Slashdot Mirror


Porsche Unveils Its First Electric Car

An anonymous reader writes: German automaker Porsche has made its first foray into electric vehicles. On Monday at the Frankfurt Auto Show, it unveiled a concept car called the Porsche Mission E. Its 800-volt drive system can take the car from 0 to 100km/h in 3.5 seconds. The high-voltage charging system lets it gain 80% of its battery capacity back within 15 minutes. They claim a driving range of 500km on a single battery charge. Porsche said the car was not a response to the Tesla Model S, but the two will likely be direct competitors when the Mission E goes into full production. That will happen "within the next five years."

213 comments

  1. Fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Zero to production in five years. Yay.

    1. Re:Fast by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Hey, at least someone is making an electric car that isn't FUGLY.

      I was excited about electrics when Tesla had the roadsters out, but I just couldn't get one. Then tesla switched to only doing "family cars" and the like.

      I wish they'd out together a good looking, 2 seater sports car that was all electric, in the price range of maybe a corvette? Something affordable.

      I'm sure the Porsche will be out of my price range again, but at least someone is making an electric car that doesn't look ass ugly, or that a boring family of five's family truckster, ready to head to Wally World.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Fast by DougOtto · · Score: 1

      Not only that but they're letting Tesla build out the infrastructure for them....nice

      --
      Solving Unix problems since 1989...
    3. Re:Fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live near the Tesla design studio so I see the Model S on the roads around here all of the time. Pictures do not do it justice. It is a gorgeous car.

    4. Re:Fast by bledri · · Score: 1

      Hey, at least someone is making an electric car that isn't FUGLY.

      I was excited about electrics when Tesla had the roadsters out, but I just couldn't get one. Then tesla switched to only doing "family cars" and the like.

      I wish they'd out together a good looking, 2 seater sports car that was all electric, in the price range of maybe a corvette? Something affordable.

      I'm sure the Porsche will be out of my price range again, but at least someone is making an electric car that doesn't look ass ugly, or that a boring family of five's family truckster, ready to head to Wally World.

      I don't know about the price coming down but Tesla is planing to release a new Roadster in 4 years. That's sooner than the Porsche. At least before adjusting for Elon Musk's penchant for late deliveries (which don't bug me, but one must consider it when planning.)

      I like the look of the Model S, but clearly that is a personal preference. Hopefully someone will make something that works for you.

      --
      Some privacy policy Slashdot.
    5. Re:Fast by tnk1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Which is pretty sweet, and exactly what Tesla wants.

      Tesla wants the competition in the market. They won't be able to put enough money together to make electric cars into the "new normal" by themselves. For that, they need a lot of competitors who are producing enough volume to make EVs something that you see everywhere.

      Once it hits a certain tipping point, the market will start supporting EVs as more than just toys. At that point, the goal of mass adoption could turn EVs into a replacement for gasoline vehicles which means that now Tesla makes more money due to increased volume over all. And being the owner of a great deal of production capacity for these sorts of vehicles, this means they have a head start on everyone else.

      It won't be enough to make Tesla completely dominant in the EV market, but it could propel them into a top spot in a New Electric Vehicle Order. More to the point, it would turn them into a real honest to goodness car company, and not just an expensive vanity project.

      Or to put it more succinctly, a rising tide lifts all ships. Any work that anyone does to support EVs or dedicate production capacity to EVs will help Tesla out too. Just like they're helping out everyone else by releasing their patents and building infrastructure.

    6. Re:Fast by 12WTF$ · · Score: 1

      I wish they'd out together a good looking, 2 seater sports car that was all electric, in the price range of maybe a corvette? Something affordable.

      Yeah, and I want an electric pony.

      --
      Cryonics - Keep cool and carry on.
    7. Re:Fast by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      From Porsche, I would have expected better than "in five years we'll be able to make a car that has the same range and is almost as fast as the P85Ds that Tesla has been selling for almost a year." (Never mind the even faster ludicrous P90D).

      About the only advantage would be the charging time, which is faster than Tesla's current crop of superchargers. But those have been improved several times over the last years, and with 5 years to go, I think it would be extremely unlikely for Teslas to still take more than 15 minutes to charge 400 km by then.

    8. Re: Fast by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Ride the subsidies?? What a crock.
      Fortune not at risk? He's put his fortune on the line a couple times now to keep Tesla & SpaceX afloat. And probably Solar City too.
      NINE billion of his wealth is in the value of his 35 million TSLA shares; another $1B is the current value of his 21 million SCTY shares.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    9. Re:Fast by haruchai · · Score: 1

      The Zombie 222 might suit you.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  2. EV conversion by i.r.id10t · · Score: 5, Informative

    One of the first cars Dr Ferdinand Porsche designed was electric, had motors on all 4 wheels.

    His son Ferry is the Porsche car maker we all know... and did the 356.

    But for the cost of a high end rebuild on a 356 engine, you can convert them to electric. Same conversion should owrk on any model with the 200mm clutch - 356, 912, 914 - as well as later (post '64 IIRC) VW bugs and busses.

    http://www.evwest.com/catalog/...

    Also, I thought the 918 Spyder was electric?

    Finally, Saturday is the 19th - not just Talk Like a Pirate Day, it is Ferry Porsche's birthday and Drive Your Porsche Day.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    1. Re:EV conversion by PPH · · Score: 3, Informative

      Also, I thought the 918 Spyder was electric?

      Hybrid.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:EV conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 918 Spyder is a hybrid which uses the battery for initial launch and for extra hp/torque while the gears are busy switching - it's a pretty crazy car still.

    3. Re:EV conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 918 Spyder is hybrid, but uses electric power only as boost. It cannot be driven in all-electric mode.

    4. Re:EV conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a lot of Poorsche knowledge for someone that cant spell hybrid.

    5. Re:EV conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It cannot be driven in all-electric mode.

      Actually, it can, but the range is estimated at 12mi (19km).
      So yeah, the electric motors are there for the constant and instant torque, not for billionaire eco-weenies to feel good about themselves.

    6. Re:EV conversion by vux984 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, the 918 is hybrid and it definitely was designed to , but it can run on all-electric only... at least for 20 miles. :)

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    7. Re:EV conversion by vux984 · · Score: 1

      But for the cost of a high end rebuild on a 356 engine, you can convert them to electric

      Rather entirely missing the point of owning a 365 and completely ruining it, in my opinion.

      Potato Jesus all over again. :)
      http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/...

      Also, I thought the 918 Spyder was electric?

      As others have replied, its a hybrid.

    8. Re:EV conversion by kheldan · · Score: 2

      But for the cost of a high end rebuild on a 356 engine, you can convert them to electric. Same conversion should owrk on any model with the 200mm clutch - 356, 912, 914 - as well as later (post '64 IIRC) VW bugs and busses.

      If you're going to do something like that, do it to some vehicle nobody actually cares about, like an old VW bug or bus, not a Porsche. Otherwise you just come off like a Philistine.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    9. Re: EV conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see what you did there...

    10. Re:EV conversion by Type44Q · · Score: 5, Interesting

      His son Ferry is the Porsche car maker we all know... and did the 356.

      His grandson Ferdinand Piech is the Porsche car maker we all should know... and did the 240mph 917/30, the Quattro (amen) and the Bugatti Veyron. Hell, he even designed the most reliable and indestructible engine ever put in a passenger car (the Mercedes turbo-charged five-cylinder). These may be among the reasons that it was he (and not his father or grandfather) who won Car Executive of the Century.

    11. Re:EV conversion by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Why do I say this? Because even though Porsche rules required the owners (aka the Porsche family) to stay out of management (thus Piech's exodus to VW/Audi) in the late 70's), VW Group essentially functioned as one entity, sharing tech, manufacturing facilities and even platforms; there are multiple models that can be purchased either as a Porsche or an Audi...

    12. Re: EV conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha-ha his son was named Ferry.

    13. Re:EV conversion by Barny · · Score: 1

      Well, technically, his prototype for the Tiger tank was a hybrid diesel-electric. Powerplant drove a generator which ran electricity to two big electric motors that drove the wheels, kinda like what the new CAT 'dozers use.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    14. Re:EV conversion by WindBourne · · Score: 0

      Porsche has NEVER built a pure electric cars. All they have ever built were hybrids that were so-so.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    15. Re:EV conversion by stooo · · Score: 1

      A porsche is a car like other cars.

      --
      aaaaaaa
    16. Re:EV conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the Mercedes turbo-charged five-cylinder"

      a turbo-charged diesel, no less. used with the w123 body chassis.

      an 83 300d is my daily driver.

    17. Re:EV conversion by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Apparently you're not a 'car person'. Nothing Porsche created was ever 'just a car'.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  3. EVERYBODY WINS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Competition FTW, bitches!

  4. Erste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/a

  5. Wrong headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is NOT their first electric car by a long shot
    http://www.history.com/news/fe...

    1. Re:Wrong headline by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Ferdinand != Ferry

      Ferry started the car company - Ferdinand was an engineer and worked for Mercedes, VW, etc.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    2. Re:Wrong headline by ProzacPatient · · Score: 2

      Well another thing is that Porsche is owned by Volkswagen which came out with the E-Golf last year so technically I don't think Porsche coming out with an electric car is as huge a thing no matter how you look at it.

    3. Re:Wrong headline by fnj · · Score: 2

      Ferdinand != Ferry

      Ferry started the car company - Ferdinand was an engineer and worked for Mercedes, VW, etc.

      Bull crap. Ferdinand Porsche (Sr.) (1875-1951) was the FOUNDER of Porsche car company as well as, yes, an engineer. He designed the VW Beetle and the Mercedes SS/SSK, as well as being heavily involved in Tiger Tanks, V1 rockets, and other war projects.

      Ferdinand Anton Ernst "Ferry" Porsche (1909-1998) was the son of Ferdinand, and operated Porsche AG.

    4. Re:Wrong headline by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      I have an eGolf and I love it, but I seriously fucking doubt Porsche's e car will have much similarity to the VW eGolf.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    5. Re:Wrong headline by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      It didn't do 0 to 100 km/h though.

    6. Re:Wrong headline by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      And Porsche AG was the one to first produce a car that had "Porsche" on the back end of it... Ferdinand's work was as a design engineer, but until Ferry and the '48 Gmund cars nothing had ever been badged as "Porsche".

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    7. Re:Wrong headline by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The E-Golf is not a very good car though, due to being an ICE car that has been converted to an EV. Porsche is doing the right thing by designing a dedicated EV, like Nissan and Tesla did.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  6. Not a car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is Porsche's first foray into vapourware.

    1. Re:Not a car by FranTaylor · · Score: 2

      This is Porsche's first foray into vapourware.

      The "defroster" on the original VW Beetle has this beat by many decades, we are still waiting for the one that works.

  7. Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by themeliorist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Assuming it launches for a similar price range, it can't compete with a Model S now, much less in the next five years. Next year the supercharger network will blanket the US and they'll have two attractive (/expensive) models to choose from. In 2018 they'll have a $35k everyman's car to compete with the LEAF and Volt. How is Porsche going to compete? If this came out a year ago maybe it could rely on it's brand but Tesla is quickly becoming the Apple of cars (not entirely a good thing). Talk about dead on arrival.

    1. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by avandesande · · Score: 2

      What do you mean by compete? Do you think acceleration is the only important specification for a car? Sorry but if Porsche wants to they can eat Tesla's lunch.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by lymond01 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Porsche doesn't compete with non-performance cars. From appearance and probably stats, this will be more in the supercar arena: Audi R8, BMW i8, Ferraris, Lamborghinis. My guess, if it's up to Porsche standards, one will be required to find at least $150,000 to afford this. Which, according to reports, is how much a fully loaded Tesla Model X will run (the price range is...large on that one: mid $70s to mid $100s).

