Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Is Only Going To Pay Authors When Each Page Is Read

An anonymous reader writes: Amazon has a new plan to keep self-published authors honest: they're only going to pay them when someone actually reads a page. Peter Wayner at the Atlantic explores how this is going to change the lives of the authors — and the readers. Fat, impressive coffee table books are out if no one reads them. Thin, concise authors will be bereft. Page turners are in.

172 comments

  1. Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How this is good for anyone but Amazon. Because I don't want EVERY book to be written as a page turner. Just as I don't want every book written from the same POV, or with the same set of characters. Doing things that could encourage a particular writing style isn't to my benefit as a reader.

    1. Re:Tell me... by TWX · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Additionally importantly, some books are simply worth more than others, even in low-volume batches, especially if the books are necessities to those buying them. That's part why textbooks are so expensive, and part why Patricia Cornwell is sold in grocery stores and is perpetually 20% off the cover price. If mass-market paperbacks and even new hardcover books were too much more expensive they probably just wouldn't sell.

      I assume that a lot of e-books are the same way, and honestly, they're not priced well, and too many middle-men get in the way. e-books should be the author selling right to me. Call it the exact opposite of the music distribution model; author owns the work and potentially contracts-out editing and marketing, and retains all profit after costs are paid or shares profits as a percentage with editors and marketing depending on the arrangement that they come to.

      That Amazon is involved as a middleman is itself a problem. There's no need for the author to sell to Amazon for them to then sell to me when there's no physical medium for e-books, and for traditional publishing, Amazon should just be another traditional retailer, not something special.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re: Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree but at the same time disagree - Amazon exists as a one-stop e-book shop and makes discoverability of similar authors/books etc. easier as well as managing the monies and distribution. Independent authors that are successful seem to do pretty well under the current model and therefore value is added. The new model is likely to destroy value - particularly for books being dipped in and out of.

    3. Re: Tell me... by Stewie241 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I mostly agree, though it generally feels safer to hand your CC details over to a reputable vendor like amazon than some anonymous author selling a book on the internet using who knows what means to store your personal information. And who knows if Joe Author is storing your payment details securely or not. Or whether it is just some author's nephew who knows how to install some web script on shared hosting.

      Sure you can call the CC company and get the payment reversed, but it is more hassle than not having to do it.

    4. Re:Tell me... by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      If the model sucks, then Amazon 'should' be faced with competition.
      At least, that was the capitalist answer. We're still at least superficially capitalist, right?

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    5. Re:Tell me... by Xicor · · Score: 1

      just because text books are expensive doesnt mean they should be. everyone in college would love it if text books were not 250$ a piece.

    6. Re:Tell me... by art123 · · Score: 5, Informative

      This only applies to books read through the Kindle lending program where the author's all receive a part of the monthly pooled money based on the lending behavior. It is true of course that a 200 page book can provide as much value as a 500 page book to a particular reader. But let's assume that the author's effort is more for the 500 pages versus 200 pages (not always the case but probably true much of the time). This seems like a fairer way of distributing the Kindle lending money to me. I don't know anything about the lending program but hopefully authors have control over whether they participate or not.

    7. Re:Tell me... by Nate+the+greatest · · Score: 4, Informative

      Given that the new terms are voluntary and limited to just KU, this will likely be fine for everyone. What the above summary missed was that the new payment terms only apply to the books authors put into Kindle unlimited, and not to the entire Kindle Store. http://the-digital-reader.com/... Amazon made the change to encourage authors to submit longer works to KU. The old terms were based on per ebook read, not page. That favored short works over longer works.

    8. Re:Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >That's part why textbooks are so expensive

      Textbooks are expensive when they are required by universities/colleges! That's all. There are a lot of equivalent textbooks, even better one, far cheaper.

      A "part" is even too strong.

    9. Re: Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the author could use paypal like everyone else on the internet....

    10. Re:Tell me... by I'm+just+joshin · · Score: 2

      Mod Parent Up.

      This has to do with ebooks in a particular program where many authors were abusing the system.

      This is a good thing.

    11. Re: Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Everyone else on the internet" = small subset that one AC hangs out in.

    12. Re:Tell me... by hey! · · Score: 2

      Well, this applies to self-published books read through their Kindle Unlimited Program.

      I agree with your sentiment, but having read a number of self-published books, it wouldn't be fair to the better self-published authors to pay them the same rate per free book download as the worst ones. While some self-published stuff is as good as most traditionally published fiction (albeit usually needing a bit more proof reading), there's a vast body of stuff that consists of unreadable manuscripts dumped on the ebook market.

      Of course paying by page actually read is a crude measure of a story's value, paying a flat royalty per download is even cruder.

      Personally I like a tightly plotted novels of 70-120 thousand words best, but we're living in the age of the endlessly sprawling epic.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    13. Re: Tell me... by davester666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, it is solely to make Amazon more money. The 'purchaser' doesn't pay less, but the writer gets paid less because Amazon just wants to pay them less.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    14. Re: Tell me... by HangingChad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The 'purchaser' doesn't pay less, but the writer gets paid less because Amazon just wants to pay them less.

      That's it right there. If the reader turns the pages and you end up getting more at the end of the book, then I can work with that. But that's not what's happening. If someone buys your book and doesn't read it, you get squat but Amazon still gets paid.

      It's kind of a ripoff for authors.

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    15. Re:Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. However, I still don't want Amazon keeping track of which and how many pages I read. Maybe they're already doing that, and I haven't been paying attention.

      But I've purchased my last ebook from Amazon, and frankly Amazon's service has been so crappy lately that they've become the seller of last resort for me (when Walmart online is better, things are pretty damn bad).

      Lugging bound bricks of paper around just looks better and better. Sorry, trees.

    16. Re: Tell me... by davester666 · · Score: 2

      without the 'kind of'

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    17. Re:Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with textbooks is they require specialized expertise to write (which means: lower supply of possible textbooks), and yet have low-volume runs that don't get a lot of recommendations. Novels need writers and editors, but textbooks also need reviewers to align them with reality, and the editors and writers have to be highly specialised.

      You'd think the low-volume runs = lower demand which would help put the price down, but low volume also means the fixed up-front costs are divided between fewer people.

      And yes, they do also get captive audiences. But for the reasons I've outlined, they might actually be more expensive without the captive audience, because it's even harder to defray the fixed costs.

    18. Re: Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could use a disposable credit card number...

    19. Re:Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So tell me, why is it that the epically bad, and always required Stewart's Calculus is $250+.

      Every two years there is a "new" edition which is nothing more than the same thing with the problems moved around and one or two new graphs.

      Textbooks are a scam, pure and simple.

    20. Re: Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what Bitcoin was supposed to solve (rather than simply being a speculative bubble).

    21. Re:Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It didn't say but if I go back and reread the page 5 times does the author get paid five times? What about if I stay on a page for an hour trying to parse the text? What happens if I forget to close the book when I go to work leaving it open to that page on my screen?

      Does this punish authors whose readers have eidetic memories and can consume the page as fast as it is displayed?

    22. Re:Tell me... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      When I was going to college in the early 1990's my English instructor blamed Ronald Reagan for rising textbook prices. Publishers used to get a tax deduction for storing textbooks in a warehouse. That text deduction disappeared with the 1986 tax reform bill. Publishers could no longer afford to print a million copies of a textbook, store them in a warehouse forever, and ship them out when needed.

    23. Re:Tell me... by tsotha · · Score: 1

      It's more about the captive audiences. Sure, what you're saying is true if you're taking graduate level classes in a field that's changing. But there's no reason to charge that much for general education lower division classes. Lower division math, for example, hasn't changed in generations. From what I can see brand new textbooks on the subject offer no advantage over the ones written seventy or eighty years ago.

    24. Re: Tell me... by Damarkus13 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Except that this policy doesn't apply to "purchased" e-books. It only applies to the Kindle Lending Library.

