Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: How To Turn an Email Stash Into Knowledge For My Successor?

VoiceOfDoom writes: I'm leaving my current position in a few weeks and it looks unlikely that a replacement will be found in time. My job is very specialized and I'm the only person in the organization who is qualified or experienced in how to do it. I'd like to share as much of my accumulated knowledge with my successor as possible but at the moment, it mostly exists in my email archive which will be deleted after I've been gone for 90 days.

The organization doesn't have any knowledge management systems so the only way it seems I can pass on this information is by copying all the info into a series of documents, which isn't much fun to do in Outlook. Can my fellow Slashdotters can suggest a better approach? By the way, there's quite a lot of confidential stuff in there that my successor needs to know but which cannot leave the organization's existing systems.

129 of 203 comments (clear)

  1. Okaaay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm leaving my current position in a few weeks and it looks unlikely that a replacement will be found in time. My job is very specialized and I'm the only person in the organization who is qualified or experienced in how to do it

    Look, it's "I'm a Special Little Snowflake" syndrome.

    Also, didn't we get a similar question to this last month (How to leave my technical knowledge, that is not documented on any company-wide system for some reason, to my replacement)?

    1. Re:Okaaay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The reality is that you, the person leaving, are the only one who has this on their radar. Management doesn't know what you do, doesn't have a plan for when you leave, and will not ask you for help down the line. So while it's commendable, it's not going to amount to a hill of beans no matter what you do.

      CAPTCHA: realist

    2. Re:Okaaay. by rhook · · Score: 5, Informative

      Management may very well ask for help in the future. At which point you tell them "$200/hour, 4 hour minimum".

    3. Re:Okaaay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This guy just needs to leave. I left my old job, I too was a "special snowflake", I got 4 phone calls and helped for a total of maybe 2 hours after I left. They figured it out. Trust me you are not that special, period. Either the things you are doing are not actually critical to the company and will fall by the wayside or someone will figure out how to connect point A to point B and get the same result. It'll be a learning curve for them, but they'll survive. They did so without you before and will do so afterwards. EVERY single person at every level of every company and organization is 100% replaceable, 100% of the time. It's just that not everyone will be as effective. Look at Apple and Jobs. That company pretty much needed him and still does to be the Apple everyone loved, now Apple is purely trying to follow the rest of the market. But guess what, they are surviving.

    4. Re:Okaaay. by ArhcAngel · · Score: 2

      This is the only real answer. They will begin calling you when they start trying to piece everything together. on the very first call inform them you will only provide support if they hire you as a consultant. Depending on how crucial your knowledge is to their success $200 hr, 4 hour minimum may not be asking enough.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    5. Re:Okaaay. by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

      This, right here.

      Your obligations end the moment they stop paying you. Anything else is free labor on your part.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    6. Re:Okaaay. by VoiceOfDoom · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Kinda harsh - I don't think of myself as any kind of snowflake and we're not talking about technical IT knowledge here but understanding of privacy law and how it applies to a pretty unique non-profit health and social care organisation.

      No doubt any other data protection expert can come in and suss it all out - just thought it might benefit the organisation if the learning curve for the new bod were a little less steep.....

      --
      "Life is pain Highness. Anyone who says otherwise is selling something"

      Westly, The Princess Bride

    7. Re:Okaaay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I bet the company uses Microsoft Office therefore import all the important emails into Microsoft OneNote and the successor will have a tidy, easy-to-read archive of all the relevant information. The Microsoft OneNote document can be put on a network share or handed off to a colleague in the interim.

    8. Re:Okaaay. by umghhh · · Score: 1

      There was a scene in "About Schmidt" where retired manager hands over all the special knowledge to the new guy only for the new guy to throw everything away. The world did not stop indeed.
      Having said that - just leaving with not even one hint to the next guy is not very professional. Telling to the direct supervisor that the startup info is in mail account would be good enough me thinks. If they wait 90days to sort out who takes over the info is not that important and even if it is, there is time to find a solution if need be.

    9. Re:Okaaay. by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      plus travel and expenses. first class/top tier hotels only.

    10. Re:Okaaay. by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      I've been in a similar position. I was working on a harassment/discrimination project for the gov. I actually convinced them to include an appendix in their own documentation. That worked.
      I left an email address with the management and a readme.txt on screen.
      I fwd relevant docs/emails to my server as well as leaving a 'How To" on the desk thinking if my replacement needed something then I could forward on what they needed. I couldn't do more than that.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    11. Re:Okaaay. by Kjella · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This, right here. Your obligations end the moment they stop paying you. Anything else is free labor on your part.

      Of course it does. But as long as I'm getting paid I will act professionally and loyally to my soon to be ex-employer, unless I got reason to feel stabbed in the back anyway. It's not like I waited for things to crash and burn then tell my boss "You didn't tell me to do anything about it" before, so I wouldn't be that way in my resignation period either. If they'll listen is another matter, but pretty soon that won't be my problem. It's not really about that company's future, I do it because if I cross paths with my boss or colleagues later they might have a more positive opinion of me.

      It certainly can't hurt and whether my boss deserves it or not isn't really relevant, I might think he's a short sighted and ignorant PHB but that doesn't preclude him from being involved in a hiring decision about me. I know for a fact that companies look for current employees that have a shared work history with you and ask their opinion of you, since that way they get a reference you don't control. It of course depends on your field of expertise and mobility, but it's usually hard to avoid having a reputation so best to make it a good one. Unless you really need to burn those bridges and rise from the ashes.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    12. Re:Okaaay. by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Exactly. Let the company burn, if he really is that irreplaceable. They should have been more aggressive in finding a replacement, and more importantly, they should have listened to his advice. He's obviously screaming to them that all this domain knowledge will be lost because of their shitty IT systems and idiotic automatic 90-day email deletion policy. Let management suffer with the effects of their own dumb policies. This guy sounds like he's done all he can to warn management and try to help smooth the transition for them, but as they say, you can lead a horse to water but you can't force him to drink.

    13. Re:Okaaay. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Maybe, maybe not. There's definitely nothing wrong, and it's actually commendable IMO, that he's trying to make things better for his employer so they're not completely screwed (in his opinion) after he leaves. However, if they're so dumb they don't want to actually follow his advice regarding data retention and would rather blindly follow dumb policies and then have to reinvent the wheel later, there isn't much he can do about that, nor should he. Management is supposed to be competent enough to handle these things, and if they're not, oh well.

