Slashdot Mirror


Ellen Pao Launches Advocacy Group To Improve Diversity In The Tech Industry (theverge.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Verge: Ellen Pao, a former Silicon Valley venture capitalist, today announced the launch of Project Include, an advocacy group aimed at improving diversity in the technology industry. The group was started by Pao and fellow female engineers and executives, including members of Slack, Pinterest, and other Bay Area VC firms. The initiative will focus on providing startups and established tech companies with information on making hiring more inclusive, improving retention, and examining bias in the workplace. Pao became embroiled in one of the most divisive debates in tech last year after suing her former employer, VC firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield and Byers, for gender discrimination. She lost at trial and, later, stepped down from her position as interim CEO of Reddit following a severe harassment campaign. Project Include is also accepting as many as 18 startups, who can apply to receive recommendations through a program called Start-Up Include.

265 comments

  1. Fuck anyone with a penis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you disagree then you're part of the patriarchy.

    1. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      To an SJW, disagreement is synonymous with harassment.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's at least two ways to interpret your title...

      Captcha: taunter

    3. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad we've got elrous0 fighting for us, bros. Otherwise, we poor, weak men would be crushed under the tyrannical boot-heels of the SJW-Transsexual-Feminist conspiracy.

      Counterpoint: if the bros were all cool with the idea of fucking anyone with a penis, wouldn't that be, kinda, sorta, the world the trans folk are fighting for?

    4. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How dare men have a sex drive that doesn't conform to marxism-feminism! Those filthy fascists! Time to build an iron curtain!

    5. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      If this were true we wouldn't be seeing this 'sjw-transsexual-feminist conspiracy' oozing from every major media orifice.

      1. Game conferences wouldn't be canceled just because there weren't enough vaginas. Valid job applicants wouldn't be terminated days later because their privately/financially expressed political views made someone 'feel uncomfortable.'
      2. Politicians wouldn't be taking statistics out of context and passing law.
      3. University professors would not be calling for policy to force men to let women speak first in all public discourse, and to cancel such meetings if not enough women are present.
      4. TV shows and commercials wouldn't be loaded with 'empowered' women labeling men as 'stupid dad' and 'manpig' stereotypes and ordering them around, or making sure that if the narrative calls for someone to show fear or emotion, it must be the man, with the 'empowered' woman consoling him like he's a child.
      5. Sweden (and south carolina) wouldn't be micromanaging how people go to the bathroom.
      6. Bruce Jenner would not have been in the news again. Somehow a psychological need to amputate a part of your body is considered a sign of mental illness, but if it's male genitalia, we're supposed to 'celebrate the diversity.' Figure that one out..

      If there're chicken littles and conspiracies meant to alter the way we think, they're definitely on the SJW side these days. The religious right tried this same tactic up through the 80s to push its crazy on us and failed. Now I guess it's the left wing's turn to push its brand of crazy. In light of this, it can be hard to remember that all of this hubris has no basis as long as society places individual rights ahead of groupthink ideology. Once we lose that, it's a race to the bottom.

    6. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Something tells me that this new Ellen Pao group to advocate for diversity is not going to sit well with the Anonymous Cowards on Slashdot.

      Just a hunch.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nothing sits well with the Anonymous Cowards on Slashdot. Why do you expect this to be any different?

    8. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean North Carolina. SC has yet to pass any of these "bathroom laws".

    9. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something tells me that this new Ellen Pao group to advocate for diversity is not going to sit well with the Anonymous Cowards on Slashdot.

      As they would if the story was about Lennart Pottering's new project. Confirmation bias is a bitch.

    10. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1, Insightful

      To an MRA, any disagreement or admission of the facts is synonymous with being an SJW.

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
    11. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say it is an anti-male advocacy group. But if you don't have the experience for a job got to find a way to force a business to give you a job.

    12. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a bit of alright, I suppose.

    13. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Faggots like this don't care about facts.

    14. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe you are indeed an SJW. The fact that you assume the worst about a diverse group of people united only by their advocacy for male rights is quite telling.

    15. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by jcr · · Score: 1

      Don't the SJWs rail against people who fuck anyone with a penis?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    16. Re: Fuck anyone with a penis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BFD, we all know what he meant, and we all know how much SJW get off on nitpicking.
      Aren't you supposed to be screaming at white people's hairstyles on college campuses? I mean, if you're not, then who is?

    17. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Can you cite some specific examples of these things happening. I'm genuinely interested, especially in some of the political stuff because it sounds quite concerning if politicians are undermining efforts to increase equality like that.

      I think I can guess what you are referring to in a few cases though.

      1. Game conferences wouldn't be canceled just because there weren't enough vaginas. Valid job applicants wouldn't be terminated days later because their privately/financially expressed political views made someone 'feel uncomfortable.'

      Which conference? In the job applicant case, would that be Eich? In which case I'd point out that freedom of speech (i.e. criticism) trumps him feeling comfortable in his job, even if he means he feels his position is no longer tenable.

      4. TV shows and commercials wouldn't be loaded with 'empowered' women labeling men as 'stupid dad' and 'manpig' stereotypes and ordering them around

      There are some great videos on YouTube where feminists and others often labelled as "SJWs" deconstruct those adverts. It's sad that advertisers are so dumb and feel that insulting their audience is a good idea.

      6. Bruce Jenner would not have been in the news again. Somehow a psychological need to amputate a part of your body is considered a sign of mental illness

      I'm afraid medical science is against you on this one. It's a lot like "shell shock" (now known as PTSD) in the 1910s. Cowards trying to get off the front line, not a complex psychological condition. Attach the electrodes, that'll get them talking again.

      The most interesting part of all this is the conspiracy theory you have constructed to link all these things by portraying them as some kind of attack. I've said it before - people who accuse others of being "SJWs" usually do all the things they attribute to SJWs.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    18. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1. Game conferences wouldn't be canceled just because there weren't enough vaginas. Valid job applicants wouldn't be terminated days later because their privately/financially expressed political views made someone 'feel uncomfortable.'

      Which conference? In the job applicant case, would that be Eich? In which case I'd point out that freedom of speech (i.e. criticism) trumps him feeling comfortable in his job, even if he means he feels his position is no longer tenable.

      http://nichegamer.com/2016/04/28/star-game-industry-panel-cancelled-last-hour-not-including-women/

    19. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Youtube -> The Amazing Atheist, .. or Thunderf00t. They talked a ton about some of that stuff. To some people this could sound like a conspiracy theory, but there is so much bullshit going on with this modern feminism. Google/Youtube -> Atheism+. This is just wtf. https://thunderf00tdotorg.wordpress.com/2012/08/26/a-atheism-plus-for-a-third-glorious-age-of-total-agreement/. I dont even. Harris, Hitchens, Dawkins and Dennet are dubbed the 4 horsemen. What the actual fuck.
      Richard Dawkins was temporarily disinvited from a science conference because he retweeted a pretty funny video in which hardcore feminists (feminazis) are compared to Islamists/Jihadists (The truth hurts).

    20. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I wasn't sure if the OP meant 'fuck everyone who possesses a penis' or 'fuck everyone using a penis'. Either way, I don't think I have enough stamina, sorry.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    21. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OP meant 'fuck everyone who possesses a penis'

      Such as, Casper the friendly spunk?

    22. Re: Fuck anyone with a penis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with that comic is a lot of the things they do aren't the correct things to do. They may have a point about some of the issues they bring up, but not only are they far from on point with some of the things they bitch about but their solutions to these problems are usually just as bad as the problems themselves were to start with.

    23. Re: Fuck anyone with a penis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdots resident cuckold is in full effect. Good work weaboo

    24. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I hadn't seen that before. Looks like an unfortunate mistake. Makes little sense to cancel it on those grounds.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    25. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      How can you take anything Thunderf00t says seriously? Ignoring his actual arguments, which are easy to refute, for a moment, how can you overlook the shear number of logical fallacies and underhand techniques he uses in his videos?

      https://youtu.be/8N-tkrxAEWw

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    26. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... Slashdot ACs and SJW are one and the same group?

    27. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by OakDragon · · Score: 1

      You mean North Carolina. SC has yet to pass any of these "bathroom laws".

      The OP self-identified as commenting on South Carolina, and we shouldn't try to force him into talking about one particular state or another.

    28. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Wait, what? I thought we were to be accepting of all sexual proclivities so long as they're performed by consensual adults? Why is it okay for you to denigrate someone's sexual preferences? It's not like they have a choice in who or what they're attracted to - those are innate, born to them, and to be respected.

      Or is that not the case for this particular group and, if not, why not?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    29. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean beef curtain?

    30. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by Kielistic · · Score: 2

      Ignore his arguments and take my word that they're totes easy to refute. Then fallacy fallacy and ad hominem fallacy.

      Classic.

    31. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "as they're performed by consensual adults?"

      In most cases there is one consensual adult and one hentail-girl pillow, figurine or tenga

      And... there is nothing wrong with that, the problem comes into being when the neck-beard thinks that women in general should resemble or act like their fantasy-girls do

      The disappointment becomes seething anger which demonstrates itself in public outbursts

    32. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      There is no ad hominem, You don't don't what it means.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    33. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you are going to talk about hentai, most of the hardcore artists are confirmed females. Kek.

      >Ryoumoto Hatsumi
      >Noizi Ito
      >Hiro Suzuhara
      >Aoi Nishimata
      >Miray Ozaki
      >Uran
      >Yonekura Kengo
      >Cuvie
      >Ootsuka reika
      >Kaarage
      >Digital Lover
      >Yuzuki N Dash
      >tenkla aka Doi Sakazaki
      >Abgrund
      >Chikiko (Pleco)
      >Miura Yasuto
      >Yanagawa Rio
      >Cannabis (Shimaji)
      >Urute
      >Hisasi
      >Sayori (Neko Works
      >Rikako Inomoto
      >Akiko Fujii
      >Akari Tsutsumi
      >Yuuki Ryoh
      >Kanna Tenzaki
      >Wakako Kotono
      >Nadeara Bukichi
      >Hiyoko Kobayashi
      >Satsuki-doh (Juri Miyabi)
      >Aoi Nanase
      >Kanako Meiji
      >Kahori Onozucca
      >Azuma Tesshin
      >Azuma Yuki
      >Araki Kanao,
      >Equal
      >Izou Ei
      >Inuburo
      >Inomoto Rikako
      >Uran
      >Urute
      >Ureshino Megumi
      >Okada Kou,
      >Kanyapyi
      >Kantamaki Yui
      >Kiyomiya Ryou
      >Kuon Michiyoshi
      >Saeki,
      >James Hotate
      >Shinonome Ryu
      >Shouno Kotarou
      >Shirota Kurota
      >Suzudama Renri
      >Sumeragi Kohaku
      >Sekiya Asami
      >Soyoki
      >Taropun
      >Dobato
      >Bareisho,
      >Pon Takahanada
      >Miyazaki Maya,
      >Momoiro Manjiru
      >Yuzuki N,
      >Rico
      >ReDrop
      >Wamusato Haru
      >Alpha
      >Maya Miyazaki
      >Oshima Towa
      >Shigeo Hamashima

    34. Re: Fuck anyone with a penis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good work weaboo

      AmiMojo is not a weaboo. Maybe a Japanophile, but not a full blown weaboo.

      Difference is that a Japanophile loves a naive idealized version of Japan that is mostly in their heads. Weaboos love Japan what what it is in reality: a sexist misogynist patriarchy that brings them robot maids and tentacle monsters. That sexism may very well be why they became weaboos.

    35. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe you are indeed an MRA. The fact that you assume the worst about a diverse group of people united only by their advocacy for equal rights is quite telling.

      FTFY.
      Also, FOAD.

    36. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And to Ellen Pao, penis is synonymous with Hitler.

      In that it's evil, of course, as well as the fact she's never seen one in person.

    37. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      Saying somebody is underhanded and therefore you shouldn't listen to what they have to say is pretty much the definition of ad-hom.

      I've always been a little curious as to whether you are aware of the extremely transparent semantic misdirections you try to use or if you actually believe them yourself.

    38. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I see, you don't understand the difference between making a general point that someone is underhanded, and making the specific point that the work in question is underhanded.

      Note how his point is that killing innocents loses the player 100 points. What he fails to mention is that the game then encourages you to do what Sarkeesian demonstrated, by giving you the 100 points back if you hide the body.

      Note also how he starts the video of by poisoning the well with a rant about what a liar she is. I.e. an actual ad-hominem.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    39. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      That's no more accurate than the statement you replied to.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    40. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      Attempting to be derisive toward me doesn't make your point better. Your statement wasn't that complicated; it was easy to understand what you meant. "Ignore what he has to say because he is underhanded." You actually said, in plain English, to ignore his arguments. Then claimed he makes logical fallacies and is underhanded. That was the only substance to what you said.

      You attacked the person and told people to ignore the argument. I am not sure how much of a better example of an ad hominem it could be. What, exactly, do you think an ad hominem fallacy is?

      Are you trying to convince others here or just reassure yourself?

    41. Re:Fuck anyone with a penis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iron meat curtains*

      FTFY

  2. I think I finally understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This woman is having the longest period ever.

    1. Re:I think I finally understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's exactly the kind of misogynist hatespeech that's proof that this initative is needed. Ellen Pao is a hero and you should be fired.

    2. Re:I think I finally understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's exactly the kind of misogynist hatespeech that is proof that this initiative is needed, Ellen Pao is a hero, and you should be fired.

    3. Re: I think I finally understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's not bigotry if it's true.

    4. Re: I think I finally understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you assume the commentor was employed?

    5. Re:I think I finally understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The shit Ellen Pao has done in the past has done so much harm to the image of women in tech leadership roles than this bullshit campaign can ever fix.

    6. Re:I think I finally understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The shit Ellen Pao has done in the past has done so much harm to the image of women in tech leadership roles than this bullshit campaign can ever fix.

      Hey, there's Carly "President" Fiorina, Meg "Governor" Whitman, Marissa "Yahoo!" Mayer....

    7. Re: I think I finally understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because most people are employed.

    8. Re:I think I finally understand by lucm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Correction: he should be fired quietly and he should not make a tweet or post a single comment on Reddit to report it.

      We don't want to repeat the Donglegate incident where Adria Richards, after being psychologically raped by a private discussion made behind her in a room full of 300 people, was victimized a second time by people who unfairly called her a cunt for getting a guy fired over such bullshit.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    9. Re:I think I finally understand by lucm · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hilary "Yahoo!Mail" Clinton

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    10. Re:I think I finally understand by arth1 · · Score: 2

      I don't think Ellen Pao is particularly heroic, she was out for herself but she did point out real problems in KP and the industry.

      Pointing out problems is one thing. Jumping from problem to conclusion without no intermediate is quite another.

    11. Re: I think I finally understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you assume the commentator didn't mean that the grand-parent should be fired out of a cannon?

    12. Re: I think I finally understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people are heterosexual too.

    13. Re:I think I finally understand by Pseudonym · · Score: 0

      Adria Richards did not get that guy fired. The Internet mob of crazy got them both fired.

      A lot of people seem to forget that rather important fact, possibly because it inconveniently doesn't fit with anyone's approved narrative.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    14. Re: I think I finally understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, some wouldn't call the later a problem. Any reaction other than blind praise and acceptance then becomes a problem, because feelings are more important.

    15. Re: I think I finally understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences of that speech, and that applies to her as well.

      That, ironically, is gender equality. That thing feminists are supposedly fighting for is a double-edged sword.

    16. Re: I think I finally understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What fuckwits modded this +5 Funny?

      It's not fucking ironic. It's moronic. Sexist bullshit masquerading as "humour". If you don't understand why it's sexist then you're part of the problem, along with all those butthurt entitled arseholes who do nothing but whine about "SJWs" while making rape threats and photoshopping porn of women who dare to point out when said arseholes are being arseholes.

      Grow the fuck up.

    17. Re:I think I finally understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Adria Richards did not get that guy fired. The Internet mob of crazy got them both fired.

      Right. It's not the person that pulled the trigger, it's the crazy bullets that killed the victims. Someone should call Clinton right quick, her platform of gun control is a sham, she should go full tilt on bullet control.

      /sarc tag in case your detector is not fitted with working batteries

    18. Re: I think I finally understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those who are not are either unemployed or tax evaders. The only real work is the one where people are under a boss, period. That's how things are.

    19. Re: I think I finally understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because most people are employed.

      In 21st Century USA, that's no longer a given.

    20. Re:I think I finally understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's Hillary "Nigerian Princess" Clinton to you.

    21. Re:I think I finally understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly the kind of misogynist hatespeech that's proof that this initative is needed. Ellen Pao is a hero and you should be fired.

      That that
      Dude looks like a lady!

    22. Re: I think I finally understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ellen Pao is toxic to the immediate environment, not a hero. Her track record is one of failing performance, leaving mess behind and whining about someone else being responsible. Care to point to different facts?

    23. Re:I think I finally understand by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I dunno... I like to antagonize people (sometimes on either side but I do have my preferences) because it's good to get them to see the absurdity of that which they represent, or claim to, but I don't really have a dog in this fight. I have to say, I thought it was pretty funny. Maybe I have a warped sense of humor? I don't know. Probably - but that doesn't mean I didn't find it amusing.

      As an aside, it's fun to watch the folks change over time. They fight and rail against the things you point out, they decry it as facile, and all that. But, if you watch for a while and pay attention it does seem to have an impact. Let's face it, there's a whole lot of absurdity on the 'net and it's really been amplified lately. I'm not sure where this path goes but I'm guessing that it's not good. Pendulums that swing quickly apply more force than those which do not. You might as well as enjoy it too. Pick someone and poke 'em to see what comes out. It's moral so long as you're honest about it.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    24. Re:I think I finally understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This woman is having the longest period ever.

      I thought Ellen Pao was trans? I guess we're not supposed to care, though.

    25. Re:I think I finally understand by eepok · · Score: 1

      Adria overheard them making quiet "forking" and "dongle" jokes. She stood up, turned around, took a photo of them, and then tweeted the photo and her complaint to the conference organizers as well as her many followers. (https://twitter.com/adriarichards/status/313417655879102464?lang=en) The conference responded by pulling the two men out of the room and discussing the comments. They were mortified, admitted it was childish, and apologized. The outrage machine ground on unbeknownst to them. Then they were fired.

      Each of the involved parties were interviewed for the book "So You've Been Publicly Shamed" by Jon Ronson. It's an amazingly insightful book. Get a taste of it here in Ronson's TED talk. (https://www.ted.com/talks/jon_ronson_what_happens_when_online_shaming_spirals_out_of_control?language=en)

    26. Re:I think I finally understand by volmtech · · Score: 1

      So she overheard quiet comments and these guys where fired for thought crimes. Well, and for being stupid enough to let their victim overhear them.

    27. Re:I think I finally understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fingering jokes are funny.

    28. Re:I think I finally understand by eepok · · Score: 1

      Yes. And for very low values of "victim".

    29. Re:I think I finally understand by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      The outrage machine ground on unbeknownst to them.

      This is the key point. The outrage machine turned on her just as much as it turned on them.

      I don't expect people to understand this, because we all like to believe in conspiracy theories and we all like to think that people who agree with us would never react in a bad way, but the plain and simple fact is that Internet outrage machine is an equal opportunity shithead. Were it up to the people who were in that conference, nobody would have been fired. Thanks to the mob, both of them were fired.

      Jon Ronson was spot on in his talk. This has nothing to do with what Adria Richards did, or what the guys who made the joke did, or even what the conference organisers did. It's all about what the Internet mob did to both parties.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    30. Re:I think I finally understand by lucm · · Score: 1

      Read the book. To this day Adria Richards still blame the guy who got fired, she says that her life became difficult because he dared announce publicly that he had been fired following this incident.

      The guy made ONE FUCKING comment on Reddit. She went on TV, radio, social media, even made money with her blog and her conferences discussing this incident.

      All of this for a bad taste joke that wasn't even intended for her, for which the guy apologized but that she nonetheless decided to very publicly denounce. She didn't even talk to him, she took this beef on the social media.

      The mob was not the guilty party in this case. She is 100% to blame because she used the social media to ruin someone's life and it backfired, ruining hers as well.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    31. Re:I think I finally understand by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      To this day Adria Richards still blame the guy who got fired, [...]

      If that's true, I think she's wrong. Just like all those who blame Adria Richards for getting the guy fired are wrong.

      She went on TV, radio, social media, even made money with her blog and her conferences discussing this incident.

      I'm not quite sure what you meant by this. If you meant to say that the Internet shitstorm became news, that is true. If you meant to imply that she milked it for All The Publicity, that is not true.

      The mob was not the guilty party in this case. She is 100% to blame [...]

      I hope the mob never targets you.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    32. Re:I think I finally understand by lucm · · Score: 1

      If you meant to imply that she milked it for All The Publicity, that is not true.

      Look at her resume after this incident.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    33. Re:I think I finally understand by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Look at her resume after this incident.

      I just did. She appears to be employed. Was I supposed to notice something specific?

      For for comparison, I also notice that Justine Sacco and Monica Lewinsky also appear to have paying gigs.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    34. Re:I think I finally understand by lucm · · Score: 1

      For for comparison, I also notice that Justine Sacco and Monica Lewinsky also appear to have paying gigs.

      You can't possibly put those three people in the same category. Justine Sacco did not try to shame someone, she made a joke not knowing that it would be seen by so many people and offend strangers. Adria Richards was something else entirely. She did tried to shame publicly two guys who made a joke she disliked, and then it backfired. If you don't see how those things are different, you don't understand the issue of public shaming.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
  3. When you can't do real work.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Start an advocacy group to harass people who can.

    1. Re:When you can't do real work.... by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If this "project" follows the standard race-hustling/gender-hustling formula, it will look something like this:

      1) They approach your company and ask for you to sponsor them, or hire them to provide diversity training, or pay them to do a diversity study of your company (aka they'll shake you down for money)
      2) If you do sponsor/hire them, they'll call you progressive and give you a social justice free pass (a real commodity in ultra-liberal Silicon Valley)
      3) If you don't, they'll cite you as an example of a company that's not "embracing diversity" and is clearly racist/sexist/homophobic blah blah. You must be, otherwise you would have embraced diversity by giving them money, right?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:When you can't do real work.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Painting them with mob tactics. This is frighteningly accurate and come to think of it, not the first time I've heard of social issues being falsely used for personal financial/commercial gain; See Anita Sarkeesian.

    3. Re:When you can't do real work.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you think a lot of the rights groups get funded?

      Even Google had to pay them off, remember? Even as liberal as they were, it wasn't enough until they started paying money.

    4. Re: When you can't do real work.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how much money have thunderf00t et al made from exploiting a social issue? Do you think they do it for free? Collectively millions of views of his videos add up to a reasonable income.

    5. Re:When you can't do real work.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It worked to Anita and Randi, I am sure Ellen will rake in the dough.

    6. Re: When you can't do real work.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A pitance. You forget thunderf00t has a real job as a research scientist. His YouTube money is there to support him making videos. When you consider how much Anita has pulled in, she only made 2 videos, but you can pay her $20K to speak about tropes in video games she has never played.

    7. Re: When you can't do real work.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thunderf00t, via Patreon, earns just under $3,000 per video. Not exactly a pittance.

    8. Re:When you can't do real work.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      3) If you don't, they'll cite you as an example of a company that's not "embracing diversity" and is clearly racist/sexist/homophobic blah blah. You must be, otherwise you would have embraced diversity by giving them money, right?

      Good Luck with that! The USA is 77% white! That means "zero discrimination" should have 23% other races. Of course if you account for poverty which limits access to college, then the number goes beyond 80% white as a "zero discrimination" goal. Take a look at Reddit's Headquarters in San Francisco, yep, 77% white.

      Oh, my. The office I'm at has 10 employees and 4 are black guys! Better fire one or two of those black fellas so we can get back to the 77% white census statistic for my town. I'd hate to be biased!

    9. Re:When you can't do real work.... by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Isn't this technique also used by some "environmentalist" groups and various "animal rights" groups as well?

    10. Re:When you can't do real work.... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I have seen Sarkeesian's work. It seems you are unfamiliar with it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:When you can't do real work.... by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      I'd be more familiar with it if she had ever finished what she said she'd do...

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
  4. Step 1 to improving your company by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Never hire Ellen Pao.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Step 1 to improving your company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...and never invest money with her husband.

      Grifters like Pao and Fletcher are why we can't have nice things.

    2. Re:Step 1 to improving your company by jcr · · Score: 1

      ..and if you do make a mistake and hire someone like her, can her useless ass as soon as you know she's damaging your business.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    3. Re:Step 1 to improving your company by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      She has made herself difficult to employ now. It's a shame because it just makes it even harder for other people to complain about discrimination, for fear of ending up the same way.

      Maybe she can find another job like Reddit. I think she was brought in to make necessary changes and absorb the backlash. It worked brilliantly, Reddit is better off now and the screaming mob think they "won" by forcing her out. I just wonder if she was in on this plan before she accepted the job.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Step 1 to improving your company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh there is our resident queen of the SJW. I hadn't seen you as much and I thought you had gotten a life. WB!

    5. Re:Step 1 to improving your company by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Thanks. It warms my bleeding heart to know I'm missed.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Step 1 to improving your company by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      because it just makes it even harder for other people to complain about discrimination

      This is the real tragedy. Just like any false claim that appear to be on the rise. http://www.breitbart.com/milo/...

      Take Brietbart for what its worth but the links are at the bottom.

      The whole "ends justify the means" or "there are no wrong tactics just bad targets" is counter productive and destructive.

      If you believe what Anita believes that "Everything is racist. Everything is sexist. Everything is homophobic." then it is no wonder people see it where it is not.

    7. Re:Step 1 to improving your company by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

      Grifters like Pao and Fletcher are why we can't have nice things.

      ...and why THEY shouldn't have nice things.

  5. How about more 'diverse' U.S. citizens? by kheldan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If she's backing more U.S. citizens being employed instead of more overseas workers brought in on H1-B's, then I'm all for it, otherwise I couldn't care less.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:How about more 'diverse' U.S. citizens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, she's cool with H1-B's, as long as they have a vagina.

    2. Re: How about more 'diverse' U.S. citizens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If she's backing Slack, they'll never get it right. Also, no one publishes a commercial app with all of the debug code enabled...except Slack, they do.

    3. Re:How about more 'diverse' U.S. citizens? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Informative

      agism is the elephant in the room (I'm biased, I'm over 50 and unemployed in the bay area). I see lots of women where I was previous employed (at pretty much any place); but if you look for grey hair guys and girls, no, there are some token hires or maybe some rock star that happens to be old; but for the most part, if you are over 35 and looking to stay technical in this area of the country, LOTSA LUCK to you.

      the other elephant (yeah, its crowded in this room) is that if you are born in the west, especially the US, employers mostly prefer to NOT hire you and instead take an h1b or other form of import. its not about race; its about being brought up here and knowing your rights, knowing you can say NO to your boss for that 4th weekend request in a row of his, knowing lots of things that foreigners who were not raised in the US culture simply don't know.

      employers leverage the HELL out of that fact. most people outside the US who are from asia, for example, has zero idea what freedom really is. they are perfectly fine with being eavesdropped, spied, directed, micromanaged and then disposed of. they think its normal. US born folks know better, and so we are not the first choice when it comes to hiring.

      the cries of DIVERSITY! is bullshit and yet another distraction to hide what is really going on. war on middle class; and that mostly means folks born here and who have a vested interest in what happens here in the next 10, 20, 50 years. but we are being passed over for most of the core hiring in the valley.

      btw, indians who end up staying here and having kids; YOUR kids are now americans and they will be passed over just like I and my friends are, now. think long and hard about that, immigrants; and think again if you really should hire yet more h1b's or if you should, maybe give some locals a chance at some of those jobs. later on, your kids will be the locals. think about it.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:How about more 'diverse' U.S. citizens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      H-1Bs are not white, so they pass the affirmitive action check.

      The ironic thing is that companies can be listed as matching diversity standards by importing H-1Bs. Combine that with the fact they don't pay payroll taxes, and other tax benefits, it is no wonder why almost all big company go the Gastarbeiter route.

    5. Re:How about more 'diverse' U.S. citizens? by Shados · · Score: 1

      If you're over 50 and in the interview, it's obvious that you're up to date (that doesn't mean knowing the API of the latest trendy bullshit, but it does mean you don't think SVN is new and scary), and you have the skills of someone with 25+ years of experience, not only will you get an offer before you have time to get in your car, in any of the tech hubs (not just SV and the west coast), the conversation will start at over 300k total comp and you'll be able to milk them up from there.

      The problem is that there just wasn't that many software engineers back then (compared to today), and the vast majority jumped ship when the dot com bubble crashed. Of what's left, a large section are scared of SQL as something too technical, or are too scared of new tech to learn them enough to explain why we shouldn't use them, from experience.

      The rest though (which leaves very very few)? You can't hire them because they're never on the job market.

      As the huge influx of engineer gets older, it's a problem that will go away. Eventually there will be more older engineers than younger ones, and we can go back to the good old days where no one could get a job without 10 years of experience in a technology that's 5 years old.

    6. Re:How about more 'diverse' U.S. citizens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are living in a fantasy land.

    7. Re:How about more 'diverse' U.S. citizens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They like rectal extracted "facts".

    8. Re:How about more 'diverse' U.S. citizens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps if you had real skills and didn't hang out at work when you should be working, you'd be more employable. Don't blame others for your own laziness and the consequences. E.g. why are you posting here? You should be working, studying, or improving your skill set; but you are not. H1-B candidates are. That's why we prefer them to local lazy me-me-me types.

    9. Re:How about more 'diverse' U.S. citizens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      couldn't agree more with all of what you said. all of this is a veiled war on the middle class.

    10. Re:How about more 'diverse' U.S. citizens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm over 50 and unemployed in the bay area
      Move out of the bay area Dude. Life is better outside the bay area. For one things cost a lot less in other parts of the country and they hire older people.

  6. Let's shift that focus a little by suupaabaka · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article is a bit light in detail as to what Pao's trying to accomplish, but from her history, I'm assuming it's about gender

    But maybe we should focus on diversity of skills and experience rather than diversity of physical characteristics?

    1. Re:Let's shift that focus a little by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The article is a bit light in detail as to what Pao's trying to accomplish

      My guess would be to extort businesses to give her money under the threat of calling them sexist-racists if they don't. You know, the standard race-hustling, gender-hustling modus operandi.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Let's shift that focus a little by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Because "diversity" and "inclusion", when used by someone like Ellen Pao, are just code words for Anti White Male.

      I guarantee she has no problem with any business or organization that is 100% female or 100%, black or 100% asian or 100% hispanic or 100% lesbian midget eskimo. Those would all be considered perfectly OK, according Ellen Pao and her ilk, as examples of diversity and inclusion.

    3. Re:Let's shift that focus a little by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >100% lesbian midget eskimo

      Those people never invite me to their parties.

    4. Re:Let's shift that focus a little by tsotha · · Score: 1

      It's a shakedown racket. That's what qualifies as a Heroic Woman In Tech idea.

    5. Re: Let's shift that focus a little by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More "facts" from a child rapist, no thanks.

    6. Re:Let's shift that focus a little by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      So she's pulling an "Asian Woman" Al Sharpton/Jesse Jackson racket, then?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    7. Re:Let's shift that focus a little by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Why would they? You're probably not a lesbian midget Eskimo.

      It's like those people who say, "Oh, that lesbian stuff turns me on!" Umm... Why? They're lesbians. They are not interested in you and they'll only let you watch if they're fake lesbians who are porn actresses or otherwise in it for the money - which might be a good thing but certainly doesn't mean what they seem to think it means.

      And no, no you can't fuck a lesbian straight.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    8. Re: Let's shift that focus a little by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummmm they would invite me because DIVERSITY! That's the whole point. Or are you saying that we are allowed to discriminate now? It's all fun and games until we discriminate against what you people don't want us to discriminate on, while you discriminate against others because you call it "equality" when in reality it's just divisive discriminate contradiction... Don't get me wrong I discriminate all the time, but then again I'm not the one who says what others can and can't discriminate against, I don't try to rule people's live like these people.

    9. Re:Let's shift that focus a little by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And no, no you can't fuck a lesbian straight.

      I'm willing to give it a try.

    10. Re:Let's shift that focus a little by KGIII · · Score: 1

      You do a good service to your country!

      Err... I think? I'm not actually sure how to respond to that. :/

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    11. Re:Let's shift that focus a little by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      How many tiddies would one expect an anime character to have?

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    12. Re:Let's shift that focus a little by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      How many tiddies would one expect an anime character to have?

      All of them.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    13. Re: Let's shift that focus a little by KGIII · · Score: 1

      > Or are you saying that we are allowed to discriminate now?

      That's a tough question but I'm going to answer it like this:

      From what I've witnessed it looks like not we but they are allowed to discriminate.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  7. Slashdot Still Fooled by Harassment Narratives? by Kunedog · · Score: 5, Informative

    She lost at trial and, later, stepped down from her position as interim CEO of Reddit following a severe harassment campaign

    Please. Here's an outline of the shitshow that Pao and the rest of the Reddit regime (which is still largely intact) caused, leading to her ouster:
    https://news.slashdot.org/comm...

  8. Re: *Popcorn* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod up and pass the popcorn. I came for tech news and stayed for reality tv.

  9. what a sexist racist bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    preferential prejudiced different treatment of individuals based on sex or racist is sexist and racist.

    pao pao my yellow kootchie

  10. Enough with Diversity by BeemanIT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just getting tired about all this diversity stuff and not enough with just simply having the best workers. If they want diversity why does this seem to be limited to the Technology area and not to other areas like medicine? For examples most nurses are women, you don't hear them saying they need more men in nursing?

    1. Re:Enough with Diversity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh... just because your knowledge seems to be limited to the Technology area, doesn't mean other things don't exist.

      maybe you have heard of "google" in your Technology area circle of friends... here, let me show you how it works: search for "need more men in nursing"

    2. Re: Enough with Diversity by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Get back to me when the President of the United States launches a drive to get more men into nursing and teaching.

    3. Re:Enough with Diversity by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are many schemes and incentives aimed at getting more men into nursing. Ditto teaching, especially for very young children.

      The thing about hiring the "best" candidate is that you need to define "best" somehow. You could argue that it should be the most qualified or most experienced or who does best on a test, but in practice businesses have to consider many other factors.

      Is it worth paying top dollar for this job? Will this person fit in with the rest of the team? What non-technical skills and abilities can they bring to the table? For example, if they are looking to hire someone to glue to Javascript frameworks together for a web front end, they might be more interested in that person's understanding of the target demographic and ability to create an attractive UI. Being the absolute master of Javascript is probably not top priority.

      Beyond the benefits of diversity to a company, many of them are now realizing that to get good staff they need to cast their net a little wider and appeal to previously untapped candidates. For example, but offering more flexible working hours they could get a really great coder who wouldn't have applied if they couldn't pick their kids up from school or take time out when they are sick. In other words, the company might have hired an inferior programmer because the job was incompatible with the most skilled candidate.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re: Enough with Diversity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They tried the nursing part in Sweden like 10 years ago... and the women that didn't get accepted because a man got their place sued the school. /Marcus

    5. Re:Enough with Diversity by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      In the US, there is a push to get men into nursing. Nursing (may) involve(s) a lot of physical labor, and having men that can move 300+ pound patients is an unfortunate necessity.

    6. Re:Enough with Diversity by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      It's interesting to read that while male nurses are 6% to 10% of the total, female nurses still make less than a male nurse makes.

      http://nursinglink.monster.com...

      "About 6 percent of nurses in the United States are men. However, men are represented in much higher numbers in nursing specialties that also pay higher salaries. For example, 49 percent of Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) in the U.S. are men. In 2005, the average salary for CRNAs was $160,000, significantly higher than the average floor nurses, who are mostly women. Of course, a master’s degree is required for a nursing specialization such as CRNA, which also increases the take-home salary."

      "Men seem to go for higher education in nursing than women do, increasing their take-home earnings. There are more men in RN programs than in LPN programs, and more men in BSN programs than in RN diploma or ADN programs."

      https://www.advisory.com/daily...

      "Why is that? The data seemed especially striking because women don't just make up the overwhelming share of staff nurses, but represent about 90% of Chief Nursing Officers, too."

      "I took the question to our in-house think tank, the Nursing Executive Center. (Collectively, they have several hundred years of experience studying the nursing industry, working in it, or both.)"

      "One reason, they suggested: Some may be where the nurses work."

      ""Anecdotally, I hear that many men enter the “high tech” nursing specialties—such as critical care," the Center's Jennifer Stewart told me. "These are often higher paid nursing specialties." "

      ""Men also tend to aim for higher levels of education," Katherine Virkstis pointed out. "There are more men in RN programs than in LPN programs, and more men in BSN programs than in RN diploma or ADN programs.""

      https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2015...

      "Male registered nurses (RNs) make more than $5,000 per year than their female counterparts across most settings, specialty areas and positions, according to a UCSF-led study, and this earnings gap has not improved over the last three decades."

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    7. Re: Enough with Diversity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get back to me when professional sports teams are proportionately diverse based on racial percentages... In reality I just want to see them all fail because no one would watch anymore because they would SUCK! But since sports it's pretty much based on best for the position it makes it a better entertainment.

    8. Re:Enough with Diversity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beyond the benefits of diversity to a company.

      Diversity in skills, sure. But assuming that because someone is a member of a minority that they bring something unique to the table skills-wise is, in fact, discriminatory in itself.

    9. Re:Enough with Diversity by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      People don't complain much about a lack of men in nursing because it's one of the few things women have that isn't constantly contested. "What's that, little girl full of hopes and dreams? You say you might wanna be grow up to be a game developer? No!! Go to Hell, you filthy casual-gamer fake-geek! You wanna be a nurse or an elementary school teacher? Well all right then, that's better. Go play with your dollies."

    10. Re:Enough with Diversity by AgentSmith · · Score: 1

      BS of the highest order.

      The more probable scenario.

      "What's that, little girl full of hopes and dreams? Line right up and get a degree in a STEM field! We need women in engineering of all disciplines, and game development! We need scientists! We have scholarships and funding for women willing to enter STEM fields! If you're having problems you can meet at the Campus Women's STEM group and mentor program! We also have paid internships for diversity candidates and you qualify!"

      "No. I'm not interested in Computer Science or Game Development. Maybe become a Biologist, but I want to be a Nurse or a Veterinarian. Maybe a Fashion Designer or a Singer! Or maybe get an art or psychology degree."

      "Please! Enter a STEM field!! We need a diverse field, since there aren't so many women in it right now and women can do anything!"

      "Nnnnnno!"

    11. Re:Enough with Diversity by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      I'll grant you that plenty of people will be there to urge young women into STEM. That said, if you try to get a girl interested in the realm of computing and tech, she will be met with lots of resistance, from the hands of people like most of the commentors here. Constantly shaming her and saying that she's only in this program because she's a dumb girl, generally making her feel like shit. The women-in-STEM supporters are really happy to hear about women being in STEM, but they can't do a damn thing about all the assholes.

    12. Re:Enough with Diversity by AgentSmith · · Score: 1

      The women-in-STEM supporters are really happy to hear about women being in STEM, but they can't do a damn thing about all the assholes.

      Yes. So am I, but you know how to get rid of the assholes?
      Dismantle their arguments.

