Slashdot Mirror


The Popular Over-The-Counter Cold Medicine That Science Says Doesn't Work (forbes.com)

HughPickens.com writes: Back before methamphetamine cooks started buying up non-prescription decongestants to brew crank, all of us were able to buy effective decongestants right off the store shelf without a problem. Now David DiSalvo writes at Forbes that to fill the store-shelf void, drug companies substituted the already-FDA approved ingredient phenylephrine for pseudoephedrine. But the oral decongestant phenylephrine simply doesn't work at the FDA-approved amount found in popular non-prescription brands, and it may not even work at much higher doses. Researchers at the University of Florida are asking the FDA to remove oral phenylephrine from the market. "We think the evidence supports that phenylephrine's status as a safe and effective over-the-counter product should be changed," says Randy Hatton. "We are looking out for the consumer, and he or she needs to know that science says that oral phenylephrine does not work for the majority of people."

In 1976, the FDA deemed a 10 milligram oral dose of phenylephrine safe and effective at relieving congestion, making it possible for companies to use the ingredient without conducting studies. But Leslie Hendeles and Hatton say phenylephrine does not effectively relieve nasal stuffiness at this dose. They say the FDA cited four tests demonstrating efficacy at the 10 milligram dose, two of which were unpublished and sponsored by drug manufacturers. In contrast, the FDA cited six tests demonstrating no significant difference between phenylephrine and placebo. Hendeles said a higher dose may work, but no research has been published regarding safety at higher doses. "They need to do a dose-response study to determine at what higher dose they get both efficacy and safety," says Hendeles adding that until then "consumers should go that extra step and get it (pseudoephedrine) from behind the counter."

50 of 310 comments (clear)

  1. Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone who has taken a product sans pseudoephedrine already knows they don't work.

    1. Re:Duh by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

      In my ignorance, I bought the Sudafed containing phenylephrine, and I could not figure out why Sudafed, which was my go-to medicine for daytime cold relief, did not work! I wasn't really expecting to suddenly hear an angelic choir from the heavens after taking the stuff, just some relief. Instead, nothing. Not a goddamn thing.

      I did the research and figured out what was wrong: I was rope a doped. Not only is the good stuff only behind the counter, the pharmacist (at least here) defaults to giving you the Sudafed with phenylephrine unless you specifically ask for the pseudoephedrine. So, counting that money wasted I got the good stuff, and miracle of miracles, it worked. I was my own blind trial. Phenylephrine is bullshit, don't waste money on it.

      I have not done the research on meth cooking methods, but I believe it continues unabated with this blockade on pseudoephedrine... I get the strong feeling we're wasting our time here, all hail the war on drugs.

    2. Re:Duh by MachineShedFred · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well here's the real problem - pseudoephederine is a short cut to making meth. Meth cooks made meth before they figured out you could use decongestants. Meth cooks still make meth after the so-called restrictions.

      In fact, meth cooks in Mexico make meth using extract from natural ephedera plants that grow like weeds, and then smuggle it across the border the same as anything else.

      In the end, we've just made it harder for legit use, just like practically all other "think of the children" and drug war legislation. Oh, and the pharma companies were able to perpetrate a multi-billion dollar placebo scam for the last 10 years by selling a decongestant that does NOTHING.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  2. This isn't news by russotto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Everyone knows PE doesn't work. It's only there so the government can claim they haven't removed all the useful OTC decongestants from the market. Yes, technically you can still buy pseudoephedrine in most states, but doing so puts you on a list which gives them probable cause to bust down your door on suspicion of meth manufacture.

    1. Re:This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Furthermore, the FBI's own stats show that the ban/restriction on pseudoephedrine has made the problem worse. Before the ban, meth was mostly a mom & pop business. For the next 2 or so years after the ban meth sales dropped, but then the mexican cartels more than filled the gap with wholesale production (like Breaking Bad style industrial manufacturing importing the raw ingredients from China) and now instead of little guys who are mostly dumbasses selling to their neighbors you've got organized crime networks all over the country.

      Meanwhile I don't feel safe buying a sudofed and there are a bunch of stories of people being arrested for having bad allergies. I don't have the link handy, but the very first person arrested for buying too much was buying it for his kid.

