Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Predictions For 2016? (slashdot.org)

An anonymous reader writes: Ok folks, it's been ten years since we've done this. What are your tech/science/nerd/misc predictions for 2016? Is VR going to be the bombshell it's being hyped as? Are wearables going to come into their own? Which tech companies are going to implode, and which are going to blossom? What discoveries are we going to make this year? Will people ever shut up about Donald Trump? Which new movies, books, games, and TV shows are going to be awesome? Which are going to suck? How will our privacy and security erode in 2016? And anything else you'd care to forecast.

42 of 239 comments (clear)

  1. Stealing one from 2006 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm going to steal one from 2006 since it is almost a reality:
      by BCW2 (168187) on Monday December 26, 2005 @11:59PM (#14342970) Journal
    [How about] Flash drives get priced competitivly with hard drives of the same size?

    1. Re:Stealing one from 2006 by greenfruitsalad · · Score: 4, Interesting

      now if we could get rid of fans as well, i'd be happy. i'd like my laptop to have cpu in the screen part so it can use the lid as its heatsink.

    2. Re:Stealing one from 2006 by jones_supa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The low-end Core and Atom series already allow designs without a fan. Also, many modern laptops stop the fan when idle, as the energy efficiency of the mainline chips has gotten so good.

      Your idea of building the CPU board inside the screen part is interesting, manufacturers should experiment with that.

    3. Re:Stealing one from 2006 by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      i'd like my laptop to have cpu in the screen part so it can use the lid as its heatsink.

      The only problem with putting the workings into the screen is that it makes it top-heavy, which changes the balance when hold it. It can be slightly more prone to falling over too, although none of these problems are really horrendous. I guess if you kept the drive and battery in the base it would counter-balance the computer.

      I have an ASUS Transformer Book T100 (which has a detachable screen that can be used as a tablet). The weight problem is not too bad because the entire computer is so light. I do want to try a Surface Book, which also has a detachable screen (and so has to have the CPU in the screen). But it also has an extra battery and graphics processor in the base to give it more grunt when using it in a traditional notebook format. I'm quite keen to see how the balance is with the mix of parts.

    4. Re:Stealing one from 2006 by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      You'll never get rid of the fan in high end laptops. Well, unless radical new tech to deal with thermal efficiency is invented. Since a low end laptop doesn't require much more cpu than today's phones, the fan in those will probably go the way of the dodo.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    5. Re:Stealing one from 2006 by leathered · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I hoped we would be saying goodbye to 1366x768 displays in laptops, but alas, my employer has just handed me a new one with a WXGA screen.

      --
      For all intensive porpoises your a bunch of rediculous loosers
  2. Firefox will continue to lose market share. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think that 2016 will be a disastrous year for Firefox. Thanks to more dumb changes by Mozilla, most of which will be unwanted by Firefox's few remaining users, many of these users will move to Chrome, Edge, Safari, or one of the other browsers out there. Firefox's share of the market, which is only in the high single-digits at this point, will drop below 5%.

    Furthermore, Mozilla supporters will continue to refuse to acknowledge why this massive drop in market share will have happened. Instead of just admitting that Mozilla fucked up and fucked over its users, these Mozilla supporters will use excuses like "Google advertised Chrome a lot" and "it's because of mobile browsers". They still won't realize, or at least admit, what the real problem has been: Mozilla has repeatedly fucked over Firefox's users with one stupid, unwanted and awful change after another!

    Additionally, Servo and Rust won't see much progress in 2016. Rust will continue to spin its wheels as it tries to become as useful as C++14 has been for a few years. Servo might get to the point of providing an IE 7 level of experience, rather than the IE 3 style experience it currently provides. Both will continue to be a waste of resources that could have instead been put toward improving Firefox's performance or fixing many of its longstanding bugs.

    1. Re:Firefox will continue to lose market share. by Blaskowicz · · Score: 2

      2016 may be the year when Electrolysis is enabled by default, I'm not longer weary of it and I'll welcome it.

      See, the masses aren't technical and can't be assed to run a task manager or a "top" window to watch resource use these days. They'll say the computer is slow instead, or put the blame on what they can think of. Electrolysis won't make Firefox use less resources (unless it helps claiming back some when tabs are discarded) but it should help with god awful slowness that semi-randomly happens depending on what is going on, including waiting five seconds for a GUI operation to proceed or major stutter in video (with software decoding at least).

      If you're a technical user you know you can just wait a few seconds and ignore the problem, or know about workarounds if they get really needed like restarting the browser, using a separate instance, opening the video in external software etc.
      The masses of users are less technical than ever and don't want to know about esoteric stuff such as the GUI is waiting for some "lock" to get released.

      And I'm ok with old extensions dying off. I will say : too bad. I have lost one of the most needed one already, Flashblock. Unless it's been maintained/updated again, I don't know. Biggest pain in the ass was losing Windows XP anyway.
      Mozilla is concerned enough with backwards compatibility that this is happening quite slowly. If you're a technical user I guess that for a while you'll be able to do things like disable e10s, get around add-on signing etc. to use some deprecated features or extensions.

    2. Re:Firefox will continue to lose market share. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They should do a WinAMP and go back several versions. Maybe use the Pale Moon code base as a starting point.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  3. I predict we all go to BSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Systemd has spoken, but it's impossible to decode its incoherent message. Perhaps it's saying that it is a perpetual victim of injustice. Then again, it might be babbling that this is the best of all possible worlds and that it is the best of all possible organizations. Let's get down to business: It ought to unstop its ears and uncover its eyes. Only then will systemd hear that to which it has been too long heedless. Only then will it see that when I hear it say that it has an absolute right to be intolerant in the name of tolerance, I have to wonder about it. Is it thoroughly worthless? Is it simply being asinine? Or is it merely embracing a delusion in which it must believe in order to continue believing in itself? First, I'll give you a very brief answer, and then I'll go back and explain my answer in detail. As for the brief answer, while systemd has been beating the drums of opportunism, I've been trying to take the mechanisms, language, ideology, and phraseology for determining what is right and what is wrong out of the hands of systemd and its adherents and put them back in the hands of ordinary people. In doing so, I've learned that in its quest to prevent us from getting in touch with our feelings it has left no destructive scheme unutilized.

    Every time systemd spouts some nonsense about how it's inflexibly honest, thoroughly patriotic, and eminently solicitous to promote, in all proper ways, the public good, the effect is that its apple-polishers become even more loyal to it. Sociologists refer to the phenomenon of increased devotion to a maledicent theory at the very hour of its destruction by external evidence as “cognitive dissonance”. I, for one, call it proof that systemd wants us to feel sorry for the subhuman, mindless skivers who promote the lie of stoicism. I warrant we should instead feel sorry for their victims, all of whom know full well that systemd is trapped in a vicious cycle. The more opposition to its bromides it faces, the more prudish it becomes. The more prudish it becomes, the more opposition to its bromides it faces. I wish I didn't have to be the one to break the news that I pray for the day when those who support those for whom hatred has become a way of life will see what they're doing to the world and to all of its citizens. Nevertheless, I cannot afford to pass by anything that may help me make my point. So let me just state that if we are to provide actionable steps people can take to break the spell of great expectations that now binds poxy bigamists to systemd, then we must be guided by a healthy and progressive ideology, not by the high-handed and pesky ideologies that systemd promotes.

    Epistemic warlordism weakens political determination and gives comfort to anarchism. To overcome this the question of the role played by systemd's faction must be broached directly. Let me suggest we do by examining the way that whenever I hear systemd's dupes witter on about how hanging out with nauseating converts to misoneism is a wonderful, culturally enriching experience, I interpret this poppycock as an implicit request for chemical treatment of their rampant (and generally unacknowledged) Asperger syndrome. The biggest supporters of systemd's unscrupulous, disloyal rantings are snotty charlatans and craven filthy-types. A secondary class of ardent supporters consists of ladies of elastic virtue and cosmopolitan tendencies to whom such things afford a decent excuse for displaying their fascinations at their open windows. Let's just ignore systemd and see what it does.