    14. Re:Okaaay. by baegucb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Dang! Smartest comment I've read so far. Me? I only have 30-40 years computer experience. Moved around a lot. But I keep running into former co-workers, vendors etc. So the teen age kid from India I met on IRC circa late 1990s is now someone important at MS. Or the guy I met on IRC from Finland, well I got ill when we were thinking of visiting Linus. Doesn't matter. Your rep will follow you. And I stand by my rep, despite moving around all over North America (and friends all over the world). Of course, my ex-wife, the RN and MD, and my current wife don't view me the same way lol.

    15. Re:Okaaay. by dbIII · · Score: 2

      I love the smell of burning bridges in the morning.

    16. Re:Okaaay. by kenwd0elq · · Score: 2

      If it's in Outlook, save everything in a PST file. Burn the PST file to a DVD, and tell your boss (before you leave) "Bob, eventually you're going to want this stuff. Here you go, and think of me when you open it." Give him the DVD, smile, shake hands, and sail off into the sunset. If Bob gives the DVD to whoever inherits your job, then the knowledge transfer will have been accomplished.

      If you're in California, drop me a line; my company sells document management systems. We may be able to hook you up. :-)

    17. Re:Okaaay. by WOOFYGOOFY · · Score: 1

      Holy Shit, someone who actually gives a crap about the outcome their job supports and apparently has management which has earned their genuine regard. Welcome to planet I.T., stranger. Now tell us, what is this "care" you speak of?

    18. Re:Okaaay. by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Have it all translated into Hindi.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    19. Re:Okaaay. by Ocker3 · · Score: 1

      Mod Parent Up, this is an excellent use of existing resources. If you're looking for extra Karma, collect some of the e-mails that relate to certain areas and use OneNote's various folder systems to organise them. Both Outlook and OneNote are bog-standard in most enterprises, anyone will be able to support access to the files, and using some kind of half-way useful naming structure will have the new hire praising your name (in private at least).

    20. Re:Okaaay. by GerryHattrick · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Exactly what I did, after a lifetime of ever-unfinished international legal diplomacy. Except - I gave a copy of the DVD to the boss's secretary, and a copy to another secretary. Bosses would never bother to look, but good secretaries would compete to find answers.

    21. Re:Okaaay. by OolimPhon · · Score: 1

      I burned my emails to a .pst and took a copy with me when I left an employer in the 2001 dot.com bust.

      Unfortunately, since then my work is all Linux and I have never found a program which will properly read that .pst file.

      You might want to find some other way of exporting the info.

    22. Re:Okaaay. by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      Well, tell your boss about the email stash and how it may still be important. If he agrees, export the whole email stash into an archive. In the same discussion, you should arrange a storage location for the archive. After all, your successor has to know about where to find the archive, and it will probably your boss who has to tell him.

      If management doesn't agree about preserving the emails, it's their problem if the mail disappears after 90 days.

      Otherwise, I'll quote Rhook's sibling post:

      Management may very well ask for help in the future. At which point you tell them "$200/hour, 4 hour minimum".

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    23. Re:Okaaay. by hodet · · Score: 1

      Huge respect for you sir. This is how an IT professional behaves. Since it is Outlook I would just throw it all into a pst to preserve the information. Put it on a USB stick and give it to your current boss. Even if he doesn't understand or see the value in it now he will one day. Do not leave the building with the USB stick as it is all company information anyway. You could even send them a signed email from your personal email account on what you have provided them and why and how to reach you should they need anything in the future. I think the comments on consulting are fair game at that point.

      A professional never leaves the old shop high and dry.

    24. Re:Okaaay. by dcw3 · · Score: 2

      I was with you in the first part, but you lost me at "WAY, WAY...".

      I get about a hundred emails a day, many with useful information. It's easy for me to search back by name, topic or chronologically, or even follow the flow of the discussion. How much of my time should I devote to transferring this knowledge and what tool(s) would you recommend. I'm stuck using Windows, though most of our systems are *NIX, and I can't transfer mail to them...they belong to customers. As the systems I work on have about a 30+ year history, issues that have popped up on rare occasions cause us to search for old answers. This isn't the only source of info, but it's still an important one.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    25. Re:Okaaay. by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Ever seen a grain elevator fire?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    26. Re:Okaaay. by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      They're surviving because the product line is planned several years ahead. Give it a few more.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    27. Re:Okaaay. by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Don't confuse stupidity with a lack of caring. They probably won't know what they've lost until they can't find it.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    28. Re:Okaaay. by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      This. You have done your due diligence.

    29. Re:Okaaay. by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      I must admit thinking "Why weren't you putting all this on a wiki as you went"? Which would be simple to have set up.

  2. Let them use it as reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Dump your mailbox to an archive and pass the archive along with a note telling them to search it for keywords whenever a question comes up.

  3. .pst? by WillgasM · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just export a .pst file of all your emails and import into your successor's outlook. Keep the file for backup.

    1. Re:.pst? by Spy+Handler · · Score: 5, Insightful

      also you can convert the .pst into html and put it on the company intranet if that's more palatable.

      https://www.google.com/webhp?h...

    2. Re:.pst? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      This. But prior to that, organize e-mails into another folder that's pertinent to the job. Or, if it's easier just delete your personal e-mail. Never mix and match business with personal stuff. Though when it happens, drop it into a folder that you can later export and delete off the server. But at the end of the day, you'll want to walk away and leave nothing but business related content in your mailbox.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:.pst? by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      pshaw!
      Just barf it out to multiple .PSTs (because who doesn't have a mailbox > 2GB?) and crap it out on the Sharepoint(tm) server.
      Done and done.
      HARUMPH!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    4. Re:.pst? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It sounds more like you don't know how to use the Outlook search.
       
      And that's not to say that it couldn't be better but I find that most searches fail because people don't understand how to search. Outlook's search works fine for me.

    5. Re:.pst? by praxis · · Score: 1

      Most people know how to search their mail in Google. It takes a particular skill that you have and most people don't have to search their mail in Outlook. I think there's a search problem in Outlook here. It's a solved problem; we have exemplars of good solutions.

    6. Re:.pst? by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      That's a terrible suggestion. Confidential data can't be given away to Google like that, and Outlook search works fine.

    7. Re:.pst? by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      I know plenty of people with 40GB PSTs too, you haven't been limited to 2gb since Office 2007

      But sometimes Outlook ends up in "compatability" format and will screw up at 2GB.

      If I were using Outlook at work, I'd probably partition my emails off into PSTs by calender year. That way I can have a fixed archive for previous years. I partition off "My documents" by year as well.

  4. Forward to someone who will be around... by kaychoro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just select all the mail you've got and forward to someone who will be around - like your manager (he/she will appreciate the extra e-mail - it will make him/her feel more important) - and then have them forward all the mail to the new person.

    --
    //TODO: create a signature
  5. Particular answer by postbigbang · · Score: 3, Insightful

    On one hand, it seems like an honorable request to establish a knowledge base that shares institutional and situational history with your successor.

    For the organization, however, it represents a responsibility that they should somehow be shouldering. If indeed they sanction this, may I suggest considering transferable knowledge base software like Evernote, or the like, to feed docs, URLs, workflow information, and so forth. Email histories have legal status, and so you must be careful as to what's transferred, subject to the jurisdictions and audit/regulatory authorities involved-- in other words, a legal problem.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  6. Well ... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can print them. You can forward them. You can paste them into a document and pass them on.

    Or you can realize that if the company doesn't care enough to have a replacement hired, or a system in place to store this knowledge ... they either don't know or don't care enough to plan for this.

    Ask your manager, if his response is "gee, I don't know, I'll get back to you" ... well, then it's their damned problem.

    Wanting to make transition is a nice thing, but at a certain point, your employer also has to take ownership of that process.

    At a certain point, hand holding your employer through such things isn't really your problem.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Well ... by Beorytis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      if the company doesn't care enough to have a replacement hired, or a system in place to store this knowledge ... they either don't know or don't care enough to plan for this.

      I almost took this attitude the last time I changed jobs, but I realized it wasn't to help the company as a whole or my manager. It was for my immediate colleagues and juniors who would have to fill in. They were the ones who could make the most use and who appreciated the extra transition effort.

    2. Re:Well ... by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Or... how about take on the hard job and documenting your job?

      Right now, the information to do your job is spread across millions of emails and no matter who your replacement is, it's going to take forever to read it all.

      So why not sit down, and write down everything you know. Print it out and if there's email to go along with it, print it out and stick it in the binder with your instructions.

      Have it serve as the "owner's manual" for your job. Your replacement will be glad to have such a nice document to get up to speed, and your coworkers who will be shouldering the load will also have a nice reference.

      Yes, it's easier to leave a lump of email for the next guy, but you can bet it'll be a jumble of confusion until you actually map out what's going on.

      Or you can realize that if the company doesn't care enough to have a replacement hired, or a system in place to store this knowledge ... they either don't know or don't care enough to plan for this.

      That assumes they aren't trying to hire a replacement. Sometimes someone gives their two weeks, and it can take longer than that to hire a replacement. Heck, it usually takes a couple of months from posting the job offer and leaving it up for a little while, interviews, etc.

      I mean, one option is to make it like Europe where people in important positions must give 2-6 months notice, but since I don't think that's possible in the US, 2 weeks is not a lot of time and many companies will not have anyone able to be called up to do a live knowledge transfer.

      At a certain point, hand holding your employer through such things isn't really your problem.

      True, but there's the concept of not burning bridges. I get the "companies are out to screw you" feeling, but actively trying to screw your old company just ends up screwing your coworkers who may re-appear at some future point in life. If all they remember of you is you left them with a bunch of broken things and a giant FUCK YOU, well, there goes that opportunity.

      Yes, it's highly unfair that employers can screw you over, while your options for retaliation are limited, at least if you intend to either continue working in the same industry or in the same area. Life is horrendously unfair, but while those 10 seconds of screwing over everyone feel good, it can be dangerous down the road.

    3. Re:Well ... by scsirob · · Score: 1

      I mean, one option is to make it like Europe where people in important positions must give 2-6 months notice, but since I don't think that's possible in the US, 2 weeks is not a lot of time and many companies will not have anyone able to be called up to do a live knowledge transfer.

      Perhaps a bit naive, but if you really have a decent relationship with the company, is there any particular reason not to inform them earlier? I'm sure you plan to give notice long before those two weeks. So if you plan to retire/move/whatever two months from now, why not tell them right there and give them those two months to plan ahead as well? Or are you afraid they will turn around and fire you on the spot? In that case they didn't deserve your courtesy to start with.

      --
      To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
    4. Re:Well ... by Reapy · · Score: 1

      This right here. Nobody really is in love with the company in general, but it is the people you've worked with and for that actually might have made working there tolerable. The last thing I wanted to do leaving a long position I had was strand any one of them by being lackadaisical during my final two weeks.

    5. Re: Well ... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Your boss has told you he doesn't want any notice. That's what they are saying when they immediately fire anybody who gives notice.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  7. Consulting by Rogue974 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1) Do your best to store it where it won't get deleted
    2) Sign an agreement with them on your billing rate if they call you for help
    3) Don't look back unless they call

    This should be SOP. BTW, they usually don't call.

    1. Re:Consulting by Beorytis · · Score: 2

      BTW, they usually don't call.

      And if you check in on them, it's likely to be like This scene from the film About Schmidt .

    2. Re:Consulting by nine-times · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree mostly. Sort of.

      The problem with it, if I'm being honest, is that I want to do a good job. I don't want to screw things up for my employer, especially if I have a decent relationship with them. So if they say, for example, "Hey, go ahead and delete these files," and I know those files are very important, I'm not going to just delete them without saying anything, wait for them to discover the problem, and then say, "Well you told me to do it!" I'm going to give them a big warning that they've just asked me to do something stupid. I may even fight them on it a bit.

      Now if they absolutely insist that I delete important information, I might go ahead and do it. I'd probably say, as the last thing I do before deleting it, "Just to be clear, I'm doing this at your request, overriding my own objections." I might even put that in writing.

      To me, that kind of conscientiousness shouldn't end when you start planning to leave your company. So in that vein, I agree with you, with the assumption that you're also informing the employer what you're doing, and making it clear why you're doing it. Tell them, "I'm saving these documents here. These are important for my successor. I don't recommend deleting them, since then my successor may have trouble doing [whatever]. Would you prefer that I store them anywhere else?" If they ignore that and delete the files, then that's their own fault, and you charge consulting fees for helping them.

      I also agree that they probably won't hire you on as a consultant. No matter how indispensable you are, the graveyards are full of indispensable men.

