Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: How Do I Recover From Doxxing?

An anonymous reader writes: I've been doxxed on a popular forum, by one of the moderators no less. The forum owner doesn't care, the hosting company doesn't care. I'm getting bombarded by email and social media, even via GitHub. How does a person recover from this? I don't want to create a whole new identity or shut down all my web sites, social media etc. Can't really change my real name either, at least not without an incredible amount of hassle. The police don't care, and since the forum owner is on the other side of the world it's unlikely there could be any legal consequences, and even if they were they would probably only draw more attention to me. I've tried to clean up Google's search results about me. How do I fix this? What does a fix even look like?

370 comments

  1. Police? by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Informative

    The police don't care,

    If you want to get the police to do anything in this world, don't contact them yourself, have your lawyer contact them.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Unless this doxxing contained anything beyond public records what are they police going to do even then? It's not illegal to post public information on someone (barring things like victim shield laws, etc.).

    2. Re: Police? by dmitrygr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You know, back in the day they published whole doxxing books. One per town (though you could request another town's by mail). In fact many such doing books were shipped for free to everyone. They were white and yellow too, if I remember correctly.

      --
      -------
      1. Enjoy your job
      2. Make lots of money
      3. Work within the law

      Choose any two.
    3. Re:Police? by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 2

      Publishing information with intent to threaten or cause distress is illegal in most places as far as I'm aware. It's a bit like carrying a big honking hunting knife in public, you won't get arrested if you have a good reason for carrying it but there aren't many good reasons.

    4. Re:Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, that's why I said outside of things like victims shield laws. Obviously harassment and threats would fall under such a similar exception.

    5. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Questioner here. By publishing my details on this forum they have started off a campaign of harassment. I also have to keep checking Google and bing to make sure I'm not going to be screwed next time I apply for a job, and that it won't stop people contributing to my open source projects.

      The worst part is that although I'm not the one doing it, at a casual glance it makes me look childish. Like some 4channer who pissed off other 4channers.

    6. Re:Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Harassment however is illegal.

    7. Re: Police? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      AC nailed it.

      Remember when Google insisted that everyone use their real names on G+? I never did offer my real name. Google contacted me three or four times about it, threatening to terminate all services if I didn't supply my name.

      I told them that I'm almost sixty years old, and that I've made enemies in my lifetime. I wasn't willing to publish my name and address, so that one of those enemies could find me and murder me.

      It was a bullshit story - but it made a point. It is stupid and potentially dangerous to post your real life contact information randomly all over the internet.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    8. Re:Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pony up $10k on a lawyer, sue them all. Go after the sites domain name if necessary or their hosting providers. Do it with john doe lawsuits if necessary, find them, wherever they are and extract monetary damages from them. The only way to deal with bullies is to hit them back harder.

    9. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I see this argument a lot and it's pretty stupid. Phone books were usually only distributed to the local area, where everyone who got one probably already knew you (or your family) and if they tried to harass you via phone the call was easily traced and police would take care of it.

      Doxxing on the Internet is different. Over a billion people suddenly have easy access to your info, most of them strangers and many of them out of reach of the law. It's a completely different scenario.

    10. Re:Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't all unwanted attention harassment after the person contacting you has been told to stop (possibly even before they've been told).

      So... it's a pain in the ass, but get a restraining order on every single one of these annoying people.

      And then, hunker down for a decade or more of legal battles.

      Or... just ignore it and hope it goes away, and if it doesn't get the restraining orders on the persistent ones.

    11. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      NAME THE FORUM!!!! We can be of more help if we know who it is.

    12. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      It was reddit obviously. When you side with #gamergate expect SJW asshole to dox you.

    13. Re: Police? by Echo_Hotel · · Score: 2

      In the good old days any public library worth a damn would have dozens of phone books available not to mention the fact that you could just request one be sent to you for any given area and to top it all off there has always been the operator you could call for directory assistance for a few cents. The tools have always been there you just had to be smarter than the recycled tree pulp in the pages to use it back then.

    14. Re: Police? by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 0

      Libraries even had copies of books for the major cities. And they had some blue too.

    15. Re: Police? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

      Remember when Google insisted that everyone use their real names on G+? I never did offer my real name.

      Yep. My response was "FUCK NO!!", and yes they kept pestering me for months. I never gave them a damn thing.

      I was, frankly, amazed that the bliss-ninnies at Google never stopped to consider the downside of posting your real name and linking to all the other stuff you have online. (What could possibly go wrong, eh?) Or maybe they did and just said, "Eh, tough shit."

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    16. Re: Police? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      It was reddit obviously.

      That'd be my guess, but any well-traveled site could be the culprit here.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    17. Re: Police? by tompaulco · · Score: 2

      NAME THE FORUM!!!! We can be of more help if we know who it is.

      Yes. Out the outer. Then you will be even and can let it drop.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    18. Re: Police? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I see this argument a lot and it's pretty stupid. Phone books were usually only distributed to the local area,

      And they didn't contain links to a million other bits of data on you, either. There wasn't much you could do with a phone book back then, really (at least not compared to present day maliciousness).

      Really, though, I blame social media and the "Cult Of Sharing Everything" for this shit. It all seems so innocuous to share and share and share and then one day you get doxxed...and by that time it's waaaaaaaaay too late to do a damn thing about it.

      I've worked hard to keep a low profile. You won't find squat online about me, even though I have a very unusual last name. Very very few pics, no direct links to my "real life" from my online life, and I stay the hell off of facebook, twitter, linked in, etc etc etc.

      If other people want to share their personal info I think that's fine, have at it....it's just not for me. And there have been more than a few times that I've been thankful that I was so paranoid and/or careful.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    19. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Are you neckbeards STILL so butthurt about being called out for your misogyny? FFS, literally nobody else on the planet gives a crap whatsoever.

    20. Re: Police? by ohnocitizen · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Reasons a Phone Book is different from being doxxed:
      1. More than just your name, phone number and address might be shared.
      2. It is linking offline and online, not just posting your info in isolation. Imagine if a phone book contained every single one of your online identities and logons.
      3. Phone books don't link to material that could threaten your personal relationships or career.
      4. Doxxing is used as a tool to intimidate and attack people. It is a form of retaliation, not a public service.
      5. Often(though not always) a single person is singled out.

      As others are pointing out, this is a poor argument and should not be modded up.

    21. Re:Police? by fustakrakich · · Score: 0

      ...have your lawyer...

      Yes, we all have one of those in our pockets...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    22. Re: Police? by paulatz · · Score: 2

      Yep. My response was "FUCK NO!!", and yes they kept pestering me for months. I never gave them a damn thing.

      Lucky you, they just terminated my G+ account after a couple weeks of pestering (and at the time you could not use a lot of services without G+), but now G+ is dead, and Vic Gundotra has been fired while I'm still alive and I still have my job.

      --
      this post contain no useful information, no need to mod it down
    23. Re: Police? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      And do you remember the reaction when people started putting them on CD-ROMs in the early 90s?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    24. Re: Police? by unami · · Score: 1

      they probably had lots of pressure from big brother on them. that's why i chose fake names that sound like real ones, only slightly more vulgar. it's less hassle. yours, peter le coq

    25. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It was reddit obviously.

      That'd be my guess, but any well-traveled site could be the culprit here.

      The only reasonable option is to delete the Reddit account. I did it - I made the huge mistake to use my name and email.

      When (or if) enough people do the same, then Reddit will do something about. And even if Reddit ever does something, at least this will not affect me anymore.

      Shitty people do shitty things, and create shitty places.

    26. Re:Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He meant its time to go get a lawyer asshat.

    27. Re: Police? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Ben Dover, Max Imum, I.P. Daily, Fuq Q. Googel....and the list goes on. :)

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    28. Re:Police? by fustakrakich · · Score: 0

      Yo know that costs money, right? Or do they grow on trees, free for the picking where you live?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    29. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good ole' #gamergate "it's about crying because we aren't getting our way"

    30. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To dox someone with a phone book I need to know something about them. A phone number, a name, a place. At least one of those. Then I need to get a phone book for their area. Then I need to spend the time to find the person in the phone book. At that point, the only person who has that information and a will to use it is me. I still needed to get that information out to the world if I want my victim to be harassed with phone calls or mail or people showing up at their house.

      Doxxing on the Net is completely different. It's a person taking someone is is mostly anonymous and presenting that information to millions of people at once via a quick-n-ease form. Then those people can harass the victim in multiple ways, not just by mail and phone, but also on social media, find connections to their peers and harass them too, bother them by e-mail, swap them, etc.

      Anyone who thinks looking someone up on a phone book is even remotely similar to doxxing obviously hasn't thought about how different the situation is, even for a second.

    31. Re: Police? by penguinoid · · Score: 1, Informative

      Maybe you could post the specifics on a different site, of course only if you think the average person would be understanding of your situation (I'd recommend not trusting your own judgement on this, ask a friend). I know a few people who got doxxed over some joke got lots of sympathy over here. If the doxxers think of themselves as righteous, they'll have second thoughts if a large group of people think they're overzealous assholes. Of course, if the doxxers are trolls, they'll love any reaction they get.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    32. Re: Police? by mrbester · · Score: 0

      I'm not playing one-up, but in over 20 years of online activity there isn't one picture of me, any phone number you might find never worked in the first place (but if you could find that then you wouldn't need it anyway).

      It is not easy, but you can remain pretty anonymous, even if you use Twitter, as I do.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    33. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should have thought of that before you screwed that sheep.

    34. Re: Police? by Harlequin80 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Realistically, do nothing. This will end up falling off the bottom of the page, and people will lose interest / forget. The way to ensure that the problem continues is to respond to it.

      Remember the "Bring back our girls" campaign. Had everyone from Michelle Obama down making public statements of support. Go and have a read about how the # tag and search results basically disappeared after a month.

      While it sucks now, the people who send you stuff based on a forum are not really invested in you, and once the next object of their hatred arrived it will move on. Keep you head up and weather the storm.

    35. Re: Police? by rudy_wayne · · Score: 1

      I see this argument a lot and it's pretty stupid. Phone books were usually only distributed to the local area,

      And they didn't contain links to a million other bits of data on you, either. There wasn't much you could do with a phone book back then, really (at least not compared to present day maliciousness).

      Really, though, I blame social media and the "Cult Of Sharing Everything" for this shit. It all seems so innocuous to share and share and share and then one day you get doxxed...and by that time it's waaaaaaaaay too late to do a damn thing about it.

      Exactly. They didn't dox you. YOU DOXXED YOURSELF!

    36. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wait, what? I'm pretty sure that if you side with gamergate, you are the a-hole. Although the whole thing about doxing - that is just wrong. Monkeys fling poo. The internet lets humans fling poo farther and wider than monkeys ever dreamed. Enabling internet a-holes to fling stuff IRL is just wrong. It doesn't matter if the person being doxed is a reasonable person or an a-hole. It is wrong to do that stuff.

    37. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is practically nothing done on the Internet that couldn't have been done with phones, fax machines and the mail. It's the speed and convenience that changed everything.

    38. Re: Police? by Megol · · Score: 1

      You have to be quite stupid to equalize a phone book in "the good old days" to doxxing on the Internet.
      What next: claiming a DDOS is like someone knocking on your door?

    39. Re: Police? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

      My legal name has been Dick Gazinya since about the 5th grade.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    40. Re: Police? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

      When you side with #gamergate expect SJW asshole to dox you.

      Did SJW assholes call your mom, too? Brother, that's why guys like you and me are MGTOWs. Because moms are not the boss of us.

      God, I hate SJWs, with their "moral superiority".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    41. Re:Police? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      They do that for free where you live too?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    42. Re: Police? by known_coward_69 · · Score: 2

      don't get into flame wars on the internets with people over stupid things, or anything at all. herd mentality and vigilantism is alive and well

    43. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My family isn't even listed in the phone book. The phone company charges $1/month for the "privilege" of having an unlisted number. (Yeah I know there's lots of other ways to get our number, but it's not public information). Anyways, it's not even a good example -- the type of doxxing we're talking about is more like putting an ad in the phonebook saying "James Smith is a pedophile rapist. Please go shit on his doorstep." for someone who didn't actually do anything wrong besides piss off the wrong people.

    44. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Are there a lot of single Jewish women on reddit?

    45. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you still taking in game insults seriously?
      It's a valid strategy, called taunting, and it will be used as long as it works.

    46. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yup. I may have G+ profiles under my real name and the name I go under when dealing with internet-stuff. My domains point to PO boxes. Good luck mailing shit to a PO box.

      Doxx'ers get their stuff from public Whois first, Phonebooks second, legal records third, and insiders of Verizon/AT&T or other Utility companies. Sometimes even having a cop or someone who works at the DMV in the state is leaking the information.

      It's very hard to figure out who leaks your information, thus every time you change physical address, you should change utility providers (gas, internet, electricity, phone, tv/cable) until you figure out which one leaked the information. Unfortunately it's usually the phone companies that do this. Good god, when I first got a landline out here in the city, I was getting a dozen calls per day of telemarketers, that I just stopped answering the phone. My Mobile phone, other than the random "obviously fake same NPA-NXX" calls, I get no calls whatsoever. When I briefly subscribed to the Cable Company's digital phone line... I got no phone calls whatsoever than one day I got a call... from the Phone company trying to sell me on switching to them. What does that tell me? The Cable Company sold a list, or is abusing their LNP database.

      So... to the OP...

      Your best bet if you really want to get away from this crap is to change your physical name (costs about 300$ here and a lot of document replacement costs thereafter) , physically move, even if it's to another unit in the same building (but better if you move to a different city altogether,) change your mailing addresses on everything to a PO box, if you have a job, get a new one under the new name. Delete your facebook/twitter/linkedin/etc profiles and stay off those sites going forward.

      I've actually done all of this after I had a falling out with an insane roommate who is one of those 4-chan types. I needed to disappear just enough that I couldn't be found in Google, but anyone who followed the bread crumbs long enough would only come to old contact information. My cell phone number changed as a result of moving to a different area code, so that wasn't even a possibility for stalkers to find me.

      But end result is that I've generally not had to worry about assholes doxx'ing me. At worst, I've had assholes that I sent DMCA requests to attempt to destroy the email address sent from with mailbait + botnet, but jokes on them, that email address is only used to SEND DMCA requests.

    47. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Pfft, Gamergate is the source of the Doxx'ers.

    48. Re: Police? by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      Do you still french kiss your dog every day?

      I mean, if we're asking inane questions I'd like to at least get a laugh out of the answers.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    49. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you care enough about flyingunder the radar that you are going to change your name, find the name frequency tables from the census and pick the most common name in your area. John Smith is a 1000x times harder to find that Richard Gazinya.

    50. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rich Strokes, Jack Schidt and Phuc Hu were mine.

    51. Re:Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the fuck would I know, I'm not a common faggot dick smoker like you.

    52. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can be more help? How does the original poster know that you don't want to join in? Inquiring minds want to know.

    53. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Had a friend have the same thing happen from a horri-bad breakup. Said ex was known to go to veteran forums and show "Old Glory" being pissed on with the person's name. Of course, there is a point where going too far will step into felony-hard territory and the popo will start going after IP addresses, which is what happened to the ex once the ex thought their reign of terror was unstoppable.

