Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Which Expert Bloggers Do You Read?

An anonymous reader writes: The crush of news sites today is almost overwhelming. For true bits of news — bare facts and alerts that something has happened — it doesn't really matter which site you read it on. Some tiny, no-name website can tell me $company1 bought $company2 just as well as Reuters, CNN, or the NY Times. When it comes to opinion pieces and analysis, though, it's a different story. One of the generalist tech bloggers at the NY Times probably isn't going to have many worthwhile posts comparing database sorting algorithms or explaining the Cassini spacecraft's orbital path or providing soldering techniques for fixing a busted monitor. An example most of us are familiar with: Bruce Schneier generally provides good advice on security and encryption. So: what expert bloggers do you keep tabs on? I'm not looking for any particular posting frequency. This type of person I'm thinking of is probably not a journalist, and may not post very often at all — posting frequency matters far less than the signal-to-noise ratio. My goal is to build a big list of smart people who write interesting things — mainly for topics you'd expect to see on Slashdot, but I'm open to other subjects, as well.

203 comments

  1. DaringFireball by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

    Because really, I need the skinny on bourbon and James Bond. I mean occasionally he writes about Apple and tech, but let's be honest. We're all there for the booze news.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    1. Re:DaringFireball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Writers should be asking the questions that really matter.

      Hasn't someone developed personal and data-farm CPU cooling systems that can switch between "still" (refined alcohol production) and "desal" (fresh water production) modes?

      And why can't some of that "waste heat" go into the water heating systems. Whose writing about the capturing of heat from sewer systems and treatment processes in Japan?

      Why doesn't anyone ask why it is that Japan built great geothermal power generation equipment for the Philippines years ago, but isn't using it much at home? Why isn't anyone writing about the pros and cons of geothermal in California? Current capacity is roughly the same as one atomic plant. Does the elevated pressure trigger too many earthquakes (similar to that seen with some fracking, look at Oklahoma). Are dealing with mineral deposits in the pipes and restricting hydrogen sulfide releases obstacles to viability? More minds would work on improvements if these things get discussed.

      Was the fear drummed up by those doing consulting for things like solar-storm grid impacts mostly to peddle very expensive solutions?

      Why can't college students design simple monitoring equipment (Hall-Effect sensors and maybe some FFT processing routines) that could sense ramping up ground currents long before transformer cores saturate or windings overheat? There's no excuse for fried transformers. And couldn't the same electronics alert plant operators to a possible pending need to reroute or dump a load, and perhaps do a fast ramp-down of output?
      If no one write of these things, how will the many potentially helpful minds out there help us face challenges??

      The people that should be protecting us from security threats seem to be creating them instead.
      (loss of privacy and data security, long term public sector pension debt, pension funding going into the wrong development or funding the buyup of housing, excessive salaries, business majors instead of engineers handling utilities &c &c)

    2. Re:DaringFireball by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      I need the skinny on bourbon and James Bond.

      Huh? Bond drinks vodka martinis. Shaken, not stirred.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    3. Re:DaringFireball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No. The original Bond martini is the one that is in the 2005 Casino Royale, as well as the original book. It is a martini, but much more than just vodka:

      3 parts Gordon's gin
      3 parts grain based vodka, roughly 80 proof
      a cap full (~1 oz) cochi americano or so other clear apertif.

    4. Re: DaringFireball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Part" and "cap full" are not compatible units.

    5. Re:DaringFireball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Expert blogger" is a contradiction of terms. If they were an expert, they wouldn't be just a blogger. Blogging is what amateurs do to try to become real journalists.

    6. Re:DaringFireball by KGIII · · Score: 1

      You know, we are just stacking someone's RSS list so they can aggregate them, put them into HTML format, and make money... We might as well give them just idiots who have blogs.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  2. Daring Fireball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    John Gruber

    1. Re:Daring Fireball by ArhcAngel · · Score: 4, Funny

      Didn't he die in the second Die Hard movie?

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    2. Re:Daring Fireball by ClickOnThis · · Score: 2

      The Gruber brothers were (separately) in the first and third Die Hard movies. They didn't appear in the second. That was the one about mercenaries taking over the Dulles airport.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    3. Re: Daring Fireball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Join Gruber took over the Dulles airport?

    4. Re:Daring Fireball by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      YES! I intentionally put the second JUST so it could get corrected. Nicely done sire. You know your Die Hard.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  3. You Get What You Pay For by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's free, it probably has a corresponding worth.

    1. Re:You Get What You Pay For by Anrego · · Score: 2

      I imagine a lot of people boost their reputation (and thus the money they can make doing speaking engagements / consulting work) by publishing free content. Bruce Schneier comes to mind.

      Then there's people like Raymond Chen, who's blog I read despite that I haven't had much to do with windows in about 10 years.. I just find it interesting and he has a fun writing style.

      And there's always ad revenue. Stuff like eevblog is "free" but he's probably making a bunch of money on ad revenue (as far as I know, eevblog is his full time job).

    2. Re:You Get What You Pay For by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah the NYT has the best bloggers. lol.

  4. Simple: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Most experts don't have the time to write or read blogs based on their work. And if I wanted an explanation of Cassini's current activities I'd just walk down the hall and ask one of the experts myself. ;)

    1. Re:Simple: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm not an expert and even I don't have the time to write about my work. Besides most people who'd find my work interesting probably already know most of what I'd say anyhow.

    2. Re:Simple: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Same here, just different reasons. I have 88 newsfeeds in my RSS reader, I don't read a fucking thing. Max /. comment section for the drama lol...

    3. Re:Simple: I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucky they don't bother walking down the hall and asking you how to be a total fucking prick then, eh?

  5. Was Slashdot by 31415926535897 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It used to be Slashdot. Not sure what this site is anymore, and I'm still looking for a reasonable replacement. I guess a collection of experts would be a decent way to go.

    1. Re:Was Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HN

    2. Re:Was Slashdot by rwa2 · · Score: 2

      http://arstechnica.com/ is pretty good from a tech news coverage perspective. http://theregister.co.uk/ has the nice snarky British humor angle as well.
      http://fark.com/ tends to have pretty great and balanced political discussion and humor.

      For more irreverent/technical discussion threads, though, I'd guess there might be some corner of reddit that could match what we had here on Slashdot... but I haven't redditted much, so someone else will have to guide us.

    3. Re:Was Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ars has about 4 good writers and 40 idiots. It used to be amazing.

    4. Re:Was Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      it's still slashdot. I mean, you just made a post here :D

    5. Re:Was Slashdot by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Fark has become Reddit lite. They went full SJW, removed boobies from the front page, redesigned it, etc.

      With all of the coders on here you'd think someone would figure out a way to update INN to include moderation of some sort. Put a nice web front end on it and make it all open over API/RFC and let other people make your clients.

