Slashdot Mirror


Mattel Unveils $300 3D Printer (computerworld.com)

Lucas123 writes: Perhaps in an attempt to get out ahead of the consumer 3D printing market, which has allowed popular toys such as Legos to be replicated, Mattel today announced it would begin shipping its $300 fused filament fabricator machine in October. Mattel's ThingMaker at-home toy-making device, reinvents the company's iconic 1960s toy by the same name. The new ThingMaker allows users to upload design files via Mattel's proprietary Design App, which works on Android or iOS devices. The 3D printer can then print single-part toys or print hundreds of different parts to be assembled into toys using ball-and-socket joints. Mattel's ThingMaker Design App is based on Autodesk's Spark, an open 3D printing platform that provides extensible APIs for each stage of the 3D printing workflow. Because it's based on an open architecture, the ThingMaker Design App also works with other 3D printers; it is available now and free to download for iOS and Android devices.

108 comments

  1. $300 bucks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I won't have to buy those 1K Makerbot shitty ones after all!

    1. Re:$300 bucks? by johnsnails · · Score: 0

      better yet...
      http://deltasine.com.au/ Disclaimer, I know the guy who owns the company and he has some really exciting new models in the pipeline.

    2. Re:$300 bucks? by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      It depends on whether you want something that works or not. I spent years, as a kid, seeing how easily Mattel toys break. I'm not about to trust them with $300 of my money.

    3. Re:$300 bucks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a bit more than $300. What's your point?

    4. Re:$300 bucks? by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      makerbot 5th gen mini (1k abouts) is a piece of shit.

      300 gets you a kit nowadays. a 300 bucks kit is better than 5th gen makerbots.. not better than last gen makerbots though. for under 1k you can get a clones of makerbot replicator 1/2 that are pretty decent(read: more reliable than 5th gen).

      and now theres plenty of offerings in the 350-1000 dollars range. they're all pretty much based on same parts and tech though, which isn't really that bad since it means cheap parts for service.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:$300 bucks? by piojo · · Score: 1

      Could you elaborate on how makerbots or other cheap 3D printers are deficient? Is it about print speed/quality/resolution or reliability? I'm interested in this market, but it's hard to evaluate products since I don't yet know about the things they're likely to fail at.

      --
      A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
    6. Re:$300 bucks? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      makerbot replicator 1/2 and clones use different, very slightly different, kind of control board and run different (opensource) firmware than most repraps. it has minor feature differences on how it deals with pressure in the nozzle to other 8 bit boards. the only reason it works really well is due to open source contributions from couple of guys(mbi released buggy).

      makerbot 5th gens use a properiaty board with closed firmware and they rolled their own stepper controllers as well(which are noisy as hell). the real downsides to 5th gen was/is that they released it with a really shitty extruder that cost 260$+ to replace after a filament jam - this is the reliability issue and a cost issue. now replicator 1 had kind of same problems at launch but the community found fixes for those, not so with the 5th gen. this spring makerbot is releasing/released a "fixed" extruder for it, that you have to buy! also the webcam in the 5th gen is a joke.

      too busy, but look at the google groups for makerbot. they closed the official one down after 5th gen release do to the posts of people complaining..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    7. Re:$300 bucks? by piojo · · Score: 1

      Thanks, you not only answered what I asked but my more interesting question as well. So it sounds like the biggest problem with low budget printers is that the exact control of extruders and stepper motors is not something chip/firmware creators usually do well.