    3. Re:Consulting by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      The sadness when you realize you can be, and have been replaced.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    4. Re:Consulting by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      BTW, they usually don't call.

      The reason they don't call is that really special people are usually no where near as special and indispensable as they think they are. 80% of what they were frittering their time away on wasn't worth doing in the first place, and the remaining 20% can be streamlined and done faster/cheaper/better by their replacement, using their own methods.

    5. Re:Consulting by Rogue974 · · Score: 1

      I agree with what you said. I always try and do my best for my current employer as well. Someone else in the thread said, your stuff should be documented as part of your job. When you get to the point of leaving, you should not be starting the documentation, just have to be organizing it for the next guy. Maybe a nice book that says where everything is so the next guy can find it.

      If it is more then that, you have missed the boat already and your predecessor will be cursing you to for the next 2 years, so you burnt that bridge to the ground!

      On a different level, since when is important technical documentation solely stored on the company email server anyway?

    6. Re:Consulting by VoiceOfDoom · · Score: 1

      I also agree that they probably won't hire you on as a consultant. No matter how indispensable you are, the graveyards are full of indispensable men.

      Good thing I'm female then! ;-)

      --
      "Life is pain Highness. Anyone who says otherwise is selling something"

      Westly, The Princess Bride

    7. Re:Consulting by will_die · · Score: 1

      I did get called once and they contracted out with my current employer for a week of training.
      Went back did a look and check of the system and then asked for where they put all the documentation and notes I had left. They spend a few days digging those up and then we went through them showing them the steps to follow to correct what they wanted done.

    8. Re:Consulting by nine-times · · Score: 1

      On a different level, since when is important technical documentation solely stored on the company email server anyway?

      Yeah, but in reality, there's always a bunch of random bits of information that aren't very well documented, appearing only in someone's head or in an email message, that somehow you just haven't gotten around to writing good documentation for it. It's usually not super-important, but when you're leaving a job, you should search through your head and try to get that stuff down as much as possible. And that's the best possible scenario. The reality is that most documentation is terrible or non-existent.

    9. Re:Consulting by Kjella · · Score: 1

      The reason they don't call is that really special people are usually no where near as special and indispensable as they think they are. 80% of what they were frittering their time away on wasn't worth doing in the first place, and the remaining 20% can be streamlined and done faster/cheaper/better by their replacement, using their own methods.

      Even if you leave on good terms, you are usually leaving because somebody offered you a better deal, I guess there's a few exceptions where you're moving far away or retiring but usually not. Your manager knows this, it's like bringing your ex-girlfriend flowers and candy after she broke up with you for not paying enough attention to her. Also it implies you're the well-meaning employee and the manager the poor manager for undervaluing the work you do and putting the company in a situation where they're critically dependent on competence they don't have anymore.

      I still don't think I've met a manager who'll take more crap than he needs to, if you're no longer around to defend yourself any amount of problems or extra work can be blamed on you, doesn't matter if they have to rip out a good system and replace it with duct tape as long as they don't need to own up to needing the instruction manual. If they have to present it like you left a Rube Goldberg contraption with no documentation, so be it. In short, I think the threshold for calling and grovelling is extremely high even if it's really important. In fact, that might even make it worse unless the manager is at the point of desperation where egg on his face is better than the impending meltdown.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    10. Re:Consulting by g01d4 · · Score: 1

      really special people are usually no where near as special and indispensable as they think they are

      You've got to think a one off job that's best covered by email is a position ripe for elimination. On the other hand, even if a person was better than sliced bread he's still dispensable in that in most cases a company will find a way to muddle along without him.

    11. Re:Consulting by SimonInOz · · Score: 1

      In a couple of major companies where I worked, I archived all my code before leaving, burned them to CDs, and gave two copies to my manager. And I kept a copy for me. I copied them on my home discs, automatically backed up, and left them there.
      In both case, the companies lost the copies, and came back to me offering money - years later. And yes, I took it!

      It's a sensible idea to have offsite backups - and taking copies home is a good way to do that. Could be illegal, theoretically, but really, what would you do with this specialised stuff? But it certainly is useful to the original company.

      So take copies of all the emails, and leave good contact details with your manager, their manager, and if possible for your replacement, and offer a support rate of - say - double your current rate (don't mention that to your replacement). Make it a daily rate, not hourly.

      --
      "Cats like plain crisps"
  8. This is your manager's problem by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >> I'd like to share as much of my accumulated knowledge with my successor as possible

    Don't worry about it unless your manager told you to do so. (Your manager knows you're leaving right? And you've told your manager that there might be useful info your email, right?)

    >> The organization doesn't have any knowledge management systems

    Don't worry about this either. These are all overrated and highly ignored by most organizations that own them anyway.

    1. Re:This is your manager's problem by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      I recently left a job after 7 years and I totally understand the OPs point. It does wear off after about 2 days at your new job though.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  9. Create a wiki? by mlts · · Score: 1

    Since there may be legal items with just archiving a PST file and leaving it for a successor, it may take some time, but creating an internal wiki on a secure computer may be the best thing, even if it just is copying documents from E-mail attachments and throwing them in the wiki's file structure.

    1. Re:Create a wiki? by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      You know, creating a wiki for your employer a few weeks before they're no longer your employer is misguided and pointless.

      Fixing everything the company failed to do now that you're leaving is a sucker's game of diminishing returns.

      Taking on new projects to benefit them because nobody has figured out how to plan for your leaving? Well, sure if you think you want to start creating something like this now ... and which in all likelihood will go unused after you're gone.

      Mostly you'll just throw good time after bad.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Create a wiki? by mlts · · Score: 1

      Very true. However, it is a karma thing, because it makes life easier for the person who is cleaning up the mess.

      It also makes life easier when the next potential employer calls the previous employer for reference checking, and even though technically there is only a limited things that can be asked for, there are ways to communicate about people's performance (or lack of without worrying about a lawsuit. Silence is one way, or the statement "works well when supervised" is another.)

  10. Export a PST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'd just move the messages needed to a folder export that as a PST file and put it on the share that your other relevant data lives. They can open or import that PST to get at the messages after the server side archive deletes things.

  11. VB might help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There was (is?) a programming language, called Visual Basic, which was optimized for programming (automating) parts of Microsoft Office. Visual Basic scripts can be helpful in moving text from Outlook, into Word, Excel, and Access. It might take more time to learn Visual Basic, but if you prefer to avoid menial labor, and don't mind learning a programming language, it might be up your alley.

  12. Make it fun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Print out all of your emails on 4x6 cardstock and bundle them up by conversation thread.

    Wrap them in newspaper and stash them in various forgotten corners of the office.

    Attach to teach cryptic notes that give directions to where he(or she) can find the next bundle.

    It will be like a scavenger hunt! What fun!

    1. Re:Make it fun! by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      for that very reason, I take my company emails, tar them up, call them wumpus.tar and have them hunt thru them all they want!

      btw, there is ZERO company loyalty, so I won't spend any time caring about what the employer is left with. more often than not, its the employer that cuts YOU loose, not the other way around. after a few rounds of that, you give up even caring about the employer anymore. pay me and I'll work for you but if you cut me loose, I owe you nothing from that point onward. I know they feel the same about us, employees, too.

      I wish it was not like this, but sadly, it is. we are 'human resources' and the respect train left decades ago.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  13. Can you categorize into PST files? by Beorytis · · Score: 1

    I don't know what the information is, or how it could be organized, but maybe you could add a series of PST data files in Outlook to categorize the emails, and then save each PST at appropriate, somewhat permanent network locations.

  14. Permissions... by David_Hart · · Score: 2

    Work with your exchange admin to give your replacement permissions to your inbox. They can then open it as a second mailbox. Make sure that you delete any personal stuff first.

    Another option is to have your Exchange admin create a public folder and only give permissions to you and your replacement. You can then move the email into the public folder and have shared access until you leave.

    Those are the only two methods that I can think of where the information would not leave the Exchange system. Typically, this is done by exporting email from the old mailbox and importing it into the new using a PST file, but the email is temporarily outside of the system during this process.

    1. Re:Permissions... by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1

      Or create a separate role-based rather than individual-based email account (say widgetPolisher@yourcompany.com) that your manager owns (so it persists even after you've left) and to which you forward emails (ideally to be automatically filtered into categories) that are relevant to your work. That way you don't need to worry about forgetting to delete a personal item and having it forwarded on to your replacement.

    2. Re:Permissions... by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Ever since Exchange 2007 came a long its been a few trivial powershell commands to copy the contents of one mailbox into another. What he probably should do is have his exchange admin copy his mails to a folder in his managers mailbox; so they won't be subject to delete.

      That way the person likely to be responsible for anything the submitter would have been will have the information at his finger tips, and in a format that is easy to forward the relevant parts to whomever (s)he finds to do the actual work.

      Once a designated replacement is hired that folder can be copied/moved to that persons mailbox.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  15. 30 reams of paper by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

    Load your printer up, select all the emails, and print them off. You'll probably want to position an "in" basket to catch all the sheets in order. Or, maybe thirty "in" baskets, or more. Stack baskets neatly on corner of desk. Job complete.

    For shits and giggles, you could load the printer with disappearing ink.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  16. Export your email to a .pst file.. by Simulant · · Score: 1

    ..and then give it to your successor's boss to pass on.

  17. Affinity diagram by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

    Load everything into an affinity diagram. Scan all your e-mails for salient information, separate it by category, and put those bits under headings. Use that to expand into brief documentation. It'll be organized and easily approached: your first scan will give you an orderly set of data to work from, rather than a mound of abstract e-mails.

  18. Under 30, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm going to be blunt. Your respect for your employer outweighs your employer's respect for you by at least an order of magnitude. That is a huge mismatch, and you're on the bad side of it. I understand you consider your job important and yourself difficult to replace, but mark my words, your employer doesn't feel that way at all, even if they say so. Do yourself a favor and just give the standard 2-week notice, provide them with a basic info sheet, a firm hand shake and move on. After all, that is exactly what they are expecting you to do, since they view the relationship as one of pure business (with the bottom line being money, no more, no less). After you leave, the only reason your name will come up is to conveniently blame something on you, certainly not to reminisce about how great of an employee you were and how important your job was. So don't waste your time on something that not only won't benefit you, but that won't even be appreciated by your former employer. Concentrate your efforts on your new job from this point on.

    1. Re:Under 30, huh? by Miser · · Score: 1

      Hear, hear. This comment is spot on.

      Translation: companies are assholes. Employers have no loyalty to the employee, so neither should the employee have any loyalty to the employer.
      Was it like this in the old days? Inquiring minds would like to know.

      -Miser

  19. Why not use the email server as CMS front-end? by WillAdams · · Score: 1

    This is something which I've been wondering about for a while --- given that people won't be disciplined enough to use a wiki or other content management system, why not just dump all corporate communications into a single archive?

    Use some sort of expert system to make an initial effort at putting things into a hierarchy based on sender, recipient and subject line, strip out all attachments and replace them w/ a link to the stored copy of the file.

    If need be, have some sort of system for determining access levels based on recipient.

    Bonus is people would be forced to accept that work e-mail was to be used for work stuff only.

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  20. Knowledge Base by kdub007 · · Score: 1

    Set up a knowledge base. We use Wordpress, but you could use a Wiki or something. Both are free.

    --
    The correct answer is 42.
  21. Arrays of goto tabs in C may be the odests. by brookman1 · · Score: 1

    I just say that arrays of labels, may be the oddest thing in C; the ANSI GNU version had none of it, only proprietary and I am assuming platform dependent / patented C implementations had the feature. This improved algorithmic performance, switch / case statements are sequential searches in a way; dynamically linked functions, before load time linkage, ie .so's where function pointers and still are slow (mainly used to dynamically link to a COFF or ELF on UNIX at runtime). Eventually virtual linkage at runtime made its' way as virtual inheritance to C++ and algorithms could take paths without doing a sequential search through case options. Not sure why anyone would think the result of assignment operation going into if statement is odd. Arrays of goto labels existed on Sun Microsystems "ANSI" C, those were the days.

  22. Documentation? Wiki? by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sounds like a total failure to document anything....

    Everywhere I've worked in the past few jobs I've had, processes and procedures and anything important about business process has to be documented on a wiki (or more recently, everyone seems to have gone to confluence) and documenation is considered REALLY important.

    Sounds like the places I've worked have learned the value of employee knowledge and suffered from employees leaving with vital knowledge not documented.

    You either work for either a really tiny organisation, or a business that just hasn't suffered through an important person with a lot of important knowledge leaving.

    Oh well. Their problem.

    Move on and forget your current employer.

    --
    You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
  23. Is .pst standard? How about mbox or Maildir? by ron_ivi · · Score: 2
    Agree with export so that the recipients can import into the tool of their choice.

    But is .pst the best format to do that?

    Personally I'd prefer a Maildir or mbox or MIX as the export format.

  24. Not Your Problem by mrun4982 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't bother with this unless your manager asks. It's their problem to ensure your replacement can do the job. No offense intended, but it sounds like you're making yourself sound more important than you really are. While I'm sure you are a hard worker and did your job very well, I've never ran into a situation where a company was SOL when any one particular person left. However, I've known lots of people who thought they were the only ones who knew how to do their job. In the end, it always turns out that the company does just fine and has no problem filling the role. If you really are that important to the company, then offer to help them out at a respectable contract rate; They won't call though.

    1. Re:Not Your Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you're making yourself out to be more informed than you are about OP's situation, given how much he shared. But that's pretty common fare with anybody even remotely associated with IT, in my experience.

  25. Run and don't look back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Do you really think the company would be as accommodating to you? If they don't have anybody skilled enough to take over from you it's their problem not yours. It's noble and all trying to help out the company or your successor but if it's not required of you don't do it. If you start copying data around, making copies, etc etc it might just flag up in IT and raise some eyebrows.

    Just go to your manager, say that your successor might need access to your e-mail archive and suggest they ask the IT dept to save a copy for future access. Then blacklist their phone number the second you leave and never give it a second thought.

  26. Do what fits your former company's style by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    First, I know people are telling this guy to just walk away without documenting anything, but I think he's doing the right thing. Yes, there's no employee/employer loyalty anymore, but I've worked with a bunch of people that I would never consider working with again because of their actions or attitude. Even in a big industry, I'm amazed how many times I've run into people from former employers...and reputations do follow you. You don't want to be remembered as they guy whose mass of scripting blew up 3 days after he left and required weeks of consulting to pull apart. (Yes, this has happened to me.)

    My recommendation for this task is OneNote. It's structured enough and free-form enough at the same time to handle an internal knowledge base. No one is going to keep a wiki going unless there's a real need, and commercial knowledge base software, usually tied to million-dollar ITIL compliant ticketing systems, is useless. Even better, you can directly paste in emails from Outlook. OneNote also lets you quickly mess around with screenshots, diagrams, and Office documents. I've used this method to communicate some of the proprietary stuff that off-the-street sysadmins wouldn't know about.

    Something like this is useful in organizations like the one I'm in now -- where knowledge sharing is an extremely formal process requiring documents be written in a certain format, every aspect of a system needs to be documented in full detail, etc. This gives the person following you at least a head start before they start digging into the formal stuff. Kind of like the mystery letter every President leaves behind for his successor.

  27. Just be like Hillary... by TechJag · · Score: 2

    Move it all to your private email server, then only give them what you think they need. Seems to have worked well for her.

    1. Re:Just be like Hillary... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Ironically, her own server appears to have been more reliable than the gov't server she was allegedly supposed to use.

    2. Re:Just be like Hillary... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Certainly more reliable for her and her interests.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:Just be like Hillary... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      When you send to somebody else, they also have a copy, which may end up saved, archived, forwarded, etc. Unless you are confident you can control all copies of all recipients, it's not realistic to assume one can control and delete all copies of sent content. If you miss enough, then you are caught hiding stuff. The conspiracy angle makes very little sense. More likely she never really gave the issue enough thought. That's still a "bad" thing, but one should probably invoke Hanlon's Razor.

    4. Re:Just be like Hillary... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The administration has had people repeatedly lying to congress and getting away with it.

      It has gotten to the point where the corruption is open and flaunted. They know the press will cover for them, so they don't care.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:Just be like Hillary... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Guilty until proven innocent?

  28. Let's turn the question around! by tlambert · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Let's turn the question around!

    Hi.

    I'm an employer who intends to fire someone, but they don't know it yet, and I don't want to clue them into it by bringing in their successor ahead of time, for fear of what their reaction might be, or what they might delete.

    I have access to all of their company email, since it's stored on a central server, and I want to know how to turn this stash of email into a set of useful instructions for their successor.

    Can anyone help? It's really annoying when there is someone in a critical position that you hate enough that you want to get rid of them, and they hate you enough that you can't trust them to "play nice".

    Does that about sum up the actual situation?

    1. Re:Let's turn the question around! by youngatheart · · Score: 1

      Wow. Yeah, I think you just shattered my rose tinted glasses.

  29. Re:A consulting agreement by HappyDrgn · · Score: 1

    There's really two problems with consulting for the old company. Firstly it's just going to be distracting to the process of acclimating to your new role, company and peers. Secondly it does not sound like, in general, the company is very efficient to begin with. It may take much longer than anyone expects to find and hire a replacement. As time progresses many of the minute details of that knowledge will fade.

    Documentation and email never forgets the details you put in them. Create a backup and give it to your manager. If you do insist on any consulting make sure its limited in scope to explaining something in the documentation you left and that your agreement terminates in 30 days.

  30. Re:.pst? probably doesn't matter by petes_PoV · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whatever format you dump it in, it's unlikely that your successor will bother reading through it. Either they will be skilled up in whatever it is you were doing and will spend the first few weeks slagging off your name for not leaving any coherent documentation (a not unreasonable option: look! all he left was a pile of emails! It'll take months to make head or tail of all that crap!), or the company will recruit someone who hasn't a clue and will re-invent the basic functions. Or (more likely) your company will dump the whole thing and realise that there are other ways of doing what you did. Ways that are both supportable and easy to recruit people to do.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  31. Missing the question by alphabet26 · · Score: 1

    The question is a simple ETL task; take email as the input and output to a document. I have seen powershell able to access Outlook folders, and once you have it in powershell you can pretty much do what you want with it. You might be able to follow threads, only include missing blocks of text, ignore signatures, etc.

    The real question is why make the effort of converting the emails to documents when, really, who is going to look through it? If someone is trying to find out where attribute FooBar is being set in program JarJar2001, how are they going to know which document to open? You need a good search engine, and the best ones are in knowledge management applications. Look at OpenText or Hyland or any other ECM app, or get Altiris to at least index what you have.

    If the company isn't willing to take knowledge management seriously then neither should the OP.

    --
    -AlPhAbEt
  32. One of my favorite tools for storing knowledge by toygeek · · Score: 1

    http://zim-wiki.org/

    Personal desktop wiki that stores everything in flat text files, which can be stored somewhere like dropbox. My full review here: http://www.tidbitsfortechs.com...

