Slashdot Mirror


Plastic Roads Sound Like a Crazy Idea, Maybe Aren't

schwit1 writes with news that the Dutch city of Rotterdam is looking at partnering with a company called VolkerWessels to test a prototype plastic road for safety and durability. "They envision pulling waste plastic out of the oceans, and then processing it into prefabricated sections of road with integrated utility channels and drainage. The composition and structure of the plastic makes it more durable than traditional asphalt, and VolkerWessels estimates that their plastic roads should last about three times as long as traditional roads." The roads are manufactured at a factory, and then hauled in a mostly finished state to where they'll end up. This could dramatically reduce the time during which drivers are inconvenienced by road construction efforts.

183 comments

  1. Plastic roads are for cars. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    You are all cars. Cars say honk. HONKHONKHONK! HONKHONKHONK! Honk say the cars. YOU CARS!!

    1. Re:Plastic roads are for cars. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First time you actually made me laugh, dear usually-unfunny AC.

    2. Re:Plastic roads are for cars. by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Finally a car analogy I can understand.

    3. Re:Plastic roads are for cars. by hey! · · Score: 1

      ... Give me back my caps!

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  2. Potholes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Pothole in tarmac? Fill it with more tarmac.
    Pothole in plastic? Pour molten plastic in? Buy a new section of road?

    1. Re:Potholes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the sections of road are standardized and cheap enough they could be easily replaced as quickly as the local road crew would get around to filling a pothole. The issue I foresee is a lack care for the roads much as we have now, but with a material that can't be driven on at all once it has problems. Every place I have lived has left potholes in roads until there is a wreck because of them, then they finally send out two guys to fix it in an hour.

    2. Re:Potholes? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Plastic would be more resistant to potholes then normal material.
      Being water proof and is a better insulator.
      However what I see as a big problem is the ground shifting then knocking out a whole road unit with a plow. Unless the decide to keep them heated so you don't need to plow

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:Potholes? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Just take a wild guess.

      Hint: It worked for bumpers, why not for roads?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Potholes? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

      Pothole in plastic? Pour molten plastic in? Buy a new section of road?

      Potholes form in asphalt when water settles into slight depressions. The water softens the asphalt, and then traffic deepens the depression, allowing more water to settle. Freezing and thawing makes it even worse. The plastic road in TFA is perforated, so water drains into a series of tubes. So potholes should not form in the first place. Even with asphalt, potholes can be greatly reduced with proper grading, and by adding fiber.

      But I don't think this plastic road is a serious proposal. They may build a few hundred meters as a PR stunt. You cannot collect plastic from the sea cost effectively, and you aren't going to make a good road surface out of random trash.

    5. Re: Potholes? by GrantRobertson · · Score: 0

      Yes, and a human being CANNOT survive going over 20 mph and buggy whips are going to be in high demand forever. Besides, you can't get that nasty black stuff out of the ground without digging up half the countryside.

      I can think of at least two methods to remove plastic from the oceans and I haven't even tried very hard. Someone will find a way.

    6. Re:Potholes? by dugancent · · Score: 1

      Potholes also form when the road cracks and water gets in, then freezes. The asphalt, on concrete, buckles slightly then a snow plow catches it and rips a chunk out of the road.

      Here, all the potholes appear after a heavy snow.

      --
      SJWs are the new boogeyman. -Me
    7. Re:Potholes? by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

      That's no quite how it works here. The water inflitrates the asphalt, then it freezes during night or automn, winter and spring, then the small cracks enlarge, then the cycle restart with water, freezing point, ice, enlargment, etc. Then some chunks detach from the road, then more water, etc. That's how potholes form here. I wonder how a plastic road will perform into winter conditions and with abrasive stuff, melting salt, snow plows, etc. Will plastic flex under heavy weight in normal conditions? How about -40C conditions? Will it crack instead?

      As I see it, this material will be more suitable for urban streets not submitted to heavy usage. The fact they designed it as hollow slabs for conducts and wiring seems to indicate this is in fact the target market, not the highways, freeways, and boulevards.

      Salt and abrasives are a concern during winter, but also plastic tends to degrade under UV light exposition. I am really not convinced it is a so good idea and it will last that long or long enough to compete against asphalt.

      Slippery conditions is another concern. How about ice? Plastics doesn't accumulate heat like asphalt neither.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    8. Re: Potholes? by yakumo.unr · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://www.theoceancleanup.com... is the curent page for the project Boyan Slat started that got some coverage back arround 2013 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sci...

    9. Re: Potholes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting the plastic from the oceans isn't a problem, the keywords were cost effectively. There are a couple of projects working towards that but right now there really isn't a way to remove that plastic, recycle it and break even at a large scale. When your cost to collect and recycle is 50+ times the cost of making new plastic that isn't cost effective. Of course the collecting of plastic from the oceans is completely optional, they can use any other source of plastic for recycling as well.

    10. Re:Potholes? by TWX · · Score: 2

      The whole point in just about all construction is to achieve an acceptable, durable result for the lowest possible price. Having to heat the road itself completely negates that, as there's a LOT of road out there.

      Roadways start by digging a wide, shallow cut. That cut is lined with some form of crushed stony material or sand, and harder and larger layers are built-up until truly solid layers are applied. In some places they use concrete and coat it with a layer of asphalt, in other places it's just multiple layers of asphalt that are let to cool before the next is put down. Most of the materials used are themselves durable in the local environment so that they wear well. The tar and oil components of the top layer simply act to bind the durable sandy/stony mix together so it stays-put.

      The idea of prefabbed sections worries me. If it's a top-layer I worry about water or other liquid getting between it and the substrate on which it sits. If it's anchored with tie-downs into the lower layers, I worry that they'll push up and puncture tires. Ever lost tire pressure at freeway speeds? I have three times. It's scary as hell.

      The idea of taking our roadways' surface area and making it do something useful is appealing, but so far I don't see any ideas that make more sense than using the same old layered-material approach that we've used in some form or another since Roman times. There's simply not enough benefit to outweigh the detriments and costs.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    11. Re:Potholes? by TWX · · Score: 2

      I live in the desert and we have potholes form here too, where it doesn't ever freeze enough for the mild overnight frost to do jack to the roads.

      Our roads pothole because enough traffic over time stresses the material, and the expansive soil expands and contracts, causing the road to fracture. Since it doesn't rain much here either, the roads are not designed to drain as well as in other places (ie, no steeply banked crown) and the water finds its way down into the cracked road surface. As vehicles continue to drive on it they push down, and when they let up the pressure pent-up pushes road material up and out of the road surface.

      Admittedly this happens more on the roads in less-populated areas at the outskirts of the city more than in the middle where the roads have been resurfaced off and on for 50+ years, but every time it rains I see chunks of asphalt on the roads that were pushed out by the pressure and moisture.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    12. Re:Potholes? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Collection doesn't have to be cost effective, it's environmental clean up that is necessary.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:Potholes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      good thing in the Netherland, which is where this article is taking place, we keep the roads free of potholes anyway.

    14. Re:Potholes? by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Having to heat the road itself completely negates that, as there's a LOT of road out there.

      Actually heating the road is easy, with a little creativity. I was going to suggest adding plutonium to the road mix, but the same end could likely be achieved more cheaply by just using nuclear waste. Solves the waste problem at the same time.

      Of course, there may be some undesirable side effects....

