Slashdot Mirror


SourceForge Eliminates DevShare Program (sourceforge.net)

SourceForge has officially eliminated its DevShare program. The DevShare program delivered installer bundles as part of the download for participating projects. We want to restore our reputation as a trusted home for open source software, and this was a clear first step towards that. We are more interested in doing the right thing than making extra short-term profit. This is just the first step in a number of improvements we will outline in the coming weeks. SourceForge and Slashdot were acquired in late January by BIZX.

88 of 454 comments (clear)

  1. Too late by JazzXP · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The majority of the good open source apps have moved to GitHub over this, and user trust in the site is dead. I know myself and a number of people I know don't go there anymore, hell, uBlock even blocks it by default.

    1. Re:Too late by whipslash · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah and we are focused on fixing all the issues that have caused projects to move.

    2. Re:Too late by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Informative

      The majority of the good open source apps have moved to GitHub over this

      At the rate Github is going, it won't be around much longer either.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Too late by EmeraldBot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah and we are focused on fixing all the issues that have caused projects to move.

      And that's the good part, the alternative is that it just permanently stays the way it was. If Whiplash (and friends) are willing to work to make it better, I'm willing to keep an open mind about it, and you should too.

      --
      "Set a man a fire, he'll be warm for the rest of the night. Set a man afire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
    4. Re:Too late by whipslash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Appreciate your reasonable tone

    5. Re:Too late by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      At least you folks are answering questions. I'll take a wait and see, buff SourceForge was once great, and it would be nice to see regain at least some ground.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:Too late by H_Fisher · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well said.

      On a related note, I've noticed that, for the most part, the quality and amount of interesting news has gone up since the new regime took over. Keep it up, Whipslash et al. So far, so good.

    7. Re:Too late by r.freeman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indeed, fuck github's SJW and censorship - but - no problem it's git. Just push to 3 other servers and run own one.

      PGP sign git commits, or at least the tags with published binaries and all security issues are fixed too.

    8. Re:Too late by macklin01 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      For what it's worth, we're keeping our NCI-funded cancer/biology projects there for the time being. (We just posted our 3-D diffusion code there in December, and we're about to post 3-D agent-based models and parameter estimation code.) SourceForge was a good and user-friendly home to me when I just got started in open source, so I'm happy to keep trying it now and see where it goes.

      We may have some feature requests down the road (some of which may already be there, but hidden behind UI design) ...

      Thanks for all your work. -- Paul

      --
      OpenSource.MathCancer.org: open source comp bio
    9. Re:Too late by Baricom · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Are the people who were previously infected still generating recurring revenue?

      If so, what are you going to do with that money?

    10. Re:Too late by ShaunC · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I, for one, welcome^W am willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. Whatever motives BIZX has, you at least seem to be accepting and acting upon feedback. I find GitHub's politicizing to be rather irksome, so it would be nice to see SF rise from its ashes and provide another alternative.

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    11. Re:Too late by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      I think most people just ignore any SJW/whatever/controversy issues,
      but it's things like this. You can see that Github is becoming an unpleasant place to work, and focusing on hiring salespeople instead of programmers, and at that rate the good programmers will leave, and the bug tracker will start filling up, and the product will get worse and worse. That's the way things go.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    12. Re:Too late by whipslash · · Score: 4, Informative

      I am not sure about this but will definitely investigate. Thanks.

    13. Re:Too late by NotInHere · · Score: 5, Informative

      A bit unrelated: I was just browsing your website (the one in your signature), and was noting that I couldn't watch the embedded youtube video (talking about this video). They are included as html object element and require flash to be played (which I don't have). Its better to support HTML5 as well by using a more modern embedding code via iframes. It will still offer a fallback for users who can't play back html5 videos, e.g. on outdated browsers. You can get the embed code by clicking "share" and then "embed".

    14. Re:Too late by BronsCon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But continuing to do so under new ownership, who have shown that they are interested in fixing what they bought, is.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    15. Re:Too late by BronsCon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is the helpful home that I remember Slashdot being when I first started lurking in the late 90's, long before I created this account. Thank you for being part of the solution.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    16. Re:Too late by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 2

      So you're saying if they change the name that will help, but keeping the old name spells doom? Is that rational?