    25. Re:Tell me... by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      I think, while it might make sense to say that a 500 page book takes more effort, I think we might be surprised. I think like coding most of the effort can easily go into trimming a book down. Both authors wrote 600 page manuscripts, the one whole published the 200 page one just spend months more refining than the 500 page guy.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    26. Re:Tell me... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      I suppose that makes sense for something like an English book, which probably doesn't have to change all that often (although it would be nice if it did catch up with the times and cover newer literature and usage).

      I'm not sure that I'd want a science textbook that had been sitting in a warehouse for ten years, though. Maybe not even five years, although I suppose the less specialized basic classes wouldn't really change significantly in a short time.

    27. Re: Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >It's kind of a ripoff for authors.

      Yes, it's really shitty and will lead to a decline in quality. It's literally "page-viewing" books. Reference manuals, probably the most valuable and expensive books will be decimated. This may lead to an overall dumbening, like 24 hour news has over the past couple of decades.

    28. Re:Tell me... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      English, Math, History and Basic Science textbooks don't change much from year to year. If a subject was on the cutting edge in an advanced class, an extra handout might be added to the reading assignments. For many subjects, a ten-year-old textbook would work fine.

    29. Re: Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not just reference manuals: pretty much any non fiction. I struggle to think of a single maths, physics, or engineering text of which I've read every single page. I read chapters and sections found via the index or table of contents, bookmark the really important stuff and completely ignore other parts. As in "damn, can't remember quite how x works... know I saw it somewhere... flick flick flick ah yeah, page 492, cool.

      And does this policy include introductions (seriously, does anyone read those)? Prefaces? Long-winded conclusion/summary chapters? Preliminary revision material for n00bs in chapter 0?

    30. Re: Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's kind of a ripoff for authors.

      Absolutely not! It's just the lending program, not purchased titles. This is no different to streaming services.

    31. Re:Tell me... by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      First you claim Amazon shouldn't get in the way, should be out of the picture, and that there's no sense in having Amazon buy e-books from the author and then resell them. Then at the end of your message you say Amazon should be "just a traditional retailer".

      Now this reselling is exactly what traditional retailers do, so here you contradict yourself. That Amazon happens to be in the digital sphere doesn't change the argument. Why should one have to go to the author directly for an e-book but not for a traditional book? Maybe this is because going to a retail store is convenient. All books in one place, nicely displayed and ordered by genre. You go there to browse books, see stuff from authors you didn't know yet, and finally make your choice and buy a book or two (or none).

      Amazon and other e-retailers do the exact same thing. They collect a large number of titles and put them on display. They help readers to find new, interesting books. This adds a lot of value for both the author (who can sell more) and the reader (who has more choice). It's just fair that Amazon takes their share of the proceeds, a share that overall seems very reasonable to me considering what they do for the authors.

    32. Re:Tell me... by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Mod Parent Up.

      This has to do with ebooks in a particular program where many authors were abusing the system.

      This is a good thing.

      No, it isn't. Even if there were no other ways to detect "lending abuse" by authors, that's no reason to spy on the reading habits of the readers.

      If the fucking NSA were checking which pages of books you read, you'd be up in arms, but since its Amazon, it's okay.

      Not to mention that the abusers will find a way to defeat that silly control scheme in no time anyway.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    33. Re: Tell me... by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      I'm selling stuff over the Internet myself, and give as payment options local bank transfer, credit card and PayPal. Credit cards go via PayPal: customers don't have to give me their credit card details (I never see this, I don't want to see it even as then I have to add all kinds of extra security measures). Works great.

    34. Re: Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? If your so concerned use bitcoins. I'm amazed at how your blaming authors for a shitty payment card system your choosing to use. And you can't say ohh bitcoins are too hard. Cause you could use paypal in most cases and avoid handing over that information. Not that I'd endorse paypal, but your excuse is the poorest I've ever heard.

    35. Re: Tell me... by Shoten · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The 'purchaser' doesn't pay less, but the writer gets paid less because Amazon just wants to pay them less.

      That's it right there. If the reader turns the pages and you end up getting more at the end of the book, then I can work with that. But that's not what's happening. If someone buys your book and doesn't read it, you get squat but Amazon still gets paid.

      It's kind of a ripoff for authors.

      What the OP doesn't mention is that there's a kind of "scam" on Amazon where people self-publish e-books on a broad variety of topics and give them promising descriptions. The books are usually somewhat short and/or heavily plagiarized, but the key is that the entity doing the self-publishing shotguns tons of them out there. Some even use automated systems to simplify the process...it's on that scale. They're all crap, mind you, but they're cheap, so a lot of people say "what the hell...how bad can it be?" and buy them. Five bucks here, five bucks there, and the books turn out to be worthless, so the people who buy them rarely read more than a few pages in. This is a means of changing the economics so that if you are a self-publisher and your book is total shit, you won't get paid.

      A valid question would be, "What does Amazon care?" The issue is twofold: one, the Kindle users have a bad experience, which is bad for Amazon, and two, the crap books clog up the search results. Both of these are against Amazon's (and our) interests. Hence the desire to figure out a way to cull such things. And I like that Amazon's effectively taking themselves out of the decision loop on this...ultimately, it's a way that the readers get to decide, directly, whether or not the person who published the e-book should get their money.

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    36. Re:Tell me... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      That Amazon is involved as a middleman is itself a problem. There's no need for the author to sell to Amazon for them to then sell to me when there's no physical medium for e-books, and for traditional publishing, Amazon should just be another traditional retailer, not something special.

      Physical and e-books are pretty much equivalent these days, at least in this regard. Modern printing presses allow printing on demand, so all that's left is the logistics of having a catalog somewhere handling orders and sending them to printers.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    37. Re: Tell me... by SumDog · · Score: 2

      Why is this critical fact missing from the summary?! What the actual hell?

    38. Re: Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitcoin solves all that except for reversing the transfer. For small payments where an unscrupulous vendor simply doesn't give you what you paid for, your maximum loss is limited to the purchase price.

      Sucks that half of the Slashdot crowd has crazy theories on it (only exists for libertarians, only exists to destory banks, only exists to buy drugs) and those stupid theories have made it into the mainstream. Guess we'll just keep getting credit cards stolen instead.

    39. Re:Tell me... by GoddersUK · · Score: 2

      It's an incredibly misleading article they omit to mention that it is to do with the way Amazon divvies up royalties from the Kindle lending library, not to do with the way Amazon passes on royalties from actual purchases, until about half way through. At the end of the day the latter would be unambiguously wrong, the former seems not to be an unreasonable approach: It means the difference in value of books is recognised (i.e. a longer book, that requires more to write, earns more than a shorter one) (rather than a flat rate for all books, which is what the article implies is currently paid) and it rewards authors that add value to the library rather than authors whose books customers check out and then decide aren't worth reading.

