Slashdot Mirror


Federal Judge Calls BS On Homeland Security's 2008 STEM 'Emergency'

theodp writes: In 2008, the U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security enacted 'emergency' changes to Optional Practical Training (OPT) to extend the amount of time foreign STEM graduates of US colleges could stay in the country and work ("to alleviate the crisis employers are facing due to the current H-1B visa shortage", as Bill Gates explained it in 2007). More than seven years later, U.S. District Court Judge Ellen Huvelle has found that the government erred by not seeking public comment when it extended the program, and issued a ruling that could force tens of thousands of foreign workers on OPT STEM extensions to return to their home countries early next year. Huvelle has given the government six months to submit the OPT extension rule for proper notice and comment lest it be revoked. From the ruling (pdf): "By failing to engage in notice-and-comment rulemaking, the record is largely one-sided, with input only from technology companies that stand to benefit from additional F-1 student employees, who are exempted from various wage taxes. Indeed, the 17-month duration of the STEM extension appears to have been adopted directly from the unanimous suggestions by Microsoft and similar industry groups." Microsoft declared a new crisis in 2012, this time designed to link tech's need for H-1B visas to U.S. children's lack of CS savvy.

73 of 142 comments (clear)

  1. STEM OPT extension was really bad by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Great recession, almost a depression, crashing economy, loss of million jobs a month.. unemployment spiking over 10%... underemployment way past 16%... and they persisted this farce of 17 month additional OPT for STEM? It is corporatocracy, pure and simple.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:STEM OPT extension was really bad by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Informative

      "unemployment spiking over 10%."

      You mean the government reported heavily adjusted to avoid panic numbers.

      Real unemployment was near 25% government reporting of unemployment only counted people that were actively collecting unemployment checks. If you were not being paid, you were not counted as unemployed. Some places Unemployment real numbers were closer to 35% to 40% Detroit for example.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:STEM OPT extension was really bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Economy is so bad, they just changed how GDP is calculated. Q1 went from -2% to positive because of it, couldn't allow for another recession so they changed it.

    3. Re: STEM OPT extension was really bad by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Poor A/C, sentences start with a capital letter.

    4. Re:STEM OPT extension was really bad by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      "Straight Out of 'Detroit'?" Yup, that's what all of America looks like.

    5. Re:STEM OPT extension was really bad by tompaulco · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But that doesn't accurately depict the situation that existed in *TECH*. Yes, unemployment and underemployment among construction workers was high. But at the time, tech workers had an unemployment rate under 5% (and in 2008 unemployment overall was only 8%). Considering that it takes years to put a tech worker through a college degree and introductory employment, even if construction workers were qualified to switch from construction to tech, it wouldn't have helped the short term problem.

      Unemployment figures don't take into account the people who used up all of their unemployment and were never able to find a job. They may still be unemployed, but the numbers aren't tracked. Also, this number doesn't take into account the number of tech workers that took jobs in other fields because they couldn't find jobs in tech. I know many, many people (including myself) who have 25+ years of experience in tech, but are doing something else because there are no jobs.
      Underemployment is rampant as well. Tech jobs don't pay enough to live on, but when they demand 60-80 hours a week of your time, and availability on a whim, you also can't go get a second job to make ends meet.
      Microsoft is starting to slip, though. They released press releases demanding more H1B workers a little too soon after laying off 6,000 tech workers. Someone is bound to notice.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    6. Re:STEM OPT extension was really bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      That is not true. The government determines the unemployment rate via a household survey, not via the number of people collecting unemployment checks. You may not believe the BLS because it sounds as if you have an axe to grind, but here's their explanation of how they do it.

  2. Family reunification vs STEM by jonsmirl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Prioritizing family reunification visas is worse. I know of two people that have used family reunification visas to bring in their parents. All four of which went onto Social Security and Medicare shortly after arriving. The US would have been much better off if those four slots had been given to STEM workers.

    1. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

      Do away with all the welfare handouts and this problem disappears. The real problem is too many government programs.

      --
      Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    2. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by rholtzjr · · Score: 2

      Trolling unsuccessful. Stick to the subject.

    3. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Absolutely! start with stopping all Corporate and Farming handouts.

      Also hospitals freaking welfare breeding grounds. Cut their funding as well.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem isn't too many programs, it is too many mishandled expenses. I'd wager, that is run as well as a company with accountability, all the programs you seem to hate could run twice as well for the same cost.