    17. Re:Too late by macklin01 · · Score: 3

      A bit unrelated: I was just browsing your website (the one in your signature), and was noting that I couldn't watch the embedded youtube video (talking about this video). They are included as html object element and require flash to be played (which I don't have). Its better to support HTML5 as well by using a more modern embedding code via iframes. It will still offer a fallback for users who can't play back html5 videos, e.g. on outdated browsers. You can get the embed code by clicking "share" and then "embed".

      Ah, thanks for the reminder! I worked on embedding those videos back in the HTML4 strict days. (And before YouTube, we had XVID-encoded AVI files, with a support page on how to play the videos. :-/ Embedded video has come a long, long way!)

      I completely agree--they should be embedded as real HTML5, particularly as browser support is much more widespread now. And the "share / embed" code works very well for that now. I'll try to get back to it over the weekend.

      Thanks for dropping by and giving the work a look! I plan to submit a method paper on PhysiCell (the 3-D agent-based model in the video you linked) and open source it soon. I should have some much cooler videos available for you then. ;-)

      Very best -- Paul

      --
      OpenSource.MathCancer.org: open source comp bio
    18. Re:Too late by KGIII · · Score: 2

      I can't do a lot of testing right now but I have uBlock installed and I did not unblock anything - I just went and downloaded CloneZilla. It's been the same version of uBlock for a while now. I don't actually recall ever unblocking SourceForge. Ever. I've been using uMatrix and uBlock for a very long time. I also sometimes get things from SourceForge - on a fairly regular basis but much less stuff as of late. Certainly much less often than I used to visit.

      So, no block here with uBlock. I've got some older versions of it stashed away and can spin up a VM if anyone really wants to see what happens. But, alas, I am not really supposed to be here right now. I'm supposed to be drinking cocoa.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    19. Re:Too late by Kobun · · Score: 2

      I beg you, don't recommend FileZilla. SourceForge may have changed, but Tim (botg) was more than happy to take blood money from DevShare. There are a few good alternative programs out there. For example - WinSCP - give someone a chance who voluntarily cleaned up their act, instead of 'zilla who would have kept on going indefinitely with infecting users' computers for money.

    20. Re:Too late by BronsCon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Dude, they've owned it for barely a week. Considering that the first part of that time was spent reorganizing and restructuring (people and business, not code) and they've already been asking the community what needs to be done and made a headway on that, I'd say they're moving quite rapidly in the right direction, having hit the ground running.

      I'd say it's fair to approach them with some skepticism, even to avoid them until they've had a chance to fix things, but to continue to boycot? Give them a chance to fuck up, first.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    21. Re:Too late by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      Fool me twice, well, I guess the new owners have to fool me once, first. I'll give them a chance to fix what's broken, then check it out again; with GitHub going in the direction they are, it would be unreasonable not to consider alternatives and I like the enthusiasm of the current ownership if they're able to pull it off. If not, well, nothing lost.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    22. Re:Too late by Kobun · · Score: 2

      Nope. Talk is cheap (although buying a company is not), I'll be waiting to see the effects of the actual changes that are made. The blocks stay in place until SourceForge's momentum is actually reversed.

    23. Re:Too late by BronsCon · · Score: 2
      I'm not sure what you're nope-ing. I flat out said:

      I'd say it's fair to approach them with some skepticism, even to avoid them until they've had a chance to fix things

      Which is what it sounds like you're doing. That's not a boycot and we're not arguing, so "Nope." wasn't really a valid response. Carry on with your blocks and check it out when the time is right, like you just said you're going to do right after I suggested it.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    24. Re: Too late by cypherdtraitor · · Score: 2

      Github has gotten a lot of negative press lately for political bullshit and race baiting. A bunch of small timers were talking about moving to Gitlab over it. Perhaps you can differentiate your product by committng to allowing controversial content.

    25. Re:Too late by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think most people just ignore any SJW/whatever/controversy issues, but it's things like this. You can see that Github is becoming an unpleasant place to work, and focusing on hiring salespeople instead of programmers

      And this is why I think anyone who uses the phrase "SJW" without irony is a complete and utter idiot. Seriously? Growing companies hiring a sales team is now an SJW issue? You have described every medium to large sized business ever.

      The argument goes like this:

      SJWs are resonsible for traffic calming/sales teams/dystopia in scifi/buffer overflows in C/being worse than the Nazis[*] and are the ultimate evil becuase they're responsible for everything wrong. You/him/$COMPANY is SJW so they are EVIILLL!!!

      You of course have to provide no rational argumet or reasoning, you just compare them to the biggest evil and hope to shut down the conversation.

      A clue for you: companies need sales teams.

      I mean you could have focused on a real problem like the blatantly racist and sexist "diversity" team. But no, instead you go off on paedoterrorsbogeymen (i.e. SJW) and sales teams for some reason.

      WTF, dude, WTF?

      [*] Those are all insane things I've seen SJWs blamed for on slashdot.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    26. Re:Too late by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't mistake all the noise about Github's policies for a mass of users just waiting to migrate though. Look at Reddit, you would think the internet nearly imploded to read about it, but actually the great saviour Voat is still a distance second place and now full of people the average Reddit user wants to avoid anyway.

      Better to focus on features and utility. Sourceforge used to provide a nice way for open source projects to offer binary downloads. Github allows it, but you have to set stuff up manually, update links etc. With Sourceforge you just released and it pointed users in the right direction.

      I think there is a gap in the market for a more user-focused hosting web site. Github has bug tracking and wikis, but they could both be improved on. User contributed documentation is something that could be great if implemented right. Often it kinda builds itself around forum stickies, but I'm sure it could be done better if formalized.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    27. Re:Too late by SIGBUS · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not going to wade into the minefield regarding the sexual misconduct case, but I'd most definitely consider the Jeep story to be pretty damn relevant for anyone building computer-controlled devices. Let's see: computer-controlled car with a radically different user interface compared to almost any car in the last 60 years or so. And, unlike Windows 8 or GNOME 3, we're talking about something with potentially life-threatening implications.

      Back to the subject at hand, I'm very glad to see Sourceforge getting repaired, even if a lot of projects have moved elsewhere. Monocultures are a Bad Thing in my view.

      --
      Oh, no! You have walked into the slavering fangs of a lurking grue!
    28. Re:Too late by Kobun · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure what you're nope-ing. I flat out said:

      I'll help. This is what I was noping:

      Give them a chance to fuck up, first.

      I took that as an admonishment from you to remove the blacklist I've put them in, more or less immediately, due to the expressed intentions by Logan. Call what I'm doing whatever you will - self-protection, blacklist, boycott, blackball, etc. It's the same effect for me, there is no free pass here. Demonstrate actual change on the scale of the bullshit that killed SourceForge in the first place, THEN the names come off the lists.

    29. Re:Too late by whipslash · · Score: 2

      Thanks for the support. We intend to stick to our word

  2. Re:Then pay up by whipslash · · Score: 5, Informative

    Do you understand we just bought the site last week? We didn't see a dime from the DevShare program since we weren't the owners. The first thing we did when we purchased the site is remove the program.

  3. Re:Haha, NOPE. by whipslash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We just purchased the site a week ago. I think your anger is misdirected.

  4. Now if you would just bring Fresh Meat back by Crashmarik · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Never understood why it was killed. It was a great way to find out about new and interesting projects/ideas.

    1. Re:Now if you would just bring Fresh Meat back by whipslash · · Score: 2

      Yes that's a good idea

    2. Re:Now if you would just bring Fresh Meat back by emmavl · · Score: 2

      There already is freshcode.club

  5. i do like a clean gravesite... by Pseudonymous+Powers · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nobody else has said so, so let me say: Thanks for trying to fix things, New Management. I appreciate efforts like these. Keep it up.

    The others are probably right about it being too late to make much difference, of course. Broken trust is a mother. And none of us are really sure how reputable the new bosses are, of course. But I feel it's important to recognize and encourage any steps in the right direction. So thanks again.

    1. Re:i do like a clean gravesite... by whipslash · · Score: 2

      Thanks. I appreciate it

    2. Re:i do like a clean gravesite... by whipslash · · Score: 5, Funny

      Haha thanks. Been a long time reader of /. , but I figured I'd wait till I owned it to start posting ;)

    3. Re: i do like a clean gravesite... by whipslash · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah I'm aware of the sentiment directed at the previous owners. I hope everyone will see we are different in the coming weeks, if it's not clear already

    4. Re:i do like a clean gravesite... by rmdingler · · Score: 2
      It's a great site.

      Of course, as widespread as the internet is now, you can find excellence as easily as any of your other surfing preferences... but when you think you're smart, come post here.

      You will be rapidly corrected.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    5. Re: i do like a clean gravesite... by goose-incarnated · · Score: 2

      Yeah I'm aware of the sentiment directed at the previous owners. I hope everyone will see we are different in the coming weeks, if it's not clear already

      It's clear to those of us who are conscious :-) Ignore the ACs who are flaming and/or trolling you - pretty much everyone in the know already knows that SF is under new management. Most of us here (myself included) will happily give you a fair shake in light of your actions with SF and interaction with /.

      Relatedly, you're in a prime position here even if you do not realise it. Github appears to be having a nervous breakdown of some sort. SF is well-positioned to transition Github users. In short - you should be propositioning open-source projects as SF offered much more than Github.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    6. Re:i do like a clean gravesite... by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Haha thanks. Been a long time reader of /. , but I figured I'd wait till I owned it to start posting ;)

      pfft that's how *everyone* justifies having such a large UID.

  6. Re:Then pay up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It is a long and proud tradition here to not read the article. The summary given does not mention the sale, so it is a pretty easy mistake to make.

  7. Re:Then pay up by whipslash · · Score: 2

    You're right. I thought the Related Links sufficed. I'll update it.

  8. Re:Haha, NOPE. by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First, good on you to start fixing things in the first week. I know that I miss the days of being able to download things off of sourceforge.

    Secondly, do you have an overarching philosophy you can share about how you plan on running your new acquisitions. I know a mission statement is often a lame thing, but I think something that clearly explained your vision, and that people could judge your future actions by, would be nice..

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  9. Re:Haha, NOPE. by whipslash · · Score: 5, Informative

    Our overarching philosophy for SourceForge is that it needs to be a trusted destination free of any sort of malicious adware or deceptive advertising. We are committed to achieving this. Eliminating DevShare was the first step. Establishing SourceForge as a trusted open source destination is our main goal.

  10. Re:Then pay up by Sax+Russell+5449D29A · · Score: 2

    It's going to be a Via Dolorosa for you guys. SourceForge got properly Volkswagen'd by Dice and it's even blocked by uBlock by default. If, however, you are truly going to try to purge SF from all its evil, please consider streamlining the UI while at it. It's a mess at its current state.

    --
    -SR
  11. Great! Where do I send money? by localman57 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No bullshit. I'll really send you money. I remember loving sourceforge. If you have a gofundme, or paypal account, or something like that, I'll send you $5 to help offset the lost revenue from that program you scrapped. There are people out there who will help support those who do the right thing, even if they're companies or for-profit corporations, or whatever.

    Give me my "Turn this ad off because you've got good Karma" option back, and there's another $10 in it for you.

    It's been 2 1/2 years since I've posted. I see the potential in this for something I loved to come back. So I'll post now.

    Who else will support these guys?

  12. Re: Haha, NOPE. by whipslash · · Score: 4, Interesting

    APK's days are numbered. Also we're talking SourceForge here

  13. Re:Cloned Projects Next? by whipslash · · Score: 2

    Yes.

  14. Re:Also eliminated grammar by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Holy crap, an editor that fixed an error in TFS!

    That's bigger news than the article itself.

  15. Re:Great! Where do I send money? by whipslash · · Score: 4, Informative

    Thanks for the support. Keep your $15 for now. We're doing this because we want these sites to live up to their former potential, and if we do this correctly, then legitimate advertising dollars will support the business instead of bundled warez and deceptive ads. Hope you keep posting. We will definitely look at the karma/ad thing though.

