Slashdot Mirror


Merry Christmas - Be an Erector Engineer!

theodp writes: More than 50 years ago, lucky kids found an Automatic Conveyor Erector Set under the Xmas tree. And while President Obama lamented last year that kids — including his own — were done a disservice by an educational system that failed to introduce computer science concepts 'with the ABCs and the colors', Radio Shack advised 'Parents Who Care' to put a TRS-80 under the tree for their kids to program way back in 1978. So, to bring things up-to-date, what are the hot tech/science gifts that Santa brought children today?

29 of 200 comments (clear)

  1. Snap Circuits by PvtVoid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Snap Circuits. Yeah, baby.

    1. Re: Snap Circuits by gonz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Snap circuits are neat - but I'm not a huge fan. They are generally fairly very "high level, complex" building blocks. Even most of the definitions of what the pins (of the modules) do aren't described, nor referenced in any instructional way.

      I agree 100%. I had exactly the same disappointment when my son started playing with Snap Circuits. It doesn't really try to teach any concepts, and the manual is is written like a boring lab textbook ("OBJECTIVE: To show how a resistor and LED are wired to emit light") and not at all geared towards creativity or exploration.

    2. Re: Snap Circuits by rfengr · · Score: 2

      Well my son does like making the propeller launch into the air.

  2. LittleBits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Considering buying this for my child in the near future.

    http://littlebits.cc/

  3. Do they still have... by NorthWay · · Score: 2

    Can you still get those 501-in-1 electronic kits they used to have? With door bells, radios, and whatnot. Haven't seen ads for anything like that in ages - mail-order catalogs used to carry those, but I guess kids aren't trusted to be thinking for themselves today...

    1. Re:Do they still have... by KGIII · · Score: 2

      http://www.amazon.com/Elenco-5...

      I think I might have to buy one.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  4. Cat got your tongue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Kids want only tablets and phones. Finding a way to program in these electronic devices is almost futile: Lame IDE kits, obsolete and broke ports of languages, webserves that cannot read local files... When I was kid I did carve for a C64 or Apple II, now I my tablets only drops birds and wait to hearts for recharge. Meh.

    And if you didn't got it: WANT KIDS TO BECOME CODERS AND ENGINEERS? PORT THE TOOLS TO ANDROID AND IOS!

  5. Well duh by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

    Well duh, an iPad of course, because downloading and "installing" apps is all that any kid needs to learn these days.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Well duh by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

      My daughter loves ScratchJr on my iPad. And also Monument Valley (check it out)

      Well goody for her, not having to get her hands dirty actually doing something with physical objects (Ewwwwww!)

      Seriously, fuck off. Your whiny response just shows that you AND the daughter you think is yours are both going to grow up to be humorless fucktards with a pedantic streak as wide as Alabama. So please, go play with your new shiny toys and let the rest us of make a fucking joke in peace, you jackoff.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  6. The Dumbing of America by Gim+Tom · · Score: 5, Interesting

    By the time I was five or six I had an electric train set that my Father taught me how to put together and wire up each time I would use it. I wasn't much, if any, older when I had a chemistry set with chemicals in it that would get you on a terrorist watch list if you bought them today. Before I was ten my Father had taught me how to solder and I got a very nice soldering iron when I was ten and used it to assemble my first radio receiver kit. It used vacuum tubes, which took hundreds of volts to work. What would the parent police think or do today to the parents of a ten year old who was given a 300 degree C soldering tool and left alone to use it to build a radio with high voltages. Yes, I also had an Erector set, and toy guns and latter a BB gun and all of the other things that made kids from the 1940's and 1950's into the engineers and scientists that got us to the moon in 1969.

    To learn you have to do and try and sometimes you fail and sometimes things might have some risk but not to try and not to do is a complete dead end for society.

    The most hopeful thing I see on the horizon is the Maker Movement, although I think that sometimes it tends to candy coat real learning. Learning is not always easy or fun but LEARNING that is is almost always worthwhile and enriching is one of the most important lessons anyone can have and the earlier the better.

    1. Re:The Dumbing of America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Toy Train set at 7, along with an Erector Set.
      Getting the two to play well together wasn't easy, and I got more than one pretty cool blood blister by jamming an errant finger into the Erector Gearbox.
      By eight I was getting into Electronics, but with Solid State; a TRF AM receiver using two 2N170s and a 2N107.
      At ten, I built my first Heathkit- a HR10.

      But before putting all that stuff together, I was taking stuff apart, and I think that is what is mostly missing today. Not only the interest in taking stuff apart, but even the possibility. How is a kid going to take an iPad apart, and what then? Aside from the Battery, not much use can be made of the parts inside. (Even after five decades, I still have boxes of really neat Junk in my Garage. Need a 7360 Balanced Modulator Tube? I have several... I made my first Donald Duckifier when I was 13. My own design.)
      At the age of 14, Frank Oppenheimer took an interest in me, and I spent a Summer designing and making things for his new Exploratorium, out of whatever was in the Parts Bins. Gotta fill the Bins. But with what?

      For example, Quadcopters are a good alternative today. They crash regularly, and so repair parts are readily available. Parts that can be re-purposed. Cheap out-of-collimation Binoculars are full of interesting Optics, and Lasers are preposterously cheap compared to the days when we paid _$200_ for a small Ruby rod from Edmund's.
      An old broken down Laser or Dot Matrix Printer is full of Electro-Mechano-Optical goodies. Parts is Parts. Some might call me a Pack-Rat. I prefer "Technology Archaeologist".

      Of course, taking things apart takes some skill, but for every Tamper-Proof Screw, there is an Anti-Tamper-Proof Hammer, and optional accessories. This has been noticed at the National Labs; they often have Disassembly Fairs for Kids, and more than one Adult has been seen taking a Sledge Hammer to something too disinclined to be taken apart. (Wear Eye Protection, a step skipped in earlier decades.)

      We don't need to go back to the "And Easy Hobbi-Games for Little Engineers, complete with Instructions. Oh, easy for Leonardo!" days, (Note the very appropriate quote for Today...), since every sensible Household should be full of broken Stuff, a decent selection of Tools, well laid out Storage, access to the Internet, and at least one mildly destructive Child. (I _hated_ those "300 In 1" Electronics kits. Too limiting, and after a while, I had a _much_ better selection of Parts.)

      Santa was very good to this Little Engineer this Christmas. There were the Useful Presents, a Hawaiian Shirt, (In hideous taste...), a Sailing Jacket, a Waterford Biscuit Jar, an LCD Display Microscope, (I have a fairly well equipped Home Laboratory),... and then there were the Useless Presents- an old European Racing Bicycle with a busted Shifter, a Macbook Air Magsafe Power Supply whose DC Cable the Mice had gotten to, and a Tillerpilot, which acted much like the Wave Stabilizer used on the Queen Mary in that first week of April, 1958, and probably pretty much for the same reason.
      I've already fixed the Magsafe: RG174 Coax; and I'll finish up the rest fairly soon.

    2. Re:The Dumbing of America by Minupla · · Score: 2

      My (Canadian for the record, but who cares) 7 yr old daughter has been soldering since she was 4, was taught by some nice folks at the Defcon Hardware Hacking Village. So there are kids out there doing this stuff still, but it requires a bit more intent on behalf of the parents and the kids, because it is a bit counter culture now.

      It's getting better tho. Groups like the defcon r00tz group, kids-targeting maker groups, etc, are rolling back the crazy a bit. If anyone can tell me where to buy a real chemistry kit, that'd be awesome.

      And yes, she's been burnt by a soldering iron. We didn't sue the folks teaching her, and they pointed out to her they'd done the same thing a bunch of times. No big deal for any of us.

      Min

      --
      On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
  7. Bring back the TRS-80 by randomErr · · Score: 2

    The TRS-80 and similar system have something no other system has:

    * A simple DOS like system (Linux is just a steep learning curve)
    * A solid Basic / JavaScript system at boot up
    * Simple IO communications
    * Easy hardware maintenance
    * Self-contained system

    Raspberry Pi is a step in the right direction but if something goes wrong I can't soldier in a new RAM chip or pull the processor. People really like a simple all-in-one unit. The wide range of choices and lack of uniformity makes it hard design a solid education program.

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    1. Re:Bring back the TRS-80 by aquabat · · Score: 2
      Yeah, DOS was a great thing to learn on because it was simple and useful at the same time.

      tldr: wah, I want the '80s back.

      Say what you want about DOS, but it was simple enough that, as a teenager, I could read the printed OS manual and understand almost everything it could do. It was a great way to graduate from the VIC-20 at home and the TRS-80s at school, into "real" computers, whatever the hell that means. So when someone at University introduced me to Slackware and ftp.cdrom.com back in '95, I was already primed to deal with that particular learning curve.

      I think that simplicity is key to successful skill aquisition. It lets you ramp up the learning curve in bite size chunks. With the VIC, I got to deal with big connectible components, like the Datasette, the RF modulator, power connectors, cartridges, etc. I learned that you have to always turn off and unplug before switching cartridges if you don't want to blow a fuse (ask me how I know this). I also learned how to take apart a VIC-20 and identify, purchase, and change a fuse. And there used to be all kinds of interesting things in Radio Shack to look at, besides all those fuses. Like the Tandy computers at the front of the store, running Shamus. Already having experience with the TRS-80 model 1's and model 3's at my junior high school made me feel like an expert when I sat down at these and played away my after school time. I lusted after these machines, or even just a floppy drive of my own for the VIC, but they were financially unattainable.

      So yeah, simple, but usefulness is also necessary. Turtle Graphics in grade nine was boring as hell, because all you could do with it was move the cursor around on the screen. But with BASIC, you could write an actual game that other people could play. I devoured everything I could find in print on programming BASIC. I got, by specific request, the VIC-20 Programmer's Reference guide for my 13'th birthday (my parents must have thought I was nuts) and the Usborne programming books were solid gold. Again, I think it was important that the programming environment of these computers was simple enough that an interested kid could digest and apply the information available. And there were tons of games for them, so you had examples of what was possible. These systems were more than generic computing tools; they came with really good educational documentation, and there was a significant ecosystem around them geared to that end as well.

      I remember in high school, seeing MS-DOS 5.0 for the first time, and the paradigm shift that happened when I realized that BASIC wasn't the computer, but rather just another program on a disk. It was sort of all there already on the Tandy, but it didn't really click in my head until I experienced that bare command prompt. This is where I found the aforementioned printed DOS manual. I would sneak into the lab after school and mess around with reinstalling DOS on a bare 10MB hard drive (which I didn't know was a thing, before then). God, I loved fdisk, and all those extra flags on the "format" command. So yeah, there was that second paradigm shift, when I grokked that the OS itself was just another program on a disk. The computer was now interconnected component hardware and the BIOS screen. Too cool. I also brought a screwdriver to school and spent an unauthorized weekend locked in the lab, taking apart and reassembling a couple of the computers. Luckily, they never figured out who burned that one motherboard by forgetting to unplug the video cable from the live monitor.

      When I went to University, I was already pretty comfortable with assembling hardware and installing DOS from floppies. Without this, I think linux would have defeated me, or at least taken me more time than I had to spare after classes. A buddy and I spent all night in the Physics Reading Room ftp'ing Slackware onto fifty-seven 1.44Mb floppy disks, and then a couple more nights in his basement installing it onto a partition of his Cyrix 386SLC2 based PC. I remember being blown away on th

      --
      A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
  8. Truly by JustNiz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm also one of us that remember dicking about with electronics and designing/building/programming early computers at home...
    That culture of exploration seems to have died with us.
    I have a 10 year old son. Neither him or any of his friends or school mates are interested in anything that isn't completely pre-packaged, comes with full instructions, and is 100% convenient. If anything requires any creative thinking or even any slight effort on his part, it just gets left unfinished in a drawer.
    Sadly I think thanks to the sick liberal values in society and promoted by mass media, this level of laziness and total absence of scientific curiosity is completely typical of the current generation of at least middle class US kids now, and simple market demand explains the complete lack of electronic sets, chemistry sets etc in toy stores these days.

    1. Re:Truly by kheldan · · Score: 2

      I understand exactly what you're talking about. When I was 15 years old I was designing and building expansions for the CDP1802 microprocessor trainer from the 1976 Popular Electronics article, adding a BASIC interpreter to it, extra RAM, serial interface, and fixing an old Teletype to use as a terminal and data storage device (paper tape). These days the most adventurous ones think that Arduino means they understand electronics, and meanwhile they couldn't build a crystal radio to save their lives because it's not digital -- and they think that anything with analog circuitry is not worth bothering with. Little do they know.. Meanwhile there are more and more so-called 'conveniences', which I see as just serving to make people even lazier than they already are (so-called 'self-driving' cars, for instance) and providing a disincentive to actually learn anything (or retain anything they learn). Instead of being a country full of innovators, we're becoming a 'service economy', and just garden-variety consumers. Seriously, I fear for the future.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    2. Re:Truly by hambone142 · · Score: 2

      We built match rockets. I do agree that video crap has mostly ruined curiosity from children. In my day, "getting bored" actually stimulated creativity. Now it is replaced with meaningless time wasting.

    3. Re:Truly by feufeu · · Score: 2

      Anyone has tried to think why this is so ? My 2 cts FWIW:

      I think that the world today is so much more commercialized than it was when we were kids (I'm born in the early 70's) and the whole show only works with ever expanding market volumes. Which implies that the tinkering kid is not as nearly a good consumer as the one who never gets beyond the next and the next unboxing event of some premade stuff. And some of us are even shareholders of that economy... In short, we all are much more consumers than we were a few decades ago.

      A lot of stuff gets passed down from one generation to another also, which means that my kids would have had a nice collection of Legos even without ever getting a gift on their own. Now add to that what is to be foud under the christmas tree. There's too much stuff around to get bored.

      I try to teach the kids to screw around with stuff, to make them understand that a bicycle from that thrash that we've fixed is so much better than a new one etc. but it's hard when those bloody grandparents come along with yet another gift...

    4. Re:Truly by sjames · · Score: 2

      I actually see some potential with Arduino, but the kids may need to be lead beyond the IDE and the libraries. It actually reminds me a bit of the old days with the C64. It has less RAM, but you have 32K for program memory. Back in the day, if I could have afforded to blow up the C64 and have a new one in days (or on the shelf just in case) I would have done even more with it.

      The datasheet for the 328p is excellent and a careful read shows a good bit of functionality not offered in the Arduino libraries.

      That doesn't get you to analog yet, but it provides a good base to start from. There's a lot of interesting things you can do with it if you add some analog support circuitry.

    5. Re:Truly by bungo · · Score: 2

      Sadly I think thanks to the sick liberal values in society and promoted by mass media

      Maybe.... or maybe it's just your son and his friends.

      My Son 12 yr old asked me for a soldering iron for his birthday. He now tries to fix any electronics that are broken. He pulled apart a Christmas penguin (with internal led lights) and tried to get it working again.

      He took the iron and some other tools to school to show his friends, so his friends have some level of interest as well.

      For Christmas I got him a number of soldering kits from Maker Shed http://www.makershed.com/ , as well as a couple of Arduino boards.

      --
      "The best part? I became an ordained minister while not wearing pants." -- CleverNickName
  9. Re: Up to date? by rfengr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'd up mod you if I had points. I have been an EE for 20 years, and don't think I will steer my kids into it. Same for my wife who is also an engineer. We like our work (the technology), the people we work with, but hate our employer. The keep hammering for more billable hours, cutting benefits, etc. I have about had it. If I didn't have young kids I'd quit tomorrow and try working for myself. Those who clamor for more STEM are not STEM workers.

  10. Bah, humbug... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    As a child I wanted an Erector Set. My parents gave me Lincoln Logs instead. My childhood was ruined.

  11. Hate em by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I dislike snap circuits because the block units tend to roll up too much of the complexity making them more magical and less electrical. I liked my ancient electronics kit that had discrete components with springs that clamped the wires you used to make connections. What was good about that was you could make errors or try shorting things out or removing things and see what changed. Plus they included some fun stuff like high voltage shock circuits you could build.

    Now the thing is I could be wrong about preferring discrete components. These days no one at all builds analoc circuits from scratch. You want a thermometer, well no worries, no need to bias a themistor or measure the voltage on a reversed biased junction. No just buy a thermometer chip with an SPI data bus and connect 3 wires to your arduino. Simple! And absurdly that hideously complex way of making a thermometer turns out to be cheaper and easier than the discrete component approach. No need ot learn any analog electronics.

    SO maybe I'm just old fashioned in liking discrete components. kids won't ever use that stuff, the magic bits will all be rolled up for them into block elements they can snap together on their SPI bus.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  12. Re: Up to date? by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Same here, I've worked in EE for 25 years, as a technician at first. I don't see much of a future for it here in Montreal, I'm lucky I found a job here, it's off the island but at least I'm working in my field. At the same numerical wage as 15 years ago, minus the benefits, and with no vacation time except for the legal minimum. I worked the 24th. All day. I slept the 25th because I also work evenings doing contract work.. so I can make enough money to pay the immoral taxes in Quebec. (I made the mistake of going on unemployment last year, oops, the province considers this a revenue so it wants even more taxes from me.)

    I wonder how the kids at Bombardier feel these days, with their bosses getting welfare to the tune of a billion dollars US yet shipping the jobs to Mexico.

    Sure, just study more... What kind of life is this?

    All I'm doing is running in place to pay taxes with the same salary as 15 years ago.

    --
    Mostly random stuff.
  13. A Progression of Toys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...a progression of professions. Start with an erector set, but mechanical engineers are the lowest paid engineers. Progress to simple electronic kits, but electrical engineering is a dying profession. Get a Raspberry Pi, but all software is now offshored. Sell all those used kits; now, sales is a lasting profession.

  14. Erector is Meccano by tepples · · Score: 2

    Erector, perhaps; what about Meccano?

    Last time I checked (two minutes ago), Erector products were made by Meccano.

  15. Re:Hmm by KGIII · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I read that as Erection Engineer but I'm mildly buzzed from a couple of drinks. That's an unusual state for me. I have an excuse. They are all being a bit loud, getting to know each other, and getting drunk so I have a minute. So, today's novella...

    I had an Erector set, several, as a child. My kids had one too but it was not nearly as much fun to play with but they both have fond memories of it. It's kind of sad for kids these days. I didn't have one but my older brother had a chemistry set that had all sorts of things they'd never even dream of letting a kid have in today's litigious society. It had a variety of acids, all sorts of stuff. I'm pretty sure there was radioactive stuff in there as well but that might have been a different science kit? Maybe Little Joey's First Bomb Making Kit or something? I dunno. It's been a minute since I was that age.

    At any rate... Yeah, some of the toys are kind of cool. We used to buy black powder and use our empty BB gun's CO2 cartridges. We'd fill them up, tamp 'em down, throw in a waterproof fuse, and then cause hate and discontent with various inanimate things. We stomped through the woods with rifles and spent hours shooting cans and other targets. We had chemistry sets and Ka-Bar knives. We had Lincoln Logs. Okay, those were pretty dumb. We had potato guns, paint can dust bombs, machetes, hatchets, saws, gasoline and a book of matches...

    Meh, none of us died or anything and we learned lots of things. Sure, we sometimes got hurt and broke bones skateboarding, fighting, jumping off stuff onto other stuff, etc... But no, we all managed to make it to adults.

    Somewhere, between what I was allowed to do and what kids are allowed to do now - there's gotta be a more interesting and educational way. We learned a lot by having fun. Yes, we got hurt sometimes. Shit happens, you know? I had rifles and pistols at my school - like my own. They stayed in an unlocked cabinet in the office. We had a ski slope too. Hell, we had an ice arena. But we also had an observatory and a lab with things like chemicals with a MSDS and Bunsen burners. We had evaporation hoods and PPE. Nobody died. If someone got hurt, we cleaned up the mess and they went to the hospital - and we didn't get hurt at all in the lab. For few days we all went and got glass blowing lessons in case we were eventually going to need to blow our own glass. (No, I didn't do very well but we all got to blow a beaker and some tubing and some other crap, fucked if I know, I'm not a chemist.)

    We played rugby and basically beat the hell out of each other - it was a good way to get over being pissed at your roommate. We sneaked off into the woods at night and smoked and drank out behind the Away team goal on the soccer field. I should also add that I ended up at this school because a friend of mine and I (we were pretty young) set his dad's garage on fire. So... That turned out better than I expected but that's besides the point. Where was I?

    Oh yeah, it has to suck to not be allowed to do stuff like that now. If you could put it in your mouth, we did. If you could roll in it, we did. If you could take it apart, we did. If it was broken and you wanted it to work, you figured out how to fix it. (That applies to bones, feelings, hearts. and bargains.) We learned stuff, whatever we needed. There was a drive, a need. We don't need to let them learn those things any more. It's like we're afraid to let them learn by making mistakes until they get it right, I guess.

    I dunno if I'm being a crotchety old man or if there's really that much difference. My kids were pretty driven to learn. I hold high standards. They don't have to meet them but I appreciate them trying and will love 'em even when they fuck up. 'Cause ya gotta. You have to fix broken things and if you don't know how then you have to learn.

    And that's kind of where I was going with that. I think. It really must be sad to have a young kid these days unless you can still get away with allowing them to get an education. How do they learn t

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  16. Re: It's different now by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

    Today a raspberry pi would be the modern replacement of a TRS80.

    Not an identical replacement, but as a relatively cheap computer.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  17. LEGO Mindstorms by jonwil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For kids who are into robotics (or parents who want to get their kids interested in robotics) LEGO Mindstorms is a good place to start.

    Its easy to assemble, usable with all the other LEGO bricks out there and easy to program with the LEGO supplied development environment.

    Plus the programmable brick runs Linux under the hood and every single thing running on the brick itself is open source (as far as I know anyway). The brick even has bluetooth for talking to the outside world.