      As for E-mail addresses, thanks to tons of free sites, all it takes is a burner phone (bought anywhere) and an E-mail, and you can Joe-Job someone enough so they lose their employment, even if the employer is doing "where there is smoke, there is fire" CYA.

      From what I know, here is what the friend of mine did to mitigate getting doxxed:

      1: Do a name change. Joe becomes Joseph. Joe becomes Jose. Teresa becomes Theresa. Slight spelling.

      2: Use one's middle name or change it. Jane Charles Doe is different from Jane Doe and Jane C. Doe.

      3: As the parent states: physically move, even if it is the same apartment complex.

      4: Get an offshore corporation set up in Switzerland or some other place. Set it up so it owns another holding company with you as the physical employee who is authorized to do anything, and this info is classified as an offshore trade secret. Now, move assets to the corporation's name. The corporation's address should be a rental 1 room suite at a local Regus or some other item. This way, someone scanning license plates will find a company owned car, and stuff stops right there. To boot, police tend to do a lot more if a vehicle belonging to "XYZ, llc" has a car set on fire than if Jane Doe reports it. I have learned that a burglary of a business gets a lot more interest than a burglary of a habitation.

      5: Trade your car in and have it titled under the corporation. Keep it somewhere secure until you get plates for it (so it isn't obvious to a vandal looking for a vehicle to key or slash tires.)

      The biggest problem is that until lawyers get involved, an attacker has free reign even with a restraining order against them (assuming they are not mind-fuckingly stupid). There are whole books devoted to destroying people's lives as vendettas.

    54. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My dog, your mother. Indistinguishable.

    55. Re:Police? by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 1

      "If you want to get the police to do anything in this world, don't contact them yourself, have your lawyer contact them." Wrong. In places where the rule of law or lawyers is strong, yes. But in most places, contacting Benjamin Franklin is the better option.

    56. Re: Police? by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      What next: claiming a DDOS is like someone knocking on your door?

      People do exactly that.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    57. Re: Police? by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Informative

      I worked at one of those background check companies for a while. It's amazing how much information people will give up for the chance of winning a contest, or even just asking.

      The credit headers have some good information, but it's nothing in comparison to people filling out random forms for free shit.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    58. Re:Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The police are poorly equipped to handle cases where the masses act against an individual. If it was an individual against the masses, they can arrest the individual easily. If it is an individual against an individual, again an easy arrest.

      If it is ten thousand people against one, they'll turn their eye. The can't arrest ten thousand people. It is hard not to get upset at a person or group of people when they are supposed to help but don't. In this case, giving the police some slack might be warrented. They really don't have the resources to stop ten thousand motivated individuals. They play the game of economic cost and benefit, and their system is just expensive enough that they'd have to incur a few million dollars of expense to round up ten thousand people and put them in jail.

      I highly suggest doing nothing very objectionable, and that includes strong defense of one's self (defend one's self lightly, in ways that leave little leverage for more doxxing). After a month the worst will die down. Then the rest of the doxxers are likely lose steam and the real problem people will persist.

      There will be fewer of them, and that makes them easier to identify. With fewer targets, and (if you can prove it) a month of harassment, then file a few court cases seeing a restraining order for the specific people who are still troublesome. If they continue to bother, then seek a legal injunction against them and give them criminal histories.

      Yes, this means you lose in the short run, but you remove the problem children. You win in the long run, and that will have to be your reward. You cannot un-do the bruises you have received, even if you cause harm to others. Instead, make them realize the severity of what they've done (court restraining order) and if they scoff at that, let the feel the consequences of scoffing at the courts.

    59. Re:Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you could've asked, in case your mother wants to come by and visit.

    60. Re:Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, with a name of Anonymous, I can see why you have a problem. Maybe you should change it to John Smith instead.

    61. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A phone book was a dangerous thing. You could get hit over the head with it - that would be last century speak for a 'doxing'. However, it could also stop a .22 bullet. So it had its good points too.

    62. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't have to be well traveled; it just has to be connected to the wrong group of people, possibly via a single person. I made a reference to a research project I worked on once, and some ufo nut that I had a previous disagreement with on the forum took that off to some other forum and tried spamming me at work. Some people have a lot of free time, and a single such person can be a handful. After my boss told him to fuck off and he got distracted by something else, it went away.

      But I've had two different friends piss off the wrong troll that turned out to have connections to people with lots of time to spam and harass them. And one of them wasn't through even direct contact, but someone that later trolled a forum he used to frequent and then just connected the dots on people at random so he could troll them offline.

    63. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > a campaign of harassment

      Turn off the internet. Go outside.

    64. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the best advice, short of the situation where someone does something clearly illegal and you think they can be charged with minimal police effort. However, in occasional cases, someone will become obsessed and not forget for a long time. Even on Slashdot, you can find posters that have stalking trolls for years after they responded to the nutcase. And a friend who had his personal website dropped after someone harassed his host, went quiet online for two years and then got harassment again with two days of reposting his site. 95+% of trolls out there are fickle and easily bored, but the couple who go to the length of keeping notes and checking up on things can really make a mess.

    65. Re: Police? by ultranova · · Score: 2

      don't get into flame wars on the internets with people over stupid things, or anything at all.

      Know your place, shut your face.

      Don't you just love our brave new world?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    66. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You getting off corpses? Killed your dog, even? Oh, my.

    67. Re: Police? by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

      Good thing I never signed up for G+

    68. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Love it or not, we live in a different world snd we need to learn to function within it. With the coming of the Surveillance Age, simply keeping our thoughts to ourselves should be a no-brainer. Not entertaining potentially illegal thoughts is another.

    69. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should have put your real name in the summary of this story, so that the top google hit on you would be this story!

    70. Re: Police? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      they probably had lots of pressure from big brother on them. that's why i chose fake names that sound like real ones, only slightly more vulgar. it's less hassle. yours, peter le coq

      Not big brother. The NSA? They probably can figure you out from your fake name G+ profile quite easily.

      No, Google wanted it because it gave them better data to sell you as a product. Of course, Google could probably already track you around until you screwed up and used your real name with a Google service, then bingo.

      Humans are simplistic - if they think Google can't match them up without "real names", then that's as far as they'll go to hide "their identify". Meanwhile, Google is laughing all the way to their customers because they've already linked you.

    71. Re: Police? by jsh1972 · · Score: 1

      Amanda Hugankiss

    72. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think siding with Gamergate makes someone the asshole, you are misinformed about Gamergate. Of course, that's an easy subject to be misinformed about, given the sheer volume of shit flinging and lies from the anti-GG people.

    73. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bollocks. It's the Gamergaters who GET doxxed. Let's not forget this lovely piece of SJW asshattery: http://i3.kym-cdn.com/photos/i...

    74. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heywood Jablowme

    75. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people who upvted you are morons. Yellow pages never said "dmitrygr is rupert fuckface, living at 123 moron st. in shitforbrains, ca 66666.". If the person posted their name publicly, that's a different situation, but doxxing generally means dmitrygr = rupert fuckface.

    76. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jack Mehoff is a good one too. And Hugh G. Rection.

    77. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only evidence backed you up on that claim.

    78. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Mike Hunt.

    79. Re: Police? by jlar · · Score: 1

      If you live in the EU you have a "right to be forgotten":

      Right to be forgotten

    80. Re: Police? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      It's about crying because they aren't getting any.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    81. Re: Police? by naich · · Score: 1

      Real name policies are brilliant for scammers. I had a Paypal scammer use my email address to look up my real name on Facebook. He made a supposed email from Paypal look more authentic by starting it off with "Dear ..." Luckily I use a fake name on FB, so it was easy to spot.

    82. Re: Police? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      And instead of Directory Assistance, you could go the Public Library and look up phone numbers based on address for free. Low budget telemarketers would just make copies.

      Unlisted numbers became popular because some people didn't like getting phone calls from people they hadn't seen since the 60s. Facebook teaches that most people actually welcome those calls.

    83. Re: Police? by DuckDodgers · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm Tina Crumpett, and I work in London in hospitality.
      I'm Luke A. Boyd, and I work as an ornithologist.
      I'm Imelda Czechs, and I work in payments.
      I'm Turner Luce, and I work in animal control.
      I'm Lisa Carr, and I work in car sales.
      I'm Otto DeLupe, and I'm a CIO.
      I'm Picov Andropov, I work as a chauffeur in Moscow.

      ...with apologies to the folks at the old Car Talk radio show.

    84. Re: Police? by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      I know this is going to sound like a sales pitch, but I use the VOIPO voice over IP phone provider, and their account settings control panel gives you the option of blocking numbers, reporting them as spammers (if a number gets reported as spam often enough, it's blocked from all VOIPO customers), or setting them to direct-to-voicemail. After about three annoying months where I had to keep logging in and adding numbers to the respective lists, my land line quieted down a lot.

    85. Re: Police? by DuckDodgers · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Whatever legitimacy there might be at the core gamergate complaint that launched the shitstorm is buried under the mountain of insults, rape threats, death threats, swatting, and doxxing of anti-gamergate people. No matter how valid your original point was, if you haven't disavowed the 95% of your movement that is a bunch of assholes, you're part of the problem. If it really matters to you, pick a new tag and start over. But you can't team up with a bunch of babyfuckers and call yourself one of the good guys.

    86. Re: Police? by greenfruitsalad · · Score: 1

      i'm all for poisoning the available information. tag yourself in pictures of random people, create multiple twitter/fakebook/g+ accounts with your (possibly real) name but where everything else is a bit off. and for f*cks sake, do not keep the same online accounts for too long for sentimental reasons. it's ok to have a high UID on slashdot even though you've been on slashdot for 10+ years. the feeling of prestige in an online community is what feeds this doxing phenomenon.

    87. Re: Police? by invid · · Score: 1

      I am reminded of the 70s movie The Jerk, where Steve Martin's character Navin R. Johnson becomes all excited when his name is put in the phone book for the first time. He exclaims "I'm somebody now!" The next scene shows a crazed psychopath picking out his name at random from the phone book to hunt and kill him.

      The big difference between the 70s and now is that because of the internet, we are able to perform many of our social interactions anonymously. This simply was not an option in the 70s. Let's face it, with all this anonymous communications, people are more willing to perform actions that will make them enemies, because they don't see any consequences to themselves for their actions. Unfortunately, the big danger from this is that it could potentially lead to the end of the anonymous internet. A large percent of the population don't post anything anonymously (posting primarily on Facebook), and wouldn't care if all internet communications could be traced to their source. If the internet becomes "too scary", you could potentially see an end to anonymity.

      --
      The Moore-Murphy Law: The number of things that will go wrong will double every 2 years.
    88. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny you don't ask the SJWs to disavow the 95% on their side too. Get off your high horse you poser.

    89. Re: Police? by neoritter · · Score: 1

      Your house does come crashing down because of it though.

    90. Re: Police? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Good thing I never signed up for G+

      that you know of.

      Everybody that has a gmail seems to automagically have a G+ account and google don't seem to understand that many of us have our professional personaes where everything has to be work place safe, and our in the bar with our trash talking bro's personaes where I don't really care if Sears injects lingerie ads into every web page I load.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    91. Re:Police? by MrLint · · Score: 1

      This is a legitimate topic of conversation. "No doxxing" rules (and said enforcement) are really a measure of the forum. Is publicly available information 'dox'? Ostensibly yes, but where do you draw the line? Sometimes its hard to say. If someone goes around with a pseudonym all the time, but then files legal papers, are you forbidden from talking about or linking to the documents because it has that person real name and other public info on it? Does it mean you can no longer reference the public record?

      Restriction on doxxing appear to exist for the purpose of preventing overly lazy persons from acting badly. However, as above, once you even talk about the existence of a document in the public record all it takes is to be slightly less lazy to find information. How far do you go? You cannot stop bad actors from acting badly.

    92. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a bit of a generalization and bigoted remark. There are awful people both within and opposing Gamergate. There are valid opinions both within and opposing Gamergate, but they tend to get drowned by the awful people.

      Do not assume the opposition to Gamergate is full of upstanding individuals; Gamergate events have had bomb threats made to them and harassment made against them as well. And while Gamergate is notable for it's particularly bad community, there are some valid opinions within Gamergate, such as reviews of games being marked down because they don't support a progressive political agenda and not on the merits of the game itself.

      There is a worthwhile debate in here, unfortunately the debate is being carried out amongst the noise of a bunch of immature anonymous internet trolls on both sides that use misogyny and harassment attacks instead of real opinions and debate.

    93. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Mike Hunt.

      I'll never forget that Yorick Hunt either.

    94. Re: Police? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Ah yes... I loved Car Talk, and "Picov Andropov" was one of my favorite names. And their law firm, "Dewey, Cheatem, and Howe".

      If I had mod points, they'd be yours.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    95. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's funny you don't ask the SJWs to disavow the 95% on their side too. Get off your high horse you poser.

      Why? SJW's, by the very definition of the term, are trying to make things better for everyone. Well, everyone except the assholes. But the way they do this is simply by reacting to the assholery they hear about.

      If GamerGate had really just been about journalistic integrity the SJW's wouldn't have thrown out such a huge shitstorm over it. Instead, they threw out a huge shitstorm over how the woman in the situation was treated because the actual fucking journalist who let his integrity be compromised was being defended as the victim. And then it came out later that he never even reviewed her game, so the guy was lying the whole damn time and STILL never got hassled about it by GamerGate because by that point they were....what, too busy defending how they were all about journalistic integrity and not all the misogyny that was going on in the general discussions they were having that didn't involve journalists at all? I mean really, how many of them seriously believe that Anita Sarkeesian is a journalist? But go ahead and ask what they think of her and watch the shitstorm boil over.

      Really, GamerGate never had a chance. GamerGate only stands against the journos. SJW's stand against the assholes.

    96. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally like and use Mike Hunt.

    97. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a bullshit story - but it made a point.

      Yes.

      It is stupid and potentially dangerous to post your real life contact information randomly all over the internet.

      Not so fast. The point is that people should be free to choose how they manage their public engagement, and not everyone does it the same way. People have different levels of operational security, paranoia, and talent.

      There are many better points to be made about Real Names, but I'll skip them.

      Everything is "potentially dangerous" if you play the ridiculous American chain-of-consequences game that people here confuse with "being responsible". It's not necessarily stupid to post your name or even your address on the Internet, and people trying a lot harder than you have been doxed anyway. It's reasonable to choose not to do this, but not necessarily stupid to do it.

    98. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phone books were usually only distributed to the local area, where everyone who got one probably already knew you (or your family) and if they tried to harass you via phone the call was easily traced

      Completely untrue, whipper-snapper. You could go to THE LIBRARY and get white pages from other places [le gasp]. You could go to several Internet sites that scanned and aggregated the white pages. You could call 411 and ask them to look up whatever you want globally for an outrageous price, ~$1/lookup. The phonebook is your real name and address because the phone company does a mini-credit-check since they are in theory post-paid and offering you credit. For free, you can be "J. Smith," but if if you _don't_ want to be in the phone book under your real name, you have to pay every month for an "unlisted number".

      The reason we don't have them any more is equally ridiculous. It's because incoming calls aren't free on celfones.

      In Sweden they still have them, ex. hitta.se.