  16. Re: Haha, NOPE. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Funny

    APK's days are numbered.

    I think we were just hoping you'd mute him, but that works too.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  17. Re:Isn't this a bit disingenuous... by whipslash · · Score: 4

    Also the "wrongdoing" was committed by the previous owners, not us

  18. Re:Reputation and Trust by whipslash · · Score: 3

    It's only been a week. I think you'll see in the near future we are serious about rebuilding trust.

  19. Re:Sorry Assholes by whipslash · · Score: 5, Informative

    Cool. Well we just eliminated bundled installers so look at it however you please

  20. Re:Isn't this a bit disingenuous... by whipslash · · Score: 4, Informative

    Me? My name is Logan Abbott and I am the president of SourceForge. Check my twitter at @loganabbott and the slashdot icon next to my name

  21. Re:Haha, NOPE. by whipslash · · Score: 2

    Stuff like this will be addressed in our upcoming TOS.

  22. Re:Bullshit by whipslash · · Score: 4, Informative

    1) we won't bundle anything. however you should be aware some project owners bundle their own incarnations that are not beneficial to users 2) we are removing any deceptive advertising 3) right

  23. guess I'll stick around a bit longer by IT.luddite · · Score: 2

    I've been lurking here since 98. If they can maintain half the engagement and clean up SF as mentioned, I'll keep visiting.

  24. Don't forget by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The goal is to hire non-white sales people. Github's boss has declared that she can't even interview white people. Worse, she has declared that white WOMEN are the enemy. Racists are racists, no matter which race they are denigrating.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    1. Re:Don't forget by KiloByte · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Fuck racists. Anything but total race- and gender-blindness is not acceptable.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:Don't forget by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is all untrue.

      As an example, her PowerPoint slide said "white women can be some of the biggest obstacles", which is quite different from "white WOMEN are the enemy". The other claim is just an outright lie.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Don't forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is all untrue.

      As an example, her PowerPoint slide said "white women can be some of the biggest obstacles", which is quite different from "white WOMEN are the enemy". The other claim is just an outright lie.

      "white women can be some of the biggest obstacles" ---- Because that's so much better.

  25. Re: Haha, NOPE. by whipslash · · Score: 5, Informative

    35 million monthly unique users say otherwise.

  26. Re:Then pay up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hey, can you like give them a minute or two? They just bought the fucking site a week or two ago. They've done more good in that time than Dice did in the last several years. It's going to take some time for them to remove all the Dice fuckups.

  27. Re:A lot of work to do by whipslash · · Score: 2

    We're gonna do the work. Feedback welcome

  28. Congrats on the efforts so far. by Harlequin80 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Off topic I know but I wanted to say I appreciate the changes that have happened to slashdot as well. I look at the front page and there is only 1 story I would remove (The Anthropology sexual abuse one) and the rest are ones that I was actually interested to read about. I compare that to a fortnight ago and the difference is massive.

    So thank you Whiplash.

    And if you are interested these are the reasons why I would remove the Anthropology story
    * Click bait headline - There is no way a single incident would "Rock" an entire global sector or industry.
    * It isn't related to science, technology or anything that I would call Nerd worthy. You could change the word Anthropology for anything and the story doesn't change. It is a people story.
    * Read the comments. There isn't anything to really discuss. Either you think the guy was a fuckwit or you think someone over reacted. There is no grey zones to discuss. No expert that could come in and give me a nugget of information that I didn't know.
    * Sciencehabit is a posting bot. He / She / It isn't part of this community. I suspect there is a multi-poster somewhere with their credentials loaded into it and the only thing they are doing is trying to drive traffic to sciencemag.org having posted the same stuff to every site they could.

    1. Re:Congrats on the efforts so far. by whipslash · · Score: 2

      Thanks for the feedback

    2. Re:Congrats on the efforts so far. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Just wanted to say that I appreciate the anthropology sexual harassment story. It's about an important issue in science and education, both things highly relevant to many nerds. There seem to be particular issues in the sciences and in education, which we do occasionally manage to have a discussion about before the anti-modding starts.

