Slashdot Mirror


Struggling University of Phoenix Lays Off 900

An anonymous reader writes: The struggles facing for-profit colleges continue. The University of Phoenix announced poor quarterly earnings yesterday, and the institution has laid off 900 workers since September. Enrollment is down 14% since last year, and the CEO of its parent company, Apollo Education Group, says enrollment is likely to drop from 206,000 to about 150,000 next year. Apollo's stock has lost more than half its value since the beginning of the year. "Tighter regulations on for-profits and the Obama administration's push to make community college free top the list of headwinds. And non-profit universities have entered the online education space, where for-profit schools once held center stage."

133 comments

  1. Johnny can't get a job by Revek · · Score: 1

    So Jane says no thanks to phoenix.

    1. Re:Johnny can't get a job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Jane says no thanks to phoenix.

      Soon to be renamed to University of Mumbai.

    2. Re:Johnny can't get a job by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Have you actually priced these guys? My ex-wife used them back in 2001-2003 to finish up a BSN degree, and paid an obscene amount of cash each month to do it. They also adopted that neat little trick the state colleges have of requiring 'bridge classes' and of discounting certain courses taken (in favor of pricier ones they provide), so sometimes you're taking superfluous classes and in some cases re-taking classes you'd already taken.

      One thing I do wonder about though... most of the oft-touted 'free' community college courses are more towards getting an Associates' degree, whereas Phoenix' big advertising push is for folks who want to convert their 2-year degree into a 4-year one, or to convert a Bachelors' into a Masters'.

      Personally, I think their biggest competition is the recent growth of small state-accredited colleges going online, expanding their presence, and pushing to provide the same thing Phoenix does. Many of these colleges have provided this sort of thing remotely (albeit not online, but by 'traveling prof') to military members for decades, but have recently decided to get a piece of the civilian market now.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    3. Re:Johnny can't get a job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep.

    4. Re:Johnny can't get a job by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Which is funny, 'cause I'm converting an AS to a BAS via UCF ... a Real Accredited University, and for cheaper. Sure it was quicker for me to also complete a General Sciences AA first and then hit UCF, but if I hadn't it would've only added 4 extra gen ed classes to my "need to take" list.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    5. Re:Johnny can't get a job by Shoten · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Have you actually priced these guys? My ex-wife used them back in 2001-2003 to finish up a BSN degree, and paid an obscene amount of cash each month to do it. They also adopted that neat little trick the state colleges have of requiring 'bridge classes' and of discounting certain courses taken (in favor of pricier ones they provide), so sometimes you're taking superfluous classes and in some cases re-taking classes you'd already taken.

      One thing I do wonder about though... most of the oft-touted 'free' community college courses are more towards getting an Associates' degree, whereas Phoenix' big advertising push is for folks who want to convert their 2-year degree into a 4-year one, or to convert a Bachelors' into a Masters'.

      Personally, I think their biggest competition is the recent growth of small state-accredited colleges going online, expanding their presence, and pushing to provide the same thing Phoenix does. Many of these colleges have provided this sort of thing remotely (albeit not online, but by 'traveling prof') to military members for decades, but have recently decided to get a piece of the civilian market now.

      The thing is, what matters isn't the final bill. What matters, in recent years, has been the apparent short-term affordability of such institutions.

      Two things have been happening in higher education in the last 15 years. One, a recession drove many people out of the work force, and a lot of those people instead turned to higher education while they were idling as a way to improve their marketability and also kind of hit the 'pause' button on working until things improved. And two, most of those people did it by taking on student debt. For-profit schools flourished during this time, because they understood that the name of the game to growing their enrollments was at least as much about how to finance the education as it was about the nature of the education itself.

      But now, two other things are happening that counteract each of those effects. One, the job market is growing steadily, and even more importantly, people are returning to the work force. That's how it's possible for more and more net job creation to take place, and yet for unemployment (the number of people *looking for work* who are unemployed) to rise at the same time. And two, everyone has suddenly caught on to the fact that people are racking up massive amounts of debt to finance these classes, without really gaining all that much in the way of job opportunity. So the drive towards education using this model fades, and a counterforce starts pushing away from it.

      Really, this was inevitable...it's almost like there was a "higher education bubble" that is bursting as we watch. Instead of it being funded by subprime mortgages and shady income verification, it has been funded by aggressive student loan processes and overstated promises by many institutions.

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    6. Re:Johnny can't get a job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go knights! /ucf alum

    7. Re:Johnny can't get a job by xSauronx · · Score: 1

      it seems like, since UofP started, a lot more Unis have upped their game for online-classes to get their standard degree. The local area Uni here let's you do a huge amount of online work for many bachelors and masters degrees at north carolina in-state tuition pricing. I finished my bachelors that way for a couple of reasons and had some pretty good classes that way.

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    8. Re:Johnny can't get a job by sabri · · Score: 3, Informative

      it seems like, since UofP started, a lot more Unis have upped their game for online-classes to get their standard degree.

      I hate to spam, but here is something you need to look at if you're looking to get an accredited online degree: www.wgu.edu. Western Governors University is affordable: $3000 per 6 month term, where you can do as many credits as you can. I got my MSc in 18 months, for 9k. Everything was online, except graduation, which was a big party in Utah.

      5 Stars, strongly recommend.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    9. Re:Johnny can't get a job by seyyah · · Score: 1

      I hate to spam, but here is something you need to look at if you're looking to get an accredited online degree: www.wgu.edu. Western Governors University is affordable: $3000 per 6 month term, where you can do as many credits as you can. I got my MSc in 18 months, for 9k. Everything was online, except graduation, which was a big party in Utah.

      I knew there was going to be a catch.

  2. Low profit? Double the tuition! by sinij · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Low profit? Double the tuition! It is not like guaranteed student loans provided to student will turn it down.

    This is how we got into this mess - guaranteed loans and inability to discard them in bankruptcy removed all competitive pressures on price.

    1. Re:Low profit? Double the tuition! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Pheonix is a mail order degree institute. Many people bought into their hype and trained/purchased their MBAs from this outfit. Once they have their paperwork, the new MBA remains unable to get a top job, being stuck doing office admin and banking crap. Why? Because no one takes this university seriously.

      As you almost catch, it's a facility designed, not for edumacation, but to lend money at high rates.

    2. Re:Low profit? Double the tuition! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's easy to jump on this bandwagon, but there is likely a more direct reason the UofP is in trouble.

      A few months back they had to default on private loans offered by the University to students as they attempted to keep enrollment numbers up in the wake of harder to obtain student loans. When they felt the sting of their own loans defaulting, they tried to hide it by having the University pay the loan payments to prevent default. Then it all fell apart as the SEC investigated them.

      So they probably shutdown their in-house loan origination and the staff needed to support it, along with scaling back their educational staff to match the enrollment drop. In short, they're struggling because they can't keep the bubble from popping, even though they tried to by cooking their books. You won't see me cry a tear for them, they made the bed they are complaining about, and it's time for them to lie in it.

    3. Re:Low profit? Double the tuition! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, it's even worse than that.

      The government guarantees the loans, then allows banks to profit from making them. Student loans make money for the government, but instead we literally pay money to banks to give them the privilege of profiting from our guaranteeing the loans. And nobody notices or cares because our national budgets are never balanced, so what's billions when we have trillions in debt?

      There is no competitive pressure on loan rates or college tuition because every school and bank profits. All industries benefit from students graduating from college with debts. Businesses are thankful for the depressed wages, the competitive job atmosphere, and the inability for people to comfortably move between jobs. Maybe it's good to exist in a system with some pressure toward productivity, but the corrupt banking and financing issues of public and private education needs to be addressed. It's morally objectionable to profit from crime, corruption, and suffering.

    4. Re:Low profit? Double the tuition! by spartacus_prime · · Score: 1

      Technically you can discharge student loans in bankruptcy, but it's a very very difficult thing to do. You pretty much have to be a quadriplegic.

      --
      If you can read this, it means that I bothered to log in.
  3. BS on the Obama comment by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >> Obama administration's push to make community college free top the list of headwinds

    I lean conservative, but I call BS here. Obama's push was dead on arrival and largely forgotten.

    >> And non-profit universities have entered the online education space, where for-profit schools once held center stage.

    I'm not even sure I believe this. To save money and graduate faster, I picked up many of my 100's and 200's via "telecourses" I purchased through my local community college...and that was in the early 1990s.

    1. Re:BS on the Obama comment by Bengie · · Score: 2

      I could see 100s, but not 200s. 100s had a quite a bit of team work, but 200s had even more team work. I didn't go to college to gain knowledge, I went to get educated. As a teacher so eloquently put it, anyone with internet access has access to more knowledge than they know what to do with.

    2. Re:BS on the Obama comment by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      I didn't go to college to gain knowledge, I went to get educated. As a teacher so eloquently put it, anyone with internet access has access to more knowledge than they know what to do with.

      I agree. However, the knowledge you gained from the Internet may or may not be correct though...

    3. Re:BS on the Obama comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      " I went to get educated."

      So, then you failed.

      "Went to get an education"
      "Went for an education"
      "Went to be educated".

      Pick one.

      "Get" is a verb. "Educated" is also verb. Proper simple sentence structure is Subject-Verb-Object , not Subject-Verb-Verb

      So you are essentially saying you "went to get gotten", which you evidently were.

      Pedantic, I know, but anyone throwing around smack about how smart they are should know better.

    4. Re:BS on the Obama comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a teacher so eloquently put it, anyone with internet access has access to more knowledge than they know what to do with.

      As I so eloquently put it, fuckety fuck fuck fuck! fuck my face!

    5. Re:BS on the Obama comment by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      " I went to get educated."

      So, then you failed.

      "Went to get an education" "Went for an education" "Went to be educated".

      Pick one.

      "Get" is a verb. "Educated" is also verb. Proper simple sentence structure is Subject-Verb-Object , not Subject-Verb-Verb

      So you are essentially saying you "went to get gotten", which you evidently were.

      Pedantic, I know, but anyone throwing around smack about how smart they are should know better.

      Educated is also an adjective, as in "an educated person". "I became [adjective]" is a valid sentence with valid structure and "get" in the sense of the GP is a colloqial form of "become". You can "get taller", "get fatter", "get healtier". And, as I have just shown, even pedants can "get educated".

      Just look at the second example here.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    6. Re:BS on the Obama comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "colloqial" [sic]

      Holy Hell. If you are going to respond to a post about grammar, at least pay attention to your spell checker. It's "colloquial".

      Definition:
      Bad Grammar used so many times, educated people give up trying to correct it.

      So all you are saying is that because enough people use incorrect grammar, it's OK to use it yourself while at the same time proclaiming "I R Smart".

      Also, These verbs are "stative" verbs, which express a state or change of state, not "dynamic" verbs which express an action.

      "Get" is not a "stative" verb.

      "[g]et educated" is unquestionably bad grammar.

      Point to pedant.

    7. Re:BS on the Obama comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could see 100s, but not 200s. 100s had a quite a bit of team work, but 200s had even more team work. I didn't go to college to gain knowledge, I went to get educated. As a teacher so eloquently put it, anyone with internet access has access to more knowledge than they know what to do with.

      s/educated/schooled/g

    8. Re:BS on the Obama comment by operagost · · Score: 1

      Obama just brought it up again this year. It's not forgotten.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    9. Re:BS on the Obama comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah? But my shlong is bigger!

    10. Re:BS on the Obama comment by seyyah · · Score: 1

      "Get" is a verb. "Educated" is also verb. Proper simple sentence structure is Subject-Verb-Object [about.com], not Subject-Verb-Verb

      Educated is an adjective you moron. Just like bored, it is formed from the past participle of a verb.

  4. adjective choice by fche · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One wonders whether it's the "for-profit" nature of the institution, or its "lack of government subsidy" that puts it at relative risk.

    1. Re:adjective choice by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      I presume the "for-profit" is actually related to their IRS status and not their overall financial goals. Most colleges are (IRS recognized) non-profits, though they pay high-6 and 7 figure salaries to top officers and have endowments in the billions.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:adjective choice by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      That is a general argument against most not-for-profit organizations. Because they NFP do seem to spend a lot of time and resources towards collecting money, and investing their "Excess Revenue" into sources where they can bring in more revenue.

      For Not for profits do have to deal with being under a fine tooth comb and do not enjoy the same freedoms a for-profit will.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:adjective choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      investing their "Excess Revenue" into sources where they can bring in more revenue

      Which is how for-profits work, except that for-profits do so after the dividend receivers have taken their skim from the top. That even includes the companies that hold billions of dollars in reserve, just in case some tasty startup comes along that they need to buy in order to bring in more revenue.

    4. Re:adjective choice by ranton · · Score: 1

      One wonders whether it's the "for-profit" nature of the institution, or its "lack of government subsidy" that puts it at relative risk.

      It is neither, UoP is at relative risk because it provides little to no value to students. The only value it provides is giving a degree that can pass through an HR filter, and this usually only works when the filter doesn't pay attention to the institution name. Anyone willing to hire a UoP graduate is likely willing to hire someone without a degree as well.

      The majority of government subsidies all private colleges receive today are in the form of government backed student loans. This is probably the majority of subsidies for public schools at this point as well. So UoP receives plenty of government subsidies. They price their classes so around 95% of the tuition can be paid with Stafford loans. They even do tricks like filing for student loans more frequently than once a year to get more money from the government (not sure why this works, but it does).

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    5. Re:adjective choice by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      for-profits either have owners (if they are private) or shareholders (if they are public) who expect a return on their investment each quarter. so for-profits make short term decisions to maximize profits. Non-profits don't have this pressure, so they can make decisions that are in the best interests of the institution and possibly the students.

