Slashdot Mirror


Google Fiber Goes Down During World Series, Credits KC 2 Days of Service (pcmech.com)

kstatefan40 writes: Google Fiber went down in Kansas City during one of the most important times in the local market: Game 1 of the World Series between the New York Mets and the Kansas City Royals at Kauffman Stadium. Yesterday, I got an apology from them via email, and even though I wasn't home during the outage, they're making up for it by proactively giving the entire market 2 days of service off of their next bill. The rest of the industry could really learn from their customer service.

When was the last time a telecom provider gave you a discount on your bill without you asking for it?
The only times I've gotten much apology from my own ISP is when I threaten (with reason) to jump ship.

183 comments

  1. redundancy by Noah+Haders · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When was the last time a telecom provider gave you a discount on your bill without you asking for it?

    when was the last time a whole city lost service? what does this say about the redundancy of their infrastructure? people rely on utilities to provide a crucial function in their lives. electricity? natural gas? phones? if google wants to get serious about their fiber, they need to take on the responsibilities that come with being a public service provider.

    1. Re:redundancy by bfpierce · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We lose broadband in my town (Time Warner) for 4-6 hour periods, roughly once in a calendar year depending on the weather. And no, they've never credited me a dime for it, nor will they since they already have the market cornered.

    2. Re:redundancy by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Comcast does this all the time, Hell this summer the entire state went down for 1 hour.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might not have been a google problem necessarily, could have been an outage with a downstream or upstream provider, or intermediary, contractor, or whatever else. What's good is that regardless of why it happened, google is refunding for the outage, period. I would love to see a copy of the email to see if they pull the comcast usual, which is to explain all the reasons why they're not wrong, how it's someone else's fault, or that they're already doing us such and oh-so-lovely favor by not quite bending us over 100%, merely 95% before...well, you know. Seriously, this is pretty nice customer service, and they get some nice PR out of it as well.

    4. Re:redundancy by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

      It seems you cant read.

      "Most lost service from shortly before 7 p.m. Tuesday until about 7:35 p.m. "

      So what planet are you from where there is 48 hours between 7:00pm and 7:35pm?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, the All Seeing Government Spy Balloon ran away yesterday and cut power to 20,000 people. You want to gripe about a serious threat to public utilities, gripe about that. Google Fiber going down is up there with the Great Barista Strike of 10:27AM, and the Doping in the World Beard and Moustache Championships® Scandal.

    6. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It says ITA that most people had their service back up in a couple innings. The 48 hours is just the compensation google gave to everyone for the couple hours they lost their servie.

    7. Re: redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It was 35 minutes of downtime. The credit is 48 hours.

    8. Re:redundancy by olsmeister · · Score: 2

      Also a difference between a 'normal' outage and an outage during the World Series when the local team is playing in it.

    9. Re: redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put down the pitchfork. They are crediting 2 days service to compensate for ~1 hour of downtime. Seems more than fair.

    10. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      You keep saying 48 hours, but that's the credit, not the downtime. Downtime was between half an hour & three hours, depending on customer location.

      a difference to losing it due to inclement weather (also happens to electricity over power lines) than just cuz

      No, there isn't to the customer.

      also difference in TW dealing with aging infrastructure than goog having brand new technology and installed network

      No, tha'ts TWs fault for not investing in upgrades, taking short term profits over long term sustainability.

      I think we can expect goog to have much better uptime than TW.

      Why accept that?

    11. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So you count it as 48 hours of outage? That's completely insane!

    12. Re:redundancy by bfpierce · · Score: 1

      There isn't a difference if your main point is based on the implementation of redundancy, none what so ever.

    13. Re:redundancy by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Funny

      when was the last time a whole city lost service?

      All you need to cause a whole city to lose service, is a "Loose Nut" behind the steering wheel of a backhoe. You can put up a big sign saying "Do Not Drill or Dig Here!" . . . which the "Loose Nut" will interpret as an invitation to do some investigative fracking.

      what does this say about the redundancy of their infrastructure?

      "Loose Nuts" tend to be like Quantum entangled pairs of Schrodinger's cats: They are both digging where they shouldn't be digging at the same time, but in difference places. In highly redundant systems, "Loose Nuts" are like an Abstract Hilbert Space full of Schrodinger's cats.

      This is why Einstein quipped about Quantum Mechanics, "Niels Bohr and his pals must be smoking some weird shit, because I can't make heads or tails of it." And then Bohr answered, "Chill out Al, . . . it's not heads or tails . . . it's both . . . at the same time! Hey, is von Neumann Bogarting the bong again!?"

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    14. Re:redundancy by pla · · Score: 1

      when was the last time a whole city lost service?

      Not to sound like too much of a Google apologist, but my entire county lost power (not merely the ability to read Slashdot), this morning. For way, way longer than 48 minutes. And unless you start seeing demons wearing ice skates, I'd bet the farm that I don't get so much as a "sorry", never mind any form of credit for the inconvenience of needing to bathe in cold water poured from a bucket.

      But please, don't let me interrupt the Google hate-fest.

    15. Re:redundancy by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      I remember several years ago the dialup server in town was down I had to dial into another isp. They didn't give me any credit on my 19.95/mo or give any explanation.

      I am not aware that the att uverse dsl line at work has ever been down on att's end but the modems are crap and have to be replaced every few months at a cost of $100 each
      i've had uverse service for a bit over 2 years now and I'm on my 5th nvg510 modem. This is the first one i've had made by arris tho it seems to be holding up better than the motorola version.

      I had service through wildblue for satellite internet services for about 3 years on anik f2 beam 35 syracuse gateway.
      It was down a lot any time it rained here or in syracuse, NY I would lose service. Never got any sort of credit from them.
      Just fyi it rains a LOT in syracuse, NY.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    16. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say you're either trolling or can't read. You're making it sound like Google had a 48 hour outage when they have, depending on how you RTFA, between 35 minutes and 3 hours and 15 minutes only. They're giving a 48 hours worth of discount for that outage. Your other comment is doing exactly the same, and even then, when somebody points THIS out, you defend your post with "they're crediting 48 hours of service" as if the bash you received was malformed or something.

    17. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Google fiber wasn't out for 48 hours, you clueless dickbag.

    18. Re:redundancy by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      Sorry but I have to ask do you have riots/looting during the blackouts like the ones in NY back when the power went out statewide back in 2003? Or is that just a US thing?

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    19. Re:redundancy by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      why didn't they post this in the summary? seems like a material fact.

    20. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all of my city loses comcast about twice a year. often without any severe weather.

      and at least once a month large blocks of channels go missing for a day.

    21. Re:redundancy by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      happens all the time to more important things than your entertainment/news/bill paying feed

      is the power line to your house redundant? the water line? the sewer line? Cities have done without those for over a week and causes sickness, death, financial troubles, etc.

      but you go crying about the fucking internet pipe

    22. Re:redundancy by Capt.Albatross · · Score: 1

      why didn't they post this in the summary? seems like a material fact.

      I get the distinct impression that you are one of those people for whom it is always someone else's fault.

    23. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say you're either trolling or can't read. You're making it sound like Google had a 48 hour outage when they have, depending on how you RTFA, between 35 minutes and 3 hours and 15 minutes only. They're giving a 48 hours worth of discount for that outage.

    24. Re:redundancy by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      I have high standards for others just as i have high standards for myself.

    25. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must beat yourself often.

    26. Re:redundancy by JazzLad · · Score: 2

      If you had high standards for yourself, you'd stop posting.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    27. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could just RTFA and find out the actual number. The summary wasn't wrong, you just wanted to get on a soapbox and roar to the world about how your opinion matters.

      Protip: It doesn't.

    28. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They're crediting 2 days of service.

      "Crediting" means that Google is giving their customers two days of free service. This is in compensation for a 30 to 180 minute outage. I don't know about anyone else, but the only compensation I get when a water main breaks or there's a power outage is the fact that it's impossible to incur cost during the outage. You sound too young to remember, but back in 2003 there was a blackout that left the entire northeast US out of power for days. Shit happens sometimes, the best you can do is just hope to minimize downtime.

    29. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are stupid to a level that is just hard to quantify.

    30. Re:redundancy by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      I've read your comments on this article and you appear to not have a basic grasp on reading or logic. I will be kind and assume you have taken too much cold medicine and are not normally this imbecilic, but that is the impression that folks are getting of you right now.

      My recommendation is to walk away from the keyboard, clear your head and maybe post again in the morning.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    31. Re:redundancy by pla · · Score: 1

      Sorry but I have to ask do you have riots/looting during the blackouts like the ones in NY back when the power went out statewide back in 2003? Or is that just a US thing?

      Not really a US thing so much as a dense urban thing.

      In the 'burbs, we pretty much just patiently wait for it to come back on - If anything, people get more friendly as they wander out of their dark and boringly TV-less houses to socialize in person for the first time in months. If it stays off heading into evening, often someone will spark up a grill and everyone will gather around to chat and eat - downright congenial.

      Though, that doesn't apply so much to a pre-dawn power outage on a work day - Mostly, that just counts as a complete PITA, but still no rioting over it.

    32. Re:redundancy by Kjella · · Score: 1

      why didn't they post this in the summary? seems like a material fact.

      Clickbait? My impression is that more and more headlines and summaries lack some critical fact, often one that would turn a story into a non-story in the article. After all if it said Google had a short outage during World Series opening, credits 2 days for goodwill why exactly would you bother to read the "full" story? You pretty much already got it.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    33. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      says something about the google-fest on this site that I am getting pilloried for calling out a wealthy company on their poor infrastructure planning and lack of redundancy.

      That's not what's happening to you, and you know it.

      You spouted off a hasty, ill-informed judgment and continued to argue with others who were obviously more informed than you. This has caused embarrassment to you, and that embarrassment is both one hundred percent your fault and one hundred percent deserved.

      Your attempt to shift the blame for your mistake, and to frame the mockery you earned as some kind of martyrdom, are only compounding that embarrassment.

      And because you lack self-awareness and the will to learn, you're going to keep repeating these mistakes even after they have been carefully laid out and explained to you.

    34. Re:redundancy by Noah+Haders · · Score: 0, Troll

      Nice, I'm trying to have a mature conversation and your throwing ad hominems. I'm Marco Rubio and your Donald Trump.

    35. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New York didn't have rioting and looting in the 2003 blackout. You're thinking of the one in 1977.

    36. Re:redundancy by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's called customer service. They're saying "we screwed up for 35 minutes, please have 2 DAYS of credit as a sorry". They are going above and beyond and you are COMPLAINING ?

      You have Stockholm Syndrome from your cable company pissing all over you and telling you it's raining or something?

    37. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you are a dipshit. That is not an ad hominem as he wasn't attacking your position.

    38. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A mature conversation would including knowing all the facts from the linked article.

      You seem to have no facts, so are just making shit up. I wouldn't call that mature.

    39. Re:redundancy by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      They're complaining because they missed a major live event that one-fifteenth of their cable bill hardly compares to. I am in no way a fan of baseball, but I they certainly have my sympathies.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    40. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ad hominem is not Latin for "that's mean!"

    41. Re:redundancy by rhodium_mir · · Score: 1

      Throwing ad hominems for TWO WHOLE DAYS!

      --
      You can't spell "oneiromancy" without "roman".
    42. Re:redundancy by davester666 · · Score: 1

      You mean like when one of AT&T's lines was cut maybe a month or so ago, and ALL the cell service for a pretty good region stopped working, because everyone was using AT&T for backhaul?

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    43. Re:redundancy by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      The outage sprung from a failure of a computer server designed to authenticate customer equipment, what the company describes as a security feature. When the server’s authentication process was interrupted, the company said, it began denying legitimate customers access to the network.

      What makes you think that there is any way to run this server in a redundant manner? Google might have nothing to do with the design or implementation of this server, and it sounds like it was an unusual outage as well because the server didn't just plain not respond, it actively responded that the user wasn't authorized.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    44. Re:redundancy by rhodium_mir · · Score: 1

      Or, worse yet, what if a plane landed 2880 MINUTES late because the captain couldn't read but also had extremely high standards for himself?

      --
      You can't spell "oneiromancy" without "roman".
    45. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It happens, from time to time

      Of course, that was electricity not internet service ... but the whole system was FUBAR for a solid 12 hours. Google being down for an hour (or less), while super frustrating, doesn't even begin to compare.

    46. Re:redundancy by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Last time we had a power outage, I grabbed a 12 pack of beer out of the fridge and started sharing with the neighbors while we waited for it to return.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    47. Re:redundancy by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      But what *I* am saying is if this outage happened with any other cable provider they would't give you any credit at all. I've had my cable down for DAYS without so much as an apology when it comes back up. Google's response here is orders of magnitude above what any other US provider will do and still people complain.

    48. Re:redundancy by rhodium_mir · · Score: 1

      Game 1 of the World Series was less than 48 HOURS ago.

      --
      You can't spell "oneiromancy" without "roman".
    49. Re:redundancy by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      Link needed or just FUD.

    50. Re:redundancy by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      I tried to be nice, but at the point will just watch as you get mod bombed to hell, Problem is that you take a position based on stupid assumptions, get called on those assumptions and then double down. Then you get called on it again and make an ass of yourself blaming the summary.

      Have a nice day.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    51. Re:redundancy by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      What makes you think that there is any way to run this server in a redundant manner?

      Umm idk get two servers? Or don't design a check point?

    52. Re:redundancy by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I was commenting on the "above and beyond' remark you made. Orders of magnitude above crap does not automatically equal 'awesome'.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    53. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why you keep track of your shared risk link groups. If this was an optical issue. It could have just as easily have been a software issue.

    54. Re:redundancy by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      So in other words, you know nothing about the subject, but are going to try to blast Google for your lack of knowledge?

