Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Smart Electronics For a Marathoner?

New submitter IMightB writes: My question is basically what is the best smart watch style device for runners. Must have features GPS, bluetooth and music storage for roughly 5 hours of use during a marathon. Pretty much everything else is a nice to have. My wife has recently decided to enter her first marathon and unfortunately, the other day during a training run her 7gen iPod Mini gave up the ghost due to moisture accumulating in the armband and her Garmin Forerunner 15 only lasts about 3 hours with GPS on (despite Manufacturer claims to the contrary). She would like to consolidate devices down to something with a watch style format and start using a bluetooth headset. I currently use, and really like, a pair of aging Jaybird JF3's for a bluetooth headset and will probably recommend to her whatever Jaybirds current equivalent is in their lineup. But the watch portion is eluding me still. Based on my current research, the Sony SmartWatch 3 may be the only one that fits my wife's 'Must have Requirements' Are there other options available? Can anyone with marathon or distance running experience share their thoughts on this subject? Thanks in Advance.

169 comments

  1. moto 360 sport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I am an avid marathoner I am looking for something similar. This is what I have my eye on http://www.motorola.com/us/consumers/watch/Moto-360-Sport/moto-360-sport.html

  2. I'm not a runner, but... by damn_registrars · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hear of runners running (no pun intended) into trouble when they are out practicing while wearing headphones. If she's just getting started, do you really want to prioritize on that?

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:I'm not a runner, but... by onkelonkel · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Three posts in and we already have the obligatory "Why would you want to do that?" response. Some things never change.

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    2. Re:I'm not a runner, but... by hawguy · · Score: 4, Informative

      I hear of runners running (no pun intended) into trouble when they are out practicing while wearing headphones. If she's just getting started, do you really want to prioritize on that?

      Three posts in and we already have the obligatory "Why would you want to do that?" response. Some things never change.

      It's a valid point - many races ban headphones and running on streets with headphones is not just a bad idea, it's outright stupid. Anything that reduces your situational awareness out on the road is a bad thing - especially when you're out on a 20 mile run and towards the end, you just want to get home.

    3. Re:I'm not a runner, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listening to loud headphones, maybe, also, not watching where you're running. And if you're going to dodge a puddle into the road, check your blind spot ffs.

    4. Re:I'm not a runner, but... by nullchar · · Score: 1

      Not everyone runs on roads... there are lots of great trails to run where you don't fear for your life and need to listen for passing cars.

      Earbuds block more sound, but over the ear phones with a low volume can still be enjoyed while being aware of surroundings.

    5. Re: I'm not a runner, but... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      There are also trails, I could cite examples in my locality, where predators look for zoned out people to bonk and steal their gadgets. Running along in your "zone" at mile 17 with your ear buds in is just asking for trouble.

    6. Re:I'm not a runner, but... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I hear of them running into trouble without wearing headphones. Since we no nothing of the circumstances in which she will be running how can we question the prioritisation?

    7. Re:I'm not a runner, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Run with soothing music playing a low volume that doesn't drown out the sorrounding sounds. That way you have situational awareness as well as the soothing music taking your mind off your fatigue.
        Though of course, if you are reaching excess fatigue levels, you probably shouldn't be running a marathon anyway. Excess running damages your heart if it is not strong and trained for it.

    8. Re: I'm not a runner, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't all live in shitholes. In Europe there are even places where you can leave your house without fear of being stabbed or shot.

    9. Re: I'm not a runner, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even without nebulous "predators", there's still bicycles, dogs and other runners on trails. Running into those isn't as bad as car, but still isn't awesome.

    10. Re:I'm not a runner, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Is this some sort of troll post? 116 people injured in 7 years? Stop the presses!

      A quick google search shows 66,000 injured by motor vehicles in 2013 alone. (http://www.pedbikeinfo.org/data/factsheet_crash.cfm)

      Your fun info graphic shows 116 people injured from the period between 2004-2011 and these statistics include non-motor vehicle crashes-- unless we assume trains are motor vehicles, I'm not sure. For the sake of argument, let's assume those are included. Hell, lets's assume, that 2013 was a terrible year and the same number of injuries happened each year between the entire period of 2004-2011 (even though the same statistics state that accidents are trending DOWN from 78000 in 2001)

      That leaves us with 462,000 injured pedestrians. 116 of these accidents involved headphones. So that's around 0.03% of all injuries...

      Well, hold on, that might not be fair, that 462000 involves all accidents, so lets limit it to just car accidents-- I don't have the info on the headphone study, so lets be generous. That's only 12% of the original number per the source above, which ends up being 55,440 injuries from motor vehicles. Also from that source, 4735 per year deaths from motor vehicle related accidents.

      So, now we have headphones accounting for 0.21% of all accidents; still not a significant figure.

      Percentage of injuries resulting in death is 59% for people not wearing headphones, and per your source "almost 70%" for people with headphones.

      So for 0.21% of the accidents there is a possible additional risk of death of about 10%. Given that your source quotes 55% of those accidents as being from trains, which I am not sure are included above, I'm going to call this a wash. There are so many unknown factors. If we assume all these people with headphones are running, this could be from fatigue. Are people in crowded cities more likely to wear headphones to drown out their surroundings? If so increased cars on the road and people walking in a small area is going to bump up your numbers.

      It's clear that this is not some horribly dangerous trend. People get hit by cars because one or more parties involved were not paying attention. Can headphones affect this? Sure. Can a busy street? Yep! Can the car radio? Texting? Tying your shoes without moving over? Crossing a street without looking? Making an illegal left in your vehicle?

      Whether or not someone is wearing headphones, however, does not seem to be a statistically worse proposition that doing just about anything else while running and driving.

      In short, this is NOT a valid point.

    11. Re:I'm not a runner, but... by Alien1024 · · Score: 1

      I never wear headphones while running, whether I am training or running, no matter where I'm running.

      On roads, it's just dangerous.

      On trails, in a park or in wilderness, I'd rather listen to the environment.

      In races, it's especially discouraged. You should pay attention to the pace of fellow runners, and you have to listen to any alerts the organization might issue.

    12. Re: I'm not a runner, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that he was specifically thinking of Europe. All of the stories of that happening that I've heard were from Europe.

    13. Re:I'm not a runner, but... by jofas · · Score: 1

      1. If you get to the point where music will prevent you from being aware of traffic, chances are that you're tired enough that it won't matter whether you have music or not. 2. I see lots of walking pedestrians with their earphones in. Should we just ban mobile music?

    14. Re:I'm not a runner, but... by kheldan · · Score: 1

      many races ban headphones

      I wondered about that with footraces, I know bicycle road racing prohibits such things even in ITTs. There's also the concept of 'dont' do anything different in training than you'll do when racing'.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    15. Re:I'm not a runner, but... by Wargames · · Score: 2

      I wholeheartedly agree! Show me some science backing up this crazy belief that running with headphones is more dangerous than sitting on a sofa watching TV while eating a bag of chips. I always hear this belief but I never see any real hard facts. This is like being afraid of sharks when you are more likely to die slipping in your bathtub.

      The fact that phones and music are banned in many marathons and branded Ironman events agravates me. Why can someone have a wrist computer and a bike computer but not a pocket computer? Why do they not want me to be able to communicate? I think a phone is nearly essential for safety's sake when you are out running or biking.

      I am a triathlete. I run with my iPhone 5. The one with the size advantage of being small. It can last a 5 hour marathon. It lasts me for 6 hour bike rides. Sadly with IOS 9, in normal mode it will not last for an ironman, it can do a half, if you are fast enough, with gps and music. Put it in a plastic bag to protect it from sweat. Use bluetooth headphones that won't fall out your ears. Pay attention to your surroundings like a defensive driver. I like listening to music while I am running and biking just like people like to listen to music while they are in their car. I use my eyes and other senses to compensate for what my ears are missing. When I feel I need more situational awareness, I reduce the volume or take my headphones off.

      Better yet, just outlaw music altogether. And the meek shall inherit the earth... ;)

      --
      -- Each tock of the Planck clock is a new world and here we are still life. --
    16. Re:I'm not a runner, but... by IMightB · · Score: 1

      Ha OP here? My co-workers outed me this morning, because I posed to them the same question. They don't believe that I have a wife either! My wife is amazing and she does what she puts her mind to. For example, she's conquered all the official and un-official 14ers in Colorado.

      The question I pose to most ./ers is: Can your wife do that?

    17. Re:I'm not a runner, but... by IMightB · · Score: 1

      Good to know, I'll have her check into this. The two half marathons shes done have not banned them.

    18. Re:I'm not a runner, but... by jfengel · · Score: 1

      Even without data to back it up, it does seem reasonable that a bike would be dangerous with headphones on. You're sharing the road with cars, and you've moving very fast. There's less room for error, and if you have to ditch, you hit the ground pretty hard.

      It's tricky, since there's so much wind noise that it can be hard to hear cars coming anyway. Frankly, I just don't feel all that safe on a bike, and I prefer running. Worse, I find cycling duller than running, since I can't let my mind wander as much; I have to constantly pay attention for anything that might throw off my steering (glass in the road, cracks, objects, etc.). So I often put one headphone in as a compromise, though I'd like to try getting a mount that might let me listen through the external speaker.

    19. Re:I'm not a runner, but... by Alien1024 · · Score: 1

      Show me some science backing up this crazy belief that running with headphones is more dangerous than sitting on a sofa watching TV while eating a bag of chips.

      We're comparing running with headphones vs. running without headphones, not running vs. sitting on couch eating junk.

      Here's the study that produced the figures mentioned a few posts above. Headphones are definitely an extra risk. We may choose not to be worried by that risk and we can say it's small compared to other risks, but let's not say the extra risk is zero, because that's false.

  3. One device to rule them all by blackfeltfedora · · Score: 2

    Does not exist. I've never heard of a Garmin that only has a 3 hour battery life, I think you may have gotten a lemon. I don't think Apple makes a nano/shuffle with bluetooth so she may end up using her phone for music. The GPS on the phone apps is not as good as Garmin or the other running watches so you will end up with at least 2 devices. I recommend the Garmin 220 for the watch, I don't have a good answer for music.

    1. Re:One device to rule them all by blackfeltfedora · · Score: 5, Informative

      DC Rainmaker has in-depth reviews of pretty much every running/cycling/fitness device made for the past decade, I recommend looking there. http://www.dcrainmaker.com/

    2. Re:One device to rule them all by ByTor-2112 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Parent is correct about DC Rainmaker. He's very thorough and accurate.

      For tunes, I recommend an ipod shuffle (the ONLY apple product I use). It's perfect for sports, it's VERY cheap, the battery lasts a long time, and if it can handle my sweat it can handle anything.

      Your garmin watch should not be having these problems. A 3 hour battery life is either a dud battery or something weird wrong with the software. Try a full reset. Regardless, you won't find anything better than a forerunner.

    3. Re:One device to rule them all by LaurenCates · · Score: 2

      Indeed. I thought it was weird that a Forerunner would only have 3 hours of run time.

      I bought one a decade ago that had at least 10 hours. And given Garmin's market, I don't think they'd create something that would last only 3 hours.

      --
      Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
    4. Re: One device to rule them all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also use a 2nd gen iPod shuffle for tunes and a "dumb" wristwatch for race splits. Most races will officially ban headphones (probably for legal reasons) but I've never seen it enforced. For training I'll use a iPhone strapped to the arm.

    5. Re:One device to rule them all by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 1

      Garmins support is also excellent. They are known to warranty for a small fee devices that are way past their warranty end date. Depends on the circumstances, but there is no harm in trying.

      --
      I came, I conquered, I coredumped
    6. Re:One device to rule them all by IMightB · · Score: 1

      Good to know, I'll check out doing a full reset as another poster mentioned. If that doesn't work, I'll try Garmin's Support

      Thanks!

    7. Re: One device to rule them all by Outta_the_way_peck! · · Score: 1

      Most races discourage headphones. It is rare that they are banned.

    8. Re:One device to rule them all by blackfeltfedora · · Score: 1

      The shuffle is okay but better than the alternatives I've seen. The 6th generation Nano was damn near perfect for running, I do not understand why they got away from that with the new one.

  4. Apple Watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just get one. I know you want one. Stop making up stories about a "marathoner wife". We are geeks, we understand.

    1. Re:Apple Watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just get one. I know you want one. Stop making up stories about a "marathoner wife". We are geeks, we understand.

      Apple watches aren't for geeks. They are stupid status symbols with no use.

      Why do you need GPS on a marathon route?

    2. Re:Apple Watch by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Track your speed, etc. as well as make sure you stay on your planned route

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    3. Re:Apple Watch by sexconker · · Score: 1

      1: Plan route & stay on it.
      2: Subtract start time from finish time to get travel time, divide route length by travel time to get speed.

      If you can't stick to a route without getting lost or can't do basic math you shouldn't be allowed outside without adult supervision.

    4. Re: Apple Watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already killed one iDevice with sweat, what makes you think the iWatch will suffice? That thing has to be paired with an iPad or iPhone to do anything. Those will die of sweat in her pocket. It's just a 2nd screen, not a stand alone device.

    5. Re:Apple Watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      GPS watches won't help you stick to a route. They will show you the route run after the fact though. They are more about showing current pace and HR so you don't blow up during your marathon or so that you can stick to specific pace/HR zones during training.

    6. Re:Apple Watch by LaurenCates · · Score: 1

      If you're going to be a nerd about it, you can use a Forerunner (for instance) to track a lot of things, like where in the run you might get stopped or where you encounter hitting a wall in your stride.

      If you're just going by beginning and end time and distance, it doesn't give you near the amount of data you can use to improve.

      --
      Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
    7. Re:Apple Watch by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      That's going to tell you your average speed over the entire distance.

      It's not going to tell you if you're keeping pace.

    8. Re:Apple Watch by stoborrobots · · Score: 2

      Average speed on uphill sections vs downhill sections?
      Fastest point on route?
      Hardest (max heartrate) section on route?
      Number of stops?
      Duration walking vs running?
      Distance to exhaustion, time to exhaustion? (When you can not complete the route as planned.)
      Average intensity (heartrate)?

    9. Re:Apple Watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever ran a marathon? I haven't, but I've ran half-marathons. Here's the thing, 15 km into the race, you're so tired you can't do any basic math. You're trying to keep your composure, trying to get to the finish line, doing extra-math is tough. Sure, it might be doable if your pace is 5 min/km, but if you're plan is to do 4:15 or something, after a few km, those seconds start complicating your life. Another thing is the updates on the info. If you run with a simple watch and check your pace every km, you have 21 updates on your pace, one every "pace". What happens in between, you have no idea, you just have to feel it... which is kind of hard when you are running on changing terrain.

      For that reason alone, and even though I usually train with just a simple digital watch, no GPS, no pace info, nothing, I see a value in a GPS watch for race day. At least you can easily keep the pace you set for yourself.

    10. Re:Apple Watch by Alien1024 · · Score: 1

      Which is why the Apple Watch is a terrible choice for runners (no GPS).

    11. Re: Apple Watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It fails requirement #1: the Apple Watch doesn't have a GPS.

  5. tomtom spark? by nostromo · · Score: 1

    Haven't tried it yet, but seems promising. gps, heart rate and 4GB of storage, should last long enough for a marathon.

    Runner's watches are slightly different than the usual smartwatches, as they have built-in gps and better battery life than ordinary smart watches, which rely on your phone fro music and gps.
    I use a Polar m400 for gps while running, and it lasts about a week with daily 6mile running (gps tracking). Unfortunately no music on that one.

    1. Re:tomtom spark? by gyepi · · Score: 1

      I second the TomTom Spark, here is a quick overview from the best sports-watch review site:

      TomTom Spark impressions.

      I use an earlier version of TomTom Cardio, which is really great. In case you'd want also want to have optical heart rate monitoring (which the TomTom Spark hs) then it's pretty much the only choice, as most other optical heart rate monitors are quite inaccurate when it comes to sports, see D.C. Rainmaker's review of them on the same site.

      --
      Attitudes make the difference between Space and Time: we want to MAX our temporal, and MIN our spatial extension.
  6. Timex Ironman by hawguy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Timex Ironman 50 lap watch:

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/Timex-...

    That watch trained me through at least 10 marathons and a couple Ironmans. I had a Garmin GPS watch + Heartrate monitor for a while, but I found myself paying more attention to it than just paying attention to my body.

    50 splits so I can get splits for each mile of the marathon. The "Flix" backlight was handy for night runs so a flick of the wrist turns on the light. Battery lasts for years, and the watch is 100% waterproof (which is more than I can say for the Garmin - I had to send it back for repair twice when water got inside)

    1. Re:Timex Ironman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excess running damages the heart.

    2. Re:Timex Ironman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cool lack of citations or any justification for your random-ass armchair M.D. comment, bro

    3. Re:Timex Ironman by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Excess running damages the heart.

      Excess Bacon damages the heart too. I'll stick with the excess running and see how that works out.

  7. Think different by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    Consider a single earpiece, a Motorola Elite Flip or Silver. Excellent battery life, good audio if only in one ear, and a free ear might be handy. But I really like my BackBeat Fits.

    Several battery cases are out there for iPhones.

