Slashdot Mirror


Volkswagen Ordered To Recall 500K Vehicles Over Its Own Malicious Programming

Etherwalk writes: The Obama Administration today ordered Volkswagen to recall 500,000 4-cylinder Volkswagen and Audi vehicles from model years 2009-15. The vehicles were programmed to turn on more thorough emissions control and generate cleaner readings when tested for emissions than they did when in ordinary operation. In effect, the software made everything operate normally when you looked at it, just like any good malware.

22 of 411 comments (clear)

  1. This only applies to diesel models by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 3, Informative

    Might want to be more specific in the synopsis.

    --
    I came, I conquered, I coredumped
  2. Built-in "performance chip" by istartedi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So VW incorporated stuff you see advertised in the back of hot-rod mags into the car. Now they'll have to go after those after-market guys, assuming the chips actually do what they say. It's not like anybody even tells state inspectors they swapped out the chips. I'm not sure how much this goes on. I've got a relatively new car and have only had it smogged once since I bought it. No, I don't plan on ever messing with it. I just know that such things exist.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  3. Color me naive.... by mark-t · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... but how does the software in the car know that the vehicle's emissions are being tested in the first place?

    1. Re:Color me naive.... by Bugler412 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Something plugged into and actively reading data from the OBDII port I suppose. Wouldn't be hard to setup

    2. Re:Color me naive.... by Optic7 · · Score: 5, Informative

      It sounds like they went way beyond that. A comment on Jalopnik says:

      According to the report from the EPA, it used figures such as steering wheel input, barometric pressure, engine run-time, wheel speed, etc, to determine it was being tested on a dyno.

      I think VW is going to be in a world of hurt over this. Apparently their 2016 models are already being held at the port and cannot be delivered to dealers.

  4. Re:Don't take yours in. by ZeroPly · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If the car drove well while complying with emissions requirements, it's doubtful that Volkswagen would have risked an obvious legal violation for some marginal performance gains.

    And since they're not going to give you a new engine when you take your car in for recall, it's safe to say that the performance will be reduced when you get it back. For the majority of people, a slight difference in emissions would be preferable to a noticeable drop in performance.

    --
    Support microSD: in a post 9/11 world, it is unwise to carry your data on media that you cannot comfortably swallow.
  5. Re:Don't take yours in. by Moof123 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Driving around with a known polluting car is awful. You are a jerk for suggesting folks just ignore their cars being 40x out of compliance. Diesel particulate emissions are a major contributor to diseases like lung cancer, asthma, etc. Eff you.

    I couldn't easily find if VW is just going to update the software, or what?

  6. Re:Don't take yours in. by flappinbooger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Some people care about the emissions from their car...

    just like some people like low flow shower heads and low flow toilets.

    --
    Flappinbooger isn't my real name
  7. Re:Don't take yours in. by suutar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Depends which emissions they're concerned about. Diesels (as I recall) are worse for particulates and NOx, but better as far as CO2.

  8. Re:No fine? by sjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually, it is. It is fraud.

  9. Thanks, Obama? by mothlos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Saying "The Obama Administration [sic]" makes it sound like some sort of political meddling was behind this action. While the EPA is part of the executive bureaucracy, this does not stink of Obama political officials pushing an agenda, but just normal regulatory oversight and it therefore should be attributed to the agency.

  10. Re:No fine? by Wdomburg · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, it is. See: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/7522.

    And there is precedent for this specific case. Ford was fined millions for selling Econoline vans that disabled emissions controls at highway speeds, leading to excessive nitrogen oxide emissions. If anything this seems a more egregious violation. See: http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-06/documents/defeat.pdf

  11. Re: Don't take yours in. by amiga3D · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've done it so often that now every time it rains I get a hard-on!

  12. Re:Shit. by cpoch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's probably how VW got a Euro spec engine to meet US regulations. Euro specs measure pollution per distance - the way to win is to burn fuel really efficiently. US specs measure pollution per unit of fuel consumption - the way to win is to burn fuel really cleanly. That difference is a big reason why they have much more fuel efficient vehicles in Europe. It's much easier to get a larger engine to burn cleaner. Most manufacturers that sell the same engine in both continents use different tunings in each, where the EU one gets better fuel economy and the US one burns cleaner.

    Manufacturers have been trying to bring the incredible economy that small diesels in Europe get to the US for years but it turns out making a diesel that is significantly more efficient than a comparable gas engine and also meets EPA regulations is really hard. For example, Mazda has been promising Skyactiv-D (diesel) engines in the US for years now, but they keep getting delayed because they're not satisfied with their performance.

  13. Re: Don't take yours in. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've done it so often that now every time it rains I get a hard-on!

    That's weird. Every time I get a hard-on, it rains. Some people have a trick knee.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  14. Re:Don't take yours in. by lgw · · Score: 4, Funny

    enough horsepower

    I don't understand those words in that order. There cannot be "enough horsepower", there can only be "more horsepower".

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  15. Yes, Emissions free, tragedy of the commons by Etherwalk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For the majority of people, a slight difference in emissions would be preferable to a noticeable drop in performance.

    For the majority of individuals, yes. Because you're not *paying* for the harm your emissions do.

    1. Re: Yes, Emissions free, tragedy of the commons by BenBoy · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's such a common problem-type it even had a name: Externalities (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Externality).

  16. Re:Don't take yours in. by eth1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Driving around with a known polluting car is awful. You are a jerk for suggesting folks just ignore their cars being 40x out of compliance. Diesel particulate emissions are a major contributor to diseases like lung cancer, asthma, etc. Eff you.

    I couldn't easily find if VW is just going to update the software, or what?

    No, VW are the jerks. If there ends up being a noticeable negative impact on performance, the only fair thing for VW to do is offer full refunds (including tax, and everything) for those who want it, and take the cars back. Otherwise, how are people jerks for wanting to keep what they paid for? Even compensating people a few hundred dollars isn't enough to make up for being stuck with a multi-thousand-dollar asset you no longer enjoy using.

  17. Re:Don't take yours in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    CO2 is plant food, therefor it's harmless. Nightshade berries are bird food, therefor they are harmless. Why don't you eat some nightshade berries and let us know how that logic of yours works out.

  18. Re:Don't take yours in. by lgw · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you had more horsepower, you might be able to catch up with and discover what's making that "whooshing" sound you hear overhead.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  19. Re:Don't take yours in. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you cannot break traction by pressing on the accelerator, you don't have enough horsepower. If you can beak traction by pressing on the accelerator, you don't have enough traction.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate