Slashdot Mirror
Amazon Customers Sign Letter To Jeff Bezos To Dump Donald Trump (thestreet.com)
An anonymous reader writes: More than 13,000 Amazon customers (including upwards of 5,000 Amazon Prime subscribers), have signed a letter to Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos calling for the company to stop selling Trump's line of menswear. UltraViolet Action is the organization hosting the petition, which calls for Amazon to "stop profiting off of [Trump's] brand of hate." The letter reads: "Donald Trump has consistently lobbed racist, sexist, and xenophobic attacks against entire groups of people, encouraged violence and vitriol against his political enemies and perpetuated a culture of violence against women. Amazon.com should want to distance themselves from this hateful rhetoric, but instead, they're profiting off his brand," explained Karin Roland, Chief Campaigns Officer at UltraViolet, in a statement. "Jeff Bezos needs to listen to his customers and ensure that Amazon doesn't profit off of Trump hate, and take immediate steps to dump Trump." If Amazon does take action, they wouldn't be the first. Macy's stopped carrying Trump's products last summer, and Univision and NBC cut ties with Trump over his statements as well.
Petitions are always just samples of the real objection, so this shows a sizable segment of the customer base objects to Trump's posturing.
It is a simple request to stop funding it by selling his merchandise, which Amazon must decide with weight on its PR impact now too.
Personally if Amazon drops Trump, I will make a point to buy more from them, even at a modest price increase per item.
I'm firmly in the "I wouldn't vote for Trump as dogcatcher" camp, but why should Amazon take sides by denying the Donald a place to sell trinkets? Unless Amazon also stops selling all political junk. Just because he offends me to no end doesn't give me license to rid the world of Trump merchandise. Is political correctness invading the marketplace???
Don't step on the baby.
I normally vote third party but after seeing all the hyperbole about Trump being a racist because he (GASP!) wants the legal process of immigration to be followed is really just pissing me off. I'm sick of hearing this assholes who scream "racism" anytime you don't agree with the leftist agenda.
"Donald Trump is a fascist! I demand we silence him, burn all his books and ban all his merchandise. We must not allow him to speak or be heard!." The irony of the anti-trump people is beyond comprehension.
Don't buy his cheap fucking suits.
In fifteen years, when they write the two paragraphs in the 8th grade history books about this election, do you think Donald Trump will even be mentioned?
I think he may have as much effect as Ross Perot had in 1992...
You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
This sounds a lot like harassment and intolerance to me.
Can you image the uproar from leftists if some Christian fundamentalists had written to Amazon requesting that products associated with, say, transsexuals be pulled from sale?
Maybe the leftists don't realize this, but people in general are getting awfully fed up with their hypocrisy. That's why we see a candidate like Trump gaining so much support. People across the political spectrum, even including some moderates on the left, are getting fed up with how so many leftists say one thing, but do another.
Leftists say that bullying is wrong, yet they'll turn around and target certain individuals they dislike for some reason without showing any remorse.
Just look at the case of Brendan Eich for a good example of this. The way they savagely attacked him and his reputation is disgusting. Somebody shouldn't lose his job merely because of his stance on marriage! Leftists would throw a fit if somebody lost his job for supporting homosexual marriage, yet the moment somebody supports traditional marriage the leftists unleash on him with extreme fury and hatred.
Leftists really need to address their hypocrisy problem if they want to be taken seriously. To everyone else they're starting to look like total jokes.
Probably. It will be about how the Republican party alienated their base by pulling an establishment candidate out of nowhere, and tossed aside BOTH front runners who were anti-establishment. It will be the chapter on the end of the republican party. Right before the chapter on the end of the Democrat party for the super-delegate shenanigans.
Not that I support either Bernie or Trump, but this flagrant disregardful for the base will simply not fly this time.
I find the prospect of a Trump presidency to be kind of scary. At the same time he's obviously tapped into some genuine concerns of a substantial portion of the public. Attempting to silence him just marginalizes his supporters even more and further justifies the extreme positions he advocates. Rather than suppressing or ignoring him, we should be trying to understand his appeal and attempting to address some of the underlying issues that fuel his popularity. My guess is that there's a link between Trump supporters and Sanders supporters. The middle class is hurting and has been for decades.
If he wins the nomination it will likely tear the Republican party apart. Which is a good thing at this point. So pretty important.
A US retailer catering to men offers rack quality clothing at generally inflated prices is named 'Mens Wearhouse' and their slogan is "you're going to like the way you look" or something to that effect.
stereotypical liberal intolerance to contending ideas
Why must I be tolerant of intolerance? If Trump wants to ban Mexicans and Muslims, why am I not allowed to try to ban every trace of Trump?
Because it's morally "the ends justify the means".
It's going outside the process just because you don't like the results. That's not how we do things.
Effectively, the rule seems to be "it doesn't matter how we do it, we *have* to stop Trump. BY ANY MEANS!!!"
People shout at him during speeches. That didn't work, so they started being rowdy. That didn't work.
(Not letting him speak - how is this any different in principle to censorship?)
They dressed up in KKK robes and *that* didn't work either.
(I read about a 16yo protestor that falsely accused a rally goer of sexual assault. Willing to ruin a man's life for the cause - that's some dedication!)
I'm waiting for the assassination attempt, because "STOP TRUMP" is more important than how it gets done.
In the newspapers, they called him as clown. That didn't work, so they called him a sexist. That didn't work, so they called him a racist.
I remember reading analysis a couple of months ago, where pundits were astonished (!) that people were still supporting Trump, even after they called him a clown! (What are the Americans thinking?)
Then it was his supporters. We're all under-educated, unemployed, white, disempowered losers who are angry and want to take our country back. You don't want to be part of *that* group - do you?
That didn't work either.
Then they turned the crazy up to 11. Trump is Mussolini, Stalin, Satan, Hitler. The Washington Post said Cthulhu supports Trump.
That didn't work. Now it's backroom deals, delegate stealing, and rule changes.
Here on Slashdot, most of the political dialogue is name calling and unfounded drivel. We're the smart ones in the room, and even *we* have bought into the hatred. No one can put together a cogent political argument, simply because the other candidates don't have a clear position.
200 people control the election, and they do NOT want someone who will make the place better for the citizens.
It doesn't matter how many votes Trump gets, so long as he doesn't get 1237 on the first try. So long as we can prevent *that*, we can drop him from the race and pick someone we support.
It's as if voting doesn't matter.
The ends justify the means. Stop Trump using ANY MEANS POSSIBLE!
If you want freedom of speech, a free exchange of ideas, freedom of association, civic participation in government by the people... then we can do that.
Or if the progressive peasants are just too triggered by contrary opinions they can give up all that and the nobility will take care of them. No need for any more elections. Hereditary nobility for... ever. Hillary's daughter is already being groomed for high office. They very ready to simply accept your offer at ennoblement... right now.
You can all sit in communal buildings every Sunday and chant along from a book of dogma. And everyone can live by the strict new code of political correctness. We can have religious conformity inspectors... they'll probably be blue/pink haired hipsters wearing ceremonial trilby's that will scream in my face about how tolerant they are... You can see it now.
And then we can have government enforced gender equality... but only in jobs women want to do... or often as not... just get the pay and status of doing the job. Because after all, a lot of those jobs are hard, boring, lonely, and really only a bunch of nerds would do them anyway. But its unfair that there aren't equal numbers of women in those fields. Maybe we should just figure out how many women want to do a given job, then say that equal number of men can also do that job. But no more than that even if there is a need for more than that. After all, that would be sexist.
The whole political scene in the US has been fucking retard inception for the last 10 years at least. You want to cite a longer duration... sure. Cite your favorite flavor of ice cream and we'll go with that. But its just so stupid.