    40. Re: Tell me... by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

      Amazon makes money and they look for maximizing the money they make. In case you do not know, Amazon is a for profit business, not the publishing arm of the Salvation Army. I wish there would be more competition in the self-publishing arena, then we as authors could pick the model and outlet we want. Marketing directly from author to reader is no easily possible because most authors cannot afford running servers that distribute ebooks and do all the financial processing. A few years back I translated a tech book that is of interest to a small audience. I contacted numerous tech publishers and they had not interest...at least I assume because most of them did not even bother to reply to my inquiry. Maybe it was because they get slammed with proposals and suggestions, maybe it is that they instantly decided that it is not even worth their time sending a response. So I looked around for printers who do small volume prints and binding. I did find a few, they even offered registering an ISBN and put together a nice softcover package. The problem was that they would not do less than 500 copies which I had to pay for in full up front. I understand that it may not be worthwhile for them to do smaller volumes than that, but I had neither the money to pay for 500 copies nor the room to store 500 books so that I could reasonably resell them. Selling the books would also mean traveling to trade shows and training events, contacting distributors, keeping track of finances, run promotions, get sort of press coverage, and all the while figure out how to turn over 500 books. I then came across CreateSpace which back then was independent, but was shortly after I signed up with them bought by Amazon. I think they always has some connection. CreateSpace / Amazon not only took care of the printing, they also do the distribution, the shipping, and all I had to do is buy one copy as proof. So rather than putting up a few thousand dollars that I did not have getting with CreateSpace cost me less than 50 bucks. And since then over 300 copies were sold worldwide. Nothing to get rich from, but way better this way than having to wonder how I write off 200 books that by now are all dusty and wrinkled. I disagree on the price that CreateSpace made me set for the book. It is listed at 39.99 which I think is too expensive. I could have picked a lower price, but that would have sent all the money to Amazon and none to me. They also do not let you set a price where they would not get enough money out on top of covering production cost. If someone buys directly from the CreateSpace site I get 13$ per copy, when buying directly through Amazon I get 5$. I have no idea why the royalty is so much different. Anyhow, the bulk of the sales is from Amazon's site and by now I think I got fair compensation for my efforts. In comparison, the author of the original issue had it published through a real publishing company and gets about 1$ per copy sold!! Neither of us is in it for the money, but many others do not even get royalty payments from traditional publishers unless there is a threshold number of copies sold. As author you get the much better deal through CreateSpace/Amazon with wayyyy less upfront risk and basically no work for distribution. CreateSpace eventually also made it very easy to publish the book as ebook although I had to do the file conversion myself (they do that for a fee, I'm cheap). The quality of both the printed and electronic version is excellent, both are in full color. Best is, I do not have to do a damn thing. And for that I am very thankful and think that the 18$ something that Amazon pockets as their 'royalty' isn't all that bad. The new plan of paying authors by page turns is something that has to do with the insane amount of total crap ebooks that flood the market. There are 'authors' writing dozens of books that really just badly pasted together blips of crap that was clobbered together at some point in any one of their books. The expense for Amazon to push an ebook through distribution is roughly the same per book, no matter how

    41. Re: Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Per the article, Amazon doesn't pay less. They distribute the money differently. So if the concept of "rip off" means that whomever got the money did the ripping off, then it's one author ripping off another

        As part of their plan that lets readers read all they want for a flat fee per month Amazon had distributed the money amongst the authors in the program based on titles downloaded. Authors of longer books complained that since it was per title irrespective of the length of book that the distribution wasn't fair. Had Amazon just distributed based on number of pages of the books downloaded then there would have been a big uptick in books being padded just to make them longer for a bigger piece of the pie.

      But what if the book sucked? Once downloaded the author got paid for a long book even if no one actually read the pages the author got paid for, and an author who wrote a shorter book with more pages read would be paid less.

      Authors opt-in for the unlimited lending programs on Amazon. The programs have a set amount ( based on the size of the subscriber pool ) that is paid to authors each month. All this does change the distribution to one that seems to favor books that are read, not ones just pulled of the shelf, peeked at, and put back.

    42. Re:Tell me... by petteyg359 · · Score: 1

      I think it will be WONDERFUL for everybody. The authors that are dumping trash because self-publishing lets them will stop getting paid for trash. Maybe it will convince them to stop writing (for a very loose definition of "writing") entirely, and I'll actually be able to buy books without spending hours filtering through the moron word spewers.

    43. Re: Tell me... by petteyg359 · · Score: 1

      That a million times. Buying books has become a horribly tedious chore, because I have to filter through so much shit.

    44. Re:Tell me... by alexgieg · · Score: 1

      I still don't want Amazon keeping track of which and how many pages I read. Maybe they're already doing that, and I haven't been paying attention.

      Amazon "adds value" to ebooks purchased / downloaded from them by allowing you to highlight sentences, bookmark pages, add annotations, and continue reading from your last viewed page on another device. Evidently they can only do any of that if what you do with and within a book is tracked and uploaded to their servers.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    45. Re: Tell me... by phorm · · Score: 1

      *can* somebody buy you an eBook? Not saying it's not possible, but I never noticed any gifting functions for the non-paper variety.

    46. Re: Tell me... by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      This is completely inaccurate. See all the other notes that this is for the lending libraries only. Amazon pays out the same total regardless, but they're redistributing royalties in a way designed to better reflect reader enjoyment. This change doesn't result in Amazon keeping any more money than previously.

    47. Re: Tell me... by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      This has nothing to do with purchases, and is for the lending libraries only. It's primarily a maneuver to limit some kinds of fraud and scams, or publishing techniques that game the system. Amazon makes no more money by applying this change.

    48. Re:Tell me... by I'm+just+joshin · · Score: 1

      No, it's the cost of the 'free' book you get to read.

      The NSA tracking the pages of the books people read is a different conversation altogether. Though given your penchant for paranoia, I suspect they already know what you're reading.

    49. Re: Tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either you read the article, which makes you a liar, or you didn't, which makes you an idiot.

      Starting in July, Amazon will divvy up the pool based on how many pages are read. This per-page model applies to books published through Amazon that are read as part of the Kindle Unlimited and the Kindle Online Lending Library programs

      +4 insightful?

    50. Re:Tell me... by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      If you believe that Amazon will only use the page reading statistics to pay (or rather not pay) authors, you are, well, just the kind of person Amazon is looking for.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  2. How about withholding payment to /. editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Until they actually make sure TFS is properly formatted HTML?

  3. How will they know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How will amazon know I didn't just skip past every chapter with daenarys and cercei?

    1. Re:How will they know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eye tracking.

    2. Re:How will they know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cercei is a interesting story arc. Dany in Meereen is stale, sure, but overall she's alright. Now Asha and the rest of the iron born, Sansa, and Brienne, on the other hand....

  4. The Stray Shopping Carts of Eastern North America by jfdavis668 · · Score: 3, Funny

    The sales of The Stray Shopping Carts of Eastern North America: A Guide to Field Identification will probably drop like a stone.

  5. College students will be rich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    2.2 spacing, 1.1 inch margins, size 13 font...Students have all those increase-the-length-of-my-paper tricks down solid.

    Also, books for the elderly will become cash cows.

    1. Re:College students will be rich by stasike · · Score: 2

      One page in a Kindle book is defined as a number of bytes.

    2. Re:College students will be rich by Ariven · · Score: 1

      Amazon tends to come down on you for doing this if its too egregious. You get a nastygram telling you to fix it or the book will be pulled.

    3. Re:College students will be rich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spaces take bytes. My sentences need them to be understood.

  6. Bad editors by Sangui5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Come on now!!!! The link in the post is broken. That's just sloppy.

    Did anyone even look at the post before putting it up?

  7. Re:hey DICE newfags by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can't for the life of me figure out why they thought it would be a good idea to make the icons cover up the headline so you can't read it.

  8. Refund? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is the prorated cost of the unread pages refunded to the customer?

    1. Re:Refund? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is for the kindle "unlimited", so only borrows not buys. People were borrowing popular books, but never reading them. They also suspected that a reddit/forum brigade was borrowing without reading, so that a particular author could get money for a shitty book.
      The only downside is a technical book where people are borrowing it only for 1 or 2 chapters.

    2. Re:Refund? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > The only downside

      To me as a reader the bigger downside seems to be that my behavior is tracked, monitored and logged.

      Another profiling shitshow that logs what you read, when you read, how long you read, which sections you skip, which you pay more attention to, etc.

    3. Re:Refund? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think they don't do that already? They are changing out they pay their suppler, not how they track you. Notice no mention of a EULA change for the customer....

  9. Actual Working Link by willworkforbeer · · Score: 1
    --
    Pretending this is my office full of bitter coworkers..
  10. Different middlemen, same story by Mrs.+Grundy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's sad really. The promise of the web was that would be a tool for democratization, it would empower the individual, level the playing field. It was finally a chance for the individual to stake out a piece of ground and speak dirrectly to his or her audience. It turns out, however, that we all just handed the power over to different middlemen who now use more sophisticated tools to squeeze the artist back to a position of bare survival. So far this has been true in photography, music, and books. Probably more.

    1. Re:Different middlemen, same story by turbidostato · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "It turns out, however, that we all just handed the power over to different middlemen who now use more sophisticated tools to squeeze the artist back to a position of bare survival."

      As it came to a surprise.

      This has been, more or less, a capitalist market (quite so, since it was a novelty). Even Adam Smith knew that leaving capitalism alone, it is the land owners the ones that extract the most rent, with farmers being left at the point of bare survival. Here the public is the land the author nurtures via her books -and the public nowadays is owned by Amazon. The more free market tools are thrown to me mixture, the more certain this kind of output is to be.

    2. Re:Different middlemen, same story by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Informative

      We're getting all worked until over a summary that doesn't actually explain what's going on.

      This is specific to Amazon's subscription services (e.g. Kindle Unlimited), and only affects how Amazon divvies up the fixed pool of money Amazon already allocates to reimburse authors whose works are being read as well art of those subscription systems. It used to be per-book; now it's per-page.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Different middlemen, same story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > a tool for democratization

      > we all just handed the power over to different middlemen

      Democracy is a concept destined to fail. People love their monopolies. Consumers don't want competition because choice is just too damn confusing. Obviously thse monopolies will then leverage their market dominance.

    4. Re:Different middlemen, same story by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      If Amazon accomplished nothing else, Kindle has sold the idea of the e-book to the reading public. Ten years ago, the Internet hipsters in places like Salon, Slate and even Slashdot itself sneered at the whole concept. Readers, they opined, would never give up the rich smell of the leather-bound editions they never bought, curled up beside the baronial fireplaces they didn't have, to read on a small screen.

      Today, e-books already account for over 30% of all books sold. Consumers seem to like the e-book idea just fine. Tablets give you a better page presentation than the hard-to-keep-flat paperbacks real people are used to reading, and with a consistent illumination for the darkened corners where reading is actually done. You can carry as many books as you want on the road without giving up precious luggage space. Because nobody around you knows what you're reading, you can feel free to try works and whole genres you never contemplated before. E-books are still more expensive than they should be, but they are coming down.

      So because of Amazon, e-books are here to stay. If Amazon's rules are too odious for authors, new choices will pop up as fast as the market can provide them.

    5. Re:Different middlemen, same story by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 2

      If Amazon accomplished nothing else, Kindle has sold the idea of the e-book to the reading public. Ten years ago, the Internet hipsters in places like Salon, Slate and even Slashdot itself sneered at the whole concept. Readers, they opined, would never give up the rich smell of the leather-bound editions they never bought, curled up beside the baronial fireplaces they didn't have, to read on a small screen.

      I'd never claim to predict what the general public will do, but as someone who has a collection of thousands of books, I tried out e-books, and I have absolutely no interest in them. PDF copies of books -- sometimes. "E-books" as reflowing text, often badly formatted, with illustrations messed up? No thank you.

      I will say that I read very little ephemeral fiction, though -- and for people who read that stuff, I completely understand the attraction to e-books. I can understand how e-books function as "disposable" books. For me -- I rarely buy a book unless I actually intend to keep it. If I want a book for a week, I'll take it out of a library.

      And if I intend to keep a book, I usually buy it because I want to be able to refer back to it. E-readers and e-book tools just lack the kind of consistent layout I'm used to with physical books. I can thumb through a paperback and have a clear memory of "yeah -- the passage was about 3/4 the way through, and there was a diagram on the upper left corner, with the passage opposite..." I can often locate the passage in a matter of seconds.

      I can't do that with a typical e-book. For books I ever want to refer back to, I'd prefer a stable pagination and layout. Not saying everyone has to want this -- but it's what I find works for me. (And yes, obviously you can put electronic "bookmarks" and comments in e-books, but often you don't realize what you want to refer back to until long after you've read the book... also "marking up" the book is often much easier with a physical pencil/pen or highlighter.)

      Today, e-books already account for over 30% of all books sold. Consumers seem to like the e-book idea just fine.

      I'd be somewhat cautious about the conclusions you're drawing. Paper books sales hit their low point in 2012 -- they've been growing again since. E-book sales seem to have hit a plateau since 2013 and haven't grown much since. (Some studies even suggest a slight decline in sales, but it depends on whose stats you believe.)

      Yes, lots of people use e-books. But do "consumers seem to like the e-book idea just fine," or are there significant numbers of consumers who don't really like them or have tried them and decide not to convert? Or is it more like what I said above about myself -- people who like to buy "disposable" books like them, but others have doubts?

      I don't know what the long-term trend is going to be. Certainly I think some form of electronic book is here to stay. I have had scanned PDFs of books I frequently refer to on my computer for over 15 years. Those are useful to me. But e-books? I have absolutely no desire to buy them... and at least the trend in the past 2-3 years suggests that e-books have at least hit a temporary "wall" in their adoption process.

    6. Re:Different middlemen, same story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally unacceptable pricing scheme. Amazon needs to eat shit and die.

    7. Re:Different middlemen, same story by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      I have a similar sentiment as you: e-books are fine for "disposable" books. Books, mostly fiction but maybe also non-fiction (depending on which category you like to put those popular "self-management" and "self-improvement" books) that are read once, maybe twice, then put away to never leave the shelf again.

      Those books are exactly what I would never buy, but borrow from the library. This would then logically also the kind of books people like to borrow rather than buy. Continuing this line of thought, with the increase of borrowing services such as Amazon's offering more and more people will borrow e-books rather than actually buying them.

      With e-books being mostly in the disposable or borrow-category, this idea indeed does not bode well for e-book sales. It may very well be that in the future most books that are read are e-books (I assume most people read books for entertainment, so mostly the disposable category), while most books that are actually sold are paper books (which act as reference material). Myself I barely read books, but I do occasionally buy books on specific subjects that are of interest and that I'm sure I will look back at time and again.

    8. Re:Different middlemen, same story by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      If Amazon accomplished nothing else, Kindle has sold the idea of the e-book to the reading public.

      Yeah, that whole "selling ebooks below cost to drive the competition out of business while selling proprietary ebook-readers for far more than everybody else" business tactic sure worked fine. And as an Apple hater you of course love getting it up the ass from Amazon.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    9. Re:Different middlemen, same story by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      E-books are not synonymous with PDF. I like Kindle format because it works well for works you read sequentially, like novels, and because of the convenient purchase system, but there are a lot of other formats out there. We need one that is better suited for random access, for textbooks and reference works.

    10. Re:Different middlemen, same story by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      "Selling e-books below cost," meet "E-books are too expensive."

      As I mentioned above in the response to AC, Kindle format is great for anything you read sequentially, not so much for random access. I also like the ability to read at home on my iPad for a while and then later, when I'm standing in line at the pharmacy, be able to pull out my iPhone and see it automatically syncing the same book to where I left off on the other device. Can any of the other formats do that? As a lifelong reader, it's a real treat to no longer have to worry about carrying books around, being able to knock off a chapter without planning ahead in all those random places where I might have to wait for something, and being able to maintain a "Netflix queue of books" that is always available. They even carry the free selection of Project Gutenberg works.

      And yes, I've tried those library downloading systems. It's a neat idea but they never seem to have the books I want. Hopefully this will improve as usage spreads.

    11. Re:Different middlemen, same story by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Blah Blah. Amazon is not innovative, other have done it before blah blub. You Fanboy.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  11. And what about the readers? by gerddie · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Do the readers only pay for each page when they look long enough at it to be able to actually read it?

  12. Counting pages by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 5, Informative

    This isn't going to affect the majority of books. It's strictly for the Kindle Unlimited and Kindle Online Lending Library portions, where customers can read the book without buying it. Simply don't make your books available through those programs, or limit them to initial books in a series or those likely to hook readers into wanting more of your works. Basically juggle the benefits of KU/KOLL exposure generating additional sales vs. the potential cost in royalties.

    1. Re:Counting pages by west · · Score: 1

      Simply don't make your books available through those programs

      How long is that going to remain an option? There are very few companies that dominate a market that have any compunction about ordering their suppliers to jump through whatever hoops they feel are required to further their interests.

      Given Amazon's status in the e-book world, how many non-best-selling authors will choose to kill 95% of their sales in order to stay out of the Library program is Amazon chose to make it mandatory if you wanted to self-publish on Kindle.

