Slashdot Mirror
How Donald Trump Uses Twitter As a Weapon of Fear
HughPickens.com writes: Alexander Burns and Maggie Haberman write in the NYT that with his enormous online platform of six million followers, Donald Trump has used Twitter to badger and humiliate those who have dared cross him during the presidential race, latching on to their vulnerabilities, mocking their physical characteristics, personality quirks and, sometimes, their professional setbacks. Trump has made statements that have later been exposed as false or deceptive — only after they have ricocheted across the Internet. For example, Cheri Jacobus, a Republican political strategist, did not think she had done anything out of the ordinary: On a cable television show, she criticized Donald J. Trump for skipping a debate in Iowa in late January and described him as a "bad debater." Trump took to Twitter, repeatedly branding Jacobus as a disappointed job seeker who had begged to work for his campaign and had been rejected. "We said no and she went hostile," Trump wrote. "A real dummy!" Trump's campaign manager told the same story on MSNBC's "Morning Joe." For days, Trump's followers replied to his posts with demeaning, often sexually charged insults aimed at Jacobus, including several with altered, vulgar photographs of her face.
(continued)
This week, Trump sent out a menacing message on Twitter about the Ricketts family, a wealthy clan of Republican political donors, after it was reported that Marlene Ricketts donated $3 million to a group opposed to Trump's candidacy. "They better be careful," Trump wrote of the family, "they have a lot to hide!" "It's a little surreal when Donald Trump threatens your mom," Marlene Ricketts's son, Tom, later told reporters.
It is not just that Trump has a skill for zeroing in on an individual's soft spot and hammering at it. It is that he sets a tone of aggression against the person, and his supporters echo and amplify it. Jacobus sent a cease-and-desist letter to Trump and his top aide, citing electronic messages that showed the Trump campaign had courted her and not the other way around. "I have been trashed and ruined on Twitter," Jacobus says adding that Trump's lawyers had responded to her letter, but that they had not yet reached a resolution. "At what point does it cross the line into something that's defamatory and might be actionable?" says Parry Aftab, a lawyer who leads the Internet safety group WiredSafety. "At what point does it cross the line into encouraging violence against groups and individuals?"
It is not just that Trump has a skill for zeroing in on an individual's soft spot and hammering at it. It is that he sets a tone of aggression against the person, and his supporters echo and amplify it. Jacobus sent a cease-and-desist letter to Trump and his top aide, citing electronic messages that showed the Trump campaign had courted her and not the other way around. "I have been trashed and ruined on Twitter," Jacobus says adding that Trump's lawyers had responded to her letter, but that they had not yet reached a resolution. "At what point does it cross the line into something that's defamatory and might be actionable?" says Parry Aftab, a lawyer who leads the Internet safety group WiredSafety. "At what point does it cross the line into encouraging violence against groups and individuals?"
since everyone makes fun of Trump's hair at least
wusses
Mod articles as trolls?
The one pervading evil of democracy is the tyranny of the majority, or rather of that party, not always the majority, that succeeds, by force or fraud, in carrying elections.
In today's politics news:
A blond raccoon was caught lying on the internet. Here's Bernie with the weather.
Have you ever fallen asleep at the keybhanusdiog?
It's been my theory all along that Trump is trolling the Republican party. I am also not much surprised that this has been an effective method for gaining support from some of their followers.
Ideology: A tool used primarily to avoid the bother of thinking.
This is the Century of Fear. Everybody promotes fear. It's what they use to make us willingly offer up our dignity and our freedom.
What's being described here is use of media not as a "weapon of fear", but as an all-out weapon of attack.
no, just politicians.
terrorists are defined as politicians despised by a specific group.
Trump has made statements that have later been exposed as false or deceptive â" only after they have ricocheted across the Internet.
Oh, NOW you complain about this. Is this not in fact the way the internet has worked since day one? Is this not in fact the very premise the entire news industry is based on?