      If you look at the discussion as it is now, there are some good points being made about the nature of the issue and why it is hard to deal with. The only way these things improve is by discussing them, and some of us are interested in that. Those who don't like them can simply scroll past.

      As for the ad-hom against Sciencehabit, I'd have posted this myself if they hadn't. It's just that others usually beat me to it, and unfortunately some of them do write rather flaimbaity summaries. If there is one area we agree on it's that the summaries and headlines must be reasonably neutral, and to be fair I think the tiny bit of hype ("rocked") here is fine.

      Direct question to Harlequin80: Would having more control over which sections/tags appear on your personalized front page help, or are you saying no-one should be allowed to discuss these topics on Slashdot?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  29. Re:Sorry Assholes by cfalcon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You have no idea how glad this makes me. I've had that site blacklisted for years. The first time it had shitware bundled in I was done. Thank you for just straight up buying the whole goddamned thing and fixing it.

  30. Re:Sorry Assholes by cfalcon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You do understand this is a new crew right? Like if you had bought sourceforge a year ago, and then immediately fixed the shitware problem, you'd expect people to be happy with that, right? Well that is what happened.

  31. Re:Sorry Assholes by BronsCon · · Score: 3, Informative

    You do realize Sourceforge, like Slashdot, is under new ownership now, right? What they've done here is show that they are willing and able to listen to the community, unlike previous owners of the property. Just sayin'.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  32. Re:Sorry Assholes by whipslash · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You're very welcome

  33. Re:Sorry Assholes by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 2

    It won't restore your reputation one iota, but at least you aren't complete scum of the earth.

    So then it did restore their reputation one iota.

  34. Re:Haha, NOPE. by EmeraldBot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Really? Ok, put it in site ToS for both publishers and the users/downloaders, that 1) you will never never NEEEVER bundle ANYTHING or in ANY WAY try to alter the files placed there by uploaders/project owners. 2) also NEVER you will post ADs that could be mistaken for The Download, and in addition all ads will be very clearly marked e.g. with red border and red text saying "3rd party advertisement". And any banner/AD will lead first to outgoing banner saying clearly "You are now leaving sourceforge.net! and going to xyz.com - we take no responsibility for that site or any downloads on it" 3) of course you can never delete or take over a project then e.g. to kick out legitimate owner and push own "enriched" versions Put that it in ToS and guarantee e.g. up to 10,000$ per project damages. Then we could talk. Btw. anyway what imo could be more interesting now, would be an guthub.com clone, just like github but without the SJW nuttery that results in censorship that is going in there. How ever I doubt you could do it, as Slashdot seems quite leftist too, with frequest bullshit stories about "closing the technical gap" and other anti-white-male whiny propagana bullshit. But sure - feel free to impress us on these fields, we will see.

    Honestly, I don't understand your viewpoint. They've made progress towards improving both sites they bought - this is a huge step forward for Sourceforge, and Slashdot's quality of news has drastically increased. We're actually getting News for Nerds, and I for one have greatly enjoyed reading stories that are actually pretty interesting for once. They've answered many questions patiently, they've taken the abuse expected from a cynical community, and Whiplash and Co. haven't done anything yet that would make my eyebrows raise. Why would you write such a puerile response for a site whose old owners have left, and a new owner is actually trying to breathe some life back into it? This is a good thing, and I'd love some competition to Github. If BizX turns into what Dice was, then we'll talk, but so far they've shown that they actually do care about the site and are interested in our community. Hell, if you look through, you can see that Whiplash has actually read a lot of posts here, or at least responded to some that aren't close to the top.

    Frankly, Mr. Freeman, you are coming off as a troll and that doesn't help anyone. A clause against backdoor additions or advertisement bundling would be nice, but that whole damages spiel is unnecessary, and you're in no position to make demands of someone who will host your programs, maintain a site, foot the monthly internet bill, and provide tools to help you with your open source project for free.

    --
    "Set a man a fire, he'll be warm for the rest of the night. Set a man afire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
  35. Re:Also eliminated grammar by deadwill69 · · Score: 2

    I am encouraged with our new overlords!!!

  36. Re:Sorry Assholes by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 3, Funny

    You know that's right, n00b.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  37. Re:Sorry Assholes by NickHydroxide · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Slashdot has turned into an incredibly angry, toxic environment over the past 5 years (which is pretty visible in this thread and, IMO, part of the reason why the site was/is suffering), so I dug up my old account and logged in just to give you some positive feedback. It looks like your heads and hearts are in the right place and it would be great to see Slashdot restored to its former glory. SourceForge could definitely become a major competitor to GitHub (for one, I think GH is too expensive) so that's one avenue to go down.

    I'm already returning to Slashdot more regularly and it's only been a week since you took the reins - so keep it up.

  38. Re:Sorry Assholes by narcc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is Slashdot, home of the perpetually dissatisfied user. If Microsoft, Mozilla, Sony, or whoever simultaneously ended world hunger, cured cancer, and gave you shiny red balloon, they'd bitch about the color.

  39. Re:Sorry Assholes by stoborrobots · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even when that 7-digit user is the new *OWNER* of /. ???

  40. Re:Sorry Assholes by Omega+Xi · · Score: 2

    Slashdot has turned into an incredibly angry, toxic environment over the past 5 years

    It seems to me that almost everywhere on the internet is like this now, I used to post and comment on various different sites, these days I very seldom bother because people are more concerned with point scoring and arguing than actual discussion. This time I wanted to comment as another fairly old UID who is intrigued to see BZIX does with /. I'm glad to see you're working on fixing sourceforge's tarnished reputation good luck with your future endeavours ^_^

    --
    Simplicity lies within chaos
  41. Re:Great! Where do I send money? by Melkman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Please do make a donation option. I use an Ad Blocker because I find the ad business toxic. I will not turn it off. Not even for Slashdot. But I do want /. to earn a living.

  42. Re:Also eliminated grammar by thegarbz · · Score: 2

    Fixed

    I'm not sure I like the new direction Slashdot is going. :-)

  43. Nerds aren't just in IT by sjbe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of the stories on the front page the only ones I wouldn't consider "news for nerds" would be the sexual misconduct case and the Jeep gearshift story.

    Believe it or not there are other types of engineers here besides folks who program for a living. The jeep gearshift story is about an engineering/design screwup and personally I find it quite interesting. Judging by the number of comments so did others. That sort of story definitely fits slashdot and would have before Dice took over. Furthermore the motto of Slashdot is "News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters." Nerds come in many forms and I certainly am one but not of the IT variety. Stuff that Matters extends beyond IT.

    I agree however that the stories seem to be more focused lately so that is a good thing in my opinion. Of course the number of comments is still WAY down from 10 years ago. Used to be that slashdot attracted a fairly elite technical crowd. That hasn't been the case for a few years now for the most part. I still find it interesting but not like I once did.

  44. Re:Sorry Assholes by synaptik · · Score: 2

    Kids these days...

    --
    HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
    NO CARRIER
  45. Re: Sorry Assholes by gbjbaanb · · Score: 2

    Never underestimate the potential for the developer community to change their minds (or the hosting company to 'add extra value' at any time).

    Github may be the current darling, but I recall when it was Google Code and Freshmeat. I even remember Codeplex for all the Microsoft stuff and even that now seems to be migrating to github.

    So keeping Sourceforge going, and preparing it with some much nicer navigation and website functionality would go a long way towards being ready for when github stops being cool and starts to look pretty crappy. If SF could provide the kind of fancy management portal for a product with wikis and decent bug trackers, and possibly the return of their old compile farm, it'd compete favourably with github and we'd be free of a dangerous monoculture.

    So I welcome our new source control and discussion overlords, lets hope they return to their glory days.

  46. Re:Sorry Assholes by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    You guys need to advertise that far and wide. The reputation was earned from the scam tactics of the previous owners, and nobody will come back to see if it has changed if you dont make it a core part of your advertising.

    The new sourceforge, under new management and it is back to the pure form with nothing shady going on.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.