Slashdot Mirror


Volkswagen CEO Issues Apology Over Emission-Cheating Software

cartechboy writes: Last Friday we learned that Volkswagen got caught cheating on emissions testing via software programming. The punishment? It could get slapped with up to $18 billion in fines. While the company has yet to admit to any wrong doing, the CEO has now issued a formal apology and said the automaker will cooperate fully with any and all investigations. It's issued a stop-sale on all new and used TDI vehicles until further notice. VW's currently in talks with the EPA and the California Air Resources Board in regards to these allegations. It's also ordered an external investigation of its own into the matter. Whether criminal charges will be filed is yet to be seen.

44 of 301 comments (clear)

  1. That'll teach you... by bob_super · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When Toyota had the audacity of becoming number 1, their CEO got dragged in front of the US congress about some acceleration issues.
    VW just made the mistake of becoming number 1, and suddenly we discover they've been cheating at emissions. Expect a congress hearing and lots of demands for sanctions.

    Was there a punishment when GM recently had a major oops?

    1. Re:That'll teach you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Was there a punishment when GM recently had a major oops?

      Nope, their whole ignition switch failure was swept under the rug with only about 20 million vehicles recalled, and a paltry 900 million dollar forfeiture.

    2. Re:That'll teach you... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      cheating at emissions

      This wasn't just some simple "cheating" . . . this was large scale "fraud". If the Feds in the US wanted to, they could RICO VW. That would essentially put them out of business in the US. But VW has a puny market share in the US, when compared to other foreign auto producers in the VW or Audi price range. So the government in the US is probably thinking of what the collateral damage would be for VW car dealerships, independent mechanics, etc. VW got the worst possible penalty that anyone can levy: the VW stock got mauled. Their brand has been emasculated.

      But the worst is yet to come. Germans take their reputation for great engineering very seriously. The German government is now pissed off at this as well. For Americans, this would be like a team cheating in the Super Bowl. Germans and their cars, have a relationship like Americans do with their guns.

      The CEO of VW can start cleaning out his desk, and a bunch of executives will be headless in the coming weeks, as well. That serves them right. However, in typical corporate fashion, VW will end up firing ordinary, innocent workers, who had nothing to do with the fraud at all.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:That'll teach you... by turbidostato · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Nope, their whole ignition switch failure was swept under the rug with only about 20 million vehicles recalled, and a paltry 900 million dollar forfeiture."

      So here we are talking about 500.000 cars instead of 20.000.000 (40x less) but the fines could reach 18.000.000.000 instead of 900.000.000 (20x more).

      Overall German-based WV may be fined 800x more per car than US-based GM.

      Quite interesting.

    4. Re:That'll teach you... by tipo159 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The CEO of VW can start cleaning out his desk, and a bunch of executives will be headless in the coming weeks, as well. That serves them right. However, in typical corporate fashion, VW will end up firing ordinary, innocent workers, who had nothing to do with the fraud at all.

      Written by someone who does not understand the on-going boardroom drama at VW.

      The VW Group CEO (Winterkorn) recently came out ahead in a boardroom battle in April. I have to wonder if his Winterkorn's opponent (Piech) knew that this was coming.

    5. Re:That'll teach you... by ThatsLoseNotLoose · · Score: 4, Insightful

      GM only killed people.

      VW committed a far worse crime. They offended the regulators.

    6. Re:That'll teach you... by iwaybandit · · Score: 2

      The U.S. is going after Germany's top automaker. It's not about the emissions, what does the U.S. really want?

      My bet is that Greece needs a bit more bail-out money because Goldman-Sachs would have a bad quarter if Greece exited the E.U. Let me hedge my bet, now. The Bundesbank wants to repatriate gold held by J.P. Morgan and they're a little short on the stuff these days. Can't let them default, can we?

      Captcha: circus

  2. Re:Another 40 years before we see popular diesel c by Dzimas · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Audi A3 is one of the models implicated in this scam. It appears that it includes any VW and Audi vehicles that don't have a urea injection system.

  3. CRAP! I have one of those. by Paleolibertarian · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I suppose I'll have to get my firmware updated which will cut my performance down. I could decline the recall but then I probably wouldn't be able to pass the emissions here in CA to get my tag renewed.

    Goodby 42 MPG.