    2. Re:This isn't news by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The government would be better off decriminalizing all drugs and producing chemically pure versions and controlling the sale of those substances while investing the revenues in treatment programs. It won't eliminate addiction, but it will go a long way to reducing the amount of organized crime in this and other countries that make their profits off the back of illegal drug sales. That in turn would go a long way towards freeing up law enforcement who wouldn't have to devote nearly as much activity towards dealing with the gangs that run the illegal drug trades.

    3. Re:This isn't news by The+Grassy+Knoll · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it will go a long way to reducing the amount of organized crime in this and other countries that make their profits off the back of illegal drug sales

      These crime gangs will just look for some other large profit activity. If drugs were legalised, do you think they'd all re-train as accountants?

      --
      They will never know the simple pleasure of a monkey knife fight
    4. Re:This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Alcohol prohibition proves you wrong. Eliminating it greatly reduced gang crime. History is a great teacher, people are just to fucking stupid to realize it.

    5. Re:This isn't news by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In the short term, existing gangs will move to other areas of criminality, which are less profitable (or else they would switch now). The reduced cash flow will also intensify competition (read: violence) in those endeavors.

      In the medium term, a few organizations will die out, the remainder will claim their new turf but with less wealth to spread around both for status (read: bling) and patronage (read: cheddar, philanthropy). There won't be much less crime here at this stage, but the organizations will be less able to buy loyalty (kinship).

      In the long term, the reduced status and patronage will mean fewer recruits and ultimately an equilibrium with less crime. But you are right, gangsters don't go into accounting. The difference comes from convincing kids to go into accounting instead of criminality, and to do that you've got to reduce the total revenue of the criminal organizations.

    6. Re:This isn't news by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      it will go a long way to reducing the amount of organized crime in this and other countries that make their profits off the back of illegal drug sales

      These crime gangs will just look for some other large profit activity. If drugs were legalised, do you think they'd all re-train as accountants?

      Sorry, the accountant cartel has that one already sewn up. But seriously, much of all of this goes back to good old ethanol. When the puritans decided we couldn't have it it just opened up the floodgates for funding criminal based business, as people aren't going to stop getting their buzz on, and those who will provide can make a lot of money for their risk.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Other high water marks for OC were the Harrison act in 1914 and the Marijuana Tax act in 1937.

      But when old Dick Nixon declared "War on Drugs" in 1971. The money really started pouring in for the bad guys, and the military tactics we used got them into military tactics of their own.

      There will always be bad guys. There will always be vice. What you do, is remove the profit from it. When there is no profit, you are probably as close to controlling it as you can ever get.

      One thing is for certain - The staunchest anti-drug strong law crusaders are on the same page with the most ruthless drug cartels in wanting strict anti-drug laws.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    7. Re:This isn't news by pla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If drugs were legalised, do you think they'd all re-train as accountants?

      FDR appointed Joe Kennedy as the first chairman of the SEC for a reason.

    8. Re:This isn't news by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Outside of drugs, the next biggest criminal enterprise is probably prostitution, which is yet another vice crime that shouldn't be illegal. As Carlin said, "Selling's legal. Fucking's legal. Why isn't selling fucking legal?"

      Once you eliminate those you're down to much lower profit margins and can't support the kind of massive gangs that trouble law enforcement so much. Even if they try to stick with the illegal drug business who would want to buy from them when you can get a better product from a legal source?

      Also, you still need someone to work at the store that's selling the drugs. Seems like there are probably some out of work drug dealers that could handle a counter job and be tax paying citizens. If taxes are used to fund other organizations to help people get over their addictions, etc. that's additional jobs that are being created rather than having the revenues end up in the coffers of criminal enterprises while still leaving society with the cost of cleaning up the consequences.

    9. Re:This isn't news by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      Or, as the saying goes ... "People who don't learn from history, are doomed to repeat it"

      The counter argument is "But DRUUUUGGGGSSSS!!!!"

      Yeah, so, making them illegal has stopped them from being used? It has created associated crimes hasn't it?

      I am opposed to drugs, because they are bad for people. I am also equally if nor more so, opposed to government making them illegal. In trying to protect us from ourselves, the government actually has made things worse. As it usually does.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    10. Re:This isn't news by tomhath · · Score: 2

      Instead of getting snarky, why don't you do a bit of research? Google is your friend.

