Slashdot Mirror


HP To Jettison Up To 30,000 Jobs As Part of Spinoff

An anonymous reader writes: Hewlett-Packard says its upcoming spinoff of its technology divisions focused on software, consulting and data analysis will eliminate up to 30,000 jobs. The cuts announced Tuesday will be within the newly formed Hewlett Packard Enterprise, which is splitting from the Palo Alto, California company's personal computer and printing operation. "The new reductions amount to about 10 percent of the new company's workforce, and will save about $2.7 billion in annual operating costs." The split is scheduled to be completed by the end of next month. "The head of the group, Mike Nefkens, outlined a plan under which it is cutting jobs in what he called 'high-cost countries' and moving them to low-cost countries. He said that by the end of HP Enterprise’s fiscal year 2018, only 40 percent of the group’s work force will be located in high-cost countries."

273 comments

  1. To the other Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is still Carly's fault

    1. Re:To the other Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, Donald Trump!

    2. Re:To the other Republicans... by unixisc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, there are a lot better grounds to attack Carly. Like today, she rails against the Iran agreement, but as HP CEO, she authorized a foreign subsidiary - Redington Gulf - to sell HP products into Iran, in order to get around the sanctions. She criticizes Trump for his immigration stance, but as HP CEO and even as McCain's advisor (when he ran for president), she supported amnesty, just like McCain did.

      For the record, I do agree w/ most of the GOP platform. I just think that Carly would be as bad as Bush or Gramm if she was elected.

    3. Re:To the other Republicans... by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sanders is too old? That's the best you can come up with?

      He's not *that* old; McCain was as old. And Sanders seems to be in good health. I'm sure he can handle 4 years before he croaks. I'd rather take my chances with him rather than any of these other clowns (including corrupt Hillary).

    4. Re:To the other Republicans... by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Moderate republicans? You guys exist? I thought they chased all you guys out of the party on a rail. :)

    5. Re:To the other Republicans... by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Moderate republicans? You guys exist?

      I for one do not (anymore). I didn't leave the Republican Party, the Republican Party left me. I am still moderately conservative however with libertarian bent.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    6. Re:To the other Republicans... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I think he's referring to the RINO group. You know... like that screaming liberal Jeb Bush. (One of the 10 top conservative governors in the country as reported last year).

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    7. Re: To the other Republicans... by denis.goddard · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you should be in New Hampshire

    8. Re:To the other Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moderate republicans? You guys exist? I thought they chased all you guys out of the party on a rail. :)

      They're called Democrats.

    9. Re:To the other Republicans... by ebh · · Score: 1

      They're called "Democrats".

    10. Re:To the other Republicans... by unixisc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The GOP left me, but for exactly the opposite reason. 8 years of Bush, where after 9/11, he kept gushing about Islam and kissing @$$ to the Saudis, Qataris & Paks. Opening the doors wide open to illegal immigration in an attempt to make the Hispanic vote the GOP's Black vote. Signing campaign finance reform, and capitulating on the Gang of 14. Speaking of which, McCain becoming the GOP nominee in 2008 was the last straw: even though I disagreed completely w/ Obama, I was glad that he knocked both Hilary and McCain out of the race.

      In the current party, I support Cruz, but I'm glad Trump is in - he is the one person who can outspend Bush, who'd otherwise have gotten the nomination. The GOP establishment would normally have backed Jeb against anyone else to give him a headstart, but in this case, they dare not, since they fear Trump is capable of pulling off a third party run, if they piss him off too much. I want Trump to burn out Jeb's money machine: he's the one guy capable of it. Once he's done, I'd be fine w/ either him or Cruz getting to the top of the ticket.

    11. Re:To the other Republicans... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      You mean the same Jeb Bush, who went against his brother and opposed drilling for oil off the FL coast? The same one who has the same immigration policy his brother and John McCain have? The same Jeb who condemned men who've been driven out by their baby mommas after the latter giving birth?

      It's interesting that most of the people who supported Bush 41 are now on Jeb's team, rather than Rick Perry's. Which is what repels him for me. Last thing I want is a Karl Rove or a James Baker back in the running. Or for that matter another Powell or Rice.

    12. Re:To the other Republicans... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Well, there are the honest ones, like Lincoln Chafee and Jim Jeffords, who openly left and joined the Democrats. And then there are the frauds and liars like McCain, Lindsay Gramm and Carly Fiorinna.

      IMO, that's a good part of the reason Trump is doing so well. When you have the GOP establishment pretend that the last 3 are Republicans, there's no reason to have those Conservative litmus tests. So let Trump be for Single Payer Healthcare or taxing Hilary's hedge fund guys. That's a lot less damaging than Lincoln Chafee wanting to demolish the Statue of Liberty if the US doesn't throw its borders wide open to either ISIS sympathizing Syrian Sunnites or Baath sympathizing Syrian Alawites/Shi'ites. While at the same time sending US ground troops to fight ISIS. Something tells me that there's nothing that Chafee loves more than dead Americans. Just wondering when exactly did that happen, and why do the otherwise Conservative people of SC continue to elect him?

    13. Re:To the other Republicans... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Agree with everything you said. That said, as a moderate republican, she's the best of the 15 to choose from. On the Dem side? Hillary? Oh god no. She's so farking corrupt she doesn't recognize corruption. Sanders? Too old Biden? Too old, and has run twice before without gaining traction. He's more of a "hey, Joe's in so Hillary isn't unstoppable anymore!". Lessig? One can only hope

      If you're a moderate Republican, why not go w/ Kaisich? He has accepted some compromises, like participating in Obamacare. Without coming up w/ such howlers, such as befriending Iran before he was a candidate (like Carly) or endorsing amnesty (Gramm or Jeb).

      On the Dem side, why doesn't Kanye West run? Why wait 4 years? There's a very weak Democrat field, particularly if Clinton's support goes below that of the other candidates, like O'Malley or Chafee.

    14. Re:To the other Republicans... by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Yep, we still do. No one's chased anyone off, though the stupid RINO label is annoying.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    15. Re:To the other Republicans... by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Age was a huge argument the Left used against McCain in 2008, though. And I haven't heard that much bellyaching from the collective Right regarding Sander's age, they focus much more on his being a socialist running on the democrat platform. Still better than Hillary though.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    16. Re:To the other Republicans... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I meant Lindsay Gramm above rather than Lincoln Chafee in my last statement

    17. Re:To the other Republicans... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Why is it stupid? Stands for 'Republican In Name Only', and is perfect for describing guys like John McCain, Arlen Specter, Jim Jeffords, Lincoln Chafee and Lindsay Gramm. Three of them were honest enough to leave the party and openly become Democrats, while 2 of them still hang about the party and are a part of the reason that McConnell, formerly a real conservative who opposed Campaign Finance Reform, is now at odds w/ the rank & file of the party.

      What positions of the RINOs are Republican? They openly support Illegal Immigrants having the same privileges as Legal Immigrants. Now they want to accept any number of Syrian refugees. They are unwilling to concede that there is anything wrong w/ Islam, and that there is no problem w/ any number of Americans becoming Muslim, whether by immigration, conversion or anything else - even if these are all tools that both al Qaeda and ISIS use as a part of their recruiting. They vote in judges who make up law in favor of Obama - be it the Obamacare mandates or Gay Marriage.

    18. Re:To the other Republicans... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      In 2008, McCain was 72.
      In 2016, Hilary will be 69.

      Hillary is old!
      Hey, payback is a bitch, isn't it?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    19. Re:To the other Republicans... by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Because it means you must toe the party line on every single issue, of which you only listed a few, or be an outcast. That's the problem with both parties. A little compromise might actually be a good thing sometimes; that said, those particular issues bother me too.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    20. Re:To the other Republicans... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I'm a moderate conservative. However, everyone kept telling me I was Democrat. So I changed my party affiliation. That was the only thing I changed.

    21. Re:To the other Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Age was a huge argument the Left used against McCain in 2008, though.

      Funny. I don't remember that at all. I guess I don't listen to enough talk radio.

    22. Re:To the other Republicans... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      The people I listed are people who went against the party on some very major issues. Some of which are far more important than others. So supporting, say, steel tariffs or participating in Obamacare (like Kaisich does) is one thing, while supporting the influx of Syrian refugees is another or granting amnesty to Illegals is another. That's why while there is room for people w/ differing opinions, you don't want the tent to be so broad that nobody is outside it: that's the point where you cease to stand for anything.

    23. Re:To the other Republicans... by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      Not as much of a problem with the Democratic party. Liberals tend to be all over the map on a lot of issues, it's why they have a hard time taking a stand on anything. But as you can see, inflexibility is a sign of decline. That's true in nature, and true in communities. You need diversity, because group think is a bad thing.

    24. Re:To the other Republicans... by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      Hah. Of course, now we have all these people of various stripes in the democratic party pulling the party all over the place. A new conservative party needs to be created, that is you know, actually consrevative, and doesn't define itself as the opposite of whatever the other party is even though if what they are doing is in fact a conservative position.

    25. Re:To the other Republicans... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Of course, now we have all these people of various stripes in the democratic party pulling the party all over the place.

      The Democrats are fairly unified. It's the Republicans in Congress and running for president who are "all over the place", being unable to agree on anything.

    26. Re:To the other Republicans... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      At least he is honest about his beliefs. I think that is also part of the appeal of Trump is he at least seems honest.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    27. Re:To the other Republicans... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      payback is a bitch

      Now that is just mean to female dogs.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    28. Re:To the other Republicans... by Magnus+Pym · · Score: 1

      Actually a lot of it is. HP is still paying the price for Fiorina's actions. As with most CEOs these days, she borrowed against the future. She optimized for her self-aggrandizement and pay package. HP will continue to pay the price for a long time to come.

    29. Re:To the other Republicans... by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Neither do I. I don't listen to any radio, actually, I have an eclectic taste in music I guess. I just use my MP3 player for prog or hard rock.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    30. Re:To the other Republicans... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      How are they unified? For instance, the Black vote base of the party, that happens to be religious as well, is opposed to both abortion, as well as to gay marriage. So are union members. The people who support minimum wage hikes, or Obamacare or other such things do not necessarily support abortion rights, nor are they fine w/ gay marriage.

      While there may be 16 candidates on the GOP side, some of them can be bunched into groups. Huckabee, Santorum and Jindal all form one group of religious conservatives. Carson is a bit different in that on non-religious issues, he tends to stray from the GOP platform. Bush and Rubio a second - I really don't get the differences b/w their platforms. Gramm, Fiorina and Christie form the Liberals within the group. Kasich is a magnet for moderates (not Liberals) within the party - he makes some compromises, but the underlying message is still conservative. Rand Paul is a loner in the group, w/ a mix of his father's policies and some Conservative ones tossed in. And Trump and Cruz can be bunched into one, although they diverge a bit on Iran - Cruz would toss out the agreement, while Trump would re-negotiate it.

    31. Re:To the other Republicans... by G00F · · Score: 1

      "The same Jeb who condemned men who've been driven out by their baby mommas after the latter giving birth?"

      I am not sure I under stand this reference or meaning of that statement. Could you please elaborate on it.

      --
      The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
    32. Re:To the other Republicans... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      The various voting blocs in the Democratic Party are not at war with each other. The White House got 42 Democrats to filibuster and frustrate the Republicans over the Iranian nuclear deal. If House Speaker John Boehner offered the Democrats a clean spending bill, Nancy Pelosi could pass the bill overwhelmingly with nearly every Democrat voting and a handful of Republicans voting. That's unity. Something the Republicans haven't demonstrated so far this year.

    33. Re:To the other Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lindsay *Graham*. I'm not a fan, but spell his name right - it seems needlessly disrespectful to not do so.

    34. Re:To the other Republicans... by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      It wasn't just McCain's age though. It was his age coupled with Palin's proximity to the presidency.

    35. Re:To the other Republicans... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Sure. After he made a comment about single parenting, when it seemed like he was taking a shot at single mothers, he clarified that he was actually hitting out at men who abandoned their wives after their wives gave birth. Completely discounting the fact that enough women drive out the men so that they can have their babies all to themselves.

    36. Re:To the other Republicans... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      yup

    37. Re:To the other Republicans... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      This is still Carly's fault

      Thanks, Donald Trump!

      Well, one interesting part today, which was glossed over in the post debate analysis, was where the Donald really took her out on her management of HP. He pointed out how she had driven that company to the ground, mentioned the acquisition of Compaq when Carly talked about how she grew HP, and then brought up stuff about her management at Lucent. Carly tried to bring up his 4 bankruptcies, but that was earlier in his career, and he's not been failing in business lately, unlike the way Carly did in her last stint as a CEO. I thought Chris Christie really saved her bacon by ending that conversation.

    38. Re:To the other Republicans... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Trump actually brought this up in today's debate, mentioning this 25-30k layoff at HP and laying it at Carly's feet

    39. Re:To the other Republicans... by rail2rail · · Score: 2

      It absolutely is the result of Carly's actions. People were shrieking warnings about that fucked up HP/Compaq merger. Once it was completed and the first cracks started appearing she was forced out by the board of directors. Well her actions have come home to roost. This is the great unwind of her grand plans, with tens of thousands losing their jobs. Oh yeah, real great leadership there Carly. You might want to remove this one from your LinkedIn profile.