      There is nothing wrong with assisting those with needs. The very idea is fundamental to a government, which should have the very explicit goal of "protecting its citizens." These protections go from international threats (wars, treaties, etc.) to protecting citizens from other citizens and themselves. Social programs are a mix of the later. As a society, we produce so much and throw away so much, that having an entirely working populace isn't needed, so people are out of jobs. Social programs are suppose to work to fill in that gap so that their lives don't get to the point where they must commit crimes to be able to live. This is a failing of the current system, as it isn't good enough. Right money spent in the wrong way, usually decided by the trends (War on Drugs, No Child Left Behind, etc) instead of reasoned analysis.

      In an ideal nation, every individual would be guaranteed enough support to at least be at the minimum standard of living, so just above or at the poverty line. As an alternative to just handing out money, the government made the EBT cards, which is pretty awesome. I do agree they shouldn't pay for nicotine products and the like, but there is no reason it shouldn't care for medical goods like asprin, bandaids, or cough syrup. The price of food fluctuates by region just as much within a region over time, so having a percentage over the bare minimum cost of calories per person in the family makes sense, and a person good at budgeting would be able to afford more or better products. Honestly, it would be nice if they gave an extra credit exclusively for fruits and vegetables to enforce better eating habits.

      With such systems, day to day life for an individual can be managed, but there are also medical emergencies. Relying on emergency rooms for treatment is more expensive than preventative measures in the long run, which is a point where our system fails. It would be great if dental cleaning is offered every few months and cheap plastic lens glasses as well. For the record, prescription lenses are so expensive since only a hand full (2 or 3) own all the different brands, so they act like the diamond companies and create an artificial price point to keep them expensive. In a similar manner, insurance companies (mal-practice and medical) and medical companies in general work to keep the prices higher than they need to be to create greater profits, so most of the money from social programs gets wasted feeding into the accounts of those that don't need it.

      It would be great if the congress required an at-cost + 5% for services that everyone needs. If a companies fails, they can be taken to court over it by the state.

      That aside, as a generally Christian nation, we should all "Love thy neighbor."

    5. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by gbjbaanb · · Score: 2

      nearly al those programs are for the benefit of the companies. Even health care is a way of addressing the cost to business of paying health insurance, now the taxpayer pays straight off and the insurance companies are happy.

      H1B has little to do with a skills shortage, its a way to help companies pay their staff much less and also to ignore training of existing staff. Microsoft could have retrained all those tech workers they laid off from Nokia, but they chose to sack them all and then complain about the lack of skilled workers (so much so they now "need" more H1B workers....)

      So yes it would be good if programmes were created to care for the health and social security of the citizens, but you're not going to ever get it from either of the main parties.

    6. Re: Family reunification vs STEM by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      YAWN.

    7. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why this "they arrived here and immediately got Social Security" MYTH persists. Permanent Residents (green card holders) have work and pay into Social Security for a minimum of 10 years before being eligible for benefits.

    8. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      Family reunification should be something that an immigrant can accomplish on their own. If they want to reunite their family, they can return to their home country to be with their family.

    9. Re: Family reunification vs STEM by Boronx · · Score: 1

      Because they can't be bothered.

    10. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by ATMAvatar · · Score: 1

      Hear! Hear! Let's start with the oil subsidies, since Exxon Mobil is the second most profitable corporation in the Forbes 500.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    11. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

      Agreed. But profitability or not is irrelevant. Both XOM and Iowa corn growers need to be removed from the taxpayer's teat.

      --
      Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    12. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by chihowa · · Score: 1

      I'd wager, that is run as well as a company with accountability, all the programs you seem to hate could run twice as well for the same cost.

      I'm not sure why this view of corporations persists. Companies minimize expenses in order to maximize profits. The cost of goods or services to the customers of a company has little bearing on the cost to the company of providing/producing those goods or services. The cost of a corporate provided service will be what the market can bear and in the case of a monopoly like the government, that cost will be extremely high. Costs (and corners) are cut for the sole purpose of maximizing profits.

      If the government was run like a corporation, the citizens would pay just as much but the higher-ups in government would get bigger salaries. If anything could be done to reduce the expenses of the government, it would be done even if it drastically reduced the quality of the services, and the higher-ups would get bonuses. As far as the customer is concerned, profit is an unwanted added expense.

      Or did you mean that we'd have competition between several governments and get to shop around for who we pay our taxes to?