    In any case, there is something in the way of “natural law” that can be stated awkwardly as follows: “Anyone who was sober for more than an hour or two during the last five years knows that systemd's presumptuous calumnies have been establishing beachheads on paper and celluloid and silicon and everywhere else that presumptuous calumnies can appear.” Please do not quote me on that. Instead, work it into a better natural law and enunciate it in clearer and more concise te

  4. To record predictions, use Predictionbook by JoshuaZ · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://predictionbook.com/ is a website that allows one to record predictions along with a probability estimate for them. Others can then comment and give their own estimates. When a prediction comes due one can then judge it. It also has a nice graph that allows one to then see how accurate one has been (most humans are overconfident). It isn't perfect since for example it doesn't have categories for predictions; it would be nice for example to be able to say look at just one's predictions related to politics, or to the space program or something similar. But overall, I strongly recommend it.

  5. More IPv6 by Tim+the+Gecko · · Score: 4, Interesting

    10% of users accessed Google with IPv6 yesterday: http://www.google.com/intl/en/...

    If you expand out the graph you can see that during the work week there are about 8% of users on IPv6, but at the weekends it increases. There is a two-speed internet, with residential and mobile leading the way, and corporate networks lagging behind.

    Prediction: 14% at weekends next year.

  6. Crypto Wars, take 2 by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The brushfires have been smouldering, but in 2016 both the owners and subjects will organize to oppose each other with fervor. Individuals and companies will begin making news for fleeing repressive regimes to continue their work and these will be regimes that used to claim a penchant for liberty. Other subjects of these regimes will begin to notice and start a three-year cycle that will lead to one extreme or the other.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  7. Rumors of the death of the desktop PC... by The+Real+Dr+John · · Score: 2

    are greatly exaggerated. And Windows 10 will not do nearly as well as it should based on the price (free). Windows 7 will remain above 40% market share of desktop PCs throughout the year.

    --
    A brain is a terrible thing to waste... Mind? That's debatable.
    1. Re:Rumors of the death of the desktop PC... by jones_supa · · Score: 2

      Windows 10 is not free. It's only a free upgrade for users of Windows 7 and 8.

  8. Yet another C Replecement, or two... by Space · · Score: 3, Funny

    I predict that there will be yet another programming language claiming to replace C and we will still be mostly using C in 2026.

    --
    I Don't Work Here
  9. Will people ever shut up about Donald Trump? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's not the right question. The question should be, "Will Donald Trump ever shut up?" And the answer is no. He has no chance of being elected, and he knows that. Who has Donald Trump pissed off? Women? Latinos? I feel discriminated against . . . he hasn't pissed off middle aged white guys . . . yet.

    He is going to find his place sniping at Hilary, when she gets elected: the social gadfly of the opposition. It's a great role to play. A lot of folks really detest Hillary, but she's going to be elected anyway, just because of demographics that favor the Democrats. That will leave a lot of folks looking for a steam valve, to let off some vitriol. The trouble that Hillary will have, is a Republican Congress and Senate. She will have to resort to the "Obama Prerogative" of using Executive Orders, read, "imperial decrees", to circumvent the due process of the creation of laws in the US. Opening the border to Cuba? A good idea, but the way Obama did that was dubious, at best. Congress should have approved.

    Now Obama wants to do another Executive Decree, that affects the Bill of Rights, on gun laws. In international soccer matches, that would get the red card from the referee. What will happen if Hillary decides to issue a decree about the Freedom of Speech? Democrats will close ranks behind her; Trump will honk off.

    Although that sounds a bit pessimistic, I'm thinking that is what 2016 has to offer.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re: Will people ever shut up about Donald Trump? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The best part is that if you listen to what he actually says, the talking heads have deliberately misstated him. Who's paying them is an open question, but my bet is on the people who bought Obama and Hilary.

    2. Re:Will people ever shut up about Donald Trump? by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Quite the opposite, the very fact THAT he is offensive to women, latinos, gays and pretty much everyone but white male protestant voters is his strong suite. Because they are fed up with the whole SJW bullshit, even enough to vote for the hairpiece.

      Just to give you an idea how far that political correctness bullshit has gone.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Will people ever shut up about Donald Trump? by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You don't get it, do you?

      We have arrived at a point where sexism, racism and other -ism are something that reached public awareness. People don't make flippant stereotype jokes anymore. Because people are aware that they are hurtful and that people of that race, gender, orientation, you name it, are hurt by it. That it's not funny but harmful.

      What's left is the assholes that don't give a shit about offending anyone and still tell them.

      The problem now is that for some that ain't enough. They don't want equality, they want preferential treatment. They want to swing that pendulum to the other extreme now. Some professional victims go out of their way to be "offended" by anything anyone says, claiming that "everything is racist/sexist/homophobe" and try to build a power base on it.

      And that's pissing people off. Not because they can't be sexist/racist/homophobe anymore. But because they are neither of those, get accused of it and may even get into trouble for essentially NOTHING, just 'cause some SJW asshole is on a power trip.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Will people ever shut up about Donald Trump? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I predict that the SJW movement will largely die out this year. The MRAs will still be noisy, but after the last year of GanerGate people are aware of what kind of abuse is going on and won't tolerate it any more. More over, a number of programmes aimed at reducing harassment and bigotry, and in getting more diversity in CS/IT will come to fruition and start having a big effect.

      The screams of reverse-isms from the SJWs will become confined to their free screaming echo chambers as most people see then for what they are and stop listening.

      I also predict that this year trans rights will really come to the fore and be considered as important as gay rights, with changes to the law following.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  10. More sinking in Miami by debrain · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People will keep flocking to one of the fastest growing city in the USA, even though it will continue to have increasingly devastating consequences from regular flooding for the population and industry, particularly farming.

    Wall street, on behalf of rich people, will short-sell (via complex derivatives that mask their intent) the Florida property and life insurers, mortgagees, corporations, and property owners.

    Florida will continue to deny the existence of climate change at the popular and official levels.

  11. Same old same old by petes_PoV · · Score: 2
    Internet freedoms will be slightly (more) curtailed
    Linux will push out more fixes and hardware support - but nothing compelling that will be worth an upgrade (unless you like dickin' about with your computers, or need the fixed stuff)
    Windows will continue to be Windows - nothing new there
    There will be more cyber attacks, exploited security holes, scams and cockups
    The Greek economy might finally crash - or it might not.
    Apple will probably release some more stuff. The fans will all tell you they are the best versions ever and worth every penny
    China will make more, faster, better, cheaper stuff then ever before

    Oh yes - and there will be the olympics. But nothing else of any consequence.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  12. prediction: bugs will persist by cellocgw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Completely unable to post from Chrome because slashdot keeps logging me out when I hit "Submit" and won't let me post as AC.

    I just love it when upgrades break things.

    OTOH, if this post from FF fails, it's certainly slashdot's fault

    --
    https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  13. Slashdot will get rid of its broken mod system. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I predict that Slashdot does the right thing in 2016 and ditches its outdated, broken modding system.

    It's a system that made sense in 2002, when even the most boring Slashdot stories routinely got 400+ comments.

    But these days, it's typical to see stories that get less than 100 comments. Even just hitting 50 comments is a real accomplishment.

    The only stories that see more than that today are highly-politicized or controversial topics, where the editors are clearly stirring up pointless discussion (see all of the women-in-tech submissions as examples of this).

    In order to keep this site viable, more good discussion is needed.

    The seeds necessary for good discussion are there. The problem is that the best comments often get modded down before this discussion can start.

    Facing an ever-dwindling number of users, 2016 will be the year that Dice will need to take some real action.

    The first thing to do is to get rid of the moderation system completely. It's old, it's broken, and it doesn't help promote good discussion. It just stifles it nowadays.

    The second thing to do is to display all comments by default. It made sense to hide some comments when there were typically 500+ in each thread of discussion. But now it's typical to only see one or two comments showing by default, with the other 30 comments, most of them very good, not being shown by default!

    The third thing to do is to get rid of the posting limits. Again, these made sense a decade or more ago, when this site actually had a lot of users and got a lot of comments. But now it's just dumb to limit anonymous users to just 10 comments per day, along with the stupid delays imposed between comments. The last thing Slashdot should be doing is impeding the ability of the small number of remaining users to comment!

    By turning Slashdot into a site where discussion can happen freely and without the friction imposed by the current bad moderating and the unnecessary posting limits, it could very well see a revival in 2016.

    No longer would Slashdot be seen as the early-2000s relic that it is currently seen as. Instead, it'd become known as a site for vibrant discussion, without the pathetic don't-offend-anyone wimpiness of places like Reddit and Hacker News.

