Slashdot Mirror


ISIS Help Desk Assists In Covering Tracks (cnn.com)

An anonymous reader writes: The ISIS terror group appears to have 5 to 6 members offering 24-hour support on how to encrypt communications, hide personal details and use apps like Twitter while avoiding surveillance. It's kind of like a 'help desk,' though not an actual call center hiding in the hills. It is a group of IT specialists answering questions from locations spread out all over the world, according to Aaron Brantly at the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point. It has been find out that the advice is largely being relayed on an ISIS channel on Telegram, a messaging app that has become popular among members of the group because it allows for special secret chats. The jihadi help desk has lengthy training manuals, and Brantly has reviewed over 300 pages of training documents and roughly 25 YouTube videos that provide tips to evade intelligence agencies and law enforcement.

145 comments

  1. ISIS help desk prompts by JoeyRox · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have to break out my ISIS helpdesk post again:

    Welcome to the Daesh hotline. Please listen carefully to the following message as our options have changed.
    Press 1 for information on how to encrypt messages sent to members of your terrorist cell
    Press 2 if you're a suicidal bomber and are having trouble detonating your device
    Press 3 if you're an oppressed female who would like to sign up for our next Perl Programming Bootmap
    Press 4 for tips on how to write terror and/or hate messages in 140 characters or less
    Press 5 to voice your displeasure with systemd
    Or Press 0 to speak with a member of the Bush family for further assistance

    1. Re:ISIS help desk prompts by Howitzer86 · · Score: 4, Funny

      [2]

      Please wait while we remotely access your devi

    2. Re:ISIS help desk prompts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, not falling for that again. I almost broke my 5 key last time.

    3. Re:ISIS help desk prompts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was about to make a systemd joke but the captcha is "shelled" so I think that the systemd in slashdot servers is sending me a message.

      Therefore I'll talk about kittens, instead. They are cute.

    4. Re:ISIS help desk prompts by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Welcome to the Daesh hotline.

      "My name is Brad. First, let me say I'm sorry that you're having trouble with our service today. To whom am I speaking?"

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:ISIS help desk prompts by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I have a mod point to spare, and would have modded you up if you had written something like devi^%E$^ instead of just devi

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    6. Re:ISIS help desk prompts by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      It would depend on if we're hearing the caller's end, or the help desk's end. The caller's end probably wouldn't make it to the ^%E$^ part if it had detonated.

    7. Re:ISIS help desk prompts by operagost · · Score: 1

      Bonus points for NO CARRIER

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    8. Re:ISIS help desk prompts by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2

      No, it would depend on if you have been around long enough to know why the latter is funnier, or indeed, why it makes any sense at all.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    9. Re:ISIS help desk prompts by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      At first I didn't like that idea, but the more I think about it why wouldn't the caller be using an old school modem from the trenches?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    10. Re:ISIS help desk prompts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Thank you so much for choosing to be a fighter in our caliphate, Abdul. And I also see that you've come through as authorized so I thank you for that. What can I help you with today?"

    11. Re:ISIS help desk prompts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you even bother spamming that shit? He is not even going to participate in the election.

    12. Re:ISIS help desk prompts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Booosh!

    13. Re:ISIS help desk prompts by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      would have modded you up if you had written something like devi^%E$^ instead of just devi

      Modern digital protocols don't generate static or line noise. This isn't 1992.

    14. Re:ISIS help desk prompts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Welcome to the Daesh hotline. What is the nature of your problem?"

      "My life is a mess, I just want to end it all!"

      "Wonderful! Can you drive a truck?"

    15. Re:ISIS help desk prompts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you're picking nits, the whole packet wouldn't have been transferred.
      JOKE SO FUNNEH

    16. Re:ISIS help desk prompts by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      The explosion stops to properly hang up the receiver before expanding further. Bomb makers initially had some difficulty getting the plasma to work with smartphone touch screens, but they figured it out years ago and the technology has been wide spread for some time.

    17. Re:ISIS help desk prompts by gargleblast · · Score: 1

      Your call may be monitored for quality control and Sharia law enforcement purposes.

    18. Re:ISIS help desk prompts by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      I have a mod point to spare, and would have modded you up if you had written something like devi^%E$^ instead of just devi

      Or that old chestnut, devi^%E$^ NO CARRIER

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    19. Re:ISIS help desk prompts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the first option should be "to continue in english, press 1."

      captcha... "bloody"

    20. Re:ISIS help desk prompts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why do you even bother spamming that shit? He is not even going to participate in the election.

      The hell he isn't. Why do you think he goes on TV and derides the field of republican candidates? ("Oh, Poor babies, you having trouble with the debate moderators? How you going to rule the world?".... OR the "You guys afraid of a few Syrian refugees? Scared of your own shadow too?" ring a bell?) Like it or not, he's participating in this election.

      Look, I don't think he intends to stay in office by force, marshal law or what have you, but I also think he's VERY involved in this election if for nothing else but to pad his "Legacy" by getting someone into office to carry on his policy (I.E. Hillary Clinton). I also don't expect he will go quietly back to Home in January 2017 and spend the rest of his days relaxing and building his library like past presidents, this guy is going to have his fingers in politics until he's either totally repudiated by the mess he's created and gets rejected by even the leftist in this country (never going to happen), gets some bigger gig (what ever that might be) or looses his mind though dementia or death.

