Slashdot Mirror


Tesla Receives 115,000 Model 3 Preorders Worth $115 Million In 24 Hours (theverge.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Over 115,000 reservations at $1,000 each were placed for the Model 3 in the first 24 hours. This gives Tesla a little extra operating cash. If each tech-savvy enthusiast who preordered the Model 3 in the first 24 hours follows through with their $35,000 purchase, Tesla would make $4 billion in sales. Right now, they're sitting pretty with $115 million from the down payment required for preordering. It looks like Tesla may have a big hit on their hands.

161 comments

  1. That's a lot of cash... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ... for an overhyped fugly overpriced piece of cheap tat.

    1. Re:That's a lot of cash... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... for an overhyped fugly overpriced piece of cheap tat.

      Yes, it's for latte slurping 'hipsters' no self respecting Android user would be caught dead in one.

    2. Re:That's a lot of cash... by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I got mine with a bike mount for my fixie.

    3. Re:That's a lot of cash... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Virtue signalling is expensive

    4. Re:That's a lot of cash... by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      . . . it's a Kickstarter without the guarantees of Kickstarter. . .

    5. Re:That's a lot of cash... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      It could be wore, like the idiots that buy Caddilac or the Chevy corvette thinking they are getting anything special.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:That's a lot of cash... by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      At least they can get from A to B without a charge.

    7. Re:That's a lot of cash... by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      You're right. Paying 4 times as much for gas is much smarter.

    8. Re:That's a lot of cash... by danomac · · Score: 1

      For most people paying 2-3 times that of a normal car is too much, period. $20-$25,000 buys a lot of gas.

    9. Re:That's a lot of cash... by ranton · · Score: 2

      For most people paying 2-3 times that of a normal car is too much, period. $20-$25,000 buys a lot of gas.

      A Cadillac or Corvette are both already 2-3 times the cost of a normal car. The current Tesla models are not more expensive than other cars in their class, and neither will the Model 3.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    10. Re:That's a lot of cash... by Ravaldy · · Score: 2

      That's correct. The model 3 will go for 35k USD. In Canada that will be 45k. The government provides a 8.5k credit which brings the car to a more reasonable price range.

      Additionally your upkeep should be 1-4k less over 5 years at about 25km / year. No oil changes, no coolant changes, not as many brake changes, no air filters...
      Adversely, at the 8 year mark the battery will probably need replacing and I'm sure that won't be cheap.

      If you buy the Model 3 you don't do it to save money, you do it to promote innovation.

    11. Re:That's a lot of cash... by danomac · · Score: 1

      not as many brake changes,

      I agree with what you've said except this one. The Tesla is heavy, as much as a half ton truck from what I remember, so it'll need brakes more often than a regular car.

    12. Re: That's a lot of cash... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With strong regeneration there's little pad wear

    13. Re:That's a lot of cash... by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      A Cadillac or Corvette are both already 2-3 times the cost of a normal car. The current Tesla models are not more expensive than other cars in their class, and neither will the Model 3.

      And what exactly is their class?

      I notice the EV fans like to call Tesla a luxury car. Why? It isn't that nice inside, it doesn't come with all the normal luxury car services.

      You're giving it way too much credit.

      You can buy cars just as nice for a whole lot less money.

    14. Re:That's a lot of cash... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you have less than the zero guarantees that Kickstarter gives you?

    15. Re: That's a lot of cash... by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      How could any Android user respect himself?

    16. Re: That's a lot of cash... by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Brake energy is captured, no? Vs eating brake pads? My question is as to how complete the 35k model is, or if most people option up significantly.

  2. I have a suspicion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Whipslash was a little coy earlier about whether there would be an April Fools joke or jokes on Slashdot. Maybe I'm wrong, but I have a suspicion that this is a part of it. It's not like Slashdot to post two consecutive articles about the same topic, unless it's something really big. There have been enough posts lately alleging paid posts and Slashvertisements. I have a feeling whipslash is behind a bit of trolling here. If so, as a fellow troll, I give him credit.

    1. Re:I have a suspicion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      C'mon, you're April Fool metajoking.

    2. Re:I have a suspicion... by Thanshin · · Score: 2

      If it is, it's a very smart one, as you can go to Tesla's site and preorder, and news sites are showing pictures of the long lines at different countries Tesla stores.

      A "funny" way of checking how much a starting hype train of 100k people would get them.

    3. Re:I have a suspicion... by goose-incarnated · · Score: 2

      Re:I have a suspicion... (Score:10)

      Is anyone else seeing this? April 1st, scores are in binary?

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    4. Re:I have a suspicion... by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      No. It looks normal to me?

    5. Re:I have a suspicion... by Dins · · Score: 1

      Well, the first post is currently showing a score of 11111111, with a total moderation of -1 Flamebait when you click on it, so there's that...

      Plus the user numbers presumably in binary (didn't do the math) is a nice touch.

    6. Re:I have a suspicion... by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      01000010 01101001 01110100 01100101 00100000 01101101 01111001 00100000 01110011 01101000 01101001 01101110 01111001 00100000 01101101 01100101 01110100 01100001 01101100 00100000 01100001 01110011 01110011

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    7. Re:I have a suspicion... by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is much easier, seeing the numbers as I count on my fingers.

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    8. Re:I have a suspicion... by Sique · · Score: 4, Informative

      11111111 is just -1 for a "signed byte" or a signed integer of 8bit.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    9. Re:I have a suspicion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After a while you get used to it
      I just see a blonde here, a red head over there..

    10. Re: I have a suspicion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I like the taste of musky cock, who the fuck are you to tell me to stop!

  3. Gosh it's going to be really embarrassing by tandavanadesan · · Score: 1

    Gosh it's going to be really embarrassing when he days "April fool" this afternoon.

  4. The hype train by Thanshin · · Score: 3

    Ultimately, the hype train ended up being an electric car. Who'd'a' thunk it.

    One more major electrical energy sink that will concentrate in a very small portion of the day.

    Time to invest in energy accumulating techs.

    1. Re:The hype train by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      One more major electrical energy sink that will concentrate in a very small portion of the day.

      And also concentrate in a very small portion of smug owners.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    2. Re:The hype train by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sure it will be a nice car and all. But wouldn't you want to drive it first?

      There are a *lot* of cars out there that look good on paper. But when you get in them you do not like the way they drive.

      For example for a long time I wanted a mustang. Saved up for a few years and then went looking for a new one. Got in the thing drove it around the block a couple of times. Realized I did not like the thing at all and came to my senses and bought something I actually like driving.

      Cars are very rarely a 'shut up and take my money' sort of deal. You want to try before you buy.

    3. Re:The hype train by tibit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Very small portion of the day? Charging is typically done at night, when the demand for electricity is the lowest. It's actually a win-win for electric utilities, since they get paid for what amounts to unused capacity sitting idle and costing them money.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    4. Re:The hype train by Robotbeat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have a Volt. It charges at night, and you can set the charge time to be whenever you want. If utilities simply charged for time of use (which makes the most sense as it'd be the closest to the true cost), then owners would simply choose to charge whenever the price was lowest. With a Volt, I have a relatively small battery, so while I can choose when to charge at night, I can't easily shift charging to other days. With a 215 mile battery, you can now choose when you want to charge, just like you can choose when you want to fill up, particularly if workplace chargers are installed. This has the effect of actually leveling out the peaks and troughs in supply and demand BETTER than no EVs at all, not concentrating it in a "very small portion of the day."

      Also, batteries are "energy accumulating tech." Tesla is building a Gigafactory (the initial portions of which are already operational) that will surpass the current global total Li-Ion production capacity. The Powerwall, and the utility-scale Powerpack (which is actually a big deal), beat basically all other grid-tied battery tech options available today. So if you want to "invest in energy accumulating techs," I suggest you buy Tesla stock.

    5. Re:The hype train by kamaaina · · Score: 1

      In places with a lot of sun and solar panels like Hawaii, wouldn't there be more power during daylight hours?

    6. Re: The hype train by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says the telsa investor

      "Furthermore... please buy the stock. I was in at $280"

    7. Re:The hype train by Aqualung812 · · Score: 2

      In places with a lot of sun and solar panels like Hawaii, wouldn't there be more power during daylight hours?

      It's hard to overstate the amount of power used during the day.
      Every office building of any size in Hawaii is likely using A/C, and shutting it down or using far less at night.
      Add to that any type of daytime industry, from restaurants to factories, and the hours that people are sleeping just can't even remotely compare.
      The peak seems to be around the time everyone gets home from work.
      Check out this page from Hawaii's electric company.
      See that big dip from around midnight to 6am? Charging time. If there are enough people charging during that time, the yellow base load rises and power becomes cheaper. Power that can be generated at a steady rate is cheaper than power on demand.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    8. Re:The hype train by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell is this modded up? Of course it's an electric car. Everyone knew it was an electric car. The cheaper, lower-end Model 3 has been talked about for years now - the only mystery was the specifics (appearance, functionality). Nobody was expecting anything from their Model 3 electric car announcement other than an electric car. There was no "hype train" implying anything otherwise.

    9. Re:The hype train by toadlife · · Score: 1

      EVSEs that can automatically ramp up and down using data directly from the utilities will be the norm in the near future.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
  5. Re:Technology is raising this tocis world by Thanshin · · Score: 1

    Apparently you can now spam Slashdot freely, as long as you don't write in English.

    Also, unless I recall incorrectly, in the past you were able to moderate after having posted, and it deleted your previous posts. Now you can't, so anyone who enters the thread with mod points won't be able to mod spam down if he entered the thread to write something.

    Yes. I see how Slashdot advances more and more, in the wrong direction.

  6. Congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're now a slightly bigger rounding error on the US and world auto markets

  7. $115M in operating cash? by darthsilun · · Score: 3, Funny

    I dunno about you, but for building cars, $100M isn't a lot of money.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    1. Re:$115M in operating cash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucky they have $1.2 billion in reserves then

    2. Re:$115M in operating cash? by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      They didn't sell the cars for $1000. That was just the reservation price. $35,000 * 115,000 = $4.025 billion, which is a pretty substantial amount of money.

    3. Re:$115M in operating cash? by Rei · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indeed - far more valuable than the money from the reservations is the amount of investment money they'll be able to attract given such a demonstrated customer interest level.

      --
      If I ever become wealthy and mad, I'll leave Companion Cubes on desert islands for shipwreck survivors.
    4. Re:$115M in operating cash? by tommeke100 · · Score: 1

      If you have to pay 1,000$ to say "yes, please", it gives them a realistic guess at how they should scale their operations. Maybe not all people who gave 1,000$ are going to buy them, or some may have gotten "in line" as an investment but it definitely shows interest. Even if they don't have the money as of now, they can surely tap some investors with this kind of pipeline.

    5. Re:$115M in operating cash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder what the profit is per car. If they are selling them at a loss, the picture changes... But hopefully they are not:

      http://www.reuters.com/article/us-teslamotors-cash-insight-idUSKCN0QE0DC20150809

    6. Re:$115M in operating cash? by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      Can I get that in binary?

    7. Re:$115M in operating cash? by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Not from Tesla sales though! The Tesla I believe just broke even last year. It's still bleeding money start to now (last I checked).

      But I admire their investment in the future. Clearly lots of people with money are willing to fund the future for a little something.

    8. Re:$115M in operating cash? by kellymcdonald78 · · Score: 1

      Tesla isn't making any money because it's reinvesting everything into R&D and production tooling. This is pretty typical in high growth companies as the goal is to grow the company quickly rather than accumulate cash (or pay out dividends) for no other reason. On a gross margin basis they make money with each car.

    9. Re:$115M in operating cash? by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      That statement is only partially correct. Yes, Tesla reinvests a lot of it's gains into R&D but this R&D is for future vehicles, not previously sold vehicles so you need to use the R&D applied to the sales made, not the sales not made.

      The equation is simple: R&D cost + Manufacturing cost + service cost is smaller than the revenue per car which means they aren't making money yet. Last year was the first year they broke even for a single year.

      This is not to say that they won't get there but many investors have gotten on board with hopes Musk's promise is going to realize itself by 2020 while others have pulled out realizing what GM CEO has already expressed about electric cars.

      So their current R&D cost is very high but eventually they should reach a tipping point that will allow them to make money year to year.

    10. Re:$115M in operating cash? by kellymcdonald78 · · Score: 1

      R&D spending is not considered part of Cost of Goods Sold, it and capital spending on plant are not included in Gross Margins (except for depreciation of said capital equipment). Tesla could decide tomorrow that they don't want to develop new vehicles, or expand their production capacity and become a profitable company, rather they have chosen to invest all of their margin (and then some) into expanding capacity and growth. They make money on every car, they just choose to invest all of that money in growth rather than take profits (likely because the future value of growth is better than socking it away in some bank)

    11. Re:$115M in operating cash? by darthsilun · · Score: 1

      They didn't sell the cars for $1000. That was just the reservation price. $35,000 * 115,000 = $4.025 billion, which is a pretty substantial amount of money.

      $4B is a lot of money. Or it will be if and when they sell those 115,000 cars.

      I didn't write anything about cars being sold for $1K. What I wrote (go back and read it) is that $115M is not a lot of money. It's not a lot of money when it comes to making cars. Anyone that's impressed by Tesla raising $115M is kidding themselves if they think that's a lot of money.

    12. Re:$115M in operating cash? by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      R&D spending is not considered part of Cost of Goods Sold

      Where is this written? All spending is part of goods sold but R&D today is not for products sold today. R&D for previous vehicles should be applied to said vehicles.

      The formula to determine if you've made money is simple; Revenue - all spending. From a historical standpoint Tesla has not made money yet. The R&D They spent in the past was required for them to be where they are today. Without the R&D then there is no car. Could the company continue to produce the car without R&D and start becoming highly profitable? Absolutely. But because this tech is still requiring tones of R&D it is not making money and probably won't for another 2 years. This is why many investors have pulled back. The ROI is just not there by 2020 as promised by Musk.

      As an investor in the future this company has great promise but if this was a SMB seeking a bank loan they would be denied unless they could prove the red ink will bring tones of black ink down the road.

    13. Re:$115M in operating cash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      11101111111010001010000001000000

    14. Re:$115M in operating cash? by kellymcdonald78 · · Score: 1

      It's written in International Accounting Standards (specifically IFRS), these are very specific terms that mean things to those bankers issuing loans. Fundamentally this is related to the matching principle in accounting (one of the core tenants of accounting). Things like R&D spending and capital investment are things that a company can easily change from year to year independent what is produced in the current year. Cost of goods cannot easily be changed as they are directly related to the revenues that are produced (hence the name "Cost of Goods Sold"). A company with a positive gross margin means that they make money on the goods they sell, how they choose to spend the money they make is a key piece of data that investors look at, and the marginal utility of how that money is spent. For high growth companies, it is a good sign when they spend all of their money to expand capacity (since the marginal utility of doing that is better than putting the money in a bank account or paying dividends). For a large stable company that doesn't a have a lot of growth potential, investors would prefer they pay the money they make back to the shareholders (via stock buybacks or dividends) rather than investing in corporate jets or solid gold toilets in the CEOs washroom.

    15. Re:$115M in operating cash? by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      You nailed it and I totally get it. I'm just saying that the cars themselves have not yielded a profit yet if you include the R&D required to get them out the door. This also needs to include after sales service which has been expensive because all new tech has issues. Here are the number right from Tesla: http://ir.teslamotors.com/rele...

      The investors are investing not because of their amazing track record of profit but rather the potential the R&D bring and the ROI long therm. They see the next Apple and it's very attractive for early investors.

    16. Re:$115M in operating cash? by kellymcdonald78 · · Score: 1

      The link you posted was from 2010. If you look at their latest 2015 quarter, while they lost $320M, they spent $411M on new capital. Gross margins on their vehicle production is just under 20% and approaching 25% on the model-S. I don't have the Q4 numbers, but they spent $719 on R&D in 2015. If Tesla wanted to be profitable, they could easily do so by just reducing capital and R&D investments.

    17. Re:$115M in operating cash? by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      If Tesla wanted to be profitable, they could easily do so by just reducing capital and R&D investments.

      Not sure that is correct. They are only attractive because of their continuous innovation at the moment. People don't buy their cars for the same reason they buy a Corolla or Focus. The future is very bright for Tesla but their R&D cost will be high until the tech is mature and technological advancements ahead are minor or not worth seeking. At that point they hopefully have a foothold as strong as Apple's in the mobile space.

      I honestly think Tesla has the most innovative way to obtaining R&D money. Cater to those who want to promote innovation while looking good doing it.

    18. Re:$115M in operating cash? by kellymcdonald78 · · Score: 1

      I didn't say that it would be a good idea for them to do this, in fact they are doing exactly what a high growth company should be doing. They should be spending every cent on equipment to expand production capacity and R&D for future models because that is the most valuable use of their capital. I'm arguing against those which paint Tesla as a "looser" because they aren't profitable. It is an explicit choice their making, not a signal of how viable or successful the company is. A company that is throwing off wads of cash is actually a bad single, as it implies that they cant find anything useful to do with the cash besides pay out dividends or stick it into low yield accounts

    19. Re:$115M in operating cash? by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      I'm arguing against those which paint Tesla as a "looser" because they aren't profitable

      Absolutely. Companies with lots of capital to spend should follow their lead. Unfortunately not all company leaders inspire adventure, risk taking and innovation like Musk.

  8. What this means by RubberDogBone · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A typical modern sedan auto factory making your average Camry or Sonata or Accord turns out about 30,000 cars a month. Sometimes more, sometimes less. And usually there are 1-2 months of downtime and maintenance. Figure roughly 300,000 cars a year.

    Tesla is saying they've pre-sold roughly four months of production, before people see the announcement and decide to order one and add more numbers to the list. They sold something like 25,000 MORE pre-orders during the reveal event. This is pretty spectacular by any standard, and more so considering Tesla's annual production rate for the Model S was only 50,000 in 2015. The S is seasoned design which they no doubt assemble fairly efficiently.

    This really mean they have sold the equivalent of two plus years of new cars, probably more like three because they won't be at peak output anywhere near the beginning of production. It may take a year to fully ramp up.

    To summarise: Damn fine sales, Tesla. Congratulations!

    --
    Sig for hire.
    1. Re:What this means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla has never proven they can make 30k cars per month. It will take two years to deliver all these preorders.

    2. Re:What this means by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      Yeah, now they just have to actually build the cars.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    3. Re:What this means by tpjunkie · · Score: 1

      Maybe. That's assuming they don't scale up their operations accordingly

    4. Re:What this means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is the money going to come for that? 100m$ is a drop in the bucket.

    5. Re:What this means by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      It's at 200k now: https://twitter.com/elonmusk

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    6. Re:What this means by samwichse · · Score: 1

      The 1.2bn cash reserve they have on hand?

  9. Re:Technology is raising this tocis world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    To be clear, you've never been able to post and moderate in the same discussion. If you posted, you couldn't moderate. If you moderated in a discussion and then posted, all of your moderations were undone. In fact, posting a comment is done somewhat frequently for the purpose of undoing a moderation done by mistake. So, yes, your recollection is quite incorrect.

    There's always been spam on Slashdot, and it's always been addressed through moderation. There have always been troll links on Slashdot, which is why the link domains are displayed after links. Before then, it was way too easy for trolls to slip in a goatse.cx link in an otherwise benign comment and trick people into viewing the goatse man's gaping hole. If goatse.cx links weren't deleted, I don't see why Slashdot would suddenly start deleting spam links in comments.

  10. Score:11111111 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It begins..

  11. Re:Technology is raising this tocis world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, in the past you were able to post after moderating, and it would undo your moderation; you were not able to moderate after posting.

  12. Slashdot Plays Annoying April Fools Joke... by skam240 · · Score: 0

    Slashdot plays annoying April Fools Joke that isn't funny. Why are the the mods fucked up? This is stupid.

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    1. Re:Slashdot Plays Annoying April Fools Joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are 10 types of people: those who understand binary and those who do not.

    2. Re:Slashdot Plays Annoying April Fools Joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just thought it was some sort of 4chan exaggeration humour.

      But now I see that the user and post IDs are shown in base 2 as well.

    3. Re:Slashdot Plays Annoying April Fools Joke... by Zocalo · · Score: 2

      Yep, they appear to be using 8bit the mod scores (-1 shows as 11111111) and presumably, since leading zeros are stripped and they'd want an octet boundary, at least 32bits for the UIDs.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    4. Re:Slashdot Plays Annoying April Fools Joke... by geantvert · · Score: 2

      Really? I still see them in base 10

    5. Re:Slashdot Plays Annoying April Fools Joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re:Slashdot Plays Annoying April Fools Joke... (Score:10)

      by geantvert ( 11110011010100001000 ) on Friday April 01, 2016 @07:29AM (#11000101101011110110010111)

    6. Re:Slashdot Plays Annoying April Fools Joke... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      They're just keeping the old traditions alive (by completely missing the point of April Fools day)

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    7. Re:Slashdot Plays Annoying April Fools Joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be so much funnier if the mod scores were displayed in octal. Maybe next April Fools'?

    8. Re:Slashdot Plays Annoying April Fools Joke... by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      You just missed a fantastic joke.

    9. Re:Slashdot Plays Annoying April Fools Joke... by geantvert · · Score: 1

      I am pleased to see that there are indeed 10 kinds of people :-)

  13. Re:With capacity of not 50,000 a year... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Math isn't your strong suit, eh?

  14. But what is net profits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all know math can sound very attractive with raw numbers. But we also know Musk has yet to make Tesla viable in a real world company profit result.
    His hope is on this new model being more mainstream attractive and affordable. His delivery estimates have been falling way behind. That's no April fools joke.

  15. Score 101 by jez9999 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Good to see Slashdot finally take the leap to the digital age and do comment scores in binary!

    1. Re:Score 101 by The+Raven · · Score: 1

      I can now brag about my 15 digit /. ID.

      --
      "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
    2. Re:Score 101 by sootman · · Score: 1

      Good to see Slashdot doing proper geeky funny things for 1 April rather than posting links to one unfunny fake story after another.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    3. Re:Score 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give back your 5 Digit UID Club membership card.

    4. Re:Score 101 by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Some people got nice patterns in their UIDs today. The guy with 43690 suddenly has something kind of pretty.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  16. Re:Technology is raising this tocis world by Thanshin · · Score: 1

    Indeed. I remembered wrongly.

    I have no alternative explanation as to why a clear spam post stood un-modded for so long.

  17. Re:With capacity of not 50,000 a year... by Thanshin · · Score: 5, Funny

    150.000 / 50.000 = 30

    So... How's that job market for social studies graduates?

  18. comparsion stats? by sittingnut · · Score: 1

    "Over 115,000 reservations at $1,000 ... in the first 24 hours. ... It looks like Tesla may have a big hit on their hands."
    without comparisons with stats for other cars, their (and this) preorder amount and conditions(eg is it refundable?), etc all that is meaningless.

    also even if preorders are above others, that merely proves effectiveness of hype, since actual product is not available, only hype is, success will be judged after the appearance of product.
    same with some trashy/good movies for which people queued up for days.
    claiming premature success as in here, is just more hype.

    1. Re:comparsion stats? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      I was interested in this car until I saw that they turned the gauge cluster into a tablet in the center of the dash. I don't want to take my eyes off the road by looking sideways to make sure that my fast electric car isn't speeding. Especially since you don't get audio feedback of how many RPMs your engine is turning, etc.

      Mini putting the speedo over there was stupid, this is more stupid. Also, why mold the front to look like there should be an opening for a grille, but have no grille? Did they forget to cut it out and install one? Yes, I know that an electric vehicle doesn't need a grille, but it also doesn't need to have the front cowl shaped like there should be one there.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    2. Re:comparsion stats? by rhazz · · Score: 2

      I agree a lot of it is hype, but apparently hype worth putting down $1000 for. As noted here, the top selling electric vehicles are selling about 30,000 units per year. Four times that amount were pre-ordered and it hasn't even been a full day yet.

      This specific product isn't available yet but their other products are, and people like what they see. This isn't like Google Glass, the demand is real.

    3. Re:comparsion stats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where we're going, we don't need gauges....

    4. Re:comparsion stats? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Tesla has had that tablet thing in all of their cars. Unusually for an auto manufacturer, they actually update the software on the tablet and continue to maintain it.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    5. Re:comparsion stats? by MS · · Score: 1

      I agree that this big touch-screen is not only awkward and ugly but also dangerous in case of an accident. But I am convinced that this is only a temporary solution.

      On the front bumper, where you expect the grille, there's the space for a license plate.

  19. 115,000 suckers by DrXym · · Score: 1

    As the adage goes, never buy version 1 of anything. And especially don't plunk one grand down on something which won't even see the light of day for a couple of years.

    1. Re:115,000 suckers by chill · · Score: 1

      Tell that to Tesla Roadster owners, which would be "Version 1" of the car. Expect to be looked down on as a jealous insect not worthy of notice.

      Follow that up with the purchasers of the Model S who started $5,000 pre-orders in, what, 2008? Delivery started in 2012.

      Lots of Tesla owners to disprove that old adage. They might even whip out the old Aesop fable about the fox and the grapes in return.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    2. Re: 115,000 suckers by DrXym · · Score: 1

      The model 3 is not magically exempt from the norms of vehicle production. New vehicle designs always suffer glitches, deficiencies and bugs that are rectified over its production lifetime. If early adopters are lucky they will be relatively minor and if not it might even mean recalls. I see no reason to gamble money to find out. Let some other sucker find out.

    3. Re:115,000 suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I do like Tesla, but finding a Tesla owner is a surefire sign I don't want to hang out with that dickbag. May as well just paint "I'm a giant cunt" on the side of each one.

      And yes, I'm in IT, I can afford one with the cash in my bank account. Relax, before you say something more cunty.

    4. Re:115,000 suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Post of the century.

    5. Re: 115,000 suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect any significant problems will be ironed out well before they get to 50,000. Most of these pre-orders are unlikely to be getting the first revision of the Model 3.

    6. Re:115,000 suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're the one that needs to refrain from cunty statements.

  20. aaaand it's time to go offline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America has entered April 1st. 24 hours of over the top nonsense imminent. See you tomorrow.

  21. Since we seem to be counting in binary today... by Pollux · · Score: 1

    Does that mean that the down payment is actually $8?

  22. Does that mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we can drop the subsidy? I am tied of subsidizing Obama's hipster friend's extravagant lives. Tesla and Musk are a joke. Happy April 1st. I guess even you pagan nerds deserve a holiday.

  23. First step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To crushing Detroit.

    1. Re:First step by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      If you think this is the first step, you must have missed the late 70s, the 80s, the 90s, and the 00s.

      Detroit has been getting crushed by Europe and Japan for quite some time now, with the lone exception being pick-up trucks. And there's still no electric answer to the F-150, which is by far the highest selling vehicle by volume, shifting 4 million more units than even the VW Golf.

      Do all those people need trucks? Maybe not, but I'm not a communist and neither are they, so I don't get to tell them what they can or cannot buy.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    2. Re:First step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your logic appears to have been consumed by your ignorance.

    3. Re:First step by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      What are the numbers once you drop fleet vehicles?

  24. Can't spend that money just yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those deposits are fully refundable.

  25. We'll see by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    As I understand, the $1000 deposit is refundable, so we'll see how many of those turn into actual sales.

    --
    -Styopa
  26. Missing the point of April Fools' day again, I see by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 0

    I'm glad the new owners of Slashdot have kept up the yearly tradition of completely missing the point of April Fools; day.

    It's not "do something weird and quirky" day. You're supposed to do something - well, really you're supposed to tell people something - that they might actually fall for (and, preferably, get annoyed about). Otherwise it's no different from (rather lame) satire.

    So if you're going with the binary thing, announce it. Explain why you're doing it - say it's to make Slashdot more compatible with the Internet of Things, or something. That'll annoy plenty of people.

    That's if anyone actually believed it for a moment, which they almost certainly wouldn't.

    Here's a few you can have for free:

    Facebook is moving exclusively to Tor to protect the privacy of its users.
    Microsoft has declared Windows 10 a failure and will be force-downgrading to Windows 7 for all users.
    Amazon plans to send a small probe to the Moon to relay data and act as its corporate headquarters for tax purposes (this idea (c) wonkey_monkey Mooncorp Enterprises 2016)

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  27. Crushing Detroit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If crushing Detroit is you goal, it was already achieved by 50 years of democrat misrule. Today it is more like kicking an addict sleeping on the street.

  28. And by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

    The hatefest on Slasdot goes into defcon 5

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:And by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 2

      The hatefest on Slasdot goes into defcon 5
      Normal readiness? You do know the scale counts down to 1 with 5 being the least severe right?

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
  29. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is not over 4 billion the company would make unless the cars cost nothing to make. I would guess majority of these reorders are from the government throwing more tax dollars into the wind.

  30. Hypebeasts by tom229 · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone help crowd fund a car from a well established for-profit company? Do you just like gambling with your money? Here's a tip people: when the thing is actually finished, it will still be for sale.

    --
    If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
  31. Re:With capacity of not 50,000 a year... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    150.000 / 50.000 = 30

    Umm, 150,000 / 50,000 = 3

  32. $50,000 in Canada by mark-t · · Score: 1

    I won't lie... I would love to own a Tesla, but when the vehicle costs so much more (just a little more than double, to be specific) than what I would have otherwise been comfortable paying for a car, it only means that if I am to get financing and try to keep the terms to reasonable levels, I would be spending more each month paying for the car than I would on financing for a regular car PLUS gasoline, and that means it would take that much longer for the extra expense of not having to use gasoline to pay for itself, not to mention potentially causing increased levels of hardship upon myself for the duration if I should hit any unexpected financial difficulties.

    Oh, and that's not even including the fact that I'd have to drop another 10 thousand dollars of my own money on getting a car charger installed in our condo's garage.

    In the end, I'd be looking at having to replace the battery on the car even before the extra amount I was spending would have broken even with how much I would have paid for an otherwise new car, likely pushing the time that it would take for the money I saved on gasoline to break even with the extra expenses to somewhere in the vicinity of about 10 years.

    Which is slightly more than the longest single period that I've ever owned any single vehicle.

    And it's not a particularly great incentive to look elsewhere for an EV when every other EV manufacturer either also overprices their cars or else makes them look like shit.

    1. Re:$50,000 in Canada by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      WTF, you're complaining that they made a car that doesn't cost $17,500? Isn't that just about every car? Do you go to BMW forums and say "well, it looks nice, but really I wish it cost about the same as a Toyota Yaris?

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    2. Re:$50,000 in Canada by mark-t · · Score: 1

      As I said, they are $50k here. Obviously I wouldn't expect a car like a Tesla to go for as little as a Yaris does, but I *would* expect it to not cost so much more that after financing I'd be spending twice as much on the car as I otherwise would on financing and gas combined.

    3. Re:$50,000 in Canada by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Oh, andI was never comparing the costs of a tesla to a Yaris anyways. I wa comparing it to what I would suggest are otherwise similar classes of vehicles that are available for well under $30k cdn. I would not expect it to be comparable to cars that are under $20k.

    4. Re:$50,000 in Canada by foxalopex · · Score: 1

      Actually, I own a Volt and I live in Canada. The Volt is much cheaper and has a large enough battery that will make it electric for most average trips. I've gone whole summers without gas. Best of all when you actually do want to go cross-country you have a gas engine to make the trip. Personally I wouldn't trade my Volt for a pure EV, it's far more flexible.

    5. Re:$50,000 in Canada by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Much cheaper? No.... the Volt goes for more than $40k... although this is half the price of the model S, it is still not much less than what Tesla Model III will go for in Canada.

  33. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  34. $7500 federal income tax credit by zerofoo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Reserving one of these cars now increases the likelihood that your car will be eligible for the $7500 tax credit. As I understand it, this credit only applies to the first 200,000 qualifying vehicles sold by a manufacturer. At last estimates, Tesla sold about 100,000 or so vehicles which leaves about 100,000 credits left.

    I reserved mine last night. The deposit is fully refundable. At the very least, I think I've got a shot at getting the federal credit.

    It's not a bad deal.

    1. Re:$7500 federal income tax credit by craighansen · · Score: 2

      Reserving one of these cars now increases the likelihood that your car will be eligible for the $7500 tax credit. As I understand it, this credit only applies to the first 200,000 qualifying vehicles sold by a manufacturer. At last estimates, Tesla sold about 100,000 or so vehicles which leaves about 100,000 credits left.

      I reserved mine last night. The deposit is fully refundable. At the very least, I think I've got a shot at getting the federal credit.

      It's not a bad deal.

      Note that only US sales count against the 200k limit. Based upon some knapkin-scratch computation (I got to an estimate of 175k by end of 2017), the 200k figure (assuming 50% of sales are in the US and 50% annual sales growth) seems likely to be hit about the end of 2017, which is when the Model 3 is supposed to start shipping. It's not a sure thing, as sales over the next two years may be depressed by the Model 3 announcement (as iPhone new model expectations depress sales of existing models), and Telsa has been at least a little late in first shipping of each new model. I'd estimate that if you don't get an early order of the Model 3, you're not likely to get the 7.5k bonus rebate from the US, unless Congress (hah!) sees fit to extend the program.

    2. Re:$7500 federal income tax credit by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      The rebate doesn't immediately disappear when the 200K number is hit, it gets phased out.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    3. Re:$7500 federal income tax credit by craighansen · · Score: 1

      The rebate doesn't immediately disappear when the 200K number is hit, it gets phased out.

      True, it gets cut in half for two quarters, then gets cut in half again for one quarter, then it's done. It phases out dramatically and rapidly.

  35. $10k on a charger? Not really. by zerofoo · · Score: 2

    The charger included with Tesla vehicles only needs a NEMA 14-50 outlet in your garage. That means you need a two-pole 50A breaker - 6-3 wire and a NEMA 14-50R receptacle installed......hardly $10k - more like $300 worth of materials and a half a day's work for a competent electrician.

    Your charging solution should cost $800 bucks or so.

  36. Re:$10k on a charger? Not really. by mark-t · · Score: 1

    I thought so too, until I read this. Page 20 is where installation costs are mentioned.

  37. economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    actual numbers here

    I went from a BMW 3 series to a Model S.
    Old BMW reached end of useful life, so compared new BMW 4 (convertible, like old 3) to Model S.
    Commute is 100 mi/day. in BMW at 26 mi/gal, this is roughly 4 gallons a day, or 20 gallons/week or 1000 gallons/year (2 wks vacation, etc.)
    Annual fuel cost @$3/gallon is $3000 or $250/month
    Charging tesla is 30 kWh/day (100 mi @ 300 Wh/mile, which is what I get) @ 0.11/kWh = $3.30/day or about $65/month

    For same loan term:
    Loan payment on new BMW would be about $750-800
    Loan payment on new Model S would be about $1000

    So the total cost of the BMW is 1000-1050/mo
    The total cost of the Model S is 1065/month

    Of course, on the BMW there are also
    oil changes
    brake pads
    coolant changes
    etc.
    which are not free, and none of which you need for a Tesla (I have a friend with a Roadster and he's never replaced brake pads after years and years.. regen braking does a fine job for the "small speed adjustments" in day to day driving)

    The cars *are* different: both are fast, both handle well, but you know the Tesla is a 4500 lb vehicle. The Tesla is MUCH quieter on the road than my BMW 3 series was. I don't think the Tesla would do as well in a slalom course as the BMW, but then, I don't do much slalom course driving.

  38. Re:With capacity of not 50,000 a year... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Great! So what do you want on your latte? Would you like some biscotti as well?

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  39. How much will this car be worth if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saudi Arabia Plans $2 Trillion Megafund for Post-Oil Era, because post oil means they are running out.

  40. Tesla US Federal Rebate End in Sight by Isao · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many potential purchasers in the US are aware that once Tesla passes 200K vehicles sold the Federal subsidy will phase out over the following 12 months. With 90K+ on the road already, not counting Model S & X sales for two years, I think the pre-orders put them over the top. Best guess is subsidy eliminated by the start of 2019 (assuming no delays in Model 3 release, which are expected).

    I hope the production costs will decline with experience to replace the subsidy.

  41. Zero Operating Cash by Mondragon · · Score: 2

    This money cannot be used by Tesla, there is zero operating cash acquired by people pre-ordering a product.

    When (and *only* when) the cars are actually delivered, depending on various accounting rules and commercial regulations, Tesla *may* be able to profit from any interest made on these payments. These payments express interest and are an excellent way for Tesla to factor real production needs (more than just adding your name to a list), but the actual monetary value to Tesla in the short term is nil.

  42. Re:With capacity of not 50,000 a year... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Job market's fine. You don't expect them to stop producing those 50,000 cars overnight so they can output more of the 'cheaper' model, right? Ah, a code monkey? Well, maybe you do.

  43. The average price of a new car by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 2

    Last year the average price of a new car was $33,560:

    http://www.usatoday.com/story/...

    So, basically, Tesla just introduced an electric model that is the same price as a non-electric car.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:The average price of a new car by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      Kinda maybe. Tesla introduced the base model at $33,560, with the top of the line going for almost double that. The average per the link will be about $42k. You can get many gas powered vehicles for $33k +/- loaded with features. Still good job on Tesla for pushing into the future. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/...

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    2. Re:The average price of a new car by q4Fry · · Score: 1

      Let me know when you find the median price of a new car. I half-heartedly searched a couple times a few months back and got nothing. I looked again, just now, and found a chart of used car median prices by city from 2012 and something from the Boston Herald that is probably wrong, since it quotes the same number USA Today says is the average.

      In a group of 4 cars, a single $90k luxury model can bring the average up to $33k when the three others cost $15k. That's why nobody cites the average home price, but somehow the median car price is impossible to find. You'll notice, if you go searching, that there are a bunch of articles bemoaning how the "median" American can't afford an "average" priced car, but that's a ridiculous comparison. If a person had the "average" wealth of all Americans, s/he would easily be in the top decile, and probably higher.

    3. Re:The average price of a new car by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      In a group of 4 cars, a single $90k luxury model can bring the average up to $33k when the three others cost $15k. That's why nobody cites the average home price, but somehow the median car price is impossible to find. [grassroots...sports.com] You'll notice, if you go searching, that there are a bunch of articles bemoaning how the "median" American can't afford an "average" priced car, but that's a ridiculous comparison. If a person had the "average" wealth of all Americans, s/he would easily be in the top decile, and probably higher.

      My income is well above average, and my only debt is my house with a modest monthly mortgage payment. I cannot afford most SUVs when bought new. Most cars are just too damn expensive. And yes, I've bought two new vehicles in the last 11 years - a 2005 Mazda3 at $18.9k+interest (total $23k), and a 2011 Grand Caravan at $28k+interest (total $30k-$33k max).

      Now, I'd go for the Tesla Model 3, but it would definitely be near the top of my budget if I did. But I'll likely go for a used F-350 instead, and be a low lower in price.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    4. Re:The average price of a new car by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      So, basically, Tesla just introduced an electric model that is the same price as a non-electric car.

      Yes, if you don't look too closely at the cars themselves.

      The Model 3 is not equal to your average $35K car, it is closer to a $22K car.

    5. Re: The average price of a new car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You trolling?

      A Tesla vs a F350 are about as different in substance and concept as you can find in a car.

  44. I would have ordered but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to convince my condo to electrify my parking spot... this is a common problem with people living in condos.

    1. Re:I would have ordered but.... by AaronW · · Score: 1

      I had a coworker who lives in a condo who bought a model S. He had no problem getting a charger installed. It helps that in California HOAs generally cannot block the installation of EV chargers.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
  45. Re:$10k on a charger? Not really. by kellymcdonald78 · · Score: 1

    You picked the most expensive scenario and didn't continue reading to the part where the government will cover up to half of the cost. This is also for a communal charging station of which the strata would be expected to cover, so you would only pay your portion of the cost to the strata

  46. Re:$10k on a charger? Not really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not applicable to most residential installations - but definitely a consideration for apartments and condos (multi-unit buildings). That's the only time you'll need a charger for a Tesla in a residence.

  47. Re:$10k on a charger? Not really. by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Sure, but if nobody else in the strata actually *HAS* an electric car yet, then nobody else is going to be chomping at the bit to offset your own costs. Thus, nobody can really afford to be first, and it never gets any cheaper.

  48. Misread the title by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

    I read the title as:
    "Tesla Receives 115,000 Model 3 Predators Worth $115 Million In 24 Hours"

    Where do I sign up?

  49. Chevy Volt is a good option too by foxalopex · · Score: 1

    I still find it odd that a lot of folks considering an EV completely forget about the Volt. The new 2016 model has about 50 miles of range on pure electricity and switches over to gas when you run out completely eliminating any range anxiety or need to wait for the car to charge. In actual practice, I have the older 2013 model and so far it has served me well for years now. I end up running completely gas free summers and only burn gas in the depths of winter or when I decide to make a cross-country trip. It's also cheaper than the Model 3 Tesla. So cheaper, virtually no limitations. (Works like an EV if you don't drive too far and works like a hybrid when you do.) I would think that it'd be a no-brainer for a lot of folks.

    1. Re: Chevy Volt is a good option too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Volt is easily the most underrated hybrid car in the market and will probably remain that way.

      Shame it's got no bigger appeal, but it suits me fine to drive an excellent car that's orthogonal to the mainstream.

  50. Median, schmedian [Re:The average price of a n...] by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    Let me know when you find the median price of a new car.

    Indeed, an important distinction.

    But I have to admit that in over thirty seconds of diligent searching-- maybe more!-- I didn't run across a link with that number.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  51. brake wear is small.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, the car is heavy, but most of the time, you're using the motors to slow down, not tapping the brakes. the brake pads touch the disks only when you decelerate so fast the battery can't accept charge (about 50kW) or at a complete stop (although I'm not sure about the latter.. it could easily use the motors to hold position), and, of course, when you're parked (different brake pads, though, for the parking brake).

    Let's do some numbers: 2000 kg (4400 lb) car, decelerating from 30 m/s (67 mi/hr). Energy in the car is 900 kJ. The battery can accept charge at 50 kJ/s, so 18 seconds to stop from free way speeds. Average of 1.7 m/s^2, or about 0.2g, which is a pretty quick stop.

    In reality, there's significant air drag at the higher speeds, so that helps scrub off energy too.

    As a practical note, when I commute to work (50mi on freeway) in my Model S, I almost never decelerate at more than 10 kW: I would assume the brake pads never touch the rotors.

  52. comparison [Re:The average price of a new car] by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    So, basically, Tesla just introduced an electric model that is the same price as a non-electric car.

    Yes, if you don't look too closely at the cars themselves. The Model 3 is not equal to your average $35K car, it is closer to a $22K car.

    Since you've never looked at a Model 3-- unless you were at the unveiling in California?-- you don't actually know that. I'm not sure anybody knows that. Tech Insider claims that the Bolt, the other similar electric car, doesn't come close to Tesla, but they're mostly arguing on speculation. http://www.techinsider.io/how-...

    In any case, the point is still that the introduction puts electric cars into the same price class as gasoline cars.
    (Leaf, of course, has the jump on both of them (in price as well)-- so it's really about electric cars with 200+ mile range. Leaf seems to get left behind in the discussions, although they will be on their third generation of consumer vehicles before Tesla delivers the 3.)

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  53. Re:Median, schmedian [Re:The average price of a n. by toadlife · · Score: 1

    I tried to find the media number too awhile back Couldn't find it. As with income statistics, it's most certainly lower than the average.

    --
    I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
  54. LOAN OFFER AT 2% URGENTLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Public Notice!!!!! This is to inform the General Public about Finances Online is a Wide Range Loan firm Base in the Europe, Asia, United Kingdom And America is currently giving out Loan at a low interest of 2% Interested Readers should kindly Contact Us at ==>( financeonline2@gmail.com )
    *Choose a Personal Loan from $10,000 - $350,000.00*Direct Plus Loan or Business Loan of up to $10,000,000.00 USD and More.
    Here is Our Email Once again: financeonline2@gmail.com
    Thanks and God Bless you all.