    Dice, make 2016 the year that these three important things happen:

    1. The moderation system is completely thrown away.
    2. The current posting limits are completely disabled.
    3. Slashdot is turned into a site where discussion is prompted and encouraged, rather than stifled like it currently is.

    Dice, make 2016 the Year of Slashdot!

    1. Re:Slashdot will get rid of its broken mod system. by fustakrakich · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Moderation system is fine. We don't need wild 1000 point swings that will just attract "gang" mods and forum poisoning. The overall stability over the years here is a good thing, and who else has almost 17 years of uncensored archives accessible to all? To all the complainers about this, and unicode, please, don't let the door hit yer ass! Though I will admit, the uniqueness isn't there anymore. Eh, such is life. The pasture here is green enough...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:Slashdot will get rid of its broken mod system. by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      The second thing to do is to display all comments by default.

      At least show them in collapsed mode by default.
      If you get rid of moderation completely, then we'll be inundated by warnings that "Republicans are destroying everything!" and moooo we are all cows.
      It's the best moderation system on the web, but maybe tweak the defaults a bit.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Slashdot will get rid of its broken mod system. by peragrin · · Score: 2

      Correct the mod system is fine but unicode is definitely needed.

      What really gets me is the new website doesn't maintain logins beyond one page click.

      mobile.slashdot.org won't let me stay logged in. overtime I click a link it logs me back out.

      I generally use classic.slashdot.org on mobile devices to maintain a log in but as of this morning that isn't working anymore either. I tried posting this from chrome on android and slashdot would log me out every single time and would refuse to let me log in . however if I opened a new tab and went to slashdot.org I was logged in automatically. This has been an on again off again issue for years. maybe one day they will fix it.

      chrom on OSX , Safari on OSX, Chrome on andriod 6.0, Safari on IOS 9.02 public beta

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    4. Re:Slashdot will get rid of its broken mod system. by EmeraldBot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's purely arbitrary and relative if not malicious as to what's good. Modpoint abuse in downmods with nothing behind them happen here a lot.

      There plenty of us (myself included) who cruise at 0 in order to promote the good stuff, and honestly speaking, most of what's at 0 is pretty crap. The good stuff inevitably rises up to at least 2, and often times to 3+. Adopting your system, there is no way to easily screen out the garbage, since now everybody is at the same level.

      Furthermore, although this isn't a problem for me personally, allowing people to both mod and post simply opens of too much room for abuse. I don't earn that many compared to site owners or people with old accounts, but I posses more than the average Slashdot reader probably has, and I'd have the ability to mod down entire discussions so that my own sits higher. I appreciate the sentiment though - it's always frustrating to be reading to get some background info before forming one's opinion, only to realize the mind has been absentmindedly modding the whole time :-)

      --
      "Set a man a fire, he'll be warm for the rest of the night. Set a man afire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
  14. Prediction by SeriousTube · · Score: 2

    I predict Christmas will come on December 25. I also predict the sun will rise tomorrow morning.

  15. No conspiracy is actually needed in this case. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think you're making up a conspiracy where there really doesn't need to be one.

    He wouldn't have to pay anyone in the "social justice" crowd to act the way that they do. Those in the "social justice" crowed are just naturally deranged, and voluntarily engage in the behavior that they do without requiring any sort of financial compensation or incentive.

    "Social justice" supporters are naturally hypocrites. They're naturally intolerant. They're naturally hateful. They're naturally bullies. That's why they're drawn to the "social justice" movement in the first place: it embodies everything that they naturally want to do. But best of all, it deludes them into thinking they're doing something "good", rather than having to admit their true awful nature.

    Their anti-white, anti-heterosexual, anti-male agenda promotes the very things that they claim to stand against: racism, discrimination based on sexual orientation, and discrimination based on gender.

    It does not help that they also pardon and encourage illegal activities, such as foreigners crossing the border illegally, "disadvantaged youth" attacking police officers, and the riots that these "disadvantaged youth" engage in in order to steal the latest Nike shoes.

    Maybe Trump is benefiting from the divisive environment that the "social justice" crowd has naturally created. But I really doubt he has to waste his money on these people. Their natural actions will benefit him more than anything he could ever hope to organize.

    It's much like what we've seen in the open source community with systemd. The people who support systemd have, perhaps unintentionally, done more to harm the viability of Linux, especially when used on servers, than Microsoft, or SCO, or Apple, or any other organization could ever have hoped to do. A community that is naturally rotting from the inside out can be exploited much more effectively than one that's being actively manipulated.

    1. Re:No conspiracy is actually needed in this case. by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

      You left out the ones milking it for money ... :-(

      Anita Sarkeesian and Brianna Wu and Zoe Quinn would never do something like that! (Unless it made them a shitload of money, which seems to be exactly the case.)

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    2. Re:No conspiracy is actually needed in this case. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Informative
      Brianna Wu's Patreon page is ... well, I'll let some quotes explain how stupid it is. Starting right at the top of the page in really big text:

      Brianna Wu is creating Videogames
      I'm the Godzilla of Feminists.

      and

      None of this has anything to do with videogames. But it's what I waste the majority of my time doing.
      I have to be honest, I need some help or I'm not going to last. If I quit, that would signal a victory to those harrasing (sic) me. If you want me here, working to hold the people that break laws accountable, I need help. I have got to get back to making games

      Really? "working to hold the people that break laws accountable'??? And then immediately after - "I need help. I have to get back to making games."??? The only thing in that sentence that makes any sense is "I need help."

      I mean, really. Claiming to be the one holding off the barbarians at the gate, and asking money so you can both do that and make games?

      And just what are the "barbarians" doing?

      have a well-known stalker that posts disturbing levels of information about my house, my car, my pets, my neighborhood. So, I waste hours documenting this for law enforcement. Later, this person emails me to say he's gone through my husband's blog and has more private information from there.

      In other words, someone has gone on the net and found readily searchable public information. You run a business, your name and business address are public information. So, run it out of your home, that's the address they'll find. Ditto for the neighborhood. Google Street view, etc. As for the car and pets, really? That's threatening? And if they've gone through your husbands' blog, it's not private information. Get over yourself.

      And the final ask is just as lame as the rest:

      Here's where you come in: If you appreciate what I do, please chip in so I can hire some help with the Women in Tech advocacy I do. I need someone to help me with the medial parts of dealing with my attackers so I can focus on my work, making and shipping games. I imagine we'll also have them work on women in tech advocacy.

      Why not just come out and admit you like being a professional victim more than the game industry, and be done with it?

      Oops, almost forgot this quote from the left sidebar:

      "I'm Brianna Wu and I'm Risking my Life Standing up to Gamergate"

      No, you're not. Cut the melodrama, it's not working any more. Gamergate is ancient news that pretty much everyone else has put behind them, in part because of crazy people like you, Wu.

      And to those reading this, don't bother to click on the "creator posts" link - it's a lame attempt to get some google juice by posting the exact same crap 5x.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    3. Re:No conspiracy is actually needed in this case. by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

      In a word, "exactly".

      These people are professional victims. Anita Sarkeesian was one of the trailblazers in this field, turning her "harassment" into dollars and producing almost nothing in return. Brianna Wu is a duplicitous con artist without a shred of talent in her body.

      All these people make me want to vomit. The harm they do promoting their bullshit about "safe spaces" and "micro-aggressions" and "cultural appropriation" have turned an entire generation of young people into the most pathetic wussies and whiners and special snowflakes ever seen in the history of the planet.

      At 18, our fathers and grandfathers were jumping out of troop ships while being shot at and shelled with mortars. These entitled little fucktarts can't even read Romeo and Juliet without having a breakdown. They can't listen to opposing opinions without being "triggered". If they have a moment of doubt about anything, it's an "identity crisis" and they'll cry if you don't respect their personal set of oddball pronouns (shiz, shim, shey, etc etc). They're all demi-semi-queerplatonic-fat-free-otherkin-fictives with multiple-system headmates. AND THEY BELIEVE THIS SHIT.

      Fuck these little losers. I can't wait to see them enter the job market and be chewed up and spit out like old gum. In a way I'm actually glad they're such hopeless losers because they're competing for jobs against people like my son, who will wipe the fucking floor with them.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  16. Don't worry about tomorrow by JBMcB · · Score: 2

    Worry about today. After today, you can worry about tomorrow.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
  17. Bitcoin will continue to Grow by codebonobo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While Bitcoin had a great year in most metrics of 2015( https://blog.coinbase.com/2015... ), expect even more rapid growth in 2016 when years of development and investment compound with another disinflationary bubble driving media and user interest. Several more bitcoin "killer-apps" (I.E.. https://openbazaar.org/ ) will come online while banks continue to poor money into block chain development to play catch-up. Crypto-currency developers will be the biggest winners as more fintech VC money pours into innovative startups and "blockchain" consultants.

    Banking alts will begin to roll out in late 2016 with some eventually becoming massive failures and some private blockchains winning out providing slight benefits from removing some interbank inefficiencies. Both bank alts/tokens and bitcoin will coexist and serve different purposes as the key benefits to bitcoin will never be replicated by the banks: immutability, privacy and security with no KYC, sovereignty, open source and decentralized allowing limitless innovation and ability to onramp billions of unbanked and underbanked.

  18. Trump could be elected today by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 3, Informative

    He has no chance of being elected, and he knows that.

    Reality disagrees... but please, keep saying stuff about Trump. It only helps.

    I am aware that polls this early are largely meaningless, but let's look at some numbers outside of context.

    He's got about 40% of the Republican vote at the moment. Let's assume that figure holds across the party so that, for example, if Cruz bows out 40% of those supporters move to Trump. That gives him 40% + (40% x 60%) = 64% of the Republican vote, using back-of-the-envelope estimates.

    No one bothered to check with Democratic voters until recently, but Trump has stronger support from Democrats than he does from Republicans!

    Astonishing!

    If *those* numbers are accurate, he could get elected right now.

    And all of this is ignoring any context. For example:

    a) The investigation into Hillary could conclude, bringing charges against her
    b) Hillary could have a medical issue (campaigning is stressful, she's had medical problems, Trump hasn't)
    c) US could have another domestic terrorist attack
    d) Trump has not made campaign ads - he's spent about a million, compared to Jeb's 32 million.

    And finally, Trump will get elected simply because no one opposes his position in any rational way - it's all namecalling and derision.

    Don't believe me? Find a rational argument as to why a temporary ban on Muslims entering the country isn't a common-sense response to an immediate threat.

    You can't do it. The only response, so far as I can find, is to cast aspersions on the person asking that question. Terms like bigot, predjudiced, racist, and extremist are used. Also outright lies such as "it's unconstitutional" (no, it's not), "it's impossible to tell who's a Muslim" (no, it's not), "that's not what America is about" (we've done it before), and so on.

    Then tell me why enforcing immigration law is a bad move (instead of amnesty, which is what the administration was quietly floating), why simplifying the tax code is a bad move, why having strong treaty negotiation is a bad move, and why replacing Obamacare with something better would be a bad move.

    As near as I can tell, early November was the tipping point where you could have stopped Donald Trump. Someone could have stepped up and addressed his policies, and in that act presented as a strong leader. By now it's probably too late.

    Oh, and let's not forget that the lead Democratic candidate has accomplished nothing in her career, and the democratic runner-up is a Socialist. A SOCIALIST!

    Please.

    Donald may not win the election, but saying he has no chance is entirely without merit.

  19. Cannonical syllogistic file systems are the wave by goombah99 · · Score: 2

    If you have never experienced the systemD reintegration you can see it synergizes the kernel calls. The benefits of this simple schema can be difficult to believe. The future will be a transformative refining of insight. Eons from now, we adventurers will live like never before as we are reborn by the grid. We must change ourselves and empower others.

    Your system resources may be ruled by greedy algorithms without realizing it. Do not let it sabotage the self-healing disk fragmentation. You must take a stand against selfishness. We can no longer afford to live with plural arbitration. The new paridigm of digital auto-transcendence is now happening worldwide. It is in refining that we are re-energized. Imagine a refining of what could be.

    The galaxy is approaching a tipping point. We are being called to explore the cosmos itself as an interface between complexity and being. Soon there will be a redefining of knowledge the likes of which the planet has never seen.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  20. Slashdot will support Unicode and https by sciengin · · Score: 2

    And then the healing can begin. Nah, just kidding, that would be completely crazy. Instead I predict more slashvertisement, more videos, and even less quality in editing the stories. Oh and more Social Justice Warrior nonsense and Nerdbashing.

  21. Someone will, without thinking, say something by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... that could be construed a bigoted, sexist or unpatriotic. It will go viral, and a flame war will rage across social media in which the public shamers and defenders will vie to twist the narrative of what was in fact a moment of misspeaking into proof that their respective world views are, not only right, but the only conscionable viewpoint to have.

    And, even knowing in advance fully how futile and unsatisfying it will be, you won't be able to resist weighing in with what seems to you to be a reasonable and nuanced take on the matter. This will not be perceived by anyone as reasonable and nuanced. Then, like a gambler vainly trying to win back his stake, your participation in the controversy will grow in proportion to your dissatisfaction with it.

    An when it is all over a few weeks later it will all happen again.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  22. Meg and Marissa will be gone by hambone142 · · Score: 2

    I predict Meg Whitman and Marissa Mayer will both proclaim their "success" in destroying H.P. and Yahoo and will depart to "spend more time with their families".

    Both ships are about to sink and they can save face by departing in the near future.

  23. Unemployment, Automation, Civil unrest... by MindPrison · · Score: 2

    ...are amongst a lot of those things we'll see in 2016, hardly a new theme from 2015, but there's light at the end of the tunnel and here's my predictions for 2016:

    As you may be aware of - it's becoming increasingly hard to get a steady job to hold on to and plan a future, the big companies want young and fresh minds to form and take advantage of while they're willing and ready and the older generation will have to start their own businesses in order to keep their capital flow coming. The most important thing will be - change. People must be willing to do other things than what they're currently used to, because things will indeed change, slowly over the year 2016 - 17 - 18 - 19 etc... you catch the drift, we will be moving towards the moneyless society.

    During that transaction of time - we will experience increased civil unrest, increased dismay with our government, leaders, politicians, employers etc. since our way of life as we know it is threatened with lay-offs, unpaid overtime, smaller salary, increased immigration and heavy outsourcing. This is not easy to handle for anyone of us, but it's a thing we've gotta get through somehow, and the only way to do this - is to stay cold and level headed and make sure we're a PART of the future instead of just complaining about it. You don't want to miss the bandwagon when you in reality can take advantages of the change instead of being the one screwed over.

    We will notice an increase in social welfare recipients, joblessness, and a transition towards online entertainment instead of manual manufacturing, albeit that part will be outsourced so you may want to re educate yourself into something dealing with design, media, film, online communication, fitness and personal health - as these areas will most likely see an incredible increase.

    Good future job perspectives will be in: Automation, Web Shops, Online shopping, Online Entertainment, Programming (Improving algorithms for saving space/data/bandwidth etc. will be in HIGH demand) Game developers, Graphics artists will be sought after so don't sell yourselves short by working for free (these has been outsourced with BAD results earlier, so this area will be especially lucrative). Due to heavy world immigration people working within Medicine (Doctors, surgeons, dentists etc.) will be in HIGH demand anywhere and you'll pretty much be able to set your own salary. As the population becomes more passive, on welfare/being more online during this transition to the moneyless society - we will also notice an increased need for personal health so if you're into fitness - start your own GYMs now, you'll bloom before you know what to do with your success.

    Due to increased online production, film, media, entertainment etc. an increased need for the worlds most hated people (lawyers) will be a fact soon, because you'll need to protect that intellectual property (you and I may disagree here, I'm more for Open Source myself) but what you and I think isn't always what will happen, so ....I think we're gonna see a huge increase in companies hiring lawyers just to survive out there.

    Due to increased immigration, it might be wise to invest heavily in property - the gov. will usually pay overprice for rent/property-lease/welfare/daycare/schooling accommodations for immigrants (this is happening BIG TIME in Sweden right now, and we're literally experiencing newcomers to the property market literally raking it in just because of this). Unfortunately they're also amateurs so the market will suffer greatly from this as well, so beware! You may even want to consider a career as an interpretor as these will be in HIGH DEMAND shortly.

    Retro trend: We're experiencing the boomers are getting middle aged, so they want to relive their childhood - expect a HIGH demand for old used tech, especially video games from the late 70s to the early 80s, a huge comeback for Pinball machines & old arcades.

    New Tech: Expect flat screen TV's to set a record low price-tag i

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.