      You and I both know nothing about this software, trying to claim there is a way to make it redundant is disingenuous. It is also possible that the problem wouldn't have been prevented by being in any way redundant, as the software continued to respond, it wasn't a redundancy issue, it was likely a database or data issue, which no amount of redundancy would solve. Your suggestion to not have the software is also pretty silly, this software facilitates the removal of people who no longer pay for the service. Your suggestion would make it so anyone could steal service from Google, yeah, that is a great solution.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    55. Re:redundancy by glsunder · · Score: 1

      The downtime was 30 minutes for me and most of the city. Some areas were longer, but none were more than 3.5 hours afaik.

    56. Re:redundancy by Talderas · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say that. This outage happened in the middle of a major live event that the area had a substantial interest in. When your other cable provider has an outage it is typically not during a major live event that the location has a substantial interest in. What's Google's history on outages? Have the had any? Did they give any credit during those outages? How many outages occurred with cable providers similar in scope to what happened here with Google.

      There's no way to tell if this is par the course for a Google outage or if the credit was provided due to the exceptional circumstances and visibility.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    57. Re:redundancy by glsunder · · Score: 1

      Take several sips of water and re-read the article.

    58. Re:redundancy by glsunder · · Score: 1

      Maybe he's talking about this? I'm not sure, since I didn't really read the article.
      http://lostcoastoutpost.com/20...

      I just highlighted "AT&T's lines was cut", right clicked on it and selected Search Google for "AT&T's lines was cut". It was the 4th entry.

      The 5th entry was:
      http://kmph-kfre.com/archive/a...

    59. Re:redundancy by swb · · Score: 1

      Who has redundant natural gas at their house?

      I don't know what that distribution network looks like, but if a branch line feeding some section of town got broken and cut off, I feel skeptical that they could just cap it temporarily knowing that gas would continue to flow to that segment because...spanning tree for natural gas.

      I mean maybe in cold weather climates they have that ability, even if it requires guys in hard hats to go to some valve someplace and turn some knobs, but something tells me it doesn't work that way.

      We all know for sure that fault tolerance in electricity is roll your own -- UPS and/or generator power.

      The one I worry about the most is water. What if there was some kind of *major* fuckup in some big pipe between the water plant and the rest of the system, like the kind of thing that would take a few days to fix. That's a long time for a major urban center to go without water.

    60. Re: redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only use my internet for 30 minutes a day, so I lost a weeks worth of usage!

    61. Re: redundancy by Redbehrend · · Score: 1

      I guarantee half the people were illegally streaming it lol

    62. Re:redundancy by neoritter · · Score: 1

      When your other cable provider has an outage it is typically not during a major live event that the location has a substantial interest in.

      1) Citation needed.
      2) Weasel word typically. It's irrelevant if it's typical or not. I'd argue it's never typical for any provider. But since the sentence concedes that it does happen to other providers (and it has for me), we're still back to the fact that the other providers don't provide refunds, typically.

    63. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm idk

      Obviously. So why are you acting as though you do?

    64. Re:redundancy by neoritter · · Score: 1

      I hate to help the guy, but they could've had a redundant server running authentication. When the customer boxes failed authenticating on the first one, they could've rechecked with the other one.

    65. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you. Google OWNS the server, Google CHARGES for the service; if they can't do the job or figure out how to do the job they suck and there is no excuse.

    66. Re:redundancy by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You want resiliency, not redundancy. Redundancy was good back in the real world, but with networks, redundancy of equipment makes for more points of failure, not better up time. Resilience can be achieved through redundancy, but redundancy for redundancy's sake can end up with a worse up time. When HSRP goes down, it doesn't matter how many routers you have, none of them will work.

    67. Re:redundancy by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      They had a 40 minute outage. So 99.995% up time over a year. And you find 99.995% uptime to be unacceptable on a residential connection.

      We aren't pillorying you for calling out a wealthy company, but for you saying silly things.

    68. Re:redundancy by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      I've seen people do that, put in two servers, then replicate between them. So now, a hardware failure between either would cause both to fail, and a failure of the replication would cause both to fail. So the uptime was reduced greatly, but they had redundancy. That kind of stupidity is what happens when someone demands redundancy without understanding.

    69. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TWC went down for me completely (TV and Internet) last Christmas for over a week. Since it was the holidays, they couldn't get someone out for over a week. It was a problem at the pole (some kind of box was fried - apparently several houses were affected). All of this after hours on the phone where their reps variously described the problem as due to my cable modem (I own it), bad wiring in the house, wireless problems, etc.

      No refund offered, even when requested.

      Punishment? They are now my 'backup' Internet provider at $15/month for their basic 3Mbps plan. I *need* internet as I work from home full time. The "new guys" are almost as bad in a lot of ways, and more expensive.

      Please God let Google Fiber extend its reach outside Austin city limits.

    70. Re:redundancy by davester666 · · Score: 1
      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    71. Re:redundancy by trawg · · Score: 1

      I've had a great experience with TWC in Columbus OH, I had an problem about 6 weeks ago that meant Internet was going up and down. They sent someone out and fixed it within a day.

      They also gave me a credit without me asking for it. It was small (under 10 bucks I think, maybe 10% of my bill) but I was impressed. Maybe it is different because other providers are available in my area.

    72. Re:redundancy by sjames · · Score: 1

      Then why didn't you RTFA?

    73. Re:redundancy by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Do you have DSL? If so then, in my home state (Maine), the telco is required to allow me to use any provider that is willing to service my area. I did pay CommTel (now Fairpoint) to put the lines in as well as install a CO. However, I can (and have) use any of the third party DSL service providers. For the longest time I was on GWI but it didn't really mean anything improved - I was just too lazy to switch back. This also happens without interruption. I have three separate lines and they are all able to be switched to any DSL provider I want.

      I don't switch because Fairpoint keeps putting me on business class service at consumer prices - I have static IP addresses, can run a public facing server, and don't seem to have any of the ports closed though I certainly only pay residential fees. They also send me lots of superfluous equipment (I don't use the ISP's router even though they have tried to convince me to do so a few times) and keep increasing my speeds but not my costs. I started with 2 MB/sec and now am at 13.

      Rumor has it that they'll be running fiber to the village next year. I have no idea what it will cost but I'll probably contact them and see if I can jump on (and they may let me do it) and pay for them to do the last X miles. I had to pay for the CO and for 6 miles of wiring for my current setup. After running the numbers, it was cheaper than going with ISDN.

      Anyhow, you may have similar laws. They're probably not advertised but you can also just check with the PUC in your state. I have no idea what Time Warner offers - if it's cable then this probably does not apply.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    74. Re:redundancy by KGIII · · Score: 1

      As evidenced by their posting history, they're also Apple fanboys. Insane might be redundant. ;-)

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    75. Re:redundancy by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Sure you can quantify it. It's 48 hours!

