Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Reportedly May Acquire BlackBerry

New submitter techtsp writes: Microsoft is just one one of many companies reportedly looking to get a bigger piece of the enterprise mobile market by buying BlackBerry. Reports claim that Chinese firms including Huawei, Lenovo and Xiaomi are also interested in picking up BlackBerry following the company's recent return to profitability. This report comes on the heels of BlackBerry announcing it is cutting jobs across its global business units in an attempt to consolidate its software, hardware and applications business.

129 comments

  1. This one will be easier by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This one will be easier, Microsoft won't have to plant a trojan CEO to annihilate the company's market share first.

    1. Re:This one will be easier by marcello_dl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > Microsoft won't have to plant a trojan CEO
      Who knows. Maybe they did.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    2. Re:This one will be easier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      nokia was already dead when he joined them. Not saying he did them any good, but Nokia were going down with or without him.

    3. Re: This one will be easier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nokia was selling more smartphones than Apple and Samsung put together when Elop came aboard.

    4. Re:This one will be easier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because msft is teh evil

    5. Re:This one will be easier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hard to believe anyone is so grossly incompetent. Evil, makes more sense.

    6. Re: This one will be easier by kamapuaa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nope. Elop came on board at at the time when Android has just recently surpassed Symbian, and when iPhone was dominant in the category of expensive smart phones. Plus, Symbian sucked too hard to really be called a proper smartphone.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    7. Re: This one will be easier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumb phones and Symbian phones with no future.

    8. Re:This one will be easier by dmbasso · · Score: 5, Funny

      At least it might make for a nice slogan: Microsoft, where phone companies go to die!

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    9. Re: This one will be easier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maemo was vastly superior to both. And imho, it still is in many ways (let's talk about privacy and freedom).

    10. Re:This one will be easier by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      I think this may be release 2.0 of the Microsoft-aided business plan. It used to be:

      1. Found startup doing something Microsoft doesn't do.
      2. Wait to be bought out by Microsoft.
      3. Profit!

      Now it's:

      1. Wait till your cellphone company is in its death throes.
      2. Wait to be bought... well, you know the rest.

      If you work for a cellphone vendor I guess you know it's time to dust off your resume when you hear rumours that you're being bought by Microsoft.

    11. Re: This one will be easier by aliquis · · Score: 1

      But Nokia didn't only sell smartphones or even mostly smartphones.

      They sold future-phones and dumb-phones too.

      So you may both be correct.

      That they still sold a bunch of phones though shitty ones which couldn't compete in the premium market doesn't really matter all that much.

    12. Re:This one will be easier by aliquis · · Score: 1

      The Nokia stock is up above where it was than the Windows phone deal was announced.

      Which also was a pretty weird reaction even though it would be in line with what I felt about the ideas before-hand but considering analysts / at least some people had said that was what they should do and then it tanked anyway =P

      Anyway. Stock price recovered. And now they don't make phones.

    13. Re:This one will be easier by Stormwatch · · Score: 2

      And now they don't make phones.

      But they do make a high-end Android tablet, and an unique Android launcher. Maybe this does not sound like much, but it is widely speculated that they will make Android phones in 2016. They are just waiting for the non-compete clause of their deal with the devil to run out.

      And it would be a wise move, I believe. The Nokia brand is still incredibly strong in developing countries; it was only Windows Phone that poisoned their sales.

    14. Re: This one will be easier by Celarent+Darii · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually no. Elop came in 2011, when Nokia was still selling more phones than Samsung and Apple. However *Android* had just begun to have majority of marketshare.

      http://25labs.com/a-quarter-of...

      During his tenure Nokia's marketshare went from 38% to 3% (yes, that is right, 3 percent) source..

      Elop was a disaster and got paid a 18.8 million dollar bonus on his departure from Nokia.

    15. Re: This one will be easier by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      the year elop came onboard was the best selling year for the symbian smartphones.

      though, if they had kept the same middle layers they would still have been fucked - elop or not. elop accelerated things considerably though, by announcing windows phones when they were selling symbian phones by the boatloads(EXCEPT in USA. a market that traditionally was a niche market for Nokia really and rightfully so). for some reason the board was hell bent on conquering the low profit shitty carrier ran smartphone market of the USA and were willing to put the company under a bus for it. why? who the fuck knows. they probably were jealous that they were not on american magazines as much as motorola, despite having buried motorolas business 3 times already globally.

      like, if Elop had been competent he could have saved the company and moved to android or whatever. really just last year nokia DID release android phones and they sold pretty well in markets where they were sold(elop refused to sell them in NA or EURO regions, Nokia X, it was a sub 100$ series of android smartphones and consequently sold well).

      also, nokia fudged stats by moving phones between smart and feature categories pretty much yearly, but that's besides the point. nokia gave you ssh, irc and web browsing on a 200$ phone like 6 years before apple gave it to you on a 600$ phone. c++ apps baby.

      there were other long running fuckups at nokia along the way as well almost _all_ which could be attributed to middle managers subcontracting&giving perks to outside companies which said middle managers then used as golden parachute jobs when exiting Nokia(and most fucked up that part as well).. also they had about 7000 too many people working on the symbian phones... ultimately it's the upper leaderships fault for not looking what the officers were doing.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    16. Re: This one will be easier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't start your sentences with a capital, would you mind not using them at all then please ?

