Slashdot Mirror


Federal Judge Calls BS On Homeland Security's 2008 STEM 'Emergency'

theodp writes: In 2008, the U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security enacted 'emergency' changes to Optional Practical Training (OPT) to extend the amount of time foreign STEM graduates of US colleges could stay in the country and work ("to alleviate the crisis employers are facing due to the current H-1B visa shortage", as Bill Gates explained it in 2007). More than seven years later, U.S. District Court Judge Ellen Huvelle has found that the government erred by not seeking public comment when it extended the program, and issued a ruling that could force tens of thousands of foreign workers on OPT STEM extensions to return to their home countries early next year. Huvelle has given the government six months to submit the OPT extension rule for proper notice and comment lest it be revoked. From the ruling (pdf): "By failing to engage in notice-and-comment rulemaking, the record is largely one-sided, with input only from technology companies that stand to benefit from additional F-1 student employees, who are exempted from various wage taxes. Indeed, the 17-month duration of the STEM extension appears to have been adopted directly from the unanimous suggestions by Microsoft and similar industry groups." Microsoft declared a new crisis in 2012, this time designed to link tech's need for H-1B visas to U.S. children's lack of CS savvy.

142 comments

  1. There is no way this looks good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DHS, FOUNDED BECAUSE FOREIGNERS LEVELED OUR STOCK EXCHANGE, HIRING FOREIGN IT LABOR, BY THE TENS OF THOUSANDS, TO BUILD CRITICAL ANTI-TERRORISM INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE.....

    What you need slaves because the US citizens were like "Screw this guys I am not building my own cage"?

    It's all about getting the budget approved and finding ways to get kickbacks on the side. Just like how all these utility companies are now outsourcing. "We need to remain competitive"; your 50 million dollar golden parachute wasn't big enough?

    Meanwhile, Real IT Pro's know there's a tremendous shortage of real Talent out there, and it has gotten so bad companies can only stumble upon people who know what they are doing. Everyone else just kinda passes as somewhat knowing what they are doing.

    1. Re: There is no way this looks good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, they overlook older workers who have the experience and skills for younger or foreign workers who they can pay less. Those older workers would love to work with and mentor the next generation. But, damn, we cost too much.

    2. Re:There is no way this looks good. by jafiwam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Meanwhile, Real IT Pro's know there's a tremendous shortage of real Talent out there, and it has gotten so bad companies can only stumble upon people who know what they are doing. Everyone else just kinda passes as somewhat knowing what they are doing.

      I am not surprised at all this tired old lie would show up as an anonymous first post in a thread like this.

      Pay more, more will come. Very simple. Why would anybody bother to learn / earn experience for your shit-pay job? Your problem is YOU.

    3. Re: There is no way this looks good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Pay more and more will come"is a bit of a farce. Around where I live (in an area with a lot of tech opportunities) whenever we post, we rarely even get through the interview and to the point where you make an offer.

      I know good people, but they aren't out looking for jobs.

      The only way to find good people is to steal them from someone else.

    4. Re: There is no way this looks good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, since you're clearly too stupid to see it. The other way to find good people is to hire good people and train them for what you need.

      But you likely expect them to have 10+ years experience and pass your magical insightful interviews that are nonsense. Since you're clearly a PhD in psychology and just want to know 'how they think' before hiring them.

      When people complain about 'not being able to find good people', it's you. I've never had this problem in hiring.

    5. Re: There is no way this looks good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      we rarely even get through the interview and to the point where you make an offer.

      Are you out looking for candidates yourself or are you going through HR? The reason I ask is that if you're going through HR, you're almost certainly getting idiot candidates who know how to push all of HR's buttons and tick every requirement from the ridiculous job description (also prepared by HR) on their doctored resume. The really good recruits, who refuse to engage in HR shenanigans or game playing are getting dropped as "not qualified". Finally, really good IT people tend to be introverts and not exactly the most outgoing or socially minded people. It's easy for these kind of people to be missed by an HR department staffed with non-tech extroverts who majored in liberal arts. Sometimes, in order to find good tech people, you have to do more to meet them where they're at instead of waiting for them to beat a path through the HR jungle.

    6. Re:There is no way this looks good. by Gob+Gob · · Score: 1

      Pay more, more will come. Very simple. Why would anybody bother to learn / earn experience for your shit-pay job? Your problem is YOU.

      No the problem is you, you, you and me. Whilst we all want cheaper "everything" and use online bidding to push prices down we create a cost/price based business. I have a SaaS platform and the pressure to sell seats for under $100 is huge. If that seat wants support then profit margins quickly are eaten away.

      We are an Australian firm. Our latest hire is a Dev in the Philippines because the western world is over priced (not their fault because they have too much costs & taxes).

      Oh and I have started her our on the "shitty jobs" so she knows what not to do (and can incrementally improve to code). She is enthusiastic and putting in a good effort . You see it called a "job" not a "happy-happy-la-la-time-on-someone-else's-$$$".

      Many people embrace their responsibilities to climate change by recycling more, using less energy and changing their living routines. It surprises me that they don't have the same attitude towards fiscal responsibility and expect their governments to borrow more prosperity from their futures to keep the illusion of wealth dancing in front of them.

    7. Re: There is no way this looks good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a former pseudo-HR person I can attest to the truth of this. HR people always do it the easy way, checking off buzzwords and demanding useless credentials with which to cover the HR person's ass.

    8. Re:There is no way this looks good. by ExekielS · · Score: 1

      Congratualtions on getting so far in life without understanding the basics of currency markets. Outsourcing weakens currency which makes imports more expensive and discourages outsourcing. Only currency manipulation and cheating can achieve that. The only reason we are expected to have so little is so that the wealthy, those who own everything, can have so much. Their wealth has increased a thousand times over while others see massive cuts throughout the middle and lower class. It is idiots like you that let our wages keep getting pushed down by those who manipulate currencies and the politicians who profit from that manipulation. In no natural state is outsourcing actually cheaper.

      --
      ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
    9. Re:There is no way this looks good. by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      True.

  2. STEM OPT extension was really bad by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Great recession, almost a depression, crashing economy, loss of million jobs a month.. unemployment spiking over 10%... underemployment way past 16%... and they persisted this farce of 17 month additional OPT for STEM? It is corporatocracy, pure and simple.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re: STEM OPT extension was really bad by brgj · · Score: 0

      Wow, what an insightful comment, I can't imagine why you would post this as AC.

    2. Re:STEM OPT extension was really bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well where I worked has just finished a repositioning where they conveniently got rid of a lot of people just above my level... They actually replaced them for the most part with lower grades...

      Prior to a few years ago I worked as a contractor at that company, which was much better wages. I barely got in the door as a regular employee after that with almost a 1/3 pay cut several months later, and my current yearly increases are not much over inflation, with no sign of a promotion anywhere in sight. In fact, even if I got one, all it would mean would be being stuck in my current position, since other jobs around the company rarely if ever offer positions to those above my grade level. Well, technically a person a level higher could accept a lowering of grade to get a different position, which if their current one runs out they might have to do...

      So yah, I'm seriously doubting this crises is anything but a bunch of crap, lest there be actual pressure on employers like mine..

    3. Re:STEM OPT extension was really bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great recession, almost a depression, crashing economy, loss of million jobs a month.. unemployment spiking over 10%... underemployment way past 16%... and they persisted this farce of 17 month additional OPT for STEM? It is corporatocracy, pure and simple.

