Slashdot Mirror


A Phone App Helps Day Laborers Attack Wage Theft (nytimes.com)

An anonymous reader writes with this story from the New York Times, excerpting "After three years of planning, an immigrant rights group in Jackson Heights is set to start a smartphone app for day laborers, a new digital tool with many uses: Workers will be able to rate employers (think Yelp or Uber), log their hours and wages, take pictures of job sites and help identify, down to the color and make of a car, employers with a history of withholding wages. They will also be able to send instant alerts to other workers. The advocacy group will safeguard the information and work with lawyers to negotiate payment." Adds the submitter: "Although I completely support the app, personally, I see this encountering some significant legal challenges. Hope they've lawyered up." Though the use case is different, this is similar in spirit to "cop watch" apps, like Cell411 and the ACLU's Mobile Justice. (And of course there's Periscope.)

101 comments

  1. Trump is winning here, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Early reports show Donald Trump is in the lead for the most number of reports from this app.

  2. Article link dead by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    https://myaccount.nytimes.com/...

    Seems to link to someones personal NYT sub.

    1. Re:Article link dead by beakerMeep · · Score: 2
      --
      meep
  3. One of these things is not like the other by Quarters · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Adds the submitter...(And of course there's Periscope)"

    Which is a tool 100% unlike either the app the NY Times is writing about or the other two apps the submitter referenced. So while yes, there is Periscope, it is not germane to this discussion.

  4. Sounds useful. by ArylAkamov · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sounds good to me. I've recently started logging my hours after a number of suspiciously low pay checks and frequently being "forgotten" on payday.

    Being an independent contractor sucks. Especially when the boss is always several states away and never answers his phone.

    Yeah, I should quit, I know, but it's either marine electrician or unemployment.

    1. Re:Sounds useful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Do you work on fishing radar or just yacht internals? If you don't have family you must stay with, consider relocating to Trinidad. Much greater demand for marine electricians when everyone needs their boats to work, and most boats are fairly advanced.

    2. Re:Sounds useful. by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah. Just move to Trinidad. Problem solved.

    3. Re:Sounds useful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll find that people who's career stretches past 'would you like fries with that' are more willing to relocate for work. Actually, you probably won't ever find that out.

    4. Re:Sounds useful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not require the pay be in escrow?

  5. A small issue by oshkrozz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can see the unintended consequence
    IRS
    They better be current on all their reporting to the IRS before making any claims for or against anyone. Day labors tend to not be so vigilant in this area

    1. Re:A small issue by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Day labors also tend to be illegal immigrants. I wonder how long until this is considered a criminal enterprise or the cops end up demanding the user database. Even sanctuary cities might be forced into compliance and if E-verify becomes mandatory, it can cause problems with these employers too.

    2. Re:A small issue by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They better be current on all their reporting to the IRS before making any claims for or against anyone.

      I don't think the idea is to "make claims", but to make it harder for abusive employers to find laborers. My company occasionally needs extra labor for a rush job, and I head over to the local Home Depot parking lot to pick up some Mexicans. They all know each other, and word spreads fast, so scumbag employers will drive around and try different laborer congregation sites. This app will help guard against this by spreading information more widely. I never have a problem because we pay hard cash at the end of the work day. We also provide a free hot lunch (hot in both temperature and condiments).

    3. Re:A small issue by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wonder how long until this is considered a criminal enterprise or the cops end up demanding the user database.

      Nobody really cares about "illegal immigrants". The Democrats see them as future Democratic voters, and the Republicans want to keep them around as a wedge issue that they can exploit. Most cops are local government employees, and immigration is a federal matter. In my city, San Jose, California, cops are prohibited from asking about anyone's immigration status, unless they have already been arrested for other reasons.

    4. Re:A small issue by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      cops are prohibited from asking about anyone's immigration status, unless they have already been arrested for other reasons

      As it should be. No cop should be requesting information unless they have a valid law enforcement interaction with you and looking like a crook is not valid.

      Republicans want to keep them around as a wedge issue that they can exploit

      Well, that and cheap labor. In fact, many democrats like the idea of cheap labor too.

      This is why things like E-verify is important. It gives penalties to employers who attempt to exploit illegal immigrants. You still have the problem of criminals doing day labor while hiding from capture but at least they aren't doing more criminal things in their attempts to survive.

    5. Re:A small issue by Luthair · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd say the republicans want to keep them around so they can pay them less than minimum wage and drive wages down.

    6. Re:A small issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I day labored even as a college grad. back in 2000. I had to pay bills until I got a real job. I was raped on paychecks. I was paid min. wage... and then the day labor place took their cut, and I was less then $4 per hour.

    7. Re:A small issue by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      I'd say the republicans want to keep them around so they can pay them less than minimum wage and drive wages down.

      In California, minimum wage is $10/hour. At least where I live, you cannot hire day laborers for less than that. They won't take the job, and since the demand for labor is higher than the supply, they don't need to. Considering that they are working tax free, $10 in cash is effectively a lot more than minimum wage.

    8. Re:A small issue by KGIII · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've hired people from Labor Ready, including just recently after a few Slashdotters helped me make a great big mess on the lawn and beach. To be fair, they weren't the only ones there for the NYE festivities. But, I'd used them before.

      I can't say how valid this is but they're VERY clear on the documentation that you, the contractor, sign. They employees are all supposed to be documented and paying their taxes. They get paid daily (or weekly) and the "appropriate" sums are withdrawn before they even see the money. They fill out a W-2, show ID, and all that. At the end of the day (or week) they can get a check or they can get a code. They put their code and some other number(s), I don't know the exact details, into a machine that looks like an ATM but is not an ATM and it spits out their money.

      I have no idea how stringent those checks on ID are, how well they follow the IRS' regulations, or anything like that but they're very, very clear about it. I also have no idea how other companies do it as I have no experience with anyone but Labor Ready. I always cheat and give them extra money on top of what they get paid from the company so I'm probably not helping matters much. I call 'em tips and that's exactly what they are. I kind of doubt they're paying taxes on their tips but, at the same time, they may not actually (and probably are not actually) be earning enough by tips to be required to report it.

      Also, the policy I signed says that I'm not supposed to give them tips. However, Labor Ready takes something like 1/3 of their pay. I only use Labor Ready because there's some accountability, insurance, and the employees are supposed to be documented. I've used them a number of times over the years and in a few different locations. I've only once had to send someone back to the office. The rest have all been good people who worked well.

      I make sure to ask the average wages and pay more than that and the guys who run the place don't send the drunks and lazy people. Meh, it works out well. I sent the ones from the NYE cleanup home with a whole bunch of left-over booze and the three kegs so that they were able to get the deposits on those too. I can't say that I have any complaints and the workers seem pretty happy to get paid well and not have to work for a hard-ass that's breathing down their necks. I've already set it up to pay them for x-amount of hours. If they get it done sooner than that, they get same amount of pay so long as they don't go back to the office too soon.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    9. Re:A small issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      i work in California as a construction worker and metal fabricator

      i assure you, myself, my crew, and they guys on the street will take less than $10/hr if there are no other
      options available. and we often do. even though we can get as much as $100 for a skilled job

      everything here is predicated on cheap labor, so cheap those that work - hard - can't afford things like
      heath care and housing. to pretend otherwise is a lie.

    10. Re:A small issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ..."We also provide a free hot lunch (hot in both temperature and condiments)."
      This is discriminatory against Midwesterners, Lithuanians and anyone who knows what oofta means! Where's MY lawyer?

    11. Re:A small issue by um...+Lucas · · Score: 1

      "Day Labor Place"? What is that you speak of?

      This app appears more targeted to the dozens of guys that stand out in front of Home Depot every morning, waiting for a contractor with a van or pickup truck to select a few to work on their project, not people going to an agency or something...

    12. Re: A small issue by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Pfft, its the contractors themselves that need to worry about the IRS; how many of 'em do you think try to run cash-based whenever they can??

    13. Re: A small issue by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Bingo; you've just discovered the difference between "day laborer" and "temp."

    14. Re:A small issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not afraid the police might find out you do that? It is illegal. Worse if you put the cash you pay them under business expense, will be in trouble if you get audited.

      When people come here illegally, there will be people who will abuse them, since they can't or don't dare go to the police. :p

    15. Re:A small issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly you have never had midwest chili.

    16. Re:A small issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "and I head over to the local Home Depot parking lot to pick up some Mexicans"

      So you are admitting to the entire Slashdot community that you are part of the illegal immigration problem.

      You admit harboring illegals, providing them work, and intentionally knowing and using illegal labor.

      You also provided evidence of at least one federal crime, and if you are a u.s. citizen, you are a Traitor.

  6. hey...that's a nice App you have there... by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    it would be a shame if.....

  7. Yay for Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The advocacy group will safeguard the information and work with lawyers to negotiate payment.

    And work with marketers.

    Well, maybe not initially as the target group has been looking for something like this and decided it develop it. However, I expect a few sting operations in the near future:

    Previously, when workers were robbed of their wages, Mr. Trinidad said, they were unable to respond; because of their immigration status, they were often afraid to report the theft or did not know how.