Listening to code pink go on and on and on about how bad war is and how we should just bring everyone home... and then when the people they campaigned for start blowing up Libya or whatever... fucking crickets.
Endlessly being told that there's too much money in politics... except when that money happens to be used by progressives... then its fine. Use tax dollars to bribe people to vote for you? No problem. Use tax money to run partisan propaganda campaigns for your faction? No problem. Use billionaire slush funds to advance your position... No problem. But anyone else does even a shadow of the shit that they get away with on a daily fucking basis... clearly the second coming of literal Hitler.
The sophistry on display is so astounding that I can't take anyone seriously anymore on these issues. Too many people are full of shit. No one can claim they're serious with any sincerity because its been outed at bullshit too many times.
Gents, just express yourselves... actually be tolerant... as in... actually... not just tolerant of YOUR OWN stupid opinions whilst naturally being utterly intolerant of any view that contrasts with your own. Because, that's not tolerance.
I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
These people are already angry of the constant erosion of civil liberties...
You pretty much summarized Trump's message. ENOUGH !
So Trump attempting to ban minorities by seeking the highest office of the free world and riling up mobs until they start beating up said minorities = "He has a right to speak!"
What the fuck?
He hasn't done any of that!
I don't think my neck is all that odd, but two years ago in Las Vegas, the only shirt in TJ Max with my neck size was branded by none other than Donald Trump.
So I now have a Donald Trump shirt. Maybe I could auction it to Trump supporters on Ebay.
I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
The masses, by which I specifically mean a majority of voters and potential voters, show no indication of this at all. On the contrary, Trump is disliked and deemed unacceptable by a very large majority of those same people; unless that can be turned around, something there is also no indication of, the man is outright not electable.
The fact that a majority of voters in the Republican primary might prefer the man notwithstanding, that's not anywhere near enough to result in his election. He also has to convince the rest of the Republicans, and the swing voters or some equivalent swatch of Democrats. Again: There is no indication of this at all.
To put it another way, 51% of Republicans liking a candidate will get them through the primary quite handily; it will not in any way suffice in and of itself to see that candidate through to elected office.
...and as of today, it doesn't even look like he'll reach 51%.
In fact, again as of today, his ultimate contribution to the process has every indication of serving as a near-guarantee that we will have another four years of a presidency sourced from within the Democratic party.
I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
No, Perot didn't, he took votes from the Republican side by a large margin the accurate exit polls show this,
Ah, a republican de-skewering the polls to justify their dismal performance... what else is news.
Again, polls indicate Perot took votes equally. Also they were disenfranchised anti-NAFTA voters. Had Perot not been there what exactly makes you think they would have turned to Mr. Establishment, NAFTA negotiator Bush Sr?
In all likelihood they would have either (a) stayed home or (b) voted for change (i.e. Clinton).
The same is true for Nader and democrats by the way. In most states not having Nader on the ballot wouldn't have made much of a difference. The only place it might have is in Florida and only because the margins of victory were so low.
In the 2016 US Presidential Elections, several large national news-agencies and financial institutions decided that Hillary should be the next president.
I think predicting that she would be President is different from deciding that she should be President. The Democratic Party had, and still has, almost no leaders who could credibly make a presidential run. When Elizabeth Warren announced that she would not run for President (she had to do it several times since not many people believed her the first few times) it seemed like Hillary had a straight shot. And really, who was there to derail her campaign? She'd been building support for a decade now. In the past, at least in the recent past, people didn't just come out of nowhere to take the nomination; they needed establishment support. Even Obama had about four years of support-building before he launched his campaign. Warren could have been this year's Obama. Clinton's campaign had the aura of inevitability to it because you could see it coming for years. No one has been particularly excited about Hillary, but they didn't think, assuming they're voting for the party, that they had anyone better. As soon as Obama jumped in, everyone flocked to him. And now Sanders is siphoning away her support.