    1. Re:One of my favorite tools for storing knowledge by dancomfort · · Score: 1

      Use the wiki! Create 3 pages; daily tasks, weekly tasks, monthly tasks,. Link in the relevant emails, and the newbie will have at least a head start.
       

  33. translation: by superwiz · · Score: 1

    I am the successor who inherited someone else position after the guy and doesn't really want to help me in figuring out how to do his job. Please, help me. I know the boss is a jerk, but I am straight out of school and I need to make this work or else.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  34. Contract with Them And Be Your Own Successor by brian.stinar · · Score: 1

    If you can setup a contracting agreement with your soon-to-be-previous employer, then you can be your own successor!

    Seriously, this constantly happens when people decide to leave their employment to go out on their own. It happened with me when I quit my 9-5 to take the plunge, and I've seen it happen with every other person I've directly witnessed quitting a job to pursue contracting full time (three total, other than myself.)

  35. Swap days with future employer by iceco2 · · Score: 1

    I have arranged this with a few employees from both directions when a replacement was not found in time.
    Start doing a few days at your new job early (before the agreed upon date) they don't have to be in a row.
    And return these days after a replacement has been found (but no more then two months after you start the new job or such like).
    The new employer is likely to agree, it allows you to get into things sooner, and can prevent first week stagnation since you will be on boarding gradually.
    It is common after the first day on the job the new boss realizes he isn't quite ready(accounts, training materials, computer, first assignment, ...) on-boarding gradually is easier. You probably can't do more then a handful of days this way but but a few days is much better than none.

  36. I say you (plural) have already failed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Part of doing the job responsibly, especially for such highly special specialist jobs, is to keep documentation. So if all you have is a large bundle of messages* in some proprietary format that may or may not survive the upgrade to the next version of the required proprietary software, you have essentially already failed your duty of keeping reasonable documentation.

    Maybe my sysadmin background is showing, but I do expect site documentation to exist, and if it doesn't, I will start it first thing, and I will try to keep it updated. I typically set up a wiki (one with CREOLE support, but that really is but a taste issue), but even plain text in RCS(!) will do nicely. If you have nothing else, then your favourite word processor might do, but then you need to export archivable versions like PDF/A, or even print the thing--and how do you expect your successor to keep the documentation updated then?

    Any road, you're plenty late with this. The only way to avert total failure is to make up for it by producing coherent documentation in a hurry. Good luck with that.

    Then again, the organisation obviously doesn't care, so perhaps it needs to fail too, just so it might learn. I would probably and completely unofficially... ah, but that'd be telling.

    * You may think of it as email, but then you know about as much about email as the authors of said software do. Quelle surprise most "email" is unreadable crap.

    1. Re:I say you (plural) have already failed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Good points. Personally, I'm a fan of a set of markdown-formatted text files and normal code, organized in a git repo:

      node-logs/ -- logs of any activities or events on particular nodes.
      procedures/ -- text documents describing important procedures, with very descriptive filenames.
      policies/ -- text documents describing important policies, with very descriptive filenames.
      notes/ -- random rough notes - try to keep this mostly empty, but if you have to brain dump something and don't have time to clean it up... at least there's a brain dump.
      scripts/ -- general tools I've written, all with at least a README describing what they do, and typical use cases
      puppet/ -- the code that defines as much of my infrastructure as I've been able to create, mixed with extensive documentation.
      specs/ -- designs and specifications for various pieces of important infrastructure
      arch/ -- general architecture documents - site, application, etc.

      Add/remove directories as you see fit, but keep it up to date. This should be one of the first things you set up in a new gig, and no task should be considered complete until you've committed relevant updates to this repository.

      Since it's markdown, you can publish to HTML / Wiki / PDF formats easily, and search your primary documentation very easily;
      Since it's in a repo, your successor can understand when, how, and why things changed - as long as you don't git commit -m "trollolololol" all the time.
      Since you've kept these docs up to date consistently, when you decide to leave, the process of leaving should be as simple as:
      1) git commit -m "Publishing all finished work & WIP before my departure from the company."
      2) git push origin master
      3) Spend an hour or two typing up relevant "in-memory-only" things, like passwords, etc., print them out, and hand them in a secure envelope to your boss before you leave. Along with them, provide pointers to the git repository, and instructions on how to access it.
      4) You should also include a helpful list of things that a new guy should get familiar with first -- i.e., where most of your breakfix time gets spent, so he knows what to watch for while he's coming up to speed, as well as a reminder that once he takes control, he should probably change ALL passwords across the environment to make sure that you're good and locked out.

      To the OP - if you haven't done any of this... then yeah... you kinda shirked some of your duties.

    2. Re:I say you (plural) have already failed by hodet · · Score: 1

      git is awesome for documentation. I do this.

  37. mail archive, web index. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    use some tool to convert the mail to html and then some other tool to make it searchable, pat yourself on the back and call it done. if you really wanted a knowledge base you would have built one a long time ago. now it's just a makework project.

    On the other hand, if you need something to do, do the first part and then proceed to build an intelligent index of the contents in the CMS of your choice.

    Either way, preserving the emails themselves preserves context which might help later technicians comprehend the situation better.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  38. Convert to PDFs by frank249 · · Score: 1

    A handy program is ABC Amber. It can convert a variety of email archives(outlook, BlackBerry, Groupwise etc) into a number of different formats including HTML and PDFs. The PDF feature is nice as it links to the attachments. It allows bulk operations and seems to be very fast.

    --

    Today's vices may be tomorrow's virtues.

  39. DON'T do anything without authorization by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

    Um... archive it and let them search it? Lol

    NO. Do not.

    Your company has a data retention/destruction policy. Any of your emails can come up in a lawsuit against the company in the future, for example, which is almost certainly why they have a policy of destroying data. Do NOT violate their data policy without permission in writing that you keep a record of in your personal files. You don't want to get stuck with the bill for a lawsuit, or be known as the person responsible for the company losing one.

    1. Re:DON'T do anything without authorization by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Yep - this is (well, mostly) correct. Check the policy before you act. Unless they're a F500 corporation, I sincerely doubt they could practically bring such a lawsuit against you after losing theirs (let alone win one), it's better to keep your six clear.

      Besides, I've always subscribed to the policy that if that's how they want it, that's how they get it.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  40. memcpy(); by cfalcon · · Score: 1

    Just raw copy the bytes to his drive. It's always a solid plan!