    40. Re:To the other Republicans... by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      Trump is in - he is the one person who can outspend Bush

      Obama's campaign spent 750 million in 2004. If you include all the super pac / outside spending, it is a lot more. I doubt Trump has 2-3 Billion in liquid assets available. (Side note, I heard that if Trump had just put his inherited money from his Dad in an index fund and not touched it, he'd have more money than he does now... imo, it shows that Trump isn't that great of a business man if we can't even beat a moderate percentage market rate).

      In the current party, I support Cruz

      Just out of curiosity, is that because he's so religious, or is that not a factor for you? If it isn't a factor, what policy objectives does Cruz have that you like? He doesn't stand out to me at all.

    41. Re:To the other Republicans... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      His positions on Islamic Jihad. His religion is not a factor (I'm a Hindu, so why would I care how Christian he is?) He is committed to fighting the Jihadis, sans the part about winning the hearts & minds of Muslims. In other words, unlike Bush 43, he wouldn't use US money and military to try converting Iraq into Switzerland. In the first debate, he mentioned how he'd make it clear that anyone who joins ISIS would be signing their own death warrants, and also, that any American who left the US to join ISIS would forfeit his/her passport. These are the main ones: there are several others. (In contrast to Lindsay Graham, who's more interested in getting more American troops into Syria, and Syrians into America).

      Trump can decide how much of his own money he wants to spend, much like Mitt Romney or Steve Forbes. Except that he has much more. My main point above - Cruz can't outspend Bush unless he raises more than he does, which is unlikely. Trump can, regardless of how much he gets in donations.

    42. Re:To the other Republicans... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      That's exactly it. It was clear then that McCain was getting senile. The McCain of 2008 was not the McCain of 2000. The fact he picked Palin as his running mate really showed that he had lost it.

  2. buy-back stock payoff by turkeydance · · Score: 5, Insightful

    most execs get a bonus based on stock price. if it ain't happening, the execs MAKE it happen. paid for by 30K pink-slips.

    1. Re:buy-back stock payoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and a 2.8B line item in the GDP

    2. Re:buy-back stock payoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What is interesting, these guys are motivated mostly by their short-to-medium term gains, without tracking bigger picture ( in a way they act very rationally ). Of course, not all optimizations for short-term may not necessary be good in longer term course ( like asus/dell story , or other ideas whereas engineering and manufacturing capabilities are moved to other countries ). Not sure there is any way around it unless understood and acted upon on higher levels of decision process (which seems unlikely, after all idea of buying new 911 is more important that 30k pink-slips for any sufficiently developed exec mind).

    3. Re:buy-back stock payoff by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Most of the cuts will occur in HPâ(TM)s long-troubled Enterprise Services unit and may be offset by new hires in that unit."

      E.S. is basically what they are selling off. Most of the jobs will be bought by an outsourcing company. It was on this site not too long ago, and in the summary so you could avoid the article.

      I know at least 500 people from HPES, and there are overpaid and underpaid people. Guess who gets the axe? That's right, the overpaid people. Not the "expensive and worth it" but overpaid.

      I'm guessing lots of middle management cuts, where people built a team to look important but do little.

      Job cuts aren't always bad, sometimes the job should never have existed.

      How else can you do the opposite of a merger and save money? Hiring cheap replacements is a very tiny part of the answer. Take your knee jerk cynicism elsewhere, and meanwhile learn before posting. All if it was posted right here, in dorkslush, so you didn't have to exert much energy at all.

    4. Re:buy-back stock payoff by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Related: 1h ago I was called by a HP representative to get me hired. My interview is Friday.
      Note: I live in a low-cost country and HP has been hiring like crazy, 20% of my co-workers have already moved to HP. They pay slightly better than my current employer (which is arguably bigger than HP globally but have a shitty salary process) and from what I've heard they have a good working environment.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    5. Re:buy-back stock payoff by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Anything for their bonus and fuck the company and its employees. These people are dangerous psychos without even a shred of honor or integrity.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    6. Re:buy-back stock payoff by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Quite often the "troublemakers" are also gotten rid off in such a step. You know, those people that insist on a strategic view, that want R&D, that want IT security to not suck, etc. These are usually those that ensure a tech company has a future.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    7. Re:buy-back stock payoff by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      "Most of the cuts will occur in HPâ(TM)s long-troubled Enterprise Services unit and may be offset by new hires in that unit."

      E.S. is basically what they are selling off. Most of the jobs will be bought by an outsourcing company. It was on this site not too long ago, and in the summary so you could avoid the article.

      I know at least 500 people from HPES, and there are overpaid and underpaid people. Guess who gets the axe? That's right, the overpaid people. Not the "expensive and worth it" but overpaid.

      I'm guessing lots of middle management cuts, where people built a team to look important but do little.

      Job cuts aren't always bad, sometimes the job should never have existed.

      How else can you do the opposite of a merger and save money? Hiring cheap replacements is a very tiny part of the answer. Take your knee jerk cynicism elsewhere, and meanwhile learn before posting. All if it was posted right here, in dorkslush, so you didn't have to exert much energy at all.

      Here, from the article itself. Think of it as a middle finger to your post, or think about it as unfounded knee jerking, whichever suits you best.

      Most of the cuts will occur in HP’s long-troubled Enterprise Services unit and may be offset by new hires in that unit. The head of the group, Mike Nefkens, outlined a plan under which it is cutting jobs in what he called “high-cost countries” and moving them to low-cost countries.

    8. Re: buy-back stock payoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Capitalist filth like you should be tracked down and shot dead. Filth like you should have never been allowed to LIVE

    9. Re: buy-back stock payoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Capitalist filth like you should be tracked down and shot dead. Filth like you should have never been allowed to LIVE

      Is that you Bernie Sanders?

    10. Re:buy-back stock payoff by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1

      You are spot on. I worked for HP (well, technically, I worked for their 3rd party Facilities Management company who ran their Data Centers for them) for 3 years. I was initially with EDS, and was with them through the transition to HP. I can tell you from direct experience that you're exactly right with regard to the "legacy EDS" section of the company.

      The number of old timers who were just hanging on in the old EDS world was staggering. I think it was a product of EDS getting really big during the 90's, getting some really large accounts, coming out of the dot com bust, and just frantically trying to keep its business afloat. That is, they were so scatterbrained that they quite honestly had no idea what they were doing, who did what, who paid for what, etc. It was a tangled mess.

      I had worked for EDS for 4 years prior, but had left them, and I came back as HP came in thinking that maybe they could straighten things out. After a few years, I realized that the ship was sinking, and nothing was gonna save it. This is just the inevitable fall that they can't put off any more. There aren't enough buckets to bail out the water. This is a last ditch effort, but frankly, it's probably too late. All of these middle managers pulling down nice six figure salaries for years and years to essentially be responsible for nothing has just sucked the life blood out of the organization. The few good people you have left are so demoralized that I doubt there's any hope.

      My bet is that after the split, HP ES will continue its death spiral, and someone will buy them trying to put it back together. They'll be buying them for the contracts they still have that are worthwhile, the patents they hold, and some of their infrastructure, and it'll be for pennies on the dollar.

    11. Re:buy-back stock payoff by stanjo74 · · Score: 1

      Why is short-to-medium term outlook a bad thing? Why should a company exist and grow for hundreds of years?
      Nowadays we have a flexible workforce, flexible markets and little bureaucracy to set up a new company. Ideally a company should be built around an idea, implement the idea in the best possible way and when the idea olives its usefulness, the company can fold. The players can move on to new things, with a new company, unencumbered by legacy baggage.

    12. Re:buy-back stock payoff by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      The crazy thing is that the stock market keeps rewarding these short-sighted moves. I guess that makes a kind of perverse sense, in that short term stock investors can reliably predict that other short term investors will push up the price in response. But that only highlights how far the stock market has come from reflecting the true value of companies as real long term investments. The only long term rationale for buying stocks today is as a hedge against inflation (i.e. the price of everything goes up, so ultimately my stocks will too).

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    13. Re:buy-back stock payoff by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      Well, that's pretty dumb. If you don't think there is any compelling reason for generating stable jobs in this country, you'd better build a pretty high wall around your home. Whatever happened to 'promote the general welfare'? The 'legacy baggage' you're talking about is people's jobs. And not jobs that were being performed badly - just jobs being performed at US pay scales. Believe me, outsourcing doesn't make those jobs get done any better (it's usually much worse for tech jobs), but they're done much cheaper, indeed. Makes the bottom line superficially better - makes the long term prospects of the company lousy.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    14. Re: buy-back stock payoff by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Definitely not; the liberals are staunchly against the death penalty.

    15. Re:buy-back stock payoff by nanoflower · · Score: 1

      Who is talking about 100s of years. Short to medium term tends to mean a year to two years. That means companies will take actions that look good over the next year but will hurt the company within five years. Now, I don't expect many companies to make investments that take decades to pay off since no one can see that far in the future but a five year payoff isn't asking too much.

    16. Re:buy-back stock payoff by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Why is short-to-medium term outlook a bad thing? Why should a company exist and grow for hundreds of years?

      Why have you committed the fallacy of excluding the middle?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    17. Re:buy-back stock payoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does firing a bunch of people, thereby reducing the amount of work the company can complete, increase a company's value?

  3. A tough decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But clearly Meg Whitman asked herself, What would Carly have done?

    1. Re: A tough decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carly Fiorina, CF, truly is a charley foxtrot.

    2. Re:A tough decision by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Just like What would Jesus do, you can have WWCD - What would Carly do?

  4. Carcass of a great company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that the greedy VC hawks are swirling around even more so. HP is as good as dead.

    At least remove Bill and Dave's names from the company at least. The company that exists now has nothing to do with either of them.

    1. Re:Carcass of a great company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...At least remove Bill and Dave's names from the company at least. The company that exists now has nothing to do with either of them.

      But that's the only thing of value now...

    2. Re:Carcass of a great company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

    3. Re:Carcass of a great company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HP and Varian were _The_ Silicon Valley Startups, back when most of the Valley was still covered with Fruit and Nut trees.
      Agilent took Hp's Good Stuff, and they then acquired some of Varian somewhere around the way, but nobody gives a fart as to who is still running things, except circle-jerking MBAs.

      So add the names of Russell and Sigurd to Bill and Dave.

    4. Re:Carcass of a great company by unixisc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now that the greedy VC hawks are swirling around even more so. HP is as good as dead.

      At least remove Bill and Dave's names from the company at least. The company that exists now has nothing to do with either of them.

      Maybe name the company to FW or Fiorina-Whitman

      Really, the HP name should have gone to Agilent when they spun them off, and the remnants of the company could have taken the name EDS, which was the part of the company that Carly was really interested in.

    5. Re:Carcass of a great company by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      At the rate they're going, before too much longer HP will be just 2 guys in a garage.

    6. Re:Carcass of a great company by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      I really regret leaving Agilent. I left for a startup with six people, and the company expanded; but soon they hired a guy who fired everybody and made the company 90% H1-B.

    7. Re:Carcass of a great company by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Except this time it'll be an HR wallah and an accountant.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  5. won't solve much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens when they try to sell high price services and products to all those out of jobs in 'high cost' countries?

    1. Re:won't solve much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      OK. We should need 30,000 fewer H1B visas now, right?

    2. Re:won't solve much by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why H1Bs when you can open an entire branch office in India?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:won't solve much by cfalcon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wish the mods would come in and somehow make your post a nobler green. Or maybe just like, 3D. Or (Score: 7, Poignantly Sad And Explanatory).

    4. Re:won't solve much by mwvdlee · · Score: 0

      Of course not. H1B visas are for workers with skills that aren't available in the domestic workforce.
      Important technical skills like how to live below minimum wage with no job security.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  6. Jettison != Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or did I miss something.

    1. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by tnk1 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here's more of the article around the cuts:

      Most of the cuts will occur in HP’s long-troubled Enterprise Services unit and may be offset by new hires in that unit. The head of the group, Mike Nefkens, outlined a plan under which it is cutting jobs in what he called “high-cost countries” and moving them to low-cost countries.

      Many companies have layoffs but they don't disappear. The reason is that the layoffs aren't "reductions in force", they are mass firings of people who are expensive due to seniority or bad negotiations from better times. The company then turns around and hires almost the same number of people, but at a lower rate.

      This is frequently done by going to cheaper countries (which is what Nefkins is actually quoted here as saying), which means that this is effectively equivalent to an outsourcing. Either they will really outsource those jobs, or they will hire people in "outsource-worthy" labor markets. That makes this an outsource in all but name and perhaps organizational detail.

    2. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Most of the cuts will occur in HPâ(TM)s long-troubled Enterprise Services unit and may be offset by new hires in that unit. The head of the group, Mike Nefkens, outlined a plan under which it is cutting jobs in what he called âoehigh-cost countriesâ and moving them to low-cost countries.

      FTFY

      Bye bye American jobs, welcome Bangalore jobs. That's the "offset".

    3. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > The reason is that the layoffs aren't "reductions in force", they are mass firings of people who are expensive due to seniority or bad negotiations from better times.

      Or age, gender, fast approaching retirement, and failure to delight middle management from other departments. I sadly remember years ago when I got "downsized", the oldest guy in the department, the only one with kids, and with medical issues. I'd saved the company several million in hardware and turning software deployment from a 2 day process worldwide to a six hour process, *and* deploying successfully to machines behind the great firewall of China. But unfortunately, I'd just demonstrated that an entire department of 4 highly paid developers hadn't actually contributed a single useful feature in the past year. Their high counts for code submitted were *whitespace* manipulation, and I'd traced their one significant software contribution to the original GPL published patch. There was *nothing* in their last year of work that wasn't done better in the current upstream, GPL codebase, the one they swore they'd "just backport any new changes we really need".

      But, hey, *their* manager blocked 6 planned deployments that would have brought in the new codebase I assembled, and actually tested, unlike the code those clowns each built on their laptops and sent as "release packages". Tnad their manger showed up at all the planning meetings while *my* manager was actually making sure tired engineers got naps and food.

      So guess who got axed?

    4. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by raind · · Score: 1

      Whitman for prez! She can almost afford it:
      Total Annual Compensation, USD 1,500,060
      Restricted Stock Awards, USD 8,147,640
      Long-Term Incentive Plans, USD --
      All Other, USD 9,964,470
      Fiscal Year Total, USD 19,612,200

      Nefkins does pretty well for him$elf:

      Basic Compensation
      Total Annual Compensation, USD 700,027
      Restricted Stock Awards, USD 3,437,150
      Long-Term Incentive Plans, USD --
      All Other, USD 2,851,780
      Fiscal Year Total, USD 6,988,960

      --
      Get up!
    5. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There will be a vigorous discussion here on Thursday about what went on during the Republican debates (Wednesday, tomorrow).

      Trump is completely against this outsourcing thing. He sees quite clearly the damage it does to our workforce, and how it's turning the country into a 3rd world nation.

      Unlike the other candidates, he doesn't have to promise anything to super PACs just to get campaign donations. We're starting to see the fallout from this, as at least one supar-PAC has declared war on Donald Trump.

      And for comparison, note that about 6 months before becoming president, [then] Senator Obama voted *for* telecom immunity. After he had promised to vote against it. And the measure didn't need his vote to pass - it already had enough support for that.

      As a result several telecoms donated to his campaign and he ultimately won.

      Keep this job-loss article in mind as you listen to the candidates on Wednesday. Most of them are career politicians, and we know how they actually voted on some of these issues.

      If you want to compete with 30,000 new job hunters because your company outsourced to another country, feel free to vote for a politician.

      Of course, your company will offer you 3 months of extra employment if you agree to train your replacement, so it's not all bad!

      Increase H1B Visas (Senate) (source)

      YEAs: 67 (D = 52, R = 14, I = 2)
      NAYs: 32 (D = 0, R = 32, I = 0)

    6. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Trump is completely against this outsourcing thing.

      I'm curious. What do you think a POTUS can do about outsourcing, except be against it?

      How do you stop a transnational corporation from moving jobs to other countries in an age of big-dollar corporate lobbying? You think Trump is gonna call for a boycott?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they're constantly advertising around here. Them and Level 3 and Echostar. These companies' reputations precede them. When you hear them whining about not being able to find qualified people, it's because they're shitty places to work and their salaries are always below market, and everyone in the business around here knows it.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    8. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know. Why don't we start with:

      1. Be less apt to create and sign the US to treaties which are in outsourcers' interests (thank you democrats, McConnell and Boehner for making the US Congress much less effective in that regard)
      2. Instruct the administration (ie the department of labor) to use their resources to aid employees associated with these layoffs in obtaining compensation and benefits from their ex-employer whenever possible, to make these kinds of outsourcing much less short-term profitable and maintaining experienced staff much more long-term profitable
      3. Instruct the administration to maintain the public's awareness about these goings-on, talk about it when possible, push citizens to buy American and not simply AINO (American in Name Only)
      4. Work with congress to enact legislation to penalize (or provide benefits to others) companies that engage in this kind of behavior (there are plenty of ways to do that)
      5. FFS, stop with all this fucktarded Americans-are-stupid-and-companies-can-only-survive-by-outsourcing crap that's going on in this current administration and U.S. media today
    9. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 2

      Trump is completely against this outsourcing thing.

      I'm curious. What do you think a POTUS can do about outsourcing, except be against it?

      How do you stop a transnational corporation from moving jobs to other countries in an age of big-dollar corporate lobbying? You think Trump is gonna call for a boycott?

      The president can stop bad laws from passing.

      Additionally, Trump in particular is an expert at negotiations and making deals.

      For comparison, note that our current ambassador to Japan is Caroline Kennedy, who is largely a poor choice.

      That last link was from the State Department's internal audit of our Japanese ambassador.

      We have a long list of trade deals which supercede the constitution and make Americans miserable. We're currently working on the Trans Pacific Partnership, which extends copyright protections, jacks up the cost of medicine, magnifies income inequality, and threatens the climate. (See Wikipedia for more detail.)

      A president who has the interests of the *people* as a goal, and who wants the country to become strong again, could veto this treaty and negotiate better terms.

      The President...shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur... Constitution of the United States, Art. II, Sec. 2

    10. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by unixisc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So HP 'Enterprise Services' is now no longer a part of HP? Well, what else does one expect, when they ain't much different from Wipro these days? But this company will just get eviscerated by the likes of Infosys, HCL, Wipro and even TCS and Tech Mahindra.

    11. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "thank you democrats, McConnell and Boehner for making the US Congress much less effective in that regard"

      Huh? First, it was the Democrats who were generally opposed to renewing fast track authority. The Republican caucus supported it. Secondly, fast track is just a procedural device. Both houses of Congress must still pass the legislation, they just can't tack on amendments to torpedo legislation behind closed doors. Are you trying to tell me that you generally approve of using legislative riders? They're the most important mechanism for ork barrel spending.

      And with a Republican controlled Congress, how the heck do you think any of your other ideas could possibly be passed? The Republican party wants to kill government, not give it more jobs to do. And they certainly won't fund any new job.

      The delusion of people who support the Republican party is just beyond me. Come to the dark side, the Democratic side, where fiery capitalists and molotov cocktail throwing socialists are actually capable of coming to compromises. Compromise does not exist in the conceptual framework of a Republican politician.

    12. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by jenningsthecat · · Score: 2

      How do you stop a transnational corporation from moving jobs to other countries in an age of big-dollar corporate lobbying?

      Perhaps I'm naive, but I always thought this could be accomplished by political leaders who had the integrity and the balls to actually represent the best interests of the majority of their constituents. If a company's ability to sell its products and services in a country were dependent on the number and quality of jobs it provided in that country, (as tended to be the case before globalization was rammed up our asses with the promise that it would be 'better for everyone'), then we wouldn't be bleeding so many jobs to "low-cost countries". And guess what? There'd still be enough wealth left over to help break the poverty cycle in impoverished countries, if it wasn't all being eaten up by spurious wars, political corruption, and other sundry wealth concentration schemes.

      The death knell for a just society was sounded on the day that corporations like HP gained all the rights, (and more) of individual citizens, with little or none of the corresponding responsibility.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    13. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Disclaimer: I work for HPE. Anyway, the split isn't quite done yet. We just changed email domains last week, and the internal sites are still in the process of splitting. Funny you mention Wipro, much of our unix and wintel support has long ago been outsourced to them. My facility is in Tulsa, we mostly support various airlines and have the SABRE mainframes in our basement.

    14. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      I love my job at HPE, but it's mostly eyes-on-glass and I often don't do any "work" all week. I work overnights though, if I was day shift I would have a pile of change control requests / approvals to sort through. My main job is watching netflix and primewire and posting here.

    15. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 2

      "outlined a plan" I work for HPE, and this is the first time I've hear of Mike's latest "plan". It's always a great day to learn once again of huge lay-offs via the internet and not a PEEP from anyone in my management chain. In fact, most people at work don't even know about this. Time to spread the cheer I suppose and start emailing my co-workers and making sure my resume is good to go.

    16. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      Damn straight.. whose bright idea was it to make corporations just like citizens? Aren't they like super humans? Plus, they don't even have the same morality, a group of people running the company has a different set of morals than a singular person. It blows my mind that the supreme court thought that was okay back in the day. Yet, nobody has challenged this, we get 100s of challenges on the ACA though.

    17. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      A corporate embargo perhaps? Make it so absolutely painful to outsource that the only option is to move corporate HQ to a 3rd world nation. There, they can deal with the local government and their taxation laws. Fuck all them bastards that think they can shop on the cheap while maintaining protection in the US!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    18. Re: Jettison != Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you did all those things, you should have no trouble finding another job. Tech jobs are plentiful. Stop bitching on Slashdot and go get a new job whiz kid.

    19. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you mean "back in the day", you're referring to 1886, right? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....

    20. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love my job at HPE, but it's mostly eyes-on-glass and I often don't do any "work" all week. I work overnights though, if I was day shift I would have a pile of change control requests / approvals to sort through. My main job is watching netflix and primewire and posting here.

      So a selfish person would say that you're exploiting the situation you find yourself in, getting the most for the least work, etc. If anything such a person might be jealous of you.

      A more moral person might see you as a selfish bastard because you're a slap in the face of everyone who actually does real work for a living.

      You'll have to decide if they're both wrong. If they're not both wrong then you should choose a philosophy from among them.

      You soft, privileged likely-white douchebag.

    21. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Investor class salivates.

      Third world countries are joyous plebs.

      Can still call them if you speak Telugu.

      The head of the group, Mike Nefkens, outlined a plan under which it is cutting jobs in what he called “high-cost countries” and moving them to low-cost countries.

      This means using cheaper slaves. Outsourcing means selling out the host country, but in utmost possible generic language. In an international business world.. this is just pleb management.

    22. Re: Jettison != Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bingo. darwin has decided hp must go the way of dodo. deal with that.

    23. Re: Jettison != Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did. I was working elsewhere 4 weeks later. This was at the depth of the dotbomb, and companies were pretty reluctant to hire staff with families and kids when they could hire younger, more desperate, cheaper engineers.

      The other embarrassing layoff was another engineer whose departure made people weep. It turns out we'd both been closing in on a manager who was stealing hardware, them by tracking serial numbers, me by reviving hardware that was "commented out" of the monitoring systems. Neither of had realized that someone was stealing hardware, we just thought some of our colleagues were clowns who couldn't be bothered to track resources. But someone who'd been shipping hardware to their home apparently got nervous. The manager finally got caught shortly after the layoffs, but it was too late for our careers.

      My *god*, that company had a lot of corruption at the middle management layers.

    24. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid that I really miss "www.fuckedcompany.com". It used to be _the_ place to go for insider corporate rumors on layoffs and outsourcing, and I knew several people who were first warned of layoffs there. It was a vicious website, but a great place to get insider information about what companies were really like on the inside. I considered checking that website to be part of my due diligence when working with a new client or partner.

    25. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice plan. Except that many of the third world countries first worlders like you mock actually have better policies towards businesses comapred to the lobbyist and lawyer infested mess that the US econ- e.g. Dubai, Hong Kong, Sri Lanka, Mauritius, Costa Rica. They just expect (foreign) businesses not to criticize their domestic and social policies. Not all of third world is a messy Shthole you know, but keep consuming your first world media and form opinions as we expect you to do, patriotic citizen.

    26. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they shutdown bcoz the giant screwups in Land of the Free were costing them too much to keep up ?

    27. Re: Jettison != Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you new? His vote had no sway, yet got the donations and win.

      That's fucking genius. I'm not sure what your point was.

    28. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      We have a long list of trade deals which supercede the constitution and make Americans miserable. We're currently working on the Trans Pacific Partnership [wikipedia.org], which extends copyright protections, jacks up the cost of medicine, magnifies income inequality, and threatens the climate. (See Wikipedia for more detail.)

      Now I want you to try to focus like a laser beam on the topic at hand: outsourcing.

      What do you see President Trump doing about outsourcing except being "against it"?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    29. Re: Jettison != Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was responding to someone's point, fuckhead

    30. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

      He'll build a wall. Out of Mexicans.

    31. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      An AC already answered your question just above.

    32. Re:Jettison != Outsourcing by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like he's also an exemplar of the imaginary Rational Actor required for your holy Invisible Hand of the Free Market to work as theorized.

      Too bad his short-term interest isn't aligned with the long-term good of society. They can suck it.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  7. Everyone join me in saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HP... ...Fuck you.

    1. Re:Everyone join me in saying... by MouseR · · Score: 1

      And who are you exactly?

    2. Re:Everyone join me in saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who are you exactly?

      Someone who has the balls to say what you are too scared to even think

    3. Re:Everyone join me in saying... by Notorious+G · · Score: 1

      By posting as Anonymous Coward? I don't think those balls are as big as you say.

  8. "High Cost Countries" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ie: anywhere that doesn't treat humans like dirt.

    1. Re:"High Cost Countries" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ie: anywhere that doesn't treat humans like dirt.

      Capitalism at its finest

  9. The old game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the old game. They bring in some skilled foreigners "via H1-B" (from Malaysia, India, Vietnam, etc). They work alongside the American team. The managers tell the engineers to get them up to speed. A year later those folks go back to the home country where it is cheaper. the Americans are expected to work internationally as a team with them.