    1. Re:CRAP! I have one of those. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Based on summary - you will pass emission test easily:)

    2. Re:CRAP! I have one of those. by BitterOak · · Score: 2

      Based on summary - you will pass emission test easily:)

      No, I'm sure the emission testing folks will know about this car and will make sure it has the recall installed before testing.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    3. Re:CRAP! I have one of those. by slew · · Score: 2

      When did California start requiring smog checks on diesels?

      AFAIK, since 2010, CA has required diesels newer than 1998 model year to go to smog check stations. I think they just check the OBDC and to a visual inspection (EVAP and smoke).

    4. Re:CRAP! I have one of those. by TWX · · Score: 2

      Emissions, power, and fuel economy have a lot to do with each other. Running lean versus running rich versus getting the balance just right will affect different kinds of emissions and power output for a given amount of fuel burned, and different modes (acceleration, maintaining speed, coasting) are not operated the same way either.

      What I suspect is that they were running these cars hella-rich on acceleration to give them the power that people wanted, and possibly running them lean while maintaining speed or coasting to attempt to regain the fuel economy lost during acceleration. That would give them poor emissions in two different ways.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    5. Re:CRAP! I have one of those. by jerryjnormandin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      diesel is different from gasoline. optimizing power and performance has a lot to do with fuel injection timing. We tested my 2014 TDI at a local shop. NOx was higher when tested with just a probe in the exhaust... when connected to the state inspection system you can smell the DPF regen cycle kicking (fuel is injected in the exhaust and ignited to incinerate ash collected in the DPF) in and the engine fuel injection timing changed. NOx was low. But injection on the early side results in performance loss and lower mpg.

  4. Re:Has the Nazi Party Reemerged? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2

    You must be confused: the Nazis would never stoop so low as to lie about fuel economy...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  5. Does this at least mean.... by mark-t · · Score: 4, Insightful

    .... that testers will stop trusting a car's own reports about its emissions?

    If not, nothing was learned here. Either by accident or intentionally, it will happen again, eventually.

    1. Re:Does this at least mean.... by Dan+East · · Score: 2

      My understanding is that the car actually does have better emissions in a certain "mode", which is enabled when various parameters hint that testing is being performed (IE the car is on a dynamo). Inputs cited are steering changes (if the steering wheel doesn't budge as you gradually go from 0 to 65 MPH, then it's probably on a dynamo), barometric changes (sensitive to even the slightest changes in elevation or as airspeed increases, which, again, are static when on a dynamo), etc. That is one of the reasons the car gets better MPG in real world than advertised, because it produces more HP and drives better when the emissions controls are turned off.

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    2. Re:Does this at least mean.... by jerryjnormandin · · Score: 2

      I own one of the vehicles in the recall. It's test mode where DPF regen occurs more often and fuel is injected earlier in the powerstroke than normal for a hotter burn to reduce NOx. earlier in the power stroke results in less mpg and less performance. So I want a full refund. They committed fraud.

  6. what are the criminal charges? by sumdumass · · Score: 2

    No I didn't RTFS but exactly what would the criminal charges be in a case like this? There was something similar a while back in which some car maker used a distinct programing settings in the ECM which allowed fuel economy to be inflated but shipped a different version so the consumer didn't complain the car was a turd in performance. As far as I know, the only thing that came of that was a change in economy measurement standards and revised estimates.

  7. Re:Just a firmware fix? by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Funny

    The firmware changed to pass while it was being tested, so it seems the fix will be to leave the car in 'test' mode permanently. Apparently performance will suffer when that happens, but that doesn't really matter when you're stuck in a line of traffic on the freeway.......

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  8. To Quote "The Wrath of Kahn" by bobbied · · Score: 2

    Saavik: On the test, sir... will you tell me what you did? I would really like to know.

    McCoy: Lieutenant, you are looking at the only Starfleet cadet who ever beat the no-win scenario.

    Saavik: How?

    Kirk: I reprogrammed the simulation so it was possible......

    Saavik: What?

    David Marcus: He cheated.

    Kirk: I changed the conditions of the test; got a commendation for original thinking. I don't like to lose.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  9. Blaming American Engineers by BenJeremy · · Score: 5, Informative

    In the German press, the CEO is already painting this as a bunch of rogue American engineers doing this.

    One problem: If there was any engineering in the US, it was probably only to tweak the existing calibrations. It's pretty rare to see the actual source to ECUs, which is mostly unchanged over long periods of time. Most of the adjustments made are in the calibrations - a checksummed block of mapped constants in the ROM image file where the symbolic map has been exported by the compiler.

