Slashdot Mirror


Ocean Temps Predict US Heat Waves 50 Days Out, Study Finds (ucar.edu)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from UCAR.edu: The formation of a distinct pattern of sea surface temperatures in the middle of the North Pacific Ocean can predict an increased chance of summertime heat waves in the eastern half of the United States up to 50 days in advance, according to a new study led by a scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). The pattern is a contrast of warmer-than-average water butting up against cooler-than-average seas. When it appears, the odds that extreme heat will strike during a particular week -- or even on a particular day -- can more than triple, depending on how well-formed the pattern is. "We found that we could go back as far as seven weeks and still predict an increase in the odds of future heat waves," said McKinnon, a postdoctoral research at NCAR and the lead author of the study. "What's exciting about this is the potential for long-range predictions of individual heat waves that gives society far more notice than current forecasts."

62 comments

  1. Study finds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Light this morning, with increasing chance of darkness in the evening hours

    1. Re:Study finds by tripleevenfall · · Score: 4, Funny

      Scientists believe there was no darkness before humanity and their CFC pollutants came along. Modeling shows conclusively that temperatures were milder, bowling scores were much higher, golf scores much lower, and waterslides were much more excellent in the pre-Phanerozoic eons.

    2. Re:Study finds by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      Scientists believe there was no darkness before humanity and their CFC pollutants came along. Modeling shows conclusively that temperatures were milder, bowling scores were much higher, golf scores much lower, and waterslides were much more excellent in the pre-Phanerozoic eons.

      They also think that humor was funnier.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    3. Re: Study finds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But douchebags have always been douchebags.

    4. Re:Study finds by jellomizer · · Score: 0

      Bah there no real science behind that. it is all part of the Liberal Agenda for them to take over our lives.
      Some days it says light for over 16 hours a day, while other times is barely 8 hours of light. There are reports that some people have days that go by of all darkness and sometimes days of all light. How can you make sense of such chaos, to make a general statement like that.
      Night and Day is a myth.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:Study finds by JustBoo · · Score: 1

      Scientists believe there was no darkness before humanity and their CFC pollutants came along. Modeling shows conclusively that temperatures were milder, bowling scores were much higher, golf scores much lower, and waterslides were much more excellent in the pre-Phanerozoic eons.

      They also think that humor was funnier.

      But, but... Fred, Barney, Wilma and... and Barney's wife! Dino get me off this crazy thing!

    6. Re: Study finds by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      But douchebags have always been douchebags.

      I'm not a douchebag - I'm an asshole. Get your pejoratives straight.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  2. Hmmm. Wasted research, methinks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm pretty sure knowing there's a higher than normal chance of a heat wave 50 days from know wouldn't alter my behavior or lifestyle in any way, and even people like farmers probably wouldn't change anything because:
    a) 50 days out is a long time away, and
    b) there still is only a relatively small chance a heatwave will actually occur. Unless it's summer, in which case heat waves always occur 80% of the time.

  3. Cause or effect? by Sooner+Boomer · · Score: 2
    From TFA:

    Scientists do not yet know why the fingerprint on sea surface temperatures in the Pacific predicts heat in the eastern U.S. It could be that the sea surface temperatures themselves kick off weather patterns that cause the heat. Or it could be that they are both different results of the same phenomenon, but one does not cause the other.

    --
    Chaos maximizes locally around me.
    1. Re:Cause or effect? by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      "Scientists unsure if correlation equals causation."

    2. Re:Cause or effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      That requires another study... and another multi-year, multi-million dollar research grant (taxpayer funded, of course)

    3. Re:Cause or effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, what a horrible use of our resources, to be able to detect and prepare for heatwaves. Oh the humanity,

  4. Re:Yay! They've discovered "seasons"! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Please mod "-1, Get This Political Fuckery Off My Screen Please".

  5. Cause or effect? Who cares... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Correlation is enough for short-term prediction, which is all they're claiming.

    But if ocean temperatures (which are rising) are the indicator to this prediction, you folks in the east had best be getting ready for more frequent, longer, and hotter heat waves.

    --
    That is all.
    1. Re:Cause or effect? Who cares... by Layzej · · Score: 2

      In this case they are looking at a distinct pattern of warm water relative to the surrounding seas, so warmer seas overall may not play a part in this phenomenon.

    2. Re:Cause or effect? Who cares... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While I'm entirely convinced of rising ocean temps, your logic is flawed.

      What we know (assuming that we accept this research result as true), is that a peak of high ocean temps in one location statistically correlates with a heave wave in another location. We do not know that an overall rise of the ocean temps correlates to more or hotter heat waves in the second location. An increase in the "base level" temperature may well have no such affect. Or it may even have an opposite effect by reorienting / redistributing ocean currents in such a way as to weaken that specific correlation.

    3. Re:Cause or effect? Who cares... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correlation is always enough for prediction, that's why it's called correlation instead of unrelated.

    4. Re:Cause or effect? Who cares... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Correlation is enough for short-term prediction, which is all they're claiming.

      But if ocean temperatures (which are rising) are the indicator to this prediction, you folks in the east had best be getting ready for more frequent, longer, and hotter heat waves.

      And a notice is a darn nice thing to have. If a city knows that a heat wave is likely, they can prepare for it. And that will save lives.

      While to me, at first it seems like understanding the causation will follow pretty quickly - after all, this is energy stored in the ocean, so it's going to want to shed it somewhere, who knows for certain? A good use of research dollars.

      I suspect people getting snarky about this are just venting because its related to you-know-what.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    5. Re:Cause or effect? Who cares... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We will have to see how it plays out. For example these days we get things like "20%" "40%" "80%" chance of rain. They don't seem to correlate well to real world results, especially within any small area. Hopefully something like "35% higher chance of severe heat wave" will actually correlate to something useful. Because after people prepare for a heat wave a couple of times and nothing much manifests - that's all she wrote. No more preparations will ever happen.

    6. Re:Cause or effect? Who cares... by ljw1004 · · Score: 2

      But if ocean temperatures (which are rising) are the indicator to this prediction, you folks in the east had best be getting ready for more frequent, longer, and hotter heat waves.

      Read the article. They weren't looking just at "how high are ocean temperatures". They were looking at a specific pattern where the ocean was warmer than usual in one part of the ocean while cooler than usual in another part of the ocean, and these pair of things predicted the heat wave.

    7. Re:Cause or effect? Who cares... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      This is interesting because it is in the middle ground between weather and climate predictions, something along the lines of what the Old Farmer'a Almanec wishes it could do.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    8. Re:Cause or effect? Who cares... by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      Correlation is enough for short-term prediction, which is all they're claiming.

      But if ocean temperatures (which are rising) are the indicator to this prediction, you folks in the east had best be getting ready for more frequent, longer, and hotter heat waves.

      Sounds good to me. We've had it pretty light the last few years. In high school 10+ years ago I remember regularly having days hovering near 100 with extremely high humidity. Last few summers it's barely pushed past 90.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    9. Re:Cause or effect? Who cares... by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      While to me, at first it seems like understanding the causation will follow pretty quickly - after all, this is energy stored in the ocean, so it's going to want to shed it somewhere, who knows for certain? A good use of research dollars.

      Actually, ocean heat is generally released by hurricanes, tropical storms and cyclones. They're basically all natural heat engines, which given the amount of heat energy the ocean can store is the reason why the storms can be quite powerful. It's why they continue to grow until they either hit a patch of colder water, or hit land - once removed from the ocean heat (and humidity), they die off pretty quickly.

      But they do cool the oceans off pretty dramatically. Something like Sandy caused 3-4C temperature reduction.

  6. Re:Yay! They've discovered "seasons"! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why did you have to ruin a good joke with a global warning nonsense reference?

  7. Link to paper by orledrat · · Score: 3, Informative

    Neither the summary nor TFA has a link to the actual paper. Insensitive clods, the both of 'em.

  8. Correllation is not Causation. . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    . . .otherwise, one could argue that the lack of Pirates causes Global Warming. . . .

    1. Re:Correllation is not Causation. . . by serviscope_minor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Correllation is not Causation

      Oh FFS, I wish this meme would die. I mean in particular the way people parrot it as a subsitute for insight.

      No, correlation does not necessarily imply causation, but it does have predictive power, which is what TFA is about.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re: Correllation is not Causation. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correlation is useful for prediction ---- unless it is a spurious correlation in which case it is useful as grist for academic research and subsequent, publication credits

    3. Re:Correllation is not Causation. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What does causation have to do with the article? It doesn't matter whether patterns of sea-surface temperatures cause heat waves, or whether they're both caused by a third factor. Either way, sea-surface temperatures are useful for *predictions* of heat waves.

      The distinction would be important if we were trying to prevent heat waves by altering sea-surface temperatures, but no one is suggesting that.

    4. Re:Correllation is not Causation. . . by orledrat · · Score: 1

      Correllation is not Causation

      Oh FFS, I wish this meme would die. I mean in particular the way people parrot it as a subsitute for insight.

      No, correlation does not necessarily imply causation, but it does have predictive power, which is what TFA is about.

      I hear you. Try this: the next time some insensitive clod brings up that played-out prat just tell them about autocorrelation.

    5. Re:Correllation is not Causation. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, correlation does not necessarily imply causation, but it does have predictive power, which is what TFA is about.

      No, correlation never implies causation. Correlation may have predictive power.

    6. Re:Correllation is not Causation. . . by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      . . .otherwise, one could argue that the lack of Pirates causes Global Warming. . . .

      Considering they are both side effects of a stable industrialized global society, it's probably a pretty good correllation.

  9. Re:Hmmm. Wasted research, methinks. by butzwonker · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Thank God that there are plenty of distinguished meteorologists like you on Slashdot to put sensationalist headlines into perspective.

  10. Re:Hmmm. Wasted research, methinks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If, as the summary says, they could pinpoint it to a particular week, then this would actually be quite useful. People who are at increased risk of death during a heat wave (ex: elderly) would do well to get out of the area. Our normal 10 day (or less) forecast isn't much time to plan a vacation, but if you had 50 days notice (and could count on the timing of the forecast) then those people would have plenty of time to make vacation plans to get out of the area.

    Similarly, in the summer we often take several small vacations which we plan only 3 or 4 weeks ahead. Taking a vacation during a heat wave would be miserable, so this sort of info (if fairly accurate) would be enough to convince me to plan a few weeks earlier/later.

  11. Re:Hmmm. Wasted research, methinks. by NatasRevol · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you tell a farmer that there's a heatwave coming in ~50 days, I guarantee you they will do things differently.

    Water patterns, planting patterns, fertilizing patterns, moving livestock to better places, etc, etc, etc.

    I'm guessing you're not too familiar with farmers.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  12. Re:Yay! They've discovered "seasons"! by Notorious+G · · Score: 1

    Constant exposure to propaganda is necessary so that it become something "everybody knows is true" and so generally accepted that nobody questions it.

  13. Re: Hmmm. Wasted research, methinks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No he's not. 50 days in farmer land is a short period of time.

  14. Re:Hmmm. Wasted research, methinks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You are implying that the information has no value.

    I guess that at very least knowing in advance that a heatwave is coming could be used as a decision factor to proactively activate standby power generation facilities, reducing associated rushed setup costs.

    There's value in correct and timely information. You just have to know how to extract it.

  15. Re: Hmmm. Wasted research, methinks. by NatasRevol · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What drugs are you on? It's roughly half a growing season.

    OF COURSE they're going to make changes.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  16. So, is this Climate or Weather? by mi · · Score: 0

    can predict an increased chance of summertime heat waves in the eastern half of the United States up to 50 days in advance

    Does this fall into Climate, which the scientists can predict with precision, or Weather which remains imprecise?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  17. Re:Yay! They've discovered "seasons"! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please mod "-1, Get This Political Fuckery Off My Screen Please".

    Wow really? Your position and beliefs are so weak and tenuous you literally can't bear to see "things on your screen"? That tracks very closely to religion. Plus the Streisand Effect by calling it out. [shrug]

  18. Re:Yay! They've discovered "seasons"! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The OP was off topic; this post has nothing to do with global warming.

  19. Re:Hmmm. Wasted research, methinks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might even be able to get someone out to repair the A/C in that amount of time.

  20. Heat Wave Are Trigger Words by JustBoo · · Score: 0

    If one studies Earth's history long term, say for example, ancient Egypt and the Nile over thousands of years, it is clear the weather and it's impact on the Earth has changed many, many times. Kingdoms rose and fell based on long term drought and hot weather; long term cooling and wet weather. It is true of all the Earth. It's a cycle. Many of those cycles are far longer than a persons lifetime.

    The so-called Environmentalists and all their hysterical loony-bin predictions, of which all were totally wrong, have caused certain words to be trigger words, like 'heat wave.' An example of loony was Al Gore claiming in 2005 sea levels would rise by a meter or more in 10 years unless we did what he told us and made him a billionaire. Times up and he was dead wrong. Should I even bring up East Anglia and Climategate? Thankfully most smart people have figured out the scam that would have made a select few very rich.

    And here's another, it also benefits websites who want a lot of "click-throughs" and responses. Now when I hear or read about a 'heat wave' in these situations I always think of South Park's episode about Global Warming. They nailed it.

    If this method can be used to provide a probability of knowing that short term warmer weather might happen soon, fine. But the person who wrote the headline was being completely disingenuous.

    1. Re:Heat Wave Are Trigger Words by Pinkoir · · Score: 1

      An example of loony was Al Gore claiming in 2005 sea levels would rise by a meter or more in 10 years unless we did what he told us and made him a billionaire.

      You live in a very interesting parallel universe. Can you share more of your alternate history? It sounds fascinating and definitely an example of loony.

    2. Re:Heat Wave Are Trigger Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An example of loony was Al Gore claiming in 2005 sea levels would rise by a meter or more in 10 years unless we did what he told us and made him a billionaire.

      You live in a very interesting parallel universe. Can you share more of your alternate history? It sounds fascinating and definitely an example of loony.

      Are you denying the whole Carbon Credit Scam he tried to screw the Earth and its population with? He himself admitted it was going to make him uber-rich, you know, if people would have just fallen for it. All his 'investments' in companies designed to, once again, screw the Earths population if a lot of his insane policies had been enacted? He claimed if we just did what he said (Oh my Gawd! All The Science is Settled!), then all his ridicules predictions would not come true. We just had to be 'cereal!' and listen to him.

      And that is just for starters. Care to deny that? My guess is you are just giving him a break since He invented the internet, eh?

      You can furrow your brow and shake your little fists and cry out: "Nuuhuh!" all you like, it doesn't change that Inconvenient Truth.

  21. Hopefully as accurate as Punxsutawney Phi by butchersong · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Data crunching is awesome and I'm all for looking for these patterns but they predicting a change in the odds from 1-6 to 1-4 "that a heat wave would strike somewhere in the eastern U.S. during a given week" betwen June and August.. I'm not sure how useful this is.

    1. Re:Hopefully as accurate as Punxsutawney Phi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So basically they are saying we went from having an 18% chance across 6 weeks up to 25% over the same 6 weeks. Sorry, but that information won't change any of my plans in the least. Even the local weather report is wrong half the time and that 25% chance over a 6 week period...sure I'll bank on that.

  22. Re: Hmmm. Wasted research, methinks. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    No he's not. 50 days in farmer land is a short period of time.

    You're confusing "farmer" with "geologist".

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  23. Re: Hmmm. Wasted research, methinks. by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    What drugs are you on?

    Probably ones that he grew himself.

    It's roughly half a growing season.

    Wouldn't that depend on what you are growing? Like, poppies, coca bushes, wheat fungus, or mushrooms?

    OF COURSE they're going to make changes.

    The farmers might need to change the dates when they post armed guards around their crops.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  24. Re: Hmmm. Wasted research, methinks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No he's not. 50 days in farmer land is a short period of time.

    To quote the post you responded to, proving the other poster's point:

    I'm guessing you're not too familiar with farmers.

    Only difference is that now everybody knows that you're not. No guesswork needed.

  25. delet this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are we really sinking so low as to repost the same shit that was on Reddit yesterday?

  26. IN a related story, the South becomes hot desert by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    In related news, projections are that by 2025 most of the South will become a desert, with 50 C (that's really really hot in F) temps, similar to the wildfire-causing heat waves in Australia.

    Yes, Climate Change is real. And you didn't do anything about it, so it's going to be really really bad.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  27. This is great news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The weather modeling folks are taking the first steps to bring ocean weather into their atmospheric weather models.
    These are early, meager clues for what happens in the combined system.
    Next step is gathering way more data in the ocean.
    Then constructing a model that predicts the behavior.
    Then some understanding of how it operates.
    Then they will be in a state to start talking about cause and effect for climate change.

    In the meantime, all we can do is blindly walk a knife edge between treading lightly and wrecking our lifestyle.

    Given the urgency of the situation, one hopes they are working hard on this path.

    1. Re:This is great news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The weather modeling folks are taking the first steps to bring ocean weather into their atmospheric weather models.
      These are early, meager clues for what happens in the combined system.
      Next step is gathering way more data in the ocean.
      Then constructing a model that predicts the behavior.
      Then some understanding of how it operates.

      So climate models left out or generalized over 2/3 of the earths surface?

      Sounds like a hole that could invalidate all of the climate change predictions so far.

      Or are you one of those deniers trying to trick me? :P

  28. Re:Hmmm. Wasted research, methinks. by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

    All they can tell a farmer is that there is a 25% chance that somewhere in the eastern or midwestern US will experience a temperature increase of 11.7 degrees over the average temperature in the next 50 days. This is a slight increase over guessing which yields a 17% success rate.

    --
    Knowledge = Power
    P= W/t
    t=Money
    Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
  29. Re: Hmmm. Wasted research, methinks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    100 day growing season where you live? Most of the eastern US this is referring to has a much longer one.

  30. Re: Hmmm. Wasted research, methinks. by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    Most *crops* have a 90-100 day growing season.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure