Slashdot Mirror


How Uber Profits Even When Its Drivers Aren't Earning Money (vice.com)

tedlistens writes: Jay Cassano spoke to Uber drivers about "dead miles" and what work means when your boss is an algorithm, and considers a new frontier of labor concerns and big data. "Uber is the closest thing to an employer we've ever seen in this industry," Bhairavi Desai, founder of the New York Taxi Workers Alliance, told him. "They not only direct every aspect of a driver's workday, they also profit off the entire day through data collection, not just the 'sale of a product.'"

180 comments

  1. New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's see. An organization with a vested interest in perpetuating the Taxi industry's grip and pricing doesn't like something about Uber and it's ilk. I think there's a picture of Captain Picard captioned "I've just shat myself with surprise!".

    Fuck cabbies. Fuck cab owners. Let 'em all starve like buggy whip manufacturers. Price gouging, monopoly having, tourist and local abusing, talking to their overseas family on the phone motherfuckers.

    I don't give a single shit about your labor concerns. You screwed yourself out of that with your attitude, your work ethic, and your lies. Fuck off and die already.

    --
    "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    1. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I 100% agree. Uber is optional for drivers and passengers. Taxi service is terrible. Taxis are dirty and old and frequently rip you off if you don't know where you are going. Uber doesn't have this problem. Ever seen a dirty Uber car? I don't even use Uber, but I have no love for the taxi "alliances".

    2. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > Ever seen a dirty Uber car? I don't even use Uber,

      Solid reasoning.

    3. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Complain to your municipal government. Taxis here are clean, the drivers have to conform to a dress code and a service code, and there are dedicated inspectors to make sure that standards have to be maintained. When a taxi enters service, it cannot be more than 5 years old, and has to be retired when it it 10 years old, no matter if it's still in great condition. Rusty cars aren't allowed. Heck, there's even one cab driver driving a tesla because the extra initial cost is offset by the lower running costs.

      If taxi drivers are expected to live up to professional standards, they'll actually behave like professionals, which is good for everybody. When you get a company that just reinforces the race to the bottom, all you're going to get is bottom-feeders.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    4. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 3, Funny

      The taxi industry in South Florida has (or had) the municipal government in it's back pocket. They tried to shut down Uber, etc, until it became clear that everyone knew that the commission was being bribed, and that federal investigations were incoming unless they started representing the will of the people and not the will of Yellow Cab (Jessie Gaddis, here).

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    5. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Every cab I've ever been in has been a good experience for me. I just can't imagine myself getting into a stranger's car. I'll take a taxi over Uber any day of the week.

    6. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by DarkSabreLord · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Complain to your municipal government.

      This is really going to depend on where you live - around here, lobbying groups for taxi companies and their drivers forestalled any attempts at legislated change for over a decade before Uber stepped in, quickly picking up market share due to its reliability. It used to be that even if you called to schedule a pickup (in an hour!) there was only a 30-40% chance a taxi would actually show up. I remember the days of being unable to get home via taxi at night without offering a 100% tip in advance all too vividly and have no desire whatsoever to return to that.

      I'm not saying Uber is the best answer here - clearly, the new model comes with its own share of problems - but the previous monopoly (taxis) really screwed themselves out of a future with their own behavior. There was a hotline to call to report problems, but absolutely zero accountability for the drivers at the end of the day. The situation has since improved, but generally falls along the lines of 'too little, too late'.

    7. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by known_coward_69 · · Score: 1

      NYC a lot of the cabs are decades old, dirty, worn out and the drivers drive like murderous assholes cutting everyone off and hitting pedestrians when they are looking for a fare. most of them don't want to take you outside of manhattan or even to far away parts of manhattan

    8. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's means it is

    9. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's means it is.

    10. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you prefer the local government continue to operate their taxi monopoly? I'd rather rely on other riders' experience. Just a hunch but I suspect government employees are just not as efficient or even very useful overseers. The customer is far more reliable.

      In my area the taxi infrastructure is rigged to raise the barrier to entry by limiting the number of vehicle licenses and also keeping ownership fees out of reach for the majority of drivers.

    11. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just a hunch but I suspect government employees are just not as efficient or even very useful overseers. The customer is far more reliable.

      Then you don't have a democratic government. Sticking another band-aid over this problem won't fix it.

    12. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If medallion taxi companies tracked their drivers, they could collect the same data, and drivers could make the same pitch for getting paid something for the data they are generating. But tracking would also reveal those roundabout routes cabdrivers like to use on newbie passengers, so I'm betting the union would nix it.

    13. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) "its". I've seen this mistake in your posts before. It's not that hard.

      2) Every time the buggy whip analogy comes out, I can't help guessing the writer as having studied no economics beyond freshman Econ 101 at a liberal arts school and sexually identifying as an Internet Libertarian. You might as well argue that Scientology is better than Roman Catholicism because it's newer.

      3) You sound the kind of person who grew up next to a bad black neighbourhood and spends his adult life condemning "niggers" across the world. I'm not sure what fault in a person's brain makes such gross generalisations from limited experiences.

      4) When someone's argument includes an I-don't-give-a-shit-about-you, you know it's not worth engaging too long with them, as they're essentially admitting that they have no interest in benefitting you, and that you're probably going to be worse off if you listen to what they have to say. If you honestly believed your crap about all non-Uber taxi services (Uber's just a competing taxi service, remember), a beneficial response would be to explain to drivers why it's in their interest to modify their behaviours, not to tell them that you "don't give a single shit" about them.

    14. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by dbIII · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, but on the other side of the coin it's the old story of piecework with a race to the bottom plus deliberate criminal action even if the laws broken are unfair. It's like bringing a little bit of the third world home or digging up a 19th century robber baron.
      There is nobody to cheer for in this situation. Unfair monopoly versus a new player that wants to take over the unfair monopoly and move a lot of cost onto their employees. The lie of "ride sharing" as a smokescreen is an especially blatant lie and is being used as a pretended point of difference to get around laws protecting the current local monopolies.

    15. Re: New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Democracy has nothing to do with it. Three bureaucrats simply cannot have as much information on a driver or a car as three thousand riders.

      That's the information theory side of politics, not the polisci side. (Not that bureaucrats are elected anyway.)

      The taxi industry is the case study for corruption under government monopoly grants. There may be an exception that proves the rule, but in nearly every case, having actual humans involved screws up the ideal theory.

      Meanwhile a simple automatic booking, rating, and paying system solves the base problem far more effectively, incentivizes actual humans to behave, and even addresses outstanding problems, like cabbie safety, for the first time.

      As usual, the rational, economics-based solution far outperforms the strictly emotional (political) approach.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    16. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by cheater512 · · Score: 0

      Erm...if a taxi driver can afford a Tesla for his work car then jeez the Taxi industry needs to die faster.

    17. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      Ever seen a dirty Uber car? .

      yes. i was able to give the driver a bad rating. i don't know what happened, but i received a credit towards my next ride so i felt like something happened.