      But that doesn't accurately depict the situation that existed in *TECH*. Yes, unemployment and underemployment among construction workers was high. But at the time, tech workers had an unemployment rate under 5% (and in 2008 unemployment overall was only 8%). Considering that it takes years to put a tech worker through a college degree and introductory employment, even if construction workers were qualified to switch from construction to tech, it wouldn't have helped the short term problem.

      Overall, adding more tech workers, even if they came from outside the US, probably helped with unemployment. Because those tech workers needed goods and services and construction workers were probably much better suited to providing those than to doing IT work.

      And it's also worth noting that making it artificially difficult to move from outside the US into the US doesn't necessarily mean that the IT work will be done by US workers. It's just as possible that some IT work would have shifted from US offices to foreign offices. Where the multiplier benefits (from goods and services demanded by IT workers) would have gone to foreign countries rather than the US. That's already been happening -- increasing the costs of domestic IT workers would likely have made it happen faster.

      I'm actually more worried about the shadow economy. In the shadow economy, workers move from Mexico (or wherever) to the US to perform jobs. Most of those jobs are in fact the kind that construction workers could otherwise do. We should have been doing more to connect construction workers with jobs that would otherwise be filled by illegal immigrants.

      Note: all this doesn't mean that the judge was incorrect in applying existing law. It's quite possible that the law was applied incorrectly, even if the policy was correct. The administration should have pursued changes in the law if necessary. Of course, the Bush administration (2008) might have found that difficult, and it's unclear whether the Obama administration agreed or disagreed with the changes (2009 on).

    4. Re:STEM OPT extension was really bad by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Troll

      But that doesn't accurately depict the situation that existed in *TECH*. Yes, unemployment and underemployment among construction workers was high. But at the time, tech workers had an unemployment rate under 5% (and in 2008 unemployment overall was only 8%).

      Both of those numbers are bullshit. First, they are both total bullshit, second, the first number is also partial bullshit. Not only are these numbers essentially made up (especially the overall unemployment number, which is based on the number of people eligible to collect unemployment benefits, so it's complete horseshit, only total fucking idiots or the completely disingenuous pushing an agenda cite it) but a lot of tech workers went into other work, work which may or may not actually serve their financial needs but which is better than no work at all.

      I'm actually more worried about the shadow economy. In the shadow economy, workers move from Mexico (or wherever) to the US to perform jobs. Most of those jobs are in fact the kind that construction workers could otherwise do. We should have been doing more to connect construction workers with jobs that would otherwise be filled by illegal immigrants.

      You really have no clue, do you? Those jobs are jobs which should not even exist. We have multiple homes sitting vacant for every homeless person in America. Not family, but person. There is no need whatsoever to build more homes. And the illegal mexicans are very much on the home-building jobs, and not the skyscraper-building jobs which would still go on even if we actualy put people in all those vacant homes.

      The average construction worker should be out of work. That's predominantly bullshit broken-window make-work.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:STEM OPT extension was really bad by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Informative

      "unemployment spiking over 10%."

      You mean the government reported heavily adjusted to avoid panic numbers.

      Real unemployment was near 25% government reporting of unemployment only counted people that were actively collecting unemployment checks. If you were not being paid, you were not counted as unemployed. Some places Unemployment real numbers were closer to 35% to 40% Detroit for example.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:STEM OPT extension was really bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Economy is so bad, they just changed how GDP is calculated. Q1 went from -2% to positive because of it, couldn't allow for another recession so they changed it.

    7. Re:STEM OPT extension was really bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's Detroit, not the entire US. That's like saying 10% of people hate peanut butter -- and of people that hate peanuts, 90% of people hate peanut butter! Oh my gosh!

    8. Re:STEM OPT extension was really bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ell they obviously couldn't afford to pay BOTH first world stem salaries AND big fat bonuses for the high level bureaucrats running the companies...

    9. Re: STEM OPT extension was really bad by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Poor A/C, sentences start with a capital letter.

    10. Re:STEM OPT extension was really bad by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      "Straight Out of 'Detroit'?" Yup, that's what all of America looks like.

    11. Re: STEM OPT extension was really bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misspelled "your".

      Please tell me you don't vote...

    12. Re: STEM OPT extension was really bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when is a college degree. Basedon standards that will be no longer valid at graduation, a good measure? The best tech workers I know figure things out themselves and self evolve with no college. The problem is idiots hiring tech workers with no knowledge of the job, and the robot HR throwing out thousands of applicants that know the job better than a degree earner.

    13. Re: STEM OPT extension was really bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fail.

    14. Re:STEM OPT extension was really bad by tompaulco · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But that doesn't accurately depict the situation that existed in *TECH*. Yes, unemployment and underemployment among construction workers was high. But at the time, tech workers had an unemployment rate under 5% (and in 2008 unemployment overall was only 8%). Considering that it takes years to put a tech worker through a college degree and introductory employment, even if construction workers were qualified to switch from construction to tech, it wouldn't have helped the short term problem.

      Unemployment figures don't take into account the people who used up all of their unemployment and were never able to find a job. They may still be unemployed, but the numbers aren't tracked. Also, this number doesn't take into account the number of tech workers that took jobs in other fields because they couldn't find jobs in tech. I know many, many people (including myself) who have 25+ years of experience in tech, but are doing something else because there are no jobs.
      Underemployment is rampant as well. Tech jobs don't pay enough to live on, but when they demand 60-80 hours a week of your time, and availability on a whim, you also can't go get a second job to make ends meet.
      Microsoft is starting to slip, though. They released press releases demanding more H1B workers a little too soon after laying off 6,000 tech workers. Someone is bound to notice.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    15. Re:STEM OPT extension was really bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you really that daft, or just trolling?

    16. Re:STEM OPT extension was really bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      That is not true. The government determines the unemployment rate via a household survey, not via the number of people collecting unemployment checks. You may not believe the BLS because it sounds as if you have an axe to grind, but here's their explanation of how they do it.

    17. Re: STEM OPT extension was really bad by bill.mcnew · · Score: 0

      With a heavy dose of crony capitalism thrown in. Big business is in league with big media and big government to literally screw any IT worker in this country looking for a job. 92,000,000 people out of work, Microsoft lays off 19,000 while claiming they can't find anyone to work? Pure lies.

  3. Family reunification vs STEM by jonsmirl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Prioritizing family reunification visas is worse. I know of two people that have used family reunification visas to bring in their parents. All four of which went onto Social Security and Medicare shortly after arriving. The US would have been much better off if those four slots had been given to STEM workers.

    1. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

      Do away with all the welfare handouts and this problem disappears. The real problem is too many government programs.

      --
      Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    2. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, American morals. If they can blow up something in Iraq that kills 400 people, that's okay, but if, for far less cost, they help 4 people in the US, it's a tragedy.

    3. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by rholtzjr · · Score: 2

      Trolling unsuccessful. Stick to the subject.

    4. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Absolutely! start with stopping all Corporate and Farming handouts.

      Also hospitals freaking welfare breeding grounds. Cut their funding as well.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem isn't too many programs, it is too many mishandled expenses. I'd wager, that is run as well as a company with accountability, all the programs you seem to hate could run twice as well for the same cost.

      There is nothing wrong with assisting those with needs. The very idea is fundamental to a government, which should have the very explicit goal of "protecting its citizens." These protections go from international threats (wars, treaties, etc.) to protecting citizens from other citizens and themselves. Social programs are a mix of the later. As a society, we produce so much and throw away so much, that having an entirely working populace isn't needed, so people are out of jobs. Social programs are suppose to work to fill in that gap so that their lives don't get to the point where they must commit crimes to be able to live. This is a failing of the current system, as it isn't good enough. Right money spent in the wrong way, usually decided by the trends (War on Drugs, No Child Left Behind, etc) instead of reasoned analysis.

      In an ideal nation, every individual would be guaranteed enough support to at least be at the minimum standard of living, so just above or at the poverty line. As an alternative to just handing out money, the government made the EBT cards, which is pretty awesome. I do agree they shouldn't pay for nicotine products and the like, but there is no reason it shouldn't care for medical goods like asprin, bandaids, or cough syrup. The price of food fluctuates by region just as much within a region over time, so having a percentage over the bare minimum cost of calories per person in the family makes sense, and a person good at budgeting would be able to afford more or better products. Honestly, it would be nice if they gave an extra credit exclusively for fruits and vegetables to enforce better eating habits.

      With such systems, day to day life for an individual can be managed, but there are also medical emergencies. Relying on emergency rooms for treatment is more expensive than preventative measures in the long run, which is a point where our system fails. It would be great if dental cleaning is offered every few months and cheap plastic lens glasses as well. For the record, prescription lenses are so expensive since only a hand full (2 or 3) own all the different brands, so they act like the diamond companies and create an artificial price point to keep them expensive. In a similar manner, insurance companies (mal-practice and medical) and medical companies in general work to keep the prices higher than they need to be to create greater profits, so most of the money from social programs gets wasted feeding into the accounts of those that don't need it.

      It would be great if the congress required an at-cost + 5% for services that everyone needs. If a companies fails, they can be taken to court over it by the state.

      That aside, as a generally Christian nation, we should all "Love thy neighbor."

    6. Re: Family reunification vs STEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know why Americans hate poor people and bomb brown people either.

    7. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by gbjbaanb · · Score: 2

      nearly al those programs are for the benefit of the companies. Even health care is a way of addressing the cost to business of paying health insurance, now the taxpayer pays straight off and the insurance companies are happy.

      H1B has little to do with a skills shortage, its a way to help companies pay their staff much less and also to ignore training of existing staff. Microsoft could have retrained all those tech workers they laid off from Nokia, but they chose to sack them all and then complain about the lack of skilled workers (so much so they now "need" more H1B workers....)

      So yes it would be good if programmes were created to care for the health and social security of the citizens, but you're not going to ever get it from either of the main parties.

    8. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which subject is that? Family reunification? What, pray tell, is the connection to STEM?

    9. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'd have been better off giving those four "slots" jobs to US Citizens.

      H1B is a cruel farce in the form it's being used. There's not enough workers...that are willing to work for lower than prevailing wages, that is.

    10. Re: Family reunification vs STEM by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      YAWN.

    11. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why this "they arrived here and immediately got Social Security" MYTH persists. Permanent Residents (green card holders) have work and pay into Social Security for a minimum of 10 years before being eligible for benefits.

    12. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      Family reunification should be something that an immigrant can accomplish on their own. If they want to reunite their family, they can return to their home country to be with their family.

    13. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 0

      Republicans believe in democratic education funding. Based on local taxes collected locally. Get the big corporate national-level educational bodies completely out of our education system.

      "Funding education adequately' does NOT mean giving money and heavy bias toward big national Teacher's Unions who then give part of the money back as political contributions.

      The teacher's union Hack recently dropped out of the Governor's race in Indiana. We need to get the Union Hacks and National Figures entirely out of education. Eliminate the Department of Education and redistribute the money they suck up into their big bureaucracy back to the local school districts who need the funding.

    14. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it wouldn't as the STEM field in the US already has a glut of workers, the opposite of what they claim, so those 4 more STEM workers would just displace more US workers putting the US workers in situations where they are either working outside their field or not working at all and them being the ones on Welfare.

      We actually have more STEM majors who are working outside their fields or unemployed then we have openings to fill as is and that is after you remove the visa workers doing those jobs. The thing is they at least want to be paid close to what the job is worth and not completely sell out their own lives taking the jobs for below what it costs them to live or pay off their college debt to get it.

      These visas aren't about labor shortage at all, it is about wage suppression. You know, one of those things that free market capitalists keep saying to leave to the free market till it no longer suites them and then they do stuff like this to subvert that very same free market for their own benefit.

    15. Re: Family reunification vs STEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Farming handouts? You realize that the farming industry is unsustainable without those handouts at current food prices right?

      I like to be able to afford to eat.

    16. Re: Family reunification vs STEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The purpose of our government was never supposed to be to protect us from each other and ourselves. It was created to protect from foreign powers, arbitrate disputes, and perform the collective will where it doesn't interfere with individual rights. The other things, particularly the ridiculous "protect people from themselves" were added more recently.

      Sadly, so many people think we should give up all ability to protect ourselves to the government (since they do such a good job -_-) and play nanny to to ourselves for our own good. That way of thinking is destroying our freedoms.

    17. Re: Family reunification vs STEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! I found the ultra-partisan that blames everything on the other political party every time there is discussion!!

      *Marks off scavenger hunt list*

    18. Re: Family reunification vs STEM by Boronx · · Score: 1

      Because they can't be bothered.

    19. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by ATMAvatar · · Score: 1

      Hear! Hear! Let's start with the oil subsidies, since Exxon Mobil is the second most profitable corporation in the Forbes 500.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    20. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

      Agreed. But profitability or not is irrelevant. Both XOM and Iowa corn growers need to be removed from the taxpayer's teat.

      --
      Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    21. Re: Family reunification vs STEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rest of the world would produce more than enough food to cover shortages if the EU and USA would drop the farm subsidies. The only ones affected would be social-wellfare-for-the-rich farmers. Food would be somewhat pricier though, but with obesity being the problem it is it would be less of a problem.

    22. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by chihowa · · Score: 1

      I'd wager, that is run as well as a company with accountability, all the programs you seem to hate could run twice as well for the same cost.

      I'm not sure why this view of corporations persists. Companies minimize expenses in order to maximize profits. The cost of goods or services to the customers of a company has little bearing on the cost to the company of providing/producing those goods or services. The cost of a corporate provided service will be what the market can bear and in the case of a monopoly like the government, that cost will be extremely high. Costs (and corners) are cut for the sole purpose of maximizing profits.

      If the government was run like a corporation, the citizens would pay just as much but the higher-ups in government would get bigger salaries. If anything could be done to reduce the expenses of the government, it would be done even if it drastically reduced the quality of the services, and the higher-ups would get bonuses. As far as the customer is concerned, profit is an unwanted added expense.

      Or did you mean that we'd have competition between several governments and get to shop around for who we pay our taxes to?

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    23. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by jonsmirl · · Score: 1

      The rules for this were more lax when they came about twenty years ago. I believe the work requirement was five years back them. They did get minimal type jobs helping out in businesses connected to the family (which I am fairly sure was done specifically to qualify for Social Security).. Their children more or less supported them during this period. Currently all four are receiving Social Security and Medicare and will probably do so for another decade. Pretty certain benefits being paid will be 10-20x what they put into the system.

      The 10 years, 40 quarters rule applies to everyone, it is not specific to green cards.

    24. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if they did work a bit when the requirements were less there social security checks are probably close the minimum possible since they worked the minimum amount of quarters at near minimum wages. Their checks are probably less than four hundred dollars per month.

    25. Re: Family reunification vs STEM by bill.mcnew · · Score: 0

      Christianity never taught people to take money from people by force, ever, not even once, even to give to others. This tired idea gets recycled regularly: since we waste so much taxpayer money on so many worthless things that means we might as well waste it on other useless, counterproductive and even harmful things as well. If the government never had the money to blow on worthless and stupid things to begin with they would only be able to spend it on roads, bridges, and necessary things . A person does not stay unemployed for 50 years. Anyone could find a job in that time or move to a place where they could find a job doing something. This is how we got 19 trillion dollars in debt as a nation.