    This won't change their immigration status.

  8. Takers! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Funny

    Those damn takers are at it again. The Job creators need your wages. Goddamned socialists!

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:Takers! by sumdumass · · Score: 2

      Huh? I'm not sure I follow what you are saying here. Do you actually think that expecting a days pay for a days worth of work is socialism or that keeping the pay is some sort of socialism? The former is free market capitalism, the later is criminal behavior plain and simple. I'm not sure where socialism or any political ideology comes into play here other than a lot of the workers are illegals which is the only real reason people can get away with robbing their wages and underpaying them. It's not like they can complain to any authorities without fear of legal consequences for themselves.

    2. Re:Takers! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0, Troll

      Do you actually think that expecting a days pay for a days worth of work is socialism

      That is actually one of the most prominent parts of the Republican Party's platform.

      I wouldn't be surprised if there were t-shirts and bumper stickers on sale at CPAC with "Expecting A Day's Work For A Day's Pay Is Socialism" on them.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:Takers! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Huh? I'm not sure I follow what you are saying here. Do you actually think that expecting a days pay for a days worth of work is socialism or that keeping the pay is some sort of socialism? The former is free market capitalism, the later is criminal behavior plain and simple. I'm not sure where socialism or any political ideology comes into play here other than a lot of the workers are illegals which is the only real reason people can get away with robbing their wages and underpaying them. It's not like they can complain to any authorities without fear of legal consequences for themselves.

      It was a throwaway sarcasm/joke. Not even all that good of one. Kinda like how the job creators need as much money as possible to create jobs, and how employees are viewd as the enemy.

      But if I might, since you've decided to take my lame joke seriously - years and years ago, I had a job selling auto stuff, like oil, batteries and tires. I was pretty good at it. The owners set up a bonus system for the salesmen. For sales above X amount, we'd get a percentage. So I set out and sold, sold, sold. In a few weeks I was into the bonus sales. The first time, I got there, they said that it wasn't completely set up yet. Okay, no problem. The second time, it was "Those things you sold were lower profit items." I was a little annoyed. The third time, I asked about it and they told me they had to change the dollar figure for getting bonus. Upward, of course.

      They didn't consider it criminal behavior at all, they considered it good, sound business practice. And what was I going to do about it? Nothing much, so it was indeed good, sound business practice. Do you even think for a minute that this behavior isn't going on for citizens as well? With the same results?

      Now of course, I scaled the sales back and got another job pretty quickly. But they carried on for a number of years, probably screwing other employees over.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    4. Re:Takers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He is responding to the fact that in America anything that advantages employees over employers is immediately derided by conservatives as being socialist or communist. The thing he's saying is a parody of that view; he's being sardonic.

    5. Re:Takers! by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      lol.. Your trying to be silly.. Or you ran out of meds.

    6. Re:Takers! by sumdumass · · Score: 2

      They didn't consider it criminal behavior at all, they considered it good, sound business practice. And what was I going to do about it? Nothing much, so it was indeed good, sound business practice. Do you even think for a minute that this behavior isn't going on for citizens as well? With the same results?

      I'm sorry to say but you are or were kind of stupid. If an employer refused to pay me when I follow their own rules, I move on to another job and likely take them to court for back wages. There shouldn't have been a third time.

      And no, I do not have to stop and consider that this behavior happened to citizens as well. As a citizen, assuming you are not wanted by the cops for anything, you can report the employer's behavior and even sue. But if you cannot go to the courts or state agencies, you kind of have to put up with it or figure out how to go elsewhere.

      Now of course, I scaled the sales back and got another job pretty quickly. But they carried on for a number of years, probably screwing other employees over.

      You should have sued them for lost wages too.

      Here is what I do not get. If you were making the sales, they were making the money. They would have to know that either people would stop making the sales or go elsewhere. Either way, they lost a valuable sales asset which doesn't make any business sense at all. Are you sure the business you were in wasn't just the front for a drug ring and they didn't want it to succeed else they would have issues laundering drug money?

    7. Re:Takers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They got the sales for free, and then got rid of someone too smart to be fooled by their schemes. Disregarding ethics, that's something that looks like success.

    8. Re:Takers! by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      It's only a success if you count criminal behavior and a failure to act by the employee a success. If an employer fails to pay the employee, under various state and federal laws, the employee can sue for wages plus costs. In some areas circumstances the state or federal labor board or Secretary position will file the suite on the employees behalf. In others, the employee can place a mechanics lien on titled property locking the employer or even the customer from selling the property until it is paid.

      Your idea of it being a success is like calling a liquor store robbery a success because the only witness refuses to come forward. Sure, you can look at it that way but it was only a success because someone failed to stand up for themselves.

    9. Re:Takers! by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Who gets an honest day's wages these days? Productivity has tripled in the last few decades, while basically all the increased profits have gone to the executives and investors. If you were getting an honest day's wage you'd be making 3x as much as you actually are.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    10. Re:Takers! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry to say but you are or were kind of stupid. If an employer refused to pay me when I follow their own rules, I move on to another job and likely take them to court for back wages.

      So what is your plan, you a breatharian, and can exist on nothing or something like that? Have such resources that you can at any time quit without notice, then have the additional resources to fully prosecute these people? And me at the tender age of 19? Sorry, I don't jump ship until I know another one is coming. Even back then. I simply got a new job in a couple weeks, and the problem was solved for me.

      Perhaps you are independently wealthy, have a sugar daddy or mommy, or can simply move back in withyour own mommy and daddy, which in my world, shows a sure sign of failure on both their and your parents.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    11. Re:Takers! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      It's only a success if you count criminal behavior and a failure to act by the employee a success.

      Even at the age of 19, I knew where the bear shit in the buckwheat. Your choosing to make this an indictment of me based on me working a couple more weeks, waiting until I had another jobe to go to and was not enemployed for even a day, is pretty bizarre.

      Hell, I even made thousands more a year, although that was sorta lucky. But still.

      What a fuckheaded stupid person I was. Left a job where I was getting screwed over, while a man of impeccable principlies such as yourself, would have quit on the spot, marked into a lawyers office, and (presumably successfully) sued these people and for what? Maybe a hundred dollars in missed wages?

      Yup, I'm stupid, and your plan was the only intelligent option.

      I only say this to a few people because it usually pisses them off big time:

      Bitch? Please!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    12. Re:Takers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your choosing to make this an indictment of me ... is pretty bizarre.
      Near as I can tell, your post was a threatening counter-example to his libertarian-esque view that the market solves all problems, and that employers and employees are always playing on the same level field.
      Wild guess: there are some Rand quotes in his posting history.

    13. Re:Takers! by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Lol. You certainly cannot follow a thought.

      Listen, you admitted to sticking around. If it was only a few weeks to find another job, you did exactly what I said you should do outside of going after backwages.

      It's important that you go after back wages because it does two things. First, It puts the employer on notice that this behavior is illegal and unacceptable. Second, it gives awareness to your replacement so they can be informed and watch for the same behavior.

      But you presented the situation as if you remained there long term hoping you could get the bonus eventually. That is stupid. If what you say is true, you weren't stupid, just inconsiderate to employees that would follow you.

    14. Re:Takers! by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      No rand quotes - at least not purposely.

      You are partially correct though. The market can sort it out. But you see, that requires people to follow the law and the contract. What he described was a failure to both fulfill a contract and a failure to enforce the terms.

      So let me ask you. If you order and paid for a widget from my company and I failed to deliver it, would you seek restitution or dismiss it altogether and purchaseand pay for another widget? Let me tell you that one solution is obviously stupid. Employment is not very different. The employer buys your effort. You purchase money by trading efforts. If the employer doesn't fulfill their contract obligations and you do nothing, you are essentially buying and paying for another widget without receiving the previous one.

      So no. The market doesn't solve everything, but laws and courts and your actions fill in the gaps.

    15. Re:Takers! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      It's important that you go after back wages because it does two things. First, It puts the employer on notice that this behavior is illegal and unacceptable. Second, it gives awareness to your replacement so they can be informed and watch for the same behavior.

      That's nice and all, but you usually destroy yourself when going into whistleblower mode.

      But you presented the situation as if you remained there long term hoping you could get the bonus eventually. That is stupid.

      And you accuse me of not following a thought?

      Under this sentence, I cut and paste my text on bold and italic from my first response to you.It is the single sentence where I described my reaction to their cheating:

      Now of course, I scaled the sales back and got another job pretty quickly.

      So I have no idea where you got the idea that I remained there long term trying to eventually get the bonus. The only ambiguity in that statement is "pretty quickly", which in that case was a couple weeks.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    16. Re:Takers! by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Depends on what you are whistle blowing. Getting paid what you were promised isn't going to be overly detrimental to you. You will likely lose your job and they will likely be stuck paying lost wages but that is remedied by getting another job.

      It also took you three times of being cheated out of pay you were due before you got another job pretty quickly. The only way they can get away with that kind of crap is if you let them. The order of events suggests you actually spent some time trying to comply before realizing you were getting screwed.

  9. Nice and all by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    but when are we going to start enforcing minimum wage law? Yeah, I know a lot of these are illegals and they're screwed either way, but I know some guys that are ex-cons treated the same way. These guys hurt us all. Shit runs down hill and their low wages serve to depress wages everywhere...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Nice and all by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but when are we going to start enforcing minimum wage law?

      The current minimum wage law is a joke. There are states where the minimum wage is still $7.25 an hour.

      I don't care what kind of job you have, if you're working for someone, it's worth more than $7.25 an hour. If you're the Quality Assurance supervisor at a Las Vegas strip club, your time is still worth more than $7.25 a goddamn hour.

      And by the way, I'm currently seeking a position as a Quality Assurance supervisor at a Las Vegas strip club. If you know of such a position, hit me up on Linkdin. But you better be paying at least $9/hr and offer free hand sanitizer. I don't care if there's an employee lunch room on premises, because I hope to be eating out.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Nice and all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > if you're working for someone, it's worth more than $7.25 an hour.

      That's a lie, and you know it. Many jobs are not worth that much an hour so therefore they simply don't exist. The oppressive people that brought us this minimum wage garbage hates workers, and they are using it to increase unemployment Jobs that aren't worth minimum wage simply don't exist.

    3. Re:Nice and all by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Even if I had no money, I would not get out of bed to be paid the least amount possible, by law. If someone's paying you minimum wage, they're basically saying that they'd love to pay you less but the law prevents them from doing so. It's tantamount to telling you that you're worth the lowest amount legally possible.

      I'd find a nice, older, heavy-set widow and stud myself out before I got out of bed to be insulted like that. I suppose I'd do it if I were truly destitute but, at that point, I might just as well wait until the middle of the night and smash the window in at a liquor store. Then I'll just sit there and get as drunk as I can until the cops come or morning arrives and they find me giggling in a pool of my own urine and vomit. I might as well go prison at that point, seriously.

      I guess, more importantly, I'd never put myself into a position where I needed to work for such a low wage. So long as minimum wage is a joke, I'd not even consider working for it (unless under duress). I really would whore myself out to old ladies.

      Oh, ha! Come to think of it? Your name reminds me of a movie with a guy named "Ratzo" in it. He's hanging out with a guy from Texas who's gone to New York to be a gigolo. The Texan's not very good at his job and they go to Florida and Ratzo dies. Oh yeah, spoiler alert. It's a kind of funny movie and I've not seen it in years. I've no idea what the name of it is.

      But, at this point, minimum wage is a joke. To be paid minimum wage would be like a slap across the face. Sure, I'd like to live in a world where we didn't have to have a minimum wage. I'd love that. However, I don't see that as a realistic option at this time. What the exact price of minimum wage should be is subject to debate but the reality is that it's much too low. Having had this discussion with a few other people lately, the $12.50/hour figure it thrown around a lot. I'd say that's not too bad - it might even be higher than is required back home. It should be higher than what it is and more areas should take advantage of the fact that it's the Federal Minimum Wage and then adjust it (up) according to their cost of living. Right now, most areas just stick with the Federal regulations.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    4. Re: Nice and all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GP sounds like the type of person that likes massive unemployment so people are more dependent on the government. It's all about control.

    5. Re: Nice and all by convolvatron · · Score: 1

      s/government/employers

    6. Re:Nice and all by beelsebob · · Score: 2, Informative

      A human can self sustain on a smallholding, and stay alive. That gives us a reasonable lower bound on how much human labour is worth - you can build a house, farm, eat, and get by.

      Lets see what $7.25 an hour (aka $15,000 a year at 40 hours a week) can get you. You can get a 6 pack of ramen for $2.19 at walmart, so that's $400 a year on food if you expect to eat a packet of ramen 3 times a day. Median one bed rent in the US is $1200 a month, so that's $14,400 on rent. To survive, you're going to need water and sewerage, so that's $200 a month to the local government - $2400. You're also going to need electricity to boil water for that kettle to eat your ramen, and basic heating, so call that $100 a month for the electric bill. Another $1200.

      That's us at $18,400 *just* to eat ramen day in day out, doing nothing but that, sitting on a bare floor, staring at a wall while you're not out labouring.

      In reality, what a human can produce on a smallholding is significantly better than a packet of ramen 3 times a day, so in reality, food will cost significantly more than that.

      So we can pretty firmly establish here, no - human labour is *not* ever worth less than $7.25 an hour. Humans, even when doing the ultimate in unskilled labour, just literally doing nothing but scraping by surviving produce more value than $7.25 an hour. If you're trying to get someone to do something that's worth less than that, then you're actively making humanity less efficient, not more so. Minimum wage law preventing you from doing that is preventing you from making humanity worse.