    Next, coincidentally, the CEO announces an option for employees to get a payout for those that would like to leave. A few months later, the CEO announces job cuts typically 10% and focuses on the mid level management and engineering teams that taught the H1-B folks.

    This happens all the time. I was glad I took the payout and saw the writing on the wall.
    Remember if you are expected to teach foreigners your work and they overlap your team's skill set, within a year or two you will be gone.

    1. Re:The old game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We were told we had the payout option (HP in Germany) in 2005, so I said sure.

      Except my direct manager was a guy in the USA and he said 'no way' to the payout.

      I was ripped off. Loads of my colleagues got like 20-30K Euros :(

    2. Re:The old game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A friend that works for this HP unit said that they're basically going to put people through a 6 week course and if they pass a test, hire them to do whatever they were trained to do. The candidates just need a bachelor's degree (doesn't have to be a CS degree). They won't bother with H1-B people. They can get Mexicans in on a TN visa much easier and that's what they're doing.

  10. high cost countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How cost countries or low profit margin countries?

    1. Re:high cost countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually "high labour cost countries". Maybe that is easier for you to understand...

  11. pretty near all the US contingent, then by swschrad · · Score: 1

    slap those resumes up all over town, leave them gasping from their own poison gas.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:pretty near all the US contingent, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You sound like a HP product owner. Or maybe a former employee. Or maybe shareholder?

    2. Re:pretty near all the US contingent, then by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I've got a pretty nice HP printer which has proven to be very reliable. It's a LaserJet 2300d. Of course, it's over 10 years old now.... I got it on Ebay for $100 years ago and the 3rd-party toner cartridges are pretty cheap.

      I'm actually typing this on a brand-new HP ProBook laptop, but it's my employer's, not mine. This thing sucks ass; it has the absolutely worst keyboard layout I've ever used on a laptop. However, to be fair, it seems that most laptops have adopted these shitty flat keys and terrible layouts. But this one is supposed to be a business model, competing with the Thinkpads and Latitudes, but it's crap compared to those two. (Then again, I also have a new ultra-small Latitude for work, and that thing sucks too, with an awful keyboard. But my Dell Precision 6800 laptop (another work computer, yes I have 3) has a nice keyboard.)

  12. It seems they lost the HP way long ago by dejitaru · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I've owned two HP computers, basically my first one that wasn't a hand-me-down in 1997 (HP Pavilion 8140) and my most recent one I got this year (Envy Pheonix). So I decided to read up on the history of HP's CEOs and it seems that they have really lost their way after Lewis Platt resigned back in 1999. It says a lot on what happened to the company based on the Wikipedia entry on Platt's page:

    "Late in his tenure, Platt was often criticized by investors and some HP executives for focusing on progressive values and long-term results. Platt's detractors said that company needed a more cold-blooded competitiveness and higher octane leadership to succeed, that his "pragmatic, nothing-fancy approach" seemed out of touch with the "go-go demands of the late 1990s," and that he had failed to capitalize on the Internet boom."

    So the investors and executives cared more for the quick buck instead of long-term growth of the company. What a shame...

    1. Re:It seems they lost the HP way long ago by lucm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So the investors and executives cared more for the quick buck instead of long-term growth of the company. What a shame...

      This is how Wall Street works. Investors no longer hold stock for a long time, merely cashing in dividends. They want the stock price to go up, quick. So they vote for board members who will promote that agenda. Then board members hire a management team that can deliver the agenda. The stock price goes up, the investors sell to other investors. Rince and repeat.

      What is amazing is that the investors who have the most influence in this process are institutional investors (such as pension funds) who need to make a profit with their investments to meet their own needs (such as paying out pensions). So in order to make a profit, those large investors drive a short-term agenda that, globally, hurts their customer base. With one hand they give you a 8% return in your 401(k), with the other one they drive your employer (and many others) to the brink of destruction by always forcing executives to think short term.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re:It seems they lost the HP way long ago by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I wonder what's left of HP that anyone should bother? The MRI equipment, oscilloscopes and other high end electronic instrumentation equipment - things that HP was renowned for - are today a part of Agilent. What HP had left was EDS (and Mphasis), and the computer division.

      Now that HPES is spun off, what's really left? PCs? One can get better PCs - either from Microsoft itself - the Surface Pros, or from the Taiwan guys - Acer, Asus, Lenovo, et al. If one's talking servers, why prefer HP to Dell or Oracle or Cisco? And I'm assuming we're not talking Itanic anymore, right?

      Four or eight years from now, we can watch Meg run for president, when we no longer have an 'HP'

    3. Re:It seems they lost the HP way long ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electronics test equipment was moved to "Keysight", Agilent still does the medical end of things apparently.
      I think Keysight is a really dorky name.

    4. Re:It seems they lost the HP way long ago by TheSync · · Score: 2

      I wonder what's left of HP that anyone should bother?

      HP is currently the largest vendor for my employer, we buy a ton of servers. HP also has "Moonshot", the workload-optimized blade project. And they have a private cloud offering.

      Cisco used to be our largest vendor (switches, specialty gear, UCS). For the time being, HP is very competitive on servers and switches.

    5. Re:It seems they lost the HP way long ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The MRI equipment, oscilloscopes and other high end electronic instrumentation equipment - things that HP was renowned for - are today a part of Agilent.

      Most of that has by now been spun off into yet another company: Keysight. Agilent is now more of a life sciences company.

    6. Re:It seems they lost the HP way long ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Agilent is now more of a life sciences company. ...with a killer set of legacy software still used by hardware designers. ADS is still generating revenue....

    7. Re:It seems they lost the HP way long ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agilent is now more of a life sciences company. ...with a killer set of legacy software still used by hardware designers. ADS is still generating revenue....

      ADS and all the other EE-related software now belongs to Keysight. Agilent is focused on life sciences and chemical measurement.

  13. In other news... by BenJeremy · · Score: 2

    ...there is no longer a shortage of STEM resources in the US.

    Mission Accomplished!

    1. Re:In other news... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      It gets better, when Meg Whitman runs for president, she can also tell us all how she created 30k jobs! (In China and Malaysia)

    2. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, she'll follow the Obama plan?

    3. Re:In other news... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      It sounds like the layoffs are mostly HP Enterprise people though. You know, IT drones. Not Science and Engineering people.

      HP will never recover from the Cold War era when the government would spend infinite amounts of money for the absolute best quality. That doesn't happen anymore. Even Agilent needs to be cost-concious now. The boomers who climbed aboard the company in the 80's thinking they had jobs forever in the back labs have for the most part figured it out, but they're still inclined to blame 'Carly' or whomever was in charge when the endless Fed dollars stopped flowing at the end of the Cold War.

  14. Exactamundo... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I saw the same TOO many times, & did something about it: I got into my OWN business where the product literally can't be "built overseas" & everyone needs it - It literally allowed me to ALMOST completely stop working as a software engineer/programmer analyst/network admin completely (actually, I could totally stop, & I've proven that to myself for the 2008-2013 period as a test of sorts... wasn't easy, scared the hell out of me taking that risk, but I wanted... no NEEDED to know I could pull it off!).
    I did, successfully, 2008 to present & so far, Thank the merciful Lord, it's been good!

    So far this year, I've done 3 contracts for a Fortune 100/500 for a custom application & servers + workstation migration/upgrade, & have a small one coming up this weekend that's REALLY simple - retail POS update (extra cash for what I consider EASY work in networking? Hey, why not! Gets me outta the house if anything & a couple extra bucks never hurts!). That's a TYPICAL year for me. No joke, as far as working for others that is.

    Best advice I could give ANYONE? Don't get into a "want" line of business - get into a NEED line instead (people wanting is VERY SECONDARY to needing).

    APK

    P.S.=> I learned 2 things a LONG time ago: First is, you're not wealthy if you're working for others (they get wealthy off YOUR time, life, & efforts - paying you peanuts by comparison to what YOUR efforts help make them) & second is, if you're not letting your monies work for you, instead working for your monies? You're NOT well-off, & a wageslave selling the MOST valuable asset you have - your TIME, & LIFE, which there is no online or brick & mortar outlet out there to buy more of it from... apk

    1. Re:Exactamundo... apk by lucm · · Score: 5, Funny

      Best advice I could give ANYONE? Don't get into a "want" line of business - get into a NEED line instead (people wanting is VERY SECONDARY to needing).

      Excellent advice. That's how Apple made truckloads of cash: because people NEED iPhones and iPads, and why Safeway got in financial trouble (since people merely "want" food).

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re:Exactamundo... apk by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't get into a "want" line of business - get into a NEED line instead

      In other words: HVAC.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:Exactamundo... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Best advice I could give ANYONE? Don't get into a "want" line of business - get into a NEED line instead (people wanting is VERY SECONDARY to needing).

      Excellent advice. That's how Apple made truckloads of cash: because people NEED iPhones and iPads, and why Safeway got in financial trouble (since people merely "want" food).

      APK doesn't respond to posts that invalidate what he wants to believe. He pretends not to notice those posts.

      He'll probably notice this one though, rant about this and that, etc.

    4. Re:Exactamundo... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have changed my life for the better, thank you for your comment.... need vs want

    5. Re:Exactamundo... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, if someone is trying their best to be insightful and give useful advice, it doesn't help to be a smartass. Your post, while making a valid point, also doesn't help because it adds confusion to people who are desperate to find some sort of job that's at least semi secure.

      Your post reinforces the fact that success in life isn't straightforward anymore, and people down on their luck don't fucking need to hear that!

    6. Re:Exactamundo... apk by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      He has an overall point of the needs vs wants in life. Markets that lean toward the "needs" tend to be rather stable forms of employment. For example, please see agriculture. OTOH, "wants" based markets are risky, yet can be very rewarding and profitable during boom times, yet suck wind during a bust. For example, please see Las Vegas.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    7. Re:Exactamundo... apk by lucm · · Score: 1

      Let me quote Baz Luhrmann on this.

      Be careful whose advice you buy but be patient with those who supply it. Advice is a form of nostalgia, dispensing it is a way of fishing the past from the disposal, wiping it off, painting over the ugly parts and recycling it for more than it's worth

      from Everybody's Free (to Wear Sunscreen)

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    8. Re:Exactamundo... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent advice. ...

      everyone loves sarcasm and there's never enough around somehow

    9. Re:Exactamundo... apk by lucm · · Score: 1

      Markets that lean toward the "needs" tend to be rather stable forms of employment. For example, please see agriculture. OTOH, "wants" based markets are risky, yet can be very rewarding and profitable during boom times, yet suck wind during a bust. For example, please see Las Vegas.

      Are you aware that the US government is spending on average 97 billions PER YEAR on subsidies and misc support programs for farmers? That's the only reasons farms haven't collapsed.

      Meanwhile, gaming and tourism in Las Vegas generates a cool 50 billions every year. That's about 14 billions in wages that benefit 40% of the Southern Nevada workforce. And if you look at the economic growth curve, you'll see pretty much a stable increase over the last century.

      "Common sense economics" is never a good alternative to cold hard facts.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    10. Re:Exactamundo... apk by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      Your counterexample is concise, but is it generally applicable? I mean, how many companies have tried to be Apple, and failed? And there sure are a lot of successful grocery stores.

      I'm not saying you are incorrect, merely that your example doesn't make a good case. You'd want to look at the median case of companies that tried to fill "wants" versus "needs", by some metric that, uh, you get to run by APK. Hopefully you aren't in his hosts file...

    11. Re:Exactamundo... apk by lucm · · Score: 1

      Excellent advice. ...

      everyone loves sarcasm and there's never enough around somehow

      I totally agree and I appreciate that you didn't use sarcasm to make your point.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    12. Re:Exactamundo... apk by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I wish I could give you five mod points.

      And remember.... Wear Sunscreen.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    13. Re:Exactamundo... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please American Sir,

      Your thoughts are intriguing, can I subscribe to your Noozeletter ?

      An admiring Turd Worlder.

    14. Re:Exactamundo... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are aware that those subsidies are to keep the cost of food low, right? Without them, the farms would still be there, your grocery bill would just be higher. Things like fresh food like fruits and vegetables are very difficult to do in another country cheaply. Don't believe me, look at the price of produce now vs 3 months from now.

      Seriously, to make the claim that farming is an industry that can fail is ridiculous. What next, the morgue industry is going to collapse?

    15. Re: Exactamundo... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Food costs are too low. We subsidize calories over nutrition. Hence junk food and diabetes epidemic.

      Asshole

    16. Re:Exactamundo... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or plumbing. Or electrician. Or other skilled trade.

      I've done all of these on my own house, and hire professionals where I can afford to, because honestly they do a better job than I can, even if I am reading building code and interpreting it as well as possible.

      I do not have kids, but if I did, I'd want them to get a college education bc it is worth the time and will help broaden their knowledge base, and then apprentice in a trade to ensure that they can work and earn decent money if they didn't want to go into white-collar work. I am impressed that in my company's new building site (in Santa Clara County), a lot of the tradespeople fit this pattern....they are smart, capable, funny, hardworking people with a reasonable education, and can solve things on their own that used to be the province of construction meetings.

  15. spinning off Enterprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "The purge announced Tuesday will occur within the newly formed Hewlett Packard Enterprise, a bundle of technology divisions focused on software, consulting and data analysis that is splitting off from the company's personal computer and printing operations."

    Wha? They are keeping consumer business, spinning off the Enterprise business, and it will be moving to low wage nations?!?! I thought enterprise was the high paying american jobs, and consumer was the cheap, crappy stuff that would get outsourced to China?

    1. Re:spinning off Enterprise? by lucm · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of that bit from George Carlin about gun control...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re:spinning off Enterprise? by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Yes, the consumer stuff is the cheap products outsourced from China. However what they probably are doing is keeping a small workforce in high wage countries to interface with the enterprise customers. They will gather requirements, do the installs, etc. All of the actual development work will get shipped off to lower wage countries. So most of the people that never dealt with the customers are the ones that got cut.

    3. Re:spinning off Enterprise? by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      At least at my site it can't be moved. It's not feasible to move several mainframes, and the last time HP cut too deep it ended up with a giant fine from the FAA for a 45 minute outage. Apparently that lesson wasn't taken to heart.

    4. Re:spinning off Enterprise? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      And that is why you are simply no CEO material. Too much logical thinking, not enough setting up company for failure and awaiting golden parachutes.

    5. Re:spinning off Enterprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just you wait. If they can figure out a way of doing so in order to stuff a few extra dollars in their pocket to get that personal yacht they've been looking at they will do it and send you and your co-workers to the bread line...all with a big smile.

  16. Get out there and shop! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm, what happens when you have no customers left in the "high-cost countries" to buy your kit? You're not going to sell much to the drones making $5/hr.

    1. Re:Get out there and shop! by turbidostato · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Hmm, what happens when you have no customers left in the "high-cost countries" to buy your kit?"

      Well, you'll sell them to the high-grow countries, which happen to be those where you outsourced to.

      Think of it: where would you want to be selling printers in ten years? A country already full of printers, where you can only sell for those that break and less paper is used at home, or to a country which is growing and basically doesn't have one?

      Do you think HP gives a damn if it's selling devices and services to USA or the new generation of growing companies and middle class in India?

      And even if it ended up utterly wrong in ten years, do you think the high executives that will get their ginormous bonuses in less than five will give a damn?

    2. Re:Get out there and shop! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China found a solution to that problem: Create clone items that cost a fraction of the cost of the higher end items, but have the same functionality! Now the drones can buy the fancy stuff.

      Seriously though, I think part of the problem is that Americans want those jobs, but they are unwilling to work at certain wages, so... the jobs go to people willing to work at those wages.

      I think if Americans were willing to work at certain wages that are just a little lower than what certain foreigners are get paid, they would stand a better chance of keeping their jobs.

      Capitalism: It's worse than Communism, and without bailouts and our welfare programs, our Great Recession would have been a bigger mess than the Great Depression (I'm pretty sure the only reason Obama kept the wars going for several years even though one of his campaign promises, at least for the first term, was to bring them home, was because "war is good for the economy"). In many ways, what is happening, even now in the USA, is much, much, much worse than what happened during the Great Depression. At the moment we have nearly a 30% unemployment rate across the country; during the Great Depression, there was rarely greater than a 25% unemployment rate.

      Thanks, Obama. #blacklivesmatter

    3. Re:Get out there and shop! by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      HP Enterprise doesn't sell printers. We're the network side of the house. We run the "cloud", the airline mainframes, etc. No actual single human buys our product, we sell to corps and governments.

    4. Re:Get out there and shop! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It's a printer business. The goal is no to sell printers at all. Those take a loss. The lucrative parts of the industry is consulting, services, and parts. In that regard your existing customer base is most definitely your cash cow.

      Often to break into new markets you start competing heavily on a cost basis with competitors, whereas with support and service contracts you have a monopoly on your own existing gear.

    5. Re:Get out there and shop! by gweihir · · Score: 1

      What, actual capitalist thinking? That is so yesterday. Today, unreflected greed is the new capitalism!

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  17. Re: Union's aren't looking so bad now, are they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So then everyone could lose their instead of just a few? That would have happened to GM I'd Obama hadn't ignored the law and bailed them out.

  18. Re: This is the future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong. HP wants us to starve while the Republicans want us to die.

  19. So..... by SpankiMonki · · Score: 1

    Which one's the printer and which one's the ink?

    1. Re:So..... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Which one's the printer and which one's the ink?

      Workers are the consumables.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  20. HP shouldn't lay off people by Kohath · · Score: 3, Funny

    They should keep paying 30,000 people they don't need. Shouldn't they?

    1. Re:HP shouldn't lay off people by PRMan · · Score: 1

      They are rehiring them in "cheaper" countries.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    2. Re: HP shouldn't lay off people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do maybe not need 30.000. But since they plan to re hire some of them again, they shouldn't fie 30k. They even admitted to playing the shipping off US jobs to low cost countries game. Pathetic to even jokingly try to justify it.

    3. Re:HP shouldn't lay off people by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Insightful


      They are rehiring them in "cheaper" countries.

      you 20 and 30somethings in software out there: take heed! you have, at best, 5-10 years before all software is outsourced.

      your software degree? will be useless and you won't even be able to pay your student loans out.

      this country (US) is very quickly going to hell. we all see it, don't we? some are more insulated than others, but its spreading like a disease. the ceo's are robbing us of what made us great; they are stealing all the profits and keeping us around just long enough but not longer than necessary. we are all short timers now.

      still think that unions are not needed? lets check back again in 5 yrs and see how the sw industry is doing in the US. my guess is that it will be way worse as time goes on. can anyone show me any signs of it getting better?

      since ceo's are patted on the back each time they do a mass-firing of US workers, it will be you, sooner or later. you don't think so, but you just wait. sadly, no one wants to form a union in IT and so we'll all hang separately since we REFUSE to hang together.

      really breaks my heart to see us all taken for chumps like this. american ceo's are pond scum but they are powerful land-owning money-keeping pond scum.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:HP shouldn't lay off people by Kohath · · Score: 2

      So they should just keep paying extremely high taxes and bay area salaries rather than try to find a better deal?

    5. Re:HP shouldn't lay off people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not "taken for chumps". You ARE chumps. Computers are for chumps. Those of us with any brains found REAL jobs.

    6. Re:HP shouldn't lay off people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I should allow you to just continue walking around with dat ass rather than try to anally rape you repeatedly?

      What if performing anal rape increases my shareholder value?

    7. Re:HP shouldn't lay off people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the CEOs you should blame. You should blame competition. Did you expect people from overseas to remain ignorant forever? No, they're learning, competing and eating your pie. Sucks to be you who are living in the time of the decline. But not to worry, your salary will just fall to the world average, and as it does costs will necessarily follow. Welcome to the middle class!

    8. Re:HP shouldn't lay off people by TheSync · · Score: 2

      According to Glassdoor, there are 104,828 openings for software engineers in the US, and the average base salary is $98,074.

      Just because one company is re-orging doesn't mean the entire industry is going under. There will continue to be plenty of new software engineering jobs both inside and outside of the US.

      It is true that the number of people working as electrical engineers in the US declined by 29,000 last year, but the number of software developers increased by nearly 12%, or a gain of 132,000 jobs.

      The US unemployment rate for electrical engineers was 2% last year, near its historical low, and for software developers at 2.5%.

    9. Re:HP shouldn't lay off people by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      since ceo's are patted on the back each time they do a mass-firing of US workers, it will be you, sooner or later. you don't think so, but you just wait. sadly, no one wants to form a union in IT and so we'll all hang separately since we REFUSE to hang together.

      As someone who worked in a 75% union company with more than 1000 employees, part of a multinational group, I can tell you first hand from experience that the existence of a union has done nothing for us. More than half of us are standing in line waiting for government handouts, me, I left the country to look for work elsewhere.

      The only thing the union achieved in all it's years was protect slackers who considered sick leave to be an "entitlement" that they could take whenever they wanted, and then complained when one worker without any sick leave left broke his arm and cried foul because the company didn't want to pay for his time off (rightly so, that's why he should have sick leave). Oh they also did a great job of creating 2 classes of people: old / protected, and new / expendable. The old protected people thought it was great that they got guaranteed promotions based on years of service, the awesome and motivated new people... they didn't exist, they left and worked for companies who appreciate effort or excellence over years of service.

      Fuck the MWU with the biggest and most uncomfortable implement they can find.

    10. Re:HP shouldn't lay off people by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Like manufacturing, there will be a lot of low end software jobs moved overseas. Like manufacturing, it is possible to keep a large work force of high end developers employed. Maybe not in the US where short term profit is everything, but you can move to places like Germany where you will get a similar or better standard of living and this type of outlook. Germany still has very strong manufacturing.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:HP shouldn't lay off people by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

      Citation needed...

    12. Re:HP shouldn't lay off people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know that electrical engineers, welders, pipe fitters...the "blue collar" jobs have an equivalent "H1B" program, don't you? Actually there are several. One of them is the "L1" program designed to import cheap labor to replace traditional "blue collar" jobs that supposedly cannot be "out-sourced". This includes HVAC and the solar industry.

    13. Re:HP shouldn't lay off people by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      We do this internally, too.

      Used to be you needed a $90,000 DBA, an $85,000 networking engineer, a $60,000 sysadmin, and a $115,000 storage engineer to run the data center, if not multiple, all working full tilt. They worked a lot, and it was expensive.

      Nowadays, these guys all work like 100 hours per year; yet you can't cram all that knowledge into one person. To get around this, we fire all of them, hiring a few into services companies. Now the $90,000 DBA, $85,000 network engineer, $60,000 sysadmin, and $115,000 storage engineer work for an IT services firm which supplies their 2000 hours per man per year labor to 20 companies, each paying 2-3 times their total package--until some direct competition slims the margin to 20% or so--and so you're spending $17,500 in total for all that, plus maybe $60,000 for a broad-skill infrastructure guy who doesn't know much about these things, but can identify what you need and plug the pieces together if someone else assembles the parts for them. Hell, we can send you that guy, too.

      That means 95% of those IT workers get booted out of their jobs.

      This is actually a good thing. Karl Marx wrote that each product's value is the labor invested, and so we should not reduce the labor required to make new things, lest we reduce working hours and create unemployed man. Karl Marx failed to realize reduced labor hours to produce a product reduces costs, which eventually becomes a price reduction; such a price reduction concentrates wealth in the broad consumer market, creating wide demographics which have buying power ready to buy niche products. Producing niche products in higher quantity requires labor, which creates jobs--the statistic of lost jobs is what we can afford to buy into for creating new products.

      It's actually more complex than that.

      The reduction of labor in food and other basic living production reduces the minimum wage required--India produced rice for $550/ton in 1970, but for under $200/ton in 2001, whereas the inflation on $550 from 1970 to 2001 would have come to $3000/ton--which allows you to employ a higher percentage of the population, since you can sustain those employees with a smaller cut of the total income, and thus can afford to buy more labor hours to produce more goods. This is why middle class standard of living has increased over the years, yet middle class salaries have stagnated (that's a whole other can of worms involving the information age and a middle class bubble, though).

      Further, just reducing the cost of current production doesn't allow for population expansion. Let's say India makes new machines to harvest rice, dropping the cost by 95%; but they still need the same amount of land to grow it. Well, if you double the population, the old supply of rice still costs $200/tonne; the new supply of rice grows on rocky soil, since you have no available good farmland left, and produces yields of 20% the size of the rest of production, with more fertilizer, more irrigation, and overall twice as much labor invested (due to using more seed, more water, more fertilizer, more pumping power, etc., all produced by labor). That means the new supply of rice costs 10 times as much, so you can't expand a population of middle-class or lower-class and manage to feed them all--their labor contribution (as farmers, mostly) can't sustain an income to afford their living and, eventually, can't even produce enough food to feed them all.

      India also stepped up from production of 2 tonnes per hectare to 6 tonnes per hectare. With the same arable land, they'd be able to produce food for three times the population at a third the cost; but the inflation-adjusted numbers suggest they're producing at around 5% of the original cost. That's because they also implemented new farming methods, fertilization methods, and farming equipment (harvesters, planters, etc.) to dramatically reduce labor. They still can't more than triple the population without access to more arable land (else the yields go down and

    14. Re:HP shouldn't lay off people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry: that's a WIP. Germany is about to get an additional 500,000/year new mouths to feed. Check THAT impulse response out!

  21. Re: Union's aren't looking so bad now, are they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    GM didn't fail because of anything that the unions did, the workers could have been free and they would still have been in trouble. Why? Because the problem was on the finance end of things, where the executives had put the company in perpetual hock, but then along came the Wall Street meltdown.

    Oops. Crash.

    Operationally, GM and Chrysler were running a general profit. All the bankruptcy proceedings did was allow them to coerce their various associates into more favorable terms, like jettisoning some brands, dumping some dealers and otherwise clearing house. That's why they were able to quickly transition to other loans once the finance markets decided to play ball again.