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    13. Re:Family reunification vs STEM by jonsmirl · · Score: 1

      The rules for this were more lax when they came about twenty years ago. I believe the work requirement was five years back them. They did get minimal type jobs helping out in businesses connected to the family (which I am fairly sure was done specifically to qualify for Social Security).. Their children more or less supported them during this period. Currently all four are receiving Social Security and Medicare and will probably do so for another decade. Pretty certain benefits being paid will be 10-20x what they put into the system.

      The 10 years, 40 quarters rule applies to everyone, it is not specific to green cards.

  3. I'll believe it's an emergency when 2 thingshappen by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1. Wages increase

    2. They bring in people on green cards for 5-10 years for any employer instead of this H1B nonsense where they bring people in with a leash around their figurative nuts and hand the nut leash to one company.

    --
    Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
  4. Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's funny how Silicon Valley hipsters love to mock conservatives over illegal immigration ("They took err jerrrbss!") but throw a big fit over H1Bs, which are exactly the same thing. But they're disadvantaged immigrants! Their rights trump yours, Whitey, remember that. Your own politics opened that door.

    1. Re:Funny by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I really don't see Silicon Valley hipsters doing that kind of whining. If anything, the Silicon Valley hipsters are more likely to be bleeding hearts. It's the midwestern tea bagger trailer trash that are most likely to whine about illegal immigrants as if they were within 1000 miles of one.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Funny by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...too early in the morning.

      What Silicon Valley hipsters are likely to object to are "indentured servant" visas. This is one problem with the low skill illegals actually. The situation helps create an underclass that can be easily abused.

      That's what H1Bs are for, they are a tool to abuse labor.

      I've always said that if a guy's talents are worth importing, then it's worth importing that guy as an EQUAL.

      None of this stupid indentured servant crap.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:Funny by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      ...too early in the morning.

      What Silicon Valley hipsters are likely to object to are "indentured servant" visas. This is one problem with the low skill illegals actually. The situation helps create an underclass that can be easily abused.

      That's what H1Bs are for, they are a tool to abuse labor.

      I've always said that if a guy's talents are worth importing, then it's worth importing that guy as an EQUAL.

      None of this stupid indentured servant crap.

      Yeah tell yourself that and keep telling yourself that and you might even believe the hair you are trying to split matters. Hope you don't mind winding up living in shipping container in SF

      http://www.businessinsider.com...

    4. Re:Funny by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The tea baggers are all to the north, in San Francisco. But you already knew this. Their trash is in the dumpsters behind the bath houses. The dumpsters with the Biohazard stickers on them.

      Trailers? They're called tiny houses now.

    5. Re:Funny by Boronx · · Score: 1

      Silicon Valley hipsters want to make illegal immigrants legal so that they can get paid minimum wage.

    6. Re:Funny by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I really don't see Silicon Valley hipsters doing that kind of whining. If anything, the Silicon Valley hipsters are more likely to be bleeding hearts. It's the midwestern tea bagger trailer trash that are most likely to whine about illegal immigrants as if they were within 1000 miles of one.

      Are you serious? You think there are no illegal aliens in the midwest? About 2% of the population of my state is illegal aliens, and that is only the ones we know about.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    7. Re:Funny by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I've always said that if a guy's talents are worth importing, then it's worth importing that guy as an EQUAL.

      The H1B program is not for hiring equals. It is for hiring people that are BETTER, because even when you offered infinity billion dollars as a salary, you were unable to find an American to do the job. It was never meant to hire people to do a job that any of 100,000 unemployed tech workers could easily do.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    8. Re:Funny by Undead+Waffle · · Score: 1

      I've always said that if a guy's talents are worth importing, then it's worth importing that guy as an EQUAL.

      The H1B program is not for hiring equals. It is for hiring people that are BETTER, because even when you offered infinity billion dollars as a salary, you were unable to find an American to do the job. It was never meant to hire people to do a job that any of 100,000 unemployed tech workers could easily do.

      That's how it was sold, but not what it was meant for.

  5. Re: Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I am not sure what you mean by that - sarcasm, literally mean it, or xenophobia.

    When I see under/un-employed IT/developers/CS people, recent grads in CS not finding work, and then see some big shot in tech (or worse, some peon here on Slashdot) saying how there is a shortage, I just think the system is broken and rigged. There are plenty of qualified Americans who would love to have the work and no one is going to convince me that someone educated in the Third World is going to have a better background and have the "skills" that somehow Americans don't have.