    99. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how much time did you spend on reverse searching data on thoes doxxing books? ;-)

    100. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reasons a Phone Book is different from being doxxed:

      1. More than just your name, phone number and address might be shared.
      2. It is linking offline and online, not just posting your info in isolation. Imagine if a phone book contained every single one of your online identities and logons.
      3. Phone books don't link to material that could threaten your personal relationships or career.
      4. Doxxing is used as a tool to intimidate and attack people. It is a form of retaliation, not a public service.
      5. Often(though not always) a single person is singled out.

      As others are pointing out, this is a poor argument and should not be modded up.

      Other reasons?

      - Phone calls used to cost money (long distance wasn't cheap).
      - Mail used to cost money in stamps.
      - research on someone in another city probably required travel (which was also more expensive).
      - everything was done on paper.

      So aside from knocking on someone's door, doxxing in the olden days required a a significant investment on the doxxer. About the closest analogy I have is that you might sign someone up for the RCA Record of month club. RCA mailed you a card telling you an album (music) was going to be sent to your house. If you didn't return the card it was sent and you were responsible for mailing the album back or, after a given amount of time, paying for the album. Good for a couple of months of aggravation on the part of the doxxee.

    101. Re: Police? by anyGould · · Score: 1

      To dox someone with a phone book I need to know something about them. A phone number, a name, a place. At least one of those. Then I need to get a phone book for their area.

      Or you simply call directory assistance and get the number from the operator. Seriously - it's hilariously easy to get help finding a number. I used to do it for university fundraising.

      Doxxing on the Net is completely different. It's a person taking someone is is mostly anonymous and presenting that information to millions of people at once via a quick-n-ease form. Then those people can harass the victim in multiple ways, not just by mail and phone, but also on social media, find connections to their peers and harass them too, bother them by e-mail, swap them, etc.

      Anyone who thinks looking someone up on a phone book is even remotely similar to doxxing obviously hasn't thought about how different the situation is, even for a second.

      The difference is twofold today. One, it's easier to disseminate the info - once one person has done the legwork, it's just a post and everyone has it. Two, people can hide behind *their* anonymity to harass you from a distance, which makes them bolder (and lets more people do it, because they're too lazy to drive over and egg your house).

      Doxxing is a problem; it's just not a *new* problem. Like patents, it's the same problem with "on the internet" attached to it.

    102. Re:Police? by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      "It's not illegal to post public information on someone "

      In a lot of countries, it is with intent to facilitate harrassment, or reasonably knowing that doing so will result in harrassment.

    103. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, but Pepperidge Farms remembers.

    104. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never forget the finger daemon ;)

    105. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in a city of over 1 million people. Every household had my info when the phone books came out. They had phone, name and address. Not sure where you live where only name and phone number were only released to friends and family but every city I've lived in had all three pieces of info. Oh, and all that info is still available online for free for anyone interested.

    106. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, SJWs just want to whine about anything that isn't absolutely prim and prudish. That shit only flies in the USA where everybody is ashamed of natural things like nakedness and sex.

    107. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, you killed your own mother?

      Reported to the FBI for admission of murder. Don't drop the soap.

    108. Re: Police? by OutOnARock · · Score: 1

      Dewey, Dickem, and Howe.....Three Stooges

    109. Re:Police? by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      The police don't care,

      If you want to get the police to do anything in this world, don't contact them yourself, have your lawyer contact them.

      In all seriousness, this is the kind of thing that the Mafia was created to deal with, long ago. But oddly enough, they got corrupted by power just as the police had before them.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    110. Re:Police? by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Unless this doxxing contained anything beyond public records what are they police going to do even then? It's not illegal to post public information on someone (barring things like victim shield laws, etc.).

      Could have all your email and phone calls automatically forwarded to the police department.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    111. Re: Police? by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      You know, back in the day they published whole doxxing books. One per town (though you could request another town's by mail). In fact many such doing books were shipped for free to everyone. They were white and yellow too, if I remember correctly.

      Ah, but the identities were cleverly hashed, so that for instance, P. Diddy would be coded as Diddy P.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    112. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. My response was "FUCK NO!!", and yes they kept pestering me for months. I never gave them a damn thing.

      Lucky you, they just terminated my G+ account after a couple weeks of pestering (and at the time you could not use a lot of services without G+), but now G+ is dead, and Vic Gundotra has been fired while I'm still alive and I still have my job.

      Back in the day, when Usenet held sway and Google Groups was a new and wonderful interface to that, Google in its wisdom decided to terminate my account for "violation of terms of service". After a lot of me demanding what they were talking about, I got a pointer to a posting wherein i had quoted an antisemite and argued with his conclusions. I asked them whether they had misidentified the quoted section as my work (although they didn't dump the antisemite), or were they just in favor of antisemitism, but no further answer was forthcoming.
      The point being, they arbitrarily cut off my own access to all of my past postings on Usenet, as well as forcing me to create a new online identity with no connection to the old one. All in the process of Not Being Evil.

    113. Re: Police? by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Ben Dover, Max Imum, I.P. Daily, Fuq Q. Googel....and the list goes on. :)

      Deez Nuts.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    114. Re: Police? by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Do you still french kiss your dog every day?

      I mean, if we're asking inane questions I'd like to at least get a laugh out of the answers.

      doesn't everybody?

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    115. Re: Police? by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Reasons a Phone Book is different from being doxxed:

      1. More than just your name, phone number and address might be shared.
      2. It is linking offline and online, not just posting your info in isolation. Imagine if a phone book contained every single one of your online identities and logons.
      3. Phone books don't link to material that could threaten your personal relationships or career.
      4. Doxxing is used as a tool to intimidate and attack people. It is a form of retaliation, not a public service.
      5. Often(though not always) a single person is singled out.

      As others are pointing out, this is a poor argument and should not be modded up.

      Yes, you could do most of a doxxing manually in the days prior to the Internet and google, via looking things up in city hall and newspaper morgues and etc., but it was harder. Sometimes, making something easier makes a significant qualitative difference. As you would learn if you ever tried to push a .45 caliber bullet into somebody's chest by hand.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    116. Re: Police? by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      Even if we grant that the SJWs are whiners, the Gamergaters are using insults, death threats, rape threats, DDOS, doxxing, and swatting. Tell me again that the SJWs are the villains in the story.

    117. Re: Police? by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      Disavow the 95% of their side that.. what? How many of the SJWs have been caught doxxing Gamergaters? Swatting? DDOSing? Death threats? Rape threats? Give me a list.

      All I've seen the SJWs do is throw insults and make extensive use of ignore lists. Big deal.

    118. Re: Police? by DedTV · · Score: 1

      Are you a patent attorney? Adding "on a computer" to something does not make it different. The difference between having info released online or via phone book is no more than the difference between being published in a New York City phone book versus being published in a Owensboro, Kentucky phone book. It's a difference in scale, not mechanics.
      A phone book gives people just as much malicious potential as someone releasing your personal info on an internet forum.

      Regardless of the medium in which it's released, the likelihood of someone using the information maliciously is highly proportional to the number of people with access to that information who perceive you to be a douchebag. A Pediatrician who has their name, address and phone number plastered all over the internet is far less likely to have that information used maliciously than a paroled child molester who has the same info published in the Owensboro, Kentucky phone book would.

      The only real difference is that online, people perceive themselves as being free from any real world consequences to their words and actions because they're less likely to have their personal information revealed when they spout off on an internet forum than they would if they showed up on their local news talking shit. Just because a Klan member wears a hood in public, doesn't mean he's free from the consequences if someone is somehow able to identify him.

      The only real solution to doxxing is to try and behave online in a way that if your information is revealed, no one has any reason to want to use it maliciously.

    119. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tldr

    120. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both sides are so that argument doesn't hold up. As an outside observer this is nothing more than your standard flame war. And claiming that any side are just trying to make things better would require a lot of evidence.

      One side have spawned a worldwide decline in feminism by associating it with extreme options that most feminists doesn't want to be associated with.

      A lot of feminists have complained about that sides activities only to be called gamergate supporters etc. Prominent members of female only feminist organisations have been repeatedly called male misogynists because they dare disagreeing with this campaign.

      The other side whines that the media that they pay for and support are corrupt. Well yeah welcome to reality. These people couldn't give shit about a media that preferres promoting child labour products rather than reporting on for example powerty. But when their precious luxury product (games) are threatened they care. By debating on corrupted media giving them more cash.

      Meanwhile media makes countless amount of cash on this, both sides feeding what both perceives to be the main problem.

    121. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because if you don't see it, it isn't there. By the way there are no confermed death treat or other criminal activity from any side. All of it can simply be cases of false flag attacks for what we know. You got to remember that there are more than two sides here. There are also media making a shitload of money on this, while most of them couldn't care less about the issues involved.

    122. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. There are mostly white trash on reddit.

    123. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doxxing is awesome. If you don't like someone just steel their identity and make them appear to support gamergate. That'll keep them busy for a while!

    124. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, it's the SJWs posing as Gamergaters in an attempt to discredit them. Some have been caught red-handed. That's how low SJWs will stoop.

    125. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming you are genuinely misinformed and not a SJW shill. Watch this channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    126. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Law and Order: SVU lmfao. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Is that where you got your information that gamergate swat poor innocent feminist 'video game creator'?

      Drop the idiot box. It is no good for you and do not represent the reality in any way.

    127. Re: Police? by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      http://wehuntedthemammoth.com/...

      There are others, I don't feel like digging them up. Many of the death threats and rape threats are directly on Twitter.

    128. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're confusing SJW with conservatives. Social Justice has NO PLACE in a conservative america.

    129. Re: Police? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      No idea who "Car Talk" are or were, but the British satirical magazine "Private Eye" has cartooned the antics at (law firm) "Sue, Grabbit and Runne" for decades.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    130. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahaha I have NEVER EVER used my real name on the Internet for anything other than Secure financial transactions. Since 2000 I have been living a lie online. Actually 3 lies. These lies are actually believed by many to be real persons. The best way to protect your real identity is to be someone else. It's not that difficult.

    131. Re: Police? by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      Car Talk ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ) was a one hour weekly radio show broadcast throughout most of the United States for 35 years. It was about 50% customers calling in with car repair and car purchase questions, and 50% puzzles and humor. They ended every show with a fictional list of people that worked on the show, and all of the names I used and hundreds more rotated through the list.

    132. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I usually add a random number to my address.
      e.g. My name
                    Nb. Street
                    City
                    Country

      Post sent to this non-existing address arrives. (The mailman ignores that fake number).
      If i get ads sent to the address containing a certain number, I can map it back to the person/company I gave that number to and thus know who has leaked that address.

    133. Re: Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the most important difference....

      you can OPT OUT of a phone book.... or choose exactly how your name is shown (e.g. first initial, last name, no street address) if you keep a listed number.

  2. "popular forum" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Which forum exactly is this so we can avoid going to that trash heap?

    1. Re:"popular forum" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Probably Something Awful. They have a forum dedicated to "doxxing" people, mostly "for fun," sometimes because they don't meet the crazy standards of the left-wing SJWs that run that site. Really all you need to know about Something Awful was that it became so toxic that 4-chan was created to escape it.

    2. Re:"popular forum" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? From what I remember it had some interesting stuff there back in the day (like a decade or more ago). I had no idea it had turned to shit.

    3. Re:"popular forum" by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      SA is left wing SJW material? The name alone could've fooled me...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:"popular forum" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was reddit. When you side with #gamergate expect SJW asshole to dox you.

    5. Re:"popular forum" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah like that derek smart thing!!!! those bastard's dont leave a good man alone!

    6. Re:"popular forum" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, bullshit. South Park covered the anti-gamer side perfectly.

      Gamers aren't the ones doing the harassing in this dumb little hashtag war.

    7. Re:"popular forum" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usually it is SJW that berate people for blaming the victim. Your post is victim blaming. If there was any justice in the wold the hypocrisy of it would make your head explode.

    8. Re:"popular forum" by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yep, Zoe Quinn originally was a helldump poster (their doxing board) over at SA.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    9. Re:"popular forum" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah SA has such crazy left-wing SJW standards that they stuck all the leftist posters in a concentration camp subforum first, trolled them repeatedly, and ultimately kicked them all off the site, and continued whining about them in their absence. all while multiple moderators have worked/are working for us intelligence agencies. very left wing.

    10. Re:"popular forum" by St.Creed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the new reality, Ronald Reagan was an SJW.The term has lost all meaning.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    11. Re:"popular forum" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure it was EEVblog. This guy has been complaining all over the internet this weekend.

    12. Re:"popular forum" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, 4chan was created when they booted the pedos.

    13. Re:"popular forum" by dhasenan · · Score: 1, Troll

      She posted on a board on which people called out others' bad behavior online. Doxxing was against that board's rules. Calling for online-only raids on other sites was against their rules, as I recall. That was around 2004, so it's hardly representative of her current behavior.

      Do at least a modicum of research before repeating lies, please.

    14. Re:"popular forum" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      She posted on a board on which people called out others' bad behavior online. Doxxing was against that board's rules. Calling for online-only raids on other sites was against their rules, as I recall. That was around 2004, so it's hardly representative of her current behavior.

      Do at least a modicum of research before repeating lies, please.

      Said board also bragged about harassing people, including proudly announcing they had one "confirmed kill" -- they were mentioned in someone's suicide note, which they took as a badge of honor. And Zoe Quinn bragged about being part of that community -- until she decided to start playing the Feminist Victim card.

      But remember, poor widdle Zoe Quinn is an innocent pure princess and you should give her patreon funbux, plz. And ignore that nasty man she admitted to raping 5 times, he's just a mean old jilted ex.

      Oh and definitely ignore that time Zoe and her friend, DailyKOS Intern Margaret Pless swatted a free speech lawyer who had the wrong politics. Remember: Zoe Quinn is a feminist and a girl -- ON THE INTERNET -- which means she's an innocent victim and should be coddled no matter how vile she acts. I mean, pure and innocent. Not vile. Girls can't be vile, that would be as if they were human beings and capable of fallibility -- or responsible for their own actions.

      And besides, that Cernovich guy's a conservative, he probably has bad thoughts that make it ok to try to have him killed by the police.

      Posting as AC because when you talk about Zoe Quinn, her psychotic supporters (who are currently busy defending Sarah Nyberg, a self admitted pedophile and child pornography trafficker) tend to doxx you, swatt you, and send dead animals to your house. Then act like they never did nuthin' but by god you're evil so you did deserve what they didn't do, and besides, didn't you know white men are the cause of all the evil in the world?

    15. Re:"popular forum" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like Something Awful forums administrator Aatrek who was discovered to not only be a pedophile, but to have actually raped young children? The one who was allowed to keep his position even after it was discovered that he was a literal child rapist?

    16. Re:"popular forum" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turns out forums, especially large ones, can have a mix of assholes and non-assholes. Also turns out that many assholes have interesting hobbies besides trolling. Even over a decade ago, SA had a lot of assholes that caused problems in the name of justice and/or lulz, and didn't care who got caught in the crossfire. That isn't mutually exclusive with having interesting stuff too.

    17. Re:"popular forum" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who doesn't enthusiastically support their right to harass and rape and murder women whenever they please is an SJW. Anyone even slightly to the left of Hitler is a radical extreme leftist.