    6. Re:adjective choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since the recent proliferation of for-profit schooling, evidence on this is emerging, and it doesn't look for for the for-profits. It looks like they actually do a worse job of educating people as a result of their profit motive.

    7. Re:adjective choice by jbengt · · Score: 1

      I do not believe that most colleges have endowments "in the billions". Many have less than one billion.

    8. Re:adjective choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ... speaking as someone who works in higher ed I have to take exception with your last statement. The non-profits may not have the same pressure, but the (big money) decisions are made to benefit the administration, not the institution and never the students. They couldn't care less about the students, other than the enrollment number. And if that isn't what they want they flounder. Anything from "must pass everyone" pressure on the academics to creative statistics "year-on-year we have more students due to shuffling reporting categories so the one that is looked at has more" to activity that has no relationship to, or bearing on, enrollment.

      Very expensive single sourced project that was not run through procedures? (Kickbacks all around) Someone quietly quit and there was no investigation.

      Rampant, large scale fraud by the chancellor? He gets paid a large severance package and goes to work for a university in another state.

      Screw up financial aid processing so that almost no student gets money forcing a huge drop out rate? Just water under the bridge, nothing to worry about (that one lost a few thousand students, but when your student body is 30,000 who really cares about 10% going missing? Obviously not them).

      This happens on the large scales mentioned above, and smaller scales as well. Why spend $5,000 on an unmandated project when you can spend $50,000 and be wined-and-dined by a vendor? If at all possible, spend $5,000 on a system that you will *never* use -- because the money is being spent on *you* is what is important. I once knew an administrator who held *three* positions at the same university, with salary, equipment and office space for each position.

      There is so much waste and graft in higher education it is alarming, and only overwhelmed by the significantly higher corruption in state government and corporations (which I could elaborate on, but this article is about higher ed).

      Yeah, I didn't name any names. But enough details there that someone in the right region might well recognize them. Unless, of course, it is even *more* widespread than I realize and it just fits *everywhere*.

    9. Re:adjective choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's scary is that University of Phoenix is one of the better for-profit schools. There are complete shitholes like ITT tech and others that exist solely to get those precious government-guaranteed loan. If the student defaults, the institution isn't on the hook. The government and the student are.

      I'm extraordinarily right-wing, but we should probably cut back on the for-profit college companies. Some of them will survive. They haven't been completely useless. My understanding is that the 3D modeling/artistry industry (using Maya 3D and whatnot) for movies/video games was basically powered by these for-profit companies. Public institutions were a bit slow to realize there was a demand for those skills.

      Public colleges/universities need to cutback on their tuition hikes as well. They apparently have been using tuition to increase their prestige as opposed to educating their students. They could also drop some dead weight programs (like ethnic and gender studies courses).

    10. Re:adjective choice by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I can not speak for most but MIT's endowment was over 12 billion last year. I do not recall how much over 12 billion it was but it was over that. They still wanted money.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    11. Re:adjective choice by fche · · Score: 1

      "If the student defaults, the institution isn't on the hook."

      Well sure, the institution has delivered what it agreed to. The loan was not from the institution but from a bank - or the feds, with their own perverse incentives.

      "we should probably cut back on the for-profit college companies"

      What, by outlawing them? No, even those people involved should be free to pursue their happiness.

  5. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Phoenix and other for profit schools are nothing more than diploma mills. They need to die.

    1. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agree. Any employer who sees the name "University of Phoenix," or "Devry," or "ITT" etc. on a resume is going to throw that shit right in the trash.

    2. Re:Good by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      State universities are normally funded from a different source and are less dependent on students' money.

    3. Re:Good by ranton · · Score: 2

      Phoenix and other for profit schools are nothing more than diploma mills. They need to die.

      And this is different from state run schools how?

      If you actually attended both UoP and any state school, you would understand the difference. I already was self educated so the lack of rigor wasn't a problem (I literally just needed the piece of paper / diploma), but it was truly a waste of time for anyone trying to learn a trade.

      To put it in context, here are the 5 assignments I had in my second semester SQL class at UoP. They constituted almost 100% of the grade (the rest was just participation in forums). One assignment was due each week of the 5 week class.

      1) Create a database (literally just a CREATE DATABASE command).
      2) Create three tables
      3) Create foreign key relationships between the tables
      4) Populate the tables with data from a CSV file
      5) Create a report listing the data ina tabular format

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    4. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      To put it in context, here are the 5 assignments I had in my second semester SQL class at UoP. They constituted almost 100% of the grade (the rest was just participation in forums). One assignment was due each week of the 5 week class.

      1) Create a database (literally just a CREATE DATABASE command).
      2) Create three tables
      3) Create foreign key relationships between the tables
      4) Populate the tables with data from a CSV file
      5) Create a report listing the data ina tabular format

      And the sad part is that most of the students probably still had to cheat.

    5. Re:Good by Bengie · · Score: 1

      That's sad for a "University" to have such low quality database classes. In my first semester we didn't even touch SQL until we spent two weeks starting with Set Theory and working into other concepts of how databases work. By second semester we were learning how to profile queries to make decisions on how and when to create indexes, then covered how we could have better designed the database.

      I wandered into my professor's room one day to ask him about his thoughts about World of Wacraft's database. He told me one of his students helped design that custom database and he started going over a lot of the kinds of issues huge high transaction databases can have. He was used to teaching graduate students who specialized in databases.

      Over all, I probably learned more out of class talking with my teachers about what we learned in class.

    6. Re:Good by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Wow that is a very low bar. I felt somewhat cheated when I took this course at the local technical college as I thought they were going to go really in depth but didn't. Not really knowing much about DB other than the high level stuff and how to write a simple dumb query that pisses off DBAs I did get something out of it but wanted more.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    7. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, they give no credit for on-the-job experience just because they saw one of these names on the resume?

    8. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes. You're better off with *just* the experience. Putting one of these "colleges" on your resume is a big red flag.

  6. They needed 900 people to print out fake diplomas? by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Funny

    Couldn't they just go to Kinkos?

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  7. U of P's post-graduation job placement rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just took a big hit.

  8. They can't fire me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have tenure!

    .

  9. A corrupt company stuggling. Boo hoo. by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The struggles facing for-profit colleges continue. The University of Phoenix announced poor quarterly earnings yesterday

    Cry me a river. These are companies that prey on people who are financially unsophisticated and often have no business being in college. (No disrespect intended but not everyone is college material or is ready for it even if they are) They push huge amounts of debt on people ill prepared to deal with it and provide a shoddy facsimile of an education. No employer is impressed by a degree from these degree factories because they know the "schools" are third rate at best.

  10. Good. by rogoshen1 · · Score: 2

    These universities only exist to suck money from the department of education, and have nothing to do with actually educating or producing people with skills.

    (traditional schools and their palatial grounds and constant build projects are an entirely different topi.)

