Slashdot Mirror


Russian Official Calls For "International Investigation" of the Apollo Program

MarkWhittington writes: According to a Tuesday article in the Moscow Times, a spokesman for Russia's Investigative Committee named Vladimir Markin suggested that an international investigation be mounted into some of the "various murky details surrounding the U.S. moon landings between 1969 and 1972." Markin would particularly like to know where some of the missing moon rocks went to and why the original footage of the Apollo 11 moon landing was erased. Markin hastened to add that he is, of course, not suggesting that NASA faked the moon landings and just filmed the events in a studio.

56 of 307 comments (clear)

  1. Of course not. by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Markin hastened to add that he is, of course, not suggesting that NASA faked the moon landings and just filmed the events in a studio.

    Of course he's not suggesting that. He's suggesting that Putin wants another sideshow and is desperate enough to think this'll do it....

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    1. Re:Of course not. by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      Where were you Tuesday the 10th of Jan, 2009? I'm not saying you beat your wife, but if you can't prove you weren't beating your wife on that date...

    2. Re: Of course not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's because you beat her to death!

    3. Re:Of course not. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Of course he's not suggesting that.

      Here's what's completely ridiculous about the whole "fake Moon landing" thing:

      In 1969, "special effects" that were convincing enough to have faked the whole thing would probably have cost more than 2 whole trips to the moon.

      Besides... the site has been photographed from orbit repeatedly since.

    4. Re:Of course not. by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 5, Funny

      In 1969, "special effects" that were convincing enough to have faked the whole thing would probably have cost more than 2 whole trips to the moon.

      I guess you haven't taken a look at those images lately, the "special effects" have not aged well. This site is truly revealing But you be the judge. ;-)

    5. Re:Of course not. by Immerman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Obviously those are fakes. You can tell by the fact that they show a lander on the moon. :-D

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    6. Re:Of course not. by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. I did an IMDB search and found a Sci Fi movie from 1969 - Journey To The Far Side Of The Sun. Take a look at some of the effects. They were probably state of the art then and must have looked amazing, but they look extremely fake nowadays. Even if NASA had gotten the best and brightest of Hollywood on the "moon landing production", I doubt that 1) they could have pulled it off with so much realism, 2) they could have all kept the secret for so long, and 3) they wouldn't have used their knowledge from faking the moon landing to make more realistic movie special effects.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    7. Re:Of course not. by ShaunC · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not only that, but at the time of the Moon landing, the Russians themselves were rather heavily involved in that arena. Had the landing been faked, Russia absolutely would have known; they would have distributed the proof far and wide to humiliate and one-up the Americans. It's just a tad late for a Russian to start asking questions.

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    8. Re:Of course not. by dunkindave · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Obviously those are fakes. You can tell by the fact that they show a lander on the moon. :-D

      Sadly, that is how a conspiracy theorist actually thinks. In this case, NASA publishing photos from a probe orbiting the moon to prove NASA went to the moon 40 years ago will be labeled as the complicit organization just putting out more lies. These people will only believe something when it is put directly in front of them (sometimes not even then), and since they can't go to the moon to see these artifacts for themselves, you can't prove it to them, and any second-party proof you present will be dismissed as fake or lies. It is one of the tenets of how they make claims that within their requirements for "proof", the claim becomes non-falsifiable.

    9. Re:Of course not. by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here's what's completely ridiculous about the whole "fake Moon landing" thing:

      Well, if you understand the physics of the Lunar Laser Ranging stuff, then it is pretty much irrefutable humans were on the moon.

      Because to have a calibrated retroreflector, in a known spot on the surface of the moon, and with a measurable round trip time for a laser, with which you can measure the distance to the moon (because you know the speed of light) is not something you can fake ... that is, unless you have a calibrated retroreflector in a known spot on the surface of the moon.

      To hell with special effects. Let's just go with physics. You can point a laser at a known spot on the moon and have that laser come back to you.

      There is no faking that.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    10. Re: Of course not. by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, I have one final thing I want you to consider. Ladies and gentlemen, this is Chewbacca. Chewbacca is a Wookiee from the planet Kashyyyk. But Chewbacca lives on the planet Endor. Now think about it; that does not make sense!