    18. Re:"popular forum" by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      The only person repeating lies here is you. Helldump was a doxing and harassment board and its users were proud of being mentioned in someone's suicide note. As for her current behavior considering she's STILL doxing and SWATting people I'd say nothing's changed.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    19. Re:"popular forum" by Sowelu · · Score: 1

      Well now I'm morbidly curious

    20. Re:"popular forum" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      zoe like most doxed girls go nuts and make it a crazy insane mess for themselves. always makes it worse.

      another doxed girl kimmy (Kim F) handled it with excellent grace and character. great story on this girl
      *warning* some graphic material read carefully
      https://encyclopediadramatica.se/kimmy

      i say chill and let it blow over

    21. Re:"popular forum" by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

      Wow... when did they become a place for SJW's? They used to be the de-facto forum for (mostly) harmless internet shenanigans.

    22. Re:"popular forum" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically 5-10 years ago. Some SJWs managed to become mods, so effectively they kicked out all the people who did the (mostly) harmless internet shenanigans and they fled to 4chan and later reddit. The old Something Awful is long dead, and the new one is run by SJWs.

    23. Re:"popular forum" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting as AC because when you talk about Zoe Quinn, her psychotic MRA opponents crawl out of the woodwork and start spewing hate all over the place while defending the "jilted ex", whose original post about her was nothing but a pile of lies.

    24. Re:"popular forum" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you might just hate women.

      Where are all of the men in your "outrage?"

  3. It is really very simple by TheAngryCat · · Score: 1

    You Don't everything you post and everything someone posts about you are here forever. I have a good friend who was impersonated by an internet troll, one of those LBGT activist types, what was said about here even though it is not true just won't go away. The technical term for this; like she you are Screwed. Life isn't fair.

    1. Re:It is really very simple by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      Inquiring minds want to know:
      Was your friend an LGBT activist who got trolled by the opposition, or an opposition activist who got trolled by LGBT activists?

    2. Re:It is really very simple by TheAngryCat · · Score: 1

      She was the opposition, she was against men in dresses being allowed in women's bathrooms in California.

  4. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... just imagine what it's like for actual famous people?

    1. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must be a burden. However, I myself am a bit lucky actually since several very well known people have the exact same name as I do. Try to Google my name and you get a shitload of results, just about anything you can imagine. Good and bad, but this is a shield that protects me from stuff like this.

  5. Paranoid's Bible. by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 5, Informative

    Start Here. Unfortunately there's really not much you can do if the webmaster doesn't care other than maybe try to go over their head somewhere in that chain.

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    1. Re:Paranoid's Bible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent and compact guide. Although I've never been doxxed myself (well, not in a serious and harmful way anyway), this helps me keep my footprint smaller in the future.

    2. Re:Paranoid's Bible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having lead a very sheltered life, I wasn't aware of such sites. Is any of this even true? You know in 4.37 light years they're going to be watching this on Alpha Centauri.

      Darksidered992
      Ickeriss69
      Brittany_Holechko

  6. DMCA to the rescue? by nmpg · · Score: 2

    By simply asking to the forum owner, well, he may simply not be motivated.. A lot of people seem to use fake/automated/careless/troll DMCA complaints, and they do tend to actually work, even if when they are not legit, and with no subsequent consequences to the complainer afterwards... Maybe this can help you.

    1. Re:DMCA to the rescue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course knowingly doing it for something illegitimate opens you up to legal proceedings.

    2. Re:DMCA to the rescue? by MrLogic17 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      OP said the forum owner was not within the US, so it's a fair guess that the hosting site isn't either. A DCMA request will be met with either a "Aww, how cute. [delete]" - or a new round of "Hey everyone, check out Op's attempt to stop us! Let's get him!"

      In either case, a DCMA takedown request has done nothing positive.

    3. Re:DMCA to the rescue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe you can declare that your aggregation of your personal info into one place, as part of living your life, is copyrightable, and file a DMCA notice on those grounds? Even if you would probably lose in court, it might be effective here. Is the original poster going to file a counterclaim? Because if they did, you'd have their real info and could file a civil suit for being horrible.

    4. Re: DMCA to the rescue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what worked for me in this situation was to hire a private investigator. once I had the bastards address I was able to ritualisticly rape him until he removed my data. Its a good way to blow off some stress.

    5. Re:DMCA to the rescue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      OP here. The host us in the US but doesn't take much interest. They ignore TOS violations like the prohibition on hacking and copyright infringement. It's Bluehost, FWIW.

    6. Re:DMCA to the rescue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sue the forum operator, get the hosting provider to turn over the operators info with a subpoena.

    7. Re:DMCA to the rescue? by bugnuts · · Score: 1

      The OP already said they're not in the same country. DMCA doesn't have much reach outside the USA.

    8. Re:DMCA to the rescue? by bugnuts · · Score: 1

      If you can show it's copyrighted work, they'll take notice when you file a DMCA. But I believe this has to be under penalty of perjury.

      If they do ignore it, file a DMCA on the ISP's provider.

      However, the info posted is likely not copyrighted.... which falls under other rules of anti-harassment and state laws. Unfortunately, there's still not a lot you can do about it in that case, due to the annoyance of having to deal with a company across the world.

    9. Re:DMCA to the rescue? by Pliny · · Score: 1

      Buy an hour or two of a lawyer's time to send a nasty letter to Bluehost's lawyers. They'll listen to them.

      --
      What does this button d$#%* NO CARRIER
    10. Re:DMCA to the rescue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      OP here. The host us in the US but doesn't take much interest. They ignore TOS violations like the prohibition on hacking and copyright infringement. It's Bluehost, FWIW.

      What steps have you taken with Bluehost? As someone who works there, I'm pretty sure we don't ignore TOS violations...

    11. Re:DMCA to the rescue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This comes back to get "get legal advice," because the host is ignoring the Terms of Service, it's possible that it may be viewed as condoning the harassment.

    12. Re:DMCA to the rescue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OP said no such thing.

      It says "the forum owner is on the other side of the world".

      You are making the assumption that OP is in the US.

    13. Re:DMCA to the rescue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OP said the forum owner was not within the US

      Where does OP say that?

    14. Re:DMCA to the rescue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's not hosted within the US, is it hosted in Europe? If so then it's merely a question of following it up under the European Data Protection Directive, because for them to post personal information and store it without permission or reason would be a breach of national implementations of that directive. Should the owner encourage others to disseminate the information in a revenge game that would merely exacerbate the inevitable fine the site owner would receive for breaching the directive. In the UK I believe the current penalty can be as high as £500,000.

    15. Re:DMCA to the rescue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many years ago I worked at a large web hosting provider. We pretty much ignored everything not though some kind of more official channel. The abuse@ email box would get thousands of emails a day, no one was seriously checking that mailbox. The only take down notices I recall complying with where ones send from lawyers on letter head as part of a filed cease and desist case against us. Many times upper management would even wait and only comply once a case was filed in court and we had a court date.

      Do what others have suggested and call a lawyer if you want a chance at anyone taking any action.

  7. An armed society is a polite society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd hate to see what happens in America if guns were restricted because the fear of someone showing up on your door step with a weapon is the difference between a genuine doxxer epidemic and your typical interwebs asshats.

    1. Re:An armed society is a polite society by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the fear of someone showing up on your door step with a weapon is the difference between a genuine doxxer epidemic and your typical interwebs asshats.

      No, that's exactly what happens.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  8. Re:Don't... by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

    Doxxing, by definition, is the public release of private information. Op didn't release the info. Nefarious 3rd parties did.

  9. And You? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you an asshole that's only complaining because he one upped you?

    1. Re:And You? by TheAngryCat · · Score: 1

      There was a situation on a forum I belong to sometime in the last two weeks where a forum member was complaining that many phrases used by other forum members were not PC. Well long story short the complaining member made a big nuisance of himself, we are talking a real PITA of the first magnitude. This is in a forum where very few people ever get banned, where you can delete your own posts and the owner will occasionally lock a thread, he doesn't like the Gun Debate. At this point there are probably twenty people who know this forum and twelve that remember the incident. The individual's first and last legal name was released, that is something that is public knowledge, I guess the malcontent who got DOXXED didn't have a criminal reccord, wasn't a sex offender, and was not a known terrorist. I Googled his name, but since you cannot change the stripes on a Tiger I suppose he hasn't learned anything from his experience.

    2. Re:And You? by Rei · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, by telling this story were you under the mistaken impression that the story puts you in a good light?

      --
      "This administration is so incompetent that they cover their tracks with bigger tracks." - Seth Meyers
  10. Golden rule! by gimmeataco · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I understand you're trying to avoid further publicity, but you left the context of your crisis blank. Why are you a personality that's driving these people to bombard you? In the off chance this was retaliation for a negative action on your part, use this as a life lesson to behave better. Golden rule!

    1. Re:Golden rule! by Runaway1956 · · Score: 0

      ROFLMAO - I disagree with you, but I notice that someone else has modded your post as flamebait. Abuse of mod powers - once again.

      But, yeah, I disagree with you. Maybe the OP is an asshat - or maybe the other forum members are asshats, or maybe EVERYONE involved are asshats. None of that really matters. OP shouldn't have posted personally identifiable information on the web. It's dumb.

      As for posting things that might anger people - that's what honest discussion is for. People who can't deal with honest, open discussion shouldn't be on the intartubez.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    2. Re:Golden rule! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the OP is an asshat - or maybe the other forum members are asshats, or maybe EVERYONE involved are asshats.

      Every human being on this planet is an asshat. (I do not exclude myself.) I am unaware of any human beings in places other than this planet (leaving aside those in low Earth orbit), but if they exist, they're probably asshats too.

  11. Time by Thagg · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's the only real solution. All of those people who are hassling you now, will be hassling somebody else in the future. I hope that the "popular forum" you mention isn't something that's vital to your life; if it isn't then abandon it. If it is, it's a more interesting question.

    If you need to continue to participate in that forum, I would suggest you just be yourself. Say what you believe, and don't get too fussy about it.

    I've heard from a lot of women who participate in public fora that this kind of abuse is not just commonplace, it's ubiquitous. You might also think of the 34,000,000 people doxxed last month. It's just a common thing, it's going to happen to everybody sooner or later.

    --
    I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
    1. Re:Time by Harlequin80 · · Score: 2

      99% of the abuse you will be receiving will be from dickheads who don't really care about you. Just wait them out.

    2. Re:Time by Improv · · Score: 3, Informative

      If I had any mod points, you'd be being upvoted for this - time normalises everything, and whether someone is getting kudos or negative attention, eventually people forget, whether it's the teeming masses or troll groups. Plenty of us have been victims at least once, and it sucks (and can be scary) at the time, but it gets better.

      --
      For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    3. Re:Time by Vermonter · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. 99% of harassment is done for personal reasons, ie, the harasser wants to feel powerful knowing they are causing someone to feel a certain way (and making someone feel bad is usually much easier than making them feel good). When you give them nothing, they quickly move on to another target that will give them what they want. Only when you get someone mentally unstable do they continue to harass someone with no feedback whatsoever.

  12. Wait it out? by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

    Not sure how to attack this problem, but a couple ideas:

    Like you said, you can't change your name, and you probably don't want to move. Said information is therefore static. If you fight it, you risk the Barbra Streisand effect. Raising a ruckus and loudly complaining will only draw more attention.

    I think your best bet is to wait it out. The best way to become invisible is to be boring. Lay low, wait for the mob to some some new, more interesting person to bother.
     

  13. Simple answer: You don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You have to realise that once that information is out you will never be able to completely get rid of it.

    It's all about damage control, and tedious link removal, possibly for years to come.

    The best behaviour is ofcourse to make sure doxxing can't really harm you, ie don't post/do stupid things on the net that can be exposed.

  14. Re:Don't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Addresses, Social Security numbers, phone numbers, names, etc. are all part of doxxing but that's all public records

  15. Well, your first mistake was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    trying to live on the web, a "place" that does not really exist. The internet is a great thing for communication and to go looking for information, but there is really no reason for most people to have a "web presence" and people who do not (like 99.99% of all people in human history) do not end up with these sorts of totally artificial and unnecessary problems.

    Your first question therefore should be: "why do I care?" followed shortly after by "what does it REALLY matter?"

    People who actually know me know what I am like and no amount of online dirt about me would convince them otherwise. People who do not know me could be easily convinced to believe anything about me they might find online - but they do not matter to me; since I do not know them I do not care if they know me or if they imagine they know me. I do not know the internet reputations of any of the people I deal with in the real world, I do however care very much about their actual reputations in the real world and I know who I can trust on their word or a handshake.

    This silly mental disorder of the Twitter generation that thinks that an online reputation or identity matters at all need to seriously contemplate what really matters in life and need to remember that NOBODY on Earth in all of human history even had an online reputation before about 20 years ago. In most places, the people you actually need to interact with in the real world care nothing about your internet identity/presence.

    1. Re:Well, your first mistake was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know what doxxing is? It's not about destroying someones forumprofile. It's identifying a person, and publishing their name/address, so the person cannot go "away" from the internet. This seems to not be the case yet, but this isn't something like "I forgot the password to my facebook account".

    2. Re:Well, your first mistake was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This silly mental disorder of the Twitter generation that thinks that an online reputation or identity matters at all need to seriously contemplate what really matters in life and need to remember that NOBODY on Earth in all of human history even had an online reputation before about 20 years ago. In most places, the people you actually need to interact with in the real world care nothing about your internet identity/presence.

      The problem with 'doxxing' isn't generally "trying to preserve one's online reputation", but random 'anonymous' people thinking it is fun to 'troll' your "real life", generally with a very bad case of misdirected ('vigilante') 'justice'. It can happen to people without a computer or smartphone, or even an email address.

      (Of course, sometimes it is hard to defend the target... but there are many cases of very misdirected/random attacks...).

    3. Re:Well, your first mistake was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This silly mental disorder of the Twitter generation that thinks that an online reputation or identity matters at all need to seriously contemplate what really matters in life and need to remember that NOBODY on Earth in all of human history even had an online reputation before about 20 years ago.

      This is... very out of touch. 20 years ago, people still often lived and died by their reputation. What was nice was if somehow things went completely south, you could move the next state (or a few towns over) and start anew. Reputations still matter, and the internet means once you have a reputation that reputation is always there.

    4. Re:Well, your first mistake was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This silly mental disorder of the Twitter generation that thinks that an online reputation or identity matters at all need to seriously contemplate what really matters in life and need to remember that NOBODY on Earth in all of human history even had an online reputation before about 20 years ago. In most places, the people you actually need to interact with in the real world care nothing about your internet identity/presence.

      This is stupid. It turns out an online reputation matters these days. How many employers will Google you? Potential partners, etc. It's a common enough problem that how to avoid it is at the top of the search results for "employer googled me": http://www.careerattraction.com/how-to-survive-being-googled-by-potential-employers/

      There have even been employees potentially losing their job, or not getting jobs as a result.

  16. One cannot recover from doxxing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You and/or your social media friends have publicized information about yourself in the web. You can't get it back. Live with it. You're very naive to assume that you have any control over any of the content you've posted or anyone who reuses it. This is the nature of the internet. There is no global system that would give you any rights on this. Though I am curious what triggered this doxxing in the first place. As long as it stays online it is no different to any other bullying.

    If the harrasment is beyond legal and the police wont help, your only chance is to find the individual and deal with him directly. So, find the person and go knock on his door. Make sure that you do not do anything beyond repair.

    1. Re:One cannot recover from doxxing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make sure that you do not do anything beyond repair.

      Like torturing his family in front of him, force him to rape his kids, then garroting his wife, have him butchering the body and feed his wife's flesh to his kids, then garrote them too? And then cut off his arms, legs and genitals, gouge his eyes and slice his tongue and leave him to die of starvation with the only company of the rotting corpses of his family? This kind of stuff?

  17. How to delete yourself from the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2012 article but it might help: http://www.cnet.com/how-to/how-to-delete-yourself-from-the-internet/

  18. Re:Don't... by Desler · · Score: 2

    Doxing is releasing personally-identifiable information. Pretty much all of what is part of "doxing" can be bought from public records sites for like $15.

  19. Block, filter, ignore by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you go to a user page on GitHub, you can report abuse and/or block users.

    Even if they are using an alt account, reporting abuse is a good first step because if they create more alts, GitHub may eventually block those, and even the main account if they have one.

    On email, mark the sender as spam, for the phone if you can just disable voice mail for a while and whitelist calls.

    It's probably just a handful of idiots so if you ignore them and carry on eventually they will tire of getting nothing out of their efforts.

    If the moderators of a forum are against you not much you can do except carry on and complain to the web site owners. But do be really sure about what you are complaining about and present evidence of what you are claiming they did.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Block, filter, ignore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Get a google voice number. Then follow the instructions on google voice to change the voice mail on your real phone to use google voice instead. Start blocking numbers. A block on google voice plays the not in service tone to anyone you have blocked.

      In the future, pass out your google voice number. Then you'll not only be able to trivially block voice mail but the entire call itself.

    2. Re:Block, filter, ignore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      GitHub blows anyways. I had a few projects that got bombarded with SJW wording change requests. Admins don't care even though I could prove it was brigaded on reddit. I just stopped using it and moved to BitBucket.

  20. Someone doxxes me, I doxx them by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 2

    This is a stupid word in any case. There is tons of publicly available information on people, just the municipal tax roll for starters, then the business registry.

    No special leet skills required.

    --
    Mostly random stuff.
  21. If your info is out there, it's out there by poity · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is only prevention
    Besides the obvious tip of not using the same password:
    - Never use the same username
    - Never register on any website using the same email address you use to receive bills and bank statements
    - Never use 3rd party authentication (facebook, twitter, google+) to log in to other sites, much less multiple sites

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    1. Re:If your info is out there, it's out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You forgot:
        - Post as an AC

  22. Go to the services themselves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe talk to Github, your e-mail provider (or the abuse address of each sender), and your social media host about all the harassers who are coming through those platforms? They can presumably ban people who use your contact info as a way to harass you, or at least lock down your account from random people messaging you.

    As for your contact information being available, that's not really actionable, but directing people to harass you probably is. You should probably screenshot everything, and hire an actual lawyer, who can presumably help you file a civil (?) suit against a John/Jane Doe and try to subpoena the IP and actual info of the person or persons encouraging others to harass you.

  23. Re:Don't... by JMJimmy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    More often than not, 'doxxing' is just compiling information that is already available on the internet. People think they've been 'hacked' or 'stalked' but they often forget that they posted the information in some forum/comment section using the same username they use everywhere. I once had a guy ask me to do it to him because he didn't believe that I could. He'd posted 6 times on the forum in question using that username. I was able to identify 2 or 3 other anonymous accounts he'd used on that forum, pictures of not only the exterior but the interior of his house, his real name/social media profile and all the troves of information that provides. It took me about an hour to tease out his data from a woman in Florida. Why? Because he'd mentioned his cats names in one of those 6 posts. That lady in Florida had the same names for her cats, otherwise it was the only thread I needed to pull to unravel exactly who this guy was.

  24. Find one harasser who is in legal reach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make an example of them. (Just to be clear: Legally! Do not harass them back.)

  25. Bury it. by meta-monkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You're not going to be able to wipe stuff off the internet. You need to bury the bad with something good. Here's an article that might help about how the woman whose tasteless joke picture was taken out of context and blown out of proportion got her life back together.

    Good luck and God bless.

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  26. become a profesional victim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i hear people make money with it, you are just only a casual victim

    go pro, just like the videocameras

  27. Re:Don't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doxxing is a way to single out a person with the intent to cause them serious emotional, financial and or physical harm by inciting others to harassment or worse. Yes, most people's street addresses, phone numbers, etc. are easily found, but finding and publishing that information about a particular person to harm them is an aggressive and in most cases illegal act.

  28. Rule # 1 of Forum Posting by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

    Never use an account of any sort that can be traced back to yourself. Never post a photo of yourself as it can be traced by the likes of Google images et al.

    1. Re:Rule # 1 of Forum Posting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This here. *ANYTHING* I say that could possibly be inflammatory is AC and most of the time AC or under a pudendum. I have a few of my 'real name' accounts. They are very carefully cultivated and dont say anything I wouldnt in real life. So they are very bland and tame. "Oh look at the nice flower bed I made in my front yard" "here is an interesting graphics alg" "here is a nice recipe for stew" sort of junk. Politics, money, or religion is AC.

      Learned it the hard way. Not as bad as the dude asking for help. Some dude followed me around story to story on this site. All because I professed a view he did not like. The sad thing I was AGREEING with him yet somehow he twisted it around that I disagreed with him and took every opportunity he could to tell me so. I have not logged into this site since 2004. I figure he would just start following me around again. I got lucky. My name is common enough he could not track it back to me.

      The funny one is a dude over on soylent. He keeps putting his signature on everything. Yet does not bother to log in. I think it somehow makes him think he is immune to being tracked. Apparently he has never heard of the site: command on google.

      A good way to undox is to remember doxing works both ways. For every-time they post something negative just post up that dudes name phone and address saying 'this is not my opinion here is the guy DOXing me give him a call and talk to him about it". Doxing works because they are 'anonymous' but if you bring in shame it falls apart. Also contacting your local police is not a good place to start. Start with *THEIR* local police. Start with your local police if you want. Just make it clear you want a police report so you can contact the police in that dudes area and they can work with them. It is a easy collar and you look good 'working with international police'.

    2. Re:Rule # 1 of Forum Posting by rl117 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Serious question. Why?

      I always use my real full name. My slashdot account is an exception now (it was my email address back in '97) but my email is real. I don't see the benefit of total anonymity--as a free software developer both as a hobbyist and professional programmer, I don't want to participate in development behind some random handle, I want people to know who they are interacting with both in real life and via email/usenet/forums/bugtrackers/whatever. And vice versa Hiding behind anonymous handles is the exception rather than the rule, and while there are sometimes reasons for it, it's unusual. For whatever subconcious reason, I also tend to prefer to know who I'm dealing with--I'd be more likely to ignore or postpone dealing with a bug report from an anonymous person, for example. For some random unimportant forum it might not matter, but when you're participating in development with others over an extended period (years to decades) it would be a bit weird to be anonymous. While I think "doxxing" sounds like childish bullying, I don't see that hiding my name would help much should someone single me out. If they cared enough, they'd find out anyway.

      That said, while my name and email addresses are not kept secret, I do value the privacy of my actual personal details etc., and I wouldn't be amused if they were published, but as mentioned in this discussion, stuff like phone numbers and addresses are "public" if you know where to look. Mine is in the paper phone book and you can look it up online. While it would be nice if idiots didn't abuse this, it's not realistic to keep secret stuff we need to communicate with each other. If you do a google image search for my name, three of the first two rows of images are me; two take you to my work profile page and my work contact details (email, phone, address), the other is my github profile. It would probably only take a few more minutes to work out my home address as well for a determined person. Occasionally I do get people contacting my via all these work details for legitimate purposes. While it would be nice to not have idiots abusing these things, we equally can't wall ourselves off from the world in an isolated bubble.

      Regards,
      Roger

    3. Re:Rule # 1 of Forum Posting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It only takes you ignoring the bug report of a frustrated, immature person for them to spam you. It's best to limit the potential damage and have separate account for separate functions. If you want all your development accounts linked together fine, but you probably shouldn't link those to your furry artwork. Maybe you're too boring to have any fetishes, don't talk about politics, and aren't for or against any religion though there are some religions nuts that still go after those people.

      You can build up a profile that everyone identifies you by, but you don't have to do it with your real identity. Being anonymous doesn't mean you have to be unknown, just that your real info is unknown.

      Do you not run anti-virus or ad blockers because a determined hacker will get into your computer anyway? It's easier to be safer than to clean up the damage.

    4. Re:Rule # 1 of Forum Posting by EdwardFurlong · · Score: 1

      "Childish bullying" might escalate into the criminal, identity theft, defamation of character, swatting, and so on. I have seen someone talk about getting a traffic ticket on a form, then people figuring out who they were, posting pictures from google street view, finding out where they work, etc. just because they could, imagine if you pissed someone off? In general you are probably pretty safe, piss someone off and they might get a kick our of trying to ruin you. Unless you really have to I would not open myself up to that sort of risk.

    5. Re:Rule # 1 of Forum Posting by rl117 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, but I'm a mature adult and a professional. I'm not going to "hide" just on the off chance that some nutter is going to take exception to something--that's their problem, not mine. You don't see Larry Wall, Guido van Rossum or anyone else vaguely serious hiding behind a pseudonym for this reason. I've used my real name from the start as a free software developer, Debian developer, and professional scientist and professional software developer; I've also been involved in some heated discussions in my more youthful days, but that's never been escalated into anything outside being flamed by someone. There's a tradeoff here, and I don't think being anonymous/pseudoanonymous is sufficiently beneficial to warrant it; there's a certain loss of trust in doing so, and it hasn't been a problem for me in the last 18 years of free software- and software development-related activity. I don't think it's realistically possible to reconcile being a professional without being completely transparent as to your identity.

      You're right that maybe different accounts are in order for different things. I certainly use separate accounts for "work", "free software development" and "personal" stuff, though I use my real identity for all of them in any case. Though in practice the latter two are somewhat blurred--I don't do much "personal" stuff online anyway--it's pretty much restricted to software-related stuff with personal things being primarily offline "real life" activities.

    6. Re: Rule # 1 of Forum Posting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're missing the most important part. You aren't a keyboard warrior.
      People actually want something from you.
      DOXing someone is an attempt to get them to leave with a veiled threat that carries more weight than "were gonna get u noob!"

    7. Re:Rule # 1 of Forum Posting by sinij · · Score: 1

      You can't have privacy if your real name is out there. Plus, by using your real name you are one cultural shift away from being turned into paria.

    8. Re:Rule # 1 of Forum Posting by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      You may be a mature adult and a professional. But there are about a half billion others who are the exact opposite. It only takes one to do enough damage that it would take you years to undo the hit you take to your reputation, that hit could have very real financial and social hit, all because someone disagreed with your opinion or because you did something they didn't like. I never use a real identity online for anything beyond basic family stuff, the world is full of self entitled fuckheads who take delight in causing pain, I choose not to be an easy target for them.

    9. Re:Rule # 1 of Forum Posting by wienerschnizzel · · Score: 1

      I sympathize with your sentiment about human to human interaction, but it misses the point. If you've been doxxed it means people are trying to hurt you. The more details they have on you, the more they can hurt you. You can get death threats including things like getting a grenade mailed to you. You can get trouble with the police - like getting swatted or accused of sexual offences etc. People can call your employer/bank/spouse to bad mouth you or call your utility provider to have them disconnect you (cause you are leaving the country for 6 months etc.).

      There are a lot of ways you can fuck somebody's life up just with the real life information you have on them. I'm happy for you that you don't have these kind problems and hope you never will, but don't assume nothing bad can happen just because it never happened to you.

    10. Re:Rule # 1 of Forum Posting by Otis_INF · · Score: 1

      I've used my real name from the start as a free software developer, Debian developer, and professional scientist and professional software developer; I've also been involved in some heated discussions in my more youthful days, but that's never been escalated into anything outside being flamed by someone. There's a tradeoff here, and I don't think being anonymous/pseudoanonymous is sufficiently beneficial to warrant it; there's a certain loss of trust in doing so, and it hasn't been a problem for me in the last 18 years of free software- and software development-related activity.

      I know what you mean, I'm on the internet since '89 and used my real name on e.g. usenet too but you have to realize that today is different than back in the days on usenet and forums and IRC channels where flamewars were kept inside and seldom bled out to other areas, left alone real-life. There are certain areas where I don't use my real name (e.g. in areas that are gaming related) and that's simply because they can be hostile like we know from usenet, but at the same time they DO bleed to outside areas and can affect other aspects of your life, i.e. bleed into your professional life. Back in the days that was uncommon (if you were in a flame war with some people on some IRC channel, chances are if they contacted your work your boss would likely answer "IR what?"), but today it's not. The tools are there, and more than before the concept of 'identity' is different: it's no longer only your passport and the information in it, it's also your combined profile online of all the sites you frequently visit and leave your opinion. So it's best to be careful, e.g. not to use a real name in places which have nothing to do with where you're using your real name.

      --
      Never underestimate the relief of true separation of Religion and State.
    11. Re:Rule # 1 of Forum Posting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who expects privacy on the internet, or out in public, is a moron.

    12. Re:Rule # 1 of Forum Posting by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I am with rl117 on this. The fear of doxxing reminds me of the people that support the school and police arresting the kid with the clock. The author is complaining about harassment. It is annoying but does no real harm. Even harm to your reputation is probably very unlikely. It is a case of fear and paranoia.

      The thing is just how many people praise doxxing when the victim is someone they do not like?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    13. Re:Rule # 1 of Forum Posting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some dude followed me around story to story on this site. All because I professed a view he did not like. The sad thing I was AGREEING with him yet somehow he twisted it around that I disagreed with him and took every opportunity he could to tell me so. I have not logged into this site since 2004. I figure he would just start following me around again.

      Let me guess---Does the phrase "hosts file" figure in there somewhere?

    14. Re:Rule # 1 of Forum Posting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. When I need an account somewhere, I use my real name - why not? I am not hiding, so there is nothing to expose. Certainly not a problem for open-source development.

      The internet may seem like a place where you can use fake identities, but it isn't. It doesn't take NSA powers to figure someone out. If you write enough publically, your identities can be correlated just from writing style and spelling mistakes.

      Lots of the stuff we do on the net is not controversial - why hide then? And if you feel a need to hide - think long and hard if you should even be on that forum and write that post. Is it worth it if you cover gets blown?

    15. Re:Rule # 1 of Forum Posting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re: "If they cared enough, they'd find out anyway."

      This argument is used far too often. The point is, lots of people who would troll you actually don't care enough. They don't have the time, interest, skill level, or whatever to find you. And that point often gets lost.

      The world contains 7 billion people and maybe 2 billion are online. Do you really want to take your chances with 2 billion people? You need to screen out the idiots, the ignorant, the weird, the stalkers, the criminal, the spies, and so on. There are enough damaged or broken people in the world and contact with them can only degrade your life (unless you choose to fraternize with the damaged and broken, in which case good luck but you're on your own).

      It's the same with people who say that security generally or encryption specifically is pointless. "If they cared enough, they'd find out anyway." It's true at some level, but it's also giving up and giving in to the darkness.

      If a tsunami is coming towards you, do you run or do you freeze? It's a simple question of self-preservation. A rational person chooses self-preservation.

      You can also turn it around. The people who really need to know who you are probably already know. And the new friends and colleagues can be introduced via safe, normal mechanisms. You don't need to expose yourself to excessive risk and exposure online to get any of that.

  29. Well.. by grasshoppa · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Your first mistake was being an asshole. How do I know? Because people, as a rule, are lazy. I'm lazy. You're lazy. We're all lazy. So why, I'm forced to ponder, are so many people intent on fucking with you that it overcomes their natural laziness?

    The only answer that makes sense is that you were a raging asshole.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much this.

      Trolling as a hobby requires:
      1) obnoxious levels of precautions against admin facilitated doxing
      2) keeping the trolling at a level that doesn't piss off an admin beyond their natural state of apathy
      3) precautions such that a non-admin user can't match your real identity to your troll identity

      It sounds like you didn't do #1, and failed to do #2. Good job being a royal asshole without covering your bases. If you're going to be a big enough asshole to rise above the "apathy" threshold of a sites administrators, this sounds like a pretty classic case of karma.

    2. Re:Well.. by Ash-Fox · · Score: 2

      Your first mistake was being an asshole. How do I know? Because people, as a rule, are lazy. I'm lazy. You're lazy. We're all lazy. So why, I'm forced to ponder, are so many people intent on fucking with you that it overcomes their natural laziness?

      I've seen this happen to software developers who happen to not make complicated, hard feature some community wants. That's not being an asshole.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    3. Re:Well.. by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Your first mistake was being an asshole. How do I know? Because people, as a rule, are lazy. I'm lazy. You're lazy. We're all lazy. So why, I'm forced to ponder, are so many people intent on fucking with you that it overcomes their natural laziness?

      The only answer that makes sense is that you were a raging asshole.

      Also likely is that he gave responses that made him an entertaining target. Seeking entertainment also overcomes peoples natural laziness.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    4. Re:Well.. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      humm....
      So like the kid that started and anti-swearing site that was Doxxed on 4Chan?

      "The only answer that makes sense is that you were a raging asshole."
      AKA takes a stand on a subject that someone else really disagrees with.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  30. Popular Forum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just come out and say it - Reddit.

  31. Pack and Move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure why anyone hasn't said this but get a one way ticket to Vietnam. Live like a king on the beach for a few years. Stay offline for the most part. Could be a fresh and exhilarating thing to do. Take up new hobbies and enjoy your life.

    You won't get any logistical answers here because there isn't anything you can do to combat what has happened.

    1. Re:Pack and Move by mlheur · · Score: 1

      I came to say almost the exact same thing.

      Go offline. Live in the real world. Take up farming or some other sustainable life-style; olive farms in Tuscany are nice. You can probably find somewhere you can work in exchange for room and board. Probably 6 months or less before the band-wagon wears off and the supporters move on, but personally I'd go for 2 years to be sure.

    2. Re:Pack and Move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That worked out real well for Gary Glitter, so why not for OP, right.

  32. Why do you care? by Threni · · Score: 1

    If you turned your computer off now, and never turned it on again, would you notice any ill-effects? If someone in my office was doxxed, would I even know? I someone told me "bob in accounts was doxxed" I'd go "oh?". And that's it. Is it the fear that someone's going to turn up at your house and kill you? What is the fear?

    If it's only an online thing, then just changed your online presence. I create a new account on pretty much every site I use every year or so - or just stop using them - to help avoid stalkers, spys, people tracking my usage patterns etc. Just do that. You lose nothing except a few minutes a year and whatever reputation you've earned (in the rare case that there's any reputation system in place).

    I seriously doubt random people are scanning the internet for people they don't know and have had no interaction with and who've been doxxed so they can then turn it into a real world problem of some sort; it's just spotty little bedroom boy virgins with internet access and nothing better to do.

    1. Re:Why do you care? by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      If you turned your computer off now, and never turned it on again, would you notice any ill-effects?

      sudden, immediate, and complete loss of all income, but otherwise no

  33. Check out Crash Override Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    you can find them at http://www.crashoverridenetwork.com/

    they also have a guide on what you should do after you've been doxxed (http://crashoverridenetwork.tumblr.com/post/114270394687/so-youve-been-doxed-a-guide-to-best-practices)

    1. Re:Check out Crash Override Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mean that website that was created by a person that started doxxing left and right and then claimed to be the victim when people told said person to stop?

      Yeah, thanks but no thanks.

    2. Re:Check out Crash Override Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean that website that was created by a person that started doxxing left and right and then claimed to be the victim when people told said person to stop?

      Yeah, thanks but no thanks.

      "Crash Override Network is founded and led by Zoe Quinn and Alex Lifschitz, and staffed by a number of online abuse survivors whose identities remain anonymous to anyone outside the network."

      At least we know where you stand.

    3. Re:Check out Crash Override Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're joking, right?

      People have tried to contact Zoe Quinn aka Valkenburg and her dumb hypocritical network for help and, unless they're a high profile person/issue, have gotten nothing but a brainless useless run-around that makes the dumbest tech support look competent.

      More, Crash Override Network *AND* the Online Abuse Prevention are BOTH founded and run by notorious online harassers, doxers, intimidators, and brigaders. You are essentially suggesting that people who have suffered some form of child abuse contact NAMBLA for assistance.

  34. Online identity management by beakergeek724 · · Score: 1

    I heard an interviewee on Mixergy talk about how his company protects clients' brands online and I realized it resembled my own approach to online identity management. He said you can't control what people say about you, but you can deliberately fill the internet with information of your choosing. I have lots of online accounts and they're all in my real name. (A password manager helps for keeping track of them all.) If you google me you'll find my Twitter, my Google Plus, my Flickr, and on and on. You'll also find that my accounts reference one another. Most of them reference my personal domain, which references my Google Plus and my professional domain. My professional domain references my LinkedIn while my Google Plus points to all my other social media accounts. And I also have an About Me page that points to a lot of my social media accounts as well as my personal domain. Someone claiming to be be would have a very hard time convincing anyone interested in the truth.

  35. http://www.crashoverridenetwork.com/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    they should be able to help

  36. This sounds familiar by Chelloveck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "OMG! Like, Tiffany? She totally told Heather that I had sex with Trevor. I mean, no way! He's such a dork! Anyway, Heather told Megan who told Sierra who wrote a note and passed it around 7th hour band and now everyone in the school thinks Trevor and me are an item! My life is like totally ruined! Now I'm afraid no one will ask me to the prom because they're all gonna think I'm a slut!"

    That's what you sound like, and your doxxing problems are going to be about as meaningful a year from now. Your life will suck for a short period of time, then everyone will forget about you and move on to the next bit of juvenile drama.

    If you're honestly concerned about your safety (not just your reputation, that damage will blow over and be forgotten) take the evidence to the police and get real legal advice instead of asking a bunch of jerkwads on a random tech web site.

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    1. Re:This sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I'm afraid no one will ask me to the prom because they're all gonna think I'm a slut!

      I don't think there is any risk there.

    2. Re:This sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because shit that happened on the internet in the past never came back to haunt anyone while searching for work, or anything like that.

      You're the sort of dipshit who comes back later on and asks "Why didn't you do anything about it at the time?"

    3. Re:This sounds familiar by umghhh · · Score: 1

      This looks like a real advice.
      I like the part about us all being jerwads. It fits quite well actually.

    4. Re:This sounds familiar by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      "OMG! Like, Tiffany? She totally told Heather that I had sex with Trevor. I mean, no way! He's such a dork! Anyway, Heather told Megan who told Sierra who wrote a note and passed it around 7th hour band and now everyone in the school thinks Trevor and me are an item! My life is like totally ruined! Now I'm afraid no one will ask me to the prom because they're all gonna think I'm a slut!"

      That's what you sound like, and your doxxing problems are going to be about as meaningful a year from now. Your life will suck for a short period of time, then everyone will forget about you and move on to the next bit of juvenile drama.

      If you're honestly concerned about your safety (not just your reputation, that damage will blow over and be forgotten) take the evidence to the police and get real legal advice instead of asking a bunch of jerkwads on a random tech web site.

      Doxxing can have real life impact. http://www.businessinsider.com...

      The OP already said the police couldn't do anything and that as the sources are outside the US legal options are ineffective.

      Maybe you should have read more before posting something completely useless.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    5. Re:This sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Now I'm afraid no one will ask me to the prom because they're all gonna think I'm a slut!"

      Really? I'd have thought the opposite!

    6. Re:This sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to comment on this 'outside the US legal options' thing. As of arrival of TTIP and other shitty blackmail treaties nothing is outside of US legal options - you just need be incorporated and have enough of cash for lawyers. Other than that you may convince US authorities that people doing it to you are evading US taxes because as we know even before FATCA all world's citizens and financial institutions have to comply with US laws. From what I understand by transferring US currency (who has never had an US dollar in his/her hand?) one automagicaly becomes a subject of US laws. One can try also the ISIS route or tell the currently white house occupying idiot that the land hosting the servers urgently needs more democracy.
      If all that fails tell them Putin is hiding behind this. I am sure there is no place on earth where a US drone could not send a missile, if the physical location of the servers is near some orphanage or grand school it just confirms the suspicion that an evil activity is being conducted there...

    7. Re:This sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if that rumor got you expelled from school and made it so you couldn't get into others for some time?

      I think your comments are belittling and take away from the discussion.

    8. Re:This sounds familiar by tigersha · · Score: 1

      Wow. Ever consider a career as a novelist?

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  37. Re:Don't... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Social Security numbers are most assuredly NOT supposed to be public records. Businesses try to treat them as if they are, because they like the idea of having a unique identifier for every person in the US.

    Don't ever provide your SSN to a website.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  38. Do Nothing by jon3k · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wait a couple of weeks for the internet's ADHD to kick in and everyone to move on to something else. Problem solved.

    1. Re:Do Nothing by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
      The parent probably has the best advice.

      .
      The more you fight it, the more attention you'll bring to it, and the longer it will last.

    2. Re:Do Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like zoe mentioned above and most doxed chicks or people they go nuts and crazy and make things worse for themselves

      another girl doxed kimmy that handled the whole thing with grace and character
      instead of going nuts she went to the source and chatted with them and showed them who she really was
      ended up pretty liked and respected by said site

      *warning* read with caution, great story but some 18+ content
      http//encyclopediadramatica.se/kimmy

      best advice, stay chill and let it blow over, be yourself

  39. Ignore it, stop struggling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dealing with doxxing is sort of like fighting the tar baby, the more you fight, the more you struggle, the worse it will get. Stop arguing with the forum owner and moderators, you're just making it worse. Don't reply to the e-mails, just block them (or avoid checking e-mail for a few weeks). Ignore your social media for a few days. For goodness sake, stop checking Google. No one who you would want to work for is going to take childish pranks on search results seriously.

    I was listening to a podcast just this morning with Kevin Smith and he mentioned how, when the "too fat to fly" thing happened he was devastated. It was the top story on Google for days, social media was unkind to him and he worried about his career. Then, the next week, the story went away as people found other things to entertain themselves. The Internet will hit you hard and fast, but then the storm passes and no one will care next week. ... Unless you fight it and keep making yourself a bigger target.

  40. Post fake doxx and fake info by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

    Post fake doxxes and enough fake info mixed with real info, that google searches dont reveal anything real. If you are up for it, kill you public accounts (emails, social media), and start a fresh.

  41. Become someone new on the Internet. by goodmanj · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You can't become someone new in real life, but you can become a new person on the Internet, someone nobody cares about anymore. There are probably millions of doxx out there, and nobody has time to SWAT all of them. If your old identity disappears, people will stop caring.

    Change your email, create new logins for your forum and social media sites and give the new identity only to people you absolutely trust. And stop going to the forum that doxxed you (or if you insist on being a moron, create a new login).

    Two comments: first, this only works if people are interested in you because of who you are on the Internet. If you're somebody in real life, you're screwed, but you can probably get the cops to care. Second, yes, this is totally letting the doxxers win. But once your info's out there, it's not about being right on the Internet, it's about keeping your house from burning down.

  42. Re:Don't... by TrimTabTim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This. Wish I had mod points.

    In a perfect world one could be honest and use their real identities online. But we live in this world where shit's messed up at the moment.

    Unless you need a public persona for your job, or are really committed to being on the front line of an info-war, you are a naive fool if you don't carefully take all prudent measures to preserve your privacy. The "social" fad has just created human cannon fodder for trolls, corporate identity mining operations and nation state surveillance.

    So it is with regret that I must inform you: we need more people like you to keep getting doxxed and screwed as collateral damage until enough people wake up and realize that privacy is a pivotal component of a civilized and free society. Good and honest people have the MOST to hide if they want to avoid getting taken advantage of. Don't buy the lies of the "if you have nothing to hide" argument.

    Whatever you were doing on the website which screwed you: it should not have required any link to your true identity. If you provided personal info out of free will, then you only have yourself to blame. Sorry for the sour grapes, but there's no recourse. Take the black eye. Soldier on with your life with lessons learned.

    Signed your's truly,
    {any name I sign with is false}

    P.S. Get a password manager and lots of disposable email accounts. If you feel compelled to participate on a forum (hello Dice), do not reuse credentials, emails or nicknames. And even if the administrator is your best friend who you trust with your life, FOLLOW THESE RULES! It's the blackhat who p0wns his website or the troll who abuses it, who you need to protect yourself from, not your friend.

  43. "anonymous reader", eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quick boys, let's doxx this mother fucker. His name is Kyle and he lives in the San Fernando valley area. Post any other info you have below!

  44. Nothing to hide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with getting doxed unless you have something to hide? Why don't you go ask the Zuck, I'm sure he'll explain to you that anonymity is against freedom.

    1. Re:Nothing to hide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fear people willing to kill or hurt others over opinions expressed on-line.

      Or who do it "for the lulz".

  45. Sue. Sue fast, sue everyone., by gurps_npc · · Score: 2, Interesting
    These people are not taking you seriously, and you need to realize how bad this is.

    It isn't a prank, it's not a joke, it's a serious invasion of your privacy that puts you at real risk of physical and financial harm - not just mental.

    You need to hire a lawyer and start suing them. Don't send warning letters and requests, send subpoenas and court orders.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  46. Re:Sue. Sue fast, sue everyone., by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember that homeowners and renters insurance have personal liability coverage in it. Parents are civilly responsible for conduct of their children. This is the money you will go after in your lawsuits. Plenty of the actors will have sufficient coverage to turn this into a windfall for you.

  47. Re:Don't... by Kjella · · Score: 1

    More often than not, 'doxxing' is just compiling information that is already available on the internet. People think they've been 'hacked' or 'stalked' but they often forget that they posted the information in some forum/comment section using the same username they use everywhere.

    Also don't forget that once you're circling a target, you can find what someone else has posted. Like if you know someone comes from a particular place or goes to a particular school, just crawl through everyone else's social media feeds until you find the person you're looking for even if they're not tagged or named but they're at some event or class or group or whatever. A lot of "doxxing" is basically casting a big dragnet and have your own personal army sifting through it until you find the person you're looking for from vague references that ordinarily wouldn't identify you..

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  48. How to put a stop to it by mysidia · · Score: 1

    The police don't care, and since the forum owner is on the other side of the world it's unlikely there could be any legal consequences

    You can make it go away with enough cash. Either bribe the forum owner, Or hire some people who are within a stone's throw of the forum owner to make the problem post go away through any means necessary, up to and including physical force and violent coercion.

    If they're outside the reach of the law, and they're doing serious harm to you, then I guess you could possibly have to go around the lack of law through vigilante tactics that would otherwise be illegal.

  49. Forgive them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ignore them. It will pass. And then forgive them.

  50. Re:Don't... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, congress never made a law that says the Social Security Number cannot be used as an ID. They did print that on the Social Security cards for the first couple of decades, and the government is required to issue you a privacy statement if they ask for your Social Security Number. It is good practice to not use the Social Security Number as an ID and we should encourage the practice by refusing to do business or be an employee of a company that uses the Social Security Number as a means of identification.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  51. Re:Don't... by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    Accept the fact that you allowed your personal information out into the world and are now facing the consequences of that decision.

    Bingo. Whether careless or willfully complicit, the results are the same. Now you're screwed.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  52. How to recover? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    8 oz of whiskey, ice optional, in a glass of of your choice.

    Minimum 3-4 servings recommended daily, more is encouraged but not required. Repeat as necessary until the symptoms subside.

  53. Ask Barbara by kwerle · · Score: 1

    I think Barbara Streisand probably has some good advice on this subject.

    Seriously, though, once your information is out, what do you hope to do? It's like complaining about spammers - get a better anti-spam system. Be prepared to filter aggressively. Do not engage.

    1. Re:Ask Barbara by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has nothing to do with the Streisand Effect.

  54. NEVER EVER create any account in your own name! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But I guess its too late for you now grasshopper.

  55. Here's a suggestion by rossz · · Score: 0

    Put on your adult pants and grow the fuck up. Your personal information has been out there all along, so get over it.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
  56. EEVBlog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Are you by any chance that YouTube troll that claims to have been doxxed on the EEVBlog forum, but of said dox there are no info on the Internet whatsoever?

  57. Re:Don't... by NicBenjamin · · Score: 2

    You actually have to for a variety of finance services.

    If they're sending you interest income, they have to send out a 1099-INT with your SSN on it. The IRS also gets a copy, which they use to verify that you didn't lie on your tax return.

  58. Re:Don't... by NicBenjamin · · Score: 0

    Yes and no.

    You can buy all kinds of info about my name from a public records site, because NicBenjamin's RL name is probably not Johan Czerpinski-Al Ahmed.

    But Desler? you'd have do some research to figure out which Desler to ask for.

  59. Are You an Asshole? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Live your life like you don't care what people know. And if you need to keep secrets your opsec better be perfect.

    What did you do that this is such a problem? If you've been an asshole maybe you'll reconsider future behaviors. But tell us the grand story about how the forum mods and owners were unjustified.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Are You an Asshole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Just like women wearing skimpy clothing in a dark alley: they're looking for it.

  60. People with nothing to hide hide nothing by 0dugo0 · · Score: 1

    Elaborate on why being doxxed is so bad in your case. I rarely hear this term outside the realm of script kiddies. Anyone else seems to be able to post their CVs, kids pictures, favourite catfood and whatnot without getting harassed.

  61. Re:Don't... by mysidia · · Score: 1

    You actually have to for a variety of finance services.

    Any service (financial or otherwise), where you might be paid money or given consideration, will require the SSN for the W-9 form, and the SSN is used to complete 1099-* forms.

    Basically... any service that facilitates monetizing or generating a profit for the customer, such as Ads for your Blog, or Uber where there is Cash exchanged for giving rides.

  62. Internet Attention Span by PPH · · Score: 1

    Yeah. Let's get this guy. I tell you what we ought to do, is .....

    Oooooo! Cat videos!

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  63. Double down. by o_ferguson · · Score: 2

    You can always do what I did. Anonymous Canada "D0xed" me a couple years ago, because I pointed out how week their OpSec was (they were posting highly sensitive d0x-in-progeress about minors on an open forum with no login or password required.) Once they released their incredibly cursory and inaccurate collection of stuff from public source, I replied with this: http://obsceneworks.com/blog/o...

    --
    - In Soviet Korea, only old people loose all their bases to Natalie Portman's petrified hot grits overlords.
  64. Re:Don't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    boo hoo. if you can't stand by your words with your real name then fuck off. sincerely, anon.

  65. Use BS to fight BS by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Flood the internet with fake and silly stories and data about yourself so that people cannot tell the real from fake.

    1. Re:Use BS to fight BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, some actual advice after dozens of critical comments about what he should do if he had a time machine.

      Indeed. Burying the truth in a mountain of BS is one of the few tactics for dealing with this situation now that the damage has been done.

      Also (I just thought of this) considering switching between full name and nickname to "reinvent" yourself on the sites where you might want your identity known (FB, LinkedIn or whatever you use). i.e. if you previously went by "Robert", recreate yourself online as "Bob" or "Rob" or if you used a shortname, go back to your full name. Then, turn the compromised identity into a different person. Make "Rob Smith" and "Robert Smith" two different people in terms of their online presence.

  66. The iPhone can block calls also by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I don't know how it comes off on the callers end, but you can also opt to block callers on an iPhone also and then they cannot reach you - just go to the recent call list, press "i" and you get an option to block that caller.

    Google voice might let you block ranges of numbers though? That might be helpful if you were under some kind of robo-attack (I had one call bank that tried to reach me with three sequential numbers, luckily after that they gave up [or ran out of numbers])

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  67. Read 'The Gift of Fear', not responding is KEY by VoxBoston · · Score: 1
    Read http://www.amazon.com/The-Gift... The Gift of Fear. Really insightful, talks about many issues with stalking, violence, etc.

    The main part relevant to this problem: responding to many stalkers even with negative / threatening behavior is a form of positive encouragement, and they'll keep at it. The only solution is to filter YOUR experience (delete / don't listen to VM, don't read emails etc) rather than trying to get the unwanted inputs to stop.

    That way there's no feedback to the jerks on the sending side, they get bored or angry at someone else, and go away.

    One subtlety is: don't turn off your phone, or leave a outbound message saying 'I will not be checking this voicemail because of the jerks". That's encouragement. Change nothing. Get a 2nd phone as needed, use that.

    Likewise, don't setup an autoresponder saying "I don't read this email because of the jerks" - same logic as above. GoF is a very worthwhile read, for everyone.

  68. Re:Don't... by koan · · Score: 1

    Mmmmm... We don't really get a choice in this, most information people are commonly concerned about are public information.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  69. Profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Upgrade your phone line to a premium number.

  70. Who are you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're a dick or a complete asshole, get used to being kicked off every chat forum you enter, eventually

    Stop whining

    Grow some nuts and be a ma .. whatever

    Stop being such an asshole all the time. Take a sedative ..

  71. Re:Don't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you die the number gets recycled Not currently.

    http://people.howstuffworks.com/question719.htm

    see question 20
    http://www.ssa.gov/history/hfaq.html

    Given the current rate you are looking at 30-40 years before re-use will become an issue. My guess is they will have to fix this fiasco before then. Probably with some sort of two factor auth. It is an interesting problem. How to uniquely identify everyone. The SSN does that well. The problem is 'are you who you say they are'. Which is some sort of public key that goes along with it or two factor.

  72. Cut the attitude, contact Crash Override Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, contact the Crash Override Network as they will better be able to work with the specifics of your situation rather than having Slashdot respond to an overly generalized question.

    Second, drop the attitude that the world "doesn't care." Having someone tell you that you aren't providing them enough information for them to act on is not the same as not caring. It means the ball is still in your court. I work for a hosting company and frequently hear the guilty trip line that if we don't monitor the impact of every single bit that flows over our network then we "don't care." Usually this is said by someone that contact us over the phone and expect us to disconnect a customer just on their verbally. A hosting provider has contractual obligations to it's customers and usually can't remove individual items. Instead, the hosting provider can only disconnect an entire customer (including legitimate websites hosted on the same server) or continue to provide services to the entire customer. I have yet to run across someone that include the words "doesn't care" when making an abuse report without also resorting to also attempting verbal abuse and laying down a guilt trip. If that is the attitude you are going to take then at some point your declaration will become a self fulfilling prophecy.

    Instead of measuring your lack of success in terms of "caring," pay attention to what you are being told is required for them to proceed. If they say it take a court order for a hosting company or the policy to take a server offline, then they are telling you that because that really is what it takes. They aren't telling you that to try to make you feel like no one cares. If they need a court order or more written evidence then the ball is back in your court to address the requirements. If you are failing to listen to what is required or failing to provide what is required then it might be possible it is really you who is failing the "care" scale of trying to take care of things.

    Hopefully if you contact the people of the Crash Override Network, they will be able to work with the different organizations involved while being able to filter out your crappy attitude.

  73. SJW trying to do research? by sethstorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Something doesn't smell right about this. They're asking for advice in a potentially unfriendly forum (read: it doesn't purge material) and may not be fully honest about their intentions.

    If the Anonymous Reader is honest in their intentions for seeking advice, I hope they will understand the reason for suspicion.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  74. Re:Don't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The amount of information out there on people is shocking. In 2008, there was a guy selling a custom camera attachment on a video camera forum I frequented. People started complaining that he had their money but they couldn't reach him. He hadn't posted in weeks. I decided to try to find out more. I found out his real name and city from his use of the same id on other forums. From this I found phone number and his address (and a google street view of his house). I even found the reason for his lack of communication; he had lost his house in a mortgage foreclosure. A week later he finally logged and confirmed what had happened. That's a hell of a lot of personal information to pull off the web in less than an hour starting solely with a forum id.

  75. Harassers & doxxers are not good counsel. by sethstorm · · Score: 0

    So you're asking them to have a known harasser, Chelsea van Valkenberg, take on the case?

    If they're not involved (directly or not), that group would make things worse.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  76. You must be kidding. Really you must be. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It takes all of two minutes to put a name, address, phone number and most other publicly available info together with very little actual info to start with. I saw a mention of some open source projects and some websites. All it would take is a mention of the names of the projects or sites and I could probably tell you what you had for breakfast by the end of the day. You are making it worse by trying to "fight" it. It sounds like you have ticked someone off, and as soon as you quit fretting about it, they will decide it isn't worth their time to keep messing around.
    Now it is called doxxing. In the 80's it was, as another poster pointed out, called the phone book.

    1. Re: You must be kidding. Really you must be. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The phone is a really stupid comparison. It has your name and phone number. Not your name plus spouse and kids plus their ages, your SSN, address or place of work.
      Not the fucking treasure trove you make it out to be.

  77. Re:Sue. Sue fast, sue everyone., by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worse possible advice ever, that will just pour petrol on the flames, and make it worse. There is nothing more fun for a baying crowd of assholes, than a target that fights back. Your supeanas will become badges of honour.

    Just hunker down, grit your teeth and wait it out, they will all eventualy wander off when the fun ends and stop bothering you.

    Remember the streisland effect.

  78. Keep your digital footprint as small as possible.. by kheldan · · Score: 2

    ..and make yourself invisible, if possible. Stay away from forums, never use your real information, avoid so-called 'social media'. So far as 'recovery' is concerned: They'll get bored before too long, so long as you don't 'feed the trolls'. Don't respond to them. If you're being threatened in real life or your property is being damaged, then involve the police. Otherwise just ignore it and it'll stop on it's own.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  79. Re:Sue. Sue fast, sue everyone., by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
    Streisand effect works when YOU are being the shmuck. Attempting to hide your own bad behavior. That is NOT what is going on here, instead you are attempting to stop other people from acting badly.

    If you sue, the media will not think "oh, this random stranger is being a shmuck, lets talk about it. Instead they will say "X corp. is being a shmuck, let's talk about THEM.

    But frankly, the media is not likely to talk about it at all. Instead, what is most likely to happen is that once the people get court orders, they will suddenly become reasonable and say "we can handle this without the court right?

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  80. Re:Sue. Sue fast, sue everyone., by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you've already been doxxed the damage is already done. Might as well enrich with a few extra houses.

  81. You mean Chelsea van Valkenberg. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    ...a known harasser of others.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  82. They? by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 1

    " yes they kept pestering me for months"

    Pesky algorithms. They should know when to shut up.

    Seriously, I thought Google's "customer service" and whatnot was merely (mostly?) sophisticated spam, Turing-contest bots, and that you had to write a really nasty, threatening letter to get past the filters to a human.

  83. Sometimes it matters by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 2

    If I read right the OP said or implied that s/he was a software developer of some sort (Github?), so I think in this case an online reputation does matter. So unless the OP is Linus Torvalds, a bad web rep means your chances of getting hired or contracted for a project is significantly impacted.

  84. Keep cryin bitch nigga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's way way easier than you think. Without even lifting a finger, handled.

  85. Social Networking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "I'm getting bombarded by email and social media, even via GitHub."

    Its called social networking.

    "social media" is something made up by dinosaur media companies broadcasting on TV and radio that are still trying to be relevant.

    Remember the movie The Social Network http://www.imdb.com/title/tt12... It 'doesn’t sound right if it was called "The Social Media" does it?

  86. Re:Don't... by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    Until the 90s Massachusetts used social security numbers as License numbers as a default. In the 80s they started giving the option to use an "S" number instead. I jumped at it, and when I did a bunch of unpaid parking tickets disappeared from my record.

  87. DoS them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should DoS the forum until either the forum removes the post or the webhost shuts down the forum. The internet is still a wild west, and if your attack is effective terrorism still works. If they're big enough to sign up for CloudFront or AWS it probably won't work.

  88. The most effective solution. by idbeholda · · Score: 1

    Hit the power button and go outside.

  89. Re: Kill yourself. by JWSmythe · · Score: 1, Funny

    I read that as "Second Life is over. Suicide is the only course of action left to you, sorry." well, either way.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  90. Re:Don't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, thanks for correcting me.

  91. How do you know it had no repercussions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You see a job post that you seem like a good match for. You send your resume and get no response. Did they find someone else first? Or did they google you and find some old outburst of yours online?

    Do you now have no opinions about anything? You say you like Coke better than Pepsi? There goes your shot at that automation contract for the Pepsi distribution center. It's one thing to use your real name in professional developer forums, but for just random online bullshitting (like Slashdot) it has a large downside and basically no upside.

  92. Re:Don't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can get tax ID numbers issued that are not a SSN, and people with a green card will have a nine digit alien number. The problem is a lot of places that do cheap automatic screening of info will deny attempted use of such numbers because it turns out they are not SSNs. I guess it lets companies get away with not hiring legal immigrants, as I've known people who had job applications denied because they used an alien number. I've also had a local business refuse to setup a business account for me because they complained my company's tax identification number is not a valid SSN for tax purposes.

  93. Re:Don't... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    Oklahoma did that as well until also sometime in the 1990s.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  94. Re:Kill yourself. by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry but we need to nuke him from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

  95. My solution is to "DOX" myself by StevenMaurer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously. Anonymity is a legal fiction and an illusion, and almost nothing you say anyone gives a damn about anyway. I mean, my God, seriously, what do you think is going to happen? Being embarrassed because you hold some sort of unpopular opinion? Currently in the U.S., the big news is that Carly "HP rose 6% when I was fired" Fironina, is considered to have "won" the Republican debate over Trump the Clown, because she brazenly lied multiple times about Planned Parenthood! And you think you're going to be affected by some pro- or anti- Gamergate opinion?!?