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    76. Re:redundancy by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Whenever the outages occur on my DSL, Fairpoint always pro-rates the bill, without my asking. I don't even use their email service. It went down for a week or two at one point. I didn't notice. Even that meant my bill was smaller than normal. I even got an email saying that it would be prorated and why - even though I didn't complain, didn't notice, and didn't care.

      Hell, this is Fairpoint. They're not even known for being all that good. I find them fine or I'd use another provider. It may be because I can just use another provider that they are so proactive, perhaps not. I've no way of knowing. Because the signal is carried on the telephone lines they're not able to lock out other providers so I can use any old DSL provider that's willing to serve my area.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    77. Re:redundancy by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I don't want to defend him but, and I see you've been here nominally longer than I, but I'm pretty sure that reading the article is expressly (perhaps tacitly but I've not actually read the terms of service) against the rules. Sometimes, I'll approach the limits and open an article link for the express purposes of viewing the pictures but reading the article is simply not allowed. (Sometimes, indeed, I do cheat and read the article but I feel bad for it. Making informed comments is simply not acceptable.)

      This is Slashdot. It's where we go to screech and throw poop. We're mostly howler monkeys in cubicle cages.

      Meh... It's his karma to burn. ;-)

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    78. Re: redundancy by KGIII · · Score: 1

      He's an Apple fanboy. You can't really expect him to be knowledgeable and informed, can you?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    79. Re:redundancy by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      Unless you were watching the World Series on Fox Sports anywhere in the country...

      http://money.cnn.com/2015/10/27/news/fox-world-series/

    80. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez, where do you live? I live in a third-world country and I haven't had an outage in three years.

    81. Re:redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 Gotta post anon because my employer knows I /. but, yeah, you hit it on the head. Then you have a 6 hour conference call to determine who to blame.

    82. Re:redundancy by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      There also wouldn't be compensation if the electricity went out for half an hour during a World Series game, and that would stop people from streaming it as surely as an internet outage. Heck, if I was using the internet and my fiber went out, I could use my phone as a hotspot, and with my data cap I could do that a lot longer than my laptop would run on battery power.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    83. Re:redundancy by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Here on Slashdot, we'll have free ad hominems for 48 hours!

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  2. Are you kidding? Best free advertisement ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They take it as a writeoff, and now:

    People know there's such a thing as Google Fiber.
    Big companies use it for real things.
    Google is cool about customer service.

    I wouldn't be surprised if they torched it on purpose just to make the point.

    1. Re:Are you kidding? Best free advertisement ever by NEDHead · · Score: 1

      Take it as a write off? Do you even know what that means? Sure it is always good to have positive customer service, and to have people know about it. But reducing revenue is not the same as double dipping. And the 'free advertising' was not free, it cost them ~6.7% of that month's revenue.

    2. Re:Are you kidding? Best free advertisement ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they're going to loose X thousands of dollars to save y hundreds of dollars on taxes?

  3. Same thing in Austin by nukem · · Score: 5, Informative

    Had an outage a couple of weeks after install. I wasn't home so didn't even notice. Got an email crediting me for the day and showed up on next bill. It sucks that there are outages but it's nice that they give credit for them.

    1. Re:Same thing in Austin by TWX · · Score: 1

      Maybe because Google is used to enforcing the terms of its Service Level Agreements against its providers when those providers do it wrong, they are also, at the moment, willing to do what it takes to make amends for their own violation of their SLAs to their customers.

      Companies or divisions of companies that primarily provide consumer-grade service aren't accustomed to SLAs in my experience. I've had both DSL and Cablemodem service personally, and I've had to deal with Metro Optical networks from the same companies, and while the phone company understood its obligations and would proactively call me when the MOE network had a fault, the other company, that started out life as a cable company and then a cable Internet company, basically requires me to call them when a MOE circuit is down. They do not meet their SLAs but getting that addressed has been like pulling teeth.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:Same thing in Austin by antdude · · Score: 1

      Several months ago, I got credits from Time Warner Cable for a free on demand movie (up to $5.99) for its on demand outage, and didn't know about it.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    3. Re:Same thing in Austin by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      That's not compensation, it's just a first-one's-free advertisement for their overpriced on demand movies service.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
  4. Google Fiber was down in KC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have Google Fiber, but not their cable product. The internet connection didn't go down for my house, but I heard from friends in the neighborhood that their television service from Google did go down. So not all Google Fiber was down in KC. The game was also broadcast on a local station so there were alternatives available.

  5. If Comcast did this... by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Funny

    You would get an email explaining that the service interruption was a feature and your bill will go up by $22.50 from now on.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:If Comcast did this... by internerdj · · Score: 2

      Of all the nightmare troubles I had with Comcast customer service, this wasn't true the last time I had Comcast. I lost service for a week. It was completely their fault and I called them up and asked for a credit for the service interruption and they said "OK. I've credited it to your bill." No escalation, no hours on hold. Of course, another time they decided to move my billing due date by a week, charge me for a whole month of service, and refused to issue any credit.

    2. Re:If Comcast did this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is still a difference: You need to call Comcast to complain. Google did this to all their Fiber subscribers automatically. It feels as if they put an SLA into their contract.

    3. Re:If Comcast did this... by internerdj · · Score: 1

      Definitely a difference, but it was one of the only times Comcast didn't screw me. That is an event worth noting.

    4. Re:If Comcast did this... by willworkforbeer · · Score: 1

      You would get an email explaining that the service interruption was a feature and your bill will go up by $22.50 from now on.

      "It's a feature to proactively keep you below your throttling limit. You. Are. Welcome."

      --
      Pretending this is my office full of bitter coworkers..
    5. Re:If Comcast did this... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Definitely a difference, but it was one of the only times Comcast didn't screw me. That is an event worth noting.

      So Comcast screwing up by not screwing you is an event worth noting?

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    6. Re:If Comcast did this... by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Honestly, it should be illegal not to provide credit for downtime. I signed a contract with my cable internet service. In exchange for $x/mo, they provide me with 730 hours of service. If they only provide me with 729 hours, they should credit me for the hour they failed to provide. Yes it'll be on the order of 10 cents, but multiply that by 10,000 or 100,000 customers and it starts to become a real incentive to avoid downtime. The only exception should be scheduled downtime where they give me plenty of advance warning about the upcoming service outage.

    7. Re:If Comcast did this... by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      I signed a contract with my cable internet service. In exchange for $x/mo, they provide me with 730 hours of service.

      I bet that's not what the contract actually says. I don't remember any guaranteed uptime when I signed with Comcast. The business service I have with Charter doesn't even have a 100% guaranteed uptime.

    8. Re:If Comcast did this... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I signed a contract with my cable internet service. In exchange for $x/mo, they provide me with 730 hours of service.

      Which company? Even business services don't have commitments like that.

  6. Maybe in return they can learn not to fuck up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Customer service is best when I don't need it.

    1. Re:Maybe in return they can learn not to fuck up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they should be flawless 100% of the time. The should be more like...uh...um... give me a moment...