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
I was hoping that this kind of article wouldn't be showing up any more on the "new" Slashdot. I'm digging the new DICE-less Slashdot (and I even downloaded something from SourceForge for the first time in years!), and while this is obviously not a democracy, MHO is that if I want to read superficial and partisan social networking commentaries, I would seek them out (or not!) somewhere else--not on slashdot.
Isnâ(TM)t a âweapon of fearâ(TM) what terrorists use?
Donald Trump is terrorizing the Republican Establishment with becoming the party nominee.
A pathological narcissist, a skilled liar, and possibly a sociopath.
But an eloquent speaker who so far hasn't actually shown any concrete plans on how he plans to guide america.
But very good at spewing mindless rhetoric that people seem to eat up, or at least enjoy watching the clown-car circus that the debates have devolved into.
I fear a showdown between him and Clinton for the highest power in the land. Or in the words of Alien vs. Predator "No matter who wins, we lose"
So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
>> Donald Trump has used Twitter to badger and humiliate those who have dared cross him
Er, I suppose, but when's the last time anyone actually read their Twitter feed? Or is this story about people dumb enough to read and react to what this guy says?
I would rather have a jerk trying to run the country than a puppet for Koch and friends, I'm really interesting to see if the RNC will let him actually represent them or if something will happen on the way to the convention. Now that the Koch brothers are pushing Rubio I expect him to get better coverage but I think that Trump would make for an interesting 4 years. I don't think that 4 years under Trump would be as bad as 4 years under the Koch brothers.
( http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/top-koch-brothers-official-jumps-marco-rubio-s-campaign-n524336 )
So this is clearly a subjective, politically motivated posting. For example, we don't hear the other side of the story, etc. Love or hate Trump, I come to this site for news for nerds, not clap trap about the actions of some candidate. Frankly they all suck, and so holding one higher--or lower as the case may be--is vapid at best. Drop the slanted political "news" and get back to what we come to Slash Dot for.
I think it's more "The Republican Establishment terrorized themselves resulting in Donald Trump becoming a party nominee"
So what I'm getting is that Trump is using Twitter in the exact same way the SJWs use Twitter, but because it's Trump doing it, now it's bad.
Mm-kay.
The problem Twitter has is that it's become a platform for building outrage. People use retweets as a weapon to get their followers to harass people they disagree with. They'll post small, out of context quotes solely for the purpose of building rage. When it's SJWs or the likes of [only] Black Lives Matter doing it, that's fine, and Twitter is all about how cool activism is on their platform.
When Trump does it, now it's the end of the world and we've got to stop those evil people by blocking them.
Uh, no. Either ban both, or ban neither.
"The Republican Establishment terrorized themselves resulting in Donald Trump becoming a party nominee"
That would imply that the Republican Establishment are capable of taking responsibility for the situation that they created by embracing the Tea Party.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/02/how-gop-elite-set-stage-for-donald-trump
If only Twitter could appoint a committee with Anita Sarkeesian in charge to ban all those nasty conservatives who abuse their "free speech" to say things good liberals find offensive.
Oh wait, they already have.
SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
Effectively, libel doesn't exist in the US, especially for anyone in the public sphere.
And this is a good thing, because how else would we have learned that Ted Cruz is the Zodiac Killer?
http://www.miaminewtimes.com/n...
You are welcome on my lawn.
And slashdot is trying again?
http://tech.slashdot.org/story...
(I notice the highly commented article is conspicuously absent from the "you might also like to read" list)
"Oooh, he's such a meany.. he's so mean, like gamer gater mean... only Democrats can be so mean to Republicans on twitter so Trump should be bannnnnned"
You're arguing for anti-bullying speech on one post while simultaneously posting articles calling for the heads of other "non-slashdot" approved persons on others using the exact same bullying tactics being decried here (or have you read your own comment sections? (Including this one)
Stop this free speech for me not for thee crap.