      No, we will be dealing with this guy for decades to come... The only thing that is sure out live him is the mess he created while in office.

    21. Re: ISIS help desk prompts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume you're talking about George W Bush because, having started 2 wars and created the Great Recession, he sure matches your description a lot more than Obama.

      What is Bush II doing now? Hanging out at his ranch, clearing brush, and painting. He had a lot of soul-searching to do.

      On the other hand, Obama will have no problem sleeping at night. He nabbed Bin Laden, stopped (mostly) 2 wars, and pushed the Economic recovery forward. Also, improved health care. Also, an improved energy and trade policy. And if you disagree with that, you're likely a Trump supporter ('nuff said there).

    22. Re:ISIS help desk prompts by Calavar · · Score: 1

      Look, I don't think he intends to stay in office by force, marshal law or what have you, but I also think he's VERY involved in this election if for nothing else but to pad his "Legacy" by getting someone into office to carry on his policy (I.E. Hillary Clinton).

      Ah yes, I also live in the fantasy land where Reagan clearly showed no thought to his "legacy" when he endorsed Bush Sr. for president, Bill clearly showed no thought to his "legacy" when he endorsed Gore, and Bush Sr. never endorsed Jr. or Jeb.

      I also don't expect he will go quietly back to Home in January 2017 and spend the rest of his days relaxing and building his library like past presidents, this guy is going to have his fingers in politics

      So I guess this is also the fantasy land where Carter and Clinton didn't go on stumping for years after their presidencies ended and Bush Sr. didn't handpick half of his son's cabinet.

    23. Re:ISIS help desk prompts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Thank you so much for choosing to be a fighter in our caliphate, Abdul. And I also see that you've come through as authorized so I thank you for that. How may I not help you today."

      FTFY

  2. ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    They get free housing, food, a full on welfare system... These guys are running a solid business.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Maybe I probably should mention that they are paid in US dollars, not local currency. You know, just in case that point is important to anybody. Maybe it's nothing.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by ClickOnThis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      These guys are running a solid business.

      The overwhelming majority of their revenue is acquired through theft.

      I'd hardly call that a "solid business."

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    3. Re:ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      These guys are running a solid business.

      The overwhelming majority of their revenue is acquired through theft.

      I'd hardly call that a "solid business."

      Wall Street would beg to differ!

    4. Re:ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Islamic State sells oil for dollars. It shouldn't be surprising they make payments with dollars as well.

    5. Re:ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      They get free housing, food, a full on welfare system... These guys are running a solid business.

      Easy to find free housing when you kill or kick out the people who were living in said housing. Next you are going to say ISIS is full of ladies men because it's so easy for them to get a wife....

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    6. Re:ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by bobbied · · Score: 2

      They get free housing, food, a full on welfare system... These guys are running a solid business.

      Maybe, but once you are working for them, there is no leaving. Oh, and the retirement plan sucks because it is always blowing up.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    7. Re:ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Easy to find free housing when you kill or kick out the people who were living in said housing.

      Just ask the people in the Israeli settlements.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re:ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

      OTOH, their contributions to the pension fund tend to run a little light.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    9. Re:ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by MouseR · · Score: 2

      That's because the CIA and Halliburton (/Backwaters) only accepts US currencies for their weapons drops.

    10. Re:ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by misexistentialist · · Score: 0

      Where do you think the US government's revenue comes from?

    11. Re:ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      OTOH, their contributions to the pension fund tend to run a little light.

      Perhaps, but they pay survivor benefits to the families of killed fighters.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    12. Re:ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      These guys are running a solid business.
      The overwhelming majority of their revenue is acquired through theft. [newsweek.com]
      I'd hardly call that a "solid business."

      I'd call that straight-up Corporate.

    13. Re:ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      It makes no difference. I'm just saying to set the bullshit ideology aside and realize these guys are in it for the money. Tactics are a separate issue.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    14. Re:ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I probably should mention that they are paid in US dollars, not local currency. You know, just in case that point is important to anybody. Maybe it's nothing.

      Not entirely coincidentally, this is the currency that oil is bought in. I guess we should assume that anyone that supports reducing renewable energy subsidies is a terrorist supporter and bomb them. Right?

      CAPTCHA: Clouds (!!)

    15. Re:ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 2

      Where do you think the US government's revenue comes from?

      Yeah, but when the US government does it, it's *different*.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    16. Re:ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by wyHunter · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So would the Department of Internal Revenue.

    17. Re: ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      Those settlements are one of the biggest roadblocks to peace in Palestine and Israel. Personally I think the US should cut off aid to Israel until settlements at least stop expanding

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    18. Re:ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by bankman · · Score: 1

      Easy to find free housing when you kill or kick out the people who were living in said housing.

      Whole countries were built following this model...

      --
      I feel so sig.
    19. Re: ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      History is your friend. The settlements were abandoned once and it did little other than allow rockets to be launched closer.

      The situation is more complex than the settlements. They might be part of it but not as much as you might think.

    20. Re:ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet, both would fuck you up the ass at any opportunity!

    21. Re:ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Works for Wall St.

    22. Re: ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who were killed and kicked out by Muslim invaders, you mean?

      Faggot.

    23. Re: ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      History is your friend. The settlements were abandoned once and it did little other than allow rockets to be launched closer.

      Closer to what? If you expand your borders by building settlements, how does that move your people or the people on the other side of the border further from the border?

    24. Re: ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't expand their borders. There is no separate Palestinian State. The Palestinians were offered a split of the country with the British Mandate and by the UN. They turned it down and decided to try "driving the Jews back into the sea." It did not work out well. In 1989, the terrorist organization known as the PLO decided to try to declare independence. Maybe if they'd not tried, again, to exterminate the Jews in the 6 Day War there would have been different results. Maybe if they'd have accepted the Jews in the first place there would have been better results. Maybe if the League of Nations (and then the UN) had not fucked them over, there would have been better results. This does not change the fact that there is no borders being expanded because the land already is owned by the Jews (right or wrong - this is factual). At best, they're an 'observer state' and nothing else. Hopefully this will change in time but, for now, try to stick to the facts.

    25. Re: ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      As i said history is your friend. Israel has already attempted ending the settlements and it ended up with rockets being launched deeper into Israel because of the more close proximity and lack of civil control.

    26. Re:ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      From your referenced article "The ISIS economy and its fighters predominantly rely on the production and sale of seized energy assets"

      Which begs the question of why they still have ANY drilling or production capability at this point, as rigs and refineries are stable, visible targets.

      "Grossing as much as $40 million or more over the past two years, ISIS has accepted funding from government or private sources in the oil-rich nations of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Kuwait—and a large network of private donors, including Persian Gulf royalty, businessmen and wealthy families."

      Which leads to another question of if we know this, we do we not take action against said donors and the countries allowing it to happen (Qatar and Kuwait, according to the same article)?

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    27. Re: ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by MagickalMyst · · Score: 1

      "...because the land already is owned by the Jews"

      "...because the land already is illegally occupied by the Jews"

      FTFY.

      --
      Political correctness is really just herd psychology pushed by insecure people who desperately seek social conformity.
    28. Re:ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From your referenced article "The ISIS economy and its fighters predominantly rely on the production and sale of seized energy assets"

      Which begs the question of why they still have ANY drilling or production capability at this point, as rigs and refineries are stable, visible targets.

      "Grossing as much as $40 million or more over the past two years, ISIS has accepted funding from government or private sources in the oil-rich nations of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Kuwait—and a large network of private donors, including Persian Gulf royalty, businessmen and wealthy families."

      Which leads to another question of if we know this, we do we not take action against said donors and the countries allowing it to happen (Qatar and Kuwait, according to the same article)?

      The answer is this. Lots of people in power (both money, and politics) want it to happen.

      You can't create a socialist state if people are happy, content, and capable of defending themselves. You have to make them defenseless by martial law, regular laws, and through fear. The fastest way to do that is have the excuse of fear.

      Our president is a sniveling, groveling, bitch. There is no spine to come from anywhere. For the next several years, get used to the fact that islam and other bullshit will run rampant in Eurasia and Africa.

      Lastly, there's a particularly big problem with islam in that the average young liberal pansy on the street has no clue and is willfully ignorant of what islam is.

      1400 Year Secret

      What the West Needs to Know

      The Myth that Radicals are a Minority in islam

    29. Re:ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by Shalhav · · Score: 0

      I'll settle for moving to a state where the taxes are less.

    30. Re: ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      What exactly is illegal about it?

    31. Re: ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those settlements are one of the biggest roadblocks to peace in Palestine and Israel. Personally I think the US should cut off aid to Israel until settlements at least stop expanding

      Agreed.

      The international community should also cut off aid to the Palestinians until they publicly acknowledge a right to the State of Israel to exist within agreed upon boundaries (excluding the specified occupied territories).

      Then at least both sides would have come to the table.

    32. Re: ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by MagickalMyst · · Score: 1

      "What exactly is illegal about it?"

      Seriously? Are you trying to be flamebait or you really don't know?

      Israel has been terrorizing Palestinians and stealing their land for decades. They have committed massive human rights violations and indiscriminately murder Palestinian citizens - including women and children - whilst trying to portray itself as the victim to the rest of world. Of course, nobody is buying it. It is really quite disgusting.

      As a result, Israel has begun isolating itself from the rest of the world and now has earned a boycott, divestment and sanctions movement brought against them for their crimes. The BDS movement is rapidly growing as more and more people become aware of the atrocities that Israel is committing.

      Here is a map detailing the land loss by Palestine at the hands of the theiving Israelis.

      --
      Political correctness is really just herd psychology pushed by insecure people who desperately seek social conformity.
    33. Re: ISIS fighters can get paid up to 700 USD/month by MagickalMyst · · Score: 1

      A few things:

      1. "History" is not factual lore. It is - literally - 'his story' - written by the so-called victor in a conflict. It is one-sided, biased and very often incorrect.

      2. Wikipedia is a very tainted, unreliable source of information. Quoting Wikipedia is lame.

      3. Israel has not made any serious effort to end the settlements. If they did there would not be an issue. It is because Israel has stolen and illegally occupied Palestinian land that these problems continue. Israel simply refuses to take responsibility for their terrorist activities and continually points the finger at the people whose land they have stolen, whose homes they have destroyed and whose families have been murdered by the Zionists.

      4. Anyone who supports Israel is a supporter of terrorism. The BDS movement against Israel began in response to their terrorist activities and human rights violations; mainly against the Palestinian people.

      --
      Political correctness is really just herd psychology pushed by insecure people who desperately seek social conformity.
  3. typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It has been find out"

  4. I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does the caller get upset if the agent is not an ESL person???

  5. News for nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wooo!

  6. Does this mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that they will be outsourced by companies like Dell, etc. in the near future>?

    1. Re:Does this mean by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Who do you think staffs Dell's helpdesk now. Many of the members have regular jobs.

    2. Re:Does this mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My explosive vest won't detonate.

      Have you tried turning it off and back on again?

  7. We need an excuse to outlaw encryption again? by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I bet my rear end that no later than tomorrow we'll get to hear about how we have to outlaw telling people how to use encryption and how to avoid being tracked on the internet.

    I am confident that we can rely on Cameron to not disappoint us.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:We need an excuse to outlaw encryption again? by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      We need an excuse to outlaw encryption again? (Score:1)
      by Opportunist (166417)

      I bet my rear end that no later than tomorrow we'll get to hear about how we have to outlaw telling people how to use encryption and how to avoid being tracked on the internet.

      I am confident that we can rely on Cameron to not disappoint us.

      Username checks out.

    2. Re:We need an excuse to outlaw encryption again? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      Hopefully it's an excuse to outlaw foreign help desks.

    3. Re:We need an excuse to outlaw encryption again? by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

      I like how governments seem to assume that criminals will stop doing something when it becomes illegal.

      "Yo, these dudes are killing billions of people and using secret encrypted messages*! I bet if we outlaw encryption, they'll stop using it! Clearly they won't want to break the law."

      *I'm well aware that they weren't all encrypted.

  8. Experience by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    I wonder if they can help me get the snoopware out of Windows 10. Sounds right up their alley.

    1. Re:Experience by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's quite easy to get rid of all of Windows 10's snoopware. Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't realize that you wanted to keep Windows 10 on your computer. Never mind.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  9. Stern riffed on this yesterday... by spywhere · · Score: 1

    It was well worth the price of SiriusXM.

    1. Re:Stern riffed on this yesterday... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      yep. Howard Stern out scooped the "news for nerds" website.

      Tomorrow on slashdot, How to carve a pumpkin for the upcoming Halloween festivities!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  10. USD green backs by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    Wait till they found out that money is actually North Korean super notes...

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  11. Encryption is a weapon by mi · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Libertines and Libertarians fighting the notion of "encryption is a weapon" are wrong. It certainly is a weapon — and their fight should be targeting attempts to take (all) weapons away from citizens instead. There is no meaningful difference between an "assault rifle" and strong encryption — both have ample legitimate purposes and both can be used to perpetrate heinous acts.

    We all may want to study ISIS videos to learn both the actual techniques as well as how to better find and kill these assholes.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Encryption is a weapon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've never seen anyone bled out from being shot by PGP.

    2. Re:Encryption is a weapon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no meaningful difference between an "assault rifle" and strong encryption — both have ample legitimate purposes and both can be used to perpetrate heinous acts.

      There is no meaningful difference between anything and everything else. Both have ample legitimate purposes and both can be used to perpetrate heinous acts.
      Like "assault rifle" and a spoon. Of an egg and a car.

      Or we might just accept that argument that two thing are not the same just because you can use general purpose bullshit sentence on them.

    3. Re:Encryption is a weapon by Hydrian · · Score: 3, Funny

      Have you ever tried to compile it from source? :-D

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished.
    4. Re:Encryption is a weapon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no meaningful difference between an "assault rifle" and strong encryption

      My SSH client has a black background, so it's clearly an assault terminal.

    5. Re:Encryption is a weapon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... but it's not a weapon. A "weapon" would be something used to cause direct physical harm to a person or people. And the government is not trying to take away all "weapons", so I'm really confused about why you want to become a domestic terrorist.

    6. Re:Encryption is a weapon by bfpierce · · Score: 2

      You've heard of deaths due to it's use, which is the point. Guns don't aim at people and then go off by themselves, which is the same for every weapon, ever.

    7. Re:Encryption is a weapon by burni2 · · Score: 2

      SARKASM
      To demonstrate to one the difference between the meaningful kill potential of an assault rifle and encryption would be a crime! And from your POV it would be two!

      And I hope that you have read the news that the french/belgium ISIS-terrorists used unencrypted communication to execute their plan.

      Using your rational unencrypted communication would therefore also constitute as a crime. Because of no meaningful difference.

      I hope you somehow begin to understand the real differences between things and come down from your extremist views.

      And btw:
      "bring 2 water melons, 10 eggs and a pack of peanuts"

      is a chiffre that translates to:
      - two bombs
      - 10 hand granades
      - and 5000 shots AK47 amunition

      Beware of Granny Uncanny! She brings water melons and terror.

      Where you really need to look at:
      All these three letter acronyms can search billions of messages but fail to find the real important ones.

      Often also ignoring real crime like illegal arms and explosives trade.

      Terrorism is really nothing virtual, it needs the physical factor and especially the french government(Holande & Sarko) watched it happen.

      But they did nothing about the many illegal automatic and semi-automatic weapons that were and are in the hands of criminals in many suburbs of french cities.

      When their policemen cried for help because they are fired uppon with automatic weapons and also being outnumbered they did some "action" but without a strategy everything is deemd to be useless actionism and quickly forgotten.

      They even did not increase the policeforce to put the law back into rule, but they reduced the policeforce.

      And Mr. Sarko is known for this kind of two sided behaviour.

      The suburbs of france' and belgium's big cities are the place where those weapons came from.

      Just search the news for Marseille and suburbs.

    8. Re:Encryption is a weapon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Encryption is free speech. Assault rifles hurl projectiles at ludicrous speeds toward an often unsuspecting target. You are an idiot.

    9. Re:Encryption is a weapon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the legitimate use of an assault rifle? You make it sound like an assault rifle can be used to plant trees if only people would stop being so violent.

    10. Re:Encryption is a weapon by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Their most effective "technique"? They pay their fighters in US dollars.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    11. Re:Encryption is a weapon by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "Libertines and Libertarians fighting the notion of "encryption is a weapon" are wrong. It certainly is a weapon"

      Dear dumbshit,

      You may have heard the phrase "The pen is mightier than the sword". It is very common for people to hear this and then go onto the battlefield mistakenly believing that their pen is some sort of weapon. It never works out well for them I'm afraid. One guy tried cutting an "H" in a man rather than an "I" thinking that by encrypting his pattern the damage would be worsened, but alas they still got chopped down by the adversary carrying and using an actual weapon. Now don't get me wrong. In the hands of an expert a pen can cause great physical damage. A pen is not a weapon, though it can be used to cause great harm. Encryption is not now, never has been, and never will be a weapon.

      Sincerely,

      Anyone with a Clue

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    12. Re:Encryption is a weapon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shooting for recreation.
      Home defense.
      And occasionally overthrowing governments.

    13. Re:Encryption is a weapon by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

      Ho Le Fook, I can't believe someone is this fucking stupid.

      **EVERYTHING** can be _misused_ as a weapon, dumb@$$. You don't ban tools simply because a few retards mis-use them. i.e. Cars cause more death then guns, or drinking too much water causes poisoning, etc.

      Encryption was NOT designed to kill people, only facilitate communication.

      Unlike assault rifles whose sole purpose is to kill, maim, or cause fear.

      If you want to shut ISIS down then shut down the profit. Beat them at the financial war and education, because violence only begets more violence.

    14. Re:Encryption is a weapon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Black background? You racist!

      /SJW

    15. Re:Encryption is a weapon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Encryption is a weapon the same way a lock on my front door is a weapon.

      I'm sure law enforcement would love it if every door was unlocked (except their own, of course) granting them free access to walk in, mosey through your home and check out the contents of your refrigerator and/or gun safe without your consent or knowledge.

      Likewise, I'm sure the TLAs would love it if every communication channel was unencrypted (except their own, of course) granting them free access to scrape, sort and log every word you say without your consent or knowledge.

      To both of those options, the answer needs to be a resolute no. Actually, the answer needs to be a resolute FUCK NO.

    16. Re:Encryption is a weapon by ichthus · · Score: 1

      We know, proof-positive, that guns were used in Paris. We've heard that encryption has been used by ISIS. That may or may not be true.

      --
      sig: sauer
    17. Re:Encryption is a weapon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But why did you ban reading comprehension, bro? I think OP is agreeing with you.

    18. Re:Encryption is a weapon by dwpro · · Score: 1

      Obligatory...https://xkcd.com/504/

      --
      Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. -- Susan Ertz
    19. Re:Encryption is a weapon by mi · · Score: 1

      We've heard that encryption has been used by ISIS. That may or may not be true.

      The entire FA is about ISIS using encryption... They use it. It is true.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    20. Re:Encryption is a weapon by mi · · Score: 1

      this fucking stupid. [...] dumb@$$

      Uhm, hello? I'd like to report a Bias Incident...

      Encryption was NOT designed to kill people, only facilitate communication.

      False. You don't need encryption to communicate. You need encryption to hide your communications — and/or their contents — from others. Yeah, one of us is "fucking stupid", but it ain't me.

      Unlike assault rifles whose sole purpose is to kill, maim, or cause fear.

      I can think of a number of situations, where killing, maiming, or frightening can be done by most upstanding people and for very good reasons. Even you, for all you shocking and awesome stupidity, ought to be able to imagine one or two such scenarios...

      because violence only begets more violence.

      And cursing (a.k.a. verbal violence) only begets more cursing, right, you moronic asshole? Please, don't hate...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  12. HP/Dell/Windows technical support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gentlemen, we have our new "catch-all" number for technical support. Where's the any key? The retractable coffee cup holder spills. People are saying things on the internet.

  13. Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ISIS help desk is probably in Tel Aviv.

    1. Re:Where? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Can't be. From all accounts, these guys are helpful. Have you ever tried to get tech support from an Israeli?!?

  14. is Telegram any good? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    to take a nerd detour since the official reporting is all half-truths and lies anyway - is Telegram any good? Solid crypto? Apparently the usability is sufficient.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:is Telegram any good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few friends and I just switched off Hangouts and settled on Telegram. It's pretty slick and has an answer for most of our needs.

      The real problem is, as always, getting everyone onto one platform. Now I'm split across Telegram, Hangouts, Facebook Messenger, SMS, and carrier pigeon, depending on who I'm communicating with.

    2. Re:is Telegram any good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No

  15. Must protect Big Ben at all costs... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Can't let the Terrorists get a hold of the Internet, the Elders of the Internet would be very displeased!

    I can only wonder how many times Terrorist IT has asked someone "Have you tried turning it on and off again?"

    "Remember, without 'IT' all you have are errors..." :) --- I should win the internets for that one I think.

    1. Re:Must protect Big Ben at all costs... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I can only wonder how many times Terrorist IT has asked someone "Have you tried turning it on and off again?"

      Just wait until Daesh outsources their tech support to a Bangalore call center.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Must protect Big Ben at all costs... by macs4all · · Score: 1

      I can only wonder how many times Terrorist IT has asked someone "Have you tried turning it on and off again?"

      Ok, now try pressing the button again...

      [Loud sound, then Line goes dead]

      Thank you for calling ISIL Technical Support. Have a good day. If you would like to participate in a survey of your experience today, please stay on the line

      Hello?

      They hung up.

  16. so true on many levels... by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Forget worrying about Syrian refugees.
    H1Bs are the real fifth column!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  17. Wut. The. Fuck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The notion that they used encrypted channels to coordinate has already been debunked. Let's tar and feather these assholes trying to use the deaths of 129 innocent people to further their agenda of outlawing privacy.

  18. So no desk for the helpdesk? by jandrese · · Score: 1

    How is this different than having that one guy who "knows tech" that everyone calls when they have a problem or a question?

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:So no desk for the helpdesk? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "How is this different than having that one guy who "knows tech" that everyone calls when they have a problem or a question?"

      These guys apparently actually know what they are talking about.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  19. How is it ranked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'd bet their customer service satisfaction would be ranked higher than Comcast...

  20. ITCrowd by esperto · · Score: 5, Funny

    ISIS member: "hello, my bomb vest won't explode, what do I do?"
    ISIS Hotline: "have you tried to turn it off and on again?"
    ISIS member: "no, wait----" BOOOOM
    ISIS Hotline: "God dammit, everytime..."

    1. Re:ITCrowd by link-error · · Score: 1

      ISIS member: "hello, my bomb vest won't explode, what do I do?" ISIS Hotline: "have you tried to turn it off and on again?" ISIS member: "no, wait----" BOOOOM ISIS Hotline: "Allahu Akbar, everytime..." ...FTFY

      --
      -Unresolved symbol? Byte me!
    2. Re:ITCrowd by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Why would he say "God dammit"?

      A) It should be Allah
      B) The desired result was achieved, so he would be praising Allah.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  21. The trouble is they're right by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If we're going to have a world where the conversations of private citizens cannot be eavesdropped on then it's a natural by product that criminals and terrorists will also benefit from this. You can't have one without the other. If we knew the terrorists from the legit citizens we could block them from using encryption, but if we knew that we wouldn't be having this conversation, now would we?

    What I've found is that it's mostly right wing folks who want these laws. In America the solution is to point out that encryption control and gun control are basically the same thing. They don't like gun control, so it shuts them up. I'm largely indifferent either way. I'm more concerned about economic issues like H1-B and guest worker programs and the high cost of my child's education.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:The trouble is they're right by njnnja · · Score: 2

      encryption control and gun control are basically the same thing

      Except that the Constitution is quite clear that Americans have certain rights with respect to Arms, backed up by hundreds of years of case law supporting those rights, but it is silent about the question of rights to use ciphers and codes. So when talking about laws they are very different things entirely.

    2. Re:The trouble is they're right by Sowelu · · Score: 2

      I was going to bring up the 4th amendment, since encryption and ciphers are certainly part of being secure in one's person, house, papers and effects, but it does explicitly say you're protected against unreasonable search and seizure--not ALL search and seizure. I couldn't confidently argue one way or the other about what the founding fathers' opinions on effectively-unbreakable encryption would be.

      Then again the 2nd amendment also talks about guns in the context of well-regulated militias, so who even knows.

    3. Re:The trouble is they're right by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      How dare you use facts to get in the way of a good meme.

      However, that same Constitution allows you to also be allowed Free Speech (First Amendment) making your encrypted speech still yours in freedom.

      Then there's that pesky Fourth Amendment which requires security, as in "secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures" including the ability to reveal your assets, which I'll cover next.

      Ok, head-desk time, that old Fifth Amendment, which among other things, "nor shall (you) be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."

      So is there a tie? Yes, it's called The Bill of Rights and its aim is freedom and liberty.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    4. Re:The trouble is they're right by operagost · · Score: 2

      The funny thing is that back in the Clinton era, they classified strong encryption as a munition to keep it from being exported and inadvertently gave it second amendment protection here...

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    5. Re:The trouble is they're right by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

      I think the point is that if you're in favor of encryption then you use the analogy to control the debate and shut down the anti-encryption side, since they're usually also opposed to gun control.

      --
      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    6. Re:The trouble is they're right by frrrp · · Score: 1

      What I've found is that it's mostly right wing folks who want these laws.

      Bollocks. The biggest war on anonymity is being waged by the social justice left. They can't live with the idea that people can shoot holes in their gibberish with impunity and not have their personal data on public view in order to contact employers and get them fired.

      --
      smilies are for reetards
    7. Re:The trouble is they're right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't encryption still classified as a munition for some export control purposes? Then surely we have a God-given second amendment right to bear encryption.

    8. Re:The trouble is they're right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that the Constitution is quite clear that Americans have certain rights with respect to Arms, backed up by hundreds of years of case law supporting those rights, but it is silent about the question of rights to use ciphers and codes

      For quite some time the US classified encryption technology as a munition for export purposes. So, unless they were just lying for the sake of overstepping their authority (shocker), people in the US should have the right to bear encryption under the 2nd amendment.

    9. Re:The trouble is they're right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, the fact that the Constitution is silent proves the point. Keep in mind they couldn't put everything in that document - it would have gotten too big.

      Most people in power (or brainwashed by the system) tend to be of the mindset that if it isn't in the Constitution that you can do something the government has the right to stop you if you try. It works the other way around. If the federal government is not given explicit permission or authority to do or prevent something in the Constitution, then it doesn't have that right. The founders were very suspicious of what a strong central government would do. The tenth amendment was added to confirm this logic. It says essentially that if a power is not delegated to the Feds in the Constitution, then it is reserved to the states or the people. So if nothing is there, by default, the feds lose.

      To paraphrase Jefferson, freedom is the ability to do anything you want to do within your power so long as it does not interfere with the freedom of anyone else. Encryption does not interfere with anyone else's freedom. It simply annoys certain people in the government who think they should be able to know everything you are doing. Despite any ruling by anyone or even a judge, they do not have that legal authority.

    10. Re:The trouble is they're right by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      But as has been shown recently, such misuse of information can backfire badly. The internet is not totally populated by self-flaggelants, and some do stand up.

      Btw, my employer is a misogynist. If anything, it would make me look better to him. Bring it on, bitches!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  22. IF THEY KNOW ALL THIS THEN WHY .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IF THEY KNOW ALL THIS THEN WHY ....do they still let them DO IT!?

    Twitter CEO should be hauled out to court for assisting them.
    Facebook CEO also.

    All the companies that LET THEM DO IT shoudl be held accountable.

    If you or I did sometihng like that we would have been SWAT raided long time ago.

    1. Re:IF THEY KNOW ALL THIS THEN WHY .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What better way to spy on them? Take it away and you lose intel.

  23. My name is.... by bobbied · · Score: 2

    Hello "Fellow Jihadi warrior of peace"! My name is Peggy, how can I help you with your terror related problem today?

    In order to better serve your Jihad needs, please make a selection from the following menu of options....

    Press 1 if you would like to suggest an evil plot to frighten the world. (Note, we are not accepting ideas involving Paris at this time due to local personnel availability)

    Press 2 if you need help with communications, configuring computers, finding a place to charge your phone or getting a cell signal.

    Press 3 if you need help with explosive devices, destroying alarm clocks or need to schedule detonation call time.

    Press 4 if you would like to enroll in Obama care, pay your IRS fines, or file your taxes.

    Press 5 if you need help submitting pictures and video (staged or real) of collateral damage to Al Jazeera and other sympathetic media outlets like ABC, CBS or NBC or getting advice on how to artificially inflate casualty counts, civilian deaths or harm to women and children.

    Press 6 if you would like to report a violation of sharia law, including women driving, tight fitting clothes in public, bare ankles, eating during Ramadan or desecration of the holy book by your neighbors.

    Press 7 if you need the locations of your nearest Jihad training/testing facilities, schedule your next jihad certification test session or check on your certification status.

    Press 8 if you need advice on how to avoid Russian, French and other country's activities including bombs, leaflets and laser designators.

    Press 9 if you are a useful idiot, US citizen, or other foreign national who wants to throw their life away on a war that will never be won and save us the trouble of killing you ourselves...

    Press 0 to hear this list again in Arabic, Farsi or Russian.

    Or stay on the line to be connected to your nearest CIA operative acting like an agent of Jihad. Please be prepared with your exact location, including latitude and longitude good to at least 4 decimal places, full name, photo and desired emergency contact for BDA assessment purposes.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  24. So much intel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And yet we still let them do it.

  25. Windows 8, caliph 8 by edittard · · Score: 1

    I suspect they are Microsoft Support.

    It would explain quite a lot.

    --
    At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
  26. How we can ultimately destroy ISIS by kheldan · · Score: 1

    Outsource their technical support line to Comcast. After that their entire operation will grind to a halt in a matter of days.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  27. I don't think we're debating the law here by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    there's plenty of cases where we've run roughshod over the US Constitution in the pursuit of terrorism. The Constitution is, after all, just a piece of paper. And besides I can in both cases say that your right to free speech hasn't been compromised. You're free to talk, but not necessarily to talk in private; especially not about crimes. The 4th doesn't help either since you have to prove "unreasonable". The 5th is useless to. In fact, it's sort of the problem. We can't compel a witness to give encryption keys up, so we use a back door to get at the information. That's perfectly consistent with due process.

    You're not going to get anywhere appealing to the constitution. If you want encryption you're going to have to convince the portion of people who vote that it's in their best interests to have it. Good luck. I mean it.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I don't think we're debating the law here by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Many variables here, including whose context you're speaking from, e.g. the government, the opposition, or others. The classicist view becomes increasingly meaningless, as much is the result of SCOTUS precedent, if/where available.

      With no explicit right to privacy, and the other amendments including the 14th, encryption is vulnerable in terms of mentality. Where a court order exists, and doesn't violate the 5th, I see the mandate to turn over keys. Lacking that, I'm in favor of co--opting memes, like conflating gun rights to privacy rights, as both aren't necessarily explicit, except in the hearts of liberty.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  28. Anonymous by GeekBoy · · Score: 2

    Now, Anonymous should be finding these 5-6 guys, discovering their true identities and sending that information to the CIA while knocking them off the internet and locking them out of their account (while turning over their account credentials to the CIA as well.)

    1. Re:Anonymous by Viewsonic · · Score: 1

      Why get rid of them when they can be a honeypot?

    2. Re:Anonymous by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      Now, Anonymous should be finding these 5-6 guys, discovering their true identities and sending that information to the CIA while knocking them off the internet and locking them out of their account (while turning over their account credentials to the CIA as well.)

      Yes, yes, no, no and yes.

      Finding the accounts is not useful if they can't be monitored and monitoring isn't useful if the supposed ISIS user been locked out of the account.

      Also, there's the question of how sure Anon can be about any given user, not to mention the question of potential for abuse by Anon, anyone claiming to be Anon or the police themselves.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    3. Re:Anonymous by GeekBoy · · Score: 1

      Well it's certainly better than shutting down their twitter accounts..

      My point was more that the CIA/FBI could potentially take over the accounts and impersonate them. If they can't then yes, they should just monitor (which is probably more practical.)

  29. What's their number? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our helpdesk is returning 'your enquiry is in a queue, update in 3 weeks' for encryption enquiries at the moment (actually 'when we get a clue' would be more accurate). I've been wanting to off-shore them for ages...

  30. Hmmz by easyTree · · Score: 1

    I guess the backdoor in Telegraph is well-disguised by now, they're * REALLY * pushing this "terroristssss use this encrypted messaging thingie" agenda ** BIGTIME **

  31. Drug money finances the development of darknets by Macdude · · Score: 2

    As long as drugs remain illegal there are people with deep pockets developing methods to communicate while avoiding police/government interception. These same methods can be used by groups like ISIS.

    Just wanted to throw that out there for people to think about.

    --
    "Grab them by the pussy" -- President of the United States of America
  32. And the problem is that terrorist dont encrypt by DrYak · · Score: 1

    we'll get to hear about how we have to outlaw telling people how to use encryption

    If we're going to have a world where the conversations of private citizens cannot be eavesdropped on then it's a natural by product that criminals and terrorists will also benefit from this.

    And the weirdest part is that, as Schneier has written on his blog ("Paris Terrorists Used Double ROT-13 Encryption"), the terrorists don't even use encryption to begin with.

    It's not a case of secret services complaining "Oh my god, the terrists use unbreakable encryption! And Tor!!! We can't do nuthin' !!"

    It's a case of terrorist operative having such a horrendous track of information security (actually good for us!), that some less stupid guys in ISIS decide that maybe it would be a good idea to give some introduction about encryption and anonymity, lest any operation ends up being followed by more arrests due to clues left. (As was the case in paris last wednesday)

    So apparently terrorists are using *less* encryption than the average citizen (which isn't a big surprise. Bright people aren't very likely to blow themselves up in the name of some random $IDEOLOGY/$DEITY. Thus the average terrorist is rather bright than the average citizen. There might by a couple of brighter bulb among the terrorist, but they are few, and are at the top, far away from actual danger, and profiteering out of the indoctrinated masses)

    Which is good for the rest of us. It's easier to win against stupider opponents.

    And which also means that it's not a solution to ban encryption.

    First and fore most:
    - benefits of encryption and anonymisation (for the average citizen everywhere: protection one's data, avoiding becoming victim of identity theft, industrial spying, etc. for citizen of totalitarian government: better protecting themselves and avoid getting arrested for having said the wrong word at the wrong time)
    far out-weight the draw-backs (a few malevolent individuals might want to use it to hide they nefarious projects).

    And now we see that poor schmucks stupid enough to blow themselves up are also too stupid to even properly use encryption.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  33. Bootmap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is a bootmap?

  34. Anatomy of HATE; by NewYork · · Score: 1

    If you're not from my caste/religion, you're non-human to me; https://wh.gov/iyhMK