      Personally, I'm waiting for listing and advertising fees. My guess is that Amazon can make a *lot* more money from would-be authors than they can make from purchasers of self-publishing books.

    2. Re:Counting pages by known_coward_69 · · Score: 1

      a lot of the indie authors already sell on itunes, google, nook and other platforms so it's not a big deal. most of the good books i want to read aren't on kindle unlimited and most likely will never be on there

    3. Re:Counting pages by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 1

      It'd be too easy for authors to set up an alternative Kindle store, for one thing. The DRM's well-understood and there's many options around for stripping the DRM off AZW* files, if it can be decoded it can almost certainly encoded as well. The only thing different for the customer would be having to enter the serial number of their Kindle by hand rather than having the Kindle upload it as part of the registration process like it does with Amazon. Or you can go the Baen route and publish without DRM. It wouldn't take Goodreads or other index sites much to add pointers to author stores, and then all that Amazon has to offer is a single checkout.

      Note that Amazon already does this for Android: they don't like Google's restrictions on apps so they built their own app store and version of the Play Store app and sell apps directly to users. They already know how easy it'd be for authors to cut them out of the loop entirely. And amusingly enough the authors would probably use AWS instances for their sites and stores, so Amazon would be in a way helping the authors to cut Amazon out of the loop.

    4. Re:Counting pages by west · · Score: 1

      It'd be too easy for authors to set up an alternative Kindle store, for one thing.

      Sure, and your customers can just walk across the street to that other store if you don't want to sell at Walmart.

      Except they don't.

      The trouble is not the ease of use. Most authors I know offer their goods at half a dozen e-stores. And for all the money that Apple, et al have poured into their bookstores, the customers aren't interested in anything but Amazon. In fact, Amazon is often used by the book stores as a whole to figure out what's being published.

      For the *vast* majority of e-book readers, Amazon pretty much defines the book industry. And unfortunately I don't see that changing any time soon. (And if B&N collapses, I see its dominance extending from e-books to books as a whole.)

  13. Privacy again by Nkwe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well your honor, not only did the defendant purchase "How to murder your spouse", he read the page on poison techniques 37 times and only read the rest of the book twice. Since the autopsy indicates death by poison as described by the page in question, I rest my case.

    1. Re:Privacy again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well your honor, not only did the defendant purchase "How to murder your spouse", he read the page on poison techniques 37 times and only read the rest of the book twice. He also made an enemy of Amazon. Since the autopsy indicates death by poison as described by the page in question, there exists the possibility of Amazon hiring a hitman to kill the spouse based on the page that was read the most.

      Alternate Reality:
      He left the device on the ground, and the cat was reading the book.

    2. Re:Privacy again by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Well your honor, not only did the defendant purchase "How to murder your spouse", he read the page on poison techniques 37 times and only read the rest of the book twice. Since the autopsy indicates death by poison as described by the page in question, I rest my case.

      And frankly, if that DID happen, then he probably DID kill his wife... and he should go to prison...

      I fail to see the problem...

    3. Re:Privacy again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "probably" => "should go to prison"

      is the problem

    4. Re:Privacy again by c0d3g33k · · Score: 1

      Well your honor, not only did the defendant purchase "How to murder your spouse", he read the page on poison techniques 37 times and only read the rest of the book twice. Since the autopsy indicates death by poison as described by the page in question, I rest my case.

      And frankly, if that DID happen, then he probably DID kill his wife... and he should go to prison...

      I fail to see the problem...

      The problem is this: he could have been reading that section while doing research on a mystery novel, acting as editor for that section of Wikipedia article on that book or just got interrupted a lot and had to go back. Or any number of other innocent actions. And because the data/metadata is likely not secure, anyone with access to it could have chosen death by poison as a way to frame him. Or the poisoning was accidental (particularly if the poison was a common household chemical). It could imply intent, but it's not evidence or proof. But people like you will see it as such because it's easy and convenient to assign blame based on flimsy evidence. And you might end up on the jury. That's why it's a problem.

    5. Re:Privacy again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you ask me, it's pretty suspicious that he read the technique 37 times. Think about it. That's reading a single page more than once a day for a month on average. Why would he read it so frequently? He wouldn't need to--

      Unless... maybe someone ELSE read it to implicate him! Someone who had regular access to his Kindle. Someone who knew his password or would be easily able to socially engineer it... someone who had the motive to see him go to prison for the rest of his life.

      Desere! The wife of Jesus the gardner! That bitch! She had befriended the wife.. had been inside the house several times in the last month. And asked if she could check her mail on the lapt-- why, she must have seen him type in the password, the same one he uses on the kindle! But how many times had she visited.. surely not enough to read the page 37 times.

      Unless... could she have been having- no it's too- but maybe-- if she was having an affair, that would have explained the frequent visits. But what is the motive? Was the affair with the husband or with the wife? Did Jesus know? Was he in on it? Who stands to benefit from the wife's murder and her innocent husband getting the death sentence?

      Well, while you figure that out, I'm going to contemplate how much money a choose your own adventure book would make using Amazon's new shitty system.

    6. Re:Privacy again by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      It's up to a judge to decide what evidence is admissible and what isn't. Don't blame the existence of the evidence.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    7. Re:Privacy again by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      The problem is this: he could have been reading that section while doing research on a mystery novel, acting as editor for that section of Wikipedia article on that book or just got interrupted a lot and had to go back. Or any number of other innocent actions.

      All true, but that is why the requirement to convict isn't "proof beyond all doubt", it is "proof beyond a reasonable doubt".

      If the wife was murdered at home, the husband has no alibi, no one else's DNA was found, and the wife was killed in the manor in which the husband researched a week before and read 27 times...

      That likely is plenty to get a conviction.

    8. Re:Privacy again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is this: he could have been reading that section while doing research on a mystery novel, acting as editor for that section of Wikipedia article on that book or just got interrupted a lot and had to go back. Or any number of other innocent actions.

      All true, but that is why the requirement to convict isn't "proof beyond all doubt", it is "proof beyond a reasonable doubt".

      If the wife was murdered at home, the husband has no alibi, no one else's DNA was found, and the wife was killed in the manor in which the husband researched a week before and read 27 times...

      That likely is plenty to get a conviction.

      Lots of people are convicted on circumstantial evidence alone.

    9. Re:Privacy again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is the "probably".

  14. Uh by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Fat, impressive coffee table books are...

    ...not e-books.

    Thin, concise authors will be bereft. Page turners are in.

    Why? Why wouldn't they have just as much control over the price-per-page as they currently do* over the price-per-book?

    *which may not be much, or may be a lot. I don't know.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:Uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's a gigantic pool of "pages", and they split up the monetary pool by total pages read. If 50 people read your 100 page book (5000 pages) and 5 people read a 1000 page book (5000) pages, the payout to each of you is the same. Now imagine how that scales out, if the average book is 250 pages..

    2. Re:Uh by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Do you know that to be true, or are you just guessing?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    3. Re:Uh by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      The AC is basically quoting directly from Amazon's email describing the change, so it's accurate. See all the other posts about this only being for the pool of money Amazon uses to pay for books borrowed through Kindle Unlimited or the Kindle Lending Library.

  15. Only "rented" books--headline/summary misleading by R.Mo_Robert · · Score: 4, Informative

    As is usual, the headline and summary are sensationalized at the expense of truth: Amazon isn't doing this for all Kindle books. They're doing it only for self-published Kindle books (i.e., not ones from actual publishing houses, which comprise the majority of books most people actually read), and even then it's not for books that are actually purchased: it's for books read as part of the Kindle Owners' Lending Library and Kindle Unlimited programs, which basically allow you to rent/check out participating books for "free" if you are in one of those programs (the former requires an Kindle reader or tablet from Amazon plus a Prime subscription, and the latter requires a monthly fee). Books people actually buy are unaffected, as are the vast majority of books in general even if they're rented. This is still an interesting model, but it's not as extreme as I thought from the Slashdot posting. I guess it would kind of be like Pandora negotiating a significantly lower royalty on songs that are skipped within the first few seconds.

