Slashdot Mirror


More Tech, STEM Workers Voluntarily Quitting Their Jobs (dice.com)

Nerval's Lobster writes: New data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) suggests that more tech professionals are voluntarily quitting their jobs. In August, some 507,000 people in Professional and Business Services (which encompasses tech and STEM positions) quit their positions, up from 493,000 in July. It's also a significant increase over August 2014, when 456,000 professionals quit. Voluntary quits could be taken as a sign of a good economy (Dice link), hinting that people feel confident enough about the market to jump to a new position (likely with better pay and benefits), if not strike out on their own as an independent. For tech pros, things are particularly rosy at the moment; according to the BLS, the national unemployment rate among tech pros has hovered at under 3 percent for the past year, although not all segments have equally benefitted from that trend: Programmers, for example, saw their unemployment rate dip precipitously between the first and second quarters of this year, even as joblessness among Web developers, computer support specialists, and network and systems engineers ticked upwards during the same period. If there's one tech segment that hasn't enjoyed economic buoyancy, it's manufacturing, which has suffered from layoffs and steady declines in open positions over the past several quarters.

22 of 167 comments (clear)

  1. You like our work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pay us well and treat us well, and we won't keep job-hopping.

    1. Re:You like our work? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Pay us well and treat us well, and we won't keep job-hopping.

      People tend to job-hop when pay is rising the fastest. It is during recessions that they hunker down and stay loyal.

    2. Re:You like our work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Pretty much this.

      Management and other small-minded folks like to blame employee dissatisfaction on anything but the real causes: mistreatment by management, mandatory unpaid OT, expectation of being on-call 24/7 and very few opportunities for promotion and advancement for tech workers who choose to stay at one company.

    3. Re:You like our work? by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 4, Informative

      Pay us well and treat us well, and we won't keep job-hopping.

      People tend to job-hop when pay is rising the fastest. It is during recessions that they hunker down and stay loyal.

      To be fair, it's when pay is rising fastest *in other companies* that that people tend to job-hop, yes?

    4. Re:You like our work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, and it's during the boom times companies whine about "employee loyalty" and all that shit they destroyed. Yet during recessions, they can't do the layoffs fast enough.

      Boo fucking hoo.

    5. Re:You like our work? by plopez · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why not share you numbers? An efficient labor market cant operate without a good flow of information.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    6. Re:You like our work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You got it!

      Company offers a 2% raise, competitor offers 30% more pay and better benefits. No contest.

      Actually, I went to my boss and explained that I could get 30% more by getting another job. His response was "I don't believe you, times are tough and you should be thankful you have a job." He was surprised when I turned in my resignation 48 hours later. Seems the listing company jumped when I sent in my resume, interviewed me same day and offered the next morning.

      i've been at the new job a year and love it!

    7. Re:You like our work? by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Many companies fail to understand the cost of turnover. Normally when turnover happens it will cost 150% to replace an employee. Because of the time it will take them to settle in and get use to the process (The informal one, that isn't written down, such as avoid these departments, as their manager is a jerk, work around this director because he is useless). After about a full year of learning then someone usually comes truly productive in the institution. So that is a big cost to the organization to have people leave.

      While employee salary is the biggest expense for an organization, it is also a vital key to its infrastructure, and it shouldn't be skimmed. Studies show if someone is getting paid more than they feel it is worth, they will work harder, if they feel they are getting paid less than they feel they are worth, they will not work as hard. The calculation for happy employees isn't hard.
      Give them good pay: on par or better than your compensation.
      Give them predictability: They will need to feel that their job is steady, and they can plan a life outside around it.
      Give them opportunities to grow: Make sure they have a path towards promotion, ability to learn other things. A lot of businesses feel tuition reimbursement will just train people to be overqualified for their job. However if you can promote the person once they have the new education, they will stick around, and you will have someone in that higher position who knows the business with the latest skills.

      Avoiding any one of these causes turn over.
      Under par pay: You may get employees when they are desperate, or with a promise of the other two where they think they can work up really fast. But any thing that causes them to lose trust in the organization and they are out, as soon as they can.
      Lack or predictability: This could just come from a volatile attitude, where you may be friendly one day, and yelling and screaming the next. Where your job in under pressure that YOU may be next on the layoff. Down times do happen, but you can make this more predictable letting people know who is getting canned, and why, allowing them time to prepare, and perhaps using your organizations resources to help them find new work. This can also mean unpredictable hours, granted all work isn't 9-5 but, having a good scheduled and shared out of office duties so people can live their life.
      Lack of growth: As they continue on the job, the gain insight on what needs to be done, not allowing people to grow, in terms of rank, or getting choice jobs. Also the organization will have an overly simplify ranking structure.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  2. Hewlett-Packard effect by BenJeremy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    At HP, there are a LOT of people leaving, as morale is at an all-time low. Those with marketable skills would rather leave on their own than get a dreaded "offer" to work at Ciber or Modis at 30% less pay, reduction in benefits, and a loss of seniority - and finding they can make more at a company willing to actually offer reasonable compensation increases on a regular basis.

    There may be other companies, not as high profile as HP, where this is also occurring. Obviously, there are many companies "below average" (Kind of has to be that way), but the disparity is pretty high - when people start shopping around, they quickly realize they are underpaid, and the rest of the pieces start falling into place.

    It can't go on forever... which is all the more reason those people confident in their ability to place at better companies are going now, rather than waiting.

  3. maximum suckage by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    More people are clueing into the fact that working conditions suck, that sh*t always rolls downhill when it comes to missed deadlines or ever changing specs, and that it's not worth it. Ageism and the up or out mentality, where there are too few jobs to move up to, doesn't help.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  4. Fed up by paugq · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I see more and more people in IT leaving their jobs to work on something else.

