Slashdot Mirror


Backwards S-Pen Can Permanently Damage Note 5

tlhIngan writes: Samsung recently released a new version of its popular Galaxy Note series phablet, the Note 5. However, it turns out that there is a huge design flaw in the design of its pen holder (which Samsung calls the S-pen). If you insert it backwards (pointy end out instead of in), it's possible for it get stuck damaging the S-pen detection features. While it may be possible to fix it (Ars Technica was able to, Android Police was not), there's also a chance that your pen is also stuck the wrong way in permanently as the mechanism that holds the pen in grabs the wrong end and doesn't let go.

157 comments

  1. Moronic by damicatz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a perfect example of over-engineering; designing something for flash rather than functionality. It reminds me of the Tesla and people getting locked out of their cars because someone thought it would be a good idea to have retracting door handles (complete with all the moving parts that can break down).

    What is wrong with a simple slot for the pen? Why do you need an ejection mechanism? All that does is add unnecessary parts and over complicate the design.

    1. Re:Moronic by damicatz · · Score: 4, Informative

      It doesn't require you to jam the pen in. It requires no force at all to mess it up.

    2. Re:Moronic by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's also easily resolved by having a design that assumes the user might accidentally attempt to insert the pen the wrong way. If you're not assuming that your users are going to do something dumb like that, you should recheck your assumptions, because in a mass-market product I can virtually guarantee that someone is going to at some point. That's why you design the pen such that the back end is shaped slightly differently than the front end, and with just a little extra plastic back there, it becomes impossible to insert it end first.

    3. Re:Moronic by retchdog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      people who make comments like this should be forced to sit in a corner and stare at a plot of a geometric decay function until the point sinks in.

      suppose that, each usage, there is a 1-in-1000 chance that you fuck up. if you use the pen 5 times a day, that's about an 80% chance by the end of the year that you've fucked up, and it apparently only has to happen once.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    4. Re:Moronic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's next, a bug report about if you jam the charger in backwards it can break?

      Bug Status: Closed due to duplicate report
      Comment: Fixed in v3.1

    5. Re:Moronic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why can't people pay attention to how they are inserting the pen? I agree, this over designing is getting out of hand, but this "bug" is resolved by the user not being an idiot.

      What's next, a bug report about if you jam the charger in backwards it can break?

      Putting the pen in backwards is something a kid could do by mistake. Not all tech users are adults.

    6. Re:Moronic by omnichad · · Score: 2

      It might be over-designing, but it's a severe lack of engineering. We've had one-way insertion for a lot of things for a long time. SD cards insert and eject only one way with a similar spring lock.

    7. Re:Moronic by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And not all adults are paying full attention to their devices - especially if they're having to deal with children at the same time.

    8. Re:Moronic by DrXym · · Score: 2
      A design can be bad by virtue of not taking into account typical use cases. While I don't think I'd put the stylus in the wrong way I could easily see a kid or a non tech savvy person doing it. And if it happens then the design should save the user from a catastrophic error such as the damage or destruction of their phone.

      e.g. Nintendo manages this feat in the DS / 3DS by having a square profile at the top of the stylus. Put the DS stylus in the wrong way and it won't fit. It shouldn't be any harder for Samsung to solve - taper the stylus or make the non writing end a little larger than the shaft so it can't be inserted the wrong way around.

    9. Re:Moronic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly this -- they need to release a new pen design that is impossible to insert in the "wrong" way (quick fix is to broaden the end, but the pen won't sit flush to the casing) OR it needs to not break when the pen is inserted the "wrong" way. I put "wrong" in quotes, because the current design does not prevent inserting the pen backwards (so both ways are "correct").

    10. Re:Moronic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With 3D printing, I was assured we could simply download new parts, including entire cars. So what's the problem? You a Luddite or something?

    11. Re:Moronic by jkevin99 · · Score: 1

      Hi, woefully un-educated statistic enthusiast here. I have been thinking about the function you describe, i.e. "x chance of an event happening on a given day, what is the probability of it occurring in y days." Can you tell me what this function is called and how to calculate? Thanks!

    12. Re:Moronic by Dog-Cow · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most users are not dumb. Most users simply assume that the worst thing to happen when inserting the wrong way is for it to not work. The only dumb ones are the designers/engineers who didn't take into account completely normal human behavior and expectations.

    13. Re:Moronic by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      They're inserting it wrong?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    14. Re:Moronic by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      What is wrong with a simple slot for the pen? Why do you need an ejection mechanism?

      The pen would fall out of a simple slot. That's why floppy drives first had little handles that closed and held them in place, and later automatic eject mechanisms. Duh.

      The flaw is not having an eject mechanism, which is necessary for any sane design. The flaw is in allowing the pen to be inserted the wrong way around.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:Moronic by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      No it wont. Panasonic toughbooks and a gajillion other devices use a simple tapered slot with a tapered pen and work perfectly without the pen falling out. Plus it's impossible to jam the pen in backwards.

      Stop defending bad engineering, It's a bad design that had zero testing to see if the general public would screw it up.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    16. Re:Moronic by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 5, Informative

      Probability of fuck up at each attempt: 0.001
      Probability of no fuck up at one attempt: 0.999

      Probability of two no-fuck-ups in a row: 0.999*0.999
      Probability of x no-fuck-ups in a row: 0.999^x
      Five attempts per day, for a year, is 1825 attempts in total.
      So, probability of getting to the end of the year without a fuck up: 0.999^1825 = 0.16
      Probabilty of not getting to the end of the year without a fuck up (i.e., having a fuck up): 1 - 0.16 = 0.84.

      84% chance of having a fuck up in a year.

      I think it's called the multiplying-things-together-a-bunch-of-times function.

      TL:DR; You calculate the chances of it never happening (there's only one way for it to never happen, whereas there are many ways for it to happen - on day one, on day two, etc) and subtract them from 1.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    17. Re:Moronic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly. Every time I get a new camera, I have no idea which way the rechargeable battery gets inserted. Yet I have no worries that I might be inserting it the wrong way, because I know the batteries are designed to only fit one way (or at least every one I've ever handled is designed that way). So my expectation is that if I try putting it in and it seems to fit, then it must be the right way, because only an idiot engineer would design it otherwise.

    18. Re:Moronic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly -- in sadistics, you calculate the probability of something NOT happening (ie: the parent's "no-fuck-ups"), and then once you have the probability of it not happening (example: in a year timeframe), you subtract from 1 and you have the probability of it actually happening.

      Math for the win!