    26. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The brown curry scented folk also breed like jackrabbits. It only takes a generation or two and you have these giant festering ghettoes like in Europe. Followed by waves of 100% organic, home-grown terrorists who will strive to impose sharia law on western society.

  4. I'll believe it's an emergency when 2 thingshappen by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1. Wages increase

    2. They bring in people on green cards for 5-10 years for any employer instead of this H1B nonsense where they bring people in with a leash around their figurative nuts and hand the nut leash to one company.

    --
    Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
  5. About Fucking Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bill Gates can kiss my hairy ass.

  6. Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's funny how Silicon Valley hipsters love to mock conservatives over illegal immigration ("They took err jerrrbss!") but throw a big fit over H1Bs, which are exactly the same thing. But they're disadvantaged immigrants! Their rights trump yours, Whitey, remember that. Your own politics opened that door.

    1. Re:Funny by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I really don't see Silicon Valley hipsters doing that kind of whining. If anything, the Silicon Valley hipsters are more likely to be bleeding hearts. It's the midwestern tea bagger trailer trash that are most likely to whine about illegal immigrants as if they were within 1000 miles of one.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Funny by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...too early in the morning.

      What Silicon Valley hipsters are likely to object to are "indentured servant" visas. This is one problem with the low skill illegals actually. The situation helps create an underclass that can be easily abused.

      That's what H1Bs are for, they are a tool to abuse labor.

      I've always said that if a guy's talents are worth importing, then it's worth importing that guy as an EQUAL.

      None of this stupid indentured servant crap.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re: Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except this is essentially government sanctioned and promoted indentured servitude. The amount of leverage employers have against temporary visa holders is about the same as with an illegal immigrant. Don't do what we want for undercut wages? Back home you go.

      The difference is, at least with an illegal immigrant, at no point does the US government say, "sure, that's fine and we'll help enforce deportation logistics."

      If the STEM professional "shortage" was such a crisis, what is stopping large tech companies that already have a presence around the world from employing these individuals in their home countries to do the same work? Yes, some cases require specialized equipment and on site work, but many in the tech sector/software engineering/etc. generally do not. The answer is that the employer doesn't have as much leverage against the employee, which pushes lower wages. A native working at home isn't effected by losing a visa. Illegal immigrants similarly face the same threat.

    4. Re:Funny by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      ...too early in the morning.

      What Silicon Valley hipsters are likely to object to are "indentured servant" visas. This is one problem with the low skill illegals actually. The situation helps create an underclass that can be easily abused.

      That's what H1Bs are for, they are a tool to abuse labor.

      I've always said that if a guy's talents are worth importing, then it's worth importing that guy as an EQUAL.

      None of this stupid indentured servant crap.

      Yeah tell yourself that and keep telling yourself that and you might even believe the hair you are trying to split matters. Hope you don't mind winding up living in shipping container in SF

      http://www.businessinsider.com...

    5. Re:Funny by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The tea baggers are all to the north, in San Francisco. But you already knew this. Their trash is in the dumpsters behind the bath houses. The dumpsters with the Biohazard stickers on them.

      Trailers? They're called tiny houses now.

    6. Re:Funny by Boronx · · Score: 1

      Silicon Valley hipsters want to make illegal immigrants legal so that they can get paid minimum wage.

    7. Re:Funny by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I really don't see Silicon Valley hipsters doing that kind of whining. If anything, the Silicon Valley hipsters are more likely to be bleeding hearts. It's the midwestern tea bagger trailer trash that are most likely to whine about illegal immigrants as if they were within 1000 miles of one.

      Are you serious? You think there are no illegal aliens in the midwest? About 2% of the population of my state is illegal aliens, and that is only the ones we know about.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    8. Re:Funny by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I've always said that if a guy's talents are worth importing, then it's worth importing that guy as an EQUAL.

      The H1B program is not for hiring equals. It is for hiring people that are BETTER, because even when you offered infinity billion dollars as a salary, you were unable to find an American to do the job. It was never meant to hire people to do a job that any of 100,000 unemployed tech workers could easily do.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    9. Re:Funny by Undead+Waffle · · Score: 1

      I've always said that if a guy's talents are worth importing, then it's worth importing that guy as an EQUAL.

      The H1B program is not for hiring equals. It is for hiring people that are BETTER, because even when you offered infinity billion dollars as a salary, you were unable to find an American to do the job. It was never meant to hire people to do a job that any of 100,000 unemployed tech workers could easily do.

      That's how it was sold, but not what it was meant for.

  7. WOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WOW, a breath of fresh air!
    (Sadly, I doubt it will stick.)

  8. Re: Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I am not sure what you mean by that - sarcasm, literally mean it, or xenophobia.

    When I see under/un-employed IT/developers/CS people, recent grads in CS not finding work, and then see some big shot in tech (or worse, some peon here on Slashdot) saying how there is a shortage, I just think the system is broken and rigged. There are plenty of qualified Americans who would love to have the work and no one is going to convince me that someone educated in the Third World is going to have a better background and have the "skills" that somehow Americans don't have.

    The H1-b program is ALL about exploiting cheap labor from mostly India and driving pay down by increasing the supply of workers. I see jobs paying 65k that used to pay 80k back in '01. Now, add inflation in. Yeah, pay has been cut in half in real terms. That is NOT a sign of a shortage!

  9. Total Horseshit, As Always by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is no shortage of tech workers. There is only a shortage of people willing to work at rates management wants. And these are not burger flipper jobs that can only sustain paying employees out of the $5 value menu gross proceeds. These are wildly profitable tech giants with billions in revenue.

    1. Re:Total Horseshit, As Always by gweihir · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indeed. Something went very wrong after the last crisis was over: Companies continued to decrease STEM staff quality and wages paid, despite revenues being back to good and sometimes excellent. This has two effects, both catastrophic in the long run: 1.) fewer and fewer bright and capable people will go into STEM 2.) when the next crisis hits, companies will be a lot less able to deal with it, as they have systematically dumbed down their employee-pools. The only "positive" effects for the companies I see is even higher bonuses for even less deserving CEOs and the like.

      Somehow, they have completely forgotten that STEM is hard, it is what makes the modern world tick, and that good STEM workers are both critical for the long-term success of any tech company and hard to get.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:Total Horseshit, As Always by currently_awake · · Score: 3, Insightful

      American industry is systematically exporting their entire STEM industry, along with their manufacturing and science. Once it's gone the USA will not be able to afford to buy it back. Looks like they want the American economy to be built around banking/finance/investment/copyright. This is a bad idea because these are all "Luxury" industries, that always do poorly in a recession. If you build your economy around them then your country goes broke during a recession (even the rich would suffer).

    3. Re:Total Horseshit, As Always by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the same is happening all over Europe. This might be the thing that brings about the end of the dominance of the western world. Well, stupidity and greed deserve their rewards, I guess.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re: Total Horseshit, As Always by bill.mcnew · · Score: 0

      Oh come now, next you'll be saying 19 trillion dollars in debt to countries like China could actually be a problem very soon.

  10. Re:Vacant homes for the homeless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. I had no idea we had so many affordable houses for the homeless.

  11. "crisis" should be paid preminum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no problem with H-1B if they companies really want the talent they can't find in the US. What I don't like is H-1Bs filling in routine positions for cheap. Maybe if H-1B had a rule about being paid in top 10 percentile in the industry, the abuses will stop.