    As somebody who has actually authored calibration tools used in the automotive industry, and worked on some of the software used to provide version control, I have a pretty clear idea of what is going on here.

    In this case, the code itself - the algorithms used in the ECU, specifically disabled emissions controls (either by an alternative set of calibrations, or by skipping entire routines) when in Emissions Test Mode. If it's using an alternative set of calibrations... it still demands an answer to why it would need a second set of calibrations to begin with.

    Sadly, the press and many of the investigators involved in this will probably not understand the techical aspects of this, and why this is a fundamental cheat that could only have been created by the team that engineered the ECU.

    1. Re:Blaming American Engineers by toonces33 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I call BS on that. There is no way that a rogue engineer would do such a thing on their own - they would only do it because management wanted them to.

      For that matter, you can't even sneeze in the auto industry without there being a paper trail. Once the investigators start digging they will find all kinds of stuff about the requirements and specifications documents that preceded the actual software changes. You will find the actual engineers who did the work, and you will find the people who signed off on it when the work was done...

    2. Re:Blaming American Engineers by x0ra · · Score: 2

      this is the same as Abu Ghraib's torture case, only the underlying go to jail (when they do), the brass knew, we know they knew, but they get their ass saved.

    3. Re:Blaming American Engineers by toonces33 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, because of work that I have done in the past. I have seen the level of process audits that the automakers require of their suppliers, and I have seen the kind of process management software that is used to track requirements/specifications/changes and all the rest of that. That being said, I have no recollection/memory of how VW does things.

      When all of this is in place, you can't change a single line of code without it being justified, specified, written, tested, and finally signed off on, and *everything* is traceable. Could one hack the database? In theory, I suppose, but doing so would elevate this to a whole new level of fraud, and if you screw it up and corrupt the database then the whole company could be dead in the water.

      Google "Automotive SPICE" to learn more..

  10. Re:Why does the U.S. hate diesel so much? by cirby · · Score: 4, Interesting

    US standards are pretty strict in comparison to Europe.

    Part of the reason VW got caught was that the people doing the testing were looking at European diesel cars, found they polluted more than they should, and decided to test US cars for comparison.

  11. Re:They got caught with their dick in the pig by sexconker · · Score: 3, Funny

    They got caught with their dick in the pig.

    I fail to see what the Clinton family reunion has to do with this.

  12. 18 billion dollars, good luck with that by burtosis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This will be reduced to some completely unimportant sum like 18 million. Further its hilarious how the CEO is blaming rogue American engineers when it's clearly a upper management decision. Reading 'they launched an independent investigation' actually made me spit up my coffee it was so hilarious.

  13. Re:What? "We're sorry we got caught"? by The+Real+Dr+John · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Obamacare was based on Romneycare from MA, which was created by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. So you are saying Obama is a secret Republican? If so, then I agree completely. He wages war like a Republican, he deports immigrants like a Republican, he drills for oil and gas like a Republican, even in the arctic, and he goes after whistleblowers and journalists just like a Republican. So I think you've got something there.

    --
    A brain is a terrible thing to waste... Mind? That's debatable.
  14. Re: What? "We're sorry we got caught"? by turbidostato · · Score: 2

    "The European mileage tests are absolutely silly."

    Well, they probably are a bit stretched as, no doubt, are American, but I for one have to say that my 15 y-o car behaves as advertised (and, of course, YMMV): it was published as making 10.4 l/100Km mixed and mine makes 10.2 l/100Km (so even slightly better).

  15. Re: What? "We're sorry we got caught"? by toadlife · · Score: 2

    Check out this 70mpg VW that's already in Europe.

    110 HP
    0-60 in 10.7 seconds.
    Spews cancer causing NOx.
    Whats not to love!

    --
    I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
  16. Re:What? "We're sorry we got caught"? by toadlife · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And in all practical terms doesn't resemble that smaller state-level program in any meaningful way.

    Are you fucking kidding me? It's a CLONE of Romneycare.

    Unprecedented.

    As was the abuse of the filibuster by Republicans, so I guess they're even then, right?

    --
    I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
  17. The apology by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Full text: "We're sorry we got caught!"

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  18. Re: What? "We're sorry we got caught"? by GuB-42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It depends a lot on your driving. If you do a steady 100 km/h on the highway, your mileage will be excellent. At 130 km/h, you may use about 20% more, and can more than double if you take the road for a race track.
    Maybe your driving is more economical than most.