              Why would a Wookiee, an 8-foot-tall Wookiee, want to live on Endor, with a bunch of 2-foot-tall Ewoks? That does not make sense! But more important, you have to ask yourself: What does this have to do with this case? Nothing. Ladies and gentlemen, it has nothing to do with this case! It does not make sense! Look at me. I'm a lawyer defending a major record company, and I'm talkin' about Chewbacca! Does that make sense? Ladies and gentlemen, I am not making any sense! None of this makes sense! And so you have to remember, when you're in that jury room deliberatin' and conjugatin' the Emancipation Proclamation, does it make sense? No! Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, it does not make sense! If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must acquit! The defense rests.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    11. Re:Of course not. by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not only that, but at the time of the Moon landing, the Russians themselves were rather heavily involved in that arena. Had the landing been faked, Russia absolutely would have known; they would have distributed the proof far and wide to humiliate and one-up the Americans. It's just a tad late for a Russian to start asking questions.

      That and Parkes (I have a relative who worked there at the time, he didn't work for NASA). And Fresnedillas.. Oh, and the Japanese.

      Why is it that the same people who claim the Moon mission was a fake, happily believe the Moon is now a secret military base, the world is ruled by shape shifting lizard aliens, all technology was reverse engineered from crashed alien space craft, and that 9/11 was an inside demolition job kept totally secret (and that no one outside the Manhattan project knew the US was working on nuclear weapons). Is it the fluoride in the water, gang-stalking mind-control rays, or just the high altitude chem sprays?

    12. Re: Of course not. by davester666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He loves football, but has really tender feet. That's why he lives on Endor.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    13. Re: Of course not. by IMightB · · Score: 5, Funny

      I want to know why Putin fucks goats and why all evidence has been erased. So many shirtless Putin shots have been doctered!

    14. Re: Of course not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even if you don't believe the primary evidence, this is very compelling secondary evidence. The Soviets were locked in the space race with the U.S. and would have done anything to embarrass the U.S. The fact that they did not do that suggests that it actually happened.

    15. Re:Of course not. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In this case other countries with no reason to lie for the US have observed the landing sites too. Both China and Russia have photographed them from orbit.

      Even back at the time the landings were taking place other countries were able to verify them by simply listening in on radio communications from the moon. They would have realized pretty quickly if the signals were not coming from the moon, so at the very least NASA would have had to somehow get some unmanned transmitters up there.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    16. Re:Of course not. by khallow · · Score: 2

      How do you keep people from eavesdropping on your initial signal from Earth? If people keep hearing the strong signal from Earth a couple seconds before it returns from the Moon, then the gig is up.

    17. Re: Of course not. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      I want to know why Putin fucks goats and why all evidence has been erased

      Because they were MALE goats and we all know Putin's stance on all things gay.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    18. Re: Of course not. by ncc74656 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I want to know why Putin fucks goats and why all evidence has been erased

      Because they were MALE goats and we all know Putin's stance on all things gay.

      Wide?

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    19. Re: Of course not. by Immerman · · Score: 2

      Hmm, how about the fact that I and my friends personally remember many of the events happening at the time?

      Oh no!!! I just realized my own memory must be in on the conspiracy! This is so much worse than I ever imagined! Or is it? Maybe this isn't the first time I've realized this - if my memory is in on it then it could simply refuse to recall any previous realizations... Thanks a lot, I can't trust anything now!

      Wait, what was I talking about? Oh well, can't have been too important. If you'll excuse me I'm off to watch funny cat videos. Those things won't laugh at themselves after all.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  2. The reason is the US FIFA investigation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    There, saved you reading the article.

  3. Buzz Aldrin, paging Buzz Aldrin by istartedi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Will Buzz Aldrin please pick up the white courtesy phone? We have need of your your services.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Buzz Aldrin, paging Buzz Aldrin by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?

      Indeed, it is obvious that someone does not care about language. Whom shall we say it is?

  4. It's just grumbling about US investigations by ClickOnThis · · Score: 4, Informative

    From T first FA:

    Venting his frustration with what he viewed as "U.S. prosecutors having declared themselves the supreme arbiters of international football affairs," Markin proposed that international investigators could likewise examine some of the murkier elements of America's past.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    1. Re:It's just grumbling about US investigations by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It is sort of amazing that the US managed to get involved in FIFA. You'd think that a secretive organization based in Switzerland, of all places, could handle a little slush money without passing through US jurisdiction.

      Seems like sloppy work, to me.

