Slashdot Mirror


North Korea Accused of Testing an ICBM With Missile Launch Into Space (examiner.com)

MarkWhittington writes: Reuters reported that North Korea launched a long-range missile that is said to have placed a satellite into space. The launch happened much to the consternation of North Korea's neighbors, South Korea and Japan, as well as the United States. Pyongyang claimed that the missile launch was part of that country's peaceful space program. But, other countries are pretty sure that the launch was a test of an ICBM capable of placing a nuclear weapon on any target in the world, particularly the United States.

32 of 287 comments (clear)

  1. Of course it is. by Crashmarik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The only difference is the payload.

    1. Re:Of course it is. by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Refresh my memory, how many US launches were atop "U.S. Army" boosters again?

    2. Re:Of course it is. by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Most of them.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Of course it is. by james_shoemaker · · Score: 5, Informative

      All except Vanguard were atop converted ICBMs until the Saturn boosters came along, and the first Saturn was basically cobbled together from ICBM parts so it could also call it ICBM based, The Saturn V was mostly not ICBM based.

    4. Re:Of course it is. by Brett+Buck · · Score: 4, Informative

      Which is of course irrelevant. The US (nor USSR) were not under international sanctions with agreements not to do it at the time, unlike North Korea.

    5. Re:Of course it is. by gman003 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I did my own checks to see how many US military missiles were used for space launch.

      Two Mercury launches (the suborbital ones) occurred atop PGM-11 Redstone missiles, which were operated by the US Army. The remaining four used SM-65 Atlas missiles, which were operated by the US Air Force. They technically had a new designation, but the modifications were mostly additional safety measures, so the actual launch system was essentially Atlas.

      All twelve Gemini launches used Titan II missiles, used by the US Air Force. Again, they had a separate designation, but adding abort systems and backup navigation systems doesn't really make it "not a missile".

      Apollo, as you stated, used only Saturn I, IB and V rockets, which were never used for military purposes. However, the Saturn I/IB's first stage was derived from PGM-11 Redstone. Only Saturn V was completely free of military history. The same is true of ASTP and Skylab, since they reused Apollo launchers. This definitely doesn't fall under "atop US Army boosters", but you can't deny that there was some history there - mostly because the design of Saturn started before NASA or even NACA existed.

      The Space Shuttle did not directly use any military components, but the design was informed by the capabilities of the military-industrial complex. Solid rockets had, by that point, become the obvious choice for nuclear missiles, so much of the American rocket industry retooled around solid rockets, and so the Shuttle used solid boosters for much of its power. And the US Air Force did plan to operate their own Shuttles, even building a launch site for them (Challenger convinced them to go with expendable launchers instead). But it can't reasonably be claimed the Shuttle itself was a military product.

    6. Re:Of course it is. by cold+fjord · · Score: 5, Funny

      He seems to have had a really bad aim then as he kept hitting London.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    7. Re:Of course it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      North Korea is possibly the worst country on the planet, but arguing international law is a bit rich considering the US and USSR ignore international law any time it's inconvenient. If you want international law to have any weight behind it, the big boys have to play along too.

    8. Re:Of course it is. by shortscruffydave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As the great Tom Lehrer put it...

      "Once rockets are up, who cares where they come down.
      'That's not my department', said Wehner von Braun"

    9. Re:Of course it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What is the purpose of this discussion? Who cares if the most rockets had a military use? NASA's drive was always directly related to the Cold War; when the Cold War ended NASA's funding got cut over and over again. So frankly anything NASA did had a military use behind it.

      And quite frankly, just about everything has a military use behind it to. We're currently writing on computers that likely use the same or similar hardware to power military weapon systems. We're using the Internet that has it's genesis in DARPA. I just drank some orange juice from frozen concentrate that was initially designed by the military in order to cram more supplies sent to troops into a single shipment. I'll be driving later today and need some directions, so I'll use my cell phone to access the GPS system that was initially set up as a missile and military unit guidance system. Hell I buttered my bred with a knife today; I'm sure some "military" invented that way back in the day.

      So while the facts are all interesting, the question is why is this even coming up?

  2. Anything NK does is suspicious by ITRambo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's amazing that NK still has the means to play serious games with the rest of the world. Of course, this test was intended to scare the rest of the world into throwing more money at the madman in charge hoping he stays quite again, for a little while at least. Instead, new ways to provoke an eventual land war will be dreamed up. They won't just go away. China needs to do more to keep NK under control, unless NK's games are tolerated by China for reasons unknown.

    1. Re:Anything NK does is suspicious by Great+Big+Bird · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They will be tolerated in so much as they keep a buffer between them and South Korea. They do not want another democratic neighbour to stir up trouble.

      The limits to this arrangement are of course in question.

    2. Re:Anything NK does is suspicious by meerling · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From what I've seen, even China is getting sick of North Korean antics and have started applying political pressure behind the scenes for them to chill out. Unfortunately, it seems as though NK is ignoring it and going rogue, which is a really bad idea as it's really only the influence that China wields that keeps them from getting steamrolled by any of several other countries or groups.

    3. Re:Anything NK does is suspicious by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That sounds logical. The only other reason I can see is that they are letting NK force the West into developing more advanced ICBM counter measure technologies because they are confident that they will then be able to steal it and thereby undermine the West's ICBM capabilities. Ask yourself what would Sun Tzu do?

    4. Re:Anything NK does is suspicious by arbiter1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Reason China is getting sick is they see the writing on the wall with what NK is doing. NK is playing with fire and its not a game they can win.

    5. Re:Anything NK does is suspicious by jonwil · · Score: 3, Informative

      2 things are keeping the western world from taking more action against North Korea. The first is that any military moves against North Korea would result in North Korea lobbing massive firepower (missiles, artillery and other things) at South Korea long before the US or others could stop them. And the second is that regardless of what China may say about the North Korean nuclear program, China would likely take action to stop a democratic unified Korea right on their doorstep just as they did in the early 50s.

    6. Re:Anything NK does is suspicious by encad · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That sounds logical. The only other reason I can see is that they are letting NK force the West into developing more advanced ICBM counter measure technologies because they are confident that they will then be able to steal it and thereby undermine the West's ICBM capabilities. Ask yourself what would Sun Tzu do?

      Interesting thought and the US was/is (?) developing that tech with variing results and more for propaganda reasons against russia, which upset them on hillarious levels, even with the knowledge that they have enough firepower to overcome any of these systems.

      Beside their wanna-be nuclear ordenance NK has also enough firepower at the DMZ that they can easily shell Seoul into ground zero with conventional weaponary which seems even more dangerous, because MAD (without the M in NKs case) is not really effectiv as they still can fire at billions of people even after the capital was nuked to the ground.

      Probably the only acceptable answer to them firing an ICBM would be return fire by the 5 permanent members of the security council, with total annihilation of NK damn the consequences, because if one gets to fire it and nothing happens afterwards, others will try as well (looking at you India/Pakistan/Israel/Iran).

      China already mentioned quite public that they don't like NK acting up, but in contrast to my statement above they also might not be in the position to intervene without a major incident and are now between a rock and a hard place:

      - Keep that shitty dictator and send him enough money to keep his kingdom and hope that it destabilizes from inside and stays inside or
      - actively act against him and try to explain why half SK would look like the eastern french border after WWI

      Would be interesting to see how Sun Tzu manages this one.

    7. Re:Anything NK does is suspicious by Martin+Blank · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's more that the US isn't willing to do anything about it because it guarantees thousands to hundreds of thousands of dead allies and unpredictable results for geopolitical balance in the region. By chiding them publicly, it sets up a history of warnings in case something does happen, but lets all those people keep living for now.

      Also, South Korea doesn't want to fight over it, preferring to wait until the regime collapses on itself and then figuring out how to clean up that mess, which would be easier than cleaning up that mess plus the leftovers from a war.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    8. Re:Anything NK does is suspicious by cold+fjord · · Score: 3

      Because it worked so well back in 1940 with Japan.

      Aggressive military dictatorships aren't always deterred by anything less than war. Can you think of a measure less than war that would have deterred Japan from its path of conquest in Asia and war against America? Surrender doesn't count.

      . . . amid all their paranoia and psychopathy they are honestly scared about what happens to non-nuclear countries once USA tells them "you are not my friend" and how different it is when the one at the receiving end is an ICBM-capable country.

      Your theory needs some adjustments. North Korea was at war with South Korea, the UN powers, and through that the US before there were ICBMs. You're trying to paint a 60 year old war with a 10 year old brush and it doesn't work. Many countries have had an interest in nuclear arms and many of them were US allies. I don't think your idea holds water. North Korea wants nuclear weapons for the power, not just to use against the US.

      By the way, did you take any notice of what happened to the "friends" of the USSR that went off script? East Germany? Hungary? Czechoslovakia? Afghanistan? I don't recall the US invading a friendly nation like that.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  3. so what? by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They aren't signatories to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. They are parties to the outer space treaty but as long as the US and others have ICBMs I find it hard to argue that ICBMs are covered by that treaty. Makes sense since the weapons don't reside in space nor are designed to target space objects but just pass through space on the way to their targets.

    I don't get the US centric bias towards military policy. Basically anyone that becomes capable of attacking the US is automatically an aggressor that needs sanction. What about the US' ability to attack everyone? How about those pricks disarm and reduce their military to 1/10th the size, stop toppling governments because they don't like them etc?

    1. Re:so what? by Daemonik · · Score: 3, Informative

      The US and North Korea only have an armistice, not a peace treaty. Legally they're still at war with each other. Added to NK's disregard of pretty much everyone, their having ICBMs does make the US nervous for good reasons. The US respects the armistice, but NK will likely start the war up again if they ever think they can get away with it.

      No country is happy with any other country having the ability to attack it. Just very few countries are in the position that the US is in of having a military powerful enough that their displeasure makes people take notice.

      The US doesn't just use it's military as casually as most think, typically it waits for a large group of allies to urge it to take action. It's wars in the Middle East benefit Europe a lot more than they do the US.

    2. Re:so what? by Schmorgluck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree it's a bit of a moot point in practice, but it doesn't speak highly of the state of constitutional workings within the USA themselves. If the USA can project whatever amount of armed force they want on the whim of the Executive power, what's the point of having constitutional provisions requiring the approval of Congress to declare war? That's a long running case of exploiting procedural loopholes if there was any.

      --
      There's nothing like $HOME
  4. Anything the US does is suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For what bizarre reason shouldn't North Korea be "allowed" (by whom?!) to have ICBMs when the US - its biggest enemy - also has has them? And why would China "need" to prevent one of its closest allies from protecting itself from a possible american aggression?

    North Korea is a sovereign nation and it has the right to have nuclear weapons and ICBMs, so that it will be safe from any possible Iraqi-style american invasion.

    1. Re:Anything the US does is suspicious by Nemyst · · Score: 4, Informative

      North Korea is currently under international sanctions for violating several UN Security Council resolutions. That means that the majority of the UN considers North Korea's missile/nuclear program to be a problem, specifically destabilizing the region and undermining the global nonproliferation regime. In case you forgot, the nonproliferation treaty states that aside from the "nuclear weapon states" (China, France, Russia, the US and the UK), no other nation state should receive, manufacture or acquire nuclear weaponry. The NWS are also the five permanent members of the Security Council.

      So within the bounds of international law and politics, North Korea is indeed disallowed to have ICBMs. Who's disallowing them? Everyone. As of the last few resolutions, even China has decided to withdraw their support, making the resolutions passed unanimously. Nuclear weapons aren't something you get to unilaterally decide you'll develop and own, and if you do, other countries will be extremely suspicious of you and for good reason.

      Let's not kid ourselves here: North Korea is a farce. Its people is continuously under threat of famine, is being brainwashed, held back on just about every level, because the leadership of the country wants to conserve an iron grip on their small patch of land. As such, it's one of the poorest and most isolated places on the planet, and politically is extremely unstable and dangerous. You can't consider them on a rational level because they are not a rational actor. They have severe delusions of grandeur, regularly threaten just about every neighbor of armed conflict, often for no apparent reason, etc. The best possible thing that could happen for NK and the rest of the world would be a slow transition towards democracy and a complete reconstruction of its political sphere (including eliminating all current military and political personnel, up to Un himself). Failing that, I hope that one day the rest of the world decides to act upon this retarded stepchild and cut the head off - the transition would be far more traumatic, but at least it'd happen.

    2. Re:Anything the US does is suspicious by Lotana · · Score: 3, Informative

      What right does the US has to invade North Korea?

      According to Wikipedia, US and South Korea are in a military alliance.

      From what I understand, North and South Korea are currently in a state of war.

      Based on these two factors, US does not need any extra international justification to once against wage war on North Korea.

    3. Re:Anything the US does is suspicious by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      North Korea is currently under international sanctions for violating several UN Security Council resolutions. That means that the majority of the UN considers North Korea's missile/nuclear program to be a problem, specifically destabilizing the region and undermining the global nonproliferation regime. In case you forgot, the nonproliferation treaty states that aside from the "nuclear weapon states" (China, France, Russia, the US and the UK), no other nation state should receive, manufacture or acquire nuclear weaponry. The NWS are also the five permanent members of the Security Council.

      Try to see it from NK's point of view. It's biggest enemy, the one that keeps playing war games off its coast and supplying SK with military hardware is part of a powerful club, and no-one screws with them. To get into the top ranks of this club and wield all this, you need nuclear tipped ICBMs. The goal of the club is to make sure no-one else ever gets them, although it's both ineffective (India, Pakistan, South Africa) and corrupt (the US tolerates Israel's nuclear weapons and won't allow sanctions or inspections).

      If the rest of the world really wants NK to abandon its nuclear programme then it first the US needs to stop antagonizing it, and then every effort has to be made to normalize relationships. Despite the impression you may have been given, NK isn't a closed state or unable to participate in world events. They hold international sporting events, you can do business with their technology companies.

      Yes, they have work camps and a lot of other horrible stuff. The US has Guantanamo and various other black sites, including one in New York where inmates are tortured. Various European countries violate human rights and ignore legally binding UN rulings. The way to address that stuff is to engage, not to stand off and pile on more and more sanctions.

      Finally, can we stop calling Un a mad man please? He isn't insane, he isn't stupid. None of them are. They know the game, they play it because it benefits them to do so. It's not unlike how many western politicians bemoan the fact that the political system is broken, but do little to fix it because its how they got there in the first place.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  5. The reasons are far from unknown. by tlambert · · Score: 5, Informative

    China needs to do more to keep NK under control, unless NK's games are tolerated by China for reasons unknown.

    The reasons are far from unknown. China is currently grabbing as much territory as they can, anywhere they can:

    Baekdu Mountain (North Korea)
    Bhutanese enclaves in Tibet (Bhutan)
    Demchok, Chumar, Kaurik, Shipki Pass, Jadh, and Lapthal (Taiwan, India)
    Hong Kong (Taiwan)
    Jiandao (North Korea, South Korea)
    Kula Kangri and points West, Haa District (Bhutan)
    Macclesfield Bank (Taiwan, Vietnam)
    Paracel Islands (Taiwan, Vietnam)
    Scarborough Shoal (Taiwan, Philippines)
    Senkaku Islands (Taiwan, Japan)
    Shaksgam Valley (India)
    Arunachal Pradesh (Taiwan, India)
    Spratly Islands (Taiwan, Vietnam, Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei)
    Taiwan (Taiwan)
    Eastern Bhutan (Taiwan, Bhutan)
    Mainland China, Hainan (Taiwan -- but the PRC has a pretty good claim here 8^) ...)
    Western Heixiazi / Bolshoy Ussuriysky Island (Taiwan)
    Penghu, Jinmen,Matsu Islands, Pratas Islands (Taiwan)
    Songling District, Jiagedaqi District (Mongolia)
    Pamir Mountains (Tajikistan)
    Yalu River islands (North Korea, South Korea)
    Shaksgam Valley (India)

    Anything that keeps peoples attention focussed elsewhere is all to the good, as far as China is concerned. The territorial waters claims in the South China Sea, in particular, are important to them in terms of extending their range of control, in order to control fishing rights, since their population is still rising, despite sterilizations after the second child, and similar measures.

  6. Re: Weighed Response by bloodstar · · Score: 5, Informative

    NK with ICBMs is a big concern because there is doubt that the NK leaders are 'rational actors.' So normal considerations like self preservation of the country or people may not apply.

    --
    "The bass, the rock, the mic, the treble. I like my coffee black, just like my metal" - Mindless Self Indulgence
  7. Re: I bet it annoys Kim Jong... by WarJolt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's not about actually attacking the US. It's about perpetuating the propaganda. Our media hypes the threat for him. All he has to do is the NK version of shouting "ooga booga" and we all jump. I'm not saying there isn't a credible threat here, but it actually benefits NK to keep us all wondering. they can spin the hell out of it to their citizens.

  8. Re:Hypocrisy much ? by Nemyst · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As much bad rap as Obama and the US government gets on a daily basis, I would never imagine in a million years anyone in there deciding to declare war over a neighbor and start shelling nukes at them. With NK, it's not only probable, it's almost inevitable if they are left alone long enough. They are not rational, they do not care about the well-being of their citizens, and they think they can get away with many things. At some point they'll think too large and hit a city or contaminate a big area and people will die for no reason.

    To compare the US and NK is utterly reductionist and shows a complete lack of understanding of the differences in context.

  9. Space denial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    All NK has to do to fuck the planet is loft some high explosive packed around a tonne of sand into a retrograde orbit and blow it up.

    Goodbye trillions of dollars of fancy hardware once the debris cascade starts. Asymmetric warfare is a bitch ain't it.

  10. The truth about China and its influence by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 5, Informative

    From what I've seen, even China is getting sick of North Korean antics and have started applying political pressure behind the scenes for them to chill out. Unfortunately, it seems as though NK is ignoring it and going rogue, which is a really bad idea as it's really only the influence that China wields that keeps them from getting steamrolled by any of several other countries or groups.

    If anybody here would like to understand the situation in North Korea better, I highly recommend reading Victor Cha's book _The Impossible State: North Korea, Past and Future_. Cha worked for the George W. Bush administration and he's an expert on North Korea. Not to digress, but it would really be helpful is President Obama would make somebody in his staff who pays attention to North Korea read this too. Secretary of State Kerry keeps demanding that China do more. If he'd just read the book or have a staffer summarize it for him, he'd understand why they won't.

    Here's the deal. North Korea started the Korean War on their own and Mao and Stalin weren't really happy about it. Stalin refused to get involved although he was willing to for Soviet pilots to serve as the de facto North Korean Air Force during the war. China committed troops only when it looked like MacArthur might actually get up to the border with China and possibly invade China. China paid a real price in blood to save North Korea. Mao's own son was killed in the fighting. So while the old line of North Korea and China being "closer than lips and teeth" is no longer really true, China does feel involved because a lot of her soldiers died in that war and they don't want it to be for nothing.

    What Kerry, Obama and others in the US need to understand is what Cha points out in his book. Namely, that China really doesn't like North Korea causing problems but it views all possible outcomes of a post-North Korea version of Korea as really bad for China. China feels stuck in that it knows that North Korea's regime can't last forever, but if it puts too much pressure on them, they may collapse soon and remember, they view all post-DPRNK outcomes as very very bad for China. China fears that a unified Korea will have US soldiers stationed in what is now North Korea, so that means right on its borders. China also fears that once North Korea falls, the border will be overrun with North Koreans (there is an area of China near the border that is majority ethnic Korean, so refugees would likely go there) and China will have a humanitarian disaster on its hands that it will have to spend time and resources to deal with. Additionally, in exchange for their financial support, North Korea is basically selling its rare earths to China at below market prices, so China is financially very vested in maintaining this. A unified Korea is not likely to let China continue to destroy the North Korean countryside to get rare earths at a discount. China doesn't see any possible outcome of a post-North Korea world where things aren't a lot worse for China, so they are caught in rarely using the influence they have. However, outsiders, especially the Obama administration, seem to greatly overestimate what influence China actually has. The reality is that China has more influence than they are willing to use, but not as much as everybody else thinks. The Kim regime will do what it can to survive and if that means going against China, no problem there. China is simply never going to stop providing money and assistance as long as the regime exists, so expecting China to do anything but maintain the status quo is not very likely to happen.