    The H1-b program is ALL about exploiting cheap labor from mostly India and driving pay down by increasing the supply of workers. I see jobs paying 65k that used to pay 80k back in '01. Now, add inflation in. Yeah, pay has been cut in half in real terms. That is NOT a sign of a shortage!

  6. Total Horseshit, As Always by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is no shortage of tech workers. There is only a shortage of people willing to work at rates management wants. And these are not burger flipper jobs that can only sustain paying employees out of the $5 value menu gross proceeds. These are wildly profitable tech giants with billions in revenue.

    1. Re:Total Horseshit, As Always by gweihir · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indeed. Something went very wrong after the last crisis was over: Companies continued to decrease STEM staff quality and wages paid, despite revenues being back to good and sometimes excellent. This has two effects, both catastrophic in the long run: 1.) fewer and fewer bright and capable people will go into STEM 2.) when the next crisis hits, companies will be a lot less able to deal with it, as they have systematically dumbed down their employee-pools. The only "positive" effects for the companies I see is even higher bonuses for even less deserving CEOs and the like.

      Somehow, they have completely forgotten that STEM is hard, it is what makes the modern world tick, and that good STEM workers are both critical for the long-term success of any tech company and hard to get.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:Total Horseshit, As Always by currently_awake · · Score: 3, Insightful

      American industry is systematically exporting their entire STEM industry, along with their manufacturing and science. Once it's gone the USA will not be able to afford to buy it back. Looks like they want the American economy to be built around banking/finance/investment/copyright. This is a bad idea because these are all "Luxury" industries, that always do poorly in a recession. If you build your economy around them then your country goes broke during a recession (even the rich would suffer).

    3. Re:Total Horseshit, As Always by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the same is happening all over Europe. This might be the thing that brings about the end of the dominance of the western world. Well, stupidity and greed deserve their rewards, I guess.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  7. comparing overall unemployment rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comparing the tech worker unemployment rate with overall unemployment is bogus.
    The Construction industry was decimated and so was finance. And sll of the unskilled workers were creamed too.

    And then there is the attrition of tech workers. After 35 or so, jobs start getting harder to come by and with the continued offshoring and H1-b hiring, many of us saw the writing on the wall and left. Half of my MBA class were tech workers looking to get out.

    When you leave or get forced out of tech, you are no longer counted as a tech worker. When big decides to eliminate a whole division and send it overseas and flood the job market with unemployed workers, the younger ones get hired first and the older ones get left behind.

    Please, spare me the fairy tale that "if you have the skills, there's work for yoy," when you are unemployed in tech, you are damaged goods -"if he was any good, he'd have a job." (Kids, always have another job queued up.)

    And there were quite a few guys from India, Middle East, Eastern Europe there - and they were all aiming at our markets. See, their foreign based companies were paying their way.

    1. Re:comparing overall unemployment rate by ranton · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please, spare me the fairy tale that "if you have the skills, there's work for yoy," when you are unemployed in tech, you are damaged goods -"if he was any good, he'd have a job." (Kids, always have another job queued up.)

      Please spare me the fairy tale that "even if you have the skills, its hard to find jobs in tech." I know four highly skilled IT workers in their 30's and 40's that have been fired or laid off in the last couple of years. Every one of them found work within a month. I know two mediocre IT workers in their 30's who were fired or laid off in the last few years, and one found work in a couple months (with a promotion to senior dev) and the other took four months. I do know a handful of tech workers who no longer work in tech because they couldn't find work, but they were never someone I would hire based on their ability.

      And I live in the Midwest, not some west coast IT paradise. The simple fact is we are currently in a sellers market, and if you are good you can set your own rates. I was unsatisfied with the projects I was being given about 6 months ago, and got my acceptance letter from a new company within 3 weeks from the start of my job search. With about a 20% raise. Although I am only 35, so I guess according to you its all downhill from here.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    2. Re:comparing overall unemployment rate by JustNiz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      >> People who are still in their early careers don't realize how vulnerable they become when they get older.

      As a 52 year old software developer I get what you are saying. The trick is to be in the right industry. All the young guns are mostly doing only web and web-related stuff because they think its cool. Just avoid that whole thing.

      What helps is that those guys seem to be pretty much clueless when it comes to bare metal stuff like embedded systems and device drivers etc because it seems even in CS degrees these days they don't teach anything as low-level as C, let alone assembler or how computers actually work any more. It seems most of those guys are completely out of their comfort zone around any language/environment that doesn't have a garbage collector, isn't in a VM or container, can't be scripted and doesn't come with a massive app framework that includes giant libraries of helper functions to do all the actual heavy lifting.