    7. Re:Nice and all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      What a ridiculous set of numbers! I live for about half of that much in Seattle. Water and sewage is not $200/month. My bill is $42 and split with a roommate so it's $21. Also, power is nowhere near as expensive as you claim. I have never seen a power bill that huge. Our bill is usually just under $35 per month split two ways is about $17.50 each.

      Why does your kind always exaggerate and lie? We all want to make more money, but the idea that we need to be dishonest about it is ridiculous. I get that you hate the truth and constantly spew lies, but please at least try to make them believable. No sane person believes your $200 per month for water lie. Your kind lies.

    8. Re:Nice and all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To survive, you're going to need water and sewerage, so that's $200 a month to the local government - $2400.

      I own a farm, and I don't spend nearly that much a month on water.

      Why don't you just admit you're wrong instead of claiming numbers that any adult knows is not true.

    9. Re: Nice and all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would someone making minimum wage try to live somewhere so very expensive? By definition, half of the housing is cheaper than the number you quoted.

    10. Re: Nice and all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, we get it that you want high unemployment. You hates people so you want us to suffer and have to depend on the government.

    11. Re: Nice and all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't bother trying. He didn't use facts to reach his conclusion so you're not going to be able to use facts to convince him if the truth.

    12. Re:Nice and all by Whibla · · Score: 1

      Oh, ha! Come to think of it? Your name reminds me of a movie with a guy named "Ratzo" in it. He's hanging out with a guy from Texas who's gone to New York to be a gigolo. The Texan's not very good at his job and they go to Florida and Ratzo dies. Oh yeah, spoiler alert. It's a kind of funny movie and I've not seen it in years. I've no idea what the name of it is.

      Midnight Cowboy.

    13. Re:Nice and all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Minimum wage is a band-aid measure to prevent the race to the bottom due to the inherent monopsony of the labor market. The problem is that somebody who isn't independently wealthy can't refuse to work otherwise they starve to death. Of course, the other problem is that most workers are paycheck to paycheck. Hence minimum wage.

      Enact a universal basic income and you can get rid of the minimum wage; in fact I'd recommend it.

      Get rid of minimum wage and you'll see lots of riots.

      Disclaimer: I've never worked for minimum wage in my life, not even when I was flipping burgers.

    14. Re:Nice and all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I can live easily in flyover country on $15,000 per year, especially with a roommate. The big red flag in GP's scenario was the $1200 per month rent.

      I can live in a decently sized town, pay $500 per month for rent, sewer/water/garbage included in rent, electricity is maybe $100 (hey, I like my toys!), and if you pick the right place, they'll also cover the gas for heating. Where I'm looking to move next will probably be about $600-$700 for a single bedroom apartment. Still very doable.

      Currently a homeowner, and $200 per month sounds absolutely insane. My water/sewer bill comes quarterly and is more like $150. Quarterly trash bill is $50 and that's only because I went with the larger container.

      So really, the only figure GP listed that looks correct from here is electric. Maybe electricity is just insanely expensive where I live, but on the other hand having a roommate who doesn't believe in completely disconnecting power from things that aren't in use and turning off lights when leaving a room doesn't help.

      So looking forward to living alone...

    15. Re:Nice and all by skam240 · · Score: 1

      "Why does your kind always exaggerate and lie?

      Why does your kind always take a single instance of something and use it to damn an entire ideology or political movement?

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  10. Day Laborers? by rossdee · · Score: 1

    What about night shift workers?

    1. Re: Day Laborers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's coming in release 2.0

      That whole AM vs PM thing requires additional, highly complicated programming. Don't even get me started on daylight savings time...

    2. Re: Day Laborers? by plopez · · Score: 1

      don't forget leap years and Y2K problems.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    3. Re:Day Laborers? by JustOK · · Score: 1

      they're not going to be losing any sleep over it.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    4. Re:Day Laborers? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      A "day laborer" is someone hired for a single day. Sometimes I suppose a week

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    5. Re: Day Laborers? by ZipK · · Score: 1

      That whole AM vs PM thing requires additional, highly complicated programming.

      And don't even get me started on the memory this will require. Probably some sort of a hybrid silicon-neural network.

  11. Made By Apple Inc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple Inc. did not make it. But it feeds there desires to aid ISIS.

  12. Verification? by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    How will the data be verified? There is so much potential for abuse here.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    1. Re:Verification? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      How will the data be verified? There is so much potential for abuse here.

      You mean people who hire day laborers might be targets for abuse?

      Now THAT is irony.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Verification? by plopez · · Score: 1

      It's like any other review system, one person abuses it but is outweighed by dozens of others also reviewing employers.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    3. Re:Verification? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't need to be. Just look at all the business screaming about Yelp. Yelp is already prevailing in courts, and has no need to verify anything thanks to safe harbor and their users being the ones to post the reviews. They only have to remove whatever a particular judge orders them to, and that's not happening often - it's usually the individual user that's ordered by a judge to remove or change a review.

  13. proper link by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03...

    seriously, have you no decency slashdot editors?

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:proper link by KGIII · · Score: 1

      > have you no decency slashdot editors?

      Of course they don't. And I wouldn't have it any other way. Nor would you! Don't lie. You'd be sad and bored if it they did a better job. You'd have to find something new to bitch about. If we can't bitch about "editing" we'd have to find something new to do. We might even have to read the articles and make intelligent, insightful, or informative comments. That would be like cats and dogs living together!

      No sir! I would not stand for it.

      I will not stand it, if they edit.
      It'd just be wrong, don't you get it?
      Do not be one, don't be a hero!
      I could not stand it Gravis Zero!
      I like it now, I give a damn!
      With "Slashdot Green" and comment spam!

      Err... Yes, yes I am a wee bit stoned.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    2. Re:proper link by denzacar · · Score: 1

      You forgot to add "Burma Shave" at the end.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    3. Re:proper link by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I was actually going for a Green Eggs and Ham kind of thing. :-/

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    4. Re:proper link by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know. But this IS Slashdot after all.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  14. And this in Turn will Rat out people who use them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the day laborers want an app of who hires them? Dear IRS... here is a database of people that don't pay taxes.. and a database of small business that hire workers and don't pay tax on them as well...

    Seems like a loose loose App... Idiots.

  15. Re:And this in Turn will Rat out people who use th by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Dear IRS... here is a database of people that don't pay taxes.

    Some of those people do pay taxes. I had to file for unemployment benefits a few years ago and discovered that someone used my social security number for employment purposes. The only thing in between my name and the other person's name was the first and last initials. I had to contact the unemployment office to get my benefits readjusted, notified social security that extra funds were credited to my account, and get a PIN from the IRS for filing taxes. As a precaution, I requested new debit and credit cards.

  16. Day laborers with smart phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many day laborers actually make enough to afford a smart phone and its subscription?

  17. there's something like that for Mechanical Turk by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Informative

    There was a rash of people submitting jobs to Mechanical Turk and then not paying anyone. The person paying can rate work as unacceptable and not pay, and there's no real oversight if they just do that all the time (and Amazon doesn't police this at all, or even provide a reputation mechanism). So some academics put together a third-party site, Turkopticon, that people use to rate jobs, payers, etc., which has made it a lot easier to avoid the people on the site who won't pay. Seems like a good idea to extend it to "the real world".

  18. A great day for the Free Market! by plopez · · Score: 1

    You can only have anything approaching a Free Market[1] with good information flow. This will help the labor market immensely.

    [1] Whether it can ever truly exist is a matter of debate and I am dubious on the matter [2]

    [2] By the way, do not confuse a Free Market with an unregulated market. Often well regulated markets can approach Free Market conditions. Unregulated markets often become captured markets, e.g. monopolies.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    1. Re:A great day for the Free Market! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, do not confuse a Free Market with an unregulated market.

      Markets, or at least sophisticated ones, cannot exist without some regulation and thus are not really "free". The enterprise is the part that's free as in the "free enterprise" system, but the market itself is not and cannot be "free".

      Unregulated markets often become captured markets, e.g. monopolies.

      I think you have that one backwards. Monopolies almost always exist due to government charter or corruption of the regulatory body (i.e. regulatory capture). Either way it's the heavy involvement of the government in making (or breaking) that market that provides and maintains the opportunity for the monopolist to monopolize.

  19. Re:Translate "day laborer" to "illegal alien" plea by KGIII · · Score: 2

    Then you simply don't employ them and don't support those who do. At the very least, illegal immigrant or not, you don't abuse them. We can be humane about shipping them back across the boarder. There's no reason to be hostile and there are zero reasons to be abusive.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  20. Re: Translate "day laborer" to "illegal alien" ple by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Point conceded. If I may, I amend my statement to there are no socially acceptable reasons.

    I was initially going to type "good reasons" but then I realized that's entirely too subjective. But, yeah... I mean, some folks might find it emotionally satisfying to plink at them with .22LR rounds but I'm pretty sure that's not really considered socially acceptable. That and we're the US of A and that means we're supposed to hold the moral high ground. Well, it does... It doesn't mean we actually do it. We are supposed to do so.

    We're supposed to be the greatest nation on the planet. I'm pretty sure that means we're supposed to avoid abusing illegal immigrants. I'm also sure that we're not supposed to be spying on our own citizens, stripping away liberties as fast as the populace can be convinced to give them up, torturing people, and that sort of thing.

    Actually? Come to think of it, we've already gone this far down the rabbit hole. We might just as well put barbed wire and land mines along the border. Then, when we catch 'em, we can make 'em run back through it. We can air it on prime time television and turn it into a game show. Hell, we can force them to run back across at gun point and sell tickets to people who want to wield the guns. Varied ticket prices mean that they get bigger and better weapons.

    Where's Trump at? He'd probably sponsor that television show. He might even host it. They could have chutes that they run out of before they have to dart across the border. Anyone who doesn't cross quickly enough gets shot at with a variety of weapons. Each contestant gets their own "zone." The highest scoring contestant gets to come back the following night and participate for free. Non-winning contestants are allowed to take home a trophy so long as they go retrieve it themselves. It could happen.

    Seriously, we're supposed to be the example of what people should aspire to become in their own nations. Abusing people who do illegal things (instead of handing down justice) isn't something that normal people aspire to. I don't have any particular love (or even sympathy) for the illegal immigrants. What I do have is a love for my country and I'd like it to be better than it is.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  21. Is there anything special about an app here by jader3rd · · Score: 1

    Couldn't this have been done via a website decades ago? What makes apps so special?

    1. Re:Is there anything special about an app here by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Websites can be hard to use. A decade ago day laborers didn't have smart phones.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  22. It goes both ways by Solandri · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to do the accounting at a company which used day laborers. I did my job honestly and paid exactly what each employee's time card said they worked. The biggest problem we had was actually people getting their friend to punch in their time card for them before they'd actually arrived for work, and people hanging around before clocking out to pad the amount of time they'd worked.

    We let the latter abuse slide because it was usually done to round off 7.98 hours worked to 8 hours (the employees we knew didn't do this just got bigger end of year bonuses instead). The former abuse got serious enough we actually considered switching to a fingerprint-based time card. In the end we decided doing so would send a "we don't trust you" message to all our employees, when it was only a few employees who did it. Instead we opted to put the time clock in a more public location, and have the managers sit down with any of their employees we knew did this and give them a talk stressing that having a friend punch in for them was not allowed.

    1. Re:It goes both ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But are you talking about legal day laborers? Because it feels like this app is for illegal alien day laborers. Ones were you would not keep a record of paying them since you can't send information to the IRS that you are using people that are not legal to work here.

      Could say this app is needed because the illegal day laborers can't go anywhere to complain, or else they could get deported, but it would result in a fine for the business that had him work.

  23. Re:Takers! Whoosh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Huh? I'm not sure I follow what you are saying here.

  24. send them all back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good, we can hack their database and then identify the effing illegals using it and send them back from 15,000 feet with a Chinese-made parachute. This app will help us do that.... and the SJW morons who are developing it, well, send them back too.

  25. Re: Translate "day laborer" to "illegal alien" ple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I may, I amend my statement to there are no socially acceptable reasons.

    Depends on who you socialize with, I could, with relatively little trouble, find a number of people who would find it abhorrent to even suggest they not be as nasty as they could to the illegal immigrants. Or others they disdain.

    At most, they'll conceal their viciousness under a layer of concern.

    But this kind of thinking is not new, and it's always been easy to bring out. It's not a matter of aspiration, so much as it is the base level, while higher functions take a bit more work.

    Then again I saw a bit of a TV show the other day, where a man had his brain function disrupted by a stroke, so he was excessively kind and generous. They could do nothing to deal with it. Then he had another stroke, and he became fearful enough that he wouldn't let someone have his empty cup to refill it with water.

    Which brings to mind a David Brin short story where a virus infects people causing them to donate blood more.

  26. A Great Tool for President Trump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The geotagged photos will help President Trump round up both the undocumented aliens and their employers!

  27. DDOS is more likely than a lawsuit by hwstar · · Score: 1

    The businesses and people which hire day labour probably can't afford to challenge the app creator legally. What they could do is hire unscrupulous hacker groups to DDOS the app's servers, making the app very hard to use. This is the more likely scenario IMHO.

    1. Re:DDOS is more likely than a lawsuit by skam240 · · Score: 1

      Day laborers are usually used for landscaping, construction and the like. Do you think many of the people employing them in these industries even know what a DDOS attack is let alone know how to find some one to do it for them?

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  28. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Feds can use this as a list of business owners that need to be arrested for breaking the law.