    17. Re:This one will be easier by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Are you sure you're not looking at the other Nokia - the part that M$ didn't buy?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    18. Re:This one will be easier by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I look at the Nokia which is Nokia.
      Not what is now Microsoft.
      I talk about Nokia not Microsoft.

      The fact is that Windows phone and number of phones manufactured or not Nokia according to the market is worth about the same. That the phone business has been sold of is irrelevant. The price for that include what it contained and was.

      Finns who held the stock through this time is likely about or better of by now (whatever you measure before it was announced or after matters.)
      Of course having changed to the market in general would still had been a better deal though.

      So has it been a success or failure? I don't know. I don't know what would have happened otherwise. Guess I'd say no. But it at least haven't been a catastrophe because Nokia hasn't lost value since it happened (it has relevative the total market value of the whole stock market.)

    19. Re: This one will be easier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      future-phones ... huh ... feature-phones

    20. Re: This one will be easier by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I post shit on the Internet the whole time.

      My brain isn't used all that much and English isn't my native language so occasionally my mind and fingers don't type the same thing.

  2. They should rebrand it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe change the name to BlueBerry in homage to the blue screen of death. Or perhaps go for the luxury of BlackRaspBerry. Then again, they could just go for something boring like Apple.

    1. Re:They should rebrand it by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      I like "Crashberry"

    2. Re:They should rebrand it by tompaulco · · Score: 2, Informative

      I like "Crashberry"

      Maybe Microsoft could make a Blackberry crash. I personally had believed that phones crashing was just a joke because my Blackberry literally never crashed or needed rebooting. Then I got an Android and found out that, yes, phones really do crash. Apparently iphones do too, from what I hear from iphone owners, however, iphones crash because it is Job's will.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    3. Re:They should rebrand it by hey! · · Score: 1

      I nominated "dingleberry".

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:They should rebrand it by the_B0fh · · Score: 2, Informative

      I personally had believed that phones crashing was just a joke because my Blackberry literally never crashed or needed rebooting.

      Now we know you're a plant, I've had quite a few blackberries since the mid 2000s. Every single one of them have crashed to the extent where I had to remove the batteries.

    5. Re:They should rebrand it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those kinds of things depend greatly on how bad of a job your carrier has done in "customizing" the OS. I've seen identical hardware behave completely differently, the only difference being the carrier.

  3. Might as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This makes marginally more sense than the SalesForce acquisition, which would've cost MS 10x more and then led analysts to ask, 2-3 years from now, why doesn't Microsoft spin off SalesForce as a separate company?

    Blackberry is already failed so the question of a spinoff won't arise. And Windows OS wasn't going anywhere even with Nokia. Might as well try to rope in some corporate accounts and then gradually migrate them to Windows OS.

    1. Re:Might as well by ArhcAngel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Microsoft just lost the Ford account to BlackBerry. I'm more inclined to think Microsoft sees the value in BlackBerry QNX in the IoT arena. BlackBerry is positioning itself to be the middleware glue for medical, auto, automation, and a host of other fields.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    2. Re:Might as well by savuporo · · Score: 1

      Microsoft sees the value in BlackBerry QNX in the IoT arena

      Then they are stark raving mad. It has zero traction and negative appeal in IoT space.

      --
      http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashdot.org Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
    3. Re:Might as well by Megol · · Score: 1

      IIRC QNX can deliver a POSIX environment in ~32kiB of RAM (kernel + process manager). Why would that have a "negative appeal"?

  4. Not going to happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just click bait. China might be interested, so they can rape the code/encryption for military purposes. India might be interested so they can keep the Chinese from having the technology. Microsoft?, only some CEO with a brain aneurism would buy blackberry.

    I suppose microsoft might want some of the patents so they could sue someone, but that the only thing blackberry has now.

    1. Re:Not going to happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ding. Ding. Ding. You win the magic prize!

    2. Re:Not going to happen. by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Either that or Microsoft is sick and tired of competing with blackberry for the ass end of the smartphone market, and hopes to grow from 2.3% market share to 3.3% again.

    3. Re:Not going to happen. by redwraith94 · · Score: 1

      That probably, and their BYOD management software, which surprisingly wasn't all that bad.

      --
      I art more snarky, and terse than thou. I art Slashdot!
    4. Re:Not going to happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your brain damage is showing. ;-)

    5. Re: Not going to happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but Microsoft also bought Hotmail and Skype, two companies that generated next to zero revenue. We now know, thanks to Snowden, that the likely driver behind the purchase was to allow the likes of the NSA into those communications channels. (iIRC - please correct me if I am wrong) Skype used to use direct end-to-end communications until MS got the company, and now we know that interception is routine.

