Slashdot Mirror


Google Challenge Results In Astoundingly Efficient Inverters

AmiMoJo writes: A few summers ago, Google and IEEE announced a one million dollar prize to build the most efficient and compact DC to AC inverter. It was called the Little Box Challenge, with the goal of a 2kW inverter with a power density greater than 50 Watts per cubic inch. Typical solar inverters have a density of about 5 W/cubic inch. Now the results are in, with the winners hitting 143 W/cubic inch using GaN transistors, and two other teams meeting Google's goal.

144 of 245 comments (clear)

  1. Hooray for science by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    The world is a slightly better place.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  2. Efficiency by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Astoundingly Efficient Inverters

    This doesn't seem to be about efficiency at all, but rather about power density (how much power can be converted in a particular cubic volume.)

    Not that small isn't a worthy goal, but efficiency is important in any application where available power isn't both free and copiously oversupplied.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Efficiency by guruevi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't they go hand-in-hand though? You can only dissipate so much (waste) energy in a particular cubic volume. Decreasing the amount of waste energy increases the amount you can pack together. It wouldn't be a challenge if you're just looking for miniaturization.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:Efficiency by Stewie241 · · Score: 2

      Yeah... from the website:

      INTRODUCING THE LITTLE BOX CHALLENGE

      An open competition to build a (much) smaller power inverter, with a $1,000,000 prize.

      Design and build a kW-scale inverter with the highest power density (at least 50 Watts per cubic inch).

      Efficiency is not mentioned anywhere. I see somebody arguing that efficient with space is still being efficient. This is true, but is not what is commonly meant when referring to the efficient of an inverter, and misusing the word in this context is confusing.

    3. Re:Efficiency by PIBM · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you had read the challenge when it was proposed (or went to read the rules), the efficiency was required to be > 95%

      . Produce a DCAC conversion efficiency of > 95%

      From https://www.littleboxchallenge...

    4. Re:Efficiency by slashkitty · · Score: 4, Informative

      95.4% efficient in the conversion per the Datasheet http://littleboxchallengecetpo...

      --
      -- these are only opinions and they might not be mine.
    5. Re:Efficiency by DeathToBill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe, though Hack-a-Day say it involves an "incredible thermal management solution," which doesn't sound like they've actually bumped the energy efficiency up that much.

      Why were Google so keen to have an inverter that maximises power density? Why not maximise energy efficiency?

      Ideally you'd like to minimise cost of energy. But I guess it's fairly difficult to construct a competition around this: It depends too much on production scale and the prevailing cost of electricity. But why power density as a substitute?

      --
      Slashdot - News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters, in ISO-8859-1 Has just realised that beta makes this signature redundant
    6. Re:Efficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the website https://www.littleboxchallenge.com/:

      In brief, the other specifications are :

      * Must be able to handle up to 2 kVA loads
      * Must achieve a power density of equal to or greater than 50 W/in3
      * Must be able to handle loads with power factors from 0.7–1, leading and lagging in an islanded mode
      * Must be in a rectangular metal enclosure of no more than 40 in3
      * Will be taking in 450 V DC power in series with a 10 O resistor
      * Must output 240 V, 60 Hz AC single phase power
      * Must have a total harmonic distortion + noise on both voltage and current of 5%
      * Must have an input ripple current of 20%
      * Must have an input ripple voltage of 3%
      * Must have a DC-AC efficiency of greater than 95%
      * Must maintain a temperature of no more than 60C during operation everywhere on the outside of the device that can be touched.
      * Must conform to Electromagnetic Compliance standards as set out in FCC Part 15 B
      * Can not use any external source of cooling (e.g. water) other than air
      * Does not require galvanic isolation

    7. Re:Efficiency by Stewie241 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ah, I didn't look that closely to see that. On the other hand, I still wouldn't consider them 'astoundingly efficient' as the headline claims. This article discusses a design for a 97.09% efficient inverter. (I admit at this point I'm beginning to be argumentative, but I still think the headline should have been astoundingly dense inverters, though my theory is that slashdot injects in intentional errors to drive comments and traffics from those who like to nitpick submissions).

    8. Re:Efficiency by fyngyrz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They can go hand in hand; they don't have to go hand in hand. Generally speaking, efficiency of power conversion is fairly high, 95% isn't all that uncommon for a design that tries hard. Some of the problems are that when you're doing conversion at the KW level, 5% is 50 watts, which tends to be RFI (both direct and indirect) and heat - that's efficient in one sense, and a serious problem in another. Going from 95% to 97.5% cuts that to 25 watts; and that's not space saved once per installation, that's money saved and more energy for other things and less crap in the air every moment the conversion is ongoing.

      In the case of houses and cars, where KW is the order of the day, space is a minor problem; efficiency is the major problem. I'd take a 97.5% efficient box at 10x the volume over at 95% converter any time. But it isn't even 10x the volume, generally speaking.

      That's why the first thing I looked for was competition for conversion efficiency, and why I was a little put off by it not even being there.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    9. Re:Efficiency by bytesex · · Score: 3, Funny

      They want to put it in your mobile phone! Have a solar panel on the one side, your house fuse box on the other, and your phone in the middle! That's why they wanted the highest energy density per volume!

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    10. Re:Efficiency by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ah, I didn't look that closely to see that. On the other hand, I still wouldn't consider them 'astoundingly efficient' as the headline claims. This article discusses a design for a 97.09% efficient inverter. (I admit at this point I'm beginning to be argumentative, but I still think the headline should have been astoundingly dense inverters, though my theory is that slashdot injects in intentional errors to drive comments and traffics from those who like to nitpick submissions).

      I disagree that you're being argumentive. While efficiency can mean a lot of things, it's a dead lock given that in a story about electric inverters, that efficiency would mean conversion efficiency.

      Because the "efficiency" they were actually referring to was efficiency in th enature of efficiency apartments.

      I certainly don't want to disparage what they did, because it was very impressive. This was more an issue with the person who wrote the original article.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    11. Re:Efficiency by DeathToBill · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to [1], the winner achieves 95.4% efficiency - not actually that impressive as inverter efficiencies go.

      [1] http://littleboxchallengecetpo...

      --
      Slashdot - News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters, in ISO-8859-1 Has just realised that beta makes this signature redundant
    12. Re:Efficiency by arth1 · · Score: 1

      According to [1], the winner achieves 95.4% efficiency - not actually that impressive as inverter efficiencies go.

      So, in the space saved, they can fit a small stirling engine? :)

    13. Re:Efficiency by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Batteries. Current inverters are rather large compared the batteries that can provide their maximum output power.

      Electric vehicle charging would benefit from this. You want to be pushing 120kW+ DC into the battery. You can also go back the other way and run your house from the car battery to save money when your solar panels are not producing anything.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:Efficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A lot is left unsaid in this announcement.
      One extremely obvious way to have a box with a set conversion factor smaller, is to allow it to get hotter. A lot hotter.
      Say you make a box that is designed to run reliably at 200C instead of limited to 80C. (In The Vacuum Tube era, some transmitting tubes were designed to have the Plates glow Red Hot, and instead of glass, Ceramics were used as housings... did they get hot!)
      So, no Epoxy PCBs, no Film Resistors, no Polyester Caps. Note that the bits already exist- Point-to-point wiring using Silver solder, Nichrome Resistors, Mica Caps.

      But a more interesting question, why the need for such a small controller in the first place? Unless of course, it's built into something else, like a "Car" Battery... 12.6VDC from the normal posts, plus a place to plug in a Tea Kettle.

      Captcha: industry

    15. Re:Efficiency by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Given that the challenge was specifically to come up with *space* efficient inverter designs, it's dead certain that the 'astoundingly efficient' comment refers to *that*, not conversion efficiency. (Given that the designs are required to be 95%+ efficient on the conversion metric, and that isn't atypical for less space-efficient designs, that's a further indicator that 'astoundingly efficient' refers to space requirements.)

      Go ask an EE what they think of when dealing with efficiency in inverter circuitry. Given that I'm not the only one noticing the headline was misleading, I'm not alone at all in my response.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    16. Re:Efficiency by CauseBy · · Score: 1

      I don't understand your attempt at pedantry. Density is spacial efficiency. If you make something smaller, you make it more efficient in the dimension of size.

    17. Re:Efficiency by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      Space efficiency is technically a type of efficiency as well as all the other points above. :)

    18. Re:Efficiency by castionsosa · · Score: 2

      There is always liquid cooling. A data center usually has a decent water chilling system present, so if inverters could be cooled by that (likely via a heat exchanger, so a leak wouldn't be a major disaster), it would be more efficient than ones that are air cooled. Liquid cooling is maturing slowly, but surely, the main advance are better closed loop systems which make it easier to go this route.

    19. Re:Efficiency by KGIII · · Score: 2

      > If I press really hard during those, it almost stings a tiny bit.

      Err... I can save you the expense of a doctor's visit! It's stinging because, you know, you're pressing really hard. Just a guess. Don't do that and the problem will go away.

      "Doctor, it hurts when I hit myself with a hammer."
      "Don't hit yourself with a hammer."

      That'll be $50 and schedule a follow-up in six months with the secretary out front.

      Disclaimer: I am, technically, a doctor. I am not a medical doctor. Consult a qualified medical professional before deciding to stop pressing on an old injury really hard to see if it stings. My daughter is a real medical doctor. She is not my doctor. She probably is not your doctor unless you're a child in a trauma/intensive care unit.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    20. Re:Efficiency by JimSadler · · Score: 1

      Consumption of space is an efficiency in itself. For example, suppose your car engine could be made the size of a pack of cigarettes with the same power output. Even if that small engine was made of pure gold it would have less weight and therefore, your car would use less fuel. You could also reduce the frontal area and wind drag on the vehicle. Bulk almost always means less efficiency.

    21. Re:Efficiency by JimSadler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wouldn't it be wonderful to do that energy conversion outside the home with a tiny box. Keep in mind that the more equipment inside a home the more power the home will consume. In hot weather a big box inside the home would add to the cooling energy load on the home. If installed outside the home a duct could, in cold weather, direct that excess heat from the converter to keep pipes warm or pumps from freezing up. Most people fail to realize that once power is sent down the power line to the home or industry that that power will be converted to heat again. Whether it is an air conditioner, a TV set, a computer or an electric motor or water heater all of that electricity is converted to heat. To really fight global warming we must control heat generation at both ends of the power line. One way is to reuse the heat emitted from every device to be used by other devices. For example, heat radiated by your hot water heater could be used to heat your home a bit. Heat generated from an air conditioner is already used to heat some hot water tanks. I wonder how many people have even considered this sort of thing.

    22. Re:Efficiency by JimSadler · · Score: 1

      Consider a mobile installation of such an inverter. Electric cars might be far cheaper if AC power to the wheels was used instead of the DC from the battery packs. Higher powered DC brushless motors seem to be very expensive. Higher powered AC motors seem to be much cheaper but I can't comment on what industrial, bulk buying, prices might be. The weight of AC motors seems to be less as well. So being able to carry a tiny DC to AC converter might be far more efficient in an electric car or truck. Apparently an AC to Dc converter is also called for in regenerative braking systems. Again a tiny box might make that far more efficient as the car must carry the device. I feel that the competition was quite meaningful.

    23. Re:Efficiency by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      Whoosh!

    24. Re:Efficiency by torkus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Electrical Efficiency is loosely coupled to volumetric efficiency. We're talking about an inverter roughly the size of a fist that's outputting 2kW. Without very high efficiency your cooling solution would be larger than your inverter. A moderate size CPU cooler (sinking ~65w) is the size of this whole inverter.

      The rules require efficiency >95% which is typical for high efficiency inverter systems. At that, the primary benefit to higher efficiency is lowered cooling requirements (i.e. size) which is the primary goal of the competition.

      So the rules basically *do* set teams out to maximize efficiency. Having small, highly efficient inverters is useful is many applications (solar, vehicular, UPS, etc.)

      As for Google's exact benefit? I could see them running these in datacenters: deliver 450VDC rails to all your racks and power them off a hockey puck inverter or two. Simple to scale - add more battery, more racks with inverters as needed. Everything becomes modular.

      Beyond that, solar and larger UPS systems typically run at 450VDC - so this means you can also scale your UPS and solar installation in conjunction with your datacenter. Basically combine all the technologies together without requiring large monolithic components. Ok, TLDR my own post.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    25. Re:Efficiency by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Space efficient :-p

      Also, smaller may additionally imply cheaper, or lighter.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    26. Re:Efficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Liquid cooling has matured already. I once worked at a Facility that used Freon to cool most of the critical Electronics. If it leaked, which it did, 45KV Power Supplies underneath wouldn't explode. This stuff was put in in 1972, and accounts, in part, for the Ozone Hole above Berkeley.
      We also tried using Propylene-Glycol, until we discovered that the damn stuff polymerizes at relatively low Standoff Voltages, and the polymers are corrosive to Copper.
      We tried a lot of things- Deionized Water, Liquid Nitrogen and Helium, supercooled N2 and He gasses, Propane, SF6, Silicone Oils, Fomblin... the end result always came to the same; the less heat that needs to be carried away, the less cooling needed.
      One of my last tasks was to design a Goniometer that would go down to 12Kelvin; the bulky Commercial versions had difficulties making 25K.
      My design actually made 8K, using half of the Liquid Helium of previous designs. One of my tricks was the use of very thin annealed Gold foil as heat gaskets, which is common enough, but my Foils were powder coated with 10 Micron Diamonds.

      The design of the Inverters is worthless for Data Center applications: 400VDC to 60Hz sine-wave 240VAC is the Spec. There are few modern applications that require pure sine wave in the Kilowatts region, except Air Conditioners.
      (On my boat, I have a stepped-sine Inverter. The compressor in my ice maker is definitely noisier when running off the Inverter rather than Shore Power, but it's worked fine for 2 years.)

    27. Re:Efficiency by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      They are dissipating 92 (2kW @ 95.4%) watts in a 13.77 cubic inch enclosure and it's only heating 19 degrees above ambient.

    28. Re:Efficiency by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      The winner runs at 48 degrees in a 29 degree environment.
      A laptop PSU runs hotter than that at full load, and it's only transferring 60W, not 2000.

    29. Re:Efficiency by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      The inverters used for 120 kW+ charging isn't in the car, it's in the charging stations. The only charging stations hitting 120 kW+ are Tesla's superchargers, which are pure DC as far as the car is concerned.

    30. Re:Efficiency by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      As for Google's exact benefit? I could see them running these in datacenters: deliver 450VDC rails to all your racks and power them off a hockey puck inverter or two. Simple to scale - add more battery, more racks with inverters as needed. Everything becomes modular.

      Let me guess, you don't have an electrical engineering background?

      Computers run on DC, why oh why would you convert DC - AC, then AC - DC inside the case? It is far better to convert that 450 VDC to 12 VDC, 5 VDC, and 3.3 VDC and run the whole computer off that. Also, in a datacenter, the DC line losses could be pretty extreme, there may be a tradeoff in the increased efficiency in not converting DC to AC in the UPS system, but it depends on voltage and distance from the source.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    31. Re:Efficiency by werepants · · Score: 1

      Waste heat is low-grade, and hard to employ in a way that makes it worth it. What do you do with that bit of extra heat from the water heater that is leaking into the utility closet that will be cheap enough to have a payoff time within decades, controllable so you don't heat your home up when you don't want to and make a significantly larger impact than just letting that heat disperse through the house naturally? There probably isn't anything viable.

      The thing is, power plants aren't using heat to produce energy, they are using a heat differential. You need to have a very high temp heat reservoir and a low temp exhaust to efficiently extract energy from heat, and the larger the difference in temp the more efficient you can be. So, in the case of a water heater being a few degrees warmer than the surrounding air, there's very little that you can do that will be worth it.

      What I've found from researching energy improvements is that the most effective savings to be found is also the most low-tech and boring: insulation. The other thing that's a real bear about optimizing energy use is that every improvement you make reduces the impact and increases the payoff time of future improvements. My house is insulated well enough that my gas bill is only ~$300 a year, so at this point anything exotic (read: expensive) isn't close to worth it... an air-source heat pump, radiant floor heating, solar powered heating, etc - even if they reduced my heating bill to zero it still would take over a decade to pay itself off and I'll probably move by that time.

    32. Re:Efficiency by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Why not maximise energy efficiency?
      Because AC/DC converters are already extremely efficient.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  3. Re:AC is by its very nature inefficient by dlleigh · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is that you Thomas Edison?

    Stop electrocuting elephants!

  4. Re:Who participated? by GLMDesigns · · Score: 2

    I think he forgot the /sarc at the end of his post.

    --
    If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
    Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
  5. Watts per cubic inch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Are guys fucking serious?!?

    If you really want to use your old units, why not horse power per cubic inch?

    1. Re:Watts per cubic inch? by suutar · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be 3.05MW/m^3?

    2. Re:Watts per cubic inch? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Electricity post-dates the metric system, so the US uses SI units for electricity.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    3. Re:Watts per cubic inch? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      If you really want to use your old units, why not horse power per cubic inch?

      Or BTU per hour per inch squared. The great thing about imperial is that there's no shortage of choice.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  6. Does any one know : HVDC inverters by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    Does any one know what power density the inverters for HVDC transmission lines achieve? I know that this is not a comparable use case, i'm just interested.

    1. Re:Does any one know : HVDC inverters by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      The first iteration was around 80% conversion efficiency, but I understand they are in the low 90% range now. The challenge is the IGBTs need to be chained for the voltage, which increases switching losses.

    2. Re:Does any one know : HVDC inverters by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Doh. Looks like the new yards are about 500' square by (say) 30' operating height, at 3.2GW that gives you about 4W/cubic inch. But the satellite images are kind of old and poor quality so it is hard to tell for sure where the separation between the AC substation and DC equipment really is.

    3. Re:Does any one know : HVDC inverters by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Doh. Looks like the new yards are about 500' square by (say) 30' operating height, at 3.2GW that gives you about 4W/cubic inch. But the satellite images are kind of old and poor quality so it is hard to tell for sure where the separation between the AC substation and DC equipment really is.

      I thought it might be low, because of the heat dissipation. Even at 90%+ efficiency there must be a lot of heat produced

  7. GaN Transistors are the future by stevel · · Score: 4, Informative

    Gallium Nitride transistors have a lot of nice characteristics, but low yields and high costs have slowed their introduction. Two tiny laptop chargers, the FinSix Dart and Avogy Zolt, were said to use GaN transistors. The Dart still hasn't shipped, a year past its claimed release date. The Zolt has but is apparently using older Silicon Carbide-substrate transistors instead (Also see here.) (I received my Zolt recently and it is working well.)

    It won't be a surprise to anyone following this technology that it can make inverters more efficient - that's what FinSix and Avogy have been claiming/demonstrating for two years at least.

    1. Re:GaN Transistors are the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I work in RF, Ku band stuff, we use GaN parts like candy. One day I noticed that these things always come straight from Japan in hand-written and hand-packed little boxes... I asked what the BOM cost was and it was very high!

      These things are so cutting-edge that you can't even google for the part number they ship you; it's not even on the manufacturer's page! You need to ask for the datasheet and often it's just screen printouts from the VNA...

      I've also noticed that they smell different when the top explodes because of a mismatched load.

    2. Re:GaN Transistors are the future by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      GaN isn't cutting edge. It's just super expensive. The only real use for GaN, due to the cost, is in radio transmitters and a few other niches where they need the ability of GaN to run at faster MHZ than silicon can support and can afford to pay the ridiculous process costs. GaN will remain a niche in process tech until they can find a way to make chips cheaper and they've been trying for a very long time. A lot of companies have come and gone trying to improve GaN because of the promise.

      I can remember in the 90's is was the big fad that GaN was going to replace silicon. You can hopefully see how well that worked out.

    3. Re:GaN Transistors are the future by MattskEE · · Score: 3, Informative

      RF GaN parts are certainly expensive - the GaN is grown on silicon carbide substrates which is incredibly expensive by itself, and high-speed RF stuff has much more demanding fabrication needs like very small T-shaped gates, better contact resistances, and so on.

      GaN for power electronics is much cheaper, grown on 6 inch silicon substrates, and produced in much higher volumes. You can buy GaN parts from EPC on Digikey for a couple of dollars each, the other GaN power device manufacturers aren't selling publicly that I know of (just to partners, or nobody) but the cost per unit is not tremendous - a bit more than the same voltage and current rating silicon device but the GaN part can switch faster.

    4. Re:GaN Transistors are the future by vandamme · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that's RF. The promise of GaN was that it would be used everywhere in power circuits. To replace SiC.

      Maybe someday it will. Or something better will come along.

  8. Re:AC is by its very nature inefficient by DeathToBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you don't understand why this isn't going to happen, you need to be kept away from grid design.

    Replacing the AC network with a DC network would mean either replacing or substantially modifying the entire fleet of existing generation plant, all distribution and conversion equipment, all industrial equipment powered by electricity and most appliances. You might well be right that you can achieve better efficiency in a new network with DC than with AC; when you have to replace the entire electricity system, from spinning turbine to phone charger, it just ain't gunna happen.

    --
    Slashdot - News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters, in ISO-8859-1 Has just realised that beta makes this signature redundant
  9. Why is this important? by Kohath · · Score: 1

    Genuine question. The web site talks about inverters being 1-2 cubic feet in size, and it wants them smaller. I understand that smaller is better. What's the application that requires a 2kW inverter smaller than that?

    1. Re:Why is this important? by swb · · Score: 1

      Marine or other mobile applications?

      2-5kw is a sweet spot for these applications. Most marine generators in recreational applications are about 5kw -- and most of that is usually to drive air conditioning or similar high voltage applications.

      2kw or so, though, is pretty decent for off-battery use of lower powered items and might even provide enough power (if you can use all 2k) for a small microwave.

    2. Re:Why is this important? by mykepredko · · Score: 1

      An obvious one for me is for solar cells. As small/flat as possible to minimize the size/mass of an array.

      When I've looked at home arrays, the inverter is a large box that fits off to the side in its own enclosure. I can see that having a small inverter that is part of the array would be an advantage in terms of cost and installation workload.

    3. Re:Why is this important? by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but solar cells to generate 2 kW are large. The size of the inverter doesn't seem like a limiting factor in that kind of installation.

    4. Re:Why is this important? by afidel · · Score: 2

      Heck a 10,000 BTU AC unit in a small travel trailer only needs 700W once running so a 2kW setup would net you almost 3:1 runtime:collection (or about 2:1 once all inefficiencies are accounted for). The big problem is that 2kW of panels takes a lot more room than you have on a travel trailer (at least the ones that only need one 10k A/C!)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:Why is this important? by Tx · · Score: 2

      You don't need to use the solar cells directly, you charge up your batteries from your solar panels, or from cheap off-peak grid power, and you then need an inverter so you can run all your AC appliances from the batteries. The basic Tesla Powerwall model is 3.3kW, so that should give you a pretty strong hint of at least one application.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    6. Re:Why is this important? by Kohath · · Score: 2

      That helps. I don't foresee a lot of applications that have room for those batteries but not for the inverter though. I can definitely see the merit of the complaint that the inverter is too large compared to the batteries. I'd still like to know what makes it very important rather than just something that's nice to have. Maybe nice to have is an adequate motivation for Google ...?

    7. Re:Why is this important? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Matching inverters to an appliance would be my guess.

    8. Re:Why is this important? by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      Google is doing work for military-industrial-complex?

      It's actually the other way around. Once Google has their killer robot army, they can finally force everyone to use Google+

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    9. Re:Why is this important? by swb · · Score: 1

      Didn't know about the design goal wanting 400V DC input. That clearly cements it in some kind of fixed installation mode, but it would be interesting to know if the input voltage can be scaled down.

      There are some interesting variable speed DC generators which seem to provide better overall efficiency than fixed-speed AC generators because they can run at lower RPMs when power demand is lower, but they mostly seem to make sense when integrated into a larger battery bank. And usually they have some kind of programmable range of run speeds tied to various use cases -- like deep charging battery, topping off the battery or maximum load output.

      "Most marine generators in recreational applications are about 5kw"
      That's on the high end, for fixed diesel installations; most of the boaters that I know use much smaller portable generators. (I don't; too noisy.)

      I guess it depends on what you're looking at. Most recreational boats I've looked at that come with generators seem to start at 5 kw, which seems to fit the typical maximum power usage (stereo/TV, microwave, air conditioning, lighting). Kohler's smallest is 4kw @ 50 hz and 5 kw @ 60 hz. Boats over 40 ft tend towards even larger, like 9+ kw.

      There are a lot of people who seem to want to use a Honda suitcase generator on 30 ft. boats. I think this is a nutty fire risk, and the 2kw models probably can't start the air conditioning, either.

      Of course I've only ever looked at power boats, too. I don't know how it works on sailboats -- most larger ones with inboard engines may use the propulsion power plant with the prop disengaged and tied to a heavy duty alternator for battery bank charging. Although I would kind of expect more dedicated power generation on larger boats that may have bigger power consumption (fridges, lighting, marine electronics).

      My own interest was mainly to see how practical a solar/battery bank would be on a recreational boat, or how much generator run time it might reduce when not running air conditioning.

    10. Re:Why is this important? by istartedi · · Score: 1

      That's the right question. I think you'll eventually reach the inevitable conclusion that we must hack their inverters, with the end result of filling the Google data center with freshly popped popcorn.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  10. Re:Who participated? by cc1984_ · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think he forgot the /sarc at the end of his post.

    You are assuming GP male. This kind of sexist assumption is exactly the type of thing that needs to be stamped out in the industry.

    Now if you need me, I'll be in my safe space. /sarc

  11. Re:AC is by its very nature inefficient by cc1984_ · · Score: 1

    We should not be generating AC power in the first place. DC is much more efficient.

    Perhaps not now, but way back when, AC was required because transformers could only work on AC, and people wanted high voltage, low current to minimize power wasted in the pylons' cables.

  12. Astoundlingly dense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's probably a joke to be made at your expense, here.

  13. Trifecta by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

    We may have just hit peak Google. Three stories in a row.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Trifecta by houghi · · Score: 2

      As the postings are all about different subjects, it just shows how big Google is.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  14. Ironic heading to the comment by mykepredko · · Score: 2

    Personally, I read it as "Anonymous Coward by its very nature inefficient".

  15. Split phase by shawn2772 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Another nice improvement the winners made above the requirements was that Google asked for 230 or 240 VAC output, but the winning device provides 240 VAC split phase, which means it can also be used to provide two legs of 120 VAC. Not that it's terribly hard to add a 240 VAC -> 120 VAC transformer, but with this design there's no need.

  16. Cubic inches? by HammerToe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cubic inches?! So this isn't a project intended to be looking beyond the borders of one country?

    -Matt

    1. Re:Cubic inches? by fibonacci8 · · Score: 4, Funny

      And in English no less, the third most commonly spoken first language in the world. Could we please get these summaries in Mandarin and Spanish? If we're going to base things in the US on what more people are doing elsewhere, why stop at measurements?

      --
      Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
    2. Re:Cubic inches? by CauseBy · · Score: 1

      First of all, you mean two countries, right?

      Second of all, by "one country" you mean "the most important and powerful country that has ever existed through all of history, including Rome". So, yeah, okay fine, not intended to be looked at beyond that country.

      Also, if we are going to keep pretending that Europe is more than one country, then I insist that Europeans recognize the USA as fifty countries. Then, any time they complain that Americans don't know the King of whichever European theocracy, they can prove they aren't hypocrites by naming the governors of all fifty of our States from memory. When they fail, we will mock them as stupid and unworldly.

      Finally, I challenge your unstated major premise that most people in the world don't know what an inch is. Unlike you, I doubt people are so poorly informed. Maybe they are -- presumably you are, or you wouldn't be carping -- but I doubt everyone else is.

    3. Re:Cubic inches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Three countries actually: United States, Liberia and Myanmar.

      All others are metric.

    4. Re:Cubic inches? by rsborg · · Score: 1

      Cubic inches?! So this isn't a project intended to be looking beyond the borders of one country?

      -Matt

      It's a secret ploy to force all those millions of non-imperial-units-aware challengers to use Google:
      https://www.google.com/search?...

      Someone call the antitrust department!

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    5. Re:Cubic inches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Mils are a technological legacy which has some inertia because of breadboards and through-hole perfboard. With through-hole parts going out of fashion, mils are becoming less relevant. Lots of new parts come with mm specs, and not converted from mils. Just one example that hobbyists may be familiar with: The ESP8266 chip has 0.5mm pin pitch, not 0.508mm. Even many of the modules that it's sold on have mm pitch (2.0mm instead of 2.54mm).

    6. Re:Cubic inches? by stooo · · Score: 1

      >> A technology company such as Google (and a tech-focused website such as /.) should be trying to drag the rest of the country out of the dark ages, not perpetuate a backwards and harmful tradition.
      Yep ! interesting fact is, NASA was working largely in metric at apollo times, and reverted to more imperial as far as i know....

      --
      aaaaaaa
    7. Re:Cubic inches? by stooo · · Score: 3, Funny

      >> Yea. Inches are kind of THE STANDARD for doing PCB layout worldwide.
      Not any more.
      Today, 80-90% of components are SMD, and SMD is metric.
      The odd 2,54 component is just destroying the harmony of the grid, but that's OK, the modern CAD packages handle this well.
      Yeah, sometimes I use 2,00mm headers instead of 2,54mm -> more compact, but a bit more exotic.

      Farewell, imperial.....

      --
      aaaaaaa
    8. Re:Cubic inches? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The states of the US are only a little bit more than the federal states of gGermany, the Kantons of Switzerland, or the regions of Spain.

      So be careful what you ask for, as Europe most certainly has more "governors" and parliaments than the USA have.

      Also your "King of whichever European theocracy" sounds a bit fishy :D I believe the only theocracy is the Vatikan ... but I could be wrong ;D

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    9. Re:Cubic inches? by vandamme · · Score: 1

      And weight spec in stones...

    10. Re:Cubic inches? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      It depends on what level you are doing PCB design at.

      At the hobbyist level imperial-based packages like DIL and SOIC dominate but most smaller packages (TQFPs , BGAs, QFNs etc) tend to be metric based. If you have a mixture of components it's usually better to work in metric because a dimension designed in inches can be converted exactly to a terminating decimal fraction in mm while converting the other way can result in a recurring decimal.

      Anoyingly some common PCB packages work internally in inch-based measurements regardless of what units they are using for display/entry which leads to strange DRC violations due to rounding errors.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    11. Re:Cubic inches? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Passives aren't really an issue, with only two pins the difference is negliable.

      With ICs one sees a fairly distinct line between the large old packages which use imperial pitches (2.54mm 1.27mm) and the small modern packages which use metric pitches (1mm 0.65mm 0.5mm 0.4mm ).

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    12. Re:Cubic inches? by CauseBy · · Score: 1

      Denmark has an official state religion; that's a theocracy. Iceland's constitution reads "The Evangelical Lutheran Church shall be the State Church in Iceland and, as such, it shall be supported and protected by the State"; that's a theocracy.

      But the worse offender is the UK. Britain's official state religion is Anglicanism, the Church receives tax money, and the head of the church is the ruling Monarch. Church leaders have reserved seats in the legislature. That's absolutely a theocracy.

      Now, let me be super duper clear because some people just can't hear me say this without retorting how Americans are so religious and blah blah blah whatever, or how other theocracies are so terrible because yadda yadda.

      Yeah, that's all true, but at least America doesn't have an official religion, doesn't give tax dollars to an official church, doesn't give church leaders legislative powers, and doesn't make the President of the USA the head of any church (how crazy would that be?). Furthermore, no, I'm not equating the UK to, say, Iran; all I'm saying is that they are both theocracies, and theocracy is bad, not that they are all equally bad.

      (Furthermore, my insult was not only about theocracies but monarchies, and there are a bunch of monarchies still hanging on all across Europe.)

    13. Re:Cubic inches? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Just because a religion is tied to the state, it is not a theocracy. So your examples of Denmark and Iceland's are simply wrong. I'm not sure if one could consider Iran a theocracy either.

      The states you mention are still constitutional republics. Especially if you consider that the head of Anglicanism, which is the Monarch, has no power at all.

      But perhaps I'm nitpicking :D

      and there are a bunch of monarchies still hanging on all across Europe
      Yes, basically every country is a monarchy. The exceptions I count from my mind are: Italy, Germany, Switzerland, France ... and then it starts with the question what you count as "Europe." If the border is Ural, then all of east Europe (Poland, Letland, Estland, Luitania, ex Yugoslavia etc.) are non monarchies, but most of the west is.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    14. Re:Cubic inches? by CauseBy · · Score: 1

      If the leaders of the government are the leaders of the official state religion, then that's theocracy, and that describes Denmark and Iceland, where the legislatures control the religion. For instance, in America you can't pass a law requiring a church to perform same-sex marriages, but in Denmark you can, as this American pastor was aghast to find out

      http://www.addictinginfo.org/2...

      That's because in Denmark they have civilian control over the state Church. That's a theocracy.

      I should have added this to the list of retorts I hear every single time:

      "Especially if you consider that the head of Anglicanism, which is the Monarch, has no power at all."

      This is plain nonsense. If the Queen has no power at all, then she isn't the Queen. Can just any old person live in her tax-supported house and do her official state duties? Yes? No, of course not. She's the queen, nobody else is the queen. She is the head of state and the head of the religion, and nobody else is. She has the power and nobody else has that power.

      And no, not all European countries are monarchies. It's substantially less than half, but the quantity doesn't change how ridiculous it is to have a monarchy:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Anyway, that's what I meant: theocracy is stupid, monarchy is stupid, America is neither, and that is two big ways that America is better than some other countries. And all of that is just a tangential insult to my original point, which is that saying "only one country" in reference to America is a silly way to talk about the world's and history's most important country.

    15. Re:Cubic inches? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      If the leaders of the government are the leaders of the official state religion, then that's theocracy
      And all this is not the case in the examples of Denmark, Icelands etc.

      The government is elected ... perhaps you should check that once.
      And it is not leading the religion. So what is your point?

      Your are simply wrong, sorry.

      in reference to America is a silly way to talk about the world's and history's most important country.
      What retarded statement is that?

      Basically every nation of the world cam make the same claim, at a certain time.

      Right now the US migt be 'important' in 20 years theybare history, like Germany, the roman empire or the persian empire.

      Sorry, thinking that the US are important in any way besides winning the two world wars is just retarded.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    16. Re:Cubic inches? by CauseBy · · Score: 1

      "And all this is not the case in the examples of Denmark, Icelands etc."

      In Denmark, the legislature passed a law compelling the state religion to grant same-sex marraiges. That is "leaders of government being leaders of the state religion." That is theocracy. Whether the government leaders are elected isn't relevant.

      Every nation can make what claim at a certain time? that they were the greatest nation in all of history? When did New Zealand lead the world? India? Papua? Cuba? Brazil? Argentina? South Africa? Only Rome, China, UK, and America have any plausible claim like that.

      Winning the second world war is in the top ten things America did in the last century, but not in the top three. "Pax Americana" is number one: our might is so awesome that the world has seen unprecedented peace. And we did all that without the metric system.

    17. Re:Cubic inches? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      A theocracy is a government form where the priests are ruling. In one of your examples that is the case.
      Which as a first thing implies: they are not elected.

      In Denmark, the legislature passed a law compelling the state religion to grant same-sex marraiges.
      1) That is "leaders of government being leaders of the state religion."
      2) That is theocracy.

      Your idea is simply wrong. 1) the government makes laws. If they tell "a religion" to conduct same sex marriages, 2) that does not make the government a theocracy.

      In a theocracy, the priests had forces the government to either do it, or don't do it, at their leisure. It is exactly the opposite around as you think it is.

      Regarding when which country was a world might: you for fuck sake should read some history if you not even grant India or Persia that title. E.g. Africa was governed by nations as great as rome, India or Persia, just because you don't know that makes that fact not vanishing. The only point where you might be right is New Zealand ... and even for that I would not bet as we simply don't know enough about human history.

      "Pax Americana" is number one: our might is so awesome that the world has seen unprecedented peace.

      Pax americana ... that does not exist. It was a nice word when america was openly imperialistic and the rest of the world called it mockingly "pax americana".

      The correct word would be "bellum americana" as since the US are "the declining leading country" we had more wars than the centuries before, and if you count all the death: more death than World War II (which is estimated about to be 50 millions including the death by Stalin in the aftermath)

      Summary:
      As long as not priests are making the politics, elected or unelected, a ruling system is not a theocracy.
      Secondly: having a state religion, does not make a country a theocracy. Iceland are for all matters a typical western democracy. The church has no say in anything that is relevant for ruling the country.

      Hint: "Section VI (of the constitution) contains articles 62-64, and sets the Evangelical Lutheran Church as the State Church and establishes freedom of religion."
      Freedom of Religion ... you can pray to/for what ever you want in Iceland.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  17. Re:Who participated? by suutar · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I think that's the point - to remove some of the challenges not everyone else has so they have the opportunities everyone else does.

    Whether any given program actually achieves that is of course debatable.

  18. Re: Who participated? by Coeurderoy · · Score: 1, Troll

    Thanks to all the AC for clarifying why Trump might become you president....

    As a side note: positively discrimination on a goal oriented challenge would be beside the point, after all you want the maximum of "what ever" from the winner...
    But not going through a phase of positive discrimination has two drawbacks, you get less talented people from the discriminated group, and you give the illusion to a whole bunch of idiots in the advantaged group that they are actually worth something in their chosen activity, instead of letting them either try harder, or change business.
    So as defined in the Hacker's Dictionary Loose Loose !

  19. Economics of those challenges? by sshir · · Score: 1

    I'm still puzzled by the economics of these prize driven challenges. Look at the winning design: (pdf) . R&D costs of it (including expertise, etc) well exceed $1mil. And having a lot of teams working on their designs... Assuming that there are at least 3 other good teams means then expected payout is laughable $250k...

    As a professional, I expect to be paid for the work I do for hire. Sure, some things are done for fun, but building entire product is rarely is... Like, look at the open source software, for example: many parts of Linux OS are interesting and fun, others are not - so if you need them to be done, you better be ready to pay.

    Another angle: even if you don't need money, there are plenty of engineers who do - google can afford paying for these things full sticker.

    1. Re:Economics of those challenges? by chrysrobyn · · Score: 1

      Another angle: even if you don't need money, there are plenty of engineers who do - google can afford paying for these things full sticker.

      Google is not avoiding paying one team, but several. Not only are they avoiding dealing with exclusively a firm at random, who, lacking financial competition, is likely to build in a decent profit margin, but they're soliciting from several teams who understand the nature of the competition. Regardless, they're catching a price break. Successful companies often get that way by avoiding paying money they don't have to. In this way, they're not ending up with an "average" design, and not only are they getting the "best" design, but they're getting a whole pile of designs. Any chance they see to pick design elements from a few of the "almost best" ones to make the "best" even better, that's something they can leverage.

      I'm still puzzled by the economics of these prize driven challenges. Look at the winning design: (pdf) [littleboxchallenge.com]. R&D costs of it (including expertise, etc) well exceed $1mil. And having a lot of teams working on their designs... Assuming that there are at least 3 other good teams means then expected payout is laughable $250k...

      The $250k is only a small part of the payment. Look at the biographies at the back of that PDF. This team isn't doing it for the cash, they're doing it for the publicity. They might want to get Google to conduct business with them more regularly, perhaps even manufacturing these boxes for them, but they really want the wider engineering market to see what they're doing as innovative. This isn't some cheapskate bully firm screwing an individual graphic artist by offering only publicity for their hard earned work (and nobody cares about it), this is GOOGLE. This publicity is worth something. In their portfolio, they can now put "Winner of the Google Little Box Challenge" and they'll shove that in any prospective client's faces. I don't know if this is going to help them seal any deals or get higher profit margins, but I'd expect it's one of those two.

    2. Re:Economics of those challenges? by sshir · · Score: 1

      That publicity is great for the people, not for the firm that paid the bills. You can bet your ass that most of folks, whose names were printed, will be gone from CE+T by the end of the year.

    3. Re:Economics of those challenges? by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      I suppose the publicity of winning is worth something, though maybe not as much as $1 million.

  20. How $1 million cost, for an inverter company? by raymorris · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you started with nothing and had to buy all of the tooling and equipment, recruit people, etc., I could see this easily costing $1 million, but the winner is an inverter company. They already have all of the tooling, equipment, expertise, etc.

    They "just" needed to optimize one of their existing designs for size. Also, they only needed a working prototype, not a full production model. How do you figure that costs a million dollars?

    1. Re:How $1 million cost, for an inverter company? by sshir · · Score: 1

      What you described is essentially a marginal cost of R&D. Which indeed is well below $1mil. But just to put a better contrast on what I've said before: try to go to Intel and ask them to design and produce for you "only a prototype" custom (non fpga) CPU for $1mil., for 10mil... They will laugh you out of the building.

    2. Re:How $1 million cost, for an inverter company? by pchimp · · Score: 1

      The point is: as a professionnal, what is the value of having your name associated to this? As a consultant, how much would you have to shell outto get that attention on Slashdot? ;-)

      Absolutely. Also, as a consultant, do you have any downtime that's not being charged? This sort of competition is worthwhile and (if you like your job) fun.

      Also, gamifying these problems gets lots of minds thinking about the problem that wouldn't otherwise. And the "competition" is a cost-free way of separating the wheat from the chaff.

    3. Re:How $1 million cost, for an inverter company? by sshir · · Score: 1

      Ok, publicity argument makes sense. Advertisement plus google's good will. Hopefully the firm that won is ready to lose all those engineers to google and such...

  21. Re:AC is by its very nature inefficient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I would assume that the parent is talking about on a residential basis (Excerpt from Little Box Challenge Website "The problem is household inverters are too big") not on a utility scale. If that is the case there is some reasoning to keep the power DC where it is reasonable (TV's, LED lights, etc), A KW scale DC-AC inverter is still however necessary for high draw appliances which are unlikely to run off of DC anytime soon. Homes in the future will likely run a mixed AC/DC system, using power from the grid (AC) and from residential solar/wind (DC) to feed AC & DC wiring throughout the house.

  22. Google suckered everyone by ArchieBunker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sounds like Google had very specific design requirements and didn't want to spend the money in house doing development. So they dream up a contest and offer a cash prize. Meanwhile Google saves way more than the $1 million they paid out.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Google suckered everyone by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the 'gig economy' -- in this gig, many people do the work but only one gets paid!

    2. Re:Google suckered everyone by tsqr · · Score: 2

      Sounds like Google had very specific design requirements and didn't want to spend the money in house doing development. So they dream up a contest and offer a cash prize. Meanwhile Google saves way more than the $1 million they paid out.

      Are you implying that Google somehow assumed ownership of the designs? TFA didn't say that the submitted designs ended up belonging to anyone aside from the submitters; it was, in fact, mute on the subject of ownership. Do you have a source to cite that says Google ended up owning any of the designs?

    3. Re:Google suckered everyone by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 1

      The FAQ on the website says this:

      Does Google own the intellectual property created during the competition?

      No. Google is not requiring any IP or licenses be granted except a non-exclusive license to be used only for the purpose of testing the inverter and publicizing the prize. We want entrants to benefit themselves through the advancements they make in order to help grow an advanced power electronics ecosystem.

      It also links to the detailed terms and conditions, which I've not read.

      --
      Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
    4. Re:Google suckered everyone by tsqr · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that. Too bad the mod points seem to be in the hands of people who would rather believe it's not true.

  23. Does it? by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

    "Google Challenge Results In Astoundingly Efficient Inverters"

    Sooo, what is that number? I can't find it anywhere.

    Commercial PV inverters are about 97% peak, 93% average. Not a lot of room for movement there.

  24. Japan by DarthVain · · Score: 2

    Hell if I remember correctly half of Japan runs at 60Hz and the other have at 50Hz due to a standards change years ago, and they've never been able to convert even that due to the monumental effort required, and that is AC to AC!

    Though I expect the use of things things would be for Cars and Homes, not entire network conversions...

    1. Re:Japan by Gramie2 · · Score: 1

      That's right, the east (Tokyo) part of the country is 50Hz and the west is 60Hz. The only thing I remember it affecting was a timing dial on some kitchen appliance (rice cooker?) that had one scale for east and another for west.

    2. Re:Japan by cstdenis · · Score: 1

      It's due to half the countries power plants using generators from US (GE), and the other half generators bought from Germany (AGE), originating back in the early power grid days when each city had it's own individual separate grid.

      There are connections between the grid with frequency converters, but they don't have much capacity.

      --
      1984 was not supposed to be an instruction manual.
    3. Re:Japan by stooo · · Score: 1

      Yeah it's hard. Hard as a rock :)
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      on a more related side, the solution the winner used is very innovative. switching a filtering capacitor with full power swing for minimizing the size is quite novel.
      I love the MLCC bricking from team Augustin Reibel also

      --
      aaaaaaa
  25. Efficiency? by PPH · · Score: 1

    Watts per cubic inch (cm or whatever) is just one measure. It's a fine target for aerospace and automotive applications. But it is of secondary importance for fixed installations like solar. Here, the efficiency I'd be interested in is power conversion efficiency. Particularly across a wide range of loads. And I'd like that efficiency to come at a reasonable price as well. Where I can evaluate the dollars spent to save a Watt of inverter loss vs the dollars per Watt that a larger solar panel will cost me.

    The size of inverters used in solar installations has already come down to the point where small single inverters per panel are available. Once these units have come down to the size of a paperback book, their physical volume is no longer much of a factor compared to the panel size.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  26. I'll believe it when ... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

    ... the Mythbusters test it - oh, wait ... damn (sigh).

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  27. Re:AC is by its very nature inefficient by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

    As you did too, taking an opportunity to make a point is fine

  28. Re:AC is by its very nature inefficient by slashping · · Score: 1

    We should not be generating AC power in the first place. DC is much more efficient.

    I look forward to your design that can convert generator output to 300kV DC for long distance transmission.

  29. Re:AC is by its very nature inefficient by Bengie · · Score: 1

    AC is very efficient for transitions without using exotic equipment. Barrier to entry is much much lower. And efficiently transmitting DC requires very dangerous voltages.

  30. Re:Who participated? by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Because registering a team is somehow hard for minorities or women? The fact they had to use the internet or english? Please describe a change faced by these groups that a white male from Appalachia would not also face?

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
  31. Re:Fucking hell, people are dumb. by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

    It's not like it's a secret who won the competition, and you know the winners are about to seriously upgrade their jobs. There's also prize money, but arguably, the fact that you can get a job pretty much anywhere with this on your resume is the bigger reward. There are lots of incredibly competent people in the world whose competence is underutilized by their employers. If contests like this bring out their A game, everybody comes away better off.

  32. Open Spec by phorm · · Score: 1

    Are the results open for everyone? If so, then they're also paying for something which everyone can (potentially) benefit from

    1. Re:Open Spec by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 1

      From the FAQ:

      Does Google own the intellectual property created during the competition?

      No. Google is not requiring any IP or licenses be granted except a non-exclusive license to be used only for the purpose of testing the inverter and publicizing the prize. We want entrants to benefit themselves through the advancements they make in order to help grow an advanced power electronics ecosystem.

      --
      Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
  33. Re:AC is by its very nature inefficient by IcyHando'Death · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You know the same thing could have been (and was) said about the switch from an analog phone system to digital. Every phone, every piece of switching equipment, every repairman's kit had to change -- all at enormous expense. It paid for itself though, by increasing profits (companies could charge for the new services that were made possible). All it would take is for some upstart startup to begin hooking up DC power in some new neighborhoods to get the game going. I don't even know if that would be legal now in most places though. The entrenched power monopolies would be a big obstacle to overcome.

  34. Re:Who participated? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

    The original parent was obviously speaking with tongue-in-cheek to mock the whole concept and your reply while being modded as a troll was completely genuine.

    You want the truth? People can't handle the truth!

  35. astounding posting stimulus by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

    Google must have gotten Timmay a new wheelchair.

    or wired the current one to give 240VAC shocks to the occupant.

    --
    There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  36. Re:Who participated? by kimvette · · Score: 1

    I think someone is trying to be too politically correct. For ages it's been assumed that "he" and "man"/"mankind" may be used in a generic sense to refer to everyone, because English is already cumbersome enough as it is without having to write out "he or she" just to satisfy the hypersensitive knee-jerk reactionists out there.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  37. Re: AC is by its very nature inefficient by KGIII · · Score: 2

    Cock, alternating, cycles... I'm pretty sure there's a retort about how your dick hertz in there somewhere.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  38. Designs are public by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The top 18 finalists' designs are available here: https://www.littleboxchallenge.com/

    The winner's design is here: https://www.littleboxchallenge.com/pdf/finalists/56568-Tech.pdf

    "GaN transistors have many very interesting electrical characteristics (low Rds_on, low
    Qgate and Cds, ultra low Qrr); these create technological advantages over current MOSFET and
    IGBT devices (small size and low production costs). Unfortunately, they also have serious
    drawbacks due to their very fast switching characteristics: they are challenging to drive and
    require sensitive electromagnetic noise management. Another pitfall is the high voltage drop due
    to the reverse current when the GaN is turned off. The solution selected to overcome these
    difficulties is to control all the GaN transistors using soft switching for the entire operation
    range"

  39. Re:google's bullshit claims - metric mistake? by PIBM · · Score: 1

    The only problem with this specific item, is that it's doing exactly the opposite work of what google was looking for. This is an AC -> DC converter, which have been improving a lot in the last years, and they wanted to improve the DC -> AC path.

  40. Re:google's bullshit claims - metric mistake? by koreanbabykilla · · Score: 1

    What you linked to is a battery charger that takes 120-240V AC and outputs 24-60V DC, not an inverter that accepts 300-450V DC input and outputs 240V split phase AC. These are very different things.

  41. Re:Who participated? by HiThere · · Score: 2

    And when AIs start objecting we'd need to write she/he/it.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  42. Slobodan Cuk is not convinced. by ferespo · · Score: 1

    Slobodan Cuk of "Cuk's converter" fame (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%86uk_converter) is not very convinced. From the commentaries:

    I could not find anywhere in a number of public announcements the efficiency achieved for any of the top three designs! It appears then that efficiency was NOT a criterion at all in Google's Little Box challenge, but only Power Density and resulting total volume!
    I spent 42 years in Power Electronics with the main goal of improving efficiency and reducing magnetics size tenfold without increasing switching frequency! Both are the prime factors enabling smaller size and weight! Without the efficiency objective and novel systems solutions, the glorification of the power density alone sends absolutely wrong signals to Power Electronics industry and misleads young engineers as to what is really important! This is one man’s opinion, I invite yours!
    Dr. Slobodan Cuk

    1. Re:Slobodan Cuk is not convinced. by stooo · · Score: 1

      That's true, the extreme power density at the expense of cost and efficiency is kind of a niche thing, especially more with active air cooling, and grid connection, there's no point in that strange combination, really....
      But this is to be considered research! The advances in this field can be applied to more common segments....

      --
      aaaaaaa
  43. Re:AC is by its very nature inefficient by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    There are numerous devices for making DC directly from mechanical motion. Tesla invented a low voltage device ("Unipolar Dynamo") which is unfortunately very inefficient. There are also very high voltage DC generators like the Wimshurst machine that induces an accumulation of charge and the Van de Graff generator which uses the simple technique of transporting charges on an insulating belt.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  44. Re:AC is by its very nature inefficient by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    100,000 3 volt power supplies wired in series.
    Ten 30kV DC CRT power supplies wired in series, from discarded televisions. Recycle!

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  45. Re:AC is by its very nature inefficient by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    For a given amount of power, DC can use lower voltage and/or lower current than AC. That means less aluminum or copper, or towers that aren't quite as big. DC doesn't suffer from skin effect. (Skin depth for aluminum and copper is about 10 mm at 50/60 Hz.) One disadvantage of DC is that arcs aren't self-quenching.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  46. Re:Who participated? by erapert · · Score: 1

    We need some kind of automatic bounds checking for sarcasm so that these kind of comment overflow attacks can't happen.

  47. Re: Who participated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You found all 8 female engineers!! Well done!!!

  48. Re: Who participated? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    When there's 1 of you and 17 others hitting or eeriely friendly towards you- it's creepy.
    When you travel with your advisor and they want to go out and get drunk with you, it's creepy.

    But I think you pretty much set the standard so I'll just use your words.

    ALL UNWANTED behavior or UNWANTED attention is creepy.

    I duped the unwanted to make it clearer.

    Cheers.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  49. Re:Who participated? by dave420 · · Score: 1

    I think this discussion is pretty good evidence of the challenges facing minorities in tech. It's not about registering, it's about getting to the point in one's career when one can register. That is the part more difficult for under-represented groups. This has nothing to do with blame or vengeance, just fixing something obviously wrong.

  50. Re:Who participated? by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

    I do not see that as much different than a white male who grew up in the poorest parts of the US. In many ways a member of a minority or female in the suburbs has a lot more access and opportunity. To often we make the bad leap from correlation that some group has statistically less representation in a field to that they are somehow excluded from that field. Asians/pacific islanders hold nearly twice their percentage in the overall population in new STEM degree's. American Indians/Alaskan Natives only about a third. In any event you have to look as why people are not choosing that field of work, poor education, societal values that do not value those sorts of fields, lack of role models, etc.

    In any event thats far far out of scope for a contest to deal with, you can not fix not having enough minorities or women with the appropriate skills as part of a less than two year competitive event. If anything you realy should not give anybody special treatment in a competitive event only the results matter. Initial outreach is probably as far as you can go without biasing towards those minorities or women. Longer term unbiased outreach to younger populations could even things out in the long run and remain fair.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
  51. Re:Who participated? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    As far as I know they didn't. They didn't correct for creepy fellow male students mobbing them nor for creepy professors hitting on them or for creepy co workers mobbing them and hitting on them once they graduate either.

    Yeah, the same guys that can't get a date to save their lives. They come across as creepy because they don't know how to talk to women, but I guess it is more fun to make fun of the kids with handicaps than to understand that very likely you are talking about people with autism.

    A scary finding of the questionnaire was that women reported their high school guidance counselors were very non-supportive of their decision to study engineering. Non-supportive is a nice word, because I got long letters that talked about how they were actually discouraged by people in their high schools. There seem to be many high schools in our country which discourage women from taking advanced math and physics courses, and, in fact, there seem to be very few women who were physics teachers in high school.

    When I was in Calc and Physics (ap and regular), the class was half women. My Calc teacher was a woman, my physics teacher was a man, so what? Women far outnumber men in teaching positions, should we start correcting for that next? I'll bet that those same guidance councilors would discourage men from teaching or going into nursing, where is all the outrage? Considering my office (systems engineering) is half women, I don't see an issue, if you personally run against sexism, you should move around it or deal with it, not complain on an internet forum where there will be no effect on the problem.

    They were expected to take care of household duties any way.

    That is an issue in the household, it sounds like she chose the wrong husband. There are guys that would love to stay home and take care of the house and kids, those guys are considered creepy by woman like you because they are more sensitive instead of being alpha males.

    And having a child is a challenge - especially since men don't get maternity leave.

    It depends. When men work in white collar employment, many companies offer paternity leave, but I would be seriously surprised if anyone offered maternity leave to a man, as that would be the wrong type of leave.

    http://dictionary.reference.co...

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  52. Re:Who participated? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    Amazing. I was quoting from responses to a survey of 4,000 female engineers.

    The response- all from males- allege there is no problem for female engineers.

    Those silly female engineers just don't understand apparently.

    Keep kidding yourself.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  53. Re:Who participated? by slashdotwannabe · · Score: 1

    Pregnancy. Rape. Institutional racism/discrimination. The complete obliviousness of the average white male to their privilege relative to lesser privileged groups to the point where they have to ask such a question as this.

    --
    This comment is my opinion and does not represent an official position of Donald Trump or others I do not work for
  54. Re:AC is by its very nature inefficient by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    We should not be generating AC power in the first place.
    And how exactly do you propose to that? (*facepalm*)

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  55. Re:Who participated? by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

    So pregnancy is somehow a hurdle? It's a choice at least in the modern world. Rape has something to do with people ability to enter an engineering competition? With their ability to get an education?

    What institutional level racism or discrimination would a person of color have to deal with that a white male from appalachia would not have? The "justice" system comes to mind but not a lot else. Comparatively they have a lot of programs in their favor.

    Sorry your just a SJW with your check your privilege this or that. I'll give you a hint to check privilege in effect means to pull somebody down from there perceived unfair advantages, to say they have no right to the circumstances they were born and/or raised with. Want equality thats enabling people to rise as equals, additive vs subtractive. That's also a much harder sell, to say they are free to earn it that yes their parents are responsible for not giving them a specific advantage etc.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
  56. Re:Who participated? by slashdotwannabe · · Score: 1

    So pregnancy is somehow a hurdle?

    Get pregnant and see. Oops. You can't. I'm shocked, shocked that you are therefore unaware that pregnancy can be an impediment to career advancement.

    It's a choice at least in the modern world.

    Leaving aside the obvious retort that many women don't live in the modern world, it's a choice that men never have to make. Go ahead. Tell me about that time you had to delay your career for 9-30 months because your wife wanted to have a family.

    Rape has something to do with people ability to enter an engineering competition? With their ability to get an education?

    Obviously you have never been raped. When you're afraid to leave your home, it's rather hard to get to your local institution of higher learning. When you are sexually coerced by your Chemistry professor, it's somewhat difficult to trust your other teachers. I don't expect you to understand; your tone deafness speaks volumes about your ability to empathize, but you might at least try to research the things you say before you allow your biases to blithely dismiss them.

    What institutional level racism or discrimination would a person of color have to deal with that a white male from appalachia would not have?

    Obviously you aren't a person of color. Lower pay. Fewer employment opportunities. Fewer educational opportunities. Grading biases. Selection biases.

    The "justice" system comes to mind but not a lot else.

    Well! I guess the biases in Justice system can't really do much!

    Comparatively they have a lot of programs in their favor.

    This is where citations would come in really handy!

    Sorry your just a SJW with your check your privilege this or that.

    *You're. As in "You're just a privileged while male attempting to mansplain his way through why the world owes him his privilege because everyone else also has access to it. They're just too lazy/stupid/{state character defect of your choice here} to claim it."

    I'll give you a hint to check privilege in effect means to pull somebody down from there perceived unfair advantages

    *Their. For example, "White people like to lecture socially oppressed people on their problems without understanding what those problems are". Pro Tip: people are far less likely to dismiss you as an uneducated dolt when you use proper spelling and grammar.

    Want equality thats enabling people to rise as equals, additive vs subtractive. That's also a much harder sell, to say they are free to earn it that yes their parents are responsible for not giving them a specific advantage etc.

    “The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.”

    -- Stephen Hawking

    --
    This comment is my opinion and does not represent an official position of Donald Trump or others I do not work for
  57. Re:Who participated? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    For ages it's been assumed that "he" and "man"/"mankind" may be used in a generic sense to refer to everyone

    The operative word in that is, of course, "may". At other times, it may NOT be assumed that (etc). In other words, you don't know.

    So I assume that I don't know, whereas if I see someone who writes "he/ she/ it/ they" then I do know that it's someone who does think that it's a significant point they're making.

    Part of the point is that it does take an effort.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  58. Re:Who participated? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    Not just the AIs. I don't know how restricted your social circles are, but I've known at least one person who has been through male-to female gender re-assignment surgery, and may know more (how would one know without asking, and what possible grounds would one have for asking?). I also know people who consider their anatomical and identity genders unimportant, and would really prefer to have a neuter grammatical gender.

    There is, of course, "one", but that's a bit contrived for some uses.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  59. Re:Who participated? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    And having a child is a challenge - especially since men don't get maternity leave.

    Who the fuck are you kidding? All countries in the civilised world have maternity leave for fathers as well as mothers.

    Or do you not live in the civilised world? You poor, unprivileged bastard.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"