      I drive a Civic. I had a Porsche for a weekend earlier this year -- 911 Carrera S. I imagine it to be a land-based version of a fighter jet. I haven't driven a Tesla -- I hear they are very very nice, very fast off the line...but I wonder how their sport handling compares to a 911. Hmm...need to find me some Youtube comparisons...

      Oh, and will someone explain what BMW is doing with the i3? When I think BMW, I think sport sedan. That thing has the specs of a Nissan Leaf and the looks of a Scion Cube. I'd expected something Tesla-ish.

    3. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean by compete? Do you think acceleration is the only important specification for a car? Sorry but if Porsche wants to they can eat Tesla's lunch.

      Fortunately they sell enough Cayennes to take a loss if they need to.

    4. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Their charging system would be an incredible advance if it really can add 80% charge in 15 minutes. For the range they must have 80+kWh batteries. With losses they must be pushing 300kW into the charger. More than double what Tesla do.

      The down side is that we have yet another incompatible charging system.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      Some people will buy it simply because it says "Porsche" on the back.

    6. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by zdzichu · · Score: 2

      Pushing 300kW would mean 1300 amperes at 230V. Or 750 amperes with 3-phase 400V. Which is quite a lot (to waaaay understate). My whole apartment has 60 amperes terminal.

      --
      :wq
    7. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5000V @ 60 amps?

    8. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      There is room for more than 2 or 3 competitors in any part of the car industry. The f-150 and tacoma seem to provide all anyone could possibly want in a truck. However, their existence isn't stopping chevy, dodge, nissan, etc from selling pickup trucks.

    9. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Tesla does 300Amps at 400Volts at superchargers, right now. Yes, that's a really scary amount of power.

    10. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by AaronW · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not easily. With Tesla you're getting a lot more than just a car. You're also getting access to the largest network of rapid chargers along major routes. Next week I'm driving from the SF Bay Area up to Seattle in my Tesla. At least from the Bay Area to Grant's Pass OR I'll spend around 90 minutes charging for that route with most stops being 20-30 minutes. Right now I can drive from San Diego to Edmonton Canada or across the country to the East Coast on Tesla's superchargers. There's already a huge amount of charging infrastructure in place with more going online quite rapidly. There is nothing equivalent right now for non-Tesla EVs. Sure, there's a lot of ChaDeMo chargers in urban centers but there are many places where it's quite difficult to go. I have a friend with a Leaf and it takes him at least a couple of days to reach the Oregon border from the SF Bay Area since he has to spend a significant amount of time charging at RV parks since there's no infrastructure between major urban areas.

      Also, I don't think there are many CCS chargers that could output anywhere near enough to charge the Porsche to 80% in 15 minutes. Tesla's supercharger network outputs 120KW (135 in Europe). Also, unlike the mish-mash of CCS and ChaDeMo chargers, they're being installed along major routes. It will be at least several years until CCS catches up with where Tesla's network is now. As it is, Tesla owners with the ChaDeMo adapter have been complaining that many ChaDeMo chargers can't even handle 45KW without overheating (even in the dead of winter when it's 0F outside).

      Tesla also will have the battery manufacturing capacity to significantly cut prices on the batteries. Additionally, they're already starting to offset their charging stations with solar and grid-tied batteries to significantly reduce peak electricity usage and cut costs. Also, nobody has talked about the price of the Porsche. You can bet that it will be a lot more expensive than Tesla.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    11. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by afidel · · Score: 2

      The cables wouldn't have to be that big, in my datacenter we run 600A 480V and the cables are about as big around as my fingers, granted there are 4 of them but that's not much bigger in total than the gas hose on many pumps with vapor recovery systems. It would be a lot heavier than a gas hose though so you'd probably need overhead support with the ability to swing the cable into position over the car so you're only moving a small fraction of the weight for those of smaller build.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    12. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by AaronW · · Score: 1

      None of the existing charging standards can handle 300 KW. Tesla is currently the highest and they top out at 120 KW (135 KW in Europe). Tesla is talking of upping theirs to 150 KW in the near future. CCS and ChaDeMo talk about handling up to 100 KW but most charging stations only handle a fraction of that. Tesla has a ChaDeMo adapter but customers have been complaining that it causes a lot of ChaDeMo chargers to overheat when they're asked to pull 45 KW continuously.

      I have had my car for 2 1/2 years so far and have over 31K miles on it. I have not noticed any degradation in range in my P85.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    13. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by AaronW · · Score: 1

      I have a 100A circuit for my house and another 100A circuit for my garage for charging my Tesla. At 80A (max continuous load is 80%) it still takes 5 1/2 hours to fully charge from empty, but that's drawing 20 KW.

      The Tesla superchargers typically are wired to 3-phase at 480V in the US. In Europe 3-phase is much more common from my understanding. Tesla maxes out at 120 KW in the US (135 in Europe) though I've heard plans to upgrade it to 150 KW.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    14. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Amouth · · Score: 4, Interesting

      once you get above 300 volts you have to start really dealing with NFPA-70E Arc flash regulations (below 300 is only an issue if "exposed" other wise it is avoid contact).

      If you then start getting above 750 and in the kV range you start dealing with hard regulations around approach boundaries

      751-15kV is 2'2" restricted boundaries (requires PPE and training) and 7" prohibited boundary (meaning you can't be within 7 inches of a live line in that range period)

      My bet is that no car manufacturer wants to deal with having to design a charging station standard which requires people to hook it up, step away, AND have a method for ensuring that there is zero possibility of someone within the area.

      When you have power in that voltage range someone will be liable for safety in that area, and car manufactures can not insure that the operator of the car and charging station have had the appropriate training or PPE available so they most likely won't go there. Even on industrial equipment that uses this level voltage most OEMs have safety interlocks so that you can't accidentally get into an energized compartment.

      Sorry you just won't see real high voltage charging systems for consumer cars. This is one of the reasons they will have to figure out how to deal with the current side of the problem.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    15. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by themeliorist · · Score: 1

      Well, if you read TFA it says "charge to 80% of capacity." Much of the competition currently uses similar language for 20-80% charge times (a typical QC session). For 500km (EPA) range it will need at least a 90kWh battery pack but most likely 100kWh. To charge that from 20-80% in 15 mins means a new charging standard, a thicker cable for increased current, improved cooling system, and either new battery chemistry or a willingness to quickly degrade the cells in the pack. Even with all those things they'll be hard pressed to build a network of these faster QC units because 480V 3 phase hookups are plentiful. Tesla recently announced it was being a little conservative on their taper but at best it could reduce it's 20-80 time from 40 to 36min. By increasing from 480V to 800V perhaps they could come down to 20min but to do 15 and 10% more range we need new technology on several items. And all that new technology and infrastructure can't be funded with a few thousand sales like the i8. If they really intend to sell this at $150k+ they'd be better off just focusing on inductance charging or autonomous charging at home (and work) and leave the customer to either fly or take their gas porsche for the 500km trips.

    16. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Amouth · · Score: 1

      will someone explain what BMW is doing with the i3? When I think BMW, I think sport sedan. That thing has the specs of a Nissan Leaf and the looks of a Scion Cube. I'd expected something Tesla-ish.

      My bet is they are hitting the target market that wants to say "i'm wealthy, and i'm green" who are not wealthy enough to drive a Tesla/i8 and are just snob enough not to drive a Leaf.

      From a "looks" prospective i think it looks like just about every sad rendering of a car of the "future" crammed into a echo box frame. To me the i8 looks good but the i3 is up there on the ugly meter on par with the Pontiac Aztek

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    17. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you read the article (yeah, I know...who really does..it's /.), you would have noticed that they're using a 800 volt charging system to get the fast charges. Tesla has a 400V system.

    18. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I don't have the link handy but tests showed that performance of a porche vs a tesla were within 2% and both in the high performance range.

      Porsche was better at somethings (I think a few feet less stopping distance -- like 115 vs 118) and Tesla was better at other things due to its insane acceleration and obscenely low center of gravity.

      If you google "compare Porsche Tesla" you can probably find the articles. One was from 2012 and the other was from 2014. The Tesla lost 2 feet of stopping distance between 2012 and 2014. As measured from when the foot depressed the pedal. But that may be in the margin of error between the different track surfaces.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    19. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frankly, I want something more like the i3 than I want a Tesla. Tesla is for people who need a penis replacement. The i3 is for people who don't need to get their self confidence from a commercial entity.

    20. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cables wouldn't have to be that big, in my datacenter we run 600A 480V and the cables are about as big around as my fingers, granted there are 4 of them but that's not much bigger in total than the gas hose on many pumps with vapor recovery systems.

      Ever try bending them? Hollow rubber tubes are good for that. Copper wire... not so much.

    21. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by pavon · · Score: 1

      You don't really need fast charging at home, where charging typically happens overnight. You want fast charging on road, where charging stations could easily have physical interlocks and Oregon would have a reason to reinstitute full-service stations again ;)

    22. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by fnj · · Score: 1

      Pushing 300kW would mean 1300 amperes at 230V. Or 750 amperes with 3-phase 400V. Which is quite a lot (to waaaay understate). My whole apartment has 60 amperes terminal.

      Or, more to the point, 375 amps at 800 volts, since it is an 800 volt car. To put it in perspective, 300 amp service is nothing out of the ordinary for a US single-family home (of course not at 800 volts, but the voltage is just the pontential; the demand on the conductor is strictly the amps of current).

      You can take it as a given that supplying 300 kW would be duty for a charging station, not anything feasible at home (1250 amps at 240 V 3-phase, anyone? I don't THINK so!). But 10 kW, which would recharge in 8 hours, would be entirely feasible with a special circuit wired up to the garage. Thats only 42 amps at 240 V 3-phase. It's a bit more than a fair size electric oven/range with the oven and all burners working full, but not crazy more.

    23. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

      This comparison, interesting as it is, is exactly why myself and about 99% of other drivers out there would never willingly choose to rely solely upon all-electric for long trips, given the choice between gas and electric. A couple of DAYS between SF and the Oregon border? No, thank you... I'll take option C (gas-powered).

      Somehow get 1) battery charge completion (95-100%) down to 10 minutes or less and 2) a national network of chargers at least half as populous as the current number of gas stations and we'll talk again.

    24. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by afidel · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have, when we ran them through the conduit. It wasn't that difficult to make them take 90* turns so making them take a few degree bend to align the charging port should be no big deal.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    25. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by fnj · · Score: 2

      800 volts, which is what this car is, should not be in the same class as 15 kV. It is closer to 120 V than it is to 15 kV.

      The maximum air gap 800 volts DC will jump is 1/10 of a mm. Hmmph. Big deal. It requires respect because the consequences of coming within an air distance equal to the thickness of a few sheets of paper of it - or much more likely, touching it, are SEVERE, but it's not a big bad magic monster.

      If lay people (drivers) when charging at quick charge stations are dealing with several hundred volts now every day (a Tesla supercharger is 400 V), then there is no deep dark reason why 800 volts should suddenly become a priesthood-only matter. Time was, not that long ago, ordinary drivers weren't allowed to pump their own gasoline either.

      I think you will find that the insulation on a charging cable is made literally many hundreds of times thicker than the barely required dielectric strength, and the connector is designed so that you can't come anywhere near the contact. I bet it has some super effective GFI protection, too. It sure as hell is not live when being connected.

      To put it in perspective, ordinary hookup wire with teflon class E insulation is rated at 600 volts. The insulation is 0.25 mm thick but clearly has a gigantic safety factor. The dielectric strength of extruded teflon is 19.7 MV/m, which is 19.7 kV/mm, so if the insulation on that wire is in perfect condition it will actually withstand 5 kV. I'll bet the insulation on a high voltage charging cable is a minum of 50 times as thick; probably more.

    26. Re: Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'm fine with the i3 looking like a futuristic horse carriage. I just didn't expect BMW to be the ones to make it look like that.

    27. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you missed the point of that comparison, though - Tesla already has a comprehensive national network of chargers. The Tesla owner doesn't have the problem that you're talking about, only the Leaf owner.

      I think Tesla's really got the market cornered in some ways - unless they allow other car manufacturers to make use of Tesla's network of chargers (and why would they?), none of them can really compete without rolling out a charger network of their own, and none of them seem to be doing that.

    28. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Tesla is working on a charging system that plugs itself in without the user getting anywhere near the cable (more like a robotic tentacle). The idea of using your hands to lift and insert the nozzle may turn out to be unnecessary in very near future.

    29. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by deathguppie · · Score: 1

      The BMW i3 is a weird car. However the issue with EREV's is that unlike full BEV vehicles you still have standard vehicle maintenance. You might and in fact not believe this but the Nissan Leaf has the lowest TCO of any car in recent years. No oil, no exhaust, no transmission (relatively speaking). The brakes ride on the recharge system prolonging brake pad life. No wiring exposed to the elements. In fact all of the components are in an enclosed space making them much less susceptible to the environment.

      My point being that a fully BEV (battery electric vehicle) can potentially make back the money you've invested in the car initially, by the time your payments have expired. This may not be True for your EREV (extended range electric vehicle)

      --
      once more into the breach
    30. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Aerovironment showed off a 250 kW charger some years back that's backwards compatible with CHAdeMO

      http://www.teslamotorsclub.com...

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    31. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Just a few days ago, I read that Tesla has now passed 500 Superchargers stations globally with a total of 2800 charging bays.
      It took them 1.5 years to get to 100 stations and another 1.5 to add the next 400.

      Wow.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    32. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by haruchai · · Score: 1

      The i3 was always supposed to be a city car and I thought that with those carriage doors, it would make a great taxi if BMW widened the back seat to properly fit 3 people. But it's no beauty queen.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    33. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by rch7 · · Score: 1

      Aerovironment has demonstrated 250kW 330A 700V charger to CARB about a decade ago.
      http://evsolutions-dev.avinc.c...
      It has Chademo compatibility.
      It is sad that Tesla went fragmenting charging infrastructure with their closed proprietary protocol/network, or 2 incompatible Tesla networks for different regions of the world. It doesn't help EV adoption whatever you say.

    34. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by haruchai · · Score: 1

      The Porsche should win handily on long, difficult tracks.
      The Model S tries too hard to protect the battery and you can't completely defeat regen (which heats the battery very quickly) or stability control. But from a standing start or a rolling start below 50 mph, the Porsche won't catch the Model S until both of you are in the zone for a $500 speeding ticket.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    35. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by rch7 · · Score: 1

      Correction: 550A, not 330

    36. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by rch7 · · Score: 1

      i3 would be fine car with enough head space, and it is actually fine in megacities in Europe and is going to sell there. But BMW overextended with their wish to please CARB for some extra credits that I think they eventually didn't get, and made some crippled version that can't keep charge with speed over 70-75mph on highway or go up on elevation with ReX. Just a bit more powerful ReX generator and bigger fuel tank, and it would be ideal vehicle, no worries for some charging networks and 95% of your traveled distance would be electric.

    37. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by rch7 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and the primary reason for that reputation is that Porsche makes really good cars that are fun to drive and own.

    38. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      My bet is that no car manufacturer wants to deal with having to design a charging station standard which requires people to hook it up, step away, AND have a method for ensuring that there is zero possibility of someone within the area.

      Yeah, we should stick to something safer, like highly flammable liquids with explosive vapor clouds.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    39. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had to use larger wires that handled 2500A at 600 V, and they bent like a cheap garden hose full of running water. They weight was a little more awkward, but not an issue for weak, but healthy person. They were awkward to install when they had to be held up and bolts put in with bad threads, taking two people. But once someone added on a few pieces to the other connection so it was hard to get the alignment wrong, a single person could hold it with one hand, while putting bolts in with the other. Putting a well designed plug into a slot should be easier yet.

    40. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, the Leaf isn't where the Model S is. It's really more for driving around town and renting a gas car when necessary. I think you're missing the OP's point, though. He's saying he can make a ~13 hour trip in his Tesla while stopping for two or three 20-30 minute charges. And he doesn't have to pay a penny for gas or electric. In a 13 hour trip you should probably be making a couple of 20 or 30 minute stops anyways. That's pretty fantastic. And in the context of this article, if "most" electric cars can achieve that within 5 years and the charging network can be similarly built-up, it is going to be a bright future.

    41. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Imbrondir · · Score: 1

      What sort of standards are these? IEC low voltage rules apply all the way up to 1500V DC.

    42. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by bentcd · · Score: 1

      A couple of DAYS between SF and the Oregon border?

      I have no idea how far this is, but that is also not relevant.

      If Tesla has superchargers along your route then essentially your Model S drives for 4 hours then charges for 20 minutes before repeating the cycle. It can keep doing this 24/7 for however long you need it to. What will usually stop you is tired drivers or having reached your destination.

      This summer I did a 12 hour drive with a Model S covering about 800km, which includes ~2h of stops wasted on feeding the humans. (That may seem like slow going but that's Norwegian speed limits for you.)

      --
      sigs are hazardous to your health
    43. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I think BMW, I think sport sedan

      BMW sells far more estate cars than sedans.

    44. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder why, instead of fast charging, no one is concentrating on fast battery swapping. The charging station could charge with solar, at least in rural areas, and swap the battery in a few secs. No high current/voltage needed. Batteries could be leased, reducing the front up cost of car by half.

    45. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Electric cars are a strange market.

      We're going to need not just superchargers, but an infrastructure standard. Every car will need to charge from a Tesla supercharger or a Porsche port or a big 4-wire 220V high-voltage standard outlet (+110V, -110V, Neutral, ground) or a straight high-voltage option. The most advantageous would be a high-voltage DC option, because a 220V high-voltage AC going across a transformer to make 600V DC will need 2.75 times the amperage capacity (so a 60A 220V to supply 600V 20A safely)--thicker wiring and heavier sockets--while requiring a transformer in the car or connector itself. Rather than produce millions of heavy transformers using a lot of metal, we can produce a single transformer of the same size (or, really, 2-3 times the size, to reduce operating temperature and increase lifespan) and install it into the base station for the 600V port, leaving a rectifier in the car or even rectifying at the port.

      Even then, nobody's really thought to go intermediate. The Volt has a 9.3 gallon gasoline tank powering a generator to power an all-electric drive train, rather than a gasoline combustion engine to provide driving power. It hasn't occurred to anyone to use a smaller diesel engine with higher efficiency as a generator to power the drive train, allowing for a larger battery and a sort of fast-charge option.

      The Tesla Model S delivers 3.83 miles per kWh of power, while a 20kW small diesel generator running at full load produces 12.5kWh of electricity per gallon--roughly 47.87 miles per gallon at a fuel consumption of 1.6gal/hr, allowing continuous operation at around 75mph. That means even a 3 gallon diesel tank and a small generator can supply over half the full charge range of the 60kW battery--a full 150 miles--whereas the Volt has gone for a 38 mile plug-in battery that can charge from a 9.3 gallon gasoline engine to get a total 380 mile range. What's more, a diesel hybrid can self-charge while the car is parked, if desired: if the car uses a very small diesel engine and generator with a small tank, it can recharge while parked if desired, allowing the user to periodically top up.

      In any case, an electric drive train does weird things. Because a sufficiently large motor is both cheap and high-output, you consistently get these enormous amounts of torque output and extremely high acceleration. Building a 0-to-60-in-3.5-with-a-half-ton-load car is trivial, and the response curve is damn flat. At the same time, large generators--diesel, coal, even wind--cost a lot less than small generators to generate the same output; the 77kWh to run 13 miles costs $6.50 plus taxes, or $8 with solar supply, versus a $38 fill-up.

      With taxes, my electricity would cost $13.86 per 300 miles; and yet my per-month consumption would come to 150kWh, so even a 7kW solar array on my roof would probably come close to fully covering my usage--I'd generate about 9,800kWh/year or 800kWh per month, versus my peak summertime use of 880kWh including one window AC running 24/7 as a dehumidifier. Mind you, that's average: I'd generate less in the winter (probably 600kWh) and more in the summer; and switching to split-system heat pump and actually insulating my house (it has drafts and 3/4 inch sheathing, no insulation) would cut my electricity usage down substantially, likely to 700kWh summer, leaving me at 850kWh summer generation and just about break even consumption while powering my electric car.

      You can imagine what $50/mo more in every last consumer's pocket would do to the economy.

      Notice this follows my theory of wealth quite well: the demands on infrastructure go down due to less labor in the fueling of cars, as the generation of electricity to charge electric cars is incidental and, per kWh unit fuel, less than the production of gasoline and diesel to fuel cars. That reduces working hours--you can call it jobs--leaving the wages in the consumer's pocket. The consumer now has $600 more to spend each year, so we can sell him a $600 gadget every

    46. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Amouth · · Score: 1

      While i'll agree that 800v wouldn't be bad the regulations lump 751-15kV together as that is where the uncommon voltage starts.

      Also not ethat when you start getting in the 700+ range minor fluctuation in voltage (by %) can be major in overall impact.

      They could do it, but they would need to get an exception to the regulations, which would not be an easy thing to do.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    47. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      Except for the part where they aren't that reliable and you have to dismantle the entire rear half of the car to perform simple maintenance. Oh, and most of them are butt-ugly.

    48. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BMW i3 looks like a Citroen DS3 actually. First time I saw the i3 on a parking lot in Phoenix I was like "Who of my crazy French colleagues imported this thing from back home" :)

    49. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to drive between Southern CA and the bay area.
      My Jetta would do ~450 miles on a ~15 US Gal tank, so it was a no stop drive, except for a drive-thru 1/2 way for caffeine to keep me away, and a deserted off-ramp about an hour later. Total time not on the freeway doing ~85 mph was perhaps 5 minutes.

    50. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Amouth · · Score: 1

      Cited in my post NFPA-70E

      In your link the up to 1500v is for the British Standard BS 7671

      The wiki entry also states that the US coverage for low voltage is 0-49v and is cover by NEC 250.20

      I will note that the NEC also has requirements for high voltage and that NFPA-70E does have an overlap in this area, but the overlap is in that the NFPA-70E is specifically covering safety requirements due to Arc Flash which the NEC does not cover. So you are double regulated but not on the same elements (NEC would cover wire sizing, insulation requirements, labeling, isolation methods, etc.)

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    51. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by rgmoore · · Score: 1

      But 10 kW, which would recharge in 8 hours, would be entirely feasible with a special circuit wired up to the garage. Thats only 42 amps at 240 V 3-phase. It's a bit more than a fair size electric oven/range with the oven and all burners working full, but not crazy more.

      Actually, that's 42 amps at 240V single phase. You may be confused because many 50A home circuits (under NEC, at least) are 4 wire, single phase 120/240V circuits. They have 2 hot wires, a neutral, and a ground wire, so they can provide either 240 V (between the hot wires) or 120V (between one hot wire and neutral). That's the same kind of circuit that's typically used to supply an electric range, which are often rated at about 12kW (240V x 50A). A true 3-phase, 50A 240V circuit would be able to provide just under 21 kW peak power (240V x 50A x sqrt(3)). Note that those kW ratings are for non-continuous operation; circuits intended for continuous (i.e. >3 hours at a stretch) operation may not operate at over 80% of the nominal capacity. A range can get away with using full circuit power because it's practically impossible to operate all the burners and the oven at maximum capacity for very long, but the expected 8-10 hour charging times would classify the car charger as continuous and prevent it from operating at more than 80% of nominal power.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    52. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Tesla charger infrastructure had been designed _before_ ChADeMo was finalized. And it is superior to it - the official standard is still limited to 80kW, far cry from Tesla's 150kW. Never mind the fact that Tesla actually has a far superior plug.

      Oh, and Tesla network uses one standard everywhere - some superchargers in Europe are simply more powerful.

    53. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by pz · · Score: 1

      Oh, and will someone explain what BMW is doing with the i3? When I think BMW, I think sport sedan. That thing has the specs of a Nissan Leaf and the looks of a Scion Cube. I'd expected something Tesla-ish.

      On the European side of the Pond, BMW manufactures and sells a lot of things that don't fit into the sport sedan slot. Like covered scooters, hatchbacks, SUVs, and station wagons. Not all of them are available Stateside. Ultra-small cars for the urban market, like the i3, are all the rage in Europe where the small streets and tight parking make a classic VW Beetle look like a large car.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    54. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by rch7 · · Score: 1

      Aren't reliable?? Not in my experience. They can go on track and do just fine. Yes cheap maintenance is not what you will find in Porsche or any performance car - when you push physical limits, you always need more expensive materials and design to handle higher loads.

      It is difficult to argue about taste, especially when they have many different models, but many people would not say that they are ugly.

    55. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by rch7 · · Score: 1

      Airvironment demonstrated 250kW EV charger to CARB in 2007. Chademo was already deployed in 2008 in Japan. Tesla opened superchargers when, in the end of 2012? Do they were sitting 4 years designing a charger and somebody prevented them from participating in existing standard improvement all these 4 years? It sounds like very lame excuse.
      And no, Tesla network do not use one standard. In Europe and China their plug is completely different and not compatible with American version. Their service centers don't take European Model S in the USA and don't serve American Model S in Europe. No service manuals are released unlike any major automaker. As they skip autodealers, they can use it as loophole to skip "right to repair" laws too. No spare parts are sold unless you prove you own proper title Model S and more "advanced" parts are not sold at all. Face it, it is classic monopoly play to take advantage of customer, just like DVD regions invention. Lip service about "creating greater future" doesn't count, words are cheap.

        Chademo is the same everywhere and even Tesla can take advantage of it with their adapter. Not vice versa. You can plug CCS car in European Tesla Supercharger as the plug is similar to Mennekes Type 2, but it would not charge. Some people say even rebuilt salvage title Model S are prevented from use superchargers as they check VIN when you plug in. Do you really want to say all this is good business ethics? Sure, it is always possible to find excuses for a single thing, but the broad picture is still not nice.

    56. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Cyberax · · Score: 1
      There were no cars capable of 250k charging and the standard itself is limited to 80kW, so it was a stunt only. I have no idea where you got the 2008 date, the official international ChADeMO standard was released in 2011 ( http://www.iec.ch/dyn/www/f?p=... ). And anyway, it's being deprecated in favor of another shitty standard (from SAE this time).

      And no, Tesla network do not use one standard. In Europe and China their plug is completely different and not compatible with American version.

      They are not completely different. They just use different wiring arrangements and can be adapted by a simple wiring adapter.

      Model S are prevented from use superchargers as they check VIN when you plug in. Do you really want to say all this is good business ethics?

      Since Tesla actually foots the electricity bills and funds the network rollout - that's perfectly fine. Also, superchargers are more powerful than ANY of the deployed standards out there right now.

    57. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by haruchai · · Score: 1

      I believe Tesla will allow those Model S rebuilds to use Superchargers if they're allowed to inspect the vehicle.
      Guess they're unwilling to take the chance that someone may have modified the electricals and cause a battery fire.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    58. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by rch7 · · Score: 1

      There were no cars capable of 250k charging and the standard itself is limited to 80kW, so it was a stunt only. I have no idea where you got the 2008 date, the official international ChADeMO standard was released in 2011 ( http://www.iec.ch/dyn/www/f?p=... ).

      Standards are not made by some aliens, but by people interested in them. The fact that Chademo standard wasn't finalized to the last detail until some years later doesn't mean compatible chargers didn't existed before.
      http://www.japanfs.org/en/news...
      http://www.greencarcongress.co...
      http://www.chademo.com/wp/wp-c...
      As Tesla has chosen to fragment market in "DVD regions" style and do not participate, their needs for more power were not addressed. It doesn't mean it is not possible with the same or compatible plug. You can always extend software protocol for more power options and leave it backwards compatible. Changing plugs of existing widespread infrastructure is next to impossible. Chademo plug geometry allows up to 200 A, likely more if you use different alloy to handle higher temperature. It means 80kW at 400V or 160kW at 800V.

      And anyway, it's being deprecated in favor of another shitty standard (from SAE this time).

      Exactly. Some shitty "standard" was invented by German/US automakers to drag down Japanese EVs. Some FUD was spread that competitors are "deprecated" and it worked, you repeat it now. Tesla had option to use common open standard at that time and CCS may be not have happened. Like in Japan BMW i3 is sold with Chademo outlet instead of CCS:
      http://insideevs.com/bmw-i3-ge...

      And no, Tesla network do not use one standard. In Europe and China their plug is completely different and not compatible with American version.

      They are not completely different. They just use different wiring arrangements and can be adapted by a simple wiring adapter.

      I don't think they sell such adapter, and I wouldn't be sure they would start charging when VIN from other region would be sent to supercharger, and you already may be carrying a dozen different adapters in your trunk or frunk. What a hassle. Well, next year we will see GM Bolt, and most likely GM's own (CSS or whatever) fast charging infrastructure will follow, more wider as GM (plus others) is bigger player, and Tesla will be left on isolated island. Isn't that what they wanted?

      Model S are prevented from use superchargers as they check VIN when you plug in. Do you really want to say all this is good business ethics?

      Since Tesla actually foots the electricity bills and funds the network rollout - that's perfectly fine. Also, superchargers are more powerful than ANY of the deployed standards out there right now.

      It is called abuse in my book but as the are trying "to save the world" they are entitled to do anything in they eyes of their fans. Most evil things in the human history were done by people fighting "for greater good". They receive lots of subsidized loans/credits/all kinds perks from all taxpayers and it isn't exactly correct that they foot all the bills or that it is impossible for them to charge others for use of their network to recoup all reasonable costs. Such practice may be even become illegal in Europe soon, there is bill proposed that publicly accessible charging stations should not be discriminating against other EVs. How about gas stations with different hoses and owned by GM, Toyota, BMW, each incompatible with each other? Do you imagine what absurd waste of resour

    59. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by rch7 · · Score: 1

      It is good my favorite gas station doesn't do some $$$$$ inspection of my vehicle before I put highly explosive gas into it, and do not require me to go to their own body shop charging $10,000 for each fender before I'm allowed to pass their inspection ;) Competition is good thing for me.

    60. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Can you get unlimited lifetime gas for ~$2000 at your favorite gas station? And at a couple hundred locations around the USA?
      Did you buy your car from your favorite gas station with a comprehensive warranty?

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    61. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Chademo plug geometry allows up to 200 A, likely more if you use different alloy to handle higher temperature. It means 80kW at 400V or 160kW at 800V.

      Except that Tesla connectors were actually designed for 200kW at 400V. They are doing 150kW _right_ _now_ in Europe (not in some uncertain future) and are experimenting with liquid-cooled cables in the US.

      So let's see, there was no approved standard when Tesla was developing its superchargers and the eventually approved standard is extremely shitty (the plugs are heavy, unreliable and don't allow for enough power).

      Exactly. Some shitty "standard" was invented by German/US automakers to drag down Japanese EVs. Some FUD was spread that competitors are "deprecated" and it worked, you repeat it now. Tesla had option to use common open standard at that time and CCS may be not have happened.

      I actually work with guys who were involved in the SAE plug design. They have some choice words about it. For example, the SAE plug uses a complete TCP/IP stack over a custom PHY layer.

      I don't think they sell such adapter, and I wouldn't be sure they would start charging when VIN from other region would be sent to supercharger, and you already may be carrying a dozen different adapters in your trunk or frunk. What a hassle.

      Tesla said that the supercharging network will be unified across the continents. As for dozens adapters - yes, I actually carry a "frankencable" for charging and a ChADeMO adapter.

      It is called abuse in my book but as the are trying "to save the world" they are entitled to do anything in they eyes of their fans. Most evil things in the human history were done by people fighting "for greater good".

      Nissan has it's own network for LEAFs. They should have called it "Charge for Sure(tm)". So I'd like to _eventually_ see collaboration between auto vendors. However, right now there is only ONE vendor that actually cares about providing fast charging. BTW, Tesla had actually offered their technology to BMW and SAE - and was rebuffed.

    62. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by rch7 · · Score: 1

      For the Tesla Model S/X price, certainly any gas station owner would be glad to sell you a cheaper car and provide gas for 100,000 miles, whatever is reasonable lifetime of that car, or until bankruptcy. Nobody in their right mind would go for such silly offer though. Who wants lock up itself into some niche monopoly company and get restricted for the life of the car where to fill gas and where to service car and pay up to the roof whatever the monopoly asks to pay because you have no choice anymore.

    63. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by rch7 · · Score: 1

      Chademo plug geometry allows up to 200 A, likely more if you use different alloy to handle higher temperature. It means 80kW at 400V or 160kW at 800V.

      Except that Tesla connectors were actually designed for 200kW at 400V. They are doing 150kW _right_ _now_ in Europe (not in some uncertain future) and are experimenting with liquid-cooled cables in the US.

      So let's see, there was no approved standard when Tesla was developing its superchargers and the eventually approved standard is extremely shitty (the plugs are heavy, unreliable and don't allow for enough power).

      There were EV automakers and Japanese electricity company working on the standard finalization, it was used in practice, it was well known for everybody in the field that is used in practice, and if Tesla wanted, they should have participated. "Not finalized" is not an excuse if you ever worked in any standard creation. Finalization typically takes long time as all interested parties have their opinions on every fine detail, but finalization usually don't go far from initial draft. No need to invent another wheel. The standard was approved as such because Tesla didn't wanted standard and didn't participated, and nobody else cared for Tesla power requirements. It doesn't mean that the plug can't carry more power - nobody worked on making it to carry more power. The fact that plug is bigger/heavier means that maybe it can carry more power. Just like Tesla in Europe uses modified Mennekes Type 2 plug that wasn't designed for such power initially, but it was made possible later.

      Even if you speculate that Tesla found existing standard unsuitable, it is not how you do things if you want vehicle charging concept to succeed. You make your own much better standard, and make it public, maybe patent it and charge reasonable fees, but allow everybody interested to use the standard and network and not just fragment market for foreseeable future.

      Exactly. Some shitty "standard" was invented by German/US automakers to drag down Japanese EVs. Some FUD was spread that competitors are "deprecated" and it worked, you repeat it now. Tesla had option to use common open standard at that time and CCS may be not have happened.

      I actually work with guys who were involved in the SAE plug design. They have some choice words about it. For example, the SAE plug uses a complete TCP/IP stack over a custom PHY layer.

      I don't think they sell such adapter, and I wouldn't be sure they would start charging when VIN from other region would be sent to supercharger, and you already may be carrying a dozen different adapters in your trunk or frunk. What a hassle.

      Tesla said that the supercharging network will be unified across the continents. As for dozens adapters - yes, I actually carry a "frankencable" for charging and a ChADeMO adapter.

      Any link about supercharging network unification? American version should go away then as it doesn't have enough conductors for 3-phase charging that is needed in Europe. I would imagine it would cost a fortune if they do right thing and change equipment everywhere in the US. And you know, European Tesla plug is bigger.

      As for the adapters. See, you have no problems carrying Chademo adapter and using Chademo network built by other people, most charger owners don't make issue about it, even if you with your big battery may be blocking slower charger for a long time. But nobody from outside can use Tesla network. Don't you find something wrong in such approach?

      It is called abuse in my book but as the are trying "to save the world" they are entitled to do anything in they eyes of their fans. Most evil things in the human history were done by people fighting "for greater good".

      Nissan has it's own network for LEAFs. They should have called it "Charge for Sure(tm)". So I'd like to _eventually_ see

    64. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Even if you speculate that Tesla found existing standard unsuitable, it is not how you do things if you want vehicle charging concept to succeed. You make your own much better standard, and make it public, maybe patent it and charge reasonable fees, but allow everybody interested to use the standard and network and not just fragment market for foreseeable future.

      That's what Tesla did. Tesla's charging standard is open for other automakers and it was offered to SAE working group. They were not interested.

      Any link about supercharging network unification? American version should go away then as it doesn't have enough conductors for 3-phase charging that is needed in Europe. I would imagine it would cost a fortune if they do right thing and change equipment everywhere in the US. And you know, European Tesla plug is bigger.

      Retrofitting existing superchargers won't cost too much, especially if they distribute adapters among the existing Tesla customers first. Or do a retrofit during the regular service.

      As for the adapters. See, you have no problems carrying Chademo adapter and using Chademo network built by other people, most charger owners don't make issue about it, even if you with your big battery may be blocking slower charger for a long time. But nobody from outside can use Tesla network. Don't you find something wrong in such approach?

      Certainly not. Every time I charge at ChADeMo stations I also pay a fee, often quite steep (the most recent 30kWH charge up at Astoria, OR cost me $32). But superchargers are free for Tesla owners since they are essentially priced into the car's cost.

      I don't see how Tesla cares more than others. Sure they have some limited network that allows cross country travel if you go the way that is available. But so what, other players don't need cross country travel, they didn't make long range EVs until recently as they found price would be prohibitive.

      It's remarkable how you can contradict yourself in just two sentences.

    65. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by rch7 · · Score: 1

      Even if you speculate that Tesla found existing standard unsuitable, it is not how you do things if you want vehicle charging concept to succeed. You make your own much better standard, and make it public, maybe patent it and charge reasonable fees, but allow everybody interested to use the standard and network and not just fragment market for foreseeable future.

      That's what Tesla did. Tesla's charging standard is open for other automakers and it was offered to SAE working group. They were not interested.

      "Not interested" means the proposal had too many hooks attached or nothing was valuable in that Tesla protocol. If Tesla really wants to open it, it should 1) publish it 2) allow non-discriminatory third party EV access to their network based on reasonable per-use fee to recoup costs. Otherwise it is just lip service to look good and pump price of shares for next raise of capital.
      As Tesla wasn't able to come with single plug for their own network yet, what is the point switching to it now? 200kW likely will not be enough for this Porsche car anyway.

      Any link about supercharging network unification? American version should go away then as it doesn't have enough conductors for 3-phase charging that is needed in Europe. I would imagine it would cost a fortune if they do right thing and change equipment everywhere in the US. And you know, European Tesla plug is bigger.

      Retrofitting existing superchargers won't cost too much, especially if they distribute adapters among the existing Tesla customers first. Or do a retrofit during the regular service.

      As for the adapters. See, you have no problems carrying Chademo adapter and using Chademo network built by other people, most charger owners don't make issue about it, even if you with your big battery may be blocking slower charger for a long time. But nobody from outside can use Tesla network. Don't you find something wrong in such approach?

      Certainly not. Every time I charge at ChADeMo stations I also pay a fee, often quite steep (the most recent 30kWH charge up at Astoria, OR cost me $32). But superchargers are free for Tesla owners since they are essentially priced into the car's cost.

      You tend to thing about yourself only, and short term. $32 is peanuts as you don't need to pay it every time, and it is much cheaper than flatbed truck to closest Tesla supercharger. Availability is more important than per-use rate. The point is that Tesla makes its network available to their customers only, it is useless for non-Tesla EVs. At the same time Tesla uses other networks. Not so nice word about would be leaching.

      I don't see how Tesla cares more than others. Sure they have some limited network that allows cross country travel if you go the way that is available. But so what, other players don't need cross country travel, they didn't make long range EVs until recently as they found price would be prohibitive.

      It's remarkable how you can contradict yourself in just two sentences.

      It is not contradiction, it is looking for perspective. You as a customer are not interested in some proprietary monopoly as you are going to pay a lot for it eventually and will not get anything, and is even an obstacle for mass EV adoption in long term. Maybe you have a lot of Tesla shares and hope to profit from it, it would be different story. It is risky investment at current price.

    66. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by tingentleman · · Score: 1

      Oh, and will someone explain what BMW is doing with the i3? When I think BMW, I think sport sedan. That thing has the specs of a Nissan Leaf and the looks of a Scion Cube. I'd expected something Tesla-ish.

      I have one. It is ugly and weird (which I like) but drives wonderfully - is as fast as a hot hatch, and the interior is like nothing else (in an excitedly interesting way)

    67. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      "Not interested" means the proposal had too many hooks attached or nothing was valuable in that Tesla protocol.

      Really? Nothing interesting in the only charging standard that actually is doing 150kW charging _right_ _now_? Sure.

      If Tesla really wants to open it, it should 1) publish it

      Telsa pledged to open the standard for anyone interested.

      2) allow non-discriminatory third party EV access to their network based on reasonable per-use fee to recoup costs. Otherwise it is just lip service to look good and pump price of shares for next raise of capital.

      Nope. This requirement has NOTHING to do with standards - it's perfectly possible to use open standards for private networks. For example, Nissan's dealer ChADeMO network is open for Nissan only.

      The point is that Tesla makes its network available to their customers only, it is useless for non-Tesla EVs. At the same time Tesla uses other networks. Not so nice word about would be leaching.

      Except that there are NO OTHER CARS that can fully utilize Tesla superchargers. None. Chevy Bolt will be limited to 85kW and LEAFs are limited to a measly 40kW. If the situation were different with lots of cars capable of utilizing high-power charging then I might be agreeing with you.

    68. Re:Slower, Same range, within 5 years?!? by rch7 · · Score: 1

      "Not interested" means the proposal had too many hooks attached or nothing was valuable in that Tesla protocol.

      Really? Nothing interesting in the only charging standard that actually is doing 150kW charging _right_ _now_? Sure.

      1. It is not a standard, it is "standard".
      2. It is nothing new - 250kW charger was demonstrated in last decade and Tesla's one can't even reach that. It is invention of a wheel with a lot of hype, just Apple's style.
      3. It is worthless to new cars like this Porsche concept.

      Frankly this is getting repetitive. I already know all these talking points very well and not getting any new information from this discussion.

      If Tesla really wants to open it, it should 1) publish it

      Telsa pledged to open the standard for anyone interested.

      Sure, I'm interested ;) How about taking 5 minutes and posting internal company document online? How about actually opening charging network to every individual willing to pay per-use, just like any gas station does? Pledges are worthless when your actions are opposite.

      2) allow non-discriminatory third party EV access to their network based on reasonable per-use fee to recoup costs. Otherwise it is just lip service to look good and pump price of shares for next raise of capital.

      Nope. This requirement has NOTHING to do with standards - it's perfectly possible to use open standards for private networks. For example, Nissan's dealer ChADeMO network is open for Nissan only.

      This is obviously not true. Many Tesla owners charge at Nissan dealerships just fine. Sure some dealers may be nuts and refuse anybody but their own customers. Most don't make issue if somebody else asks for charge.

      The point is that Tesla makes its network available to their customers only, it is useless for non-Tesla EVs. At the same time Tesla uses other networks. Not so nice word about would be leaching.

      Except that there are NO OTHER CARS that can fully utilize Tesla superchargers. None. Chevy Bolt will be limited to 85kW and LEAFs are limited to a measly 40kW. If the situation were different with lots of cars capable of utilizing high-power charging then I might be agreeing with you.

      So what? I can read this talking point in every second post from Tesla advocates but it makes zero sense. If they don't utilize full power, Tesla expense for electricity will be less. Tesla's own cars don't utilize full power for most of the charging time, they can only take full power for the short moment when battery is fully discharged. Why should you be concerned about that? People invented such thing as "money" thousands years ago. You pay at gas station to take your fuel, gas station is happy to provide it and don't invent excuses about how you are going utilize fuel in your car. Charging stations usually charge by time spent. It is none of their business to tell customer how to utilize that time.
      All this only makes perfect sense if you want to introduce fragmentation into charging infrastructure. Then you make proprietary network and don't allow anybody other than your high paying customers. Maybe make some "feel good" PR statements, they don't cost much. Sure competitors are not stupid and may follow your lead and do the same, then you'll get slowdown of EV adoption for a long time and have your niche market remain niche. It may take very long time until Justice Department come up to charging infrastructure with some AT&T style antitrust suite to break last-mile monopoly.

  8. Still playing catch-up by rgmoore · · Score: 2

    Big deal. Porsche is unveiling a prototype of a car that can compete with what Tesla has been doing for a few years. That's great, except that Tesla is a moving target. If Porsche wants to get some excitement going, they need to put out something that will compete with where Tesla will be in a few years when this thing actually makes it into production.

    --

    There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    1. Re:Still playing catch-up by SpankiMonki · · Score: 3, Funny

      It IS a big deal! Porsche will be the FIRST electric car with a battery hanging behind the rear axle! It won't even need front wheels! They're just for show! Porsche FTW!!!

    2. Re:Still playing catch-up by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      That's what I thought when I read the summary as well. Tesla Model S P85D has a 0-60 time of 2.5 seconds. This porche appears to be designed to compete with the pre-P85D model S.

      Tesla is so far ahead of everyone that even Porsche can't beat them in a performance sector that Tesla doesn't even really compete in.

    3. Re:Still playing catch-up by DerekLyons · · Score: 0

      *chuckles*

      Sorry, but that really is one the (probably inadvertently) funniest things I've seen posted to Slashdot in a while.

      Seriously, unless you're a dyed-in-the-wool Tesla fanbot, you're seriously clueless about how the world works. If Porsche put's an electric car into full production, it'll be Tesla playing catch up. They don't have a tenth of Porsche's reputation or a hundredth of it's marketing muscle. People who've barely heard of Tesla will be lining up around the block to get in line to pre order one.

      (I just noted that my spell checker, which I've taught fanboy, tripped on 'fanbot'. But it fits, so I'll let it stand.)

    4. Re:Still playing catch-up by b0bby · · Score: 1

      Maybe... but every review site will be comparing the two, and if the Porsche isn't actually better, or at least as good, I bet only Porsche fanbots would buy them. As an example, consider that Tesla sold 10000+ Model S cars in Q1; BMW, with its reputation and marketing muscle, sold about 4500 i8s in Q1 & Q2.

    5. Re:Still playing catch-up by Zobeid · · Score: 2

      If this logic really worked in the marketplace, we'd all be using Kodak digital cameras, playing videogames on Atari consoles, flying Pan-Am and carrying Nokia smartphones in our pockets.

      Zune: you make it you

    6. Re:Still playing catch-up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does Elon Musk's dick taste?

    7. Re:Still playing catch-up by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      What? Who hasn't heard of Tesla?

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    8. Re:Still playing catch-up by haruchai · · Score: 1

      The P85D does 0-60 in 3.2s although a few have managed 3.1s on track surfaces with really good tires and gets 11.6 - 11.8s at the 1/4 mi.
      The P90D which is just starting to ship is touted to have a 0-60 of 2.8s and a 10.8s at the 1/4.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    9. Re:Still playing catch-up by haruchai · · Score: 1

      That's what we've been hearing but the Germans have yet to get it done, despite years of trying.
      Mercedes has an SLS AMG electric with 750 HP years before Tesla launched the "D" and while it'll probably still behave better on a demanding track, it's been far surpassed for short drags and city / highway driving.

      And it's 4.5x the price of a top-end Model S. Audi has been showing off one e-tron model after another for 6 years but all you can buy is the A3 hybrid that reviewers say is very good - compared to a Leaf or Volt.

      The BMW i8 is well-regarded by the car mag pundits but you really need good, challenging roads to appreciate its handling. But for around town and normal highways, even the midrange Model S85D outperforms it - and for $40k less.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    10. Re:Still playing catch-up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The P90D which is just starting to ship is touted to have a 0-60 of 2.8s and a 10.8s at the 1/4.

      Furlongs please.

    11. Re:Still playing catch-up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Building a good electric car is far easier than building a good petrol or diesel car, since the most complicated components are replaced by something much simpler. There are two main reasons major car manufacturers are not selling anything like a Tesla:
      - Small market. A petrol or diesel car is still more practical and cheaper to run in most marketst
      - To compete with Tesla, they also need to compete on price, and thus also sell their cars at a loss

      Now Tesla needs to develop and sell cars now to gain expertise and establish a market presence once electric cars do become a sizeable market. Established car manufacturers don't, since they already have that.

    12. Re:Still playing catch-up by stooo · · Score: 1

      Here the correction :
      >>The P85D does 0-100km/h in 3.2s although a few have managed 3.1s on track surfaces with really good tires and gets 11.6 - 11.8s at the 400m.
      >>The P90D which is just starting to ship is touted to have a 0-100km/h of 2.8s and a 10.8s at the 400m.

      --
      aaaaaaa
    13. Re:Still playing catch-up by stooo · · Score: 1

      Most people outside of the US have not heard of Tesla (the car company)

      --
      aaaaaaa
    14. Re:Still playing catch-up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people, probably. Tesla is very popular on Slashdot, but so far, I've only seen one in real life, there are no dealerships and they don't advertise. Chances are that people who don't read Slashdot and are not especially into cars don't know it exists.

    15. Re:Still playing catch-up by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      The #1 recommended car of every car magazine? I think every single person who would consider buying a Porsche would be aware of Tesla. Every single person who would consider buying an all-electric car, as well.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    16. Re:Still playing catch-up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't seen a car magazine recommend a Tesla. They usually recommend Alfa Romeo's and Mazda roadsters for people with a midlife crisis, Mondeos and Lagunas for people with a familiy and a dog and small Korean cars with funky names and bright colours for people without money.

      I agree that people specifically interested in electric cars (or even cars in general) would probably know Tesla, bust the majority of people will probably not have heard of it.

  9. Lots of details in that article by Lucas123 · · Score: 2

    I just can't seem to find the expected price tag. Whoops. I forgot, if you need to ask the price of a Porsche, you cannot afford it.

    Personally, I'm vastly more excited about an affordable Tesla than some horrifically expensive EV Porsche.

    1. Re:Lots of details in that article by mccalli · · Score: 1

      I'm equally interested - there's room in the market for more than one kind of car.

      I currently have a Boxster (987.2), and previously a 911 (996, was twenty years old when I had it and then the engine blew up as early 996's are wont to do...). I've looked at the Tesla and would really like it, but the handling of the Boxster is something I'd miss and there's no convertible either.

      That doesn't make the Tesla bad of course, it just makes a different segment. So I'm equally interested in the new Porsche designs and the new Tesla ones - different cars for different purposes.

    2. Re:Lots of details in that article by Amouth · · Score: 1

      I've AutoX'ed a Tesla Roadster, if it is setup right that thing is a beast. haven't had a chance for a model S yet, would be fun.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    3. Re:Lots of details in that article by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Would it be anything $1k? It's electric, AND it's a Porsche. Only people who have cash to crap on status symbols would be able to afford it.

    4. Re:Lots of details in that article by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's an exciting time for EV buyers. Nissan is due to announce a 30kW Leaf soon, with a much larger bump next year to get 200 miles range. A few other manufacturers have announced longer range EVs, and there are some interesting Chinese models coming in too.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Lots of details in that article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a 2006 Porsche Cayman, bright yellow, I pass on my way to work every day (on a dealer lot). They only want $30K for it.

  10. Pity the big auto companies were so blind. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A number of people (myself included) have known for decades (and somtimes brought to the attention of auto company executives that electric cars could be capable of performance far better than fuel-driven engines and limited only by the traction of the tires, and that people might want lectric vehicles with sane levels of performance.

    But the auto execs only thought of electric vehicles as appealing to eco-freaks, who would be willing to accept - and might desire - classic VW levels of performance. So when they designed electric "concept cars" they didn't do the engineering to achieve performance. Their offerings were traffic-snarling, short-range, wimpy eco-freak commuter cars.

    This left the market SO open that Elon Musk (who also understood the demand) was able to build a successful new auto company from scratch (a couple billion dollars worth) and capture the market.

    Musk started with the high end - to recover the development cost from the early adopters willing to pay big for the new toy - in classic Silicon Valley style. He's working his way down from the pricey prestige cars to the bulk market as fast as his engineers can bring the cost down and his financing can build the manufacturing infrastructure (and his lawyers and lobbyists can remove the legal obstacles to his not-dealer-dependent marketing).

    But now the PARTIAL lesson - that there's a market at the top for a high-performance electric car - has been learned, and a prestige auto maker is trying to get a slice of that.

    They're STILL not seeing the whole picture. Which is very good for Tesla. B-)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:Pity the big auto companies were so blind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The major automakers were afraid of cannibalizing their own products. As we learn over and over again, if you don't regularly cannibalize your own market, someone else will do it for you.

    2. Re:Pity the big auto companies were so blind. by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Most of the traditional car companies still sneer at electric cars and not capable performers. BMW, Mercedes and Porsche (probably Lamborghini) as well have now developed electric cars to compete with 3 year old Tesla's but only because they were tired of people asking about them. They are being dragged kicking and screaming into electric because of Tesla's sales numbers are beginning to erode their own market-share.

      My bet is they continue to treat the electric car not as a technological advance but as a half rate car that they won't take seriously. Tesla will continue to erode their market-share because you can't beat an electric car for performance. Electric motors are far funner to drive. The only limiting factor has been the energy storage and Tesla is making that restraint go away.

    3. Re:Pity the big auto companies were so blind. by mspohr · · Score: 1

      In an interview in May of this year: Porsche CEO Muller said:
      “I cannot say anything about Tesla,” he said. “I don’t know anything about Tesla .”

      I think the Tesla is eating into their sales of Cayenne, Panamera (and even 911) so this is a defensive move. The announcement is pure vapor and it will be five years before you can actually buy one (if they decide to make it) so they are very late to the game. In five years, Tesla will have the Model S, Model X and Model 3 in full production (and maybe even a new Roadster). And... the Gigafactory will be cranking out batteries by the ton. Tesla has a 10 year head start on everyone else.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    4. Re:Pity the big auto companies were so blind. by Strudelkugel · · Score: 3, Informative

      FYI:

      Tesla Motors was founded by Martin Eberhardt and Marc Tarpenning. Musk was an early investor.

      --
      Imagine how much harder physics would be if electrons had feelings! -Feynman, maybe
    5. Re:Pity the big auto companies were so blind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't we have both? As in a hybrid with a 0 to 60 instant torque acceleration electric motor and a 500HP gas motor for sustained speed/range.

    6. Re:Pity the big auto companies were so blind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [[ ... who would be willing to accept - and might desire - classic VW levels of performance. ]]
      Yes! Thank you for saying this out loud! Perfectly put.

    7. Re:Pity the big auto companies were so blind. by swb · · Score: 1

      I doubt the Tesla is eating into sales of the Cayenne, it's a SUV. The Panamera, maybe, but it's a much better handling car and has more top end and all wheel drive -- plus, much more expensive than Tesla. 911 is iconic -- nobody is buying a Tesla who wants a 911. They're not even in the same ballpark.

      The people who are probably worrying about the Tesla are Mercedes and BMW. The S550 is still a big deal, but it's not hard to see buyers switching from that to Tesla, same with the BMW 7 series, too. I think the Tesla's too expensive for wannabes who lease E350s or 530s, but perhaps some of those people have switched.

    8. Re:Pity the big auto companies were so blind. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Why can't we have both? As in a hybrid with a 0 to 60 instant torque acceleration electric motor and a 500HP gas motor for sustained speed/range.

      You slipped a decimal. Cruising at freeway speed (in a full-sized car with ordinary tires) only requires power levels in the teens of horsepower. So call it 20 to 25 HP to give you margin for recharging the "peaking" system and you've got what you need.

      IMHO the whole POINT of a hybrid is to have a storage system to provide "peaking" power for acceleration and hill climbing and scavenge power from stopping and descending, letting the prime mover engine be low power, low weight (so you don't burn a lot of fuel carrying it around), and run either at peak efficiency or not at all. Having a prime mover means you can store energy as fuel, which can be refilled very quickly and has historically been lower weight than an equivalent fuel supply as charged batteries. Having a peaking store means stop-and-go traffic can approach the mileage of highway travel. (Also: If your peaking store is large enough, a rechargeable hybrid can double as an only(-using)-electric commuter vehicle and only run the prime mover on long trips or when stuck in traffic when the charge runs low.)

      Pure electirics dispense with the prime mover, use a bigger battery, and take a hit on range and cross-country practicality. But with new ultra-fast, ultra-efficient batteries and deployment of matching charging systems, they may become as all-around effective as hybrids. (Or you might add a trailer with an engine/generator/fuel tank for cross-country expeditions, creating a two-piece hybrid. B-) )

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    9. Re:Pity the big auto companies were so blind. by AaronW · · Score: 5, Informative

      I agree. I own a Tesla model S P85 (for 2 1/2 years now). Tesla brings a lot more to the table than just the car. They also have a nation-wide charging network that nobody else comes close to. Next week I will be driving from the SF Bay Area to Seattle, WA. I plan to take a leisurely drive, stopping in Grants Pass for the night. On my drive to Grants Pass I will spend less than 90 minutes charging out of about 8 hours of driving. Given how most superchargers are near malls and other amenities I've found that often I grab something to eat and my car is fully charged before I am.

      Besides the charging network, Tesla is also addressing the battery supply with their gigafactory, which should significantly reduce the cost of their batteries. On top of that they're also offsetting their superchargers with solar power and are now starting to add grid battery storage as well to significantly cut peak power usage.

      Nobody else comes anywhere close. Their service and support has been excellent, though I've also heard that Porsche is also quite good. Even though my car was one of the early ones manufactured (VIN in the low 5000s) I've had very few problems and no major problems. Most were just squeaks and rattles, which they quickly fixed. They've also made very rapid improvements to the car in the 2 1/2 years since I bought mine. It may look the same on the outside, but there are a lot of new features under the hood and Tesla has addressed problems quickly in their production run, not waiting for 6-month or yearly intervals like many manufacturers.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    10. Re:Pity the big auto companies were so blind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla will continue to erode their market-share because you can't beat an electric car for performance. Electric motors are far funner to drive. The only limiting factor has been the energy storage and Tesla is making that restraint go away.

      A big part of the enjoyment of these types of cars is the noise the engine makes and for some, being in control of shifting gears. What's so fun about electric?

      As far as performance goes, it depends on how it's measured. I can see the Amazon TopGear reboot including a race between Clarkson in some new Euro supercar and May/Hammond in a Tesla. Clarkson will end up winning because he won't have to waste 30 minutes (or more) every 250 miles or so.

    11. Re:Pity the big auto companies were so blind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      From your wiki link:

      One public provision stated that the parties will consider Eberhard, Musk, Straubel, Tarpenning, and Wright to be the five co-founders. Eberhard also issued a statement about Musk's foundational role in the company: "As a co-founder of the company, Elon's contributions to Tesla have been extraordinary."

    12. Re:Pity the big auto companies were so blind. by rch7 · · Score: 1

      BMW i3 ReX has 25kW generator and I heard it is enough to sustain 70mph on flat road, but it isn't all what you need. You may need to go against high wind for long time, go into mountain, put some heavy baggage or more people into a car and it would not enough to reach destination.

    13. Re:Pity the big auto companies were so blind. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      A horsepower is almost exactly 3/4 kW, so 25 kW is 33 1/3 HP. That's twice what you need to cruise a full-sized car on the level at highway speeds.

      Headwinds from ordinary weather don't give you THAT much of a bump, even taking into account that the major drag term goes with the cube of the speed.

      Yes, substantial hill-climbing (like mountains) might mean crawling like a loaded semi once the peaking store is exhausted. But at least it's not as bad as one that was sized for JUST the level cruise load would be.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    14. Re:Pity the big auto companies were so blind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe there was some other company that designed battery packs for Tesla, Musk tried to persuade them to do a full car and even said he will finance it, but the guys were not interested, so Musk created Tesla and is using the battery pack in it (while the original dudes get royalties).

    15. Re:Pity the big auto companies were so blind. by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      I doubt the Tesla is eating into sales of the Cayenne, it's a SUV.

      You might be right; OTOH I can certainly imagine a number of potential Cayenne buyers sitting on their money waiting for the Model X to become available. Whether or not that would be noticeable in Porsche's Cayenne sales figures I have no idea.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    16. Re:Pity the big auto companies were so blind. by horza · · Score: 1

      Of all the people that go on about the love of the noise and shifting gears, few have them have driven a Tesla. We will end up having two cars. Tesla for every day, and a sports car just for track days (or a run around Nurburgring). Once you have experienced never having to go to a gas station again, it would be hard to go to a petrol car again.

      Interesting Amazon TopGear comment though, makes me think ferries and Eurostar should have Tesla chargers built in. A perfect time to recharge.

      Phillip.

    17. Re:Pity the big auto companies were so blind. by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      The electric car revolution we're seeing now depended on the availability of batteries with a high-enough capacity-to-weight ratio to combine sportscar performance with decent range. That availability is pretty recent, and was driven by gigantic amount of research across the laptop and phone industry. A single car manufacturer wouldn't have been able to spend enough money to create usable batteries on its own, so an electric car built 30 years ago would have had sportscar performance and a range of 30 miles, or milk float performance at 100+ miles range.

    18. Re:Pity the big auto companies were so blind. by stooo · · Score: 1

      >> A big part of the enjoyment of these types of cars is the noise the engine makes and for some

      The rest of the enjoyment is the acceleration, curve handling, etc... Tesla clearly wins there.

      --
      aaaaaaa
    19. Re:Pity the big auto companies were so blind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You neatly ignore that this market is still tiny. So far, I have seen exactly one Tesla on the road.

    20. Re:Pity the big auto companies were so blind. by swb · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about that. The Cayenne is kind of a big SUV and for a lot of people the SUV is their "long drive" car, not just a metro runabout.

      Plus, it is a Porsche and has a performance cachet to it that the Model X won't have outside of the torque of an electric motor.

      The SUVs that will be in its crosshairs, though, will be stuff like BMW X1/X3, and maybe the Mercedes ML350, which seem to be more focused on daily drivers. Maybe Acura MDX/RDX as well.

    21. Re:Pity the big auto companies were so blind. by rch7 · · Score: 1

      70-75mph limit for i3 ReX to maintain charge is what i3 drivers say, so I tend to believe them. Yes you can drive faster for a bit, and even hack the system to get some European setting to enable option to keep 30% charge for mountains. But once you get your charge exhausted, you are dropped into some eco mode with around 45-50 mph limit, and you can't drive at normal US highway at that speed at all :(
      p.s. Drag is not just cube of speed, it is much more complex. Anyway at high speed air drag takes most energy to maintain speed. Just normal sustained 20-40 mph front wind would drop your maximum speed needed to maintain charge by about the same. OK, maybe less a bit, but even 15 mph less would be 60 mph and it is just unsafe whey everybody drives at 75mph. In some Texas highways speed limit is 80 mph.
      It may be ok for some, but you can't really expect people to get $40-$50k car and constantly babysit charge level when driving on highway, too much pain.

  11. 15 minute charge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not until there are 800 Volt charging stations available. Not likely to happen anytime soon in the US at least.

    1. Re:15 minute charge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could see them at Porsche dealerships I bet. You might need large stationary battery packs, which would be recharged at a slower rate once the car has left.

    2. Re:15 minute charge? by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      I easily change 120v to 25,000v in my house daily. Using 100 year old technology. It's trivial to do and I'm sure 800v would be just as easy.

    3. Re:15 minute charge? by stooo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sure. Now try to put a 150kW transformer in the trunk of your porsche.

      --
      aaaaaaa
  12. other features familiar to the porsche owner. by nimbius · · Score: 1, Funny

    many owners will be reluctant to climb into the new porsche electric. As a lead marketing and test analyst however, I can assure you we at porsche are keeping the finer appointments of the vehicle just the way they are. Turn Signals, or that strange stalk present in some cars, are of course removed to enhance sophistication. lane position assist helps ensure you maintain a comfortable 45 miles per hour in the left most lane of any road, as the Porsche aficionado is accustomed. and finally, our cup-a-fart seats allow you to continuously enjoy reap the rewards of a hard days work. As always, we offer available specialty armrests for customers who have recently fractured the appendage while vigorously masturbating to their own achievements.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  13. Metoos ... by stongef · · Score: 1

    Now that the real innovator has paved the way, the metoos will be coming out of the woodwork. I'll give my money to Elon, thank you ... And I do hope he gets his volcano lair too.

    1. Re:Metoos ... by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      Well, the whole car industry is a "me too" thing. The first working electric car is from Gustave Trouvé 1881. And Karl Benz is acknowledged as the inventor of the modern car which would make any other company beside Daimler-Benz (today Daimler AG) a "me too". Elon Musk only had a lot of money to start his business. In contrast to many of the other electric vehicle companies. And while all the car companies are struggling with electric mobility are bicycle and scooter developer far ahead in number of released vehicles and usability in public.

      However, you are right with that the big companies did not believe in modern electric cars. Even Daimler who were successful in developing fuel cell cars have hesitated to go beyond the prototype stage, like Toyota.

  14. Capacity by nospam007 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "The high-voltage charging system lets it gain 80% of its battery capacity back within 15 minutes. "

    Don't they have any marketing slime in their company?
    Why don't they just add another 20% to the battery, then they can claim that it will be _fully_ recharged after 15 minutes?

    Later people will notice that if you let it stay longer on the charger, they will even get 120% of the capacity.

    It would be a win/win.

    1. Re:Capacity by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 2

      I'm not buying an electric car until it comes in electric yellow and can charge its battery over 9000%.

    2. Re:Capacity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the battery chemistry would go wonky without taking to real 100%? People might get suspicious if 1 in every 10 charges or so takes an extra 10 hours.

    3. Re:Capacity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. Lithium Ion doesn't have that kind of memory.

    4. Re:Capacity by Malc · · Score: 1

      You need to brush up on your maths. 80% of 120 = 96.

    5. Re:Capacity by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      And it's accelerator goes to 11.

    6. Re:Capacity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it is accelerator goes to 11.

  15. What high is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good. The world will see what high cost really is. It's unlikely Porsche will offer a car that doesn't cost more, break down more often, and cost more to repair with no more performance than a Tesla. Part of the reason people think Teslas cost a lot is because Tesla just flat hasn't had any real competition before.

  16. New Porsche? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it still an under engineered, over priced, shitty Volkswagon ripoff?

  17. No mention of price by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    Likely to be around 150K USD. Given the typical Porche production runs and amortization schedules and past pricing policy.

    800 Volt motor is quite unusual for an automobile. Wondering what the cost/benefit is for such an voltage. For the same power, the current will be low, so the conductors can be thinner. The motor could be made more compact. But insulation and isolation could be a head ache. Wondering how they would provide safety in crashes.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:No mention of price by samwichse · · Score: 1

      If they've taken a page from Tesla (and they probably will have at 800V for the motor), then the only place they'll have to worry about insulating that voltage is inside the motor/inverter.

      My guess is that they'll have about 250-400v pack and use some kind of voltage booster integrated with the inverter. The inverter on the tesla is physically attached to the motor so there's very little HV AC flying around the car, but you get the compactness benefits in the motor as you said.

  18. it will compete with Tesla... by u19925 · · Score: 1

    Based on the spec, it will compete with now obsolete Tesla Roadster. Good luck.

    1. Re:it will compete with Tesla... by bledri · · Score: 1

      Based on the spec, it will compete with now obsolete Tesla Roadster. Good luck.

      Actually, Tesla is planning a new roadster for about the same time frame. So it will be competing with the new Roadster, not the obsolete one. I'd say good luck with that, but I imagine different people will have different preferences.

      --
      Some privacy policy Slashdot.
  19. If this is a real design, not vapor... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Then the breakthrough is the fast charging system. 80% in 15 minutes is approaching the "electric filling station" of our dreams. Such a paradigm would still not be the same as filling up a car and going on your way, but it could fit in with a fill-at-the-supermarket strategy that works with a loyalty program, like the one Kroger offers to its customers.

    1. Re:If this is a real design, not vapor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes me more then 10 minutes to fill my car, put oil in the engine, and go to the bathroom. Maybe get a snack or drink too. If 15-20 minutes isn't good enough, it is you that is the problem, not the technology.

      I won't buy another ICE car until it produces no emissions, and doesn't fund right wing politics.

  20. This intrigues me by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 1

    For a long time, muscle cars kept trying to push the 0-60mph acceleration. We basically hit a limit with internal combustion engines. I don't think we've even come close to the limit an electric motor can do. Don't they produce more torque than you can get friction with tires? So the limiting nature might be on the tire design. It's been a long time since I've been intrigued by fast cars, but I want to see just how quickly they can get 0-60mph if the car is designed for that. We all know electric cars blow the doors off internal combustion engine cars, but just how much can they smoke them. What opening about a drag racing league with electric cars?

    1. Re:This intrigues me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tires are a part of it, but so is the gearing. 4WD rally cars can easily do 0-60 in 2.0 seconds with under 600 hp. Rally cars don't need to go above 120 mph, but consumer exotics need to do 210+ to be competitive.

    2. Re:This intrigues me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What opening about a drag racing league with electric cars?"

      Why, when electric drag racers have been around for over 20 years doing just fine without their own racing league.

      http://www.plasmaboyracing.com/whitezombie.php

    3. Re:This intrigues me by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Don't they produce more torque than you can get friction with tires?

      Sure, although a number of gas-powered cars can do that also AFAIK.

      So the limiting nature might be on the tire design.

      No worries, someone will design a car with 8 wheels; the usual four plus an extra four that descend to touch the ground only during hard acceleration or braking, thus doubling the amount of friction available.

      Eh, could happen.... :)

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    4. Re:This intrigues me by amorsen · · Score: 1

      No worries, someone will design a car with 8 wheels; the usual four plus an extra four that descend to touch the ground only during hard acceleration or braking, thus doubling the amount of friction available.

      Friction does not work that way unfortunately.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
  21. 1.21 gigawatts? by belphegore · · Score: 1

    So, um, basic math envelope-scirbbling:

    ~100kWh battery (to be slightly more range than 85kWh Tesla), charging to 80% (or 80kWh) in 15 minutes, is 320kW during charging.

    320kW / 240V = ~1300kA

    Good luck getting your local electric company to give you a 1300+ amp connection for a residence. Most people have at most 100-200A on their main breaker. And the theoretical "concept" of this car's inductive charging system: 800V at presumably around 400A is just scary. Don't accidentally drop a penny under the car on top of the inductive loop! I don't want to even picture trying to dissipate ~320kW through a penny.

    Not clear to me how there are more people reading about this "concept" car that might or might not be in production in around 5 years maybe, and saying "wait a minute, this doesn't make any sense".

    1. Re:1.21 gigawatts? by rgmoore · · Score: 1

      The 15 minutes to 80% charged is not for the home charger; it's for the Porsche equivalent of Tesla's superchargers. I would assume they'll be fed from the local medium voltage distribution system- typically around 10kV to ground- rather than from household voltage. Home charging will probably be with a conventional 240V/50A system, which should be able to get the car fully charged overnight.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

  22. I don't see them as compeditors by BlueCoder · · Score: 1

    The market is more than large enough that Tesla can't keep up with demand. Porsche adds luxuries on top of the electric car. What if you don't like the look of the Tesla or you want other colors/features. These are two kids playing in a sandbox the size of a small city. More than enough room for both of them. I even find it likely that Tesla may consult for them and eventually in 5 years be selling them batteries from their Giga factories.

  23. The hybrid solution is the best... by bjdevil66 · · Score: 0

    Why does everyone have wood for all-electric cars now? The Chevy Volt model, if refined to a Porsche/Tesla level of quality and not wrapped in a nerdmobile shell is the best of both worlds. At least as a bridge to some future model (all hydrogen?)

    Until then, gas's "recharge" time (less than 5 minutes) + 10,000s of locations to fill up trumps all-electric every day of the week as of today.

    1. Re:The hybrid solution is the best... by Chuq · · Score: 1

      Because the hybrid solution isn't the best - it's no better than a slightly more fuel-efficient car.

      Add to that the fact that hybrids have both electric and petrol engines - so there is more maintenance and more things that could go wrong. Compare to a pure EV which has no need for spark plugs, exhaust, transmission, catalytic converters, etc....

      Who cares how many electric charging stations there are when an EV driver wakes up every day with full range? Unlike petrol and hydrogen, where no filling stations results in your vehicle becoming a very heavy paperweight, EVs can take advantage of existing electricity networks and outlets. Fast charging stations are a bonus, not a necessity.

      --
      - Chuq
    2. Re:The hybrid solution is the best... by bledri · · Score: 1

      Why does everyone have wood for all-electric cars now? The Chevy Volt model, if refined to a Porsche/Tesla level of quality and not wrapped in a nerdmobile shell is the best of both worlds. At least as a bridge to some future model (all hydrogen?)

      Until then, gas's "recharge" time (less than 5 minutes) + 10,000s of locations to fill up trumps all-electric every day of the week as of today.

      Tesla owners that drive less than 250 miles per day, they never have to "fill it up." It's "full" every morning. Other electric cars, the range is much shorter, but if the range is comfortably in your daily commute the same principal applies.

      As to why people have wood for them, there are a lot of reasons. Everything from helping move away from fossil fuels [1], to liking something that's different, to the crazy acceleration, or the fact that it's truly quiet, to having a status symbol. At least as far as the Tesla is concerned, it seems to actually be one hell of a car. The customer satisfaction ratings are off the charts.

      [1] Yes, I know coal is used in parts of the US to create electricity, but so is natural gas [2], nuclear, hydro, wind, solar, whatever. Electric cars are basically multi-fuel.
      [2] Yes, I know that natural gas is a fossil fuel. But it's way cleaner than coal.

      --
      Some privacy policy Slashdot.
    3. Re:The hybrid solution is the best... by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Until then, gas's "recharge" time (less than 5 minutes) + 10,000s of locations to fill up trumps all-electric every day of the week as of today.

      You'd think that, but in practice most electric car owners spend less time refueling than gas car owners do.

      Why? Because it takes them just 10 seconds to plug in the car in their garage after they drive in, and 5 more seconds to unplug it again in the morning before they drive out -- a total of ~1.5 person-minutes spent recharging per week. Compare that to the 5-10 person-minutes per week that gas car owners spend driving to the gas station, waiting for a pump, refueling, paying, and then driving back again, and it's the gas car that is usually more time-consuming to refuel.

      Of course the electric recharges are less convenient during long trips (Superchargers notwithstanding), since the driver has to wait for the recharge to finish, but long trips aren't the common case for most cars -- daily commuting and errand-running is.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    4. Re:The hybrid solution is the best... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      There is something to be said for BEVs with range extenders, though. If your range extender fails, you're not left with a completely immobile car, and the unit could be quite small (being optimized for constant output in the range of kilowatts) and easily interchangeable in the car repair shop - it's just a few more cables, not a mechanical interconnection. Whether it's actually worth it in the real world is a different idea, regardless of the reliability. Here in Europe, I suspect most people wouldn't need it anyway.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    5. Re:The hybrid solution is the best... by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

      All of the responses to this are reasonable, but they rely upon one huge premise: "As long as you don't ever need to drive more than X miles without stopping for Y hours to recharge..."

      That's a pretty big hangup for someone who wants an "all-purpose" vehicle, which is what gas-powered cars are. They're an increasingly unappreciated modern wonder - moving people around at an unlimited range at a high rate of speed without any time restriction for resting the power plant (horses, batteries, etc.) - that we've taken for granted for over a century now.

      As flawed as it is, hybrid tech has that ability. All-electric (as of 2015) does not.

      Maybe as people have become increasingly hooked into urban society and become less geographically mobile in everyday life, they've forgotten how important it is to have an unlimited range sometimes? I mean, which is easier to haul when stuck outside of civilization and out of "fuel" - hauling a gas can, or a two ton dead battery with four wheels? Are we all counting on our cellphones and some stranger with a tow truck to bail us all out in a pinch (or worse)?

  24. Reverse defroster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My brother drove his VW through a small lake-sized puddle and I experience the VW's reverse defroster -- impressive.

    1. Re:Reverse defroster by samwichse · · Score: 1

      Oh man, I sure don't miss the reverse defrost feature.

      Or the constant smell of gasoline fumes!

      But I still miss that car. Too bad the cancer became terminal (rust in the front bulkhead).

      Sam

  25. Sports car != 0-60mph by skaralic · · Score: 1

    For the thousandth time, a low 0-60 time does not make your car a sports car. There is so much more to a sports car than raw acceleration. The Miata is 3x slower than a Tesla to 60mph but it's ten times the sports car. Go drive one and use a manual transmission.

    1. Re:Sports car != 0-60mph by mjwx · · Score: 1

      For the thousandth time, a low 0-60 time does not make your car a sports car. There is so much more to a sports car than raw acceleration. The Miata is 3x slower than a Tesla to 60mph but it's ten times the sports car. Go drive one and use a manual transmission.

      This cannot be stated enough.

      Sports cars emphasise handling and responsiveness over speed. The idea is that you can not just carry more speed into a corner but still have most of it on the way out of the corner.

      As such, sports cars tend to focus on low weight and good weight distribution over raw power (HP/KW). I drive a Nissan Silvia S15, 1240 KG, 55/45 weight distribution and only 160 KW but it can still out perform most of the GM and Ford boats on the road.

      Also, definitely drive a manual transmission.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    2. Re:Sports car != 0-60mph by bledri · · Score: 1

      For the thousandth time, a low 0-60 time does not make your car a sports car. There is so much more to a sports car than raw acceleration. The Miata is 3x slower than a Tesla to 60mph but it's ten times the sports car. Go drive one and use a manual transmission.

      This is an article about Porsche making an electric sports car. Porsche knows a thing or two about sports cars.

      --
      Some privacy policy Slashdot.
    3. Re:Sports car != 0-60mph by skaralic · · Score: 1

      For the thousandth time, a low 0-60 time does not make your car a sports car. There is so much more to a sports car than raw acceleration. The Miata is 3x slower than a Tesla to 60mph but it's ten times the sports car. Go drive one and use a manual transmission.

      This is an article about Porsche making an electric sports car. Porsche knows a thing or two about sports cars.

      Parent was a reply to all the "Tesla is a sports car" comment.

    4. Re:Sports car != 0-60mph by gnupun · · Score: 1

      There is so much more to a sports car than raw acceleration.

      Acceleration and top-speed are very important otherwise a bicycle would be considered more sporty since it handles better than any car.

  26. Finally some design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally an electric car that doesn't have a huge iPad for a dashboard.

    Next step is to propose an electric charger standard, endorsed by all the main car manufacturers, and have Tesla migrate their proprietary stations to it.

    1. Re:Finally some design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It already exists, the Mennekes connector has been chosen as the standard electric vehicle charging connector.

  27. No they aren't. It is a concept rendering. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A concept rendering with no approved plans for production. And the currently available Tesla Model S already has better specs anyway.

  28. wish granted by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    In 3 years, the new roadster based on the Model 3 frame, will be out. Musk has said that it will blow the doors off ludicris speed, i.e. 0-100 km in 1.x secs. And for around 50-60K.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:wish granted by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      In 3 years, the new roadster based on the Model 3 frame, will be out. Musk has said that it will blow the doors off ludicris speed, i.e. 0-100 km in 1.x secs. And for around 50-60K.

      I'll have to look up what that means for 0-60mph in terms of time/speed, but it sounds fast, and that would certainly be in my price point range!!

      I just hate to wait 3-4 more years!!

      :(

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re: wish granted by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      100 km is 62 miles. Most ppl treat these the same, though 0-100 km tends to be .1 sec higher.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:wish granted by haruchai · · Score: 1

      That's crazy quick - and beyond, ahem, ludicrous for city streets. If that's true, he intends for the Roadster NG to take the 0-60 crown away from the White Zombie.
      And for $60 grand?? I'll believe that when I see it.
      My guess is / was that the target would be something in the 2.2 - 2.5s range for 0-60 and 10.0s for the 1/4 mile. Of course, Roadster NG needs to be able to do that at least a good handful of times in quick succession, which may prove challenging.
      And it needs better track handling, too.

      These are all achievable but not, IMO, in a $60k car unless seats & brakes are optional.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  29. Tesla fighting? ROFL by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Ok, here is a 4 seater sports car which does 0-60 in 3.8 secs which after reading the description of the car, makes it sound like it will run about $250,000-500,000. Who really thinks that a slower car, that is easily 2-4x as costly, is going to compete against Tesla? Seriously?

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  30. You're all forgetting something..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..... while Tesla was the fist player of any weight in this market, once the big boys come in they'll eat up and spit out Tesla.

    Lets face it, the Tesla is still an American car. No American car can compete with the high end Euros, or Japanese for that matter.

    So while it might have decent acceleration figures it'll still be let down by the usual pedestrian characteristics that blight all American cars.

    They handle awfully, they have mediocre finish, the are relatively primitive and they are treated as disposable commodity items.

    There is a reason why BMW, Porsche, Ferrari et al are the pinnacle of automotive design, and why no-one apart from Americans of modest means would even consider owning a US car.

    Like it or not, the hierarchy is :
    Euro
    Japanese
    Korean
    American.

    Americans just can't make decent cars.
     

    1. Re:You're all forgetting something..... by horza · · Score: 1

      The Tesla is an incredible car. I love the finishing, the build quality is great as well as the comfort. The screen is killer as is the software. The A4 size map right in front of you is a game-changer, and you can flick the map up onto the dash behind the wheel so you can navigate at the same time as drive through trickier/busier areas. The acceleration is beyond that of my "European" sports car. The styling is very neutral but I personally find it very pretty.

      The "big boys" have been left in the dust. The offerings from BMW, Mercedes and Porsche have been pathetic vapourware. Ferrari are toys, all my friends with Ferraris use them as "weekend cars" and have a Bentley for day to day. I am amazed how such profitable companies like the aforementioned have managed to turn into such dinosaurs.

      Phillip.

  31. hybrids are the WORST solutions for cars. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Cars rarely go more than 100 miles. As such, there is little reason for 99% of the trips.
    OTOH, the one place that hybrids SHOULD be used at, is in large passenger, and most commercial vehicles. Yet, that is not where the focus has been on hybrids.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:hybrids are the WORST solutions for cars. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electric with a trailer you can rent for long trips to haul all the crap you need for the trip, and has a small motor to charge the battery.

  32. Is it a true Porsche? by Toshito · · Score: 1

    Is it rear engined and air cooled?

    --
    Try it! Library of Babel