Slashdot Mirror


Students Win Prize For Color-Changing Condoms That Detect STDs

New submitter PJ6 writes: Three students attending the Isaac Newton Academy in the UK won the Healthcare Category of the Teen Tech Awards, for their idea to use antibodies to create color-changing condoms to recognize STDs. They say the material, which is still in the concept stage, will turn green for chlamydia, yellow for herpes, purple for HPV, and blue for syphilis. The BBC reports: "The boys said they still have to test the science and feasibility of their idea. They want to work with a university on the science and say they've already been contacted by a condom company which is interested in working with them on developing the concept further."

171 comments

  1. Must it be a condom? by briancox2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How about just a small sample bit of test material that is packaged with the condom?
    As it stands you'd have to dip it in before you got the feedback. I'd prefer the feedback up front, I would think.

    --
    We should learn what we need to know about issues, before we decide what we need to feel about them.
    1. Re:Must it be a condom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because when you are about to get laid the last thing you want to do is spit in a test tube and run it through tests. By the time you get your results you will be flacid and she would be in a taxi going to someone who will fuck her.

    2. Re:Must it be a condom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean something you can dip your finger in so you can test the waters "up front"? Or your tongue?

    3. Re:Must it be a condom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and she'll take your as yet unused condom with her.

    4. Re:Must it be a condom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You poor misguided soul. You don't need to test the vagina and therefore don't need to "dip it in". Women are divine and don't transmit STDs. The condom is meant to protect them from your evil diseased dick.

    5. Re:Must it be a condom? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2
      You missed:

      still in the concept stage

      That means it's just an IDEA. Well, hell. I want an award for my idea of a thing just like a Star-Trek replicator, except it makes really cool sparkly FX when it operates.

    6. Re:Must it be a condom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A bitter sarcastic computer nerd. You must be a real hit with the ladies.

    7. Re:Must it be a condom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I just came up with a donut-shaped Death star! Where is my award? Hello?

    8. Re:Must it be a condom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too close to home?

    9. Re:Must it be a condom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because when you are about to get laid the last thing you want to do...

      No, no...say no more. It is very clear that while humans are one of the most advanced creatures in existence, we can also demonstrate the capability of being the most ignorant species on the fucking planet with this goddamn excuse.

      As far as the cab goes, I'll call it in myself and put the whore on her way. Clearly there's one person in that scenario who doesn't give a shit about their health.

    10. Re:Must it be a condom? by gtall · · Score: 1

      That's easy to fix, put the magic chemicals on three popsicle sticks. Test the obvious three orifices. If negative, you are good to go. If not, you can still be friends.

    11. Re:Must it be a condom? by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have an even better idea! How about a condom that kills all known STDs while you're doing the deed. That's a much better idea than one that just changes color. It can have enzymes in it. I predict the whole STD thing will be history within a decade.

      Please send my prize to the usual address...

      --
      No sig today...
    12. Re:Must it be a condom? by tomhath · · Score: 2

      Just supply a few smaller versions of the condom that are finger sized. Then you don't need the dip test on the real thing.

    13. Re:Must it be a condom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone disagrees with your replicator idea, just call him a dumbshit again.

    14. Re: Must it be a condom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prostitutes actually care a lot about their health, tend to be bad for business otherwise.

    15. Re:Must it be a condom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A bitter sarcastic computer nerd. You must be a real hit with the ladies.

      No, merely a realist enlightening those who are still wondering why the human species is being forced to develop a real-time test kit for STDs. Because traditions have gone out the fucking window in favor of getting laid as quickly as geographically possible.

      Building a friendship? Getting to know someone to understand if you can trust them? You should still wait for the blood test to validate? Yeah, tell that to the ain't-nobody-got-time-for-that! generation running around playing Blue Man Group with condoms.

      Remember though, accelerating technology to keep up with the pace of ignorance or laziness creates jobs. it's brilliantly stupid!

    16. Re:Must it be a condom? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Nah; i like it this way more. Can you imagine - you think you might have gotten an STD and someone hands you a condum and says go get fucked.

    17. Re: Must it be a condom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had this idea and submitted it into a science fair in 94 or possibly earlier after I saw a rapid test for one std demonstrated. I didn't even place. Everyone had the exact same comment. Wouldn't you want to know before hand? The chemistry/biology doesn't really work out well either if you want to maintain accuracy and eliminate false positives, at least from my research. There might be more robust ways now.

    18. Re:Must it be a condom? by cdrudge · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why limit it to just STDs? Or even just to diseases. How about cure all medical conditions. Should be pretty easy thing to accomplish.

    19. Re:Must it be a condom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... playing Blue Man Group with condoms.

      The Blue Man Group has syphilis??

    20. Re:Must it be a condom? by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because when you're getting laid the last thing you want to do is pull out (or be pulled out of), discovered the condom broke and is now a rainbow of colors.

    21. Re:Must it be a condom? by dcw3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because traditions have gone out the fucking window in favor of getting laid as quickly as geographically possible. ...

      Yeah, they went out the window a couple thousand years ago. But please continue believing that your imaginary society ever existed.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    22. Re: Must it be a condom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All medial conditions... like' life'?

