Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Surge Protection For International Travel?

New submitter gaiageek writes: As someone who has lost a laptop power supply (and thus use of the laptop) due to a late-night power surge while traveling in a developing country, I'm acutely aware of the need for surge protection when traveling abroad. While practically all laptop and phone power adapters these days are voltage auto-sensing 100V-240V compatible, most so-called "travel" surge protectors are restricted to either 110V or 220V. Given the space and weight constraints of carry-on only travel, I'd like to avoid having to carry two separate surge protectors knowing I may go from Central America (110V) to Southeast Asia (220V). Strangely, laptop specific surge protectors typically are 100V-240V compatible, but this doesn't provide protection for a phone or tablet that requires the original power supply (can't be charged from a notebook USB port).

Is there really no solution out there short using a 110V-240V notebook surge protector with an adapter to go from a "cloverleaf" notebook plug to a 5-15R (standard US) plug receptacle?

92 of 138 comments (clear)

  1. Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by markus_baertschi · · Score: 4, Informative

    The problem is, 200 Volts on a 110V circuit is a surge and will fry a 110V power supply. So surge protectors need to be voltage specific or they become ineffective at lower voltages.

    I would go another route: Make sure that your have spare/alternative ways to power or charge your equipment. For example carry a 12V charger for your laptop (also works on some airplanes). Only buy equipment (phones/tablets) you can charge from an USB outlet. Carry a spare USB charger.

    This will get easier over time with the USB type C connector and USB power delivery, as modern devices get equipped with it.

    1. Re:Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Technically the surge protector could adapt to the normal voltage. Also, technically you should be fine if you use a 240V surge protector on a 110V circuit, as long as the device can handle 240V, so pack a 240V surge adapter and a wide range power supply.

    2. Re:Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by BenFranske · · Score: 2

      Yes, it's true that 200 volts on a 110/120v circuit might damage a 110/120v power supply. However, the OP mentions that their power supplies are universal 110~240v. That means the supplies can actually handle up to 240v so they only need surge protection above 240v regardless.

    3. Re:Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by gaiageek · · Score: 2

      OP here. If surge protectors must be voltage specific, that doesn't explain how the laptop-specific surge protectors can be 100V-240V compatible.

      As for carrying a spare laptop power supply, that would be just as much weight/bulk as a 2nd surge protector, so kind of defeats the point.

    4. Re:Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by Z00L00K · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A surge protector for 230-240 volts is what's needed.

      So get a power strip with surge protection for Schuko (Common style in most of Europe) connectors, replace the plug with a male connector same as power supplies as stationary computers have and then get a country specific power cable in the country visited.

      The reason to use the Shuko connector is that most devices are available in European format alternative, fewer in the UK format and the Schuko plug is smaller than the UK plugs as well. Any talk about need to identify live and neutral is just bollocks on anything manufactured after 1980.

      If all the power supplies connected are auto-ranging up to 240 volts there's no need to have a voltage specific surge protector, the power supplies can cope with it.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    5. Re:Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Most power supplies are auto-range or wide range 100-250V or so, so only a surge protector for the upper voltage is needed.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    6. Re:Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      The problem is, 200 Volts on a 110V circuit is a surge and will fry a 110V power supply. So surge protectors need to be voltage specific or they become ineffective at lower voltages.

      I would go another route: Make sure that your have spare/alternative ways to power or charge your equipment. For example carry a 12V charger for your laptop (also works on some airplanes). Only buy equipment (phones/tablets) you can charge from an USB outlet. Carry a spare USB charger.

      This will get easier over time with the USB type C connector and USB power delivery, as modern devices get equipped with it.

      This...

      Buy one or several power banks for your phone/tablet. Charge the power bank, not the device, and use the power bank to charge your portable devices.

      I use a Kensington K33117 International All-in-One Travel Plug Adapter plus a Monster MP OTG400 BK Outlets To Go Power Strip when traveling. The Kensington travel adapter has a built-in ceramic slow transition fuse rated at 250v 2.5A plus a spare in the removable end. While it will take a grounded plug (i.e. the power strip, it's a tight fit but it does fit) it's not connected to anything, It's not a problem because none of my travel device plugs have grounded plugs, they are all two-prong.

      I've never had the fuse blow nor experienced any problem with my devices during travel, so take the above with a grain of salt. Basically, I can't say how good the fuse is because I've never needed it.

      This got me curious about how much power I am using for my devices as they have been upgraded since I got the travel plug adapter. Looking at my devices, the Surface Pro 4 tablet takes 1A input (~1.35A for a laptop), dual port 5V 2.1A USB adapter takes 0.5A input, and universal camera battery charger takes 0.2A input. So, a total of 1.7A when I travel for vacation and 2.05A when I travel for business @ 110v. If you are on 220V, the auto-switching power supply will use approximately half of the rated Amps. So, for me, a rating of 2.5A is fine.

    7. Re:Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by gweihir · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Indeed. Even when you have a 100-240V device connected to 110V, you must use an 110V surge protector. The problem is that while a 220V surge protector would clamp at a voltage the device can survive, it can only survive reliably if it has been running at 220V because of the way these devices are designed. They have a rectifier and filter capacitor. If the filter capacitor gets charged up from 110V by a surge clamped for 220V (which clamps at around 400...500V), the inrush-current will likely blow the last-ditch fuse in the device and may well damage other components.

      So, sorry, what you want is not possible. You must get both.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    8. Re:Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by gweihir · · Score: 1

      No. Because of the way surges, surge-protectors work and wide-range PSUs work, this is not true at all.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    9. Re:Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by Teun · · Score: 1

      It looks like you haven't seen a notebook in many years :)

      Because it must have been in the days of the 286/386 that the build-in mains power supply was replaced by an external one, also referred to as a 'brick'.

      All those I have ever seen are auto negotiating between ~100 - 250 Volts 50 - 60 Hz.

      This means they will handle Voltage variations within that range which is not quite the same as handling frequency spikes and surges.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    10. Re:Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by gweihir · · Score: 2

      If you have a 100-240V "compatible" surge protector, then you have been cheated, as that is not possible to do reliably without significantly more effort than goes into these devices. These will always only offer limited protection at 110V.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    11. Re: Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The inrush current doesn't blow the fuse when you go directly from 0V to 230V by plugging it in. The slew rate is limited by an inductor, and the sharper the spike the harsher the limiting.

