Slashdot Mirror


Professional Internet Troll Sues Her Former Employer

baegucb sends a followup to the news from March that professional internet trolls were operating by the hundreds at factories in Russia. A woman hired to be one of these trolls, Lyudmila Savchuk, spoke to the media about her job, which led to her being fired. She's now suing her former employer and providing further details about how they operate. "The 'troll factory' operates based on very weird schemes, but all those firms are connected to each other, even though they are separate legal entities," she said. "I knew it was something bad, but of course I never suspected that it was this horrible and this large-scale." She describes how they flooded comment sections with pro-Putin responses, pushed out over 100 blog posts each shift, and doctored images to suit their employers' needs. Savchuk is now gathering activists to oppose this form of internet propaganda.

184 comments

  1. It's 1930s retro! by CajunArson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Stalin-- uh, I mean Putin -- would be proud of their efforts.

    I hope she carries a portable geiger counter. Polonium 241 is nasty stuff.

    --
    AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
    1. Re:It's 1930s retro! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    2. Re:It's 1930s retro! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome Professional Internet Troll! Please take a seat.

    3. Re:It's 1930s retro! by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The parent post should not be off-topic. We don't have a choice except to talk about this on unrelated threads, precisely because Dice is suppressing stories about it!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:It's 1930s retro! by JazzLad · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ^ This. Unfortunately, Slashdot editors have unlimited mod points, so I expect your post and this one to get modded into oblivion. My karma can take it, but I think it's a shame that what would have been 'the big story' today was suppressed by Dice. If Soylent, et al weren't so lame, I'd have jumped ship, but /. is still one of the best sources for discussion.

      Say what you (not you specifically) will about /. going downhill, there's still much good signal in the noise - just hard when the corporate overlords expect you to not look behind the curtain.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    5. Re:It's 1930s retro! by easyTree · · Score: 4, Informative
    6. Re:It's 1930s retro! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I was professional ... no one wants to pay me. Certainly not Dice.


      Why did Dice buy Slashdot?

      So they could suppress discussions about their own scandals!

      SHAME ON YOU DICE!

    7. Re:It's 1930s retro! by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Why did Dice buy Slashdot?

      So they could suppress discussions about their own scandals!

      SHAME ON YOU DICE!

      To be fair, the filezilla project opted to use the adware/malware. The other "abandoned" projects, not so much.

    8. Re:It's 1930s retro! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why did Dice buy Slashdot?

      Hey, that rhymes with "why does Rice play Texas?"...!

    9. Re:It's 1930s retro! by dcollins117 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The the most important issue of today will not be appearing on the front page and that is very sad. This used to be the place where we could come together and share a common bond. Those days are gone.

    10. Re:It's 1930s retro! by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2

      What access? Tech minded individuals don't see anything they don't want to see on something as malleable as HTML.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    11. Re:It's 1930s retro! by cavreader · · Score: 1

      You show me a discussion site with a "common bond" and I will show you a site that is no more than an "echo chamber" and mutual back slapping society comprised of people convinced of their own magnificence. Forums so bereft of meaningful discussions that overtime it's participants think anyone disagreeing with them are trolls at best and idiots at worst.

    12. Re:It's 1930s retro! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      I was at +50 back when they showed karma, then got body slammed to -20. Never did find out why. I just dug back out of it.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    13. Re:It's 1930s retro! by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I tried Soylent for a few weeks until I just sort of forgot to click on it and haven't been back since. Really ugly looking site too. Even /. is pretty in comparison.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    14. Re:It's 1930s retro! by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      Soylent News is slowly getting better and better. I still check it each day, and the comments section has slowly been getting more interesting and more full over time. It's not as good as /.'s comments section yet, but give it another year and it might be. Plus, the staff there are making a real effort to be transparent, supportive of the community, and extremely receptive to feedback for changes that should be made, and it's clear that it's having a beneficial impact.

    15. Re:It's 1930s retro! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They delete any stories against feminism from the que too.

    16. Re:It's 1930s retro! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do they have quality trolls?

    17. Re:It's 1930s retro! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody cares about sourceforge.

    18. Re:It's 1930s retro! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. I installed Filezilla and my Mac got a piece of adware that took me fucking ages to remove.

    19. Re:It's 1930s retro! by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      It is sad.

      Sourceforge used to be a pillar of the community. It seemed something more than what github is now. I'm not sure precisely what caused the demise, but I remember it going downhill since before github was really, really big.

      Apparently they decided GIMP-Win was "abandoned". It was after a fashion---the distributor decided to stop using sourceforce and instead goes through the main GIMP site. Naturally the thing to do here is for sourceforge to take over the reigns and start putting the latest GIMP releases in it's place for the 6 or 7 remaining people who still use sourceforge. That in itself is not terrible, but it's the way they hijacked the installer which stinks.

      But it's all OK since the account owner never knew^Wobjected.

      Here's the delightful corporate weasel wording:

      https://sourceforge.net/blog/g...

      But it's not "obnoxious shitware" it's "easy to decline third party offers". Right.

      Now Dice: grow a spine and let this article on the front page. You fucked up, everyone knows you fucked up now own it.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    20. Re:It's 1930s retro! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And just remember, the filezilla devs and sourceforge explicitly chose to do that to you.

    21. Re:It's 1930s retro! by tingentleman · · Score: 1

      I did not know about this, and it has shaken my confidence in /. I hope the pleasure does not seep through this gap now

  2. LOL ... by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, internet trolls you

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:LOL ... by Pfhorrest · · Score: 2

      In Capitalist America, internet trolls you too.

      It's like my favorite Soviet Russia gag: "In Capitalist America, man oppresses man, but in Soviet Russia it's the other way around!"

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
  3. Not really a troll... by jandrese · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This looks a lot more like plain old propaganda. It's not really internet trolling in the traditional sense.

    Is "internet troll' some sort of clickbait term? We heard it last year for people who were physically stalking women and it didn't make any sense then either.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:Not really a troll... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative
    2. Re:Not really a troll... by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    3. Re:Not really a troll... by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      This looks a lot more like plain old propaganda. It's not really internet trolling in the traditional sense.

      It is "plain old propaganda" - NOT "trolling".

      Is "internet troll' some sort of clickbait term?

      Yes!

      We heard it last year for people who were physically stalking women and it didn't make any sense then either.

      Read my signature (i read yours!).

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    4. Re:Not really a troll... by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      Is it trolling when truthful? I clicked those links ... I didn't think Dice was meddlesome, but /. seems to be the only one not covering it, so ... maybe the AC (or Scotsman, above) is right.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    5. Re:Not really a troll... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or in US.. marketing!!!

    6. Re:Not really a troll... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck but you're annoying.

      Why do you keep subjecting us to your pointless drivel?

    7. Re:Not really a troll... by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why did Dice buy Slashdot?
      So they could suppress discussions about their own scandals!
      SHAME ON YOU DICE!

      Are you trolling?

      No, he is not trolling, he is merely pointing out the power of propaganda as mentioned by the OP. I believe it should be more considered irony given the context off this story

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    8. Re:Not really a troll... by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      Is it trolling when truthful? I clicked those links ... I didn't think Dice was meddlesome, but /. seems to be the only one not covering it, so ... maybe the AC (or Scotsman, above) is right.

      No, it is NOT "trolling" when truthful - i just like to "up-grade" some anonymous comments... unfortunately i just* "down-graded" to just "good" karma, so...

      * not a "conspiracy" from /. against me, althrough a couple of my "up-graded" comments were modded "-1" - but i am glad that YOU had a chance to read some "news for nerds, stuff that matters"

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    9. Re:Not really a troll... by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      Why did Dice buy Slashdot? So they could suppress discussions about their own scandals! SHAME ON YOU DICE!

      Are you trolling?

      No, he is not trolling, he is merely pointing out the power of propaganda as mentioned by the OP. I believe it should be more considered irony given the context off this story

      I know my friend...

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    10. Re:Not really a troll... by JazzLad · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Roger that, I do that sometimes myself. I hate all forms of censorship (save self-censorship, I can choose what I want to see :)) & when Dice pretends they don't do it and then we find blatant examples where they do ... it's sad.

      I'll get modded down, I'm sure, but I think it needed to be said.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    11. Re:Not really a troll... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Are you trolling?

      I see you're new here, and have no idea exactly how fall /. has fallen in the last 15 years.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    12. Re:Not really a troll... by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      Roger that, I do that sometimes myself. I hate all forms of censorship (save self-censorship, I can choose what I want to see :)) & when Dice pretends they don't do it and then we find blatant examples where they do ... it's sad. I'll get modded down, I'm sure, but I think it needed to be said.

      You are a good G[r]eek, my barbarian friend!

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    13. Re:Not really a troll... by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      Are you trolling?

      I see you're new here, and have no idea exactly how fall /. has fallen in the last 15 years.

      I understand my friend...

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    14. Re:Not really a troll... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People on insufficient geekyness to know the history of the term thing it means "monster that lives in the Internet".

      They use it more like "black hat" or "bad guy".

    15. Re:Not really a troll... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Propaganda is just marketing for a brand called a nation.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    16. Re:Not really a troll... by swillden · · Score: 1

      I have mod points today, and I was really tempted to mod your post "Troll". Just because it would be funny.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    17. Re:Not really a troll... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not Greek by any chance, are you?

    18. Re:Not really a troll... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This looks a lot more like plain old propaganda. It's not really internet trolling in the traditional sense.
      Is "internet troll' some sort of clickbait term? We heard it last year for people who were physically stalking women and it didn't make any sense then either.

      don't be a tool, troll nazi newb.

      jandrese (485)

    19. Re:Not really a troll... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My understanding of the term "troll" is that it means someone making comments not in order to further productive conversation but to evoke a response. I agree that propaganda doesn't seem to fall under that definition. I would say harassment does, but I can see why it would be helpful to separate the two as different kinds of bad behavior in comments.

    20. Re:Not really a troll... by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 1

      Because trolling is a art, and this is just the political version of advertising and marketing.

      A lot of social media sites are full of special interest groups and cliques that indulge in such behaviour.

      It does not even match the media's warped idea of what a troll is, which is more of a stalker or psychological sadist.

    21. Re:Not really a troll... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way he is right. He isn't a true Sctosman.

  4. Pfff amature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Trolling is a art.

    1. Re:Pfff amature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean "an art".

    2. Re:Pfff amature by Infiniti2000 · · Score: 1

      It's ok, he's an amature.

    3. Re:Pfff amature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he means "a rat".

    4. Re:Pfff amature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a diamond dozen.

    5. Re:Pfff amature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could care less! What's the big dill? All of the sudden, like noone talks good.

    6. Re:Pfff amature by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      You misspelled "armature".

    7. Re:Pfff amature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troling only has one "I" in it.

    8. Re:Pfff amature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's a doggie dog world out there. Gotta get attention wherever you can.

  5. Propaganda trolls propagandize propaganda article by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's amusing that in the comments on this article about pro-Russia propaganda-trolls, most of the comments are by the very pro-Russia propaganda trolls that the article exposes, belittling the article and blaming the west

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  6. Now THAT'S A Job I Want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If I get hired by these guys, do you think I have a shot at the Slashdot gig?

    Imagine getting paid for

    * First posts
    * In Soviet Russia jokes
    * Natalie Portman/Hot grits
    * Old Ike stories

    A good goatse redirect should pay big bucks!

    1. Re:Now THAT'S A Job I Want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh man, 2005 were indeed simpler times....

    2. Re:Now THAT'S A Job I Want by fred911 · · Score: 1

      You would also have to know how to appropriately use

            ( >
            / )
            X
      8====D

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    3. Re:Now THAT'S A Job I Want by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      Just imagine a Beowulf cluster of 2005!

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    4. Re:Now THAT'S A Job I Want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would also have to know how to appropriately use

            ( >

            / )

            X
      8====D

      A bird on your weiner?

  7. Troll v Troll by meta-monkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    I kind of have this idea that the comments section on CNN.com or foxnews.com is all troll bots. Right wing troll bots arguing with left wing troll bots arguing with agent provocateur right wing troll bots pretending to be deranged left wingers arguing with agent provocateur left wing troll bots pretending to be deranged right wingers.

    Basically, the internet is trolls all the way down.

    The alternative, that those are real people expressing their actual opinions, is too horrifying to contemplate.

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    1. Re:Troll v Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On Twitter, the game is,"Who is a real person, and who's astro turf?" It is sad that sometimes its too hard to tell.

    2. Re:Troll v Troll by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      I kind of have this idea that the comments section on CNN.com or foxnews.com is all troll bots.

      I occasionally check into the PINAC site, and in the comments there is always one guy there taking such an outrageously contrary opinion to all the other posters that I am beginning to suspect he is actually a sock puppet of the site's owner, solely to drum up reactions from those other posters.

      Sort of like what's his name, who treated this place as his personal blog and who we haven't seen here for a while (an no I am not saying his name doing so is sort of like saying "Beetlejuice" 3 times)

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    3. Re:Troll v Troll by genghisjahn · · Score: 1

      Basically, the internet is trolls all the way down.

      I don't have anything to add, but I thought that should be posted again.
      Oh...you're a moron.

      --
      Sorry about the mess.
    4. Re:Troll v Troll by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The alternative, that those are real people expressing their actual opinions, is too horrifying to contemplate.

      The first rule of Fight Club might be "Don't Talk About Fight Club", but the first rule of The Internet is "Don't Read The Comments Section." There are very few exceptions to this rule, but most times reading the comments section on an article is an invitation for the worst of humanity's opinions to invade your brain via your eyeballs.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    5. Re:Troll v Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      you mean Bennet? he's only been MIA for months

    6. Re:Troll v Troll by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      It kind of makes me wonder how effective this kind of shilling actually is.

      I don't think I've ever seen anyone change their mind because of an argument, on the internet or otherwise. Ok, not anyone every, but the rare occasions I've ever seen of anyone ever having their mind changed about anything involved people who were already very open-minded critical thinkers, being presented with well-reasoned and nuanced arguments, and even those are rare.

      Can the kind of mindless name-calling that passes for "argument" in most forums actually change anyone's mind, much less the kind of closed minds that tend to engage in that sort of conflict in the first place? What's the payoff for a big organization to engage in that sort of thing at all?

      (Then again, I also frequently get spam that does not mention any products or contain any links or attachments or even complete sentences sometimes, which seems to completely defeat the point of spamming, yet it's been going on for years and years anyway at someone's expense...)

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    7. Re:Troll v Troll by gmack · · Score: 1

      I wish you were right but I get people trying convince me of these things in person and then complain I don't take them seriously.

      My least favorite is an otherwise functional guy who believes that Obama is a gay Muslim secretly married to a transvestite (Michelle) who plans to take his role as "The Beast" and under the direction of the Antichrist, declare martial law before the end of his term and round up all non Muslims and put them in Internment camps already being prepared by FEMA.

      I don't understand how he manages to get dressed without drooling all over himself let alone hold down a job.

    8. Re:Troll v Troll by codemachine · · Score: 4, Funny

      Except here, where the rule is "Don't Read The Article".

    9. Re:Troll v Troll by Grog6 · · Score: 2

      Frank and Open laughter works for me, pretty much against those people.

      Just be careful of them in groups; you might get burned at the stake.

      --
      Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
    10. Re:Troll v Troll by jopsen · · Score: 2

      Except here, where the rule is "Don't Read The Article".

      Yeah, I find that if you read the article, it totally ruins most of the sensational headlines and outrages summaries :)

    11. Re:Troll v Troll by swillden · · Score: 1

      Except here, where the rule is "Don't Read The Article".

      But really should be "Don't Read the Summary", since the summaries frequently get edited into incomprehensible trollishness.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    12. Re:Troll v Troll by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      And article authors and site editors follow that religiously.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    13. Re:Troll v Troll by Maltheus · · Score: 1

      The worst and the best. The comments usually point out the flaws in any article. Sometimes they supplement important facts that were left out. Just because you can't trust everything you read, doesn't mean you should give up on reading. It just means that you should be skeptical and DYODD.

    14. Re:Troll v Troll by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      You had me at "don't read"!

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    15. Re:Troll v Troll by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Stop going to church and you'll run into a lot less of these whackjobs.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    16. Re:Troll v Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... real people expressing their actual opinions ...

      It's real people alright but they're expressing: a SJW circle-jerk, corporate propaganda, patriotic self-delusion, "fuck you, I got mine" arrogance, sentimental self-importance, "it's your fault" blame-shifting, or just mindless drivel. The actual opinion is they agree with some pre-fabricated excuse that promises simplicity and moral superiority.

    17. Re:Troll v Troll by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I did not check but I recall someone posting that CNN has disable their comments section entirely.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    18. Re:Troll v Troll by weilawei · · Score: 1

      Basically, the internet is trolls all the way down.

      Shazbot! You caught me!

    19. Re:Troll v Troll by weilawei · · Score: 1

      I am not saying his name doing so is sort of like saying "Beetlejuice" 3 times

      I suggest you say Betelgeuse instead. It's safer that way.

    20. Re:Troll v Troll by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for B***** to weigh in on the representation of women in systemd. /. will implode with the rage.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    21. Re:Troll v Troll by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Fucked ur mom.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    22. Re:Troll v Troll by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Let's just say "don't read." Read NOTHING on /. No articles, no summaries, no comments. Just vomit rage through your keyboard, please.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    23. Re:Troll v Troll by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

      The "agent provocateur" bit. Make outrageous claims pretending to be a democrat or a republican to discredit them or generally cause infighting.

      It's not about persuasion, it's about disruption.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    24. Re:Troll v Troll by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It's not meant to be changing minds directly. It's meant to provide a display of purported majority backing the policies, so that people who are easily swayed by the "majority must be right" argument (which are plenty) have more incentive, and to scare the minority in opposition into silence.

    25. Re:Troll v Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sort of like what's his name, who treated this place as his personal blog and who we haven't seen here for a while (an no I am not saying his name doing so is sort of like saying "Beetlejuice" 3 times)

      I still see his posts. The reason you don't must be because of the way you have your hosts file set up. *ducks and runs*

  8. Shill, not troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they're also disrupting online discourse like the CIA does, then that part could be called trolling, but from the description it looks like they are mostly propagandists who engage in astroturfing.

    1. Re: Shill, not troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the average Slashdot shill pushing their freedom / Linux agendas.

    2. Re: Shill, not troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn straight. I hate those bastards.

      Freedom sucks. Windows rules.

  9. Very Orwellian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We call them trolls. George Orwell used the term 'Ministry of Truth'. Please refresh my memory, what term do we use for 'dystopian'?

    1. Re:Very Orwellian by mujadaddy · · Score: 3, Funny

      what term do we use for 'dystopian'?

      "News for Nerds, Stuff That Matters" ?

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    2. Re: Very Orwellian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Present

  10. Now we know.... by bobbied · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What Snowden is doing with his time in prison, I mean Russia.. Working at a "technology" firm, making blog posts to keep Putin in power... Poor guy. It's just another way to make little rocks out of big ones...

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    1. Re:Now we know.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty big prison.
      Endless untouched wilderness and all...
      Biggest country on the planet...
      Millions of girls to fuck...

  11. Great to see this exposed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...now I'd like to see some of the same exposed among various right-wing trolls worldwide, particularly those of the Libertarian/NeoLiberal bent.

    I think paid online propaganda like this (though not all quite in this fashion) is now a worldwide problem, with very little light shone on it thus far.

    1. Re:Great to see this exposed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Signed: ~ anti-Internet-troll-propagandist Internet troll propagandist.

    2. Re:Great to see this exposed... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      In other words, those people I don't agree with must also be trolls, because no one could honestly disagree with me on how the world should be run.

      Libertarian ideals = Leave me the hell alone. Everyone should support this perspective.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    3. Re:Great to see this exposed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, we'd all like to leave you alone.

    4. Re:Great to see this exposed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Libertarian ideals = Ignore that it's not possible to have a society where "Leave me the hell alone" is possible (there will always be a government and taxes), and advocate "Leave me the hell alone" only where it suits them.

  12. Whispering Campaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a modern Whispering Campaign

    to me.

  13. Professional trolls by penguinoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    are called shills.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    1. Re:Professional trolls by bobbied · · Score: 1

      are called shills.

      But not all shills are professionals.. Some just do it for giggles...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:Professional trolls by swillden · · Score: 3, Informative

      are called shills.

      This is wrong. As is the use of the word "troll" in the summary/article. Trolls and shills are distinct, and the difference isn't whether they get paid. You can be a paid or unpaid troll and a paid or unpaid shill.

      Trolls post messages written specifically to generate responses. The term derives from fishing where trolling means to drag something through the water to catch fish. Internet trolls post baiting comments trying to get people to respond to them. Flamebaiting is a subset of trolling, where the aim is to generate angry responses.

      Shills post messages to talk up some product, service, etc., trying to make it look good and its competition look bad.

      Both categories also assume that the writer likely doesn't fully agree with what he or she is writing. If two people write the same words but one believes them while the other doesn't, the former is not a troll or shill, but the latter may be.

      Note that paid trolls are pretty common on the Internet, but they tend to write the articles (or, on /., the summaries) not the comments. "Clickbaiting" is almost the same as trolling in this respect, except that a clickbait article is to collect clicks, while a troll article is intended to generate comments.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    3. Re:Professional trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no mod points, or I would have modded the parent post up. Good and factual post. Thus deserving to be modded + Informative.

    4. Re:Professional trolls by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Correct, and PP is wrong. But upmodded wrong posts (and downmodded not-wrong posts) are common these days and I blame it on the trolls and moderation groupthink.

    5. Re:Professional trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for shills and giggles?

  14. How do you feel about the internet is trolls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's why I only read Slashdot. I have it on good authority that we're all nothing but modified chatbots and Markov text generators.

    1. Re: How do you feel about the internet is trolls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's why I only read Slashdot. I have it on good authority that we're all nothing but modified chatbots and Markov text generators.

      >Does that question interest you?
      >What does that suggest to you?
      >I'm not sure I understand you fully.

    2. Re: How do you feel about the internet is trolls? by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Is it because of your mother that you feel about the internet is trolls?

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    3. Re: How do you feel about the internet is trolls? by Grog6 · · Score: 2

      Let me Tell YOU ABOUT MY MOTHER!!!!!!

      (Sweeps the table clear, and ...) :)

      --
      Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
  15. Not the only regime that does this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In China, the regime has been paying trolls for years now.

  16. Language skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see Youtube comments and forum chat as a way for people in other countries to practice their language skills.

    Start small, when they improve they move up to a better site, and eventually are selling gold in WoW or something. :-)

  17. So the concept of Putlerbot sockpuppet is true!? by blind+biker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have seen on various non-tech forums some extremely biased and even absurd views from a very obvious pro-Russian government position. All these accounts seemed to work in unison, with the same talking points and a very clear agenda. The fact that their agenda was so clear and transparent is the reason why many forum patrons call them "putlerbot" and "Kremlin's sockpuppets". I thought that Putin most likely would not waste money on such nonsense, but I did find the comments humorous.

    But now I am starting to think that these... "people" aren't just utterly delusional Internet users from Russia, but actual, paid-for, managed and directed sockpuppets.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  18. Re:So the concept of Putlerbot sockpuppet is true! by jandrese · · Score: 1

    What reason did you have to think that a professional politician wouldn't hire professional propagandists? Was Vladimir Putin's reputation too pristine to contemplate such a deal?

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  19. Trolls & Hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really hate how the term troll is now being used to cover anything you don't like or agree with, and now apparently astroturfing/sock puppets. Which sucks, because now we need a new term for internet troll.

    Soulskill, you've been around tech long enough to see this with hacker/cracker and on and on, no need to contribute to this trend, friend!

  20. ok...maybe the original post by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    is a troll/propaganda/sock-puppet, too.

    1. Re:ok...maybe the original post by baegucb · · Score: 1

      You must be new here ;)

  21. Re:So the concept of Putlerbot sockpuppet is true! by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not really, no. Russian government shills are only used inside the country, to calm down dissent. They won't do their work on any English language website - what for? Basically, if you don't speak Russian, you won't see them. The only exception might be Serbia, but my guess is, you don't speak Serbian either.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  22. How about america? by Tyrannicsupremacy · · Score: 1, Troll

    I wonder if and when a whistleblower will speak out on the organized liberal agenda trolling done in communities like reddit, gawker, and twitter.

    --
    http://i.cubeupload.com/T6cyLu.png
    1. Re:How about america? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it weren't for the organized trolling, I think those sites would all implode. Meanwhile, I'll get some popcorn and watch the fireworks from safely behind the 4chan bunker.

    2. Re:How about america? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont doubt what you say is going on. However........ It is speculation at this point. My guess is once one of these groups is doing it for awhile and gets ye the ol RIF speech and they become mad about it. We can only hope it happens soon. I want to get out a big bowl of popcorn and watch the other groups set out to discredit whichever poor soul decides to make the leap.

  23. They are not trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    they are "shills", just like their American counter-parts that try to control opinion on forums like Reddit etc. It's sad how the narrative is that USA is good and Russia is bad, and that we don't see any articles on how the U.S gov is doing the same thing.

  24. Not Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was Truth. Pravda style!

  25. We now know the origins of various /. users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mi, crashmarik, cuiderwolf, phantomfive, flyhelicopters

    feel free to add to the list!

  26. Propaganda not trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't why , but I feel like that's important to point out. Don't think these don't exist in America. Both party's use them. Pro-guns and Pro-pot lobbies have a huge presence on the web.

    1. Re:Propaganda not trolling by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      Pro-pot lobby? Who would the backers of that be? lol.

    2. Re:Propaganda not trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shhh!! It's Big Hydroponics!

    3. Re:Propaganda not trolling by KGIII · · Score: 1

      The reason it took so long to get marijuana legalized is because we all kept forgetting where we put the petition.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  27. Wait..."troll" is a job description? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean to tell me I could have been paid for my internet activities all these years?!? That's fucked up.

    p.s. - systemd!

  28. Re:Propaganda trolls propagandize propaganda artic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agree completely. Slashdot itself is flooded with pro-USgov shills every time there is an Edward Snowden/Bradley Manning/Wikileaks story.

  29. Re:Propaganda trolls propagandize propaganda artic by Pfhorrest · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unless they've been deleted somehow (Slashdot wouldn't do that, would they?), none of the posts prior to yours in this thread appears to be pro-Russian propaganda-trolls. There's a Stalin/Putin comparison (with a OT subthread ranting about Dice), a OT rant about Dice, an "In Soviet Russia" joke, a post distinguishing internet trolling from plain old propaganda (with an OT subthread ranting about Dice), and an AC calling trolling an artform. What's pro-Russian in there?

    --
    -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
    "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
  30. Russian trolls are very active by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Already modded so have to be anon.

    If you look at any article talking about Russia's invasion of Ukraine you will see the comments infested with Russian trolls based out of St. Petersburg. They use every excuse they are told to use trying to explain away the hundreds of dead Russian soldiers (killed in training accidents over a 2 month period according to them), the amount of brand new equipment the Russian-backed rebels have and continue to get, even if the Ukrainian army never had such equipment (they raided weapons depots and now manufacture tanks, artillery and ammunition on their own despite having almost no manufacturing capabilities), the captured Russian soldiers (they weren't really soldiers. They left the army right before they were captured and were only "vacationing" in Ukraine or "volunteering" to fight which is why they brought along their tanks, artillery and BUK missile systems).

    It's quite funny, at time, reading their completely fabricated and unbelievable stories of how everyone but Putin is to blame for Russia's problems. Even when Putin came out and stated categorically he ordered Russian troops to take over Crimea the trolls denied Putin's own words. Apparently not only is everything coming from the West a lie, but so are the words of their dear leader. In their minds, everything is a lie.

    I read something the other day which helps to explain the Russian mind set. The Grapes of Wrath was shown as a movie to the Russians many decades ago (30s?). It was supposed to be an exercise in how bad capitalism was. The problem was, at the end of the movie it was shown that even the poorest American could afford to buy their own car so the Russian authorities banned the showing of the movie. They needed to keep up the lie about the evils of the West so like Putin has done by banning the mention of how many Russian soldiers have died during the invasion of Ukraine, including preventing the mothers and fathers from speaking about their dead sons, Russia needs to keep its people believing in lies because if they knew the truth they would realize how backwards their country is and why they will never be taken seriously by anyone.

    1. Re:Russian trolls are very active by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America doesn't need to pay shills, they get their propaganda for free.

    2. Re:Russian trolls are very active by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've seen multiple posts now about how much shilling the Russian government does; with an unstated assumption that nobody else is doing this. I'd like to suggest the reader go take a look at the massive PR campaigns constantly waging on the internet to influence public perceptions. Does nobody remember stories we've had on slashdot about Microsoft astroturfing almost a decade ago? Or more recently how United Launch Alliance bought PR services to trash-talk SpaceX and Elon Musk to prevent them from getting government contracts?

      My problem with these articles is that they come off so goddamn anti-russian; it's like propaganda in the reverse direction, and if I point out the fucking hypocrisy of calling out Russia for doing something like this while the US, EU, and various corporations get a free ride, I'm called a "russian shill", it's maddening that common sense is thrown away for the sake of "good guy, bad guy" politics!

      I don't think many people even realize just how slanted these stories and comments look if you stop treating Russia like immoral mustache twirling villains and western-anything as proud defenders of justice and freedom and paragons of virtue. It's so comically black and white that it fucking blows my mind people on sites like slashdot still treat these issues this way.

      Fuck, I hate politics so goddamn much. It's like it automatically flips off the 'critical thinking' switch in everyone's head.

    3. Re:Russian trolls are very active by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to admit politicians from the US are also lying. Take for example Mr. Baker with his promise not to expand NATO to Mr. Gorbachev. The Clinton administration conveniently told Russia, the successor to the Soviet Union, that the promise was made only to the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union continued to exist for a few months after the promise was made...

      That is about as good faith as the US government made to the Native Indians in their treaties.

      Russia seems to be a good pupil and is catching up fast.

  31. Re:So the concept of Putlerbot sockpuppet is true! by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

    Now I have to wonder if all the stories and images of Putin being a general bad-ass are real or if they're all just a carefully orchestrated p.r. campaign.

  32. And who's paying her now? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    The problem about propaganda, especially in this day and age, is that everyone does it. I wouldn't be too surprised if the same shit goes down on our side of the fence. Just 'cause our media are "free" doesn't mean that they have to tell the truth. It only means their lies may be different from the government's.

    Seriously, I'd pay for a halfway decent, balanced NEWS system that gives me news instead of propaganda of this or that flavor. How long 'til the definition of "impartial" is to watch both sides of the propaganda in the vain hope to maybe find the truth in the blend?

    Journalism is dead. What matters is sensationalism and entertainment.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:And who's paying her now? by jblues · · Score: 1

      Most of the media in the USA is owned by Murdoch right? Same in Australia. There are laws there stating the the media need to be a certain kind of neutral on contentious issues, so they will post up a the other side of the coin occasionally, but when they do that the comments section will be flooded with obvious professional astro-turfers.

      • * Most folks don't even seem to notice.
      • * The ones that do notice don't seem to care.
      • * Nobody does anything about it.
      --
      If it acquires resources on instantiation like a duck, then its a shared_ptr<Duck>
    2. Re:And who's paying her now? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I stopped caring a while ago. Why should I? Most idiots don't care that they're being lied to. Those that do already noticed the same I did: It doesn't matter that you notice it. It's not like you can do anything about it.

      Right now, I'm just sitting here, waiting for our economy to collapse in the vain hope that something better might emerge. I just don't really think there will be anything better. Different maybe, but better, hardly. Human won't change. And whether this or that asshole rules us, and this or that asshole lies to us, where's the difference? In the end it's like voting, you may only choose the person, group or entity that is given the right to fill their pockets at your expense. The option that you'd get someone who doesn't do it simply does not exist.

      So apologies if I just sit here, relax and watch the world burn. Fighting windmills is more a pastime of the younger generations.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  33. Re:So the concept of Putlerbot sockpuppet is true! by blind+biker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not really, no. Russian government shills are only used inside the country, to calm down dissent.

    How in the hell do you know this? Is it more likely that hundreds/thousands of Russian citizens are utterly delusional to the point of insanity, all the while being perfectly Internet savvy, or that there are propaganda firms working for Putin to control the Western public opinion regarding things such as Ukraine? I find the latter much more likely.

    The only exception might be Serbia, but my guess is, you don't speak Serbian either.

    Tu si se zajebo. Sasvim solidno "citam" srpski i ostale bivse Yugo jezike, osim makedonskog.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  34. Dice Company responds: (first draft) by Earthquake+Retrofit · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dice is currently involved in transitioning SourceForge's magnetic niches. In order to synergize such a leading-edge platform while integrating web-enabled e-tailers and benchmarking frictionless vortals we had to postpone synthesizing out-of-the-box convergence.

    I hope this clears things up.

    --
    Fifty years of Yippie! 1968-2018
    1. Re:Dice Company responds: (first draft) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Synergize is old-school ... they need to be 'disruptive' somehow now ...

    2. Re:Dice Company responds: (first draft) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FUCK!!! My head exploded from the silicon-valley paradigm-shift-lingo-talk!!! KA-BLEWIE!!!

  35. Bigger question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will the goatse guy now have a case?

  36. Re:So the concept of Putlerbot sockpuppet is true! by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    Is it more likely that hundreds/thousands of Russian citizens are utterly delusional to the point of insanity, all the while being perfectly Internet savvy, or that there are propaganda firms working for Putin to control the Western public opinion regarding things such as Ukraine? I find the latter much more likely.

    Well, first of all, Russians who actually speak English can get a much better job than that. Second, the government propaganda in the Western mass media has shaped the public opinion regarding Russia for over a century now. It would be a waste of time. Third, Putin stopped caring about what West thinks about Russia two years ago. Previously you could see that he sort of tried to build a working relationship with EU and USA, but it was very much an one-sided effort. So he stopped caring and annexed Crimea. And fourth, you underestimate the number of internet savvy Russians, I think because this part of the internet exists outside of what most people usually see - same for Chinese internet.

    Tu si se zajebo. Sasvim solidno "citam" srpski i ostale bivse Yugo jezike, osim makedonskog.

    There is no need for this kind of vulgar speech. It is good for you that you can read Serbian. Also in cyrillic or is this the reason why you have a problem with Macedonian? Because for me it is not more difficult than understanding Serbian (I speak Russian pretty well and also have learned Czech).
    Anyway, then you might have seen a Putin paid shill indeed.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  37. Chechen extremists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She will shortly be gunned down by "Chechen terrorists" in a "random act of violence"
    Putin will not be involved at all

  38. Filezilla installer responsible for breaches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it possible that the alleged adware or alleged malware packaged with Filezilla led to some of the major security breaches?
    Can Slashdot do some investigative reporting and look into this possibility?

  39. Re:So the concept of Putlerbot sockpuppet is true! by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    There is no need for this kind of vulgar speech. It is good for you that you can read Serbian. Also in cyrillic or is this the reason why you have a problem with Macedonian? Because for me it is not more difficult than understanding Serbian (I speak Russian pretty well and also have learned Czech).
    Anyway, then you might have seen a Putin paid shill indeed.

    Ucio sam fiziku i matematiku citajuci cirilicu jos u dalekim 70-im. Srpsku tj. Vukovu cirilicu. A sto se tice "there is no need for this kind of vulgar speech", tvoj uzak pogled na zivot me nimalo ne tangira. Ja i dalje govorim na isti nacin sa mojim drugarima iz Srbije kao sto sam govorio jos prije rata. Za mene su lazi puno gore nego psovke. In fact, I do find it very true that people who swear are more trustworthy than the ones who feign offense at expletives.
    Also, if you weren't so narrow-minded (or perhaps uneducated in Serbian language and culture), you would know that "zajebo si se" is not an expletive intended to offend the "receiver" - it is a fun way people in Serbia say "you are/were wrong". I would LOVE it if there were a similar expression, with similar connotations, in English or the other four languages I speak.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  40. Are you sure she isn't working for the opp? by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
    I mean how much is the anti-Putin lobby paying her to spread such spiteful lies? Can we really trust her after her record?

    (Please Putin, don''t feed my baby to the dingoes) )

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  41. Re:So the concept of Putlerbot sockpuppet is true! by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    The closest equivalent in English is "you have fucked up".
    You are welcome.

    And my Serbian friends never use this kind of speech when they think I can hear them - they are well aware that I understand what they say. You may speak with your friends however you like, but I am not your friend.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  42. Re:So the concept of Putlerbot sockpuppet is true! by Maltheus · · Score: 1

    It's not just Russia. I see coordinated posts come in, supporting a variety of agendas. It's like a plague of locusts. Expect to see more and more campaign money dedicated toward this in the future.

  43. Re:Propaganda trolls propagandize propaganda artic by rsmith-mac · · Score: 2

    I suspect the parent means the comments attached to TFA, not the comments here at Slashdot.

  44. Re:Propaganda trolls propagandize propaganda artic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And here comes the USgov shill modbomb. Bravo for not being any better than the side you're claiming to fight.

  45. $commentSubject by Falos · · Score: 1

    Treat your grunts like shit and they walk out. That may seem fine if you're a call center, but maybe think twice when the grunts are handling sensitive information? Like the minutiae and specifics of your semisecret propaganda machine that wants to be somewhat discrete and less-known?

    No, go ahead and treat them like shit, it's not like burning those bridges and begging for disloyalty could ever come back to bite you in the

    oh.

  46. Re:Propaganda trolls propagandize propaganda artic by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    Right, I was referring to the article referenced, not the slashdot thread.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  47. Re:So the concept of Putlerbot sockpuppet is true! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Have you noticed what happens here any time there's an article about Russia doing something? Until recently, I would never have thought Russia thought Slashdot was worth troll-bombing. It seems to me that there's a slightly different mindset among the trolls/shills: they give me the impression that they're not used to an information-rich environment with modern Western cynicism, something like some of the Arab propaganda.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  48. Re:Propaganda trolls propagandize propaganda artic by KGIII · · Score: 0

    These shills, as you call them, can still be pro US government... They are just pro government like it is intended to be - one that is open, honorable, and follows the constitution with ethically sound judgments. A dissenting opinion is probably the most intense form of patriotism. I realize that probably does not fit your narrative but it is true. I am very patriotic but I feel very strongly about the inferior service it has provided in the past forty years.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  49. Re:Propaganda trolls propagandize propaganda artic by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

    My apologies for misunderstanding. (I was puzzled trying to figure out what the motive would be for making such an obviously-falsified claim as you seemed to be... makes much more sense now).

    --
    -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
    "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
  50. Re:So the concept of Putlerbot sockpuppet is true! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are probably not all real, they are probably not all bad-ass, and they are probably not all a PR campaign. Probably many are doctored, probably many are created for PR campaigns, and probably many are edited to make them more bad-ass. Where many you can change to most and it is likely correct.

    KGIII

    Posting as AC because /. is run by absolutist ninnies who seem to think I have been to conversational today.

  51. Everybody's doing it? by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    ...while Obama (and everyone else) are doing the same shit.

    That's a great link, AC... but it says the opposite of what you said it does. It does not at any point say Obama is doing this-- in fact, the one "sock puppet army" that it says it has unmasked is actually against Obama.

    From page 4 of the article you reference, referring to what that article calls a "sock puppet army" and the article here calls "professional internet trolls":
    "These accounts had consistent multi-faceted views: They were generally pro-Palestine and anti-Israel; they wrote “We (USA)” to present themselves as Western; were against Syria and US President Barrack Obama, and attempted to project themselves as pro-Islam with derogatory comments against Christianity.
    “Who is this sock puppet army? It’s difficult to speculate"

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Everybody's doing it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, faced with a cheap sock-puppet army, the opposition is above employing the same tactic?

      Hey, I've got some very cheap ocean front property in Nevada to sell you.

  52. This is supposed to be a tech savvy site by argStyopa · · Score: 2

    Astroturfers != trolls.

    This is as stupid as every Fox or CNN commentary that calls anyone posting anything 'naughty' or bothersome a troll, or anyone under 30 as "gen-x".

    Christ, people. If this site can't get it straight, what hope do we have that anyone else would?

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:This is supposed to be a tech savvy site by Mnot_Paranoid · · Score: 1

      Well that would be wrong. Anyone *over* 33 is Gen X. Anyone younger is a Millennial.

    2. Re:This is supposed to be a tech savvy site by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      That was kind of my point as "examples of stupid pop-media MISunderstandings of things that aren't that hard"

      --
      -Styopa
  53. Other sides by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    The interesting point is that Russian zealots online do have their US opponents. Are the later paid by the CIA or did the USA managed to find propaganda workforce for free?

  54. Re:So the concept of Putlerbot sockpuppet is true! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're joking, right? You have to wonder that?

  55. Re:So the concept of Putlerbot sockpuppet is true! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bit arrogant, aren't you? You're definitely losing the little quibble you're in, right now. (I say losing because you are clearly trying to "win" it, somehow, for some reason. Anyhow, you're not winning it.)

  56. tsk tsk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should have been happy having job. Now you have nothing.

  57. Re:So the concept of Putlerbot sockpuppet is true! by marsu_k · · Score: 1

    O RLY? As a Finn you see them frequently in the commenting section of any popular newspaper website. If the article is about Russia, the shills will be there. Very amusing to see the exact same comment, word to word, posted at the same time by two different "people".

  58. The US does the same. by Jack+Zombie · · Score: 1

    Certain IRC channels are being interfered by US professional trolls. They work in teams and create fake discussions to influence and to bait out radicals.

    Here is one log of two of them trying to bait with supposedly secret information on drone technology. Notice that the main one mirrors radical ideas as bait, too.

    http://pastebin.com/sfnkmDFD

    I imagine that this is done to prevent another Snowden.

    --
    "You should never doubt what nobody is sure about." -- Willy Wonka
  59. Re:So the concept of Putlerbot sockpuppet is true! by edis · · Score: 1

    Remember, he is KGB missionary. Bold one.

    --
    Servant of karma
  60. MOD PARENT UP by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    It would only be off topic if Dice weren't suppressing the biggest stories in the FOSS world this week.

    They are suppressing it because it reflects badly on them. We have nowhere else to discuss it, so like Beta it'll get discussed everywhere until they finally listen.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  61. Re:So the concept of Putlerbot sockpuppet is true! by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    The closest equivalent in English is "you have fucked up".

    Nope - "fucked up" has a much more negative connotation than "zajebo si se". Most Serbians say "zajebo sam se" quite often in fact, because it's such a jocular and mild term that it's quite OK to use it on oneself.

    And my Serbian friends never use this kind of speech when they think I can hear them - they are well aware that I understand what they say. You may speak with your friends however you like, but I am not your friend.

    Maybe they just don't like you very much, i.e. you didn't integrate with them and their culture too well.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  62. Re:So the concept of Putlerbot sockpuppet is true! by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    Right you are. But I think Finns, both old and young, are too sophisticated for Russian sockpuppets. The Russian PR agencies should hire more educated shills if they intend to "direct them" at the Finnish websphere.

    Muuten, terveiset Helsingistä.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  63. Re:So the concept of Putlerbot sockpuppet is true! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In fact, I do find it very true that people who swear are more trustworthy than the ones who feign offense at expletives.

    You have a limited view of people. Very little offense from expletives is feigned. And people who swear are less likely to care about what others think, including whether people think they are liars. I have found cursing people to lie far more.

  64. I like /. (mostly except troll BUT...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you *think* I asked this question here MANY times to be 'snuffed' constantly: Why can't we SEE who UPMODS or DOWNMODS us? It's a simple question, & I've gotten bs answers OR downmodded away every time (see below)!

    It's a feature of other discussion boards that helps ferret out sockpuppets + trolls.

    Don't you have enough of a problem here with that issue that you want to do something about it?

    Don't hand me that garbage about "it would start a flame war" stupidity as a weak counter-point to that OR that the moderators alone can "handle it" and they obviously can't or it wouldn't be going on @ all: You have flame wars here anyways by the truckload as well as sockpuppets in the same amounts & I'd also *think* they'd want 'flamewars' for the reasoning of "controversy is good" since it raises participation and thus, views, However, probably ONLY when it fits "the agenda" around here ONLY, that is (from their "pov" I'd think @ least since views = profit etc./et al).

    This measure/change would stop it by allowing users to see the patterns of abuse either way (sockpuppeteers upmodding themselves using sockpuppet fake accounts that they "farm karma" with as well plus using modpoints gained from it for downmodding opponents of theirs they cannot factually logically disprove).

    I would like to see a discussion about this with the members of slashdot (which of course, the sockpuppeteers will be out in full force against this).

    Should be interesting to see.

    However: Apparently, there are those who don't WANT that discussion, OR for this to be seen @ all, period.

    The results so far, speak for me!

    E.G.-> I submitted this before here 10 times now, only to get the outright deleted... why?

    http://slashdot.org/submission...
    http://slashdot.org/submission...
    http://slashdot.org/submission....
    http://slashdot.org/submission...
    http://slashdot.org/submission...
    http://slashdot.org/submission...
    http://slashdot.org/submission...
    http://slashdot.org/submission...
    http://slashdot.org/submission...

    (This will, no doubt, be a 12th time I am predicting)

    My single "naysayer" from the 2nd time above was easily defeated, point-by-"so-called 'point'" of his & he ran when confronted directly on it -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    My single other "naysayer" from the 8th time also was defeated, defeating himself on the very point I made in this post many times:

    The "downmod truncheon" is used in lieu of conversation here unjustifiably.

    Only those using sockpuppets would fear this ability to see who issues upmods or downmods here after all, & he CLEARLY did instantly downmodding my post -> http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    (Yes folks: you can ALWA

  65. Re:So the concept of Putlerbot sockpuppet is true! by quantaman · · Score: 1

    I thought that Putin most likely would not waste money on such nonsense, but I did find the comments humorous.

    But now I am starting to think that these... "people" aren't just utterly delusional Internet users from Russia, but actual, paid-for, managed and directed sockpuppets.

    I think it's a bit of both.

    There are wildly delusional advocates for almost any position, I don't see why Russian foreign policy would be any different. Especially when you consider that Russia does have some legitimate grievances against the West (I get why people wanted the NATO expansion, but expanding an anti-Russia alliance into the former USSR was more than a bit provocative).

    At the end of the day Russians are just like anyone else, and they'll be willing to swallow a boat-load of BS so they can cheer for Russia. Some of them will go online and undergo crazy rationalizations on comment boards to convince people why Russia is in the right. They're largely following the same pool of newspapers, blogs, and pundits, so they'll all repeat the same arguments and crazy theories.

    I have no idea how to differentiate these people from the actual trolls.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  66. take it offsite guys, heavy censoring by K10W · · Score: 1

    It would only be off topic if Dice weren't suppressing the biggest stories in the FOSS world this week.

    They are suppressing it because it reflects badly on them. We have nowhere else to discuss it, so like Beta it'll get discussed everywhere until they finally listen.

    I would if had points but it will do no good as they'll just keep removing them as admins have unlimited resource there essentially, as it is clear they're doing watching it for past few minutes alone. This post will go as others like it have. Time to take this discussion somewhere it can't be censored. You'd think they'd learn.

  67. Professional? by iq145 · · Score: 1

    What's the pay like? i've seen some beauts online who i could refer...