    People are fed up with low pay, crazy schedules, lots of pressure -often times for no reason!- and technology changing at Formula 1 speed (just take a look at the web: what was good and trendy 2 years ago is proscribed today).

    To top that up, add off-shoring: today you are key, tomorrow your job is in India, Vietnam or who knows where. People do not like job insecurity.

    What are they moving to? Everything else: law, gardening, plumbing, cake shops, teaching, whatever with a more relaxed schedule, people not discussing about hourly cost and difficult or impossible to offshore. Really.

  5. Well, of COURSE they're quitting their jobs by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

    They've finished training their H1-B replacements, after all.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Well, of COURSE they're quitting their jobs by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I did a PC refresh job where an Indian engineer had 40+ half-empty coffee cups with slime mold on the surface of each one inside his cube. My boss told me not to replace that PC. The engineer got fired and a hazmat team went over that portion of the building.

  6. I started in 1979 - I think tech is getting worse by walterbyrd · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have seen ads for jobs as desktop techs, asking for a masters degree in engineering.

    Costco starts out at $20.00 an hour. Walmart truck drivers make $82K a year. I see ads for developers, asking for a degree, and five years experience, for $14 an hour. I see ads for interns that require five years experience.

  7. Re:Leave no H1-B behind! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Are you kidding? I got laid off from my tech job just before the government shutdown in October 2013 and I was out of work for eight months. Meanwhile, the CEO gave himself a 60% pay raise and bought a new yacht for having a lousy fiscal year. That didn't stop the company from hiring Indian workers to replace American workers.

  8. They see the writing on the walls by Grand+Facade · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When all of their cow-orkers speak Hindi..

    What is big business going to do when the short term payoff HB-1 workers go home and take their new found knowledge with them?

    They will cry crocodile tears about how the offshore engineers are beating them at their own game.

    They will need more government subsidies and tax breaks to survive!

    --
    Rick B.
  9. And doing what? by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I sorta get your sentiment, but you didn't finish it. What exactly are they doing about it? Are they joining communes? Committing Sepuku? Otherwise there's 3 possibilities: a) they're starting their own businesses, unlikely in this economy. b) They're job hopping because that's the only way to move up in the world or c) they're having nervous breakdowns and/or being forced to quit/retire.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: And doing what? by gweihir · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That is just called solid engineering. Most companies would benefit a lot from it, but it is a long-term effect that the current crop of MBA idiots-savant "managers" do not understand.

      Incidentally, I know one bank large enough that you would have recognized the name that recently nearly died because they did away with that redundancy to reduce cost. They were very lucky the incident happened on a Friday or they would be gone by now. A large competitor had the same problem a few days later(same network services supplier) and they only had a 30 minutes outage because they have a fully redundant infrastructure.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  10. Don't forget by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sometechcompany has contintuity and visibility. The Company writes policy, press releases, public relations statements, etc. So, year after year after year, The Company keeps reiterating how great they are, and how unappreciated they are.

    The techs who have worked for The Company in the past and the present have no such outlet. Their reasons for leaving aren't publicized. Two, or six, or twenty people might know your real reasons for leaving, but none of it is publicized. Outside of your immediate freinds and associates, no one knows how shitty The Company has been treating you.

    And, it is the job of HR to ensure that your reasons are twisted, perverted, and/or hidden from public view. Often enough, it would cost your freinds and associates their jobs to make any attempt to set the record straight.

    So, when all is said and done, The Company just gets away with whatever the hell they please, and you have no recourse other than leaving.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    1. Re:Don't forget by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "The Company keeps reiterating how great they are"

      you have no idea. The year my company was named to 100 best to work for...they reprinted every god damned piece of letterhead, envelope, notepad...anything with our logo on it now had the 100 best to work for logo.

      the funny thing was apparently that was illegal and within a month we got cease and desist from whoever grants 100 best to work for. Now we had zero paper for anything we could use and corporate wasn't buying yet another company wide paper buy...yeah they do anything to claim how great they are

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  11. Re: Leave no H1-B behind! by Sentrion · · Score: 4, Informative

    Get off your high horse. I graduated with a degree in electrical engineering just after the Enron crisis unraveled and the dotcom boom went bust. Even though I spent each day applying for every technical role imaginable, I ended up working at Sears for a few dollars over minimum wage. That lasted almost six months until I took a job several states away from my home in Dallas. Many tech workers who are unexpectedly laid off face a unique challenge of being very good at one particular specialty. Even though they can be just as effective with a very different role, employers often seek out a candidate that exactly meets the job specification. So someone with four years experience designing 10kW power supplies will be deemed under qualified or an unfit match for a job requesting five years experience designing 2kw power supplies. A second candidate with ten years experience designing power supplies ranging from 1kW to 10kW would be deemed over qualified. The company then justifies recruiting a candidate from a third world country that will work for whichever wage keeps him employed and allowed to remain in the country. The fact that no one understands his emails, and he has to repeat what he says two or three times before anyone can make out what he's trying to say doesn't seem to matter.

    We definitely should bring in talent from around the world, but often times in STEM fields the H-1B visa holders have a very narrow skill set and are expected to work extreme hours for low pay. But it gets the message across and keeps the rest of the STEM workers from demanding too much. Of course when today's technology is made obsolete the H-1B workers are sent home rather than retrained. But by then there are millions trained on the latest trend and they import replacements.

  12. "Big business" doesn't give a fuck. by blind+biker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    CxO's who run "big business" have only one allegiance, and that's their own profit, nothing else. They don't give a shit about firing thousands, tens of thousands of engineers (Carly Fiorina), the state of the US tech industry, the US as a country or its people... they only care about their own bonuses and then fuck the hell off once the company is screwed. Or the country is screwed.

    Please read up about corporate psychopaths. "Snakes in suits" is a good book.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.