    12. Re:Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Multi-range PSUs, as in ones without a physical switch, simply have a combination of inductors and capacitors with a bridge diode to create a filtered DC source that can be regulated to the voltage actually needed. The filter and bridge diode need to be rated for the maximum voltage, so a surge from 120 to 240 will still be within the rating of the front end and be on par with plugging the thing in the first place.

    13. Re:Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by feenberg · · Score: 1

      Aren't nearly all surge protectors made with 330 volt MOVs? Wikipedia has an article on surge protecters which includes this "A lower clamping voltage indicates better protection, but can sometimes result in a shorter life expectancy for the overall protective system. The lowest three levels of protection defined in the UL rating are 330 V, 400 V and 500 V. The standard let-through voltage for 120 V AC devices is 330 volts."

    14. Re: Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by adolf · · Score: 1

      To a modern, global, switch-mode PSU (laptop power brick), everything (including the nasty non-at-all sinewave that serves as "AC power" in many locations) looks like noise/transient voltage.

      They don't care. It's all the same.

    15. Re:Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by gweihir · · Score: 1

      We are talking surges here, not regular switch on. A typical surge-test uses 500...15000V. A "surge" from 110V to 240V does not even register even in most 110V equipment.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    16. Re:Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by mjwx · · Score: 1

      A surge protector for 230-240 volts is what's needed.

      Actually what is needed is a voltage converter/step down transformer, surge protectors don't downvolt 220-240v to 110v.

      Or the US could just admit that 110v is a bad idea and follow the world onto 220-240v.

      However for laptops, it usually doesn't matter as most manufacturers make one auto-switching power supply for the entire world. Check your power brick to see if it supports up to 240v, it should say something like "AC 100-240v". As for the rest of your stuff, just make sure whatever you get a step down converter/transformer, then just bring a powerboard/powerstrip from home.

      As an Australian (240v), I only have to worry about getting a plug adapter. Most Europeans are in the same boat.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    17. Re:Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by geoskd · · Score: 1

      limiting that rush has less to do with protecting the PSU and more to do with not tripping crappy breakers if you plug them in coincident with the peak of the mains sine wave.

      This has not been true since breakers were introduced. One of the principle advantages to the breakers was a magnetic *and* thermal capability. This allows breakers ( even crappy ones ) to handle inrush of massive machinery.

      If you are feeling brave, you can try the following experiment ( I already have with several different types of breakers ): Take a dead short (Large gauge wire like 8 AWG or 6 AWG. Hook it up to a power transistor controlled by a microprocessor. International Rectifier makes some 100A jobbers that can handle spikes of up to thousands of Amps for less than 10ms bursts. Set up a zero cross detect on your microprocessor and turn the juice on through the dead short for 1 full wave of 120VAC. Hook up an o-scope to your mains and check the line voltage as you turn this critter on.

      What you will get is one full cycle of severely browned out mains (might drop as far as 10Vp-p. across a 1mOhm load ). For those astute at math, that would be 10,000Amps at 10Vp-p, or about 60 kWatts RMS. As long as you only do this for one full cycle and no more, you will neither blow the breaker, nor significantly heat any of you components. The reason for this is because breakers are mechanical devices and have a specified amount of time before they can "react" to overload. Even their thermal shutdown takes time. Long story short, a standard 15A wall breaker can dispense about 15kAmps for 10ms without tripping. That is far more than the transformer at the pole can handle, and its own internal resistance becomes the current limiting factor. A good line supply will provide you with about 10kAmps before the current limiting drops the line voltage significantly. A typical residential supply will only dump about 1000 Amps before significant drops in voltage. Either way, the breakers will not trip no matter what you do, as long as the entire incident is shorter than 10ms.

      This design is very much on purpose. As I have seen, and what these experiments demonstrates is that in-wall wiring, breakers, and utility company equipment are not seriously threatened by short power spikes, so they have no reason to try to protect against them. The breakers in your house are there to prevent enough power from flowing through the wires in the walls to cause them to start fires.

      The inrush can however severely damage switching power supplies. Many of them are built to just barely handle the voltages they are designed for. This is done to save money and weight in the extremely competitive mobile power supply market. This market is so competitive, and the margins are so thin, that they will do almost anything sketchy they can to shave pennies off the design. I have personally seen transformerless designs that were built assuming one of the two main lugs was neutral. If they are plugged into a reverse polarity outlet, they short the hot line to the ground directly... This is a common design used on many different power supplies, and is one of the primary reasons you should never open one of those supplies while it is powered. Even in the lab the damn things are dangerous.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    18. Re:Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Obviously you do not have the EE understanding required. A 220V surge protector is typically designed to clamp at around 500V. From rectified 110V AC that gives you a 350V relative spike into the capacitors. From rectified 220V it is only 190V. A 110V surge protector is typically designed to clamp at around 330V. That is an 180V spike. If you cannot see that a 350V spike may be a bit more destructive than an 190V/180V one, and that in particular, the components in the device may only be dimensioned for a 200V spike or so as that is what to expect with surge protection done correctly, then you have no business being in this discussion. If you have to ask where these numbers come from, the same applies.

      Incidentally, this is only one of the problems with a wrongly dimensioned surge protector. And yes, the surge voltage is relevant, as it influences dU/dt and the surge current. In actual fact, there is a surge model behind this and the surge voltage is only one factor. Also, surge protection devices do not do a perfect clamping, and have maximum ratings. If they are exceeded, the surge protector may short out, fail or even start to burn if not fitted with a thermal fuse. Incidentally, there is a maximum of surges a surge protector can clamp, depending on the surges and its ratings. After that, it needs replacement.

      Why do incompetent morons always feel they are qualified to comment on advanced engineering they really do not understand? The Dunning-Kruger effect is strong on Slashdot.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    19. Re:Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by xtronics · · Score: 1

      Not really - anyway - most of these 'surge protectors' are simple MOV blocks that get blown open after a few years of use. (They silently die in the line of duty).

      Amazing how many people here don't know anything about transients. - Common mode vs differential mode etc.

      Most power supplies have one built in - and work well above both voltages.

      The key bit is most transients are at RF frequencies - you don't have to know down all of what gets on the first cap past the rectification - and with PFC the inductor will just reflect most of it.

      Much more important is what happens when your computer is hooked up to two different grounds (Ethernet vs power mains ) and it becomes a shunt between the two.

    20. Re:Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      The problem is, 200 Volts on a 110V circuit is a surge and will fry a 110V power supply.

      The OP specifically stated that the power supplies under discussion are rated to take 110 or 240 V. This is not an issue.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    21. Re:Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      If you're serious, I would use a rotary converter. Failing that, at least a ferroresonant power conditioner. That should allow you to plug into just about any dodgy power source without worrying about frying things.

    22. Re: Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by Teun · · Score: 1

      Indeed and it's a good thing, one reason why I have trouble understanding the reason why OP's power supply failed.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    23. Re:Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      Yes, 200V on a 110V circuit is a surge, but most "typical" surges are 2kV or higher common mode (both lines going high relative to earth) due to lightning strikes.

      Sustained higher voltage surges on low voltage lines are normally a result of 11kV distribution lines falling on local feeders. The best you can hope for in such cases is that the fuses do their job before your wiring catches fire.

      My experience is that power lines don't get much in the way of surges - there are so many transformers along the way that ground point are plentiful.

      Comms lines are another matter entirely. In another lifetime (as a telco tech) I used to routinely see smoking wires hanging in mid air where a line card used to be and it's not at all uncommon to find black arc tracks inside modems or phones after a strike.

      Most surge arrestors work fine for the first hit, but self destruct whilst doing so and don't block the second and third ones a few hundred milliseconds later. In addition they tend to interfere with line characteristics and cheap ones often badly screw up DSL circuits.

      For "wrong voltage" on a power circuit (200V on 110V, etc) that's what fuses exist for. Surge arrestors are supposed to clamp short period , high impulse transients.

    24. Re:Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      > And why is 115 a "bad idea"?

      Stupidly high circuit currents for starters, resulting in having to use heavier switchgear and much heavier wiring to avoid excessive circuit losses and heating issues. losing 10V in a 220V circuit isn't an issue, but in a 110V circuit it can take you out of supply tolerance.

      The actual domestic feed into a USA house is 220V, not 110V. It's centretapped to provide 2 "pseudo phases". This has resulted in some parts of the world that started on a US system having 220V 60Hz supplies on NEMA sockets (be warned if you're in the Philippines or Thailand)

      110/115V was originally used on Edison's DC supplies, because higher than that started having major problems controlling arcing when things were switched off

      DC arcs are self sustaining. AC arcs self-quench every half cycle. This is why the same switch will have wildly differing AC/DC current ratings on the rating plate - the AC rating is what can pass through the contacts, whilst the DC one is about how fast and how far apart they open, in order to be able to safely switch whatever's being controlled OFF.

      Trivia: Whilst Edison was running around telling people Tesla's AC was dangerous and electrocuting dogs to prove it, 2-3 electricians per month were being killed by the "safe" DC supply system.

    25. Re:Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      "Also, nobody uses 110"

      I point you to parts of South America and certain areas in Japan.

    26. Re:Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      "I've never had the fuse blow..."

      Fuses and circuit breakers are there to protect the wiring and prevent a fire.

      They're not there to protect devices.

    27. Re:Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      MOVs have to be rated higher than the expected sinusoudal _peak_ voltage.

      For most mains circuits the allowable RMS deviation is "nominal" RMS -10%+15%, which means that peaks need to be sized appropriately. If the supply isn't clean then the peak might be slightly higher still.

      This brings up an important point for a lot of cheap chinese electronics rated for "220V" or "220-240V" - Whilst the supply in the UK is a nominal 220V, my house's _normal_ line voltage is 245VAC and it can go as high as 265VAC whilst still being within allowable power system tolerances (this is applicable across europe, but most of the EU centres on 220V whilst the UK centres on 230V, as do a lot of ex-british colonies)

      I've told chinese suppliers that the line voltage here is 245V and the standard response is that "this is out of spec" - when you point out the legally allowable variations in supply voltages(*) you can almost hear their heads exploding. Far too much single-voltage kit is made on the basis of "nominal +-5%" and that's simply not safe.

      (*) Most "developed country" mains noise and voltage excursion standards were written in the 1930s, when "electronics" simply wasn't sensitive to any of these kinds of things.

    28. Re:Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I can try to simplify things down so that the morons claiming that a 220V protector is perfectly adequate for a wide-input PSU running at 110V may get some glimmer of understanding that things are more complicated. I am well aware they are _much_ more complicated.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    29. Re:Surge protectors *must* be voltage specific by geoskd · · Score: 1

      I've even seen ground fault systems that trip from inrush current, which should be something simple to implement but somehow ones exist that can't handle noise and surges on the lines they monitor (resulting in a lot of wasted time debugging of a device once trying to track down a transient ground fault that wasn't there).

      Ground fault devices that experience even a transient current *must* trip. Any ground fault excursion is dangerous, and the result of a faulty piece of equipment. If you were seeing a transient ground fault, in a device, that device is *dangerous*, and the design fault with that device should be corrected. Most likely, you have some relatively high power signal that is coupling to the case. The easiest way to fix that problem is to ensure a strong enough coupling of all of your power supplies (bigger bypass caps), and better grounding (Most likely culprit is unexpected ground loops, or parts too close to the chassis ground). You might also have been victim of counterfeit breakers, which did not actually meet the CE/UL markings on the devices.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
  2. Lindy surge protector with usb by mriya3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have a Lindy Surge Protector (model number 73311) which has a cloverleaf input, a cloverleaf output, a "universal" (Multi region power socket) output plug, and 2 usb outputs (1A maximum). It's rated for 660W max at 110V and 1380W Max at 230V.

    1. Re:Lindy surge protector with usb by gaiageek · · Score: 1

      OP here: thanks for this, as it's at least an interesting variation on my current solution. I was hoping to find something in a more simple cube/outlet format that plugs right into the wall (ideally with retractable plug) but this may be the next best thing.

    2. Re:Lindy surge protector with usb by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'm skeptical. Devices like that may work to protect 220V devices from surge but I highly doubt that a 110V device will be covered. Proper surge protection is not something that can handle wide input voltages without subjecting the low voltage to at least the high voltage.

    3. Re:Lindy surge protector with usb by gweihir · · Score: 1

      A fast surge will create a huge inrush current into a device running at 110V when the surge protector is dimensioned for 220V. That has a good change to damage or kill the device. On a slow/weak surge, it will offer reasonable protection.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  3. 220V should be sufficient by bosef1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So I'm clear: you have a collection of devices with switch-mode power supplies that can handle the global 100-240V power, and you want a surge suppressor that will protect you on any voltage.

    Since your power supplies can handle up to 240V, you just need a surge suppressor that handles spikes above 240V. So buy a 240V-rated surge suppressor, and use a 120V plug adapter for countries with lower voltage. Since your devices already handle up to 240V, then they can handle minor over-voltages on 120V systems just fine. Bigger spikes, like lightning, are going to be high over-voltages regardless of the base voltage.

    I'm not sure of your solution if you have devices that have only-120V or only-240V power supplies, and you need a surge suppressor that can protect both. Buy new wide-band power supplies or build your own (it's not that hard).

    1. Re:220V should be sufficient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      All the OP needs to do us buy a basic local surge protector for < $10. There is no need for a "global" option. If you can afford to bounce around all over the world, you can buy a cheap protector from any local consumer electronic shop, or just ask the hotel to provide one.

      The OP is really an advert in disguise. There will be a highly promoted product with the hour.

    2. Re:220V should be sufficient by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      This is the new more moral Slashdot. They'll wait at least three hours!

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:220V should be sufficient by gaiageek · · Score: 2

      OP here. I appreciate your theory, but sorry, this isn't an advertisement in disguise - and if you believe one can arrive in a developing country and just buy a surge protector within the hour, I would guess you haven't been to the kind of countries I'm talking about (or arrived at 3am when local shops are all closed). When my Thinkpad power supply got fried in India (as mentioned in the OP) I literally spent weeks trying to find a replacement: I'd call a local shop, they'd say they ordered it and it would arrive in 2 days and they'd call me. 4 days later I'd call and they'd say it would be there in 2 days and they'd call me. (They never called). I'd change towns and go through a repeat of the same situation. I finally gave up trying.

      Keep in mind as well: not wanting to waste time searching for a new surge protector every time I switch to a different region; wanting to use a quality surge protector from a brand I know is reliable, and not a cheap one as you suggest.

    4. Re:220V should be sufficient by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Power strips with surge protectors worth their price aren't $10, they are closer to $100 in Europe.

      For $10 you may get the cheapest possible ordinary unprotected power strip.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    5. Re:220V should be sufficient by gaiageek · · Score: 1

      OP here. Your assumptions are correct: both power supplies (laptop & USB power adapter) are 100V-240V compatible. Your suggestion to simply use a 240V-rated surge suppressor even when on 110V is one I hadn't considered, and your reasoning seems sound. If anyone has actually tried this with without problem, please post about it.

    6. Re:220V should be sufficient by jandjmh · · Score: 3, Informative

      If I had mod points I would mod this up - most sensible post in this thread so far. So called surge suppressors are only useful to minimize the amplitude of very short, very high voltage but low total energy transients of the kind created by lightning (nearby, not a direct his) and other arc like events, such as sparks created by connecting and disconnecting loads.

      If you are somewhere third world, and the nominal 220V line goes to 260V and stays there for a while (fractions of a second to many seconds) the kind of surge suppressor found in power strips is useless. Your adapter will probably fry - and with luck fail in a way that blows a fuse inside without sending any damaging over voltage to the device it is powering. Better quality power adapters have added parts on the output that clamp the DC to safe limits even if the upstream parts in the adapter are being overvoltaged to failure.

      So use good quality (expensive brand name) adapters and take extras. They may die, but should sacrifice themselves to save the attached gear.

      PS - I spent years in industry designing power distribution, regulation and filtering gear for pro audio - including equipment designed for touring sound that had to run from generators that would sometimes put out excess voltage for a relatively long time if too much load was shed suddenly.

    7. Re: 220V should be sufficient by gaiageek · · Score: 1

      OP here. Thanks. Your comments are in line with my experience having the laptop power adapter get fried. As I asked elsewhere, what about using an outlet adapter with a replaceable fuse? Maybe even using lower rated fuses? A stock of 10 extra fuses would be a negligible size/weight addition.

    8. Re:220V should be sufficient by mjwx · · Score: 1

      If you are somewhere third world, and the nominal 220V line goes to 260V and stays there for a while (fractions of a second to many seconds) the kind of surge suppressor found in power strips is useless. Your adapter will probably fry - and with luck fail in a way that blows a fuse inside without sending any damaging over voltage to the device it is powering. Better quality power adapters have added parts on the output that clamp the DC to safe limits even if the upstream parts in the adapter are being overvoltaged to failure.

      That being said, I've travelled all over the third world from Colombia to Thailand and I've never had to use a surge protector. Most devices are solid enough to handle dirty power and most hotels, coffee shops and what not will have surge protection installed at the mains if power is that dirty (They dont like replacing all their electronics when the power company screws up).

      Surge protectors are just another thing taking up space in my bag... so I dont bother carrying them.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    9. Re: 220V should be sufficient by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      if you manage to find some voltage blown fuses sure but I guess those would be surge protectors.

      a regular fuse would I guess work with brown outs to some extent.. (current gets higher as voltage goes down).

      voltage dropping to half or about is a more common occurance in these parts of the somewhat developed but really not developed asia anyways...

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  4. Three headed outlets and two surge protectors. by maeka · · Score: 1

    It sounds like you are traveling with only passive adapters, and so you would need to protect each and every device separately.

    So own two single-outlet surge protectors, for they are quite small and as mentioned elsewhere they must be voltage-specific and make your chain thus:

    PassivePlugAdapter:SingleOutletSurge:ThreeHeadedOutlet(s):Appliances

    This will pack quite compactly, as the N Passive Plug Adapters get replaced with N/3 Three Headed Outlets

  5. I'm confused by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    If you are traveling with a laptop whose power supply is capable of handling either 110v or 240v, why do you care about a surge protector for 110v? Surely all you need is a single surge protector that is rated for the highest voltage that your laptop can handle.

    Also I wouldn't be too concerned about the 220v/240v differential. The components used in surge protectors don't suddenly cut off all spikes that just creep over their limit. In fact MOVs limit voltage to 3 to 4 times their rated value. So a 10% difference in line voltage is nothing to them.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  6. Buy on site by Crowd+Computing · · Score: 2

    Rather than carry why not buy on the spot in the country you're travelling to? Every airport should have a duty-free shop of some sort. What you'll probably find are power strips with surge protection rather than something specifically marketed as a surge protector. Look for one with a fuse or a mini circuit breaker. If you're worried about the quality, then you can try daisy-chaining two of them.

    1. Re:Buy on site by gaiageek · · Score: 1

      Buying on site isn't an option when you arrive at 3am on an overseas flight.

    2. Re:Buy on site by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      Because the Lindy that another poster mentioned is 10 euros. In an airport shop, it'll cost 30-60 euros, and/or be a chinese knockoff with a higher margin. Travel light, not foolishly.

    3. Re:Buy on site by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Rather than carry why not buy on the spot in the country you're travelling to? Every airport should have a duty-free shop of some sort. What you'll probably find are power strips with surge protection rather than something specifically marketed as a surge protector. Look for one with a fuse or a mini circuit breaker. If you're worried about the quality, then you can try daisy-chaining two of them.

      Personally I carry one socket adapter and a powerboard.

      That way, I can charge all of my devices from one power point. I've also got a powerboard with universal outlets so that I can plug in Australian and local electronics. Useful if the only useful power point is being used by the TV or what not.

      However I dont bother with surge protection. I've never had any of my electronics fail on holiday and if the power is regularly that dirty, the hotel will have surge protection installed at the mains as they dont want to replace all their TV's, computers, set top boxes and alarm clocks every time the power surges, let alone get complaints from their guests about dead laptops.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    4. Re:Buy on site by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Most countries where one would need such a surge protector, I wouldn't trust on having those things available - or if available, being of good quality.

    5. Re:Buy on site by amyreyna · · Score: 1

      Not in every airport can find a duty shop or any shop that sell surge protector, especially if traveling to developing country but not to the capital city.

  7. Here's what I did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    From US, but spend 90% of my time abroad for work. I bought a US power strip w/ surge protector, for my devices to plug into, and then attach a voltage adapter to the input plug on the strip. I swap adapters depending on what country I'm in--each of which is only slightly larger than the length of the plug on the power strip, so it's not a big deal to carry a half dozen of them around in my luggage. This has served me well for about 3 years now.

    1. Re:Here's what I did by BenFranske · · Score: 2

      You shouldn't do that. The US power strip is likely only rated for 120v. If you use it with an adapter in a country with 240v service you may find that some of the clearances are not enough and you get arcing, thus a fire hazard. I've actually had this happen to me. A better, but similar solution is to get a 220/230/240v power strip with surge protector. You can even get one that will accept US style plugs if you'd like. As long as your power supplies are rated for up to 240v input you'll be protected from surges.

    2. Re:Here's what I did by burtosis · · Score: 2

      You shouldn't do that. The US power strip is likely only rated for 120v. If you use it with an adapter in a country with 240v service you may find that some of the clearances are not enough and you get arcing, thus a fire hazard. I've actually had this happen to me.

      The voltage required to start an arc is around a million volts per meter. The 110V difference requires under four thousandths of an inch additional clearance given no insulation at all. If that's the issue I'm going to argue the device was so cheaply made it was already a fire hazard.

      A more likely scenario is cheap components (like capacitors for example) and overall bad design.

    3. Re:Here's what I did by stonefoz · · Score: 1

      Arcing is just about impossible. However the fuse and/or circuit breaker is most likely rated for less than 200 volts. Under rated circuit breakers and fuses may not disconnect higher voltages than their rating. OP will likely have no issues until an over current happens. The it will be a gamble of it may safe-fully disconnect or may catch fire. Voltage and Amp ratings are for both normal situations and what happens when things go bad. It may go very bad with wrong ratings.

      --
      I think I just cashed out all my cool points.
    4. Re:Here's what I did by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Just because it works for you doesn't mean it will work well for someone else with another brand of surge protector. The safety level on the US power strips aren't as good either compared to the Euro variants.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    5. Re:Here's what I did by Teun · · Score: 1

      That's why he has a voltage adapter (AKA a transformer) in the INPUT of the strip :)
      Not a bad idea when all your kit is for US voltage. But a transformer that can handle several 100's of Watts is going to be heavy, like my Thinkpad has a 170W power supply.
      The advantage is it will to an extend suppress some high frequency spikes by virtue of it's inductance.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  8. Re:Original power supply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I hope you realize that the optimal "waveform" from a USB charger is a flat line. There isn't such a thing as "waveform quality" with DC power, which is what USB uses. Ripple, maybe, from insufficient filtering, but not "waveform". That is only an issue with inverters that output AC mains voltage power.

  9. Buy them by DogDude · · Score: 1

    If you can afford to travel to multiple continents, then there's no reason why you can't spend a few bucks and buy the surge protectors you need when you arrive on the continent, and just donate them when you leave.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  10. 'surge protection' internationally by rossdee · · Score: 1

    Well don't go to Afghanistan, Iraq, or Syria
    all three have experienced a 'surge' of troops from the US, Iran, or Russia

  11. Power Rating by tempmpi · · Score: 1

    This sounds like a good idea, however when using a 240V surge protector at 100V you need to consider the reduced power rating. The power rating is likely mostly an maximum current rating and the same amount of power at 100 V instead of 240 V uses 2.4 times the current. So if you need 150 Watt maximum power at 100 V, you should use a 240v surge protector rated at least 360 W.

    --
    Jan
  12. Not what your asking for due to weight constraints by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    But what you really need is a UPS, It not only prevents surges, it cleans up the voltage outputting a near perfect sine wave.

    As mentioned an Isolation Transformer would also do the trick, but again weight constraints prevent their use.

    While I wouldn't put much faith in those surge arrestors, trusting a circuit breaker over one. APC has one on Newegg.com (quick search) http://www.newegg.com/Product/... - for cheap but 120 volts.

    As one reviewer to the above product put it " So-called surge protectors, IMO, fit into one of the most ethereal realms in I.T. Go ahead and Google, "Do I need a surge protector," and you'll get answers from both sides of the fence--in pages upon pages of search results. That's because the answer is subjective."

  13. How about a battery pack? by Alypius · · Score: 1
    I don't think this is quite what you're looking for, but my wife and I have used a spare power brick with great success:

    Poweradd Pilot Pro 32000mAh External Battery Pack

    Much safer than relying on a non-grid electrical supply.

    1. Re:How about a battery pack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Safer" by your definition, but more batteries are not such a safe option to bring on an airplane.

  14. Any will just do by d4fseeker · · Score: 1

    General plug-in surge protectors just short to ground whenever the component inside triggers over X volt. According to Wikipedia the lowest trigger voltage is 330V for 110V circuits, so even a 110v-rated protector will work fine as the device MUST be able to handle such spikes without damage for certification. However note that especially in developing countries the surge protector may NOT be enough but the adequate solutions are probably far too heavy for you.

  15. Re:Not what your asking for due to weight constrai by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    But what you really need is a UPS,

    Putting a bit more thought into this, I can see rigging up an expensive GFI (not a GFCI) -one that trips instantly or faster than normal to do what you need, .

  16. You're doing it wrong... by itsme1234 · · Score: 2

    Modern good laptop power supplies aren't that easy to kill; probably many mains appliances the locals use are more sensitive to troubles on the line (not only spike but also short drops), from fridges or air-condition units (anything that's compressor-based), washing machines, etc. Sure, PSes can die out of the blue, like mostly everything else but you might not be able to prevent this with a surge protector.

    If it is critical to have the laptop available then you need to carry (at least) two power supplies AND TWO LAPTOPS! Frankly the power supply can be replaced almost everywhere for less than the cost of 2-4 beers from minibar, is just a 12-20V DC power supply (it can be also jury-rigged from basic parts - YES I know about the laptops with data pins, etc but still a basic supply will work). In fact it is more likely the laptop will die (not only from electrical problems!).

    If you don't really need a backup laptop you can plan to use the phone for most of the communication, basic browsing, etc. You can have a memory stick with the important files, bitlocker encrypted if you want, even a fully encrypted bootable linux distribution if you so desire. Heck, you can borrow a machine if absolutely needed at Everest Base Camp, I'm sure you'll be fine anywhere else.

    And why, WHY, WHY, WHY would you have in 2016 a phone "that requires the original power supply (can't be charged from a notebook USB port)" ?!?!?!?!!??! YES, we all knows somebody who still has a Nokia from 2008 with the round connector and a battery that goes for three weeks when new and even now from Monday to Friday without any sweat. But I haven't seen anybody on an intercontinental flight with something like that for a while. Even if I do see somebody I'll just assume it is a second phone, to use with a local SIM...

    1. Re:You're doing it wrong... by gaiageek · · Score: 2

      OP here. My situation isn't critical enough to warrant carrying more than a half-pound of extra gear, which rules out an extra power supply and certainly a 2nd laptop. As you mention, I can always use my phone.

      As for a "phone that requires the original power supply" - that was misleading. All my devices (save the laptop) can be charged from from USB, but the laptop USB ports tend put out the standard 500mAh, so it can be a long time charging compared to a 1000mAh USB charger. Also, I have encountered devices (the HP Touchpad) which, if depleted to 0% battery, will not charge without the stock charger. I no longer use a Touchpad, but the experience taught me that "USB charging" isn't so universal and the stock charger may be necessary.

    2. Re:You're doing it wrong... by adolf · · Score: 1

      Questions:

      1. How do you know it was a surge that killed your PSU?

      2. What else was your laptop plugged into when it got roached?

      Surges from line-to-neutral are usually taken up by the PSU's own internal MOVs, spark gaps, and other things designed for the purpose (and far better than an average power strip of reasonable expense) of protecting the device. (Or at least this is the case with proper PSUs. No-name Ebay cruft without a UL/CSA/whatever registration is anyone's guess.)

      Contrastingly, common-mode surges cannot be dealt with in this way....but they also can't affect anything unless that potential has someplace to go (ie, a complete circuit).

      Which, of course, makes perfect sense: Stick one side or the other of a 9V battery against your tongue and nothing happens, but when you stick both sides to your tongue...ow.

      So if your laptop was connected to two things (the wall *and* the hotel TV, or the wall *and* the Ethernet jack/phone line, or...), your failure makes more sense.

      (and its mA when discussing current flow.)

    3. Re:You're doing it wrong... by gaiageek · · Score: 1

      Questions:

      1. How do you know it was a surge that killed your PSU?

      2. What else was your laptop plugged into when it got roached?

      I was in India (Goa) and was awoken in the middle of the night to the overhead fan spinning crazy-fast, like it was going to take off. Half-asleep, I tried adjusting the switch to put it on a lower level, but it had no effect so I just turned it off. During this I noticed the a light outside seeming unusually bright, but then someone stepped out and turned it off. I went back to sleep, not realizing that what just happened was a surge - and that my laptop was plugged in to the AC (and only the AC - no network cables or anything else). When I woke in the morning I noticed my laptop was running on battery power. I checked to make sure it was plugged in and noticed this - the surge protector (a laptop specific one). It fried it (and warped the plastic casing as you can see) and killed my Thinkpad PSU as well. The laptop was fine, though I have to wonder if it would have still been fine if the surge protector hadn't been there.

      Now I know 1. the symptoms of a power surge and 2. not to leave anything plugged in and unattended when in surge-prone countries. But still I'm concerned about it enough to think about carrying surge protection.

      The comments here have left me thinking that maybe I'd be just as well off, or better off, with something containing a replaceable fuse. I assume that a surge like that would've killed the fuse and left my PSU undamaged, and a few spare fuses weigh practically nothing.

      Alternatively, maybe I should not worry about it and just have a spare PSU in a box ready to be shipped to me if need it.

    4. Re:You're doing it wrong... by itsme1234 · · Score: 1

      GGGP here :-)

      First of all I'm surprised nothing more fried, especially from whatever other appliances the locals surely have.
      To prevent damage from a simple overload yes a replaceable fuse and some MOVs would be the ticket; the only thing is that MOVs can absorb only so much energy and they get damaged at every hit (possibly the very first one). I don't know if anybody makes a commercial light (for travel) surge protector with replaceable fuses (maybe even MOVs). Probably it would be a nice project to make one yourself, the parts are quite cheap (and you can chose precisely what you want); the only problem would be the enclosure itself (maybe you can re-purpose one of the larger travel socket adapters). What works well in your advantage is the low power you need (for laptop and such), many surge protectors are rated for a lot of amps so they need a beefy fuse so it doesn't trip when you use your hairdryer for example...

      However, I still wouldn't want to increase the complexity of my setup with some protection box, something that doesn't add any other features beside protection. As you mention India you might have noticed in any populated place they have people repairing everything, from laptops to mobile phones - they are sometimes doing complicated soldering jobs literally by the side of the road. Also "universal" laptop power supplies are usually available and they do work fine usually unless you have a particularly fancy laptop (I wouldn't let them plugged at home for sure but in a pinch they're better than nothing).

      As for the USBs that don't charge things that are supposed to be charged by USB - I haven't seen for many years things that really don't work at all (I'm referring to things like phones, tablets, etc - stuff that needs to charge, not hard drives, that's another story). The laptops/desktops got better and better and giving power over USB and the devices themselves got better at accepting well under 5V inputs without stopping charging completely. If you want some insurance on this side I'd recommend a USB power bank, not a big one (unless you really want a big one), even one with only one 18650 battery would do (be sure to read some tests, many "numbers" are pure marketing).

      If you get a good power bank you can recharge it from anything and power any of your finicky devices. You can also use it for more things than just the obvious, for example you can use it to firewall your device from strange USB charging ports (in the airport/planes/etc) - be aware not all power banks support charging and discharging at the same time, you can use it to "get some juice" without having the phone tied to the wall, etc.

      Of course I didn't mean to drop your original charger. In fact my setup is the following:

      - man purse - phone, small (but 2+A) USB charger, short cable, small powerbank

      - laptop bag - laptop, laptop PS, long USB cable

    5. Re:You're doing it wrong... by adolf · · Score: 1

      Alright, first I want to thank you for participating. I meant to do this before, but forgot. So often an Ask Slashdot happens, and the asker never interacts at all.

      I can tell from your description that what you experienced was a surge from line to neutral.

      Here's what's supposed to happen in any "surge protector" in this scenario:

      The surge exceeds the breakover voltage of the MOV that is across line and neutral (which it must have, as it was the MOVs turning conductive that generated the heat that melted the housing). This does two things: It attempts to shunt the voltage, and also draws lots of current.

      The circuit breaker (ever notice that the power switch on a surge-protected strip usually says On/Reset?) on the power strip is then supposed (via heating, electromagnetics, or both) to detect this excess ("lots") of current, and disconnect one leg of the mains. Once the breaker trips, things are supposed to be fine until reset, and then function normally (though MOVs do age as they get used like this and you should replace/repair the suppressor before absolutely trusting it again).

      At least some of these things didn't happen. And sometimes, the MOVs get blown to bits by transient voltage, in which case they can't do anything further to help.

      So. As much as I want to, and in fact did, say that a proper mdoern PSU should be reasonably unaffected by a line-to-neutral transient surge, apparently that wasn't the case here: Either its internal protection failed to be effective, or was effective briefly before being overwhelmed by the duration.

      It might have sacrificed itself by blowing its own internal fuse: A post-mortem tear down is always a good idea with stuff like this, even if it involves taking it to the alley behind the hotel and paying neighborhood kids to pummel it with cement blocks until it opens. You'll see what's broken/fried/sacrificial, and learn to make better choices next time, and maybe come back and tell us all about it.

      That all said: I tender the following three possible off-the-shelf solutions:

      1. A Ditek surge suppressor. These are MOV and circuit-breaker based like most, but they advertise having lower breakover voltages than most others and are therefore more sensitive.

      2. A Transtector surge suppressor. These are avalanche diode based unlike most, and are advertised to shunt surges earlier, faster and with more current capability than any MOV-based suppressor. They also use circuit breakers instead of fuses.

      3. Someone here mentioned, I think, a Belkin design that includes a fuse, which is doubtless also MOV-based. Having a fuse seems low-tech, but fuses are generally -much- faster than circuit breakers and you can tailor the size of the fuse to your expected load, whereas a circuit breaker will always be sized for the maximum ampacity of the entire power strip. You'd want to install the smallest fuse you can get away with (buy a kill-a-watt or other thing that can measure current, too, to be sure). And you'll know if it's too small because it will blow inconveniently and often.

      The idea with #3 is that the MOVs shunt the voltage, the fuse blows very quickly (much faster than a breaker), and there is no drama. Fuses are also much simpler and more reliable than $0.50 circuit breakers. Carrying a few extra (or a dozen!) fuses of different values shouldn't be a big deal as they are small and light and often come with appropriate packaging, and if they're AGC fuses (which they probably are) then you can find replacements literally anywhere on the globe.

      IIRC, it comes with a 3A fuse. This seems totally appropriate for multinational use of a modern laptop with its 100-200W PSU, along with a small thing or two like a clock and a real cell phone charger.

      (I really like #3, having thought this through for a couple of days)

      Note, though, that in all cases (and for all countries!) you'll want to buy a 240V suppressor. I stand by and maintain that a global PSU will work with anything even rese

  17. Surges weren't my biggest problem... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

    Persistent over/under voltage was always my challenge traveling. A surge protective device doesn't do anything when power is running at 300V for a few seconds. The old MOVs, without proper fusing, would always pop and start smoking, which was a sign to trip the main breaker before everything got fried.

    For truly sensitive electronics we always used commodity 12V chargers tied to a big battery bank with individual inverters for each piece of equipment. We might have had a custom filter to deal with ripple current off the chargers, too long ago to remember the details. The chargers lasted 2-3 months on average, but were easy to replace. Normal dual-conversion UPSs would barely last 3-4 months and were much harder to find and more expensive.

    For today, I would have two laptop power supplies and an extra battery, and only charge from USB. The bigger USB power supplies are pretty robust, worth carrying extras.

    1. Re:Surges weren't my biggest problem... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      A surge protective device doesn't do anything when power is running at 300V for a few seconds.

      Seriously? Is that actually a problem is some parts of the world?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Surges weren't my biggest problem... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      Yes. In the course of a day, mains power where I used to live would range from 100V to 300V. You get the prolonged over voltages when a large load drops off, either a circuit breaker trip, or something more random. Modern voltage regulators prevent this, but legacy units will operate for a few minutes at 30-50% over voltage.

      Even with modern voltage regulators, when the load is random they are often programmed pretty loosely. 3rd world load creates 3rd world grids.

    3. Re:Surges weren't my biggest problem... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      That's brutal

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  18. Re:Isolation Transformer by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    You don't lug around a 1:1 transformer if you are traveling around the world. You want to travel relatively light.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  19. Re:These work well, and are dual voltage by gaiageek · · Score: 1

    OP here. Thanks! I've seen that Belkin one before but didn't know people had used it on 220V despite it only being rated for 110V.

  20. Re:Not what your asking for due to weight constrai by gaiageek · · Score: 1

    OP here. I see some GFCI single outlet adapters on the market, but no GFI (and I'm not sure of the difference). If it matters (I think it does), some of the places I've been have used outlets that aren't even grounded, which further complicates the whole surge protection defense of sending excess current to ground.

    Here's a question: I have a cheap international plug adapter that has "surge protection" built-in in the form of a standard user-replaceable fuse. What about using that, and maybe even putting in a lower-rated fuse?

  21. Re:Original power supply by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Most clueless posting so far, USB power is DC, no "waveform" present. The actual problem is that they are often too weak and can heat up dangerously.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  22. Re:Electricity by Teun · · Score: 1

    That's what we call a 'Rotating Transformer', with a couple of pulleys and a belt you can even make it change between 50 and 60 Hz frequency.
    Just a pity the one I use weighs nearly half a ton.

    But as a surge isolator it is bullet proof.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  23. Re:Not what your asking for due to weight constrai by jandjmh · · Score: 1

    Most UPS's are "pass through" devices that connect the incoming power directly to the output if the input has power. When the input power drops, a relay inside the ups switches the outlets to an inverter that is powered by a battery. They provide no protection against surges, other than the same kind of limited protection that a powerstrip with surge protection has.

    There are "online" UPS's that do a full double conversation (AC->DC->AC) at all times. They are heavy and expensive, but do provide nearly perfect protection to the attached gear.

  24. Re:Original power supply by Rising+Ape · · Score: 1

    Not sure about you, but I'm not entirely comfortable plugging something that cost $1 into the mains.

  25. Re:Not what your asking for due to weight constrai by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    OP here. I see some GFCI single outlet adapters on the market, but no GFI (and I'm not sure of the difference). If it matters (I think it does), some of the places I've been have used outlets that aren't even grounded, which further complicates the whole surge protection defense of sending excess current to ground.

    GFI's are required in the US in all newer homes, they are a fast tripping device, the outlet normally located in the bathroom. One outlet can protect an entire line.

    Grounding protection is required for personal protection alone. If a country is too cheap to pay for the extra wire, I'd give serious consideration of using one's incoming metal water pipes as the third wire (think of the kids).

    Here's a question: I have a cheap international plug adapter that has "surge protection" built-in in the form of a standard user-replaceable fuse. What about using that, and maybe even putting in a lower-rated fuse?

    According to others replies your power supply should be well protected, situations like yours taken into account. The fuse a bonus allowing you more control. Amperage is your concern here, phones, computers, what have you; require a specific amp rating to charge, anything lower can take hours longer to charge if at all.

  26. List of laptop surge supressors by Aryeh+Goretsky · · Score: 1

    Hello,

    Inline 100-240V laptop surge suppressors are readily available from online electronics retailers. Here are a few that will work for you:

    I've used the APC model without any issues, as well as models from Targus and TRC that has since been discontinued, but occasionally show up online for sale.

    Regards,

    Aryeh Goretsky

    --
    Dexter is a good dog.
    1. Re:List of laptop surge supressors by gaiageek · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm aware of most of these (the Lindy one I hadn't seen). The point of my post though was that I'd like something that plugs directly into an outlet and has outlets for plugging in to, instead of something like one of these which are specific to laptops.

  27. Re:Original power supply by Chrontius · · Score: 1

    http://www.righto.com/2012/10/...

    Except some of them do produce a waveform where a line should be, and it's good to know which ones - you don't want to run that into a cell phone you like.

  28. Must be rare failure by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 1

    Never had that happen to me, though I travel regularly. It must be a rare mode of failure. I have never lost a piece of equipment this way in any country. Just once I had to fix a N. American power stripe after its surge protector component smoked out in Europe. Bypassing it fixed the stripe and it run finely ever after :).

    Personally I would not bother, as a failed power supply is not a big risk comparing to other risks that something else fails or gets lost. It may be more practical to rely on replacing the power supply from a local store in the event that it fails (many sell universal power supplies that fit sockets on most notebooks). If you are that paranoid, just pack a spare in your checked luggage.

    --
    17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
  29. Only original power supply? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    but this doesn't provide protection for a phone or tablet that requires the original power supply (can't be charged from a notebook USB port)

    That sucks, because my suggestion was going to be to get something like this Kensington charger. I have one with the standard North American plugs, it works with 100-240VACm, 50-60Hz.

    I have a strict rule ... down own anything which can't charge from stock USB. I find between my Kensington and a couple of 6600MAh USB power bricks, I can pretty much keep everything charged.

    Things which require their own chargers just create more hassles in terms of what chargers you need to bring ... whereas bringing 5-6 USB cables of several different sizes and one or two good chargers is pretty damned easy.

    Just say no to devices with proprietary chargers, because you can eliminate a lot of stuff with a decent USB charger which already handles the different voltages -- they're easy enough to find these days, relatively inexpensive, and help you cover a lot of cases much more conveniently.

    Things are a whole lot easier when you just have some generic cables and a multi-port charger.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  30. What I use by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    I have multiple devices - more than a typical hotel provides sockets for. So I carry a 4-way or 6-way power extension lead for my home-country's type of wall socket. Then I have all the usual chargers (my laptop; company's laptop; client's laptop ; generic USB charger ; camera battery charger) , which plug into that. This works if I'm at work in my home country, at a clinet in my home country, at a client in their home country, or at work in any other country (e.g., where the client is operating).

    I additionally carry ONE adaptor each for home-country to US ; and home-country to European "Shucko" (which is mostly compatible with Russian). And I carry a multimeter and a screwdriver - but I carry them normally anyway.

    In combination, this then gives me 4 (or 6) sockets to my home country, in any country in the world. Well, any country I've met so far. I've occasionally had problems with only having South African sockets available.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  31. Frequency by NewYork · · Score: 1

    You need protection surge against Voltage, Current and Frequency.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utility_frequency