  5. Putin Vs. Donald Trump by retroworks · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's a sideshow war

    --
    Gently reply
    1. Re:Putin Vs. Donald Trump by msauve · · Score: 4, Funny

      The hair Putin doesn't have is better than the hair Trump does. But, overall a fair comparison - they're both overcompensating, megalomaniacal sociopaths.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    2. Re:Putin Vs. Donald Trump by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm pretty sure Putin has nukes, blackjack, and hookers.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  6. Space Race by CrystalShepard · · Score: 2

    Maybe if they believe we've never been there they'll restart the Space Race in an effort to get there first.

  7. Apollo 18 by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 2

    Here's why various moon rocks have gone missing:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RGhKzUUaME

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    1. Re:Apollo 18 by dcollins117 · · Score: 2

      When I was in middle school we had a guy from NASA give a talk about the moon landings and he passed moon rocks around the classroom. This was early seventies and it kinda blew my mind that I could actually hold one of them. Made quite an impression. Anyway, I gave it back but I wouldn't put be surprised if that guy put one in his pocket as a "souvenir".

    2. Re:Apollo 18 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Passing around bits of pumice to gullible school kids seems like a real mean trick.

  8. The tapes were re-used by whitelabrat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A while back there was a huge hunt to find the original tapes used to record the lunar landing. It is suspected that the tape was re-used due to NASA's tight budget and they couldn't afford more tape. The tape was very expensive at the time so it was common to just re-use what they could find. The Apollo mission was done, so why would they need to keep the tape around. I'm sure it seemed like a good idea at the time.

    That or it's stashed under someone's coffee table and forgotten about.

    1. Re:The tapes were re-used by imidan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It is suspected that the tape was re-used due to NASA's tight budget and they couldn't afford more tape.

      Not just budget concerns. There was also a big problem in the 80s when commercial whaling was outlawed. The tape that NASA had used to record a lot of data involved whale oil in its production somehow. When whaling went out, whale oil went away, and companies that made data tape scrambled to replace it with something. They came up with synthetic alternatives, but because they didn't have much time to test, they discovered after it was already in use that the new stuff basically turned into glue after sitting on a shelf too long, which ruined tapes. So the old whale oil tapes became valuable for re-use, since you could depend on them not gluing together and losing all of your data. So that's another reason why NASA taped over a lot of irreplaceable data.

      At a conference last year, I spoke with a NASA guy who was working on recovering a lot of old lunar data. He told me about the whale oil angle. He also said their best find at that point had been a whole palette/palettes of the whale oil tapes that had been sent from one NASA group to another to be copied over, but had been misplaced in a warehouse during transit, and just sat there ever since.

  9. Let Russia Bankrupt Themselves To Check by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Fine, go ahead Russia, spend a chunk of your GDP and put some boots on the Moon and fact check the U.S.

    Oh yeah, make sure to make some more nuclear missiles. That's not cheap either, but security!

    But wait...weren't these exact activities what caused the USSR to bankrupt themselves back in the 90's? Just checking.

    No hate Russia, but you need to rein in your rhetoric. You have been beaten by playing this hand before.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

  10. The footage is with the lost Doctor Who episodes by jfdavis668 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Find the lost Doctor Who episodes, and you will find your answer. Probably not, but I would be happy. I want to see the Marco Polo serial.

  11. What is this crap? by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Informative

    So, some guy from a Russian Investigative Committee for ... what exactly? Snide innuendo and propaganda?

    Does he have a mandate for something?

    This is some idiot trying to throw around smoke about the fact that Russia is implicated in bribery with FIFA, and then somehow pulling the bullshit nugget out of his as to fling poo at the moon landings?

    I wonder if Mr Vladimir Markin has stopped sodomizing young boys and embezzling resources from the state.

    This article is such thinly veiled rhetoric and bullshit as to be deserving of a fucking award.

    Vladimir Markin penned a column for the Izvestia newspaper arguing that U.S. authorities had crossed a line by launching a large-scale corruption probe targeting nine FIFA officials. The scandal surrounding the case prompted the June 2 resignation of longtime FIFA president Sepp Blatter, and sparked a heated debate about Russia's role as host of the 2018 World Cup.

    Venting his frustration with what he viewed as "U.S. prosecutors having declared themselves the supreme arbiters of international football affairs," Markin proposed that international investigators could likewise examine some of the murkier elements of America's past.