      They can't bitch about quotas when there are none. When will we take away the training wheels and treat women and men the same regarding merit? Yeah, the STEM field is full of arrogant assholes, but that never stopped real pioneers and innovators. The STEM professions are not for the faint of heart and trying to cultivate a special space for women does a disservice to capable women everywhere. Talk to Sallie Ride about the shit she had to deal with during her astronaut training. They kept puttin' front and center misogyny right in her face and she kept going. It wasn't easy, but it proved point and her experience puts current workplace microagressions and diversity issues in their place.

      It's a self fulfilling prophesy. "Oh well, I don't want to go into a STEM field because the men will just be assholes." Meanwhile, "Women don't want to be in STEM field, because they don't choose those fields thus they aren't interested". Break the cycle! There's more women than men attending universities in the US. They can be going for STEM fields and make women in those fields commonplace. When more women are available in the technical labor force and as company founders the less arguments can be made. The labor pool diversity takes care of itself, since it'll be real obvious in a hurry that all the unemployed STEM workers all of a sudden happen to be women.

      I work with some very intelligent women who code and project manage circles around me. Some were hired before quotas and some were hired afterwards. The ones after and their co workers always have that niggling doubt of being hired for 'diversity' reasons. It's time to take off the crutches and remove the hypersensitivity. In another two decades it's going to be the Gen X crowd at the helm and we can do away with this bullshit.

       

    13. Re:Enough with Diversity by Verdatum · · Score: 1
      So this is a difficult and systemic problem that is going to take lots of eyes and wise input to slowly work towards solving; and we won't see significant improvement for about a generation. DAMNIT.

      We'd better set up some advocacy groups ASAP to try and help figure out good ways to deal with this problem.

      I appreciate that solutions like quotas and subsidies are harrowing, and quite possibly not ideal. But people in comment sections like this freak out at the mere mention of anyone even approaching the problem.

    14. Re:Enough with Diversity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an HVAC mechanic and I go to a lot of industry meetings and conferences. I have not seen or even heard of a female HVAC mechanic so far. It pays well so not like they'd be slumming. But you don't hear about this field.

    15. Re:Enough with Diversity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is it interesting? Men strive for more money by working harder and/or achieving greater personal growth. There's nothing interesting about it.

    16. Re:Enough with Diversity by bobo_1968 · · Score: 0

      So this is a difficult and systemic problem that is going to take lots of eyes and wise input to slowly work towards solving; and we won't see significant improvement for about a generation. DAMNIT.

      We'd better set up some advocacy groups ASAP to try and help figure out good ways to deal with this problem.

      I appreciate that solutions like quotas and subsidies are harrowing, and quite possibly not ideal. But people in comment sections like this freak out at the mere mention of anyone even approaching the problem.

      Very true, one might even be tempted to call it a "knee jerk" response ;)

  11. Step 2 - avoid people likely to get pregnant by Bruce66423 · · Score: 0

    If you are a start up, the news that a major member of your team is going to have a baby is NOT good news... So...

    1. Re:Step 2 - avoid people likely to get pregnant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you are a start up, the news that a major member of your team is going to have a baby is NOT good news... So...

      As someone that works for a start-up with five developers that have had three pregnancies in the past three years, this. My god, this. We had to do another round of funding because of the year it delayed our release.

    2. Re:Step 2 - avoid people likely to get pregnant by lucm · · Score: 2

      Being inclusive is not a pre-requisite or a moral obligation. Being inclusive is a game that people with too much time and money on their hands play because they're too afraid to tackle real social problems (like homeless people who live in terrible conditions or ISIS sympathizers who open fire in large crowds).

      If you decide to play the inclusive game when you don't have time and money, you'll lose.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    3. Re: Step 2 - avoid people likely to get pregnant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That is true on a national level too.

  12. I don't think you understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Repeating the same bullshit multiple times does not make it true.

    1. Re:I don't think you understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's exactly the kind of misogynist hatespeech that is proof that this initiative is needed, Ellen Pao is a hero, and you should be fired.

    2. Re:I don't think you understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's exactly the kind of misogynist hatespeech that is proof that this initiative is needed, Ellen Pao is a hero, and you should be fired.

      Now you're just being funny

    3. Re:I don't think you understand by chill · · Score: 0

      It seems to be working for Trump.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    4. Re: I don't think you understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except Trump, Inc. scores pretty damn well on diversity.

      Oops. Sorry. Not supposed to mention that.

  13. Re:Hire more gay Linux nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    need african-american homosexual linux nerds. They have an association you can contact

  14. If you work for a big company by Bruce66423 · · Score: 1

    You are still a problem if you are a critical part of a team...

  15. Well, THIS should engender thoughtful discussion. by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hate it when the handlers don't warn the bystanders before they throw in the raw meat.

  16. better products through diversity by frovingslosh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, we must end the scourge of things being designed by well educated engineers, and add the diversity of blond bimbo strippers, people who "identify" with the gender that they were not born into, people who choose to waste their public education and remain illiterate (although some of those are still waiting for the Basketball or rap "music" opportunity that society owes them), and people who bring different insight through dubious chemical means that Obama chooses to look the other way on. Of course, we will still let the engineers do the actual work, but we must add the other diversity to the design teams.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:better products through diversity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just a puerto rican lesbian trapped in a white mans body, quit harassing my imaginary tits!

    2. Re:better products through diversity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I'm just a puerto rican lesbian trapped in a white mans body, quit harassing my imaginary tits!

    3. Re:better products through diversity by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, this is typical of the horseshit dumped on us by the anti-diversity crowd. No-one is suggesting hiring people who aren't qualified to do the actual job.

      Then that seemingly reasonable straw man is used to launch into some transphobic and racist bullshit. Nice.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:better products through diversity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sexually Identify as an Attack Helicopter. Ever since I was a boy I dreamed of soaring over the oilfields dropping hot sticky loads on disgusting foreigners. People say to me that a person being a helicopter is Impossible and I’m fucking retarded but I don’t care, I’m beautiful. I’m having a plastic surgeon install rotary blades, 30 mm cannons and AMG-114 Hellfire missiles on my body. From now on I want you guys to call me “Apache” and respect my right to kill from above and kill needlessly. If you can’t accept me you’re a heliphobe and need to check your vehicle privilege. Thank you for being so understanding.

    5. Re:better products through diversity by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      An AH64 Apache? Really?

      Personally, I sexually Identify as an Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II. Ever since I was a boy I dreamed of soaring over the oilfields dropping hot sticky loads on disgusting foreigners. People say to me that a person being an attack plane is Impossible and Iâ(TM)m fucking retarded but I donâ(TM)t care, Iâ(TM)m beautiful. Iâ(TM)m having a plastic surgeon install jet engines, a 30mm GAU-8/A Avenger cannon and AGM-65 Maverick missiles on my body. From now on I want you guys to call me âoeWarthogâ and respect my right to kill from above and kill needlessly. If you canâ(TM)t accept me youâ(TM)re a aerophobe and need to check your vehicle privilege. Thank you for being so understanding.

      More seriously, I'm transgender, and have been called an SJW on Slashdot....but I have a weakness for the Attack Helicopter meme.

    6. Re:better products through diversity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the problem I have with the "diversity" push. If you want to hire the best people for the job, with as little discrimination as possible, then it's anti-discrimination. Just call it that. The problem with calling it "diversity" is if you eliminate discrimination but still don't achieve diversity, then you have to discriminate against someone to force diversity. So "anti-discrimination" is a much better term for that kind of thing.

    7. Re:better products through diversity by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      This is some uncommonly good troll-bait. I must admit, I almost fell for it. Could you imagine if anyone was really dumb enough to think this way, and then be vocal about it in public forums devoted to nerds? That's be insane.

  17. Fuck Ellen Pao by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yeah, just for some background. Ellen Pao was no-one. She wasn't a long term user of the site. They tried to make it look like that, but it was a transparent attempt. She was one of these Ivy League fucking for-no-other-reason climbers. They tried to give her a back story as a long term "one of us" people. That only made it worse. And when there was the inevitable pushback against her inevitable claims of sexism, there was an inevitable escalation of those claims. That's all you need to know, other than that she was defeated soundly in law about similar claims regarding her dismissal from a previous job...

  18. I'd call her a cunt, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But she lacks both the warmth and depth they have...

  19. If I had ever seen a diversity hire... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    workout I might think she has a point.

    1. Re:If I had ever seen a diversity hire... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't seen it work after working for start-ups for more than a dozen years and nine years working for a VC doing due diligence on quite a few start-ups. The diversity hires stick-out like a sore thumb.

    2. Re: If I had ever seen a diversity hire... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen quite a few workout since I own a gym in the Seattle area. Of course, that wasn't what you meant.

    3. Re: If I had ever seen a diversity hire... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the ones that were hired for their abilities look worse because of the assumption they were hired for their race or gender. I hate dealing with new people at work because of that assumption.

  20. Re:when the first comments on posts like these are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck anyone with a penis! if you disagree then you're part of the patriarchy

    Use apps! only apps can apps apps, NOT LUDDITE feminists! Apps!

    I think i finally understand this woman is have the longest period ever

    When you can't do real work... start an advocacy group to harass people who can

    hire more gay linux nerds who like hard cocks in their rectums

    Can you not fathom how there just might be some discrimination happening in the tech world?

    1) No more so than anywhere else
    2) Other people being discriminatory does not automatically mean that your beliefs and suggested courses of action are correct
    3) Nobody really gives a damn anyway because we're adult enough to deal with a few trolls.

  21. lower cost housing? by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    If such is possible in Silicon Valley (i.e. complaints about lack of diversity in many SV companies if not counting janitorial staff). I haven't RTFA but appears this group will go nowhere with the techies based on the comments here.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
    1. Re:lower cost housing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A while back I read an article complaining that Twitter only had 48 black employees. My thoughts were:

      (a) So what. You re not supposed to hire people according to their race.

      (b) Why do they need so many janitors?

  22. Follow your own advice to prove it is good. by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 2

    Why tell other people what to think when you can just do what you think everyone else should do, then if it brings you success people will emulate what you have done when you led by example. Share holders see advocates as a risk vector, where as experts with a proven track record are seen for their potential to grow profits and their advice is sought-after.