    1. Re:Good. by BVis · · Score: 2

      Traditional schools have the problem that they still think employers want workers who are well grounded in theory. Current employers want cogs that can be shoved into an organization and start making them money immediately; there's no room for the big picture. What employers want is fresh graduates with 3 years' experience that they can't get while they're in school; at the very least they need practical, marketable skills. Going to college and getting a bachelors' degree used to be about getting educated. Now it's about keeping employers from shitcanning your resume immediately because you don't have a degree. At least the for-profits talked about job placement rates (even though they were pretty much making them up). Try finding out what your state university's graduate job placement rate is. And then ask if they count Starbucks as getting a job.

      When I was a senior I went to our "career center". I got handed a newspaper with job listings (yes I'm old) and told "Yeah the job market sucks, sorry." Not a single fuck given, they had my money already.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    2. Re:Good. by hendrips · · Score: 1

      Traditional schools have the problem that they still think employers want workers who are well grounded in theory.

      In my experience, universities (at least, the better universities) do not think this. Rather, they are pretty well aware what employers want, but they don't cater to it because they are not vocational training schools. I think they have a reasonable point; it is the employers' fault for demanding unnecessary liberal arts degrees, not Harvard's fault for refusing to turn into a vo-tech.

    3. Re:Good. by Bengie · · Score: 1

      If you were that concerned about if you'll get a job immediately after school, why not pick a degree with a proven track record of job availability?

    4. Re:Good. by BVis · · Score: 1

      Of course it's the employers' fault, that I think goes without saying. But, until people stop needing jobs, they hold all the cards and can do pretty much whatever the fuck they want.

      So, universities will continue to crank out students that aren't employable, and employers will be able to whine about no qualified graduates.

      Harvard is a bad example IMHO. When you get a degree from Harvard, it's not the diploma or the education that matter, it's the network. It's the brand. Put "Harvard" on your resume and not a lot else matters.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    5. Re:Good. by BVis · · Score: 1

      Such as...

      Seriously, even STEM graduates can't find jobs these days. Employers whine about a shortage of STEM workers, but it's demonstrably not true. Schools are putting out twice as many STEM grads as there are job openings. What the employers really want is cheap foreign workers, or to pay STEM grads about half what they should get and make them do the work of four people.

      No, the only degree with a "proven track record of job availability" is Time Travel Engineering, which allows you to get the 3 years' experience that you need these days for an entry-level, "new grad" job.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    6. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmmm... are you 20 years old? Never been around a university? Or at least not for any length of time?

      I grew up in a college town so maybe I have more exposure to this than is typical, but only the naive think like you do. I have in fact known people to do that. Sometimes for the first degree, sometimes for a second. Here's the basic problem with it: the time from when you start on the degree program to when you get your degree is at least two years, and possibly five (talking undergraduate). A lot can happen in two years. Like a lot of other people thinking, "gee, ee's get job offers for good money on graduation day" -- and in a year or two the market is saturated and by the time you graduate it is glutted and *no one* without ten or more years of experience can get a job.

      That's also not accounting for the "you may want the pay, but can you do the job" aspect. Ever look at the rates of people who start pre-law or pre-med and actually get the lawyer or medical degree? It isn't just expensive, its grueling, expensive, and not everyone has what it takes to do. That isn't knocking them, its just a fact that your little snow flake self is not going to be good at whatever you set out to do, no matter what your parents told you.

    7. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what ? there are dozens of sr level engineering positions in my city. i just negotiated a 16.4% salary raise due to the proliferation of awesome high paying jobs

  11. Rumors and whisperings by BForrester · · Score: 1

    I don't want to defame UoP, so I'll say that I've heard from a large number of sources that this institution has come to represent everything wrong with for-profit education, i.e. complete lack of quality in offerings leading to useless certifications, watered-down assessments so that "everyone passes," and shady applications and loan-mongering to skim the most revenue possible from unaware students.

    Now that community and mainstream colleges are legitimately coming on board with better online offerings, it couldn't be that UoP is being squeezed out by the competition? ...or so I've heard.

    1. Re:Rumors and whisperings by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      I don't want to defame UoP, so I'll say that I've heard from a large number of sources that this institution has come to represent everything wrong with for-profit education, i.e. complete lack of quality in offerings leading to useless certifications, watered-down assessments so that "everyone passes," and shady applications and loan-mongering to skim the most revenue possible from unaware students.

      Now that community and mainstream colleges are legitimately coming on board with better online offerings, it couldn't be that UoP is being squeezed out by the competition? ...or so I've heard.

      Yeah - but.. if they had a football team they'd be making millions.

      Go doggies! (one of you is destined to become Governor)

    2. Re:Rumors and whisperings by ranton · · Score: 2

      As someone who did attend, you are correct that the degrees given by UoP are worthless as anything but a way to get past HR resume filters.

      I had no other option in 2009 other than an online degree because I needed to work full time. Standard brick and mortar schools didn't offer online or night school BS programs in anything but a handful of degrees (oddly enough none of them IT related). Today that is no longer the case, so there really is no reason to attend UoP anymore. They simply prey on people with underhanded recruiting, and the world will be a better place when the school is just shut down.

      They offered a much needed service 5 years ago because no worthwhile schools were doing it. I was already self taught so I didn't need an education; I just needed a degree. I also decided to get a Masters degree from a real school (plenty of colleges offer good nigh and weekend MS degrees) so I no longer even mention UoP on my resume.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    3. Re:Rumors and whisperings by Bengie · · Score: 1

      I had no other option in 2009 other than an online degree because I needed to work full time.

      A failing of society. Around here, non-trad students with no degrees get paid to go to a State University. I first found out about this when a 30 year old father of two children was going to class full time and working part-time told me the state was paying him just enough to keep going to school and keep his home.

    4. Re:Rumors and whisperings by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Hmm... Maybe they should have one of those fantasy football teams?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    5. Re:Rumors and whisperings by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      Hmm... Maybe they should have one of those fantasy football teams?

      Too late - they just laid off the coach.

  12. I wouldn't hire anyone with a U. of Phoenix degree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It screams "Hey! I'm a moron!"

  13. College != Jobs by jellomizer · · Score: 3

    The problem in the US is the impression You go to School then you go to College with the college degree you can get a good job.
    The marketing for the the For Profit takes advantage of this, and tries to make a Job focuses curriculum. But because employers are expecting a college degree, there is a bunch of other classes and stuff that is needed to take, which overall doesn't help out that much.
    The traditional colleges, may have their marketing team say this will get you a good job, once you get into the school it is the impression "College is for learning, not job training"

    The real solution is to give a better status of vocational training. So someone who wants a job in a particular field can get job training for that field. It isn't necessary for a Computer Science Degree to be a programmer. Also a Computer Science Degree shouldn't need to focus so much on programming, but more on the abstract concepts, that we normally wont get to until grad school.

    College should be for learning. We should have a better quality and more positive few towards vocational schools for the Job training.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:College != Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo. In the 1980s, you could go to college, any major, and find a job. This persisted until 2000, where you had to have a relevant major. After 2008, college only means anything for government or established companies using it as a filter.

      I graduated in December of 2008, and now, am doing OK, but the places I had lined up either went into freezes, got bought out, or just went out of business. At the job fair, there was just one, and only one place looking for CS grads. The Army recruiter, and the only MOS he was offering was 11X, as all others were supposedly full.

      All and all, nobody held a gun to my head and forced me to finish up school with student loan debt, but there was a big paradigm shift from college being part of the rite of passage to a job that wasn't a McJob (because it showed a person could toe the line and deal with classes that were uninteresting)... to college being absolutely worthless other than a checkbox.

      Would I recommend college? No. I was doing far better before I took a break and got my degree, because I didn't have student loan payments, and student loans shit on your credit rating even if not delinquent.

      The only exception would be medical or law school. Those are professions, and there is no such thing as an unemployed lawyer, so if one does gets a J. D., or a M. D., it is a lifetime meal ticket. However, anything else... not worth the bother, and the student loan debt, combined with ever inflating books and tuition prices make it consigning to indentured servitude... or a life of being a mendicant.

      tl;dr... Fuck college. Get certs, and perhaps go into a tradeskill vocation.

    2. Re:College != Jobs by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The State of Utah did this back in 2000 -ish, by converting their technical (ATE) schools into campuses for the then newly-formed Utah College of Applied Technology. UCAT is fully accredited and on the state Board of Regents, but focused exclusively on 2-year Associates' degrees in vocational fields - CompSci (basically programming and systems/network administration), Nursing (up to RN licensing), Diesel Mechanics, Culinary Arts, a basic Business degree, CAD/CAM, and even a Cosmetology certificate (and subsequent state license).

      You could then take that AAT degree, and convert it to a 4-year degree at any Utah state college (in fact, each UCAT campus was partnered with the nearest state college - The campus I taught at was allied with Weber State University in Ogden, and I was considered to be faculty and taught a few courses there, albeit while still on the UCAT payroll).

      The cool part was that high school students could attend as early as their Junior year, and could, if they applied themselves, have a 2-year degree less than 6 months after graduating high school - all on the government dime, gratis. The classrooms were a mixture of AP-level high school kids and adults, and held day and evening courses.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    3. Re:College != Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only exception would be medical or law school. Those are professions, and there is no such thing as an unemployed lawyer, so if one does gets a J. D., or a M. D., it is a lifetime meal ticket.

      MD is because the number of new doctors is limited by the number of med school spots--there aren't that many. The AMA has not actively pushed for more medical schools because the situation they have is perfect for their constituency: get an MD, and you *are* guaranteed a job for life as long as you don't malpractice your way out of it.

      Lawyers....well, there are a lot of unemployed or underemployed lawyers. Most don't make that much money because most lawyers go to night school classes. Much like medical school, there's a small number of top programs at big name universities whose graduates will life the high life, but for every one of those, there's two dozen night schools willing to let people live their dream of getting a JD, even though that JD is roughly on par with a UoP BS in the law world. But the costs are just as high so it's a really bad ROI for most people.

      Oh, and then the school stats say "99.9% are still employed after 5 years!" except that they could *any* job. Notice they don't say "99.9% are practicing law at great firms" because a number of law school grads are working menial jobs next to the liberal arts PhDs.

    4. Re:College != Jobs by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      This sounds not so different from one of the public university systems here in Minnesota. The MNSCU system is comprised of the state colleges (technical and community) that offer various trades and associates degrees and then a number of Universities offering bachelors, masters, and doctoral degrees. The credits all transfer easily between one of these schools and another. I have a cousin who took advantage of post secondary program for MN high school students and entered college as junior but ended up getting shipped to Iraq with the national guard for a year. He managed to complete his degree in 2 years once he got back and didn't have to shell out any money for it.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  14. College is to get a diploma. Education is a bonus by sjbe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I didn't go to college to gain knowledge, I went to get educated.

    Let's be honest. You (and I) went to get a diploma and you hoped to learn some hopefully useful stuff along the way. I actually work in the field my degrees are in and I use only a tiny fraction of what they taught. Did they teach me how to think? Debatable. How to work? Already had that before I got to college. Impart some knowledge? Some though not always what I really needed and frequently stuff that was pointless or trivial. Not saying it was a complete waste of time (it wasn't) but calling it "getting educated" versus "gaining knowledge" misses the mark.

    No, I went to college to get a diploma so I could get considered for jobs. Fortunately I learned some neat stuff along the way but the cost/benefit for what I got beyond the diploma was WAY out of whack. Seven years of classes for me and over $100K in debt is pretty stiff given that the stuff you really are going to need when you get out you'll mostly learn on the job anyway. Take away the diploma and the doors that opens and it really would not have been worth it.

    As a teacher so eloquently put it, anyone with internet access has access to more knowledge than they know what to do with.

    I prefer the one I heard which was "Don't confuse your schooling with your education". I learned more from projects outside of class that I never got a single credit-hour for than from all my formal classes combined. I worked through college and I guarantee you I learned more from the jobs than from the classes.

  15. Re:I wouldn't hire anyone with a U. of Phoenix deg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It screams "Hey! I'm a moron!"

    Or, Hey, I got my degree overseas while in the military in 90s.

  16. Re:Just to be Clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Close... Money only spent on institutions that have union employees who have their union dues given to the DNC whether they want it or not.

    You will also notice the $1Trillion spent on "shovel ready jobs" mostly went to other union workers in a DNC money laundering scheme.

  17. Re:A corrupt company stuggling. Boo hoo. by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 1

    The struggles facing for-profit colleges continue. The University of Phoenix announced poor quarterly earnings yesterday

    Cry me a river. These are companies that prey on people who are financially unsophisticated and often have no business being in college. (No disrespect intended but not everyone is college material or is ready for it even if they are) They push huge amounts of debt on people ill prepared to deal with it and provide a shoddy facsimile of an education. No employer is impressed by a degree from these degree factories because they know the "schools" are third rate at best.

    Way to paint the whole group with the same brush. That's ALWAYS the best path to the truth.

  18. Re:I wouldn't hire anyone with a U. of Phoenix deg by ranton · · Score: 1

    [Have a UoP degree] screams "Hey! I'm a moron!"

    UoP degree holding candidates should simply be treated the same as self taught candidates. Up until recently there were no other options to get BS degrees online or at night school for the vast majority of majors, so students were forced to attend diploma mills like UoP or Devry. To get past HR filters schools like UoP were the only choice for many people.

    I got my BS degree from UoP for these very reasons, but I followed it up with a MS degree from a real school. Even the MS degree wasn't that useful for someone self-taught and motivated (I could have taught all but 3 of my 13 classes), but I knew I wouldn't want UoP on my resume in the future because of employers that would just black ball me.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  19. Re:College is to get a diploma. Education is a bon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I went to college because it was what people do.

    But I think you're missing the main use of getting educated in a classroom vs. reading books or websites. That is, that you have someone to critique your work. That's largely what we pay professors and TAs for.

