, was this going to be the Star Trek Wars or the Star Wars Trek?

      The War on the Trek of Stargate?

  29. Fuck off nanny state apologist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't want the police deciding what belief I can and cannot follow, be that Trekky, Catholic, Dr Who or 'theatons' .

    And you think its *OTHER* peoples cults they would protect against, but why should your choices get to be the special ones permitted? Freedom of expression is a right and not just for you.

  30. I already saw the warning signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My mom disowned me for prefering Picard over Kirk.

    1. Re:I already saw the warning signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mom disowned me for prefering Picard over Kirk.

      Rightly so. Heretic.

    2. Re:I already saw the warning signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least we finally get more than 2 choices ;P

  31. In the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They worry us right wingers will rise up.

    1. Re:In the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's because you repeatedly insist you need unfettered, undocumented access to All The Guns for this exact purpose.

      (And then when it turns out the NSA knows everything about your arsenal probably down to the serial numbers and ammo count, you do nothing. LOL!)

  32. Warring Factions by DigitalPagan · · Score: 1

    I suspect the Jedi are behind this.

  33. Wow by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    I'm glad they were worried about Trekkies and not, like, Islamic State. Or super AIDS. You know, just one teaspoon of super AIDS in your blood and you're dead in three years. So just remember, intelligence agencies, there's nothing to be afraid of. Except super AIDS.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  34. Translation by MitchDev · · Score: 1

    To the government, everyone looks like a potential criminal.

  35. Re:There are quite a few haters on this thread but by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    If you wanted to nip Scientology in the bud, you could do so by fighting their lawyers to make it safe to expose their wrongdoing. But preventing blackmail and protecting whistleblowers isn't in line with the wishes of those in power.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  36. trekwars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not the Trekkies you need to worry about. Hell no.

    It's those dastardly and sinister Trekkers that you have to watch.

  37. Let's Party... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tonight let's party like it's Space 1999....

  38. As Captain Hammer Sez... by Steve+B · · Score: 1

    ..."Have a friend that excels in math and science? Report him!"

    --
    /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  39. Circuses by Translation+Error · · Score: 1

    And give us bread, too!

    --
    When someone says, "Any fool can see ..." they're usually exactly right.
  40. Re:USAsians are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been worried about those Pentecostals for over a century now. They stole my relatives to the abyss of Purgatory, abused my uncle by messing up his marriage and made me avoid my cousins like plague. Oh, and those other movements are fun as well: my moving man told about his role in naturally fertilizing the wives of the believers who can't get it up during the national yearly religious get-together with tens of thousands of people there.

  41. Re:USAsians are special by Holi · · Score: 1

    Why are American Asians a special bunch?

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  42. I Think I understand more now by davydagger · · Score: 1
    Even more reasons I am glad I am done with the government. Its seems like ever last seemingly innocous habbit I had as a kid the government saw as some part of ungodly conspiracy. From loud rock music, to computer skills, now riding harleys.

    I can't win, they know it, I know it. So fuck them.

  43. I always knew the Brits were retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And this just solidifies that.

  44. Re:USAsians are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are American Asians a special bunch?

    Cause they got the best looking chicks.

  45. Herbert Herbert Herbert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Herbert" is a derogatory term for a rigid, hidebound person, named from an unimaginative "minor official", notorious for his "limited patterns of thought".

  46. My Brain is Washed by linearZ · · Score: 1

    Terrorism is a red shirt.

    --
    Revolution is the opium of the intellectuals.
  47. Wow, logic fail that just keeps on trucking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, logic fail that just keeps on trucking.

    A) "...the surveillance society is pure fascist evil" - repeatedly revealed by history as a not only valid, but an undeniably true statement (Power corrupts and so on)

    B) "...the government's fault for not doing the surveillance right..." - Pervasive surveillance is not only evil, it is used incompetently, or maliciously (let certain things happen to scare the public and increase power/control.)

    A) and B) are in no way contradictory. They are complementary.

    Stop pretending that the two opinions you mock are some kind of contradiction. They are both the essence of a very powerful argument against a surveillance society.

  48. Re:There are quite a few haters on this thread but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect they were more concerned with the socialist aspect of the whole thing.

  49. Self-Referential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This could make a pretty good X-Files episode:

    "Dark powers and Black Ops in government are afraid of citizens taking the X-Files too seriously. Leading to black helicopters landing and taking the suspects to a secret desert base for reprogramming. The reprogrammed citizens are then returned for use as double agents, spying on the local fan groups!"

  50. They were right! by Uncle+Robert · · Score: 1

    The trekkies and conspiracy nuts grew up and got government jobs. Remember 911 we invaded Iraq and only the conspiracy nuts in the white house knew why.

  51. Dr. Who fans are the real conspiracy! by MtnDeusExMachina · · Score: 1

    Maybe in the United Kingdom Scotland Yard fears local fans of American science fiction programs, but they got it backwards. The real troublemakers, tracked by the F.B.I. and U.S. Secret Service, are American fans of the British television show Doctor Who. The American authorities fear that these American fans might go mad and kill themselves, turn against society or start a weird cult. After all, it is patently obvious that X-Files and Star Trek convey perfectly normal behaviors, but Doctor Who presents some very odd and disturbing ideas, not to mention the strange accents and misspellings of simple words like "color" and "civilization".

  52. Re:There are quite a few haters on this thread but by strikethree · · Score: 1

    Protecting people from evil cults (even if they got the specifics of meme transmission a bit off by choosing "X-Files" and similar) is definitely something I would like my government to do.

    I do not want my government involved in such things. I want my government involved in infrastructure and physical harm mediation. Protecting me is not on my list of things a government should do.

    Yes, there is some protection afforded by the fact that the government will mediate physical harm issues, but the subtle point is that it is not done for protection but to mediate after the harm has already been done. You can not actually prevent ANYTHING.

    --
    "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  53. "Where No Fan has gone Before" - Futurama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This reminds the Futurama episode "Where no fan has gone before"

  54. Re:There are quite a few haters on this thread but by Alsee · · Score: 1

    Further, if this was in existence a few decades ago, perhaps we would have nipped Scientology in the bud before it landed in the UK.

    If it were in existence ~1400 years ago, perhaps we would have nipped Islam in the bud.

    If it were in existence ~2000 years ago, perhaps we would have nipped Christianity in the bud.

    And I wonder how many readers agreed with my first line, then threw a shit-fit when they got to my second line.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.