      --
      -- Alastair
    15. Re:Potholes? by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Do you subject your bumper to impacts more than 5 mph for a it's entire lifespan?
      (hint: you're bumper is only covered with plastic, filled with styrofoam, and has a metal band on the inside to withstand the 5 mph impact)

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    16. Re:Potholes? by pipingguy · · Score: 2

      water drains into a series of tubes

      But that's where the internet goes! Will we have a moister, more humid (and therefore more prone to rusting) internet if this technology is implemented?

    17. Re:Potholes? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "Actually heating the road is easy, with a little creativity. I was going to suggest adding plutonium to the road mix, but the same end could likely be achieved more cheaply by just using nuclear waste. Solves the waste problem at the same time.

      Of course, there may be some undesirable side effects...."

      Indeed, it would trigger the Iran anti-neutrino detector from 2 articles father up and send the the brute-squad on the way.

    18. Re:Potholes? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Being water proof and is a better insulator.

      Why would you want waterproof roadways? Wouldn't something that would allow drainage make the road safer?

      They recently did my little street and alley with some special material/process that looks just like regular paving but allows for drainage. The standing water and black ice conditions have completely gone away. I don't know anything about the new material besides the fact that it's water permeable, because I asked one of the workers about it last year. I didn't get any other details, unfortunately.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    19. Re:Potholes? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Hint: It worked for bumpers, why not for roads?

      Bumpers are all but useless. My '68 Caprice had bumpers you could use to knock down light poles at 30mph. Not that I would have ever done such a thing. Sober.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    20. Re:Potholes? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      no no no, we 3d print the roads

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    21. Re:Potholes? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      you joke but why not solar with bat backups? sure its not ideal yet but maybe by the time this actually happens

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    22. Re:Potholes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The world's tallest people driving the world's smallest cars. While wearing wooden shoes. And smoking pot.

    23. Re:Potholes? by pz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I live in New England. We have lots of freeze-thaw cycles during the year. It's rare that you see a proper frost heave in a road (and you certainly know it when you see it). By FAR the most road damage is caused by inexpert patching of the asphalt where the surface needs to be cut for utility work. When inexpertly patched, the surface is no longer remotely planar, and the unevenness right at the (and caused by the) patch increases the wear exactly where it can do the most damage. So, shortly, the patch needs a patch. Which is inexpertly done, and the cycle continues until you get a stretch of crud for surface and the local municipality shells out big bucks to have the road re-surfaced entirely.

      Compare this to Southern California (where I lived for a number of years) where the road patches after utility work are 100% as smooth as the original surface. With your eyes closed, you cannot tell that you've driven over a patch. The patch (and especially the transitions from original surface to patch, and back) receives no more or less force than the original road, so there's no focus of wear, and it lasts a very long time.

      It baffles me why we can't make proper road patches in New England. It's clearly possible. And I really can't believe that the people working to patch roads in Southern California are that much more talented, so it's either a technology issue, lack of managerial directive, or an out-and-out conspiracy to have a never-ending amount of road resurfacing work.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    24. Re:Potholes? by minstrelmike · · Score: 1

      In Chicago, to prepare for global warming and more rain, they are replacing the alley pavement with similar stuff that lets the water soak into the ground. It's one way of not having to triple the size of your storm water drainage systems. apparently, within 90 years, they expect a climate similar to Baton Rouge Louisiana.

    25. Re: Potholes? by minstrelmike · · Score: 1

      You don't have to recycle it. We aren't talking about pulling out toys. There are a bazillion "original" plastic pellets infesting the oceans, the same pellets they use to make plastic stuff in the first place. Filtering that out shouldn't be too much harder than running a gravel pit operation.

    26. Re:Potholes? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      In Chicago, to prepare for global warming and more rain, they are replacing the alley pavement with similar stuff that lets the water soak into the ground.

      Yeah, that's where I am. They also did the aprons from the alley to the street and a couple of the streets encircling my block. Probably because the alderman lives just a few doors away.

      within 90 years, they expect a climate similar to Baton Rouge Louisiana.

      It feels like Baton Rouge today. But really wasn't Chicago originally a swamp way back when DuSable set up camp here?

      I walked the dog over near Union Park earlier where Pitchfork is going on and it looked pretty swampy over there, too. All the hipsters were sloshing around.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    27. Re:Potholes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you start out saying that it can't possibly be the freeze-thaw cycles, then end up complaining that your roads aren't as inexplicably smooth as someplace that doesn't have freeze-thaw cycles?

      Let's take the inexplicable out and just chalk it up to freeze-thaw cycles. Sometimes the obvious answer is really the answer.

    28. Re: Potholes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit WHAT is this utter tripe that is dribbling from your batshit crazy mouth?

      Are you insane?

      ARE YOU?

    29. Re: Potholes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I promise you it doesn't feel like Baton Rouge in Chicago. The heat index in Baton Rouge at 9pm while I type this is higher than it was at 4pm in Chicago.

      Also, in Arkansas and Louisiana we have plan old concrete and asphalt roads not special porous materials. Isn't daytime flux in the winter the biggest pothole creator anyway? Ice melts in the day, fills in cracks, refreezes at night, rinse, repeat=pothole.

    30. Re: Potholes? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I promise you it doesn't feel like Baton Rouge in Chicago. The heat index in Baton Rouge at 9pm while I type this is higher than it was at 4pm in Chicago.

      Yeah, but you have andouille, cold Tin Roof beer and Joe Barry on the jukebox.

      https://youtu.be/QcriNmPyY-Q?t...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    31. Re: Potholes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You ARE the brute squad?

    32. Re:Potholes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ted Stevens is rolling in his grave. Or rolling his airplane or something.

    33. Re: Potholes? by GrantRobertson · · Score: 1

      Thanks.

    34. Re:Potholes? by mcrbids · · Score: 2

      LA has a freeze cycle. It could even be hours of freezing temperatures in some areas, sometimes....

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    35. Re:Potholes? by TWX · · Score: 1

      Or, we could make the road out of a material that is passively heated by the sun's rays during the day, with a slow release of that pent-up heat overnight, such that the road stays warmer than the surrounding earth...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    36. Re:Potholes? by Caedite+Eos · · Score: 1

      > Of course, there may be some undesirable side effects....

      something, something ... break eggs to make omelette. :-)

    37. Re:Potholes? by pz · · Score: 1

      Really? You live in New England? You watch how utility cuts are patched? You notice how smooth they are? You take note that even patches made in the middle of the summer are not smooth, and deteriorate rapidly before the first freeze?

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    38. Re:Potholes? by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Hint: It worked for bumpers, why not for roads?

      Bumpers are all but useless. My '68 Caprice had bumpers you could use to knock down light poles at 30mph. Not that I would have ever done such a thing. Sober.

      Under the expensive but flimsy plastic bumper cover, however, is a nice metal beam which is quite good at stopping things from putting a crimp into the sheet metal. which is quite a bit better than what we had in the years between big solid bumpers, and when the gov decided to mandate minimum bumper requirements.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    39. Re:Potholes? by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      I live in a province that has seasonal temperature fluctuations from -35F (about -32C) to 50C (125F) between summer and winter. And we use a ton of salt. Salt is quite corrosive to cement, and to metal.

      Our roads and highways have nicknames. The road of 1000 patches to the 10K patch highway. A good American example of patchwork is to visit Buffalo NY.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    40. Re:Potholes? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      20 years ago, sure, but less and less these days. My bumper -- the parts that absorb low-speed impacts -- are completely foam and plastic. They attach to a metal beam, but all of the characteristics of the thing we call a "bumper" are non-metal.