    19. Re:Moronic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      At first I thought you had to try, but from the article it requires zero force. What a horrible design, when it would have been so easy to make the top end slightly wider so you could not insert it backwards. You could retain all the rest of the design if you made the top 5mm of both the slot and the pen slightly wider, then the most you could insert the pen backwards would be 5mm.

    20. Re:Moronic by dkman · · Score: 1

      Exactly. All it needs is a nub so it doesn't fit that way. If you file off the nub then you accept the risk.

      --
      I refuse to sign
    21. Re:Moronic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, I'm not sure where you're getting this from, but the legions of i fans proclaiming invulnerability (or even fast patches) to hacks (despite being jail broken) would like to disagree with you.

      Most users ARE dumb, and WILL refuse to even read or think about what clicking "OK" to any dialog box means.

    22. Re:Moronic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      look where the exposed terminal is. look where the metal bits contacting the exposed terminal. Either that, or look where the spring is (for regular batteries) and put the flat end in that way

      Seems pretty easy to me, even if there's no proper orientation shape you can determine.

    23. Re:Moronic by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      He's not defending bad engineering, he attacked it too. He's attacking what he sees as a poor criticism/solution.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    24. Re:Moronic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have a Note 3. It is nearly impossible to insert the pen in backwards. You could jam it in if you were motivated, but still, it is obvious that you are inserting it wrong.

    25. Re:Moronic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could jam it in if you were motivated, but still, it is obvious that you are inserting it wrong.

      Apparently San Fransisco residents are either highly motivated or to them it is simply not that obvious.

    26. Re:Moronic by Jax+Omen · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have a Note 3 as well.

      You are correct FOR OUR PHONES.

      The Note 5 redesigned the S-Pen and this is no longer the case - the Note 5 pen can be inserted backwards with zero resistance.

    27. Re:Moronic by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      It takes a really stupid engineer to assume that all users will never do a single mistake.

    28. Re:Moronic by TheCarp · · Score: 2

      Any design which requires perfect attention from the user to not break is a poor design. Every pad/stylus combo I ever tried only fit one way, looks like this has been a solved problem for a long time now.

      I would fully agree with you, if sliding the stylus in backwards didn't break anything. However, if sliding it in backwards is destructive, it shouldn't be easy to do. That is bad design and no amount of blaming the user changes that.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    29. Re:Moronic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is they have probably already gone into production so at this point it is a huge change and cost associated with fixing it.
      Best to bite the bullet and fix it now before any more bad press IMHO.

    30. Re:Moronic by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      A design can be bad by virtue of not taking into account typical use cases. While I don't think I'd put the stylus in the wrong way I could easily see a kid or a non tech savvy person doing it. And if it happens then the design should save the user from a catastrophic error such as the damage or destruction of their phone.
      e.g. Nintendo manages this feat in the DS / 3DS by having a square profile at the top of the stylus. Put the DS stylus in the wrong way and it won't fit. It shouldn't be any harder for Samsung to solve - taper the stylus or make the non writing end a little larger than the shaft so it can't be inserted the wrong way around.

      Putting the pen in backwards can also be done intentionally - they go into a holder and you need to eject it to use it again. Sometimes you're just switching between doing a lot of tapping to a lot of writing, and it's handy to put the pen away temporarily. For these cases, I put the pen in backwards - they generally get stuck halfway in so instead of fiddling with getting it ejected, I just grab the end sticking out (especially since some ejection mechanisms don't push the stylus out far enough so it's a tough grab).

      It's surprising how many stylus based devices this works on and how handy it is not having to futz with getting the pen out.

      Now, the pen isn't locked into position, but if you're switching between stylus and other control inputs, it beats holding it the entire time.

    31. Re:Moronic by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I have owned a few Toughbooks over the years. They all had eject mechanisms for the various PC Card and memory card slots, and the one with a pen had an eject mechanism for that too.

      Clearly a tapered slot won't prevent something falling out, only stop something going in too far or backwards. Explain how a cone going into another cone will be held in place. Where is the friction, where is the gripping force?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    32. Re:Moronic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wonkey_monkey's explanation is good. the formal name for it is the "geometric distribution", in case you want to google it.

    33. Re:Moronic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. I know.

      I was simply pointing out that the Note 3 didn't have this brain dead design.

    34. Re:Moronic by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      They're inserting it wrong?

      That's what she said.

      C'mon, you know someone was going to post that answer.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    35. Re:Moronic by robi5 · · Score: 1

      Over-engineering isn't even the right term. It's certainly underdesigned, and as part of it, it was probably under-prototyped and under-tested. Engineering is good, so over-engineering isn't the issue.

      Unfortunately Samsung just churns out stuff while other makers (Apple, and some pockets in HTC) design stuff.

    36. Re:Moronic by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      The pen never fell out of my Note2, Note4, DSLite and 3DS-XL despite all these devices being simple slot based with no eject mechanism.
      Eject mechanisms are actually worse for mobile devices : they are too easy to trigger unwillingly and once the stylus is out, it doesn't naturally come back in, making it easier to lose it or break it.

    37. Re:Moronic by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      How about they just design the pen with a flanged end and a socket to match, so it's impossible to insert backwards?

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    38. Re:Moronic by Falos · · Score: 1

      All the more reason to not assume 100% perfect use everytime forever.

    39. Re:Moronic by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this is why you review a design before making a billion of them.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    40. Re:Moronic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It must be a use case issue. The pen has fallen out of every variant of the DS that we have ever owned. That is 3 DSs and 2 DS Lite. Granted we travel a lot and they may get more than the normal level of rough handling, but we've had to buy about a dozen pens just because the little plastic nub wears down or some other minor wear makes the whole thing useless.

      I've only used a few devices with quick release stylus slots around the office, but I've never been inconvenienced by accidentally triggering it. And the spring release distance is so shallow that I really can't imagine what gymnastics someone must be doing to be at any risk of breaking it that wouldn't also damage a friction-held stylus.

    41. Re:Moronic by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, most nerds have never encountered a situation where someone grabbed their "pen" and refused to let go.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    42. Re:Moronic by macs4all · · Score: 1

      This is a perfect example of over-engineering; designing something for flash rather than functionality. It reminds me of the Tesla and people getting locked out of their cars because someone thought it would be a good idea to have retracting door handles (complete with all the moving parts that can break down).

      What is wrong with a simple slot for the pen? Why do you need an ejection mechanism? All that does is add unnecessary parts and over complicate the design.

      No. It is a perfect example of UNDER-engineering.

      If the stylus-holder and/or stylus was engineered (and TESTED!) correctly/thoroughly, they would have caught this error in the prototype phase. While I understand what you are saying about "over-engineering", that is actually a false canard.

    43. Re:Moronic by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Every time I get a new camera, I have no idea which way the rechargeable battery gets inserted. Yet I have no worries that I might be inserting it the wrong way, because I know the batteries are designed to only fit one way (or at least every one I've ever handled is designed that way). So my expectation is that if I try putting it in and it seems to fit, then it must be the right way, because only an idiot engineer would design it otherwise.

      I expect AAA batteries to usually fit both ways. But I do expect a device with the batteries the wrong way round to stay undamaged and to just not work, so "insert batteries without looking", "try and it doesn't work", "remove batteries the other way round" should be a safe option.

    44. Re:Moronic by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Exactly this -- they need to release a new pen design that is impossible to insert in the "wrong" way (quick fix is to broaden the end, but the pen won't sit flush to the casing) OR it needs to not break when the pen is inserted the "wrong" way. I put "wrong" in quotes, because the current design does not prevent inserting the pen backwards (so both ways are "correct").

      Or they can just sharpen the point of the stylus to a greater extent, so that pain/blood keeps the user from inserting the pen "backwards". At least more than once. ;-)

    45. Re:Moronic by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Most users are not dumb. Most users simply assume that the worst thing to happen when inserting the wrong way is for it to not work. The only dumb ones are the designers/engineers who didn't take into account completely normal human behavior and expectations.

      Exactly.

    46. Re:Moronic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Morse cones would work :P

    47. Re:Moronic by macs4all · · Score: 1

      A design can be bad by virtue of not taking into account typical use cases. While I don't think I'd put the stylus in the wrong way I could easily see a kid or a non tech savvy person doing it. And if it happens then the design should save the user from a catastrophic error such as the damage or destruction of their phone. e.g. Nintendo manages this feat in the DS / 3DS by having a square profile at the top of the stylus. Put the DS stylus in the wrong way and it won't fit. It shouldn't be any harder for Samsung to solve - taper the stylus or make the non writing end a little larger than the shaft so it can't be inserted the wrong way around.

      Putting the pen in backwards can also be done intentionally - they go into a holder and you need to eject it to use it again. Sometimes you're just switching between doing a lot of tapping to a lot of writing, and it's handy to put the pen away temporarily. For these cases, I put the pen in backwards - they generally get stuck halfway in so instead of fiddling with getting it ejected, I just grab the end sticking out (especially since some ejection mechanisms don't push the stylus out far enough so it's a tough grab).

      It's surprising how many stylus based devices this works on and how handy it is not having to futz with getting the pen out.

      Now, the pen isn't locked into position, but if you're switching between stylus and other control inputs, it beats holding it the entire time.

      Or, you could just use a device that doesn't require a stupid stylus.

    48. Re:Moronic by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      What is wrong with a simple slot for the pen? Why do you need an ejection mechanism? All that does is add unnecessary parts and over complicate the design.

      See, I was thinking the exact opposite... Have a mini-rail gun launch the pen so it can never get "stuck".
      As a bonus write an app that will use the whole battery potential to shoot the s-pen like a blowgun dart!

      Now I'm seeing a MacGyver comeback for the digital age!
      We will need the modern version of a mullet though...
      https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1293&bih=658&q=MacGyver&oq=MacGyver&gs_l=img.3..0l10.2805.2805.0.5079.1.1.0.0.0.0.213.213.2-1.1.0....0...1ac..64.img..0.1.213.elR9Fw1feVI

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    49. Re:Moronic by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      > Exactly this -- they need to release a new pen design that is impossible to insert in the "wrong" way (quick fix is to broaden the end, but the pen won't sit flush to the casing) OR it needs to not break when the pen is inserted the "wrong" way.

      Why would boradening the head not let it sit flush to the casing? It's done with bolts and screw everywhere every day.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    50. Re:Moronic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [...] would fall out of a simple slot. That's why floppy drives first had little handles that closed and held them in place [...]

      Because otherwise the floppy would fall out? Don't know about you, but most people don't hang their computers from the ceiling, ya know.

    51. Re:Moronic by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Because it would still have the latching mechanism that the current setup has. duh.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    52. Re:Moronic by Immerman · · Score: 1

      > Where is the friction, where is the gripping force?

      Seriously? Have you never seen a cork in a wine bottle? The gripping force comes from compression of the parts - push the cork/pen in just a little further than it will slide easily, and the gentle taper converts that small lengthwise force into a large radial compressive force between the sides of the cork and neck of the bottle, and with it a large friction force. So long as the coefficient of static friction is greater than the slope of the taper, the cork will remain in place.

      Thanks to the high compressibility of cork, wine bottles will often have a negative taper (flaring inwards) to ensure a strong long-term fit, but the principle is the same - you don't often see wine corks sliding down into the bottle, do you?

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    53. Re:Moronic by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Have you ever tried to remove a cork from a bottle? You usually need a tool to apply enough force to it. Plus a cork is made of cork, a fairly soft material, not plastic.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    54. Re:Moronic by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Right, it's a fairly extreme example of the process. Making the required forces weaker is trivial.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    55. Re:Moronic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a tech site sprouting zero resistance is a slippery slope!

  2. This is a huge design flaw? by JackieBrown · · Score: 0

    I just got my note 3 5 a few days ago. You have to really not be paying attention to make this mistake - especially to the point of breaking the locking mechanism.

    That said, you can go into the s-pen setting and turn off the pen detection and it will work just fine.

    There is an xda thread on this.

    http://forum.xda-developers.co...

    1. Re:This is a huge design flaw? by Luthair · · Score: 1

      There is a huge design flaw with cars - they tend to break when driving through walls.

    2. Re:This is a huge design flaw? by alhead · · Score: 1

      I just got my note 3 5 a few days ago.

      A Note 3 or a Note 5? The issue is for a Note 5, as others have said that the styles for the Note 3 has a different design that isn't susceptible to the issue.

  3. HUGE design flaw!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dropping a Note 5 can damage it!

    WTF Samsung?

  4. TL;DR by bruno.fatia · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You are holding it wrong.

    1. Re:TL;DR by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      Isn't that a Swatch trademark?

  5. LOL ... by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So ... "you're holding it wrong" for the win?

    Nope, not a bad industrial design, but it's pilot error.

    In the real world, humans aren't always going to do these things as you envisioned them. If you can't design to account for this stuff, you're doing it wrong.

    Like in software QA you pretty much try to do everything you shouldn't just to see what happens ... in this kind of design, you give it to someone who is going to try every thing your engineers have said "nobody would ever do that", and find out just how badly they've done.

    If it shouldn't be put in that way, you should probably ensure it physically can't be put in that way without a hammer. Because someone will do it wrong.

    Sorry, but the human monkey seldom acts according to the idealized assumptions of engineers and product designers. Which means you should be assuming your assumptions are wrong.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  6. Doctor!, Doctor! by rstanley · · Score: 0

    It hurts when I do this!

    Doctor: "Don't do it!"

    Henny_Youngman https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  7. Defect resolved already. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 0
    Defect SS023926: Severity 5; Priority 5:

    Status: Resolved.

    Resolution Code: User Error

    This is what we have been doing for software bugs. Almost industry standard now.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  8. This is a regression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I verified on my Galaxy Note 3, I am unable to insert the S-Pen backwards

    1. Re:This is a regression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Checking my Note II... yup, ditto here.

    2. Re:This is a regression by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      You must have had a fraught minute or two, there.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    3. Re:This is a regression by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      Checking my Note 5.... Oh fsck it

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  9. Same with a Note 4? by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

    I'm using a Note 4, so I just tried it.

    Surprisingly, yes it is possible to stick the pen in backwards. It wouldn't have been difficult at all to make the grabber nub on the top of it too big to fit down the shaft. I'm not sure why they didn't bother to do that. Of course I wasn't stilly enough to try to force it down all the way to duplicate the issue (sorry folks).

    That being said, I never use the pretend pen. I'm not even sure what apps it would work with. For taking actual notes, I use an 11 inch pad. So I'm not sure how many actual users this will be a big issue for. However, I believe Samsung S6+ has the same size display, so perhaps people who don't care about the pen will all be buying that instead now, and *all* (both) remaining Note users will be pen users.

    1. Re:Same with a Note 4? by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      I went with the note 5 instead of the edge + to save myself 100 dollars but don't really plan on using the pen.

      I am so used to typing that holding a pen is uncomfortable for me.

    2. Re:Same with a Note 4? by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      First thing I tried too, but I was a bit less gentle than you ;)
      I jammed it backwards hard enough so that I had to use my pocket knife to take it out but there is no damage, no weird behavior and no loosening. The only problem when you force it down all the way is that it is a bit difficult to get enough of a grip to pull it out. And I tried it several times in both orientations.

      And in case you are interested : when inserted backward, the S-Pen is considered "out". The sensor is contactless and triggers when the base of the S-Pen lines up with the entrance hole, whatever the orientation.

    3. Re:Same with a Note 4? by 6ULDV8 · · Score: 1

      I got my Note 5 on the 17th. I didn't choose based on price. I chose the Note because I do use pen input. I work with wood as a hobby. It dries out your hands. My fingertips don't always work on touch screens. It works very well as a phone or tablet and the side buttons aren't as sensitive as my Galaxy Mega. My issue is covered in the Check Point article. I'd rather see that addressed first.

      --
      Pull my finger for my public key.
  10. Re:So don't put it in backwards? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 3, Informative

    Um, they've designed around that. The diesel nozzle is larger than a gas nozzle.

    Can you do it the other way around? Yes.

  11. Re:So don't put it in backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Don't give it to a young child and don't be dumb enough to stick it in backwards. Should my car manufacturer be held responsible for my gas powered vehicle's inability to run diesel? Non-story.

    Oh, if we're going with a car analogy - let's use a seatbeat instead of fuel. Would you be annoyed that inserting the seatbelt clip the wrong way round meant you couldn't release it and you had to cut the seatbelt to get out?

  12. Re:So don't put it in backwards? by anchovy_chekov · · Score: 1

    Have to agree. We have no stories about people actually doing this by accident - just someone emulating stupidity. Fuck me... science.

    If it does turn out to be a real problem, cue the fans boys on other side of the fence with "You're sticking it in wrong" jokes.

    Man, this is turning out to be a dumb century.

  13. Re:So don't put it in backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Your analogy is broken.

    Gasoline powered vehicles run on diesel. It won't be pretty, but they run. Its diesel cars that run on gasoline.

    A better analogy would be: If I put my car in reverse while going forward, should the car manufacturer be held responsible for me destroying my car?

    But even that analogy is broken since cars (at least here) have had mechanisms to prevent accidentally putting the car in reverse for decades.

    This Note 5 flaw is an ENGINEERING flaw pure and simple.

    Whatever moron designed it forgot to put in safeguards to prevent an easy mistake that can permanently damage the device.

  14. And don't run... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holding scissors with the pointed end up.

  15. Foreseeable Misuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While it may be a bit boneheaded to insert the s-pen the wrong way round, can we all please note that engineers (at least in the US of A) are obligated to design against use and foreseeable misuse. The courts have upheld this in a number of cases (mostly accidents resulting severe injury or death, but the precedent still holds). It seems fairly clear to me that inserting the s-pen in the incorrect orientation is a foreseeable issue, which points shoddy design engineering; thus, it seems a bit harsh (and incorrect) to blame the consumers.

  16. Not a "Design Flaw"/a Testing Flaw by mykepredko · · Score: 2

    I can see that most of the comments are referring to this as a design flaw and overly complicating the product but I imagine this was put into the Product Requirements Document as a feature that provided some benefit to the customer.

    The issue really is, what was the testing protocol put in place, I would think that with something like this, the Samsung engineers would have to check for:
    - The S-Pen being put in backwards and twisted to the preferred orientation
    - The S-Pen being damaged and put in the right way and backwards and turned away from its preferred orientation
    - Something other than the S-Pen being put in.
    - The S-Pen being inserted with the force of a jackhammer
    - The Galaxy being dropped (on all of its axis) with the S-Pen inserted correctly and incorrectly
    - etc.

    These tests should have been part of the product test and qualification plan.

    1. Re:Not a "Design Flaw"/a Testing Flaw by zx75 · · Score: 2

      It is a design flaw, but you are correct that it is also a testing failure.

      It is a simple use case that should have been discovered during testing and addressed - but that does not take away from the fact it was a design flaw in the first place. It's a chain of errors that resulted in this problem being present in production.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    2. Re:Not a "Design Flaw"/a Testing Flaw by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      You know how you do this? you hand the phone to a child.

      This emulates the typical american.

      Disclaimer, I am an american, I see the child level thought in my fellow americans every single day.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Not a "Design Flaw"/a Testing Flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you hand the phone to a child.

      Kids don't write Test Cases and they aren't allowed to work...

    4. Re:Not a "Design Flaw"/a Testing Flaw by hankwang · · Score: 1

      "These tests should have been part of the product test and qualification plan."

      I suspect that they don't test the device in their final assembled form because of the tight development and release schedule for thus kind of devices. Redesigning the spring mechanism and setting up the production lines could mean months of delay.

      They need to trust their engineers to catch this kind of problem while the design only exists as a CAD model. Unfortunately that didn't happen this time...

  17. Re:So don't put it in backwards? by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your car is a perfect example of the many of hundreds of ways a system is designed to prevent someone from doing something wrong.

    Modern cars are interlocked so you can't start the engine while the car is not in park / neutral, can't remove the key while the car isn't in park, can't put it into park while rolling, doesn't leave the lights or indicators on when the car isn't on, doesn't turn the interior light on when the car door isn't open, or automatically turns it off when you lock the door.

    Best of all, no you can't put diesel in your car without doing something incredibly stupid in most countries as the physical nozzle used in diesel is designed to not fit into the fill point of a petrol car.

    I can't lock the keys in my car as the door will unlock when closed, we provide child safety features to prevent doors from locking, override controls on windows, many convertibles will not allow you to move the roof while the car is in motion, and don't forget the many other features like warning lights or noises when you do something like not buckle up.

    Car manufacturers have gotten to this point through regulations and court cases. Many of these cases they have lost and that is precisely why companies need to design for the possibility that their products may actually end up in the hands of an idiot. Samsung clearly didn't get this memo.

  18. Apple says.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are literally doing it wrong..

  19. A Corporate Culture Flaw? by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    This sounds like the VP manager of the divisions yelled "Just do it!"

    That would be in keeping with what was reported by one of SF's top independent design firms (ideo?) mere days after Steve Jobs showed the iPhone in Jan 2007.

    A large Asian firm contacted the design firm asked it if it could design them a touch phone. And, they wanted the complete design in 6 weeks. The design firm said no one can do that. The Asian customer went elsewhere.

    Managers should manage the company, unless they are product designers by trade and work as such.

  20. Re:So don't put it in backwards? by JackieBrown · · Score: 1, Interesting

    But the gas one fits into the diesel tank. In the the states that required the gas attendants fill the tanks, they filled my mom's diesel engine with unleaded. That sure messed up our road trip.

  21. How stupid is that? by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    They seriously didn't see this happening? This is NOT exceeding expectations!

  22. This is beyond idiocy by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    Seriously, this is beyond idiocy, and an example of brain-dead poor engineering.

    If your engineering staff can't test for simple shit like this and find this sort of problem, they should all be fired on the spot. There is NO excuse for this kind of failure to pass all of the intermediary design and testing levels and make it into live production.

    Seriously, no one ever thought, "Hey, what happens if Mr Customer inserts the pen in upside down?"

    That's a failure on multiple levels- design, prototype, initial testing, final design, and production. If one of my engineering teams had let this kind of craptastic customer-hostile bullshit out the door, I'd have fired them.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:This is beyond idiocy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, this is beyond idiocy, and an example of brain-dead poor engineering.

      If your engineering staff can't test for simple shit like this and find this sort of problem, they should all be fired on the spot. There is NO excuse for this kind of failure to pass all of the intermediary design and testing levels and make it into live production.

      Seriously, no one ever thought, "Hey, what happens if Mr Customer inserts the pen in upside down?"

      That's a failure on multiple levels- design, prototype, initial testing, final design, and production. If one of my engineering teams had let this kind of craptastic customer-hostile bullshit out the door, I'd have fired them.

      You're assuming the design team didn't know about this. Since we're guessing I venture a go... perhaps the design team said hey this is fucked up and management insisted they keep the S-Pen design for some asshatted reason god knows I've seen that happen!

  23. Re:So don't put it in backwards? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Don't give it to a young child and don't be dumb enough to stick it in backwards. Should my car manufacturer be held responsible for my gas powered vehicle's inability to run diesel? Non-story.

    You missed one.

    Don't buy the thing. Problem solved. Samsung FTW, right?

    There are things you can obviously blame on the victim, like the kook who wanted to use a gymnastics high bar to vault off the edge of a cliff and it collapsed on him, sending him over the side completely uncontrolled.Miraculously, he survived.Yeah that was stupid.

    But no, putting a pen in the wrong way, while obviously not paying attention, isn't necessarily a Nobel worthy moment, but it's shouldn't be a bitch the thing up moment either.

    More importantly - it does not need to be designed in such a manner. So it shouldn't be designed in that manner. Amazing that people would stand up for bad design like this.

    Here's an example of design. Many electrical outlets use polarized plugs and sockets. Why should they do that? Shouldn't a person measure all the voltages and where they are attached on the line before each insertion of a plug? The damage that could occur if a 240 VAC device could be plugged in the wrong way are rather greater than a phablet and stylus screwup, but the principles are the same. If something can get bitched up during normal use, it ain't good design. So while the superior beings who appear to inhabit parts of slashdot, and have never, and will never ever make a mistake - I salute you all. But there are mere mortals among you. It is your cross to bear, and your forbearance is appreciated.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  24. Re:So don't put it in backwards? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    The Samsung flaw was a basic design error that should have been caught early on (and frankly it should never have been made to begin with, but that's another story).

    Yes, your car manufacturer should be held responsible if your vehicle allows you to use a fuel nozzle that is specifically designed to prevent this mistake from happening.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  25. and solved last century already by DrYak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a perfect example of over-engineering; designing something for flash rather than functionality. {...} What is wrong with a simple slot for the pen? Why do you need an ejection mechanism? All that does is add unnecessary parts and over complicate the design.

    And even last century, when Palm launched its first PDA, it featured a notch on the side (imitating the pocket-clip that actual pen have) making it physically impossible to insert it the wrong way, and making easy to extract the pen without any physical retention mechanism (no need for complex mechanism. Just push the notch that protrudes out of the PDA body).

    It's funny how more or less 20 years ago, the first PDA makers more or less got everything right.

    And suddenly, since Apple's introduction of iPhone, everyone seems to have gone stupid and needs to re-solve the same problems.

    It reminds me of the Tesla and people getting locked out of their cars because someone thought it would be a good idea to have retracting door handles (complete with all the moving parts that can break down).

    And even, in the case of Tesla, that's still semi-justified. As it is a car, and needs to optimise for drag to increase effciency and fuel (or in this specific case: battery) consumption.
    Car manufacturers have gone as far as making the 2 side mirrors differing in lenght a few milimeters, just to optimise for drag thus compensating the typically assymetric weight balance inside the car and shaving a few liters down per 100km.
    Compared to that having door handles retracting flush doesn't seem far fetched at all.

    (Tesla only need enough redundancy to be able to open it: if the retractable door handle mechanism fails, you still have several wireless way to open it - app or remote. Or if all the fancy electronics have failed - passive RRFID. In the case of electric failure in the car, the system still have a backup 12v battery to operate the doors. And in case of 12v failure, you can still charge/boost from the outside. At that point if even that fails, the event is so rare that smashing a window in an emergency [the "baby got stuck inside during a heat wave" scenario] seems acceptable)

    Meanwhile, you don't really need flush body for a smart-phone - elevating its theoretical terminal velocity doesn't serve any sane purpose. And a backup solutions whould have been completely doable (either the notch as in Palm PDAs, or having a pin hole at the opposite side to push the stylus out).
    But still, Samsung managed to create a useless feature, with no backup plan in case of failure.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:and solved last century already by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      amsung managed to create a useless feature, with no backup plan in case of failure.

      That's where you're wrong. The 'backup' plan is to get you to trade up to a phone with an asymmetrical pen, which only costs 50 dollars more

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:and solved last century already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of the stupid design that Hummers (like H2) have: if the battery is dead, you can't remove the key from the ignition cylinder -- what the hell were they thinking?

      Tesla's have disappearing door handles? That is just unbelievably stupid -- reading the Consumer Reports review of the $127,000 Tesla Model S and the reviewer was not able to even get into the car. Tesla had to dispatch a technician to open the door (the next morning).

    3. Re:and solved last century already by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      I have used a Palm Tungsten for several years and I can tell you that even that stylus wasn't engineered all that well. More than once, the stylus fell out of its slot, and was lost. There was a little notch on the end where a spring clip held it in place, but that wasn't always enough to keep it there. This opened up a market for replacement stylii.

      The engineering fault of Samsung wasn't that they didn't anticipate the reversal of the stylus. Their fault was that they *REQUIRED* a stylus. There are hundreds of phones that just use your finger, and they work well. The Palm had a resistive touch screen, so if you lost the stylus, in a pinch, you could use a fingernail, pen cap, toothpick, or almost anything else with a point.

    4. Re:and solved last century already by Jax+Omen · · Score: 1

      Uh what?

      The Note series of phones SELLING POINT is that they INCLUDE a stylus. It is in no way required. The phones work fine with your finger.

      The fault of samsung is making the pen fit perfectly when inserted the wrong way, something they didn't fuck up on previous Note phones.

    5. Re:and solved last century already by PPH · · Score: 1

      And even, in the case of Tesla, that's still semi-justified. As it is a car, and needs to optimise for drag to increase effciency and fuel (or in this specific case: battery) consumption.

      Problem solved on aircraft door handles for quite some time. Sure, the automatic handles are cool. But would it have been much of a proplem to make it so puching on one end of the handle rocks the other end out?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    6. Re:and solved last century already by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      Oddly, Samsung's older versions of the Note (I have the Note 8) had a wider, angled end, which made it physically impossible to insert it the wrong way around. I really don't understand why they didn't just keep it.

    7. Re:and solved last century already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone remember the Compaq iPaq stylus? It could be inserted the wrong way, and with enough force disappear forever into a slot next to the main board.

    8. Re:and solved last century already by macs4all · · Score: 1

      And suddenly, since Apple's introduction of iPhone, everyone seems to have gone stupid and needs to re-solve the same problems.

      Actually, Apple neatly solved the whole problem in 2007 by doing away with the need for an ignorant stylus altogether.

      Everyone else is trying to solve yesterday's problems.

    9. Re: and solved last century already by jsh1972 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't "need" the stylus at all, works just fine without it. The stylus is the phone's selling point- it includes a stylus and digitizer similar to a wacom tablet for drawing, handwriting etc.

    10. Re:and solved last century already by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      My car (a 1989 Subaru XT6) has flush door handles as well, but it is accomplished simply by having a spring-loaded plate swing out and take up the space under the door handle. When opening the door, this is simply pushed out of the way with the fingertips and the rest of the door handle operates like any other. It looks baffling, but it's not hard to use once you have done it or seen it done. The other controls in the car are similar, it seems like almost every accessory is moved to a strange place. Heat and A/C? The switch is on the center of the dash, but the mixing lever and fan speed controls are are on the center console next to the parking brake. The window controls are oddly placed, though they are on the door. They are neither at a relaxed-arm distance nor a fully-extended distance, but right in between, forcing the user to hunt for them. The intent may have been to make them hard to hit accidentally, but it hampers usability (again, until you get used to it). The one that threw me when I first got the car is the release for the fuel door. Next to the seat, there is just one lever. Pulling it pops the trunk, but pushing down on it pops the fuel door. The headlight controls are also very wacky, which can be quite amusing when parking valets are involved.

      I have to figure some of these stem from the fact that this car was ahead of the curve on a lot of these things, before de facto standards had really emerged. However, despite all the weirdness, the door handle solution is one that would work perfectly well today on the Model S.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    11. Re: and solved last century already by macs4all · · Score: 1

      It doesn't "need" the stylus at all, works just fine without it. The stylus is the phone's selling point- it includes a stylus and digitizer similar to a wacom tablet for drawing, handwriting etc.

      Yeah, that sounds like some selling point for this phone [rolls eyes]

  26. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  27. JP-1 vs AvGas by Gim+Tom · · Score: 1

    The comments about Diesel nozzles vs gasoline nozzles for cars brought back a memory I hoped I had forgotten. Back in the 1960's an aircraft that was produced in two models -- one with reciprocating engines and the other with turboprop engines -- took off from Peachtree Dekalb airport north of Atlanta. It got airborne and just East of Atlanta the engines, which were gasoline engines, stopped since the aircraft had been fueled with Jet fuel. The aircraft made a crash "landing" on an Interstate very close to where I lived at the time. The landing was at least partially successful since I think most of the people on the aircraft survived, but there was at least one and perhaps several people in the cars in the way that did not. I was in my early teens then and can still remember that day. Back then at least it WAS possible to put the wrong fuel in an airplane. Bad designs happen -- some cost lives.

  28. Re:No big loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They're holding it wrong?

  29. Re:So don't put it in backwards? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    Yes, I noted that. Which goes to show that if it can be done wrong, someone wil do it wrong.
    I could think of a couple of ways to design the fuel nozzles to prevent doing it wrong either way, but they would increase costs and fail potential.

    With this thing, it would be pretty easy to design it so that you cannot put the pen in backwards. A slightly tapered hole, and the pen sized appropriately.

  30. Re:So don't put it in backwards? by areusche · · Score: 1

    Yeah sorry guys, but I know a girl who tried to fill her car up with diesel and managed to try and drive off. You'd be amazed at how foolish some people are even with the specially designed nozzle heads. Not only does it happen, but sometimes not everything can be made idiot proof. The car analogy still stands.

  31. I can almost imagine the conversation by watanuki · · Score: 1

    Engineer: We've put $x million into user interface design so that the Note 5 is usable even by idiots.

    Idiot: *Insert pen backwards*

    Engineer: ARRRRRRRGH!!

    1. Re:I can almost imagine the conversation by idontgno · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I think the engineer should be proud.

      The design accommodates all use cases, including an idiot doing an idiotic thing to accomplish idiotic results.

      Mission accomplished! The ultimate in usability: our design doesn't stop you from doing ANYTHING you want to do!

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  32. Obligatory Apple joke for some reason by Schnapple · · Score: 1

    Insert Different (tm).

    No wait, don't Insert Different (tm). Inserting Differently (tm) is the problem. Forget we said that (r).

  33. My note 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just checked on my note 3, you can't insert the pen the wrong way round on that. Did they really need to change the pen?

  34. MicroSD card by NostalgiaForInfinity · · Score: 1

    You should see what inserting a MicroSD card can do to a card slot on one of these phones. And unlike a pen, it's far less obvious which way is the right way for these cards; there isn't even a lot of resistance to inserting them the wrong way compared to the right way.

  35. Re:So don't put it in backwards? by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    Cars can easily kill pedestrians and drivers. Cell phones, not so much.

  36. Re:So don't put it in backwards? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

    You guys should have made it quite clear you needed NOT UNLEADED!!! before the attendant even got his hand on the dispenser.

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  37. Re:So don't put it in backwards? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

    Your analogy is broken.

    Gasoline powered vehicles run on diesel. It won't be pretty, but they run. Its diesel cars that run on gasoline.

    A better analogy would be: If I put my car in reverse while going forward, should the car manufacturer be held responsible for me destroying my car?

    My car doesn't even let me put it into First while I'm going forward. Until I slow down to about 5mph, there is something that keeps the gear shift from slipping into that position. Once I get below the acceptable speed, it drops into First smoothly.

    And this is on a 5-speed manual transmission in a Saturn. I'm sure the better cars have similar restrictions to protect the machine from idiots.

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  38. Samsung has failed us on the Note 5 by ZeroNullVoid · · Score: 1

    Samsung has failed us on the Note 5.
    I have been a Note user since the Note 2.
    Every note has improved it's predecessor, although Note 3 and 4 seem very similar... but it's still an upgrade in hardware and features.

    The Note 5 had so much taken out and only a few things added with design flaws. The only advantage I see is slightly better 64bit octo cpu, slightly more memory, wireless charging, and better front and rear cameras.

    1. 1) This issue with the S-Pen enclosure.
    2. 2) Sealed non-replaceable battery, I have to use a minimum 8000mah battery to get a about 20 hrs worth of usage the way I like to use my phone and data services. The limited internal battery will not last me too long. If you're going to do a sealed battery, at least make the phone water proof. We can already wireless charge with the right battery cover.
    3. 3) Limited Non-Expandable Storage, I add a 128gb UHC Class 10 Micro SDXC to my Notes... You left off the option to expand storage... seriously? To add insult to injury you only offer a 32 and 64gb model... wtf. You want me to use cloud storage? I already use 50-85gb/month on my data plan. My carrier doesn't really want me using more. I mean with the quality of videos these things can take, you can fill up your storage fairly quickly. I guess the limited battery tries to counter this. Using more uploads for cloud storage, reduced battery.
    4. 4) IR Blaster, I travel a lot and use my IR Blaster a lot. In order to use HDMI at hotels, or to present at work or lunch meetings... the ability to have a universal remote in your pocket is a must have. Not only that, I use my phone to control my fans, portable AC, etc. If anything, they could have improved on this technology so we had an IR record and learn function.

    Overall the Note 5 is a downgrade to me, and I probably will not upgrade to it. Yes they upgraded some things, but the removal of vital functionality outweighs any benefit.

  39. Re:So don't put it in backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is that if smartphone makers make phones as regulated as cars, they would cost $5000 each, and would be locked in far more ways (think latest gen consoles where there nobody has any hacks on them, much less a successful break.)

    I'd rather have a device where I don't hold a specific one, as opposed to one that is completely idiot proof... but cannot be rooted.

  40. As a "great" man once said ... by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

    ... "Just don't hold it that way."

    1. Re:As a "great" man once said ... by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      ... "Just don't hold it that way."

      Great with quotes, and the correct quote is "you're holding it wrong". The difference was that if you were holding your phone wrong, all you had to do was to hold it in a different way. If you insert this pen the wrong way, the damage is permanent.

      Buy the way, both non-Apple phones I owned at that time had instructions in their manual (I'm a very curious person and often read manuals) telling you that your phone reception would be bad if you hold it wrong.

    2. Re:As a "great" man once said ... by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Buy the way, both non-Apple phones I owned at that time had instructions in their manual (I'm a very curious person and often read manuals) telling you that your phone reception would be bad if you hold it wrong.

      One of my early cell phones (15 years ago? I was a late adopter because I was a broke student...) had a little rubberised pad on the back with a finger sized dimple where you could brace the phone with one finger without shorting the internal antenna.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  41. Re:So don't put it in backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The attendant not paying full attention to his boring job will just hear 'mumblemumble unleaded'. Better to say diesel. Better still watch what nozzle they're putting in.

    But it's still very easy to do. My last car was a diesel and after a month-long trip to the states where I was using an unleaded car the whole time I was there I flew home, arrived completely jetlagged at 4am, stopped at the local station and between exhaustion and habit from the past month put unleaded into the car. Luckily the car was absolutely fine once the engine was flushed and lasted another 3 years without a single issue until I sold it.

  42. One more thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are inserting it wrong! Oh, it's a Samsung device...nevermind.

  43. Re:So don't put it in backwards? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

    They're idiots. They should have made the diesel nozzle larger than the gas nozzle and the gas nozzle larger than the diesel nozzle.

    Problem solved!

  44. Re:So don't put it in backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And nearly everything that thegarbz listed is something that will neither kill the driver nor kill pedestrians, but will in fact result in the car being damaged or unable to be used - much like the S-Pen when inserted backwards. But sick burn, bro, you sure showed him by being willfully obtuse.

  45. Same applies to other versions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least, the physical part.

    I actually purposefully put my pen in backwards because it is easier to get it out. (I have it in a case, nothing can accidentally bump it in... or so I thought)
    Although once I accidentally pushed it in with my knuckles and it popped the plastic frame up a bit.

    Nothing too bad though, was able to get it out eventually.

  46. Re:So don't put it in backwards? by kyrsjo · · Score: 1

    Or they should never have hired an attendant in the first place...

  47. Battery removal is harder too! :P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    N/T

  48. engadget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we leave cell phone tech garbage off of this site and leave it for shitty sites like engadget and shitty t ech podcasts? Who the fuck cares about cell phone tech.

  49. Wait...people still use a stylus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who the fuck still thinks its a good idea to have a stylus? I mean, come on, its 2015, touch is clearly superior, and those with FAT FINGERS should lose weight.

    1. Re:Wait...people still use a stylus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry. They'll have the next round of stylii free ones again soon enough. Like the big-small-big-small thing, these things go in cycles.

  50. Re:So don't put it in backwards? by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

    Of course we did. I wouldn't expect an attendant to assume we had a desiel car..

    The store manager came out afterwards and said not to worry. The fuel was interchangeable and we would be fine driving away.

  51. Re:So don't put it in backwards? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    Good job, Samsung fanboy.

    This is clearly a design flaw that didn't even exist on previous models. But it must be the users' fault that they can completely damage the one feature that sets this device apart from many others with one second of inattentiveness that none of the competitors, or even previous models, are susceptible to.

    Yep, totally the users' fault that Samsung made completely unnecessary changes for the sake of change.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  52. Re:So don't put it in backwards? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    Shit - meant to respond to GP.

    Didn't mean to call you a Samsung fanboy - you're correct with your seatbelt analogy. Slashdot needs to fix their 20 year old commenting system already.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  53. Re:So don't put it in backwards? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    That "something" is the synchronizers in the gearbox - they can't mesh if going too fast. Once they slow down, the synchro can mesh, and the gears will line up.

    It's why you don't grind gears constantly when shifting unless you force it.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  54. Re:So don't put it in backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell that to the pedestrians who get ran over every year while staring at their phones instead of paying attention to traffic.

  55. Re:So don't put it in backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you are such a dipshit.

  56. Once upon a time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A man went to a sage...

    Man: "Please teach me meditation..."
    Sage: "That's simple...just close your eyes and just breathe...."
    Man: "It can be that simple.....!! there must be something more to it.."
    Sage: "No my son...its indeed that simple..."
    Man: "It can never be that simple...!!"
    and kept on insisting...after some thought ..Sage said...
    Sage: "Oh, yes!!!! apart from closing your eyes and breathing, just don't think about a MONKEY"

    Man left happily to meditate....but then he just couldn't stop thinking about the monkey....

  57. Re:So don't put it in backwards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best of all, no you can't put diesel in your car without doing something incredibly stupid in most countries as the physical nozzle used in diesel is designed to not fit into the fill point of a petrol car.

    The converse cannot, however, be said. I had to help some folks that went to an Amoco station to fill up their diesel truck.*

    Now, Amoco, in their wisdom, thought that their main color should be used for regular unleaded, so they make regular unleaded with a GREEN handle. Gasoline pumps fit neatly into diesel vehicles, so there wasn't anything to stop them from filling their truck with 32 gallons of unleaded.

    * helped them buy some gas tanks and a siphon hose, since they couldn't drive the truck.

  58. The Samsung Curse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every Samsung product I've ever owned has one big flaw. Sometimes I can live with it, other times I can't. I get worried when I don't see what it is right away.

    A few examples:

    * Samsung Microwave - keypad would fail in a way that it would start the microwave when no one was around. (fire hazard, threw it out)
    * Samsung DVD player - Sometimes the DVD would not play if it wasn't perfectly seated. Very picky. (Also the "DIGITALL" splash screen bugged me)
    * Samsung TV - Actual TV was awesome, but the remote required hitting a button to change the source. It didn't do bidirectional and it was the first HDTV I bought with MANY sources. (HDMI 1, HDMI 2, AV1, AV2, RGB, VGA, SVIDEO, etc) It was very slow switching so it took several minutes to go from a game console back to the cable box.
    * Samsung SSD (840 series) - will eventually slow down until formatted completely.
    * Samsung Hard drive - slows down A LOT when PC gets warm

  59. Re:So don't put it in backwards? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Irrelevant. Most of the features listed above are not safety features.

    Car companies are no different to cell phone companies, they only care about one thing: liability. Whether a feature is born out of a desire not to be dragged in front of a DA representing a dead person, or a desire not to be involved in a class action of angry idiots who held their phone wrong the result is ultimately the same. It ends up as nothing more than a line item under costs on a balance sheet

  60. Precision by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Actually, Apple neatly solved the whole problem in 2007 by doing away with the need for an ignorant stylus altogether.

    Earlier PDA *could* also be operated with fingers. Resistive touch screen doesn't *require* a stylus. (Early Tomtom GPS were entirely finger operated resistive touch screens - no stylus available at all).

    The stylus is simply an option for when you need more precision.
    (To draw more precisely sketches, or operate smaller parts of UI).

    What Apple did is doing away with the *precision*. (Hence the "on/off" sliders they've introduced in iOS. Much easier to operate than check boxes when using big fingers on a small screen).

    A capacitive screen is a lot more coarse. You can't draw accurate sketches by finger painting. Apple's action have been a step back for PDA, making iPhone / iPodTouch a lot less good e.g. at taking notes during university lectures.
    That made perfect sense for Apple (all they wanted is simply making phones / music players. Their main competitor wasn't Palm PDAs, it was candy bar phones & MP3 players. You didn't need a pen to operate a phone or an older iPod, why suddenly would you need one once they switched to touch screens ?).
    But that's a big loss for PDA (they're the electronic descendent of paper note pads, personal organisers. i.e.: objects on which you write a lot. Stylus simply felt as the natural descendent of pens).

    Samsung is simply trying to find a way to reintroduce the functionality in modern smart-phones. Give back the note taking ability of former PDAs. Thus they wanted to add the option for a stylus. They just went for way too much bling (flush to the body, complex ejection mechanics, etc.)

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Precision by macs4all · · Score: 1

      The stylus is simply an option for when you need more precision. (To draw more precisely sketches, or operate smaller parts of UI [emphasis added]).

      Or, IOW, the stylus is needed.

      As for capacitive touch-screens being "more coarse" than resistive, I am not at all sure that is universally-true, and is belied by the fact that you can use a stylus on an iOS device for drawing, if desired. Yes, I realize that that supports your argument that stylii are more "precise" than fingers; but that wasn't actually my point, nor would I really argue that point.

  61. My Note 3 still works by pebear · · Score: 1

    My Note 3 still works fine and I can't make that mistake with it. Oh yea sticking with the Note 3 won't make they ever expanding amounts of cash. They should have stuck with the old tried and true design...

    --
    Paul E. Bahre
  62. "Design Flaw"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about you don't insert it the wrong way? It was designed to be inserted one way. RTFM!

  63. s-pen note 5 damage by davell+logan · · Score: 1

    Wow , what could the pen actually damage.