    1. Re:"crisis" should be paid preminum by Boronx · · Score: 1

      Just make H1B a fast track to a green card.

  12. comparing overall unemployment rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comparing the tech worker unemployment rate with overall unemployment is bogus.
    The Construction industry was decimated and so was finance. And sll of the unskilled workers were creamed too.

    And then there is the attrition of tech workers. After 35 or so, jobs start getting harder to come by and with the continued offshoring and H1-b hiring, many of us saw the writing on the wall and left. Half of my MBA class were tech workers looking to get out.

    When you leave or get forced out of tech, you are no longer counted as a tech worker. When big decides to eliminate a whole division and send it overseas and flood the job market with unemployed workers, the younger ones get hired first and the older ones get left behind.

    Please, spare me the fairy tale that "if you have the skills, there's work for yoy," when you are unemployed in tech, you are damaged goods -"if he was any good, he'd have a job." (Kids, always have another job queued up.)

    And there were quite a few guys from India, Middle East, Eastern Europe there - and they were all aiming at our markets. See, their foreign based companies were paying their way.

    1. Re: comparing overall unemployment rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I typed the above on an iPad and it really sucks. Inhate this fucking thing! It's a bitch to do anything useful!

    2. Re: comparing overall unemployment rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If companies were loyal to their employees the way they expect their employees to be towards them and provided career paths, younger workers wouldn't really be thinking about the next job.

      This isn't to say that people wouldn't change jobs for better pay, a more exciting role, different technology or better environment. But, business knowledge would stay within the company and not be outsourced or offshored to people who don't give a shit about their client other than getting paid.

      Yes, I am old school. I don't believe in expendable employees. The past five years have be tough for me after working over 30 years and always in demand as the "miracle worker" only to discover that someone employable and still in demand as a tech worker at 49 isn't once they cross (or approach) that threshold of 50. And, it's only going to get worse by the time those in their 30's and early 40's thinking they are invincible find out they aren't. Tough lesson to learn.

    3. Re:comparing overall unemployment rate by ranton · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please, spare me the fairy tale that "if you have the skills, there's work for yoy," when you are unemployed in tech, you are damaged goods -"if he was any good, he'd have a job." (Kids, always have another job queued up.)

      Please spare me the fairy tale that "even if you have the skills, its hard to find jobs in tech." I know four highly skilled IT workers in their 30's and 40's that have been fired or laid off in the last couple of years. Every one of them found work within a month. I know two mediocre IT workers in their 30's who were fired or laid off in the last few years, and one found work in a couple months (with a promotion to senior dev) and the other took four months. I do know a handful of tech workers who no longer work in tech because they couldn't find work, but they were never someone I would hire based on their ability.

      And I live in the Midwest, not some west coast IT paradise. The simple fact is we are currently in a sellers market, and if you are good you can set your own rates. I was unsatisfied with the projects I was being given about 6 months ago, and got my acceptance letter from a new company within 3 weeks from the start of my job search. With about a 20% raise. Although I am only 35, so I guess according to you its all downhill from here.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    4. Re:comparing overall unemployment rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would love to know how old you are. Betting early 30's at best. You sound like naive yet think you have a world of knowledge.

      If you are in your 30's or early 40's and get fired, why the F would somebody hire you unless they are truly desperate? Being laid off because the company has major layoffs or ceases to exist is one thing - fired for cause is another. It is NOT a seller's market despite unemployment in the IT industry being lower overall. The exception might be bumfuck America where tech workers may be scarce. Scarcity doesn't make them better - just complacent. For those over 45, many leave the industry after 6 months when they can't find work because it's been offshored or preference is given to a fresh grad at 1/2 the salary and where the cost of benefits is significantly less than that of an older "at risk" person. Where is the incentive to keep older employees when they get an H1B or F1 workers who are "indebted" to their sponsor and who they can pay significantly less while lining their own pockets? The F1's even get tax breaks making their cost to "own" significantly less than that of American workers. Just wait until you fall in that trap.

      Finding a job in your 30's and even to mid-40's is relatively easy. You are, typically, at a point in your life where you can afford to move, live a little more carefree lifestyle and, perhaps, might just be starting a family...perhaps, you have bought your first "starter" house. It isn't so easy after 45 and damn near impossible, as a "tech" worker after 50 when your kids are growing up, entering college or trying to truly prepare for retirement. My brother, a former executive, now works in retail after getting laid off in his mid-50's. That was 7 years ago. Two years ago, I was laid off and quickly rehired within 2 days of being let go. Change in corporate direction, laid off because there is no longer a need for an engineer, and I am now "damaged" goods in the eyes of the tech community. Approaching 6 months of unemployment and digging into retirement savings so my kids can have a chance at college and I can put food on the table while I keep looking. Our Republican congress made sure that unemployment benefits end after 6 months and then bitch when good people end up on welfare. What really changed in those 2 years other than going over 50? How F'd up is that?

      I will probably have to leave the tech industry altogether and head into management (which, I loath doing - not fun at all) or retail. Considering heading out to buy a new spatula to flip burgers. Given I had a great jobs where I stayed for years, did fun things and advanced within, there was little thought about what the outside world was like - I was isolated and immune (so I thought) to being "expendable". Surprise - I was pushed out the airlock.

      People who are still in their early careers don't realize how vulnerable they become when they get older. People like you are truly part of the problem. My suggestion, plan for the future ... from someone who thought like you and now regrets it.

    5. Re:comparing overall unemployment rate by JustNiz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      >> People who are still in their early careers don't realize how vulnerable they become when they get older.

      As a 52 year old software developer I get what you are saying. The trick is to be in the right industry. All the young guns are mostly doing only web and web-related stuff because they think its cool. Just avoid that whole thing.

      What helps is that those guys seem to be pretty much clueless when it comes to bare metal stuff like embedded systems and device drivers etc because it seems even in CS degrees these days they don't teach anything as low-level as C, let alone assembler or how computers actually work any more. It seems most of those guys are completely out of their comfort zone around any language/environment that doesn't have a garbage collector, isn't in a VM or container, can't be scripted and doesn't come with a massive app framework that includes giant libraries of helper functions to do all the actual heavy lifting.

    6. Re:comparing overall unemployment rate by ranton · · Score: 1

      I would love to know how old you are. Betting early 30's at best. You sound like naive yet think you have a world of knowledge.

      I specifically said I was 35 in my post. Did you read the whole thing? I also stated how my opinions have been based on experiences from past coworkers in both their 30's and 40's. I don't know anyone in their 50's+ who has been laid off, although I have probably only worked with at most a dozen IT workers in that age bracket (not counting upper management types). Considering the IT industry as we know it has only been around about 25 years, it would be odd for there to be too many 50+ year old workers even without age discrimination.

      If you are in your 30's or early 40's and get fired, why the F would somebody hire you unless they are truly desperate?

      Because you want someone who knows what they are doing. The few people I know in their early to mid 20's are the ones finding it hard to break into the tech industry; at least in the Midwest that is. In a more startup friendly culture like the valley I assume it would be very different. Based on the 20-30 yr old coworkers I have had in the last few years, I have no fear of being able to convince a potential employer I am more valuable than they are. At least until they too get 10 years of experience.

      Being laid off because the company has major layoffs or ceases to exist is one thing - fired for cause is another.

      I have never known a quality IT worker that was fired for cause. It is so damn hard to find quality IT workers that employers will deal with a lot of shit before canning them.

      For those over 45, many leave the industry after 6 months when they can't find work because it's been offshored or preference is given to a fresh grad at 1/2 the salary and where the cost of benefits is significantly less than that of an older "at risk" person.