      --
      A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
    8. Re:$300 bucks? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well, it's ok by now. and you need good machining on the extruder/cooling it at the right spot. the trick is generating the commands beforehand on the computer(slicing) just well.

      and it does not get any better from low budget to high(3000-4000) dollar hobby/home printers. they all do it same way and most of the printers on the market run the same control softwares and use the same boards, even use same heater/nozzle setups - so from that point it makes little difference if you buy a lulzbot or a prusa kit - what people seem to be able to output from them seems just the same as well.

      also to the why a kit or not.. getting the settings right and grokking the capabilities is the hard part. the output from a 350$ kit(that's complete) can be just as good as from 3000$ makerbot 5th gen or others in that range. and plenty of people seem to be just as unable to make 2000-3000 dollar machines work as some others are with sub 1000.

      some people get lucky right away and some don't. things like leveling, choosing right temperatures.. using more cooling for pla parts.. printing multiple copies if you're printing small cross section parts to avoid overheating and so forth. adjusting the slicer(!) .

      basically, it doesn't get any better(easier) fundamentally until you hit 8000$++ mojo models. and even those don't make that much better quality - the only difference is that they're "push button" and if it doesn't work you call support. and you'll pay more for material.

      the rep1/rep2 mbi and clones(wanhao, ctc) tend to be able to run sailfish firmware which is pretty good. repetier for reprap style atmel boards is actually quite good as well.

      if you buy a cheap cheap kit, just put aside 25-70 for upgrading the extruder and mostly it would print just as fine as anything else. there are minor differences like .9/1.8 degree stepper motors, 12v vs 24v and such but those end up being pretty minor.

      the biggest problem with them is that you can't leave them running unattended safely - there's some safety mechanisms in the firmwares but none of them are really foolproof fire safe.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    9. Re: $300 bucks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OP here. Cbb logging in. Fair point.

    10. Re:$300 bucks? by terminal.dk · · Score: 1

      But at least we will get 24 months of warranty here in EU. So it will be built to last that long, or be expensive for Mattel.

    11. Re:$300 bucks? by DrXym · · Score: 1
      All of these FDM printers are deficient. Even the best of them is slow as hell to run, they stink, they have limitations on what they can print (e.g. overhangs, slopes) and the models the make have a terrible surface texture. And flaws like like warping, shrinkage, misalignments, skewing, missing sections, strings etc. are commonplace.

      None of this probably matters if you're trying to print out parts that are utilitarian, where appearances are no big deal or you have the time to finish the piece. It matters a lot of you expect it to produce things like toys, decorations etc. I expect Mattel's printer will sidestep this by being "cheap and cheerful", producing things where there is little expectation of high quality.

    12. Re:$300 bucks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We bought a Makerbot z18 at my work (I guess it's the same 5th gen tech) mainly for the build volume, not many can match that. We've had incessant problems with filament jams and such, had several replacement extruders, several instances where firmware updates seemed to make it considerably less reliable, etc. The build volume is a bit of a joke, because the time it would take to print something that used most of the volume is so long, your chances of completing the build successfully are pretty low; we've only successfully completed much smaller items. Only plus point is I get to say "I told you so" to my colleagues, I pointed out worrying reviews at the time, but they went for the build volume over anything else. I recommended a Formlabs printer at the time, although that has downsides too.

    13. Re:$300 bucks? by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      The article seems to suggest it may *only* print parts from the catalog in their custom software though, and may not allow you to print random parts. Which to my mind removes most of what makes 3D-printing good in the first place.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    14. Re:$300 bucks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      his point is, he thinks it will help his friend if he lets everybody know that they should hold off on buying any of his friend's products. I wonder if his friend's name is Adam Osborne.

  2. The price point is great by rmdingler · · Score: 4, Funny
    But being able to refer to the machine as a fused filament fabricator?

    Priceless.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:The price point is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, you can make self sealing stembolts with it.

    2. Re:The price point is great by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I can't but wonder if I could use my own *.STL file to build something?

    3. Re:The price point is great by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Check out Google Sketchup.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

  3. a good way to spend 300$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but only if it can print itself!

    1. Re: a good way to spend 300$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, it can, but you need to pay the 30 million dollar licensing fee.

  4. Mattel were leaders in cheap technology before... by lhaeh · · Score: 4, Informative

    Way back in the day, they came out with the Barbie Digital Camera. It was the cheapest digital camera on the market by far. Many people who had no interest in Barbie bought them. It was $79 when most cameras were $300+, they got the price down by, among other things, using damaged DRAM chips.

    http://www.superkids.com/aweb/...

  5. Question. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny

    How much would it cost to print a RealDoll-type sex toy on one of these?
    I'm asking for a friend.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Question. by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 5, Funny

      How much would it cost to print a RealDoll-type sex toy on one of these? I'm asking for a friend.

      OK, printing a sex doll will cost a lot...
      Printing a friend?
      Priceless!

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    2. Re:Question. by anthonys_junk · · Score: 1

      Oh for mod points. Well played.

      --
      Barbara Felden claims prior art on the flip phone, sues Motorola, Nokia.
    3. Re:Question. by aliquis · · Score: 1

      How much would it cost to print a RealDoll-type sex toy on one of these?
      I'm asking for a friend.

      Wow.. I have a new idea.

      Want to invest in my "meat in a tank meet 3D-printer technology"-vaporware company?

    4. Re:Question. by DrXym · · Score: 1

      How much would it cost to print a RealDoll-type sex toy on one of these?

      Not as much as it costs for firefighters to cut you free from it and the trip to ER afterwards.

    5. Re:Question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Toys printing toys, it the sign of an imminent toyapocalypse!

    6. Re:Question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can "make it" with Play-Doh!

  6. The original ThingMaker was AWESOME. by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 4, Interesting

    At least, it was for a six-year-old kid. It fell victim to the "maybe we shouldn't have kids handling 400-degree hot molds" mindset, with an added dose of "maybe all those volatile organic fumes aren't the greatest thing for your kid to be huffing".

    Let's hope the new one is worth of the name.

    1. Re:The original ThingMaker was AWESOME. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ABS isn't exactly something you should be huffing either. I think this new ThingMaker version will fit right in!

  7. Fumes by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    Aren't the fumes from these things still kinda dangerous? I'm just saying in not 100% confident parents can be trusted to use them in a well ventilated place

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Fumes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The small particles are apparently also a problem for most 3D printers. I'd place such devices in a ventilated cabinet, especially around children.

    2. Re:Fumes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ABS: yes. PLA: not so much.

    3. Re:Fumes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ABS: yes. PLA: not so much.

      When you see the PLA coming, there will be lots and lots of fumes. More precisely smoke from gunpowder, napalm, flame-throwers and fuel depots incinerated by nuclear flash. I, for one, welcome our maoist overmandarins!

  8. Battery covers. by sims+2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Can I print replacement battery covers with it? That would be pretty useful. The finish looks pretty good I wonder if the tolerances are good enough for the clips to work.

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    1. Re:Battery covers. by Wycliffe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Can I print replacement battery covers with it? That would be pretty useful. The finish looks pretty good I wonder if the tolerances are good enough for the clips to work.

      I've thought about this too. There are a lot of little things around the house that might be worth printing (or ordering printed from a "kinkos" type service). The biggest problem is that you need a 3d model of it before you can print it. Even if you have a 2nd one to copy, the 3d scanners aren't really good enough to do it without post editing. It would be great if manufacturers let you download battery cover 3d files like you can download printer drivers but I don't see that happening anytime soon.

    2. Re:Battery covers. by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      Why couldn't we have pirated battery cover models? You could even make a pirate logo into each one.

      There are just a few hundred brands and styles of remotes at current shouldn't be too hard to get a collection going.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    3. Re:Battery covers. by piojo · · Score: 1

      Can I print replacement battery covers with it? That would be pretty useful. The finish looks pretty good I wonder if the tolerances are good enough for the clips to work.

      Since you have to use a toy-oriented mobile app for modeling, you probably won't be able to make any sort of precise design.

      --
      A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
    4. Re:Battery covers. by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      I highly doubt it will be a requirement to use only their app after all the goal is to sell the hardware and supplies.