    An NXE armband might work better against moisture. Find them in TJMaxx, or of course the usual discount haunts.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  8. Garmin Fenix 3 by gsthakur · · Score: 1

    Look for Garmin Fenix 3. It a bit expensive, but a great watch. It has two GPS (one of them in Glonass) and provide more than 50 hours of battery life while not in running use. It also has all those fancy features (sleep, activity, step count etc.) Recently, I did a 50 miler (in ~13 hours) with both GPS on, and the watch battery lasted. Indeed, the watch had 14% batter still unused. The watch can also be used for triathlon, skiing, climbing and other outdoor activities (its also water proof). I can see for a an athlete this is a true watch to explore.

    1. Re:Garmin Fenix 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few points:

      #1 Battery life outside of GPS activities is closer to 2 weeks. Certainly way more than the 50 hours you quote. This includes having bluetooth on all the time, which is useful for...

      #2 Smartphone notifications. I thought this was a stupid feature when Pebble, AppleWatch, and various other "smart" watches came out, but it's actually quite nice to have, as long as you limit which apps are allowed to send notifications in the first place.

      #3 It also has the ability to run 3rd party "apps" but the capabilities are more limited than the leading "smart" watches.

      The F3 is a far better watch than the AppleWatch could ever be - it has GPS built in so it doesn't drain my phone's battery on runs/rides; and even with this, it still lasts far longer than the AppleWatch. I charge once every 7-10 days on average, with some sort of recorded workout (using more battery) on most days. The only thing AppleWatch has is a nicer screen (but the F3 screen is plenty nice) and more capable "apps" (but how useful are they really, with such a tiny display?). To get this, Apple traded battery life to such an extreme that it is practically useless.

      The biggest drawback is that GPS accuracy isn't quite as good as previous Garmin watches (which is hilarious, given that they advertise the hell out of its new "exo" antenna which is supposed to be so great). But it's still quite good, and better than most smartphones.

      Oh, and the F3 looks much better. Hate the ugly square AppleWatch.

    2. Re:Garmin Fenix 3 by stevencbrown · · Score: 1

      The Fenix 3 is potentially a superb watch, but it's GPS performance in certain circumstances (winding tree covered trails, or cities with high buildings) is very poor. And Garmin's head in the sand response has been terrible.

      I would steer clear.

  9. Pussy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I ran marathons back in the 80s and didn't have any iPod, fancy watch, etc. Just do it! And get off my lawn!!!

    1. Re:Pussy! by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 3, Funny

      I ran marathons back in the 80s and didn't have any iPod, fancy watch, etc. Just do it!

      And get off my lawn!!!

      You young whipper snapper! I started in the 70s, and we had to build our own electronics, which we didn't use, because real marathoners go electronics free!

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:Pussy! by IMightB · · Score: 1

      My coworkers recommended that I build an arduino *something* and encase it in resin. While intriguing, I don't think it would meet WAF (Wife Approval Facter) On a side note, the ONLY piece of tech that I have ever discovered that meets an extremely high level of WAF are Harmony Remotes.

  10. Oldie but goodie by chesterw · · Score: 1

    You can pick up an old motorola MOTOACTV for cheap and root it: http://motoactv.wikispaces.com... . I love mine for cycling, and with Augmented smartwatch pro on my phone and sideloading apps through ADB, it will do many things that the latest smartwatches still don't. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    1. Re:Oldie but goodie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can pick up an old motorola MOTOACTV for cheap and root it: http://motoactv.wikispaces.com... . I love mine for cycling, and with Augmented smartwatch pro on my phone and sideloading apps through ADB, it will do many things that the latest smartwatches still don't. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Motorola isn't interested in maintaining it so they lose your data once in a while. The data should be on the motoactv itself though (hopefully!).

      The other problem is that it is not sweat-proof. So, you have to put it in a zip lock bag if you are running sweaty or if its raining.

  11. If you don't have enough battery life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    run faster

  12. You have a broken forerunner. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    I have the same watch but with the hiking firmware. The Foretrex and I get EASILY 6 hours out of it.

    You need to contact Garmin and have it sent in for repair, you have a bad battery in yours.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  13. Sony Smartwatch 3rd gen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't own one, but want to hear from people who do. Has GPS, WiFi, Music storage, bluetooth and everything else Android Wear but usable offline. Display is supposed to be good in sunlight as well. Not sure if it will make 5 hours as I've heard that it expends something like 20% battery life per hour of GPS tracking so it would be close. Motivation for a faster marathon? They can be found relatively cheap nowadays too.

  14. Pebble or TomTom Runner by Jthon · · Score: 1

    Excellent question. While I'm not a marathoner I am a half-marathon runner and have some experience with this.

    The Pebble/Pebble Time supports showing running stats on the watch when synced up with RunKeeper or Endomondo. There might be other apps available but those are the two I've used.

    They require that you have a smartphone drive them, and you'd have to have enough smartphone battery to not have the phone die while using GPS for your run.

    Both apps let you start/pause/stop your run from the watch. I used to use this for biking (and a bit running) and it worked out really well.

    Note neither currently has a built in HRM, an so you'd need to wear Bluetooth HRM to sync with your phone if you care about that stat, but they CAN show you your heart rate on the watch.

    I've since transitioned to just using a TomTom GPS Runner or Multi-sport with the built in HRM as that works well for me while running. It also removes some of the battery anxiety I used to get when using my phone for GPS.

  15. my experience by xombo · · Score: 1

    I've tried a number of devices for fitness. Anything with built-in GPS is going to seriously degrade your battery life while it's on. Even phones drain insanely fast when using actual GPS satellite signals instead of wifi for geolocation. 2 hours of continuous high-resolution GPS tracking is going to be par for the course for this type of device.

    1. Re:my experience by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      I've been using Garmin GPS watches, running 3 half marathons in the last ten years. One of those took me 4 hours because of foot issues. But none of them came close to using all of the battery life.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    2. Re:my experience by IMightB · · Score: 1

      I'm a BIG Garmin/Suunto fan, I currently use a VivoSmart for daily use and the only time it comes off my wrist is a once a week charging. It does everything I need nearly perfectly. From on-call to exercise. I also have a Suunto hiking watch from the early 00's. To your knowledge, does Garmin combine the three things I listed (GPS, Music storage/playback, bluetooth) in one device?

    3. Re:my experience by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      No. I had been using my iPod(s), but they proved unable to hold up to sweat soaked armbands, twice. My favorite was my first iPod, a shuffle that lasted several years, but had no bluetooth. I don't know of a single device that combines your list, but I haven't been hunting for one.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  16. A Couple Thoughts by quantaman · · Score: 3, Informative

    Must have features GPS, bluetooth and music storage for roughly 5 hours of use during a marathon.

    Music/podcasts are great for training but generally frowned upon in actual races, I think a lot of big marathons actually ban them since people not hearing could be a safety issue.

    I've personally never had an issue getting bored during races and for training I just bring my phone and a pair of bluetooth headphones for podcasts.

    Garmin Forerunner 15 only lasts about 3 hours with GPS on (despite Manufacturer claims to the contrary)

    That sounds like a warranty issue. I don't know about the 15 but my old 301 lasted through the entirety of a 10.5 hour ultra.

    That being said if I were to get a new watch I might be tempted to peak at the smart watches.

    --
    I stole this Sig
    1. Re:A Couple Thoughts by PPH · · Score: 1

      Music/podcasts are great for training but generally frowned upon in actual races,

      It might be better to seperate the music from the other functions. Get something like an iPod Shuffle and do the rest with a GPS/monitor device. For a bit more bulk than a watch, a Garmin eTrex 30 will do GPS, altimiter and talk to an external heart rate monitor (and record your data as you go). I know some people who will cycle a course and download the elevation data into a programmable stationary cycle. The recorded data 'duplicates' the course elevation for trining purposes.

      The battery life is about 25 hours.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:A Couple Thoughts by IMightB · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying I don't agree with separate devices, but I'm just trying to meet the requirements listed by the Boss, before I make a case against them.

  17. Re: Hey runners! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    those aren't runners, they're swimmers that can't find a pool

  18. Forget the headphones. by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most organized sporting events (marathons and bike races at least) ban headphones.

    So while great for training, they are worthless for the event. Some people rely on music for motivation, which is fine, but I would suggest you get used to it without.

    And when training, keep only one ear bud in, I cannot tell you how many runners did not hear me yelling on your left to pass and then they get frightened and pissed when I do pass. sennheiser make decent sports earbuds.

    And I suspect you got a lemon Garmin. I used to use the forerunner 300 I used before I got my edge 810. The 300 lasted me a good 8 hours. The 810 lasts me about 5 hours when I used live tracking (paired to phone provides realtime tracking for family or friends, good for long solo rides for safety).

    --
    I came, I conquered, I coredumped
    1. Re:Forget the headphones. by dcw3 · · Score: 2

      I've participated in dozens of races, and not one banned headphones...I don't personally wear them. I know some do, but I doubt "Most" is correct.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  19. Marathon game session? by bobbied · · Score: 1

    Yea, you need the game system, a collection of games, pizza, caffeinated drinks and multiple sets of batteries for your wireless controllers and head sets.... The trick is to keep everything within arms reach of the recliner you are sitting in.