      Joe Kennedy was a bootlegger and stock manipulator. President Roosevelt appointed him chairman of the Securities Exchange Commission to crack down on stock cheats because Kennedy knew all about cheating.

      Now look at the context in which GP's post appears - former gang members becoming accountants? Sure, it worked for Kennedy.

    11. Re:This isn't news by reboot246 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The SEC is the Southeastern Conference. Joey Kennedy used to write for the Birmingham News. Don't know who the FDR character was, maybe he was in some comic book.

      Just kidding, AC. You seriously need to learn a little bit of history. That single sentence you scoffed at had more insight and knowledge than a hundred regular posts here.

      I wish I had some mod points, but I can't seem to get any nowadays. It's been weeks since I had any.

  3. Already knew this by aldousd666 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I remind the pharmacist every time I have to sign my life away to buy the real stuff that the PE doesn't work. They always wink and laugh like 'sure it doesn't, we know you're cooking very small amounts of Meth with this at home, no need for the cover story.'

    --
    Speak for yourself.
    1. Re:Already knew this by pla · · Score: 2, Informative

      The pharmacist already knows PE doesn't work, and these stupid rules annoy them far, far more than they annoy you.

      Instead of you just walking up, grabbing what you need, and checking out... You instead have someone making $75+/hr forced to stop whatever useful task they had in progress and waste five minutes of their day to check your ID and have you sign the book, and then they need to store the book on the off chance the DEA decides to chase after allergy sufferers in your area.

    2. Re:Already knew this by hey! · · Score: 2

      Well, it's usually a pharmacy technician or a pharmacist's assistant (essentially a clerk) who handles the Sudafed requests at my drug store, and I doubt they make $75/hr. You only get the pharmacist if you have a question about something like drug interactions.

      Overall it's quite easy to obtain pseudoephedrine; you just pick up a card from a bin located where the OTC decongestants are and take it to the pharmacy counter. You have to wait in line with people picking up their prescriptions, but the clerk will ring up your other purchases so you don't have to wait in line again at the regular checkout. The net result is that it's just a minute or so longer to make all your purchases. And you do have to show an ID and sign a register.

      Given the behavioral impact of amphetamines I don't think these measures are an unreasonable burden -- if they work. That's the big question. Are we reducing the supply of amphetamines, or creating a business opportunity for drug operations that are already smuggling weed from Mexico? But assuming these measures do reduce the supply of methamphetamine, the main problem with them is that they dissuade people from buying effective medicine because they anticipate a big hassle. It's not a big hassle.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:Already knew this by aldousd666 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Did you ever read the waiver you sign? $100,000 fine and imprisonment, not for making meth, but for buying too much Sudafed.

      --
      Speak for yourself.
    4. Re:Already knew this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sign your life away? Is talking to a pharmacist and showing an ID really the same as "signing your life away"?

      You aren't just showing ID. You have to sign a long form which if you bothered to read it, would let you know that your ID and purchase history are being supplied to Law Enforcement, and that if you attempt to purchase too much, too often, you consent to LE coming to your home and searching it. It also lets you know that purchasing it for someone else (including your wife or child) without an actual prescription is illegal and you could face jail time if caught.

    5. Re:Already knew this by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Did you ever read the waiver you sign? $100,000 fine and imprisonment, not for making meth, but for buying too much Sudafed.

      The only thing that will stop a bad guy with Sudafed is a good guy with Sudafed.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  4. Thanks to the War on Drugs by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to take Sudafed for my allergies, but then they had to change because METH. Now I take Claritin D, and if I want more than a 2 week supply, I have to get a prescription. This requires me to go see my doctor every so often, because she isn't keen to give prescriptions without checkups. All of this mess because somebody might use a drug as an ingredient for a drug that used to be legal.

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    1. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by tylikcat · · Score: 2

      I have ridiculous allergies, and take a number of antihistamines to keep them in check (but hey, the asthma is enough in check that I can run, so I'm happy.) I have found that for me guaifenesen, which is usually thought of as a expectorant, works pretty well as a decongestant with the added bonus that it's non-drying - a huge plus in Ohio winters.