  22. Sounds like they're pulling an IBM by ErichTheRed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    IBM has been doing these kinds of layoffs for decades. If you read the article, it looks like they're planning on rehiring some of the same positions. This can be either one of the following:
    - Jettisoning "expensive" older, experienced workers that just happen to not be working on today's buzzword set (cloud and mobile in today's case) and replacing them with fresh young "talented" Millenials
    - Dumping everyone overboard and just moving the work wholesale to India or similar low cost countries.

    This is the MO for IBM nowadays. They're dumping hardware, but they're also trying to turn themselves into some kind of white shoe management consulting firm. To do this, you need to raise profit margins on service contracts, and this is the obvious choice,

    I've worked in some very big companies and I've seen my share of dead wood. I've seen managers who no longer have a team but are still somehow on the payroll, I've seen people who literally do nothing all day because their job has been taken over by someone else, and all the other fun/scary examples. But when you're talking about 30,000 employees, that's not all dead wood. If I had to guess, they're killing off the remainder of the EDS guys who know mainframe stuff inside and out. I work in the airline industry and I'm sure those experienced guys look like a juicy target to an MBA or accountant, regardless of how much they know and how awful their Indian, Vietnamese or other replacement is going to be.

    1. Re:Sounds like they're pulling an IBM by Notorious+G · · Score: 1

      Yep. I worked for IBM for 15 years and finally got the pink slip. Within 6 months (after a HR mandated wait), my job was posted for rehire - reporting to the same manager, same district, same technology platform. I understand they hired a kid right out of college.

  23. God damn it, what a tragedy the loss of HP is... by dpbsmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The loss of HP, as it was from perhaps 1950 to 2000, wasn't just the loss of a brand or a manufacturer, it was the loss of an art form, a craft, a cherished part of engineering culture.

    Their stuff was just so damn good, all of it.

    A little detail that isn't often mentioned. In the 1980s or thereabouts, everything HP advertised was real. They never played the vaporware game, they never cheated just a bit on timing the ads. If you saw the ad in a magazine, it was finished, it was real, you could order it, it would arrive in a week or two--and it would work the way it was supposed to and meet all the specs. This, in a day when their competitors would run ads based on models or empty cases up to six months before the product was finished.

    Using an incandescent light bulb as a feedback element in their audio oscillators was sheer elegance.

    All their instruments were works of art. All of them had front panels that today's user interface designers ought to be studying. All the groupings made sense, almost every control was individually designed to perform its intended function. HP instruments looked good, felt good, were easy to use, and did exactly what they were supposed to do.

    The first LaserJet was a revelation, and it worked perfectly, The first DeskJet was in many ways even more amazing--a 300 dpi printer for $600 when laser printers cost $3,000 and every other $600 machine was about 80 dpi if you were lucky.

    HP's desk calculators were sweet, and the HP-35 was just a revelation when it came out. Everyone was proud of being able to do a square root, and here's this beautiful thing. Did everything a slide rule could do, everything, to ten-place accuracy when a slide rule would get you at most three. And, again unlike the competition--most particularly unlike TI--the math was impeccable, no glitches, no odd cases--they knew their numerical analysis and they got it right. RPN seemed weird, but at least it was consistent.The competition could never get this right--they would claim that you entered it "algebraically" but you would key in 30, then "sin" instead of sin(30).

    The loss of the engineering days of HP was the loss of a whole discipline, a whole body of corporate memory on how to do things right. An irreparable loss of know-how. And it was engineering in the full sense of the word--these weren't self-indulgent overengineered toys, they were priced competitively and sold against competition in a real marketplace--and they were still so good.

  24. Re:Contact HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    why? because they are making sane choices to stay cost competitive in a cut throat low margin business? personally I think they are making a smart choice if they want to stay in business in future, quite possibly this is the only way they can hope to survive.

  25. What do we need? STEM!!! Oh and cheap. by Proudrooster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What do we need?
    STEM Jobs!

    Where do we need them?
    Cheap labor cost countries!

    What STEM jobs can Americans do?
    Train their foreign replacements!

    What can congress do!
    More H1-B's, we need cheap STEM labor and we need it now.

    What can you do?
    Don't be a lowly middle class American, be a CEO of a STEM company and outsource your way to quarterly profits. If that doesn't work, reorganize and break up business units and sell them off. Maybe hookup with a corporate raider like Ichan and rack up a lot of debt, pay large dividends to shareholders then go bankrupt.

    1. Re:What do we need? STEM!!! Oh and cheap. by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      > a corporate raider like Ichan

      I shudder to think what that messageboard would look like...

  26. Re:Union's aren't looking so bad now, are they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unions are part of the problem. The inability to compete with other countries on equal footing is devastating to a business that needs to operate on a global level. That doesn't mean the workers have to be living in sweatshops working 7 days a week for a $1, but it does mean that decisions on wages, hours and conditions need to be addressed in a reasonable manner and this is something Unions are just not capable of doing.

  27. Re:God damn it, what a tragedy the loss of HP is.. by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 0

    A little detail that isn't often mentioned. In the 1980s or thereabouts, everything HP advertised was real. They never played the vaporware game, they never cheated just a bit on timing the ads. If you saw the ad in a magazine, it was finished, it was real, you could order it, it would arrive in a week or two--and it would work the way it was supposed to and meet all the specs. This, in a day when their competitors would run ads based on models or empty cases up to six months before the product was finished.

    Then one day the power supply needs replaced and it's proprietary with no substitute available, nope never cared for HP computers.

  28. Look at what happened to Delphi Automotive by ChesterRafoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When GM spun off their component plants into their own public corporation (Delphi), almost all of their production was in the US. Now, after a bankruptcy that completely fucked the salaried staff (as in degreed engineers) out of their pensions, nearly all of Delphi's manufacturing operations are offshore. This is exactly what the two "new" HP entitites will do - stumble briefly, bankruptcy, throw the pensions off to the government (like Delphi did) and move everything - and I mean EVERYTHING offshore. Good luck with buying gear and getting support from that dysfunctional monster.

    1. Re:Look at what happened to Delphi Automotive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nearly? Outside of GDi nozzles, I do not think they make anything in the US.

    2. Re:Look at what happened to Delphi Automotive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, that would explain the rumors about TippingPoint being spun off. Last time, when 3Com tried to sell it to venture capitol and a Chinese firm, Congress blocked the sale. If they're going to offshore everything, they'll have to spin them off first.

  29. Re:God damn it, what a tragedy the loss of HP is.. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Using an incandescent light bulb as a feedback element in their audio oscillators was sheer elegance.

    I'd forgotten all about that. Thanks for the trip down memory lane.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  30. Probably sent by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    to China, just like every other technology & manufacturing jobs. If the USA would rid itself of the stupid 16th amendment, FIRE the IRS and go with a flat/fairtax idea, the amount of money coming back INTO the USA, along with the jobs would be so huge, most of the wanting to work illegal aliens would get jobs, instead of illegally obtaining "welfare". But, we can't have that, it would take away ALL politicians power. Not to mention a lot of under the table cash they get from business, to tweak the codes to give them breaks on everything.

    1. Re:Probably sent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the USA would rid itself of the stupid 16th amendment, FIRE the IRS and go with a flat/fairtax idea, the amount of money coming back INTO the USA, along with the jobs would be so huge

      Incorrect.

      We effectively have an almost flat tax. The 2700 pages of the US tax code hide lots of loopholes, allowing the rich to pay about the same 19% or so that the average person pays. Going with an "official" flat tax isn't going to increase government income unless everybody pays a whole lot more taxes, which isn't going to happen.

      Vastly simplifying the tax code (down to 20 pages or so) while leaving it progressive is the correct fix. Any form of income, including gifts or inheritance, needs to be taxed the same (possibly with a deduction for inflation). Similarly, the transfer of funds overseas also needs to be taxed as if it was income to prevent the use of overseas tax shelters (one consequence of which is that withholding needs to happen on the sale of any stocks, irregardless of the citizenship of the seller). This takes care of the major leaks in the current system.

      But the legal profession and the accountants have a huge ethical conflict of interest here. Complex laws create future business for them. Together, they'll try to buy enough politicians to make sure this doesn't happen. In ethics terms, the problem here has a name: "conflict of interest".

      Since the dual rights to ethical government and ethical practice of law are fundamental rights protected under the 9th Amendment, the actions of the legal profession, the accountants, and the politicians -- in creating and maintaining the current tax code -- have been both unethical and illegal. Unfortunately, since so many people are guilty, this makes it very difficult to get change to occur.

      The situation today is very similar to that earlier in US history, when all the legal professionals in the South with a functioning brain understood that slavery was unethical. Morris of NY made that perfectly clear in his speech at the Constitutional Convention, but nothing was done about it because there was too much money to be made (many of the lawyers were slave-holders, and the rest knew the slave-holders would also be the ones with the most money to hire their services in the future).

      Then, as now, serious ethics problems in law created major long term problems for society. This means that ultimately we're never going to fix any of these issues without grappling with the ethics problems in law and government. If that isn't done, we may end up with another Civil War. Since the last Civil War killed more Americans than all the other wars this country has fought, put together, that's a bad thing.

      Simplifying the tax code would allow the IRS to focus on doing its job instead of wasting huge amounts of time trying to deal with the current disaster of a law, greatly improving the ability of the organization of go after the criminals. About 20% of human beings are sociopaths so there will always be those trying to evade their obligations. You can't get rid of the IRS because you're still going to need lots of people doing that job.

      The "fair tax" proposal is largely a matter smoke and mirrors and has been thoroughly debunked. Prior Slashdot discussions have gone through this in detail. It is regressive and inflationary, would create huge numbers of black market transactions, would still require huge amounts of money to be spent on enforcement (and a massive Big Brother state as part of that enforcement, but like the Soviet Union the state still wouldn't be able to control the black markets), and would overall do society far more harm than good. The rich would still get richer, and everybody else would be massively screwed. There is nothing "fair" about the "fair tax" plan.

      It is far more sensible in a free society to tax income in place of sales.

  31. Actually, Carly can say... by unixisc · · Score: 1

    ...see, Meg ain't doing much better either

    1. Re:Actually, Carly can say... by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That isn't a meg or a carly thing really. This has been in the works for a long time, pretty much since the HP touchpad flop. Basically the purpose behind the split was because the consumer division (printers, desktops, touchpad) would frequently drag the enterprise division (servers, networking gear, storage gear, which generally does pretty well) into the mud along with its routinely shitty performance.

      They likewise believe that if they have a more stable stock for the enterprise division, it would be easier to attract investors.

    2. Re:Actually, Carly can say... by ksheff · · Score: 1

      If the Touchpad was a flop, what do you call writing off $5 billion after buying Autonomy?

      It's too bad they didn't bother updating the hardware on the Touchpad. It would have been current had it been released a year earlier. The 7" Touchpad Go would have been nice too. :(

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  32. training by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at it this way, companies like IBM are training inexperienced college graduates for big corporations.

    1. Re:training by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much. Targeting cheap liberal arts degree people who are looking for something better than bagging groceries or serving coffee. They're also getting Mexican college grads on TN visas - cheaper and easier than H1-B.

  33. Re:God damn it, what a tragedy the loss of HP is.. by labnet · · Score: 2

    Remember that HP (The real HP that made electronic test equipment) was spun off into Agilent which was recently spun off again into Keysight Technoogies.

    (2009)
    HP -> HP (Computers, Printers etc)
          -> Agilent (Life Sciences, Electronic Test)

    (2014)
    Agilent -> Agilent (Life Sciences etc)
                -> Keysight Technologies (Electronic Test)

    So when you talk to engineers about HP, we think Agilent and now Keysight as having the original DNA of HP

    --
    46137
  34. penalize companies for hiring Americans? by raymorris · · Score: 0

    "If you want people to less of something, put a tax on it."
    - President Barak Obama (shortly before signing one of the largest taxes on employment in the last 50 years).

    More recently, POTUS ruled that any companies who do any business witht the federal government (most large companies) are not allowed to have their lower-paid jobs in the US, hiring students and other lower cost workers. Instead, they must either outsource, or overpay for these positions, putting them at a disadvantage to competitors.

    1. Re:penalize companies for hiring Americans? by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      Yes, and now please give us the link where this happened so that we may read it.

  35. Re:God damn it, what a tragedy the loss of HP is.. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    RPN seemed weird, but at least it was consistent.

    Once you got used to it, it was quite natural, and less keystrokes than parentheses.

  36. Re:God damn it, what a tragedy the loss of HP is.. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I collect, repair and use classic test gear. I have a good collection of tektronix, hp, keithley, fluke (pretty much all 'just names' at this point; danaher ruined most of them, sigh). the old stuff is amazing, almost magic. the new stuff is overpriced (even by hp standards) and is not designed to last. on the eevblog forum, there was a big thread about an agilent high-end handheld DMM that bricked itself during a fw update and hp's reply was 'sorry, we can't fix it; its not fixable by design'. really??? what the fuck! no backup boot block and no way to jtag fix it? you can't be serious. big stink on eevblog and it taught many of us that we should now avoid hp^H^Hagilent^H^Hkeysight for test/meas gear.

    the stuff they make now will never be called 'classic'. its all disposble and even the chinese scopes like rigol and its ilk beat the snot out of the old school brand names, that pretty much invented the tech, 50 or more years ago.