    18. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by mi · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Complain to your municipal government.

      Why?!? Why should I waste time complaining and otherwise raising awareness, when I can just call Uber and pursue happiness?

      Competition is a wonderful thing — no wonder Illiberal Statists hate it.

      If taxi drivers are expected to live up to professional standards, they'll actually behave like professionals

      You mean, like those professional folks at the DMV? Or the toll-collectors? Or the public school teachers? No, dear, what ensures professional behavior is the fear of losing one's job. See also "benevolence of the butcher".

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    19. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. The new boss is just smarter and more lecherous.

    20. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > so I'm betting the union would nix it.

      What union?

      You mean the one that literally has no collective bargaining rights because each driver is an independent contractor?

      Yeah that evil, powerful union is totally going to nix it.

      Must you always live down to the stereotype?

    21. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see. An organization with a vested interest in perpetuating the Taxi industry's grip and pricing doesn't like something about Uber and it's ilk.

      Is it really that hard to do a little research before resorting to tired, old cliches?

      The NTWA is about as toothless as can be. They literally have no leverage at all. Their vested interest is in improving the circumstances of taxi drivers regardless of which company they drive for, Uber or any of the millionaire medallion owners.

      Maybe. Just maybe, the guy actually has a point worth considering?
      Nah. That's unpossible! No way Uber is just the new boss, same as the old boss.

    22. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because he doesn't take Uber doesn't mean their cars aren't cleaner. His reasoning is better than yours.

    23. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He probably got it on credit. It makes financial sense - if you're getting very heavy usage from a car, as a taxi driver would, then a reduction in running costs will eventually offset the initial purchase cost - even when interest. Payback time may be a few years.

    24. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by GNious · · Score: 1

      Taxi service is terrible. Taxis are dirty and old and frequently rip you off if you don't know where you are going.

      You should prolly go live somewhere civilized, instead of Outer Bummfuck, Poopistan?
      I've travelled half the planet so far, and far-and-away most taxis have been clean, drivers polite, and routes pretty much optimal (I occasionally check with a GPS-enabled phone out of curiosity)

    25. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by stephanruby · · Score: 0

      Solid reasoning.

      In the US, Uber only accepts drivers with newer cars and on average newer cars tend to be cleaner.

    26. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by WinstonWolfIT · · Score: 1

      its

    27. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by WinstonWolfIT · · Score: 1

      its.

    28. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      It couldn't possibly get 'very heavy usage' when it needs to recharge for several hours every few hundred km.

    29. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Unions and individual contracts are not exclusionary.

    30. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by stephanruby · · Score: 2

      "They not only direct every aspect of a driver's workday...

      Except that they actually don't. If a Uber driver doesn't feel like driving passengers, he doesn't do it. It's as simple as that. He gets to decide whether he works 5 minutes each decade, or ten hours a day. He gets to decide whether it's a hobby, a second job, or his main way to make a living. It really doesn't get freer than that.

      "...they also profit off the entire day through data collection, not just the 'sale of a product.'"

      New York Taxi services also profit from their drivers when they're not earning a fare.

      New York Taxi companies carry advertisements on their roof, and a great number of them also rent taxis and medaillons to their drivers. So when a taxi driver doesn't have a customer he's working for, and earning zero money, he has this taxi meter in his head that is always on -- and that represents the amount of money he's paying to the taxi companies and to the taxi medaillon holders.

    31. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Complain to your municipal government.

      I've never had a municipal government worth complaining to. I've seen what happens to people who enter politics around here, and I'm certainly not going to do that; any other form of complaining is a fat fucking waste of time because they will summarily ignore you. In the only town I've lived in where I took taxis regularly, the council was completely under control of business owners. In SF, the place where I notice taxis being most shit in every way (starting with frequently cutting me off on the freeway before I even make it into the city) people have been complaining about the taxis for years upon years without any kind of change.

      I don't know why you have decent taxis where you live, but everywhere I have seen them, they have been shit. I only notice the shitty taxis where I live now (in the sticks — Lake county, CA) because they drive like shit.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    32. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It couldn't possibly get 'very heavy usage' when it needs to recharge for several hours every few hundred km.

      Unless he happens to be where the superchargers are. If you're in a metro area of California, NY, or Florida, it could work out.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    33. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Incadenza · · Score: 1

      Complain to your municipal government.

      This is really going to depend on where you live - around here, lobbying groups for taxi companies and their drivers forestalled any attempts at legislated change for over a decade before Uber stepped in

      And around here drivers can only pick-up passengers at the official stands when they conform to the rules (clean car, formal clothing, no private telephone calls, etc.).
      Note that the taxi driver organizations initiated these regulations, the municipal government stepped in later en put them into formal legislature, and currently everything is being checked by an independent board.

      It is so nice to live in a place where self-interest is not purely explained is short term monetary gain.

    34. Re: New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do cabbies really drive more than that in 8 hours of work though?

    35. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

      " then a reduction in running costs will eventually offset the initial purchase cost"

      Almost impossible.

      The single biggest cost in running a car is depreciation. And heavy use actually makes that worse.

      --
      You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    36. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by NicBenjamin · · Score: 2

      Accountability is actually a major part of Uber's legal problems.

      The difference between an employer/employee relationship and a contractor relationship is all about who has the control. With most taxi companies the Taxi Company's entire role is renting out the car, and then telling them "At 6th and Wilkins there's a guy who wants to go to the South Side. Show up if you want to. Or pay us to rent the car for 72 hours while you drive the it toi Vegas for a night of debauchery, and then come back. We really don't give a shit."

      With Uber it's different. They pay you extra for working certain times (giving them an element of control over your schedule). They throw you out of the system if you're late or piss customers off (giving them control over your income). Note the "piss off customers." Since customers can be ridiculously petty ("This guy spoke ebonics while wearing a Pistons shirt! So fucking unprofessional! I'll give him a three!"), this means that it is very hard to name a single element of an Uber-driver's career Uber does not insist on having some influence over.

    37. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      If it's a New York Taxi then:
      a) Up until quite recently a $50-100k Tesla would have been 5% of the price of the medallion he needs to operate.
      b) He'd probably be able to make a mint staying in Manhattan all damn day. No need to recharge.

    38. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but in the US "contractor" is a very specific legal term with lots of important legal implications. An NFL team are not contractors, even tho they all have individual contracts, so they can have a union. Uber drivers and Taxis are contractors, so they can't really have a powerful union under the US Legal system.

    39. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Ever seen a dirty Uber car? I don't even use Uber,

      Me neither. 100% of the Uber cars I've been in are dirty!

      (Technically x/0 is implementation defined behaviour in C. Saying 100% is just as valid as saying NaN% or NasalDemons%)

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    40. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      I've had to yell at Uber drivers for trying to take the long way around.

      Most of the problems with taxis arose from making them internalize costs. Like the cost of being out in a snowstorm and not charging $700 for a ride. Or the cost of having to pick up a woman and take her to the hospital to give birth. Heck, in may places, taxi drivers need to take special emergency driving courses for if they hurry someone to the hospital.

      That's leaving aside the fact that they take into account the freal costs of labor and depreciation.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    41. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The legal system attempts to do lots of things in lots of countries to stop unions. But the end result usually fails. In my country there's no union either as taxis too are contractors. That didn't stop them from staging a stop work protest when a taxi driver was stabbed because someone didn't want to pay their fare.

      Don't confuse the lack of a 3 letter association that receives member fees, as the inability to collectively fight against something.

    42. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      Hey Einstein, Uber drivers are taxi drivers and Uber are a monopolistic taxi company, arguably the worst ever.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    43. Re: New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your final "as usual" paragraph is entirely a non sequitur. You've stated what you want to prove, not what you have proven.

      There is no reason why "bureaucrats" can't process feedback from service users. England's NHS is government owned and more monopolistic than competing taxi companies in most towns, but collects a huge amount of feedback from patients, carers, etc.

    44. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Heck, there's even one cab driver driving a tesla because the extra initial cost is offset by the lower running costs.

      How does he make a profit on the limited range? Cabbies (over here anyway) might work for eight hours straight, sometimes twelve. Very little of that time is spent stationary.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    45. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depreciation only counts if you're planning on selling. I run my cars until they dissasemble themselves...

    46. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Rain2 · · Score: 2

      More to the point, Tesla are claiming a 'Guaranteed Resale Value' figure on their website.

    47. Re: New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Monopolistic? Hardly. They lack legal protection of tgeir racket and have Lyft and its ilk to contend with.

    48. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Last time I spent the weekend in a big city (Chicago) I split my travel between Uber and Taxis.

      Uber wins hands down. I can hail it from anywhere. It shows up. It's clean. It doesn't smell. The credit card reader isn't "no work, no work" until I have 1 foot out the door.

    49. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever seen a dirty Uber car?

      I've yet to see a clean one that I'd want to get into again. Can't say I'm surprised, either -- they seem to somehow be completely immune from the rest of the rules that govern taxi drivers, why not that too?

    50. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free market vs crony capitalism. Who knew people will pay for what they want and do not need the governments help.

    51. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      'Complain to your government'? How about vote with your money for an idea? Too radical? Government is the wrong answer, the correct answer is to use or to create an alternative.

    52. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by cjjjer · · Score: 1

      Wut?

      Wait a minute here... when did cars actually start cleaning themselves?

    53. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by TotallyNotYellowCab · · Score: 3, Funny

      Me too, I don't see why taxis are so slandered/libeled by Uber!

    54. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by ComputerGeek01 · · Score: 1

      Bwhahahaha!!! You actually call your government is corrupt? Check out the Uber situation in the state of New York. Uber and Lyft are banned from the entire state of NY except for New York City.... I dare anyone to explain the logic of that situation. Hint: there is no logic. Cuomo is just a corrupt bastard who panders to NYC and sells out the rest of the state.

    55. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The restaurant workers demand a raise to $15 per hour.
      Some of our local, sit-down restaturants (Chili's, Red Robin, etc.) have installed Ziosh ordering/gaming/payment devices.
      Servers want $15 and the restaurant will reduce the number of servers because of the Ziosh devices will do the job without complaining that it needs a raise.
      Automation comes as a great remedy for over-priced labor.

      Uber is a remedy for over-priced and under-serving taxi drivers and cabs.
      Want to keep your jobs?
      Then do a better job and, at least, Over-serve your customers.
      Customers are people too!

    56. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by mrvan · · Score: 1

      In Amsterdam quite a lot of taxis are Tesla. Most taxi trips are short and in slow or stop & go city traffic, and the taxi company built superchargers at the airport. Apparently, software decides whether to charge quickly or more slowly depending on how busy it is.

      I'm not sure where the electric city (i.e. non-airport) taxis charge, a newspaper article suggested at the taxi company and on normal street charging stations. I guess with 400km radius and an average trip of <20km, charging once every 20 trips isn't that bad; drivers need a break now and then anyways.

      Also, at the official taxi waiting areas (e.g. at central station) there are a lot of taxis waiting, probably for at least 30 minutes outside of rush hour. I could imagine installing a supercharger there are well.

      Links (in Dutch - have fun with google translate :))

      - http://www.parool.nl/parool/nl...
      - http://www.luchtvaartnieuws.nl...
      - http://www.smartdriving.nl/kla...

    57. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you're just distraught that the son of your lord and savior just suspended his presidential campaign. Don't worry, you can still keep holding your church services, nobody is going to stop you from that.

    58. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Unions and individual contracts are not exclusionary.

      Correct. And fucking irrelevant to this story. But thanks for interjecting that useless bit of trivia Sheldon Cooper. Technical correctness over functional correctness is what really matters!

    59. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > That didn't stop them from staging a stop work protest when a taxi driver was stabbed because someone didn't want to pay their fare.

      And what did that get them? A news story. BFD.

    60. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      At least the taxi's I have used have washable seats... How many Uber cars have back seats that will get years of sweat, urine, vomit, and other nastiness soaked into them.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    61. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      And you think taking that industry and releasing it from any form of regulation at all will make things better?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    62. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by fluffernutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unfortunately, the rating system is never going to work for the person in a wheelchair that needs a ride, or the minority that exists in the rough area of town that Uber drivers never want to go to.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    63. Re: New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except uber decreases your chance for customers if you actually do that... Hence, they aren't really free to do what they want.

    64. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the part that Conservative Regulationists don't seem to get - you don't NEED to have a government entity overseeing a damned thing, just give people the FREEDOM to vote for their dollar.

    65. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that should have been "vote WITH their dollar"

    66. Re: New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Being a large black man on the north side of chicago, the best part about Uber is I don't spend all night watching empty taxi's passing me to pick someone else up.

      This is the number 1 reason I say taxis can eat a dick.

    67. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facts are the things that are true whether you believe them or not. Cabbies may or may not be assholes. Cab companies may or may not be money-grubbing pieces of shit. None of that changes whether the facts about Uber are true or false.

      Do we really live in a society do deficient in reasoning skills that all we're left with is looking at the source of the data to determine its accuracy?

    68. Re: New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      So as long as it works for you, that outweighs the fact that it doesn't work for others?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    69. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Just like people in Africa vote with their dollars to have warlords around that come for their voting dollars.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    70. Re: New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Well yeah. He's a human, isn't he? You can postulate that a human is greedy, arrogant, self-centered, and dishonest and, here's the fun part, be not just right but completely right - the vast majority of the time. People don't care about what doesn't impact them on a personal level.

      There are exceptions and we all think we're one of the exceptions. You could say, we all think we're exceptional.