      It thins mucous and does something with its consistency that protects the vocal cords - a lot of singers take it for this reason. I take it if I'm getting a scratchy throat and know I'm going to be talking a lot. I pretty much never get the kind of prolonged laryngitis that I used to when teaching with a minor cold. (Though these days that's more about getting through a major conference when I'm staying in a random AirBnB.)

    2. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by Ioldanach · · Score: 2

      Claritin D is just Claritin with sudafed in it. (That's the "D" for decongestant.)

    3. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by dfenstrate · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have ridiculous allergies, and take a number of antihistamines to keep them in check (but hey, the asthma is enough in check that I can run, so I'm happy.)

      Try eating a tablespoon a day of locally produced honey, unfiltered, for a month or so. The beekeeper should be the closest one to your home you can find, though even 100 miles out still ought to work.

      Sending the local pollen through your digestive tract gives your immune system another shot at getting used to pollen without causing respiratory problems. I used to have terrible allergies that could barely be controlled by double doses of claritin. I still have allergies, but they're much milder and much more controllable by medication.

      It's a pretty low-cost, low-risk home remedy. I stumbled across it when I was doing an internet search for "Is it safe to take double doses of Claritin?", and I figured 'What the hell, it's not like honey is expensive or dangerous.'

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    4. Re:Thanks to the War on Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Old myth. The pollen that bees pick up from flowers are too heavy to be blown around by the wind, but the pollen allergens that irritate you (and this ONLY applies to pollen, other irritants aren't put into honey,) are the lighter ones that get blown around without the need for bees.

      You can go ahead because honey is delicious, but there's no scientifically conducted study that corroborates the theory.

  5. I'm all Afrin now by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

    After CMEA, I switched to oxymetazoline nasal spray, which works better than oral pseudoephedrine ever did. People say Afrin can be addictive, but I reduce risk of rebound congestion by using it in one nostril in the morning and the other at night.

    1. Re:I'm all Afrin now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah but pseudoephedrine relieves all congestion, not just nasal.

    2. Re:I'm all Afrin now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      ^^^ THIS ^^^

      Usually when I get a bad head cold, it's my ears that get plugged up to the point that I become almost deaf. Then I head to the pharmacy, get the "you dirty meth head!" look, try my best to interact with them verbally (maybe I should learn sign language), get more "you druggie!" looks, sign the "I'm a COW! Mooo!" form, take 2, and in 15 minutes my ears completely unplug.

    3. Re: I'm all Afrin now by tepples · · Score: 2

      I'm not entirely sure what you're getting at. I've read stories of people still needing to use it after a cold has cleared, but I've been able to avoid it. As directed, I use it for only three or four days during the peak of symptoms. But I take a weaker dose (3 sprays in one nostril instead of 2 or 3 in each) so that there's even less rebound after the half week course of treatment ends.

    4. Re:I'm all Afrin now by thoromyr · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Afrin is pure, unadulterated evil. It is, far and away, the best decongestant on the market, bar none. It is also over the counter.

      It is wrong, IMO, to describe it as addictive due to the connotations of that word. There are no cravings that result from Afrin use. No one is going to feel a compulsion that they "just gotta have it". No junkie related crime. What *does* happen is that your body starts to rely on Afrin to keep the airways clear. Without it, you are stopped up and cannot breath. Even worse, after prolonged use the efficacy of Afrin is decreased. So eventually you will be using it three shots each nostril several times a day and still not be able to breathe.

      Thankfully, you *can* wean yourself off of Afrin. It is miserable, however, and not likely something you want to go through. The sooner you start the better. Although I've never had the misfortune to abuse Afrin like that I've known multiple people who have. At the beginning they talk about how wonderful it is (and it doesn't hurt that it is "just over the counter" so "it must be safe"), then they have to recover from it. I have significant long term breathing issues and at least twice a year I have to use Afrin for a few days in a row. Even at that I eventually noticed a diminishment of effect.

      The fact that something so debilitating, so damaging to the user's health, is sold over the counter while other less harmful drugs are strictly regulated says a lot about the true functioning of the FDA.

    5. Re:I'm all Afrin now by jbwolfe · · Score: 2

      It is wrong, IMO, to describe it as addictive due to the connotations of that word.