    23. Re: Must it be a condom? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      Three years ago when my organization convened in Reno, one of our speakers was a local madam who explained how this works.

    24. Re:Must it be a condom? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      This reminds me of the old joke....

      Guy One: "I've got this date with a girl, but I can't remember if she said she had TB or VD...."

      Guy Two: "Simple...if she coughs.....Fuck Her!!"

      :)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    25. Re: Must it be a condom? by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 1

      All medial conditions... like' life'?

      Let's start with pedantry first. That is a much more important -- and challenging -- medical condition to solve. It is a particularly cruel disease that affects a disproportionate number of slashdotters.

      --
      the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    26. Re:Must it be a condom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reminds me of the old joke....

      Guy One: "I've got this date with a girl, but I can't remember if she said she had TB or VD...."

      Guy Two: "Simple...if she coughs.....Fuck Her!!"

      :)

      And then you find out her throat was only and that is what made her cough. :)

    27. Re: Must it be a condom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yup, the only girls I found diligent in my life about sexual health were working girls in Bangkok.

    28. Re: Must it be a condom? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Yea, how about you go ahead and pilot that "popsicle stick in the ass" idea, and get back to us with your findings....

      I recommend keeping tweezers handy.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    29. Re:Must it be a condom? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Public Service Announcement --------------- It is my policy to not respond to this person because he seems to have some kind of personal vendetta, plus a nasty habit of publicly lying about other people.

      Please don't feed the troll.

      (And let the dumbshits identify themselves.)

    30. Re:Must it be a condom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      noooOooOOOOoooOOoo!

    31. Re:Must it be a condom? by durrr · · Score: 1

      Nah, I'm sure the rainbow condoms will be a hit.

    32. Re:Must it be a condom? by Tyr07 · · Score: 1

      Treatments that instantly kill also kill anything else organic.

      E.G It will damage both sexual organs.

    33. Re: Must it be a condom? by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      You know, I was going to post "Depends on how you define 'solve' - I could do it for some bullets" but then I thought "Isn't that also being sort of pedantic?".

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    34. Re: Must it be a condom? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I am no expert at shoving random things into my anus but I suspect one needn't insert them all the way? I am sure there are folks here who can enlighten us though.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    35. Re:Must it be a condom? by CaptQuark · · Score: 2

      Ummm... Will it change different colors if the STD is detected INSIDE the condom or OUTSIDE? Which partner are they testing?

      --

    36. Re:Must it be a condom? by briancox2 · · Score: 1

      I don't think popsicle sticks would be very pleasant. A good finger condom might go further toward convincing your partner that they were having a good time.

      --
      We should learn what we need to know about issues, before we decide what we need to feel about them.
    37. Re:Must it be a condom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you really letting the dumbshits identify themselves when you call people dumbshits? (And because they disagree with you about Star Trek, no less!)

  2. Lot of test. by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeo. They need to do lots of tests. Lot and lots of tests.
    They are now looking for female vilunteers to help them out.

    1. Re:Lot of test. by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

      Shit. I get the perfect straight line, first post and I mess it up with a ton of typos.

      PS the guys are still looking for more volunteers, preferably, young 36-24-36.

    2. Re:Lot of test. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still not funny. Still obvious. And you left out the elbow in the ribs, the "ifyaknowwhatImean", and the creepy grin.

    3. Re:Lot of test. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Uh, guys. In order to test if the product works, you would need to do the testing with an infected woman. Or infected women.

    4. Re:Lot of test. by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 2

      I just hope theyre not thinking of doing automation tests :) Performance and Penetration testing should be interesting though!

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    5. Re: Lot of test. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nudge nudge wink wink say no more squire!

    6. Re: Lot of test. by LazyBoot · · Score: 2

      I have 2 words for you "control group"

    7. Re: Lot of test. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how do you know you are in the control group?

    8. Re: Lot of test. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, the whips and chains might be a dead giveaway...

    9. Re:Lot of test. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They won't be testing the condoms in these tests. Be my guest because I'm not going to touch their verified STD carrier .... nasty!

    10. Re: Lot of test. by omnichad · · Score: 2

      Wish I had mod points for this AC.

    11. Re: Lot of test. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too this is the best comment on here.

    12. Re: Lot of test. by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      Lot of stereotypes out there against people in the bondage community. Even though most of them are in really close relationships.

    13. Re: Lot of test. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I've never heard that they lack a sense of humor.

    14. Re: Lot of test. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Of course they are, they are tied up and cannot get away

    15. Re:Lot of test. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much is the volunteer fee for men?

    16. Re: Lot of test. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A straight-jacket will do that.

    17. Re:Lot of test. by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 2

      A Sybian?

      Don't ask me how I know about them.

    18. Re: Lot of test. by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Funny

      the Domination community also has that problem, and you AGREE with Me DON'T YOU, You Little Sniveling Twink

    19. Re:Lot of test. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's OK, you weren't first.

    20. Re: Lot of test. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True with some of the old school BDSM people, totally false with most of the newer folk. STDs are rampant.

  3. "Win Prize" by Etherwalk · · Score: 2

    Who cares that they won a prize? They did something useful and nerdy. Can't we just be happy about that? #slashdot

    1. Re:"Win Prize" by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's a bit of an odd prize, because all they did was suggest an idea. No working prototype or anything like that, just "wouldn't it be good if..."

      In fact the idea might be a bit half-bakes because by the time the antibodies have reacted (and BTW how do you keep them alive for months or even years in the packet?) the condom will probably have been discarded. It's also rather anti-social and possibly illegal to perform medical tests on someone without their consent, which seems to be the point of this thing otherwise why not just provide a more traditional testing kit.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:"Win Prize" by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 2

      Actually that's good. Now I get to develop a competing product. Of course I will need to do a lot of testing. At least, that's my story and I'm sticking it.

      I know I'm milking it, but if at first you don't suceed ,,,

    3. Re:"Win Prize" by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Cool idea, but ...

      The boys said they still have to test the science

      Which is OK for a student competition because it doesn't have to be remotely possible, but it's not as such useful or even nerdy so I'm not really sure why it's ended up on this site. Nerdy would be to see if it's remotely possible first and then run with it instead of just declaring a wish.

    4. Re:"Win Prize" by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      and BTW how do you keep them alive for months or even years in the packet?

      You don't, they aren't alive to start with.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:"Win Prize" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should I be happy that some British schoolkids imagined an idea? The problem with rewarding for only this is the idea may have already existed in works of fiction or message board posts. It is in the stage where an actual real concept approaches reality that we even trouble ourselves to monitor for ideas. Gee whiz what if ideas are just too cheap. There is no assurance at all that such ideas have not happened before repeatedly.

    6. Re: "Win Prize" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Because they didn't. What they did isn't even in the same category as "antigravity paint". It's more like GRAVITY PAINT, a paint that increases the weight of the object in question. Also known as... Paint.

      Sounds as if it isn't even clear if they can, and there's no reason to even if they do. It's like being told after you shopped how much money you "saved" when the cashier hands you the receipt. You can't go back in time and un-have-sex with the person in question. So knowing if the person has whatever genital cooties is irrelevant. Also, what of false positives and false negatives?

      If you feel the need to use a condom when having sex, but are going to have sex anyway, the color of the condom after it's over can't possibly be helpful.

      All this really indicates is the uselessness of the people charged with the responsibility of handing out awards there. Iaasic Newton, really? I don't think so!

      And which of the boys' fathers were on the committee that made the award, huh?

    7. Re:"Win Prize" by smallfries · · Score: 1

      But the process that they followed is well-proven (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0326856/), just work on the idea, or as it is known "the actual invention" and then pass the rest off to the science guys to sort out.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    8. Re:"Win Prize" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the post-implementation world. Ideas and design are the important thing. Once you get a good one, you just hire an engineer or something to do the simple bit.

    9. Re:"Win Prize" by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      possibly illegal to perform medical tests on someone without their consent

      Well, here's another way for a male to do a medical test on a female for STD's - stick your dick in her and see if you get a disease.

      Here's something else that's illegal: tell somebody you don't have herpes and then have unprotected sex with them. Or tell them you're on the pill and then have unprotected sex to "land" them. Or just grab the used condom out of the trash while he's in the bathroom and cram it up in there - "oops, must've been a hole in the condom".

      It would be a much happier world if none of these things never happened. Given the extant State mechanisms, casual encounters have become fraught with risk and somewhat adversarial. Heck, in some US States, it's becoming necessary to have a signed consent form with a blood test first.

      Maybe what we need as an invention instead is a "photo booth" with a portable blood testing microarray and legal consent validation, with results cryptographically signed onto the blockchain.

      So much for just rolling around in the hay loft.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    10. Re: "Win Prize" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm. Sometimes having sex with a person TWO times is nice. Seeing a tie die weiner jacket after the first time could be useful in that case, no? I think of it more like the day after pill. It's useful AFTER the sexin.

    11. Re:"Win Prize" by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If only I had sent in my concept of a condom that miraculously kills all those diseases and also HIV, cancer and the common cold, I would have won.

      There is nothing useful or nerdy here.
      Neither the product nor any of it's features are currently possible.
      There is no invention, no science, no ingenuity here, just an idea.

      Ideas are a dime a dozen, it's being able to implement those ideas that matters.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    12. Re: "Win Prize" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twice in a night maybe. Beyond that they tend to talk.

    13. Re:"Win Prize" by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      It's also rather anti-social and possibly illegal to perform medical tests on someone without their consent

      Ordinarily I'd agree, but if you're about to have sex with me, I think that gives me more rights to information about you than the average citizen out there. If you're uncomfortable with what I might be putting in that condom, then we could always just not have sex.

    14. Re:"Win Prize" by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      It's a bit of an odd prize, because all they did was suggest an idea. No working prototype or anything like that, just "wouldn't it be good if..."

      Courtesy of The Big Bang Theory....

      Leonard: Jimmy, I'm kind of curious why you wanted to see me.
      Jimmy: Okay, here it is. I have this great money-making idea. I just need a gear head to get it to the finish line.
      Leonard: What's the idea?
      Jimmy: This is just between us, right?
      Leonard: Right.
      Jimmy: Okay. What do you think about a pair of glasses that makes any movie you want into 3D?
      Raj: That sounds amazing. First movie I'm watching, Annie.
      Howard: How exactly would these glasses work?
      Jimmy: How the hell should I know? That's why I need a nerd.

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    15. Re:"Win Prize" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The boys said they still have to test the science and feasibility of their idea." - Nerdy stage not yet achieved.

  4. Add one more colour by vikingpower · · Score: 3, Funny

    Red for stupidity.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    1. Re:Add one more colour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Eww, not Red.

      Anything but Red.

    2. Re:Add one more colour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      *Puts it on, turns red immediately* "Shit."

    3. Re:Add one more colour by globaljustin · · Score: 1

      Red for stupidity.

      thank you for capturing my thoughts on this so succinctly...

      it's an **awful idea**

      --
      Thank you Dave Raggett
    4. Re:Add one more colour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      red should be "she lied.. she is NOT on the pill.. proceed with caution"

  5. Haven't actually invented anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just to be clear, they haven't invented jack shit. It's just a "concept". These three kids made a presentation of "Wouldn't it be great if..." and won a prize. It isn't science, it's creative writing.

    1. Re:Haven't actually invented anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All professional jealousy aside, though, Da Vinci is often credited with "inventing" the helicopter, submarine, etc. Sometimes "just a concept" counts as an invention.

    2. Re:Haven't actually invented anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to be clear, they haven't invented jack shit. It's just a "concept". These three kids made a presentation of "Wouldn't it be great if..." and won a prize. It isn't science, it's creative writing.

      Holders of arbitrary patents are also called inventors, no matter how obvious or idiotic the claims are and regardless of whether any implementation of the described "invention" exists. I think it's perfectly fair to call these kids inventors too, and they probably have more claim to that title than many "inventors" listed on patents.

    3. Re:Haven't actually invented anything by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Just a concept" are a dime a dozen. It's the execution that counts.

    4. Re: Haven't actually invented anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Credited by WHOM? No one who matters. Anyone who thinks that isn't thinking, or has no real idea what a helicopter is, does, or how it works. You might as well credit the author of "The Little Prince" with inventing asteroid redirection or space flight between planets. No, no. It doesn't "count".

      Also, it's a fucking stupid idea. Or perhaps it's a stupid fucking idea. Or is it a idea fucking stupid? Fucking is it? Stupid idea.

      Fucking. Stupid idea it is. Yes. ~ Yoda.

    5. Re:Haven't actually invented anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to be clear, they haven't invented jack shit. It's just a "concept". These three kids made a presentation of "Wouldn't it be great if..." and won a prize. It isn't science, it's creative writing.

      I thought up an idea of a perpetual motion machine that produces clean water, and requires zero inputs. Do I get a prize now?

    6. Re:Haven't actually invented anything by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't. Anyone who has actually developed a product (or tried to) will tell you this. It has nothing to do with professional jealousy, and a lot to do with professional realism from spending time doing this sort of thing. The idea is the easy part. As others have said, why not a condom that cures STDs? I mean, hey, if all we need is the idea, right? How about one that cures any disease? Better yet, how about an app you can run on your Apple watch that cures all disease for anybody in the room? That would totally rock.

      See why it's not enough to have the idea?

    7. Re:Haven't actually invented anything by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Not a fan of Science Fiction then?

  6. Ideas are a dime a dozen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    > for their idea to use antibodies to create color-changing condoms to recognize STDs. They say the material, which is still in the concept stage
    > The boys said they still have to test the science and feasibility of their idea.

    So in other words, they've done nothing. Ideas are a dime a dozen.

  7. Rainbow novelty condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scratch the "novelty".

  8. I thought the point was protection? by Roodvlees · · Score: 0

    If you're wearing a condom are you not protected from these diseases. I think a disease detector would be more efficient if it's like the HIV detector that works like a pregnancy detector (only with blood). The colored condoms might cause people to want a certain disease (even though they can already get colored condoms).

    --
    Thank you, Bradley Manning, Edward Snowden and so many others, for courageously defending humanity, my freedom and more!
    1. Re:I thought the point was protection? by magusxxx · · Score: 2

      No, for the same reason you're not also 100% protected from pregnancy.

      --
      Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
    2. Re:I thought the point was protection? by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well you get to have sex. Pull out. Look at the color of the condom and say "Good thing I wore this you skank whore."

    3. Re:I thought the point was protection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really want to troll someone, swap it for a pre-colored condom.

    4. Re:I thought the point was protection? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Or you say "Chlamydia! .... meh ... can be treated." And keep going.

    5. Re:I thought the point was protection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or maybe she'd say "keep that thing away from me you skank!". Of course, the obvious solution is to say "yeah, sure baby, it's one of those colour changing ones - never mind all those weird marks and rashes, look - no colour change - I'm clean! Now assume the position..."

  9. Turn Your Head And Cough by magusxxx · · Score: 1

    Well, at least now there's a "good" reason to carry around a selfie stick.

    --
    Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
    1. Re:Turn Your Head And Cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh so that's what you do with a selfie stick! I wouldn't have guessed.