  19. Re:Another 40 years before we see popular diesel c by jrumney · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Audi A3 is one of the models implicated in this scam. It appears that it includes any VW and Audi vehicles that don't have a urea injection system.

    It appears that all diesel VW and Audi vehicles do have a urea injection system, but some only enable it during tests.

  20. Re:What? "We're sorry we got caught"? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's a reason that Pelosi, Reid and Obama had to ram that law through using procedural shenanigans

    Indeed and that reason is the not so latent racism in the GOP base over a black president and the lock step opposition to *anything* he proposed. Every major piece of the ACA was *favored* by the GOP, just not 'Obamacare'.

    Also note, the meeting with all the GOP players on the night of Obama's inauguration to 'oppose anything he did'. They knew that if they cooperated at all, Obama would get credit for saving the country from depression and become a transformative icon of history; and of course discredit the GOP agenda for decades to come.

    So they played politics with basically everything. The extreme of which was Sen. Cruz voting against funding for Hurricane Sandy relief money...and then demanding quick aid when Texas was hit by floods. His argument? The pork in the Sandy Relief bill. While laudable policy wise, playing political football with people's lives to make a point is exactly what's wrong with the GOP these days.

    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  21. Apology.. I want a full refund on my TDI by jerryjnormandin · · Score: 2

    My 2014 TDI at 80mph in 6th gear and no traffic gets 56mpg. In moderate traffic @ 50 - 65mph I get no less than 42mpg. I am a gear head and I know you would need to adjust the fuel injection (no spark it's a diesel) to occur a little before the power stroke to get a hotter burn and reduce NOx. The problem is this will reduce performance and mpg.. both the main reasons why I bought a diesel tdi. I want my money back. once the ecu is updated to be EPA compliant the car will not perform as well and mpg not as good. I want a refund + tax , title, registration, +6% of sale to cover taxes on my new non VW vehicle purchase since I won't have a trade and be subject to full sales tax.

  22. Re:Just a firmware fix? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

    The firmware changed to pass while it was being tested, so it seems the fix will be to leave the car in 'test' mode permanently. Apparently performance will suffer when that happens, but that doesn't really matter when you're stuck in a line of traffic on the freeway.......

    It's a compression/peak flame temperature thing. With the high compression of a diesel engine, max economy comes at the expense of NOxide emissions.

    Here is a really nice explanation of the parameters involved. It''s an old pdf scan of typewritten pages, but very clear and understandable

    http://web.anl.gov/PCS/acsfuel...

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  23. Re:Another 40 years before we see popular diesel c by jerryjnormandin · · Score: 2

    A3 and A4.. plus any other audi diesel that has a 2.0L TDI engine

  24. should we assume VW are just the ones got caught? by rewindustry · · Score: 2

    it's amazing what people think they can hide in code, on a chip, and in the wiring to that chip.

    i am not saying they're all cheating on emissions..

    i assume it's all wide open to "gaming"..

    is it not?

  25. Re:What? "We're sorry we got caught"? by FranTaylor · · Score: 2

    That new federal law was opposed by the people that didn't vote for it .... like forcing people to engage in business with insurers whether they want to or not

    “With regards to the individual mandate, the individual responsibility program that I proposed, I was very pleased that the compromise between the two houses includes the personal responsibility mandate" - Mitt Romney, 2006

    In the video released Wednesday night, Mr. Romney appears to share that view, at least as it relates to the Massachusetts plan.
    The individual mandate, he said, “is essential for bringing the health care costs down for everyone and getting everyone the health insurance they need.”

    Washington Post:

    George H.W. Bush put together a plan with an individual mandate, but left it on the shelf because there was no way it’d pass in a Democratic Congress.

  26. Re: What? "We're sorry we got caught"? by Sique · · Score: 2
    I have a four cylinder 1.6l TDI in my car (it's a Skoda, an appearently Europe-only subdivision of VW), and I sometimes get below 4 liter/100 km, which is about 60 mpg(US). And this is normal driving to a customer site about 60 km from my company. So yes, if a sticker advertised 60 mpg (actually, the sticker advertised less than 99 g/km carbon dioxide, which is about the same), I could agree in real world driving.

    And yes, it's easily possible to drive the fuel consumption up to 10 l/100 km (about 25 mpg) by inapprobriate driving.

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  27. Re: What? "We're sorry we got caught"? by MightyYar · · Score: 2

    What is the appropriate language to use when declining a left nut?

    Virtually the same protocol as the right nut.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.