      Well then again afaik the cricut machines are still pretty worthless.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    5. Re:Battery covers. by meerling · · Score: 1

      There are places where you can get a lot of 3d printer files that people have created for various things. Some of these are free, others want you to pay for them, it all depends. I'll let you locate them, but a word of warning, since the article seems to say that the mattel 3d printer uses it's proprietary software, it probably won't be any use to find those files in the first place.

    6. Re:Battery covers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are services like that (shapeways for example). You could try to search for 3d model online, maybe someone already made a model for it. If not, there are free online 3D modeling programs, with which making simple things like battery cover can be pretty easy.

    7. Re:Battery covers. by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      My guess is that the manufacturers really aren't going to care about pirating for basic replacement parts like battery covers. Once 3d scanners become more popular, if it's a popular item you could borrow from a friend or even get online and ask for a 3d scan of it. Battery covers although thought of as cheap need to have a fairly tight tolerance to fit correctly so winging it would probably take multiple attempts and/or an exacto knife. Even with a 3d file, my guess is that it might take multiple prints to tune it correctly to actually fit.

  9. Limited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Looks like can only print from a propriety library of models. Associated cost?

    At least until soneone hacks the firmware to allow Repetier control.

  10. Uh. Replicate lego? Not bloody likely by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Not with any current 3d printing technology, at least. Give the tech a few more years, and maybe...

  11. Some observations by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lots of people will point out the many problems with this system, but from an initial glance(*):

    1) The filament spools are not chipped. You can get filament from other vendors and rewind them on your spools. Chances are, other vendors will notice this and start selling ThingMaker spools.
    2) The FAQ states that if you don't have a printer, there are many places that will print parts for you. I assume this means that the output format *isn't* proprietary, possibly a bog-standard stl file that you can have printed anywhere.

    If, and this is a big if, the heads can be easily replaced, then this could be quite an exciting development in 3d printing. As hackers, we'll be able to get cheap used 3d ThingMakers off of eBay for decades.

    (*) Please correct me if any of these are wrong

    1. Re:Some observations by c · · Score: 2

      2) The FAQ states that if you don't have a printer, there are many places that will print parts for you. I assume this means that the output format *isn't* proprietary, possibly a bog-standard stl file that you can have printed anywhere.

      Apparently the software is just a branded Autodesk Tinkerplay. Surprisingly enough, Autodesk seems to be serious about consumer-level 3D printing and they seem to get that proprietary is pretty much a non-starter at the moment.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
  12. 3d printer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can it heat up in excess of 300 degrees and make Creeple People?

    Does it come with a lightbulb to cook my 3d-printed cupcakes?

  13. Print Your Own Chokables. by zenlessyank · · Score: 2

    Lawsuits in 3...2...1

    1. Re:Print Your Own Chokables. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. Or a kid printing a gun. (Even a non-functional one could get you shot at by police.) Or a slingshot. (You'll put someone's eye out!)

    2. Re:Print Your Own Chokables. by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Well, you could always bit a peanut-butter sandwich into the shape of a gun!

  14. Re:Uh. Replicate lego? Not bloody likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTFY:

    Not with any current cheap 3d printing technology, at least.

    We have a six figure priced printer in the shop where I work, which is actual now several years old, and it can easily make the tolerances for Lego bricks, and with several materials. It would be a waste of money though even with the price of Lego bricks. Our is mainly used for things that can't easily be CNC milled or for non-critical parts when the CNC mills are backlogged.

  15. I NEED A CHINESE GIRLFRIEND! \o/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3D printer toy? So the age of industry is over... Now we need to start printing human organs instead of virtual money. SERIOUSLY.

    1. Re:I NEED A CHINESE GIRLFRIEND! \o/ by LaurenCates · · Score: 1

      You laugh. But I met this guy several years ago.

      http://bioengineering.rice.edu...

      He helped me build my 3D printer.

      --
      Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
  16. Ken by FrankDrebin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Looks like Ken is finally gonna get some junk.

    --
    Anybody want a peanut?
    1. Re:Ken by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Yeah! He's going to get a 3D printer!

      Oh wait, that's not what you meant at all...

  17. Re: Uh. Replicate lego? Not bloody likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Our [printer] is mainly used for things that can't easily be CNC milled or for non-critical parts when the CNC mills are backlogged." Ie, when the CNC mills are making Legos to play with.

  18. Eeew what is that girl holding? by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 1

    It is dark brown, lumpy and coming out of the bottom of the doll figure, on the far left.

  19. Nice, but... by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    Nice, but I expect it will use proprietary everything, from the feed-stock to the nozzles to the software and whatever else they can make non-standard...and my guess is that it'll all be heavily DRM-protected as well.

    If I'm wrong, great, but knowing Mattel and the current state of the market I won't hold my breath.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Nice, but... by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Plus, it's Mattel. It probably melts the filament using an incandescent light bulb.

  20. Re:Uh. Replicate lego? Not bloody likely by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

    FTFY:

    Not with any current cheap 3d printing technology, at least.

    We have a six figure priced printer in the shop where I work, which is actual now several years old, and it can easily make the tolerances for Lego bricks, and with several materials. It would be a waste of money though even with the price of Lego bricks. Our is mainly used for things that can't easily be CNC milled or for non-critical parts when the CNC mills are backlogged.

    I'm curious. What are the tolerances of your high dollar printer? What is the actual cost of printing a lego not counting the cost of the machine?

  21. $300? by ElectricHellKnight · · Score: 1

    That's only $100 per D!

    1. Re:$300? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      It cost way more than that for my girlfriend's two updates.

  22. How about free? by piojo · · Score: 1

    Okay, not really free. But I thought the only part of a 3D printer that a talented tinkerer couldn't build is the controller/software/firmware and the extruder. Does this really cost $300? What are the pitfalls of making your own printer with an extremely minimal kit (only an extruder and a chip)? Getting compatibility between the parts would take bloody ages, but is there any intrinsic reason why this doesn't work, or is it merely difficult (like restoring a car)?

    --
    A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
    1. Re:How about free? by meerling · · Score: 1

      I've a friend who's tried two kits, and is so totally fed up with them being pieces of finicky (@#%$^&!) garbage that he's junked them and hit the kickstarter for https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/tiko3d/tiko-the-unibody-3d-printer/updates
      I hope it lives up to his expectations. Also, we have a gamer in our tabletop group who'd really love a set of braille dice as she's totally blind, just ask her guide dog, so we have ulterior motives for that one to work well. ;)

    2. Re:How about free? by piojo · · Score: 1

      I've a friend who's tried two kits, and is so totally fed up with them being pieces of finicky (@#%$^&!) garbage that

      In what way were the kits junk? I'm curious about whether a fully built printer would necessarily be better. Was it about part interoperability, or just that the kit had bad controller/interface? (I mean, was it because they weren't good kits, or because they were kits?)

      --
      A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
    3. Re:How about free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess because they are kits.

      There are a lot of kits on the market in the $250 ~ $350 range (most of them based on the Mendel Prusa i3 model), but it's not for those that do not like to tinker a lot to get things right. If you want an Out-of-the-box good working product, a kit is not for you.

      That said - If you want to put some time in it (and sometimes print improved parts) then you are able to get some real good results. You will never get the results of an $2000 or more printer, but you can get very very close. If you like to learn a bit and tinker a bit, a cheap kit is an ideal "play-toy" to get good insight in 3D Printing. Most people I know that started with a kit, ended up building a bigger and more complicated (and better) printer from printed parts and "off-the-shelf" metal parts.

    4. Re:How about free? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      look for BOM on reprap.org for some printer or on thingiverse.
      or google for repstraps(repstrap being a term for a home built 3d printer that doesn't use 3d printed parts). people do them all the time.

      the pitfall is that it takes time to get it working right. the upshot is that at least you know how the gddamn machine works - and maybe have a better chance of knowing why it's not working when it doesn't.

      the upshot is that there's online stores where you could buy all the parts you need and there's really no compatibility issues that much either.. you're going to need to fabricate some parts anyways. linear guides, stepper motors, belts(or racks, depends how you do the movement. or heck just fishing strings), bearings, extruder, control board.. that's the basic list.

      it's a lot less work than restoring a car though and a LOT cheaper..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:How about free? by LaurenCates · · Score: 1

      I'm curious...what are the specifications for braille dice?

      --
      Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
    6. Re: How about free? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      The problem with kits is that you only get the precision you put in it. Between the metal/plastic/wood parts having their own tolerances and the need for very precise measuring tools to put them all together, for most people that's near impossible to get right. A unibody system would solve it by injection molding or laser cutting the parts that have to be precise and at uniform lengths.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  23. Re:Fart graqndmother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cañ someoñe please trañslate that iñto Eñglish?

  24. Re:Uh. Replicate lego? Not bloody likely by mark-t · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We have a six figure priced printer in the shop where I work, which is actual now several years old, and it can easily make the tolerances for Lego bricks

    The tolerances for Lego are at only 2 microns. Still think it "easily" makes it? Considering the printer you describe is a few years old, I'd be surprised if it is even within an order of magnitude of that tolerance. I know of absolutely no 3d printer, at any price, that can reliably create parts at the levels of precision that can be ordinarily met with injection molding.

  25. Re:Fart graqndmother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He said, "An 'edge is an 'edge, he only chopped it down because it spoilt his view, and what's Reaper moaning about?"

  26. people do it. Tolerances add up by raymorris · · Score: 1

    People do build there own, and there are about a jillion web sites with more information, including detailed plans in some cases.

    A main reason it's not cheaper is that tolerances add up. If you have .05" of slop in your screw drive, and 0.05" in your motors, and 0.05 in your bearings, and 0.05 sideways slop in your Z axis, that means each layer may be 0.2 inches off from the last - almost a quarter inch. That's totally unusable. To get 0.001" or better on all your moving parts means you'll be buying some very specific parts, and probably spending some money.

    Now suppose you could spend 8 hours building and adjusting it, and save $250. That's $30 / hour. If you're skilled, you can probably make more than $30 / hour at your job, so you're better off working those hours and buying one.

    As I said, building one is certainly feasible. It's neither cheap nor quick, and the manufactured ones have more of the glitches worked out.

    What we may see more of is people buying cheap ones and making their own improvements, like polishing certain parts with a Dremel, adding springs to take up slack, etc.

  27. Legos to be replicated? by DrXym · · Score: 1
    Perhaps in an attempt to get out ahead of the consumer 3D printing market, which has allowed popular toys such as Legos to be replicated Even the best fused filament printers on their finest, highest detail settings produce something whose quality can be best described as ass. Aside from the atrocious surface finish they suck at producing sharp corners and fine details. You might produce something approximating LEGO but it would be terrible quality.

    That said I'm somewhat surprised that LEGO haven't produced their own printer. It'd be no good for precision parts but I'm sure they could produce something that integrates with models - allows kids to print exoskeletons, trees or whatever to go with some set.

    1. Re:Legos to be replicated? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Typo - First sentence was supposed to have been quoted - mixed up my tags.

  28. Wrong by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    which has allowed popular toys such as Legos to be replicated

    Bzzzt, WRONG!!!!

    There is no such thing as Legos, you buffoon.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THANK YOU, this drives me nuts. "Legos" indeed.

    2. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mail to the colonies has become unreliable since the rebellion

    3. Re:Wrong by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Yes there absolutely is. I played with Legos as a kid, and they remain popular today. What IS new is people listening to a corporate marketing department and altering their natural speech to accommodate a copyrighted term. And, for some bizarre reason, these people appoint themselves language nazis and start correcting other people's speech. That's right, whenever people use the term that the megamillion dollar corporation dislikes, they step in and tell others they're wrong. It's utterly bizarre and it would make sense if these people were being paid to do so. But they're not, so what the fuck?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proper English is to put an s for plural on the end of this. A company does not get to redefine, and make us cavemen.

      So... Legos Legos Legos Legos Legos Legos Legos Legos Legos Legos Legos Legos Legos.

    5. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you call a group of sheep "sheeps"?

  29. Re:Uh. Replicate lego? Not bloody likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've seen that reported as the mold tolerance, which is not the same as the plastic tolerance which is more on the order of 10-20 microns. Some engineers at my work place got an argument about this once, and bought a small pack of Lego bricks and it is closer to 50 microns for wall thickness and larger for some of the big dimensions (as in the full range of values, not the standard deviation). This makes sense, because if they need 2 micron accuracy to work over all dimensions, pieces warmed up by your hand would not fit ones at room temperature.

    20-40 micron printing is pretty common now, and even for several years with laser sintering. Stratasys has had 16 micron resolution commercially available since at least 2011-2012ish. One of the advertised uses now for sintered metal is for making inserts to be used in injection molding. Places that need higher precision still have to make their own instead of using off the shelf equipment, but research printers have been doing 10 micron or smaller precision for nearly 15 years now. When we have some thing with a very small feature size, on the order of 30-50 microns, we have a connection with with a university team that will rent out use of their micro laser sintering setup for occasional runs. Although it only has a 2x2x1 cm working volume, unlike the much larger 16 micron setups.

  30. Re:Uh. Replicate lego? Not bloody likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    16 microns is the resolution, and it can do thin walls pretty well, so that becomes precision in some places, but depends on exactly what dimension you are talking about. If a typical brick is 2.5 g... then the price of printing for materials is about a dollar if I remember correctly, and I might not be remembering ABS specifically. But there is also the cost of the the shop guys who have to interact with the machine and set it up, etc., which even if amortized over many parts, can still add up quick.

  31. Re:Uh. Replicate lego? Not bloody likely by DrXym · · Score: 1

    The solution is to melt down lego bricks to provide the plastic filament to print out your own. Aside from electricity it's the price is very competitive with actual lego.

  32. Does it use Plastigoop by khelms · · Score: 1

    And can I make creepy crawlers with it?

  33. The article suggests It's open, interoperable by raymorris · · Score: 1

    The article says that the design / print software is based on an open software package and it works with other 3D printers.

    If the software uses standard protocols to talk to printers, that suggests that printer accepts the standard protocol and can therefore be controlled by other software.

    1. Re:The article suggests It's open, interoperable by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      The article says that the design / print software is based on an open software package and it works with other 3D printers.

      The article I read said, "Users upload design files via Mattel's proprietary Design App....", so it doesn't sound open to me. (??)

      But I also see that it's "based on Autodesk's Spark, an open 3D printing platform", so now I'm a bit confused....maybe some bits are open and some aren't.

      As for hardware, I hope it's made from standard parts and pieces, but if not, an aftermarket will probably spring up to provide alternatives.

      All in all it sounds interesting, but at $300 I'm keeping my expectations low.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  34. WHERE IS MY 3D LEGO PRINTER???? by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    Print the parts you need, when you need.... LEGO 3D

    YES!!!!!!!

    1. Re:WHERE IS MY 3D LEGO PRINTER???? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1
  35. Re:Mattel were leaders in cheap technology before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Got two of the Barbie cameras for my kids at a discount store for around $20.
    They were indestructible and took ok photos compared to other $200 cameras.

  36. No specs? by Rastl · · Score: 1

    What are the X, Y, and Z microns? What are my infill options? How about supports? Does it have a heated bed?

    I looked around on the internet and didn't find any of the information which says what quality of printer this is. The samples look pretty but then again they're the best that could be done by professionals using perfectly tuned equipment.

    My 3D printer was $350 and does 15 microns on the X and Y and down to 50 microns on the Z. I can control my infill. I can download from various file sharing sites and make my own designs.

    Yeah. Printer for kids. Download Mattel stuff. Sounds great. Until the kids get bored waiting for a toy to print and parents price filament.

    1. Re:No specs? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 2

      Which 3D printer did you buy for only $350 that can do 15 microns on the X and Y and 50 microns on the Z?

  37. Do you have to design it on your smartphone? by fredrated · · Score: 1

    FTA: "...proprietary Design App, which works on Android or iOS devices"
    Does that mean you must design on smartphones?

  38. Re:Uh. Replicate lego? Not bloody likely by mark-t · · Score: 2

    if they need 2 micron accuracy to work over all dimensions, pieces warmed up by your hand would not fit ones at room temperature.

    First of all, ABS plastic such as what is used for Lego isn't affected that much by temperature change at the scales that things like Lego are made, in general the difference in size for that tiny a temperature change would be about on the order of a fraction of a micron. Secondly, the expansion or contraction for larger temperature changes could indeed pose a problem for some Lego pieces to fit together if they were made of something other than ABS. A Lego piece taken out of a freezer that has been there for some time, for instance, may have a difficult time fitting room temperature pieces because the former has become more rigid, and connectivity will certainly be affected by the temperature variance.

  39. Re: Uh. Replicate lego? Not bloody likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thermal expansion coefficient for ABS is about 80e-6 per K. A 1 cm piece with a temperatures change of 5 K would change length by 4 microns, invalidating a 2 micron tolerance, assuming the same tolerance applied to the large dimensions. A freezer to room temp give you more like a 40 K swing, which would be 30 microns, and closer to the tolerance given by the above AC.

  40. I like mine by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    I like my wooden Makerbot

    1. Re:I like mine by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      It's a collectible, from an era before Makerbot went to the dark side.

  41. Re: Uh. Replicate lego? Not bloody likely by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Yes, but but ABS plastic is flexible enough at room temperature to accommodate such tiny deviations. The example I mentioned of putting a piece of Lego in the freezer and then trying to fit it with another piece at room temperature would indeed show difficulty in fitting, in part due to thermal contraction, and in part because frozen ABS plastic is more rigid, and less tolerant of less than perfect fits.

  42. You're thinking out loud again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you seriously think the tolerances on battery covers aren't forgiving enough?

  43. Re: Uh. Replicate lego? Not bloody likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wired had some blog piece where they measure pieces and got a standard deviation of 25 microns. A standard deviation would never cut it as a tolerance at shops I've worked with, which either expect all pass on a pass fail test for smaller, important runs, or at least a pass rate of 90-95% for cheaper, volume stuff. So that would be closer to two standard deviations. Those tolerances are pretty typical for small ABS parts (and similar to many machined parts), assuming you do quality control. The expensive part is not necessarily finding an injection shop that is way above average quality, but paying for the quality control and contract details to make sure the shop pays attention. And it is not like the same tolerance applies to every dimension.

  44. What by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mattel still exists?

  45. Re: Uh. Replicate lego? Not bloody likely by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Er... I forgot to mention that that size variance of a few microns would actually be across the whole brick.... while any individual stud would deviate in position by no more than a fraction of that. The small variances that occur with only a few degrees of difference are well accommodated by the flexibility of the ABS plastic itself.

  46. You Can Tell It's Mattel! by IonOtter · · Score: 1
    --
    [End Of Line]
  47. Razor economics by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    $300 for the printer

    $25 for the filament and it does a very limited number of items.

    Considering that it's aimed at children who will have no concept at limiting how many items that they will print (unless it's really slow and they get bored by it) then they will make their money selling refills.