    6. Re:Was Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9836023

    7. Re:Was Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fark got overran by Obama kids in 2008 and never really recovered.

    8. Re:Was Slashdot by nickweller · · Score: 1

      @31415926535897: "It used to be Slashdot. Not sure what this site is anymore, and I'm still looking for a reasonable replacement. I guess a collection of experts would be a decent way to go."

      How cruel - how true ...

    9. Re:Was Slashdot by Sowelu · · Score: 1

      I got over Fark a long time ago.

    10. Re:Was Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also looking for a replacement. Dicevertisements are only getting worse.

    11. Re:Was Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've tried reading Hacker News, but that site is a little too austere for my tastes. Everything is just a giant wall of text, which makes it tough to read and follow conversations.

    12. Re:Was Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, yeah. I miss the smart, thoughtful, even erudite comments. Now we've got this.

    13. Re:Was Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot is a blog?

    14. Re:Was Slashdot by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Them not wanting to risk alienating 50% of their prospective market just to satisfy a vocal minority of the other 50% seems like common sense, not going "full SJW". "If you want to see tits, go look at porn" seems a rather mature stance to take.

  6. Politics: SCGNews by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    OK, it's a borderline conspiracy theory site, but this guy does a good job analyzing events and media coverage.

    My favorite post is on how he explains US military activity... everything makes much more sense now:
    The Geopolitics of World War III: https://youtu.be/TC3tINgWfQE

    1. Re:Politics: SCGNews by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      Just to give some perspective, every conflict since 1945 has led people to predict that WW3 was about to break out. Also, for as long as I can remember, every conflict in the middle east has spurred predictions of Armageddon and the end of the world.

      The reality is, no one actually cares enough about Syria for it to lead to WW3. It will be resolved similarly to any number of the cold war conflicts, where major powers were on both sides, but neither wanted to escalate.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Politics: SCGNews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Videos aren't blogs.

    3. Re:Politics: SCGNews by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm not worried about WWIII, it just has a pretty good explanation of how much our foreign military intervention is driven by backing the USD with growth in oil/energy since the dollar went off the gold standard.

    4. Re:Politics: SCGNews by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Informative

      Oh, I'm not worried about WWIII, it just has a pretty good explanation of how much our foreign military intervention is driven by backing the USD with growth in oil/energy since the dollar went off the gold standard.

      Never listen to any commentator on that topic if they seem unaware that most US oil consumption is supplied by the US and Canada.

      (Incidentally, Milton Friedman correctly pointed out that the US went off the dollar standard in 1934. The system from then until the Nixon shock was 'gold standard' in name only).

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:Politics: SCGNews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >OK, it's a borderline conspiracy theory site

      Perfect for the /. crowd then, or is it not paranoid enough?

    6. Re:Politics: SCGNews by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      I was going to link the blog site http://scgnews.com/ , but that site appears to have been squatted upon.

    7. Re:Politics: SCGNews by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Oh, here's where it went: http://stormcloudsgathering.co...

    8. Re:Politics: SCGNews by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      Never listen to any commentator on that topic if they seem unaware that most US oil consumption is supplied by the US and Canada.

      +5 I don't get why people don't know or understand this. Maybe they don't want to.

    9. Re:Politics: SCGNews by ArcadeMan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, if you use Canadian oil you'll go from 1 mile per gallon down to 0.425143706 kilometre per liter. Nobody wants that!

    10. Re:Politics: SCGNews by nofx911 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      http://www.npr.org/2012/04/11/...

      For those who do not want to go to the article, where does US oil come from:
          - USA: 38.8%
          - Canada: 15.1%
          - Saudi Arabia: 8.1%
          - Mexico: 7.5%
          - Latin America (other than Mexico/Venezuela): 6.2%
          - Venezuela: 5.9%
          - Nigeria: 5.2%
          - Africa (other than Nigeria): 5.1%
          - Persian Gulf (other than Saudi Arabia): 4.8%
          - Other than above: 3.3%

    11. Re:Politics: SCGNews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except us and canada do not dictate oil prices. we get it there because its close. Not a big mystery or coverup. this does not diminish the importance of middle east oil to the us hegemony or global economy. get with the program.

    12. Re:Politics: SCGNews by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm not worried about WWIII, it just has a pretty good explanation of how much our foreign military intervention is driven by backing the USD with growth in oil/energy since the dollar went off the gold standard.

      Never listen to any commentator on that topic if they seem unaware that most US oil consumption is supplied by the US and Canada.

      Argh, I never listen to any commentator who obviously didn't bother reading the link, but I'll give you a pass since all I could find was the silly youtube video. Here's another post in text form:
      http://stormcloudsgathering.co...

      The point isn't that the US buys foreign oil, the point is that oil is only traded in USD on the world market, and we primarily take military action against countries who dare to try to sell oil to others in their own currency.

      Another good narrative is the "Covert Origins of ISIS", which explains how the media is used to convince democracies to go to war in other countries by vilifying, well, villains that are mostly of our own creation in the first place. So now whenever I hear news about how bad conflicts are in the middle east, instead of worrying about terrorists I'm can be pretty comfortable knowing that things are probably going exactly as planned.

    13. Re:Politics: SCGNews by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Argh, I never listen to any commentator who obviously didn't bother reading the link, but I'll give you a pass since all I could find was the silly youtube video. Here's another post in text form:

      Thanks, I'd tried to find a transcript but couldn't

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    14. Re:Politics: SCGNews by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      The petrodollar conspiracy became popular in 2005 as Iran started to open the Iranian Oil Bourse, and as people didn't understand why Iraq had been invaded.

      Certainly oil is an important resource, but understanding foreign policy only as an attempt to protect oil is simplistic. Believing that the Federal Reserve is causing wars in the middle east (as your link suggests) is conspiratorial, but more importantly naive.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    15. Re:Politics: SCGNews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believing that the Federal Reserve is causing wars in the middle east (as your link suggests) is conspiratorial, but more importantly naive.

      Funny, I would have said the opposite is true.

    16. Re:Politics: SCGNews by jon3k · · Score: 1

      That is very dated, a lot has changed since 2012. Our imports are down significantly in 2014, lowest levels since 1985.

    17. Re:Politics: SCGNews by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      eh, I'm becoming kinda interested in energy policy, esp. since we're gradually transitioning from a production economy to a purely imaginary intellectual-property-based economy. Also timely now that we're poking/griefing at Russia's largely oil-based economy and their relationship with China.

      If you have some reading on US foreign policy / military intervention strategy that's less naive than "spreading freedom and democracy" or even "cheap energy" (like the GI Joe and Transformers cartoons I grew up with), I'd gladly read it ;-)

    18. Re:Politics: SCGNews by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      That's a good question, there ought to be some book like that, but I'm not sure. Henry Kissenger's books are probably as close as they get. That guy may be cold-hearted but he understands power.

      In any case, looking there will give you a good start. I warn you though.......once you start getting into reading about foreign policy and history (Bismark! Wow!), it becomes more addicting than Game of Thrones. It's much slower paced, but so much deeper and more realistic.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  7. none by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still don't get the blogging thing. I guess I'm not the sort to want to talk about myself endlessly.

    1. Re:none by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Me. I blog about things which are most interesting... to me.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    2. Re:none by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Ditto. Who gives a rat's ass what random dweebs think.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    3. Re:none by Anrego · · Score: 1

      I do (seriously).

      Some people are interesting or at least can write in an interesting style. The cool thing about the internet is it gives anyone who wants to a platform to babble on. It doesn't guarantee that anyone will listen, but I don't think there is any harm in doing so, and of course some people just enjoy the experience (look at people who keep personal journals that no one sees..)

      I have no inclination to have a blog, but I certainly read a fair number of them. Some are from people with serious credentials delivering useful information that may actually influence my thinking, some are by random people who I just find interesting/amusing.

    4. Re:none by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I just write novellas on random sites. It has been a habit since I was a drinking man.

      They say that /. is not your blog.

      No, it is *my* blog.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  8. Jon Katz by itomato · · Score: 1

    I also enjoy Jeff K and timothy.

    1. Re:Jon Katz by Kevin108 · · Score: 1

      I haven't heard anything from Cliffry B. in many years.

      --

      It's a perfect time for being wasted.
      A perfect time to watch the stars.
      - Burden Brothers, "Beautiful Night"
    2. Re:Jon Katz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about JeffK?

  9. none by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there may be any number of people blogging about random stuff with occasionally insightful comments to share. but i haven't found any of them to be worth "following" enough to notice instantly when they have a new post. because, frankly, i don't have time for that.

  10. Bennett Haselton by halivar · · Score: 5, Funny

    He's got a lot to say, and a captive community to say it to.

    1. Re:Bennett Haselton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and a captive community to say it to.

      aka Slashdot?

    2. Re:Bennett Haselton by dysmal · · Score: 2

      He's got a lot to say, and a captive community to say it to.

      Read on for more of what Bennett has to say...

    3. Re:Bennett Haselton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is certainly an expert at stringing words together into long sentences, and I never know what any of it means. I guess that makes him an expert.

    4. Re:Bennett Haselton by Plumber,+Programmer, · · Score: 1

      Imagine a world where Bennett Haselton limited himself to ONLY posting about things he was actually an expert on.

    5. Re:Bennett Haselton by dark.nebulae · · Score: 1

      Imagine a world where Bennett Haselton limited himself to ONLY posting about things he was actually an expert on.

      Blathering?

  11. The Incidental Economist, Bill Maher, by dywolf · · Score: 1

    Only blogs I see regularly are The Incidental Economist (healthcare news, reform, and research) and Real Time with Bill Maher (It's...um...Bill Maher...).

    http://theincidentaleconomist....
    http://www.real-time-with-bill...

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  12. Rhetorical question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot comments of course! That is if Dice morons don't continue to butcher its technical userbase

    1. Re:Rhetorical question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The smart people left quite a while ago.

    2. Re:Rhetorical question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or ban we Anonymous Courageous.

    3. Re:Rhetorical question by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      You're quite right about that. All that's left is idiots who try to get referrals to their Bitcoin faucet account.

  13. Brian Krebs by Dast · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Krebs On Security. Nuff said.

    --

    This sig is false.

  14. The only man I need. by nimbius · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Bruce Schneier. They say pre-computes S-box tables dynamically from the key... over breakfast.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  15. Expert Blogs by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 5, Interesting
    --
    The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
  16. Dilbert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why read the rest when you can laugh with the best?

    1. Re:Dilbert by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      I'll second that! Dilbert is as good as most... 8-)

  17. Tom Kyte by opentunings · · Score: 2

    asktom.oracle.com is one of the best sources for Oracle tips, tricks and shared adventures. He builds examples to prove just about everything he says - no speculation, no guesses.

    1. Re:Tom Kyte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll second this one.

  18. 3D printing tips and models by Guano_Jim · · Score: 2

    I read Zheng3.com, but that's just me.

  19. xkcd by luvirini · · Score: 4, Interesting

    oh, wait.. it is not a blog.. but who cares, the information is more valid than many "expert blogs"

    1. Re:xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, wait.. it is not a blog

      Sometimes it's hard to tell the difference.

    2. Re:xkcd by cyborg_monkey · · Score: 0, Funny

      that's because you're a moron.

    3. Re:xkcd by fermion · · Score: 1

      I was thinking XKCD as well. I wonder why there have been no more What If? updates. Is he spending all his time working on the book? I think XKCD is a blog type thing. I would also add Bad Astronomer as a place where one can get information that is not incorrect relating to things of space and space like.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    4. Re:xkcd by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://theoatmeal.com/ also has more insightful writing than most of the drivel posted on "blogs".

    5. Re:xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's right at the top of the page - no more update till the Pluto flyby.

    6. Re:xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the funniest site I've seen in quite a while; thank you.

    7. Re:xkcd by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      It's also full of interesting information, such as http://theoatmeal.com/comics/b...

  20. For politics/economics... by MetricT · · Score: 1, Informative

    Paul Krugman, David Frum, Ezra Klein, Robert Reich, Ryan Avent, Jared Bernstein. I don't always agree with them, but they have a pretty good track record.

    Also, read this:

    http://www.hamilton.edu/docume...

    1. Re:For politics/economics... by JackieBrown · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A good track record of what?

    2. Re:For politics/economics... by Kevin108 · · Score: 0

      Paul Krugman? You might as well have said Alex Jones.

      --

      It's a perfect time for being wasted.
      A perfect time to watch the stars.
      - Burden Brothers, "Beautiful Night"
    3. Re:For politics/economics... by ClickOnThis · · Score: 2

      A good track record of what?

      A good track record of insightful contributions to public discourse.

      Or at least a better track record than most of us who post to slashdot.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    4. Re:For politics/economics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least in regards to Krugman: a good track record of always getting things wrong.

    5. Re:For politics/economics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Krugman's case, being somehow considered an expert despite being massively, destructively wrong on anything of import upon which he has leveled his opinion.

    6. Re:For politics/economics... by FalseModesty · · Score: 1

      Is that what the actual wrong people have been telling you?

      Figures.

    7. Re:For politics/economics... by Plumber,+Programmer, · · Score: 1

      In that arena, you might also explore the writings of Richard Reeves.

  21. I don't. Why follow when you can lead? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It is real simple.

    * If you are wasting time following another blogger that means you are being reactive.
    * Instead, invest your time into creating/producing solutions which means you are being pro-active.