    Also, grad school really did teach me how to think. (I studied linguistics.) My approach to examining arguments, criticizing them and learning from them grew immensely from that experience. Maybe I would have learned that anyway, but I'm not sure.

  20. For-profit versus non-profit by sjbe · · Score: 2

    I presume the "for-profit" is actually related to their IRS status and not their overall financial goals.

    For-Profit means that the organization has shareholders and any profits can be distributed without regard to the mission of the organization.

    Most colleges are (IRS recognized) non-profits, though they pay high-6 and 7 figure salaries to top officers and have endowments in the billions.

    Non profit doesn't mean they don't make a profit. It means they don't distribute their surplus revenues (basically profit) to shareholders but rather put those surplus revenues back into the organization's mission.

    1. Re:For-profit versus non-profit by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      Or hoard it for the rainy day that will never come because they can lobby for government handouts far better than the for-profits simply because the are non-profits and "profits" are evil in our society now.

  21. Re:A corrupt company stuggling. Boo hoo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    University of Phoenix once offered me a part time position teaching an online Statistics course. I have no background in Statistics and told them so. No problem, they said, as they'd give me the course materials.

    They wanted to pay be $500 for a one term (semester?) course with 40 people in it. I don't remember what the students were paying, but I do remember that what they were offering me was only a teensy tiny part of it.

    They also informed me that I could not fail anyone, nor could I give less than a B to more than 10% of the students, and no less than an A to 70% of the students.

    I passed and now consider UOP degrees to be worth the paper they're printed on and not much else.

  22. Re:A corrupt company stuggling. Boo hoo. by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Exactly!

    Not that many of the "not for profit" colleges aren't guilty too. But most of these for-profit colleges just don't provide much value to the students. Years ago, my ex-wife attended ITT Tech for a while, thinking she wanted to go into Electrical Engineering. The whole thing was a disaster. She wound up hugely in debt after only a couple of semesters, and eventually decided the program wasn't for her. Then, she realized the credits earned there were basically worthless, trying to transfer them elsewhere. So it was just thousands and thousands of dollars down the drain.

    (I did get a nifty cardboard box full of various resistors, capacitors and transistors though.... I think she was required to pay for that as "school supplies" for one of the courses.)

    And more recently, it's been my experience that the for-profit online universities are pathetic. Many of them use proprietary software which is clunky and not user-friendly at all to the students. There are a few standard packages out there that work pretty well for running an online university, but the for-profits tend not to want to invest in them, since they "saved money" using whatever junk they've held onto over the years.

  23. Paperwork burden by sjbe · · Score: 1

    For Not for profits do have to deal with being under a fine tooth comb and do not enjoy the same freedoms a for-profit will.

    I've been on the board of directors of several 501C3 non-profits. I also am an accountant specializing in corporate finance. I assure you that in general the paperwork burden for most non-profits is less than or no worse than that for corporations. In my experience it's generally been much less especially if the non-profit is quite small. For a large non-profit it's generally comparable to a for-profit business of similar size.

  24. False "facts" by sjbe · · Score: 1

    However, the knowledge you gained from the Internet may or may not be correct though...

    I think it is probably comparable to the accuracy level you'll get from a lot of teachers. I couldn't begin to enumerate the number of bogus "facts" I heard from teachers over the years.

    1. Re:False "facts" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      right, so the value is instruction in how to think.

  25. Re:A corrupt company stuggling. Boo hoo. by ultranova · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No employer is impressed by a degree from these degree factories because they know the "schools" are third rate at best.

    To be fair, most employers are also third rate at best and will end up staffed with third-rate employees because first-grade ones require first-grade pay and job. It's the pathological refusal to admit mediocrity is okay that causes the whole student debt crisis, since companies dream of being the next Google without any intent to invest anything towards that. It also leads to a cynical workforce that ignores even sensible corporate policies due to having witnessed megalomania and utter disconnect from reality too often.

    Work all too often resembles an absurd farce where everyone lies, everyone knows everyone lies, everyone knows that everyone knows that everyone lies, and so on (my personal pet peeve is "zero incidence culture", where no incident is acceptable, thus people wait until work is finished before going to see a doctor if they get hurt to avoid getting punished for costing management their safety bonuses, leading to more sick days and sometimes mortal danger). They go through the motions anyway, since it's a kind of ritual meant to give something that theoretically exists only as legal fiction a palpable presence. The problem is, that presence is all too often heavy and oppressive, a kind of vampire sucking life out of its victims to sustain its own.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  26. Re:I wouldn't hire anyone with a U. of Phoenix deg by LinuxFreakus · · Score: 1

    Pretty much all colleges are a joke these days. I would never just assume anyone knows stuff because they have that piece of paper. Grade inflation is ridiculous, you cannot tell from GPA who actually knows the stuff vs who whined and complained to the professors in order to get the same A as the people who actually know it. College is necessary for some careers because you simply cannot get around medical degrees, law degrees, etc.... but a large number of people waste a lot of time and money on stuff they could teach themselves.

  27. Show me a counter example by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Way to paint the whole group with the same brush. That's ALWAYS the best path to the truth.

    Point me at an example of a for-profit school that is not a good approximation of my description of them. Perhaps there is some for-profit college that is doing a spectacular job but I've certainly never heard of one.

    I've actually lectured at several of them so I'm speaking from direct experience. I've also as an employer seen the quality of graduates they generally produce during the hiring process and let's just say I'm not impressed.

    1. Re:Show me a counter example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'll take a generation to get online education up to snuff, getting the curricula, controls, and individualized instruction in place. Twenty years from now, people will wonder why it took so long.

      Someone has to start, though. Television programming was probably pretty sad for a few decades after TV was invented. That's not necessarily any more corrupt than the folks who run Uber and AirBnb, for instance.

    2. Re:Show me a counter example by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 1

      The University of Phoenix is a direct counter-example. I'm also speaking from direct experience, having taken classes at half a dozen different public, private and for-profit universities, and having been in charge of hiring. Phoenix's education sucks - but it's better than the majority of the public universities out there that aren't at the top end of the spectrum.

      It doesn't matter whether you are impressed, it matters if they are providing an education at least as good as their peers, in this context.

  28. Re:A corrupt company stuggling. Boo hoo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many "students" of UoP are already graduates. They use it to get a second degree or MBA to change career. Both are generally worthless due to the nature of degrees by mail establishments. But not worthless to those lending tuition fees. Basically, what UoP exists for.

  29. Re:A corrupt company stuggling. Boo hoo. by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    Exactly!

    Not that many of the "not for profit" colleges aren't guilty too. But most of these for-profit colleges just don't provide much value to the students. Years ago, my ex-wife attended ITT Tech for a while, thinking she wanted to go into Electrical Engineering. The whole thing was a disaster. She wound up hugely in debt after only a couple of semesters, and eventually decided the program wasn't for her. Then, she realized the credits earned there were basically worthless, trying to transfer them elsewhere. So it was just thousands and thousands of dollars down the drain.

    In their defense, they do now point out that "not all credits may transfer". To me this is just a red flag that no other school considers their classes as worth anything.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  30. Maybe the laid off workers need a better education by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

    I know a place where they can get one.

  31. Re:I wouldn't hire anyone with a U. of Phoenix deg by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

    College degrees definitely don;t mean what they used to, but there is no way I'm hiring a structural engineer with no degree (i.e. because degrees are a joke).

  32. No excuse for fraud by sjbe · · Score: 2

    It'll take a generation to get online education up to snuff, getting the curricula, controls, and individualized instruction in place.

    Fine. Let's assume that is true even though I don't really buy that argument. That still is no excuse for scamming a bunch of people into taking on crushing debt while providing no meaningful education nor a credible diploma from a respected institution. Hell, many of them aren't even accredited. Even if they haven't figured all the details out that is NO excuse for the fraud that these institutions are committing on thousands of people.

  33. Too many out of work people with degrees by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    The big universities can't even claim to get you work with a degree so why would you slap down that kind of money for a degree from what most consider an over priced diploma mill?

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  34. Re:Just to be Clear... by rahvin112 · · Score: 4, Informative

    These private collages, such as university of phoenix, result in 90% of the student loan defaults while they service less than 10% of students. That staggering percentage is why the Government is going after these institutions. There are MANY private schools that aren't targeted because they don't have these problems.

  35. best news in a while.... by iwbcman · · Score: 2

    Hallelujah about friggin time.

    The University of Phoenix and others of it's ilk are the proverbial scum of academia, the quicker they cease to exist the better for us, our culture and our society.

    According to recent reportin (google NPR) UoP, suckered returning GI's from Afghanistan and Iraq out of more than $1,000,000,000.00 in GI benfits yielding a graduation rate of 7.3%! and for those lucky enough to get a "degree" vast numbers had to find out out the hard way that the accreditation that these "degrees" afforded were basically worthless. Spamming millions via email with their scams, hosting events at military bases to "advise" future students of how wonderful their shit is, these parasitic fuckwads have set back the cause of higher education multiple generations. Who amongst us would even council the youth of today to pursue a higher education? Now before you think I am not being fair to the well intentioned souls who work for UoP let me state this: As long as the federal student loan system/GI benefits system are in bed with the major financial institutions, creating a system where the US government earns 9 figure sums per year, while indebting countless millions of people to the tune of $1,000,000,000,000.00 can we really be mad at those capitalist "entrepreneurs" who know how to take advantage of a system designed to fuck millions with permanent indenture while at the same enriching exactly those who least need enrichment in our society?

    Fuck for profit "universities".(*note for-profit != private, other criteria is needed to weed out the parasitic scum from genuine institutions of higher learning )

    Fuck the federal student loan program.

    Fuck the congresscritters responsible for this shit.

    1. Re:best news in a while.... by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      While I agree with the sentiment lets not throw the baby out with the bathwater.

      Fuck the federal student loan program.

      As someone who used student loans (both private and federal) to get a B.S. in CS, the federal student loans were very helpful and were reasonable. Some of these changes had occurred recently, but loans that originated in 2005/6 were eligible of consolidation to take advantage of new government proposals (special loan consolidation in 2011/2012 iirc). These consolidations and proposals that passed lowered interest rates, payback amounts, possible forgiveness, etc. The private student loans however, were malicious. They knew you couldn't bankrupt out of them and they knew you were their bitch. It was one of the greatest days of my life paying those fuckers off.

      The whole point of the student loans is to increase access to higher education, barring shit like UoP, that mission has been a success with record numbers of student enrollment. I would not have been able to get an education without them.

      If there is another way to increase availability to higher education I am all ears. Student loans are not perfect but it's better then not having access to higher education.

  36. Re:I wouldn't hire anyone with a U. of Phoenix deg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or, Hey, I got my degree overseas while in the military in 90s.

    Only if you're a loser. We had access to the University of Maryland everywhere I was stationed.

  37. Re:Maybe the laid off workers need a better educat by anybody_out_there · · Score: 1

    I know a place where they can get one.

    The School of Hard Knocks?

  38. Stanford iTunesU iOS class - FOR FREE by Cutting_Crew · · Score: 1

    A strong example of their downfall are the online courses offered via iTunesU. If you want to be an iOS developer, the fact that you can watch ALL the lectures and get ALL the assignments and then converse with others doing the same thing for help/tips/hints/issues for FREE is astonishing. You don't get Stanford credit but in the end you learn. That's where I got my start.

  39. Re:Just to be Clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, you probably won't spend nearly as much due to financial aid. Sticker price != actual price.

  40. Re:Just to be Clear... by sinij · · Score: 4, Informative

    Private for-profit colleges are welcome to continue to operate in any way or form without getting government hand-outs in form of grants and guaranteed loans. The problem administration is addressing is that of outcomes, and it is equally applicable to any type of college. If the job prospects and earning potential of graduates falls below certain cutoff, then the program is no longer eligible for the taxpayer subsidies. It just happen that 99% of such programs are in for-profit institutions. Why? Because in order to maximize profits, these for profit institutions maximized enrollment and reduced the minimum level of academic accomplishments to gain a degree. This also reduced the value of such degree in the job market.

  41. If community college is free.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If CC is free, why son't we just put people through 16 years of school instead of 12? Wouldn't it make more sense to use the existing infrastructure? The college grads I've been meeting lately are not much more intelligent than the average high schooler.

  42. Re:Just to be Clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you have sources? I'd like to read up on this.

  43. Re:Just to be Clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://mediatrackers.org/wisconsin/2011/06/01/did-80-of-federal-stimulus-funds-go-to-public-unions/

  44. Are Walden and Capella having the same problem? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2

    Is this unique to U of P, or are their competitors having the same problems?

  45. Gravy is running out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Government loans include new requirements which for profit cannot meet. That's pretty much the only reason.

  46. Re:Just to be Clear... by kwbauer · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile the not-for-profit ones continue to grow their endowments unchecked but that isn't considered "profit".

  47. Re:A corrupt company stuggling. Boo hoo. by mcrbids · · Score: 1

    What's sad is that UOP really could have done it! If they offered actual counseling guidance, and curricula that didn't just suck, and made sure that their clients passed classes with rigor, they could have *easily* made a profitable college with good reviews and earned trust.

    Instead, they violated that trust, and probably deserve to be shut down.

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  48. Good, this needs to happen by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    One of the problems with the for-profit college market is that they prey on unsophisticated people. Corinthian Colleges was just forced to shut down by the Dept. of Education because their graduation and employment rates were so abysmal. Unfortunately, they know non-traditional students often see education as the only way out of a bad situation, and know exactly how to take advantage of that.

    A lot of people say it's the fault of the student loan program, but the reality is that these institutions are simply selling an unsophisticated person a dream, and cashing their student loan checks that could have easily gone to a community college or state university for a better result. They also take advantage of former military people separating from service, since they earned partial payment of their education expenses by serving.