    2. Re:Turn Your Head And Cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      We used to call them vibrators, but selfie stick is OK too, I guess.

  10. Rainbows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a pot of antibiotics and anti-virals at the end of every rainbow-colored condom.

  11. So many questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if it turns white you've got all of the above?

    So it only works on a penis before intercourse and only works on a vagina after intercourse?

    Do the colors glow in the dark or is this something you would only find out the next morning when the lights are on?

  12. This ain't "news for nerds"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Unless you need a condom to masturbate, which is the only sex that will ever be available to you losers. :)

    1. Re:This ain't "news for nerds"... by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

      Yeah but why do you need to test for STD's then?

    2. Re:This ain't "news for nerds"... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Because his hand cheats on him.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  13. Since when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... are the brain farts of schoolkids newsworthy? (I know, I know, I'm on /., yada yada)

    There is no reason to believe this is even feasible. Sure, it fits the "wouldn't it be nice"-category and provides us all with an opportunity to talk about stuff we like to talk about and for clickbait we like to click.

    Read this, for example "No, teenagers did not invent STI-detecting color-changing condoms".

  14. half-baked idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... color-changing condoms to recognize STDs.

    Three questions:
          Does it work on saliva or fecal matter? (Can it test the female orifice? That is, oral sex or anal sex.)
          What happens when the test subject has chlamydia and syphilis?
          Is the test able to distinguish between skin virus herpes and brain virus herpes?

    The point of a condom is to protect one from diseases. So the condom hopefully did its job and also alerts the user that this is a high-risk partner. If the condom only tests semen, then the product is purely marketed to women. Although women do (and should) carry condoms, disposal of the condom is typically a male responsibility. This product will require a woman to retrieve the soiled condom and examine it while avoiding a naked (and sticky) penis.

  15. Retarded. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is fucking retarded.

    (captcha for this was THRUSTS -- hahahahahah)

  16. False Positives? by darkain · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, the science hasn't even been tested yet... So, what is this, just hopeful, wishful thinking? What is the false positive rate? More importantly, what other chemicals trigger a false positive?

    Remember that "date rape testing fingernail polish" that went super viral? Awesome in theory, horrible in practice. Milk causes a false positive with it. How many drinks nowadays contain some form of milk? Rumchata and White Russians both come to mind instantly. [in before "in soviet russia" joke]

    1. Re:False Positives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would false positives be so bad? Sure, you wouldn't get lucky that time, but it would be a good reminder to get to the doctor. False positives are never a GOOD thing, but I don't think they are so bad in this case, assuming the false positive rate is not 95%.

  17. fully half baked by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    the idea might be a bit half-baked

    imho, it's not a bit half-baked, it's all the way...*this idea is awful*

    my first thought was, in order to detect on females you have to have intercourse first, which kind of defeats the purpose...also, checking the color (i can just see the antics w/ attempting to use a cell phone light...) is also going to be more awkward than any of the alternatives

    these ideas never leave the concept stage

    if something like a condom can indicate this, just make a test swab or something...it's already awkward having to stop and turn on the light to check the color...

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:fully half baked by Kester1964 · · Score: 2

      Firstly, the condom will not only work on females it will also work on males as well. So the woman will also be able to request that the man wear the condom she has in her purse just in case she gets lucky.

      Secondly, you were still going to have sex with her/him without the STD detecting condom, right? Now, if the condom changes colour, after you had sex, you can still visit your doctor or local STD clinic for treatment the next day without waiting until your next test and thus help reduce the spread of STDs.

    2. Re:fully half baked by sound+vision · · Score: 2

      The idea is great. Currently someone has to go to a clinic, have a test administered, then wait a couple of weeks for the results. With this condom, you can get an early indication of... issues. For me, if it changed color, that would be a good indication that I will never have unprotected sex with this person and would know to disconsider them as a long-term partner.

      Really, your post gives the impression that you don't know much about how sexual relations work. Using a condom with someone who potentially has an STD does not "defeat the purpose", it is the purpose. It allows you to have sex with someone whose infection status you're unsure of, without getting the infection. If you know someone is clean, you don't need to be dealing with condoms in the first place.

      I won't pretend to be some kind of playboy, but it should be apparent that most relationships start out more like 1-night-stands than arranged marriages. There's usually not a formal interview process including STD test before the first sexual encounter. Hell, there's barely time to even get a condom on. This product would be a godsend for slowing the proliferation of STDs. Regardless of your strategy for obtaining sex, that's going to benefit you.

    3. Re:fully half baked by righteousness · · Score: 1

      the idea might be a bit half-baked

      imho, it's not a bit half-baked, it's all the way...

      Come on, as nerds, we should try to be more accurate. Is it a quarter-baked, or maybe 10%-baked? Could it be 80%-baked?

      --
      Don't fornicate. Seriously, just don't do it.
    4. Re:fully half baked by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      the idea might be a bit half-baked

      imho, it's not a bit half-baked, it's all the way...*this idea is awful*

      my first thought was, in order to detect on females you have to have intercourse first, which kind of defeats the purpose...