    An international investigation could help solve the mystery of the disappearance of film footage from the original moon landing in 1969, or explain where the nearly 400 kilograms of lunar rock reportedly obtained during several such missions between 1969 and 1972 have been spirited away to, Markin suggested.

    In three paragraphs he bitches about what we really wants to complain about, tosses in a snide reference to Americans investigating corruption, and then insinuiates that maybe there are other pieces of history for which the Americans have also acted corrupt and dishonorably. There's not even a pretense of denying Russia was corrupt.

    Then the next two paragraphs is more innuendo to throw the reader away from realizing that Russia is alleged to have benefited from corruption in FIFA

    I sincerely hope journalism classes are doing a case study in propaganda, and logic students everywhere are being shown the bald-faced, lies, innuendo, and misdirection in this utter piece of crap.

    Bra-fucking-oh, I hadn't realized the extent to which the press in Moscow was still so utterly a tool of government.

    That's some exceptionally well done lies right there. Carefully crafted to look like a reasoned argument, when in fact it's specious misdirection and innuendo.

    I certainly hope that Mr Vladimir Markin doesn't have too many children out of wedlock, that could get awfully expensive.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:What is this crap? by Coren22 · · Score: 2

      Oh my god, it is APK's actual Slashdot account!

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  12. Re:and 1 ....2......3.... Begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just when I thought the fake moon landing conversation had ended.

    It will not end until the truth comes out. When I was a kid, I went on the Universal Studio tour, and when I went to the toilet, the tram left without me. So I looked around, and accidentally wandered into the warehouse with the fake Tranquility Base. Everything was done in Styrofoam, painted gray to match the color of the moon. There was an exact replica of the Eagle lander. I saw it all with my own eyes. Then the security guards grabbed me, threatened me, and told me that no one would believe me if I said anything. It is ironic that after all these years, it is the Russians that have finally revealed the coverup.

  13. The proof? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 4, Interesting
    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  14. Not that he'd know anything about this... by jratcliffe · · Score: 3, Funny

    He went on to say "I'm very skeptical, since the background in a lot of those moon photos looks just like the set we used to film those attacks on defenseless Russians by Ukrainian thugs...uh...um...I mean...nevermind."

  15. Re:and 1 ....2......3.... Begin by Rei · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Clearly fake. I can tell from some of the pixels.

    Okay, okay, the bottom 90% of the vehicle that gets to a translunar trajectory is real because we saw it go up and disappear. But the top 10% was faked. That makes sense.

    --
    What about the Ant People? They owe us money.
  16. Re:The footage is with the lost Doctor Who episode by AJWM · · Score: 2

    Ha, I've seen the Marco Polo serial.

    Mind, I was about ten at the time; it was being broadcast on CBC I think the year after it first aired on BBC.

    About all I remember from it is a scene where they're crossing the desert, the TARDIS being carried in a wagon, and The Doctor supplies water to the party "collected from condensation on the inside walls", and the incredulity of the others who aren't aware that the TARDIS is smaller on the outside.

    Also saw the first Dalek episodes when originally aired on CBC. Probably others too, but not as well remembered.

    --
    -- Alastair
  17. Re:and 1 ....2......3.... Begin by tompaulco · · Score: 5, Funny

    It will not end until the truth comes out

    The truth is once they ran the numbers for how much the program was going to cost, they decided to fake it. Then they ran the numbers on developing the technology to convincingly fake it, and that was even worse. So they sent some guys to the moon in a rocket and faked it from there.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  18. You saw that a lot in studios too by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    Master reel-to-reel tape was fucking expensive. So small time bands didn't keep the masters, or intermediate multi-track recordings. They instead reused tape that had already been used, and was then used again.

    Even these days, plenty of time master recordings aren't kept. For professional productions they usually are but for others stuff often not. At work I do recordings some times and they are AVCHD recorded to internal flash in the camera. That gets erased and reused of course. When I dump the data, I keep it long enough to edit down the video and make sure the result is good, then purge it. It is too large to be worth keeping around. We could buy storage for it, but we don't.

  19. Naaarp by redwraith94 · · Score: 2

    My favorite thing in this discussion would be Nvidia's rendering of a moon landing, and their diatribe:

    http://www.nvidia.com/coolstuf...