  7. Corporate Arrogance is plentiful. by geekmux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The only times I've gotten much apology from my own ISP is when I threaten (with reason) to jump ship."

    Well, don't expect even that half-assed effort in the future.

    We watch our government ignore anti-monopoly laws. We watch companies try and buy each other for hundreds of billions, knowing full well the DOJ should certainly shoot down the deal. And then we watch those same companies try and try again until they find that loophole (or greased palm) that allows the deal to go through. And it does eventually go through. Every damn time.

    We've watched our cellular market collapse into massive monopolies, with fixed pricing so obvious you couldn't help but blame collusion.

    As monopolies continue to grow, don't expect to be treated with kindness, since you will truly be nothing more than a number to them when there's 500 million customers to manage. Google is demonstrating a massive exception here, and one I wish would take precedent for customer service to be reborn instead of the steaming pile of shit we have today.

    I'm not holding my breath.

    1. Re:Corporate Arrogance is plentiful. by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      We watch our government ignore anti-monopoly laws. We watch companies try and buy each other for hundreds of billions, knowing full well the DOJ should certainly shoot down the deal. And then we watch those same companies try and try again until they find that loophole (or greased palm) that allows the deal to go through. And it does eventually go through. Every damn time.

      Haven't watched the attempted acquisitions of T-Mobile have you? They have yet to get acquired.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    2. Re:Corporate Arrogance is plentiful. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      We watch our government ignore anti-monopoly laws. We watch companies try and buy each other for hundreds of billions, knowing full well the DOJ should certainly shoot down the deal. And then we watch those same companies try and try again until they find that loophole (or greased palm) that allows the deal to go through. And it does eventually go through. Every damn time.

      Haven't watched the attempted acquisitions of T-Mobile have you? They have yet to get acquired.

      Haven't noticed the fact you speak of multiple attempts from multiple vendors when pointing this out? Watch and learn how loopholes are made and used.

      Don't worry. Too Big to Fail will win eventually. Look at history.

    3. Re:Corporate Arrogance is plentiful. by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      We watch our government ignore anti-monopoly laws. We watch companies try and buy each other for hundreds of billions, knowing full well the DOJ should certainly shoot down the deal. And then we watch those same companies try and try again until they find that loophole (or greased palm) that allows the deal to go through. And it does eventually go through. Every damn time.

      Haven't watched the attempted acquisitions of T-Mobile have you? They have yet to get acquired.

      Haven't noticed the fact you speak of multiple attempts from multiple vendors when pointing this out? Watch and learn how loopholes are made and used.

      Don't worry. Too Big to Fail will win eventually. Look at history.

      Too big to fail eventually fails.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
  8. This Will Probably The Only Time I Say This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    GO Google!

    The Royals won game one because of the outage.

    BEAT THE METS,
    BEAT THE METS,
    Step right up and sweep the Mets!
    Bring your kiddies,
    Bring your wife;
    Guaranteed to have the time of your life
    Because we're talking about the New York Mets;
    So place your bets, against the Mets!
    East side,
    West side,
    everybody's coming down
    to beat the M-E-T-S Mets of New York town!

  9. Google Fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'd the only phone service I know that credits you back for unused data also. I pay for 3gig and what I don't use, I get back in credit. Most telecom providers suck!

    1. Re:Google Fi by afidel · · Score: 1

      Republic Wireless also does the credit thing, they're both powered by bandwidth.com but Republic uses WiFi/Sprint/Verizon vs Fi which uses WiFi/Sprint/T-Mobile and Fi requires a Nexus device vs Republic which requires one of their customized Moto devices.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  10. 5 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    5 years ago. I was with a local ISP (Distributel). They had significant capacity issues. I received 50% off my bill until repaired. It took a few months.

    I remain their customer, still, because they're honest.

  11. Carsberg.... by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

    Carlsberg aren't internet providers but if they were........

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  12. Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "The only times I've gotten much apology from my own ISP is when I threaten (with reason) to jump ship."

    No you won't. There's a reason you stick with your ISP even though you hate them. They give you the speeds you want and that keeps you right where you are. If you were going to switch, you'd just switch. You wouldn't be a ball-less baby and threaten to do so.

    1. Re:Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That and any long time CSR really doesn't give a fuck when you drop that turd on them. They'll either transfer you to someone who is easily beat up on, or they'll escalate and put your ass on hold while you cool down.

    2. Re:Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If you were going to switch, you'd just switch.
      Describing the criteria =/= Meeting the criteria

      Switching happens after the competitor's superiority is definitive. Unsubscription is the result of sustained, confirmed inferiority. Reasonable people offer the benefit of the doubt and allow for temporary conditions.

      There will be no need to thank me for the lesson on human logic, internet tough guy.

  13. Similar treatment from Cox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to get such treatment from Cox Communications all the time, then I had to move out of their area :(

  14. Just two days of service? by mysidia · · Score: 2, Insightful

    they're making up for it by proactively giving the entire market 2 days of service off of their next bill.

    Two day's worth of service is an insignificant credit compared to the loss, especially during a special event.

    Most providers of business IP transit have SLA credits available, starting from the time when the customer calls in to request the ticket be opened, by the way, in some cases these are refundable, and can require the provider paying cash, not just crediting future service in case of a full on outage.

    A couple hours worth of outage would typically generate enough SLA credit to make an entire month and possibly two month's worth of service gratis.

    So how come it's so unusual for a residential ISP to waive even 2 days, after a few hours unscheduled downtime?

    1. Re:Just two days of service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because people in that country are worth nothing, while corporations are worth millions. Next time a corporation needs to build a data center, they will just incinerate the town that is in the way and silently bury the people who were in the way. It reminds me of the USSR.

    2. Re:Just two days of service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pop quiz, which entity is more important to a provider's revenue stream:
      a) Grandma can't surf Yahoo's homepage or check her AOL email (forgotten by next morning)
      b) An IT guy trying to keep up a mission-critical service that's costing $XXXX an hour in downtime (remembered until the universe implodes)

      Answer:
      Trick question. Grandma doesn't know anything about switching providers, and even if there were other choices she wouldn't bother.

    3. Re:Just two days of service? by swillden · · Score: 1

      Two day's worth of service is an insignificant credit compared to the loss, especially during a special event.

      For a 40-minute outage?

      Most providers of business IP... A couple hours worth of outage would typically generate enough SLA credit to make an entire month and possibly two month's worth of service gratis.

      So how come it's so unusual for a residential ISP to waive even 2 days, after a few hours unscheduled downtime?

      Because residential services don't generally have an SLA, and cost much, much less for that reason. How much would you pay for a gigabit connection with a business class SLA? A lot more than $70 per month.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    4. Re:Just two days of service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So a couple of hours would be 3-4 hours for 30 days refund. So about 8-10 credit days per hour. Most people was apparently down for about 35 minutes it seems. So that would be about 5-6 days credit based on your metric. Google did 2 which is about a 3rd of that.