      Also, 'snot my fault that people are people. However, I've stomped across the globe and found that people are people pretty much everywhere. Right or wrong, if you're hungry then you worry about your hunger and not that someone else is hungrier. And yes, there are some exceptions. They're exceptional people.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    71. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nobody cares about your third world nation and the chicken-scratch language they use to represent their beak-speak

      SQWAK SQWAK SQWAK

      'murric - fuck ya!

      *only a little embarrassed by this post - do not take me serious

    72. Re: New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heroin junkies are not normal people. They're vampiric lying thieving weak scum. Know anyone like that KGIII? Stomping across the globe in search of heroin isn't something to brag on. That's all you junkies live for. Junkies like you aren't affected by your misdoings. You know deep down inside you're trash. Nothing more. Purest trash.

    73. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by KGIII · · Score: 1

      It's a bit more complicated than that, specifically with regards to the areas of Africa that I've traveled. Unlike quite a few people, I have traveled to distant lands and seen strange people - often against the advice of friends and family. I've not only done so against the advice of my government but I've had the State Department reach out and tell me that they'd be unable to help me. I've still gone - and I've always enjoyed myself and learned new things.

      So, Africa is big. Really, really big. It also has multiple parties that you'd call "warlords." (I'd call 'em that too.) If you can narrow it down, that'd be good. If you mean places without governance, there aren't any - really. Some places have shitty and unofficial governments but they've all got some sort of government. That includes Somalia - they have government. They just have a shitty government that doesn't care about the citizens and have yet to oust that government. They even have paperwork... Very few governments don't have paperwork. They're not really "official" but that's a dubious term.

      I've actually *been* to Somalia. Good people, mostly. Well, as far as people go. They've got a shitty government. They're probably better served with less governance as it being better is unlikely. I am a wee bit familiar with the process and, suffice to say, they don't actually get to vote - because of their government.

      Of course, don't read more into what I wrote than what I actually said. That'd not only be presumptuous but it'd probably be incorrect. I do not recommend emulating Somalia. But, government is not something Somalia lacks. They don't even lack local government. They do lack a representative government. However, when it comes to governing the populace? They've got that pretty well down pat. In a certain light, you could suggest that they could actually do with less government 'cause they're pretty well governed at all times.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    74. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Wut? Wait a minute here... when did cars actually start cleaning themselves?

      I am not sure why this even needs explaining.

      People tend to take better care of their newer cars. For instance, my cousin was like that. When he got a new SUV, he would pamper it like nothing else. He used lots of wax and he would use a toothbrush to clean the inner rims of the wheels. Ten or twelve years later, the truck has a few bumps and scratches, it looks far from perfect anymore, and people write things like "WASH ME" using the tip of a finger on the dirt on his rear window.

      Now, I'm not saying everyone is like my cousin, most are not, but many of the people who don't take care of their cars tend to be like him. It's human nature.

    75. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being a heroin junky makes you have fantasoes of travel I see. Junkies only spend their often stolen money on 1 thing. Smack. They live for it. Not travel, building, or dreams. Only nod off heroin dreams. You think you're fooling anyone?

    76. Re: New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I assure you, there are people who think about other people. It just doesn't seem to be the overwhelming attitude in the US any more.

      If there weren't people who thought about others, these kinds of provisions wouldn't have been put into taxi services already.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    77. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Right... so a government that turns the other way and allows a business (ie. warlord) to set up and do anything that that they want to profit. That's pretty much the government that people are calling for here. No taxi regulations, no building regulations.. Food can be prepared and packaged or served from kitchens that don't have to be kept clean and can have vermin running over your plate. Full service drug dealers on the corner, selling everything from Tylenol to heroin. They just want the government to stay out of everything. And soon we have the same kind of society as various African nations do.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    78. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      The taxi industry helps drivers get loans for teslas because, over the long term it makes economic sense.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    79. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Taxi drivers who don't keep their cabs clean, dress properly, etc., DO lose their jobs - and worse, their permits. Not the same as the average DMV employee.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    80. Re: New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Except uber decreases your chance for customers if you actually do that... Hence, they aren't really free to do what they want.

      Do they really do that? Or is it the customers who decide to select the Uber driver with the highest star ratings and the most reviews?

      By that logic, Amazon book authors who publish on Amazon must be employees of Amazon, and 3rd party developers who publish on Google Play must be employees of Google, since both companies will give higher visibility to their highest rated and most prolific writers/developers (assuming all the other search criteria given by customers are equal).

    81. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      And you think taking that industry and releasing it from any form of regulation at all will make things better?

      The part about removing scarcity and the monopoly taxis have is what will make it better.

    82. Re: New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How so? I certainly don't look forward to driving on roads that are more trecherous because so many people are driving their uber cars around. Nor do I look forward to paying for added wear and tear on roads with my tax dollars.

    83. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I don't think most sane people are calling for any such thing. You can safely assume those who would be are idiots or insane - or maybe both. Perhaps you're trying to insert more than I said into my reply?

      At any rate, Somalia could probably do well with a wee bit less government than they have. They don't actually get to do much in the way of electing whom governs them and their government is frequently the guy with the most guns and friends. It's not the official one that stomps into the UN once in a while. No, their government is particularly bad. Maybe you misread "pretty well governed" as "governed pretty well?" They've got so much government, albeit unofficial and unrecognized, that they might be one of the few places where a little less government is a good idea - as contrary as that might sound.

      An unrecognized government is no less oppressive but it's still a government. They've got *lots* of government. Complete with a, localized at least, monopoly on force and even paperwork. They even overlap in some areas. That is often a bad thing for the locals. It's not a very representative government at all. Well, no... They're representative - just not of the citizens and not democratically. I do think that, with time, they'll improve. The government that should be governing is doing a pretty piss poor job of it - they should probably be stronger and less corrupt and oust the warlords and do way too many things to list here.

      At any rate, they've got plenty of government. It's just really, really bad government. Imagine everything you think you know about the place and multiply it by ten. It's just that bad. If you go from one city to another then you may, really, need paperwork or they'll kill you. Like trade your sister for food type of bad. Oh, and your sister is five. They are that badly governed but it's a mistake to assume/believe that they are not governed and have no government. Oh, they've got a shitload of government - really, really scary government.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    84. Re: New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Lets not ignore the fact that those 3000 riders are mostly interested in themselves so they are the worst people to give any opinion.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    85. Re: New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me, but whatever is going on in somolia does seem bad for the locals. Also maybe you want turds in your food, and to pay top dollar for unsafe buildings but not me.

    86. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Complain to your municipal government. Taxis here are clean, the drivers have to conform to a dress code and a service code, and there are dedicated inspectors to make sure that standards have to be maintained. When a taxi enters service, it cannot be more than 5 years old, and has to be retired when it it 10 years old, no matter if it's still in great condition. Rusty cars aren't allowed. Heck, there's even one cab driver driving a tesla because the extra initial cost is offset by the lower running costs.

      This. Its the same in my city (Perth, Western Australia), the government does a fairly good job of vetting taxi drivers and taxi companies. Taxis are clean, drivers are presentable and all of them speak at least passable English (most drivers are Australian, but that reflects the demographics of Perth).