    1. Re:Follow your own advice to prove it is good. by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that takes hard work. Much easier to hustle, con, and sue.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  23. I Grow Weary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of all this talk about diversity. If IT was meant to be diverse by nature, it would have organically happened. I can name the blacks and women I know in IT on one hand. I don't see a problem with this and nor should anyone else. IT has always been the domain of Asians, Caucasians, and some Spanish-heritage peoples. Women, historically never really saw IT as a meaningful career. Now, everyone is trying to democratize IT and this really sucks. I miss the "priesthood of the computer" when IT guys really were set apart. When we had our own dark data centers no one ventured into. When wanting something done on the mainframes and /or servers meant submitting a work order. I do not apologize for my age, my outlook on IT, or any of my other opinions. As a country, we are trying to de-genderize everything. It was better when women were mothers, nurses, secretaries, stewardesses. Now? I cannot speak freely, even in jest, lest I offend a woman, homosexual, man who thinks he's a woman, women who thinks she's a man. I miss the old days. They really were better, even if the technology itself wasn't.

  24. Re:when the first comments on posts like these are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Fuck anyone with a penis! if you disagree then you're part of the patriarchy

    Use apps! only apps can apps apps, NOT LUDDITE feminists! Apps!

    I think i finally understand this woman is have the longest period ever

    When you can't do real work... start an advocacy group to harass people who can

    hire more gay linux nerds who like hard cocks in their rectums

    Can you not fathom how there just might be some discrimination happening in the tech world?

    Oh I can. I see strong discrimination in favor of employing and promoting 'diversity' candidates. That means STFs (Senior Technical Female), black, native American and disabled. It's not my imagination. It's written down corporate policy. As a hiring manager I would get dinged for not discriminating in this way.

  25. I haven't spoken to her recently... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But I actually know someone exactly like that. Late 50s, has worked in every facet of QA, administration, and even mid-range scripting (never really got into dev work, but could do basically every other role you'd need to round out your team.)

    She got laid off around the '08 downturn and hasn't been able to get a hire since, despite having 20 years of techwork under her belt and staying up to date on the OSes, software, etc for which she'd be responsible.

    Maybe the real issue isn't all the old people being 'weeded out'. Maybe the real issue is the lack of old people leadership willing to invest in their fellows to create the 'next big thing' and show the whippersnappers why wisdom and experience trumps 'hype it and they will invest.' :)

    1. Re:I haven't spoken to her recently... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just move the fuck away from Silly Valley and to one of the other areas with far more reasonable tech job markets. The DC metro area and its wealth of beltway bandits, biotech companies, etc etc make it a very appealing area to work in, one that is mostly insulated from the ebbs and flow of the economy thanks to the largess of the federal government.

      Yeah I know its not as sexy as being in California, never had a single issue finding new employment as a sysadmin in the DC metro area(I've been in the area for about 20 years now).

  26. Where is the GNSAAA when you need them? :D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (System Administrators)

  27. Actually a better question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would be why people aren't still boycotting Disney(and specifically its Lucas subsidiaries) over the shitshow they pulled on the Lucasarts staff, many of which were gay, transgender, etc and rather diverse but who all magically got laid off just before the Lucas-Disney buyout went through (possibly because Disney doesn't want homos and trannies damaging its image as a wholesome christian company for the whole family?)

    Seems like everybody overlooks the dark shadows in their own backyard if they are zealot enough.

  28. Chairman Pao by zapadnik · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Over on Reddit they started calling her "Chairman Pao" for the censorious regime Ms Pao imposed. She also 'purged' pro-Free Speech moderators. We gotta fight such people, the authoritarians "doing it for our own good" or because it "hurts someones feelings".

    Free Speech is the whole ballgame. Lose that and no-one gets to "talk Truth to Power".

    1. Re:Chairman Pao by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She is rotten.

    2. Re:Chairman Pao by Verdatum · · Score: 0
      Lol. You buy into propaganda pretty easily, huh? She certainly did some fuckups. She was not good at controlling her message. But the rest of the claims here are what the panicked shitlords wanted you to see. She didn't purge anyone. The subreddits that were removed, were removed after she was dismissed, and the were removed because they were encouraging the levying of credible threats. A company failing to shut activities like that is begging to be sued into oblivion. Any ideals about a space where you can be free to threaten to sexually assault or physically harm actually people, and still expect the revenue is going to be around to keep such a site online are completely foolish. Groups like fatpeoplehate got upset, and defensive, and ran an honestly spectacular smear campaign.

      She still posts on reddit. If you read through her comment history, she's a pretty nice lady. She took all the abuse the community gave her in stride, which is something I don't think I could even manage.

    3. Re:Chairman Pao by zapadnik · · Score: 1

      Why did Reddit see it as necessary to remove her then?

    4. Re:Chairman Pao by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      For one thing, she was always just "interim CEO". She had no prior experience as a CEO. And, as I said, she'd been doing a crummy job of communicating with the reddit user base. The dev team was doing a crummy job of interacting with the moderators, which is in part, her responsibility. And yeah, there was the whole political drama related to her pre-existing lawsuit. The shitlords were raising a stink trying to get her fired, and it was getting to the point that mainstream media was starting to notice. When this happens, it is bad news because this is when sponsors and investors consider pulling their business. So the board decided for that collection of reasons, which in the end all translate to profit-motive, combined with learning that the former founder was interested in returning, throwing Pao under the bus was an obvious choice. Add to that, Pao probably didn't want to stay in control of a company that had users like those people. Redditors have since made comments asking if Ellen wanted to return, and her response was basically, "you couldn't pay me enough to do that job again".

  29. Diversity = more women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone notify Websters

  30. What would help diversity by melted · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What would help diversity (among other things) is not extorting a multimillion dollar settlement out of your employer by filing a lawsuit about things you've made up.

  31. Re:Use apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about LUDDITE mras? Are they appers apping apps?

  32. Method to "Improve Diversity?" by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    You mean like learning how to tolerate outsized egos and intrusive innuendos so the Pao's of the world don't quit?

    No matter where you are, you learn to fit in or you become a crybaby and leave.

  33. They also act like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    women/minorities should just drop into this career late in life.

    The women and ethnic members I know in tech got in it for the same reasons as the whites and men: Because somebody put them in front of a computer when they were little and OFF THEY WENT.

    The best techies, and especially programmers got into this because they have some sort of a passion, whether it is in learning about new tech, breaking shit (in the software sense), learning how something works internally (programmers/engineers/hackers/crackers) and either exploiting it, or building upon it.

    But all this modern diversity in the workplace crap is just getting people who see the once impressive salaries and 'want in on that', or see 'hackers' misrepresented on the TV/Movie screen as some sort of one size fits all superhero who can do anything if only they get a keyboard. Both of these types of people are working *AGAINST* the industry and as can be seen in quite a bit of software development in the past decade or two has helped result in even MORE less qualified individuals creating crap which has to be supported industry-wide. And that is taking into account all of the muck that had existed in the first 40ish years of modern computer design and theory (which I will add had plenty of both women and minorities involved in its development, both 'at home' (USA) and abroad.)

    1. Re:They also act like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good points, I agree.

    2. Re:They also act like... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Because somebody put them in front of a computer when they were little and OFF THEY WENT.

      Okay, but what if the person's parents were poor?

      Or what if their parents had a gendered view of tech and didn't put a little girl in front of a computer because that was a "Boy Thing"

    3. Re:They also act like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because somebody put them in front of a computer when they were little and OFF THEY WENT.

      Okay, but what if the person's parents were poor?

      Or what if their parents had a gendered view of tech and didn't put a little girl in front of a computer because that was a "Boy Thing"

      So I should hire a less qualified candidate because it's not their fault they are less qualified?

      This is solving the symptom and not the problem. You want more girls and minorities and poor kids to get into then support a basic income, quality education programs including access to modern computer resources, arts, music, and philosophy and/or anything and everything else.

      We spend so much money trying to solve the symptoms of these problems. Stop creating programs to give poor people X, Y, and Z, and provide them everyone a straight monetary amount so they have the freedom to find jobs that engage them or allow them the upward mobility they want. Put that money into education at all levels so they can gain the experiences that poor / misguided parents can't or won't give them at home.

      You want a society that is free of racism and poverty? Then start supporting programs that fight the root causes of those problems, and stop throwing money at systems that promote unqualified candidates in the hopes that somehow the skills they need will materialize, and the benefits will "trickle down" to their children who, unless you are super rich, are probably stuck in the same terrible educational system that produced the unqualified candidate in the first place.

    4. Re:They also act like... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      This is solving the symptom and not the problem. You want more girls and minorities and poor kids to get into then support a basic income, quality education programs including access to modern computer resources, arts, music, and philosophy and/or anything and everything else.

      I do support such things, however we as a nation have been "discussing" such things as "basic income" since the early 70's and it still hasn't happened.

      You've probably seen the discussions on Slashdot about basic income...and how it brings out the Randroids and the computer-geek version of the selfish-suburban-white-guy who doesn't think there's a problem with our socio-economic system in the first place and that women/blacks/gays/hispanics/transpeople are just professional victims....except of course when it's H1B's threatening his IT/programming job.

  34. And promoting diversity will.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cost money, slow down releases, and burn time on "outreach" to less skilled people who don't know how to communicate with those in power or who led the way in the technology. Been there, done that, watched the startups fold as the "diverse" crowd they hired didn't actually know how to finish their projects..

  35. She should try improving her own competency by JoeyRox · · Score: 5, Informative

    Pao is still operating under the delusion that she's no longer a VC due to sexism. Anyone who closely followed her bias case against Kleiner Perkins knows the exact opposite is true; she was given extraordinary opportunities there, much more than the average partner-in-training. Yet she still couldn't get out of her own way on the path to success paved for her by John Doerr. Diversity was not her foe; it was entitlement, jealously, laziness, and incompetence.

    1. Re:She should try improving her own competency by jcr · · Score: 2

      Pao is still operating under the delusion that she's no longer a VC due to sexism.

      I doubt that she ever actually believed that. It's just the tactic she used to try to scare Kleiner-Perkins into paying her to fuck off.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  36. Re:Pao was on your side, idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for calling everyone who disagrees with you an idiot, you tolerant piece of shit.

  37. Women are laughing all the way to the bank now. by Shados · · Score: 2

    While there's problems everywhere, since the biggest issue is long before any tech company can get (directly) involved (how parents raise kids, school, TV, etc), there's starting to be statistics showing that women right of college are starting to make quite a bit more than men (because of all the big tech companies under fire desperately trying to hire them).

    So unless you're critically incompetent, right now if you come out of CS and you're a girl, you're basically an instant-hire and you can negotiate your salary to oblivion.

    Welp, since my wife is a pretty successful software engineer, I indirectly benefit...but...

    1. Re:Women are laughing all the way to the bank now. by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      Could you please point me to these statistics? This sounds pretty exciting. I want you to be right. I already understand that the "70 cents on a dollar" number often used is skewed and related to bad stats or outdated info. But I've yet to hear anything about women making more than men.

  38. Ellen Pao, you fucking hypocrite by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 0

    There are plenty of under- and unemployed trans women who have very good skills.

    What are you doing for them? Dick all, that's what. You the and fucking SJWs almost caused somebody close to me to have another anxiety attack that would have landed her in the emergency room recently.

    No, sorry, you rich bitch. Rich bitches like you are why I'm voting for Trump. Wanted to vote for Sanders, say true, (and did in the primary! say sorry it wasn't enough) but unlike you SJW feminist bitches, Trump makes good on his views that trans people are people too. Trump wants to have the best talent in America. Sometimes the best talent comes in the form of somebody struggling to pay for bottom surgery and eager to earn it fair and square.

    At least Lyin' Ted is done for now. Maybe you Apache attack copters out there will come around and see how you're just starving yourself by your fucking failure to understand anything and your fucking immunity to reality and facts. Maybe you'll double down on your doubling down of stupid! It still floors me that you read my comments about being turned away from the men's room because my woman suit is just that good and all you can read is that I'm trying to get into the women's room to swing my dick around! Sorry you pieces of shit. I like swinging my dick around in the men's room and creeping you the fuck out because you thought I was cisfemale but you were fucking lol wrong!

    Rich bitches like you, Ms. Pao, are happy to replace talented trans AND cis women with *gasp* wait for it... wait for it... wait for it... cisgendered heterosexual males! (I hope I triggered somebody there.) Well, the important part is that they're half our age and will to work for half our pay, and you get roughly 1/16th the talent! Just so you can continue to bitch about your own fucking manufactured problem of a lack of cisfemale hunnies in tech.

    What about gaslighting asshole managers, Ms. Pao? Why aren't you doing a single fucking thing about them. They fucking shitcan trans women for "not meeting expectations" just because they ask for what they can get in Trump Tower: just being able to use the fucking bathroom. They fucking sexually harass cisgendered women (note: I did not say cisfemale hunnies there--there's a difference, even if I'm the only one who understands it, but when you've taken the next red pill after taking the red pill and seeing the real system of control for what it is, you might admit I haven't entirely lost it, just lost the ability to make pithy posts) out of tech.

    What the fuck are you going to do about gaslighting sexually harassing transphobic asshole managers, Ms. Pao?!

    Dipshit.

  39. Gay husband by lucm · · Score: 1

    Did you see the "Personal Life" section in the wikipedia article. Her husband, besides being a terrible businessman and suing people over racial allegations, used to be married to a guy, for 10 years.

    I don't know what, as a society, we've done wrong to make this kind of couple possible.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
    1. Re:Gay husband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.

    2. Re:Gay husband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Her husband...used to be married to a guy, for 10 years.

      I don't know what, as a society, we've done wrong to make this kind of couple possible.

      That's some pretty casual homophobia, what does that have to do with anything?

    3. Re:Gay husband by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      no... thats not homophobia. can we stop being so stupid already????

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  40. Beware of Slack by lucm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Here's a tweet from their talented "Lead Growth", who's also founder of "Women in Product":

    Day three of using a Windows machine: was totally mentally exhausted last night, dreaded work this morning. Struggling to do small things.

    https://twitter.com/merci/stat...

    How fucking entitled can someone get?

    When I see people like that, I seriously wonder if I should consider another career than IT. Those idiots just ruin the entire industry.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
    1. Re:Beware of Slack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't do what everyone else does and go into the food industry. It's worse, and it's being dominated by this horseshit too. Former nerd, 12 years a chef, and I'm out. Back to school for .. I don't know welding ticket I guess if my body holds up. Too old to head back for IT, and the jobs are fleeing, and I don't need to get caught up in whatever wave of feminism we're calling this tsunami.

    2. Re:Beware of Slack by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Using a Windows machine should be considered Cruel and Unusual Punishment.

      More seriously, using an OS/application/whatever that one isn't used to or familiar with that works in a way that one isn't accustomed to can cause frustrations that lead to stress and mental exhaustion.

      Haven't you ever figuratively "fried your brain" trying to diagnose/fix some problem? This is the same thing.

    3. Re:Beware of Slack by speedplane · · Score: 1

      It's a stupid tweet, but what's the big deal? If it were a dude saying it, you'd pass it off as another annoying Apple fan-boy. But because it's a women, you suggest she should change professions.

      --
      Fast Federal Court and I.T.C. updates
    4. Re:Beware of Slack by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Complaining about Windows in the most exaggerated way possible is a long standing geek tradition. But when someone you like does it, suddenly it's entitlement.

      I note that you have complained numerous times about Windows right here on Slashdot.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Beware of Slack by lucm · · Score: 2

      Using a Windows machine should be considered Cruel and Unusual Punishment.

      More seriously, using an OS/application/whatever that one isn't used to or familiar with that works in a way that one isn't accustomed to can cause frustrations that lead to stress and mental exhaustion.

      Haven't you ever figuratively "fried your brain" trying to diagnose/fix some problem? This is the same thing.

      I once spent a week using a crippled desktop that had only the serial port and the keyboard as a way to exchange data with the outside world, and it was running a dated CDE stuck in German or Dutch. I managed to do my job and I complained less than that poor little girl who had to OMG use Windows.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    6. Re:Beware of Slack by lucm · · Score: 1

      It's a stupid tweet, but what's the big deal? If it were a dude saying it, you'd pass it off as another annoying Apple fan-boy. But because it's a women, you suggest she should change professions.

      You're so busy getting your panties in a bunch over nonexistent sexist undertone that you can't fucking read what's ACTUALLY in the post. I never said she should change job, there's not even a retarded interpretation of my statement that could be construed as saying that.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    7. Re:Beware of Slack by speedplane · · Score: 1

      I don't wear panties. And your criticism was sexist. Why were you highlighting the fact that she was a "Women in Product"? Why are you treating her different from any other silly apple fan boy?

      --
      Fast Federal Court and I.T.C. updates
  41. Re: Women are laughing all the way to the bank now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real question is whether she can make a good sammich and, for bonus points, whether she can carry a beer at the same time she's bringing you the sammich from the kitchen. That is the measure of a woman.

  42. a better answer... by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    Likely because that is exactly what we would want of Disney to require of any company that they are about to acquire and then turn to crap. Although you may make it seem that way at times, most of the world isn't perverts.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  43. Pao for President by bnmm · · Score: 1

    yet another affirmative action extortion racket--her gay black diversity litigant scam artist husband Buddy Fletcher is rarely mentioned, btw. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddy_Fletcher)

  44. Re:when the first comments on posts like these are by tsotha · · Score: 1

    Against who, though? I'm getting old now, and for my entire life women around me have been given extra opportunities. Free tutoring in college, extra consideration for jobs, easier paths to promotion. It takes a lot of gall to complain about discrimination when you'd still be working in the proverbial mail room without it.

  45. I wonder if they're really "falling" for it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if they're "falling" for it so much as they'd be harassed to death if they dared to let someone publish something else?

  46. Diverse group there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Erica Joy Baker
    bethanye McKinney Blount
    Tracy Chou
    Laura I. Gómez
    Y-Vonne Hutchinson
    Freada Kapor Klein
    Ellen Pao
    Susan Wu

    Inclusive indeed

  47. Modular Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There are many nations for a reason. Don't listen to "diversity" arguments. If you want to experiment with "diversity" then do it in one house as a beta test. One of each race and one of each culture etc. eg. 1 Amish 1 Buddhist 1 Sikh 1 Jehova's Witness 1 Japanese 1 Black 1 Lesbian etc. Mix the genders too.

    If that fucks up, don't do it to the world.

    1. Re:Modular Earth by Verdatum · · Score: 1
      That is a horrible horrible horrible horrible reality show waiting to happen.

      Also, with the exception of the Amish, and the addition of lots more in that "etc." group, you've pretty much just described New York City; one of the largest and most successful cities in the world.

    2. Re:Modular Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      successful doesn't mean what you think it does.

  48. This is just relentless ego-masturbation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem with this scenario is that the idea itself is actually fine. If you have access to a roster of competent workers from both genders, and all nationalities, you already won.

    Unfortunately, this project has nothing to do with diversity. At the end of the day, the true extent of the word "diversity" lies on HER definition and understanding of it.
    H1B problems do not matter. Ageism do not matter. Actual diversity doesn't matter. All this advocacy group actually advocates is her "saviour" status. All glory to Ellen Pao, for she has "solved" the "diversity" "problem". Hooray! Hooray! Hooray!

    i actually do fear that talking about real diversity gets harder after each of these person-cult's have had a field day over the topic.

  49. Re:when the first comments on posts like these are by jcr · · Score: 1

    there just might be some discrimination happening in the tech world?

    Of course there is! How else would Ellen Pao ever have gotten a job with a tech company?

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  50. Re:Pao was on your side, idiots by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's sad is that the knee jerk sexist responses here only prove Pao's point.

    Go fuck yourself, snowflake. We're talking about Pao, not women in general.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  51. forcing diversity = discrimination by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

    if you are looking to recruit people based on their skin color, sex, age, etc. then what you are actually doing is discriminating against the majority. racism/sexism/ageism/etc. are not magically acceptable because you have good intentions. instead of forcing diversity people should be looking to reduce selection bias for everything except their merits.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:forcing diversity = discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While that may be true, if that simple logic were followed it would result in a intellectual revolution among the masses that would benefit humanity. Some may say that such a change would spark another age of enlightenment (I'm sure astute /. readers are well acquainted with history and how we got out of the prior animalistic age that preceded it). With all the "diversity" and "sjw" permeating cultures, it is plainly evident the majority of masses are still shackled to their animalistic desires. Until that changes, all of us will continue to be fucked.

    2. Re:forcing diversity = discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While that may be true, if that simple logic were followed it would result in a intellectual revolution among the masses that would benefit humanity. Some may say that such a change would spark another age of enlightenment (I'm sure astute /. readers are well acquainted with history and how we got out of the prior, dark animalistic age that preceded it). With all the "diversity" and "sjw" permeating cultures, it is plainly evident the majority of masses are still shackled to their animalistic desires. Until that changes we will all continue to be screwed.

  52. Re: Women are laughing all the way to the bank now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give me a blowjob, make me sandwich, then leave me alone to watch TV (or play a video game). Luckily, my wife understands these things. Men are simple creatures.

  53. Paocunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whether you believe this type of advocacy is needed or not, this piece of shit can only harm the cause.

  54. Re:Well, THIS should engender thoughtful discussio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone forgot to tell whipslash that SJW days are Fridays. Save this shit till then. I have scheduled my week around avoiding slashdot on Fridays. It gets it out of everyone's system. Ratzo and Ami get to say their piece and keeps the rest of the week calm. It does pull all of the commentators to the one or two articles so its pointless to peruse the other stories.

    This though... this is two SJW stories in two days, netiher of which happens to be the right day for it. Shame.

  55. Tech diversity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, if she wants more diversity in the tech world, is she going to address the disproportionate number of south Asians anf they're (on record) discriminatory hiring tactics of rejecting white/nonasian applicants outright?

  56. Good by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

    I'm glad to see she'll be doing something where she can't effect or harm other people. Hopefully it'll be a few decades before she realizes that everybody is ignoring her.

  57. Really? by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    The shit Ellen Pao has done in the past has done so much harm to the image of women in tech leadership roles than this bullshit campaign can ever fix.

    Just because you find her unsympathetic and her case was lost, doesn't mean she's wrong or did bad things (you call it "shit").
    Or do you have proof? Citations/links please.

    Thanks.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Really? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Err... Wouldn't proof be her lost case?

      I might be missing something - I've not really kept up as I don't even have a Reddit account. I did learn that there is a KGIII on Reddit but, alas, I'm not that person but I don't begrudge them the use of my moniker - I wasn't going to use it there. I don't know if they're trying to pretend to be me, I kind of doubt it, as they appear to be fond of basketball which is not something folks would expect of me. I have, on the other hand, had people try to impersonate me in the past. One of them did an almost good job but they got some details rather wrong. They also don't really write as poorly as I do.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    2. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The proof would be in the combination of the lost case plus her abject failure as CEO of Reddit. The latter demonstrated that she truly couldn't hack it as a tech executive. Reddit was hardly "Apple in 1996", after all. It didn't need a miracle worker, it just needed a competent administrator and caretaker. And the actual and proven incompetence as a CEO is a pretty good indicator that she would have been lacking at KP as well; and that the lawsuit was nothing more than an attempt at shaking them down and enriching herself by taking advantage of the current hyper-awareness of gender inequality in tech.

      Basically, her name is poison for the near future. And she brings a discredit to the cause by attaching her name to it. She really just needs to go away for a while, take a nice long vacation, and come back quietly. And if she wants to play the "tech executive" game, she should put in some time as a director or VP at an institution like HP or Intel or IBM... where they have programs that train people how to be senior management and not fuck it up... before trying to move back up into a C-level gig.

  58. Re:Well, THIS should engender thoughtful discussio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd think by now I'd have learned to just scroll past these stories. Nothing good comes of the comments section in them.

  59. Re:Well, THIS should engender thoughtful discussio by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

    You couldn't tell from the headline?

    --
    That is all.
  60. Uhm I don't think you want this by Atrox666 · · Score: 1

    Where I am adding diversity would mean giving visible minority jobs to western Europeans.

  61. Re:Pao was on your side, idiots by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    But, "an 'attack' on one woman is an attack on all women." There. That precept nicely excuses ALL kinds of odious, reprehensible behavior. That type of excuse and reasoning is the cause of so many social troubles at this time in history.

  62. Re:Well, THIS should engender thoughtful discussio by Verdatum · · Score: 1
    Slashdot wasn't always like this. I only started regularly reading this site a couple months ago, and man things have changed. The community used to get excited to hear about pushes for women in tech. The thoughtful people either moved on, or went silent. And now articles like these are insta-cancer for the comment section. Over on reddit, you can easily presume it's mostly early-teenagers who are afraid of losing their manly-sexy video games. But I can't imagine why would that demographic ever bother hanging out here. So it must also be a collective of grown-ass men behaving this way. If you go hunting _really_really_ hard, you can eventually see the seed of a valid point that they're trying to make, but that is all very well hidden behind shitlording, meaning that when history looks back, this sentiment is just going to look ignorant and horrible.

    I'm getting real real tired of the moderate viewpoint being the largest, but also the quietest and least likely to act.

  63. Might as well have Trump hold a world peace rally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't Ellen Pao confirmed to be a liar and scammer in court?
    A woman with very questionable business ethics and morals?
    But yeah, we'll ignore all the bad about her because she said something that sounds good to feminists and others.
    Political Correctness is the new preacher box that absolves of all prior sins.
    While Feminism is the new church fighting the good conservative fight against sexual liberation and sexual deviancy, as well as judging and publicly shaming people because of the clothes they wear like the Rosetta scientist even though it's not their place to judge.
    Nice.

  64. Re:Pao was on your side, idiots by Verdatum · · Score: 1
    And after all of it, she was still amazingly cool about it. She still posts to reddit on occasion. Everything in her history is kind and amusing. The shitlords did an amazing job on this spin. Lots of perfectly reasonable people were convinced that her, and lots of other women are out to ruin free speech. And those shitlords and the reasonable people who got caught up in the "struggle" defend free speech by downvoting or down-modding anyone who argues otherwise so that those comments become hidden, such as this parent comment...I don't know if they don't see the logic-conflict there, or they just don't care.

    Since that reddit mess, I've seen a number of people in discussion admitting they were swept up in the mob mentality, and they were contributing to the hate without really bothering to do their own research into what was really going on. A number of these people have apologized, and from time to time Ellen has responded to these apologies with understanding.

  65. Racism at a fundamental level. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, yes, racism at a fundamental level. have to love it!

  66. Re:Pao was on your side, idiots by Verdatum · · Score: 1

    ...He's talking about Pao as well. Do you really have to jump straight into aggressive responses? If you're position is correct, shouldn't logical discourse be sufficient? I mean, I understand that this is a passionate issue; and you have every right to be mad, but "Go fuck yourself, snowflake" only helps to shut down the ability for the various sides of an issue to come to understand each other.

  67. Re:*Popcorn* by Verdatum · · Score: 1

    Because modding is so broken here these days, you don't even get to see the actual breakdown unless you view this thing at -1,-1.

  68. Re:Pao was on your side, idiots by jcr · · Score: 1

    Do you really have to jump straight into aggressive responses?

    Have to? No. I do so because I choose to, and your approval is neither required nor is it sought.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  69. Re:Pao was on your side, idiots by Verdatum · · Score: 1
    Nor have I solicited my approval. If you're the kind of person who likes to just swear at random people on the Internet, then hey, I wish you the best. No sarcasm. I hope that this opportunity to call someone a snowflake has managed to improve the quality of your day.

    Many people reply to comments in order to change peoples minds; to cause either the parent, or readers of the thread to reconsider things. If you're gonna word things in such a way that both sides just dismiss you, it doesn't sound nearly as satisfying to me. But you do you.

  70. Re:Pao was on your side, idiots by jcr · · Score: 1

    If you're the kind of person who likes to just swear at random people

    Not random people, snowflake. Only the ones who irritate me.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  71. Re:Pao was on your side, idiots by Verdatum · · Score: 1

    You get irritated by random people on the Internet? LOL, your life must really suck. I'm sorry, dude. I hope you manage to get over that someday.

  72. Why don't they make a product? by Mr.CRC · · Score: 1

    It's interesting that this group of female engineers and managers didn't form a company to produce an actual tech. product.

  73. Sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Diversity" = "more Liberals"

  74. Remove Stigma to Improve Diversity by eepok · · Score: 1

    The first thing that has to be recognized by someone attempting facilitate gender/sex diversity in the tech industry is to recognize that tech is not a "male" industry... it's an "outcast" industry. Everyone assumes that males are specifically targeted and tracked into computer-related academic/research/career paths. That's not the case. By and large, it's social outcasts who take up computers as a hobby are tracked into computer-related academic/research/career paths and those social outcasts are more commonly male.

    If people REALLY want to foster a better, more inclusive environment for all people in the computer industry:

    1. Parents need to stop enforcing traditional femininity norms on their daughters so that their daughters are willing to go into technology-related fields of study and careers. This change is already happening, but it's not a generation-wide ideal, so expect the swell of girls being SOCIALLY supported in the field to come 30 years from now.

    2. Adults need to ensure that those whose choose computers/tech as a hobby (and are thus more likely to choose tech as a career) get the social acclimation they're likely being deprived in other parts of life. I'm speaking mainly of males here. Again, young boys don't become reclusive computer nerds because they see a rewarding career in system administration. They fall into it because it helps them escape from the tortures that come with being social pariahs. If you repair the damage of their exclusion early, you can almost guarantee a better work environment for women seeking to enter the tech field later in life.

    But, of course, that's only if you want to make real change happen over time and not just attempt to force new rules and standards without any consideration for the root causes of issues.

  75. Re:Pao was on your side, idiots by jcr · · Score: 1

    Your reading comprehension level indicates that you're an unfortunate victim of government schooling.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."