      It only serves no purpose if you never intend sleeping with this person again. If you want to play around a little more next time with this person, this condom absolutely serves a purpose.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    5. Re:fully half baked by gnaarly · · Score: 1

      The concept is "not bad" if you ignore that it's pretty much impossible to create. Here's a list of other things that would be "not bad": * Toaster with telepathic user interface (can read your mind how brown you want your toast) * Cows that raise and butcher other cows and deliver the steaks to us (saves a lot of work) * Car that does not use any fuel or energy (very cheap and easy to travel around) * A computer that is as powerful as I want it to be (does not have to upgrade for new games etc.)

    6. Re:fully half baked by Kester1964 · · Score: 1

      Why is it impossible? I am genuinely asking as I do not know enough about the technologies involved.

      Wouldn't pregnancy testing kits fit into the same category if someone suggested the possibility of one 100 years ago?

      As for your other examples, they are just strawmen since they in no way refute the original premise of producing a condom to detect STDs

    7. Re:fully half baked by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Really, your post gives the impression that you don't know much about how sexual relations work.

      If you know someone is clean, you don't need to be dealing with condoms in the first place.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    8. Re:fully half baked by del_diablo · · Score: 1

      I ask the same. I am genuinely curious.

    9. Re:fully half baked by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      If you know someone is clean, you don't need to be dealing with condoms in the first place.

      Seriously? And you'd know this how? I only ask be cause I once thought my ex-wife was clean.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    10. Re:fully half baked by Talderas · · Score: 1

      You can ask that guy I quoted but condoms do serve more purposes than just protecting from STDs.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    11. Re:fully half baked by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      my first thought was, in order to detect on females you have to have intercourse first

      Yes, but with a condom.

      So, your choice ... after you've had sex with someone new, and you see that it's turned a nasty color ... you can say "wow, you should really get checked out" ... or you have sex without a condom, and then in a few weeks you're thinking "hmmm, that's not right".

      Given the choice of knowing what you just got yourself into, and having absolutely no idea, this is a damned sight better.

      People have gotten used to condoms much more than your partner running a quick swab test.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    12. Re:fully half baked by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Really, your post gives the impression that you don't know much about how sexual relations work. Using a condom with someone who potentially has an STD does not "defeat the purpose", it is the purpose. It allows you to have sex with someone whose infection status you're unsure of, without getting the infection. If you know someone is clean, you don't need to be dealing with condoms in the first place.

      Your "quote marks" are around something I never actually said. I don't know if you just confused me with someone else or didn't read my post properly, but anyway...

      Giving your partner a covert medical test in this way is likely to be illegal in many jurisdictions. If you feel the need to perform such tests on every new partner, your relationships are unlikely to last.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:fully half baked by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I have always wanted a regenerating cow. Just go out to the field and call Bessy over and hack a steak off, three hours later she has regrown the steak, and you can go out and get a roast. I figure it will not be good for the cow but it might be better than death and, well, I am an asshole so I'd go hack a steak off.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    14. Re:fully half baked by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      Purposes better served by birth control pills.

  18. Just an idea.... by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    So as I gather from most stories around the net, this is nothing more than just an Idea, it doesn't even have a crude prototype...
    And in that case, I'd rather suggest some sort of a stick (like for testing pregnancy) to test if you have a STD.. And if I use a condom, then I really don't care if the other has a STD (well at least not one that transmits through intercourse), that's what's the condom is for (next to birthcontrol)...

  19. How bout one that detect cheating ? by Laxator2 · · Score: 0

    Turns cyan if the person cheated with Jack, and magenta if the person cheated with John.

    1. Re:How bout one that detect cheating ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doofus. Turns magenta if the person cheated with Mary. Pink is for girls.

      (Captcha: healthy -- how apt)

  20. Just a braindead concept, nothing more by Wdi · · Score: 1

    First, so far this is just an idea. Zero development of the detection chemistry has been performed. But hey, at least they have already decided on their indicator color scheme!

    Second, the concept requires that the antibodies, coloring agents and supporting chemicals come into direct bodily contact with (mucous) skin. That is very different from normal medicinal tests where you scrape off or otherwise obtain test material and then add additional chemicals far away from your body in a test tube. The FDA will look very, very closely at this and require lots of tests before it would grant approval. Lots of enormously expensive tests, far beyond what a novelty condom could ever earn.

    So in summary - a creative but stupid idea.

  21. Needs to detect on the inside by kooky45 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it's for men to see if the women are infected after they have sex. But really the detection should be on the inside of the condom so the woman can see if the man has an STD before the sex.

  22. the so-what-does-plaid-mean dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    from the so-what-does-plaid-mean dept.

    It means 'ludicrous speed' :(

  23. Pretty colors by ai4px · · Score: 1
    Ummmm.... if it turns brown, what does *that* indicate??

    Back in my day we used to say "If it smells like cologne, leave it alone, if it smells like fish, make it a dish". Now get off my lawn with your fancy schmancy color changing condoms!

    1. Re:Pretty colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Brown means "Wrong Hole"

  24. HIPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    STD status is protected under HIPAA in the US. It's not up to a third party to disclose to a second party the STD status of the first party. In fact it is illegal.

    1. Re:HIPAA by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

      No, it's not. John Q. Public is not constrained by HIPAA. If you tell me your medical information, I can tell anyone I want.

    2. Re:HIPAA by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Doctors and nurses want sex too....

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  25. Huh? This doesn't make sense by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "This material, which is still in the concept stage..."

    That's ridiculous. How is this different than sitting around bullshitting with your friends about how cool it would be to have flying cars? "Wouldn't it be cool if you had a condom that changed color when an std was present?"

    And hey, look at that, they've already picked the colors!

    This is absurd for so many reasons.
    1) as most people familiar with condoms would recognize, when a condom's in full use it's quite frequently dark and/or not exactly exposed to where you can see it.
    2) I'm not really interested in using my dong as the dipstick, no matter what it's sheathed in. I'd really rather know the STD status *before* the dick goes in
    3) considering the really rather astonishing materials science behind the construction of condoms, it's not like one can easily mix in additives - anything that's going to be part of the latex but isn't directly contributing to strength is going to be a weakness. And what are its ongoing effects on the latex over the long shelf-life and sometimes difficult storage conditions (ie wallet for far too long)? You going to use such a condom if the failure rate is 2x-3x that of normal condoms?
    4) the "magic" substance that changes colors in the presence of an STD has YET TO BE INVENTED.

    Christ.

    --
    -Styopa
  26. Re:Huh? This doesn't make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://ntys.en.alibaba.com/product/60090273601-200006026/Gonorrhea_Test_Kit_CASSETTE_.html

    Presto chango.

  27. FEEL THE RAINBOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TASTE THE RAINBOW!

    1. Re:FEEL THE RAINBOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You win 10 Quatloos!

  28. Taste the rainbow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    collect the spectrum! show you're experienced!

    spectrum is green! captain scarlet!

  29. Endless possibilities by Snufu · · Score: 1

    The condom:
    -- Turns blue if both partners are democrat, red if both republican, confederate flag pattern if either partner is racist.
    -- Displays outdoors and "indoors" temperature.
    -- Plays recorded "Echo....echo...echo" audio at the point of entry.
    -- Sounds alarm if she is a he, or he is a she.

  30. All colors united by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that a rainbow in your pocket?

  31. What about Awkward Situations and Tricks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sexual politics in this new thing should be considered. I mean, do you tell your partner you are going to use it, or not?

    If the answer is yes, the show might play out like this: "What do you mean, you're using a condom that detects std's? How DARE you! DON'T expect anything tonight!"

    If the answer is no, it might go like this: "Hey sweetheart, why is that condom turned that funny color? I was sure it wasn't like that when we started.". "Uhhh, sure it was, honey."

    Overall, it sounds to me like guys might think they should use this invention to detect cheating. But I haven't heard yet whether this condom works on both sides, you know, inside AND outside. If so, what if it only changes color on the inside . . . . in a way that implicated the guy only? And since most girls are going to be aware that these products exist early on, that could backfire bigtime. Perhaps next time you go to the Dr. for a cold, you may find your girlfriend generously offering you a condom because she wonders about your "cold".

    I think the possibilities of these things are overall very good. But if they really work this is also going to be interesting.

  32. Isn't this story bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't I read somewhere that this entire STD condom thing was a scam and had been proven or admitted to being one?

    1. Re:Isn't this story bullshit by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

      No, the story is absolutely true, it's just that nobody reads the story. Some teenagers won a contest for an idea. They have no product, no technology, etc. It's not a thing, it's just a group of kids who said "Wouldn't it be cool if..." and won a prize.

  33. Already colored condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Naw, baby! It's a normal tie-dye colored condom, I swear!"

  34. Re:Huh? This doesn't make sense by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

    "1) as most people familiar with condoms would recognize, when a condom's in full use it's quite frequently dark and/or not exactly exposed to where you can see it."

    BOOM - my invention is to make the colors glow in the dark. Hold on while I call my patent lawyer...

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  35. And black for Lohan by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

    green for chlamydia, yellow for herpes, purple for HPV, and blue for syphilis

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  36. Pregnancy test by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

    They should start small and do a condom that is also a pregnancy test.

  37. inside or out by Punko · · Score: 2

    Is the colour meant to display for the condition of the wearer (which could be a display in advance of coitus) or for the condition of the partner (which is a display after coitus)?

    Folks seem to be focusing on the partner's condition here. I think this idea would be far more valuable to the partner. Here put this on and we'll - hang on - blue plus yellow means clamidia and the clap - sorry fella - no joy for you. Warning of impending risk is far better than - hey wow, she's was really loaded up with bugs.

    A raincoat will keep you dry in the rain, checking the weather may keep you from going out in the rain in the first place.

    --
    If only we could fall into a woman's arms without falling into her hands
  38. Possible oversight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Is it changing colour?!"

    "Well, fuck, I don't know! I don't have eyes in my vagina!"

    Alternatively,

    "Is it changing colour?!"

    "Well, not yet, but let's wait a few minutes and let the moment pass."

    I hope the prize wasn't much.

  39. Trolled by stackOVFL · · Score: 1

    Big time. Don't you see? "Hey, I'm working on my senior project and well I was wondering if you could help me out. I just need..."