      I've lived in places with unregulated taxi services, the end result is that they operated like criminal gangs. Turf was carved up, enforced and fought over. Every tuk tuk driver carried a gun. When governments tried to set up municipal transport, the drivers were dragged out of their buses (which were retrofitted Isuzu D-Maxes) and beaten. The west went though this generations ago, that's why we ended up with taxi regulations. Whilst Perth is expensive, our wages compensate. In Phuket, a taxi wont even switch on it's engine for less than 200 baht (US$6) and that 2/3 of the daily minimum wage there.

      Having seen what happens when taxi services regulate themselves, I'd take the "terrible" regulations any day of the week.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    87. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Cheaper? I'm seeing uncapped peak pricing making up the difference.

    88. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The problem with Uber is not whether it has come up with a better taxi service, but that it won't admit it is a taxi service in the first place.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    89. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      " then a reduction in running costs will eventually offset the initial purchase cost"

      Almost impossible.

      The single biggest cost in running a car is depreciation. And heavy use actually makes that worse.

      Depreciation is not a cash cost like fuel.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    90. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Competition is a wonderful thing

      Fair competition is a wonderful thing.

      Uber are gaining unfair competitive advantage by ignoring the law. It's just the same as how Microsoft acquired their near monopoly over PC operating systems in the 1990s and 2000s. It was the opposite of free market competition.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    91. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Government is the wrong answer, the correct answer is to use or to create an alternative.

      Some of us believe in having functioning defence, legal and law enforcement systems, for example. Whether they're organised by a coalition of democratically elected socialist workers communes or a fascist industrial-military junta, they still require some form of government.

      Like communism, libertarianism only really works in small groups and is hard to scale up to a country with tens or hundreds of millions of people.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    92. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Be happy for the consumers — we got cheaper rides, that are also much easier to hail.

      And no doubt the cost of sweeping chimneys rose once they outlawed using five year olds. And cotton's probably dearer than if slaves were still used as labour.

      Cheap consumer prices are not an absolute good.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    93. Re: New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Except uber decreases your chance for customers if you actually do that... Hence, they aren't really free to do what they want.

      Do they really do that? Or is it the customers who decide to select the Uber driver with the highest star ratings and the most reviews?

      By that logic, Amazon book authors who publish on Amazon must be employees of Amazon, and 3rd party developers who publish on Google Play must be employees of Google, since both companies will give higher visibility to their highest rated and most prolific writers/developers (assuming all the other search criteria given by customers are equal).

      The freedom to not earn any money is a pretty meaningless sort of freedom.

      It's like saying that pure laissez faire capitalism gives me the freedom to do whatever I want, including staying at home and starving to death. Wow.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    94. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by mi · · Score: 0

      Cheaper? I'm seeing uncapped peak pricing making up the difference.

      I am not — during peak hours the prices match those of taxis, other times they are way below. Maybe, your experience is different, but I also remember, how impossible it was to hail a cab in the situations, in which Uber today is available — even if at a higher price. What good is a nominal price of even 1 penny per trip, if you can not find an actual car?

      It was so bad, economists started using the phenomenon of "umbrellas vs. taxis" as an example. Now, with Uber, Lyft at al. solving this problem, they'll have to look for some other illustration.

      So, the prices really are lower throughout — comparing Uber's "uncapped" price with that of a cab is like judging Venezuela's economy by the official prices — nobody can buy anything at those either.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    95. Re: New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      That "any more" is deceptive. People in the US used to think more about other people who looked and acted like them, perhaps, but I don't really know. The problem with trying to include people of various skin colors, sexes, and sexual orientations into the tribe is that we lose a lot of tribe cohesion. There may have been a time when we all cared more for people of our skin color, socio-economic class, religion, lack of criminal record, and such things, but I don't think disrupting that was a completely bad thing.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    96. Re: New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      There is another word for the cohesion you speak of. It's 'civilization'. You cannot have a civilized society without it. Otherwise everyone does what they want, inevitably stepping on the needs of others. This happens until there is nothing left, except for the most ruthless and sociopathic.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    97. Re: New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      You can't have what I consider a civilized society that preys on classes of people that don't look like the rulers, either. We need to figure out how to create cohesion over a more diverse population.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    98. Re: New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      That's why we vote for the rulers, in theory. If you are saying the problem is that government doesn't react to people as it should, or that the rulers don't represent the people, then on that we can agree. But it doesn't mean we totally abandon the system of government and hand the reins over to private enterprise.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    99. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by dbIII · · Score: 1

      am not — during peak hours the prices match those of taxis,

      Thousands for a trip on New Years eve is normal? Pull the other one.

    100. Re: New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I'm not suggesting abandoning government. Government has excesses and dangers. Private enterprise has excesses and danger. I figure the only way to make things halfway safe for the upper 10% like me (let alone the lower 90%) is to have them limiting each other.

      However, we have essentially no evolution conducted in an environment where three hundred people have to get along with some sort of democratic government.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    101. Re: New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Completely unavailable at any price" is normal.

    102. Re: New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      "However, we have essentially no evolution conducted in an environment where three hundred people have to get along with some sort of democratic government." I don't understand what you are saying here. Where do you get three hundred people from?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    103. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by mi · · Score: 0

      Thousands for a trip on New Years eve is normal?

      In a free market the fair price is whatever buyers are willing to pay. There is no other.

      Were you able to find a taxi in previous years? I don't think so — people prefer to celebrate the holiday with their families. If you wish them to be giving you a ride instead, you have to make it worth their while — or take the subway.

      The laws of supply and demand are Economics 101...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    104. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's the kind of bs mentality that Shkreli used to justify extorting people who without the medicine he bought the rights to.
      and its precisely why you libertarian chuckleheads are a joke.

    105. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the thing they don't like is that Uber is quite clearly a taxi company,
      while it is willfully ignoring all the laws taxi companys must abide by.

      the laws may need to change, but until they do Uber is profiting by breaking the law.

    106. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Taxis are dirty and old and frequently rip you off if you don't know where you are going. "

      there are laws that address this.
      if you have a concern, report it

      "Uber doesn't have this problem. Ever seen a dirty Uber car?"

      this may be so, but this is not because it's a company policy or because its standard under force of law.

      this is like the (dumb ) meme that decries unions just because Henry Ford instituted many work reforms before they became law.
      the problem with that meme, and the problem with your comment, is that it ignores that Henry Ford was one man with one company. he may have treated his workers better, but that treatment could have gone away at a whim; either his, or his replacement.

      the protections that the unions fought for and eventually won, while being similar to what Ford already did, had the force of law behind them, rather than one mans idealism.

      similarly the laws that govern taxis have the force of law behind them, while your uber driver's attitude and honesty have only his own personal ethics behind them.

    107. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by dywolf · · Score: 1

      BINGO
      give the man a cigar

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    108. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by dywolf · · Score: 1

      and that is precisely why the free market fails and requires the force of law after a certain point to address market failures.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    109. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep. still an idiot

    110. Re:New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Regulated markets are often because free ones piss off the community enough that a government steps in. Hence food safety standards instead of a "free market".

      There are also many situations where governments sell rights for money and keep everyone else out - initial taxi regulation, communications spectrum etc. Not so fair for the citizens with that government.

      Treating the situation as if it is only the latter instead of a mix of the two is somewhat simplistic and naive, probably deliberately so. Deliberately dumbing things down to that level results in arguing about abstractions that so not apply and justifying the ridiculous (eg. a totally free market where the buyer has to beware of everything).

    111. Re: New York Taxi Workers' Alliance by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I think the sentence would have been a lot more clear with the word "million" after the "three hundred", like I intended. My bad.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  2. Planning for driverless cars by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They're collecting all this "dead time" behavior (as well as the rest) to help them figure out how to best have the driverless uber cars 10 years down the road. If you drive for uber, you're working to put yourself out of a "job."

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    1. Re:Planning for driverless cars by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      Eh, as long as the drivers have their eyes open and are using Uber, et al as supplimental income as they should do, that's perfectly fine. I look forward to the day that the Taxi industry is as dead as Abe Vigoda, and I'll dance on its grave (unlike Abe's).

      I got rid of my car to work a 7 minute walk from my office in a downtown area. I use Uber/Lyft for some things, and car sharing services for others. An automated car service, reasonably priced, where I didn't feel obligated to tip the driver, would be magnificent.

      When Taxi's charge around $30 for a 5 mile trip, and then expect a tip on top of it... fuck that. They've dug their own grave. If I still had a car, I'd drive for Uber/Lyft part time while they develop driverless car service just to help them push those fuckers into the grave they've dug.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    2. Re: Planning for driverless cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Who said drivers should use uber as 'supplemental income'? You? You probably believe the minimum wage was intended to be some kind of training wage you shouldn't live on, right? (Hint: It wasn't. It was intended to have an ok if modest life on when passed. History has been rewritten by billionaires with an agenda.)

      Working to put yourself out of a job is insane, and supporting a company with that agenda is slimy. This everyone for himself libertarian economic model simply ensures nobody survives just as sure as making a few people support a huge number.

    3. Re:Planning for driverless cars by Livius · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you're working to put yourself out of a "job."

      So... Uber is just like every other employer.

    4. Re:Planning for driverless cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't we all, to some extent?

    5. Re:Planning for driverless cars by SeaFox · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They're collecting all this "dead time" behavior (as well as the rest) to help them figure out how to best have the driverless uber cars 10 years down the road.

      If you're an Uber driver and planning to be one 10 years from now you need to reexamine your life.

    6. Re:Planning for driverless cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Some people actually enjoy it. It's sad that people look down on jobs so much nowadays, I wonder how people will cope when most careers are gone altogether.

    7. Re: Planning for driverless cars by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      because the whole concept was/is made for supplanting.
      thats the whole point.. you can check when it would be worth your time and you can drive if you want to. if there were enough drivers then it wouldn't be worth your time and you wouldn't be driving uber.

      and working as dead time.. eh.. uber is mainly using that data to provide the drivers with foresight into when it would be worth their time to be driving.

      "ooh analytics it's so much worth soo much money" is just a common mantra now.. even when it isn't. analytics about how much money investing in analytics is not so commonly seen though.

      like, showing adverts makes money. having analytics about what time of day from what suburb people are viewing ads actually not so much. it only matters for squeezing a little more money out of the adverts but 99.999% of the time the advertiser wouldn't give a rats ass if the advert was shown to someone in the next neighborhood instead 4 hours later. with google ads for example the IDEA that it's shown precisely to the right people is the selling point.. but they actually just show it to enough people to catch on.

      the algorithms in reality are really simple. if they weren't, then I wouldn't be getting adverts in language I don't know just because I'm in geoip location that would suggest I know that language - google has full history to figure out that I don't read any pages in that language and I don't view them on youtube.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    8. Re:Planning for driverless cars by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      They're collecting all this "dead time" behavior (as well as the rest) to help them figure out how to best have the driverless uber cars 10 years down the road. If you drive for uber, you're working to put yourself out of a "job."

      Is this really the case? Would information on how Uber drivers deadhead around really be all that useful?

      Wouldn't actual trip data be more useful for predicting when and where to have cars ready to pick customers up?

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    9. Re:Planning for driverless cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're an Uber driver and planning to be one 10 years from now you need to reexamine your life.

      Totally right! I, for example, am just a temporarily embarrassed millionaire.
      I'll be high on the hog, eating Trump Steaks, by this time next year, two years tops!

    10. Re:Planning for driverless cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Is this really the case? Would information on how Uber drivers deadhead around really be all that useful?

      It's useful when you tie it to wifi access point collection data like some geolocaton software vendors use.

    11. Re:Planning for driverless cars by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      It's a possibility. Of course, I plan to be uploaded into an AI-capable processor core a few years before then, and then delegate the taxi work to a slave node, but hey, a job's a job.

    12. Re:Planning for driverless cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't actual trip data be more useful for predicting when and where to have cars ready to pick customers up?

       
      If I could have one or the other then trip data is more valuable, but it's not like the vehicles can just block the road waiting for the job they expect to come based on prior demand. Knowing the optimal behaviour when not transporting customers would be useful information, though I'm not sure how useful. It's not unusual for Uber drivers to be amassed in supermarket car parks near airports etc in the UK because they typically have free parking. I'm not sure Tesco etc would be overly happy with being used as autonomous Uber vehicle lots without compensation.

    13. Re:Planning for driverless cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't pay your bills as an Uber driver. When your only career is being an Uber driver for the next 10 years, you will become someone who lives in his car.

    14. Re:Planning for driverless cars by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

      It will be interesting as then they'll have to hire mechanics to work their fleet. Or is their plan to have an Uber for mechanics?

    15. Re:Planning for driverless cars by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      That certainly is the end game for coders ...

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    16. Re:Planning for driverless cars by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      It's a possibility. Of course, I plan to be uploaded into an AI-capable processor core a few years before then, and then delegate the taxi work to a slave node, but hey, a job's a job.

      I think, like Achmed the dead terrorist, you have it backwards. YOU will become the slave node :-)

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    17. Re:Planning for driverless cars by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      For one thing, it gives them access to the "flocking behavior" of taxi drivers. Drivers who don't have a fare will tend to wait in an area where they think they'll get one, or drive to such an area. This ties in perfectly with "cars in your area", since they can predict how many cars will be there in x number of minutes, even if they aren't there right now.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    18. Re:Planning for driverless cars by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Drivers who don't have a fare will tend to wait in an area where they think they'll get one, or drive to such an area. This ties in perfectly with "cars in your area", since they can predict how many cars will be there in x number of minutes, even if they aren't there right now.

      Okay, that helps when they have human drivers, but what about when that's automated? That's when it shifts to using algorithms to predict where rides will be needed.

      Or heck, use actual ride data to give drivers guesses on where the best spot to go to pick up their next customer is.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    19. Re:Planning for driverless cars by tehcyder · · Score: 0

      I got rid of my car to work a 7 minute walk from my office in a downtown area.

      Oh wow, if only everyone else was clever enough to think of that we could get rid of all the cars in the world! I hope someone's nominated you for the Nobel Economics Prize or whatever.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    20. Re:Planning for driverless cars by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      You don't need nearly as many mechanics as you do vehicles - otherwise everyone would be working as a mechanic.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  3. Do we have an app for that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Currently, apps work for their makers.

    How about an app that works for the user? That uses semantic web technologies (are we there yet?) to book taxis in a peer-to-peer fashion? That preferences cabbies that *I've* previously rated high (or my connections have), and negotiates and communicates the fare clearly as a number (not hiding away the impact of surge pricing).

    On the cabbies side, his user-agent-app works the same way as mine, communicates availability and pricing, sends me recommended peers if not, etc.

  4. The solution is to reset your env vars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..but they're exactly a product of our current political and economic environment.

    Uber drivers will get paid for that which they have the economic power to extract payment for and not anything else.

    Is that unfair? Yes. Everything TFA suggests about how Uber is screwing drivers is true. It's also irrelevant. Uber is scum. The idea that they aren't employing people is among the most evil types of legal fictions aimed at perpetuating and protecting a corrupt and exploitive economic relationship under color of law.

    The solution isn't to make Uber marginally less evil toward its employees.

    The solution is to pull up a terminal and type sudo ECONOMY=$ECONOMY/socialism

    Depending on your distro you may need to use $ECONOMY/democratic_socialsm. Make sure you don't under any circumstances add "comunism" to your ECONOMY vars. If you do that you'll have to rm -rf on your whole society.

    Also I love TFA was all about how companies exploit freelancers in the gig economy. Check the byline. Sure enough, it's by a freelance journalist. It's not like VICE media is a small struggling company anymore. They're worth more than several mainstream media companies I've worked for.

  5. Um... big data isn't what they're after by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    That's the icing on the shit cake they feed their drivers. They bypass traditional worker protections that require people to be paid for work done. They wouldn't exist otherwise, just like all the other companies that tried this and didn't managed to fend off the courts (that maid for hire service comes to mind).

    Oh, and better hope you don't get hit by an Uber driver during that 'downtime'. The $1 mil insurance they like to tout doesn't cover you if there's no passenger in the car. Even if they're on the way to a fare. Come to think of it you better hope you don't get hit by one period. $1 mil wouldn't cover med bills from a debilitating accident either and I know drivers doing the "gig" economy and they're all running on non-commercial insurance. I wonder if there's an uptick in hit n run where Uber shows up?...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Um... big data isn't what they're after by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't expect the 1 million insurance to be in effect during "downtime".

      1 million is a lot more than the personal Injury and liability insurance that most individual drivers will EVER carry, so I'm not sure what your angle is there...

      If the Taxi industry wasn't a bunch of backroom deal making, monopolistic thugs, Uber and Lyft would never have come into existence in the first place.

      You think you're getting jack shit if a fucking TAXI hits you? They have laws for that. They bought them decades ago. Good luck.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    2. Re:Um... big data isn't what they're after by germansausage · · Score: 1

      :...traditional worker protections that require people to be paid for work done" - Are talking about an hourly wage? Because around here the taxi drivers sure as hell don't get one.

    3. Re:Um... big data isn't what they're after by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the Taxi industry wasn't a bunch of backroom deal making,

      The roads are the property of the government. The government is the property of the local citizens. Taxi regulation is merely an instance of the owners of property getting a say on how their property is used...

      monopolistic

      Stop monopolising your house, Gojira. Let me sleep in your bed, Gojira. (Although, depending on where you are, there is lots of competition among taxi + PCH services, and the problem with Uber is its unwillingness to follow regulation.)

      thugs

      Have you ever confronted a thug? Not in the libertarian "all government are thugs hurrr anarchy is cool" sense, but in the sense of someone actually threatening to put you in hospital? Physical thuggery and other dirty tricks against competitors - as Uber has already been engaged in - was the motivation for regulation.

    4. Re:Um... big data isn't what they're after by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      They bypass traditional worker protections that require people to be paid for work done.

      Those protections are going to become meaningless as less and less of us become workers. We are going to need new protections not just for workers, but for people.

      Oh, and better hope you don't get hit by an Uber driver during that 'downtime'. The $1 mil insurance they like to tout doesn't cover you if there's no passenger in the car.

      The actual problem here is that their normal insurance company should not be permitted to deny them insurance coverage while they are on their way to pick up a fare. Their insurance premiums are already based on their total mileage, so if they drive more, they already pay more for their insurance. In fact, their insurance company shouldn't be able to deny them their normal coverage during that time either, for the same reason.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Um... big data isn't what they're after by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      you mean the guys talked about in Ziau-d din Barni's History of Firoz Shah? I don't think there has been any real thugs around since 1870.

    6. Re:Um... big data isn't what they're after by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I carry a million dollars worth of home/property/liability insurance. Costs me about 300 dollars a year.

      My brother got hit by a taxi some years ago, and spent 3 weeks in traction afterwards. The cab company was not only agreeable to covering it, they were actually *anxious* to do so, as they didn't want to get sued.

      You should also quit quoting lyrics that you don't actually understand, either.

    7. Re:Um... big data isn't what they're after by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      You think you're getting jack shit if a fucking TAXI hits you? They have laws for that. They bought them decades ago. Good luck.

      Yes, the really expensive insurance that actual taxi drivers have to pay for to legally carry passengers is clearly just another part of the government/taxi company conspiracy.

      You are a fucking idiot.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  6. Re: UBER BOOBER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, falafel is delicious. Don't disparage good food just because some crazy people also like it.

  7. Title answers itself by nitehawk214 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Uber makes money because their drivers are often not earning any.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    1. Re:Title answers itself by jjo · · Score: 2

      Why do those drivers continue to drive for Uber? Do they all want to drive for other people as a hobby?

    2. Re: Title answers itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NaÃve people and false hope. The same reason people fall into pyramid... Err, I mean multilevel marketing scams. Uber is the MLM of the taxi industry.

    3. Re:Title answers itself by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Why do those drivers continue to drive for Uber? Do they all want to drive for other people as a hobby?

      Because it's still new enough that there are plenty of starry-eyed suckers who are ignorant of the fact they wont make money.

      Plus a lot of costs are obfuscated. An Uber driver who isn't very good with numbers (because the app does everything for them) goes home and see he's earned $X, the ones with two brain cells will figure out that fuel costs $Y but still think the rest is profit... However they fail to take into account the costs of maintenance, insurance, repairs, so on and so forth.

      Eventually the shine will wear off and Uber will end up with the worst of the worst. Drivers who literally cant get a job doing anything else.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  8. Liars! by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    Uber's legal team first outlined this identity in a filing with the California Public Utilities Commission in 2012: "Uber is a technology company that licenses the Uber App to transportation service providers. The transportation service providers pay a fee to Uber to use its software technology; the passenger of the transportation service provider pays the transportation service provider for transportation services received.

    That's an outright lie. Uber collects the fares and pays the driver, after collecting its cut.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:Liars! by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      That just means Uber is also acting as a payment processor. A transaction can be legally from A to C even if the money actually goes via B - you'll find it burried in the terms of services somewhere.

    2. Re:Liars! by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      That just means Uber is also acting as a payment processor. A transaction can be legally from A to C even if the money actually goes via B

      What payment processor sets the price? What payment processor sets the terms of service between the two parties?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  9. The Good Old Fashion Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They Steal IT.

    Next year, they PRINT IT !

    Ha ha

  10. I still fail to see one thing by ruir · · Score: 1

    If Uber can skirt the law, why can I drive as a private driver, and screw the middle man? After all, it is my time and my car. What I do need Uber for in an interconnected world?

    1. Re:I still fail to see one thing by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What I do need Uber for in an interconnected world?

      You don't, but you do need something that fulfills the same function, because nobody is going to bother calling you to see if you are available. They want to see if a taxi is available. In any case, taxis with human drivers are going the fuck away, so we're only going to be arguing about this for another decade or so. Then what will Slashdot do? Will it just be nonstop women in tech articles?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:I still fail to see one thing by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      You could try, I guess you could post on Craigslist or write your own app.

    3. Re:I still fail to see one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOOOL...I have actually thought many times about closing my account. I do not support fe_min_ist outlets. Wikipedia and many others the same thing... I had to use _, censorship, now that is a new low, even for slashdot.

  11. Independent Contractor my ass! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's how business wants it. Tell us we're "self employed" but control our hours and other things about work without compensation for our risk.

    If your customer controls that much of your work, then you are not self employed, you just have a different tax status that benefits the "employer".

    The IRS needs to do what they did to Microsoft back in the day - that's why kids when you want to contract with a big company, you have to go through a body shop and give up 40% of your bill rate.

  12. Uber does not solve the problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately Uber makes the company money and the executives. But does little to improve incomes where it counts which is the drivers. After all these drivers are considered self employed and absorb all the variable costs that tend to make or break transportation. Uber to me is a slap in the face to the people who really represent this business model. Yes, I agree Taxi's in general are not very good, but frankly I think people are dreaming if you think a taxi cab should be a good experience. Much of this is the result of costs major cities place on taxi companies. They require so many operating costs from buying medallions to other operating costs. Uber tries hard to get around some of this, but is meeting some serious resistance in many cities.

    1. Re:Uber does not solve the problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IF IT IS as bad as you say, why do so many sign up as Uber drivers? No one points a gun at their heads.

    2. Re:Uber does not solve the problems by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Because as awesome as America is and everything, there are a lot of very desperate people out there.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    3. Re:Uber does not solve the problems by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      I agree. Unfortunately we have this my that under employed people really don't want to work more. I'm sure some don't, but most do.

    4. Re:Uber does not solve the problems by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      IF IT IS as bad as you say, why do so many sign up as Uber drivers? No one points a gun at their heads.

      I imagine it's like the poor, naive teenagers who end up in prostitution because they've seen Pretty Woman.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  13. Re:UBER BOOBER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm as white as they come, and I think Uber is a massive con job.

  14. so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uber == Skynet or what?

  15. Captain Obvious by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 1

    Corporation makes a profit while employees struggle to make ends meet. What a shocker.

  16. How About Google? by tommeke100 · · Score: 1

    Google has been collecting this type of data for years from every type of driver. I'm pretty sure by now they have machine learning algorithms that can predict if a particular driver is a Taxi, delivery van, private person, etc ... Probably they can even predict if a Taxi driver is an actual Taxi driver or an Uber driver (since Taxis probably spot themselves at particular Taxi hubs whereas Uber drivers will have other behavior).

  17. They Are Employees by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    Despite recent, nonsense, court decisions Uber drivers are in fact employees. If they were independent contractors there can be no acts of supervision. The IRS has defined independent contractors for decades and Uber drivers meet every inch of what an employee is compared to actually being an iDC.

    1. Re:They Are Employees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Because I am an Uber driver (for now -- profits are weak) and I don't see it. Unless you mean that writing in the contract "we can terminate your contract if your rating is below x or you don't drive for a whole month" is somehow an act of supervision. Other than that I don't think "Hint: Demand will be high at x to y time! Bigger earnings!* *(for us too after our Surge(tm) pricing, rider fee and 25% share)" counts as supervision.

      If anything it's a bit more like a pyramid scheme with the "Refer your friends! Big bonus after they make 20 trips themselves!"

  18. Uber drivers are NOT taxi drivers by jjo · · Score: 1

    Time and again we see the claim that Uber is a taxi company, despite the obvious differences between Uber and traditional taxi companies. What you are saying is that the differences between taxis and Uber are inconsequential and irrelevant, hence "Uber drivers are taxi drivers". You are entitled to your opinion about the differences between Uber and taxis, but that doesn't mean that everyone has to agree with you. I find the differences between Uber and taxis to be both relevant and consequential, so I believe that Uber drivers are NOT taxi drivers. As for Uber being a monopoly, I fear that you have not really looked closely enough into the market that Uber serves. There is significant competition to Uber, and if Uber falters in its remarkable record of satisfying its customers, its competitors will swoop in to claim its market share.

    1. Re:Uber drivers are NOT taxi drivers by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      How about you explain what these differences you perceive are so the rest of us can correct you?

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    2. Re:Uber drivers are NOT taxi drivers by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The only way in which Uber drivers are not taxi drivers is the legalistic one that they don't have actual taximeters in their cars. This is strictly true, but pathetic as an argument.

      Whether you define them as operating "carriages for hire" or "limousines" or "small private buses" or any other combination of words that excludes "taxi", Uber drivers are basically using cars to move people from A to B for a fee.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  19. Uber Won't Service All of Phoenix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uber won't come to Ahwatukee, a neighborhood in Phoenix, because we're basically a big cul-de-sac.

    Uber will charge demand pricing for New Year's Eve type nights, making a 20 dollar cab ride into a 400 dollar ripoff.

    Uber lowers wages, and so lowers tax revenue, while using tax payer funded resources.

    The profits, when they turn a profit, will be taken from local economies and sent to shareholders and hedge fund managers.

    But don't worry about the big picture, just enjoy having your movements tracked and sold to data consolidators, so someday you can be charged even more money, which will also be sent to Wall Street.

  20. jos lagunya by setykoplak · · Score: 1

    good news I'm always waiting for the latest blog posts. I created the blog because I was inspired by this blog. This is my blog Download Lagu Terbaru download lagu gratis