    It is the same deal with Focus. As Steve Job's used to say "The secret to staying focused is to say no." Every minute you waste reading someone else's blog, waste watching TV, waste gaming, etc., means the competition just gained an advantage over you.

    I spend 5 minutes / day reading /. and Reddit spread throughout the day. Any more then ~5 minutes is time wasted that could be spend more efficiently building your business, helping people, networking, etc.

    1. Re:I don't. Why follow when you can lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, 'cause living in your own bubble makes you a super effective player in the world you're ignoring.

    2. Re:I don't. Why follow when you can lead? by carni · · Score: 1

      Wow I hope to never run into you ever. You sound like some kind of arrogant jacked up A-type a-hole. If you read something for longer than 5 minutes then the "competition" has gained an advantage? Yeah you go follow your big hero Jobs, he had all the money in the world and nothing could save him from his early demise - hope you have fun dying on your giant pile of networked money while you laugh at the "competition".

      --
      May your blade chip and shatter.
    3. Re:I don't. Why follow when you can lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If I have seen further it is by standing on ye shoulders of Giants." - Isaac Newton

      e.g. You are a total fucking idiot.

    4. Re:I don't. Why follow when you can lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This post by UnknownSoldier is the best one on the page. You win the internet today sir. Why on earth I would ever care much about someone else's drivel is beyond me.

    5. Re:I don't. Why follow when you can lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As Steve Job's used to say "The secret to staying focused is to say no." Every minute you waste reading someone else's blog, waste watching TV, waste gaming, etc., means the competition just gained an advantage over you.

      Fuck you, Steve Jobs, wherever you may be [in hell, I hope]

    6. Re:I don't. Why follow when you can lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow I hope to never run into you ever. You sound like some kind of arrogant jacked up A-type a-hole. If you read something for longer than 5 minutes then the "competition" has gained an advantage?

      Yeah you go follow your big hero Jobs, he had all the money in the world and nothing could save him from his early demise - hope you have fun dying on your giant pile of networked money while you laugh at the "competition".

      In my experience people like this don't get nearly as far as those who actually pay attention to the world around them, people like Jobs are a fluke that is unlikely to happen again anytime soon. At worst you'd deal with him as a co-worker who keeps bitching about his previous failed business and why he should be running the new place instead.

    7. Re:I don't. Why follow when you can lead? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      But you have to ignore a lot of what's going on. If you follow 5000 twits heading for a cliff, even if you don't follow them down, you'll still have wasted your time.

      A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it. Fifteen hundred years ago everybody knew the Earth was the center of the universe. Five hundred years ago, everybody knew the Earth was flat*. - Kay

      * Part of the quote was removed to fit reality**

      ** Reality as I know it, anyway***

      *** If this really is reality in the first place (insert Matrix-style question here).

    8. Re:I don't. Why follow when you can lead? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Well, you just cared about his post, so you're not even following his advice even though you think he's right.

    9. Re:I don't. Why follow when you can lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Five hundred years ago, everybody knew the Earth was flat

      What? No.

    10. Re:I don't. Why follow when you can lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a valid point about not wasting time. I expect many on this site will hate you for it.

    11. Re:I don't. Why follow when you can lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you one of the people who mixes up "i.e." and "e.g."? "For example, you are a total idiot" is a strange sentence in this context.

    12. Re:I don't. Why follow when you can lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As Steve Job's used to say "The secret to staying focused is to say no." Every minute you waste reading someone else's blog, waste watching TV, waste gaming, etc., means the competition just gained an advantage over you.

      Being dead isn't doing him any favors either.

    13. Re:I don't. Why follow when you can lead? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      You completely missed the point.

      I never said to ignore everyone.

      I only said you need to be selective in how and how much you spend your time.

      If you want to be successful you need to properly manage how your time is spent / invested.

    14. Re:I don't. Why follow when you can lead? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Why are you wasting your time with pointless ad hominem attacks??

    15. Re:I don't. Why follow when you can lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As Mark Cuban says: "Most people won't put in the time to get a knowledge advantage."

      Sounds like he's talking about you.

    16. Re:I don't. Why follow when you can lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Five hundred years ago the "flat earth" cosmological view had been over for at least a millenium.

    17. Re:I don't. Why follow when you can lead? by dataminator · · Score: 1

      Why are you wasting your time with pointless ad hominem attacks??

      Well, it looks like he successfully wasted your time. Given that he is likely far less scared than you are of losing to the competition because of this, I'd say carni is the net winner.

    18. Re:I don't. Why follow when you can lead? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      /sarcasm Riiight, because taking 30 seconds out of my 5 minute budget to hopefully enligthen carni that he has unresolved issues is a SUCH a waste of time.

    19. Re:I don't. Why follow when you can lead? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I spend 5 minutes / day reading /. and Reddit spread throughout the day. Any more then ~5 minutes is time wasted that could be spend more efficiently building your business, helping people, networking, etc.

      I really hope this is supposed to be a joke.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    20. Re:I don't. Why follow when you can lead? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      /sarcasm Riiight, because taking 30 seconds out of my 5 minute budget to hopefully enligthen carni that he has unresolved issues is a SUCH a waste of time.

      That's 60 seconds now.

      And if you read this and reply to it, another 30 seconds...

      Do you keep, like, a chess clock next to your computer?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  22. Crush? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "The crush of news sites today is almost overwhelming."

    Call it off-topic, but if you are overwhelmed by the "crush of news sites", then you're probably doing something wrong. Virtually all of the news in the US can be summed up as "MSM". A couple of liberal families own most of the "news" organizations. An ultra-conservative Aussie owns the best-known alternative. There are more main-stream sites available, but most people don't want to hear about them.

    In my news feeds, I have two Russian, two Chinese, one Indian, one Kurd, one Arab, one Israeli, 4 British, one Australian, and a mishmash of US MSM. I scan over the MSM, choosing to click on one now and then. Being a conservative at heart, I click Fox more often than I click Hearst or Turner links, but TBH, I don't like Fox much. For the real news, I scroll on down to the "foreign" sources.

    Also in my feeds, I have things like Scientific American, Project Censored and - oh, what's this? SLASHDOT?!?! How did that get in there?

    Think outside the box that Main Stream Media tries to put you in.

    On a related note - http://dontbubble.us/

    Maybe I should have advised you to think outside the bubble, instead?