    --
    I art more snarky, and terse than thou. I art Slashdot!
  20. Re:No it is just grandstanding by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Investigating the US space program. Ummm, well I mean

    Hey! Look over there, a Yeti!

    There is nothing in this article other than some idiot saying he objects to the US appointing themselves in charge of investigating corruption, and by the way, we should look into their claims of landing on the moon.

    Not that he thinks they lied about the moon.

    This is very thinly veiled distraction and innuendo.

    Don't treat it like it's a coherent anything. It's complete gibberish.

    This is the fucking Wookie defense.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  21. Re:No it is just grandstanding by ClickOnThis · · Score: 2

    This is the fucking Wookie defense.

    I think you mean the Chewbacca defense.

    But you're right about the innuendo, etc.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  22. Re:No it is just grandstanding by gstoddart · · Score: 2

    "This is the fucking Wookie defense."

    I think you mean the Chewbacca defense.

    Chewbacca is a Wookie. If Chewbacca is a Wookie, then we must investigate the US moon landings.

    If FIFA is corrupt, then Chewbacca is a Wookie who must investigate the US moon landings.

    There is no logical conclusion or argument being made here. Just blatant "hey, look at the moon landings".

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  23. Re:No it is just grandstanding by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From the Russian point of view the only reason the US government investigated it and sough prosecution was because Russian is the next country to get the World Cup. The side show venting about the moon is because he didn't think about the corruption involved in the US getting the Olympics. So the Russians government does not care about the various US moon missions (at least in the past everything is changing now as the push is on to get back there, obviously this is secret that has just subconsciously leaked out), just empty bitching and a possible security blunder.

    Look at all the stupid shit American politicians say, seriously stupid shit that doesn't even hint of benign as the FIFA investigation. Every time any Russian says anything it is Putin's fault or the whole Russian governments fault. Yet the endless stream of bullshit spouting out from the whackddoodles that infest the US congress and senate is considered as not being from the US government at all this by the US government.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  24. Inflammatory headline? by Sibko · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Okay, so I decided to do a little digging on the actual op-ed piece. It's available here: http://izvestia.ru/news/587742

    Here is a translation of what he said regarding the moon landings, courtesy of washington post:

    “No, we are not saying they never flew up there and just filmed a movie instead. But all these scientific, or perhaps even cultural artifacts are part of an international human heritage, and their disappearance is a great loss for all of us. An investigation would reveal [what happened and where they are].”

    This is ALL he says about the moon landings. The slashdot post insinuates, "various murky details surrounding the U.S. moon landings between 1969 and 1972." but the actual piece after translation and in context with the corruption tone of the article looks like an accusation of US officials selling off or stealing material recovered from the moon. Not an accusation that the US never went to the moon. He even explicitly says that's not what he's questioning.

    But I guess we gotta get our pitchforks and torches out because it's the evil bad Russia.

  25. Re:and 1 ....2......3.... Begin by lgw · · Score: 4, Funny

    Everyone knows the moon landings were filmed on a soundstage on Mars!

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  26. Re:"Murky Details . . ." by Luckyo · · Score: 2

    What does Putin have to do with this?

    This is Markin, the well known token ultra nationalist retard who works as a spokesman rather than investigator. He's a bit like Rush Limbaugh in US, only with a whole lot less audience. Pens private op-eds every once in a while. He was mentioned a couple of times during a prime time show we had here in Finland about relations, basically dismissed by everyone as someone who likes attention and only gets it by publishing private over the top op-eds.

  27. USSR tracked the rocket by Kartu · · Score: 2

    Trajectory of the rocket was not hard to calculate.
    Soviet Radars closely watched the rocket.
    Here is what Alexey Leonov (soviet cosmonaut) said about the hoax theory (I've translated only important part):

    "... we had military unit 32103, which supported space transmission... Unlike the rest of Soviet Union, we watched Armstrong and Aldring landing on the moon... "

    Grechko, another famous soviet cosmonaut adds to it:

    "We know for sure that Americans landed on the moon. When we were receiving the transmission, it was from the moon, not from Hollywood"...

    Add to it: hundreds of kilograms of moon soil, which are identical to several hundred grams brought to Earth by soviet robots..

  28. Re:and 1 ....2......3.... Begin by michelcolman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Everyone knows the moon landings were filmed on a soundstage on Mars!

    Yes, they first tried to do it in the Nevada desert, but they couldn't get the sound right.