      Quality employers don't care that much about the higher salaries of the senior and director level IT staff they employ. Because good IT workers are the ones who make their bosses look great, and facilitate them getting their big bonuses. When a project is being run like shit and is about to miss a milestone that will reflect badly on our CTO, he wants someone like me who can simply get things done. Then when bonus time comes around he is glad to give me a quarter of a junior dev's salary just in bonus. In fact the only thing on his mind is making sure he doesn't lose me for the next time shit hits the fan (and I am not some special snowflake, there are other quality senior IT resources out there, although they are rare).

      Finding a job in your 30's and even to mid-40's is relatively easy. You are, typically, at a point in your life where you can afford to move, live a little more carefree lifestyle and, perhaps, might just be starting a family...perhaps, you have bought your first "starter" house. It isn't so easy after 45 and damn near impossible, as a "tech" worker after 50 when your kids are growing up, entering college or trying to truly prepare for retirement.

      Not sure how late you started your family, but most IT workers in their mid-40's already have a kid in high school. I am paying for daycare now, and at $1700 per month per kid it is just as expensive as college (and without 18 years to save up for it). So I can't wait until my kids are in college so their college funds can pay for it instead of my paychecks. With a large home in a great school district, two kids in daycare, college loans I'm still paying, and a wife who buys all her athletic gear at lululemon, I am well aware of how much my family needs our $200k+ household income.

      People who are still in their early careers don't realize how vulnerable they become when they get older. People like you are truly part of the problem. My suggestion, plan for the future ... from someone who thought like you and now

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    7. Re:comparing overall unemployment rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those over 45, many leave the industry after 6 months when they can't find work because it's been offshored or preference is given to a fresh grad at 1/2 the salary and where the cost of benefits is significantly less than that of an older "at risk" person.

      If a fresh graduate can do your job, why on earth would I pay you twice as much to do it? If all you've accumulated in your years in the industry is a pile of birthday cards and a few inches of waistline, you're not worth any more than a new hire, and shouldn't expect to earn more.

    8. Re:comparing overall unemployment rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think he actually said a fresh graduate CAN do the job. If a junior person can do the job as well for less, then there does need to be an adjustment.

      It sounds like he has seen senior members let go and replaced with fresh graduate who aren't qualified hired at 1/2 the pay. Bottom line is they lack experience and business/industry knowledge even if they are great code monkeys. It is a sad state of affairs when people think that simply because someone is older, that they should have migrated to senior management instead of doing what they love to do because somebody thinks they should be put to pasture. Why should it be assumed that they can't code or are mediocre/average performers? Most likely, they possess skills that enabled the platforms which most of today's developers rely upon to be built and exist. Yet, they are released to save a few dollars on the P&L statement and pad somebody's year end bonus.

    9. Re:comparing overall unemployment rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Betting it came off your diaper after he had to wipe and powdered your ass.

    10. Re:comparing overall unemployment rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Missed the part about you being 35 - my apologies. I did look at your profile and deduced you were, likely, in your early to mid 30's given the age of your children. Presuming you had your first kid at 34, you will be 48 or 49 when your kid hits high school. Many will be in middle school when most professional couples are in the 40's. Younger families having kids in their 20's are more of a mid-Western thing.

      You complain about daycare at $1700 a month. Trust me, it doesn't get any easier if you do you best to ensure they have access to the best education possible (private and/or college). With flat IT salaries since the early 2K's, it's harder to put money away. I've got 3. Now, digging into my retirement to make sure they have what they need to succeed. As a parent, you will do similar things for your kids.

      Your comment about the top 10-20% of workers in the industry having no problem gaining employment until they retire is only partially correct. The caveat is working for a employer that recognizes their talent and not dismissing them because they are older (and, presumably, untrainable) or being more concerned about P&L statements. I, personally, hate consulting after having gotten screwed by two firms. I have absolutely no desire to go into management even if that is where the money happens to be. I want to design and code systems and build things that make or improve people's lives. Maybe, I'm an idealist. But, I believe that just because someone doesn't want to follow the "traditional" career path to pasture doesn't mean they aren't capable. To me, their passion is in the work they do.

      The IT world that YOU know has been around for about 25 years - the era of the dotcom bubble. You were 10 when that started. The video and computer games you played were written by people of my generation - maybe you even played one I wrote. The IT world that made what you know possible extends back to the 60's and 70's when computers found their way into business. I started, professionally, in the 80's. I wrote my first business program in 1976 on a machine with less than 4K of RAM. Wrote my first non-trivial and working program for an IBM 360 in 1974 - 4th grade. I flipped toggle switches on friends MITS Altair 8800 in 1976 to learn 8080 assembler. I remember when Bill Gates made his statement about systems needing more than 640K. Scary to think that some of us are still out doing what we love to do - designing and building stuff that works. The IoT revolution may be help people realize that the skills I, and other dinosaurs, like me learned and embodied are still relevant today.

    11. Re:comparing overall unemployment rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you the guy I was talking with about charitable giving?

  13. Re:I'll believe it's an emergency when 2 thingshap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait....their nuts are figurative, not the leash?

    I didn't realize such a large percentage of H1Bs were women and eunuchs.

  14. Exactly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Years ago I saw a lecture by a "cheif scientist" . She was bitching how she couldn't find "qualified" people because there are only 25 people in the Wotkd who can do what hey need and they all eork for smaxon, google, facebook, and yahoo.

    What did they do? Social networking.
    What skills wre they lookong for? JavaScript "engineer". Engineer?
    They can't find qualified people because they just want to pach and weren't paying enough.

    Silicon Valley employers are idiots.

  15. There is indeed a crisis by paiute · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Large companies are having real problems finding skilled people they can pay minimum wage and treat like chattel.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  16. A Forbidden Truth by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    Sometimes the real issue is hidden as it is inflammatory by nature. What I suppose is going on is that in some other nations education is severe and demanding and fanatical. Students able to get advanced degrees in those nations tend to have superior educations by a wide margin. In other words a Ph.d. from some foreign nations may mean far greater abilities are present than a student trained in the US. economic competition is such that employers not only want these workers as they have to pay them less but also because even though the credentials look the same the US educated students can not compete. If businesses admit this the public will rage over it. But we may be a stronger and safer nation because we do employ these students with foreign credentials.

    1. Re:A Forbidden Truth by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      I'm more inclined to think its the long game. If the bulk of the worlds smart people come to the United States, then how is the bad for the United States long-term?

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    2. Re:A Forbidden Truth by Boronx · · Score: 1

      Give them green cards instead of H1B

    3. Re:A Forbidden Truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You'd be wrong. A recent study by PEW (http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/08/10/5-facts-about-americas-students/) showed that the U.S. was near the middle when it came to math and science scores. However, one thing these studies always fail to consider is that the U.S. has a large contingent of minorities who consistently do poorly. Factor out those underperformers and the U.S. suddenly becomes very, very competitive on the world scene.

      And since we're talking about technology jobs, it is entirely fair to factor out those underperforming minorities because most of them don't go into STEM anyway. I'll be nasty and say that most will be headed to government jobs, the dole, or prison.

      For the countries that send a tremendous number of H1-B visa workers to the U.S., you only have to look at those countries of origin to realize that the students' educations can't be that great. I cannot think of any country with great higher education institutes that have third world infrastructure and standards of living. Perhaps former SSRs but those aren't the immigrant workers flooding into the U.S.