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    1. Re:Crush? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish you had listed links to your foreign news sources. I could probably do some digging and find them, but my kids' nap may end any minute here so I'm trying to maximize what little "me" time I have ;)

    2. Re:Crush? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I dunno if AC will check back or not - but in no particular order:
      http://www.bbc.co.uk/
      http://www.reuters.com/
      http://rt.com/
      http://www.cbc.ca/
      http://www.news.com.au/
      http://www.dailytelegraph.com....
      http://news.sky.com/
      http://kurdishdailynews.org/
      http://rt.com/
      http://www.jpost.com/
      http://www.aljazeera.com/
      http://www.china.org.cn/
      http://www.scientificamerican....
      http://timesofindia.indiatimes...
      http://english.pravda.ru/
      http://www.projectcensored.org...
      http://www.arabtimesonline.com...

      I think I've covered the best - be aware, some national sites are heavy into propaganda. Pravda very much so, RT somewhat less so.

      Depending on your own interests - you might type in some country in a Google search, and add "times" or "post" or "news". From time to time, I do something like that - the earthquake in Tibet for instance. https://duckduckgo.com/?t=pale... That search offered up a number of sites, but I didn't add any of them to my feeds. Note that many of the hits are very politicized, but you can still find Tibetan news sources among them.

      Have fun!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    3. Re:Crush? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oy vey. The ol' "Librul Media" card. Thought that lie had been dead and buried years ago.

    4. Re:Crush? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can't be kept in the grave because generally 90% of journalists affiliate / donate to "progressives" or Democrats. It shows too.

    5. Re:Crush? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Every news site in the world has it's own slant, if not it's own agenda. Every single one. There are no "unbiased" news sites. There are no unbiased persons. I have my views, you have your views, and so does every other person on this planet. We are all biased, we put our own spin on things.

      If you have failed to grasp that concept, then you are a babe in the woods, prey for whatever bad monster comes along.

      If you insist on playing the fool, please don't waste my time.

      If you have grasped the concept that all news sites are biased, and you still deny that Main Stream Media in the United States is biased toward the liberal point of view*, then you are simply dishonest. The Turners are liberal, Hearst is liberal, and the large majority of other players are also liberal.

      * I use the word "liberal" not as most of the world would use it, but as is commonly accepted in the United States, to mean progressive and/or Democrat and/or socialistic.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    6. Re:Crush? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it's impossible for anyone to be unbiased. Your bias is clear. The myth of 'Liberal Media' in the USA is one of those myths that won't die. Yes it is a myth, most (a majority) of tv & print news media in the USA leans right-of-center, if not extreme right-wing. This is obvious to us in the rest of the world, however there are a few last bastions still hiding under rocks sill believe that the USA is held under sway of a 'Liberal Agenda'. News flash: Conservatives have won your country (and are gleefully bashing it's head open with rocks), and still it doesn't seem to be enough to satisfy some people.

      Just don't play the 'Liberal Media' card and expect not to get called out on your bullshit. You need to recalibrate your political meter.

    7. Re:Crush? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Whoooooaaahhh there, Nelly. I'm quite sure that I specified earlier that I was NOT using the term "liberal" in the same sense that most of the world uses it. Here in the US, we have our own meaning for the word.

      Hell, man, half of Europe thinks that Marx was right of center! Or, you might credit him with being centrist.

      Liberal, Democrat, Progressive - on this side of the pond, the terms are pretty much synonymous. And, "conservative" over here doesn't mean the same either.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    8. Re:Crush? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you use a word incorrectly (or the incorrect word), expect to be misunderstood.

      Also, backpeddling just makes you look like a clueless crank.

  23. Signal to noise ratio by grimmjeeper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem is that the people who you really want to get insight from are not the types who waste a lot of time blogging. At least not on a regular basis. As a result, the signal to noise ratio is so low there's no point in really following any of them.

    1. Re:Signal to noise ratio by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      You said a mouthful there. Now and then, I am impressed with someone's point of view. I return to their site a few times. Sometimes more than a few. So VERY many of them end up stuffing their foot in their mouths. And, of course, there are some who apparently keep their heads up their asses, and I just happened to catch them on a day they pulled their heads out to breathe.

      People worth listening to don't waste a lot of time blathering. They are to busy DOING SOMETHING!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  24. Smorgasbord by RandCraw · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the Pipeline (chemistry and pharma)
    MathBabe (math and data mining)
    Schneier on Security (crypto and computer security)
    My Biased Coin (statistics)
    Steve on Image Processing (image proc w/ Matlab)
    Paul Graham (computing and Y Combinator)
    Lessig Blog (intellectual property and cyber law)
    The Volokh Conspiracy (politics)

    MultiBlogs:
    Talking Points Memo (political)
    Google Research Blog
    KDD Nuggets (datamining)
    R-Bloggers (R and datamining)

    1. Re:Smorgasbord by Guppy · · Score: 1

      In the Pipeline (chemistry and pharma)

      Came here to look for thepipeline, was not disappointed. It's fantastic for anyone interested in chemistry and medicine.

  25. Bennett Haselton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bennett!

    And I don't even have to go to his blog, Timmy will post his verbiage right here on Slashdot!

    Excuse me now, I need some private time thinking about Bennett.

  26. Dilbert by Ghiora · · Score: 1

    Why read the rest when you can laugh with the best? Seriously experts are wrong most of the time, just take a look at what they wrote a while ago. There are plenty of books on the subject of experts like:Wrong: Why Experts Keep Failing Us - and How to Know When NOT to trust them. In economics the "experts" usually are those who had a lucky streak. Yes there are experts out there in mathematics, physics and other things who know specific stuff but they usually do not write about it in blogs, they publish peer reviewed articles.

  27. math & physics, theoretical CS, anti-feminism by Sara+Chan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For mathematics and physics, I read Not Even Wrong, by Peter Woit.

    For theoretical computer science, I read Gödel's Lost Letter and P=NP, by Richard J. Lipton and Kenneth W. Regan.

    For analyzing the harm that modern feminism is causing, I read Dalrock.

  28. News? What's that? by garyoa1 · · Score: 1

    Years ago a journalist reported the news. Today... no such animal. Just reporters giving an opinion.

    --
    Wuddooeyeno? IITYWYBMAD? Like nuts? eclecticallyincorrect.com
  29. Jon Hendren by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jon Hendren, DevOps Thought Lord.

    Naturally. *sips cognac*

  30. OP took this from reddit and voat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do the "editors" not do any research?

  31. Paywalls are all around. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is becoming increasingly difficult to access news in the traditional media. Paywalls are being erected everywhere. I was just surfing the web for highbrow stuff when I stumbled upon this article, and paywalls were making me very upset. Even Slate has just closed access to non-US readers. The panorama is bleak. So, if youre not a 99 percenter, it is getting hard to read stuff. The blogs are the last bastions of Internet freedom.

    Bruce Schneier and TomDispatch [and all the blogs listed in TomDispatch site].