    --
    R.Mo
  16. Not as bad as it sounds by JillElf · · Score: 2

    This actually sounds sane. According to the article, Amazon has two ways to borrow kindle books and authors are paid when it is loaned out (library and unlimited). It seems that the authors have been getting a share of what I'll call the loan pot money per book although I'm not sure how it compares to the regular selling price. The new system would reward authors that produced "page turners" and penalize those that didn't. Considering the number of times I've been given up on a book before finishing it, this isn't necessarily a bad thing, at least for fiction. The downside is that we as a society may read fewer of the new "great" books and more Stephanie Meyer clones. Then again, were we really reading the "great" books in the first place?

    1. Re:Not as bad as it sounds by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      The new system would reward authors that produced "page turners" and penalize those that didn't.

      First of all, not all books are novels. Books of poetry, textbooks, how-to books, recipe books, reference books, books of short stories, sports books, bathroom reading, books of quotes, economics books, music texts, books of dirty jokes, and the novels of Marcel Proust are not "page turners".

      Then again, were we really reading the "great" books in the first place?

      I don't know where you come from, but yeah, you're fucking-A right we've been reading the great books. Though we're moving in that direction, there are still pockets of people throughout the world who are not imbeciles.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Not as bad as it sounds by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      The payment model is similar to Spotify and other streaming music services. They take a percentage of all the money from the Unlimited subscriptions and divide it among all the books that were read. But now they are changing it to instead divide among all the pages that were read. The payment per page will be lower than the previous payment per book, but the total amount of money given out will be equal.

      Those great books are mostly not being offered through Kindle Unlimited. Most of what you can get is self published works. Some are good, many more are not.

  17. Still Won't Fix The Shills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I learned a lesson the other day when I picked up a new book. It had already peaked above some very long standing high ranking novels and had a hefty about of reviews. Oddly, a lot of same pretty similar things, but don't really mention details about the book. ie, author writes very crisp, great development and good coming of age novel.

    Bottom line was there were an infrequent number of posts which actually identified any content in the book.

    After getting through maybe 40 pages I can say this for certain. It's terrible.

    The characters all feel the same, it's boring, the grammar has flaws and a number of other issues.

    Someone has clearly bought their way to the top and this model won't actually stop this. Paying per page read would likely be part of kindle unlimited and not a single purchase case.

    At least I did get some value out of the work. The pattern is pretty obvious so it should be easy to avoid something when all of the ratings repeat the same bullet points.

    1. Re:Still Won't Fix The Shills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I need to proof read once in a while. Fuck.

      At least I posted AC and slashdot is in the toilet anyway.

      No huge loss.

    2. Re: Still Won't Fix The Shills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is actually exactly what something like this would stop, or at least make worthless.

  18. Whe I look at my Steam library... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine if Steam did the same, with the number of games bought on sales that are never actually installed or barely played !

  19. Re:hey DICE newfags by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... or put the action-thing for reading the article above the summary, so if the summary's long you have to scroll back up.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  20. big fonts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So best strategy is write books with 20 font to increase page count.

  21. Authors of manuals may become rich by rippeltippel · · Score: 1

    Although reading reference material in digital format is not that simple (at least for me), that's exactly the kind of book where each page may be read several times.

  22. This could mean only one thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Ads on every page of the book.

  23. Alternate headline: Amazon tracks what you read by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In a message recently released to investors, Amazon has announced that its plans to improve targeted advertising will now utilize metrics gleaned from analyzing what eBook pages it's locked in market monkeys (IE The people who think that they are the customers) read, as well as how long they linger over each particular page. This will allow Amazon sell more highly targeted advertisements to its actual customers and thus tap a previously unavailable segment of analytics.

    For example, the monkey reads a book that contains both an explicit sex scene and a restaurant scene. By timing how long the monkey takes to read each scene (and hopefully in the future each paragraph - along with eye movement measurements) Amazon will be able determine what sort of sex the monkey prefers as well as the types of food they like. Correlating this data with data obtained from other books the monkey has read, Amazon will be able to craft an individual marketing scheme that highlights the monkey's desire for blindfolds as well as chocolate lava cake.

    Note that Amazon has been rumored to be in talks with Facebook about posting such campaigns to not only the monkey's FB feed, but also to the feed of their friends as well. This will have a synergistic sales effect of either the monkey's friends sharing the same taste (and thus opening up new markets), or the monkey paying to opt out of the campaign (in order to hide their behavior) - and thus bringing in more revenue . Amazon has already applied for a patent on paying to opt out of a marketing campaign and they have also started trialing the technology in some market segments in order to estimate how much value monkey's place on their privacy.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:Alternate headline: Amazon tracks what you read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, durrrr. How do you think they implement the whispersync functionality that maintains your reading position in a given book across multiple devices and clients?

      But don't let that ruin your tin-foil hat fueled FUD.

  24. Re:Only "rented" books--headline/summary misleadin by ZipK · · Score: 2

    Indeed, the article explains that the per-page metric will be used to divide the pool of cash that Amazon sets aside to pay authors of self-published books that are part of Amazon's lending library. This doesn't affect books that customers buy.

  25. Re:hey DICE newfags by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Well apparently at least two moderators think the new layout that fucks things up is superior, because they downmodded me.

  26. I do you know I read a page? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm a fast reader, faster than whatever reasonable setting the used in "displayed on the screen long enough to be parsed". Maybe my cat flips to a random page and leaves it on all night? On my Kindle I usually flip to the next page before going to bed. But even though I left the device auto shut-off on that page, I didn't read it. The lights were out and the Kindle was on my nightstand.

    This is why every Kindle needs a credit card swipe. I should have to go through the physical act of swiping my credit card to proceed to the next page.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:I do you know I read a page? by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I don't think the examples you cite will significantly affect the program. For instance, stalling on a page while you sleep doesn't do anything. Turning to a page today that you don't actually read until tomorrow doesn't do anything. Turning one more page, waiting until tomorrow, and then deciding the book is junk that you're not going to finish, gives the author credit for exactly one additional page read, which is a minimal difference in royalties.

  27. Authors of manuals may become rich .. or maybe not by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    Authors of manuals may become rich

    Although reading reference material in digital format is not that simple (at least for me), that's exactly the kind of book where each page may be read several times.

    That really depends on whether the author gets paid every time a purchaser reads a page or just the first time. Typically reference manuals will have a few sections that are relevant to the user, and a lot that are not. If they only get paid the first time a page is read then reference manual authors may not do well.

  28. Python + infinite loop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A one page book and a data center full of VMs is about to make me rich! Thanks Amazon!!!

    1. Re:Python + infinite loop by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      You can't write an infinite loop in python its too slow.

  29. Technical Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How are they (AMZ) tracking this, exactly?
    Or, can you only use an AMZ approved reader?

    I actually own a Kindle, but use third-party software reading software (Mantano for epub, Moon+ for mobi) - they cannot track these, surely?

    Not sure about the idea either - is Harlan Coben / Stephen King worth more than James Joyce? I have only read the firts sentence of Finnegans Wake, however, I have read it a lot.. and, as sentences go, its worth more than many 'flick and forget' doorstoppers.

    1. Re:Technical Question: by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      My kindle knows when I press the screen to go to the next page. When I connect it to the internet, it will pass this information to amazon. If I never connect it, the author presumably doesn't get paid.

    2. Re:Technical Question: by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      This change is only for Kindle Unlimited and the Kindle Owners Lending Library. You can't download books through those programs (and therefore can't convert them to other formats); you can only read them on a Kindle or with a Kindle app. (There are surely nefarious ways around that, but it's very different from a standard downloaded Kindle book that can be easily converted to another format.) Books that you buy from the Kindle store are not affected; authors still get paid when somebody buys one of those, whether or not it actually gets read.

      Amazon probably is tracking what you read on a Kindle or Kindle app in any case. They're just not using the data to determine payments.

  30. E-books the size of coffee tables. by geekmux · · Score: 1

    Unless they've discovered a way to insert retinal implants without our knowledge, I can only assume Amazon is referring to e-book sales here.

    Therefore, the analogy of a "fat coffee table book" is a fucking stupid one, unless they start selling Kindles the size of coffee tables.

  31. So they don't want reference materials or by Cafe+Alpha · · Score: 1

    educational materials to be published at all.

    I buy a reference book and only read the chapter I need for a current job, then the author is only compensated for 1/20th of what I paid Amazon and Amazon gets the rest?

    Someone sue Amazon publishing so hard that they can't find their god damn feet ok?

    1. Re:So they don't want reference materials or by jo_ham · · Score: 2

      educational materials to be published at all.

      I buy a reference book and only read the chapter I need for a current job, then the author is only compensated for 1/20th of what I paid Amazon and Amazon gets the rest?

      Someone sue Amazon publishing so hard that they can't find their god damn feet ok?

      How many reference books and textbooks are by self published authors and are part of the subscription-based lending library for ebooks?

      Oh, you thought this applied to all ebooks amazon sells?!

      Well, I guess the click bait headline does sort of suggest this, but no, as usual the summary is woefully bereft of proper facts.

  32. An idea... by wbr1 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    How about a blockchain based e-book system? Each copy of a book is like a coin in a cryptocurrency. I would love to see this direct to authors, but other 'rightsholders' will get in the way. Regardless, when a sale is made it is tracked through the blockchain. The market sets the prices. So, if you bye hot new thriller for $20, the seller gets a cut as does the storefront. Then, if you transfer that book, a small percentage of your sale goes to the original author. If you give it to your uncle ernie for free, well you transferred ownership but not money, so nothing trickles upwards.

    This system would allow everyday people to sell used ebooks at whatever the market would bear. The downside is in a system like this, reading habits are traceable by all. However, if you wanted to buy "IEDs for terrorist Dummies" you probably wouldn't want to use this system.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:An idea... by Red_Chaos1 · · Score: 2

      Or, you know, stick to the tried and true method of "once it's bought, the seller and author are right the fuck out of the picture, and the owner can do whatever they want with it," as it should be. Seller and author get their cut on the sale, and never again, also as it should be.

      Anything else is greedy people trying to cook up greedy schemes in self interest only.

    2. Re:An idea... by gnupun · · Score: 1

      "once it's bought, the seller and author are right the fuck out of the picture, and the owner can do whatever they want with it," as it should be.

      That's fine as long as "whatever they want it," does not include distributing 200 free copies to other people. Because that would mean each reader only paid an average of 10 cents for the book, i.e., consumers being cheap and greedy.

    3. Re:An idea... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      That model was great back in the days of physical goods only. It doesn't work in the digital age - you end up with either people copying and redistributing everything and so destroying any commercial distribution model, or you have to use some sort of account or DRM system which renders transferal of any form impossible and destroys the second-hand market. You can pick either extreme, but a middle ground isn't really an option.

    4. Re:An idea... by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      You just broke the quite important doctrine of first sale.

      The seller gets paid and gets to say who it's sold to when he makes the sale, and only at that time. After the sale, seller has no say in what happens to/with the product.

  33. Re:hey DICE newfags by rochrist · · Score: 0

    Same here.

  34. Headline is very misleading... by EvilSS · · Score: 1
    Go figure.

    From Amazon "Beginning July 1, 2015, we'll switch from paying Kindle Unlimited (KU) and Kindle Owners' Lending Library (KOLL) royalties based on qualified borrows, to paying based on the number of pages read."

    This only applies to the amazon programs where users do not BUY the book outright. In the way they are doing it, it sort of makes sense. If I have a book available to me as part of Kindle Unlimited, what's the difference if I download it and never read it, or if I never download it at all?

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  35. Goose Sauce by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, if Amazon isn't going to pay the author until each page is read, does that mean I don't have to pay Amazon unless I read each page?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Goose Sauce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And more importantly, if I read the page twice, does Amazon pay twice the author?

    2. Re:Goose Sauce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf are amazon thinking eh?

    3. Re:Goose Sauce by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      So, if Amazon isn't going to pay the author until each page is read, does that mean I don't have to pay Amazon unless I read each page?

      I'd have to wonder why you'd subscribe to an ebook lending service if you weren't going to read any of the books, but you could try arguing this with them I suppose.

      (Obviously this doesn't apply to ebooks that amazon actually sells, but who needs facts in a slashdot headline or summary).

    4. Re:Goose Sauce by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I'd have to wonder why you'd subscribe to an ebook lending service if you weren't going to read any of the books, but you could try arguing this with them I suppose.

      I see what you're saying, but people subscribe to the ebook lending service because the lending service has a certain number of books available. Even if you only read six books a year, you probably wouldn't subscribe to an ebook lending service that only had six books available, even if they were the six books you wanted to read. So all those other books have value to the lending service, even if only for advertising purposes. And that's worth something to the authors, isn't it?

      And as I said before, not all books are meant to be (or need to be) read from cover to cover.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:Goose Sauce by gnupun · · Score: 1

      does that mean I don't have to pay Amazon unless I read each page?

      No, it's like cable TV where you pay the monthly fee even if you don't turn on the TV.

      All subscriber monthly payments go into a big pot and authors get paid proportional to how many pages of their books have been read. But here's the odd thing: all authors make the same amount per page regardless of quality of writing, difficulty of the subject matter or whether it's in a niche market. That's just communistic and greedy of Amazon. Imagine a doctor, an engineer, a nurse and a bus driver getting the same wage, even though the doctor and engineer worked very hard to get where they were.

      This type of pricing will encourage creation of cheap novels and reference material a lot.

    6. Re:Goose Sauce by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      This type of pricing will encourage creation of cheap novels and reference material a lot.

      There's going to be a mix. It may encourage larger volumes, as long as those volumes are good enough to keep readers turning pages. It will discourage really awful/cheap materials, because if readers give up on it the royalties will drop. It will discourage authors gaming the system by breaking up one long "book" into lots of short novellas, and getting paid, say, 10 times for 10 novellas instead of once for one novel. It will discourage scammy behavior like flooding the market with lots of promising titles with real junk (possibly copy/paste of other works, or procedurally generated stuff, not just poorly written) or behavior like trying to use a similar title to pick up accidental sales, where a reader downloads it and then realizes it's it's the wrong thing and gives up on it. All of those misbehaviors will be punished by diminished royalties. Where before there was an incentive to just get the download so that you can get paid, now tricking them into downloading won't cut it. There has to be actual value inside the book to earn royalties.

  36. Re:hey DICE newfags by leenks · · Score: 0

    You need a new monitor - your current one clearly doesn't have a suitable the resolution and/or physical size for the dice goodness.

  37. amazon is only goi authors when each by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 0

    What does this even mean?

  38. Don't see why you would not want something in by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    This isn't going to affect the majority of books. It's strictly for the Kindle Unlimited and Kindle Online Lending Library portions, where customers can read the book without buying it. Simply don't make your books available through those programs

    If you don't make your books available for the program, you get zero.

    If you do, and they read even a few pages, you get something...

    Frankly I'd really want to know if people were or were not reading all the way through books I wrote.

    As a reader it would be great to have incentive for authors not to spend time on boring filler such that you are tempted to skip to the ending. So I'm all for it.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  39. ALL the pages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does that include reading the EULA?

  40. Re:Only "rented" books--headline/summary misleadin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So screw some little people because they didn't want to pay publishing fees and support a bunch of corrupt companies? And if this makes more money for Amazon you know they're going to try to roll it out for all books at some point.

  41. Re:hey DICE newfags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yes, you will enjoy the new Slashdot Beta eventually. It may have been impossible to roll out all at once, but, if they slip the shit in piece by piece, before you know it, you'll be a Slashdot Beta lover, too.

  42. What about the people that convert to epub? by DeBaas · · Score: 2

    I actually published a book on performance testing on Amazon and have signed up for the KU program. I sell about 5 books per month. Living in the 'first world' I can safely say that the money isn't why I do it. I am still happy to see sales, cause that tells me people read my book. And it would be even more interesting to see if people actually read it. So for me, I'm not worried about missing out on a few dollars and may even get some more feedback.

    However, I also buy books in the Kindle store. First thing I do is to convert the books to epubs so I can load them on my Sony Ereader. I am sure I'm not the only one. How does Amazon handle those? Seems to me those are counted as not read even though the buyer actually read them. Just not on a Kindle reader.

    --
    ---
    1. Re:What about the people that convert to epub? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      I actually published a book on performance testing on Amazon and have signed up for the KU program. I sell about 5 books per month. Living in the 'first world' I can safely say that the money isn't why I do it. I am still happy to see sales, cause that tells me people read my book. And it would be even more interesting to see if people actually read it. So for me, I'm not worried about missing out on a few dollars and may even get some more feedback.

      However, I also buy books in the Kindle store. First thing I do is to convert the books to epubs so I can load them on my Sony Ereader. I am sure I'm not the only one. How does Amazon handle those? Seems to me those are counted as not read even though the buyer actually read them. Just not on a Kindle reader.

      The summary is woefully inaccurate as usual. This change only affects titles in KU that are borrowed, and even then only applies to the way that the money already allocated for paying authors in that pool is split up. It used to be per book, and was being abused by submissions of very short titles with no value that were being artificially "read" to increase the payout value. Amazon is switching the model so that actual books are more likely to take the lion's share of the money allocated for that service.

      Titles that are purchased as ebooks through Amazon's store are unaffected by this change.

  43. For Symmetry by jnwrd · · Score: 2

    Why not have readers only pay when they also read a page, it would make people more willing to take a risk on new unknown authors. If the goal of Amazon's initiative is to make the market for books more efficient then discretizing the transaction of reading would do so.

  44. Paid 2x for 2x Readings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Do you get paid twice if you read the book twice?

  45. Also their service is optional by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    You don't have to have your stuff on their subscription services. It is up to the author (or publisher, whoever controls the copyright). You can have all, some or none of your stuff on their subscription services. However, many choose to have stuff on subscription because it helps people discover your stuff, and while you may not make a lot per view/listen, you make some and it can add up.

    Pay per page view actually makes sense, as it helps reward authors that release stuff worth reading. If you do pay per book, then someone can release a book that look interesting, but has no substance. However if people have started reading, well they got their money, and they are done. With page views counting, then it is the stuff that is quality that people read to the end that gets rewarded.

    1. Re:Also their service is optional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of reference books, asshole?

  46. Re:hey DICE newfags by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

    Completely agreed. And moving the "number of comments" link to the title bar was just batshit, since now you can't just scan down the page seeing what stories are popular.

    A bit rough around the edges, but I put together a userstyle to adjust these two things. It looks like this. Feel free to fix/adapt it:

    @-moz-document domain("slashdot.org") {
        #firehose article header span.topic {
            top: 45px;
        }

        #firehose article .comment-bubble {
            right: auto;
            top: auto;
            left: 30px;
            bottom: 5px;
            border: none;
            background-color: inherit;
            font-size: 90%;
            width: 38px;
            height: 25px;
            line-height: 1.6rem;
        }

        #firehose article span.comment-bubble::after {
            border-color: rgb(1, 103, 101) transparent transparent;
            border-width: 5px 5px 0 0;
            bottom: -5px;
        }
    }

    I have a feeling that we're seeing the start of a very gradual rollout of Beta. Fuck that noise.

    --
    "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
    /)
  47. self defeating... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    Another reason to not be in Amazon's prime books service.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  48. Coffee table? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    Who buys a coffee table book for a kindle?

  49. What The Dickens? by westlake · · Score: 1

    This looks to me like an incentive to sell your books in serialized weekly installments much as Dickens and Dumas did. The end result is a marathon run --- the 800 page novel --- not a casual summer read.

    1. Re:What The Dickens? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      This looks to me like an incentive to sell your books in serialized weekly installments much as Dickens and Dumas did. The end result is a marathon run --- the 800 page novel --- not a casual summer read.

      It would look like that if it had anything to do with sales. As usual for slashdot, the summary and headline aren't actual facts.

      This change affects books in the lending library system. Anything on the ebook store is not affected by this change and is paid out the same way it always was.

      This change just affects the lending system and is designed to eliminate exactly the problem you are describing - authors intentionally breaking up books into chapters and listing them as 15 separate books instead of one book because it meant they got 15x more of the subscription pool money for the KU lending library. Amazon is just changing how the money is split up in that system only to try and discourage that behaviour.

  50. This will improve university/college education by heretic108 · · Score: 1

    Imagine if the authors/publishers of all those 1000-page tl;dr sleep-inducing university/college texts only got paid for each page actually read by each student.
    They'd go broke overnight, or very quickly figure out how to make their texts a lot more engaging!

    --
    -- In the beginning was the WORD, and the WORD was UNSIGNED, and the main(){} was without form and void...
  51. See my comment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the Where is Europe's Silicon Valley thread.

  52. The Other Story: by Nyder · · Score: 1

    Not only is this about ripping off authors, but it's about Amazon snooping on what you are doing. How will they know you read a page in an ebook unless they have 24/7 access to what you are reading with your ereader/tablet. Does it stop there? Do they start putting IoT in everything they sell? If I buy a toilet plunger, will it be recording what goes on in the bathroom so Amazon knows when to send me toilet paper & diarrhea meds?

    Fuck this shit and fuck Amazon for even suggesting it.

    --
    Be seeing you...
    1. Re:The Other Story: by gnupun · · Score: 1

      How will they know you read a page in an ebook unless they have 24/7 access to what you are reading with your ereader/tablet.

      Well, the book reader software will just store the pages you read (and perhaps how much time you spent on each page) into flash storage. When you connect online, it will upload the data to amazon's servers. I gotta agree with you, fuck this shit. These people need to be forced to stop this and fined tens of millions for privacy violation.

  53. Fraud by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    Such a scheme seems to be begging for fraud. I cannot wait to see botnets faking page being turned...

    1. Re:Fraud by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Currently you can perpetrate the exact same fraud with botnets downloading the book and never opening it or turning pages. This only makes it harder than it presently is.

    2. Re:Fraud by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      But we talk about paying content, right? Downloading a book costs money, and this is efficient to thwart botnets.

  54. Wait what? by gigaherz · · Score: 1

    They charge ME for the books, but only pay the authors if I read them? WTF kind of logic is that? If I pay, they should receive. I may have to buy my ebooks elsewhere.

  55. This only applies to Kindle Unlimited and Lending by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

    Amazon's planned change to payment of authors does not change the payment for books purchased for a Kindle or a Kindle app. It only affects books that you read using a Kindle Unlimited subscription, or though lending privileges granted to you by a Kindle owner through the Kindle Owners Lending Library program. Those programs pay authors using a model that is not unlike streaming music services: they look at all the books read over the month and divide up the revenue from those programs based on that readership.

    It's a move on Amazon's part to limit gaming of the Kindle Unlimited program. Authors have been encouraging their friends who subscribe to download their books and open a few pages, which resulted in the author getting revenue as if somebody had read the book. Now they are shifting to actually checking how many pages you read and paying on that basis, so you can't throw money to your friend as easily. It also reins in the practice of carving up a novel into multiple smaller pieces to increase the amount of money received by the author for reading it.

    It does have some possibly unintended consequences. First, it means that long books will pay more than short ones, assuming that readers actually read the entire book. (They are using a normalized page count that eliminates variables like typeface and size choices.) It also reduces the amount of money received by authors of things that aren't meant to be read cover to cover, such as reference books.

  56. Page tracking by phorm · · Score: 1

    Amazon has for a long time tracked what pages you've read up to on eBooks. This means that when I read a book on a Kindle, and then later forget it at home and use a tablet etc then it's automatically on the same page as the Kindle (provided the Kindle was connected to update the reading progress).

    I'm not sure that Amazon knowing "you've read up to page 51 on book X" is more more of a privacy concern than "You purchased book X".