    3. Re:comparing overall unemployment rate by ranton · · Score: 1

      I would love to know how old you are. Betting early 30's at best. You sound like naive yet think you have a world of knowledge.

      I specifically said I was 35 in my post. Did you read the whole thing? I also stated how my opinions have been based on experiences from past coworkers in both their 30's and 40's. I don't know anyone in their 50's+ who has been laid off, although I have probably only worked with at most a dozen IT workers in that age bracket (not counting upper management types). Considering the IT industry as we know it has only been around about 25 years, it would be odd for there to be too many 50+ year old workers even without age discrimination.

      If you are in your 30's or early 40's and get fired, why the F would somebody hire you unless they are truly desperate?

      Because you want someone who knows what they are doing. The few people I know in their early to mid 20's are the ones finding it hard to break into the tech industry; at least in the Midwest that is. In a more startup friendly culture like the valley I assume it would be very different. Based on the 20-30 yr old coworkers I have had in the last few years, I have no fear of being able to convince a potential employer I am more valuable than they are. At least until they too get 10 years of experience.

      Being laid off because the company has major layoffs or ceases to exist is one thing - fired for cause is another.

      I have never known a quality IT worker that was fired for cause. It is so damn hard to find quality IT workers that employers will deal with a lot of shit before canning them.

      For those over 45, many leave the industry after 6 months when they can't find work because it's been offshored or preference is given to a fresh grad at 1/2 the salary and where the cost of benefits is significantly less than that of an older "at risk" person.

      Quality employers don't care that much about the higher salaries of the senior and director level IT staff they employ. Because good IT workers are the ones who make their bosses look great, and facilitate them getting their big bonuses. When a project is being run like shit and is about to miss a milestone that will reflect badly on our CTO, he wants someone like me who can simply get things done. Then when bonus time comes around he is glad to give me a quarter of a junior dev's salary just in bonus. In fact the only thing on his mind is making sure he doesn't lose me for the next time shit hits the fan (and I am not some special snowflake, there are other quality senior IT resources out there, although they are rare).

      Finding a job in your 30's and even to mid-40's is relatively easy. You are, typically, at a point in your life where you can afford to move, live a little more carefree lifestyle and, perhaps, might just be starting a family...perhaps, you have bought your first "starter" house. It isn't so easy after 45 and damn near impossible, as a "tech" worker after 50 when your kids are growing up, entering college or trying to truly prepare for retirement.

      Not sure how late you started your family, but most IT workers in their mid-40's already have a kid in high school. I am paying for daycare now, and at $1700 per month per kid it is just as expensive as college (and without 18 years to save up for it). So I can't wait until my kids are in college so their college funds can pay for it instead of my paychecks. With a large home in a great school district, two kids in daycare, college loans I'm still paying, and a wife who buys all her athletic gear at lululemon, I am well aware of how much my family needs our $200k+ household income.

      People who are still in their early careers don't realize how vulnerable they become when they get older. People like you are truly part of the problem. My suggestion, plan for the future ... from someone who thought like you and now

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  8. There is indeed a crisis by paiute · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Large companies are having real problems finding skilled people they can pay minimum wage and treat like chattel.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  9. A Forbidden Truth by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    Sometimes the real issue is hidden as it is inflammatory by nature. What I suppose is going on is that in some other nations education is severe and demanding and fanatical. Students able to get advanced degrees in those nations tend to have superior educations by a wide margin. In other words a Ph.d. from some foreign nations may mean far greater abilities are present than a student trained in the US. economic competition is such that employers not only want these workers as they have to pay them less but also because even though the credentials look the same the US educated students can not compete. If businesses admit this the public will rage over it. But we may be a stronger and safer nation because we do employ these students with foreign credentials.

    1. Re:A Forbidden Truth by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      I'm more inclined to think its the long game. If the bulk of the worlds smart people come to the United States, then how is the bad for the United States long-term?

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    2. Re:A Forbidden Truth by Boronx · · Score: 1

      Give them green cards instead of H1B

    3. Re:A Forbidden Truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You'd be wrong. A recent study by PEW (http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/08/10/5-facts-about-americas-students/) showed that the U.S. was near the middle when it came to math and science scores. However, one thing these studies always fail to consider is that the U.S. has a large contingent of minorities who consistently do poorly. Factor out those underperformers and the U.S. suddenly becomes very, very competitive on the world scene.

