Google Helped Cause the Mysterious Increase In 911 Calls SF Asked It To Solve (bbc.com)
theodp writes: Android users have long complained publicly that it's way too easy to accidentally dial 911. So it's pretty astonishing that it took a team of Google Researchers and San Francisco Department of Emergency Management government employees to figure out that butt-dialing was increasing the number of 911 calls. The Google 9-1-1 Team presented its results in How Googlers helped San Francisco Use Data Science to Understand a Surge in 911 Calls, a Google-sponsored presentation at the Code for America Summit, and in San Francisco's 9-1-1 Call Volume Increase, an accompanying 26-page paper.
Many Android phones when you press the power button the screen activates with the "Emergency Call" touchable which means it easily enters calling mode. Since emergency services is the only valid call you can make from that screen those are the "butt dials" getting through.
More annoying is the fact that holding the power button, something that seems to happen often in my pocket, brings up the "silent/airplane mode/power off" options without having to enter the pass key. I've missed so many calls because of this damn "feature". It's a combination of bad phone design and bad software design.
Or you could stop putting your phone in your pants pockets. Either or :3
Full transcript of Google's remarks follow:
Uhh... We're sorry. We're really, really sorry.
#DeleteChrome
You could, maybe, stop wearing those ridiculously uncomfortable skinny jeans and actually leave "room" for your phone, in a FRONT pocket?
"Help! My owner has me trapped in these tight jeans!"
Have gnu, will travel.
By flooding the 911 system with invalid empty calls, it's harder to get access to first responders in areas that have a predominance of Android phones over iPhones.
Doesn't the 911 operator ask why the person is calling? If the phone is still in their pants, doesn't the 911 operator call them back? I thought 911 operators dispatched the police if they get a call and don't get a response. I don't see why this needed to be analyzed and then a congratulatory paper written about how they cleverly figured out what was causing it.
Butt texting... now THAT"S a challenge.
Emergency Call on my phone takes you to a screen where you can dial only previously manually entered emergency numbers.... on my phone, its empty. I still don't understand why on my device I have no choice on whether or not to have "emergency call" appear on the lock screen.
I accidentally emergency called 911 on a blackberry a few years back. I have no idea how long the call was going before I realized it was on, but there was nobody on the other end.
"Peoples butts are too fat"
Way back in 2004 I worked in an office where you had to dial 9-1 before dialing an outside line. Try dialing a 1-800 number after that.
They just pulled all the data they had been collecting and showed exactly what part of the butt dialed and even had footage and audio of it off the the phone's mic and camera.
You know the really scary thing? They could really do that if they wanted to.
I thought the generic term is pocket dial.
I'm guessing that "butt dialing" is more for girls or others who wear skinny jeans or those who enjoy sitting on the phone.
I am also guessing that skinny jeans and "butt"-dialing does not usually apply to slashdot users.
My biggest gripe with using an Android phone is that the phone unlocks during calls even when they placed/answered via a hands-free Bluetooth device. Answering a call via Bluetooth with your phone in your pocket unlocks it and starts feeding the UI random screen clicks. People have been filing bugs to the Android team over this issue since 2011 and it has never been addressed, and the newer bugs keep getting pushed to lower and lower priority. Its safe to say at this point that Android butt dialing is now a feature and is included by design.
Im not used to seeing stuff like this. This is kind of funny but what kind of a warped person spends time on this?
is to change 911 to 0118 999 881 999 119 725 3 instead. It's an easy number to remember, just learn the song!
Doo-doo-doo-doo-doo!
A-hanging with Margaret just-a feels so good like I knew it wou-ou-ould
Laughing together and-a having a blast, and I hope it lasts forever!
I can't believe how hot she is, it makes my insides feel like knotted twists
Her pretty face, and those long, long legs
And I hope someday we are more than just friends!
Oh, Margaret. Oh, Margaret.
Do you remember last night when our hands touched?
We were grabbin for the dice and you were laughing and such...
Take one roll, then take a chance on me,
And maybe then you'll see,
How perfect we can be,
Together you and me,
For all eternity!
Okay, maybe that's a long long time.
But a guy can dream, can't I?
Oh, Margaret. Oh, Margaret.
I love it when you stand or sit right next to me
Can't you see, your future with me is brighter than the ocean!
Bothers reading bug reports or they would have fixed this issue 7 years ago when users first started reporting how shitty the lock screen configuration is
Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
But I did 3 pocket-dials in a short time. I have no idea how that happened, since my iPhone was locked. Those calls were to my GF and my mom, so it appeared to be accessing my Favorites, but how it did that is a mystery.
Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
Where have you been? This is the sort of copypasta that made this place great back in the day!
Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
I've had this problem myself and at first scratched my head at the odds of random brushes across the digitizer dialing only 911 then pushing call was even remotely possible. Then I realized there is practically no "debounce" and the random brushes are allowed to be registered at uselessly inhuman rates.
Secondly a proximity sensor is present in all but about 15% of android devices. If the emergency dialer checked this sensor before pocket calling emergency services this problem would be significantly reduced. You could at the very least include an extra on-screen hoop such as long pressing keys that would only be activated if the sensor detected it was in a pocket so that emergency services could still be contacted even if the sensor malfunctioned.
Another thing is the design just sucks.. if the goal is quickly and easily contact emergency services dialing 911 on a touch screen display can't be even remotely optimal. If your going to mandate anything it should be a single physical button intentionally engineered to be maximally both easy to use and resistant to unintentional use. Drop your phone, fall, get hit by something, get into an accident.. cracked displays and broken digitizers are by far the most vulnerable and failure prone components.. good luck making a call without them.
You must be new here.
I have a similar problem.
Since I bought my android phone almost every time I talk to people they ask me "Is your meeting over, can you talk now?" and I am always like "...What?".
Finally I saw that whenever someone calls you, you have options to reject the call with a message like "I will call later, I am in a meeting" or "Sorry I am driving".
It's now possible to open an app by tapping its notification bar thingo on the front screen.
You can't call it a lock screen any more because it doesn't fucking lock anything.
I can guarantee that this idea was the brainchild of some UX hobgoblin.
It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.