      So one possible explanation for MS interest might be to prevent the company leaving US ownership. It wou,d nor help the NSA to have to go to a Chinese electronics company to ask for help intercepting communications, would it?

      Appreciate this is tinfoil hat territory, but stranger things have happened,,,

  5. Article is likely fake by billDCat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From the author's bio: "He is having immense interest in psychology, human behavior and mind hacks."

    Given that as well as the bad grammar, I'm pretty sure this is made up to get a reaction.

    1. Re:Article is likely fake by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Good point.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Article is likely fake by qubezz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Agreed. Blackberry doesn't have to sell anything. They recently announced a 12m share buyback, which they can do because they have $2.9 billion in cash.

    3. Re:Article is likely fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are fake rumors of a BB acquisition on a fairly regularly basis. I'm sure this is just one more knowledge a series. And if I'm wrong and this is somehow genuine (against all appearances), it's worth noting that the one or two sincere purchase offers fell through at the negotiation table.

  6. ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the entire canadian electronics effort moves to china. nice going there, ay?

    1. Re:ha ha by linearZ · · Score: 2, Funny

      nice going there, ay?

      Don't you mean "eh". As in "Lets all go to Tim Hortons for hot dogs and beer after a good match of curling, eh." or "There is a mouse in this beer, eh."

      "ay" is from somewhere ootside of Canada.

      --
      Revolution is the opium of the intellectuals.
    2. Re: ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 Bob and Doug reference

    3. Re: ha ha by NoGuffCheck · · Score: 1

      What about: "press eh, I'll handle this"?

      --
      serenity now!
    4. Re: ha ha by omkhar · · Score: 1

      Tim Horton's doesn't sell hotdogs you insensitive clod.

    5. Re: ha ha by linearZ · · Score: 1

      The Chuch Norris defense, eh?

      And I think the Canadian spelling is "aboot", not "about".

      --
      Revolution is the opium of the intellectuals.
    6. Re: ha ha by linearZ · · Score: 1

      This is an outrage! Tim Hortons must sell hot dogs! Where else would we expect red blooded Canadians to eat after a curling match?

      I'm always shocked at just how much Canada doesn't get Canadian culture.

      --
      Revolution is the opium of the intellectuals.
    7. Re: ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tim Hortons sell Donuts and Coffee You Insensitive Clod!

    8. Re:ha ha by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean "eh". As in "Lets all go to Tim Hortons for hot dogs and beer after a good match of curling, eh."

      You can't buy either hot dogs or beer at Tim Hortons.

      And pretty much nobody actually says "eh", and never has.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    9. Re: ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your Canadian citizenship should be rescinded. There's gobs and gobs of people who excessively say "eh". The worst are the ones who stop their story so you acknowledge their "eh" before continuing.

      Also, my dad says it a lot more as the number of drinks in him increases.

    10. Re:ha ha by linearZ · · Score: 1

      And pretty much nobody actually says "eh", and never has.

      Yes, I know. And nobody in Canada ever liked hockey. And curling is just some sport made up for people to think Canadians have figured out how to bowl on ice. But Canada doesn't have ice either. These myths aboot Canada have all been made up to make the rest of the world think that Canadians are something other than humorless automatons. Indeed, Canadians have no sense of humor.

      --
      Revolution is the opium of the intellectuals.
    11. Re:ha ha by linearZ · · Score: 1

      If Canadians had a sense of humor, that second season of JPod would have happened....

      --
      Revolution is the opium of the intellectuals.
  7. Goodbye, QNX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "embrace, extend, extuingish". Danger, anyone?

  8. And the new company will be called... by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    BlueBerry

    1. Re:And the new company will be called... by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 2

      MicroBerry?
      BlackSoft??
      MicroBlackSoftBerry???

    2. Re:And the new company will be called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's going to be Microsoft Z3 ...

    3. Re:And the new company will be called... by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      It's going to be Microsoft Z3 ...

      Microsoft - Revenge of the Zune

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  9. As big a success as the Kin by dpbsmith · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sure this will be as big a success for Microsoft as their acquisition of Danger, Incorporated, developer of the Danger Hiptop/T-Mobile Sidekick, which led the innovative, exciting, youth-oriented Microsoft Kin. And the rest is history.

    1. Re:As big a success as the Kin by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 0

      My wife just got a Virgin Mobile Nokia phone. She really likes it. I might end up getting one too.

    2. Re:As big a success as the Kin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go for Cricket or T-Mobile, instead.

    3. Re:As big a success as the Kin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You've had 80% battery life because all you can do with the device is make phone calls, because the app store sucks.

    4. Re:As big a success as the Kin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for your review, you Microsoft shill. Don't worry, windows phone will always suck ass.

    5. Re:As big a success as the Kin by Pubstar · · Score: 1

      You know, if they made a 4G LTE Sidekick, I'd buy it in a heart beat. I miss my old Sidekick from the day of feature phones and crappy 3G service.

      Or I'd settle for a regular high end smart phone with a god damn keyboard. I love swype but I really preferred typing on a slide out keyboard... and not one that felt odd by only having a protruding end on one side (HTC G1).