  32. Pharma industry/drug development by pesho · · Score: 1

    I like to read Derek Lowe's blog "In the pipeline". It has good insights on the pharma industry, drug development, etc. If you go there be sure to check the "Things I won't work with" page. It makes for some very entertaining reading on "exciting" (as in "oh my god we all gonna die") chemical substances.

  33. War nerd, simple justice, popehat by otherwhere · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The War Nerd on well, war, Scott Greenfield on (mostly criminal) law, and Ken White on law and privacy.

    1. Re:War nerd, simple justice, popehat by Noah+Haders · · Score: 4, Informative

      I came here to post popehat. My legal blog recommendations:
      * Popehat insightful/snarky legal commentary from someone who used to be a federal prosecutor and is now in private practice.
      * Lowering the Bar: hilarious legal humor. Recent topics: Hulk Hogan, Donald Trump, drone law, argle-bargle.
      *Papers, Please: Lots of TSA and similar topics. Their MO is to file expansive FOIA requests to intelligence and law enforcement agencies, then write stridently about how they were rejected.
      * Jetsetting Terrorist: trials and tribulations of somebody erroneously on the do not fly list. (not updated often)
      * Taking Sense Away: blog written by TSA employee (no longer updated, but fun to read the archives).
      * SCOTUSblog: blow-by-blow news of goings-on at the supreme court. super nerdy.
      * Supreme Court Haiku: summaries of supreme court decisions, in haiku form.
      * Volokh Conspiracy: insightful pieces on constitutional law and similar topics. primarily conservative, primarily written by law profs.

      wow, with all these things in my feedly, it's amazing I get any work done!

  34. Re: Obligatory xkcd by rwa2 · · Score: 1
  35. Kibo by plopez · · Score: 2

    The best information you can get on the 'net

    http://www.kibo.com/

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  36. Not really a blog but.. by waspleg · · Score: 1

    Zero Punctuation from The Escapist and Ben Croshaw is fucking hilarious - these are short, fast paced game reviews done in flash animation if you're not familiar.

    Red Letter Media for Half in the Bag, Best of the Worst, and of course Mr. Plinkett. These are movie reviews, commentary and sometimes satire from movie buffs. The most well known (and the reason I still regularly check back) are the scathing several hours long multi-part dissections of the Star Wars Prequels there are some for a few other things as well but the eloquence and insight in the Star Wars Prequel diatribes is really something spectacular and worth watching (it will put in to words what you probably felt).

    Even further removed from blogs... Rifftrax and Cinematic Titanic where two different ventures from the cast of Mystery Science Theater 3000 continue doing what they did sans puppets. I prefer Rifftrax of the 2, and collect them both.

  37. The best expert that we all should read... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is no surprise, we all know and love him.

    I'm talking, of course, about the most excellent Bennett Haselton!

    Oh, what we'll do for a "comedian" rating...

    1. Re:The best expert that we all should read... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, what we'll do for a "comedian" rating...

      Apparently logging in isn't one of the things we'll do...

    2. Re:The best expert that we all should read... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bennett Haselton? Bennett Haselton!
      You young punks don't even remember Roland Piquepaille, let alone the terrible reign on JonKatz!

  38. Geopolitical Analyses by dewilso4 · · Score: 1

    https://www.stratfor.com/about... From his bio: AREAS OF EXPERTISE Global Geopolitics Intelligence Gathering and Analysis International Affairs Geopolitical Forecasting Modern and Historical Warfare U.S. Foreign Policy so not necessarily stuff the slashdot community would be interested in, but every article he writes is fascinating and FULL of great information

    1. Re:Geopolitical Analyses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      longwarjournal.org is great for war on terror news. Even jihadists read it.

  39. IP/Copyright/DMCA/Cyberlaw law blog by captnjohnny1618 · · Score: 1

    I enjoy reading what the "Technollama" blog (written by Andres Guamuz) has to say. http://www.technollama.co.uk/

    He seems like a level-headed, well-informed lecturer with insight into UK law as well as US laws.

  40. Authority Be Damned by nightcats · · Score: 1

    The main lesson of any person or site posing as a techno-authority is that authority itself is now impossible, if it can be said that it ever was doable. I look at this place every day, at Ars, and at How-to-Geek (who regularly presents some surprisingly remarkable insights). Once a week I'll look over Motherboard's, BB's, and Wired's posts; and for the rest there's social media. As annoying as it can often be, following Anonymous's twitter feed frequently delivers pearls from sites I otherwise wouldn't visit. And for really important stuff I follow Glenn Greenwald of Intercept and the EFF and the Tor project's feed.

    --
    Development is programmable; Discovery is not programmable. (Fuller)
  41. The Technical Blog of James by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For advanced/but niche automation/devops tech things, I read The Technical Blog of James
    https://ttboj.wordpress.com/

    I also like Planet GNOME (an aggregator):
    http://planet.gnome.org/

    HTH

  42. Stuff by Megane · · Score: 1

    Derek Lowe, In The Pipeline, I got into him from his Things I Won't Work With tag (Note: he's going to be moving to another domain in a few weeks)

    Stephen Smith's Space KSC (I think he's a bigwig with NASA's outreach or advocacy programs or something)

    Bunnie Huang's blog (famous for hacking the Xbox, but he isn't updating very often this year, so he must be working on something)

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    1. Re:Stuff by Megane · · Score: 1

      Also Dangerous Prototypes, quite a few things appear there a few days before Hackaday or Slashdot picks them up.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  43. For Windows insights by operagost · · Score: 3, Informative
    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  44. Just Curious by perry64 · · Score: 1

    If you're out there leading and don't care what others think, why are you reading Slashdot?

    1. Re:Just Curious by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      /Sarcasm Gee, if only there was a place a person could go for a news aggregator to read the important summaries from a single place instead of wasting time with N+ sites.

      Sticking your head in the sand and ignoring what is going around in the world is dumb.

      Being balanced and investing a few minutes to keep up-to-date is smart.

  45. Daily WTF by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Kind of wish more programmers would read the Daily WTF.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  46. Post modern Christian blog, Of Dust and Kings by Theovon · · Score: 1

    "Of Dust and Kings": http://tehanna.com

    Now, most slashdotters are atheists, and I'm not going to debate about that one way or the other. I honestly have no concern what you believe, because I think there's a kernel of truth in all religions and non-religions (including humanism, satanism (whcih is another form of humanism), etc.). However, even if you are an atheist, you still have a sense of morality, and it is possible to get some inspiration from Christian tradition, as long as you don't get enmired in some kind of legalism. Although I think most Christian tradition is a bunch of hooey, I really like the *core principle* of Christianity, which is a religion of forgiveness. To everyone, we can apply this idea of "forgive those who realize they've wronged other people and wish to change their ways for the better." (There are other things about Christianity that I like, and even Dawkins will admit that Christianity is relatively benign.)