    Get it? "Students" This is just a scam to get laid! Saw it coming a mile away!

  40. Inside or outside? by waspleg · · Score: 1

    If you turn it inside out do you get a different rainbow? Students create Everlasting Cockblocker...

  41. Yes I know they didn't invent jack... by PJ6 · · Score: 1

    but I submitted the story because I knew the comments would be gold. Like, "taste the rainbow".

    I'm kind of surprised at how liberally my submission was altered, though. I see a lot of boneheaded mistakes in the summaries here, now I wonder how many come from the editors.

  42. Yellow and Blue Green, or Green Green by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just think, you may have herpes and syphilis and be accused of having chlamydia.....SLANDER, SLANDER!

    1. Re:Yellow and Blue Green, or Green Green by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though on second thought, the reverse would be better. "No baby, it's just chlamydia, that's all baby, now come over here"

  43. Dicking around with STD testing by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    Wah! Wah! Testing is too hard. Fuck that.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  44. Colors by codeButcher · · Score: 1

    Why colors? I would like one that turns to strawberry flavor for $STD.

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
  45. Attack Of The Killer Condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, men need a condom that actually kills diseases while we fuck.

  46. huh? by Nyall · · Score: 1

    This makes about as much sense as giving Popular Mechanics a lifetime achievement award for their invention of the flying car.

    I know I'm late to the bash party. And yeah, every once in a while a kiddy award for an idea gets onto slashdot. http://hardware.slashdot.org/s...

    --
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification
  47. And the use? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Skipping all the questions about whether this is possible, or inspired by "rainbow parties", or whatever....

    STDs tend to be spread by unprotected sex. A condom isn't a guarantee, but in general somebody who uses condoms regularly is going to taking a lot less risk. This means it would be targeted at people who don't need it nearly as bad as the people who wouldn't use it anyway.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  48. Interesting article in response by rst123 · · Score: 1

    I liked this analysis http://www.forbes.com/sites/ta...

    Tl; dr: it might work for some STDs but it would make the condom quite a bit thicker, and take too long for the result. For others, it's just not going to happen. Then, assuming the magic work, there's lots of reasons it's a bad idea, mostly having to do with the fact that there are people involved.

  49. Will it tell you which person is infected? by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

    I doubt that. That'd be pretty useful information.

  50. Re:"Eating your words" != GOOD nutrition by omnichad · · Score: 1

    I never cease to be amazed at what you waste your time on.

  51. Re:"Eating your words" != GOOD nutrition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spending time on a troll like you omnichad is a waste. He's just gloating.

  52. "Eating your words" != GOOD nutrition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Your hosts file comments are not trustworthy" - by omnichad (1198475) on Friday August 09, 2013 @11:22AM (#44520759)

    Oh, really? Ok: MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee who has seen & verified its sourcecode too no less as safe) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl...

    &

    MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus (per this VERY recent testing of them all) -> http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    &

    It's GUARANTEED safe & clean (per it being checked by 57 antivirus programs recently) in BOTH its 64-bit model -> https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    In its 32-bit model also https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    ---

    Tells us, omniweasel:

    * HOW'S IT TASTE "EATING YOUR WORDS" flavored with your FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH ramming them down spiced with the BITTER TASTE of SELF-DEFEAT"?

    LMAO...

    APK

    P.S.=> Lastly: In the past, You also conceded MANY points on hosts to me & made huge mistakes vs. me here http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

    &

    Here too http://tech.slashdot.org/comme...

    LMAO @ U, "omniloser"... apk

  53. HIV CURE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After been in pain and sorrow for 2years and 11months, Dr Molemen was able to restore my life back with his herbal medicine, my good friends i have been Hiv positive for 2years and everyday of my life i cry to God as i was a mother of 2 cute kids who were looking up to me, I was taking my medication from the hospital, I also did some prayers to God that he should do some miracle in my life, my friends this is a life touching story i am sharing with you all on net today, Few Months ago i was browsing on net when i found some good testimonials about Dr Molemen Herbs, and someone recommended that he has cured Hiv by Dr Molemen, i always had faith that God could use someone to heal me, i contacted Dr Molemen and i told him concerning my problem he told me not to worry that with God all things are possible and also that he was going to prepare for me some herbal herbs which i am to take and he is going to send the medicine to me, well after all the guidance and medication from Dr Molemen he advice that i go for check again to see my status result and he assured me of good result, i was afraid at this point cause i never wanted someone to tell me again that i am positive, after 2days i went to the Hospital for check up and they said the result was to come out by Friday, at 11:00am on Friday the hospital Doctor called me and told me that the result was out and i am Negative, i was shocked and could not believe it, i immediately called Dr Molemen and told him about the good news he told me to rejoice and make sure i share my testimony with my friends and that is why i am doing this right now, friends you can contact Dr Molemen today on ( drmolemenspiritualtemple@gmail.com or ( dr.molemenspiritualtemple@yahoo.com) or call him on +2347036013351, friends Dr Molemen can help you solve any problem contact him now.

  54. These guys are actually making it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/std-detecting-condom-changes-color-upon-contact/x/11205407#/story