Slashdot Mirror


Han Solo To Get His Own Star Wars Movie Prequel

New submitter alaskana writes: According to Starwars.com, Han Solo will be getting his own movie prequel. The film will purportedly tell the story of a young Han Solo and how he came to be the wily smuggler that shows up in Star Wars: Episode IV A New Hope. The film is set to be directed by Christopher Miller and Phil Lord (of The Lego Movie fame) and written by Lawrence and Jon Kasdan. Get your popcorn and tickets ready, as the movie is set to debut May 25, 2018.

20 of 227 comments (clear)

  1. Fuck That! by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fuck that! I want Jar Jar Binks' background story, and how he came to have the death sentence placed on him by Boss Rugor Nas.

    Can you imagine a movie populated completely by Gungans! Meesah think it vewry vewry good!

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Fuck That! by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Can you imagine a movie populated completely by Gungans! Meesah think it vewry vewry good!

      You forgot c3po and r2d2, who must be in every movie no matter how hard you have to strain.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Fuck That! by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Funny

      Great, so we end up with Darth Binks.

      NOOOOOOOOOO!!!!

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  2. Re:Gov-a-mint by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Funny

    So you're thinking this would be a thinly-veiled allegorical retelling of Ron Paul's life? Maybe it can include a "staffer" writing anti-Wookie rants in Han's newsletter.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  3. Kessel Run by galabar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As long as the have the Kessel Run, we'll all be satisfied.

    1. Re:Kessel Run by harrkev · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Kessel Run was covered in one of the novels. I am guessing that the novels are no longer canon.

      Actually, what IS the story? Supposedly the new movie covers the Solo kids based on what happened in the novels, but the prequals (1-3) totally crapped on the back story of Boba Fett.

      I also saw Chewy, but he died in one of the novels too.

      What is canon and what isn't?

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    2. Re:Kessel Run by grimmjeeper · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I suspect that they'll toss out everything and write a new story. That way you don't have to compensate the authors of the books for their ideas. But that's just the cynic in me speaking.

      I would be surprised, however, if they didn't at least cover Han meeting Chewie and them doing the Kessel Run (completely rewritten, of course). I wonder if, in his new story, he will have been an officer in the Imperial fleet when he rescued Chewie or if they're going to rewrite that too.

      I hope it will be interesting to watch, regardless of what direction they go in.

  4. Han shoots first by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny

    [knock, knock, knock on bathroom door]
    Young Han: Mom! I'm busy! Go away!

    1. Re:Han shoots first by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Funny

      And now you know why his childhood nickname was "Hand Solo".

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  5. Uh-oh by mrsam · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have a bad feeling about this...

    (sorry...)

  6. Re:GRR by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    > When they made Star Wars Episodes 1-3 they sucked, because we had to try to implement a modern style to an old film.

    Hm. And why did we have to do that?

    They sucked for a variety of reasons -- casting, plot, dialog, but they also sucked because there seemed to be a rule that every square inch of screen needed to be squirming with cutesy protoplasm or cutesy robotics. Agreed, the original Star Wars was a 1970's take on 1930's SF serials, but the prequels were... I dunno what. Really expensive self parody, I guess. And not the good kind.

    Ignoring all the other things for a minute, a "style" like the original film -- sparse, concise, with callbacks to older serials but without overdoing it, might have been less unpleasant to watch.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  7. Re:More non-George content? by roc97007 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Put in more little robots! And I want cutesy creatures here, and here, and here and here and here and here and here. The main character has to grab a fruit with his tongue! Kids love that!

    The main character is human, George.

    Well, make him something else then. With a funny accent. Kids love that.

    Shut up, George.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  8. Re:GRR by ubrgeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > When they made Star Wars Episodes 1-3 they sucked, because we had to try to implement a modern style to an old film.

    Wait ... you were able to narrow it down to one reason?

    --
    Bark less. Wag more.
  9. Re:Another one not to watch... by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Funny

    If they were smart, they'd have the character just blowing ten or fifteen creatures away before they had a chance to draw.

    "Han. You're still alive!"

    "I shot first."

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  10. Re:More non-George content? by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Funny

    Make more theme worlds, because apparently the universe is populated by jungle worlds, metal worlds, forest worlds, magma worlds, ice worlds and desert worlds.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  11. Re:More non-George content? by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Point. If Lucas properly understood scale, the entire series could have taken place on one planet.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  12. Re:GRR by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Every time I watch them, I come up with another reason to loathe them. Mind you, it's been about five years since the last viewing of any Star Wars film, so I'll probably have forgotten half the reasons the prequels stunk so very very badly.