      And since we're talking about technology jobs, it is entirely fair to factor out those underperforming minorities because most of them don't go into STEM anyway. I'll be nasty and say that most will be headed to government jobs, the dole, or prison.

      For the countries that send a tremendous number of H1-B visa workers to the U.S., you only have to look at those countries of origin to realize that the students' educations can't be that great. I cannot think of any country with great higher education institutes that have third world infrastructure and standards of living. Perhaps former SSRs but those aren't the immigrant workers flooding into the U.S.

      The students from some foreign countries do cover more material in primary school than U.S. public schools. However, it is largely rote memorization and academic dishonesty is rampant. (Academic dishonesty in Asia has been rampant for generations.)

      I'm not saying that all foreign students are less capable than American students. However, it is equally ridiculous to say that students with "advanced degrees in those nations tend to have superior educations by a wide margin." You must compare apples to apples. The very best students from the very best universities in a foreign country are going to be substantially better than the average students in a mediocre or crappy U.S. university. However, If you take better American students from a top 20 or better university, you'll find that the foreign students likely aren't all that special.

      If American students really were so awful, how does this country keep from spiralling down the toilet? Things were doing just fine in the early to mid 1990s before H1-B visas were rampant.

      No. The "need" for the H1-B visa is purely about money. If the U.S. government were to subsidize native-born Americans in a manner such that companies would only have to pay $10,000 out of their revenues to the American employee with Uncle Sam making up the rest, you'd very quickly see H1-B visa workers going out of style.

  10. Nice to know by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    that right when the entire US economy was imploding in 2008 and my life was going to shit because of it that several thousand more foreign workers were allowed to stay in this country. I was wondering why Bernie Sanders has been doing so well in the polls. As always vote left. Vote for the most left leaning candidate you can get your hands on. You can bet we'll have fewer judges when Jeb is in the Whitehouse...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Nice to know by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Idea for a movie title, and game? "The Pruge, at the H1B Contractor compound."

      I'd watch it on pay-per-view.

    2. Re:Nice to know by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Left leaning candidates will happily ruin the nation, because the worse things are, the more justifications for radical policies. Who wants to open the borders wide and let the entire world into America, with voting rights the moment they set foot on our soil? The left. Are you saying that Bernie is going to expel the foreigners and thereby create several million new jobs for Americans? Jeez that's some serious Nazi shit right there.

      Why don't you ask people who used to live in hard left regimes how they feel about the kind of government you advocate? What do you think they would say?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:Nice to know by SirLordGodfrey · · Score: 1

      Left leaning candidates will happily ruin the nation, because the worse things are, the more justifications for radical policies. Who wants to open the borders wide and let the entire world into America, with voting rights the moment they set foot on our soil? The left. Are you saying that Bernie is going to expel the foreigners and thereby create several million new jobs for Americans? Jeez that's some serious Nazi shit right there.

      Why don't you ask people who used to live in hard left regimes how they feel about the kind of government you advocate? What do you think they would say?

      You speak of AUTHORITARIAN LIBERALS, however Senator Sanders is a LIBERTARIAN LIBERAL.

      Authoritarians of ALL stripes are usually pretty terrible, not that libertarian liberals or libertarian conservatives can't do bad work either.

      Political compass explains libertarians and authoritarians better.

      --
      "Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment."
    4. Re:Nice to know by ExekielS · · Score: 1

      As a proud left-libertarian, thank you for point this out.

      --
      ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
  11. My Solution by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    I casually state, "We just contracted a software project to some guys in Kenya, we needed the best and brightest. The project came in on time and on budget. And because of that, I got my bonus. I think next week I'll give them another project."

    Works every time.

    1. Re:My Solution by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      OK some questions:
      What is the quality of the software and documentation they delivered like compared to what you would have gotten if it had been done in-house?
      What about the ongoing availability and cost of support for their software now it has been delivered?
      Is the cost of all the extra time, support, education/training, project management, trips etc that you/your company had to do because they are external/remote also factored into your total cost?
      Did you also calculate the cost of doing it in-house? If so how did that estimate compare to the actual total cost?

    2. Re:My Solution by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      ...and dont forget to include your bonus in the actual total cost.

    3. Re:My Solution by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      It would appear that my bonus is bigger than yours.

