Slashdot Mirror


"Credible" Bomb Threat Closes, Evacuates All Los Angeles Public Schools

The Washington Post reports that all Los Angeles public schools have been closed for the day after a "'credible threat' of violence to students at numerous schools in the sprawling district, and a schools official confirmed that it was a bomb threat to the school district." According to the Houston Chronicle, a law enforcement official speaking anonymously with the Associated Press said that the threat "was emailed to a school board member and appeared to come from overseas. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly about the investigation. The official says the threat was sent late Monday. Superintendent Ramon Cortines says the threat was made against students at many of the district's schools." The Los Angeles Unified School District, the second-largest school system in the U.S., is no picnic to close; the New York Times notes that the closure throws into disarray "the lives of millions of Angelenos — students, parents, teachers and other school staff members."

29 of 241 comments (clear)

  1. So vague is has to be true? by s.petry · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not sure how this is being spun where you are, but think for a minute. 650,000 students are being sent home because of a "credible" threat. I might be convinced that a school was threatened, but the complete district of LA is bullsh$*. Someone is attempting to change the definition of the word "credible" here.

    Before you "but the children", give me the percentage of terrorist activities or even bombings where someone gave warning.

    No matter what though, you can bet your ass this will be used as propaganda to argue for more government and more freedom loss to the same.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:So vague is has to be true? by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This isn't the first time it's happened in the last couple of months either. Quebec had 71 schools threatened with bomb threats and shootings in November a few weeks prior to that several schools in Ottawa were threatened as well. It almost seems like someone/group is doing this because they know that people will overreact, and of course if something did happen people would be screaming bloody murder because they didn't overreact.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:So vague is has to be true? by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Before you "but the children", give me the percentage of terrorist activities or even bombings where someone gave warning.

      I can't give you a lot of digits of precision, but here's the number I came up with: more than 0%. The warning is the terrorism. You don't have to murder anyone to be a terrorist (though it sure helps).

      How to be a terrorist: Do something scary, preferably targeting a society of cowards. Did you scare people into overreacting? Yes: mission accomplished, you're a good terrorist. No: You're a bad terrorist, so don't quit your engineering day job.

      They probably didn't scare any students ("yay, day off!") but the parents were hit. As for how successful it was, I'll wait for the media to tell me. Everyone, please remember to FREAK OUT, so that we can guarantee a repeat of this cheap tactic. I know I can count on Republican candidates to join the terrorists on this, but let's all please try to remember to include the progressives too: kids need more days off like this! All that pot isn't going to smoke itself!

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    3. Re:So vague is has to be true? by modecx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just imagine the alternative: You're the superintendent, and it was discovered that your received a somewhat credible threat, after something actually happened--no matter how trifling in the grand scheme. You know full well that you'd be publicly crucified by the entire nation's media, maybe you'd even be inquisitioned by Congress. You'd almost certianly lose your six figure job, and become unemployable to that standard ever again. You probably lose everything you worked your entire life for, and it would probably break up your family as well.

      If you throw up the red flag, none of this happens, except people raise an eyebrow, and some kids get to take the day off, some tax dollars get wasted and the SWAT guys get to go play Rambo in a bunch of empty schools.

      Which path do you chose?

      If I was in his/her shoes, I'd sure as fuck play the CYA card too.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    4. Re:So vague is has to be true? by MikeMo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This. ISIS doesn't phone in warnings, they kill people. If they had a bomb in the schools, they wouldn't say a thing. Now, all they have to do is phone it in from time to time in various states and they've succeeded.

    5. Re: So vague is has to be true? by mwehle · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except that California elected a Republican Arnold as Governor for a spell. Much of Cali's representation is also Republican despite the liberal cities such as San Fran.

      Yes, and before Schwarzenegger in my memory we had Pete Wilson, Deukmejian, and Ronald Reagan as well as Gray Davis and Jerry Brown. In the Senate before Feinstein and Boxer we had Pete Wilson and Hayakawa as well as Cranston. California politics are a mixed bag. The state which launched both Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon on their paths to the White House can hardly be seen as the socialist paradise some provincial thinkers make it out to be.

      --
      Wir sind geboren, um frei zu sein - Rio Reiser
    6. Re: So vague is has to be true? by Talderas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Really, california (and texas.. and new york) should be broken up into smaller states.

      Their population's representation in the Senate and house are grossly smaller than those from many other states.

      The Senate is not there to represent the people. Perhaps you should sue your high school for giving you a piss poor civics education.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    7. Re:So vague is has to be true? by neminem · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If I were an awful terrorist that really wanted to make the whole country go crazy, I'd *absolutely* call in "credible" bomb threats like this. I'd keep doing them randomly until someone told the superintendent that he *cannot* keep closing schools like this, it's making everyones' jobs impossible and losing millions of dollars of taxpayer money.

      *Then* I'd blow up a school.

      Luckily, I'm not a terrorist.

    8. Re:So vague is has to be true? by reboot246 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Because there was a warning and no bombs were found, I suspect that it was a test to see how L.A. would react and what their resources were. The real attack will come without warning.

      The next time might involve bombs designed to go off when the schools are being searched so as to endanger the people looking for them.

      The enemy is not stupid and they know exactly what they're doing; they've had so much experience at spreading terror.

  2. We've seen this before by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Funny

    A threat that led to the closing and search of every public school? They should send some police over to the LA branch of the Federal Reserve, just in case.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  3. Nuttatology 2.0 by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Unfortunately, extremists are learning they can create lots of chaos withOUT the grandiose 9/11-style plans, which often leave too many clues to hide. Many had speculated on this shift before, but it looks like it's now happening.

  4. Terrorists win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An emailed bomb threat from overseas evacuates the entire school district of one of the biggest cities in the United States. When did Americans become such cowards?

    1. Re:Terrorists win by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "An email from a law enforcement member who prefers to remain anonymous" -- this sounds like laundering of spy information in a way suitable for public consumption, which needs a reason, however executive 35,000 foot level.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  5. I wonder by fustakrakich · · Score: 3, Interesting

    During the six years of World War 2 were all the schools in Europe closed down? This is the ultimate in generating as much hysteria as possible. Next is a complete lockdown, anyone seen outside their house will be summarily shot, and as the cliche goes, survivors will be shot again.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:I wonder by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or even Narnia.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  6. Catching Up With Fiction by sehlat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    Wasp is a 1957 science fiction novel by English author Eric Frank Russell. Terry Pratchett (author of the Discworld series of fantasy books) stated that he "can't imagine a funnier terrorists' handbook." Wasp is generally considered Russell's best novel.

    1. Re:Catching Up With Fiction by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Informative

      Book's available for free now...on the phone it goes!

      https://archive.org/details/Ru...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  7. Someone had test today they didn't want to take by JoeyRox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sending in an email is much easier than pulling the fire alarm.

  8. How do we stop it by Ravaldy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Are we overreacting? Has this been happening more since the ISIS scares in Paris?

    Can we stop or control this better?

    I know many call these "isolated incidents" but these incidents still cause major disruptions to the population. This incident alone is probably affecting hundreds of thousands of people if you include students, parents and businesses.

  9. so, great success. by nimbius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After the San Bernadino shooting that killed 14 people, we have shut down more than 900 public schools in the second largest city in america. terrorism isnt about killing people, or maiming them, or destroying property. terrorism is about undermining the authority of a target nations government. Its about making its populus too frightened to send their children to school, too worried to board a plane without massive security theatre, and too scared to accept immigrants into a nation that was founded and championed by immigrants. Today is a dark day not because of lives lost, but because we have effectively agreed to the premise of terrorism.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:so, great success. by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Its about making its populus too frightened to send their children to school, too worried to board a plane without massive security theatre, and too scared to accept immigrants

      One of these is not like the others. Making the populace too frightened to send their kids to school or to board and airplane really undermines the ability of a society to function at a basic level, because education and transportation are critical to a society's continued operation as well as long-term success. Immigration (particularly from middle eastern nations) is NOT necessary for a society's survival or prosperity. You can argue that it enriches a country to some extent, or that it's a humanitarian thing that's good for humanity at large, but how is it necessary for a particular nation? It's not. And it if were, there's no reason that western nations couldn't cut off immigration of middle easterners altogether and then increase the numbers of immigrants it allows from China, India, southeast Asia, eastern Europe, South America, and sub-Saharan Africa. It's not like we desperately need masses of people from the middle east for our nations to function, the way we need schools and travel.

    2. Re:so, great success. by nimbius · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would argue to the contrary as youre assuming a short term definition. While not strictly necesary in the short term, an outright ban on middle eastern nations has a significant long term impact on our ability to understand, react to and interact with these cultures. shunning these immigrants would beget demonizing the region and cultures and, much as demonizing communists/reds/russians in the sixties, would lead to strategic and tactical disadvantages as we supplant knowledge for rhetoric. A prime example lies in the Tupolev bomber, which was consistently outclassing our best range and capability assessments as they were founded on a fundamental predicate of soviet 'inadequacy.' We based much of our political interaction with russians on the rhetoric of politicians and social scientists who, without direct access to a communist russian, simply assumed that due to their atheism they were untrustworthy scoundrels.

      considering society as an organism, diversity in organisms enhances their survival capabilities while enhancing a monoculture causes increased succeptibility to its environment. Becoming less adaptive and diverse would naturally be in a nations least interest.

      --
      Good people go to bed earlier.
  10. The Only Legitimate Reponse by 31415926535897 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I believe the only proper response to this threat is to introduce common sense bomb control legislation.

    1. Re:The Only Legitimate Reponse by The-Ixian · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know that the only way to counter a bad guy with a bomb is to have a good guy with a bomb.

      Obama, quit trying to take away my bombs!

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  11. many many to come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As soon as it is realized by students in our anti-education culture that by bouncing a forged email through the right patch of overseas re-mailer geography, they can enforce a district-wide day off, then these will become a daily and national occurrence. I wonder if this is the kill-button for high-school in the US.

  12. Kids in cold climates get snow days off. by Snufu · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why shouldn't L.A. kids get jihad days off?

  13. The terrorists are winning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Every time I see a fearful reaction like this I think back to what I heard one newscaster said near the end of live broadcasts of 9/11. I can't remember the exact wording of the quote and I haven't been able to find it posted online anywhere, but the meaning of the message is still clear in my mind. He said that the goal of terrorists is to change the lives of the population. To undermine our freedom and our ways of life using fear. Violence, destruction and killing are not the goal but rather just tools to reach their goal via fear. He said that we should not change how we go about our lives due to fear. If we do the terrorists have won.

    Every time I see a reaction such as this I know that we did not take his message to heart. The patriot act, the TSA, mass surveillance, locking down and closing schools, push for increase gun control, freedom-stripping legislation, threats and discrimination against particular races/religions creeping towards the levels of WWII with Jews (and others) by the Nazis and Japanese/Germans/Italians by the US, and so much more. Knee-jerk reactions to everything, and reduction of freedoms throughout all out of fear. If we don't start to realize what is happening and take back our lives then the terrorists have officially won.

    1. Re:The terrorists are winning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Every time I see a fearful reaction like this I think back to what I heard one newscaster said near the end of live broadcasts of 9/11. I can't remember the exact wording of the quote and I haven't been able to find it posted online anywhere, but the meaning of the message is still clear in my mind. He said that the goal of terrorists is to change the lives of the population. To undermine our freedom and our ways of life using fear. Violence, destruction and killing are not the goal but rather just tools to reach their goal via fear. He said that we should not change how we go about our lives due to fear. If we do the terrorists have won.

      Every time I see a reaction such as this I know that we did not take his message to heart. The patriot act, the TSA, mass surveillance, locking down and closing schools, push for increase gun control, freedom-stripping legislation, threats and discrimination against particular races/religions creeping towards the levels of WWII with Jews (and others) by the Nazis and Japanese/Germans/Italians by the US, and so much more. Knee-jerk reactions to everything, and reduction of freedoms throughout all out of fear. If we don't start to realize what is happening and take back our lives then the terrorists have officially won.

      It wasn't just the newscasters who predicted we'd overreact. It was in Bin Laden's playbook. "I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in -- and the West in general -- into an unbearable hell and a choking life." http://edition.cnn.com/2002/US/01/31/gen.binladen.interview/

      The terrorists couldn't take down America. Only we could do that. And we did. Just as he predicted.

  14. Re:Headlines by KlomDark · · Score: 3, Funny

    How?