Slashdot Mirror


Filmmaker Forces Censors To Watch 10-Hour Movie of Paint Drying (ibtimes.co.uk)

An anonymous reader writes: A British filmmaker has forced the people who decide how to censor films to watch a 10-hour movie of paint drying on a wall following a protest fundraising campaign. Charlie Lyne launched a Kickstarter to help raise the money needed to send his 'documentary' of a single shot of paint drying on a wall for consideration as a protest against the 'stronghold' the organisation has on the British film industry. The BBFC charge an initial fee of $144.88 to view a film and decide what certificate to give it, and then and additional $10.15 for each minute that the film lasts. The idea was the more money Lyne could raise via his fundraiser, the longer his paint-drying film could last. The campaign eventually nearly £8,500, meaning he was able to send in a 607 minute video which the examiners had to watch in its entirety.

29 of 255 comments (clear)

  1. Pounds or dollars by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pick a damn unit of currency and stick to it!

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    1. Re: Pounds or dollars by denzacar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Put some "obscene" and "violent" elements throughout the movie but keep it just within the allowed parameters.
      For bonus points, put some of them in audio only (a "fuck" every few hours should do), while others are single frame images.

      Then either call them out on not doing their work or have them stare at paint drying for 10 hours.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    2. Re:Pounds or dollars by CeasedCaring · · Score: 2

      From TFA:- "the campaign raised £5,936" = approx $8500, so the summary used the right number, but the wrong currency symbol.

    3. Re: Pounds or dollars by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Excellent idea! Personally, I would have tossed in a rickroll somewhere towards the end while I was at it.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    4. Re:Pounds or dollars by wardrich86 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sure thing champ!

      Initial Fee: 3235532.60 Vietnamese Dong
      Fee per minute: 226674.88 Vietnamese Dong
      Campaign raised: 272438646.75 Vietnamese Dong

      All in all, that's a lot of dong!

    5. Re: Pounds or dollars by toonces33 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You would want to have a really dry audio track - perhaps a computer voice reading some long novel - say "Moby Dick". If the computer mispronounces some words, it wouldn't be a big deal. Except that you would slip in some swearing in the middle somewhere - spoken by the same monotone computer voice in the same speaking pattern as the rest of it.

      An alternative would be to have the soundtrack be 10 hours of a crying baby (undoubtedly a much shorter clip in a loop). Which for most people would be torture to listen to. But in the middle of it you could have an adult come in and swear at the baby.

    6. Re: Pounds or dollars by TheCarp · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Every 3 minutes, have someone walk out with a stack of cards with pictures on them, and quickly flip through the pictures fast enough that they will certainly have to pause and rewind a whole bunch of times.

      Make sure to randomize the number of cards, contents of the cards, and interval between showings. Make sure lots of them contain pictures of people in skimpy clothing or body suits. Include pictures of scantily dressed hairy men.

      For maximum effect, each card should have 4 pictures on it, and be shown for less than 2 seconds max. Better yet, change the speed of flips with pauses of up to 5 or 6 seconds on one card, then flip rapidly through 5 or 6 cards....repeat.

      Then, copy the whole film, and spice the whole copy on the end, backwards.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    7. Re: Pounds or dollars by ChrisMaple · · Score: 2

      Swapping out is no good. The obscenity is evident only in full context.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    8. Re: Pounds or dollars by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yet, watching paint dry still better than some of the shit movies those people have to watch. Shit, I could imagine a month into that job wanting to tear my eyes out and run screaming from the room bumping into walls and furniture on the way out. Could you imagine having to watch shitty movie, after shitty movie day in and day out. Watching paint dry would be a relief, guy in question is an idiot. Honestly If I were them I would be begging for more paint drying movies, the peace of serenity of that, after week after week of watching more often than not self indulgent shit, would be an enormous relief. I would send the guy a thank you with a request for more, perhaps grass growing, or clouds moving across the sky or water dripping into a barrel anything but another shit Hollywood reboot, oh the humanity.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  2. An Oscar in the works? by OakDragon · · Score: 5, Funny

    It will probably sweep the Oscars... as long as it's white or beige paint.

    1. Re:An Oscar in the works? by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 5, Funny

      #Blackpaintsmatter

    2. Re:An Oscar in the works? by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      .. as long as it's white or beige paint.

      I wonder, is it entirely possible, that there was no racial bias...that all the movies selected actually WERE thought to be better than the movies not selected....

      Or, is it that today, if you have a group of movies made by minorities and non-minorities, you cannot, by merit alone have only consideration of the non-minority movies and categories.

      Do we now have to have a quota of minority movies and actors considered just to have diversity regardless of merit?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:An Oscar in the works? by drew_kime · · Score: 2

      You can see a screencap and a preview on the page. I'm not sure which is which.

      AC wins the internet for today.

      --
      Nope, no sig
    4. Re:An Oscar in the works? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Paintist!

    5. Re:An Oscar in the works? by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's possible that subtle racism is at work here (this year and last year); however, over the last 20 years, black actors and actresses have won 12.5% of Oscars, which actually does match pretty closely to demographics (~13% of the US is black). Since 2000, 80 actors have been nominated for best actor, and 10 have been black. Again, this matches demographics closely.

      According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, in the field of "Arts, design, entertainment, sports, and media occupations", 6.5% of workers are black (unfortunately, "actors" isn't split off by itself, as there aren't enough of them for the BLS to keep track separately). Since there are 20 actors nominated each year, you'd expect them to have 1.3 people nominated. Two years in a row of not having anyone nominated isn't that far off, and historically they're pretty much exactly tracking population demographics (which means that blacks, who are underrepresented in acting by population demographics, are actually slightly overrepresented in awards). If it happens again next year, then that might be evidence of racism, but so far it's not necessarily racism, although I'm not ruling it out.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    6. Re:An Oscar in the works? by dwywit · · Score: 2

      #Whatsamatteryou

      #gottanorespect

      #whattathinkayoudo

      #whyyoulookasosad

      #itsanotsobad

      #itsaniceaplace

      #ahshutuppayourface

      Hell, play that as the soundtrack. Over and over.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
  3. Censors must have been delighted by ickleberry · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No hard decisions, even if they had to 'watch' it they could just sit around chatting with coffee. It is a nice idea to DoS the censor's office but this method that involves horsing 8,500 quid straight into their pockets is not the way to do it

    1. Re:Censors must have been delighted by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Someone either has to prove it, or live with being wrong ...

      So if I gave you 9.75 hours of paint drying, and 15 minutes of hardcore porn, and you give me a rating which says "anybody can watch this", then it's your ass on the line when someone discovers the 15 minutes you missed.

      I'm just going to say "this is what I submitted, if they didn't look at it, I can't be blamed for that".

      I'm pretty sure those people pretty much have to watch everything, or it's them who gets in trouble for having missed something.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  4. They never knew by mdsolar · · Score: 5, Funny

    They were watching the inverse Laplace Transform of subliminal porn.

  5. Re:Dying of suspense... by bfpierce · · Score: 5, Informative

    "The BBFC confirmed it had awarded the movie a U certificate along with a note warning that the description of the film "may contain spoilers". It also read: "Paint Drying is a film showing paint drying on a wall. It contains no material likely to offend or harm.""

    From the TFA. I thought the response was pretty good.

  6. So the protest... by Junta · · Score: 4, Funny

    Was to give them 8,500 pounds to have them claim to watch the whole thing? Even if I didn't fast forward, that's still pretty good for 10 hours of work.

    I wish someone would protest me that nicely. I'd really learn something. Feel free to repeatedly protest me.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  7. Gotta say it by dargndorp · · Score: 5, Funny

    Still a better love story than Twilight.

    1. Re:Gotta say it by sacdelta · · Score: 2

      Of course it is. A 10 hour epic about the slow development of a lasting bond.

      I'm looking forward to the sequel set 10 years later when after years of having the world eat away at that bond, the wall replaces the paint for a newer version.

      --

      Brought to you by: "Al"toids - the curiously weird mint.

  8. Re:Dying of suspense... by Dragonslicer · · Score: 4, Funny

    They could have turned it into an M. Night Shyamalan movie:

    What if the paint never dries???

    What if it turns out that the paint is really aliens from the future???

  9. Re:Fast forward by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can't truly appreciate the nuance of paint drying without watching it in real time, everything else is just being a poseur to impress your art-house friends ... but they'll know you just fast forwarded ... they'll know, man.

    The heart-wrenching existential agony at 3h52 minutes when the paint crinkles like an adolescent nipple blown with soft, warm breath for the first time can't be fully appreciated in anything but real time.

    The suggestion of human suffering at 5h57 when a small droplet forms is utterly lost in anything but real time.

    The utter elation at 9:37 when you realize, finally, we are reaching denouement and resolution can't simply be watched on fast forward.

    You lose all of the majesty and vocabulary as envisioned by the film maker in his Neitzchean expression of the inhumanity of paint as a metaphor for moving past obstacles, and stepping over the carcasses of ones foes.

    Of course it needs to be watched in real time.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  10. Re:Tamper-proofing by theIsovist · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My friend used to do this job for Turner networks. His job was to watch content set to air in foreign countries and document every moment that needed to be flagged due to censorship concerns. "At 0:52:13, use of the word 'fuck.' At 0:55:43, exposed nipple..." If he ever missed anything, he would have been fired, so he had to watch every second of the film. If he became distracted, he would have to rewind. Apparently he loved this job. It sounded miserable to me.

  11. Re:Fast forward by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

    As someone pointed out, he could have spliced in non-G-rating audio at a certain point. For example, at 5 hours and 47 minutes, a single curse word might be uttered. Then, at 7 hours and 23.5 minutes, perhaps he'd have XXX-rated audio play for 3 seconds.

    If the censors still give the movie a G rating, then it's obvious that they didn't watch it all (either fast-forwarding through it or watching the first few hours and then stopping).

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  12. Re:Dying of suspense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They're British. It's almost a foregone conclusion.

  13. At like the 400 minute mark... by JargonScott · · Score: 2

    They should have blasted out the Inception sound.

    BWWWWOOONNNNGGGGGGG!!!!!!!!

    Then everyone shits their pants and has to sit there for the remaining 200 minutes.

    --
    Nuke Gay Whales for Jesus.