      The students from some foreign countries do cover more material in primary school than U.S. public schools. However, it is largely rote memorization and academic dishonesty is rampant. (Academic dishonesty in Asia has been rampant for generations.)

      I'm not saying that all foreign students are less capable than American students. However, it is equally ridiculous to say that students with "advanced degrees in those nations tend to have superior educations by a wide margin." You must compare apples to apples. The very best students from the very best universities in a foreign country are going to be substantially better than the average students in a mediocre or crappy U.S. university. However, If you take better American students from a top 20 or better university, you'll find that the foreign students likely aren't all that special.

      If American students really were so awful, how does this country keep from spiralling down the toilet? Things were doing just fine in the early to mid 1990s before H1-B visas were rampant.

      No. The "need" for the H1-B visa is purely about money. If the U.S. government were to subsidize native-born Americans in a manner such that companies would only have to pay $10,000 out of their revenues to the American employee with Uncle Sam making up the rest, you'd very quickly see H1-B visa workers going out of style.

    4. Re: A Forbidden Truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the bulk of the world's smart people who come here and you have to train before they let you go from your job.

  17. Nice to know by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    that right when the entire US economy was imploding in 2008 and my life was going to shit because of it that several thousand more foreign workers were allowed to stay in this country. I was wondering why Bernie Sanders has been doing so well in the polls. As always vote left. Vote for the most left leaning candidate you can get your hands on. You can bet we'll have fewer judges when Jeb is in the Whitehouse...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Nice to know by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Idea for a movie title, and game? "The Pruge, at the H1B Contractor compound."

      I'd watch it on pay-per-view.

    2. Re:Nice to know by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Left leaning candidates will happily ruin the nation, because the worse things are, the more justifications for radical policies. Who wants to open the borders wide and let the entire world into America, with voting rights the moment they set foot on our soil? The left. Are you saying that Bernie is going to expel the foreigners and thereby create several million new jobs for Americans? Jeez that's some serious Nazi shit right there.

      Why don't you ask people who used to live in hard left regimes how they feel about the kind of government you advocate? What do you think they would say?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:Nice to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " how they feel about the kind of government you advocate? What do you think they would say?"

      If they are any intelligent they would say that you are a moron because they will know that social policies does not automatically mean dictatorship
      I'm not a socialist but morons like you that keep crying Stalinist every time some one talk about social policies or equality piss me off you are just like the creationists and all the deranged evangelist zombies trailing American soil
      Oh look a comie....burn him, burn him to the ground, witch.... light the bonfire

    4. Re:Nice to know by SirLordGodfrey · · Score: 1

      Left leaning candidates will happily ruin the nation, because the worse things are, the more justifications for radical policies. Who wants to open the borders wide and let the entire world into America, with voting rights the moment they set foot on our soil? The left. Are you saying that Bernie is going to expel the foreigners and thereby create several million new jobs for Americans? Jeez that's some serious Nazi shit right there.

      Why don't you ask people who used to live in hard left regimes how they feel about the kind of government you advocate? What do you think they would say?

      You speak of AUTHORITARIAN LIBERALS, however Senator Sanders is a LIBERTARIAN LIBERAL.

      Authoritarians of ALL stripes are usually pretty terrible, not that libertarian liberals or libertarian conservatives can't do bad work either.

      Political compass explains libertarians and authoritarians better.

      --
      "Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment."
    5. Re:Nice to know by ExekielS · · Score: 1

      As a proud left-libertarian, thank you for point this out.

      --
      ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
  18. Puts things in a new perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Microsoft is not hiring from the available resource pool, and instead reaching out for cheaper labor through the H1-B system, it could be that its education efforts are merely a front to make it look like it's doing something. It after all has no intention on hiring those students later - they cost too much.

  19. My Solution by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    I casually state, "We just contracted a software project to some guys in Kenya, we needed the best and brightest. The project came in on time and on budget. And because of that, I got my bonus. I think next week I'll give them another project."

    Works every time.

    1. Re:My Solution by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      OK some questions:
      What is the quality of the software and documentation they delivered like compared to what you would have gotten if it had been done in-house?
      What about the ongoing availability and cost of support for their software now it has been delivered?
      Is the cost of all the extra time, support, education/training, project management, trips etc that you/your company had to do because they are external/remote also factored into your total cost?
      Did you also calculate the cost of doing it in-house? If so how did that estimate compare to the actual total cost?

    2. Re:My Solution by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      ...and dont forget to include your bonus in the actual total cost.

    3. Re:My Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My boss has repeatedly told me that it is not about getting the project done or doing a good job. It is about outsourcing the work so that when it fails or is late, it is the outsourcing company that is to blame.

      That way, the problems can not be blamed on him. Thus he still gets his bonus.

    4. Re:My Solution by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      It would appear that my bonus is bigger than yours.

    5. Re:My Solution by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Actually, the project passed BDD, the doc's needed 8th some grade grammer checking. Client was pleased. It's not that americans can't do it, they can't do it on 8 cents to the dollar. Indians charge 10 cents; a little to rich for my wallet.

    6. Re:My Solution by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but I'll get to keep my job longer.

  20. Re:Vacant homes for the homeless? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Wow. I had no idea we had so many affordable houses for the homeless.

    Most of the really affordable houses (These $1,000-5,000 specials) are in sad shape. You might not actually be allowed to live in them, they're so torn back. But they got that way because people (or banks) refused to rent or sell them for what the market would bear, so they sat vacant until the vandals and thieves got there...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  21. The damage is already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once they got use to slave labor they didn't want to give it up again.

  22. They are being asked to follow procedure, not... by slacklinejoe · · Score: 1

    This sounds like the administrative law folks decided, hey, you didn't follow proper procedure on this thing you did, go back and check the boxes on your paperwork. It doesn't sound like they are actually saying what they did was wrong or right. If they go back and check the boxes for public comment and still do what they did anyway, nothing changes. H1B1 is a complex subject on one hand, I like the fact that we do end up helping start up economies that were stagnate and had a low standard of living raising some folks from absolutely impoverished to just poor but livable, on the other side there is some truth in the "They took 'er jobs" line of thinking where we did have a lot of job displacement. It's seems much more impactful when the "host" country loses high paying jobs as a form of claimed altruism while really it just saved corporations money than if we'd have just sent over a bailout in the form of trade incentives that came out of our tax dollars. On the other side though India is in a drastically better state than it was 10 years ago and the outsourcing is leveling off and now starting to go elsewhere (China, Vietnam...) and they now have the skilled workforce to run their own modern economy without relying as much on other countries.

  23. Green card holders can get Medicare after 5 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Green card holders, including elderly parents who come in on family reunification, only have to wait 5 years before they are eligible for Medicare. http://www.insubuy.com/greencard-holders-medical-insurance/

    They have to pay premiums for it, but honestly an elderly person who hasn't spent their life paying taxes into Medicare is going to take far more dollars out of Medicare than they will ever pay in to it.

    This is not a myth and it does mean that family unification visas are a direct drain on the Federal budget.

  24. That was NOT the target by wonkavader · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's nothing wrong with giving foreigners who just graduated from an American college the chance to stay and work. These are people who competed to get into school and won, had the money to pay for it, and then learned more at the school. These are precisely the folks we want to stay here.

    This should be extended to graduates with good grades in all disciplines, not dialed back.

    The real problem is H1Bs and the difficulty in getting a green card. It's the indentured servitude nature of the immigration-work-model which allows companies to pay less and force down American wages. We should provide enough protection to foreign workers that they can tell an employer to shove it.

    People can apply for work visas if they have something to offer, and they can come and help pay for our college system and prove that they can work VERY hard and learn fast via the school-visa program. We should embrace everybody coming in on that path. H1Bs are simply destructive.

    1. Re:That was NOT the target by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does a green card for an H1-B make it better? Thats a blatant breaking of the rules.

      H-1B is hired for a specific job because there is no one available in US to do job. With your solution H-1Bs can fill any position at any time, no need to bother with rules or even having to "pretend" you have a job that can't be filled, just make the job require speaking a rare Indian dialect and VB.Net. I can then show that my H-1Bs keep going elsewhere and no Americans speak that dialect and easily and honestly get the H-1B cap raised since I can't "keep them around". Meanwhile I take a cut for moving each one of them through my system.

      Your proposal would make the cap on H-1Bs have to be raised, and remove the requirement for them doing a job an American can't do.

    2. Re:That was NOT the target by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's everything wrong with having foreign students stay here. Almost all of them want to stay here, compared to shithole countries where they're from.
      They came here to get an American education, and that should be it. It should not be a backdoor way to immigrate here. We have too many fucking people here as it is. I say: get the fuck out!!!

    3. Re:That was NOT the target by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you notice any shortage of CIOs?...Layers, bankers?...

      Corporations want skills while paying the minimum wage, they call it increasing competitiveness, meanwhile company directors to congratulate themselves self raise their bonuses by another million
      Why any smart kid will want to work as an engineer if they can work as a layer?, I am an engineer and TBH would not want my kids if they prove smart enough to be engineers when they could be layers, plastic surgeons or senators
      And if they are not that smart there is company directors, managers..you name it
      and for the truly dumb, you could do worse than serve and protect, great unions, great legal back up
      Why would want anybody want to work in STEM? Is hard to study, can be stressful and demanding work and doesn't pay that well, no any more when you could be working on easier or better paid work

  25. There is indeed a crisis - Creative Arts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Rules just need to be enforced.

    At our company, every one of the H1B's make more than their co-workers by 10-20%. All of our H1B developers make $140k+ Some over 200k.
    Our H1B Graphic Designers are making $95k.

    If we are going to be spending thousands to do the paperwork, plus tens of thousands in training, we need to make sure they stay, all 6 years rather than transfer their H1B to another company.

    We went the H1B route, because there is a severe lack of Coders with creative skills. People who have Fine Arts or Liberal Arts degrees tend to be much better developers, finding better solutions, and more innovative new directions. They need a bit more time than the "60hr nose-to-the-desk" US coder, but the overall quality is much higher on average, and they work less (we mandate 30hr work week, 10 hours "exploration" (do what you want) time. And have had much better annual throughput. So, we eventually just replaced most of the US Comp Sci grads with H1Bs who have arts degrees; but have a coding skill-set.

    What the US needs, is a better focus on teaching Creative and Liberal arts to students (Or more specifically, the ability to take University courses without going into heavy debt, so that arts classes can be taken to expand their creative and philosophical skills; in addition to the courses required for their desired field of employment.

    1. Re:There is indeed a crisis - Creative Arts. by guruevi · · Score: 1

      You went with H1B because they are cheaper than regular coders. I don't know where you are but 140k is below-average wage for good coders in most places.

      Not only are you profiting from the lower wages, you're also enjoying numerous tax breaks for hiring H1B's which brings down the TCO on said coders.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  26. Re:I'll believe it's an emergency when 2 thingshap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In some areas, there have been wage increases with programmers. I don't think the IT industry as a whole is in dire need though. There are plenty of system administrators that need jobs, etc.

    For example, I work at a large university in the midwest. I recently got an offer from a public company with a 10k raise. The university matched it to keep me. When universities have to pay real wages, you know things are not great out there.

  27. Discontinue H1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the H1B visa should be discontinued, instead, they should give every student, in the entire world, whom owns at least a master's degree or a phD a green card; this would solve a lot of problems in the USA and give us the competitive advantage we need. Also, every F-1 student should be getting a green card instead of OPT; which is nothing but a bridge from F-1 to H1B to green card.

    1. Re:Discontinue H1B by russotto · · Score: 2

      If a masters degree or a PhD from anywhere in the world were a reliable indication of intelligence, you might have a point. It isn't. There's any number of learned idiots.

    2. Re:Discontinue H1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Over the years of working with many people, some with advanced degrees some without, I have learned the followng:
      1. The more a person learns from reading and working with a skill, the better they usually become.
      2. Some people without degrees are very smart.
      3. Some people with advanced degrees were great to pass tests in school but are quite stupid at doing meaningfull work.
      4. Some with advanced degrees are extra great, but we don't need to reach out to other countries to find them, try hiring our unemployed first, actuall some are working at fast food locations!

  28. Re:Vacant homes for the homeless? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    I have looked at foreclosed homes where the previous owners were evicted. The owners themselves rip out anything of value and take it or sell it. Carpets, built-in microwaves and ovens, window treatment hardware, blinds... One had even kitchen cabinets ripped open. One owner had let the faucet running after plugging the sink drain holes...

    Also noticed some homes auctioned for 3000$ and 5000$ in Detroit had well established rhododendron and azalea bushes 20-25 feet tall, small fruit trees less than 30 feet tall, lots of weeping cherries and japanese maple and dwarf alberta spruce etc. The value of the plants alone would often exceed the auction price. Wish I had the money to buy them, dig out the bushes and sell them to nurseries.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  29. Test the Truth - raise H1b to 150% of US wage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they cannot find people, let them pay 150% of the Monster rate for that position in their city.
    If it is just to lower the wage by diluting the pool - F#$% them.
    Off shore development does not work that well, that is why they want them in the US.

    1. Re: Test the Truth - raise H1b to 150% of US wage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And make ot be X2 for any hours over 40

  30. Three Strike Rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Strike One: U.S.A. Citizen.

    Strike Two: Make.

    Strike Three: Ph.D.

    With the Three Strike Rule the Government and Universities are "cleaning house."

    But that only places Foreign Intelligence Operatives and Saboteurs within the U.S.A. at critical War Winning junctions.

    Ja Ja

  31. Price of talent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey do you know what American STEM graduates cost?

    Why would they wanna do that if they can pay a third as much and import a foreign "student" while paying them intern wages while getting real work done?

  32. Radical policies? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    You mean like going to war over intelligence we know is bad for ideological reasons? Or tapping every phone in the country? Or diverting funds from a major US city's levies for the aforementioned war. I could go on you know....

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: Radical policies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, like "we shot your aunt and uncle yesterday like we shot your mother and father last week for suspicion of not loving the government enough. Guess what we're taking you out behind your house to do now?"

    2. Re: Radical policies? by ExekielS · · Score: 1

      So taking care of the poor leads to the Gestapo how?

      --
      ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
  33. Microsoft has a bad reputation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The companies that seem to scream the loudest about there not being enough tech people, are also the ones with a bad reputation.

    Many tech people don't like how Microsoft handles themselves in the Market.
    Also they have a bad reputation as an employer; with the cut throat politics.

    Same with Facebook, how they collect all this private information. And also has a bad reputation as an employer.

    Since the Internet people can actually do research in the companies they want to work for.

  34. Re:Vacant homes for the homeless? by ExekielS · · Score: 2

    It is classic market failure. Our abandoned homes outnumber the homeless by almost 10 to 1 factor. In a proper market, prices would fall until renters move up to homes, homeless move up to renting, fewer people inhabit each house/apartment, etc. But prices aren't dropping, so the supply and demand can't meet, because of the powerful banks who seek to control and extort from society for somebody's basic right to exist.

    --
    ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn