Slashdot Mirror
Australian Police Get McLaren and Aston Martin Supercars
An anonymous reader writes: Australia's New South Wales police department has added a pair of new cars to their fleet that are going to be very hard to outrun, a McLaren 650S and an Aston Martin Vanquish Volante. The vehicles aren't going to be used on the job, but as a promotional tool to help raise money for the families of fallen police. "These sponsorship arrangements are designed to promote community engagement with NSW Police. This agreement is designed to promote tomorrow's Police Legacy Wall to Wall ride and celebrate 100 years of Women in Policing," a police spokesperson said in a statement.
I'm sure these are the last of the V8 Interceptors the Australians will buy. They'll get used eventually for that purpose.
If you read the article you'll see that the cars are supplied by the manufacturers at no cost. The police departments just pay for fuel.
Since it's a sponsorship, they don't cost anything.
In the past, the NSW Police have had an Audi RS4 and a Porsche Panamera donated to them. With these arrangements the car manufacturer foots all the costs, included servicing and registration, with the police force responsible for only the fuel.
That's probably a lot cheaper than paying for all this publicity. It's already made world-wide news.
This McLaren is rated at 11.7L/100km
The Holdens they current use are rated at 12.1L/100km
That's half a bee's dick difference.
Why bother with these "supercars" when they can easily...
Very simple: Because the Australian Police can actually read an article summary on Slashdot before posting.
No sig today...
Given that they were donated at no cost, precisely zero seconds.
It's still stupid, but no, they didn't pay for them.
That said, we keep seeing the stereotype that the key ability to successful police enforcement is to be able to drive faster than the criminals. Which is nonsense. The strength of the police force versus criminals is that there's a million of them, pre-scattered across the country, and they communicate with each other in realtime. You don't have to catch up with the fleeing perp, you're already past them - or at least, another officer is. You just need to not lose them (aka, a helicopter, or better, a drone; things like StarChase help too) and keep the net around them tight enough that you can nab them if they stop (which has to happen eventually), but not so tight that they feel the need to drive like a maniac and endanger the public. Heck, you can even make them stop in a place where they're no threat to the public, such as spike strips on a closed road or the like. But you never need to have car chases through busy public areas - at least not for more than a brief initial period. It's pointless.
There's a interesting statistics on the topic here. 91% of police chases are over non-violent crime. 233 suspects and their passengers (some of them innocent) die in police chases every year in the US, as well as 87 innocent bystanders and 3 police officers - more than the number killed by floods, tornadoes, lightning and hurricanes combined. 42% of police chases were over nothing more than simple traffic infractions. 15% were for suspected drunk driving - which just adds even more danger to bystanders.
Police chases make great TV, but usually they're hardly worth the risk unless there's a serious danger of A) losing the suspect, and B) the suspect committing a violent crime after being lost.
"This administration is so incompetent that they cover their tracks with bigger tracks." - Seth Meyers
The correct question should be: by any chance is one of the officers assigned to drive it called Max Rockatansky?
There's also this thing called a "trailer" that can be used to move a fuel inefficient vehicle (or two) around far more efficiently, and probably with less chance of them being involved in a traffic accident in the hands of an inexperienced driver as well - the Maclaren is even shown on the back of one at the top of the story. Other than a few VIP joyrides which will no doubt result in a sizeable contribution to the cause, I doubt these cars will be doing a lot of miles, fuel efficient or not, and will almost certainly bring in more donations than the outlays from fuel costs and moving them from fundraiser to fundraiser.
UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
If you read the article
This is Slashdot . . . we don't read the articles . . . some folks don't even read the summaries . . . some don't even read the post that they are replying to . . . or even the subject line.
Back on topic, I was a passenger in a "race taxi" on a track in Germany where amateurs are allowed on during the weekend. There were some rich guys with Porsches . . . and they got passed by my female professional driver in a plain looking white car . . . and were clearly annoyed about that.
The driver told me that more important than the car . . . is the driver. If the Aussie police do decide to put these super cars into active service, they should make sure that they properly train the drivers.
Oh, the car was a BMW M5
Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
The vehicles aren't going to be used on the job, but as a promotional tool to help raise money for the families of fallen police
The vehicles are a flash way to promote a charitable cause, and a bridge between petrol heads and police, nothing more.
[Sorry, this signature is unavailable in your country/region]
We need these because of... reasons.
Please don't bring your US statistics into Australian law enforcement. There's differences:
a) Police chases aren't televised live, and the last time a news helicopter was used in a police chase they were too busy relaying information between two different states who used different and incompatible radio systems, we got some occasional updates on the radios of which areas to avoid but for the most part all we saw was 5 seconds of footage in the nightly news.
b) Guidelines for police departments all over Australia are to abort police chases at speeds that pretty much every car on the road can already reach, no need for a supercar.
c) Most police chases in Australia has resulted in attempted disciplinary action against the police for public endangerment. As a result car chases here are actually quite rare.
Add on to this that Australian police forces haven't gone full paramilitary like the US has. The chances of having a gun pulled on you by a random member of the public here is incredibly small so the coppers aren't permanently scared.
If you want to see the difference watch this - https://www.youtube.com/watch?... - This is a video of police in Brisbane, a major capital city, accepting a dance challenge outside a pub while on security detail for the recent G20.
but Australians don't get a super fast internet
My ism, it's full of beliefs.
Still not better than the last of the V8 Interceptors.
-Styopa
That doesn't make what he said any less true. Nowhere did he say that these cars would be used on the job. It still maintains the illusion that speedy cars is what it takes to handle someone driving a vehicle that tries to elude police. Someone else in the thread pointed out that the illusion is better maintained in the US, but that does not make this instance not something that maintains the illusion.
Also as a result of not shooting everyone in the face, the police in NZ/AUS are generally not hated. It makes a pretty big difference. Where in the US the feeling is that they are out to get you. And my own experience is that they probably are [in the US].
If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
Clearly you are white.
If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
Comment removed based on user account deletion
"That doesn't make what he said any less true."
Just off topic.
See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.