    I interviewed at hp in palo alto a few months ago. it took months, they dragged their feet, they could not decide, they could not define what they wanted and after nearly a whole day there, they gave me a thumbs down with no reason given. months of 'we want you!' bullshit from the recruiter only to find that the team does not even know what it wants.

    you'd have to be nuts to apply to hp (or amazon, for that matter) these days. perhaps I dodged a bullet by not getting the job at hp.

    gotta say, though, the inside of HP looked quite dreary. lame-ass open office, no space for personal stuff, not even cups in the break room (seriously; I had to ask to borrow someone's coffee mug at their desk when I 'dared' ask for some water to keep near me during my interview.)

    HP is dead. parts of it don't know it yet, but they are 'dead men walking'.

    really a shame. HP was a tier-1 company in their day. when I was starting out, working for DEC or HP or Sun or SGI was the best place to be (all high end unix and unix-like workstation companies and all were great to work for back in the day). now, what do we have? essentially none of those computer companies are around anymore. their culture, which was a valuable part of who they were, has all washed away, as well. the 'hp way' died 15 years ago or more.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  37. Good for HP! by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

    I hope the loss in revenue from high cost countries will be beneficial to them as low cost countries will be the only one buying HP.

    I've certainly decided to never buy HP again.

    It's amazing to think about the stupidity of killing off rich markets in order to gain an initial profit before you're forced to sell your product to more poorer markets.

    It'll be interesting to see how much they end up selling printer ink for in Somalia.

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    1. Re:Good for HP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all about making a buck while riding the sinking ship down. Somalia's printer ink consumption is not yet a twinkle in the institutional investors' eye.

  38. Another name for outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >" Cutting jobs in what he called 'high-cost countries' and moving them to low-cost countries".

  39. Re:God damn it, what a tragedy the loss of HP is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Note: Chinese Brand Rigol was bought and is owned by Keysight.

  40. #ThanksCarly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #ThanksCarly !

  41. But what about your Hosts file? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That's what I really want to hear about.

  42. Re:Contact HP by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    no, those are not the low margin businesses. guess again

  43. Re: Union's aren't looking so bad now, are they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The existence of sweatshops, ratraps and employee abuse shows that management can't be trusted either.

  44. You can thank the other Clinton for that by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    Bill moved the dems hard right so they could win elections after the lost the blue collar guys to social issues and the welfare queen rhetoric. The Republicans had to go further right to maintain a distinct identity..

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:You can thank the other Clinton for that by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Republican moving further right? What are you talking about? Seriously! You're looking at the wrong axis of the political spectrum. The Republican Party didn't move so much as left or right, but rather more authoritarian in alignment with the current batch of Democrats in office. They've been colluding with each other far more prominently int he last four years it's unreal. It's to both parties benefit to take on the mantle of statism.

      Fact is, the Republican Party effectively committed suicide right in front of their grass roots while the Democrat Party is fractured and discombobulated to know its head from its ass. But one thing is for sure, the abject disconnect between those whom we elect and those whom are governed is frighting!!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:You can thank the other Clinton for that by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Bill moved the dems hard right so they could win elections after the lost the blue collar guys to social issues and the welfare queen rhetoric. The Republicans had to go further right to maintain a distinct identity..

      I think you confused Bill with Nixon and Reagon. Nixon had the southern strategy to leave their republican libreral heritage behind embraze the crazy, and Reagon made crazy look good.

    3. Re:You can thank the other Clinton for that by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Republican moving further right? What are you talking about? Seriously! You're looking at the wrong axis of the political spectrum. The Republican Party didn't move so
      much as left or right, but rather more authoritarian in alignment

      That is extreme right wing:You can't defend the status quo, your country and the rich without a strong authoritarian state. That you can't have an "ideal" socialist society without a similar oppresive regime either is just how the political spectrum works, only moderate opions can tolerate dissent.

    4. Re:You can thank the other Clinton for that by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      And tell me how the Democrats are different from the Republicans? Oh yes, you can't do so. Now, don't talk to me about the ACA, because quite clearly that law is designed to force individuals to buy health cover and save their employers money by not making them provide it. No, it isn't quite written that way now, but it will be.

  45. Coincidence by Arcady13 · · Score: 1

    Amazingly, the VP idiots who decided to fire the 30,000 people will all get raises that add up to the exact salary of the 30,000 people.

    This is all a complete coincidence.

    1. Re:Coincidence by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Meg Whitman's salary in 2015 is $1.5 million, only 16 times the average $90K HP salary.

      Her overall compensation package valued at $19.6 million (including a stock award valued at $8.1 million, stock options worth $5.3 million, a $4.3 million incentive award and $295,400 in perks, including $251,000 for personal use of private aircraft). This would be 218 times the average $90K HP salary.

  46. Re:God damn it, what a tragedy the loss of HP is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it all did die about 1999. I bought an HP computer about that time. Swore to never buy an HP again. Proprietary, unexpandable, locked. I had heard about HP before, but even then HP computer wasn't really HP from the HP way. "Things done right" aren't what CXO's, MBA's, accountants and Go-Go management have in mind. They want quick quick. It shouldn't be so sloppy that it looks obvious, but they want shoddy, fast, same price. Oh and if you could work at 1/2 price that would be good too. Cutting costs, cutting people. The quality control department can be eliminated because we can get the people building it to do their own quality control. Also quality control people will stop a shipment if the product is bad. We must ship to maintain revenues, and the quality people might actually argue with salespeople. We cannot accept this! We can eliminate quality, hire more sales, ship on time, and outsource the call center so that if a product is poor quality, customers will get served by an overseas team at a dramatically lower labor rate.

  47. bye bye.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posting as AC. Guess why.

    For the past month I have been offshoring my position to India, and I am on my way out the door.
    Even though I could find more work in my position on other contract within the company, as other people voluntarily leave their positions, this is not happening - possibly because of this initiative.

    HPE (enterprise) is on a drive to offshore as much as possible. They said so themselves. They can do this because most of the work is done in a "virtual workplace" anyway, thanks to Skype for business, Office 365, Sharepoint, Exchange, etc. It has become work that anyone in the world with an internet connection could do, and not have to meet anyone face-to-face, and often we don't - not even the customers. We never see the equipment we work on because we no longer have to. It's all done remotely. All accounts, payroll, timekeeping, internal stuff is done online.

    ITIL procedures are strictly enforced because that usually prevents complete muppets from doing anything stupid. It does mean that getting things done take forever, as typically nothing gets done without a pile of excel sheets typed up, authorizations from numerous people, and with all the documentation so that HP can cover itself legally. Loads of time is wasted on communications and collaboration because of the virtual work environment. I liken this work environment to trying to build the pyramids by commanding the slaves from an underground bunker with only a phone line to the outside world...... but if the cashed up customer is happy footing the extremely large bill for all of this.... who am I to argue?

    The majority of work is moving to India.... or the Phillipines... or any country where the local populace are paid little but speak good enough English. There's simply no need to hire people in the west anymore when you can do this.

  48. Re: This is the future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're wrong. We Republicans want you to starve to death, slowly and painfully. We want you to look at the light in the eyes of your children grow dimmer and dimmer, we want you to see them grow gaunt and skeletal, wasting away before your very tear-filled eyes while you're powerless to do anything about it. We want you to scream in despair while they curse your name for bringing them into this cruel, cruel world and then letting them die. Because we're Republicans, we're evil, we hate you and that's the way of our kind.

  49. Call it what it is... by rsborg · · Score: 2

    If the Touchpad was a flop, what do you call writing off $5 billion after buying Autonomy?

    It's too bad they didn't bother updating the hardware on the Touchpad. It would have been current had it been released a year earlier. The 7" Touchpad Go would have been nice too. :(

    I'd say it was a pure corruption play. Clearly someone(s) got that $5B. The touchpad was pure tragedy - WebOS sounds like the second coming of BeOS - a great OS with great ideas that just came a bit too late to the party (and didn't have the blessing of the corporate elite).

    Also keep in mind Microsoft's Skype acquisition (which in hindsight doesn't seem as bad - if MS would actually merge Skype into Windows or Office...) - the common factor being that since the money being used to purchase the offshore companies wasn't within the US, they could repatriate some of the money without paying taxes.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    1. Re:Call it what it is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Also keep in mind Microsoft's Skype acquisition (which in hindsight doesn't seem as bad

      It doesn't seem as bad? The fact that MS owns Skype is what made carriers to boycott Windows Phone. Had MS not purchased Skype its mobile phone market share might be in the double digits, rather than that measly 3% and shrinking.

    2. Re:Call it what it is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if MS would actually merge Skype into Windows or Office

      They did that back in April.

    3. Re:Call it what it is... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You've got to be kidding. MS's mobile phone marketshare is crap because their phones are ugly and no one likes the crappy UI. They've been trying to push those phones in phone stores for years, and also at the Microsoft stores, but no one wants them.

    4. Re:Call it what it is... by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      That's true, but Skype is also a big part of it. Carriers throughout the world hate Skype because it impinges on their ability to charge overages for long distance calls (which is where most of them make their money.) As a result, most carriers wouldn't try to push WP devices on their customers in their retail stores. However the crappy UI explains why Microsoft hasn't had much success pushing it in their home-grown stores as well.

      I would think that if Microsoft hadn't bought Skype, they probably would have at least come close to their sales goals, which I estimate maybe 8%-9%. There goal being a 10% global market share, as per their statements of wanting to be the third in the "rule of three"

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      And the reason I say that is because of two things: First, they throw the Microsoft brand on it (which even though Microsoft is unpopular here, the brand itself does have a lot of value, even though it's not a coca cola, a google, or an apple, it's pretty far up there) second, they managed to get Nokia to agree to be exclusive.

      The platform really does suck though. It has the walled garden of apple with none of the redeeming power user features of Android (in fact its API set is even less powerful than that of iOS. Apple regulates security through denying apps, whereas Microsoft regulates security by making it so that the programmer can't really do anything interesting AND denying apps, so the platform as a whole just blows.)

  50. H-1Bs? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Most of the cuts will occur in HPâ(TM)s long-troubled Enterprise Services unit and ay be offset by new hires in that unit.

    Any bets on how many of the new hires will be H-1Bs? Or if the total of the H-1Bs hired in the "offset hiring" plus the last year or so before the layoffs will approximate the number of US citizens laid off?

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  51. In other words, the H in HP stands for Hellhole. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    ...outlined a plan under which it is cutting jobs in what he called 'high-cost countries' and moving them to low-cost countries. He said that by the end of HP Enterprise’s fiscal year 2018, only 40 percent of the group’s work force will be located in high-cost countries."

    It's just an easier way to say that they don't like their workers having any freedom.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  52. Or just make it a royal PITA to offshore. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    First, repeal the 1965 Immigration Act and subsequent guest worker programs.
    Next, place large penalties on offshoring such that a greater reward comes from a direct-hire, indefinite-term, FTE, majority-US/First World workforce.
    Finally, calculate a penalty that will reward repatriation by making it costlier to keep things offshore. To twist the knife, employ individuals that the private sector has offshored, ignored in hiring, or given involuntary early retirement.

    After that is all done, then they can have their tax cuts.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  53. Re: This is the future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah communist, and donald trump does not exist.

  54. Re: God damn it, what a tragedy the loss of HP is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i got my cs education at hp germany. i consider myself a hardcore engineer. what they wanted in1997 was already the flimsy kind of sales and marketing engineer. they really thought hard knowledge was useless. google and apple proved otherwise. lew platt was already a major part of the problem.

    bill and dave were bad at strategic analysis. you cannot use an mba to compete with oracle, msft an google.

  55. Re:God damn it, what a tragedy the loss of HP is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is still one company which makes solid electronic test equipment: Rohde and Schwarz. Guess what:it's german, engineered and built in Germany. at least for the equipment we buy here in Europe.

  56. ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Republican party was founded by religious conservatives who were opposed to the sin of slavery. The only-give-a-damn-about-themselves-and-money wing of the GOP were originally the Whigs who were the party in opposition to the Democrats before the Republican party was created. Like all such people, they were too self-centered to take up an "icky" moral cause. When they made it clear that they had no principles beyond their own wealth and comfort, the American public rejected them and their party collapsed into oblivion. The idea that the modern GOP has been "taken over" by the very religious people who founded it is a joke pushed by the secular Whigs who've been trying to convert the GOP back into the Whig party of 1850 for many decades.

    You say "the Republican party left you" ..... impossible if you are a so-called "moderate".

    in what specific way? The GOP of today is far more left-wing and liberal than it was during the Reagan years; it's even to the left of where the DEMOCRATS were in the early 80's. Many in the GOP today are for drug legalization, and gay marriage (positions too far to the left for any DEMOCRAT to endorse in 1980). The GOP of George W Bush (from a family of modern Whigs who, like the Romney family worked very hard to prevent Reagan from getting elected) grew entitlements more than many Democrats have done (remember his prescription drug program?) and his dad slashed the nation's defenses more than most Democrats had dreamed of. The GOP of today is far less socially conservative, far less religious, far less defense-hawkish, and far less economically-conservative than it has ever been since its founding.