    The author of this blog (T. E. Hanna) is a Christian (a Methodist minister, actually), but he's also a post-modernist, meaning that he rejects traditions that are out-dated, don't make sense, go counter to evidence, etc., and his perspective on God isn't some man in the sky with a white beard who hands down nonsensical rules. For instance, he's not a creationist, he's not a homophobe, and he believes in total equality of the sexes (mutual submission of partners rather than submission of the wife to the husband in some stupid way).

    I've had personal conversations with this guy. I can't tell you just how annoying it is to try to have a discussion with so many Christians who have a narrow interpretion of their scriptures and want to force those beliefs on others. By contrast, all of my discussions with Thomas Hanna have been enjoyable and enlightening. He's all about philosophy, insight, intellectual discourse, and having an open mind. Any aspect of Christianity you learn from him is going to come from him being insightful and settng a good example.

    So, even if you don't care much for Christianity, or many of the issues don't seem relevant to you, his blog is still a really interesting read. Here's what I would call an "expert on Christianity and other important moral concerns," and I have read his blog.

  47. Wait! by NEDHead · · Score: 1

    Some of those guys are experts?

  48. APK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    APK's insightful commentary on HOSTS files is what keeps me coming back to slashdot. I love the passion he has for his work and how he relentlessly defends it against any naysayers who dare attack it. When will they learn that they are simply WRONG?!

  49. Fark balanced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [fark.com] tends to have pretty great and balanced political discussion

    I hope by "balanced political discussion and humor" you mean "a mix of political discussion and humor", because Fark was overrun by screaming liberals a long time ago.

    1. Re:Fark balanced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so youre saying its collective IQ increased several points?
      I will have to check it out

  50. Expert on what? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    Expert on what? The field of human endeavor, and thus the question, is impossibly broad. (Though the questioner quasi limits it to IT/science/hardware by implication.) In fact, the submission reads an awful lot like someone trying to get content for free...

    That being said, for most of the stuff I want expert help on I tend to visit specialized forums far more than blogs. I've generally got too much going on to strain the sea in hopes that something I can actually use drops into my lap by happenstance.

  51. None... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... but i do read Slashdot, though....

  52. Techrights | People's rights in the digital age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  53. Yves Smith by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    http://www.nakedcapitalism.com...

    Best economics group blog on the Internet. Led by Yves Smith, who's writing about the 2008 banking crisis was absolutely brilliant and spot-on. Also Philip Pilkington, who's blog "Fixing the Economists" is essential reading. Non-ideological (unless you disagree with them, in which case you will claim - falsely - that they're ideological). Their economics expertise is unquestioned.

    I read their blog every day and every time I find myself disagreeing with something they've written, I learn that I was wrong.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Yves Smith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, and Naked Capitalism is currently the best place to get informed coverage and analysis of the Greek crisis - Yanis Varoufakis has himself regularly cross-posted on the site before his (now ended) role as Greek finance minister.

      I've been reading the site for 4 years now, and I believe it is the single best source for learning about economics on the Internet, as it is regularly debunking fallacies/myths in economic thinking, that are repeated without any critical thought, in most mainstream economic reporting (and unfortunately, in many cases by most economists); indeed the main focus of the site is not just economics, or politics, but application of critical thought to a very wide variety of topics.

      It's the only site I make sure to read every day - and it keeps you very intellectually sharp.

    2. Re:Yves Smith by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 1

      >> Their economics expertise is unquestioned.

      Well then. I guess that settles that!

  54. Canadian experts by jheath314 · · Score: 1

    In general it's difficult to get excited about Canadian issues, since the news and commentary from our US neighbors tends to be a lot more loud and extreme. However, there are a couple commenters I turn to when I want to catch up on what is happening in my own country:

    Michael Geist is an excellent source for tech and intellectual property issues in Canada.

    Chantal Hebert is a fantastic political analyst... her columns are regularly insightful and devoid of the partisan screeching that seems to infect a lot of political commentary.

    --
    Procrastination Man strikes again!
  55. Just one by davidwr · · Score: 2

    This guy, because I agree with everything he has to say.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  56. Scott Hanselman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.hanselman.com/blog/

    "Scott Hanselman is a former professor, former Chief Architect in finance, now speaker, consultant, father, diabetic, and Microsoft employee. He is a failed stand-up comic, a cornrower, and a book author."

  57. Expert blogger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's an oxymoron.

  58. Fivethirtyeight by T.E.D. · · Score: 2

    I've been reading Fivethirtyeight.com since back when it was an expert blog on statistical analysis of polls. I guess that's not what it is any more, but I still read it.

    I still read CodingHorror, although Jeff's output has gone way down since StackOverflow took off (or since he starting having kids. I'm not sure which was the real driver).

    But I think for the most part youtube series have replaced a lot of my blog reading.

  59. Violet Blue for Hacking Crime and Hacking Culture by InvertedBinaryTree · · Score: 1

    She's always right, checks her sources, actual journalist. 'nuff said.

  60. no crush and no blogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read bbc, science daily, ccn, slashdot, hacker news and tor.com. I do not feel crushed by the number of news sites and I do not regularly read any single author blogs. I have no objection to blogs - I simply have not found any blogs that are consistently interesting (to me).

  61. Casey Muratori by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Casey Muratori is a game developer (and previous game-tools developer) who has an excellent blog covering various programming topics: http://mollyrocket.com/casey/

  62. XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not so much a blog but the comic is great for expanding general science knowledge

  63. late to the discussion... by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1
    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  64. When it comes to mobile news by substance2003 · · Score: 1

    I particularly enjoy reading from the Communities Dominate Brands to see where the cell phone market is going.
    He's been pretty much spot on in regards to Nokia and predicted that Microsoft would do cut to the Lumia brand which is part of today's headlines on /.

  65. Read the opposition. by niittyniemi · · Score: 1

    I read a lot of the usual suspects: this site; although it's probably
    gone downhill over the years, there are still some interesting, insightful
    or informative opinions/posts.

    Other sites include:

    El Reg. Always good for the latest government fuck-ups with IT.
    The latest: 16 billion quid wasted trying to implement a new IT system for what is essentially a renamed social security benefit.

    Our dishonest dick of a PM (David Cameron) said today:

    "I make no apology for taking Universal Credit [the new benefit] at a deliberate pace."

    "Deliberate pace"? It's been years (and it wont be ready for many more, if at all!). What a tosspot.

    Another good site is:

    FreeBSD Forums. A must read for all those using (or proposing to use) FreeBSD.

    The icing on the cake:

    The Daily Mail; drivel masquerading as news.

    It's like The Onion, only funnier.

    It consists of "news" about celebrities (I use the word loosely: most of
    them I've never heard of). On a typical day there will be about a dozen
    stories about the dreadful Kardashians. A tweet by one of those revolting
    people constitutes Daily Mail "news".