      That said, this is a service geared towards residence though i'm sure many business use it. Most residential services at least in the US won't credit you back anything without complaining in a phone call.

      So in terms of services geared toward business their actions was fairly bad, but in terms of services geared towards residence, their actions are pretty good.

    5. Re:Just two days of service? by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      > Two day's worth of service is an insignificant credit compared to the loss, especially during a special event.

      It's a lot more significant than any other US cable provider would give.

      > Most providers of business IP transit have SLA credits available

      I'm betting most providers of business IP charge a LOT more than $70 for a gigabit connection too. My god man, you're comparing apples to kumquats.

    6. Re:Just two days of service? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I'm betting most providers of business IP charge a LOT more than $70 for a gigabit connection too.

      So what? 1 Month SLA credit for your $70/month service would be $70.
      1 Month SLA credit for your $7000/month service would be $7000.

      That which is being expected to be returned, if the service provider fails to deliver: is still proportional to the amount paid! A provider can't honestly expect to be paid for a service they failed to deliver, can they?

      Are you suggesting that only people who purchase more expensive products and services should be entitled to a refund when not delivered what they paid for, and the product failed catastrophically due to defect causing X% extra loss? So you can return your defective $1000 brand new iPad for $1000 cash plus compensation, when it dies during the presentation in a big meeting causing you to lose the deal, but you can't return your $70 pair of pants that turn out to have faulty stitching, causing the crotch to rip apart, when you sit down in front of a customer, for $70 cash?

    7. Re:Just two days of service? by DainisG · · Score: 1

      It seems that everyone is pointing out that Google (or any other company that might have been involved with an equipment or service outage) should have been fully redundant... especially during such a super-important game. What isn't being pointed out is that the -broadcaster- also didn't bother to have redundancy either. Other articles besides tfa seem to suggest there were issues with both Google Fiber in KC as well as a brief outage for Fox itself, unrelated to Google. Also, tfa points out the 3/4 of the TV's in the city were tuned to the event. Does every TV in KC use Google Fiber for programming? Even if they did, the Fox outage caused all of them to black out anyway, right?

    8. Re:Just two days of service? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      For a 40-minute outage?

      The article was indicating people lost service for several hours, and it was not due to a fibre cut or damage to an individual customer's drop, so the SP was responsible, and it was no mere 40 minute outage.

      How much would you pay for a gigabit connection with a business class SLA? A lot more than $70 per month.

      Do you see the problem with what you are suggesting? What do you think a SLA is, insurance? No.
      Auto Mechanic: The vehicle needs $100 of labor. If you give me $100, then I MIGHT repair your car. But if you want, then you can instead give me $500, and I WILL repair your car, and if I don't succeed for some reason, then I will give you $250 of your money back, after you pay me for the additional labor to fix my mistakes.

      I don't know, since Gigabit isn't available around here under any conditions, heck DSL isn't available at my location. But I have a T1 with an uptime SLA, and it's less than $100 a month.

      I would assume that with Gigabit getting a SLA would not be a significant cost, unless you are ordering a protected service with a 99.99% uptime assurance, and that even if the 99% assurance wasn't violated, you'd still be entitled to credit for the pro-rata amount of actual downtime at a bare minimum for service not delivered.

    9. Re:Just two days of service? by rew · · Score: 1

      My ISP for my server had an outage for a couple of hours. They then mailed their customer base that they'd refund a whole month of service. I'm guessing that mail went out to more than the affected customers: My server didn't go down. A couple of days later I got the invoice for that month. Full charge. Two days later: full credit. I'm guessing they did the right thing and credited everybody who got the mail, even if they sent it out to customers that weren't affected.

    10. Re:Just two days of service? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Two days later: full credit. I'm guessing they did the right thing and credited everybody who got the mail, even if they sent it out to customers that weren't affected.

      This is why the language should have been slightly different. "We will provide a credit to all customers who were affected by this outage."

      Then just apply the credit to who you think was affected, and if anyone else calls in asking about their server being down and not getting a credit, just have the support rep. immediately give them the credit.

    11. Re:Just two days of service? by swillden · · Score: 1

      For a 40-minute outage?

      The article was indicating people lost service for several hours, and it was not due to a fibre cut or damage to an individual customer's drop, so the SP was responsible, and it was no mere 40 minute outage.

      From TFA:

      Most lost service from shortly before 7 p.m. Tuesday until about 7:35 p.m.

      I had missed that it was longer for some, but for most it was a mere 40-minute outage. For the smaller number that had a longer outage, it was no more than about three hours, since service was fully restored by 10:15.

      How much would you pay for a gigabit connection with a business class SLA? A lot more than $70 per month.

      Do you see the problem with what you are suggesting? What do you think a SLA is, insurance?

      Yes, that's exactly what an SLA is, it's insurance. Outages are inevitable, and the closer you try to get to perfect service, the more it costs. And SLA provides a commitment to a specific level of availability, and remedies (usually financial -- like insurance) if those levels aren't met. It doesn't make sense to provide business-level SLAs (and associated fees) to residential customers.

      I have a T1 with an uptime SLA, and it's less than $100 a month.

      What's the agreement for your connection? How much uptime is promised, and what's the remedy if it's not met? $100 per month is pretty darned expensive for 1.54 mbps, BTW, so at that cost you should have an SLA, and some pretty decent committed outage remedies.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  15. In some countries... by dave420 · · Score: 1

    ... it's required by law, and failure to compensate is met with strict fines for the company in question.

    1. Re:In some countries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but that's communism!

  16. If Verizon did this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You will be overcharged 1.998 cents.

  17. Not telecom but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our electricity provider and water provider thanked us for conserving by asking for a rate increase because of lost profits.

  18. Cuh-reepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got an apology from them via email, and even though I wasn't home during the outage, they're making up for it by proactively giving the entire market 2 days of service off of their next bill.

    Did Google know you weren't home?

  19. "threaten to jump ship" by truck_soccer · · Score: 1

    This tactic may sometimes work on a smaller business (it doesn't). Basically all you're telling the CSR is that you're unreasonable and will either be put on a long time-out in the hold corner, or they'll "escalate" you to a CSR that has a different personality. Another favorite is when people ask to speak to a supervisor. Oh man does that get some laughs in the call center.

    1. Re:"threaten to jump ship" by ledow · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And thus bad CSR's are the prime cause of customer loss, and not the other way around. That's excluding when they make promises to retain you that they know are rubbish, or it ends up costing the customer more and then they just cancel out of distrust of anything further.

      Personally, I get through to supervisors. It's not hard. I'm not even very polite, I've just had a lot of experience (you'll see why below). But mainly because I know what I'm entitled to and what I'm not. If you give me problems, that's what recording the phone call is for. Ooops. A CSR out of a job for talking bullshit is much easier than losing a long-term customer precisely because the next CSR is paid the same and just another guy reading the same script.

      It's not a question that large callcentres are always staffed by assholes, who all claim the supervisor "isn't available" (or not even there, that always gets a laugh from me too!) because that's exactly what they are told to do.

      But that's not the end of the customer's power. In the UK, you can record the phone call. It's only "advised" to tell them you are recording and if THEY have a "calls may be recorded" warning - well... I don't need to tell them if I'm recording at all (I don't need to anyway, it's just polite).

      And then the ball-game gets turned around. You're refusing to give me your name? You're refusing to accept notification of my cancellation? You failed to follow procedures? You put me on hold but never resolved the query that you went on hold to do? Oh, that little tape winging its way to head office is going to hurt and given that it's your JOB to help (no matter what your mythical never-present supervisor might train you to do), it's going to cost you.

      Last time I phoned up with a complaint, I *did* get the mythical supervisor on the line (I always do, when I deem them necessary, but that's another matter) and I had the British Gas callcentre (if you live in Britain, you know they are one of the WORST for callcentres) that he was in charge of phoning local newsagents near me to discover one that they had a PayPoint in, that they could *pay* to stay open late, especially so that *I* alone (as in I had to present ID to the newsagent, who'd already shut up shop but had been paid to stay open only for me) could go over to them and top-up a pre-payment card to solve my problem. The problem was quite minor, their way of dealing with it wasn't, but I got my way and cost them a lot more money than basic compliance would ever have cost - by getting through to that supervisor and explaining what was happening.

      I don't expect the minions on the front-line of the callcentre to understand that, they never do. But getting a supervisor isn't a fob-off that works when people are serious, and the supervisors know exactly when they have to act to not get caught.

      And turning the tables of "No, that's fine, I'm recording that response, and your name was?" on them soon wakes them up because they know those kinds of games are stupid, immoral, not helpful, losing them customers, and sometimes illegal when they have a duty to act on the information given to them (i.e. cancellations).

      I don't threaten callcentres and companies with court. They threaten me quite often. I've invited to initiate the court proceedings on behalf of at least two companies to save them time. Strangely it's NEVER got that far when they find out I have recordings and every letter and email ever sent or received. But I have screwed over any number of callcentre operatives who failed to do their job by playing such games and thinking it's cute to try to run rings around my efforts to do something quite reasonable. To my knowledge, I've cost at least two their jobs. One of them phoned me back up to threaten me because of that.

      Being a dick on the phone to customers is all fun and games until it costs you your job. Because you ARE supposed to be there to help and you're really not important enough to lose even a medium sized customer over.

      That's th

    2. Re:"threaten to jump ship" by truck_soccer · · Score: 1

      I'm not a CSR, just a lowly customer who has gone through enough BS with them to know that a large majority don't give a shit about me or my problems and are only there for a paycheck. My post was a sarcastic one, didn't mean to rattle your cage good sir. I did work for directv for a short while and there was a temp call center in the office there that was staffed by some of the least intelligent people I've had the pleasure of lending cigarettes to.

    3. Re:"threaten to jump ship" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you have never gotten a "supervisor", no, your "I'm recording too!" line has never shocked or scared anyone into taking you seriously, and no, you have never been in a position to cause a CSR to lose their job. I know it, you know it, the GP knows it, and literally everyone reading this thread knows it.

      You are the customer-service version of the Internet Tough Guy.

    4. Re:"threaten to jump ship" by PRMan · · Score: 2

      My wife is also a mystery shopper that has cost many people their jobs at high-end restaurants, amusement parks, electronics stores, coffee shops, etc. The most common reason for being fired? Lying to the customer about stock availability (because they are too lazy and think that nobody will check) or about other policies or procedures they don't want to follow (returns, allergy situations at the restaurants, etc.).

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    5. Re:"threaten to jump ship" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That may be true, but I have quit being a customer. Comcast and AT&T Wireless are two companies I will never do business with again. It's cost AT&T about $10,000 and counting. Okay, that doesn't mean shit to AT&T and Comcast has not lost quite that much but their competitors are getting my money.

      For AT&T it was all on their customer (dis)service reps. For Comcast it was that plus an inability to provide service.

      I haven't been to a McDonald's in 20 years although I'll gladly go to Burger King or Wendy's. It may not be much but it's the only power we have as consumers. Too many people bitch about how Walmart is killing small mom-and-pop grocery stores (which is bullshit of course), but those same people shop at Walmart every week.

      if you started a petition that simply said "Fuck Walmart" probably 100 million people in the US alone would sign it, but most of them will still shop there anyway. I don't have a problem with walmart except I don't trust their produce so I don't buy that there.

      Also, Sony can go fuck themselves - I still own Sony products, but I will never buy one again.

      Businesses will rise and fall. Sears used to be king of retail. K-Mart was doing very well for a while. Now where are they? What about Radio Shack?

      The big problem with Comcast and the other large ISPs is they ALMOST have a monopoly. People don't consider DSL to be a competitor to cable and it's not if you really need all that bandwidth but most of us don't. We just think we do. I'd sooner go back to dialup before I went back to Comcast.

    6. Re:"threaten to jump ship" by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --I'm just curious for a friend, but how do you apply for a job as a mystery shopper? TIA

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  20. And nothing of any value was lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Result!

  21. Pesky Ass Russian Submarines by zenlessyank · · Score: 1

    Guess they figured out a way to remotely disconnect a city in the middle of the continent whilst chillin' at the bottom of the Atlantic.

  22. Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Verizon Wireless used to do this. Any time you had a legitimate gripe with your service you got a $20 credit on your bill. That was back in the day when Verizon was a good company. Now they're among the most hated, like Comcast.

  23. Netflix by steamraven · · Score: 1

    I remember Netflix used to do this when a streamed video did not play correctly. When a movie wouldn't play the first time, or it dropped in the middle, I would get an email crediting my account for small amount. Of course, this was when they were just rolling out the streaming; now that they are established I don't receive these anymore.

  24. coastal leftists US thing by raymorris · · Score: 1

    You hear about looting and crap like that happening in New York and California. Not really in the vast majority of the country, just the coasts. When is the last time you heard about looting and rioing in Texas, Oklahoma, Montana, or Kentucky?

    Interestingly:

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/w...

    1. Re:coastal leftists US thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You hear about looting and crap like that happening in New York and California. Not really in the vast majority of the country, just the coasts. When is the last time you heard about looting and rioing in Texas, Oklahoma, Montana, or Kentucky?

      Red Summer. Tulsa Race Riot.

      Oh, did you mean recently? Okay: Ferguson.

      I look forward to seeing you stammer out a hasty excuse about how those "don't count" and are somehow the fault of those darn coast-dwelling liberals.

    2. Re:coastal leftists US thing by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      FWIW, when the Twins unexpectedly won the World Series in 1987, people in Minneapolis disrupted traffic but did little else harmful. The worst injury was a guy falling off the top of a bus. I suspect alcohol was involved.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  25. Is this not normal? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Seriously is this not normal that you don't pay for something you don't get?

    When was the last time a telecom provider gave you a discount on your bill without you asking for it?

    Errr every single time I've had an outage, across multiple providers, even for small localised ones. At one point I had a 1 month outage and the ISP not only didn't charge me for the month but they credited the cost of my wireless data for that month which I used as a backup.

    Actually my record was getting credit for 3 months when I called up and asked to cancel the account. I really wanted to leave so I took the credit and asked them to put me on their biggest, fastest and bestest plan to get rid of the credit as soon as I could. Still took me 6 weeks to do though.

  26. $5? by hawguy · · Score: 2

    They gave everyone less than $5 and *that* is the customer service model to aspire to? "Sorry we suck, here's $5, go away"

    1. Re:$5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wish I could mod up. 2 days of service for free is a joke.

    2. Re:$5? by PRMan · · Score: 1

      I think it's great. We had a really bad day on TWC once (service was up and down all day) and they didn't do anything except tell us they were aware and trying to fix it.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    3. Re:$5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you're one of those who pay nothing each month, they gave you exactly nothing in compensation! Fuck that, go with Comcast. I hear they're way better than that :)

    4. Re:$5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the dollar value, its the symbolism.

      Our service failed for 35 minutes so we are giving you 2 free days of service.

      I had a business TWC connection with regular summer outages between 2 and 4 for 3 months.
      I had to prove there was an issue and convince them to credit me for the downtime.
      Though, the credit was no where close to covering the lost productivity I wanted my gram of flesh.
      Turns out htey had an improperly sealed can....water leaked in.....add the summer heat and it became a sauna.

    5. Re:$5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was it during your city's stake in the World Series?
      Was it during the Super Bowl?

  27. This Isn't Special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worked for Time Warner. We always issued credit when the service was down and people requested it.

    We never had to do something like this because we never had an entire city down. Only local outages. I would hope anyone would do as Google is now if they were to have such a large area go down but it's very very uncommon to have happen.There are multiple redundancies at the headend which make this kind of thing almost impossible short of someone cutting multiple trunk lines.

  28. As bad as Centurylink is it's better than Comcast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just subscribe to the fastest service provided via Centurylink. It works good enough. Problem solved. Then I don't have to deal with crappy Comcast which lies lies and lies and f's it all up every f'ing time. Though I did have a nightmare of a time getting Centurylink to hook up my mothers connection properly. Only went through 6 different calls each and every time they tried to transfer me to Netgear all because I had a Netgear ADSL modem that *they* did't support. The problem was Netgear wanted $200 that I wasn't willing to pay when *I knew my configuration was right because I had the same configuration two houses away in the same service area and at another location prior to the move within the same service area as well!*. Ultimatley I got a supervisor on the phone (an American) and they were like 'year- wtf. The problem is obvious. They all should have known better. They only activated the line and not the internet connection.'.

  29. World Series? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What sport? I had no trouble not following it here in Europe.

  30. Which planet? by JohnStock · · Score: 1

    Which planet does this "world" series occur?

    1. Re:Which planet? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Which planet does this "world" series occur?

      Planet USA, which has one moon known as Canada.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:Which planet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ur-anus, or your anus which is where your fucking head is cock-sucking nigger.

  31. telco refund policy by earlofslander · · Score: 1

    This is kinda fun because back in Russia pretty much al telcos have been doing this thing like forever.

  32. On looting and governing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New York didn't have rioting and looting in the 2003 blackout. You're thinking of the one in 1977.

    Yep, a rare opportunity for direct comparison of Democratic vs. Republican government of the same city, I might add.

    1. Re:On looting and governing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, because the only difference between 1977 NYC and 2003 NYC was which letter appeared next to the mayor's name on the news.

      Or you're a moron. One of the two.

  33. It should be... by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

    Back when Century Link was Qwest, our service died and it took two on-site visits-that I had to be home for-to determine the problem was in their base station. My compensation for 5 days without service, hours of staying home to wait for their tech, and a couple hours navigating their "service" phone tree? (They closed our ticket when the first tech was dispatched, so I got to go through the whole process twice.) Nothing.

    One of the techs who came to our place mentioned that our distance to the base was beyond the DSL spec, which explained our slow data rates. I switched to Comcast a couple days later.

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
  34. Re:good grief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just so you know, everything you like can be described in condescendingly dismissive phrasing by insecure douchebags too.

  35. Comcast Business by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    I get the prorated bills every single time there is an outage lasting more than the minimum (I think 30 minutes). I've had a few dozen adjustments posted to my bill over the last few years as a customer without having to lift a finger.

    This is one of the many differences between Comcast's business versus residential services.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Comcast Business by rew · · Score: 1

      Wait.... let me get this straight.... Their BUSINESS service is down, "DOZENS of times", for over HALF AN HOUR, and then they give you a partial refund?

      I get way better SERVICE (i.e. it works) on my residential account.

    2. Re:Comcast Business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's fucking great. I only had Comcast's home service and every time I called them up to tell them the internet was down - which was a fucking lot of times - they would credit me a teeny amount of money. I didn't care about the money - I wanted a fucking ISP that actually connected me to the internet.

      So you didn't have to call and bitch and moan for your credits. You also paid a hell of a lot more than I did too and it sounds like your connection was just as comcraptastic.

    3. Re:Comcast Business by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      residential service goes down more frequently, but they don't normally report that to customers.

      For me it works out to maybe once a month, which smells of of a maintenance schedule. And technically they are rounding up the outage to 30 minutes, I don't know if it was for 5 minutes or for 30 minutes

      That they treat residential customers worse by offering the same level of reliability but forcing people to call in to complain to get a modest refund.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  36. But would they have compensated _us_?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know the diggers aren't actually real Google employees, but yesterday, their diggers cut a large gas line in our neighborhood (suburb of Kansas City). I never smelled so much mercaptan in my entire life. Could barely breathe outside. Good thing nobody had a cigarette lit.

  37. You poor people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are things really that bad in the USA? Over here, such compensations are given as a matter of course.

  38. American ISPs must suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I worked for PowerUp Internet, before they got bought out by OzEmail, we automatically gave all customers free days when we had system outages. It was great for customer service satisfaction which regularly polled >95% in the national surveys.

  39. Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The power company doesn't bill me for usage during a power outage. I would expect no less from any other service provider.

  40. Yes I got something without asking.... by rew · · Score: 1

    > When was the last time a telecom provider gave you a discount on your bill without you asking for it?

    My cellphone was down for a day this summer. They apologized and offered a "free 500Mb of internet" for the September billing cycle.

    I buy "internet service" on my phone with lots of margin. They charge like 100 times more for the "over your limit" traffic, so I rarely use the upper 500Mb of my "prepaid" 1G limit. It's cheaper to pay 12 months for 1Gb/month than to pay for 500Mb and go over the limit once a year.

    So their "free 500Mb of internet traffic" is indeed completely free... for them.

  41. Stupid by RalphOstrander · · Score: 1

    Even turning on the entire sports package for a year would not be enough to make up for that.