Meh. It's not like the IRS is auditing them or anything.
one big difference between Republicans and Democrats is that by and by, most Democrats tend to like their party. Most Republicans barely stomach their own party.
In other words, Democrats by and large are delusional and Republicans by and large are realists.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Ad hominem attacks instead of reasoned debate are considered NORMAL on every internet forum now. So much so, that I'm sure someone on /. will just call me names instead of citing trustworthy sources to refute my argument. Apparently, on the 'net, arguments are won by the biggest dick, with the most spare time to repeatedly post insults... yeah, that does sound like Trump, doesn't it?
I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
oh? Trump is planning on gas chambers.
So enforcing the law on immigration criminals or killing ISIL is "like hitler"?
get some perspective. anti-male SJW femni-nazis on tumblr are more like Hitler than Trump.
Actually, I think this comparison is better than "Trump = Hitler": http://qz.com/624065/a-tip-to-americans-from-an-italian-who-saw-berlusconi-get-elected-again-and-again-and-again/
Trump seems like the American version of Italy's Berlusconi - a buffoon who nobody took seriously, who won the election, and who ruined his country.
My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
While we're out here promoting our opinions on the subject of slashdot's Politics section, I'd like to throw my dissenting opinion into the ring.
... but seriously :P)
While you're certainly right that many stories under the Politics section indeed have little to nothing to do with news for nerds, oftentimes they still focus on stuff that matters. Many slashdotters come here not for the tech-focused stories [see also: rtfa], but to enjoy reasoned discussion with their nerdy brethren. See, for example, I cite a post I made the other day, about an admittedly controversial subject: the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. That subject is no better of a fit for the themes slashdot tends to focus on than is this Trump story, but check it out. That discussion went on for days while staying shockingly civil, levelheaded, objective (particularly the thread with Sun, for which I'm still working on a conciliatory reply). I don't know of many other forums for online discussion where this is even plausible, and that is the reason I encourage the new ownership to not abandon one of the few remaining outlets for such dialog.
tl;dr: Politics on slashdot is awesome because it's still possible to have discussions rooted in reason. At least until the libertarians come out. (I kid, I kid...
Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
For days, Trump's followers replied to his posts with demeaning, often sexually charged insults aimed at Jacobus, including several with altered, vulgar photographs of her face.
You mean like the left did to Katherine Harris, Monica Lewniski, and Linda Tripp?
It is not just that Trump has a skill for zeroing in on an individual's soft spot and hammering at it. It is that he sets a tone of aggression against the person, and his supporters echo and amplify it
You mean like how the Clinton's, the democrat party machine and the media targeting all the women Bill Clinton raped?
Seems a little late to get your panties in a twist over these tactics.
Or is this story about people dumb enough to read and react to what this guy says?
Curiously, a lot of hay has been made about Trump's support from uneducated voters, largely from this poll, page 36, which puts percent of supporters with "college degree" at 46%.
The press, of course, is quick to point out that 46% is less than half, so they proclaim far and wide that his supporters are "mostly uneducated".
What the press doesn't note, however, is that 70 % of Americans don't have a degree.
Trumps supporters are more educated than the population average.
Feel free to call us dumb, it helps us change our vote to $your candidate!
(Oh, hey! Want to go out behind the trailer and shoot at beer cans with my .22?)
Just amazing. Any other season and the "Ricketts family" are a bunch of filthy 1%'ers exploiting their privilege to steal us all blind. Now suddenly their sympathetic figures we must commiserate with against teh ebil Trump. Any other time a Republican political strategist such as Cheri Jacobus would be pilloried as the enabler of planet wreckers that should be in a gulag with the rest of the racist climate deniers that pay her. Today, however, she is a "victim", because Trump tweeted about her.
Sue him. Give him another target to beat on and another couple points in the polls.
Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
What I see with this election is the complete loss of civility. Nothing of substance is being said, it's simple mud slinging.