    Oh wait... You are talking about physically RUNNING as in OUTSIDE and more than 5 paces? Dude... We don't do that here on Slashdot.

    Also, how on earth did you catch a wife that runs? I mean a real one, I thought we had lower standards than that here.... Turn in that "Geek/Nerd card" and draw a "Man card" out of petty cash.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    1. Re:Marathon game session? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, how on earth did you catch a wife that runs?

      Just set your phaser to stun. It takes a few tries to get one that doesn`t fracture her skull on the fall though.

  20. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  21. How about ... nothing? by CaptainJeff · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps...you could just go out and run?

    Seriously. I've done multiple marathons, the Disney Goofy Challenge, a number of triathlons including two Ironman races, etc... You don't need all this fancy stuff. Just make sure you keep a phone with you (or your wife in this case) in case you have an emergency, bring ample water and snacks if you're out for long training runs, and enjoy the time. Get away from computers, TVs, phones, etc. Enjoy being outside. If you and your wife are running together, then enjoy the time together, working to a common goal, away from all of the hustle of normal life where everything is connected.

    Running without all the crap is the best, most enjoyable, time for me. I love it. I used to run with music, GPS tracking, etc. Now, just a phone in case of emergency and sometimes not even that. Give it a try. You'll love it. And your wife will too.

    1. Re:How about ... nothing? by dargaud · · Score: 1

      When I used to run, I'd get get bored to death if I didn't have music with me. It was just training for more adrenaline infused activities, so I found it boring. Now I just climb and mountain-bike every day, no more need for running ;-) but I understand OP's question.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    2. Re:How about ... nothing? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Perhaps...you could just go out and run?

      Why? I mean it's good exercise and all, but running is incredibly boring unless you're running somewhere, even then it's about as exciting as being stuck in traffic with a busted car radio.

      *Many* people do not enjoy running for the fulfilling invigorating experience some people claim it is. Heck only a few weeks ago I was out on my weekly run and the battery went flat on my iPod Shuffle only 30min in. That was me done. I'm not prepared to run around without some nice music.
      As for each other's company, that's also not that exciting when you're too out of breath to talk.

    3. Re:How about ... nothing? by William+Baric · · Score: 2

      Nobody "needs" fancy stuff when the goal is only to have fun, but a heart rate monitor is now pretty much essential for serious training and amateur competition. Not only it allows you to train with much better efficiency, but during competition it allows you to better manage your energy and counter the crowd effect. More fancy stuff will even give you data about your stride to correct mistakes you might not be aware while running. Analyzing your race might reveal weaknesses and so indicate what kind of training you should do.

      Sure, if the goal is only to escape and have fun then all this is not needed, but then why participate in a competition? An organized marathon is a very bad place to enjoy time with your wife.

      As for enjoying running, it takes a lot of time before that happens. Weekend runners never truly enjoy running.

    4. Re:How about ... nothing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, if you're running just to keep fit for other sports, you won't run a marathon. So this is clearly not the case. CaptainJeff is right, in a way. If you can't enjoy the running, you're doing it wrong...

    5. Re:How about ... nothing? by BadDreamer · · Score: 2

      All good advice once you've reached the point of enjoyment. I can assure you, no-one starts out at that point.

      At the start it's a goal, usually related to performance and improvement. "All this fancy stuff" is to provide feedback that the goal is getting closer, and on what needs to be done to work in the right direction. And then, after a long time of hard work, the point where enjoyment of running for its own sake can be reached.

      Very few people find enjoyment in starting out running, without feedback and the ability to see improvement and focus on statistics to improve for motivation. Perhaps you can (although your post suggests it's something you had to work to achieve), but if so you're in the minority.

    6. Re:How about ... nothing? by jittles · · Score: 1

      Perhaps...you could just go out and run?

      Seriously. I've done multiple marathons, the Disney Goofy Challenge, a number of triathlons including two Ironman races, etc... You don't need all this fancy stuff. Just make sure you keep a phone with you (or your wife in this case) in case you have an emergency, bring ample water and snacks if you're out for long training runs, and enjoy the time. Get away from computers, TVs, phones, etc. Enjoy being outside. If you and your wife are running together, then enjoy the time together, working to a common goal, away from all of the hustle of normal life where everything is connected.

      Running without all the crap is the best, most enjoyable, time for me. I love it. I used to run with music, GPS tracking, etc. Now, just a phone in case of emergency and sometimes not even that. Give it a try. You'll love it. And your wife will too.

      That's very subjective. I despise running. I love to play sports and can handle running around chasing a ball all day. But even a mile of running is torture for me. Due to a permanent sports injury, I am pretty much unable to engage in any other convenient form of exercise besides running. I could join a gym with a swimming pool (for some reason I can swim laps all day - it's like meditation to me), but there are none near me, my office, or commute. So I run. I don't listen to music, though. I end up calculating my running time based on the length of each song and then I torture myself. Instead, I listen to audiobooks. I listen to books I've already read but really enjoy. I keep the volume down low enough that I can hear traffic even when I run on streets with a 10mph speed limit. For some reason the book makes me forget that I am running. I look around, enjoy the beautiful houses, beach views, etc. Things I would never do if I were focused on the fact that I dislike running. You may find the technology distracting from the world around you. I find that it settles my thoughts down to where I can enjoy the world around me. Maybe the poster's wife is exactly the same way.

      As to the poster: I can tell you that you probably do not want an Apple Watch. It will do all of the things you want, plus heart rate, but the battery life on even a 4-5 mile run is not great. I've never had it die mid run, but a 4 mile run will use ~50% of the battery. Now there may be a way to disable the heart rate monitor during workouts, I don't know. If that's possible then you could probably get through a half marathon while streaming music. I don't know if it will map your run (Nike+ or Strava style). I've never bothered to investigate as I run with my phone in my pocket anyway.

    7. Re:How about ... nothing? by IMightB · · Score: 1

      I guess she could "just go out and run", care to be the one to tell her? She's done 2 half marathons so far, Destination Races - Kelowna BC and the Denver Rock N Roll half marathon and is just ramping up to do more. I'm not really much of a runner, I'm more of a Hockey Guy (As our son would say) https://www.youtube.com/watch?... is more my style. though after watching her run, I'm starting to feel inspired to try running a bit myself.

  22. New iOS devices mostly unphased by water by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The iPhone 6 lasts over an hour underwater with no issues.

    The Apple Watch is the same, you can wear it in the shower and to clean it they recommend running it under the tap. They also say you can wear it in the rain...

    So why would anyone worry about a little sweat?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:New iOS devices mostly unphased by water by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Caustic sweat is my superpower.

      If I wore a watch, it would have to be gold or plastic. Plastic watches with metal setting thingies (crowns?) have knubs after 3 months. Stainless backs aren't. Cheap metal bits are pitted in days.

      It's weird, Dad has it also.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:New iOS devices mostly unphased by water by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      sweat isn't water
      it's acidic and contains salt

    3. Re: New iOS devices mostly unphased by water by cynyr · · Score: 1

      Same here. I'm slowly eating into my tungsten carbide wedding band.

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    4. Re:New iOS devices mostly unphased by water by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      That's correct, but I've been using my AppleWatch since June when exercising several times a week, without issue. I just rinse it off in the sink after a workout.

      Yes sweat is heavily damaging, but the AppleWatch is well coated and sealed (as extensive testing has showed).

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    5. Re:New iOS devices mostly unphased by water by IMightB · · Score: 1

      If Garmin could add GPS and a bit of music storage to the VivoSmart I would recommend it to her in a heartbeat. As it is, the only apple device that I have in my possession is a PowerBook supplied by work. Everything else in my house is linux with the exception of a Yoga 2 Pro. (home desktop/mythtv, android phones, roku, openelec RPI etc etc etc)

      So suggesting an over-priced status symbol for hipsters like an iWatch, which doesn't do GPS, is like saying you should get a Bugatti Veyron to do daily commuting and transport your family

    6. Re:New iOS devices mostly unphased by water by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      So suggesting an over-priced status symbol for hipsters like an iWatch, which doesn't do GPS

      How do you explain that it as a Maps app... with directions...

      The answer is, it does use GPS when you have an iPhone with you (which I do when I run because why would you not have a phone with you in case of emergency?).

      It's humorous you would complain about "hipsters" when you appear to be someone too uninformed (about the Apple Watch or Running) to even offer practical advice.

      Even if you use the watch alone, it can still measure distance traveled by knowing your average stride length.

      Knowing distance distance alone is more important to a runner than GPS.

