Slashdot Mirror


Bloomberg Predicts EVs Cheaper than IC Engine Cars Within 10 Years (computerworld.com)

Lucas123 writes: With the price of lithium-ion batteries continuing to plummet, already dropping 65% since 2010, electric vehicles will become cheaper to own by the mid-2020s, according to a new report by Bloomberg New Energy Finance. The report also forecasts that sales of EVs will hit 41 million by 2040, up from 462,000 in 2015. By 2040, EVs will make up 35% of new light-duty vehicle sales, even if the price of crude oil goes back up from $33 today to $70 in the future. The adoption of EVs will displace about 13 million barrels of oil per day by 2040, when the clean-energy cars represent about one-quarter of cars on the road.

5 of 266 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I hope so by DogDude · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm a libertarian, who will most likely vote for Trump

    Fuck you, asshole.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  2. Re:Peak battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ummm the Lithium is recycled. It comes down to the economics between cost of cycling compared to cost of getting it out of the ground.

    Tesla seem adamant that recycling will end up cheaper source of lithium than mining will.

    Also Lithium isn't the cost inhibitor and never has been. Lithium has gotten way more expensive in recent years, while lithium batteries have dropped massively in price. The lithium itself is a very minor part of the cost.

    There are only 10kg of lithium in a big car battery, there are 22 million kg's of known lithium reserves. I doupt there will be a problem with lithium shortage for a long time.

  3. Re: Li-On batteries by Chuq · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm just glad a petrol powered car has never caught fire before.

    --
    - Chuq
  4. Re:what point? Libertarians vote fasist by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Trump is just the outcome of leftist policies

    You've gotta admit, people who will blame absolutely anything and everything wrong in their lives on Obama and the SJWs are nothing if not consistent.

    "I have to vote for the fascist flim-flam man, because Obama and the SJWs have just pushed me too far"

    There must be some small part of you that feels ashamed.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  5. Re:what point? Libertarians vote fasist by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    However, with the constant childish name-calling, spite-filled, intolerant, unadulterated hate that comes from the extreme left-wing in this country, I would never ever identify myself as a "progressive". What the left has become is to spit in the face of what true liberalism is about and many rational nominally left leaning people don't want anything to do with it.

    There's a difference between those excellent points and blaming "Obama and the SJWs" for the milk going bad.

    Donald Trump is not the outcome of leftist policies. He's the result of a major political party riding the tiger of talk radio shock jocks who are all trying to be more horrible than the next one and calling it "talking tough". It's the result of the Southern Strategy, it's the result of creating a victim mentality among white working class people, convincing them that they're being oppressed. It's the result of a cheapening of discourse and the stoking of irrational fears - of xenophobia and plain, old bigotry. It's the result of the "bully effect", where weak-minded people feel empathy toward the strong papa-figure, as long as he sounds sufficiently like a hard-ass. It's the result of a fascism that's been dormant in the US for over a century and a half and really started to flower in 1980. The 20th century was stained with rivers of blood from what happens when that sort of ugliness takes hold in a portion of a society.

    Don't blame some stupid college kids or feminists for the rise of the first candidate in decades that's been embraced by actual white supremacists and Nazis.

    http://www.theguardian.com/us-...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.