  3. Crazy? by inglorion_on_the_net · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've read the assertion that plastic roads sound like a crazy idea elsewhere, too. I don't think this ideas is crazy at all. Why would it be? We currently pave roads with asphalt which we get from crude oil. It makes sense to me that if we process the crude (or some other oil or source of hydrocarbons; say, recycled plastic) we can make something that works similarly well or even better.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    1. Re:Crazy? by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Normally...
      Plastic is slippery when wet
      Plastic is brittle when cold
      Plastic melts in heat
      Plastic is flammable

      Plastic is a more uniformed structure while asphalt is more jumbled. This jumbled makes it more complex and backups its own downsides.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Crazy? by sjames · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's a pretty good description of asphalt, composed of tar and aggregate.

    3. Re: Crazy? by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 2

      All of those things are true of asphalt as well. Asphalt is just bitumen (flammable, brittle in cold, melts in sunlight), and sand/gravel(slippery when wet). There really isn't anything stopping them from putting gravel in a plastic matrix and ending up with something not much different than asphalt. Except stronger and less brittle so that you can transport it in preformed sections.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    4. Re:Crazy? by inglorion_on_the_net · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sure, but after over 100 years of designing plastics with a wide variety of properties and applications, I don't see why we couldn't make plastics that can be (part of) road surfaces, too. If I understand correctly, the performance in wet conditions still has to be tested, but the temperature tolerance is already wider than that of asphalt. Combating the slippery when wet problem has been done before, too (e.g. the anti-slip coating on bath tubs or fiberglass yachts), although I am not aware of any efforts specifically to support cars and tires.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    5. Re:Crazy? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But even if it doesn't work out for pavement, we could always use the plastic to make small modular bricks with snap-together lugs that we could quickly assemble into gas stations, convenience stores and rest areas. Why, if you think about it we could make whole theme parks from this stuff.

    6. Re:Crazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      By that logic I should be able to improve the condition of the road by dumping a gallon of oil on it.

      Except your logic is seriously flawed.

      By using your own purposely confusing wording, we DO already improve the condition of roads by dumping gallons of oil on them. Have for decades.

      The details you are ignorant about:
      - Patching holes in asphalt roads with more asphalt is exactly what is done to improve them.
      - Asphalt is indeed made from oil.

      So the parents logic is sound, only your limited knowledge of the world is flawed, and trying to nix the idea based on that flawed logic combined with purposely confusing the issue by claiming asphalt is not made from oil, is the height of ignorance.

    7. Re:Crazy? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Plastic only becomes slippery because of its smooth texture. Simply get rid of that and it provides adequate grip. It's simply that smooth is cheap and usually desirable for aesthetic reasons.

      Some types of plastic are more durable than tarmac, even at low speeds. Some can be extremely heat resistant, e.g. cooking utensils.

      Flammability is worse for tarmac too, compared to plastics designed for fire safety.

      I'm sure they have thought of all these things. To assume otherwise would be foolish.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:Crazy? by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      but will they be able to make the roads do loops like my hotwheels race track?

    9. Re:Crazy? by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      There was a thing here in LA where a wildfire burned up to a major freeway then jumped the freeway, setting on fire a couple cars stuck in traffic. Imagine if the road itself caught on fire?

    10. Re:Crazy? by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      I almost did a woosh!

    11. Re: Crazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they used plastic to complement or substitute bitument that would be a great idea. Prefab road means a lot of retraining, new machinery, and how do you remove a section of prefab when it has integrated utility servuces

    12. Re: Crazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you loose your internet just because the road is been prepared.

      Bitument is much versatile. Concrete us great too.

      They reallfy should be looki g for other uses for plastic.

      Like making the cars out if plastic making it cheaper and people can just recycle car every five or ten years.

    13. Re: Crazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vandals will love it.
      Set it in fire and run.

      Hoons will love it
      Doing burnouts is great.

      Crane drivers will love it.
      Those slabs must be heavy.

      Plumbers will love it.
      Reconnecting pipes every swap is great.

      Rivers and oceans will love it.
      As the road surface wears down small plastic particles will be washed away into our eniroment.

    14. Re: Crazy? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      simple, you have wire connectors at each end of the prefab.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    15. Re:Crazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Want to try not saying things just to be a contrarian douchenozzle?

    16. Re:Crazy? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Plastic is slippery when wet

      The slippery of a substance is based on it's surface finish. Plastic is no more or less slippery than any other substance, it all depends on how it's finished. Much like the stupid solar roadway idea plastic and glass can both be made to be quite rough.

      Plastic is brittle when cold

      Current asphalt roads have various levels of polymers added to suit various environmental conditions. I can tell you now, unless you formulate your road specifically for cold weather (in which case it likely melts in warm weather), asphalt is equally brittle.

      Plastic melts in heat

      Asphalt melts in the heat, and plastic like asphalt can have its melting point controlled by varying its makeup and composition.

      Plastic is flammable

      Asphalt is flammable, and plastic like asphalt can have its ignition temperature controlled by varying its makeup and composition.

      Plastic is a more uniformed structure while asphalt is more jumbled. This jumbled makes it more complex and backups its own downsides.

      The structure of plastic can be adjusted to suit whatever properties you require. You want a soft smooth finish that looks great on a consumer product, you can have that. You want an ultra hard substance that is stronger than cast aluminium for industrial components, you can have that too.

      You should know that plastic or rather plastics (plural) describe a wide variety of materials with a wide variety of properties, many of which can be mixed and matched to suit almost any purpose.

    17. Re:Crazy? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

      Behind my house growing up was an unfinished gravel road. Every year or so, a truck would drive down it and spew some sort of oil mix on it. If you drove on it shortly after, your car would be a mess of oil spatters. After a day or two, it hardened into a sort of poor-man's asphalt. So, yes, you actually can vastly improve the condition of the road by dumping a lot of oil on it.

      I've heard an experimental variant of this is actually spreading used canola oil on the road. Apparently, the only downside is that your roads smell like french fries for a day or two after the application.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    18. Re:Crazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slippery in this context mostly depends on surface texture, granted you shouldn't go out there and make a road out of TEFLON or PEEK. But the regular culprits (PE, PP, PS, ...) should do a pretty good job at it! Being brittle isn't an issue for this application actually, but plastic isn't necessarily brittle at lower temperatures. It really depends on the additives you throw in, same for flammability really. And if you pick the right plastics you can get your glass transition temperature past 100C, so you'll outperform asphalt in terms of high temperature performance... The idea might sound silly, but it's pretty good if you start to think about it. You're no longer limited in terms of road texture you wish to apply, just apply it in the factory. Want sensors in the road surface, put them in during the moulding step, etc. And the best part is if you ever need to replace a section of road (and its designed in a good manner) you could replace it in minutes. And since your starting point is trash you're not exactly going to be causing any real environmental damage with this one. In fact it should be even less since you need to mine less materials for this approach.

    19. Re:Crazy? by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 1
      It pains me a little to see so many geeks apparently failing to notice the high durability forms of plastic used in products all around them. Consider that plastic is more popular than metal for semiautomatic pistol lowers, and it's not just because it's cheaper--it's extremely durable and not slippery at all. And how on earth can you assume that asphalt isn't flammable, brittle, and melty?

      Plastic is a more uniformed structure while asphalt is more jumbled. This jumbled makes it more complex and backups its own downsides.

      Then mix an aggregate into the plastic. We already do this on a smaller scale with glass and carbon fibers, and the result is so incredibly durable that the manufacturers call it "fiberglass" or "carbon fiber" to avoid drawing attention to the fact that it's actually 90%+ plastic. With current fabrication techniques it's probably not cost effective to build a carbon fiber road, but there's no reason we couldn't blend various kinds of rock aggregate into the plastic and figure out what works best.

    20. Re:Crazy? by umghhh · · Score: 1

      I hope they have thought of all these things. It would be foolish if they did not..

      Here I FTFY.

    21. Re:Crazy? by reg · · Score: 1

      In the US asphalt concrete is composed of asphalt (or more correctly asphalt cement) and aggregate.

      In the rest of the English speaking world asphalt is composed of bitumen and aggregate.

      There hasn't been tar in roads for decades (hint: it is highly carcinogenic)

          -Jeremy

    22. Re:Crazy? by sjames · · Score: 1

      It's a matter of a somewhat slippery group of terms. Coal tar is carcinogenic. Pine tar is not unless creosote is formed due to the method of pyrolysis. Asphalt is the residue after distillation of crude oil or bitumen just as coal tar and pine tar are the residues or pyrolysis of coal and pine.

      In any event, it shares the problematic traits GP listed for plastic, as do the tars from other sources.

    23. Re:Crazy? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Fresh oil and chips!

      Somewhat bizarre road sign to see if you don't know what it is.

    24. Re:Crazy? by phorm · · Score: 1

      That would almost be enough to make me switch professions...
      Actually in some cases, I wonder if it might not actually be functional. I don't know about gas-stations or convenience stores, but certainly a model based on this might be a fun and relatively quick way to create temporary shelters or structures.

  4. The Plastic Rush of 2020! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be entertaining to see everyone rush to obtain all of the plastic from the ocean so that they could build roads. Environmentalism never looked so promising

    1. Re:The Plastic Rush of 2020! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      The assumption is that the plastic from the oceans can be successfully recycled to the right quality product.
      Not to sound anti-environmental but these issues are often far more complex.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:The Plastic Rush of 2020! by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Not unlike the plastic rush of he 40's: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

  5. I'm guessing they will need parts on hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Accidents with chemical spills, fire.. Sounds like they will need to have prefab parts on hand to replace after these types of accidents, unless it's a special type of plastic.

    What will the surface texture be? Need to make sure the friction is good enough in wet conditions.

    1. Re:I'm guessing they will need parts on hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you think happens to traditional asphalt exposed to chemical spills or fire?

    2. Re:I'm guessing they will need parts on hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The case is pretty much the same for asphalt. It's quite a long path from pumping up oil to getting it to a point where you can dump it on roads.
      As long as there is throughput for maintenance and new roads you just pick stuff from the top to cover the most acute needs first.

      Damn, this thread already looks like the ones about self driving cars where every example to why it wouldn't work applies equally to the current system.

  6. Expansion / Contraction? Damage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How will these plastic road segments hold up to the kinds of expansion and contraction roads undergo during especially hot or cold days?

    Will they be have to be melted together to prevent cracks between segments for weatherproofing against rain, snow and ice? (Water expands when frozen, remember)

    And how well will they stack up against some idiot driving along on a rim with no tire?

    Will they be fireproof? One flaming car wreck and you've got a wall of fire that goes on for miles, spewing toxic smoke.

    1. Re:Expansion / Contraction? Damage? by Venerable+Vegetable · · Score: 1

      These questions remain largely unanswered. It is mostly just an idea, I wouldn't even call it a concept just yet. There is more information in dutch here: http://www.kws.nl/nl/innovatie...

      They claim it is weatherproof and can handle temperatures from -40 to +80 degrees Celcius, but I cannot find any science to back this up. They haven't worked out how to link the segments yet. No word about damage repair, but they do mention they want to use it for bicycle roads first. On the subject of fire they say they are looking into a fireproof coating (which I think is highly dubious).

    2. Re:Expansion / Contraction? Damage? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Will they be have to be melted together to prevent cracks between segments for weatherproofing against rain, snow and ice? (Water expands when frozen, remember)

      Actually, modern road construction pretty much demands that all water drain through the road, rather than just drain to the side. The reason is that if water collects on the surface (which it does even when the road is peaked as they should be), it can form ice and you end up with black ice during the cold days.

      It also makes the road shiny and makes your headlights reflect away from you, making it even harder to see the road markings on those rainy days.

      By peaking and making the asphalt drainable, the water doesn't collect on the surface, so you avoid black ice and the road appears drier in the rain so you can see the lane markings and other things much easier.

      It does, however, lead to pothole issues as the aggregate bed below it shifts more. But it's one reason why modern paved roads are far quieter (the airiness also does a number to reduce tire noise), and far easier to drive on.

      It happened quite recently, so you can still see the difference - parts of the road are nasty and hard to see and slippery, while other parts are quiet, easy to see and has good grip, In the same weather conditions.

  7. Until the tanker catches fire... by barfy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anyone see what just happened in California? Can't imagine the practical road damage and amazing environmental damage of tons of plastic on fire.

    1. Re:Until the tanker catches fire... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      You do know that asphalt burns, right?

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    2. Re:Until the tanker catches fire... by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Because the world would come to an end if a 20 meter section of road burns.

    3. Re:Until the tanker catches fire... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

      You haven't seen a lot of plastic on fire, and besides that point the point where asphalt catches on fire is much higher than most (all?) plastic.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    4. Re:Until the tanker catches fire... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. Imagine the SF freeway being rendered unusable for a entire day due to massive plastic fire.

    5. Re:Until the tanker catches fire... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Anyone see what just happened in California? Can't imagine the practical road damage and amazing environmental damage of tons of plastic on fire.

      yes, i saw what just happened in california! why don't you share a link so i can see it again for the first time!

    6. Re:Until the tanker catches fire... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      OMG! Why are we not doing more to prevent this??

  8. Sounds crazy because it is by kheldan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Unless you're the company selling the idea in the first place. What it sounds like to me is expensive and pointless. Isn't asphalt reusable? Scoop it up, reheat it, pave with it again? By all means have someone start cleaning up the oceans and recycling all the plastic waste out there, but not this way.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  9. Possible problems by bjdevil66 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Unless these road pieces are chemically altered in some way, traction on plastic roads would be awful. And shards of the roads that break off under wear and tear are going to be blown out into nature, poisoning the environments they land in over time.

    I'm all for cleaning out the oceans, but this seems like moving toxic, nature-insoluble trash from one environment to another. Permanently ridding ourselves of the plastic is the right path.

    1. Re:Possible problems by sinij · · Score: 3, Informative

      Another point - plastic degrades with UV exposure. It becomes hard and brittle.

    2. Re:Possible problems by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      Unless these road pieces are chemically altered in some way, traction on plastic roads would be awful

      Couldn't they have come up with some ridging or some pattern of grooves?

      I'm all for cleaning out the oceans

      I bet some stupid manipulative marketing asshole/bitch just made that up.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    3. Re:Possible problems by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      "Couldn't they have come up with some ridging or some pattern of grooves?"

      I know! A slot down the center of each lane that would engage a fin projecting from the bottom of each car. This would allow high-speed banking on curves and even, just for fun, the occasional inside loop.

    4. Re:Possible problems by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I'm all for cleaning out the oceans, but this seems like moving toxic, nature-insoluble trash from one environment to another. Permanently ridding ourselves of the plastic is the right path.

      That seems like a waste when we are constantly producing new plastic all the time. Why not recycle the plastic so that we don't have to use more oil making more plastic?

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    5. Re:Possible problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have seen 'plastic' roads for years.

      There is a section between Lincoln and Omaha Nebraska on I-80. A fairly well used bit of road that is holding up very well.

      They add in sand and other bits of rock to change the texture if I remember correctly.

      The problem they had was not brittleness but that it was to plastic... If you get beyond Lincoln and toward grand island you can see what I mean. There are literally ruts in the roads. The trucks are too heavy for it and they deform. The nice thing though is they can literally grind it back up on the spot and put it back and flatten it back out.

      Its odd in my 5 seconds of googling. I could not find anything. But they had signs up for years about 'road segment testing'. I remember seeing the signs in the 80s and thinking 'that is a cool use of 2 litter bottles'

      It is actually more pleasant to drive on. As it is not as noisy as ashfault or cement.

    6. Re:Possible problems by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

      Banning the production of new plastic (with "critical national defense" as the limited exception, of course). That would probably mean that superfluous usage of plastic for worthless crap like Happy Meal toys would stop altogether. Other more "important" items like shopping bags, trash bags, baby bottles, Solo party cups, etc. would go up in cost, reflecting the true life cycle cost of a product.

      That will never happen, however, until a crisis that affects the everyday Joes happens. "What do you mean there are no more Solo cups for the party tonight??"

    7. Re:Possible problems by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Couldn't they have come up with some ridging or some pattern of grooves?

      Rubberized tracks seem to have really nice traction. It might be difficult to come up with a combination that has both traction and durability.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:Possible problems by Venerable+Vegetable · · Score: 1

      http://www.kws.nl/nl/innovatie... (dutch)

      They will experiment on how to add traction and say they might add sand or gravel if they can't solve this problem with just plastic. On the topic of degradation they claim that plastic is being used outdoors a lot already without problems. I am not sure if the circumstances are comparable though.

  10. Some data missing by CurryCamel · · Score: 2

    Sounds like a great idea. Lets hope the details will add up.

    TFA:

    The things that aren't addressed by the available information are safety and cost.

    Nor is winter & studded tyres mentioned. Studded tyres eat through asphalt & the stones in it quite quickly. How about this plastic?
    Perhaps this is only for warm climates. Rotterdam seems to not average sub-zero temperatures even in February, so I guess studded tyres are not used there? Any duch person to confirm?

    1. Re: Some data missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no studded tires used during winter in The Netherlands. Some people drive on winter tires but there are still a lot of people who keep driving on summer or 4 season tires. Usually that's fine except for a few days of snow.

    2. Re: Some data missing by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 3, Funny

      They should make the road Lego compatible. Studded tires would work then.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    3. Re:Some data missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the times when there is snowfall we keep our roads, including bicycle lanes, excluding side walks, free from snow and ice.

    4. Re:Some data missing by Venerable+Vegetable · · Score: 1

      Studded tyres are actually illegal to use here in The Netherlands. We don't get a lot of snow and in the high density areas the roads are salted everytime there is a notion of snow. Unlike most other european countries it isn't even required to use winter tyres during the winter.

  11. Bad idea, though it may somehow work! by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    Imagine a vehicle fire. A plastic situation road creates fuel right there! If a round is fired at a suspect on a chase, and this chase ends up with an accident, I can't see how a plastic road can help matters. Does it?

    1. Re:Bad idea, though it may somehow work! by pahles · · Score: 1

      Have you ever seen the damage done to asphalt created by fire? Asphalt burns too.

      --
      Sig?
  12. Not going to pull plastic out of the ocean by jphamlore · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The idea of pulling plastic out of the oceans is senseless to anyone who gives the idea a minute of thought. Do these people have any idea how big the ocean is and how small the particles of plastic can be?

    1. Re:Not going to pull plastic out of the ocean by pahles · · Score: 2

      So we just let it sit in the ocean? Of course it is better to keep it out of the ocean in the first place. That doesn't mean we can't or shouldn't clean up the current mess.

      --
      Sig?
    2. Re:Not going to pull plastic out of the ocean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To bad there are no other sources of plastics around...

    3. Re:Not going to pull plastic out of the ocean by LetterRip · · Score: 1

      The harm most people are concerned about is mammals and birds. Pieces of plastic that are 'the size of a grain of rice' - don't pose any risk to mammals and birds. They also don't pose a risk to the majority of marine life.

      The author claims the devices will 'break really quick' - devices engineered to be submerged in the ocean constantly have different design constraints than devices that are for capturing wind energy. There is no reason to believe that a properly designed structure will be prone to failure and breakage.

      The author claims the devices will 'harm wildlife' - as long as it is a net harm reduction (which seems likely) who cares? Also she grossly exaggerates the risks of harm.

      The author has a point that the captured plastic won't be desired by recyclers - not sure why that matters. Worse case scenario is burn it.

      Her next two points have nothing to do with the device - beach clean up can occur independently of the booms.

      Devices to reduce plastic waste flow to the oceans can still be done.

    4. Re:Not going to pull plastic out of the ocean by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Yes, but this is a major reason why this story is being promoted - because it has to do with man's (well, actually, it's mostly western societies that must pay for this) constant and continuing evil raping of the nice, fluffy planet. Don't you know that everything these days has to reference the environment otherwise it's unsustainable and therefore doubleplus ungood?

    5. Re:Not going to pull plastic out of the ocean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Psst. I think they are talking about mining this. You see there's this giant island of trash (mostly plastic items) floating in the middle of the North Pacific Ocean.

      Here's some more good info.

      The idea is completely stupid, but not because the material to use is hard to locate or get a hold of. It may just not be practical to get it and bring it back to land for processing, and the end product doesn't seem to be very well thought out, either.

    6. Re:Not going to pull plastic out of the ocean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think his point was that just finding/collecting it would be a logistical nightmare, if not impossible. The plastic "islands" that people talk about aren't like big piles of milk cartons and soda containers clumped together, they're just huge quantities of tiny little plastic particles spread out of huge areas. From the air they might look like an "island" but at the surface you can't even see it.

  13. Refinishing roads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When it's time to refinish the road, they come along and scrape off some asphalt and lay down some new asphalt. With the plastic road, they'll have to remove a whole section which involves disrupting ALL utilities that go through it, and they laying down the new one. Totally impractical.

    1. Re:Refinishing roads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might it be a good idea to put ALL those utilities underneath the roads?

    2. Re:Refinishing roads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the summary:

      > ... and then processing it into prefabricated sections of road with integrated utility channels and drainage.

      All I was saying is that I think it is a bad idea to build integrated utility channels into the plastic road sections because those utilities will need to be disrupted when a replacement section needs to be laid. Yes, placing all utilities under the road instead of through the road (as it is today) is the right thing to do.

      Maybe the utility channels are for light duty roads like bicycle lanes with lamp posts along side.

    3. Re:Refinishing roads by vovin · · Score: 1

      Yes, placing all utilities under the road instead of through the road (as it is today) is the right thing to do.

      Only in those areas with a frost depth of zero inches: Parts of far South California, New Mexico, and Florida.
      frost map

      Unless by utilities you are excluding sewer and water and including power and cable (which primarily run overhead in most locations).

  14. Toxic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean those toxic water bottles that everyone drinks out of?

    Plastic is much less toxic than asphalt. And as far as traction is concerned, they would just mold or extrude a surface that would allow for tires to grip well in all sorts of weather. And I can see additives that would eliminate the need for salting the roads in winter.

  15. Why start the hard way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why start with random plastic that is all of differing types, dirty, and of suspect quality?

    I would begin with a prototype made from brand new plastic first, then try with properly recycled plastic, once again with low quality random plastic scraps, and only when all those work move onto ocean plastic waste.

    Seems like a typical "need money so let's greenwash" project. Those rarely work out well. :(

  16. Morrison Bridge by kschendel · · Score: 5, Informative

    Even if we assume that they have magically found a way to get and recycle the plastic garbage in a few bazillion cubic meters of ocean, they'll still have to do better with the end result than experiments so far. The Morrison Bridge in Portland OR has a skid resistant polymer deck that is already coming apart after just a couple years. I wouldn't write this idea off a priori but there major problems to overcome.

    1. Re:Morrison Bridge by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Does it? I hadn't noticed.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    2. Re:Morrison Bridge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you're not paying attention.

      http://www.kgw.com/story/news/local/2015/01/16/morrison-bridge-closed-for-emergency-repairs-saturday/21876075/

      "It does seem to be the bridge project that keeps on giving," Pullen said. "We're very apologetic to bridge users, but we are faced with yet again some more problems out on the Morrison Bridge."

      The emergency repairs are just temporary fixes. A permanent solution will cost an additional $6 million to $10 million. The funds will come from bridge maintenance budgets.

      "The lane and bridge closures are related to problems with lift span deck panels made of fiber reinforced polymer (FRP)," Pullen said. "The FRP panels showed signs of deterioration soon after being installed in a project that replaced the original open steel grating deck."

      Multnomah County is currently suing the company that installed the original panels in 2012, to recoup the cost associated with replacing the deck.

  17. When one fails to learn from history ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, please read these two links -

    http://www.spokesman.com/stori...

    http://lmtribune.com/northwest...

    Unless they use plastic which has a very high flashpoint temperature , history could repeat itself

    1. Re:When one fails to learn from history ... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Here in Arizona we are laying a lot of rubber roads: more durable, quieter, and no more mountains of old tires. It's like driving on carpet. But in accidents, they can catch fire.

    2. Re:When one fails to learn from history ... by TWX · · Score: 5, Informative

      They are also a little more dangerous for heavy trucks. A friend drives a 16-wheel dump truck with pushers and a strongarm, and apparently if he has to panic-stop the rubberized-asphalt roads are more prone to surface melting and turning to liquid under the tires, effectively making the truck hydroplane in otherwise dry conditions. Nothing like fifteen tons of uncontrollable truck sliding at freeway speeds toward a stupid motorist that cut-off the truck...

      I've also noticed they're not nearly as durable as the hard concrete surfaces they replace. There are stretches on most of the oldest coated roads like the I-17 around the Durango Curve and on the US-60 where it diverges Eastbound from the I-10 where the coating has been scraped off in patches, and there are other sections where the coating has split above the control joints in the underlying concrete, making the road noisy again.

      I won't deny they're beautifully quiet when new, but they just don't age very well.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    3. Re:When one fails to learn from history ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      As this is an article about Dutch roads. Most highways here have a top layer of asphalt; this is a mix of materials which include: rubber, plastics, stone, zand, and a tar like binding agent called bitumen.

      It is designed to make highways be able to drain water, have a rough structure for grip on tires and to reduce noise pollution, and handle the temperature and humidity changes of the Dutch climate.

      https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeer_Open_Asfalt
      There are some pictures of the top layers of a Dutch highway. And lots of text in Dutch, but no link to an english page.

      As I mention that asphalt layer is only the top 7 cm of a highway, below it are:
      - 3 layers of 6 cm each of asphalt/concrete slabs
      - 30 cm of unbounded foundation
      - 70 cm of sand

      Below this a foundation of Styrofoam blocks may be used on very soft ground to reduce sagging.

    4. Re:When one fails to learn from history ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this is a prototype surface; how has your friend the trucker driven on them to the point where he's hydroplaning around?

      Just curious.

    5. Re:When one fails to learn from history ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are also a little more dangerous for heavy trucks. A friend drives a 16-wheel dump truck with pushers and a strongarm, and apparently if he has to panic-stop the rubberized-asphalt roads are more prone to surface melting and turning to liquid under the tires, effectively making the truck hydroplane in otherwise dry conditions. Nothing like fifteen tons of uncontrollable truck sliding at freeway speeds toward a stupid motorist that cut-off the truck...

      maybe it would be safer to just rear-end the other guy?

    6. Re:When one fails to learn from history ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an example, see me, this morning, when a semi truck was swerving every which way down the interstate to ensure nobody could get past him. Seriously no idea what was wrong with that guy.

    7. Re: When one fails to learn from history ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree.
      I have seen plastic and rubber used as speed bumps on roads and they are just shredded by hoons doing burnouts on them for extra smoke. The repair crew can't just patch them with bitument so they stay

    8. Re:When one fails to learn from history ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an example, see me, this morning, when a semi truck was swerving every which way down the interstate to ensure nobody could get past him. Seriously no idea what was wrong with that guy.

      Asleep at the wheel methinks.

    9. Re:When one fails to learn from history ... by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      most people have NO idea what it takes to drive a truck. its not as simple as a car. they need more room to brake, and many motorists dont respect that. At least in NY

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    10. Re:When one fails to learn from history ... by TWX · · Score: 1

      It's not a prototype surface, it's a new technique that's being widely implemented. The I-10, the I-17, and most of the state routes through this urban area are paved in the stuff or will be shortly. If one wants to take a freeway to get across town there's no way to avoid it.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    11. Re:When one fails to learn from history ... by strikethree · · Score: 1

      Nothing like fifteen tons of uncontrollable truck sliding at freeway speeds toward a stupid motorist that cut-off the truck...

      I am cool with this. Darwinism in action. My only concern is for the truck driver. :)

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    12. Re:When one fails to learn from history ... by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Here in Arizona we are laying a lot of rubber roads: more durable, quieter, and no more mountains of old tires. It's like driving on carpet. But in accidents, they can catch fire.

      then you can use concrete tires which should last a long time.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    13. Re:When one fails to learn from history ... by TWX · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately if a fifteen-ton dump truck gets into an accident on the freeway during heavy traffic, there will be many more people impacted both literally and due to the effects on traffic patterns than just the truck driver and the car that caused the wreck.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    14. Re:When one fails to learn from history ... by reg · · Score: 1

      Your friend is full of it. Most rubberized asphalt concrete in the western US uses 20% rubber, and that is mostly in the form of rubber granules mixed in. These come directly from recycled tires. So: 1) they are tire rubber - if they were melting then so would the car/truck ties. 2) they are not continuous on the surface, so there would be no continuous layer to slide on. 3) It is impossible for most people to tell if the surface has rubber or not - generally you need a core sample and a microscope. For terminal blends and plastic modifiers, you have to do a chemical analysis of the recovered binder.

      Also, rubberized AC has mostly the same noise characteristics as conventional AC. You might be thinking about open-graded asphalt concrete, which is significantly quieter...

          -Jeremy

    15. Re:When one fails to learn from history ... by rioki · · Score: 1

      maybe it would be safer to just rear-end the other guy?

      If you could not properly stop in a straight line you either did not pay attention or you did not maintain the safety distance. I would rather have a car on car collision with dV of 20 mph than a truck on car collision. Even at slow speeds the truck will pile drive through your car.

    16. Re:When one fails to learn from history ... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Hell, most motorists don't even allow enough braking distance when driving their giant SUVs.

  18. traction by Skynyrd · · Score: 1

    I am trying to think of a type of plastic that can handle millions of cars and tires, yet doesn't wear down - or - if it does wear down, maintains traction and grip.

    As a motorcyclist, the idea of this road makes no sense, and is a bit scary. But if they can figure out the traction thing, let's give it a try.

    1. Re:traction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am trying to think of a type of bitumen that can handle millions of cars and tires, yet doesn't wear down - or - if it does wear down, maintains traction and grip.
      Hmm, could mix it with crushed rock to create some sort of aggregate...

    2. Re:traction by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I am trying to think of a type of plastic that can handle millions of cars and tires, yet doesn't wear down - or - if it does wear down, maintains traction and grip.

      As a motorcyclist, the idea of this road makes no sense, and is a bit scary. But if they can figure out the traction thing, let's give it a try.

      The sun will probably destroy it before the tires do. Sunlight breaks down plastics.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  19. It is crazy - unless you are a pot smoking dutchie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those guys are all crazy

  20. Seeming better idea, plastic in asphalt by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Shamelessly lifted from the comments on the iEEE article, is a link to India using plastic as binder in asphalt.

    This seems like a much more practical step towards using lots of plastic in roads, and the article hints that it may help prevent potholes which would mean the road would be usable longer. They've already been testing it on real roads for a year.

    I just can't see how the equivalent of potholes in a pure plastic road are anything but disaster - a ton of water gathering in the conduits, and any fragmentation would lead to very sharp shards on the road, or large areas just failing wholesale.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  21. "Plastic" is not a monolithic thing by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 0

    First off, another poster noted plastic is usually significantly less toxic than asphalt. I mean, you probably consume food and beverages from plastic containers all of the time--how would you feel about drinking from an asphalt cup? There might be environmental dangers, but this would be due to the mechanical properties of the plastic (does it break apart into particles or shards?), not the chemical properties.

    Which brings us to my next point: "plastic" is not some generic, monolithic thing, which is why so many plastic products will try to use another term to avoid the connotations of cheapness or flimsiness: "resin", "polymer", brand names or genericized brand names (acrylic, nylon, Kevlar, lucite) and, my personal favorite, calling attention to the fiber used to strengthen the plastic (fiberglass, "carbon fiber").

    I'm not a plastics chemical engineer, but I have noticed that softer plastics seem to resist shredding or dusting pretty well. It may well be possible to chemically transform unsorted waste plastic into a suitable material, particularly if some kind of fiber or rock aggregate material is added. I'm not going to say this will definitely work, but it's certainly a lot more complicated than you're making it out to be. First off, another poster noted plastic is usually significantly less toxic than asphalt. I mean, you probably consume food and beverages from plastic containers all of the time--how would you feel about drinking from an asphalt cup? There might be environmental dangers, but this would be due to the mechanical properties of the plastic (does it break apart into particles or shards?), not the chemical properties.

    Which brings us to my next point: "plastic" is not some generic, monolithic thing, which is why so many plastic products will try to use another term to avoid the connotations of cheapness or flimsiness: "resin", "polymer", brand names or genericized brand names (acrylic, nylon, Kevlar, lucite) and, my personal favorite, calling attention to the fiber used to strengthen the plastic (fiberglass, "carbon fiber").

    I'm not a plastics chemical engineer, but I have noticed that softer plastics seem to resist shredding or dusting pretty well. It may well be possible to chemically transform unsorted waste plastic into a suitable material, particularly if some kind of fiber or rock aggregate material is added. I'm not going to say this will definitely work, but it's certainly a lot more complicated than you're making it out to be. Plastic is not a catch-all term for cheap stuff that breaks when you use it. Airplanes and boats are made of plastic. Semiautomatic pistols are made of plastic. $3000 bicycles are made out of plastic. Let's keep an open mind here.

    1. Re:"Plastic" is not a monolithic thing by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 2

      Argh, copy/paste fail. Let me try that again:

      First off, another poster noted plastic is usually significantly less toxic than asphalt. I mean, you probably consume food and beverages from plastic containers all of the time--how would you feel about drinking from an asphalt cup? There might be environmental dangers, but this would be due to the mechanical properties of the plastic (does it break apart into particles or shards?), not the chemical properties.

      Which brings us to my next point: "plastic" is not some generic, monolithic thing, which is why so many plastic products will try to use another term to avoid the connotations of cheapness or flimsiness: "resin", "polymer", brand names or genericized brand names (acrylic, nylon, Kevlar, lucite) and, my personal favorite, calling attention to the fiber used to strengthen the plastic (fiberglass, "carbon fiber").

      I'm not a plastics chemical engineer, but I have noticed that softer plastics seem to resist shredding or dusting pretty well. It may well be possible to chemically transform unsorted waste plastic into a suitable material, particularly if some kind of fiber or rock aggregate material is added. I'm not going to say this will definitely work, but it's certainly a lot more complicated than you're making it out to be. Plastic is not a catch-all term for cheap stuff that breaks when you use it. Airplanes and boats are made of plastic. Semiautomatic pistols are made of plastic. $3000 bicycles are made out of plastic. Let's keep an open mind here.

  22. smart roads by cmdr_tofu · · Score: 1

    I think this is a great idea, but we really need to make to lay the foundation for the next generation of computer controlled vehicles.

    Do I know what that is? Nope, but I think it would be reasonable for computer systems on my car to be informed immediately if there is a problem ahead, whether it be damage to road detected by sensors in the plastic road itself or simply congestion to inform my vehicle to take an alternate route.

    Perhap road sensors could detect the provide feedback to rooba-plows as well and make noises to scare deer off of country roads well in advance of cars :)

  23. Wouldn't put pipes in there by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 2

    The space for cables is a good idea but I wouldn't put pipes in there, at least in colder climates as they would freeze.

    I think this would be pretty good for parking lots and sidewalks to start with since you don't seem to need to lay down a thick gravel subsurface.

  24. Glass roads by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 2

    But I thought all of our roads were going to be glass electricity generating ones!

    1. Re:Glass roads by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Grant funding expired for that one. This is the new one.

  25. Why not make self replicating plastic harvesters? by trout007 · · Score: 1

    That way the just go collect the plastic and make more of themselves until the ocean is clean.

    Of course we may run into the Slylandro problem.
    http://wiki.uqm.stack.nl/Probe

    --
    I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
  26. solar roadways by MauriceV · · Score: 2

    This is where it's at: http://www.solarroadways.com/i...

    1. Re:solar roadways by Rhywden · · Score: 1

      Good grief, that scam again?

  27. A better headline by ModernGeek · · Score: 2

    A better headline would be, "Are plastic roads the future?"

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
  28. Paving with bricks by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One time when I visited Rotterdam (wonderful people and a great city, btw) I saw some street construction near the hotel I stayed in. The street was paved with bricks. Instead of using a jackhammer to get through the street's surface, the workers just dug up the bricks, did their work, smoothed out the surface and re-installed the bricks. When they were done, it looked like they were never there. So it seems more like a matter of replacing those bricks with plastic ones, as bricks are already being used for road surfaces.

    1. Re:Paving with bricks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on the streets, sidewalks are almost always tiles and utilities are below them so we can easily maintain the utilities.
      Streets inside cities are bricks or asphalt, I am not sure why they choose one over the other, and a street may change between them.

      The latest construction technique for bricked roads now use a crane with a special arm that holds a large section of pre-layed bricks which lays large sections quickly, then the brick layers just fill in between the sections.

      We also have machines to scrape off the layer of asphalt so we can lay a new layer on top of the road foundation.
      In Amsterdam and Rotterdam we only use jackhamers to remove asphalt between the tram tracks.

    2. Re:Paving with bricks by DoubleUP · · Score: 1

      The asphalt roads are for getting through town, the brick ones for getting to places in town.

      --
      This sig may contain nuts.
    3. Re:Paving with bricks by hackertourist · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In .nl, bricks are only used in older side streets that see little traffic (i.e. they're there because they've been there for a long time and it hasn't been necessary to resurface the road). New construction favors tarmac. Tarmac is cheaper to put down as it's all done with giant machines, while bricklaying takes a lot of manual labor. Tarmac is also safer because you have more grip, and it's a lot more comfortable to drive on.

      This plastic road would be easier to put down than bricks because it comes in large sections you can crane into place.

    4. Re:Paving with bricks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the bricks are denser then water they will be fine in flooding conditions. Plastic is not more dense then water.

      In Minnesota around a hundred years ago they paved roads with pitch coated wood bricks. They were cheap and worked fine until a heavy rainfall.

    5. Re:Paving with bricks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Even new roads in Dutch residential areas are built with bricks to give the road less of a racetrack character. Asphalt is of course the choice for more important roads.

  29. Re:The point is moot either way due to corruption. by TWX · · Score: 1

    That's a shame. Our roads here in the Phoenix-area seem to be serviced on a schedule. About once a decade on the major roads they grind the surface off and lay a new one down so that they never get horribly bad. Probably every 20-30 years or so on the neighborhood streets that see less traffic.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  30. Re:Economic disruption by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    Think what you will of the people employed to maintain the asphalt roads and highways you use every day but they make quite a bit of money, especially considering the level of education required for that kind of work. Lower the total number of jobs required for road construction and maintenance and suddenly the businesses those formerly well paid construction workers patronized will feel the pain.

    Don't worry, like all great ideas that will cost less and employ fewer people, this will cost more and employ more people.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  31. It'll never work in the U.S. by rnturn · · Score: 1

    The way roads are done in the U.S.:

    1.) Award contract to the lowest bidder.

    2.) Lowest bidder was the lowest bidder because they plan on using substandard materials.

    3.) Resulting road falls apart in 4-5 years (or less).

    4.) Go to 1.

    There is no desire or advantage to build roads that don't need to be rebuilt very few years. The Free Market(TM) and your (and my) tax dollars at work. Everybody wins (road contractors, car dealers, repair shops, etc.) but the people who have to drive on the crappy roads.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    1. Re:It'll never work in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't work here either. And it doesn't have to.
      "the Dutch city of Rotterdam is looking at partnering with a company" should be read as "the Dutch city of Rotterdam is looking at giving money to a company"
      That's the only part that needs to work.

    2. Re:It'll never work in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The Free Market(TM)" is the reason socialized roads are crappy? Would you care to explain your statement?

    3. Re:It'll never work in the U.S. by nnull · · Score: 1

      If they bothered to give a proper criteria, they could bid for better roads. It wouldn't matter if it was free market or some communist dictatorship with central planning. Bad planning is bad planning, no matter where or what it is. Blame the people making up the RFQ with their lousy terms, not the free market.

    4. Re:It'll never work in the U.S. by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      "There is no desire or advantage to build roads that don't need to be rebuilt very few years."

      Speak for yourself on that one. I, and MILLIONS of others in the USA, want roads that last more than "very few years".
      Living through reconstruction of the roadway (or rather, lack thereof as it falls apart and its cracks filled with tar) is a ridiculous and laughable.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    5. Re:It'll never work in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so, your "4-5" year roads are built to the specs that those evil capitalist corporations put into the RFP ... except that it's not the corporations writing those RFPs, and the standards are written by the states. Just to further point out your jackassery, the roads aren't being rebuilt; they're being recapped. Rather than building an entire road that gets destroyed, we now build roads that last a long time, but do so at the expense of a 1" thick wear layer on top. It's actually a whole hell of a lot cheaper and gets better results over the long run.

    6. Re:It'll never work in the U.S. by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      The way roads are done in the U.S.:

      1.) Award contract to the lowest bidder.

      2.) Lowest bidder was the lowest bidder because they plan on using substandard materials.

      3.) Resulting road falls apart in 4-5 years (or less).

      4.) Go to 1.

      There is no desire or advantage to build roads that don't need to be rebuilt very few years. The Free Market(TM) and your (and my) tax dollars at work. Everybody wins (road contractors, car dealers, repair shops, etc.) but the people who have to drive on the crappy roads.

      Hey, who remembers the I-84 widening project in CT in the early 2000s, where the contractor installed the catch basins upside down? And the firm doing the inspection signed off on them, so the contractor wasn't liable for the costs of fixing it?
      Ah, memories.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  32. ridiculous by argStyopa · · Score: 2

    This is ridiculous.
    First, the expansion/contraction of plastics is generally MUCH much higher than concrete/pavement.
    Second, the "prefab road sections" are absurd; nobody builds roads like this already (of any material) because they would be ruinously expensive (not because of the raw material costs), nothing has come close to the level of durability needed to handle 50-ton trucks repeatedly for decades, and extremely hard to deploy.
    Third, the overwhelming majority of plastic in the ocean is 0.1mm or smaller (http://theconversation.com/in-the-ocean-the-most-harmful-plastic-is-too-small-to-see-35336) - the cost/magnitude of scale to sieve this from the oceans is mind-boggling.

    Seriously, Dutch, I love you - but that's a mind-blowingly dumb idea.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:ridiculous by Dereck1701 · · Score: 1

      Not that this specific technique won't need extensive testing, but chances are that on occasion you've already driven on a road using plastics as a base material. Geofoam is regularly used in road projects throughout the world.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      http://www.komonews.com/news/l...

    2. Re:ridiculous by MrMr · · Score: 1

      Just a stupid startup company, what do they know anyway. They have only been doing major on- and off-shore infrastructure projects since 1854
      http://en.volkerwessels.com/en...

    3. Re:ridiculous by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Second, the "prefab road sections" are absurd; nobody builds roads like this already (of any material) because they would be ruinously expensive (not because of the raw material costs), nothing has come close to the level of durability needed to handle 50-ton trucks repeatedly for decades, and extremely hard to deploy.

      Conventional (asphalt or concrete) roads aren't specified to last fifty years - so why would you require plastic roads to do so?

      Not to mention that prefab sections of rail track (handling 100 tons of locomotives pulling half a mile of freight behind them) have been common for decades.

  33. Cover it with rubber from tires by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Seriously, to give a big of traction, cover it up with rubber.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  34. VolkerWessels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Chekhov says:

  35. Try it and work out the kinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should try it out first and work out the kinks. If it proves safe, durable and cost effective then we can expand it.

  36. Nonsense. It already works in Denmark... by jpellino · · Score: 1
    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  37. Might work by Dereck1701 · · Score: 1

    If plastics which would otherwise go into a landfill or are already contaminating the environment can be used, if it has similar/better performance characteristics to traditional road materials and if its is a similar/cheaper in price then of course. But there are a lot of ifs in there.

  38. Studded snow tires! by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

    This will be great!

    My studded snow tires will get much better grip on plastic and ice, than rock and ice in the winter. And they'll wear less!

  39. until it floods by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Then the sections of road will float away.

  40. thinking outside the box by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    Make highways out of silly putty. resilient enough to drive over, but self healing for potholes etc. Make them deep enough and no worries about abandoned cars.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  41. Know more about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DeAr Soulskill,
          i want to know more about plastic roads. Kindly tell me where i could contact u.