      I think your right. A more accurate description would be that one can become physically dependant on oxymetazoline as the rebound congestion becomes worse the more its used. Additionally, and perhaps worse, regular use can cause a host of unwanted side effects:http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search/a?dbs+hsdb:@term+@DOCNO+3143/

      --
      Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac?
    6. Re:I'm all Afrin now by Chelloveck · · Score: 2

      Afrin is pure, unadulterated evil.

      Preach it, brother! My parents were hooked on Dristan nasal spray and I ended up hooked on it as a teenager. I had a serious dependency on it all through high school, especially when trying to sleep. I decided to go nearly cold-turkey in college which led to many sleepless nights due to feeling like I was suffocating and a roommate who almost punched me for snoring when I finally did get to sleep. It was worth finally kicking the habit, though.

      I don't know that it should be banned. It's wonderful stuff when you're suffering a cold but you really need to stop using it when the cold is gone.

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    7. Re:I'm all Afrin now by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

      It is wrong, IMO, to describe it as addictive due to the connotations of that word. There are no cravings that result from Afrin use

      Maybe, this stuff to me is one of the greatest drugs ever. It actually works, works quickly, and is night/day. If you have nasal issues such that even when healthy you aren't breathing that well, Afrin is very compelling (it also helps if you don't want to have surgery you know you need to have). You will breathe really, really well. So there might be a psychological component, however minor.

      No one is going to feel a compulsion that they "just gotta have it".

      While I wouldn't describe it as anything like what heroin users allegedly go through, there is also a physical component. The rebound congestion effect of the stuff is similar to physical addiction in many senses and you will want to take more of the stuff to fix the problem. Eventually you end up with possibly a dangerous condition that requires surgery to resolve, or you man up and endure the side effects until they pass (usually 12 hours). Significantly less terrible than working through heroin withdrawal, but it is a form of withdrawal.

      I think it just degrees of addiction, but I think addictive is a good word for the way a user is likely to behave w/o education. It is definitely a far easier habit to kick than tobacco or opiates of course... I'm not sitting here jonesing for my afrin fix.

    8. Re:I'm all Afrin now by Carewolf · · Score: 2

      It is wrong, IMO, to describe it as addictive due to the connotations of that word. There are no cravings that result from Afrin use. No one is going to feel a compulsion that they "just gotta have it". No junkie related crime. What *does* happen is that your body starts to rely on Afrin to keep the airways clear. Without it, you are stopped up and cannot breath. Even worse, after prolonged use the efficacy of Afrin is decreased. So eventually you will be using it three shots each nostril several times a day and still not be able to breathe.

      That is EXACTLY what addictive means, it is in fact the worst form of addiction: A physical one, a psychological addiction is considered less of a problem medically.

    9. Re:I'm all Afrin now by thoromyr · · Score: 2

      Nasonex is not the answer -- its long term use is harmful. And, speaking anecdotally, it is about as useful as regular use of saline solution. Or not.

      Regrettably I have quite a bit of experience with congestion. At one time or another I have been on a wide variety of medications. Nasonex, flonase, patonase, etc. In my experience none of them (with the exception of Afrin) have any meaningful effect. Allegra D was the one oral medication that provided *some* relief, but I eventually fell victim to one of its side effects and can no longer take it. I had some for quite a while after I switched to another and even tried switching back. It takes a few days and the reaction starts in.

      Now, if the pharmaceuticals could make a drug as good as Afrin without the consequences? That would be something. Heck, I'd settle for half or a quarter of Afrin's effectiveness.

    10. Re:I'm all Afrin now by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

      One of the most painful things I've experienced was a cross-country flight with plugged Eustachian tubes. Not so bad going up to altitude as pressure comes off, but landing was excruciating.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    11. Re: I'm all Afrin now by TheCarp · · Score: 2

      Blech I hate the idea of needing to show ID and be put on a list; in order to enforce a failed policy that has been eating itself for years.

      It was the law that created the market that caused idiots with a little chemistry knowledge to decide they could make good money risking blowing up houses. 50% of the people in burn units were not there for trying to make meth in apartment buildings before the laws made it profitable.

      Hell, before that, meth was just one of several stimulents some people abused, it was only the law causing meth to get selected on the basis of being "easiest to make in a bathtub lab" that really made it king.

      Drug laws have done many things, but the one thing they have utterly failed to do is even touch addiction rates....the one thing they were intended to do! And now, every time I get the sniffles, I have to be reminded of this abject failure?