    4. Re:My Solution by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Actually, the project passed BDD, the doc's needed 8th some grade grammer checking. Client was pleased. It's not that americans can't do it, they can't do it on 8 cents to the dollar. Indians charge 10 cents; a little to rich for my wallet.

    5. Re:My Solution by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but I'll get to keep my job longer.

  12. Re:There is no way this looks good. by jafiwam · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Meanwhile, Real IT Pro's know there's a tremendous shortage of real Talent out there, and it has gotten so bad companies can only stumble upon people who know what they are doing. Everyone else just kinda passes as somewhat knowing what they are doing.

    I am not surprised at all this tired old lie would show up as an anonymous first post in a thread like this.

    Pay more, more will come. Very simple. Why would anybody bother to learn / earn experience for your shit-pay job? Your problem is YOU.

  13. Re:Vacant homes for the homeless? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Wow. I had no idea we had so many affordable houses for the homeless.

    Most of the really affordable houses (These $1,000-5,000 specials) are in sad shape. You might not actually be allowed to live in them, they're so torn back. But they got that way because people (or banks) refused to rent or sell them for what the market would bear, so they sat vacant until the vandals and thieves got there...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  14. They are being asked to follow procedure, not... by slacklinejoe · · Score: 1

    This sounds like the administrative law folks decided, hey, you didn't follow proper procedure on this thing you did, go back and check the boxes on your paperwork. It doesn't sound like they are actually saying what they did was wrong or right. If they go back and check the boxes for public comment and still do what they did anyway, nothing changes. H1B1 is a complex subject on one hand, I like the fact that we do end up helping start up economies that were stagnate and had a low standard of living raising some folks from absolutely impoverished to just poor but livable, on the other side there is some truth in the "They took 'er jobs" line of thinking where we did have a lot of job displacement. It's seems much more impactful when the "host" country loses high paying jobs as a form of claimed altruism while really it just saved corporations money than if we'd have just sent over a bailout in the form of trade incentives that came out of our tax dollars. On the other side though India is in a drastically better state than it was 10 years ago and the outsourcing is leveling off and now starting to go elsewhere (China, Vietnam...) and they now have the skilled workforce to run their own modern economy without relying as much on other countries.

  15. That was NOT the target by wonkavader · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's nothing wrong with giving foreigners who just graduated from an American college the chance to stay and work. These are people who competed to get into school and won, had the money to pay for it, and then learned more at the school. These are precisely the folks we want to stay here.

    This should be extended to graduates with good grades in all disciplines, not dialed back.

    The real problem is H1Bs and the difficulty in getting a green card. It's the indentured servitude nature of the immigration-work-model which allows companies to pay less and force down American wages. We should provide enough protection to foreign workers that they can tell an employer to shove it.

    People can apply for work visas if they have something to offer, and they can come and help pay for our college system and prove that they can work VERY hard and learn fast via the school-visa program. We should embrace everybody coming in on that path. H1Bs are simply destructive.

  16. There is indeed a crisis - Creative Arts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Rules just need to be enforced.

    At our company, every one of the H1B's make more than their co-workers by 10-20%. All of our H1B developers make $140k+ Some over 200k.
    Our H1B Graphic Designers are making $95k.

    If we are going to be spending thousands to do the paperwork, plus tens of thousands in training, we need to make sure they stay, all 6 years rather than transfer their H1B to another company.

    We went the H1B route, because there is a severe lack of Coders with creative skills. People who have Fine Arts or Liberal Arts degrees tend to be much better developers, finding better solutions, and more innovative new directions. They need a bit more time than the "60hr nose-to-the-desk" US coder, but the overall quality is much higher on average, and they work less (we mandate 30hr work week, 10 hours "exploration" (do what you want) time. And have had much better annual throughput. So, we eventually just replaced most of the US Comp Sci grads with H1Bs who have arts degrees; but have a coding skill-set.

    What the US needs, is a better focus on teaching Creative and Liberal arts to students (Or more specifically, the ability to take University courses without going into heavy debt, so that arts classes can be taken to expand their creative and philosophical skills; in addition to the courses required for their desired field of employment.

    1. Re:There is indeed a crisis - Creative Arts. by guruevi · · Score: 1

      You went with H1B because they are cheaper than regular coders. I don't know where you are but 140k is below-average wage for good coders in most places.

      Not only are you profiting from the lower wages, you're also enjoying numerous tax breaks for hiring H1B's which brings down the TCO on said coders.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  17. Re:"crisis" should be paid preminum by Boronx · · Score: 1

    Just make H1B a fast track to a green card.

  18. Re:Vacant homes for the homeless? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    I have looked at foreclosed homes where the previous owners were evicted. The owners themselves rip out anything of value and take it or sell it. Carpets, built-in microwaves and ovens, window treatment hardware, blinds... One had even kitchen cabinets ripped open. One owner had let the faucet running after plugging the sink drain holes...

    Also noticed some homes auctioned for 3000$ and 5000$ in Detroit had well established rhododendron and azalea bushes 20-25 feet tall, small fruit trees less than 30 feet tall, lots of weeping cherries and japanese maple and dwarf alberta spruce etc. The value of the plants alone would often exceed the auction price. Wish I had the money to buy them, dig out the bushes and sell them to nurseries.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  19. Re: Test the Truth - raise H1b to 150% of US wage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And make ot be X2 for any hours over 40

  20. Re:Discontinue H1B by russotto · · Score: 2

    If a masters degree or a PhD from anywhere in the world were a reliable indication of intelligence, you might have a point. It isn't. There's any number of learned idiots.

  21. Radical policies? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    You mean like going to war over intelligence we know is bad for ideological reasons? Or tapping every phone in the country? Or diverting funds from a major US city's levies for the aforementioned war. I could go on you know....

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: Radical policies? by ExekielS · · Score: 1

      So taking care of the poor leads to the Gestapo how?

      --
      ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
  22. Re: There is no way this looks good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    we rarely even get through the interview and to the point where you make an offer.

    Are you out looking for candidates yourself or are you going through HR? The reason I ask is that if you're going through HR, you're almost certainly getting idiot candidates who know how to push all of HR's buttons and tick every requirement from the ridiculous job description (also prepared by HR) on their doctored resume. The really good recruits, who refuse to engage in HR shenanigans or game playing are getting dropped as "not qualified". Finally, really good IT people tend to be introverts and not exactly the most outgoing or socially minded people. It's easy for these kind of people to be missed by an HR department staffed with non-tech extroverts who majored in liberal arts. Sometimes, in order to find good tech people, you have to do more to meet them where they're at instead of waiting for them to beat a path through the HR jungle.

  23. Re:There is no way this looks good. by Gob+Gob · · Score: 1

    Pay more, more will come. Very simple. Why would anybody bother to learn / earn experience for your shit-pay job? Your problem is YOU.

    No the problem is you, you, you and me. Whilst we all want cheaper "everything" and use online bidding to push prices down we create a cost/price based business. I have a SaaS platform and the pressure to sell seats for under $100 is huge. If that seat wants support then profit margins quickly are eaten away.

    We are an Australian firm. Our latest hire is a Dev in the Philippines because the western world is over priced (not their fault because they have too much costs & taxes).

    Oh and I have started her our on the "shitty jobs" so she knows what not to do (and can incrementally improve to code). She is enthusiastic and putting in a good effort . You see it called a "job" not a "happy-happy-la-la-time-on-someone-else's-$$$".

    Many people embrace their responsibilities to climate change by recycling more, using less energy and changing their living routines. It surprises me that they don't have the same attitude towards fiscal responsibility and expect their governments to borrow more prosperity from their futures to keep the illusion of wealth dancing in front of them.

  24. Re:There is no way this looks good. by ExekielS · · Score: 1

    Congratualtions on getting so far in life without understanding the basics of currency markets. Outsourcing weakens currency which makes imports more expensive and discourages outsourcing. Only currency manipulation and cheating can achieve that. The only reason we are expected to have so little is so that the wealthy, those who own everything, can have so much. Their wealth has increased a thousand times over while others see massive cuts throughout the middle and lower class. It is idiots like you that let our wages keep getting pushed down by those who manipulate currencies and the politicians who profit from that manipulation. In no natural state is outsourcing actually cheaper.

    --
    ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
  25. Re:Vacant homes for the homeless? by ExekielS · · Score: 2

    It is classic market failure. Our abandoned homes outnumber the homeless by almost 10 to 1 factor. In a proper market, prices would fall until renters move up to homes, homeless move up to renting, fewer people inhabit each house/apartment, etc. But prices aren't dropping, so the supply and demand can't meet, because of the powerful banks who seek to control and extort from society for somebody's basic right to exist.

    --
    ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
  26. Re:There is no way this looks good. by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

    True.