    6. Re:As big a success as the Kin by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Android is fragmenting and will probably die in the next several years.

      It's interesting to ponder what will replace it. But it's not a sport where you have to back one 'side' or the other.

  10. King Midas in reverse by xeno · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm horrified, partly because I'm on the verge of buying a BB Passport. It's the best thing they've done in years, and since playing with SWMBO's (she bought one instead of a galaxy edge, after much comparison). The BB has a nice android implementation, simple hack to add the Google apps, better security and sandboxing of droid apps, and real keys with a touch surface that flows right onto the 1440x1440 touchscreen. Oh, and all that stuffy Blackberry stuff. It's a truly awesome piece of hardware. And now Redmond wants to gut 'em for their IP portfolio and security reputation?

    In the mobile market, Microsoft is like King Midas in reverse: everything they touch turns to shit.* But this isn't a rant about Microsoft, it's a worry that Blackberry -- having done the amazing job of pulling out of the total nosedive they were in -- might get stomped just as they level out, and ship something even better. What a disappointment that would be.

    *apologies to Tony Soprano

    --
    I think not...(*poof*)
    1. Re:King Midas in reverse by Prune · · Score: 1

      You nailed it. I wish I had mod points...

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    2. Re:King Midas in reverse by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Informative

      ... it's a worry that Blackberry -- having done the amazing job of pulling out of the total nosedive they were in ...

      Uh, what the heck are you talking about?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re: King Midas in reverse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Pulling out of a nosedive? The company is gutted, their products aren't remotely competitive. Buy a passport, Just know it won't be supported

    4. Re:King Midas in reverse by smugfunt · · Score: 1

      King Midas in reverse: everything they touch turns to shit.*
      *apologies to Tony Soprano

      Graham Nash in1967, but since Midas lived about 3000 years ago I doubt this was the first time the notion occurred to anyone.

    5. Re:King Midas in reverse by pastafazou · · Score: 1

      Wow, way to link to some obscure student essay just to have an argument. Maybe you could've pulled the actual financials from google instead: http://press.blackberry.com/co...
      Q4 2015: positive cashflow of $76Million versus a negative cashflow of 784Million in Q4 2014
      Q4 2015: cash and investments of $3.27 billion, up $608Million from Q4 2014
      Q4 2015: earnings of $0.04 per share, versus loss of $0.08 per share in Q4 2014

      I would say the original claim of them pulling out of a nosedive would be accurate. It doesn't mean they're flying high again, but they did manage to generate some positives.

    6. Re: King Midas in reverse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Buy a passport, Just know it won't be supported

      BlackBerry has supported (through serious software updates) their phones longer than Microsoft, Google, or Apple, and still does. Why would you believe it won't be supported when they've shown a history of doing just that?

  11. Patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    MS wants to buy the patents. The let the rest die.

  12. Microshafted to the max by deviated_prevert · · Score: 1
    Very possible considering the fact that the entire Canadian government web infrastructure and most of the Provincial ones have all become dedicated Microsoft centric infrastructures. The same thing goes for all the crown Corps like the CBC and most universities so the acquisition and dismemberment of BlackBerry at the hands of Microsoft would come as no surprise at all.

    It has been the goal of Microsoft to dominate all digital communications in the western world and as far as possible elsewhere. The acquisition, absorption and decimation of all who have stood in the way is almost complete. Acquiring and then dismantling BB makes perfect sense then making certain that there is no competition in Canada other than Google for corporate mail and communications is the icing on the cake for Redmond. Their tactics of using their OS domination position to corner the information market are obvious and very disturbing. ALL HAIL the new and open MICROSOFT! Same as the old.

    The statues of the fallen ( and some soon to die as well)

    Blackberry

    Corel (Word Perfect)

    IBM AIX, Lotus software etc and any attempt they made to network businesses with software other than windows based infrastructure

    Nokia

    HP Unix

    good ol' BSD based Hot Mail

    Netscape

    And a huge number of others who have tried to compete against Microsoft in the digital information technology market. The Scroogle campaign has not to date done much to Bing the Google thing but it is obvious that the campaign to undermine, defame and absorb them is still alive and screwing over the market place! Milo Minderbinder has nothing on Microsoft!

    --
    This message was not sent from an iPhone because Peter Sellers really was a deviated prevert without a dime for the call
    1. Re:Microshafted to the max by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder what Microsof would do with QNX...

    2. Re:Microshafted to the max by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Canadian government does a lot of Linux on the presentation (web) tier. I won't lie, Microsoft is all over the place but so is big iron Unix (AIX, HP-UX) and a lot of that is migrating to Linux. Some departments may be only Microsoft but the new Shared Services Canada (one IT department for all departments) uses both Linux and Microsoft. Desktop is pretty much MS all the way though with Exchange on the back end.

    3. Re:Microshafted to the max by Guppy · · Score: 1

      The Scroogle campaign has not to date done much to Bing the Google thing but it is obvious that the campaign to undermine, defame and absorb them is still alive and screwing over the market place! Milo Minderbinder has nothing on Microsoft!

      Microsoft has already switched tactics, recognizing the Scroogle campaign was going nowhere. Currently the main thrust to boost search is through free "Windows with Bing" devices (pairing up with Intel's anti-ARM contra-revenue strategy), and the Android-with-Microsoft ecosystem they are trying to build up through Samsung and Cyanogen.

  13. God help us all! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully BB will sell QNX before Microsoft gets its hands on the best real-time OS on the market and totally farks it up! FWIW, I have serial number 004. This would just piss me off so much!

  14. I think Microsoft is a natural by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blackberry is really 2 companies:
    The secure QNX OS, with a locked down userland with limited functionality, including email. It also manufactures some devices, that use QNX, and userland.

    The software, and infrastructure, for controlling large number of QNX devices, and messaging servers.

    Microsoft has most of the software components to duplicate Blackberry's software.

  15. NO GOD SPARE US!!! by xystren · · Score: 1

    Don't be touching my Blackberry Microsoft!!!!

    1. Re:NO GOD SPARE US!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Now that Ballmer is gone, maybe we can be a little more optimistic for once, eh?

    2. Re:NO GOD SPARE US!!! by baker_tony · · Score: 1, Funny

      Agreed, I think it's exciting times ahead for Microsoft again.

    3. Re:NO GOD SPARE US!!! by Prune · · Score: 0

      Your post has given rise to one of the few occasions I wish Slashdot supported embedded images. http://i.imgur.com/31RF4Za.png

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    4. Re:NO GOD SPARE US!!! by baker_tony · · Score: 0

      Yes yeah, blind hatred for something you don't understand and will never attempt to shows all the hallmarks for a sane mind. Back to your parent's basement and compiling kernels with you while the rest of the world carries on.

    5. Re:NO GOD SPARE US!!! by 0123456 · · Score: 2

      Now that Ballmer is gone, maybe we can be a little more optimistic for once, eh?

      Hey, babe, I know I used to beat you, but trust me. I've changed.

    6. Re:NO GOD SPARE US!!! by the_B0fh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People who don't understand how Microsoft has fucked over IT for the past few decades should really take the time to study some history.

    7. Re:NO GOD SPARE US!!! by fisted · · Score: 1

      I tried the Blackberry Microsoft for a while, and it isn't even so bad.

      commas -- fundamentally changing the meaning of sentences since 300 BC

    8. Re:NO GOD SPARE US!!! by Prune · · Score: 1

      If it was blind hatred, Windows wouldn't be my primary desktop and Visual Studio wouldn't be my primary development environment. GGP's post was funny nonetheless. By your age, you ought to have learned to be able not to take yourself too seriously.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
  16. Once they acquire the patents... by msobkow · · Score: 2

    Once they acquire the patents, they'll make a tablet with a keyboard and insist it's not a laptop. :P

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  17. Military Use by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just a small note, the military is switching to the iPhone 6 from the BlackBerry. Most of the leadership at the very large DoD facility I work for turned in their BlackBerries a few months back for iPhones.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Military Use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a small note, the military is switching to the iPhone 6 from the BlackBerry. Most of the leadership at the very large DoD facility I work for turned in their BlackBerries a few months back for iPhones.

      Citation needed. BlackBerry is still the only consumer hardware/software combo that has been granted clearance and has been certified.

    2. Re:Military Use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. android has been approved as well.

      http://www.disa.mil/news/pressresources/2014/mobility-adroid-samsung

      Windows Phone.. not so much (not approved for DoD high level security):
      http://www.minyanville.com/sectors/technology/articles/Microsoft-Windows-Phone-Cleared-For-Government/9/18/2013/id/51820

    3. Re:Military Use by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Well then, I guess all the Group Commanders and the Wing King are in violation of the rules. Though I very much don't think so...

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    4. Re:Military Use by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Citation needed? This isn't Wikipedia. I just told you what's going on here . Fell free to call me a liar, but I will have to say you clearly don't know what you are talking about.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  18. And Chinese want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the encription tech.

    Trust me, either way Blackberry will lose a large amount of customers almost overnight.

  19. NOOO, NOT AGAIN!!! by storkus · · Score: 0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    OMFG, does the evil Empire really need to strike again?!?

  20. Closure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's nice to have closure and know for sure blackberry is coming to an end. History has shown Microsoft is where portable technologies go to die.

  21. First Nokia, now Blackberry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only Microsoft could Trojan-house the CEO of the #1 handset maker in the world and lead it down to utter failure so they could buy it cheaply, *still* fail to execute, and then not promote the guy to Microsoft CEO. Elop - thousands of Finns hate you and for good reason.

    Now MIcrosoft wants to do the same to Blackberry. This time they're not even trojaning the CEO.

    Microsoft - you had Windows Mobile. Then you had Windows Mobile 2003. You had the MONOPOLY LOCK on smartphones. And, as usual, you f'd it up. You have nothing. And you never will. You won't ever beat Google/Android for #1 or Apple/IOS for #2.

    So go ahead, buy Blackberry. Or don't. You're the last-place horse. Congratulations

    Cpt Dunsail

  22. A waste of money by vision33r · · Score: 1

    Instead of sinking billions into Blackberry, why not spend $500mil on making higher quality apps on the Marketplace store? I bet if they create enough high quality apps/games and then making them free it would pay much higher dividend than acquire another niche mobile device maker. Haven't they learned already that Nokia was a dying ship? The Tmobile Sidekick/Danger was another dying ship before their acquisition.

  23. And nothing of value was lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, really.

  24. Ottawa will never allow it by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

    Canada considers BlackBerry as a national Canadian treasure of sorts. It's a huge success story and has been the backbone of just an immense number of high-tech jobs. BlackBerry is a flagship company. As such, Ottawa will never allow it to be sold to outsiders like Microsoft or anyone else.

    It's just not going to happen.

    This means the value of the company is a lot less than it seems since the value can't be taken out of Canada in any meaningful way.

    --
    Sig for hire.
    1. Re:Ottawa will never allow it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I gotta say, this is true. I can't see anyone but a canadian bank buying BlackBerry.

    2. Re:Ottawa will never allow it by etinin · · Score: 1

      so was Nokia. Oulu, with its once pride big economy is now in tatters.

      --
      "I decided I could write something better than everything out there in two weeks. And I was right." - Linus Torvalds
    3. Re:Ottawa will never allow it by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

      Not even sure about a bank as so many banks still use BBM. They might not like having another bank in charge of the company, though there are probably ways around that with a holding company or something.

      My feeling is some kind of Canadian consortium can come to BlackBerry's rescue Despite FairFax taking a look and walking away, I still think they could do it with Canadian money without needing foreign partners. Canadian investors are as good as any, have plenty of money to invest and they can read the tea leaves as well as any. It comes down to what they think the value is. If not FairFax, perhaps somebody else.

      --
      Sig for hire.
    4. Re:Ottawa will never allow it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada considers BlackBerry as a national Canadian treasure of sorts. It's a huge success story and has been the backbone of just an immense number of high-tech jobs. BlackBerry is a flagship company. As such, Ottawa will never allow it to be sold to outsiders like Microsoft or anyone else.

      It's just not going to happen.

      This means the value of the company is a lot less than it seems since the value can't be taken out of Canada in any meaningful way.

      That's nonsense and you have nothing to back up your assertion with. Besides, Blackberry was never the backbone of the Canadian tech industry so much as the University of Waterloo was and still is.

    5. Re:Ottawa will never allow it by metrix007 · · Score: 1

      That's pretty sad that you need the government to defend and bail out the single Canadian success story.

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
  25. No they outsold Samsung and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Please see the graph showing the smartphone quarterly sales:
    http://seekingalpha.com/article/916271-how-stephen-elop-destroyed-nokia

    See that top line? Way above the others? Thats Nokia.

    You cannot rewrite history in the Internet age, Elop was a trojan horse,.

    http://www.cnet.com/news/nokias-windows-phone-bear-hug-is-choking-the-mighty-finn/

    1. Re:No they outsold Samsung and Apple by kamapuaa · · Score: 2

      I love that article. 5 seconds of Googling shows that Elop didn't actually become CEO of Nokia until the end of 2010, but for some reason the article decides to start half a year earlier, with the sales record of the previous CEO, who was forced out for poor performance. You're reading an article that's more concerned with being a hit piece than the truth.

      Another 10 seconds of Googling shows that at the beginning of 2011, Android was the top smartphone OS: http://www.tomsguide.com/us/an...

      Elop talked about all this at the beginning of his infamous "burning platform" memo.

      Realistically, how would a CEO completely tank a phone OS in like two months? Steve Jobs needed a few years at Apple before his ideas really went from concept to production.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    2. Re:No they outsold Samsung and Apple by hairyfeet · · Score: 0

      Sigh....MSFT didn't have to do a damned thing, neither did Elop as Nokia was already fucked as they pulled the same shit that Palm did, wasting their time at #1 pocketing cash and going in a dozen directions at once instead of actually innovating and staying ahead of the curve!

      Break down their sales when they were last #1....what was that? It was nearly 100% Symbian "feature phones" with an OS so damned old it felt like running Windows 2 in 2005? Bingo, we have a winnar! Symbian was waaaaaaay too fucking old to compete, hell I saw that all the way back and Android Donut (1.6 IIRC) which made Symbian look like the fossil that it was. What about Maemo you say? What about it? If you go look at the actual reports coming from the devs working on the thing you'll see that Maemo would take at least another year and a half because they were having serious memory leaking and file corruption issues. Remember this was when Android 1.5/1.6 and iOS 2 was out, no way in hell would the consumer have taken a phone you had to reboot 4 times a day, could crash when you took a call, and turn your files into data salad, not when they had choices that worked!

      Look I get why Nokia fanboys wanted to think some "bad guy" just killed poor wittle Nokia, I had a Nokia for ages and AAMOF I just picked up a Lumia for the wife as she didn't care for Android and while I hate Metro with a fiery passion I'll give credit where credit is due for those not "tech heads" its pretty damned intuitive and the hardware as always seems solid but....the one that killed Nokia...was fucking Nokia. It really was Palm all over again, when Elop came on board they had not ONE OS, not TWO OSes, but fucking THREE OPERATING SYSTEMS splitting up the talent and sucking down resources. They had 1.-Symbian, 2.- Maemo, 3.- the dumbphone OS, and wasn't there even a fourth one for awhile? I seem to remember they were also working on a Java based one there for like a year and a half.

      When your only selling product, top of the heap at that moment it may be, is the equivalent of VHS when the entire industry and an ever growing segment of the populace was buying DVD? Well that is when your ass better be laser focused on beating the other guy to the punch, instead they split their resources all over the place and by the time Elop showed up? It really was a "burning platform" as Symbian was too fucking old to compete, dumbphones were going the way of the 8-track, and Maemo probably wouldn't have gone gold until after Apple 3 and Android Gingerbread had been out a good 6 months and by then they were royally fucked.

      In a perfect world they would have bought WebOS but they couldn't compete with HP throwing stupid money and Android was in a race to the bottom so Elop bought the only other OS available,and it didn't work out, it was a Hail Mary but at that point a Hail Mary was all that was left, the other guys simply were too far ahead in the game.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    3. Re:No they outsold Samsung and Apple by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      The point isn't really the timing of Elop's arrival - it's what Elop did with the situation. Going whole hog on Windows when Android was clearly the most successful alternative to iOS was pure Elop. It was a big bet with two possible outcomes:

            1. Success - in which case Nokia has a headstart on becoming just another producer of Windows phones (i.e. first mover in a replay of PC commodification). After all, if they succeeded, then Samsung and the rest would be right behind them.
            2. Failure - in which case Nokia is a cheap Microsoft acquisition.

      Either outcome could've suited Elop. Neither was particularly great for Nokia.

      The third option was to build Android phones. In that case, they'd at least be entering an arena with an established market for their products. So they'd be executing the 'success' scenario above - and competing with Samsung and the rest. On the merits of their hardware and any popular goodies they could add to their flavor of Android. And without having to develop a market singlehandedly just to get to the starting line.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    4. Re: No they outsold Samsung and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right on the spot there! It really was Palm all over again. Nice assessment!

    5. Re:No they outsold Samsung and Apple by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      I own several Nokia devices, including feature phones, "future phones" and smart devices (both S60 and S^3) - but not a single Windows phone (for what it's worth, I'm also a former resident of Finland up until shortly before Elop happened).

      Irrespective of how much you may love Elop and think that Nokia was going down the tubes, are you seriously going to sit there and bitch about Nokia devices which are difficult as shit to break, hold a charge for ages and don't need to be restarted every other week and champion the shiny-shiny produced by Apple and other OEMs which offer devices up with so much crap on them that they *do* need to be restarted frequently, don't hold a charge and can be destroyed by dropping them from less than 2 metres?

      No thanks, I'll sit here with my primary device - a Nokia N8-00 which I got back in January 2011 - which kicks the ass of any other phone I've been able to find for being a phone but also working perfectly well with modern websites, a better camera than most phones on store shelves now, has an FM transmitter so I can listen to my music collection while I'm driving with controls that are easier to use than those on the car radio and even old versions of Nokia maps kick Google maps any day of the week (says my experience driving through the Appalachians a few months ago) AND it works offline AND it has useful features like a speedometer. It also has HDMI (if I so desire to use it) and DLNA (if I so desire to use it - yes, it even works with Chromecast).

      The only real complaint I have is the micro-USB connector wasn't great... but then again, nothing I haven't seen millions of Android folks complain about, either, so, bluetooth.

      So what am I missing out on? Not much. I might not be able to run Candy Crush or whatever on my device, but that's not something I care about. I have Skype and some other key apps, I have email, I have a couple of non-SMS messaging apps, I have PuTTY, I can open PDFs... I'm probably going to use this thing until they dismantle the 3G networks because it probably won't die - it's outlasted... err... 3 Androids and an iPhone (all cracked screens/fell apart) that my SO has had in roughly the same timeframe.

      So what if it's old? I don't have to put up with half the shit I would on iOS and Android. It. Just. Works.

      As for Maemo, issues such as those you are describing happen during development, but unlike certain other manufacturers, these issues did not relate to a final release, and comparing them to even old versions of Android/iOS is stupid because it suggests that Android/iOS were bug free during development. I remember versions of Android being incredible amounts of suck - 2.1 I think had an issue whereby something to do with text messaging failed entirely (found that out when I got my mother an Android phone with 2.1 on it several years ago... guess what it was replaced with!?), and it didn't stop there - 4 and 5 have all seen more than their fair share of issues relating to the exact same things you're complaining were happening during Maemo's development. Maemo could have been a great transition for Nokia were it to replace Symbian in that segment and the dumbphone OS, well... it's a dumbphone OS, probably hadn't really been touched significantly in years - what do you want?