    What beggars belief though, is that the DM is one of the most popular sites
    in the UK! People believe and read the trash they write, as the hundreds of
    braindead comments attached to each story attest.

    Who was it that said "You can't underestimate people's stupidity"? The DM
    is living proof of the wisdom of that quote. Remember, that half the
    population has an IQ < 100; I read the DM so that I know what that
    half are thinking/being told to think.

    I'm not the only one to read the DM. The government takes a keen interest
    in what the DM and their imbecile audience has to say and it inevitably
    informs part of their unashamedly populist government policy.
    Eg. EU bad, people on social security are all scroungers, isn't
    the Royal Family lovely?, immigrants are scum, BBC bad etc.

    In short, they're hugely influential and I take it as a public duty to
    stay informed of what these dingbats are up to. If I lived in the States,
    I'd watch Fox News.

    I used to troll the DM: post comments which caused a certain amount of
    cognitive dissonance amongst the readers. But I got bored with it; the
    dullards didn't really react. Maybe my trolling technique wasn't good enough.

    We shouldn't always read stuff that confirms our own views/prejudices. You
    need to know what the "opposition"/"mental defectives" (or in the States:
    Republicans) are up to.

    --
    The Machine stops.
  66. Anyone who posts often isn't worth reading by gmiller123456 · · Score: 1

    Generating good content is hard, and for a single person to do it on a regular basis is next to impossible. As an experiment, take all the blog posts you read on a particular day that come from whatever source you normally use (for me that's /r/programming or Hack-A-Day). Then go to the previous post on that person's blog. Odds are you'll find that article of significantly lower quality than the one that brought you there, and/or that article will have been posted months or years ago.

    Content aggregators are really the only sites worth using on a regular basis. If you try to stick to just a few dozen expert bloggers, you'll only see a post every month or so, or there will be a very low interesting (to you) content to noise ratio. And you'll miss out on a lot of the one hit wonders. Additionally, I usually find the comments on the aggregator site are often just as or more interesting than the blog post.

  67. Software Engineering Philosophy by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    The very first public wiki: it goes by the aliases "Wiki Wiki Web", "C2 wiki", and "Portland Pattern Repository".

    It's a combination wiki, blog, and discussions on the philosophies of software design. It's messy, but often messy in a good way.

    There is a tension between what may be called "practitioners" and "academics" that I find fascinating (and have helped fuel, I must say). The practitioner stance is that human (coder) nature/perception and economics (bottom line) are the key factors, while the academics tend to argue that symbolic parsimony and mathematical provability/analyzability are the keys.

    You will generally NOT find definitive/consensus answers, but you will find interesting questions and a wide variety of opinions on various software design and IT topics. It's fuel for thought in the sense of "Why is technique X better than technique Y?", or "can you objectively prove that technique X is better than Y, and if not, what's holding you back?"

    http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?Welcome...

    However, lately it's only in read-only mode, and being redone into a "distributive" wiki, in part driven by vandals and spammers. The future direction is unknown.

    It's like a junkyard for idea-tinkerers.

  68. "Expert Blogger" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Expert Blogger = oxymoron. For me, "Blogger" always conjures up images of the WoW guy from South Park.

  69. Confessions of a Supply-Side Liberal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://blog.supplysideliberal.com/

    Miles Kimball is Professor of Economics and Survey Research at the University of Michigan. Politically, Miles is an independent who grew up in an apolitical family.

  70. I wish I had mod points by digsbo · · Score: 1

    Because I'd rate this funny!

  71. Maureen O'Gara by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maureen O'Gara for me. She is vary fair, has integrity, is unbiased, and has a very good insiders view with the direction of many technologies.

  72. "is idiots" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right.

    Subject line.

    1. Re:"is idiots" by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      English is not my native language.

      "are idiots"

      sorry.

  73. Changelogs count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Patrick Volkerding and the Slackware changelogs...

    ftp://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/slackware/slackware64-current/ChangeLog.txt

  74. Economic and doom sites mostly by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    ZeroHedge.com (Sensationalist but the true bits are quite interesting and after about a year or two, whatever crazy thing they're going on about shows up on "The Economist.")

    NakedCapitalism.com (It doesn't SHOUT at you the way ZeroHedge does, but it's informative).

    ricefarmer.blogspot.com (A sane news aggregation site with occasional realistic commentary. As usual, reality puts people off).

    ClubOrlov.com (Interesting guy. Grew up in Russia during the collapse. Comments on our ongoing slo mo collapse).

    http://ourfiniteworld.com/ (A happy little blog about resource depletion and its implications. Packed with facts and numbers. Do not approach without a working calculator). Don't expect to be happy at what you finally figure out for yourself either.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  75. Only site that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://dodwell.us

  76. For Aussie focused economics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.macrobusiness.com.au

  77. Re:math & physics, theoretical CS, anti-femini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > For analyzing the harm that modern feminism is causing, I read

    MUH-SOGGY-KNEEESS!!!! You hate women! You sexist neckneard cis white republicard hetro privileged male. Stop opressing me!! Get on the right side of HERstory and donate to my patreon. Your post is triggers me as harrassing terrorism!! Your world view is toxic. Donate to my Patreon and hand over your internets nerd!!!

  78. Kim K. seems to know a lot ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and this empty void in my personal life can be filled with all her wisdom ... or at least her a$$.

  79. Which Expert Bloggers Do You Read? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ACs.

    Some of the best hints have been from them thru the years (though arguably with the register system they flew off to greener pastures)...

  80. A couple by jon3k · · Score: 1

    Semi-Accurate
    Storage Mojo
    Rands in Repose

    Daringfireball for a laugh. You should seriously be cautious of any site without comments. Most of his content doesn't stand up to even mild criticism.

  81. Networking blog: ipspace.net by enriquevagu · · Score: 1

    I follow Ivan Pepelnjak at blog.ipspace.net for advanced networking stuff (some topics are CCIE-level). He is great at explaining concepts, has strong opinions on new technologies and provides links to background information. He also gives weminars on multiple technologies (most are paid). Great source of information to get in touch with reality, apart from what appears in networking books. (Disc: I am not affiliated with him, but follow the blog and have attended some paid weminars).

  82. Next Draft is all you need by Carpeaux · · Score: 1

    Not really an expert blogger, but the solution to your problem is this guy: http://nextdraft.com/ I stopped reading any news website altogether. By the end of the day I read his daily email and figure out what happened. I can't recommend this anough.

  83. ZOMBO.COM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anything is possible at zombo.com

  84. Hashtag by mundlapati · · Score: 1

    Twitter hashtag pretty much covers everything.

  85. Fefe by allo · · Score: 1

    For IT News you need to read fefe. Who doesn't?