Candidate X: "Mr. Trump, your idea is a bad one and here's why"
Trump: "You're a dummy and your mother wished she'd aborted you with a coat hanger"
Crowd: "*cheers*"
Candidate X: "But what about your idea..."
Trump: "Did I mention you're ugly too!"
Candidate X: "I'm leaving... this is pointless"
Trump: "Yup, there's goes a loser!"
Crowd: "You're the best!!!"
Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
To me this is like the end of Blazing Saddles where the large fight spills over into the studio cafeteria. Now there's nowhere to escape electioneering and the many minions pulling strings left and right.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
"They better be careful," Trump wrote of the family, "they have a lot to hide!"
It is wrong for him to do investigations of political opponents, and could be used to get the case thrown out.
It was wrong for the IRS to be misused in this way under Obama.
It was wrong for the IRS to be misused this way under Nixon.
It was wrong, when S&P downgraded the US's bond rating, for Obama to announce a redoubled effort investigating them to see if there was anything they could tag them with as punishment.
This is the purpose of warrant requirements, and the banning of general warrants, so those in power could not go fishing around for something illegal to tag uppity oppoonenta with.
Boo Trump.
Boo Obama.
Boo Nixon.
(-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
I thought the more common name for the behaviors you describe was trolling. Where is the line supposed to be?
The line is when the troll is defeated with an indisputably factual reply. When that line is crossed, he cries "SJW! SJW!!"
"I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)
Simply put, Trump is a "demagogue", as were Hitler and Stalin, that doesn't mean he is inherently evil, it means he is using the same psychological tools to gain power. He has already divided and conquered the GOP with an old fashioned xenophobic wedge, it will take them decades to recover their solidarity. Right now the rest of the planet are just crossing their fingers hoping the American people will stop humouring this wannabe tyrant BEFORE he gets to the whitehouse and starts pushing buttons just to see what happens.
And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
What you call "shaming" is just exercising freedom of speech to criticise behaviour. It's mostly the anti-feminists saying that they should not be criticised, but sorry, even if it upsets you out makes you feel ashamed, freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences. People will criticise you, deal with it.
const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
What gets me (slightly OT), is that Trump doesn't really respect those that support him. He says they would continue to support him even if he murdered someone. That is, his supporters are too stupid to judge Donald harshly, when harsh judgement is warranted.
First of all, folks, "Twitter" is in the headline, so it does enjoy some STEMy goodness.
/. into two differently (though similarly) named sites, akin to the successful Stack Exchange website. (Admittedly, I haven't given this much thought beyond this post...)
Secondly, I've always thought it was obvious that "...stuff that matters" meant a tongue-in-cheek "Nerdy news is stuff that matters to us, even though it is not interesting to the vast majority of people." Whereas stating "...stuff that matters" in the general sense is such an empty statement, it's not even worth saying. (It was never "News for nerds AND stuff that matters".)
Thirdly, I agree that what draws me here is the mental kinship - I like seeing what the more thoughtful posters have to say. However, my logical brain does not appreciate the blurring of those topical lines, and knows it only a matter of time before those with a political rant, etc., know that Slashdot has the most eyeballs to troll. So my knee-jerk thought was to break
Well, the old saying applies here... just look at their fruit. Meaning, of course forget about what he says and instead look at his actions. Those are a better indicator of how he'll behave as president. And to me, they're a pretty damning indictment of thoughtless and harsh actions. On one level, of course it doesn't matter who becomes president as the actions continue unchanged.. but internationally, it DOES matter.. and , given Don's penchant for sticking his polished patent leather shoes right uo his mouth, along with his classic rudeness, he could easily set off world war 3 (and 4, and 5, and ...). And certainly his approach to domestic crises could make matters insoluble with one word.
He may talk a good game, and that is what you need in his line of "work", but it is actions you have to look at, and his actions betray him.