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  6. The good news... by w3woody · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... is that crystal meth is relatively easy to obtain, and it can be converted to Sudafed. Now all we need is for researchers to simplify the process and provide a practical process for the layman.

  7. Re:My personal remedy by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2

    Clear your nose to the point that you can breathe through both nostrils.

    Doesn't work when your nasal membranes are swollen shut. Plus, you could blow out an eardrum if you try to clear your nose too strenuously. I know this personally.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  8. The point of stopping the little guy by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Was never to save people from meth, it was to contain the damage to the poor communities. One of the byproducts of our drug war is that the poors keep their misery to themselves. If they start spilling over we toss then in jail. Meth broke that. You had desperate folks cooking it in middle class neighborhoods. Making it otc restored the balance and put the drug way back where it belonged: in poor neighborhoods

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  9. Re:My personal remedy by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    I have started using a neti pot [wikipedia.org] to rinse out the gunk in the nose and lowest sinus cavity with some salt solution.

    You should try this stuff I found a few years ago, Alkalol. It's an old remedy and you can buy it at CVS and most Walgreens and it's on Amazon. It comes with a little neti-pot type thing and it works great. I find it a lot more effective than just the neti pot with saline solution.

    http://www.alkalolcompany.com/

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  10. While they are at it... by MrVictor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While the FDA is at it, can they please tackle all the other snake-oil products at the drug stores? All the homeopathic crap, Airborne Head On, magnet bullshit, diet pills, etc. They are all 100% bullshit placebos.

  11. Where I live by ArhcAngel · · Score: 2

    The allergies are so bad where I live meth dealers have been turning meth back into pseudoephedrine.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  12. Accounting for illegal businesses by sjbe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If drugs were legalised, do you think they'd all re-train as accountants?

    I have news for you. A lot of them ARE de-facto or even actual trained accountants. If you want to do something illegal on a big scale and not go to jail for it, you had better have a more than passing familiarity with accounting. All that money has to be accounted for same as with any other business and it has to be moved around and used to pay bills, buy materials and stored somewhere. Who do you think does all that? The tooth fairy?

  13. Why buy at all? by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

    Ephedrine from Ephedra plant (or Ma Huang, if you're Chinese) is exactly as effective as pseudoephedrine, and anybody can grow it in their own garden... why is there a market for the chemically synthesized version in the first place? IIRC, the only difference between ephedrine and pseudoephedrine is that one is a right-handed and the other is left-handed molecule, meaning both good be used for manufacturing meth... makes me wonder when Walter White is going to take up gardening...

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  14. There are existing crime ecosystems by tempest69 · · Score: 2

    They can't just move into running guns, as there are already criminals that do that, but their main buyers (drug pushers) are not buying, so it doesn't work.
    So then there is human trafficking, black markets, illegal gambling, theft, counterfeiting, and extortion.
    I don't think there is much growth potential in most of these fields.
    And with police relieved from most of the interdiction work, there are more resources left enforce the other problems.

  15. Re:Don't bother by MachineShedFred · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As an allergy sufferer, and a nerd, it matters to me. And go fuck yourself besides. Your comment adds nothing.

    If you don't like the submissions here, then find better stuff for them to post. Don't just bitch about it, do something.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  16. My Approach by kackle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have learned to use Afrin to get all the way through a bad cold, but then when I'm feeling better, I use pills to recover from the Afrin dependency, which is usually brief.

    PS - I have dramatically reduced my nasal issues in life once I started taking very good care of my teeth. It never dawned on me that germs have 8 hours every night to travel a short, wet, warm path to my sinuses.

  17. Re:Still readily available in Canada by compro01 · · Score: 2

    1. All of them AFAIK. Tylenol has different formulas, some with pseudoephedrine and some with phenelyphrine (look at the ingredients list to tell the difference). Benelyn, Advil, Buckley's, and the store generic brands seem to all be pseudoephedrine.

    2. Most pharmacies around here also carry straight pseudoephedrine tablets. They're behind the counter, but you just ask for it, no ID needed (I'm not sure if there's any kind of limit on purchases, as I've never needed more than the one pack at a time). Comes in packs of twelve 120mg tablets and is good for about 12 hours. These are my go to decongestant.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time