    I remember clearly watching The Phantom Menace and realizing the extent of the suckage when C3PO turns out to be Darth Vader's droid. I was still reeling from the midichlorians nonsense, and then that. Of course, by the time pod-racer video game advertisement had taken up most of the second act, I realized that George Lucas wasn't just a greedy bastard, but well and truly had no fucking idea how to make an at least enjoyable film anymore. Two more prequels and the last Indiana Jones movie convinced me that Lucas was done even as an action-adventure director (the latter demonstrated that he had lost even the basic concept of pacing).

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  13. And the Death Star would be what, exactly? by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I sympathise with most Lucas complaints, but this is a pretty weird one. Are you suggesting that, because our particular planet has a lot of diversity (and do I need to point out that pretty much all of the other planets we've discovered are NOT diverse at all?) that all space operas should take place on a single planet? You don't think that might diminish the epicness a tad? You don't think that changing a planet-destroying weapon to, I don't know, a continent-destroying weapon would have been a tad lame?

    The SW universe being too big is not a problem. In fact, its sense of size is one of the biggest things it had going for it, and it is precisely Lucas's unhealthy devotion to self-referential character-recycling smallness that drags things down--the main characters are all laboriously and ridiculously connected/related/cloned so that they are present or connected to all critical characters and all critical plot points. Boba Fett was a neat little background character that developed a strong cult following, so Lucas... decides to make him *the* clone of the mysterious 'clone wars', which is ridiculous from pretty much every single angle except the angle that he gets to prominently include a fan favorite in the prequels.

  14. Re:GRR by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm sorry but the talent that came up with 4-6? Just wasn't there anymore.

    The talent that made 4-6 was Kasdan, even though he wasn't there for 4. What was the best Indy film? The only one Kasdan was involved in. Kasdan is back, and that might just save the franchise.

    Lucas's defence for Crystal Skull was that viewers didn't understand his source material, and that's true, but in a way irrelevant. Lucas grew up reading adventure comics that mixed magic and aliens and mysticism and everything else on a whim -- the legacy of that lives on in Marvel's current cinematic line-up where the god of thunder works alongside a man in a homemade robotic exoskeleton, a WWII hero on steroids and a bloody archer to fight off a menace from another world who have interbred with humans to create an ancient bloodlne of superpowered beings. Head to the comic world and you could even add in a sorcerer and a genetic mutant, then send them all through time to face off against the grandfather of the devil. I like to think of Crystal Skull as the sequel to Temple of Doom. You remember Temple of Doom, right? Using a life-raft as a parachute/sledge combo, a ridiculously twisty mine shaft booby-trapped with an ugly great boulder etc. That wasn't Kasdan -- that was Lucas. What we all rmmber as Indy is Raiders of the lost Ark, where Kasdan really paid homage to the source material while constructing a genuinely good film. Over-the-top Nazis, wisecracks and character interplay, even the scene with the creepy gestapo guy reaching towards the camera after burning his hand -- all pulled straight from pulp comics, and deftly done. Crucially, it kept all the magic and mysticism to the very end, and Jones cynical to the last, so there was some kind of reveal and change. The Last Crusade was a sequel to Raiders, but somewhat formulaic and slightly overplayed. But again, Nazis, and no magic until the end, after facing all sorts of mechanical pseudo-magic.

    So I have some hope for the Star Wars sequels. However, I'm not sure about a Han origin story. Han shot first. Han was rehabilitated by Luke and Leia. So Han should be a bastard, but current Hollywood narratives don't work that way. Now there are goodies and baddies.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  15. Re:GRR by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Lucas was trying to analyse his own writing in a technical way. A New Hope was Hidden Fortress + WWII dogfighting. He tried to make... I don't know, something + Ben Hur chariot racing for EpI. But then he made it very unlike the Ben Hur chariot race. Why was the scene in Ben Hur so powerful? Because it was realistic -- in order to get the riders to take more risks, the stunt director turned it into a real race by offering prize money to the first finisher. Several horses were killed because of that. Yet Lucas went out of his wy to make the pod race entirely unrealistic. All that remained of the chariot theme was the stupid little pods that were tethered in a way vaguely reminiscent of horses. He also managed to tell us that the rebels and the Empire were complete morons for manning their fighter fleets with the species with the worst reactions in the galaxy, a species who can't even win a bloody car race if they're not blessed with a demi-god level of Jedi powers.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'