    The problem, ultimately, is that people really don't know who is wrong or right - so as a shortcut, they look to see if someone "caught" acts as if whatever it is they've been "caught" doing is embarrassing. This is why Trump is leading right now. No matter how wrong he is, or stupid, he never acts like it's important. So instead of clutching your pearls over some opinion you have, trying to "erase" someone DOXing you, when you really should be posting the entire DOX, saying "See what assholes these people are, trying to DOX me instead of actually engaging in a contest if ideas? That's because they're wrong and they know it. They can't fight my ideas, so they attack me. I guarantee that you will get an outpouring of support for whatever you believe in.

    TL/DR: I don't censor my opinions. I call 'em as I see 'em. Under my own "brand", as you will. And I guarantee you, I'll never be embarrassed being myself. You shouldn't either.

    1. Re:My solution is to "DOX" myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no reason to lie about PP.

      PP Kills babies. Period.

    2. Re:My solution is to "DOX" myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard you, Steven Maurer...were a CHILD MOLESTER.

      Hear that everybody? Steven Maurer is a child molester!

      Anyway, gotta go spread this on other forums. :) Bye

    3. Re:My solution is to "DOX" myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bullshit "you don't censor your opinions"

      read some Freud. Read studies that show people lie multiple times a day. It's just not possible you are the person you are presenting yourself as.

      perhaps you follow a discipline of always logging into forums under your real name. control freak.

  96. Re:Bury it.glgl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God bless?

    little late for that.

  97. Stop putting real data on websites by mindmaster064 · · Score: 1

    I keep saying this, but nonetheless unless you have a legal obligation to provide real info don't. The problem is your data goes in databases and you have no idea how long it is going to be retained. Closing your account doesn't even delete the data. Next, change all the info that is relevant... STOP USING REAL INFO.. esh... I'm not going to say it again.... you aren't getting checks from these people they don't need your info.. New Github account New Phone/E-mails New Everything that can be remade. For non-essential accounts use bullshit information. Use different information on each site and record them somewhere safe. You can parrot them back if you have to. Close all of the accounts they are bombarding. Solved...

  98. Forum's owner is on the other side of world? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, just ask your DoJ and RIAA, they will have them shut down faster than MEGA in New Zealand.

  99. Go back in time and don't upset whoever you upset. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not saying it's your fault, I'm saying it's hard to unring a bell. Best you can usually do is wait until the sound dies down and nobody can remember hearing it. Unfortunately, search engines have a long memory. Changing your name, addresses, phone numbers, and known associates is probably going to be the quickest, although probably not the least painful, path.

  100. Re:Don't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... It is good practice to not use the Social Security Number as an ID and we should encourage the practice by refusing to do business or be an employee of a company that uses the Social Security Number as a means of identification.

    Good luck with that.

  101. I bet this is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Let me guess. Is this @srhbutts aka Sarah Nyberg, the self admitted pedophile?

  102. How fo I recover from doxxing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't, that's why you never - ever - post personably identifiable information on the Internet.

  103. Don't register on a forum with a traceable by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    ... email address. I have many email addresses and I don't register anywhere with one that anyone i know in real life would recognize.

    Since you apparently didn't take that precaution, the solution is to kill that identity or embrace it.

    You kill the identity by going dark on it and creating another that cannot be traced and is not associated with the previous identity. Then you can participate on the forum etc using that new identity.

    People will forget the old one and eventually stop talking to you on it.

    This is one of the reasons I use email clients. It allows me to check 10 different email addresses at once. Webmail is shit.

    The alternative is to embrace the new identity. You say "Yeah, I am bob... I live here... deal with it." This will restrain you to some extent since you're going to have to not say things that you'll regret later. However, it is also powerful to be out in the open as well.

    Depends on what the forum is... is this for child porn or something? what are you doing on this forum?

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  104. Well DOH!! by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

    And people keep asking me why I'm not on facebook

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  105. Re:Don't... by necro81 · · Score: 1

    posting to undo a mistaken moderation

  106. Re:Keep your digital footprint as small as possibl by greenfruitsalad · · Score: 1

    or take the opposite approach and have multiple online personas. the trick is to first create a backstory for each. just making up a name and age isn't enough.

  107. Try this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get TOTALLY off the net for a week. Get out of the house/office and spend a week in the mountains or along a coast or a river near a small town. Eat/Shop at the local spots where the locals do. Ditch the tablet and cell phone for the duration.

    You may be shocked to discover that huge numbers of decent people rarely, if ever, even use the net and still in 2015 interact with each other in person, use cash, and shake hands. Good food can be had from people who cook it in a mom-and-pop food shop unaided by the web. Money can change hands without the web, without anybody spying on the transaction and enhancing their profile of you and what you're likely to buy and might want to see ads about. You'll discover you can spot good places to eat by watching where the locals go, rather than looking for "likes" on facebook. You'll discover you can see amazing scenery IN PERSON rather than in a cropped-and-edited image on Pinterest or Instagram.

    My point is that the combination of corporate marketing and pressure (driving people to the web where they can be analyzed, spied on and monetized), shiny flashing things (the tendency people have to gravitate to new tech and new stuff) and social pressures ("you NEED to be on Facebook, dude!") have completely brainwashed a large part of the population to ignore the REAL world that ACTUALLY matters (where people are born, live, and die and hopefully interact with others in person while making the world a better place) with a virtual world (that does not really matter at all any more than graffitti on a wall in Rome in 100BC matters) that could rapidly cease to exist in an instant if a real world war or large natural disaster occurs and may not exist as it does now in a new "thing" comes along that's "better". People need to keep this in perspective and occasionally unplug as a reminder of what ACTUALLY MATTERS.

    There are many of us you are on the web every day and use it for our businesses who, nevertheless, keep it in perspective and still DO conduct some of our business in-person and on a handshake with people who have actual reputations. Try it.

  108. One good reason to stay anonymous... your life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My co-worker and spouse were murdered in their house last year, sometime during the night or early morning. The police still haven't solved the case (or caught any suspects they might have that they're not revealing). There were no signs of break-in that the police have revealed. Initially it was thought to be an accident but further investigating led them to determine it being a homicide.

    One was the general manager of a (fairly) big company that had a few enemies in the industry. They gave out their cel # to customers all the time, and had a regular (listed) phone number and address in the directory. They played sports and had a big tag on their bag with their name and full address and phone number. They had a Facebook profile that was completely public and open.

    Now, I'm not saying that having all of that information completely accessible to someone led to his death, but I'm sure it didn't help him out either, and probably helped the killer(s) know where they lived.

    Needless to say as soon as it happened, all of us in my family took our real Facebook profile pictures down and replaced with non-personalized photos. My wife, kids, and I changed our FB profiles to be completely private, just in case. However, I never kept any info on Facebook like my phone number, address, etc., and I was already always careful about what was public and what wasn't before that happened. It really hit home for me. Who knows where the lunatics came from that killed those two people, and why they died. Could have been family, or friends, or co-workers, or a customer, or even a teammate.

    Yes you can always follow people home from their job or recreational activity to know where they live, but that's a lot more difficult than typing a few characters and finding out without needing to even get up. Makes a killer's job much easier.

    Posted as an anonymous coward for obvious reasons.

  109. was trying to make a point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If somebody trashes you online ("Joe Shmoe (made-up name as example) is a terrible guy and a rapist who lives at xxxxxx and is married to xxxxxx and has this phone #....") it can be mighty unpleasant, difficult to resolve etc. BUT anybody in the real world who KNOWS Joe Shmoe will know it's all dishonest dirt and ignore it. People in the real world who do not know him might fall for it but generally do not matter, and so-on.

    Obviously this stuff is bad and can be dangerous (in-part because so many morons live on the net and believe everything they read there, and so many "social justice warriors" are eager to join the mob and attack somebody in the real world based on crap they read on the web).

    SOME of this can easily be fixed by legislation, some of which can be driven by lawsuits. In cases like swatting, for example, Police should not be permitted to storm a house without first trying to peacefully find out if there is a problem (duh!) and if enough people who've been swatted sue enough of the cities involved these reforms will kick-in.

    SOME simply cannot be fixed because of legal jurisdictions (US laws for example do not and never will apply in Moscow nor the other way around - and no treaty that pretends to fix that ever actually will). In many of these cases, however, the damage done by a jerk halfway around the globe is limited. In cases where a business in your home country that is supposed to be supporting YOU (like a bank or phone company) is involved in a problem originating outside your home country, they need to be challenged, in court if necessary, for being party to fraudulent activity with a foreign fraudster while YOU (their actual customer) are locally available to verify the fraud.

    In summary, it's NOT that I was denying the problems that can occur, but rather I was highlighting several important points people seem to be forgetting:

    1. The real world is always more important. (hint: even in a legal sense, where businesses should be challenged when they end-up supporting bad virtual behavior even though the real innocent party is in their real-world proximity)

    2. It's easy to get depressed and bogged-down in all this stuff because it's easy, particularly for younger people raise on the net, to lose perspective.

    3. The very idea of having a "net presence" leads people to do the sorts of stuff online and place the sorts of info online that in-turn expose them to many of these risks in the first place. Do you really NEED a Facebook page? a Twitter account? A Linked-in Page? (did you NEED them a decade or two ago????) and did you really NEED to place all your family info and that of all your relatives on hackeverybodyiknow.com (i.e. ancestry.com) and did you NEED to put all that stuff about your friends and family and activities and likes and dislikes on all your "social media" sites (which are actually anti-social media given that they are replacing actual human-to-human contact and in-person exchange of info)

    We who are geeks/nerds/coders/etc need to be politically active to drive legislatures to force businesses and government to make it easier for people to clean things up in person and make it harder for anonymous people with unverified locations and unverified identities to do ANY harm to ANYBODY, from swatting, to financial transactions, to setting-up/modifying/closing accounts etc. This stuff is basic and simple (example: bankers USED to meet their customers in-person when opening/closing/changing/draining accounts and yet they were more-profitable than many are today) but will continue to be complex and risky as long as these corporations successfully lobby and bribe lawmakers to not require them to be responsible. Massive new federal Dodd-Frank-style laws are not needed; very basic SIMPLE (one page or less) state laws are better but will not happen as long as non-tech people who rarely think about this stuff are not educated on it and tech people are not involved in fixing it.

  110. Oink oink... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good morning Mr. Cameron!

  111. Re:Sue. Sue fast, sue everyone., by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do know that Streisand was just trying to stop aerial photos being take of her property by a company (I bet you can't even name it) that she believed were an invasion of privacy right? She wasn't really being a shmuck she was making a high-profile response (1/2 million dollar lawsuit, or something along those lines) to something that had a negligible effect on her existence in reality.

  112. Sigh. by 3dr · · Score: 1

    The solution to a bad hangover is to not drink excessively the night before.

    If you hang with assholes, and participate in assholery, prepare to be a target of it eventually. Was this 4chan? This sounds like 4chan nonsense drama. Fortunately for you, it will blow over quick.

    But I have to say, the sure sign of being a little bitch is participating in net.BS and then crying -- to the police! -- when the tables turn. Knock it off already.

  113. Never been stalked, I take it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've never been stalked, I take it.
    I have.
    Twice.

    The first time started just as I was planning to get a new job and relocate. An easy solution, that time. From the start of a job search to relocating about 1,000 miles away was 3 weeks.

    2nd time, about 9 yrs later ...
    When someone shows up at your door, at 11pm, thinking you wanted a "booty call" because you were polite, once, 2 months ago, well ... it gets a little scary. The phone calls at all times of the day and night - home, cell, business phones. Not fun.

    Being polite and asking nicely didn't make it stop. My wife and kids were being approached by this person who had decided we were soul-mates. It was scary for my family. The person has a mental illness and the only way that finally got her attention was letting her employer know. She was immediately moved to a different location, then her contract was not renewed a few months later. That was when it all stopped.

    Since then, I've changed my online presence completely. I never use my real name (which is highly unique in the world). I don't use facebook, twitter, g+, or any of the most popular social network sites. These are all blocked at the network layer by both firewalls and /etc/hosts on all machines here. For google stuff, I have at least 5 different accounts which are compartmentalized by use. None are used for anything important - basically just to share docs with for specific projects. As a system admin, I'm used to having hundreds of accounts, so this isn't a big deal.

    All of that happened about 9 yrs ago. Now only a few references to my real name still exist on the internet with old data, in different states. Nothing current. I don't use the same username on any 2 websites. Every login has a different password. Financial logins and passwords are random and each is tied to a different email alias. A rubber hose couldn't get me to reveal my bank login - I don't know it.

    I've learned that I cannot control someone else's poor behavior. To people I meet online, I give a different name than my real name. At this point everyone in my clubs and work use that other name. My father did the same thing with his name and I never knew why. I do now. Family and close friends still use my given name, which is fine. They understand why I use a different name.

    No images are tagged with my name online. I ask people to please not post photos of me online at all and even in groups, please do not tag me. That has worked. I had an open, online, photo gallery years ago - google found it and indexed everything. Stalker #2 found it - I moved it, password protected it. Google forgot about it, eventually.

    These days, life is pretty normal. Friends can find me. Crazies may, but not in the phone book - no POTS line, only VoIP, which does'nt get a published number. Blocking calls is trivial with VoIP.

  114. Re:Don't... by budgenator · · Score: 1

    Often it's not a matter of allowing, all it takes is one RadioShack going chpt11 and a Bankruptcy Judge ordering your personal data is sold to the highest bidder; then your cell starts blowing up from telemarketers and your suddenly "hot-babe1983" on Ashley Madison!

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  115. If iis on eht internet, it's not private. by plopez · · Score: 1

    And if you wouldn't shout it down the hall at work, don't post it.

    And never post a face pict.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  116. Re:Keep your digital footprint as small as possibl by kheldan · · Score: 1

    I should clarify: keep your digital footprint of your real name and information as small as possible, preferably invisible. By all means, make any pseudonyms as detailed as you like. Personally speaking, there are some sites that think I live in Barrow, Alaska, and that I'm 101 years old. ;-)

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  117. Funny that you never mentioned . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny that you never mentioned why they're doxxing you.

  118. Sorry for your troubles... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But you had to know this was coming, Bennett Haselton because you're just so hated...

  119. Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did someone let the thread originator use the internet?

  120. It's by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    Kind of a paradox.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  121. Consulting with a harasser and doxxer == bad idea. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    So you're asking them to have Chelsea van Valkenberg, a known and proven harasser, take on the case? You're asking for a wolf to the henhouse.

    If they're not already involved (directly or not), that group will make things worse. One would do better to study the people that have succeeded against them.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  122. You published unencrypted truename information ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I stopped doing that when the ARPANET was open to my parents, not just grad students.

    Now I've told my kid, no faces in body-part pix you send.

    If its not encrypted its published, forever. See Lewinsky, Streisand, etc.

  123. Doxxing is not your problem by allo · · Score: 1

    Doxxing (stupid word, by the way) is not your problem. Now somebody knows you. So what? Your problem starts, when somebody tries to harm you using this information. And this are mostly illegal acts. Here the police is your friend.
    Getting spam? Learn to block the sender. Do not react. Let them do it, until it bores them.