Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft Trials Outlook Premium For $4 Per Month, With No Ads and Custom Domains (pcworld.com)
An anonymous reader quotes a report from PCWorld: Microsoft is testing a premium version of Outlook.com that removes the ads and supports custom domains for email addresses. According to Brad Sams at Thurrott.com, Outlook Premium is free for one year and then costs $3.99 per month during the trial phase, though it's only available by invite for now. The service appears to combine two features that Microsoft offers or has offered in the past. The first is an ad-free version of Outlook, which is already available today as a $20 per year upgrade. The second is custom domains, which allow users to enjoy Outlook.com's features but with a personalized email address.
Outlook Premium could also slightly undercut Google's Apps for Work plans, which support custom domains for $5 per user per month. It also offers a middle ground between ad-free Outlook and a full Office 365 subscription. While Outlook Premium may be tempting for a select few, general users may be hard-pressed to pay anything for Outlook, let alone $4 per month.
I need an app to manage all my subscriptions for the benefit of companies to leaving me the fuck alone. Or I have the choice not to use anything and live off the grid and eat nuts, berries and wipe my ass with leaves.
I always figured we should be able to make systems exposed and unstable for free.
Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
Fastmail is a far better option. Fastmail is run by guys who truly know what they are doing. I've been a satisfied user for over 10 years. Yes, it costs money. Yes, it's completely worth the small amount you pay to have the best paid email on the planet. You can use their domains or use one of your own with the right plan. I'm not affiliated with Fastmail, just an extremely happy customer.
Fastmail
I love how Microsoft started by giving Office applications away for free, regardless of whether or not you wanted them on your PC back in the 90's. And now you have to pay for it.
Seriously? Who actually sees ads at this point? If you aren't running an Adblocker you are just setting yourself up for malware and worse. I haven't seen an online ad in 10 years.
Some of us are paying Yahoo! $50/year for no ads, so take that Microsoft!
By the way, does anyone see any ads on Hotmail anyway?
I'd have no problem paying $20-25 a year for an email address that I can send 50-100mb files that has very good spam protection with my own domain. Right now, I use Office 365 and have to look at it as $10 a month for that email address and occasional use of Excel/Word.
If they serve me no ads and didn't use the emails to build a psychological advertising profile to sell to to marketers and the TLAs.
Outlook has ads? Or outlook.com has ads?
The two are very different. One is an MS Office suite desktop application and the other is a fuck cloudy email website.
Instead of creating new content and apps, the legacy desktop software vendors of the world -- Microsoft, Adobe, Intuit, etc. -- continue to subscription-wall their suites in order to try to move users into constantly paying for stuff, forever, rather than forcing them to upgrade every few years. Unfortunately (for them), the younger, more tech-savvy Facebook generation isn't going to buy into their rent-seeking model -- they'll just find another "free" option and use that until it's gone or crapified to the point of being useless (heck, a lot of Adobe's products are mostly there already). The desktop software world will probably look a lot different in another decade, for the first time since the birth of the Internet.
Then it should be free for custom domains for users who Google Apps is giving that to for free because we were there when we made it... get it?
That's the trouble with all this kid-robbing, basically you never award the right people unless they do wrong with anything that the doing-wrong people have (boatloads of cash).
There are no ads in Outlook!
There are ads in the free Outlook.com web account.
There are no ads in the Office365 that includes custom domain, email, Sharepoint file storage, webbased office apps... for $6/month.
Google Apps offers a near identical list of services for $5/month.
But, we're supposed to be impressed that Outlook.com - for $4/month - will offer email only without ads but with custom domain and nothing else. And they have the unmitigated gall to compare an email only option to Google Apps?
Fuck you ignorant fucks! This service will die or there will be price changes across the board for Microsoft because, as is, this make no fucking sense!
with live mail I believe it was. It was same as Gmail. I used it for a few years but then went back to pop/webhosting.
by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
I have had the $5/mo google apps for a long time and am in the process of moving my stuff over to MS. I use MS Office online way more than google docs so it makes sense for me. Plus I think that outlook.com is a cleaner interface than Gmail.
I am currently doing an old fashioned forward to my Outlook.com mailbox from gmail.
Only problem is, in order to use my custom domains on MS, I need to use an O365 business plan which would come with OneDrive for Business (Groove) and Skype for Business (Lync) instead of the home user versions.
I don't want to use the business editions for that reason.
My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
would be to pay the same money to another mail provider, one that takes privacy serious, and one that doesn't mine all your e-mails and builds a profile of you and the people you speak with.
Or I could just keep using Thunderbird with no ads for free like I've been doing since it was born?
Or are they saying it WILL have ads? I've never seen any.
$48,000(1) is way to high for a product that will be discontinued after a few years.
(1) for 1,000 years; I read the fine print, it's $4.00 / month, but you have to pay 1,000 years in advance.
CAP === 'displays'
... I no longer trust Microsoft enough to give them any more money.
That's not a bad deal, at least for the trial phase. Outlook licenses come with hosted Exchange services now that are generally about $10/month per mailbox. It's certainly worth $10/month/user. Still, I can't believe that MS would undercut their own resellers.
I don't respond to AC's.
Using Outlook.com for email is a bad idea. So much legitimate email is never delivered, and you won't know what you're missing. It doesn't go to spam or junk or anything. They just delete email and don't warn you. You might as well set your primary MX record to 127.0.0.1 because email with outlook is about that useful.
Morphing Software
For a year or so after launch outlook.com allowed the user to use a custom domain - and that was the problem.
"domain" singular.
If you used more than one domain and you wanted me@domainone.com and me@domaintwo.net and me@domainthree.org all pointing at the same mailbox, you needed three MS Live accounts each set up differently and a bunch of forwarding rules to get email all to one place, it was hideously primitive. Compared with Google Apps's domain alias system it just sucked.
It's smokescream - he smokes cream.
W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
And they never came with a free email account or email storage. Now I need to rent ANOTHER email client. What in the hell has changed that would make me need another version of an email client? Will anyone ever invent a piece of software that just works without making it not work? Why would I want to rent something that can be made to have infinite copies of for free when I already have it via several paid versions? What the fuck are you guys smoking at MS, cuz it sure as hell ain't weed?
I think something like 25 a year is more long the lines of what I'd be looking to pay for add free email with the option to turn off content scanning.
The fact of the matter is email is becoming less and less important, so it's going to be near impossible to sell people email services in the future. They will just choose to use another free services that's likely more modern and more secure by default, eliminating much of the need for any kind of professional messaging services.
Email is a failed model, that's why it requires you to pay extra to not get spied on, because it's so damn insecure by default and generally bloated, administration is just too high for what you get. It's a dead end and MS should just use it to make the best free webmail offering as part of their Windows 10 platform with the long term goal of making more money off the mobile market because a desktop that syncs with your mobile is ideal regardless of who wins the mobile wars.
So.. really nice web email as part of the Windows 10 suit just makes sense, especially because 98% of people aren't interesting in paying for email and things like privacy fears sparked by the NSA are only fading in time, not growing.
They've been running email servers since 1989, they write books about running email systems, they teach admins how to do email, they sponsor and take part in Linux events and the boss himself answers questions on Reddit. The system even shows you whether your recipient's mail server is able to receive your message via encrypted channels, right in the recipient box.
The symbol in the comment subject is supposed to be a Euro symbol (€), it looks like UTF-8 is broken when commenting via mobile browser.
With some of the cutbacks and revisions over at Google, with their personalized service over the last few years, I'm a long time apps user who might be open to a subscription based outlook.com service. It's a good idea, and we need more free market competition. Google, at least up until this point has remained generally unrivaled in this space for too long, and it's been suffering from many of the main factors that made Microsoft a huge pain in the ass for so long. This is good news for everybody. At least, potentially.
This signature has Super Cow Powers
Only idiots use microsoft's products
but microsoft completely forget was the point of having an webmail!
each time you try to connect on another computer, it crap out with damn impossible verification!!
Yeah, Anonymous Coward is a much more trustworthy source.
They want to rent you a working email client.
This whole time in windows 10 i've been using the equivalent of express mail....no wonder why I thought it sucked.
Due to APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://www.bing.com/search?q=%...
* Less power/cpu/ram+ IO use vs. local DNS servers + addons w/ less security issues vs. DNS + routers. Less complex vs firewalls (needing layered filtering drivers - hosts don't + firewalls block less used IP addresses, hosts block more used host-domain names) complimenting 'em. Antivirus = reactive. Hosts = FAR more proactive, blocking infection BEFORE you get it. Gets its data from 10 reputable security community sites.
APK
P.S. - Hosts get you more speed (hardcodes + adblocks) & faster vs. addons, security (vs. bad sites/dns security issues), reliability (vs. downed/poisoned dns), & anonymity (dns requestlogs/trackers) vs. other "so-called -solutions'" w/ what you natively have. Unlike Adblock/UBlock/Ghostery, hosts != blockable by ClarityRay/BlockIQ... apk