      Disclaimer, I also have 2 Android devices - a small Samsung phone with 4.4 I think and a Nexus 7 with 5.1 IIRC. The phone is basically unusable as a phone, but it does make a decent enough WiFi hotspot for the times where I need one.

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
  26. simple math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Shit + more shit = shit

  27. Looking out for number 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After acquiring Blackberry, Microsoft will without a doubt become the largest also-ran in the phone business.

    1. Re:Looking out for number 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean it hasn't already?

    2. Re:Looking out for number 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Blackberry still has more residual marketshare than Windows Phone, due to government contracts, so Microsoft is currently only the second-biggest also-ran right now.

  28. The graph is correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article and graph correctly shows him starting between Q2 and Q3 2010 of Nokias financial year. It also shows 1 quarter of INCREASING market share for Symbian as Elop joined.

    Google was not the top selling Smartphone in the world in Q1 of 2011, Android only led in the US then.

    It took him 1 year to nose dive Symbian below Android and iOS not 2 months.

    He was a Microsoft trojan, recruited from Microsoft, destroyed Nokia, and received a bonus for selling the corpse to Microsoft. That bonus was paid by Microsoft.

  29. Typical by Whiteox · · Score: 1

    I've never read so much crap from the anti-microsoft brigade for a long time.
    I bet that all of them hadn't tried Windows phone 8 and so they feel that they can run it into the ground because it's MS.
    The phones are great. The OS is excellent and works well on low end phones too. The Windows store is better than you think and the gui and general operation is easy to use esp with One Drive. Cortana is brilliant. Hands off answers my sms-s with voice recognition.
    It all a matter of choice and preference. You like android with all that confusing muddle of updates that stuff things up? Go for it. Like your Apple phone? Then make sure you've got an iPad or Mac to go with it to take full advantage.
    Just look up the specs of the newest Lumia 640XL - all for around $300 unlocked. Manufactured in ex Nokia factories, great battery life and a whopping 5.7" screen.
    MS will win this. Give them a few years.

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    1. Re:Typical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You bet?
      You know what I think?
      Cortana is brilliant?

      Go fuck yourself.

    2. Re:Typical by gavron · · Score: 1

      > I've never read so much crap...

      Your illiteracy isn't something about which you should be bragging. Learn to read and then read about Microsoft and you'll read lots more crap than you ever thought existed -- all earned by Microsoft through its incompetence at software engineering.

      > I bet that all of them hadn't tried Windows phone 8

      Your wagering skills aren't something about which you should be bragging. Windows Mobile has been a scourge since 2002 when Microsoft owned the market, and lost it through sheer incompetence and bullying. Nobody's left around who would try "Windows Phone 8" or whatever Microsoft releases now because they've had 13 years to fail to corner the market -- and all they've done is demonstrate the wrong way to do things.

      > The phones are great. The OS is excellent and works well on low end phones too

      Your analytical skills aren't something about which you should be bragging. The phones -- hardware wise -- compare poorly with one and two year old Android or IOS phones. The OS is hardly stable, and the app store a joke. Yes, it works well on low-end phones because it is a low-end OS that doesn't push hardware to any limits -- fortunately -- because the hardware it runs on IS low-end phones.

      > Cortana is brilliant

      Your girlfriend in mind only. You really should look up what "brilliant" means and realize that an artificial voice recognition software can't be brilliant. Then if you decide to learn English and use an apt word like "useful" you'll find that anything with Bing as the search engine is an exercise in frustrated futility.

      > Just look up the specs of the newest Lumia 640XL

      Perhaps you should "just look up" that this is a discussion about Microsoft potentially acquiring BlackBerry, not a discussion of how much they suck, or how awful they are, or how they took Nokia down the proverbial tube. The Lumia phone is history. It just hasn't got there yet.

      E

  30. Old news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This news is over one week old.

  31. Re:This one will be funnier by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Popcorn futures are already up 5%. This is going to be fun!

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  32. What for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blackberry is already ruined - Microsoft can't do to it what it did to Nokia.

  33. NNNOOOOOOOOO !!! by swschrad · · Score: 1

    why would Microsoft double down on a dying dud? nothing there but dead weight, a black hole.

    patents are cheaper in Chapter 7.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  34. assets are also cheaper in Chapter 7 by swschrad · · Score: 1

    wait it out, enter the auction. much smarter business.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:assets are also cheaper in Chapter 7 by adolf · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's always better to buy a corpse of a company after the engineers have burned their notes and thrown their desk chairs through the window on their way downtown to mortgage their car and sign up for food stamps, than to buy a company that is not yet a corpse and still has productive and creative people.

  35. r.e. passport... Re:King Midas in reverse by Fubari · · Score: 1

    I'm liking my passport fwiw. Quite happy with it.
    It generates lots of "what is that?" questions. (Funniest one thus far: "A Blackberry, what, are you Canadian?")
    By the time BlackBerry is assimilated (or recovers) I will be on to a different handset.