  41. Re:.pst? probably doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Pretty accurate description of what will happen. When somebody leaves the company, everything that goes wrong for several months later was 100% their fault. I've done outrageously thorough documentation of mechanical systems with Solidworks assemblies. Told the first person to replace me where they were. They leave several months later and don't tell the next sucker. I come back a year later and they're essentially banging rocks together with cardboard and PVC pipe because no one knew how to open the .sldasm file... It was a very surreal "The Gods Must Be Crazy"/"cargo cult" experience seeing how pointless it was to try to build a legacy.

    Your "legacy" is just a hindrance to the ambitions of the guy who comes in after you in most cases. No glory to be found in making use of it. Plenty of "knight-in-shining-armor" stories to be found in slandering your name. Who sings praises for their fiance's ex-boyfriends?

  42. Delete everything by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 1

    Your successor will then have an excellent opportunity to learn by doing.

  43. Easy answer by safetyinnumbers · · Score: 1

    Emacs org-mode with gpg files. It's the only way to be sure.

  44. Turn off the light and go home. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is no longer your problem.

  45. Try not to worry so much by jjn1056 · · Score: 2

    no matter what you do whoever takes your place is going to have to stand the process his or her own way. As the say, the graveyard is full of people who were thought of as irreplaceable...

    --
    Peace, or Not?
  46. Re:You Sound Like Me by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

    I guess the cron job to DBAN all the servers never kicked in.

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  47. use a wiki by mykro76 · · Score: 1

    I've been with my employer for 12 years and have a lot of specialised knowledge. In that time I've diligently shuttled information from various sources including e-mail into a wiki. Anyone in the company can access and edit it but I'm by far the biggest contributor. Time and time again I'm able to send people a link to answer their FAQs, heck I even use it to discover my own (forgotten) memories. Thanks to the wiki I anticipate a straightforward handover should the need arise.

  48. Are you... by kenh · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hillary Clinton?

    --
    Ken
  49. Outlook not so good - write a summary by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Write as useful of a summary as you can in the time you can spare, print it out, and put it where the new hire is certain to find it because someone dropped into the deep end is unlikely to have the time to do discovery on a collection of mailboxes.

  50. my solution by cswacswa · · Score: 2

    I have quickly exported GBs of emails (with or without folder structure) from Outlook/Exchange using MessageSave... www.techhit.com/messagesave ...to reliable msg files on the hard drive. I then indexed them with X1... www.x1.com

  51. Re:.pst? probably doesn't matter by WOOFYGOOFY · · Score: 2

    Disagree strongly. Email is highly searchable by keyword and even phrases . Very useful stuff is in that email and the OP is doing the right thing.

  52. Yes, but a slip can muck up the mail of others by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Ever since Exchange 2007 came a long its been a few trivial powershell commands to copy the contents of one mailbox into another.

    Ever since Sendmail 1983 came along it's also been trivial to use any shell to copy the contents of one mailbox into another - but in this case since the mailboxes are not separate files the user is probably better off not fucking about with commands to manipulate email in an obfiscated database with other people's stuff in it and instead export directly from their mail client.
    If they know what they are doing, know that there is a very recent backup and they are the person that will clean up the mess, fine, otherwise it's not something to be recommended.

  53. Re:.pst? probably doesn't matter by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    Who sings praises for their fiance's ex-boyfriends?

    My ex-wife's new husband sang my praises much to her dismay :-) (Nice guy, as I eventually found out. Drove a daihatsu (sp?)).

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  54. Get Management to make a decision... by Stolpskott · · Score: 2

    If the role is really THAT specialized, then presumably they have agreed some kind of agreement where the new hire can call you during their first 6 months(?) of ramp up time, when they have questions (and that should be something they compensate you for in an appropriate and mutually agreed manner). Aside from that, securing the knowledge base is vital, so your manager (and the manager/owner of the system you are supporting, if that is not your manager) need to request/authorize the retention of your email account beyond the 90 day period. Typically that would involve getting IT to transfer ownership of the mailbox over to the manager/owner, and when the new hire starts granting access to them.
    As long as they advise you in writing that, as of your last day on the job, you forfeit ownership, control, access and rights to all content of your mailbox and get your signature to agree to that, most HR departments and HR legal specialists will be ok with that afaik.
    Once the knowledge base is out of your hands, it ceases to be your problem though, so management need to own the process of securing and preserving the knowledge, something they seem to have done a piss poor job of to date.

  55. Export the email to a PST file. by FaxeTheCat · · Score: 1

    The best way to ensure the person gets the emails in a nice readable form is to export them to a PST file. Burn it on a DVD and give it to your manager and say exactly what it is and why you did it. Then the rest is up to him.

    ...and I know that some companies block PST creation in Outlook. No problem. Just a registry value. Google it if you need it.

  56. Dump to mbox, filter and format with regexes. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Dump your mail to mbox, filter and format the mbox dump with regexes, as to make it more readable.
    Save it as a regular textfile.
    Tell your successor he can search that for keywords if he suspects an answer in there.

    That shouldn't take you more than a day or two, perhaps only 2 hours or so.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  57. Index it by dvazquez · · Score: 1

    Well, maybe this is kind of a dumb one but first of all save all of your email into a PST file (of sorts) or what ever best fits your current email client and back it up so your successor has it available, and then you can try uploading it to gmail I've found its really good on searching thru old emails and getting results. Maybe is just a dumb option but may help. Best of luck.

  58. Truck number by iTrawl · · Score: 1

    Tell management to stop playing with a Truck Number of 1. During the ramp up of the new guy, with or without your knowledgebase, they'll be in trouble. They'll want the new guy up to speed in day one, and he might not be up to speed in six months after you leave. And he might leave too if management stresses him out trying to get your performance out of him. Note: I am such a special snowflake in my organisation too, so I'm projecting. But in my case the company would just shut and everybody else would go home (they're all ex-bankers, now otherwise retired). If they were to get a replacement for me the guy would have to read a fuckton of source code, the same way I did, before he can do my job. And it took me about 6 years to understand what I'm doing, as it's not my baby. It was somebody else's, and that guy didn't like to share his thought process even though we worked on this for 4 years in the beginning before we parted ways.

    --
    "Everybody's naked underneath" -- The Doctor
  59. Use email archiving software by javaguy · · Score: 1

    Archive your email using MailStore - I use the home version

    http://www.mailstore.com/en/ma...