      As for being over-priced, even there you show a lack of understanding because it's not over-priced when you factor in build quality and function. It's is absolutely worth the about you pay over the Pebble for example, which I also have... I would have possibly recommended the pebble but it simply doesn't have near the same level of software support, nor was I sure it was solid enough to handle exercise use very well.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  23. Apple Watch with Runkeeper by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The Apple Watch works great for tracking running, there are a number of running apps on iOS that work with it - Runkeeper in particular will work and measure distance on the watch alone even without you carrying an iPhone with you, I think by measuring average stride when you do have the phone with you.

    It also has a very good battery life and a heart rate monitor which is handy.

    The only missing ingredient: You didn't mention if you had an iPhone which it requires... but you also did not explicitly rule out an Apple Watch, so I thought I should mention it as I'm using mine to train for a 10k (not marathon, but it still involves a lot of running every week).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  24. Personal experience says no headphones by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I actually preferred an old Timex watch with a stop/start button myself, since I already had measured the distances by car, and used to run along arterials and rural highways.

    Wearing a headphone for music can get you killed. I used to opt for hanging light headphones around my neck during training, but during an actual marathon I would go electronics free. If you're at all a decent runner, you may not be in a pack, and a car can ruin your day (and your life).

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Personal experience says no headphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually preferred an old Timex watch with a stop/start button myself, since I already had measured the distances by car, and used to run along arterials and rural highways.

      Wearing a headphone for music can get you killed. I used to opt for hanging light headphones around my neck during training, but during an actual marathon I would go electronics free. If you're at all a decent runner, you may not be in a pack, and a car can ruin your day (and your life).

      If you run in a group, you don't need headphones.

      If you run by yourself, headphone is a must. The boredom will kill you before the cars will.

    2. Re:Personal experience says no headphones by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

      Then you're made of weaker stuff than most successful marathoners are. Headphones == Death.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    3. Re:Personal experience says no headphones by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Headphones == Death.

      Okay, I'm only using your post as an example of one of the multiple posters here with the same belief.

      I've worn headphones (I usually don't), and had no trouble hearing traffic, or even other runners around me. It's not too difficult to keep the volume low enough and still enjoy the music and be safe. And, it's nothing like driving with a cellphone in your hand, which...don't even get me started on those idiots.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    4. Re:Personal experience says no headphones by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      dead people don't post.

      your sample is biased towards people who haven't been killed while wearing headphones.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    5. Re:Personal experience says no headphones by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Very presumptive on your part to know my bias. But, to make it slightly more clear for you, I'm aware of my surroundings when I'm out running, and when I do wear headphones, it's on low volume. But then not everyone does that so, those who wore headphones and were fatalities will only confirm your belief that there's no safe way to wear them, which is nothing more than an unproven assumption. So, I'm sure we'll continue to disagree, but I'm good with that.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  25. Doesn't quite meet your requirements, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you had not noticed it already, by running marathons you are at the narrow end of the bell curve.

    The battery life of most consumers products probably won't cut it - 5 hours with GPS , BT audio, and HR tracking is catering to a very narrow market, and the ROI probably doesn't make sense when you can get 90% of the market with 1-2 hours.

    Noting that the Garmin Fenix 2 and 3 are very good, GPS alone will consume the battery on those in about 12-14 hours, so you are probably good for 5. They will do HR as well, but not music.

    iPhone in your belt, and an Apple watch.

    In race, yes its a 143 gram weight penalty, but for training you are probably taking some water with you (which weight a lot more), and probably want a communications device for personal safety anyhow.

    In ear headphones are a safety hazard when running, as they typically seal the ear from outside noise, and reduce situational awareness threats of cars etc, so over-ear designs that seal the ear canal less tightly and have worse sound quality may be a better option. 6 hour claimed battery life when new is pretty widely available, but that's vendor claim when new so how it works out in practice is always a question.

    It may also be worth looking at a Recon Instruments Jet. Thats augmented reality glasses with GPS and HUD with custom Apps.

  26. must have versus nice to have by turbidostato · · Score: 2

    "Must have features GPS, bluetooth and music storage for roughly 5 hours of use during a marathon. Pretty much everything else is a nice to have."

    Nobody else found funny that for a sport watch a clock/chronograph is not among the "must haves"? And it supposedly is a "smart" one!

    1. Re:must have versus nice to have by swillden · · Score: 1

      "Must have features GPS, bluetooth and music storage for roughly 5 hours of use during a marathon. Pretty much everything else is a nice to have."

      Nobody else found funny that for a sport watch a clock/chronograph is not among the "must haves"? And it supposedly is a "smart" one!

      It's kind of implied. If you have a GPS receiver, you have a clock.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re:must have versus nice to have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it sad that you don't understand how GPS works.

    3. Re:must have versus nice to have by IMightB · · Score: 1

      Yeah I though so as well, I'm asking for a "Watch" after all.

  27. Re:Hey runners! by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    That's why it's a good idea to get a blinky light to hang on the headphones you hang around your neck, so the cyclists don't hit you when running.

    The bike path is softer than the too hard sidewalks, as any decent runner knows.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  28. Polar M400 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agree, DC Rainmaker has great reviews. I used a Polar M400 for my last marathon (w/ a HRM)--no music, though. Worked really well!

  29. Long Time Runner Here... by singularity · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have been running for 30+ years at this point.

    Some points:
    * There is not going to be a perfect device. As the saying goes, a Swiss Army Knife is no replacement for a well stocked toolbox. A few dedicated devices will do the trick much better than an all-in-one device will.

    * While listening to music while running can make the time go a little faster, a running partner will be a much better addition. When it is dark and snowing outside and you are warm and in your bed, knowing that someone is going to be meeting you in 30 minutes is better motivation than anything else. Training should also always allow you to talk while you run (otherwise you are going too fast). Having someone there to talk to makes sure you are going at the right pace.

    * Once you have some experience with them, a heart rate monitor can really guide training. Pace can be affected by ambient temperature, wind, inclines, and other factors. Your heart rate is a better indicator of effort.

    * I have not had the Forerunner 15. I have had the FR60, the ForeRunner 405, and the ForeRunner 220. All of them have been able to get 3+ hours. The 405 was the worst of the bunch, but that was a relatively early GPS watch. Even then, it got 3+ hours for the first year or so. The 220 gets 6+ hours - I have honestly never gotten the battery down very low. Even after 3+ hour runs, it is showing more than 50% left. I generally use the 220 for 3-4 runs before I consider charging it back up.

    * I never run with my phone. It is partly because of bulk, and mostly because I go running to get outside and get away from the always-on world we live in. I only listen to music on my long runs, and for that I have an older iPod Shuffle.

    * As others have mentioned, http://www.dcrainmaker.com/pro... is the best review site out there.

    * Based on your needs, I would consider Garmin's newest watches, the 230 or the 235: http://www.dcrainmaker.com/201... I would also purchase an iPod Shuffle. If wireless is a big requirement, I would look at the iPod Nano and BlueTooth headphones.

    --
    - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
    1. Re:Long Time Runner Here... by hooiberg · · Score: 1

      This! I have never understood people who bring their telephone along while running.
      Really, do you want to be able to receive calls while training, or is one so addicted to whatsapp and similar stuff that it has to be used even while running?
      Maybe useful to call in an emergency when I get into an accident... But that it a risk I take. In four years or running, I never needed to make a call while training.

    2. Re:Long Time Runner Here... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      * There is not going to be a perfect device. As the saying goes, a Swiss Army Knife is no replacement for a well stocked toolbox. A few dedicated devices will do the trick much better than an all-in-one device will. ...

      * I never run with my phone. It is partly because of bulk,

      A lot of people seem to forget what makes the Swiss Army Knife "perfect" in the first place. But you seemed to have remembered half way through your post. All the more reason to have an all in one device that does everything including play music wirelessly.

    3. Re:Long Time Runner Here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This! I have never understood people who bring their telephone along while running. ... In four years or running, I never needed to make a call while training.

      So "be prepared" means nothing to you? Here are some reasons I've taken my phone throughout my 17+ years of training:

      1) Wife was 37+ weeks pregnant and could go at any moment.
      2) Sick child is barely old enough to be home along so you want to be available if they need comforting.
      3) Child is borderline under the weather and you made a deal with her to go to school but if she declines during the day, have the school call you and you will come get her.
      4) Trying to get a run in before a forecasted thunderstorm, but want to able to call for help if you get stuck. (I thought the storm would come later and stay well north, so I ran south, and then a cell opened up right on top of me -- it came that quick.)
      5) On a very hilly long run -- I intended to run 12 miles but the route was blocked so my 12 miler turned into 15. On the last major uphill at mile 13 my hip locked up in a way that was something I couldn't run through. (You can tell what is just aches and pains and what is going to do more damage if you continue.)

    4. Re:Long Time Runner Here... by Malc · · Score: 1

      As I runner of just 15 years, I'm of the attitude that all you really need is a pair of shoes, and clothes don't need to be special. Keep it minimal and just enjoy the run.

      Due to continuous breakdowns due to injury I switched to finger shoes (and been fine since), which are awesome for taking on business trips because they take no space in my bag. I learnt a good lesson on one trip to Shanghai though, out with the Hash House Harriers... always carry a phone and some money because there's nothing more scary than being the wrong side of the river and no way to contact your friends when you're lost, no idea where you're going to and no way to get home! Even when I'm at home I take my phone and just share my location with my wife so I don't have to carry more shit than necessary.

    5. Re:Long Time Runner Here... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      My daughter used to go running through a nearby park. My wife insisted that she bring her phone for safety reasons. That was years ago, but my daughter still runs with the phone. As a parent, I like the idea that I could find her (where's my phone) if I became concerned.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    6. Re:Long Time Runner Here... by hooiberg · · Score: 1

      Using your phone as a tracking device could be useful. It did not know it could do that. Using that, you might get all kinds of information from it then. Such as route data that you could overlay on a map, combined with what speed you are making where...

  30. More requirements by kaur · · Score: 2

    I run.
    Marathons, half-marathons, long (8 hours) orienteering competitions, whatnot.
    I won't tell you what to buy, but I can suggest some more "must have" features.

    1) If she is serious about her training, she will need a heart rate monitor. At least as a beginner. Experience will help her understand her body without a HR belt later, but first, she will need this experience!
    2) She will do intervals, right? Some watches are better at that than others. Good, clear display is a must. Audible signals (beeps) will also help. Some people preplan their trainings ("1 km with HR 150, 1 km with HR 160, ..") but most watches won't have this capability.
    3) GPS accuracy differs. A bad watch can lose GPS signal on open field - and never get it back. Want to run in a park? Forest? Even worse. Go read up on your device of choice before becoming a field tester.
    4) As mentioned earlier, night mode (backlight on) may be needed.
    5) Check the training display options. She (probably) needs a combo of pace, HR, distance & time, lap distance & time. Does Sony have it?

    If you can, let her do a test run and go a full cycle - from planning to training to analysis.

    For reviews, http://www.dcrainmaker.com/ is your friend. Nobody else is as thorough as this guy.

    I have Garmin Forerunner 405 and Polar M400 GPS watches. Both are horrible. Garmin has worst UI one could imagine, it will literally drive you nuts. Polar has the worst software support that money can buy.

    Of course people have been doing fartleks and intervals without any GPS, so none of the requirements is really a MUST. But if she is really into running, get her a runners' watch, not a glorified media player.

  31. Running Community? by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

    Did you look in a runner's community forum?

    http://community.runnersworld.com/forum/gear-electronics/

    This is a really common topic there.

  32. 5V USB Battery charger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use this:

    http://www.instructables.com/id/Build-a-4-x-AA-USB-Altoids-Battery/

    and use whatever device you are using. As long as it has USB charging.
    Or use a similar blueprint. It will do the job.

  33. AppleWatch backs are not metal. by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    I had that same problem also (could not wear stainless steel backed watches or metal bands) but the Apple Watch back is unaffected, even though I wear it all the time working out.

    Most of the back is I think glass (the round part over the heart rate sensor LEDs). The rest of the body is coated, so is in essence not metal against your skin.

    The adjustment knob is similarly coated and has no issues.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  34. MS Band 2 by theetommyt · · Score: 2

    Microsoft Band 2 is your answer. Standalone gps, standalone music playback, etc. you don't need to take your phone with you. It has a hr sensor and even measures altitude changes for the pesky hills. When you're done running it can show you your stats via the watch, the web, iPhone, android, or windows phone. It's a really nice little device.

    1. Re: MS Band 2 by lightbox32 · · Score: 1

      I'll second that. I just got a Band 2 (had the original Band before) and it's great for running or biking. Has a built in GPS, heart rate monitor and a bunch of other sensors, and nice battery life (about 40 hrs for me). It can sync with iPhones, Androids, and of course Windows Phones.

      --
      A camel is a horse created by a committee
    2. Re: MS Band 2 by nullchar · · Score: 1

      Can it really play music without your phone? It does not appear to support that: http://www.microsoft.com/micro...

  35. Too soon?? by subk · · Score: 1

    Bomb Detector

    --
    Now, if you'll excuse me, I have backups to corrupt.
  36. Star Trek Communicator by PPH · · Score: 1

    "Scotty. Beam me to the finish line."

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  37. My running electronics. by Walter+White · · Score: 2

    First off, you need to protect your electronics from perspiration. Both my wife and I have destroyed MP3 players and I have destroyed a cell phone due to perspiration. I put mine in ziploc bags or use those plastic bubbles used for shipping things.

    Best option for marathons is one of the dedicated GPS watches. I have a Garmin Forerunner 405 and it was capable of lasting through a marathon (5+ hours for me.) At present I use a running app on my Nexus 5x and use it with a Moto 360. The advantage of that is:
    - choice of running/activity apps.
    - watch eliminates need to pull phone out to start/stop/pause
    - watch has configurable screens for whatever stats I want to see.

    Downside -
      - Moto 360 battery won't last through a marathon. (Maybe with the right app...)
      - Requires the phone - but a newer Moto watch has a built in GPS. Might still need the phone for the HRM though.

    At the end of the race when I'm hot and sweaty it can be really difficult to stop the run on either watch or phone. Touch screens don't react well to sweat tracks.

  38. moto 360 sport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Motorola is releasing a sport version of their moto 360 2. It supposed to be out by now and has all you're asking for. I'm not sure of the battery life, but I would suspect it would last longer than 3 hours.

  39. Re:Hey runners! by hawguy · · Score: 1

    That's why it's a good idea to get a blinky light to hang on the headphones you hang around your neck, so the cyclists don't hit you when running.

    The bike path is softer than the too hard sidewalks, as any decent runner knows.

    At the very least, wear some reflective gear - I have good lights on my bike, I usually turn them down low on the bike path so I don't blind other trail users, but come on people - don't wear all black and run in the middle of the trail. Reflective gear may not be "cool", but it may help you avoid a trip to the hospital. It's gotten to the point now where I turn my headlight up to medium when I'm on unlit trails so I can see darkly clad pedestrians.

  40. Music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a bit confused about your music requirement. The Sony watch does provide music but I'm fairly sure the garmin does not.
    I have a garmin vivoactive. It doesn't host music but it does have bluetooth music controls for an ipod or phone. It easily lasts 5 hours with GPS running. Probably closer to the manufacturers claimed 10.

    Another comment is that my wife has been using spotify in training as it has a function to pick music based on the running pace you want to maintain so that may be a reason to include a phone in the mix.

    We have both found belts ideal for phones. I use a flipbelt and my wife has an SPI belt. Both are good.

  41. Motorola MOTOACTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The device you're looking for is the Motorola MOTOACTV. It meets all your requirements, with one caveat - it's discontinued. You can still find it online however.

  42. Re:Hey runners! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a runner (first) and cyclist (second), this also annoys me. People in my running club are particularly bad about it. Pisses me off almost as much as 99% of other cyclists who ignore all traffic laws and incite road rage against ME because drivers think I'm a douchebag just like all other cyclists.

    The "reason" given for running in the bike lane is that asphalt is softer than concrete. Which is bullshit. If that tiny, tiny difference matters to you, buy shoes with 0.00001% more cushioning - that'll make more difference than asphalt vs concrete! The other excuse is that idiot walkers with their baby strollers and flexi-leashed dogs take up the entire sidewalk and never move; which is true. But that doesn't make it ok to run in the bike lane, forcing bikes out into traffic where road ragers are going to run them down!

    I always run on the sidewalk when I'm alone.

  43. You are a hobby jogger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are running a 5hr marathon, you are not a "marathoner"...you are a hobby jogger.

    1. Re:You are a hobby jogger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to run 7 miles in 45 minutes. That's not bad. No point running more than that. I gave it up when the cars became unavoidable. Yeah, stupid to run off track, but how many laps is 7 miles?

      And I resent your implication. Running more than 7 miles is stupid so if it takes the guy all that time, wait. what?

  44. Smart electronics for marathoners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try this to improve your performance.

    http://tinyurl.com/pat7eoc

  45. 5-time marathoner... by wandazulu · · Score: 1

    ...and I did all of them with a series of iPod nanos for tunes (replacing when they broke, got soaked, whatever), and a Garmin 305 for tracking distance. The 305 is the most accurate gps watch I've found that, while it doesn't have a lot of nice features (color screen, map details, start up time less than 15 minutes), it has been invaluable for training and the race, never letting me down on accuracy. I haven't found a do-all tool that I could stand to run with (I like the idea of the apple watch, but running with an iPhone to provide gps is an absolute no-go as I can't store it in a place that would remain comfortable for 26.2 miles). Hope that helps.

  46. Re: Hey runners! by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    Better would be to mount a small sprayer on your bike frame. A little spritz of safety orange could help save that black clad pedestrian from the next bike to happen soon. Done discreetly enough they might not even know you did it until considerably later.

  47. My equipment by TheLongshot · · Score: 1

    For music, I use a SanDisk Sansa Clip Zip with Rockbox installed. I've used SanDisk players for years, and they are great for running. It has the advantage of being small, long battery life, good storage (8GB, but with a micro SD card slot for a lot more music) and cheap.

    For marathons, I recommend a watch to help keep your pace and to keep track of your progress. The Timex Ironman watches are pretty solid. I haven't felt the need to have additional features than what it offers.

    Not a big fan of carrying phones with me, since they are bulky. I'd rather have as little on me as possible when running.

  48. No electronics by hooiberg · · Score: 2

    If you need electronics during running, you should plans your routes through more interesting places, where there is more to see.
    As a runner myself, the only electronics I bring along are two lights.
    You really want to keep an ear open for traffic.

  49. Get one with a short battery by dargaud · · Score: 2

    ...and try to finish the marathon before the battery dies ! How's that for an incentive ?

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  50. Focus on the ENGINE, not the accessories by kheldan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As something of an athlete myself, my advice to your wife is to focus on upgrading her engine, and worry about the bells-and-whistles later. Especially running out on public roads, but out running anywhere in public, you need to be aware of your surroundings, not drowning them out with music blaring in your ears. Furthermore running 26.2 miles requires mental toughness and focus; if you're relying on something external to drown out your personal demons, who are trying to sabotage you, what's going to happen when the thing dies or your earbuds fail? Skip the music. GPS I could go either way on, but if you know the course you're running on, what do you need GPS for? A watch with a chest strap for monitoring heart rate should be all she really needs to get started, they're inexpensive, durable, and will run for months on one set of batteries. If you really want to spend money on your wife being successful at marathoning, invest that money in a professional coach to give her a personalized training plan, monitor her progress, and overall maximize the benefit of the time she spends training.

    ..and no, this wasn't the advice you asked for, but I think it's the advice she needs.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:Focus on the ENGINE, not the accessories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..and no, this wasn't the advice you asked for, but I think it's the advice she needs.

      No, I'm pretty sure it's not.

      Different people have different motivations. Your post entirely reflected YOUR motivations. The poster's wife probably has entirely different motivations. Example: if the poster's wife has significantly more trouble with motivation without music, then music is a *perfectly acceptable choice* for her workouts (as long as there are no safety issues.)

      In fact, music can be a great training aid. It's generally accepted that 180+ steps per minute is about the right cadence for endurance running events. I found that firing up music that has a rhythm of ~90 or ~180 beats per minute when I started running was a great way of getting my body accustomed to that cadence. Now that I've tuned my body into a ~190 steps per minute cadence I find that same music distracting and no longer listen to it as it adversely slows down my cadence.

    2. Re:Focus on the ENGINE, not the accessories by kheldan · · Score: 1

      No, I'm extremely sure that YOUR personal choices, as poor as they are, are NOT the advice someone training for a marathon needs.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    3. Re:Focus on the ENGINE, not the accessories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't run unless I have expensive electronics with me

      sound to me like your just weak, m8

    4. Re:Focus on the ENGINE, not the accessories by IMightB · · Score: 1

      Thank you,

      I have never once heard her talk about cadence or really caring so much about her HR while she runs. I think for her it's more about the music and getting to the finish line, than tweaking out every last bit of performance from her body.

    5. Re:Focus on the ENGINE, not the accessories by kheldan · · Score: 1

      I have never once heard her talk about cadence or really caring so much about her HR while she runs. I think for her it's more about the music and getting to the finish line, than tweaking out every last bit of performance from her body.

      OK, let me say this: 26.2 miles is not a trivial distance. Unless you've got some incredible level of natural talent and therefore it doesn't matter what you do to train for it, not paying enough attention to how you train will likely give you results ranging from 'not finishing at all', to 'getting seriously injured'. Really, honestly, please, tell her she needs to pay more attention to being properly conditioned and prepared, and less about what gadgets she's carrying. I'd also suggest shorter events and later on half-marathons as 'practice' for a full marathon.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  51. Fuck Gadgets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't need any of that pussy shit. All you need is a good pair of socks and shoes that suit your feet and that you need to replace every 400-odd miles. I'd also recommend that you buy a foam roller and learn how to use it as keeping your leg muscles in good condition will do far more to help you maintain your motivation in going for regular runs in the first place.

    I run a marathon's worth of distance each week and all I take with me is my drivers license and a couple of $20 notes wrapped around it that goes in the key pouch on the back of my shorts. If there's an emergency then people will know who I am and where I live or I can buy something like a ride home. Sometimes I wear a $5 Casio watch so I can time my pulse at certain points and when it's hot I take a belt with a couple of little water bottles, but you don't really need to rehydrate on the go for a 10 mile run if you're hydrated before you start.

    I like to hear what's going on around me as well as listening to my feet pounding the ground, my breathing and my heart beat. When you get in the zone you'll know what I mean and you'll feel the euphoria and sense of invincibility.

  52. My 2 cents by dchrys · · Score: 3, Informative

    As I run long distances and marathons frequently, this is the gear that I usually have with me:

    - iPod shuffle 4th gen: without touch screen and with real buttons this one is runner's best friend. It had survived rain and sweat drops and its battery lasts for more than 12h of music. Its clip and non-existent weight make it very practical to carry

    - Garmin Forerunner 220 - It's battery lasts 8h (on paper) with the GPS on and I had occasions of 5-6h long runs with it with plenty of battery remaining

    - Samsung SIII Neo - My old android phone, I also carry a spare battery for it. Useful for safety ofcourse and also to support the Forerunner for live tracking, Endomondo, Runtastic and other apps (Ingress !)

    -=dchrys=-

  53. Samsung Gear S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Samsung Gear S is the device you are after. 2GB of storage for music. Built in GPS, Heart Rate Monitor, the UV monitor will even tell you if you need to put on sunscreen. It has Bluetooth for wireless headphones and best of all is actually a mobile phone in-case you need it while out. When running you would have the mobile network on for battery life so you'd easily get 4 hours - more like 7-9 hours.

    1. Re:Samsung Gear S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry - mobile network off for battery...

    2. Re:Samsung Gear S by Alien1024 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if you have a Samsung phone, the Samsung Gear S makes sense. Unfortunately, a Samsung phone is basically required to install apps. Non-starter for me.

    3. Re:Samsung Gear S by IMightB · · Score: 1

      While she does have a S3, she doesn't want to carry her phone with her. And from all of my research, the Gear S doesn't have a built in GPS

    4. Re:Samsung Gear S by Alien1024 · · Score: 1

      It does have built-in GPS, and, according to the reviews I've read, phone synchronization is only needed for the initial setup and for installing apps. I still wouldn't buy the Gear S even if I had a Samsung phone, because it runs a proprietary Samsung OS called Tizen - I'm not thrilled by the idea.

  54. Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Garmin's battery only lasts 3 hours? Then run the marathon in 2.45.

  55. Re:Hey runners! by stevencbrown · · Score: 1

    interesting - I've never seen this. Are you in the US? I'm UK based, and I've never seen people running in bike lanes in preference to the road/pavement.

  56. None by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No crapotronics needed. Shut up and run, motherfucker.

  57. Pebble and cheap bluetooth headphones by tj.parisi · · Score: 1

    I have a first generation Pebble that works fantastic for running, as a controller/display screen for Runkeeper on my android phone. It's waterproof, easy to read in the sun and real buttons (pause Runkeeper) work much better than touchscreen. Battery lasts around a week. Have tried expensive headphones and cheap earbuds, find that bluetooth headphones (my pair say arctic, but there are lots of look alikes on Amazon) are easy to slide off if I need to, fairly reliable and have buttons to control the music. I prefer headphones to earbuds, I think I hear more around me. Also generally run facing traffic or on sidewalks, so no close calls with vehicles. Battery on the headphones lasts multiple runs. My only issue was during a run in DC, where we were under a highway for a significant distance and no GPS signal was available. But that would be an issue with any GPS based setup.

  58. product reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have seen many people point to dcrainmaker reviews as the best; they're quite good. But I would argue anyone posting to slashdot would prefer the fellrnr wiki; here is a link to the GPS watch section: http://fellrnr.com/wiki/Best_R... His detail and true nerd approach to the review process cannot be matched.
    And my own opinion on your actual question is use two devices. A dedicated running watch for all your running metrics (any Garmin XT model would be my suggestion) and a smartphone or mp3 player for any other needs, whatever they may be. Smartwatches are in their infancy, they can't seriously compete with dedicated GPS watches for someone dedicated enough to complete a marathon or better.

  59. Smartwatch 3, if you tolerate only headphone sound by Alien1024 · · Score: 1

    I have run a number of marathons. The Sony Smartwatch 3 has great features, supports Bluetooth Smart for pairing with a HR monitor (I strongly recommend Scosche Rhythm+, by the way) and tracking apps, e.g. Endomondo.

    I don't wear headphones or listen to music while running (by the way, race organizers discourage headphones during races). So I want a loud alert for intervals, in other words, I want a device with an external speaker, which the SW3 doesn't have. So I just use a Geonaute 510 tracker watch (el-cheapo European brand, but has a feature set similar to that of Garmin Forerunner 220) and Scosche Rhythm+ HR monitor.

    DC Rainmaker has many and very comprehensive reviews of sport watches (smart- and non-smart), sports gear, etc.

  60. typical slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cue 100 non-runners complaining that she shouldn't run with headphones.

  61. Two device solution by MechEMark · · Score: 1

    =>You will not get what you want with one device (at least not in my experience.) A real training watch with GPS is not an mp3 player and vice versa

    For tracking and logging relevant data (time, distance, pace/speed, heartrate, cadence) you want a dedicated device. Garmin makes some cheap watches at $100, but you're better off spending a little more and getting a Forerunner 2xx - these are great. You can also build structured workouts on them to do interval training, etc. Trying to use an Apple Watch or something else like that is going to be costly and will never be as good. Excellent battery life on these as well.

    Music: I strongly advise against headphones for several reasons, but the ipod shuffle is probably the way to go if you must - small, no frills, long life.

    Here's why I don't like headphones:
    Situational awareness - tuning out to tune in to your music is dangerous. I also just generally believe that using headphones in public while moving (walking/running/etc.) is intrinsically bad as you're that much more likely to block others, get int he way, etc.
    Headphones are frequently banned at events.
    Training: if you're simply looking to cruise and finish the event, then this doesn't apply, but I think that's a poor approach to races, especially road marathons with reg fess at $100 or more. Needing music to run means you don't like running in of itself and it means you're not focusing on the running. Sounds crazy to noon-runners, but surroundings (on-road or off) should be enough stimulus when you're actually training - think about form, cadence, footstrike, etc. Running well - for speed, for distance, for anything - takes practice. When you stop paying attention or when you get tired, your form starts to decline, which is why it's so important to train conscientiously to develop good ingrained mechanics. This also makes you more efficient and helps with injury prevention.

  62. Better Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always enjoy the hi-tech runners who complain that things don't work during an event. eg GPS watch can't find a satellite around tall buildings etc I suggest your wife learn how to use a simple watch and learn to sign to herself.

  63. These Three Things by OrangeCarrot · · Score: 0

    The GPS Watch: The Garmin Forerunner 10. It's waterproof and fairly minimal in terms of features. It does exactly what a runner's GPS watch should do and nothing more. https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/U...

    The iPod: The current generation of iPod Nano has built in Bluetooth. Sweat being a problem - don't wear it on the arm. Get a clip to stick it on the waistband. The HHiCase (or roocase) works pretty well. http://www.apple.com/ipod-nano... http://www.amazon.com/iPod-Nan...

    The Headphones: YurBuds makes an excellent product (Liberty Wireless) that wraps over the ear, resists sweat and water, and allows ambient noise to reach the wearer for safety. http://www.yurbuds.com/en/wire...

    I used all three of these in my first Marathon last year. Nothing failed.

  64. FWIW by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    Just an anecdote... During the VA Beach 1/2 Marathon last year, my Garmin inexplicably stopped about 2.5 hrs in. It still had plenty of battery life remaining, and I was able to start it up again, but had to manually join the files once I loaded them to my computer. Same race, same watch, but this year, no such problem.

    As for iPod Nanos, I've been through 3 of them, all dying, likely due to moisture in the armband. I really don't want to carry around something the size of a cell phone.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  65. Garmin Vivoactive by xupere · · Score: 1

    I've done marathons, ultras, and tris with my Garmin 910XT; it was awesome but simply stopped turning on last year. After a lot of research I replaced it with the Garmin Vivoactive and have loved it so far.

    It does not have music storage, but it does have bluetooth, so you could use it to control a phone/ipod which has music on it. I don't know of any GPS watches that also have storage but that wasn't something I looked for either. (I don't listen to music when running; if you do please be extra careful as other posts have mentioned)

    The cons of the Vivoactive:
    -"only" 10 hours of GPS battery life; should be plenty for a marathon but the 910 had 20 hours so this was a downgrade
    -can't turn off or configure the sometimes annoying step-tracking feature (so far, that I've found)

    Things about it I love:
    -can be used as a smartwatch
    -great battery life as a smartwatch (screen is color LCD with backlight, instead of always-on LED like Apple watch or others)
    -very very small profile and light weight
    -has vibrate; some of the cheaper GPS watches skip this but I love it for mile split alerts
    -it has swimming/biking/indoor workout features

    1. Re:Garmin Vivoactive by xupere · · Score: 1

      Oh, also the price ($250) is very reasonable for the features it has when compared to the running-focused Forerunner line.

  66. No electronics by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    I recommend not wearing any gadgets. They increase your weight, reduce your situational awareness, and increase your time to completion. Many marathons outright ban them and for good reason.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  67. Roku by neminem · · Score: 1

    Roku. Netflix. A decent tv. Probably your phone, so you don't have to get up to order a pizza. What else do you need?

    Oh wait, not that kind of marathon.

    1. Re:Roku by IMightB · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I got those already! It's just not what the wife is looking for....

  68. Why a built-in GPS? by traviscartwright · · Score: 1

    I just ran my 13th marathon last month, and I have never understood the need for all these fancy bells and whistles. Then again, I'm 46 years old, and why don't you get off my lawn?

    I run with just a Timex watch (with chronograph) and an iPod Shuffle (with Yurbuds Ironman). Every marathon (and half-marathon) that I have ever run has had mile markers, often with synchronized chronographs. This should be sufficient to recognize if you are falling ahead or behind on your splits.

    Most of the time you are going to be training on a familiar path, with known mile markers that can allow you the some convenience. I train either on the running path of my local park, or around the blocks of my neighborhood, and I have these locations well memorized. Laying out a path on Google Earth can help with this.

    As far as longevity, the watch will usually last me a good 10-15 years. I did have problem with my iPods dying from sweat exposure, until I also figured out the zip-lock bag method an earlier poster mentioned. I have wanted to try one of the waterproof Shuffles from UnderwaterAudio.com but haven't had the need since using the zip-locks.

    Just something to consider. Happy running!

  69. Garmin, Avantree, and Zombies! Run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I started out racing long course triathlon there really was only one option for a GPS watch that would last the distance. Now there are a couple in the Garmin line that boast a 20 hour battery and, from experience, they generally deliver pretty well. I am currently using the 910XT and am looking at the newer 920XT for its extended features (Bluetooth connectivity, run cadence, etc) They can be fairly expensive though, especially if your only looking at using the running features (no bike or swim metrics) There are a few more run specific with an 8-10 hour battery as well
    As to Bluetooth headphones, I like my Avantree Jogger Pro. 11 hour play time, can connect to two devices simultaneously, are "sweat proof", and have a back-of-the-neck band that provides enough torque to keep the headphones in place whilst running. The headphones also double as a phone headset and the remote buttons allow you to advance/re-queue/pause/restart your music, increase/decrease volume, and redial last call (Probably other features that I haven't worked out as well)
    Do you like Zombies?
    I am using an app called Zombies! Run for my training runs, like a radio play where you are the central character, running missions to support your town. That's a very basic intro to what this app offers as it is very deep with its storyline and the interactivity it provides (Interval training, audio pace notifications, real location turn target, distance based missions, random zombie chase linked to GPS pacing, radio mode, etc) and it works in with your music, playing tracks between audio content. Really helps those kms/miles tick by!

    Good luck!!

  70. Garmin 920XT works great, also day to day by bupton · · Score: 1

    The 920XT is my fourth GPS watch and best by a wide margin. No battery issue, even for 12 hour bike events. It uploads the data without me having to think about it. Great workout features once you get the garmin connect site figured out. I use the heart rate features a lot, but that's me. Nice smartwatch features. It's a little big for small wristed people, but otherwise, no issues at all in over a year. I have run over 30 marathons. I have friends that swear by the new apple watch and the Forerunner 235 does wrist heart rate if you are lighter skinned, both are smaller. I use my phone for audio during training, but mostly leave it in the car during races.

  71. Experience marathoner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To all the people who have been posting about marathons not allowing people to listen to music, they must never have run a marathon. Most marathon runners run the race with some sort of music. I've run 68 and have never had a problem and can't imagine running that long and far without music.

    The real issue is a smart watch that does everything. There isn't one. I'd recommend the FitBit surge to monitor distance, heart-rate etc, and an iPod for music. The iWatch could have been a real hit if it did put all these together, but it didn't.