    1. Re:ha by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Well that's my point. The Republican party didn't move so much to the left (as a liberal movement) as they've really embraced a statist elite world view of themselves and the place of others beneath them. Reagan should be turning in his grave now with the ground quaking on a scale of 9.0!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:ha by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Many in the GOP today are for drug legalization, and gay marriage (positions too far to the left for any DEMOCRAT to endorse in 1980).

      This is total BS. Just look at who GOP voters are voting for: religious nuts who scream constantly about gay marriage, and who support people who refuse to obey the law in regards to it.

      The GOP of George W Bush (from a family of modern Whigs who, like the Romney family worked very hard to prevent Reagan from getting elected) grew entitlements more than many Democrats have done (remember his prescription drug program?)

      Yes, and who elected W? That's right, GOP voters.

      So while you may have a point about the modern GOP resembling the Whigs a lot, it's not some kind of conspiracy, and it's not like GOP voters don't agree with them; the GOP voters elected these people willingly. There have been other candidates out there, but the GOP voters are mostly religious freaks who care more about gay marriage than almost anything else, and will elect anyone who panders to their fundie values.

      The GOP of today is far less socially conservative, far less religious, far less defense-hawkish, and far less economically-conservative than it has ever been since its founding.

      Total bullshit. Proof: the current GOP politicians and presidential candidates (Trump excluded, maybe; his followers don't seem to be too religious or care much about the gay marriage issue).

      Face it, the party of Barry Goldwater is gone, and has been replaced by the party of Ted Cruz and his Dominionist dad Rafael. Goldwater himself worried about what would happen to his party if the religious nuts got in there.

    3. Re:ha by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Cruz is more similar to Goldwater: you're probably thinking of Huckabee, Jindal, Santorum and Walker. Although, the 'religious nuts' so far have been going for Carson and... TRUMP!!!

    4. Re:ha by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Cruz's father is an infamous Dominionist. Go read about him.

      And Cruz visited that Kentucky bimbo in jail (and I think Huckabee was with him). Santorum, Jindal, and Walker didn't.

  57. Meaning by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    They've jettisoned what's left of EDS. Another HP investment that's turned to shit although EDS was going downhill when HP bought them.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  58. "Big"-specific, not "HP"-specific by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's how it goes:

    1. Inventor or inventors create new product.

    2. Inventor/Inventors found new company and make a bunch of money.

    3. He/she/they "take it public", exchanging cash infusion for a board of directors and investors who had nothing to do with founding it and don't care about it - they just want either a quick return on their cash or a big return later.

    4. Corporation grows very large, diversifies, takes on many employees, grows layers of managers, all of whom expect golden parachutes and stock options etc.

    5. The founder/founders leave, are kicked-out, or die. THIS IS THE MOMENT THE DEATH BEGINS. After this point the company is run by incompetent disinterested hacks. Some companies avoid/delay this fate by being run by a faithful close-family member of a founder (like Roy Disney taking over from Walt) but the failure resumes as soon as the founding family is gone, or a family member who does not actually care takes over.

    6. The company rolls-on for years with a series of hired-gun CEOs and board members, none of whom have the original corporate vision and all of whom answer to a dis-interested board - All of these people do whatever they can to maximize short term profits so they get good pay and benefits. NONE of them care what happens to the company 10 years after they will be gone.

    7. As each short-term boost-the-profits hack fails, the CEO and board begin to slash at the stuff that will reap them the best short-term benefits, while ultimately sabotaging the business: R&D and employees. Eventually, they sell-off assets, product lines, patent portfolios and so-on in a death-dive of cannibalism.

    8. Notices go out to remaining employees about how valuable they are and the bright future ahead as merger talks arise. This is often followed by one or more mergers (one of which will inevitably involve a "holding company" which is an LLC)

    See: IBM, GM, Chrysler, McDonnell-Douglas, COMPAQ, XEROX, Motorola, HP, etc.

  59. Never gonna happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the 1965 Immigration Act was the crowning achievement of Democrat patron-saint Teddy Kennedy. It was designed to eliminate the WASP (White Anglo-Saxon Protestant) majority on the U.S. thereby making it easier for Democrats to win elections by appealing to ethnic groups who were imported from parts of the world that were more-tolerant of top-down control and socialist economics. It's been critical to their political success, and without it Barack Obama would never have been elected. The Democrats will allow this to be undone at the same time they vote to ban abortions: i.e. NEVER.

  60. Former HP Product Owner here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I did buy the HP TouchPad when it went on the fire sale discount price at the big box store all those years back. Does that count?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP_TouchPad

    Seriously, it was an okay product for the time, with a terrible stock HP-branded OS, the infamous WebOS. It worked much better when Android was hacked on there, and still runs KitKat today as a reader and [somewhat slow] game station for other members of the family.

    IIRC, the fallout from the fiasco of HP's mismanagement at that time was what caused the fire-sale decision in the first place, and then the eventual departure of the then-CEO to jump overboard with his golden parachute intact. Jobs were lost then in the shakeup, and this just seems like a rerun of what we saw earlier.

    Shame, the company used to make decent products at competitive prices back in the day. But that day was 20 years ago.

  61. Heads replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mike Nefkens announce he will resign, as all his directors staff. They will be replaced by a new low-salary country managers at 1/100 of the initial head staff cost.

  62. So I'm assuming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'll be moving Mr. Nefkens' job to a low-cost country as well. Right?

  63. here's the order by raymorris · · Score: 0

    Here's the executive order.
    http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/F...

    I should have noted that it actually doesn't only apply to companies which do any business with the federal government, it also applies to companies which provide services or to those companies , and those who provide services to thise second-level companies , and so on down the line.

    It would be LEGAL under this EO, though inconvenient, to move only the lower-paid jobs (interns, entry-level positions"that don't require a degree) oversees while keeping the rest of the facility in the US. Of course there are other penalties for hiring in the US for higher-paid jobs. As we've seen, many companies, like HP, decide to just move the entire facility overseas.

    1. Re:here's the order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dafuq are you talking about? I just read that document, forward and backward, and saw absolutely nothing to do with anything to do with locations of contractors.

      Want to point us to the section of the document that makes your point? You are fully full of shit.

  64. Re:God damn it, what a tragedy the loss of HP is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eh, when I was fresh from college I interviewed with them. They didn't hire me saying they wanted "somebody with more experience". 5 years later, I got laid off, ended up interviewing with them again, and they came back with an offer. I was desperately trying to get anything else as even at that time I'd heard it was a crappy place to work where you'd do 80 hour weeks, never get bonuses and never get pay raises. I did get another offer and took that one instead. Been there 5 years now, and every time I see something like this, I just think to myself, yeah, I made the right decision not working there.

    Ironic in a way though. They wouldn't hire me out of college because they wanted somebody with experience. As somebody with experience, it was a job I'd only take as a last resort.

  65. Today? People NEED to communicate... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: However, isn't Android "king" in most smartphones sold & used?

    * It "flip-flops" between Apple & Android a lot, so feel free to fill me in...

    APK

    P.S.=> The reason I note it, is since Android's are typical cheaper (afaik @ least), it's probably WHY they're sold more than Apple's IPhones (different target market demographic & what-not due to price points) - but my subject line above STILL holds true - today, you NEED to be able to communicate not only for personal use (a landline can do THAT), but moreso for PROFESSIONAL on-the-job use (smartphones replaced what I used to call "the electric choke-chain" in the BEEPER is all)... apk

  66. I did reply... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He FAR from invalidated my point http://hardware.slashdot.org/c...

    * :)

    (People today, do NOT have a choice - you NEED to communicate, especially in professional environs - it's not a matter of want or even what YOU personally WANT - it's what employers NEED & thus, if you work for others, you need it too!)

    As far as I'm concerned - The smartphone merely took the place of something many of you youngsters here might NOT even recall - the "beeper" (I called them electric choke chain dog collars, lol).

    E.G./I.E. - How many jobs in THIS very field DEMAND you have a smartphone? Most of the ones I've seen in fact!

    APK

    P.S.=> As far as my reply being so late? Hey - I was sleeping (only human here)... apk

  67. Re: This is the future... by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

    unless your child is a dog. Specifically, a big dog. 'cos, let the big dog eat :)

  68. TALENT SHORTAGE???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's a talent shortage? Oh yeah, they'll still want their H1B visas.

  69. can't even make a calculator properly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In 2011 HP re-released the 15C calculator as the 15C-LE. They based it on the ARM-emulated platform for the 12C. The keyfeel wasn't as good as the original but it otherwise looked like a 15C. In a rush to get it out the door, someone screwed up and introduced a bug whereas the 'PSE' function would only work on the first time through a loop, meaning that if you wanted to, say, display a count of 1-10 on the LCD, you would only see '1', vs. '1, 2, 3...'

    The offshored team which ported the code to the emulator was disbanded and the problem, among the others, was never fixed.

    The end.

  70. So if this trend for American Tech companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the discussion is going on and on about history of once great company and how executive is destroying engineering.
    But if you are CEO of HP in this situation what would you do?
    How will you compete with outsourcing companies and their low cost pricing. Can we make American tech sector just as attractive for companies that they dont see need for outsourcing or do you consider it as lost battle.

    This(outsourcing) is same thing that happened with manufacturing and China. Now its services and India. Look at what left of manufacturing companies in US
    and you will have an idea of future of American Tech companies.

  71. So where is the talent shortage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we now bury this stupid idea that we have a STEM talent shortage?

    Nope! the propaganda must continue comrade! FORWARD!

  72. Re:God damn it, what a tragedy the loss of HP is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All HP gear was pretty much fantastic..except for their oscilloscopes, which wouldn't trigger worth a flip

  73. Buyback of stock is another illusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Buying back a companies OWN stock creates an illusion of "growth" also - a common trick used nowadays.

    * I've often thought that MS is INTENTIONALLY devaluing their stock in order to do this, creating crap like VISTA/8/10 in order to devalue themselves so others will divest those stocks they hold in MS - & they'll turn around when it's cheapest, & buy it back when the price is low... & THEN?

    THEN, they'll turn around & release a version of Windows that blows even 7 outta the water - really profiting bigtime & on the cheap due to buybacks.

    (Doing this makes sense from a corporate mgt. perspective too - they KNOW CPU's & video + RAM are fast, but nobody's buying like before... they're fast enough to run these rigs for 1/2 decade++ @ a time before you buy again is why... so it'd be "prime-time" during such a downturn to do what I speculate above, waiting out the next "buying wave", cleaning up hugely by releasing a GOOD version of Windows to catch that wave...)

    APK

    P.S.=> I'd be almost willing to BET that's what's going on, since I can't believe anyone is as stupid as they have been since VISTA onwards... apk

    1. Re:Buyback of stock is another illusion by G00F · · Score: 1

      It doesn't help that stock prices are more about perception of the company than it has to do with value, so the value of a stock is a bit of an illusion, but I wouldn't call stock by back as an illusion of growth.

      Yes it helps manipulate the stock price to a very small degree, but that's at a real cost, not just an accounting trick where you move numbers from one column to another. It's a cost to the company yet it's value remains the same, only Earnings Per Share change. Some companies often do this to offset EPS dilution from employee stock options.

      It's more like a rechargeable battery. You need cash to expand, sell off company stock. Have cash and stock is valued low, buy back stock.

      Planning a flop product/Press Release so that they can buy back stock at bargain prices would be a different beast.

      --
      The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
  74. Re:God damn it, what a tragedy the loss of HP is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That idea was pretty standard analog electronics applied to test gear.
    In some old Fender tube amps, the Vibrato circuit works this way - a light bulb and photocell provided the pulse that controlled signal levels.

    Great stuff, great design.

    Even HP 9000 stuff was great. I was certified in it from HP-UX 9.X to 11.11, and the stuff ran well. It supported some enormous loads and it had some weird ways of handling heavy memory use - swapper was a weird dude - but it loaded up and didn't crash easily.

    I was also certified in AIX, and while AIX's JFS and patching were better, it didn't handle heavy loads nearly as well.

    (Now I use Linux and love it too. I'll be getting whiny and catankerous about it when the Next Big Thing comes along)

  75. Re:God damn it, what a tragedy the loss of HP is.. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    That idea was pretty standard analog electronics applied to test gear.
    In some old Fender tube amps, the Vibrato circuit works this way - a light bulb and photocell provided the pulse that controlled signal levels.

    That's right. And it's still useful. I've got a pair of vintage Korg MS-20s and the LF oscillators have lights that flash. It's useful for getting an idea of the approximate tempo before you mix in the tremelo/vibrato/whatever. If it's a sine wave or sawtooth, the light dims and brightens. If it's a square wave, it's just on/off.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  76. Do you eat your own flesh to grow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: That's what buyback of stock "growth" is - a dangerous illusion & deceit!

    APK

    P.S.=> Think about it... apk

  77. HVAC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny, but dead on accurate here in the south. AC is like oxygen in the summer.

  78. You know if nthey did this from space.... by EricTheO · · Score: 0

    "HP To Jettison Up To 30,000 Jobs As Part of Spinoff"

    If done from the ISS you would have 30K of pretty light streaks in the night sky . http://www.cnet.com/news/nasa-...

    It seems HP has as much concern for it's workers a human waste, they both get jettisoned.
    So rather than meet cost of living payroll obligations they just shift the work overseas because of course that will create more consumers that can afford to buy their products in the US?

    --
    -Eric