    I have never seen anyone with a University of Phoenix degree who I would consider "college educated" simply because the programs they offer don't actually do that. There's plenty of Internet stories about what actually passes for coursework and former instructors talking about how they can't fail anyone and are forced to try to retain students so those loan checks keep coming in.

  49. Re:College is to get a diploma. Education is a bon by houghi · · Score: 2

    If I were a company I would rather hire you with a 100.000USD debt than somebody with a 10.000USD debt. The power I have over you is 10 times that of what I have over the other person.

    That means I can presss much more extra hours out of you without any need to pay for a longer period,while the other person might easily say "Fuck this, I quit."
    This will not work in each an every situation, but in general? Hell yeah!

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  50. Good Riddence! by gabrieltss · · Score: 1

    I went to UOP for 1 year (at the UOP in Denver, CO) - at the time they were the only college I found that had "adult education" curriculum's. Once Regis University came out with their's I dropped UOP like a bad habit! They were a TOTAL waste of my time and $$$! They were forever losing the tuition checks sent to them and always asked me to have the bank re-send them. I took one computer science course where the instructor took the WHOLE class time to talk about his theory about what happened to the Dinosaurs. Seriously? Really? Then I took a project management course with them. The day Columbine happened when I went to class that night, the instructor came in dressed in black pants, black cowboy boots, black shirt and a leather black trench-coat. Everyone in the class was looking at each other like "doesn't this MF know what just happened today?"
    Yeah I would AVOID UOP like the plague!

    --
    The Truth is a Virus!!!
    1. Re:Good Riddence! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yer killin me!

      Well, did he know??

  51. Re:A corrupt company stuggling. Boo hoo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lot's of schools are "not all credits may transfer". in some places it got so bad that laws where passed to say colleges must take Community Colleges credits.

    and it's seems like a profit thing with BS like you must take our math class we are on quarters or semesters and you when to a school that was on quarters or semesters so not all credits will move move over. Your school is too trades based and you need to take a lot of filler / fluff class.

    We need a ged for college or some thing so people can get a gen edu's at the high school / Community Colleges cost levels.

  52. Third world country - that's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too many sub-70 IQ Africans, Mexicans, and other assorted third world scum, corrupt Indians, lying Chinese, etc.etc.

    So good luck with your 'diversity', American cretins...

  53. Garbage Employer as well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a software developer living in Phoenix. Many moons ago I interviewed in person, on site for a development position. A recruiter followed up asking about my salary requests. After providing, I never heard a peep back, not even a simple no thank you. Unprofessional in my opinion.

    I know 2 veterans (One a grade school friend, the other he met in Iraq, serving with the 4th ID) who worked in the department that recruits (well, pressures) veterans to attend using their Vet benefits. They both left after short stints, they weren't willing to perform the job that was expected of them, use their veteran status to convince other vets to attend the over priced school, almost always with loans.

  54. Re:They needed 900 people to print out fake diplom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can't. That's where their graduates are. It'd be awkward...

  55. Re:A corrupt company stuggling. Boo hoo. by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

    What's sad is that UOP really could have done it! If they offered actual counseling guidance, and curricula that didn't just suck, and made sure that their clients passed classes with rigor, they could have *easily* made a profitable college with good reviews and earned trust.

    But....but....that would mean less profit!

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  56. Re:College is to get a diploma. Education is a bon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A significant driver of college attendance was the courts making IQ tests illegal for employment. A diploma is in many cases nothing more than a surrogate for an IQ test.

  57. Re:Just to be Clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Financial aid of $XXXX means the cost of that program just went up $XXXX for everyone. Same as the mortgage and housing industry. A house is not worth what someone is willing to pay for it, it's worth what a bank is willing to lend someone to pay for it. Throw more money at the bidders and the price goes up for everyone, even the prudent who didn't want to take out a loan to do so, since he's now competing against more money.

  58. Re:Just to be Clear... by operagost · · Score: 1

    Can we get the state colleges to stop operating with government hand-outs, too? Penn State has both the highest tuition, and the biggest budget, of any state school. They are a drain on Pennsylvania taxpayers.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  59. community college / hs needs a trades track as wel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    community college / hs needs a pure trades track as well as a mixed trades / more college like track think stuff like IT / programming (does not need the full CS) and the pure college track. Maybe even a law / med school track (just to cut time down they are in school so long that they should cut out 1 year of filler / fluff from there class load)

    I say at the very least move the gen ed that are in to days college in the new system not all tracks need the full load load of to days gen ed's yes some is needed but that base level can be moved to HS / expanded HS / mixed HS / community college. With say expanded gen ed / pure college prep in it's own track.

    Or the extreme plan make 2 years of community college part of today's HS so when you get out you have an AA / AS (old system) or something to be named fitting the new plan. Now after that you can go 2 more years to get that BA / BS (old system) or something to be named fitting the new plan.

    or just start working with skills from electives classes / go to a trade / tech school maybe just 6mo - 1year with them freed from having to tech filler / fluff / gen ed's that they needed to tech as they are roped in to the old system.

    itt vs devry are pulled down as they do a poor job with gen ed's and have to tech filler / fluff classes as part of the degree system.

  60. Re:Just to be Clear... by sinij · · Score: 1

    The same kinds of checks, outcomes, are equally applied to both profit and non-profit institutions. If one kind shit the bed in the name of making profit off government handouts, while another kind still managed to deliver results, how that government fault? Or do you suggest taxpayer money should go out without any kind of checks and balances in place?

  61. Re:Just to be Clear... by sinij · · Score: 2

    How do you propose Pennsylvania compete in the global market in 30 years when % of educated professionals drops through the floor? You do understand how labor markets work, don't you? Silicon Valley exists in California not because they are friendly to corporations or have low taxes out there.

  62. Re:Just to be Clear... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    A diploma from an Ivy League college is valuable. Some people will get the diploma and still screw up, but nothing's perfect.

    It's hard to go hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt at a state school, since they don't typically charge that much. Also, a state institution diploma is worth having, although not as valuable as the Ivy League diploma.

    A diploma from one of the for-profit universities is typically less valuable, and the institution will do its best to get as much money as possible.

    The lesson here is that money should be spent where it gets better value.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  63. Re:Just to be Clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can spend hundreds of thousands at a state or Ivy League college getting a useless degree, have giant debts, end up on food stamps

    You can, but it's highly unlikely you will.

  64. Um... for what jobs? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    See, we're offshoring as fast as we can and when we can't do that we bring in more H1-Bs. Hell, I'm starting to see them in non-technical fields like entry level business analysis.

    The real solution is protectionism and an end to the H1-B visa program so you don't need a 4 year degree to do something that can be learned in an afternoon. As long as companies use that degree qualification as a quick and easy way to get H1-Bs for free you'll have kid's drowning themselves in debt out of desperation.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  65. Re:Just to be Clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you.

  66. Re:Just to be Clear... by operagost · · Score: 1

    Excuse me, but that's a red herring. I didn't suggest getting rid of all state schools, or even Penn State. I'm tired of writing them blank checks.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.